Next Article in Journal
Application of Extracellular Vesicles in Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Forced Remyelination Promotes Axon Regeneration in a Rat Model of Spinal Cord Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effects of Ursolic Acid on the Stemness and Progression of Human Breast Cancer Cells by Modulating Argonaute-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porcine Relaxin but Not Serelaxin Shows Residual Bioactivity after In Vitro Simulated Intestinal Digestion—Clues for the Development of New Relaxin Peptide Agonists Suitable for Oral Delivery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Landscape of Gene Expression during Hyperfilamentous Biofilm Development in Oral Candida albicans Isolated from a Lung Cancer Patient

1
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodźki St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodźki St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodźki St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
4
Department of Comprehensive Paediatric and Adult Dentistry, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Chodźki St., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Joint first authors.
Co-senior authors.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 368; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010368
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 26 December 2022

Abstract

:
The filamentation ability of Candida albicans represents one of the main virulence factors allowing for host tissue penetration and biofilm formation. The aim of this paper was to study the genetic background of the hyperfilamentous biofilm development in vitro in C. albicans isolated from the oral cavity of a lung cancer patient. Analyzed C. albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) were chosen based on their different structures of mature biofilm. The CA3 isolate possessing hyperfilamentation properties and forming high biofilm was compared with CA1 and CA2 isolates exhibiting low or average biofilm-forming ability, respectively. The detailed biofilm organization was studied with the use of confocal scanning laser microscopy. The whole transcriptome analysis was conducted during three stages of biofilm development (24 h, 48 h, 72 h). In contrast to CA1 and/or CA2 isolate, the CA3 isolate was characterized by a significant upregulation of genes encoding for cell wall proteins (HWP1, PGA13, PGA44, ALS3) and candidalysin (ECE1), as well as being involved in iron metabolism (FRE1, ALS3), sulfur metabolism (HAL21), the degradation of aromatic compounds (HQD2), and membrane transport (DIP5, PHO89, TNA1). In contrast, some genes (SCW11, FGR41, RBE1) in the CA3 were downregulated. We also observed the overexpression of a few genes over time—mainly FRE1, ATX1, CSA2 involved in iron metabolism. This is the first insight into the potential function of multiple genes in the hyperfilamentous biofilm formation in C. albicans, primarily isolated from host tissue, which may have an important clinical impact on cancer patients. Moreover, the presented data can lay the foundation for further research on novel pathogen-specific targets for antifungal drugs.

1. Introduction

Candida albicans is a common component of human microbiota and is considered an opportunistic pathogen that is especially dangerous in immunocompromised patients [1,2]. Among superficial fungal disorders, oropharyngeal candidiasis represents a local infection of the oral mucosa that creates an important problem in modern medicine because of the high frequency of colonization of the oral cavity by Candida spp. (up to 70% of healthy people), as well as the prevalence of risk factors that allow for excessive yeast proliferation [3].
C. albicans possesses multiple virulence factors; due to the clinical implications, the major one is morphogenesis, i.e., the ability to grow in two morphological forms—yeasts and filamentous forms creating pseudohyphae or hyphae. The invasive properties of filamentous forms enable this fungus to penetrate and destroy infected tissues, as well as to escape from the host’s immune system defenses [4].
The formation of filamentous forms by yeasts was found to be connected with biofilm formation. The ability of C. albicans to form biofilm is dependent on many factors, i.e., slime production, cell surface properties, the presence of specific adhesins on the surface, as well as ligands present on the hosts cells [2].
It has been noticed that approximately 80% of all microbial infections are directly or indirectly connected with biofilm, which, in the case of C. albicans, can be defined as a highly complex three-dimensional structure of a fungal community enclosed in an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), [2,5]. Moreover, EPS itself consists of some molecules that are crucial in pathogenesis, such as exopolysaccharides, proteins, chitins, and nucleic acid. The mature biofilm of C. albicans can be represented by three different morphological forms—yeast, pseudo-hyphal and true hyphae. Furthermore, biofilms of C. albicans can be highly diversified, so called ‘strain-dependent’, and usually range from 25 to 500 µm in thickness [6].
C. albicans is capable of creating biofilm in practically every part of the human body: skin, wounds, oral cavity, lungs, the bloodstream; as well as on several artificial objects, including pacemakers, tubes, caterers, implants, dentures, etc. [2]. Moreover, fungal cells that live in biofilms often exhibit unique phenotypic characteristics including high resistance to antibiotics or the ability to evade host defense mechanisms. Due to the resistance to commonly used antifungal agents, the therapy of C. albicans infections related to the presence of biofilm remains challenging. Additionally, the eradication of a well-developed biofilm is exceedingly difficult and requires the use of doses of antibiotics that substantially exceed the highest therapeutically attainable concentration [1]. Typically, biofilm formation consists of the initial process of cell adhesion to the surface, then the multiplication of yeast cells to create microcolonies needed for the further development of hypheal or pseudohypheal forms [7]. The time needed, as well as the final structure and composition of fungal biofilm, depend on the hydrophobicity parameter of the Candida cell surface, the expression level of the genes involved, the conditions of the environment, and many more, when considering the process occurring in vivo.
Many signal transduction pathways as well as transcriptional regulatory networks control the hyphal development in C. albicans. There are some genes that are often considered to be the main regulator factors that control biofilm formation and switch from the commensal to the pathogenic state, e.g., EFG1, BCR1, BRG1, NDT80, TEC1, and ROB1 [8]. The complexity of the biofilm production mechanism in C. albicans is underlined by the abundance of genes regulated by the above-mentioned regulatory factors. From a medical perspective, Candida isolates that are able to form robust biofilms composed of filamentous forms pose the biggest threat to patients, speeding up the infection progress and rendering antifungal therapy ineffective. At present, large efforts are being made to identify the genes involved in this process, which would not only allow for a comprehensive explanation of its molecular regulation mechanisms, but also, in the future, would provide essential information for the development of novel antifungal therapeutics [9].
The aim of our study was to analyze the genetic background of the biofilm development, along with its structural organization, in three oral C. albicans strains isolated from lung cancer patients, with a special emphasis on the hyperfilamentous biofilm.

2. Results

2.1. Biofilm Structure and Development Analysis by Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy

The biofilm structural organization of three C. albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) was observed with the use of confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM). Representative pictures of the biofilm morphology after 1 h (the process of adhesion), 24 h (early-stage biofilm formation), and 72 h (mature biofilm) are shown in Figure 1.
Based on the two-dimensional pictures, we analyzed parameters describing the steps of biofilm formation (areal porosity, length of edge line, length of skeleton line, thickness of biofilm), which was presented in detail in our previous paper [10]. A gallery of pictures presenting the three-dimensional reconstruction of 24 h and 72 h biofilms of C. albicans (Figure 1) showed the structure of the biofilm of each isolate (CA1, CA2, CA3) as a mixture of blastopores, pseudo-hyphal forms, or true hyphae. We observed that CA1 biofilms at 24 h and 72 h consisted of a mixture of blastopores only. The biofilm of the CA2 isolate after 24 h of incubation contained the mixture of blastopores, whereas the mature biofilm (after 72 h of incubation) comprised filamentous forms, i.e., pseudo-hyphal forms—true hyphae together with sparse blastospores included. Finally, the CA3 isolate after 24 h comprised filamentous forms—pseudo-hyphal forms and true hyphae. Moreover, in the confocal scanning laser microscopy the hyperfilamentous forms resembled "spruce forest”. The hypsometric maps illustrating the different heights of the 24 h and 72 h biofilms of CA1, CA2, CA3 isolates are shown in Figure 2. The height of the biofilm of CA1 isolate after 24 h of incubation was 7.6 µm, while the mature biofilm was 13.3 µm. The biofilm of CA2 after 24 h and after 72 h of incubation was 74.48 and 66.42 µm, respectively. The third isolate of C. albicans (CA3) produced the highest biofilm. The height of CA3 biofilm after 24 h was 1090 µm, whereas after 72 h it was so high that the CSLM could not produce the picture.

2.2. Differentially Expressed Genes between Candida albicans Isolates

We investigated changes in the level of genes expression in three Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2 CA3) at three time points—after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h of the biofilm formation process. All three isolates exhibited large phenotypic diversity of biofilm-related structures produced in vitro. In total, a whole transcriptome analysis identified 6359 differentially expressed genes. From all of these genes, only those that met the criteria of the mean of the read counts above 100 across samples belonging to the compared groups, Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted P value below 0.05, and absolute log2(fold change) value greater than 5, were considered significantly differentially expressed. Following these criteria, 16 genes were considered dysregulated in CA2 vs. CA1, 19 genes in CA3 vs. CA1, and finally, 24 genes in the CA3 vs. CA2 comparison (Table 1, Figure 3). The obtained groups of genes were compared on a Venn diagram (Figure 3A), which shows that no genes were common for all the gene groups; however, there some genes were common for each two groups of genes. The differential character of the selected genes is illustrated in the PCA plot (Figure 3B) and the heatmap with hierarchical clustering (Figure 3C). Figure S1 presents volcano plots showing the arrangement of the negative log10 of the P values and log2 fold changes for all differentially expressed genes.
The GO terms that are associated with up- and downregulated groups of genes are presented on Figure 4. The majority of terms are related to transmembrane transport, cell adhesion, biofilm formation, ergosterol synthesis, and cell wall. These results clearly show that the selected genes are associated with cell morphology, showing consistency with the different microscopic images of the studied C. albicans isolates.
Commensurably to the level of morphological diversification, the greatest difference in gene regulation was observed in the CA3 isolate when compared to the two remaining yeast isolates. Moreover, these differences were mainly associated with genes upregulation (Table 1). First of all, the CA3 isolate was characterized by the upregulation of multiple genes responsible for the production of cell wall proteins (ALS3, HWP1, PGA13, PGA44); most of them are known to be responsible for the processes of colonization, adhesion, or the development of hyphae. Secondly, we observed a high expression of genes involved in various metabolic processes, such as FRE1, which is responsible for iron metabolism, HAL21 for sulfur metabolism, or HQD2 for the degradation of aromatic compounds. Finally, we identified several upregulated membrane transporters (DIP5, PHO89, TNA1) and a gene encoding an important virulence factor—candidalysin (ECE1). Interestingly, we observed a group of genes that were significantly downregulated in the CA3 isolate. Except for multiple genes encoding for uncharacterized proteins, we observed the presence of genes encoding for cell wall proteins (FGR1, RBE1, or SCW11) often secreted by yeast cells as important virulence factors.
As illustrated in Figure 3, the overall gene expression differences between the CA1 and CA2 isolates were mostly smaller. The isolate characterized by biofilm comprising blastospores only—CA1—possessed some significantly upregulated genes; however, the function of most of them is not yet fully understood. Among them, we found pir protein family member gene PIR5 or unknown transporters (TF28, YIQ6). A similar situation was found in the case of genes upregulated in the CA2 isolate, mainly encoding for cell wall proteins (e.g., RBE1, IFF8) or lipid-binding membrane protein (HSP12).

2.3. Differentially Expressed Genes between Incubation Time Points

The differences in gene expression level could be clearly observed between particular C. albicans strains; however, it appeared much more stable at the three investigated time points (24 h, 48 h, 72 h) of the biofilm formation process. Genes with a different expression in time were rare (Figure S2); therefore, we lowered the log2(fold change) selection criterion from 5 to 2 (p-value and mean of read counts criteria were unchanged), giving seven upregulated genes (Figure 5). Three genes were selected from the 48 h vs. 24 h comparison, four genes from the 72 h vs. 24 h comparison, while no genes met the selection criteria from the 72 h vs. 48 h comparison. Among the selected genes, there were genes involved in the metal metabolism (FRE1, CSA1, ATX1, CSA2), including a CSA1 gene encoding surface antigen responsible for the elongation of hyphae, and a GST1 gene encoding glutathione S-transferase of unknown function (Table 2). The observation that significant differences in gene expression occur between 24 h and later time points (48 h and 72 h) may suggest that the main changes in transcriptome occurred during the initial steps of biofilm formation.

3. Discussion

Biofilm formation constitutes one of the most important virulence factors in C. albicans. Starting from the complex relationship with the host immune system and other microorganisms, through strain-dependent biofilm-forming abilities, and finally, preventing successful eradication from the infection site, this structure remains a challenging object of interest in fungal pathogenesis [11,12]. Despite many efforts to understand the mechanisms of biofilm formation, the process is still not fully explained on a molecular level. In our studies, we investigated the biofilm formation process in three strains of C. albicans (CA1, CA2, CA3), including microscopic imaging as well as whole-transcriptome sequencing to gain a detailed insight into this process. Three C. albicans strains were chosen on the basis of extremely different biofilm-forming abilities. After 72 h of incubation, the CA1 biofilm consisted of blastospores only, while the CA2 of blastospores and filamentous forms reached 13.3 and 66.4 µm, respectively. The third isolate was characterized by hyperfilamentation and unusual biofilm reaching over 1 mm just after 24 h (Figure 2).
It is worth pointing out that the colonization of the oral mucosa by hyperfilamentous C. albicans strains with strong potential to invade epithelium may be regarded as a high-risk factor, not only for oropharyngeal candidiasis, but also for systemic fungal infections. Moreover, the filamentation/hyperfilamentation process and its genetic background in C. albicans represents an important and as yet under-explored target for novel antifungals [13]. Invasive fungal infections, including those caused by Candida spp., remain a challenging therapeutic issue in cancer patients. The application of antifungals in both empirical and pre-emptive therapy is still connected with multiple side effects in patients, as well as the risk of acquiring antifungal resistance in fungi. The development of new antifungals, especially for pathogen-specific targets, would significantly improve the therapy of invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients, leading to a decrease in both mortality and morbidity rates [14,15,16]. The need for novel antifungals is underlined by the fact that the functional analysis conducted in our study showed the downregulation of genes involved in ergosterol biosynthesis. Ergosterol is not only the most prevalent sterol in fungi, but most of all, the main target for commonly used antifungal drugs such as amphotericin B and azoles. Mukherjee et al. noticed that C. albicans cells present in biofilm exhibit higher tolerance towards antifungals than cells in planktonic cultures, which raises concerns about the efficiency of routine antifungal therapy for invasive infections connected with biofilm formation [17,18].

3.1. Genes Upregulated in Candida albicans Isolate Exhibiting Hyperfilamentation

We observed that the high-biofilm forming ability in CA3 was connected with the upregulation of multiple genes encoding for cell wall proteins (HWP1, PGA13, PGA44, ALS3) and candidalysin (ECE1), as well as involved in iron metabolism (FRE1, ALS3), sulfur metabolism (HAL21), the degradation of aromatic compounds (HQD2), and mem-brane transport (DIP5, PHO89, TNA1).
ALS3 is a well-known surface protein classified as an adhesion molecule that enables fungal cells to attach to the colonized surface [19]. Our studies showed a significant overexpression of the ALS3 gene in CA3 exhibiting high biofilm in contrast to its low expression in CA1, characterized by a low biofilm-forming ability. The low expression of ALS3 would explain the absence of filamentous morphogenesis in the CA1 isolate, as adhesin mutants have already been reported to be defective in biofilm formation [20]. Additionally, some authors have also proven that the biofilm-forming capability in C. albicans is often connected with high expression of the ALS3 gene [21].
Similar to ALS3, a high expression of ECE1 is undoubtedly involved in the formation of a complex biofilm. Nevertheless, studies have also shown that the deletion of this gene has no adverse effect on mature biofilm formation [22]. Moreover, ECE1 is a crucial gene responsible for enhanced virulence because it encodes candidalysin, a cytolytic peptide that plays an important role in mucosal infections [23]. Candida albicans strains with a high expression of ECE1 might pose a threat in infected individuals, driving fungal pathogenicity in a multidirectional way. Furthermore, some studies present evidence that candidalysin, due to its strong inflammatory properties, is responsible for the malignant transformation of mucosal cells during infection [24]. Another strongly upregulated gene in CA3 is HWP1, which plays an important role in the development of hyphae. Additionally, it allows fungal strains to bind to epithelial cells and start the colonization process [25]. Both HWP1 and ALS3 encode proteins that are required to start biofilm formation in vivo; however, based on their characteristics, it is suggested that they have distinct functions in this process. Nobile et al. tested the hypothesis that HWP1 and ALS3 act as complementary surface proteins in C. albicans by mixing two mutants deprived of one of these two genes, resulting in a biofilm-competent mixture of fungal cells. Moreover, the applied models confirmed this relationship both in vivo and in vitro [26].
The upregulation of genes not directly connected with the adhesion or filamentation process in complex-biofilm formers has also been observed by other authors. Similar to our studies, a high expression of DIP5 gene encoding for dicarboxylic amino acid transporter was observed in yeasts forming complex mature biofilm, which additionally, was involved in the so-called invasive phenotype [27,28]. Another gene significantly upregulated in the CA3 isolate—HAL21, is involved in sulfur assimilation. So far, no clear connection has been established between increased HAL21 expression and biofilm formation; however, an interesting hypothesis has been presented. Studies conducted by Murillo et al. showed the upregulation of the entire sulfur assimilation pathway in the early stage of biofilm formation in C. albicans [29]. The authors explained this observation by suggesting the existence of a futile sulfur cycle in biofilm cells responsible for the production of glutathione (GSH) as a protection agent against reactive oxygen and the storage of cysteine.
The prevalence of upregulated genes in the C. albicans strain producing robust biofilm emphasizes the significance of a vast network of genes regulating this process.

3.2. Genes Downregulated in Candida albicans Isolate Exhibiting Hyperfilamentation

Most of the differentially expressed genes in the studied C. albicans clinical isolates were genes upregulated in the CA3 isolate when compared to the remaining two, thus, supporting the filamentation process. However, in the same isolate, we also observed the presence of genes with extremely low expression (FGR41, RBE1, SCW11).
Studies have shown that FGR41, among many other genes, constitutes a specific co-expression regulatory network involved in the development of candidiasis. Moreover, during the transition to true hyphae, FGR41 is often downregulated, as was the case for the CA3 strain characterized by a high biofilm formation ability [27]. Other authors found a similar situation as that in our studies that, in the case of the RBE1 gene that belongs to the putative novel family of Pry-proteins and located in the fungal cell wall, is secreted by yeast cells, playing a significant role as a virulence factor [30]. Some authors noticed that RBE1 could be downregulated under hyphae-inducing conditions, which would explain its low expression level in CA3 that creates biofilm comprising complex filamentous forms. What is also worth noticing is that RBE1 is regulated by other genes involved in the process of biofilm formation, i.e., the transcription factor EFG1 [31,32].
Another gene found with low expression in the CA3 isolate is SCW11 (Figure 3C), which encodes a putative C. albicans glucanase; its expression depends on many conditions [33]. Some authors noticed that its expression can be lower in hyphae than in yeast cells [34], which is supported by our observations. Namely, SCW11 expression was significantly lower in CA3 compared to CA1, whose biofilm consisted of blastospores only, and compared to CA2, producing a mixture of blastospores and filaments.
We also observed the downregulation of one of four known chitinase genes in C. albicans—CHI3. This gene encodes for chitinase, which is necessary for fungal blastospores to completely separate after the cell division process; this has already been investigated in C. albicans mutants deprived of various chitinase genes [35]. It was also observed that yeast cells often increase the content of chitin in their cell wall in stress conditions [36].

3.3. Iron Metabolism in Candida albicans Is Involved in the Process of Hypheal Morphogenesis

Iron constitutes an essential micronutrient in fungal pathogenesis, which is the reason for the expanded acquisition mechanisms and metabolic pathways present in C. albicans [37]. On the one hand, during fungal infection, the iron demand is higher at an early stage of infection when the tissue physiological state remains more or less unchanged, rather than at an advanced stage, when the destroyed tissues release iron [38]. On the other hand, in the case of the CA3 isolate characterized by hyperfilamentation, we not only observed a strong upregulation of genes involved in iron metabolism (ALS3, FRE1), but also a significant increase in expression over time in the case of FRE1, ATX1, and CSA2.
CSA2 belongs to the Common in Fungal Extracellular Membranes (CFEM) protein superfamily, and until recently, its only known molecular function was heme-iron acquisition; however, recent investigations have revealed that it could be essential for normal biofilm formation—in particular, in the yeast-to-hyphae morphological switch [39]. Our analysis showed that it was significantly upregulated in the CA3 isolate and, in addition, its highest expression was observed after 72 h, which could prove that it is also necessary for C. albicans to exhibit a high biofilm. The role of the other gene in biofilm formation—FRE1—also known as CLF1, encoding ferric reductase, has not been reported so far. Except for the upregulation of genes directly involved in iron metabolism, we observed the upregulation of other genes, e.g., ATX1, encoding cytosolic copper metallochaperone probably involved in the regulation of iron ion transmembrane transport, based on the function of orthologous genes in yeasts. The gene described earlier—ALS3—is also responsible for reductive iron assimilation as a ferritin receptor [40]. Despite the fact that the upregulation of genes involved in iron metabolism is clearly connected with yeast-to-hyphae transition in Candida, there is evidence that this regulatory network has a strong restoration capacity; thus, the absence of certain genes does not necessarily lead to the impartment of biofilm-forming abilities [41].

3.4. Limitations of the Study

Despite novel findings concerning the gene expression landscape in hyperfilamentous C. albicans, our study has some limitations. Based on the results obtained for a limited number of C. albicans isolates, it is difficult to extrapolate our observations to all fungal isolates exhibiting a high biofilm-forming ability, and to distinguish genes crucial for the hyperfilamentation process. Thus, further studies on this subject should investigate a wider range of C. albicans isolates with this feature for changes in the expression of newly described genes potentially connected with biofilm formation. Furthermore, determining whether these genes are necessary for fungal strains to exhibit hyperfilamentation would facilitate marking novel molecular pathways as potential targets for antifungal drugs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Candida albicans Strains and Culture Conditions

In this study, three clinical strains of Candida albicans (CA1, CA2, CA3) were isolated from the oral cavity of patients who underwent lung cancer pulmonary resection. After isolation and identification, the fungal strains were stored at −70 °C in Sabouraud Glucose Broth (SB; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) containing 50% glycerol. Before all experiments, the strains were cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SA; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at 30 °C for 48 h, and then subcultured on SB and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h.

4.2. Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy Analysis

The standardized suspension of each isolate of C. albicans (optical density of 0.5 McFarland standard, i.e., 5 × 106 colony-forming units in mL) was prepared in SB. The following analysis involved examining three stages: the adhesion process (after 1 h of incubation), early-stage biofilm formation (after 24 h of incubation), and mature biofilm formation (after 72 h of incubation). To determine the adhesion process, 350 µL of inoculum was added to four out of eight wells of a polystyrene culture chamber and then incubated for 1 h at 35 °C. After that, the wells were gently washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove nonadherent cells. Subsequently, 200 µL of solution containing 0.1 mg/mL of concanavalin A Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (CAAF) was added to each well and incubated for 45 min at 35 °C. To determine the biofilm formation at an early stage, 350 µL of inoculum was added to four wells and incubated for 24 h at 35 °C. Next, the wells were gently washed with PBS to remove nonadherent cells, and 200 µL of solution containing CAAF was added to each well. The mixture was incubated for 45 min at 35 °C. To determine the mature biofilm formation, 350 µL of inoculum was added to four out of the eight wells of the culture chamber and then incubated for 72 h at 35 °C. After that, the wells were gently washed with PBS to remove nonadherent cells. Approximately 200 µL of solution containing CAAF was added to each well; then, the mixture was incubated for 45 min at 35 °C. All assays were conducted in four replicates. The pictures for the planimetric measurements were carried out in two-dimensional scans at a magnification of x 50. The planimetric analysis was performed using Image J. v. l. 36b, Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA.

4.3. Total RNA Preparation

Fungal biofilm recovered from a single well of a six-well plate was centrifuged and resuspended in 800 μL of Fenzol (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland). The cells were placed in a tube containing 0.8 mL of zirconia beads (0.1 mm in diameter) and disrupted in a bead-beater (FastPrep24 instrument, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA MP Biomaterials) at the highest power by two 30 s pulses, separated by 5 min of chilling on ice. All other steps were performed with the Total RNA Mini Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was eliminated with deoxyribonuclease I (Sigma Aldrich, Dorset, UK). The DNA removal was accomplished by adding 10 μL of 10 x reaction buffer and 10 μL of DNase I (1 unit/μL) to an 80 μL RNA sample. After 15 min of incubation at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 μL of Stop Solution. Next, the sample was heated at 70 °C for 10 min to denature both the DNase I and the RNA. The RNA purity and concentration were measured spectrophotometrically, aliquoted, and stored at –80 °C for further use.

4.4. RNA Sequencing

RNA sequencing was conducted on three C. albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) at three time points during biofilm formation (24 h, 48 h, 72 h). The removal of ribosomal RNA and the isolation of poly(A) RNA from the total RNA samples were performed using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Libraries for sequencing were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s manual. The quality control of the isolated RNA and prepared libraries was performed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with an Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit (all Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), respectively. Sequencing was carried out using the HiSeq4000 platform (300 cycles mode) and the reagents included in the HiSeq 3000/4000 SBS Kit (both Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The experiments were performed in duplicate, giving a total of 18 sequenced samples (three isolates at three time points in duplicates). The average number of raw reads obtained in the studied samples was 21,569,234 (Figure S3).

4.5. Sequencing Data Analysis

Adapters and reads shorter than 15 bp were removed with the use of Cutadapt in paired-end mode [42]. The sequences were aligned to 6,388 genes in the reference genome of C. albicans P75063 (GCA_000775525) using TopHat [43] in fr-forststrand and no-novel-juncs mode. After alignment, the number of reads for each gene was counted with the use of HTseq [44]. The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed 24 October 2022) was used to search the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed 24 October 2022) to find genes homologous to the analyzed transcripts.
Differences in expression profiles between the three C. albicans isolates and three time points were analyzed using the DESeq2 1.36.0 package [45] in R version 4.2.0 [46]. Prior to the analysis, the read counts of the technical replicates were merged using the collapseReplicates() function, genes with means of read counts lower than 1 were filtered out, and the final data containing 6359 gene identifiers (in the case of isolates comparison) and 6282 gene identifiers (in the case of time points comparisons) were normalized using the DESeq() function. The uniformity of the normalized expression data was confirmed on the boxplot of Cook’s distances (Figure S4). The detailed expression data of all differentially expressed genes analyzed in each sample using isolates or times of incubation as a condition are shown in Figures S5 and S6.
A graphical representation of differently expressed genes between C. albicans isolates was produced on volcano plots and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plots generated using the ggplot2 3.3.6 package in R (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html, accessed 24 October 2022), as well as on heatmaps with hierarchical clustering created using the pheatmap 1.0.12 package in R (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pheatmap/index.html, accessed 24 October 2022). A Venn diagram presenting intersections between groups of genes selected from the performed comparisons was created using the VennDiagram 1.7.3 package in R (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/VennDiagram/index.html, accessed 24 October 2022).
The biological role of the selected genes was explored by a functional overrepresentation analysis, using the GO Term Finder tool from the Candida Genome Database [47]. The analysis was performed for GO (Gene Ontology) terms of Candida albicans and separately for up- and downregulated genes.

5. Conclusions

A transcriptional regulatory network controlling the hyperfilamentous biofilm formation by oral C. albicans strain CA3, isolated from lung cancer patients, involved the dysregulation of multiple genes, including those responsible for the processes of colonization, adhesion, and yeast-hyphae transition, as well as those involved in iron or sulfur metabolism. Knowledge about the genetic background of the hyperfilamentation process in C. albicans strains isolated primarily from the host organism may be useful for the development of novel pathogen-specific targets for antifungals with a high potential to prevent and/or eradicate overgrown biofilms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24010368/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.C.-R., A.M. and J.S.; methodology, A.M., A.B.-K., D.Z. and M.K.; formal analysis, R.S., D.Z. and M.K.; investigation, B.C.-R., M.K., R.S. and D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, B.C.-R., M.K., D.Z. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.M., J.S. and A.B.-K.; visualization, B.C.-R. and D.Z.; supervision, A.M., A.B.-K. and J.S.; funding acquisition, A.M. and J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported with funds provided by the Medical University of Lublin (DS30, DS290).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Antoni Gawron and Tomasz Piersiak for their support with the microscopic imaging, as well as Przemko Tylżanowski and Adolfo Rivero-Müller for helpful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atriwal, T.; Azeem, K.; Husain, F.M.; Hussain, A.; Khan, M.N.; Alajmi, M.F.; Abid, M. Mechanistic understanding of Candida albicans biofilm formation and approaches for its inhibition. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pereira, R.; dos Santos Fontenelle, R.O.; de Brito, E.H.S.; de Morais, S.M. Biofilm of Candida albicans: Formation, regulation and resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Patil, S.; Rao, R.S.; Majumdar, B.; Anil, S. Clinical appearance of oral Candida infection and therapeutic strategies. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cavalheiro, M.; Teixeira, M.C. Candida biofilms: Threats, challenges, and promising strategies. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Douglas, L.J. Medical importance of biofilms in Candida infections. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2002, 19, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Ramage, G.; Saville, S.P.; Thomas, D.P.; López-Ribot, J.L. Candida biofilms: An update. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Pannanusorn, S.; Ramírez-Zavala, B.; Lünsdorf, H.; Agerberth, B.; Morschhäuser, J.; Römling, U. Characterization of biofilm formation and the role of BCR1 in clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 438–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chong, P.P.; Chin, V.K.; Wong, W.F.; Madhavan, P.; Yong, V.C.; Looi, C.Y. Transcriptomic and genomic approaches for unravelling Candida albicans biofilm formation and drug resistance—An update. Genes 2018, 9, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Alim, D.; Sircaik, S.; Panwar, S.L. The significance of lipids to biofilm formation in Candida albicans: An emerging perspective. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chudzik-Rząd, B.; Malm, A.; Piersiak, T.; Gawron, A. Quantitative analysis of biofilm formation by oropharyngeal Candida albicans isolates under static conditions by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci. 2013, 26, 54–56. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eix, E.F.; Nett, J.E. How biofilm growth affects Candida-host interactions. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. de Barros, P.P.; Rossoni, R.D.; de Souza, C.M.; Scorzoni, L.; Fenley, J.D.C.; Junqueira, J.C. Candida biofilms: An update on developmental mechanisms and therapeutic challenges. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Romo, J.A.; Zhang, H.; Cai, H.; Kadosh, D.; Koehler, J.R.; Saville, S.P.; Wang, Y.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Global transcriptomic analysis of the Candida albicans response to treatment with a novel inhibitor of filamentation. mSphere 2019, 4, e00620-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Matthew, W.M.; Walsh, T.J. Candidemia in the cancer patient: Diagnosis, treatment, and future directions. Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2018, 16, 849–854. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ruhnke, M.; Cornely, O.A.; Schmidt-Hieber, M.; Alakel, N.; Boell, B.; Buchheidt, D.; Christopeit, M.; Hasenkamp, J.; Jeinz, W.J.; Hentrich, M.; et al. Treatment of invasive fungal diseases in cancer patients—Revised 2019. Recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Mycoses 2020, 63, 653–682. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wall, G.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Current antimycotics, new prospects, and future approaches to antifungal therapy. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Silva, S.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Araújo, D.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Henriques, M. Candida Species Biofilms’ Antifungal Resistance. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mukherjee, P.K.; Chandra, J.; Kuhn, D.M.; Ghannoum, M.A. Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: Phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 4333–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, Y.; Filler, S.G. Candida albicans Als3, a multifunctional adhesin and invasin. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhao, X.; Daniels, K.J.; Oh, S.-H.; Green, C.B.; Yeater, K.M.; Soll, D.R.; Hoyer, L.L. Candida albicans Als3p is required for wild-type biofilm formation on silicone elastomer surfaces. Microbiology 2006, 152, 2287–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Deng, K.; Jiang, W.; Jiang, Y.; Deng, Q.; Cao, J.; Yang, W.; Zhao, X. ALS3 expression as an indicator for Candida albicans biofilm formation and drug resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 655242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Short, B.; Delaney, C.; McKloud, E.; Brown, J.L.; Kean, R.; Litherland, G.J.; Williams, C.; Martin, S.L.; MacKay, W.G.; Ramage, G. Investigating the transcriptome of Candida albicans in a dual-species Staphylococcus aureus biofilm model. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 791523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, J.; Willems, H.M.; Sansevere, E.A.; Allert, S.; Barker, K.S.; Lowes, D.J.; Dixson, A.C.; Xu, Z.; Miao, J.; De Jarnette, C.; et al. A variant ECE1 allele contributes to reduced pathogenicity of Candida albicans during vulvovaginal candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Engku, N.S.E.A.F.; Ahmad, H.; Ramzi, A.B.; Wahab, A.R.; Kaderi, M.A.; Wan, W.H.A.W.; Dashper, S.; McCullough, M.; Arzmi, M.H. The role of Candida albicans candidalysin ECE1 gene in oral carcinogenesis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2020, 49, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Orsi, C.F.; Borghi, E.; Colombari, B.; Neglia, R.G.; Quaglino, D.; Ardizzoni, A.; Morace, G.; Blasi, E. Impact of Candida albicans Hyphal Wall Protein 1 (HWP1) genotype on biofilm production and fungal susceptibility to microglial cells. Microb. Pathog. 2014, 69, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Nobile, C.J.; Schneider, H.A.; Nett, J.E.; Sheppard, D.C.; Filler, S.G.; Andes, D.R.; Mitchell, A.P. Complementary adhesin function in C. albicans biofilm formation. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Nett, J.E.; Lepak, A.J.; Marchillo, K.; Andes, D.R. Time course global gene expression analysis of an in vivo Candida biofilm. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Torbensen, R.; Møller, H.D.; Gresham, D.; Alizadeh, S.; Ochmann, D.; Boles, E.; Regenberg, B. Amino acid transporter genes are essential for FLO11-dependent and FLO11-independent biofilm formation and invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Murillo, L.A.; Newport, G.; Lan, C.Y.; Habelitz, S.; Dungan, J.; Agabian, N.M. Genome-wide transcription profiling of the early phase of biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 1562–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Röhm, M.; Lindemann, E.; Hiller, E.; Ermert, D.; Lemuth, K.; Trkulja, D.; Sogukpinar, O.; Brunner, H.; Rupp, S.; Urban, C.F.; et al. A family of secreted pathogenesis-related proteins in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 87, 132–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sohn, K.; Urban, C.; Brunner, H.; Rupp, S. EFG1 is a major regulator of cell wall dynamics in Candida albicans as revealed by DNA microarrays. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Glazier, V.E. EFG1, everyone’s favorite gene in Candida albicans: A comprehensive literature review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 855229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chaffin, W.L. Candida albicans cell wall proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72, 495–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mulhern, S.M.; Logue, M.E.; Butler, G. Candida albicans transcription factor Ace2 regulates metabolism and is required for filamentation in hypoxic conditions. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dünkler, A.; Walther, A.; Specht, C.A.; Wendland, J. Candida albicans CHT3 encodes the functional homolog of the Cts1 chitinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 935–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ribeiro, R.A.; Bourbon-Melo, N.; Sá-Correia, I. The cell wall and the response and tolerance to stresses of biotechnological relevance in yeasts. Front. Microbiol. 2002, 13, 953479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fourie, R.; Kuloyo, O.O.; Mochochoko, B.M.; Albertyn, J.; Pohl, C.H. Iron at the centre of Candida albicans interactions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lin, C.; Lin, C.N.; Wang, Y.C.; Liu, F.Y.; Chien, Y.W.; Chuang, Y.J.; Lan, C.Y.; Hsieh, W.P.; Chen, B.S. Robustness analysis on interspecies interaction network for iron and glucose competition between Candida albicans and zebrafish during infection. BMC Syst. Biol. 2014, 8, S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Okamoto-Shibayama, K.; Kikuchi, Y.; Kokubu, E.; Ishihara, K. Possible Involvement of surface antigen protein 2 in the morphological transition and biofilm formation of Candida albicans. Med. Mycol. J. 2017, 58, E139–E143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Almeida, R.S.; Wilson, D.; Hube, B. Candida albicans iron acquisition within the host. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chakraborty, T.; Tóth, Z.; Tóth, R.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Gácser, A. Iron metabolism, pseudohypha production, and biofilm formation through a multicopper oxidase in the human-pathogenic fungus Candida parapsilosis. mSphere 2020, 5, e00227-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Martin, M. cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Trapnell, C.; Roberts, A.; Goff, L.; Pertea, G.; Kim, D.; Kelley, D.R.; Pimentel, H.; Salzberg, S.L.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 562–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Huber, W. HTSeq—A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Dessau, R.B.; Pipper, C.B. ’’R"-project for statistical computing. Ugeskr. Laeg. 2008, 170, 328–330. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Skrzypek, M.S.; Binkley, J.; Binkley, G.; Miyasato, S.R.; Simison, M.; Sherlock, G. The Candida Genome Database (CGD): Incorporation of assembly 22, systematic identifiers and visualization of high throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D592–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two-dimensional scans of adhesion (1 h), early biofilm formation (24 h) and the mature biofilm (72 h) of C. albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) dyed with concanavalin A Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (magnification ×50). The pictures of the CA1 and CA2 isolates are characterized by the presence of an increasing number of morphological forms in time, namely blastospores or true hyphae with sparse blastospores, respectively. The CA3 pictures at the three investigated time points are similar because the isolate proliferated only into the hypheal form, and the blastospores responsible for the “green image” in the CA1 and CA2 isolates were not present.
Figure 1. Two-dimensional scans of adhesion (1 h), early biofilm formation (24 h) and the mature biofilm (72 h) of C. albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) dyed with concanavalin A Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (magnification ×50). The pictures of the CA1 and CA2 isolates are characterized by the presence of an increasing number of morphological forms in time, namely blastospores or true hyphae with sparse blastospores, respectively. The CA3 pictures at the three investigated time points are similar because the isolate proliferated only into the hypheal form, and the blastospores responsible for the “green image” in the CA1 and CA2 isolates were not present.
Ijms 24 00368 g001
Figure 2. Hypsometric maps of the structure of 24 h and 72 h biofilm of Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3); nd—not determined. The CA3 isolate biofilm after 72 h was higher than the technical capacity of the confocal scanning laser microscope to produce a picture.
Figure 2. Hypsometric maps of the structure of 24 h and 72 h biofilm of Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3); nd—not determined. The CA3 isolate biofilm after 72 h was higher than the technical capacity of the confocal scanning laser microscope to produce a picture.
Ijms 24 00368 g002
Figure 3. Differential expression of genes selected from CA2 vs. CA1, CA3 vs. CA1, and CA3 vs. CA2 comparisons. (A) Venn diagram showing intersections between groups of genes selected from the performed comparisons. The non-overlapping numbers denote the genes that were unique for each isolate, while overlapping numbers represent mutual differentially expressed genes. There were no genes common for all three comparisons. (B) PCA plot for the expression of selected genes. (C) Heatmap illustrating the expression of selected genes in the studied samples. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the average method applied to Canberra distances.
Figure 3. Differential expression of genes selected from CA2 vs. CA1, CA3 vs. CA1, and CA3 vs. CA2 comparisons. (A) Venn diagram showing intersections between groups of genes selected from the performed comparisons. The non-overlapping numbers denote the genes that were unique for each isolate, while overlapping numbers represent mutual differentially expressed genes. There were no genes common for all three comparisons. (B) PCA plot for the expression of selected genes. (C) Heatmap illustrating the expression of selected genes in the studied samples. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the average method applied to Canberra distances.
Ijms 24 00368 g003
Figure 4. Results of Gene Ontology functional analysis performed for up- and downregulated genes selected in this study.
Figure 4. Results of Gene Ontology functional analysis performed for up- and downregulated genes selected in this study.
Ijms 24 00368 g004
Figure 5. Differential expression of seven genes in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) selected from 48 h vs. 24 h, 72 h vs. 48 h, and 72 h vs. 24 h comparisons. (A) Venn diagram showing intersections between groups of genes selected from the performed comparisons. There are three genes common for the 48 h vs. 24 h and 72 h vs. 24 h comparisons, while no genes were selected from the 72 h vs. 48 h comparison. (B) PCA plot for the expression of seven selected genes. (C) Heatmap illustrating the expression of selected genes in the studied samples. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the average method applied to Canberra distances.
Figure 5. Differential expression of seven genes in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3) selected from 48 h vs. 24 h, 72 h vs. 48 h, and 72 h vs. 24 h comparisons. (A) Venn diagram showing intersections between groups of genes selected from the performed comparisons. There are three genes common for the 48 h vs. 24 h and 72 h vs. 24 h comparisons, while no genes were selected from the 72 h vs. 48 h comparison. (B) PCA plot for the expression of seven selected genes. (C) Heatmap illustrating the expression of selected genes in the studied samples. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the average method applied to Canberra distances.
Ijms 24 00368 g005
Table 1. Differential expression characteristics of genes in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3).
Table 1. Differential expression characteristics of genes in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3).
Gene ID 1Gene Name 2Description 3Mean Expression 4Log2(Fold Change)p
CA2vs. CA1 upregulated genes
MGM_04173HSP12Heat shock protein7359.36.382.47 × 10-76
MGM_02468 Uncharacterized1306.16.441.54 × 10-68
MGM_01284 Uncharacterized123.75.833.42 × 10-35
MGM_01418RBE1Pry family cell wall protein1370.45.032.14 × 10-30
MGM_04041IFF8Putative GPI-anchored adhesin-like protein141.55.505.07 × 10-23
MGM_03388 Uncharacterized171.45.395.02 × 10-19
MGM_02469 Uncharacterized110.66.105.46 × 10-18
MGM_04845 Uncharacterized182.69.961.25 × 10-14
MGM_03664 Uncharacterized150.35.722.21 × 10-14
MGM_00218 Uncharacterized220.25.658 × 10-7
CA2 vs. CA1 downregulated genes
MGM_00696TF28Transposon Tf2-8 polyprotein6275.0−8.751.73 × 10-219
MGM_05097YIQ6Uncharacterized transporter YIL166C4152.0−7.125.38 × 10-62
MGM_04990 Uncharacterized134.6−10.656.99 × 10-16
MGM_05585ATG13Autophagy-related protein 13295.8−6.411.01 × 10-14
MGM_01460PIR5Cell wall Pir protein552.2−5.553.1 × 10-9
MGM_00695 Uncharacterized110.6−7.637.41 × 10-9
CA3 vs. CA1 upregulated genes
MGM_05423TNA1Putative nicotinic acid transporter1693.76.348.64 × 10-83
MGM_06028ALS3Cell wall adhesin1232.68.502.75 × 10-81
MGM_04596HAL213’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate phosphatase542.99.467.5 × 10-53
MGM_01318 Uncharacterized9938.05.991.55 × 10-51
MGM_04602HAL213’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate phosphatase391.36.042.75 × 10-48
MGM_00673DIP5Dicarboxylic amino acid permease13,615.46.683.33 × 10-43
MGM_06175PGA13GPI-anchored cell wall protein11,790.75.441.02 × 10-41
MGM_03585ECE1Candidalysin910.710.701.31 × 10-40
MGM_06174PGA13GPI-anchored cell wall protein11,682.15.843.27 × 10-36
MGM_02591PGA44Putative GPI-anchored protein200.65.718.22 × 10-32
MGM_04326 Uncharacterized186.45.232.78 × 10-16
MGM_03469HQD2Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase256.35.261.46 × 10-15
MGM_04845 Uncharacterized182.69.121.62 × 10-12
MGM_05487ISP4Sexual differentiation process protein isp4490.55.826.45 × 10-10
MGM_03440PHO89Putative phosphate permease1088.77.314.2 × 10-7
CA3vs. CA1 downregulated genes
MGM_04452 Uncharacterized15,450.6−5.132.03 × 10-57
MGM_01460PIR5Cell wall Pir protein552.2−6.242.17 × 10-11
MGM_06317CHI3Chitinase11,032.2−5.426.29 × 10-11
MGM_04375 Uncharacterized280.6−5.769.21 × 10-4
CA3 vs. CA2 upregulated genes
MGM_00696TF28Transposon Tf2-8 polyprotein6275.09.101.33 × 10-237
MGM_04596HAL213’(2’),5’-bisphosphate nucleotidase 1542.97.728.31 × 10-81
MGM_05097YIQ6Uncharacterized transporter YIL166C4152.07.572.82 × 10-70
MGM_03585ECE1Candidalysin910.78.351.72 × 10-54
MGM_04599 Uncharacterized272.05.926.32 × 10-53
MGM_04602HAL213’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate phosphatase391.36.236.81 × 10-49
MGM_05585ATG13Autophagy-related protein 13295.89.101.43 × 10-29
MGM_06174PGA13GPI-anchored cell wall protein11,682.15.171.57 × 10-28
MGM_00673DIP5Dicarboxylic amino acid permease13,615.45.156.04 × 10-26
MGM_00695 Uncharacterized110.610.572.59 × 10-16
MGM_04990 Uncharacterized134.68.912.65 × 10-11
MGM_03596HWP1Hyphal cell wall protein2223.75.382.2 × 10-7
MGM_03595HWP1Hyphal cell wall protein6037.45.314.81 × 10-7
MGM_03825FRE1Ferric reductase transmembrane component2044.76.871.81 × 10-6
MGM_03440PHO89Putative phosphate permease1088.75.462.35 × 10-4
CA3 vs. CA2—downregulated genes
MGM_04452 Uncharacterized15,450.6−7.611.28 × 10-127
MGM_01056FGR41Putative GPI-anchored adhesin-like protein7627.7−8.123 × 10-65
MGM_01418RBE1Pry family cell wall protein1370.4−6.821.13 × 10-52
MGM_02468 Uncharacterized1306.1−5.065.69 × 10-46
MGM_04365SCW11Cell wall protein2554.2−5.086.42 × 10-41
MGM_01211 Uncharacterized1072.9−5.154.19 × 10-32
MGM_06317CHI3Chitinase11,032.2−8.772.24 × 10-27
MGM_04375 Uncharacterized280.6−5.571.75 × 10-3
1 Gene IDs are specific numbers derived from the Candida albicans reference genome P75063 (GCA_000775525) that can be found in the Ensembl Fungi database (https://fungi.ensembl.org/Candida_albicans_p75063_gca_000775525/Info/Index?db=core, accessed 24 October 2022). 2,3 Gene descriptions are based on the Candida Genome Database, but if information was not available there, the UniProt Database was used. The absence of gene names is caused by no hit in BLAST. Genes that are listed twice in the same category were separate transcripts annotated to the same gene by BLAST algorithm. 4 Mean of read counts in compared isolates.
Table 2. Differential expression characteristics of seven genes selected from comparisons regarding times of incubation in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3).
Table 2. Differential expression characteristics of seven genes selected from comparisons regarding times of incubation in Candida albicans isolates (CA1, CA2, CA3).
Gene ID 1Gene Name 2Description 3Mean Expression 4Log2 (Fold Change)p
48 hvs. 24 h—upregulated genes
MGM_04103FRE1Ferric reductase transmembrane component1667.06.212.22 × 10-6
MGM_06015ATX1Putative cytosolic copper metallochaperone10,752.62.203.13 × 10-2
MGM_03936CSA2Extracellular heme-binding protein873.25.313.13 × 10-2
72 hvs. 24 h—upregulated genes
MGM_04103FRE1Ferric reductase transmembrane component1667.08.004.11 × 10-12
MGM_03936CSA2Extracellular heme-binding protein873.29.074.16 × 10-10
MGM_06015ATX1Putative cytosolic copper metallochaperone10,752.62.786.7 × 10-5
MGM_05642 Uncharacterized 187.33.581.11 × 10-4
MGM_02771GST1Putative glutathione S-transferase 1115.02.398.73 × 10-3
MGM_02719 Uncharacterized 108.22.969.69 × 10-3
MGM_00619CSA1Cell wall protein 111,289.73.799.69 × 10-3
1 Gene IDs are specific numbers derived from the Candida albicans reference genome P75063 (GCA_000775525) that can be found in the Ensembl Fungi database (https://fungi.ensembl.org/Candida_albicans_p75063_gca_000775525/Info/Index?db=core, accessed on 24 October 2022). 2,3 Gene descriptions are based on the Candida Genome Database, but if information were not available, on the UniProt Database. 4 Mean of read counts at compared time points.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chudzik-Rząd, B.; Zalewski, D.; Kasela, M.; Sawicki, R.; Szymańska, J.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Malm, A. The Landscape of Gene Expression during Hyperfilamentous Biofilm Development in Oral Candida albicans Isolated from a Lung Cancer Patient. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010368

AMA Style

Chudzik-Rząd B, Zalewski D, Kasela M, Sawicki R, Szymańska J, Bogucka-Kocka A, Malm A. The Landscape of Gene Expression during Hyperfilamentous Biofilm Development in Oral Candida albicans Isolated from a Lung Cancer Patient. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(1):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chudzik-Rząd, Beata, Daniel Zalewski, Martyna Kasela, Rafał Sawicki, Jolanta Szymańska, Anna Bogucka-Kocka, and Anna Malm. 2023. "The Landscape of Gene Expression during Hyperfilamentous Biofilm Development in Oral Candida albicans Isolated from a Lung Cancer Patient" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010368

APA Style

Chudzik-Rząd, B., Zalewski, D., Kasela, M., Sawicki, R., Szymańska, J., Bogucka-Kocka, A., & Malm, A. (2023). The Landscape of Gene Expression during Hyperfilamentous Biofilm Development in Oral Candida albicans Isolated from a Lung Cancer Patient. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop