Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the Wave Phenomenon in Flash-Induced Fluorescence Relaxation and Its Application to Study Cyclic Electron Pathways in Microalgae
Previous Article in Journal
At Embryo Implantation Site IL-35 Secreted by Trophoblast, Polarizing T Cells towards IL-35+ IL-10+ IL-4+ Th2-Type Cells, Could Favour Fetal Allograft Tolerance and Pregnancy Success
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of the Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Reflex in Central Nervous System Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis

by
Léo Victor G. Castro
1,2,†,
Cassiano F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque
1,3,4,*,† and
Adriana R. Silva
1,2,*
1
Laboratório de Imunofarmacologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Celular e Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Imunofarmacologia, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 20211-010, Brazil
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 20211-010, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4925; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094925
Submission received: 7 December 2021 / Revised: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 17 January 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuro–Immune Interactions in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, leaving the inflammation process without a proper resolution, leading to tissue damage and possibly sequelae. The central nervous system (CNS) is one of the first regions affected by the peripheral inflammation caused by sepsis, exposing the neurons to an environment of oxidative stress, triggering neuronal dysfunction and apoptosis. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is the most frequent sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, with symptoms such as deliriums, seizures, and coma, linked to increased mortality, morbidity, and cognitive disability. However, the current therapy does not avoid those patients’ symptoms, evidencing the search for a more optimal approach. Herein we focus on microglia as a prominent therapeutic target due to its multiple functions maintaining CNS homeostasis and its polarizing capabilities, stimulating and resolving neuroinflammation depending on the stimuli. Microglia polarization is a target of multiple studies involving nerve cell preservation in diseases caused or aggravated by neuroinflammation, but in sepsis, its therapeutic potential is overlooked. We highlight the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) neuroprotective properties, its role in microglia polarization and inflammation resolution, and the interaction with nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK), making PPARγ a molecular target for sepsis-related studies to come.

1. Introduction

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [1]. Even though the inflammation process is one of the main strategies the innate immune system uses to neutralize a pathogen, effectively controlling local infections, the same can be harmful without a proper response during a disseminated infection [2]. The host response starts with the recognition of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogens-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), activating the innate immune cells, mainly monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer cells [3]. Pathogen recognition will lead to the activation of intracellular transduction signal pathways, elevating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which will subsequently activate the coagulation and complement pathways, affecting leucocyte activation [4]. This process, when deregulated, can lead to extensive tissue damage and physical and psychological sequelae, along with long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability [5]. The estimated incidence is 48.9 million cases, with 11 million sepsis-related deaths in 2017, representing 19.7% of global deaths. These numbers are considerably higher in areas with low and middle socio-demographic indexes [6]. The burden of sepsis is so substantial that in 2017, the World Health Organization and World Health Assembly recognized it as a global health priority, adopting an action plan for all United Nations Members, focusing on improving the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis [7].
The central nervous system (CNS) is one of the first regions exposed to an inflammatory episode due to the progress of peripheral inflammation caused by sepsis [8]. The inflammatory signals reach the brain through the humoral and the neural pathways, which depend on the breach of the blood–brain barrier and the activation of the vagus nerve fibers, respectively [9], as in neurodegenerative diseases. This process allows peripheral inflammatory mediators and immune cells into the brain, also activating the resident immune cells of the CNS, exposing the neurons to an environment of oxidative stress, leading to neuronal dysfunction and apoptosis [10]. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) occurs in up to 70% of all septic patients, constituting the most frequent organ dysfunction associated with sepsis and the leading cause of brain dysfunction in intensive care units (ICU) [11]. The most common symptoms associated with SAE are deliriums, seizures, and coma, related to increased mortality, morbidity, and cognitive disability [12,13]. In addition, around 25 to 50% of the survivors will experience risks of developing considerable neurocognitive impairment, such as problems with memory, concentrating, and decision-making [14]. The cerebral damage caused by sepsis may also affect one’s mental health, where the surviving patients are commonly diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression [15].
To decrease the risk of sepsis long-term sequelae, the current guidelines for sepsis management focus on early recognition and treatment. These recommendations revolve around initial fluid resuscitation of patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion and high lactate levels, enhanced screening and performance improvement, routine microbiological cultures for proper diagnosis, and a broad-spectrum therapy with one or more antimicrobials to cover all pathogens’ possibilities [1]. However, surviving patients still experience cognitive impairment and mental health issues, denoting brain impairment and evidencing the need for a more optimal approach [16]. The study of cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in physiopathological processes causing SAE will guide the new therapy advances. Herein, we focus on the protective role of microglia polarization, discussing the effects of synthetic compounds and natural PPARγ agonists and PPARγ interactions with transcription factors and intracellular signaling proteins, highlighting PPARγ as potential target for non-infectious and infectious disease adjuvant therapy. The pleiotropic effects of PPARγ agonists make them great candidates for therapy associated with antibiotics in sepsis.

2. Microglia and Their Role in the CNS

Microglia cells originate from yolk sac-derived macrophage progenitors that migrate to the brain at the early stages of embryonic development before the blood–brain barrier is formed [17]. They can self-renew and exhibit one the most extended life-spans of any myeloid cells in the body microglia represent the main defense line in the CNS, playing a pivotal role in maintaining CNS homeostasis and neurological function [18,19,20]. They can control neurogenesis by phagocytosis and elimination of dying neurons. In addition, microglia secrets soluble factors, such as the nerve growth factor (NGF) and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF), regulating neuronal apoptosis [21]. Microglia is involved in the elimination and synaptic connectivity refinement by engulfing pre and postsynaptic structures [22]. Microglia secretes neurotrophic factors, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) being the most important, with a central role in synaptic plasticity and affecting the structure and function of adjacent synapses [23].
The systemic immune activation observed during sepsis alters microglia behavior, with a pro-inflammatory profile [24]. The role of the M1 subtype, pro-inflammatory microglia, mainly revolves around the neutralization of an invading pathogen by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-2 (IL-12), nitric oxide (NO), reactive oxygen species (ROS), and superoxide [25]. Dysregulated M1 microglia response plays a significant part in SAE and sepsis-associated chronic pain [26]. Once the pro-inflammatory response is established, microglia start shifting into a more neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory phenotype. M2 microglia plays a crucial role in resolving inflammation, toxicity clearance, and preserving brain tissue [27]. These cells can be further divided into subgroups, each with its unique function in the CNS. M2a is involved in repair (mainly by removal of cell debris) and regeneration, M2b in immune regulation, and M2c in neuroprotection and the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interlukin-10 (IL-10) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) [28]. This switch between both phenotypes allows microglia to start and suppress the neuroinflammation process, protecting the brain tissue and maintaining CNS homeostasis without harming its integrity [29]. Any disturbance, such as that observed during sepsis, can lead to neuronal death and function impairment.
The neurons damaging and killing by microglia are often related to neurodegenerative diseases, with the M1 phenotype mostly viewed as detrimental. Microglia activity is heavily involved with most of CNS diseases, consequently having a substantial impact on their outcome. Microglia express a variety of cell surface receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), phagocytic receptors (CR3, CR4), and scavengers’ receptors (CD36, CD91), all upregulated when in response to injury or infections [30]. These cells respond to DAMPs from damaged, stressed, or dying cells and PAMPs, activating microglia receptors, leading to M1-related response [31]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by M1 microglia are associated with brain damage [32]. Upregulation of TNF-α secretion is linked to endothelial necroptosis and increased BBB permeability, perpetuating neuroinflammation [33]. Increased levels of TNF-α can also intensify glutamatergic cytotoxicity by stimulating microglia glutamate release and the inhibition of its transportation by astrocytes [34]. Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter, and its accumulation leads to neuronal excitotoxicity [35]. Th overexposure to IL-1β, another major pro-inflammatory cytokine, can lead to substantial neuronal damage and worsen cognitive impairment by synaptic damaging [36,37]. The IL-1β derived from microglia cells causes synaptic alterations associated with cognitive impairment in sepsis, resulting in synaptic elimination and inhibition [38]. Moreover, high IL-1β levels are linked to the decrease of working and hippocampal-dependent memory [26]. Microglia production of NO, ROS, and derived reactive species molecules has deleterious effects on neurons, primarily inducing apoptosis or aggravating excitotoxicity, resulting in neurological deficits. The inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) deficient septic mice have a cognitive impairment, suggesting its involvement in septic patients’ sequelae [39]. During sepsis, the deleterious amount of nitric oxide produced by the iNOS enzyme activity can cause microperforations in the BBB, decreasing CNS isolation by allowing the passage of plasma leakage [40]. Elevated levels of iNOS expression are also related with hypothalamic damage [41]. Thus, microglia activation has an essential role in sepsis. The exaggerated release of inflammatory mediators, NO production, oxidative stress, and glutamate secretion causes neuronal dysfunction, possibly leading to complications as SAE, long-term cognitive impairment, and sepsis-associated chronic pain [42,43] (Figure 1).
The M2 phenotype, anti-inflammatory microglia, has a potential therapeutic role in diseases caused or aggravated by neuroinflammation [44,45]. Although neuroinflammation act to remove or inhibit brain-threatening pathogens, if sustained, it can induce neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration [46]. Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the chronic and progressive death of nerve cells in the brain and the spinal cord, altering the nervous system’s ability and functionality, with activated microglia further magnifying it with the release of cytotoxic factors [47]. In Alzheimer’s disease, M2 polarization improves the phagocytic ability of microglia, contributing to the clearance of amyloid-beta (Aβ), inhibiting its accumulation, reducing toxicity, and promoting neuroprotection [48,49]. An increase in the ratio of M2 microglia cells and the subsequent inhibition of the M1 profile is a prominent therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis (MS) and autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), reducing the symptoms at the early stages of the disease, alleviating its progression [50]. The switch between microglia phenotypes is also a promising approach in treating Parkinson’s disease (PD), where it occurs progressive M1 overactivation, increasing the damage caused to the dopaminergic neurons [51]. M2 polarization is closely related to higher neuron survival rates in PD [52]. M2 microglia-derived BDNF plays an essential role in restoring the neuronal circuit after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), the most lethal stroke subtype [33,53]. The beneficial effects of targeting microglia changing phenotype can also be seen in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression and PTSD, both affected by M1/M2 imbalance, with results showing behavioral improvement due to the inhibition of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and higher presence of the M2 neuroprotective phenotype [54]. Different classes of transcription factors can tightly control microglia phenotypic diversity and function [55]. Table 1 highlights the neuroprotective role of M2 microglia.

3. PPARγ-Dependent Anti-Inflammatory and Pro-Resolutive Mechanisms

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, being one of the three isotypes of PPARs, including also PPARα and PPARβ/δ. It usually forms a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor, either stimulated or repressed by recruited ligands, later binding to PPAR-responsive regulatory elements in the genome to control gene expression [56]. PPARγ plays a critical regulatory role in adipogenesis, lipid, and glucose metabolism [57], and it is a foremost regulator of the inflammatory response, shifting the immune system towards a more resolutive state, therefore decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [58]. Many immune cells express PPARγ, including monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, T and B lymphocytes, and platelets [59]. The activation of this nuclear receptor has a significant influence under macrophage phenotype, inducing the transition of M1 to M2 macrophages, and helping to keep the balance between them [60].
Similarly, PPARγ also regulates the microglia phenotype, leading to the polarization to the M2 cells [61]. The effects observed in macrophages and microglia phenotype and metabolism may occur due to the silencing of transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), signal transducer, activator of transcription 1 (STAT-1), and activator protein-1 (AP-1) [62,63]. NF-κB plays a crucial role in stimulating inflammation, regulating innate and adaptive immune response aspects. Its activation contributes to the production of adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines, and influences dendritic cell maturation, neutrophil survivor and recruitment, macrophage activation, and T cell activation and differentiation [64]. Given its wide range of functions and impact, an imbalance in the regulation of NF-κB can lead to devastating consequences, such as neurodegenerative disorders and chronic inflammation [65].
NF-κB is composed of five subunits (RelA/p65, RelB/p68, cRel/p75, p52, and p50) that bind to promoter regions of target genes as homodimers or heterodimers. These dimers remain in the cytoplasm in their inactive forms, connected to the inhibitory protein IκB family (IκBα, β, ε, γ, and δ) until further phosphorylation, disassociation, and subsequent nuclear translocation [66,67]. The subunits p65 and p50 form the most common heterodimer, with p65 playing a central role in inflammation activation by inducing various pro-inflammatory genes [68]. The NF-κB signaling pathways associated with MAPK activation induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [69]. MAPK signaling pathways consist of a chain of proteins that transmit extracellular signals to intracellular targets through a series of activation and phosphorylation steps, essential to cellular regulation [70,71]. MAPK family (ERK, JNK, p38) is important for microglia inflammatory response [72]. The p38 MAPK signal pathways, for instance, exert a pivotal role in inflammatory and stress responses in various cell types, including microglia. Additionally, PPARγ inhibits p38 activation and p65 nuclear translocation, inhibiting NF-κB activity and preventing M1 polarization [73]. Thus, PPARγ potently suppresses NF-κB transcriptional activity, decreasing pro-inflammatory gene expression and the subsequent production of pro-inflammatory molecules, such as cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-12), chemokines (CXCL1 and CXCL10), and reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates [74,75]. Blocking ERK phosphorylation also led to the inhibition of NF-κB p65 phosphorylation and its nuclear translocation in microglia [76]. The overexpression of PPARγ inhibited the activation of both p38 and ERK, lowering M1 microglia activation, and increasing IL-10 expression, an indication of M2 presence [77]. Since NF-κB and the MAPK signal pathways are considered key effector contributors to M1 polarization, these data indicate the pivotal role that PPARγ has in M2 shifting. Additionally, PPARγ-deficient mice are incapable of M2 activation [78,79].
In sepsis, PPARγ has a pivotal role, with in vitro and in vivo showing beneficial effects in the inflammatory response control upon its activation [80]. Evidence shows that PPARγ activation decreases inflammatory and apoptotic levels, prolonging the survival rate in sepsis-induced acute lung injury [81]. PPARγ activation also attenuates liver dysfunction, one of the most vulnerable organs in sepsis, having a significant impact on the progression of the disease since liver metabolic functions are vital players in sepsis development [82]. Additionally, PPARγ diminishes sepsis-induced acute kidney injury, one of the most common complications observed during sepsis, in up to 70% of all patients [83]. PPARγ acute activation has a cardioprotective effect, downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibiting apoptosis and necroptosis, ameliorating septic cardiac dysfunction [84], one of the leading causes of death in ICUs. This protective effect in sepsis is partially due to the PPARγ effects on macrophages, increasing their phagocytic capability, improving pathogen clearance, and mediating M2 polarization and resolution of inflammation [19,85,86,87].
Treatment with PPARγ agonists attenuates the inflammatory response, promoting a neuroprotective effect, reducing the injuries caused by neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in the brain [20,88,89]. The synthetic PPARγ agonists, known as a thiazolidinedione (TZD) or glitazones, are a class of antidiabetic drugs widely used experimentally as anti-inflammatory drugs due to their effects on cell proliferation, metabolism, and immune response [90,91].
Treatment with pioglitazone, a potent TZD PPARγ activator, reduced NF-κB activity and microglia M1-like behavior, protecting against dopaminergic neuron loss, thus attenuating motor dysfunction in a rat model of PD [92]. In combination with fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, pioglitazone’s administration may exhibit a synergistic effect, contributing to ameliorating memory and cognitive impairment and reducing neuronal loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [93]. Pioglitazone can also relieve depressive-like behavior in mice through PPARγ activation and the subsequent alteration in microglia phenotype, restoring the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines [94]. A widely used PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone exhibits a protective effect over the blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity by downregulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, mediators closely linked to the increase of BBB permeability [95]. The presence of the blood–neural barriers represents a challenge in drug delivery, significantly reducing their bioavailability in the CNS region [96]. The diffusion of lipid insoluble or larger than 4000 Da hydrophilic molecules is very limited through the BBB [97]. A few strategies minimize that problem using solid lipid nanoparticles (NPs), gold NPs, and polymeric NPs being the most prominent ones, successfully reducing adverse side effects, increasing drug concentration at the site of action, and consequently, improving the therapeutic response [97,98]. Nano-formulated rosiglitazone, for instance, has a neuroprotective effect lowering the levels of TNF-α and IL-6, upper regulating important neurogenesis growth factors, such as BNDF, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), and NGF, also improving memory and learning functions in a mice model of Alzheimer’s disease [98]. Table 1 exemplifies the PPARγ-dependent role of M2 microglia neuroprotective effects.
PPARγ-induced neuroprotective effects result from both anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [99]. PPARγ plays a significant role as an anti-oxidant by means of a crosstalk with the transcription factor NF-E2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a well-known key down-regulator of the oxidative stress and inflammation as Nrf2 upregulates the expression of almost 200 cytoprotective genes. This gene expression leads to the production of many stress-responsive proteins, including glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase (SOD), and protect the cells from oxidative and inflammatory stress. Nrf2 activating compounds modulates sepsis, being proposed as adjunct treatment as well [100,101,102].
PPARγ activation improves mitochondrial function in glial cells in neurological disease, activity which is relevant to SAE as well. TZDs improve mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and biogenesis in CNS. TZDs increased glucose utilization, lactate production, and mitochondrial membrane potential. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone prevented the death of the neuroblastoma derived cell line SH-SY5Y cells because of mitochondrial biogenesis. These findings showed that PPARγ agonists are neuroprotective, increasing the neuronal survival by mitochondrial function improvement [103].
We must mention that TZD chronic use may cause side effects, such as bone loss, weight gain, and fluid retention, a concern in congestive heart failure, increased risk of myocardial infarction, and renal failure. More than 500 trials are in progress with the safest TZD in terms of side effects pioglitazone worldwide. Preliminary data showed pioglitazone is fairly secure for clinical use [90].
In addition to the synthetic compounds, natural PPARγ agonists represent a valid and promising option to regulate inflammation [104]. Natural products have made a real contribution to the history of pharmacotherapy, functioning as a reliable and diverse source of potential new drugs, especially in oncology and inflammation [105]. They act through numerous effective mechanisms, exhibiting anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, and nervous system protection and repairing [105]. Phytocannabinoid derivatives can function as PPARγ agonists, exerting anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. Treatment with VCE-003.2, a cannabigerol derivative, reduced microglia reactivity in the substantia nigra, lowering the expression of pro-inflammatory markers, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and iNOS, in a mice model of PD [106]. Curcumin, another natural compound that works as a PPARγ agonist, successfully promoted myelin formation, oligodendrocyte differentiation, and maturation, protecting these cells from inflammatory damage [107]. Curcumin-loaded nanoparticles possess higher bioavailability compared to free curcumin, and its administration reduced microglia and astrocyte activation and improved myelin repair, decreasing the extension of affected areas in a rat demyelination model [108]. Ursolic acid (UA), an herbal medicine with a wide range of pharmacological usage, has also been shown to act as a PPARγ agonist in the CNS. UA through PPARγ activation, induced the synthesis of the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) by astrocytes, which is involved in the differentiation and activation of these cells. UA also promoted neural repair by regulating oligodendrocyte progenitor cells differentiation, elevating remyelination, showing promising therapeutic potential in treating the chronic phase of MS [109]. Omega-9 is a PPARγ ligand, having a beneficial role in sepsis, helping to decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines and ROS production, and enhancing M2 macrophage polarization and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretion [110]. Our group showed that the pre-treatment with omega-9 prevented organ dysfunction and increased survival during experimental sepsis [111]. Furthermore, we showed that omega-9 improved bacterial clearance, possibly involving PPARγ, which contributed to a better sepsis outcome [112].

4. Critical View of the Actual Scenario

M1 and M2 differentiation are not as dichotomous as previously thought by the scientific community. Instead, microglia phenotype changes show a broader and continuous spectrum. The literature already presents evidence that these cells exert different functions in the CNS compared to macrophages differentiated from monocytes that infiltrate the region from the peripheral circulation. Studies suggest that those cells have distinct actions and exert microenvironment-dependent synergistic activity, increasing their spectrum of activities. Cytokines produced by microglia when activated for a pro-inflammatory profile are directly related to neuronal damage and the consequent cognitive sequelae observed in patients. The cognitive damage observed in septic survivors is a consequence of microglial overactivity. The secretion of cytokines and chemokines by glial cells causes an imbalance in neuronal homeostasis [80]. There is a strict correlation between the microglia M1 response and the process of neuroinflammation and neural damage, especially in neurodegenerative diseases. The currently available treatments still do not present satisfactory results, often only mitigating symptoms. The discussion about the neuroprotective role of the microglial M2 proves the importance of reestablishing the microglial physiological functions. There is an evident gap in developing new drugs and targets for patients with diseases that affect the CNS. Previous studies focused primarily on the neuron as the target for the action of new treatments [71]. Nowadays, microglia has been pointed out as having a protagonist role in CNS hemostasis control. Understanding the processes that lead to microglia’s activation and transition within a broad spectrum of phenotypic profiles will allow the discovery of new cellular and molecular targets and the proposal of more potent therapeutic strategies [10,20,21,23,25].
Microglia depletion experiments have revealed that there is microglial repopulation as a result. In the genetic microglial depletion model (Cx3cr1CreER/Csf1rflx/flx), microglia depletion occurs in a temporally controlled manner by tamoxifen injection intraperitoneally (acute model) or orally (chronic model). There was a clear microglial repopulation, showing that a microglial replacement with rapid microglial self-renewal occurred [113]. Microglial depletion in the nigrostriatal pathway of mice downregulated pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory gene expression in the PD model, showing microglial repopulation caused neuroprotection in PD mice [114]. Th microglia that repopulates can restore microglial homeostatic functions after microglial depletion, which is a new proposal of therapeutic strategy for AD as well [115,116].
The effects of sepsis on the nervous system are well known and currently represent a challenge for physicians. Although exacerbated dysregulated inflammatory response causes neuronal damage due to the neuroinflammation process, a few studies focus on microglia as a possible therapeutic target for sepsis resolution and better outcomes [38,39]. Sepsis causes increased susceptibility to Aβ oligomers, as it occurs in AD. Microglia from septic mice shift morphology to amoeboid/phagocytic when exposed to low amounts of AβO, and increase of pro-inflammatory proteins. Microglial depletion with either minocycline or colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor (PLX3397), impaired cognitive dysfunction induced by AβO during experimental sepsis [117]. However, the microglial phenotype after those depletion experiments remains unknown. We have highlighted the importance of microglia and its potential for developing new treatments, thus promoting new studies that increasingly elucidate their role in the pathophysiology of sepsis. The neuroprotective role of M2 microglia in studies involving neurodegenerative diseases and pathophysiological changes that generate brain damage as a consequence can be implied in sepsis in further studies.
Microglia crosstalk with astrocytes contributes to CNS homeostasis. Astrocytes act in the brain during sepsis, controlling with the microglia, the severity of SAE and cognitive impairment. Modulating astrocyte activity and the crosstalk with microglia towards M2 may help in neuroinflammation management and block brain dysfunction [118]. The cognitive impairment and brain dysfunction associated with SAE directly correlate with higher mortality rates, and most of the reports indicate the crucial role that neuroinflammation characterized by the inflammatory cytokine storm plays in pathophysiology. Microglial activation is an important cellular target of SAE, and inhibition of microglia response has improved long-term cognitive behavior, reducing exaggerated neuroinflammation in mice undergoing experimental sepsis [79,84]. As there are no specific treatments for SAE, modulation of microglial phenotypes may be a prominent therapeutic strategy.
Our review suggests PPARγ as a molecular target for studies involving the effects of sepsis in the SNC, based on its anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and pro-resolutive properties, which are already well established in the literature for many diseases. PPARγ agents are better than the conventional treatment for SAE, that includes fluid, and non-pharmacological approaches [39]. The broad spectrum of PPARγ agent activities reestablishing homeostasis in various mechanisms show its superiority over the commonly clinically used therapy of SAE. So far, there is no specific treatment for SAE [39].
We pointed out the PPARγ role on microglial polarization, thus highlighting its neuroprotective properties. Th importance of the PPARγ activation and its therapeutic potential in several neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders has already been demonstrated, as PPARγ’s role in mitigating the neuroinflammatory process. PPARγ inhibition of the oxidative stress, inflammatory response, and prompting of resolutive processes reduces the M1 microglia and increases the M2 microglia in the CNS. PPARγ activation restores the balance between microglial phenotypes, which is essential for the reestablishment of homeostasis and the reduction of symptoms observed in these patients. Once again, although there are already studies on PPARγ activation in sepsis, including our own articles [119,120], little is known about PPARγ in microglia during infection, especially when trying to mitigate SAE. Furthermore, PPARγ activation may reduce neuronal death, thus improving the life quality of patients who recovered from sepsis, who often live with sequelae for long periods.
The activation of PPARγ and the consequent inactivation of intracellular signaling proteins and transcription factors, such as MAPK and NF-kB, can attenuate inflammatory processes. As we recall, both MAPK (ERK and p38) and NF-kB are essential for initiating and maintaining the inflammatory process, playing a fundamental role in the differentiation of microglia into the M1 phenotype. The MAPK signaling pathway is involved in the inflammatory process through the activation of transcription factors and the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, resulting in increased production of cytokines, such as TNFα and IL-6. Conversely, the inhibition of ERK or p38 proteins, and the transcriptional activity of NF-kB results in a reduced presence of M1 microglia, thus reducing the impact of its activity on nervous tissue [34,73].
Elucidation of molecular mechanisms by which PPARγ acts in the phenotypic change of microglia, while highlighting its importance in the control and resolution of the inflammatory process, thus increases the demand for studies that analyze the fundamental mechanisms that these cells use in response to the infectious agent. In addition to fundamental knowledge of interplay among intracellular players, it is urgent to develop new therapeutic adjuvant strategies as new drugs that affect those molecular pathways or even drug repositioning, expanding the possibilities for EAS treatment.

5. Final Remarks

The cognitive impairment and diffuse cerebral dysfunction associated with SAE directly correlate with higher mortality rates, with most of the reports indicating the crucial role that oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and inflammatory cytokine release have in the pathophysiology. Microglia activation is an essential cellular component of SAE, and its inhibition improved long-term cognitive behavior, reducing exaggerated neuroinflammation in CLP mice. There are no specific treatments for SAE; therefore, the modulation of microglial phenotypes could be a prominent therapeutic strategy. PPARγ anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and pro-resolutive properties are well established. PPARγ agonists may be considered potential candidates for drug repurposing, potent drugs for the adjuvant treatment of SAE in association with antibiotics. PPARγ effects on microglia polarization highlights its neuroprotective properties and PPARγ therapeutic potential in treating several neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders, thus, showcasing the PPARγ role in mitigating degenerative sterile and infectious disease processes in the brain and peripheral systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation and editing, funding acquisition—L.V.G.C., C.F.G.-d.-A. and A.R.S.; review—A.R.S. and C.F.G.-d.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) Grant 001, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the comments and suggestions of Aline A.S. Rabello, Pedro M.P. Coelho, and Rudimar Frozza that improved the quality of our article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Rhodes, A.; Evans, L.E.; Alhazzani, W.; Levy, M.M.; Antonelli, M.; Ferrer, R.; Kumar, A.; Sevransky, J.E.; Sprung, C.L.; Nunnally, M.E.; et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 304–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tay, M.Z.; Poh, C.M.; Rénia, L.; Macary, P.A.; Ng, L.F.P. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gyawali, B.; Ramakrishna, K.; Dhamoon, A.S. Sepsis: The evolution in definition, pathophysiology, and management. SAGE Open Med. 2019, 7, 205031211983504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jarczak, D.; Kluge, S.; Nierhaus, A. Sepsis—Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Concepts. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calsavara, A.J.C.; Costa, P.A.; Nobre, V.; Teixeira, A.L. Factors Associated with Short and Long Term Cognitive Changes in Patients with Sepsis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rudd, K.E.; Johnson, S.C.; Agesa, K.M.; Shackelford, K.A.; Tsoi, D.; Kievlan, D.R.; Colombara, D.V.; Ikuta, K.S.; Kissoon, N.; Finfer, S.; et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020, 395, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gu, X.; Zhou, F.; Wang, Y.; Fan, G.; Cao, B. Respiratory viral sepsis: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 200038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meneses, G.; Cárdenas, G.; Espinosa, A.; Rassy, D.; Pérez-Osorio, I.N.; Bárcena, B.; Fleury, A.; Besedovsky, H.; Fragoso, G.; Sciutto, E. Sepsis: Developing new alternatives to reduce neuroinflammation and attenuate brain injury. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1437, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, C.; Yao, R.-Q.; Zhang, H.; Feng, Y.-W.; Yao, Y.-M. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: A vicious cycle of immunosuppression. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arcuri, C.; Mecca, C.; Bianchi, R.; Giambanco, I.; Donato, R. The Pathophysiological Role of Microglia in Dynamic Surveillance, Phagocytosis and Structural Remodeling of the Developing CNS. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Czempik, P.F.; Pluta, M.P.; Krzych, Ł.J. Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Adam, N.; Kandelman, S.; Mantz, J.; Chrétien, F.; Sharshar, T. Sepsis-induced brain dysfunction. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Caraballo, C.; Jaimes, F. Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis: An Ominous Trajectory from Infection to Death. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2019, 92, 629–640. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mostel, Z.; Perl, A.; Marck, M.; Mehdi, S.F.; Lowell, B.; Bathija, S.; Santosh, R.; Pavlov, V.A.; Chavan, S.S.; Roth, J. Post-sepsis syndrome—An evolving entity that afflicts survivors of sepsis. Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. van der Slikke, E.C.; An, A.Y.; Hancock, R.E.; Bouma, H.R. Exploring the pathophysiology of post-sepsis syndrome to identify therapeutic opportunities. EBioMedicine 2020, 61, 103044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prescott, H.; Angus, D.C. Enhancing Recovery from Sepsis: A Review. JAMA 2018, 319, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ginhoux, F.; Garel, S. The mysterious origins of microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 897–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bennett, M.L.; Bennett, F. The influence of environment and origin on brain resident macrophages and implications for therapy. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peng, J.; Wang, K.; Xiang, W.; Li, Y.; Hao, Y.; Guan, Y. Rosiglitazone polarizes microglia and protects against pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 25, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wen, L.; You, W.; Wang, H.; Meng, Y.; Feng, J.; Yang, X. Polarization of Microglia to the M2 Phenotype in a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma–Dependent Manner Attenuates Axonal Injury Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice. J. Neurotrauma 2018, 35, 2330–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gogoleva, V.S.; Drutskaya, M.S.; Atretkhany, K.S.-N. The Role of Microglia in the Homeostasis of the Central Nervous System and Neuroinflammation. Mol. Biol. 2019, 53, 696–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hong, S.; Dissing-Olesen, L.; Stevens, B. New insights on the role of microglia in synaptic pruning in health and disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2016, 36, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bar, E.; Barak, B. Microglia roles in synaptic plasticity and myelination in homeostatic conditions and neurodevelopmental disorders. Glia 2019, 67, 2125–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zrzavy, T.; Höftberger, R.; Berger, T.; Rauschka, H.; Butovsky, O.; Weiner, H.; Lassmann, H. Pro-inflammatory activation of microglia in the brain of patients with sepsis. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2019, 45, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tang, Y.; Le, W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1181–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Yin, L.; Fan, Z.; Su, B.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Hou, W.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, X. Microglia: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy and Sepsis-Associated Chronic Pain. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 600421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Xing, H.; Wan, L.; Jiang, X.; Wang, C.; Wu, Y. Treatment targets for M2 microglia polarization in ischemic stroke. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 105, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; You, Z. Switching of the Microglial Activation Phenotype Is a Possible Treatment for Depression Disorder. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haruwaka, K.; Ikegami, A.; Tachibana, Y.; Ohno, N.; Konishi, H.; Hashimoto, A.; Matsumoto, M.; Kato, D.; Ono, R.; Kiyama, H.; et al. Dual microglia effects on blood brain barrier permeability induced by systemic inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bachiller, S.; Jiménez-Ferrer, I.; Paulus, A.; Yang, Y.; Swanberg, M.; Deierborg, T.; Boza-Serrano, A. Microglia in Neurological Diseases: A Road Map to Brain-Disease Dependent-Inflammatory Response. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gomes-Leal, W. Why microglia kill neurons after neural disorders? The friendly fire hypothesis. Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 1499–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Honjoh, K.; Nakajima, H.; Hirai, T.; Watanabe, S.; Matsumine, A. Relationship of Inflammatory Cytokines from M1-Type Microglia/Macrophages at the Injured Site and Lumbar Enlargement with Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury in the CCL21 Knockout (plt) Mouse. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lan, X.; Han, X.; Li, Q.; Yang, Q.-W.; Wang, J. Modulators of microglial activation and polarization after intracerebral haemorrhage. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 420–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Brás, J.P.; Bravo, J.; Freitas, J.; Barbosa, M.A.; Santos, S.G.; Summavielle, T.; Almeida, M.I. TNF-alpha-induced microglia activation requires miR-342: Impact on NF-kB signaling and neurotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Belov Kirdajova, D.; Kriska, J.; Tureckova, J.; Anderova, M. Ischemia-Triggered Glutamate Excitotoxicity from the Perspective of Glial Cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mendiola, A.; Cardona, A.E. The IL-1β phenomena in neuroinflammatory diseases. J. Neural Transm. 2017, 125, 781–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, C.T.; Wu, W.F.; Deng, Y.H.; Ge, J.W. Modulators of microglia activation and polarization in ischemic stroke (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 2006–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Moraes, C.A.; Santos, G.; Spohr, T.C.L.D.S.E.; D’Avila, J.; Lima, F.R.S.; Benjamim, C.; Bozza, F.A.; Gomes, F.C.A. Activated Microglia-Induced Deficits in Excitatory Synapses Through IL-1β: Implications for Cognitive Impairment in Sepsis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 52, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moraes, C.; Zaverucha-Do-Valle, C.; Fleurance, R.; Sharshar, T.; Bozza, F.; D’Avila, J. Neuroinflammation in Sepsis: Molecular Pathways of Microglia Activation. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Webber, R.J.; Sweet, R.M.; Webber, D.S. Circulating Microvesicle-Associated Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Is a Novel Therapeutic Target to Treat Sepsis: Current Status and Future Considerations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Michels, M.; Steckert, A.V.; Quevedo, J.; Barichello, T.; Dal-Pizzol, F. Mechanisms of long-term cognitive dysfunction of sepsis: From blood-borne leukocytes to glial cells. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2015, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ye, B.; Tao, T.; Zhao, A.; Wen, L.; He, X.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Q.; Mi, W.; Lou, J. Blockade of IL-17A/IL-17R Pathway Protected Mice from Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy by Inhibition of Microglia Activation. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 8461725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kobashi, S.; Terashima, T.; Katagi, M.; Nakae, Y.; Okano, J.; Suzuki, Y.; Urushitani, M.; Kojima, H. Transplantation of M2-Deviated Microglia Promotes Recovery of Motor Function after Spinal Cord Injury in Mice. Mol. Ther. 2020, 28, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.-H. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: The roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qin, X.; Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Liu, D.; Wang, R.; Xu, J.; Jiang, H.; Pan, F. PPARγ-mediated microglial activation phenotype is involved in depressive-like behaviors and neuroinflammation in stressed C57BL/6J and ob/ob mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020, 117, 104674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Subhramanyam, C.S.; Wang, C.; Hu, Q.; Dheen, S.T. Microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 94, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ren, C.; Li, D.; Zhou, Q.; Hu, X. Mitochondria-targeted TPP-MoS2 with dual enzyme activity provides efficient neuroprotection through M1/M2 microglial polarization in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Biomaterials 2020, 232, 119752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xie, Z.; Zhao, J.; Wang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Fu, Y.; Zeng, H.; Hölscher, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z. Magnolol alleviates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in transgenic C. elegans by promoting microglia phagocytosis and the degradation of beta-amyloid through activation of PPAR-γ. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 124, 109886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chu, F.; Shi, M.; Zheng, C.; Shen, D.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, X.; Cui, L. The roles of macrophages and microglia in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2018, 318, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Feng, S.; Nie, K.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Gan, R.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.; et al. TREM2 modulates microglia phenotypes in the neuroinflammation of Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 499, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bok, E.; Chung, Y.C.; Kim, K.-S.; Baik, H.H.; Shin, W.-H.; Jin, B.K. Modulation of M1/M2 polarization by capsaicin contributes to the survival of dopaminergic neurons in the lipopolysaccharide-lesioned substantia nigra in vivo. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Miao, H.; Li, R.; Han, C.; Lu, X.; Zhang, H. Minocycline promotes posthemorrhagic neurogenesis via M2 microglia polarization via upregulation of the TrkB/BDNF pathway in rats. J. Neurophysiol. 2018, 120, 1307–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tufano, M.; Pinna, G. Is There a Future for PPARs in the Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders? Molecules 2020, 25, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Holtman, I.R.; Skola, D.; Glass, C.K. Transcriptional control of microglia phenotypes in health and disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3220–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Huang, S.; Zhu, B.; Cheon, I.S.; Goplen, N.P.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, R.; Peebles, R.S.; Mack, M.; Kaplan, M.H.; Limper, A.H.; et al. PPAR-γ in Macrophages Limits Pulmonary Inflammation and Promotes Host Recovery following Respiratory Viral Infection. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00030-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ciavarella, C.; Motta, I.; Valente, S.; Pasquinelli, G. Pharmacological (or Synthetic) and Nutritional Agonists of PPAR-γ as Candidates for Cytokine Storm Modulation in COVID-19 Disease. Molecules 2020, 25, 2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Souza, C.O.; Teixeira, A.A.; Biondo, L.A.; Silveira, L.S.; Breda, C.N.D.S.; Braga, T.T.; Camara, N.O.; Belchior, T.; Festuccia, W.; Diniz, T.A.; et al. Palmitoleic acid reduces high fat diet-induced liver inflammation by promoting PPAR-γ-independent M2a polarization of myeloid cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Abdalla, H.B.; Napimoga, M.H.; Lopes, A.H.; de Macedo Maganin, A.G.; Cunha, T.M.; Van Dyke, T.E.; Napimoga, J.T.C. Activation of PPAR-γ induces macrophage polarization and reduces neutrophil migration mediated by heme oxygenase. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 84, 106565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, D.; Ji, L.; Chen, Y. TSPO Modulates IL-4-Induced Microglia/Macrophage M2 Polarization via PPAR-γ Pathway. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 70, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, H.; Jiang, T.; Li, M.-Q.; Zheng, X.-L.; Zhao, G.-J. Transcriptional Regulation of Macrophages Polarization by MicroRNAs. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, J.; Yi, S.; Xiao, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, C.; Jiang, W.; Yang, C.; Zhou, T. Asperosaponin VI inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory response by activating PPAR-γ pathway in primary microglia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3138–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Baidoo, J.; Mukherjee, S.; Kashfi, K.; Banerjee, P. A New Perspective on Cancer Therapy: Changing the Treaded Path? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mitchell, J.P.; Carmody, R.J. NF-κB and the Transcriptional Control of Inflammation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 335, 41–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mu, P.-W.; Jiang, P.; Wang, M.-M.; Chen, Y.-M.; Zheng, S.-H.; Tan, Z.; Jiang, W.; Zeng, L.-Y.; Wang, T.-H. Oestrogen exerts anti-inflammation via p38 MAPK/NF-κB cascade in adipocytes. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2016, 10, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Giridharan, S.; Srinivasan, M. Mechanisms of NF-κB p65 and strategies for therapeutic manipulation. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018, 11, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Giuliani, C.; Bucci, I.; Napolitano, G. The Role of the Transcription Factor Nuclear Factor-kappa B in Thyroid Autoimmunity and Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Li, L.; Chen, J.; Lin, L.; Pan, G.; Zhang, S.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Xuan, Y.; Wang, Y.; You, Z. Quzhou Fructus Aurantii Extract suppresses inflammation via regulation of MAPK, NF-κB, and AMPK signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Guo, Y.J.; Pan, W.W.; Liu, S.B.; Shen, Z.F.; Xu, Y.; Hu, L.L. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway and tumorigenesis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 19, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhou, H.; Simion, V.; Pierce, J.B.; Haemmig, S.; Chen, A.F.; Feinberg, M.W. LncRNA-MAP3K4 regulates vascular inflammation through the p38 MAPK signaling pathway and cis-modulation of MAP3K. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dong, P.; Ji, X.; Han, W.; Han, H. Oxymatrine exhibits anti-neuroinflammatory effects on Aβ1–42-induced primary microglia cells by inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 74, 105686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yang, Z.; Liu, B.; Yang, L.-E.; Zhang, C. Platycodigenin as Potential Drug Candidate for Alzheimer’s Disease via Modulating Microglial Polarization and Neurite Regeneration. Molecules 2019, 24, 3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Keledjian, K.; Tsymbalyuk, O.; Semick, S.; Moyer, M.; Negoita, S.; Kim, K.; Ivanova, S.; Gerzanich, V.; Simard, J.M. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, rosiglitazone, ameliorates neurofunctional and neuroinflammatory abnormalities in a rat model of Gulf War Illness. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zusso, M.; Lunardi, V.; Franceschini, D.; Pagetta, A.; Lo, R.; Stifani, S.; Frigo, A.C.; Giusti, P.; Moro, S. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin attenuate microglia inflammatory response via TLR4/NF-kB pathway. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Xu, P.; Huang, M.-W.; Xiao, C.-X.; Long, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.-Y.; Jia, W.-W.; Wu, W.-J.; Yang, D.; Hu, J.-F.; et al. Matairesinol Suppresses Neuroinflammation and Migration Associated with Src and ERK1/2-NF-κB Pathway in Activating BV2 Microglia. Neurochem. Res. 2017, 42, 2850–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, X.; Guo, Q.; Ye, Z.; Wang, E.; Zou, W.; Sun, Z.; He, Z.; Zhong, T.; Weng, Y.; Pan, Y. PPAR γ Prevents Neuropathic Pain by Down-Regulating CX3CR1 and Attenuating M1 Activation of Microglia in the Spinal Cord of Rats Using a Sciatic Chronic Constriction Injury Model. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tian, Y.; Yang, C.; Yao, Q.; Qian, L.; Liu, J.; Xie, X.; Ma, W.; Nie, X.; Lai, B.; Xiao, L.; et al. Procyanidin B2 Activates PPARγ to Induce M2 Polarization in Mouse Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Orekhov, A.N.; Orekhova, V.A.; Nikiforov, N.G.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Grechko, A.V.; Romanenko, E.B.; Zhang, N.; Chistiakov, D.A. Monocyte differentiation and macrophage polarization. Vessel Plus 2019, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lu, H.; Wen, D.; Sun, J.; Zeng, L.; Du, J.; Du, D.; Zhang, L.; Deng, J.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, A. Enhancer polymorphism rs10865710 associated with traumatic sepsis is a regulator of PPARG gene expression. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Xia, H.; Ge, Y.; Wang, F.; Ming, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, J.; Sun, S.; Huang, S.; Chen, M.; Xiao, W.; et al. Protectin DX ameliorates inflammation in sepsis-induced acute lung injury through mediating PPARγ/NF-κB pathway. Immunol. Res. 2020, 68, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Z.; Jia, Y.; Feng, Y.; Cui, R.; Wang, Z.; Qu, K.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J. Methane-Rich Saline Protects Against Sepsis-Induced Liver Damage by Regulating the PPAR-γ/NF-κB Signaling Pathway. Shock 2019, 52, e163–e172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, J.; Zhao, N.; Shi, G.; Wang, H. Geniposide ameliorated sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by activating PPARγ. Aging 2020, 12, 22744–22758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parikh, S.M. Metabolic Stress Resistance in Acute Kidney Injury: Evidence for a PPAR-Gamma-Coactivator-1 Alpha-Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Pathway. Nephron 2019, 143, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Peng, S.; Xu, J.; Ruan, W.; Li, S.; Xiao, F. PPAR-γ Activation Prevents Septic Cardiac Dysfunction via Inhibition of Apoptosis and Necroptosis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 8326749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Xia, H.; Chen, L.; Liu, H.; Sun, Z.; Yang, W.; Yang, Y.; Cui, S.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Song, L.; et al. Protectin DX increases survival in a mouse model of sepsis by ameliorating inflammation and modulating macrophage phenotype. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Ruan, W.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, S.; Pang, T.; Jia, A.-Q. Smiglaside A ameliorates LPS-induced acute lung injury by modulating macrophage polarization via AMPK-PPARγ pathway. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 156, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gong, W.; Zhu, H.; Lu, L.; Hou, Y.; Dou, H. A Benzenediamine Analog FC-99 Drives M2 Macrophage Polarization and Alleviates Lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) Induced Liver Injury. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 7823069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Sagheddu, C.; Melis, M.; Muntoni, A.L.; Pistis, M. Repurposing Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Agonists in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Layrolle, P.; Payoux, P.; Chavanas, S. PPAR Gamma and Viral Infections of the Brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Carvalho, M.; Gonçalves-De-Albuquerque, C.; Silva, A. PPAR Gamma: From Definition to Molecular Targets and Therapy of Lung Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Montaigne, D.; Butruille, L.; Staels, B. PPAR control of metabolism and cardiovascular functions. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 809–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Machado, M.M.F.; Bassani, T.B.; Cóppola-Segovia, V.; Moura, E.L.R.; Zanatta, S.M.; Andreatini, R.; Vital, M.A.B.F. PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone reduces microglial proliferation and NF-κB activation in the substantia nigra in the 6-hydroxydopamine model of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacol. Rep. 2018, 71, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Assaf, N.; El-Shamarka, M.E.; Salem, N.A.; Khadrawy, Y.A.; El Sayed, N.S. Neuroprotective effect of PPAR alpha and gamma agonists in a mouse model of amyloidogenesis through modulation of the Wnt/beta catenin pathway via targeting alpha- and beta-secretases. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 97, 109793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, Y.; Wei, X.; Song, J.; Zhang, M.; Huang, T.; Qin, J. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Agonist Rosiglitazone Protects Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity Following Diffuse Axonal Injury by Decreasing the Levels of Inflammatory Mediators Through a Caveolin-1-Dependent Pathway. Inflammation 2018, 42, 841–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, M.; Hu, M.; Montera, M.A.; Westlund, K.N. Sustained relief of trigeminal neuropathic pain by a blood–brain barrier penetrable PPAR gamma agonist. Mol. Pain 2019, 15, 1744806919884498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Silva-Abreu, M.; Calpena, A.C.; Andrés-Benito, P.; Aso, E.; Romero, I.A.; Roig-Carles, D.; Gromnicova, R.; Espina, M.; Ferrer, I.; García, M.L.; et al. PPARγ agonist-loaded PLGA-PEG nanocarriers as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease: In vitro and in vivo studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5577–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Pinheiro, R.G.R.; Coutinho, A.J.; Pinheiro, M.; Neves, A.R. Nanoparticles for Targeted Brain Drug Delivery: What Do We Know? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sarathlal, K.C.; Kakoty, V.; Marathe, S.; Chitkara, D.; Taliyan, R. Exploring the Neuroprotective Potential of Rosiglitazone Embedded Nanocarrier System on Streptozotocin Induced Mice Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2021, 39, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rzemieniec, J.; Castiglioni, L.; Gelosa, P.; Muluhie, M.; Mercuriali, B.; Sironi, L. Nuclear Receptors in Myocardial and Cerebral Ischemia-Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gunne, S.; Heinicke, U.; Parnham, M.J.; Laux, V.; Zacharowski, K.; Von Knethen, A. Nrf2—A Molecular Target for Sepsis Patients in Critical Care. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dovinova, I.; Kvandová, M.; Balis, P.; Gresova, L.; Majzunova, M.; Horakova, L.; Chan, J.Y.; Barancik, M. The role of Nrf2 and PPARgamma in the improvement of oxidative stress in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Physiol. Res. 2020, 69 (Suppl. 4), S541–S553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jayaram, S.; Krishnamurthy, P.T. Role of microgliosis, oxidative stress and associated neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: The therapeutic role of Nrf2 activators. Neurochem. Int. 2021, 145, 105014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Corona, J.C.; Duchen, M.R. PPARγ as a therapeutic target to rescue mitochondrial function in neurological disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 100, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Atanasov, A.G.; Zotchev, S.B.; Dirsch, V.M.; Orhan, I.E.; Banach, M.; Rollinger, J.M.; Barreca, D.; Weckwerth, W.; Bauer, R.; Bayer, E.A.; et al. Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yu, S.; Liu, M.; Hu, K. Natural products: Potential therapeutic agents in multiple sclerosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 67, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Garcia, C.; Gómez-Cañas, M.; Burgaz, S.; Palomares, B.; Gómez-Gálvez, Y.; Palomo-Garo, C.; Campo, S.; Ferrer-Hernández, J.; Pavicic, C.; Navarrete, C.; et al. Benefits of VCE-003.2, a cannabigerol quinone derivative, against inflammation-driven neuronal deterioration in experimental Parkinson’s disease: Possible involvement of different binding sites at the PPARγ receptor. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Bernardo, A.; Plumitallo, C.; De Nuccio, C.; Visentin, S.; Minghetti, L. Curcumin promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation and their protection against TNF-α through the activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-γ. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Naeimi, R.; Safarpour, F.; Hashemian, M.; Tashakorian, H.; Ahmadian, S.R.; Ashrafpour, M.; Ghasemi-Kasman, M. Curcumin-loaded nanoparticles ameliorate glial activation and improve myelin repair in lyolecithin-induced focal demyelination model of rat corpus callosum. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 674, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Ciric, B.; Curtis, M.T.; Chen, W.-J.; Rostami, A.; Zhang, G.-X. A dual Effect of Ursolic Acid to the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis through Both Immunomodulation and Direct Remyelination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 9082–9093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Silva, A.R.; Moraes, B.P.T.; Gonçalves-De-Albuquerque, C.F. Mediterranean Diet: Lipids, Inflammation, and Malaria Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gonçalves-De-Albuquerque, C.F.; Medeiros-De-Moraes, I.M.; Oliveira, F.M.D.J.; Burth, P.; Bozza, P.; Faria, M.V.C.; Silva, A.R.; De Castro-Faria-Neto, H.C. Omega-9 Oleic Acid Induces Fatty Acid Oxidation and Decreases Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Experimental Sepsis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Medeiros-De-Moraes, I.M.; Gonçalves-De-Albuquerque, C.F.; Kurz, A.R.M.; de Jesus Oliveira, F.M.; De Abreu, V.H.P.; Torres, R.C.; Carvalho, V.F.; Estato, V.; Bozza, P.; Sperandio, M.; et al. Omega-9 Oleic Acid, the Main Compound of Olive Oil, Mitigates Inflammation during Experimental Sepsis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 6053492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Romero-Molina, C.; Navarro, V.; Jimenez, S.; Muñoz-Castro, C.; Sanchez-Mico, M.V.; Gutierrez, A.; Vitorica, J.; Vizuete, M. Should We Open Fire on Microglia? Depletion Models as Tools to Elucidate Microglial Role in Health and Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, Q.; Shen, C.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Yu, M.; Ci, L.; et al. Partial depletion and repopulation of microglia have different effects in the acute MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Prolif. 2021, 54, e13094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chen, Y.; Hong, T.; Chen, F.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, L. Interplay Between Microglia and Alzheimer’s Disease—Focus on the Most Relevant Risks: APOE Genotype, Sex and Age. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 631827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. De Sousa, V.L.; Araújo, S.B.; Antonio, L.M.; Silva-Queiroz, M.; Colodeti, L.C.; Soares, C.; Barros-Aragão, F.; Mota-Araujo, H.P.; Alves, V.S.; Coutinho-Silva, R.; et al. Innate immune memory mediates increased susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in sepsis surviving mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 95, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Cudaback, E.; Graykowski, D. Don’t know what you got till it’s gone: Microglial depletion and neurodegeneration. Neural Regen. Res. 2021, 16, 1921–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shulyatnikova, T.; Verkhratsky, A. Astroglia in Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Araújo, C.; Estato, V.; Tibiriçá, E.; Bozza, P.; Castro-Faria-Neto, H.; Silva, A. PPAR gamma activation protects the brain against microvascular dysfunction in sepsis. Microvasc. Res. 2012, 84, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Araújo, C.V.; Campbell, C.; Gonçalves-De-Albuquerque, C.F.; Molinaro, R.; Cody, M.J.; Yost, C.C.; Bozza, P.; Zimmerman, G.A.; Weyrich, A.; Castro-Faria-Neto, H.C.; et al. A PPARγ agonist enhances bacterial clearance through neutrophil extracellular trap formation and improves survival in sepsis. Shock 2016, 45, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of microglia activation and its role in the damaging of neurons during sepsis. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Simplified scheme of microglia activation and its role in the damaging of neurons during sepsis. Created with BioRender.com.
Ijms 23 04925 g001
Table 1. The neuroprotective role of M2 microglia.
Table 1. The neuroprotective role of M2 microglia.
StudyModelMain Results
Peng, Jing
et al., 2019 [19]
Status epileptic male C57BL/6 mice
aged 8–10 weeks
Polarization of microglia to M2 by PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone and protection against pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus with rescued neuron loss
Wen, Liang
et al., 2018 [20]
Traumatic brain injury in C57BL/6J mice (10 to 12 weeks old)M2 microglia attenuated axonal injury in the cerebral cortex and improved neurological function
Qin, Xiaqing
et al., 2020 [45]
Chronic unpredictable mild stress in male wt mice
(23–25 g, 8–10 weeks old)
and male ob/ob mice
(43–53 g, 8–10 weeks old)
The behavioral improvement due to the inhibition of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and higher presence of the M2 neuroprotective phenotype in mice treated with the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone
Ren, Chaoxiu
et al., 2020 [47]
Alzheimer disease in
female APP/PS1 double
transgenic mice (6 months old)
M2 microglia degraded Aβ deposits and efficiently promoted neuroprotection by inhibiting Aβ accumulation and neuroinflammation
Xie, Zhishen
et al., 2020 [48]
Alzheimer-like disease in
transgenic C. elegans
M2 microglia enhanced Aβ degradation reducing its deposition in the PPARγ-dependent mechanism
Zhang, Youwen
et al., 2018 [50]
MPTP-intoxicated male
C57BL/6 mice
(5–6 weeks, weight 18–22 g)
Parkinson disease model
Higher levels of M2 microglia alleviated neuroinflammation
Bok, Eugene
et al., 2018 [51]
LPS-lesioned inflammatory model of Parkinson disease in female Sprague Dawley rats (230–280 g)M2 microglia enhanced the survival of dopamine neurons
Miao, Hongsheng
et al., 2018 [52]
Intracerebral hemorrhage in
Sprague Dawley (SD)
rats (250–350 g)
M2 microglia-derived BDNF promoted neurogenesis
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro, L.V.G.; Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, C.F.; Silva, A.R. Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094925

AMA Style

Castro LVG, Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque CF, Silva AR. Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):4925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094925

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro, Léo Victor G., Cassiano F. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, and Adriana R. Silva. 2022. "Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 4925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094925

APA Style

Castro, L. V. G., Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, C. F., & Silva, A. R. (2022). Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(9), 4925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094925

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop