Next Article in Journal
Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Proteins: Molecular Mechanisms and Modern Applications
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Antimicrobial Peptide Sp-LECin with Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity and Anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Zebrafish
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lactobacillus pentosus MJM60383 Inhibits Lipid Accumulation in Caenorhabditis elegans Induced by Enterobacter cloacae and Glucose

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010280
by Mingkun Gu 1, Pia Werlinger 1, Joo-Hyung Cho 2, Nari Jang 3, Shin Sik Choi 3, Joo-Won Suh 2,* and Jinhua Cheng 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010280
Submission received: 3 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is nicely written to identify the promising candidate for the anti-obesity probiotics. I have several minor comments for authors.

First, the manuscript should follow the order: Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion and Conclusion. The current flow is not easy to read.

Second, the introduction is still too thin to justify the research question, especially for the last two paragraphs. What was the evidence to demonstrate the anti-obesity effects of LAB in different models, especially for C. elegans? In the last paragraph, there is a logic jump to talk about Lactobacillus pentosus MJM60383 all in a sudden. After the phrase “by using this model”, still a lot needs to be clarified.

Last but not least, authors will need to clear all typo throughout the manuscript, e.g. “inflammation” in line 83, as well as all inconsistencies in formatting, e.g. “(24-26)” in line 213 but “[5], [6]” in line 217.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See attached PDF.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have addressed my concerns adequately, I don't have further comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

I am satisfied with the revisions.

Back to TopTop