Next Article in Journal
Full-Length Transcriptome of Myotis pilosus as a Reference Resource and Mining of Auditory and Immune Related Genes
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D, Gut Microbiota, and Cardiometabolic Diseases—A Possible Three-Way Axis
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Synthesis of Acridine-Triazole and Acridine-Thiadiazole Derivatives and Their Inhibitory Effect against Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms on Vitamin D Receptor Expression in Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts as a Response to Orthodontic Compression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review

1
Research Centre for Child Psychiatry, INVEST Flagship, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland
2
Public Health Stations, City of Helsinki, PB 6310, 00099 Helsinki, Finland
3
Department of Child Psychiatry, Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010063
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Vitamin D in Human Health and Diseases 2.0)

Abstract

:
Prenatal exposure to vitamin D may play a significant role in human brain development and function. Previous epidemiological studies investigating the associations between maternal vitamin D status and offspring developmental and psychiatric outcomes in humans have been inconclusive. We aimed to systematically assess the results of previously published studies that examined the associations between maternal vitamin D levels, measured as circulating 25(OH)D levels in pregnancy or at birth, and offspring neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes. Systematic searches were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science for studies published by 10 August 2022. We included human observational studies that examined associations between prenatal or perinatal vitamin D levels and offspring neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes and were published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Of the 3729 studies identified, 66 studies were screened for full texts and 29 studies published between 2003 and 2022 were included in the final review. There was a small amount of evidence for the association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency and autism spectrum disorder. When studies with larger sample sizes and stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency were considered, positive associations were also found for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and schizophrenia. Future studies with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods and prenatal vitamin D assessed at multiple time points are needed.

1. Introduction

Vitamin D is essential for bone mineralization and bone mass acquisition [1]. It may also be important for the development of other organ systems including the central nervous system [2]. In the past few decades, the role that vitamin D plays in brain development and function has been explored. Abundant vitamin D receptors have been found in brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Vitamin D is important for neuronal differentiation and reducing apoptosis in the hippocampus, the area involved in language and memory [3]. It serves as a transcriptional regulator by expressing genes vital to brain development [4,5].
Vitamin D is crucial especially when the central nervous system of the fetus develops and the brain is sensitive to maternal nutritional deficiencies [6,7]. Previous literature has emphasized the role of early prenatal insults in relation to later mental illnesses. The Dutch famine study was one of the earliest epidemiological studies of this kind and it suggested associations between maternal nutritional deficiencies during pregnancy and the subsequent risk of offspring mental illness. Offspring who were exposed to prenatal nutritional deficiency had a twofold risk of schizophrenia later in life, compared to the unexposed cohort [8].
Furthermore, studies from rodents have suggested morphological changes in the brain due to prenatal exposure to vitamin D deprivation in utero [9]. Animal studies suggest that vitamin D plays an important role in fetal brain development. However, human studies that have investigated the associations between maternal vitamin D status and offspring developmental and psychiatric outcomes in humans have been inconclusive. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have explored associations between prenatal vitamin D and some neurodevelopmental or cognitive outcomes including autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [4,10]. The reviews reported contradictory results. The systematic review found inconclusive evidence for offspring neurocognitive and psychological outcomes [4] whereas the meta-analysis reported potentially decreased risks of ADHD and autism-related traits with increased exposure to prenatal vitamin D [10]. The first study only included studies published up to 2014, while the other study did not include any other psychiatric outcomes than ASD and ADHD.
Research interest in the possible prenatal effects of vitamin D has been growing and many studies published in the last five years have emphasized the need to summarize and review the rapidly gathered new information. That is why the main aim of this review was to systematically assess the results of previously published studies that examined the relationship between maternal vitamin D levels, measured as circulating 25(OH)D levels in pregnancy or at birth, and offspring psychiatric outcomes. Previous studies focused on neurodevelopmental disorders and that is why we wanted to broaden the study area to encompass other psychiatric outcomes, including both disorders and symptoms.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) [11] and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guideline [12]. The review protocol was prospectively registered with The Open Science Framework (osf.io/jt4wa) [13].

2.1. Search Strategy

Relevant studies were identified by comprehensive searches of electronic databases from inception until 10 August 2022. We conducted systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science by combining terms that covered maternal vitamin D during pregnancy or at birth, the use of serum samples, and offspring psychiatric outcomes. Potentially relevant papers were also searched using the backward snowballing technique, which involves looking at the reference lists of the included papers and screening them to find other possible papers to include. The search strategy was developed and refined after consultation with a library information specialist (Supplementary Materials S1).

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The review included human observational studies that used longitudinal study designs and were published in peer-review journals. The included papers were written in English and measured associations between circulating 25(OH)D levels during pregnancy or from newborns and psychiatric outcomes in offspring. As maternal and neonatal vitamin D levels have been shown to be correlated, we also included studies that measured vitamin D levels in cord blood or neonatal dried blood samples [14]. The outcomes in the included studies reported offspring neuropsychiatric or psychiatric outcomes based on registry diagnoses, diagnostic interviews or symptoms.
We excluded any cross-sectional studies, as well as case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, comments, letters and reviews with no relevant primary data.

2.3. Study Selection Procedures

The studies were retrieved from search databases and checked for duplicates. Two reviewers (B.A./T.S., S.W./S.U.) screened the titles and abstracts independently, followed by full-text assessments of the papers based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers (B.A./T.S., S.W./S.U.) cross-checked the papers and any disagreements were resolved after discussion.

2.4. Quality Assessment

The quality assessment of the studies was conducted by two independent researchers (B.A./T.S., S.W./S.U.) using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools specific to study designs [15]. The reviewers used the JBI tool with 10 questions for case-control studies and the tool with 11 questions for cohort studies to assess the methodological quality of the studies. The tools enable the studies to be categorized as yes, no, unclear or not applicable. Any discrepancies with the JBI scores were resolved through discussion and studies were only included if both reviewers agreed.

2.5. Data Extraction and Synthesis

After the quality assessment, the relevant data were extracted and placed in an Excel spreadsheet. The data included the author, year, country, study design, sample size, offspring age at assessment, vitamin D assessment time, vitamin D categorization, outcome assessment, limitations and associations between vitamin D and outcome. We summarized the most relevant information in two tables: the first covered psychiatric disorders or diagnoses and the other was for the outcomes of psychiatric symptoms.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

The electronic search using the MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases yielded 3729 titles. After we removed any duplicates, the number of publications included in this review was 2444. Further screening of the titles and abstracts yielded 66 papers for the full-text review and 28 were found to be relevant. One additional article was found in the references of the included papers. The flow diagram for the screening processes and study selection are shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The 29 included studies were published from 2003 to 2022 (and 16 of them were published during the last five years of the search period (2017 to August 2022). The studies were from four regions: three from Australia [16,17,18], three from China [19,20,21], 17 from Europe (for specific countries see Table 1a,b) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] and six from the USA [39,40,41,42,43,44]. There were 14 cohort studies, 8 had a nested case-control design, either within a cohort or trial, and 7 were case-control studies. The covariates included in the studies varied greatly. Most studies included prenatal, perinatal and socio-demographic factors, but maternal psychopathology was addressed in 10 studies [19,21,24,27,29,30,32,33,36,38].
The outcomes for this review were limited to neuropsychiatric or psychiatric disorders and symptoms and therefore neurocognitive outcomes were not reported. The outcomes in the studies varied, but a clear majority of the studies had examined ASD and ADHD (Figure 2). Some studies had examined diagnoses, which were retrieved from clinical registers or were determined by a clinician during the study. Other studies examined symptoms measured by questionnaires. Some of the questionnaire scores were analyzed by using dichotomous yes/no categorizations for certain cut-off points and others were studied as continuous variables. Most of the studies examined outcomes in children and adolescents (Figure 2). Few studies had followed the subjects into young adulthood [16,24,27,31] and only one study examined adult outcomes [40]. The age of the offspring when the outcomes were assessed in each study are presented in detail in Figure S1. The vitamin D values were measured at different time points, varying from early pregnancy to neonatal samples (Figure 3). Only four studies had measured vitamin D concentrations at more than one time point pre- and perinatally [34,35,38,44]. Vitamin D was studied as a continuous variable (22 studies), by clinical categories (18), deciles (2), tertiles (1), quartiles (6) and quintiles (4) (Figure 4). Vitamin D levels were presented as nmol/L in 22 studies or as ng/mL in 7 studies. The definitions for deficient levels varied greatly. In the studies that used nmol/L, the deficiency was defined as between <20 nmol/L and <50 nmol/L. The study characteristics have been described in detail in Table 1a,b. The findings of the reviewed studies have been summarized in detail by each outcome, in Table 2.

3.3. Quality Assessment

The included studies had adequate quality, as assessed by the JBI quality appraisal tools. The biggest concerns in the reviewed studies were attrition rates, insufficient strategies used to address attrition, scarce confounders, small sample sizes and insufficient length of follow up. Vitamin D levels were often measured from a subsample and it was unclear if this was because of attrition or based on a planned decision. The sample sizes for the studied outcomes varied greatly and the number of cases with diagnosed outcomes was between 24 and 1558. In addition, the number of cases whose mothers were vitamin D deficient was relatively low in some studies. The follow-up time was considered insufficient in some of the studies, because the offspring’s age at assessment was less than five years. Diagnoses based on self-report questionnaires were excluded from the review but symptom-level outcomes of those studies were included [16,28,33]. Furthermore, one study assessed both ASD symptoms and diagnoses, but there were only three diagnosed cases and the ASD diagnoses outcomes were not included [18]. The quality appraisal is presented in detail in Table S1.

3.4. Vitamin D and Offspring Neuropsychiatric and Psychiatric Outcomes Reported by Each Outcome

3.4.1. ADHD and ADHD Symptoms

ADHD was studied as a diagnostic outcome in four studies [26,31,32,44] and ADHD symptoms in five studies [19,22,28,29,37]. There were 24 [31] to 1067 [32] cases with diagnosed ADHD. Diagnoses of ADHD were either made by a clinician [26], register-based data [31,32] or parental reports [44]. The ADHD symptoms were reported by parents in all but one study, where teacher reports were used [28]. We did not include the diagnostic outcomes from that study, as we did not consider that teacher reports on their own were a valid way of diagnosing ADHD.
Two studies reported significant links between maternal vitamin D levels and the increased odds of offspring being diagnosed with ADHD [32,44]. The largest study that examined ADHD outcomes reported significant odds ratios for both continuous and categorized vitamin D levels and ADHD [32]. The other study with significant associations reported an association between low third trimester values and increased odds for offspring ADHD but no association for values measured in early pregnancy [44].
The other two studies of diagnosed ADHD did not find significant associations between ADHD and continuous or categorized vitamin D levels from umbilical cord samples [26,31] or categorized levels from maternal sera from the third trimester [31]. It is noteworthy that the second study defined vitamin D deficiency below <50 nmol/L, which could be considered a relatively high value compared to some other studies [31].
Three out of five studies on symptom-level outcomes [22,28,29] presented associations between low prenatal or perinatal vitamin D and an increased risk for ADHD symptoms, while the other two studies did not find clear associations [19,37]. Three of the studies measured vitamin D from maternal sera in early pregnancy [22,28,37] and two from cord blood [19,29]. Four studies only assessed toddlers or preschool-aged children [19,22,28,29], which might have had an impact on the validity of the results. One study found no difference in ADHD symptoms by vitamin D category but found an interaction related to vitamin D deficiency in the association between maternal depression and offspring ADHD symptoms [19].

3.4.2. ASD and ASD Symptoms or Traits

Ten studies examined the associations between maternal vitamin D during pregnancy and offspring ASD diagnoses [20,21,23,25,30,34,38,41,42,43], whereas four studies examined ASD symptoms or traits [18,35,37,39]. The sample of ASD cases ranged from 58 [25] to 1558 [30]. The diagnoses were either made by a clinician [20,25], were register-based [30,38] or were based on medical records [34,42,43]. There was one study that included parental reports of ASD diagnoses [41].
Three studies showed significant associations between maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy and ASD diagnoses in offspring [20,30,34]. They comprised two studies that examined maternal vitamin D in early pregnancy [20,30] and one study that examined mid-gestation samples [34]. The largest study, with 1558 ASD cases, showed significant odds ratios for the continuous, lowest quintiles compared to the highest quintiles and categorical vitamin D measures [30]. One study reported significant associations between maternal first trimester vitamin D levels in the lower three quartiles (quartiles 1, 2, 3), compared to the highest quartile (quartile 4) [20]. Another study reported an association between deficient vitamin D levels < 25 nmol/L in mid-gestation and offspring ASD, but no association for vitamin D measured from cord blood [34].
In contrast, five studies did not find any associations between maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy and offspring ASD [23,38,41,42,43]. Although one study did not find any association in the overall sample, there was a significant association between maternal vitamin D insufficiency (25–<50 nmol/L) and ASD in Nordic-born mothers [38]. Most studies did not include race/ethnicity as a covariate. Two studies reported significant associations between neonatal vitamin D levels and ASD diagnoses in offspring [21,38] and one found similar associations but only in females [41].
ASD symptoms or traits in children were reported by parents in three studies [18,35,37]. Two studies showed significant associations between vitamin D levels and ASD symptoms or traits. One study reported that sufficient vitamin D levels during pregnancy (≥30 ng/mL) were associated with a lower number of ASD symptoms than deficient levels [37]. Another study reported significant associations between lower vitamin D concentrations <25 nmol/L in mid-gestation, or at the time of birth, and ASD traits [35]. However, one study did not find any correlation between low vitamin D during pregnancy and ASD traits [18].

3.4.3. Depressive Disorders and Depressive Symptoms

No associations were found in the two studies that examined associations between vitamin D levels during pregnancy and diagnosed depression [31] or depressive symptoms [36]. The first study measured maternal vitamin D levels at 30 weeks of gestation and the depression diagnoses were obtained from registers. The subjects were either diagnosed or they had been given at least one prescription for antidepressant medication [31]. In the second study, vitamin D levels were measured at any time during pregnancy and depression symptoms were measured using the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire [36].

3.4.4. Eating Disorder Symptoms

Eating disorder symptoms were only included in one study [16]. This was a cohort study and the offspring were assessed at 14, 17 or 20 years of age. Eating disorder symptoms or diagnoses were based on the Child Eating Disorder Examination or an Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. In addition, the subjects’ body mass indexes were measured and the females were asked about their menstruation. The study used both eating disorder and eating disorder symptoms as definitions for the outcomes and this meant that the diagnostic validity remained somewhat unclear. A total of 98 adolescents filled in the diagnostic criteria and only 13 were males. There were no associations in the total sample, but low maternal vitamin D levels were associated with eating disorders in female offspring. Parental psychopathology was not considered as a covariate.

3.4.5. Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder and Psychotic Symptoms

Psychotic disorders were included in three studies [24,27,40] and one study reported psychotic symptoms and disorders based on a self-report questionnaire [33]. Only the symptoms from that study were included in this review. All three studies examined schizophrenia [24,27,40], and one study also included schizoaffective disorder [40]. The number of cases varied between 26 [40] and 1301 [24] and the offspring were followed until at least young adulthood in all three studies. The two register-based studies found an increased risk for schizophrenia [24,27] in subjects with neonatal vitamin D deficiency. Both studied neonatal dried blood samples and vitamin D levels as quintiles and continuous variables. Interestingly, one study found that the highest quintile had an increased risk for schizophrenia when the fourth quintile was used as a reference [27], while another study did not find any associations between maternal vitamin D levels in the third trimester and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder [40].
One study measured vitamin D from maternal sera at any stage of pregnancy and examined the association with psychotic experiences among 18-year-olds. The number of individuals with psychotic experiences was 117 out of more than 2000 subjects. No associations were established [33].

3.4.6. Behavioral or Emotional Symptoms

Four studies assessed behavioral or emotional symptoms [17,22,37,39]. All four studies measured vitamin D levels from maternal sera in the first or second trimester. Two studies assessed very young children [22,39], whereas the other two had multiple assessment points in childhood and adolescence [17,37]. The Infant Toddler Social Emotional Assessment Scale [39], Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) [17,37] and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) [22,37] were used to assess behavioral and emotional symptoms.
One study reported fewer behavioral and externalizing symptoms in children whose mothers had higher vitamin D levels [22]. One study found an association between low maternal vitamin D levels and increased internalizing scores, but among children of White ethnicity [39]. Two studies did not find associations between prenatal vitamin D levels and offspring’s behavioral or emotional symptoms [17,37].
Since the studies were heterogeneous, we also examined these studies in several subgroups based on three factors: first, large sample size and stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency and with at least 100 mothers in the deficient group (Table 3); second, time of measurement of vitamin D levels (Table S2); and third, geographical locations. There was a tendency to report positive associations between prenatal vitamin D levels and offspring ASD, ADHD or schizophrenia for subgroups with large sample sizes and stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency. However, there were no clear tendencies to report associations based on categorization by time of measurement of vitamin D levels. Moreover, we observed more tendencies to report positive associations from countries from Nordic regions.

4. Discussion

The present systematic review found inconclusive findings with regards to the associations between maternal vitamin D deficiency and neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes. Compared to other outcomes, the most evidence was accumulated for the association between maternal vitamin D deficiency and ASD. When studies with larger sample sizes, stricter definitions for vitamin D deficiency and at least 100 mothers in the deficient group were considered, positive associations were also found for ADHD and schizophrenia. Moreover, studies from Nordic regions with low sunlight exposure during the winter season were more likely to report positive associations between vitamin D levels during pregnancy and offspring psychiatric outcomes. Only one study examined depressive disorder, depressive symptoms, eating disorder symptoms and psychotic experiences and no consensus could be reached for these outcomes. None of the studies examined anxiety or bipolar disorders.

4.1. Neuropsychiatric and Psychiatric Outcomes

The findings of this review suggest a small amount of evidence for any association between maternal vitamin D deficiency and offspring ASD diagnoses. This finding was in line with a previous systematic review that suggested the potential role of vitamin D during pregnancy and autism in children [45]. Possible mechanisms for this association are related to the role of vitamin D in brain development. For example, vitamin D seems to participate in the regulation of certain neurotransmitters, including serotonin [46] and dopamine [47]. Previous studies have shown that these neurotransmitters may function abnormally in subjects with ASD [48,49].
Interestingly, when we examined a subsample of studies with larger sample sizes, stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency and at least 100 mothers in the deficient group, there was a tendency towards reporting more positive findings for ASD, ADHD and schizophrenia (Table 3). The evidence was inconclusive for symptom level outcomes, including ASD symptoms, ADHD symptoms, and behavioral and emotional symptoms. This was in line with previous reviews that examined neurocognitive outcomes and found mixed results [4,50,51]. The lack of associations in these studies may be attributable to factors such as small sample sizes, low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, age at the time of the assessment and assessment tools. Many studies were based on small sample sizes that, for example, weakened the statistical power of possible subgroup analyses. While most of the studies controlled for maternal and neonatal factors, only eight studies adjusted for maternal psychiatric illness [19,21,24,27,29,30,32,40], and six for race or ethnicity [18,30,32,38,41,44]. These are both important confounding factors for the associations between maternal vitamin D levels and offspring psychiatric outcomes. One study only reported the association between maternal vitamin D levels and offspring behavioral and emotional symptoms by race, leaving out relevant information about the total sample [39]. In addition, when we examined studies by geographical locations, Nordic countries had a greater tendency to report positive associations. Moreover, the majority of these studies adjusted for the seasons when subjects were born or had blood drawn.
Several of the included studies had some important limitations. For example, the assessments were made at an early age in many studies, including studies on ADHD symptoms [19,22,28,29] and behavioral and emotional symptoms [39]. Furthermore, most of the questionnaire-based studies just relied on information from parental reports. In addition, attrition rates were high in most of the cohort studies and they were not always clearly reported. The included confounders varied: most studies had considered socio-demographic and pre- or perinatal risk factors, but parental psychopathology was included only in ten studies. Parental psychopathology is an important potential confounder because genetic effects are well established in the etiology of most neuropsychiatric and psychiatric disorders.

4.2. Timing of Exposure

The time when vitamin D was measured in the included studies varied from early pregnancy to neonatal samples. While most of the studies measured vitamin D levels in early pregnancy or dried blood spots from newborns, few studies had measured vitamin D levels during mid-gestation, late pregnancy or from umbilical cord blood at birth. The studies that measured vitamin D deficiency during early pregnancy or used newborn samples had a greater tendency to report positive associations. Only four studies had measured vitamin D status during multiple stages of pregnancy [34,35,38,44], which limited the ability to compare results across pregnancy. One study examined the association with ADHD using maternal vitamin D during the first and third trimesters and only found a significant association for vitamin D deficiency in the third trimester [44]. However, another measured vitamin D levels in mid-gestation and from a neonatal blood sample and observed significant associations with autistic traits at both time points [35]. Similarly, one study found significant associations between ASD and vitamin D levels in early pregnancy and the neonatal period, but the findings were restricted to the children of Nordic mothers [38]. In contrast, one study only found significant associations between ASD and maternal vitamin D levels in mid-gestation, but not for ASD and newborn vitamin D concentrations [34].
Previous literature suggests that maternal vitamin D concentrations can be seen as the determinant or the proxy of the closely correlated fetal vitamin D status. It also suggests that neonatal vitamin D concentrations measured from cord blood at birth can be used as markers of fetal vitamin D status at the end of gestation [14]. It is difficult to extract evidence from just the results of on these few studies measuring vitamin D levels at two time points in pregnancy. Moreover, these particular studies were based on small sample sizes. Future studies with large sample sizes and vitamin D measurements at multiple time points are warranted.

4.3. Categorization of Exposure

There was high heterogeneity in how vitamin D levels were classified in different studies. While 22 of the studies reported vitamin D levels using continuous variables, 18 reported varying clinical categories. The definitions of vitamin D deficiency varied considerably across studies, from <20 nmol/L to <50 nmol/, and this made it difficult to compare the findings. Moreover, there were few cases with deficient vitamin D levels in some studies, which could have limited the power to detect associations.

4.4. Age at Assessment

Most studies were conducted among young children, with a few among young adults or adults. Most associations were observed in young children, especially for ASD and ADHD. Only one study followed up on offspring behavioral symptoms until young adulthood and found no associations in the adolescent samples [17]. Based on two studies on schizophrenia, there were some indications that possible adverse effects of vitamin D deficiency might persist into young adulthood [27,40]. However, more studies are needed to confirm these findings. In some studies, the age range of the children was provided, and the studies were categorized by mean age at assessment for comparison; thus, some misclassification may have occurred.

4.5. Strengths and Limitations

A key strength of this systematic review is that we focused on a broad range of neuropsychiatric and psychiatric outcomes. This scope has not been explored by previous reviews that have focused on vitamin D in relation to neurodevelopmental or neurocognitive outcomes [4,10]. Furthermore, we investigated the studies rigorously by looking at the timing of vitamin D measurements, the categorization of the vitamin D levels and the age when psychiatric outcomes were assessed. However, there are several limitations that should be considered. First, several previous reviews focused on cognitive, motor and language development outcomes and prenatal vitamin D and we did not include those outcomes in our review. Second, the studies included in the review were heterogeneous. The study populations varied, especially by the timing of the exposure measurements and the categorization of vitamin D, which made it difficult to harmonize the results across studies. Third, only a few studies investigated outcomes other than ASD or ADHD, which prevented us from drawing firm conclusions on most of the other psychiatric outcomes. For example, eating disorders, psychotic experiences, depressive disorders and depressive symptoms were only examined in one study each. None of the studies examined other common psychiatric outcomes, such as anxiety and bipolar disorders. Fourth, only four studies measured vitamin D levels at two time points and the results were not uniform across the different time points. Finally, there were few studies from low-to-middle-income countries and this means that the most of the findings were based on high-income countries.

5. Conclusions

Our systematic review provides a small amount of evidence for the association between maternal vitamin D levels during pregnancy and offspring ASD. When studies with larger sample sizes and stricter definitions of vitamin D deficiency were considered, positive associations were also found for ADHD and schizophrenia. The findings could have important implications for public health, as vitamin D deficiency can be readily prevented with vitamin supplements. However, as the included studies were all observational, no conclusions can be made regarding the causality of the observed associations. Several other factors including genetic factors also play a role in the multifactorial etiology of neuropsychiatric and psychiatric disorders. No consensus was established for other psychiatric outcomes due to inconclusive findings or the low number of studies. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longitudinal designs with long follow-up periods are needed to draw firm conclusions, especially for adulthood-onset disorders. Moreover, future studies should preferably measure vitamin D at multiple time points during pregnancy, and at birth, to establish a window that might be sensitive to vitamin D deficiency. In particular, more studies are needed to explore the associations between prenatal vitamin D and some currently understudied common psychiatric outcomes such as anxiety, depression and bipolar disorders.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24010063/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S.; methodology, S.U., T.S., S.S., B.A. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.U., T.S., S.S. and B.A.; writing—review and editing, S.U., T.S., S.S., B.A. and A.S.; visualization, S.U., T.S., S.S. and B.A.; supervision, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme, decision number: 320162 and supported by INVEST research flagship. The funders played no role in any aspect of the study or manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

As this is a systematic review of previous studies, direct human participation is not involved.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brown, A.J.; Dusso, A.; Slatopolsky, E. Vitamin D. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, F157–F175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D Deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marini, F.; Bartoccini, E.; Cascianelli, G.; Voccoli, V.; Baviglia, M.G.; Magni, M.V.; Garcia-Gil, M.; Albi, E. Effect of 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Embryonic Hippocampal Cells. Hippocampus 2010, 20, 696–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pet, M.A.; Brouwer-Brolsma, E.M. The Impact of Maternal Vitamin D Status on Offspring Brain Development and Function: A Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Eyles, D.; Burne, T.; McGrath, J. Vitamin D in Fetal Brain Development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mattei, D.; Pietrobelli, A. Micronutrients and Brain Development. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2019, 8, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prado, E.L.; Dewey, K.G. Nutrition and Brain Development in Early Life. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Susser, E.; Neugebauer, R.; Hoek, H.W.; Brown, A.S.; Lin, S.; Labovitz, D.; Gorman, J.M. Schizophrenia After Prenatal Famine: Further Evidence. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1996, 53, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.J.; McGrath, J.J. Vitamin D, Effects on Brain Development, Adult Brain Function and the Links between Low Levels of Vitamin D and Neuropsychiatric Disease. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2013, 34, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia-Serna, A.; Morales, E. Neurodevelopmental Effects of Prenatal Vitamin D in Humans: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 25, 2468–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Campbell, M.; McKenzie, J.E.; Sowden, A.; Katikireddi, S.V.; Brennan, S.E.; Ellis, S.; Hartmann-Boyce, J.; Ryan, R.; Shepperd, S.; Thomas, J.; et al. Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) in Systematic Reviews: Reporting Guideline. BMJ 2020, 368, l6890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Upadhyaya, S.; Silwal, S.; Ståhlberg, T.; Arrhenius, B.; Sourander, A. Maternal Vitamin D during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review Protocol. Available online: osf.io/k6twd (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  14. Saraf, R.; Morton, S.M.B.; Camargo, C.A.; Grant, C.C. Global Summary of Maternal and Newborn Vitamin D Status-a Systematic Review. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2016, 12, 647–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moola, S.; Munn, Z.; Tufanaru, C.; Aromataris, E.; Sears, K.; Sfetcu, R.; Currie, M.; Lisy, K.; Qureshi, R.; Mattis, P.; et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; JBI: Adelaide, Australia, 2020; Available online: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  16. Allen, K.L.; Byrne, S.M.; Kusel, M.M.H.; Hart, P.H.; Whitehouse, A.J.O. Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Eating Disorder Risk in Adolescence. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2013, 46, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Whitehouse, A.J.O.; Holt, B.J.; Serralha, M.; Holt, P.G.; Kusel, M.M.H.; Hart, P.H. Maternal Serum Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Neurocognitive Development. Pediatrics 2012, 129, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Whitehouse, A.J.O.; Holt, B.J.; Serralha, M.; Holt, P.G.; Hart, P.H.; Kusel, M.M.H. Maternal Vitamin D Levels and the Autism Phenotype among Offspring. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013, 43, 1495–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, S.-S.; Zhu, D.-M.; Yin, W.-J.; Hao, J.-H.; Huang, K.; Tao, F.-B.; Tao, R.-X.; Zhu, P. The Role of Neonatal Vitamin D in the Association of Prenatal Depression with Toddlers ADHD Symptoms: A Birth Cohort Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2021, 281, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, J.; Xin, K.; Wei, J.; Zhang, K.; Xiao, H. Lower Maternal Serum 25(OH) D in First Trimester Associated with Higher Autism Risk in Chinese Offspring. J. Psychosom. Res. 2016, 89, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, D.-M.; Wen, X.; Han, X.-R.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.-J.; Shen, M.; Fan, S.-H.; Zhuang, J.; Li, M.-Q.; Hu, B.; et al. Relationship Between Neonatal Vitamin D at Birth and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders: The NBSIB Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018, 33, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Daraki, V.; Roumeliotaki, T.; Koutra, K.; Chalkiadaki, G.; Katrinaki, M.; Kyriklaki, A.; Kampouri, M.; Margetaki, K.; Vafeiadi, M.; Papavasiliou, S.; et al. High Maternal Vitamin D Levels in Early Pregnancy May Protect against Behavioral Difficulties at Preschool Age: The Rhea Mother–Child Cohort, Crete, Greece. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2018, 27, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Egorova, O.; Myte, R.; Schneede, J.; Hägglöf, B.; Bölte, S.; Domellöf, E.; Ivars A’Roch, B.; Elgh, F.; Ueland, P.M.; Silfverdal, S.-A. Maternal Blood Folate Status during Early Pregnancy and Occurrence of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Offspring: A Study of 62 Serum Biomarkers. Mol. Autism 2020, 11, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Eyles, D.W.; Trzaskowski, M.; Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Mattheisen, M.; Meier, S.; Gooch, H.; Anggono, V.; Cui, X.; Tan, M.C.; Burne, T.H.J.; et al. The Association between Neonatal Vitamin D Status and Risk of Schizophrenia. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Fernell, E.; Bejerot, S.; Westerlund, J.; Miniscalco, C.; Simila, H.; Eyles, D.; Gillberg, C.; Humble, M.B. Autism Spectrum Disorder and Low Vitamin D at Birth: A Sibling Control Study. Mol. Autism 2015, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Gustafsson, P.; Rylander, L.; Lindh, C.H.; Jönsson, B.A.G.; Ode, A.; Olofsson, P.; Ivarsson, S.A.; Rignell-Hydbom, A.; Haglund, N.; Källén, K. Vitamin D Status at Birth and Future Risk of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. McGrath, J.J.; Burne, T.H.; Féron, F.; MacKay-Sim, A.; Eyles, D.W. Developmental Vitamin D Deficiency and Risk of Schizophrenia: A 10-Year Update. Schizophr. Bull. 2010, 36, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Morales, E.; Julvez, J.; Torrent, M.; Ballester, F.; Rodríguez-Bernal, C.L.; Andiarena, A.; Vegas, O.; Castilla, A.M.; Rodriguez-Dehli, C.; Tardón, A.; et al. Vitamin D in Pregnancy and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-like Symptoms in Childhood. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mossin, M.H.; Aaby, J.B.; Dalgård, C.; Lykkedegn, S.; Christesen, H.T.; Bilenberg, N. Inverse Associations between Cord Vitamin D and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: A Child Cohort Study. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2017, 51, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sourander, A.; Upadhyaya, S.; Surcel, H.-M.; Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, S.; Cheslack-Postava, K.; Silwal, S.; Sucksdorff, M.; McKeague, I.W.; Brown, A.S. Maternal Vitamin D Levels During Pregnancy and Offspring Autism Spectrum Disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 90, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Strøm, M.; Halldorsson, T.I.; Hansen, S.; Granström, C.; Maslova, E.; Petersen, S.B.; Cohen, A.S.; Olsen, S.F. Vitamin D Measured in Maternal Serum and Offspring Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Prospective Study with Long-Term Follow-Up. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 64, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sucksdorff, M.; Brown, A.S.; Chudal, R.; Surcel, H.-M.; Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, S.; Cheslack-Postava, K.; Gyllenberg, D.; Sourander, A. Maternal Vitamin D Levels and the Risk of Offspring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2021, 60, 142–151.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sullivan, S.; Wills, A.; Lawlor, D.; McGrath, J.; Zammit, S. Prenatal Vitamin D Status and Risk of Psychotic Experiences at Age 18years-a Longitudinal Birth Cohort. Schizophr. Res. 2013, 148, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.J.; Blanken, L.M.E.; Kruithof, C.J.; Verhulst, F.; White, T.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Tiemeier, H.; McGrath, J.J. Gestational Vitamin D Deficiency and Autism Spectrum Disorder. BJPsych Open 2017, 3, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E.; Eyles, D.W.; Burne, T.H.J.; Blanken, L.M.E.; Kruithof, C.J.; Verhulst, F.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Tiemeier, H.; McGrath, J.J. Gestational Vitamin D Deficiency and Autism-Related Traits: The Generation R Study. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, M.-J.; Dunn, E.C.; Okereke, O.I.; Kraft, P.; Zhu, Y.; Smoller, J.W. Maternal Vitamin D Status during Pregnancy and Offspring Risk of Childhood/Adolescent Depression: Results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 265, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. López-Vicente, M.; Sunyer, J.; Lertxundi, N.; González, L.; Rodríguez-Dehli, C.; Espada Sáenz-Torre, M.; Vrijheid, M.; Tardón, A.; Llop, S.; Torrent, M.; et al. Maternal Circulating Vitamin D3 Levels during Pregnancy and Behaviour across Childhood. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lee, B.K.; Eyles, D.W.; Magnusson, C.; Newschaffer, C.J.; McGrath, J.J.; Kvaskoff, D.; Ko, P.; Dalman, C.; Karlsson, H.; Gardner, R.M. Developmental Vitamin D and Autism Spectrum Disorders: Findings from the Stockholm Youth Cohort. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26, 1578–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chawla, D.; Fuemmeler, B.; Benjamin-Neelon, S.E.; Hoyo, C.; Murphy, S.; Daniels, J.L. Early Prenatal Vitamin D Concentrations and Social-Emotional Development in Infants. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McGrath, J.; Eyles, D.; Mowry, B.; Yolken, R.; Buka, S. Low Maternal Vitamin D as a Risk Factor for Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study Using Banked Sera. Schizophr. Res. 2003, 63, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schmidt, R.J.; Niu, Q.; Eyles, D.W.; Hansen, R.L.; Iosif, A.-M. Neonatal Vitamin D Status in Relation to Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Delay in the CHARGE Case–Control Study. Autism Res. 2019, 12, 976–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Windham, G.C.; Pearl, M.; Anderson, M.C.; Poon, V.; Eyles, D.; Jones, K.L.; Lyall, K.; Kharrazi, M.; Croen, L.A. Newborn Vitamin D Levels in Relation to Autism Spectrum Disorders and Intellectual Disability: A Case–Control Study in California. Autism Res. 2019, 12, 989–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Windham, G.C.; Pearl, M.; Poon, V.; Berger, K.; Soriano, J.W.; Eyles, D.; Lyall, K.; Kharrazi, M.; Croen, L.A. Maternal Vitamin D Levels During Pregnancy in Association With Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) or Intellectual Disability (ID) in Offspring; Exploring Non-Linear Patterns and Demographic Sub-Groups. Autism Res. 2020, 13, 2216–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chu, S.H.; Huang, M.; Kelly, R.S.; Kachroo, P.; Litonjua, A.A.; Weiss, S.T.; Lasky-Su, J. Circulating Levels of Maternal Vitamin D and Risk of ADHD in Offspring: Results from the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 51, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Uçar, N.; Grant, W.B.; Peraita-Costa, I.; Morales Suárez-Varela, M. How 25(OH)D Levels during Pregnancy Affect Prevalence of Autism in Children: Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Patrick, R.P.; Ames, B.N. Vitamin D Hormone Regulates Serotonin Synthesis. Part 1: Relevance for Autism. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 2398–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Pertile, R.A.N.; Cui, X.; Eyles, D.W. Vitamin D Signaling and the Differentiation of Developing Dopamine Systems. Neuroscience 2016, 333, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pavăl, D. A Dopamine Hypothesis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Dev. Neurosci. 2017, 39, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Muller, C.L.; Anacker, A.M.J.; Veenstra-VanderWeele, J. The Serotonin System in Autism Spectrum Disorder: From Biomarker to Animal Models. Neuroscience 2016, 321, 24–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Janbek, J.; Specht, I.O.; Heitmann, B.L. Associations between Vitamin D Status in Pregnancy and Offspring Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Literature Review. Nutr. Rev. 2019, 77, 330–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mutua, A.M.; Mogire, R.M.; Elliott, A.M.; Williams, T.N.; Webb, E.L.; Abubakar, A.; Atkinson, S.H. Effects of Vitamin D Deficiency on Neurobehavioural Outcomes in Children: A Systematic Review. Wellcome Open Res. 2020, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study.
Ijms 24 00063 g001
Figure 2. The number of studies for each outcome, stratified by the age groups assessed in the study. Some studies examined multiple outcomes and multiple age groups.
Figure 2. The number of studies for each outcome, stratified by the age groups assessed in the study. Some studies examined multiple outcomes and multiple age groups.
Ijms 24 00063 g002
Figure 3. The number of studies for each outcome, stratified by vitamin D assessment time points in the study. Four studies assessed vitamin D at multiple time points.
Figure 3. The number of studies for each outcome, stratified by vitamin D assessment time points in the study. Four studies assessed vitamin D at multiple time points.
Ijms 24 00063 g003
Figure 4. The number of studies by the methods of examining vitamin D levels. Many studies had more than one way to examine vitamin D levels.
Figure 4. The number of studies by the methods of examining vitamin D levels. Many studies had more than one way to examine vitamin D levels.
Ijms 24 00063 g004
Table 1. (a) Summary of papers with psychiatric disorders or diagnoses as the outcome. (b) Summary of papers with psychiatric symptoms or questionnaire scores as the outcome.
Table 1. (a) Summary of papers with psychiatric disorders or diagnoses as the outcome. (b) Summary of papers with psychiatric symptoms or questionnaire scores as the outcome.
(a)
Author, Year, CountryStudy
Design
Psychiatric
Disorders in Offspring
N: Total Cohort/Outcome
Disorder; or Cases/Controls
Age at
Outcome
Assessment
Vitamin D
Assessment Time
Vitamin D
Categorization
Outcome AssessmentLimitationsMain Findings
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Chu et al.,
2022 [44]
USA
Nested sample from a randomized studyADHD879/1246–9 yearsMaternal sera at 10–18 weeks and 32–38 weeks of gestationCategories: <12 ng/mL, 12–19.9 ng/mL, 20–29.9 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mLParental report of clinical diagnosis of ADHD No association between vitamin D at 10–18 weeks and ADHD. At 32–38 weeks: deficient aOR 0.34 (95% CI 0.12–0.94) and insufficient aOR 0.41 (95% CI 0.15–1.10) categories against the highly deficient vitamin D category.
Gustafsson et al.,
2015 [26]
Sweden
Case-controlADHD202 cases, 202 controls5–17 yearsUmbilical cord blood samplesContinuous, quartiles, 10th and 25th percentilesClinical diagnosesControls not matched by sex; limited covariates consideredNo associations: continuous vitamin D and ADHD: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.96–1.01), levels below the 25th percentile: OR 1.13 (95% CI 0.69–1.83), levels below the 10th percentile: OR 1.14 (95% CI 0.56–2.34).
Sucksdorff et al.,
2021 [32]
Finland
Nested case-controlADHD1067 cases, 1067 controls2–13.7 years; median age 7.3 years (SD 1.9)Maternal sera at first or early second trimesterContinuous, categories: <30 nmol/L, 30–50 nmol/L, >50 nmol/L and quintilesRegister-based diagnoses ICD-10: F90.0, F90.1, F90.8 or F90.9Limited coverage of all ADHD children from registersSignificant associations: continuous decreasing vitamin D levels and offspring ADHD: aOR 1.45 (95% CI 1.15–1.81), lowest versus highest quintile aOR 1.53 (95% CI 1.11–2.12).
Strøm et al.,
2014 [31]
Denmark
CohortADHD Depression965/24 ADHD cases, 102 depression casesADHD: median age 17.2 years.
Depression: median age 19.3 years
Maternal sera at 30 weeks of gestationContinuous and categories: <50 nmol/L, 50–75 nmol/L, ≥75–125 nmol/L, and ≥125 nmol/L.Register-based diagnosis of ADHD: ICD-8: 308, ICD-10: F90 or psychostimulant prescription. Depression: ICD-8: 2960, 2962, 2968, 2969, 2980, 3004 or 3011, ICD-10:
F32) or antidepressant prescription.
Small sample of ADHD casesNo significant associations between vitamin D levels <50 nmol/L and ADHD or depression. Higher vitamin D concentrations showed a direct association with offspring depression (p trend = 0.02)
Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs)
Egorova et al.,
2020 [23]
Sweden
Case-controlASD100 cases, 100 controlsN/AMaternal sera at 14 weeks of gestationContinuousRegister-based diagnoses ICD-10: F84.0 or F84.5Study focused on several biomarkers: no specifics available for vitamin DNo association between continuous vitamin D and ASD: OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.57–1.04).
Chen et al.,
2016 [20]
China
Case-controlASD68 cases, 68 controls3–7 years; mean 3.9 years (SD 1.2)Maternal sera at 11–12 weeks of gestationContinuous and quartilesDiagnosis confirmed by clinician using DSM-V criteriaSmall sample sizeRising continuous vitamin D was associated with lower odds of ASD: aOR 0.862 (95% CI 0.795–0.913). Quartile analyses: first quartile: aOR 3.99 (95% CI 2.58–7.12), second quartile: aOR 2.68 (95% CI 1.44–4.29) compared to the fourth quartile of vitamin D concentration.
Fernell et al.,
2015 [25]
Sweden
Nested case-siblingASD58 cases, 58 siblings>4 yearsDried blood spots from newbornsContinuousClinical diagnosesSmall sample size, no covariates consideredThe mean vitamin D level was lower in children with ASD (24.0 nmol/L, SD 19.6) than in their siblings (31.9 nmol/L, SD 27.7), and the difference was significant (t57 = 2.57, p = 0.013, d = 0.33).
Lee et al.,
2021 [38]
Sweden
Nested case-control, case-siblingASDPregnancy sample: 449 cases, 574
controls; neonatal sample: 1399/1607; neonatal sibling sample: 357/364
0–17 yearsMaternal sera at 10–11 weeks of gestation and dried blood spots from newbornsCategories: <25 nmol/L, 25–50 nmol/L and ≥50 nmol/LRegister-based diagnoses ICD-9: 299, ICD-
10: F84, and DSM-IV 299
Stratified analyses limited due to sample sizeMaternal vitamin D levels were not associated with ASD in the overall sample. In the subgroup of Nordic-born mothers, there were associations between maternal vitamin D insufficiency (25–50 nmol/L) and ASD: OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.00–2.49). Neonatal vitamin D < 25 nmol/L was also associated with ASD: OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.02–1.75) compared to levels ≥ 50 nmol/L.
Schmidt et al.,
2019 [41]
USA
Case-controlASD357 cases, 234 controlsMean age at diagnosis: 3.6 years (SD 0.8)Blood samples from newbornsContinuous and categories: <50 nmol/L, 50–<75 nmol/L, ≥75 nmol/LService use from regional medical centers. ASD diagnosis confirmed by parental ADI–R interview and child assessment with ADOS.Few subjects had vitamin D deficiencyNo association between a 25 nmol/L increase in vitamin D levels and ASD before or after adjustment OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.86–1.06) and aOR 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.08). For females only (N = 47) there was an association between higher vitamin D and less ASD diagnoses: OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55–0.99).
Sourander et al., 2021 [30]
Finland
Nested case-controlASD1558 cases, 1558 controls0–18 years; median age at diagnosis: 6.6 years (SD 3.2)Maternal sera at first or early second trimesterContinuous, categories: <30 nmol/L, 30–50 nmol/L, >50nmol/L and quintilesRegister-based diagnoses ICD-10: F84.x and ICD-9: 299.x Increasing continuous vitamin D levels and decreasing risk of offspring ASD: aOR 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.92). Lowest quintile aOR 1.36 (95% CI 1.03–1.79) compared with the highest quintile. Deficient category (<30 nmol/L) aOR 1.44 (95% CI 1.15–1.81), and insufficient (30–49.9 nmol/L) aOR 1.26 (95% CI 1.04–1.52), compared to sufficient levels.
Vinkhuyzen et al.,
2017 [34]
the Netherlands
CohortASD9778/68 cases~6 yearsMaternal sera in mid-gestation and cord blood at birthContinuous and categories: <25 nmol/L, 25–49.9 nmol/L and ≥50 nmol/LScreening with parent-reported questionnaires (SRS, CBCL, SDQ), medical records and parental interviews of screen-positive children. Polygenic risk scores included.Small sample of ASD casesMaternal serum at mid-gestation: deficient versus sufficient OR 2.42 (95% CI 1.09–5.07). Cord blood: deficient versus sufficient, no association.
Windham et al.,
2019 [42]
USA
Case-controlASD562 cases, 426 controls4–9 yearsDried blood spots from newbornsContinuous and categories: <50, 50–75 and >75 nmol/LMedical records, expert review, final case status confirmed if DSM criteria were metFew newborns were deficient (14% had vitamin D < 50 nmol/L)No association between vitamin D levels and ASD, some significant interactions with ethnicity and sex.
Windham et al.,
2020 [43]
USA
Case-controlASD534 cases, 421 controlsN/AMaternal sera at mid-gestationContinuous and categories: <50, 50–75 and >75 nmol/LMedical records, expert review, final case status if DSM criteria were metFew mothers were deficient (<10%)No overall association between vitamin D and ASD or protective effect with increasing levels of vitamin D, but some significant interactions with ethnicity and sex.
Wu et al.,
2018 [21]
China
Nested case-controlASD310 cases, 1240 controls3 yearsDried blood spots from newbornsContinuous, quartiles, deciles and over or under 30 nmol/LClinical examination (DSM-V diagnostic criteria) ADI-R, parent reportPossible overadjustment with covariatesThe median vitamin D level was lower in children with ASD compared to controls (p < 0.0001). RR for the lowest first quartile: 3.6 (95% CI 1.8–7.2), second quartile: RR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4–3.5) and third quartile: RR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1–3.3) compared to the fourth quartile.
Psychotic disorders
Eyles et al.,
2018 [24]
Denmark
Nested case-controlSchizophrenia1301 cases, 1301 controls5–24 yearsDried blood spots from newbornsContinuous and quintilesRegister-based diagnoses (ICD-10: F20). Polygenic risk scores accounted for in a subsample.Youngest cases only 5 years at the time of diagnosisThe lowest quintile had an increased risk: IRR 1.44 (95% CI 1.12–1.85) compared to the highest quintile. In the combined sample with polygenic risk scores: lowest quintile IRR 1.52 (95% CI 1.20–1.93) compared to the highest quintile. Continuous vitamin D and ASD: IRR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86–0.99).
McGrath et al., 2003 [40]
USA
Case-controlSchizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder26 cases, 51 controlsAdults, age range not specifiedMaternal serum at third trimesterContinuousExpert review of interview data and medical records (using DSM-IV criteria)Small sample sizeThere was no significant difference in the vitamin D levels of cases and controls OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.92–1.05). However, the vitamin D levels of subjects with black ethnicity differed somewhat (not statistically significant).
McGrath et al., 2010 [27]
Denmark
Nested case-controlSchizophrenia424 cases, 424 controls11–24 yearsDried blood spots from newbornsContinuous and quintilesRegister-based diagnoses (ICD-10 F20)The results do not suggest a dose–response relationship between low vitamin D and schizophrenia.Compared to the fourth quintile, the lowest quintile had an RR of 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.5), while those in the second and third quintiles had RRs of 2.0 (95% CI 1.3–3.2) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.3–3.4), respectively. The fifth (highest) quintile also had an increased RR of 1.71 (95% CI 1.04–2.8).
(b)
Author, YearStudy DesignPsychiatric Symptoms in OffspringN for Total Cohort/Outcome
Response
Offspring’s Age at
Assessment
Vitamin D Assessment TimeVitamin D
Categorization
Outcome
Assessment
LimitationsMain Findings
Daraki et al.,
2018 [22]
Greece
CohortADHD symptoms and
behavioral difficulties
849/4874 yearsMaternal sera at first or early second trimesterTertilesSDQ and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder TestOutcomes based on parent report only, young age for the assessment of ADHDChildren of mothers in the highest tertile had less hyperactivity–impulsivity symptoms IRR 0.63 (95% CI 0.39–0.99), fewer total ADHD-like symptoms IRR 0.60 (95% CI 0.37–0.95) and a significant score reduction in total behavioral difficulties (beta-coefficient: −1.25, 95% CI −2.32, −0.19) and externalizing symptoms (beta-coefficient: −0.87, 95% CI −1.58, −0.15), compared to the lowest tertile.
Ma et al.,
2021 [19]
China
CohortADHD symptoms in combination with maternal depression2552/1125 assessed for ADHD symptoms/145 mothers with depression4–4.5 yearsUmbilical cord blood samplesContinuous and categories: <25 nmol/L and ≥25 nmol/LParent version of Conners’ Hyperactivity IndexAge at assessment, subgroup analyses for maternal depression low-poweredNo association between low neonatal vitamin D and ADHD symptoms overall, but ADHD symptoms were more likely among vitamin D deficient neonates if the mother had depression (adjusted RR 3.74 (95% CI: 1.49–9.41), compared to the group with no maternal depression.
Morales et al.,
2015 [28]
Spain
CohortADHD symptoms3174/1650Mean age 4.8 years (SD not reported)Maternal sera, mean gestation weeks of blood draw 13.3 (SD 2.9).Continuous and categories: <20 ng/mL, 20 to 29.9 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL.Teacher report of ADHD symptoms (using forms with DSM and ICD criteria)Up to 40% attrition, symptoms reported only by teachers, age at assessmentContinuous rising vitamin D reduced the number of total ADHD-like symptoms: IRR 0.89 (95% CI 0.80–0.98), inattention subscales: IRR 0.89 (95% CI 0.79–0.99) and hyperactivity–impulsivity scale: IRR 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.99).
Mossin et al.,
2017 [29]
Denmark
CohortADHD symptoms6707/12332–4 years; mean 2.7 years (SD 0.6)Umbilical cord blood samplesContinuous and categories: <50 nmol/L insufficiency, <25 nmol/L deficiencyParent-reported CBCLAge at assessment, only parent report of ADHD symptomsVitamin D levels >25 nmol/L and >30 nmol/L were associated with lower ADHD scores compared to levels ≤25 nmol/L (p = 0.035) and ≤30 nmol/L (p = 0.043), respectively. The adjusted beta coefficient of scoring above the 90th percentile was 0.989 (95% CI 0.979–0.999).
López-Vicente et al.,
2019 [37]
Spain
CohortADHD symptoms, ASD symptoms, social competence and behavioral problems3126/21075, 8, 14 and 18 yearsMaternal sera at mean 13.3 (SD 2.8) weeks of gestationContinuous and categories: <20 ng/mL, 20 to 29.9 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mL.Parent-reported Conner’s Parent Rating Scale, Childhood Autism Spectrum Test, SDQ and CBCL. Teacher-reported California Preschool Social Competence Scale.High attrition at 14- and 18-years assessments, large number of outcomes but no adjustments for multiple testingAssociation between prenatal vitamin D and social competence at 5 years of age: adjusted beta coefficient for 10 ng/mL increment 0.77 (95% CI 0.19–1.35). Null associations with total behavioral problems, ADHD and ASD symptoms in children from 5 to 18 years old.
Vinkhuyzen et al., 2018 [35]
The Netherlands
CohortAutistic traits9778/4229 with SRS scores/2489 with both vitamin D measures~6 yearsMaternal sera in mid-gestation and cord blood at birthContinuous and categories: <25 nmol/L, 25–49.9 nmol/L and ≥50 nmol/LParent-reported SRS. Polygenic risk scores accounted for in a subsample.Differential attritionSignificant associations between vitamin D deficiency and higher scores on the SRS. Mid-gestation vitamin D and SRS scores deficient vs. sufficient: beta coefficient 0.06 (SE 0.01), cord blood: deficient vs. sufficient 0.03 (SE 0.01).
Whitehouse et al.,
2013 [18]
Australia
CohortAutistic traits (parent-reported ASD diagnosis N = 3, not included)2900/406Mean age 19.8 years (SD 0.77)Maternal sera at 18 weeks of gestationContinuous and categories: ≤49, 50–66, and ≥67 nmol/LSelf-reported autism spectrum quotient questionnaireHigh attrition rate, vitamin D categorization (possibly limited power to detect effects of deficiency)Maternal vitamin D concentrations did not significantly correlate with offspring total autistic traits, nor most questionnaire subscales. There was a weak, inverse correlation with high scores on the attention-switching subscale: OR 5.46 (95 % CI 1.29–23.05) for low vitamin D.
Sullivan et al.,
2013 [33]
United Kingdom
CohortPsychotic symptoms
(psychotic disorder outcome excluded)
2399/2047 interviewed/177 with psychotic experiences18 yearsMaternal sera collected at any stage of pregnancyContinuous and quartilesThe Psychosis-Like Symptom interviewFew mothers were vitamin D deficient (4%).No association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency and suspected or definite psychotic experiences: OR for fourth quartile 1.00 (95% C1 0.63–1.59) compared to first quartile. No association in continuous analysis either.
Wang et al.,
2020 [36]
United Kingdom
CohortDepressive symptoms14541/2938 respondents in childhood/2485 in adolescenceChildhood: mean age 10.6 (SD 0.25) and adolescence: mean age 13.8 (SD 0.21)Maternal sera collected at any stage of pregnancy (median 29.4 weeks)Categories: <20 ng/mL, 20–29.9 ng/mL and ≥30 ng/mLShort Moods and Feelings Questionnaire obtained by interview. Polygenic risk scores accounted for in a subsample.Differential attritionNo association between prenatal vitamin D deficiency and depressive symptoms in childhood: OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.73–1.58) nor adolescence: OR 1.32 (95% CI 0.98–1.79). No interactions with polygenic risk scores.
Chawla et al.,
2019 [39]
USA
CohortInternalizing and externalizing symptoms, dysregulation, ASD symptoms1700/2181–2 years; mean 14.3 months (SD 3.3)Maternal sera in first or second trimesterQuartilesParent-reported Infant Toddler Social Emotional AssessmentResults reported only for different ethnic groups, not for the overall sample. Multiple testing not accounted for. Low power in ethnic subgroups.Mixed findings. Lower prenatal vitamin D was associated with higher (less favorable) internalizing scores among white infants, but the opposite among Black and Hispanic infants. Among Black infants only, lower vitamin D was associated with higher (more favorable) ASD Social Competence scores and lower (more favorable) ASD problem scores. No strong patterns for externalizing symptom scores.
Whitehouse et al.,
2012 [17]
Australia
CohortInternalizing and externalizing behavior2900/7432, 5, 8, 10, 14 and 17 yearsMaternal sera at 18 weeks of gestationQuartilesParent-reported CBCLAttrition in the adolescent samples. Exclusion of non-participantsThere were no significant associations between prenatal vitamin D concentrations and offspring behavioral or emotional difficulties at any time point in childhood or adolescence (no ORs provided, all p values non-significant).
Allen et al.,
2013 [16]
Australia
CohortEating disorder symptoms2900/526 respondents of which 98 had eating disorder symptoms14–20 yearsMaternal sera at 18 weeks’ gestationQuartilesChild Eating Disorder Examination and Eating Disorder Examination-QuestionnaireSmall sample sizeLow maternal vitamin D levels were associated with offspring eating disorder symptoms in females only aOR 2.09 (95% CI: 1.03–5.27). No association in the overall sample.
Abbreviations: aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CBCL: Child Behaviour Checklist, CI: confidence interval, DSM: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ICD: International Classification of Diseases, IRR: incidence rate ratio, OR: odds ratio, RR: relative risk, SD: standard deviation, SDQ: Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire, SE: standard error, SRS: Social Responsiveness Scale.
Table 2. Findings of the reviewed studies by each outcome.
Table 2. Findings of the reviewed studies by each outcome.
OutcomePositive FindingsMixed FindingsNull Findings
ADHDSucksdorff et al., 2021 [32]
Chu et al., 2022 [44]
0Chu et al., 2022 [44]
Gustafsson et al., 2015 [26]
Strøm et al., 2014 [31]
ADHD symptomsDaraki et al., 2018 [22]
Morales et al., 2015 [28]
Mossin et al., 2017 [29]
0López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Ma et al., 2021 [19]
ASDChen et al., 2016 [20]
Fernell et al., 2015 [25]
Lee et al., 2021 [38]
Sourander et al., 2021 [30]
Vinkhuyzen et al., 2017 [34]
Wu et al., 2018 [21]
Lee et al., 2021 [38]
Schmidt et al., 2019 [41]
Windham et al., 2019 [42]
Windham et al., 2020 [43]
Egorova et al., 2020 [23]
Vinkhuyzen et al., 2017 [34]
ASD symptomsVinkhuyzen et al., 2018 [35]
Vinkhuyzen et al., 2018 [35]
Chawla et al., 2019 [39]López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Whitehouse et al., 2013 [18]
Depressive disorder00Strøm et al., 2014 [31]
Depressive symptoms00Wang et al., 2020 [36]
Eating disorder symptoms0Allen et al., 2013 [16]0
Schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorderEyles et al., 2018 [24]
McGrath et al., 2010 [27]
0McGrath et al., 2003 [40]
Psychotic experiences00Sullivan et al., 2013 [33]
Behavioral or emotional symptomsDaraki et al., 2018 [22]Chawla et al., 2019 [39]López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Whitehouse et al., 2012 [17]
Table 3. Large studies with stricter definitions for vitamin D deficiency. Only studies that had defined vitamin D deficiency as ≤40 nmol/L and had at least 100 mothers in the deficiency group were included. An additional limit for the diagnostic outcomes was to have at least 100 cases for the studied outcome.
Table 3. Large studies with stricter definitions for vitamin D deficiency. Only studies that had defined vitamin D deficiency as ≤40 nmol/L and had at least 100 mothers in the deficiency group were included. An additional limit for the diagnostic outcomes was to have at least 100 cases for the studied outcome.
OutcomePositive FindingsNull Findings
ADHDSucksdorff et al., 2021 [32]0
ADHD symptomsDaraki et al., 2018 [22]
Morales et al., 2015 [28]
Mossin et al., 2017 [29]
López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Ma et al., 2021 [19]
ASDLee et al., 2021 [38]
Sourander et al., 2021 [30]
Wu et al., 2018 [21]
0
ASD symptomsVinkhuyzen et al., 2018 [35]
Vinkhuyzen et al., 2018 [35]
López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Depressive disorder00
Depressive symptoms00
Eating disorder symptoms00
Schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorderEyles et al., 2018 [24]0
Psychotic experiences00
Behavioral or emotional symptomsDaraki et al., 2018 [22]López-Vicente et al., 2019 [37]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Upadhyaya, S.; Ståhlberg, T.; Silwal, S.; Arrhenius, B.; Sourander, A. Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010063

AMA Style

Upadhyaya S, Ståhlberg T, Silwal S, Arrhenius B, Sourander A. Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(1):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Upadhyaya, Subina, Tiia Ståhlberg, Sanju Silwal, Bianca Arrhenius, and Andre Sourander. 2023. "Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010063

APA Style

Upadhyaya, S., Ståhlberg, T., Silwal, S., Arrhenius, B., & Sourander, A. (2023). Maternal Vitamin D Levels during Pregnancy and Offspring Psychiatric Outcomes: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop