Next Article in Journal
Pathophysiology and Treatment of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptomic and Physiological Responses of Chlorella pyrenoidosa during Exposure to 17α-Ethinylestradiol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinctive Toll-like Receptors Gene Expression and Glial Response in Different Brain Regions of Natural Scrapie

by
Mirta García-Martínez
1,
Leonardo M. Cortez
2,*,
Alicia Otero
1,*,
Marina Betancor
1,
Beatriz Serrano-Pérez
3,
Rosa Bolea
1,
Juan J. Badiola
1 and
María Carmen Garza
4
1
Centro de Encefalopatías y Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes, IA2, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Department of Medicine and Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada
3
Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Department of Animal Science, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
4
Departamento de Anatomía e Histología Humanas, IIS Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3579; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073579
Submission received: 9 March 2022 / Revised: 22 March 2022 / Accepted: 23 March 2022 / Published: 25 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)

Abstract

:
Prion diseases are chronic and fatal neurodegenerative diseases characterized by the accumulation of disease-specific prion protein (PrPSc), spongiform changes, neuronal loss, and gliosis. Growing evidence shows that the neuroinflammatory response is a key component of prion diseases and contributes to neurodegeneration. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been proposed as important mediators of innate immune responses triggered in the central nervous system in other human neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. However, little is known about the role of TLRs in prion diseases, and their involvement in the neuropathology of natural scrapie has not been studied. We assessed the gene expression of ovine TLRs in four anatomically distinct brain regions in natural scrapie-infected sheep and evaluated the possible correlations between gene expression and the pathological hallmarks of prion disease. We observed significant changes in TLR expression in scrapie-infected sheep that correlate with the degree of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, and gliosis in each of the regions studied. Remarkably, TLR4 was the only gene upregulated in all regions, regardless of the severity of neuropathology. In the hippocampus, we observed milder neuropathology associated with a distinct TLR gene expression profile and the presence of a peculiar microglial morphology, called rod microglia, described here for the first time in the brain of scrapie-infected sheep. The concurrence of these features suggests partial neuroprotection of the hippocampus. Finally, a comparison of the findings in naturallyinfected sheep versus an ovinized mouse model (tg338 mice) revealed distinct patterns of TLRgene expression.

1. Introduction

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), or prion diseases, are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders that include Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) in humans, scrapie in sheep and goats, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and chronic wasting disease in cervids (CWD). These TSEs are characterized by the transformation of the host-encoded prion protein (PrPC) into an infectious isoform, PrPSc, which preferentially accumulates in the nervous system and lymphoreticular system (LRS), and an inflammatory immune reaction in the central nervous system (CNS) [1,2].
Prion diseases, such as scrapie, can be naturally acquired by oral exposure to PrPSc. After crossing the intestinal barrier and undergoing primary replication in lymphoid tissues, PrPSc reaches the CNS via a process known as neuroinvasion. The infection propagates from sites in the gastrointestinal tract via the vagus and splanchnic nerves to the brainstem and spinal cord, respectively [3,4]. On reaching the CNS, PrPSc spreads from the caudal to rostral regions, i.e., via the rostral brainstem to the cerebellum, diencephalon, and frontal cortex [5]. The anatomically stereotyped accumulation of PrPSc suggests that its spread is mediated by the neuronal connectivity and/or selective vulnerability of different brain regions. Host factors such as the PrPSc genotype, breed, and age at infection contribute to the magnitude of PrPSc deposition and the distribution of spongiform lesions. However, the molecular basis of the host–prion interactions that determine the selective targeting of PrPSc to specific brain regions remains unknown, and constitutes one of the most intriguing aspects of the prion strain phenomenon.
Originally, it was assumed that the immune system did not respond to PrPSc due to natural tolerance, but time-course studies revealed prompt activation and proliferation of microglia and astrocytes even before the onset of clinical signs and neuronal degeneration [6,7,8]. This early activation and proliferation of microglia and astrocytes appears to play a central role in the pathogenesis of prion disorders, although the molecular mechanisms involved in their activation and the precise role of both reactive astrocytes and microglia in the disease pathogenesis remains unclear [9,10]. Moreover, it is widely accepted that microglial and astroglial distribution and phenotype vary across brain regions and species [11,12,13,14], attributing intrinsic characteristics to each region that influence vulnerability to neurodegeneration [10,15,16]. This phenomenon is especially evident in the preclinical stage, during which both microglia and astroglia respond to prion infection in a region-specific manner. However, as the disease progresses, a more common neuroinflammatory response begins to predominate, diluting most of the regional characteristics [17,18].
Over the last few years, a role of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in microglial and astroglial reactivity has been reported in several neurodegenerative disorders, underscoring their influence on the progression of these diseases [19,20,21]. However, data on the role of TLRs in prion diseases are scarce. A partially protective role of TLRs has been described in prion pathology. Specifically, it has been reported that the loss of TLR2 [22] and TLR4 [23] accelerates prion pathogenesis, while TLR9 stimulation slows disease progression in mouse models [24,25]. To date, most studies of TLRs in prion diseases have been performed in vitro or using mouse models [8,22,26,27,28,29], and their role in naturally infected animals and humans remains uncertain. To our knowledge, one study was performed in newborn lambs orally inoculated with scrapie (i.e., using a natural, but not naturally infected, host) and reported TLR2 and TLR4 overexpression in blood in clinical diseases stages [30]. Two studies have reported altered TLR gene expression in humans with sporadic CJD (sCJD) [31,32]. The dysregulation of genes involved in the immune response included the overexpression of TLR4 and TLR7 mRNA in the cerebellum and frontal cortex of sCJD MM1 patients, and of TLR7 in the cerebellum of sCJD VV2 patients. Moreover, Areskeviciute et al. [32] included TLR4 in the top 40 upstream regulators predicted to show differential expression in sCJD versus control brain samples.
We examined how natural scrapie infection influences the transcription levels of ovine TLRs and some cytokines in four brain regions with differing degrees of prion susceptibility, based on previous results [18]. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis revealed changes in gene expression in the scrapie-infected group versus the control group and a brain region-dependent response. Interestingly, the hippocampus showed the most distinctive lesion profile, with specific reactive microglia morphology and TLR transcription pattern.
Given the dearth of experimental data on TLR gene expression in mice overexpressing sheep PrP, we also performed experiments using tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with scrapie. Our results reveal some similarities with previous studies using wild type mice, but significant differences with respect to the findings in natural scrapie.

2. Results

2.1. Scrapie Neuropathology of Naturally Infected Sheep

We first confirmed the scrapie neuropathology in the naturally infected sheep included in this study, as previously described [33,34,35,36]. Spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, and reactive glia were examined in four regions of the infected and control sheep brains: the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc). All naturally infected animals were in the clinical stage of the disease. However, the clinical status, based on the frequency and severity of the clinical signs, varied among sheep, ranging from incipient to advanced clinical stages (Table 1).
Figure 1 shows representative microphotographs for the assessment of vacuolation and immunostaining for PrPSc, GFAP, and Iba1, taken in each of the selected regions in infected and control animals. As expected, no evidence of vacuolation or PrPSc deposition was detected in tissue sections from the control sheep. Conversely, in the scrapie-infected sheep, all neuroanatomic areas showed spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, and reactive glia (p < 0.05).
The intensity of vacuolation, PrPSc deposition, and gliosis clearly decreased from the medulla oblongata to the frontal cortex. Interestingly, despite the close proximity of the thalamus and hippocampus, significant differences in the scores for all pathological markers were observed.
The greatest degree of spongiosis was observed in the medulla oblongata and the thalamus, in contrast to the very scattered vacuolation found in the hippocampus and frontal cortex. Intraneuronal vacuolation was abundant in the medulla oblongata nuclei, as shown in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, while neuropil spongiosis predominated in the thalamus and frontal cortex (Figure 1A). Very few vacuoles were found in the neuropil of the hippocampus.
All scrapie-infected sheep showed widespread PrPSc accumulation in the four CNS regions analyzed, except for three sheep that showed incipient clinical signs and were PrPSc-negative by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot (WB) findings in the frontal cortex (Table 1). The intensity of PrPSc immunostaining revealed a caudal to rostral decrease, similar to that observed for spongiosis, with maximum intensity in the medulla oblongata and thalamus, the two regions with the greatest degree of vacuolation, and lower intensity in the hippocampus and frontal cortex (Figure 1B). In the hippocampus, PrPSc immunostaining showed a focal and uneven distribution, in contrast to the homogeneous, scattered punctate pattern observed in the frontal cortex sections. We observed four major morphological patterns of PrPSc deposition, as previously described [36]: two intracellular patterns, which included intraneuronal and intraglial (including intra-astrocytic and intra-microglial) deposition, and two cell membrane/extracellular patterns, which included neuropil-associated and glial cell-associated deposition (Figure S1). The intraneuronal and neuropil-associated patterns predominated in all brain areas. Remarkably, the intraglial and glial patterns were drastically reduced or even absent in the frontal cortex and hippocampus compared with the medulla oblongata and thalamus.
In parallel with IHC, we analyzed the presence of protease-resistant prions (PrPres) by WB. The brain samples from scrapie-infected sheep displayed the classical three-banded PrPres pattern associated with classical scrapie, with a molecular mass of the non-glycosylated fragment of approximately 19 kDa (Figure 2). Despite a certain degree of variability, the PrPres signal increased with the severity of the clinical signs in all brain regions and was more abundant in caudal brain areas. The WB for PrPres was positive in the medulla oblongata and thalamus in all scrapie-infected sheep. By contrast, the hippocampus and frontal cortex samples were not positive for PrPres in all infected animals. Although the IHC was positive for PrPres in the hippocampus of all infected sheep, 4/13 were negative by WB. In the frontal cortex, 3/13 of sheep were PrPres-negative by IHC and 4/13 were PrPres-negative by WB.
In addition to vacuolation and PrPSc deposition, the activation of glial cells has been extensively documented as an early event in the pathogenesis of protein misfolding diseases. To characterize the reactive glia, all brain areas were subjected to IHC using anti-GFAP antibodies to detect astrocytes and anti-Iba1 antibodies to detect microglia.
Iba1 immunostaining, which detects both resting and activated microglia [37], was significantly increased in all brain regions in scrapie-infected versus control sheep, and revealed marked differences in the microglial morphology among brain regions in infected animals (Figure 1C). The activation status of the microglial cells is defined based on three main morphologies: ramified, hypertrophic, and ameboid [38,39]. Microglial cells in the “surveilling” or relatively inactive state have a ramified morphology, characterized by a small cell body with many fine processes, as observed in our control animals. The active state is characterized by an ameboid morphology, which is commonly associated with the phagocytic state [38], and consists of spherical, non-ramified cell bodies. The hypertrophic morphology is characterized by microglia with a larger cell body and shorter, thick processes, and is associated with the production and release of inflammatory mediators [40,41]. The ameboid morphology was the most abundant in the medulla oblongata of scrapie-infected sheep. In the thalamus, the ameboid morphology was observed, but did not predominate: a variety of large and thin processes intermingled with sparse, thick processes arising from elongated cell bodies, corresponding to hypertrophic microglia. The morphology of the proliferative microglia in the frontal cortex and hippocampus differed markedly to that of the medulla oblongata and thalamus. In both regions, hypertrophied microglia predominated and ameboid microglia were practically absent. Remarkably, the Cornu Ammonis 3 (CA3) region of the hippocampus showed the greatest differences in terms of microglia morphology, exhibiting a microglial pattern known as rod microglia that was not observed in any other brain region. These marked differences observed in the assessment of the hippocampus prompted us to perform a detailed examination of subfields CA1, 3, 4, and the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM).
GFAP immunostaining revealed marked astrogliosis in scrapie-infected versus control sheep (Figure 1D). Morphologically, the astrocytes from infected sheep consistently displayed hypertrophic cell bodies and processes, confirming the presence of reactive astrogliosis, while control sheep showed the typical stellate morphology of the non-activated state. In the medulla oblongata and thalamus, GFAP immunostaining was more intense, with the appearance of astrocyte networks due to overlapping processes. In the hippocampus and frontal cortex, the astrocytes were evenly distributed, with the presence of isolated hypertrophic stellate bodies.

2.2. Neuropathological Features in Hippocampus of Sheep Naturally Infected with Scrapie

In the scrapie-infected and control sheep, the four following hippocampal areas were examined in greater detail for the presence of all pathological markers: the pyramidal cell layers CA1, CA3, and CA4, and the SLM (Figure 3).
Spongiosis in the hippocampus was very mild, and occasional vacuoles were observed in the CA1, CA3, and CA4, and in the SLM (Figure 3A). This limited neuronal loss contrasted with sparse, but focally intense PrPSc deposition in CA1 and CA3 (Figure 3B). Very mild PrPSc staining was observed in the CA4 and the SLM. Distinct PrPSc patterns were observed in these brain areas (Figure S2). Whereas intraneuronal and neuropil-associated PrPSc patterns predominated in the CA1 and CA3, intraglial deposition was the main morphological pattern observed in the SLM. Mild intraneuronal and neuropil-associated PrPSc patterns were consistently observed in the CA4, although the intensity was lower than that observed in CA1 and CA3.
Iba1 was constitutively expressed and sparsely distributed in the control samples. By contrast, marked microgliosis was observed in CA1, CA3, and CA4 and the SLM in scrapie-infected sheep. However, the microglial morphological features differed significantly between these brain regions. In the CA1 pyramidal layer, most microglial cells showed short processes with enlarged cell bodies, characteristic of the hypertrophic morphology. In CA4, the microglial cells were also hypertrophic, but displayed longer and thinner branches than the CA1 microglial cells. Meanwhile, the hypertrophic microglia in the SLM showed short and thin processes with swollen cellular bodies. By contrast, in CA3, we observed the aforementioned rod-microglia morphology [42]. These microglial cells had elongated cell bodies, with a long parallel primary process oriented perpendicular to the CA3 pyramidal cell layer, and subsidiary branches that were shorter than the long primary processes.
GFAP immunostaining was significantly increased in the CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cell layers from the scrapie-infected versus control sheep. Interestingly, the PrPSc scores were highest in CA1 and CA3. No differences were observed in the CA4 pyramidal cell layer or in the SLM.

2.3. Neuropathology of Scrapie-Infected tg338 Mice

The same neuropathological markers of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, microgliosis, and astrogliosis analyzed in sheep were examined in the thalamus of clinically affected tg338 mice that had been intracerebrally infected with scrapie (Figure 4). Compared with the controls, significant differences (p < 0.05) in spongiosis were observed in the thalamus of scrapie-infected mice, in which the vacuoles were clearly restricted to the neuropil. PrPSc deposits were widely distributed at the level of the cytoplasm and neuropil. The assessment of gliosis revealed significant differences in Iba1 and GFAP immunostaining between the scrapie-infected and control mice, with both astrocytes and microglia displaying hypertrophic morphologies.
The PrPres accumulation was also assessed by WB in all scrapie-infected mice, revealing a constant 19 kDa band pattern (Figure 5). The intensity of the PrPres signal in tg338 mice was more homogeneous among individuals than in sheep, as expected for experimental infection in which the dose, age of inoculation, and time of sacrifice are controlled. No signal was detected in the control mice inoculated with normal brain homogenate, in agreement with the negative IHC results.

2.4. Inflammatory Effect of Scrapie Infection in CNS Alters Gene Expression of TLRs, MyD88, Trif, CD36, and Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines

The upregulation of TLRs expression in response to PrPSc has been previously reported in experimental in vivo and in vitro conditions. Therefore, after characterizing the presence of the main prion-induced neuropathological changes in the CNS in the context of natural and experimental disease, we investigated whether these changes correlated with alterations in TLR gene expression. To this end, we performed qPCR using samples from the four brain regions of sheep to assess the expression of MyD88 and Trif, the two main adaptor proteins implicated in TLR signaling; CD36, a scavenger receptor that cooperates with TLRs; and TLR mRNA. In addition, we measured the levels of four pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the thalamus and hippocampus of sheep to further assess the inflammatory response. In tg338 mice, we measured the mRNA levels of MyD88 and TLR 1-9 in the thalamus. Genes for which significant differences were observed with respect to controls, and the corresponding fold changes, are shown in Table S1, and the ΔCt values from the control and scrapie-infected sheep are represented in Figure S3.
The number of altered genes decreased in a caudo-rostral direction. The medulla oblongata of scrapie-infected sheep was the region in which the greatest changes in TLR gene expression were observed (Figure 6). In this region, the expression of TLR2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and CD36 was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the scrapie-infected versus control animals. In the thalamus, TLR6, MyD88, and CD36 were significantly upregulated in the scrapie-infected group (p < 0.05), while TLR2 and TLR3 displayed a tendency towards upregulation (p < 0.1). In the frontal cortex (the rostral most area), TLR4 and CD36 were the only overexpressed genes (p < 0.05). Remarkably, contrasting expression patterns were found in the hippocampus of the scrapie-infected sheep, in which TLR2 and MyD88 were downregulated (p < 0.01) and TLR1 showed a tendency towards downregulation (p < 0.1). In addition, the hippocampus was the only area in which CD36 expression was not increased. Overall, TLR4 was the gene that was most upregulated in scrapie-infected versus control sheep in all four brain regions, although no significant differences were observed in the thalamus or hippocampus due to intra-individual variability. The analysis of cytokine levels revealed the overexpression of TGF-β, IL-10, and IL-6 in the thalamus of the scrapie-infected versus control sheep, but no alterations in the hippocampus (Figure 7).
To examine whether changes in TLR expression in the CNS in natural disease are comparable to those induced in the tg338 murine model after intracerebral infection with scrapie, the transcription levels of TLRs and MyD88 were evaluated in the thalamus of tg338 mice (Figure 8). TLR1 and TLR2 mRNA levels were significantly increased (p < 0.01) compared with controls, and there was a tendency towards upregulation of TLR7 (p < 0.1). The levels of TLR8 expression were undetectable.

2.5. Assessment of TLR4 Protein Levels Confirms Upregulation Detected by qPCR in Scrapie-Infected Sheep

To confirm that the observed increase in TLR4 mRNA translates to changes in protein levels, TLR4 was evaluated by WB in the medulla oblongata, thalamus, hippocampus, and frontal cortex of four scrapie-infected sheep and four control sheep (Figure 9). In agreement with the qPCR results, the TLR4 protein levels were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in all four brain regions of the scrapie-infected sheep.

3. Discussion

In recent years, the study of the neuroinflammatory response in prion diseases has led to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the consequences. Neuroinflammation involves reactive microgliosis and astrogliosis [43], both of which can be detected before the onset of clinical signs and precede spongiosis and neuronal loss [7,8,18]. Whether microglial activation in prion diseases is beneficial or harmful remains a matter of debate. Some authors argue that microglial activation and proliferation contribute to the neuroinflammatory process and consequent neurodegeneration [8,18,44]. However, others point to an overall protective role of the microglia, and in vitro studies indicate that microglia can internalize and degrade PrPSc [27,45]. In line with these findings, in vivo experiments have shown that microglial depletion decreases the survival period, probably due to reduced PrPSc clearance [46,47]. Therefore, it is plausible that multiple reactive microglial phenotypes exist during the disease process, exerting a neuroprotective effect in early disease stages and, as the disease progresses, giving way to a proinflammatory phenotype that elicits detrimental effects [9,10]. One hypothesis proposes that TLR signaling mediates glial cell activation in prion diseases. The microglia uptake of amyloid fibers in Alzheimer’s disease is known to be promoted by TLR activation [48,49]. Thus, while the activation of TLRs on glial cells may play a role in the clearance of aggregated or abnormal proteins (e.g., prion protein), chronic activation may be detrimental to the host, resulting in neurotoxicity and neuronal cell death [50]. To date, data on the role of TLRs in prion pathogenesis are very limited. Few studies have measured changes in TLR expression in the CNS in murine models, and one has reported changes in TLR expression in the blood of lambs, with all cases using animals experimentally infected with prion disease [22,26,30].
We investigated the possible correlations between the neuropathological hallmarks of prion disease and TLR gene expression in four different brain regions of sheep naturally infected with scrapie. In all four brain areas, we observed significant differences in PrPSc deposition, spongiosis, astrogliosis, and microgliosis in the naturally infected versus control sheep. These differences were most evident in the medulla oblongata, the most caudal area. By contrast, the mildest lesions were observed in the frontal cortex, the most rostral area. This sequential pattern is in agreement with the route of prion neuroinvasion and dissemination throughout the CNS, beginning at entry sites in the spinal cord and obex and ultimately reaching the frontal cortex [1,5,51]. Unexpectedly, considering their anatomical proximity, we observed a drastic decrease in PrPSc deposition and vacuolization, and a significant decline in astrogliosis, when moving from the thalamus to the hippocampus, not following the gradual caudo–rostral progression of the pathology. A specific microglia morphology known as rod microglia was observed in the proximity of pyramidal cell neurons at CA3, but was absent from all of the other neuroanatomic regions studied. To our knowledge, this microglial profile has not been associated with neuroinflammation triggered by prions to date, although a recent study reported the presence of rod-shaped microglia in the cerebellum of human patients with CJD [52]. Although little studied since the first descriptions in the 1900s, rod microglia have been recently reported in neurological disorders such as epilepsy, Lewy body dementia, Huntington’s disease, and AD, specifically in moderately damaged areas of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus [40,41,53]. The phenotypic expression and functions of rod microglia are not yet clear. However, the fact that this morphological feature typically coincides with the presence of neuronal elements that are damaged or vulnerable to damage suggests a neuroprotective role [42,54,55]. Rod microglia are not thought to be associated with severe lesions, as the progression towards ameboid morphology is expected in these conditions [56]. The presence of rod microglia in the hippocampus of scrapie-infected sheep, but not in other brain regions, may be indicative of a neuroprotective environment, in good agreement with the limited neuronal loss observed in this area. Our analysis of TLR expression reveals a direct correlation between lesion severity and TLR gene overexpression that coincides with the aforementioned caudo–rostral progression of prion neuropathology. Conversely, TLR4 was similarly overexpressed in all areas, regardless of the lesion severity. TLR4 overexpression in areas of milder neuronal damage (i.e., the hippocampus and frontal cortex) may reflect a neuroprotective role, as previously described for phagocytic cells such as macrophages and microglia [23,57].
The upregulation of TLR7 has been previously reported in mouse models of prion disease and in human patients [22,26,31]. We only observed the upregulation of TLR7 in the medulla oblongata, the most damaged area in which the highest levels of spongiosis and PrPSc deposition were detected. Neuronal death via apoptosis has been previously associated with TLR7 stimulation [58,59], and its overexpression in the medulla oblongata may be related to this mechanism [60]. Although the role of TLR1 in neurodegenerative diseases is not yet clear, TLR2 involvement in microglial activation has been increasingly demonstrated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, MS, and AD [61,62]. While the role of TLR2 in prion diseases is not fully understood, beneficial effects have been proposed: survival time is reduced in mice that do not express TLR2 following intracerebral inoculation with scrapie [22]. TLR2 and MyD88 overexpression may be also indicative of a proinflammatory microglia phenotype, which could explain the increase in TNF-α and IL-6 that we observed in the thalamus [8,63]. Interestingly, experiments using EOC 13.31 cells, an immortalized microglia-like mouse cell line, have shown a dysregulation of the inflammatory response pathway in response to TLR2 activation, and suggested a link between TLR2 expression and the accumulation of microglia in a state not optimal for phagocytosis [26]. Therefore, TLR2 overexpression in the medulla oblongata and the thalamus, the most damaged areas in which excessive levels of phagocytic microglia were also detected, suggests that the dysfunctional clearance of PrPSc may lead to sustained accumulation of PrPSc and neuronal damage [9,17].
Our findings in the hippocampus of scrapie-infected sheep reveal an opposite pattern compared with other analyzed brain areas, with the downregulation of TLR1, TLR2, and MyD88 and no cytokine alterations. This may indicate that microglia respond differently in the hippocampus; indeed, it has been shown that TLR2 deficiency in primary microglial cell cultures, from neonatal mice (0–3 days old) and stimulated with neurotoxic peptide PrP106-126, shifts microglial activation from a neurotoxic to a neuroprotective phenotype [63]. However, the relevance of PrP106-126 peptide in prion pathology has been questioned [64]. CD36 is a different type of pattern recognition receptor, able to recognize endogenously derived ligands such as amyloid-forming peptides, that has established roles in the endocytic uptake of those components [65,66]. This receptor has been associated with a proinflammatory microglial status [67]. In vitro stimulation of BV-2 cells, a type of immortalized microglial cell, with PrP106-126 results in CD36 upregulation, increasing proinflammatory cytokines and iNOS and NO production [68,69]. Additionally, the recognition of β-amyloid peptide by CD36 triggers the assembly of a novel heterotrimeric complex CD36-TLR4-TLR6 that activates the innate immune response [70,71]. In our study, all regions showed significant upregulation of CD36 except the hippocampus. The upregulation of CD36, TLR4, and TLR6 in the most damaged areas, the medulla oblongata and obex, suggests the involvement of this triad in triggering a pro-inflammatory microglial status in response to prion infection. Conversely, the absence of CD36 and TLR6 overexpression in the hippocampus suggests that this heterotrimer is not formed, indicative again of a neuroprotective environment in this brain region.
It remains to be explained why microglia respond differently in this brain region. While prion strain-specific cell tropism could determine the pattern of microgliosis and astrogliosis, recent findings suggest that both reactions are mainly influenced by the brain region [18,72]. In fact, neither microglia nor astroglia respond uniformly across the CNS, and this region-specific response could result in the selective vulnerability of some brain regions in prion diseases [16,18]. In this regard, it has been postulated that the inflammatory response of microglia to prion infection is regulated by the sialylation of PrPSc [14,73,74,75], and that PrPSc sialylation is brain region-dependent [18]. Specifically, a higher level of sialylation of PrPSc is found in the hippocampus and cortex than the thalamus and brainstem, suggesting a potential role in the selective vulnerability of these brain regions [18,73,75]. The high level of PrPSc sialylation in the hippocampus may be associated with decelerated prion replication, leading to the distinctive prion-induced microglial activation in this region, consistent with the reduced susceptibility of this region implied by our findings.
Interestingly, previous findings suggest that the hippocampus may be protected from prion neurotoxicity in natural CJD infection [76,77], and detailed neuropathological studies of CJD cases have reported milder lesions in the hippocampus than in other brain regions [76]. Specifically, the archicortex, which primarily comprises the hippocampus, appears to be relatively spared compared with other cortical regions in CJD [77]. This mild hippocampal involvement described in natural CJD is in agreement with the present findings in sheep naturally infected with scrapie. It is interesting that this partial protection against at least two natural prion diseases occurs in the hippocampus, which is phylogenetically the oldest region of the cerebral cortex and consists of the most basic type of cortical tissue. Further studies will be required to explore the relevance of this correlation.
In summary, our results reveal a particularly mild neuropathology in the hippocampus of natural scrapie-infected sheep, characterized by lower levels of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, and astrogliosis than expected given the caudal-to-rostral spread of scrapie lesions. Moreover, the presence in the hippocampus of an exclusive microglial morphology, rod microglia, which may play a neuroprotective role [54], together with a distinct pattern recognition receptor (TLR genes and CD36) gene expression profile, further differentiate this brain region from the other neuroanatomic regions in natural scrapie-infected sheep. These findings suggest a degree of neuroprotection against natural prion infection in the hippocampus that merits further investigation.
Neurodegenerative diseases caused by protein misfolding involve a vicious cycle of inflammation consisting of misfolded protein accumulation, glial activation, and the release of glial inflammatory mediators, which exacerbate protein deposition and neuroinflammation. Interrupting this vicious cycle by targeting microglia activation using specific TLR inhibitors at a specific disease stage may constitute a promising approach to limit further neuroinflammation. Our findings highlight TLR2 downregulation as a potential target for such an approach, as this may induce a shift in microglia from a neurotoxic to a neuroprotective phenotype [63].
Finally, while great progress has been made in characterizing the diversity of glial phenotypes using mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases, whether mouse models faithfully reflect key aspects of prion diseases is a matter of some debate [78,79]. Our results in the tg338 transgenic model reproduced the common pathological signs of prion infection, including marked PrPSc deposition, neuropil spongiosis, astrogliosis, and microgliosis. However, infected mice displayed significant overexpression of TLR1 and TLR2 and a tendency towards TLR7 overexpression. While the upregulation of these genes has been previously described in other mouse models infected with scrapie [22,26], this pattern contrasts with our findings in the ovine brain. Remarkably, in the mouse brain we observed no alterations in the expression of TLR4, the gene for which the greatest changes in expression were observed in the sheep samples. These conflicting findings may be a consequence of the different route of infection or/and the prion protein expression levels in tg338 mice [80,81]. Nonetheless, our results ultimately indicate that the intracerebral inoculation of scrapie in ovinized tg338 mice does not reproduce the immune response observed in natural scrapie infection.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Scrapie-Infected and Control Sheep

Twenty-one female Rasa Aragonesa sheep (aged from 2–6 years) were included in the present study. All were genotyped for PRNP polymorphisms, as previously reported [82], and were found to display an ARQ/ARQ genotype. Control animals (n = 8) were selected from a flock in which no scrapie cases had been reported. Scrapie-infected animals (n = 13) were obtained from scrapie-affected flocks and had been diagnosed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of rectal mucosa biopsies. Infection was confirmed by post-mortem immunodetection of PrPSc in the obex following published criteria [83]. The animals were euthanized by an intravenous overdose of barbiturate and exsanguination. At the time of euthanasia, all scrapie-infected sheep showed clinical signs of diverse severity: some animals displayed incipient signs such as pruritus of the back and flanks after digital stimulation and mild reduction of the body condition, whereas others displayed advanced clinical signs such as spontaneous scratching of the tail root, lumbar area, and limbs, neurological signs including ataxia and head tremors, and teeth grinding, wool loss, and intense weight loss [84].

4.2. Infection of Tg338 Mouse

To evaluate TLR geneexpressions in the brain of a murine model of scrapie, ten-week-old tg338 mice (n = 8) (overexpressing the ovine VRQ/VRQ PrPC 8- to 10-fold [85]) were inoculated with a brain pool from a natural scrapie-infected Rasa Aragonesa sheep sacrificed at the clinical stage. The mice were inoculated with 20 uL of the scrapie inoculum (diluted 2% w/v in PBS) into the right cerebral hemisphere under isoflurane anesthesia. Intracerebral injections were performed using a 50 μL syringe and a 25G needle. After inoculation, the mice were administered a subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine (0.3 mg/kg) to induce analgesia. As controls, tg338 mice (n = 8) were inoculated with brain homogenate from a scrapie-negative sheep following the same procedure described above. The mice were monitored for the development of clinical signs and euthanized by cervical dislocation when terminal signs of disease such as severe ataxia and inability to feed appeared. Mice infected with the scrapie-positive inoculum displayed a mean survival time of 187 ± 26 dpi.

4.3. Tissue Collection

Samples from the CNS were collected and divided sagittally into two halves; one was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis, and the other was directly frozen and maintained at −80 °C for protein analysis or stabilized in RNAlaterTM Solution (InvitrogenTM, Waltham, MA, USA) for RNA extraction and then frozen and stored at −80 °C.

4.4. PRNP Sequencing

DNA was extracted from blood samples with Speedtools Tissue DNA Extraction kit (Biotools, Madrid, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification and sequencing were done as described previously [82].

4.5. Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed tissues were processed according to standard histopathological procedures. Tissue sections were paraffin-embedded, cut into 4 µm thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) for the evaluation of vacuolation and neuropil spongiosis. IHC for PrPSc detection was performed using the mouse monoclonal primary antibody L42 in sheep (1:500 dilution at room temperature for 30 min) (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) and rabbit polyclonal antibody R486 in mice (1:8000 dilution, overnight at 4 °C) (R. Jackman, unpublished) as previously described [86,87]. Sections were also subjected to conventional immunostaining for the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (1:500; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and the microglia marker ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) (1:1000; Wako, Richmond, VA, USA), according to published protocols [88].
All histological and IHC evaluations were performed by two veterinary pathologists blinded to the clinical data. Assessments of spongiosis and PrPSc staining intensity were semi-quantitatively performed and adapted following the criteria described in previous studies: vacuolation of the neuropil and the perikarya was scored from 0 (absent) to 5 (very numerous and confluent) [51], the PrPSc signal was quantified based on the extent of immunostaining from 0 (no labelling) to 5 (intense uniform labeling) as previously reported [89], and the extent of GFAP and Iba1 immunolabelling was scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 5 (0 = weak staining; 5 = substantial immunolabelling throughout the region) as described [88]. Four brain regions were evaluated: frontal cortex (Fc) thalamus (Th), hippocampal formation (Hc), and medulla oblongata (Mo), and each area was globally analyzed for the scoring and graphically represented as mean ± standard error.

4.6. Western Blot

100 mg of brain tissue of each brain area (Fc, Th, Hc, and Mo) from 13 scrapie-infected sheep, 8 with advanced clinical signs and 5 with incipient clinical signs, were homogenized in 1 mL of lysis buffer. Hemiencephalons of the 8 infected and 8 control mice were homogenized at 10% (w/v) in lysis buffer. Tissue samples were homogenized in grinding tubes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a TeSeEPrecess 48 TM homogenizer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the protein concentration was measured using the PierceTM BCA Protein Assay kit (ThermoScientificTM, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For the PrPres analysis, equal protein amounts from tissue homogenates were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C with proteinase K solution, as previously described [90]. The resulting samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 12% CriterionTM XT Bis-Tris Protein Gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and transferred to PVDF membranes that were blocked for 1 h with 2% non-fat dry milk in TBST (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20). For immunoblotting, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with Sha31 primary antibody (SPI-Bio, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) at a concentration of 1µg/mL followed by 1 h incubation at room temperature (RT) with horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:5000) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Immunoreactivity was detected using the chemiluminescent substrate Immobilon Crescendo Western HRP (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
The TLR4 protein expression was analyzed from the tissue homogenates mixed with 2×Laemmli Sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty micrograms of total protein were loaded per well, run in 7.5% CriterionTM TGXTM Precast Midi Protein Gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and transferred to PVDF membranes, which were then blocked for 2 h with 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in TBST at RT. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit polyclonal anti-TLR4 antibody (Novus Biological, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL, and then washed and incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) HRP secondary antibody (ThermoScientificTM, Waltham, MA, USA) at 1:20,000 for 1 h at RT. Blots were visualized as described above. Next, the membranes were stripped with RestoreTM Western Blot Stripping buffer (ThermoScientificTM, Waltham, MA, USA) for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, and blocked again. Then, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with mouse monoclonal β-actin primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) at 1:1000, washed, and incubated with anti-mouse m-IgGк BP-HRP secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) for 1 h. After washing, the blots were developed as described above.
Densitometries were carried out with ImageJ software and the values were normalized using β-actin. The normalized values were represented with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical analyses to compare the infected and control groups were performed with a Student’s t-test, and the equality of variances was determined by Levene’s test using the SPSS software (SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at * p <0.05.

4.7. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Gene Expression

Sheep total RNA was extracted from 90 mg of tissue samples from the frontal cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, and medulla oblongata. Mouse brains were divided at the midline and total RNA was extracted from <90 mg obtained from the thalamic area. Tissues were homogenized using a TeSeEPrecess 48TM homogenizer (Bio-Rad) with RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) combined with TURBO DNase (InvitrogenTM, Waltham, MA, USA) to remove possible genomic DNA contamination. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically with a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and for each sample, 260/280 and 260/230 ratios were analyzed to verify the sample purity. One microgram of complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using qScriptTM cDNA SuperMix (Quantabio BiosciencesTM, Beverly, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In addition, the effectiveness of the DNase treatment was assessed in RT-negative samples. After reverse transcription, the same batch of diluted cDNA was subjected to qPCR to amplify TLRs.
Two commonly used housekeeping (HK) genes were selected to normalize the expression of the targets genes: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and actin-beta (ACTβ) [91]. The stability of this HK gene was verified under our experimental conditions. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression was determined by qPCR for 1 to 10 ovine TLR genes, 1 to 9 murine TLR genes, and the MyD88 gene for both species. Two proinflammatory (TNF-α and IL-6) and two anti-inflammatory (IL-10 and TGF-β) cytokines were also studied in the sheep thalamus and hippocampus. Primer sequences and efficiencies had been previously published or were designed using the Primer3Plus tool [92] (Table 2). We verified the efficiency of each gene generating a standard curve by amplifying 1:2 serial dilutions of control cDNA, and then checking for linearity between the initial template concentration and cycle threshold (Ct) values. All genes showed a correlation coefficient between 0.9 and 0.99, with a slope value of the standard curves in the ranges of −3.2 to −3.5 and qPCR efficiency of 90–110%.
The qPCR reactions were run using Applied BiosystemsTM QuantStudioTM 5 Real-Time PCR System, 96-well with universal amplification conditions: an initial activation and cDNA denaturation step of 10 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 3 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. To identify the presence of nonspecific PCR amplicons or high levels of primer dimers, we performed a dissociation curve protocol after each qPCR reaction. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate in a total reaction volume of 10 µL, consisting of 15 ng of cDNA, 5 µL Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (2X) (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the required amount of forward and reverse primers (Table 2). Nuclease-free water was added to a final volume of 10 µL. The levels of gene expression were determined using the comparative Ct method. The results were represented as fold-change and the gene expression differences relative to the mean level of the control group scaled to 1.

4.8. Data Analysis and Statistics

All quantitative data collected were tested for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk W test. Histological and immunohistochemical differences between the infected and control groups were evaluated using a Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test depending on the parametric or non parametric data distribution. Statistical differences between the four different brain regions in scrapie infected-sheep were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test or Kruskal–Wallis test, depending on the parametric or non parametric data distribution. Statistical analyses of the qPCR data were conducted from the mean ΔCt values for each gene. For the statistical comparison of infected and control groups, a Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test were performed depending on the normal distribution of each gene, and the equality of variances was determined by a Levene’s test. Differences in expression were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. The following notations were used to denote p-values in the figures: * p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; # p < 0.1. SPSS (SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0, Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for the statistical analyses. Graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) and the data shown in the figures represent the mean and the standard error of the mean (mean ± SEM).

5. Conclusions

To our knowledge, the present study is the first describing the expression levels of TLR genes in different brain regions of natural scrapie-infected sheep and ovinized tg338 mice experimentally infected with scrapie. Our study clearly shows that TLRs, and especially TLR4 in sheep and TLR1 and TLR2 in mice, are involved in the pathogenesis of scrapie. In addition, in contrast to all other regions studied, the distinctive profile of TLR gene expression, together with the unique microglial morphology and mild neuropathology observed in the hippocampus, suggests a brain region-specific immune response in natural scrapie infection. However, further studies will be necessary to characterize TLR expression in microglia, astroglia, and neurons in scrapie infection in order to understand the precise contribution of each cell type to neuroinflammation. Furthermore, it is yet to be determined whether TLR activation is a direct response to prion toxicity or occurs secondary to other inflammatory mechanisms. TLRs constitute a promising target for therapeutic approaches to prion diseases, and therefore a better understanding of TLR-regulated neuroinflammatory responses will be needed to ensure further advances in this area.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23073579/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, research, and data curation, M.C.G. and L.M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.-M., M.C.G. and L.M.C.; experimental methodology, M.G.-M.; writing—review and editing, M.G.-M., M.C.G., L.M.C. and A.O.; in vivo methodology, M.B.; funding acquisition, R.B. and J.J.B.; molecular methodology, B.S.-P.; supervision, M.C.G. and J.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Departamento de Ciencia, Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento” (Aragon Government) through the project “A05_20R: Enfermedades Priónicas, Vectoriales y Zoonosis Emergentes”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures involving animals adhered to the guidelines included in the Spanish law for Animal Protection RD53/2013 and the European Union Directive 2010/63 on the protection of animals used for experimental purposes. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Zaragoza (Permit Number: PI38/159 October 2015 and PI19/14 11 April 2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article text, figures and supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Olivier Andreoletti (UMR INRAEENVT 1225-IHAP) and Vincent Beringue (UMR VirologieImmunologieMoleculaires (VIM-UR892), INRAE, Universite Paris-Saclay) for kindly providing the tg338 mice used for these experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. The pictures and figures in this manuscript are original data.

References

  1. Andreoletti, O.; Berthon, P.; Marc, D.; Sarradin, P.; Grosclaude, J.; van Keulen, L.; Schelcher, F.; Elsen, J.M.; Lantier, F. Early accumulation of PrP(Sc) in gut-associated lymphoid and nervous tissues of susceptible sheep from a Romanov flock with natural scrapie. J. Gen. Virol. 2000, 81 Pt 12, 3115–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Prusiner, S.B. Prion diseases and the BSE crisis. Science 1997, 278, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. McBride, P.A.; Schulz-Schaeffer, W.J.; Donaldson, M.; Bruce, M.; Diringer, H.; Kretzschmar, H.A.; Beekes, M. Early spread of scrapie from the gastrointestinal tract to the central nervous system involves autonomic fibers of the splanchnic and vagus nerves. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 9320–9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mabbott, N.A.; MacPherson, G.G. Prions and their lethal journey to the brain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wemheuer, W.M.; Benestad, S.L.; Wrede, A.; Wemheuer, W.E.; Brenig, B.; Bratberg, B.; Schulz-Schaeffer, W.J. PrPSc spreading patterns in the brain of sheep linked to different prion types. Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Betmouni, S.; Perry, V.H.; Gordon, J.L. Evidence for an early inflammatory response in the central nervous system of mice with scrapie. Neuroscience 1996, 74, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sandberg, M.K.; Al-Doujaily, H.; Sharps, B.; De Oliveira, M.W.; Schmidt, C.; Richard-Londt, A.; Lyall, S.; Linehan, J.M.; Brandner, S.; Wadsworth, J.D.; et al. Prion neuropathology follows the accumulation of alternate prion protein isoforms after infective titre has peaked. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vincenti, J.E.; Murphy, L.; Grabert, K.; McColl, B.W.; Cancellotti, E.; Freeman, T.C.; Manson, J.C. Defining the Microglia Response during the Time Course of Chronic Neurodegeneration. J. Virol. 2015, 90, 3003–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aguzzi, A.; Zhu, C. Microglia in prion diseases. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3230–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Obst, J.; Simon, E.; Mancuso, R.; Gomez-Nicola, D. The Role of Microglia in Prion Diseases: A Paradigm of Functional Diversity. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lawson, L.J.; Perry, V.H.; Dri, P.; Gordon, S. Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 1990, 39, 151–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matyash, V.; Kettenmann, H. Heterogeneity in astrocyte morphology and physiology. Brain Res. Rev. 2010, 63, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bachiller, S.; Jimenez-Ferrer, I.; Paulus, A.; Yang, Y.; Swanberg, M.; Deierborg, T.; Boza-Serrano, A. Microglia in Neurological Diseases: A Road Map to Brain-Disease Dependent-Inflammatory Response. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fernandez-Arjona, M.D.M.; Grondona, J.M.; Granados-Duran, P.; Fernandez-Llebrez, P.; Lopez-Avalos, M.D. Microglia Morphological Categorization in a Rat Model of Neuroinflammation by Hierarchical Cluster and Principal Components Analysis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Makarava, N.; Mychko, O.; Chang, J.C.; Molesworth, K.; Baskakov, I.V. The degree of astrocyte activation is predictive of the incubation time to prion disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021, 9, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Makarava, N.; Chang, J.C.; Kushwaha, R.; Baskakov, I.V. Region-Specific Response of Astrocytes to Prion Infection. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carroll, J.A.; Chesebro, B. Neuroinflammation, Microglia, and Cell-Association during Prion Disease. Viruses 2019, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Makarava, N.; Chang, J.C.; Baskakov, I.V. Region-Specific Sialylation Pattern of Prion Strains Provides Novel Insight into Prion Neurotropism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fiebich, B.L.; Batista, C.R.A.; Saliba, S.W.; Yousif, N.M.; de Oliveira, A.C.P. Role of Microglia TLRs in Neurodegeneration. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gooshe, M.; Abdolghaffari, A.H.; Gambuzza, M.E.; Rezaei, N. The role of Toll-like receptors in multiple sclerosis and possible targeting for therapeutic purposes. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 25, 713–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Su, F.; Bai, F.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z. Microglial toll-like receptors and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 52, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Carroll, J.A.; Race, B.; Williams, K.; Chesebro, B. Toll-like receptor 2 confers partial neuroprotection during prion disease. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Spinner, D.S.; Cho, I.S.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.I.; Meeker, H.C.; Ye, X.; Lafauci, G.; Kerr, D.J.; Flory, M.J.; Kim, B.S.; et al. Accelerated prion disease pathogenesis in Toll-like receptor 4 signaling-mutant mice. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10701–10708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rosset, M.B.; Ballerini, C.; Gregoire, S.; Metharom, P.; Carnaud, C.; Aucouturier, P. Breaking immune tolerance to the prion protein using prion protein peptides plus oligodeoxynucleotide-CpG in mice. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 5168–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sethi, S.; Lipford, G.; Wagner, H.; Kretzschmar, H. Postexposure prophylaxis against prion disease with a stimulator of innate immunity. Lancet 2002, 360, 229–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saba, R.; Gushue, S.; Huzarewich, R.L.; Manguiat, K.; Medina, S.; Robertson, C.; Booth, S.A. MicroRNA 146a (miR-146a) is over-expressed during prion disease and modulates the innate immune response and the microglial activation state. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kang, S.G.; Kim, C.; Cortez, L.M.; Carmen Garza, M.; Yang, J.; Wille, H.; Sim, V.L.; Westaway, D.; McKenzie, D.; Aiken, J. Toll-like receptor-mediated immune response inhibits prion propagation. Glia 2016, 64, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lai, M.; Yao, H.; Shah, S.Z.A.; Wu, W.; Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, D.; Yang, L. The NLRP3-Caspase 1 Inflammasome Negatively Regulates Autophagy via TLR4-TRIF in Prion Peptide-Infected Microglia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dervishi, E.; Lam, T.H.; Dunn, S.M.; Zwierzchowski, G.; Saleem, F.; Wishart, D.S.; Ametaj, B.N. Recombinant mouse prion protein alone or in combination with lipopolysaccharide alters expression of innate immunity genes in the colon of mice. Prion 2015, 9, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meling, S.; Skovgaard, K.; Bardsen, K.; Helweg Heegaard, P.M.; Ulvund, M.J. Expression of selected genes isolated from whole blood, liver and obex in lambs with experimental classical scrapie and healthy controls, showing a systemic innate immune response at the clinical end-stage. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Llorens, F.; Lopez-Gonzalez, I.; Thune, K.; Carmona, M.; Zafar, S.; Andreoletti, O.; Zerr, I.; Ferrer, I. Subtype and regional-specific neuroinflammation in sporadic creutzfeldt-jakob disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Areskeviciute, A.; Litman, T.; Broholm, H.; Melchior, L.C.; Nielsen, P.R.; Green, A.; Eriksen, J.O.; Smith, C.; Lund, E.L. Regional Differences in Neuroinflammation-Associated Gene Expression in the Brain of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lefrancois, T.; Fages, C.; Brugere-Picoux, J.; Tardy, M. Astroglial reactivity in natural scrapie of sheep. Microb. Pathog. 1994, 17, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hernandez, R.S.; Sarasa, R.; Toledano, A.; Badiola, J.J.; Monzon, M. Morphological approach to assess the involvement of astrocytes in prion propagation. Cell Tissue Res. 2014, 358, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vidal, E.; Acin, C.; Foradada, L.; Monzon, M.; Marquez, M.; Monleon, E.; Pumarola, M.; Badiola, J.J.; Bolea, R. Immunohistochemical characterisation of classical scrapie neuropathology in sheep. J. Comp. Pathol. 2009, 141, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jeffrey, M.; Gonzalez, L. Classical sheep transmissible spongiform encephalopathies: Pathogenesis, pathological phenotypes and clinical disease. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2007, 33, 373–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ito, D.; Imai, Y.; Ohsawa, K.; Nakajima, K.; Fukuuchi, Y.; Kohsaka, S. Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1998, 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boche, D.; Perry, V.H.; Nicoll, J.A. Review: Activation patterns of microglia and their identification in the human brain. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2013, 39, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Martini, A.C.; Helman, A.M.; McCarty, K.L.; Lott, I.T.; Doran, E.; Schmitt, F.A.; Head, E. Distribution of microglial phenotypes as a function of age and Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology in the brains of people with Down syndrome. Alzheimer’s Dement. Diagn. Assess. Dis. Monit. 2020, 12, e12113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bachstetter, A.D.; Van Eldik, L.J.; Schmitt, F.A.; Neltner, J.H.; Ighodaro, E.T.; Webster, S.J.; Patel, E.; Abner, E.L.; Kryscio, R.J.; Nelson, P.T. Disease-related microglia heterogeneity in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and hippocampal sclerosis of aging. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2015, 3, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wyatt-Johnson, S.K.; Herr, S.A.; Brewster, A.L. Status Epilepticus Triggers Time-Dependent Alterations in Microglia Abundance and Morphological Phenotypes in the Hippocampus. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Taylor, S.E.; Morganti-Kossmann, C.; Lifshitz, J.; Ziebell, J.M. Rod microglia: A morphological definition. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, B.; Chen, M.; Zhu, C. Neuroinflammation in Prion Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gomez-Nicola, D.; Fransen, N.L.; Suzzi, S.; Perry, V.H. Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 2481–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gilch, S.; Schmitz, F.; Aguib, Y.; Kehler, C.; Bulow, S.; Bauer, S.; Kremmer, E.; Schatzl, H.M. CpG and LPS can interfere negatively with prion clearance in macrophage and microglial cells. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5834–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhu, C.; Herrmann, U.S.; Falsig, J.; Abakumova, I.; Nuvolone, M.; Schwarz, P.; Frauenknecht, K.; Rushing, E.J.; Aguzzi, A. A neuroprotective role for microglia in prion diseases. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Carroll, J.A.; Race, B.; Williams, K.; Striebel, J.; Chesebro, B. Microglia Are Critical in Host Defense against Prion Disease. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e00549-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Chen, K.; Iribarren, P.; Hu, J.; Chen, J.; Gong, W.; Cho, E.H.; Lockett, S.; Dunlop, N.M.; Wang, J.M. Activation of Toll-like receptor 2 on microglia promotes cell uptake of Alzheimer disease-associated amyloid beta peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 3651–3659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tahara, K.; Kim, H.D.; Jin, J.J.; Maxwell, J.A.; Li, L.; Fukuchi, K. Role of toll-like receptor signalling in Abeta uptake and clearance. Brain 2006, 129 Pt 11, 3006–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Trudler, D.; Farfara, D.; Frenkel, D. Toll-like receptors expression and signaling in glia cells in neuro-amyloidogenic diseases: Towards future therapeutic application. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 497987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ligios, C.; Jeffrey, M.; Ryder, S.J.; Bellworthy, S.J.; Simmons, M.M. Distinction of scrapie phenotypes in sheep by lesion profiling. J. Comp. Pathol. 2002, 127, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Garces, M.; Guijarro, I.M.; Ritchie, D.L.; Badiola, J.J.; Monzon, M. Novel Morphological Glial Alterations in the Spectrum of Prion Disease Types: A Focus on Common Findings. Pathogens 2021, 10, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Holloway, O.G.; Canty, A.J.; King, A.E.; Ziebell, J.M. Rod microglia and their role in neurological diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 94, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Au, N.P.B.; Ma, C.H.E. Recent Advances in the Study of Bipolar/Rod-Shaped Microglia and their Roles in Neurodegeneration. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Giordano, K.R.; Denman, C.R.; Dubisch, P.S.; Akhter, M.; Lifshitz, J. An update on the rod microglia variant in experimental and clinical brain injury and disease. Brain Commun. 2021, 3, fcaa227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tam, W.Y.; Ma, C.H. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are proliferating microglia with distinct M1/M2 phenotypes. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Heneka, M.T.; Kummer, M.P.; Latz, E. Innate immune activation in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rosenberger, K.; Derkow, K.; Dembny, P.; Kruger, C.; Schott, E.; Lehnardt, S. The impact of single and pairwise Toll-like receptor activation on neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lehmann, S.M.; Kruger, C.; Park, B.; Derkow, K.; Rosenberger, K.; Baumgart, J.; Trimbuch, T.; Eom, G.; Hinz, M.; Kaul, D.; et al. An unconventional role for miRNA: Let-7 activates Toll-like receptor 7 and causes neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hedman, C.; Lyahyai, J.; Filali, H.; Marin, B.; Serrano, C.; Monleon, E.; Moreno, B.; Zaragoza, P.; Badiola, J.J.; Martin-Burriel, I.; et al. Differential gene expression and apoptosis markers in presymptomatic scrapie affected sheep. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 159, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Letiembre, M.; Liu, Y.; Walter, S.; Hao, W.; Pfander, T.; Wrede, A.; Schulz-Schaeffer, W.; Fassbender, K. Screening of innate immune receptors in neurodegenerative diseases: A similar pattern. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Prinz, M.; Garbe, F.; Schmidt, H.; Mildner, A.; Gutcher, I.; Wolter, K.; Piesche, M.; Schroers, R.; Weiss, E.; Kirschning, C.J.; et al. Innate immunity mediated by TLR9 modulates pathogenicity in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, J.; Zhao, D.; Pan, B.; Fu, Y.; Shi, F.; Kouadir, M.; Yang, L.; Yin, X.; Zhou, X. Toll-like receptor 2 deficiency shifts PrP106–126-induced microglial activation from a neurotoxic to a neuroprotective phenotype. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 55, 880–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chiesa, R.; Harris, D.A. Prion diseases: What is the neurotoxic molecule? Neurobiol. Dis. 2001, 8, 743–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Moore, K.J.; Freeman, M.W. Scavenger receptors in atherosclerosis: Beyond lipid uptake. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006, 26, 1702–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. El Khoury, J.B.; Moore, K.J.; Means, T.K.; Leung, J.; Terada, K.; Toft, M.; Freeman, M.W.; Luster, A.D. CD36 mediates the innate host response to beta-amyloid. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 197, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Noda, M.; Suzumura, A. Sweepers in the CNS: Microglial Migration and Phagocytosis in the Alzheimer Disease Pathogenesis. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 2012, 891087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Kouadir, M.; Yang, L.; Tan, R.; Shi, F.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yin, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, D. CD36 participates in PrP(106–126)-induced activation of microglia. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kouadir, M.; Yang, L.; Tu, J.; Yin, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, D. Comparison of mRNA expression patterns of class B scavenger receptors in BV2 microglia upon exposure to amyloidogenic fragments of beta-amyloid and prion proteins. DNA Cell Biol. 2011, 30, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shmuel-Galia, L.; Klug, Y.; Porat, Z.; Charni, M.; Zarmi, B.; Shai, Y. Intramembrane attenuation of the TLR4-TLR6 dimer impairs receptor assembly and reduces microglia-mediated neurodegeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13415–13427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Stewart, C.R.; Stuart, L.M.; Wilkinson, K.; van Gils, J.M.; Deng, J.; Halle, A.; Rayner, K.J.; Boyer, L.; Zhong, R.; Frazier, W.A.; et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a Toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Carroll, J.A.; Striebel, J.F.; Rangel, A.; Woods, T.; Phillips, K.; Peterson, K.E.; Race, B.; Chesebro, B. Prion Strain Differences in Accumulation of PrPSc on Neurons and Glia Are Associated with Similar Expression Profiles of Neuroinflammatory Genes: Comparison of Three Prion Strains. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Srivastava, S.; Katorcha, E.; Makarava, N.; Barrett, J.P.; Loane, D.J.; Baskakov, I.V. Inflammatory response of microglia to prions is controlled by sialylation of PrP(Sc). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Linnartz, B.; Kopatz, J.; Tenner, A.J.; Neumann, H. Sialic acid on the neuronal glycocalyx prevents complement C1 binding and complement receptor-3-mediated removal by microglia. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Brown, G.C.; Neher, J.J. Microglial phagocytosis of live neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Masullo, C.; Macchi, G. Resistance of the hippocampus in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Clin. Neuropathol. 1997, 16, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  77. Kaneko, M.; Sugiyama, N.; Sasayama, D.; Yamaoka, K.; Miyakawa, T.; Arima, K.; Tsuchiya, K.; Hasegawa, K.; Washizuka, S.; Hanihara, T.; et al. Prion disease causes less severe lesions in human hippocampus than other parts of brain. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2008, 62, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dawson, T.M.; Golde, T.E.; Lagier-Tourenne, C. Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1370–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Watts, J.C.; Prusiner, S.B. Mouse models for studying the formation and propagation of prions. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 19841–19849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Le Dur, A.; Lai, T.L.; Stinnakre, M.G.; Laisne, A.; Chenais, N.; Rakotobe, S.; Passet, B.; Reine, F.; Soulier, S.; Herzog, L.; et al. Divergent prion strain evolution driven by PrP(C) expression level in transgenic mice. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Langevin, C.; Andreoletti, O.; Le Dur, A.; Laude, H.; Beringue, V. Marked influence of the route of infection on prion strain apparent phenotype in a scrapie transgenic mouse model. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011, 41, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Acin, C.; Martin-Burriel, I.; Goldmann, W.; Lyahyai, J.; Monzon, M.; Bolea, R.; Smith, A.; Rodellar, C.; Badiola, J.J.; Zaragoza, P. Prion protein gene polymorphisms in healthy and scrapie-affected Spanish sheep. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85 Pt 7, 2103–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Monleon, E.; Garza, M.C.; Sarasa, R.; Alvarez-Rodriguez, J.; Bolea, R.; Monzon, M.; Vargas, M.A.; Badiola, J.J.; Acin, C. An assessment of the efficiency of PrPsc detection in rectal mucosa and third-eyelid biopsies from animals infected with scrapie. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 147, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vargas, F.; Lujan, L.; Bolea, R.; Monleon, E.; Martin-Burriel, I.; Fernandez, A.; De Blas, I.; Badiola, J.J. Detection and clinical evolution of scrapie in sheep by 3rd eyelid biopsy. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2006, 20, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Laude, H.; Vilette, D.; Le Dur, A.; Archer, F.; Soulier, S.; Besnard, N.; Essalmani, R.; Vilotte, J.L. New in vivo and ex vivo models for the experimental study of sheep scrapie: Development and perspectives. C. R. Biol. 2002, 325, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gonzalez, L.; Martin, S.; Jeffrey, M. Distinct profiles of PrP(d) immunoreactivity in the brain of scrapie- and BSE-infected sheep: Implications for differential cell targeting and PrP processing. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84 Pt 5, 1339–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Monleon, E.; Monzon, M.; Hortells, P.; Vargas, A.; Acin, C.; Badiola, J.J. Detection of PrPsc on lymphoid tissues from naturally affected scrapie animals: Comparison of three visualization systems. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2004, 52, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Guijarro, I.M.; Garces, M.; Andres-Benito, P.; Marin, B.; Otero, A.; Barrio, T.; Carmona, M.; Ferrer, I.; Badiola, J.J.; Monzon, M. Assessment of Glial Activation Response in the Progress of Natural Scrapie after Chronic Dexamethasone Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jeffrey, M.; Martin, S.; Gonzalez, L.; Ryder, S.J.; Bellworthy, S.J.; Jackman, R. Differential diagnosis of infections with the bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and scrapie agents in sheep. J. Comp. Pathol. 2001, 125, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fernandez-Borges, N.; Espinosa, J.C.; Marin-Moreno, A.; Aguilar-Calvo, P.; Asante, E.A.; Kitamoto, T.; Mohri, S.; Andreoletti, O.; Torres, J.M. Protective Effect of Val129-PrP against Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy but not Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Garcia-Crespo, D.; Juste, R.A.; Hurtado, A. Selection of ovine housekeeping genes for normalisation by real-time RT-PCR; analysis of PrP gene expression and genetic susceptibility to scrapie. BMC Vet. Res. 2005, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Untergasser, A.; Cutcutache, I.; Koressaar, T.; Ye, J.; Faircloth, B.C.; Remm, M.; Rozen, S.G. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Menzies, M.; Ingham, A. Identification and expression of Toll-like receptors 1–10 in selected bovine and ovine tissues. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006, 109, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pelegrin-Valls, J.; Serrano-Perez, B.; Villalba, D.; Martin-Alonso, M.J.; Bertolin, J.R.; Joy, M.; Alvarez-Rodriguez, J. Effect of Dietary Crude Protein on Productive Efficiency, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Metabolites and Gastrointestinal Immune Markers in Light Lambs. Animals 2020, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Yang, L.; Bai, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Differential expression of T helper cytokines in the liver during early pregnancy in sheep. Anim. Reprod. 2019, 16, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mahakapuge, T.A.; Scheerlinck, J.P.; Rojas, C.A.; Every, A.L.; Hagen, J. Assessment of reference genes for reliable analysis of gene transcription by RT-qPCR in ovine leukocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2016, 171, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Grasa, L.; Abecia, L.; Forcen, R.; Castro, M.; de Jalon, J.A.; Latorre, E.; Alcalde, A.I.; Murillo, M.D. Antibiotic-Induced Depletion of Murine Microbiota Induces Mild Inflammation and Changes in Toll-Like Receptor Patterns and Intestinal Motility. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cashman, S.B.; Morgan, J.G. Transcriptional analysis of Toll-like receptors expression in M cells. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 47, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Williams, A.S.; Leung, S.Y.; Nath, P.; Khorasani, N.M.; Bhavsar, P.; Issa, R.; Mitchell, J.A.; Adcock, I.M.; Chung, K.F. Role of TLR2, TLR4, and MyD88 in murine ozone-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and neutrophilia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2007, 103, 1189–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Su, Y. Normalizing genes for real-time polymerase chain reaction in epithelial and nonepithelial cells of mouse small intestine. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 399, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative neuropathology and immunohistochemical assessment of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, microgliosis, and astrogliosis in the CNS of control and scrapie-infected sheep in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc). Graphs depict semi-quantitative assessment values for each parameter analyzed. (A) Hematoxylin–eosin staining showing spongiosis changes in the CNS from scrapie-infected sheep, and an absence of spongiosis in control sheep. (B) Detection of PrPSc with L42 antibody in scrapie-infected sheep brain regions. No immunolabelling was detected in the control group. (C) Ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1 (Iba1) immunostaining showing increased microglial reactivity in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. (D) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining displaying increased reactive astrogliosis in scrapie-infected sheep compared to control sheep. (E) Statistical comparisons of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, Iba1, and GFAP intensity between brain regions. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences in spongiosis, PrPSc, Iba1, and GFAP were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Statistical differences between brain areas were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Figure 1. Representative neuropathology and immunohistochemical assessment of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, microgliosis, and astrogliosis in the CNS of control and scrapie-infected sheep in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc). Graphs depict semi-quantitative assessment values for each parameter analyzed. (A) Hematoxylin–eosin staining showing spongiosis changes in the CNS from scrapie-infected sheep, and an absence of spongiosis in control sheep. (B) Detection of PrPSc with L42 antibody in scrapie-infected sheep brain regions. No immunolabelling was detected in the control group. (C) Ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1 (Iba1) immunostaining showing increased microglial reactivity in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. (D) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunostaining displaying increased reactive astrogliosis in scrapie-infected sheep compared to control sheep. (E) Statistical comparisons of spongiosis, PrPSc deposition, Iba1, and GFAP intensity between brain regions. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences in spongiosis, PrPSc, Iba1, and GFAP were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. Statistical differences between brain areas were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Ijms 23 03579 g001
Figure 2. Western blot detection of PrPres in the CNS of control and natural scrapie-infected sheep. Equal protein quantities were loaded for adequate comparison, and immunoblots were run using SHA31 monoclonal antibody for analysis of samples from the (A) medulla oblongata, (B) thalamus, (C) hippocampus, and (D) frontal cortex from scrapie-infected sheep with incipient clinical signs (samples 1–5) and with advanced clinical signs (samples 6–13). Line 14 shows the negative control and line 15 a sample of non-infected sheep brain homogenate not subjected to pK digestion.
Figure 2. Western blot detection of PrPres in the CNS of control and natural scrapie-infected sheep. Equal protein quantities were loaded for adequate comparison, and immunoblots were run using SHA31 monoclonal antibody for analysis of samples from the (A) medulla oblongata, (B) thalamus, (C) hippocampus, and (D) frontal cortex from scrapie-infected sheep with incipient clinical signs (samples 1–5) and with advanced clinical signs (samples 6–13). Line 14 shows the negative control and line 15 a sample of non-infected sheep brain homogenate not subjected to pK digestion.
Ijms 23 03579 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of neuropathological lesions (HE), PrPSc deposition, astrogliosis (GFAP), and microgliosis (Iba1), in four different hippocampal regions in scrapie-infected and control sheep: pyramidal cell layers CornuAmmonis (CA) 1, 3, and 4, and the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM). Graphs depict semi-quantitative assessment values for each parameter analyzed. (A) Mild spongiform changes were observed in all hippocampal regions analyzed. (B) Intraneuronal PrPSc pattern (L42) in CA1, CA3, and CA4 and widespread fine granular PrPSc pattern in the SLM. (C) Increased Iba1 staining in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. Magnified images show some of the morphological differences observed. (D) Signs of moderate reactive astrogliosis in scrapie-infected sheep compared with controls. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Figure 3. Distribution of neuropathological lesions (HE), PrPSc deposition, astrogliosis (GFAP), and microgliosis (Iba1), in four different hippocampal regions in scrapie-infected and control sheep: pyramidal cell layers CornuAmmonis (CA) 1, 3, and 4, and the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (SLM). Graphs depict semi-quantitative assessment values for each parameter analyzed. (A) Mild spongiform changes were observed in all hippocampal regions analyzed. (B) Intraneuronal PrPSc pattern (L42) in CA1, CA3, and CA4 and widespread fine granular PrPSc pattern in the SLM. (C) Increased Iba1 staining in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. Magnified images show some of the morphological differences observed. (D) Signs of moderate reactive astrogliosis in scrapie-infected sheep compared with controls. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Ijms 23 03579 g003
Figure 4. Thalamus sections from scrapie-infected (intracerebral inoculation) and age-matched tg338 control mice immunostained to assess spongiosis (hematoxylin–eosin), PrPSc deposition (R486 antibody), astrocytes (glial fibrillary acidic protein; GFAP), and microglia (ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1; Iba1). (A,E) Severe spongiform lesions located mainly in the neuropil of scrapie-infected versus control mice. (B,F) Several PrPSc-positive neurons are evident in scrapie-infected mice, but absent from controls. (C,G) Activated microglia displaying more intense immunostaining and thick processes in scrapie-infected mice versus controls. (D,H) Increased astrogliosis with hypertrophic cell bodies and processes in scrapie-infected mice versus controls. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Figure 4. Thalamus sections from scrapie-infected (intracerebral inoculation) and age-matched tg338 control mice immunostained to assess spongiosis (hematoxylin–eosin), PrPSc deposition (R486 antibody), astrocytes (glial fibrillary acidic protein; GFAP), and microglia (ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule-1; Iba1). (A,E) Severe spongiform lesions located mainly in the neuropil of scrapie-infected versus control mice. (B,F) Several PrPSc-positive neurons are evident in scrapie-infected mice, but absent from controls. (C,G) Activated microglia displaying more intense immunostaining and thick processes in scrapie-infected mice versus controls. (D,H) Increased astrogliosis with hypertrophic cell bodies and processes in scrapie-infected mice versus controls. Scores range from 0 (negative) to 5 (maximum intensity). Significant differences were determined using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Scale bar = 200 µm.
Ijms 23 03579 g004
Figure 5. Western blot detection of PrPres accumulation in the CNS of clinically affected tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with scrapie compared with matched controls. Equivalent protein quantities were loaded for adequate comparison and immunoblots were run using SHA31 monoclonal antibody. Molecular-weight markers (kDa) are indicated on the left side of the immunoblot.
Figure 5. Western blot detection of PrPres accumulation in the CNS of clinically affected tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with scrapie compared with matched controls. Equivalent protein quantities were loaded for adequate comparison and immunoblots were run using SHA31 monoclonal antibody. Molecular-weight markers (kDa) are indicated on the left side of the immunoblot.
Ijms 23 03579 g005
Figure 6. Gene expression of TLR 1-10, MyD88, Trif, and CD36 in the medulla oblongata (A), thalamus (B), frontal cortex (C), and hippocampus (D) of control and scrapie-infected sheep. Data are represented as the mean fold ± SEM increase with respect to control sheep (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. # p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Gene expression of TLR 1-10, MyD88, Trif, and CD36 in the medulla oblongata (A), thalamus (B), frontal cortex (C), and hippocampus (D) of control and scrapie-infected sheep. Data are represented as the mean fold ± SEM increase with respect to control sheep (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. # p < 0.1, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 03579 g006
Figure 7. Gene expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β and IL-10, and the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, in the thalamus (A) and hippocampus (B) of control and naturally scrapie-infected sheep. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM fold change with respect to controls (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Gene expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β and IL-10, and the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, in the thalamus (A) and hippocampus (B) of control and naturally scrapie-infected sheep. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM fold change with respect to controls (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 03579 g007
Figure 8. Gene expression of TLR1-7, TLR9, and MyD88 in the thalamus of clinically affected tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with scrapie-positive inoculum versus controls (scrapie-negative inoculum). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM fold change with respect to controls (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. # p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Gene expression of TLR1-7, TLR9, and MyD88 in the thalamus of clinically affected tg338 mice intracerebrally inoculated with scrapie-positive inoculum versus controls (scrapie-negative inoculum). Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM fold change with respect to controls (expressed as a score of 1). Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. # p < 0.1, ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 03579 g008
Figure 9. TLR4 protein expression in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc) of scrapie-infected sheep versus control sheep (n = 4 per group). β-actin was used as a loading control. The graph depicts densitometry values and indicates a significant increase in TLR4 expression in all regions in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05.
Figure 9. TLR4 protein expression in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc) of scrapie-infected sheep versus control sheep (n = 4 per group). β-actin was used as a loading control. The graph depicts densitometry values and indicates a significant increase in TLR4 expression in all regions in scrapie-infected versus control sheep. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Mean scores were compared using the Student’s t-test. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 03579 g009
Table 1. PrPSc detection by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot (WB) in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc) of scrapie-infected sheep.
Table 1. PrPSc detection by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blot (WB) in the medulla oblongata (Mo), thalamus (Th), hippocampus (Hc), and frontal cortex (Fc) of scrapie-infected sheep.
MoThHcFc
Clinical StageIDIHCWBIHCWBIHCWBIHCWB
Incipient1+++++
Incipient2++++++
Incipient3++++++++
Incipient4+++++
Incipient5++++++++
Advanced6+++++++
Advanced7++++++++
Advanced8++++++++
Advanced9++++++++
Advanced10++++++++
Advanced11++++++
Advanced12++++++++
Advanced13++++++++
Table 2. Primers used for quantification of gene expressions.
Table 2. Primers used for quantification of gene expressions.
GeneForward (F) and Reverse (R)
Primer Sequence (5′-3′)
Primer Concentrations
innMUsed for qPCR
Accession
Number
Reference
Ovine Primers
TLR1F CCCACAGGAAAGAAATTCCA
R GGAGGATCGTGATGAAGGAA
900NM_001135060.2[93]
TLR2F ACGACGCCTTTGTGTCCTAC
R CCGAAAGCACAAAGATGGTT
900NM_001048231.1[93]
TLR3F GAGGCAGGTGTCCTTGAACT
R GCTGAATTTCTGGACCCAAG
900NM_001135928.1[93]
TLR4F ACTGACGGGAAACCCTATCC
R CAGGTTGGGAAGGTCAGAAA
900NM_001135930.1[93]
TLR5F AAAACCACATCGCCAACATC
R CATCAGATGGAACTGGGACA
900NM_001135926.1[93]
TLR6F CAAAGCAGGGAACAATCCAT
R CCACAATGGTGACAATCAGC
900NM_001135927.1[93]
TLR7F ACTCCTTGGGGCTAGATGGT
R GCTGGAGAGATGCCTGCTAT
900NM_001135059.1[93]
TLR8F CACATCCCAGACTTTCTACGA
R GGTCCCAATCCCTTTCCTCTA
900NM_001135929.1[93]
TLR9F CTCGTATCCCTGTCGCTGAG
R CACCTCCGTGAGGTTGTTGT
900NM_001011555.1[93]
TLR10F TCTGCCTGGGTGAAGTATGA
R AATGGCACCATTCAGTCTGG
900NM_001135925.1[93]
TNF-αF CAAATAACAAGCCGGTAGCC
R TGGTTGTCTTTCAGCTCCAC
200NM_001024860.1[94]
TGF-βF TTGACGTCACTGGAGTTGTG
R CGTTGATGTCCACTTGAAGC
200NM_001009400.2[94]
IL-10F TTAAGGGTTACCTGGGTTGC
R TTCACGTGCTCCTTGATGTC
200NM_001009327.1[94]
IL-6F CGAGTTTGAGGGAAATCAGG
R GTCAGTGTGTGTGGCTGGAG
300NM_001009392.1[95]
MyD88F CTGCAAAGCAAGGAATGTGA
R AGGATGCTGGGGAACTCTTT
400
300
NM_001166183.1Designed
TrifF GCACGTCTAGCCTGCTTACC
R AGGTGTTGGTCACCTTCCTG
300XM_042250120.1Designed
CD36F GCAAAACGGCTGCAGATCAA
R AGCAATGGTGGCAGTCTCAT
300XM_012176565.4Designed
ACTβF CTGGACTTCGAGCAGGAGAT
R GATGTCGACGTCACACTTC
600NM_001009784[94]
GAPDHF TCCGGGAAGCTGTGGCGTGA
R GGGATGACCTTGCCCACGGC
500NM 001190390.1[96]
Murine Primers
TLR1F CTGGACCCAGAGTTTGTTAGTTTT
R GCTCATTATCCTGTTGTTGTGAAG
150
300
XM_006503856.3Designed
TLR2F GCCACCATTTCCACGGACT
R GGCTTCCTCTTGGCCTGG
500NM_011905[97]
TLR3F TTGTCTTCTGCACGAACCTG
R CCCGTTCCCAACTTTGTAGA
300XM_006509283.4Designed
TLR4F AGAAATTCCTGCAGTGGGTCA
R CTCTACAGGTGTTGCACATGTCA
500NM_021297[97]
TLR5F GCCACATCATTTCCACTCCT
R ACAGCCGAAGTTCCAAGAGA
200XM_017321704.2[98]
TLR6F ACACAATCGGTTGCAAAACA
R GGAAAGTCAGCTTCGTCAGG
300
400
NM_001384171.1Designed
TLR7F GGTATGCCGCCAAATCTAAA
R GCTGAGGTCCAAAATTTCCA
400
500
XM_006528713.2Designed
TLR8F GAAGCATTTCGAGCATCTCC
R GAAGACGATTTCGCCAAGAG
200XM_017318405.2[98]
TLR9F CAACCTCAGCCACAACATTC
R CACACTTCACACCATTAGCC
200NM_031178.2[98]
MyD88F CATGGTGGTGGTTGTTTCTGAC
R TGGAGACAGGCTGAGTGCAA
500NM_010851.3[99]
GAPDHF CCTCGTCCCGTAGACAAAATG
R TGAAGGGGTCGTTGATGGC
250XM_036165840.1[100]
ACTβF CTTCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTT
R TTCTGACCCATTCCCACCA
250NM_007393.5[100]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Martínez, M.; Cortez, L.M.; Otero, A.; Betancor, M.; Serrano-Pérez, B.; Bolea, R.; Badiola, J.J.; Garza, M.C. Distinctive Toll-like Receptors Gene Expression and Glial Response in Different Brain Regions of Natural Scrapie. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073579

AMA Style

García-Martínez M, Cortez LM, Otero A, Betancor M, Serrano-Pérez B, Bolea R, Badiola JJ, Garza MC. Distinctive Toll-like Receptors Gene Expression and Glial Response in Different Brain Regions of Natural Scrapie. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):3579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073579

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Martínez, Mirta, Leonardo M. Cortez, Alicia Otero, Marina Betancor, Beatriz Serrano-Pérez, Rosa Bolea, Juan J. Badiola, and María Carmen Garza. 2022. "Distinctive Toll-like Receptors Gene Expression and Glial Response in Different Brain Regions of Natural Scrapie" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073579

APA Style

García-Martínez, M., Cortez, L. M., Otero, A., Betancor, M., Serrano-Pérez, B., Bolea, R., Badiola, J. J., & Garza, M. C. (2022). Distinctive Toll-like Receptors Gene Expression and Glial Response in Different Brain Regions of Natural Scrapie. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(7), 3579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop