Next Article in Journal
Application of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Inactivation of Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilms
Next Article in Special Issue
NMR Study on Laccase Polymerization of Kraft Lignin Using Different Enzymes Source
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Layered Perovskite Oxide La0.85Yb0.15AlO3 on Structure and Transport Properties of Polyetherimide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Biochar and Nitrogen Application on Rice Biomass Saccharification, Bioethanol Yield and Cell Wall Polymers Features
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms24010719
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Employing Engineered Enolase Promoter for Efficient Expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via a Self-Excisable Vector

by
Liangcheng Jiao
†,
Wenjuan Li
†,
Yunchong Li
,
Qinghua Zhou
,
Mengqin Zhu
,
Guowei Zhao
,
Houjin Zhang
and
Yunjun Yan
*
Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010719
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in 'Macromolecules')
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Yarrowia lipolytica is progressively being employed as a workhouse for recombinant protein expression. Here, we expanded the molecular toolbox by engineering the enolase promoter (pENO) and developed a new self-excisable vector, and based on this, a combined strategy was employed to enhance the expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (TLL) in Y. lipolytica. The strength of 11 truncated enolase promoters of different length was first identified using eGFP as a reporter. Seven of the truncated promoters were selected to examine their ability for driving TLL expression. Then, a series of enolase promoters with higher activities were developed by upstream fusing of different copies of UAS1B, and the recombinant strain Po1f/hp16e100-tll harboring the optimal promoter hp16e100 obtained a TLL activity of 447 U/mL. Additionally, a new self-excisable vector was developed based on a Cre/loxP recombination system, which achieved efficient markerless integration in Y. lipolytica. Subsequently, strains harboring one to four copies of the tll gene were constructed using this tool, with the three-copy strain Po1f/3tll showing the highest activity of 579 U/mL. The activity of Po1f/3tll was then increased to 720 U/mL by optimizing the shaking flask fermentation parameters. Moreover, the folding-related proteins Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2 were employed to further enhance TLL expression, and the TLL activity of the optimal recombinant strain Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi-kar2 reached 1197 U/mL. By using this combined strategy, TLL activity was enhanced by approximately 39.9-fold compared to the initial strain. Thus, the new vector and the combined strategy could be a useful tool to engineer Y. lipolytica for high-level expression of heterologous protein.

1. Introduction

With the rapid growth of demand for recombinant proteins in food, bioenergy, pharmaceutical, and other industrial fields, improving the expression efficiency of target genes has become an important goal. Many proteins are expressed using the yeast-based system because of its ease of genetic manipulation and ability to perform post-translational modifications [1,2]. Besides the well-known Saccharomyces cerevisiae, other yeast species are also commonly used as platforms for the expression of heterologous proteins, including Pichia pastoris, Kluyveromyces lactis, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Hansanula polymorpha, and Yarrowia lipolytica [2,3,4,5]. Among them, the dimorphic yeast Y. lipolytica is a non-conventional and non-pathogenic organism that has been classified as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) by the Food and Drug Administration [6]. It can grow on a variety of carbon source substrates, such as glucose, glycerol, alkanes, and fatty acids, and it has the innate ability to secrete proteases, lipases, and esterases [5,7]. Based on these excellent characteristics, Y. lipolytica has been employed for the heterologous expression of over 130 recombinant proteins [5].
To construct an effective cell factory that produces a high level of recombinant proteins, a strong promoter is very important. With the study of Y. lipolytica, many strong endogenous promoters have been developed for protein expression. The first strong inducible promoter characterized in Y. lipolytica was pXPR2, which drives the expression of alkaline extracellular protease (XPR2) [8,9]. However, the full activation of pXPR2 requires high concentrations of peptone and a pH over 6 [10]. When studying the glyoxylate cycle, the β-oxidation of fatty acids, and glycerol metabolism in Y. lipolytica, several other inducible promoters were identified, with the acyl-CoA oxidase 2 promoter pPOX2 and 3-oxo-acyl-CoA thiolase promoter pPOT1 showing substantial induction activity [8,11]. Nevertheless, the inducer of pPOX2 and pPOT1 is hydrophobic oleic acid, which affects its practical application [10,11]. Moreover, the constitutive promoter pTEF, which regulates the translation elongation factor-1α gene, has also been used to drive protein expression [12]. Madzak et al. [13] studied the pXPR2 promoter and identified its 105-bp upstream activating sequence (UAS). Subsequent researchers discovered that UAS can act as an enhancer to increase the strength of a promoter [10,14,15]. As a result, a series of strong hybrid promoters harboring multiple UAS elements and a core promoter were developed and have been utilized for heterologous gene expression [8,16]. The powerful hybrid promoter hp4d, created by fusing four tandem UAS of pXPR2 (UAS1B) upstream of the minimum LEU2 promoter (mLeu2), was widely used in Y. lipolytica [17]. Despite it, more new promoters remain to be exploited to meet different demands. Previously, studies in our laboratory found that a Y. lipolytica recombinant strain secreted a large amount of enolase upon expression of Rhizomucor miehei lipase (RML) [18]. Coincidentally, Swietalski et al. [19] also discovered a similar phenomenon when expressing other recombinant proteins. Thus, it can be hypothesized that the enolase promoter (pENO) may have the potential to be developed for the efficient expression of recombinant proteins. However, no research has been conducted to date on the development of pENO for heterologous protein expression in Y. lipolytica.
In addition to the promoter, several other factors may also influence the protein expression level in Y. lipolytica. Since the codon usage bias of Y. lipolytica differs significantly from that of S. cerevisiae and P. pastoris [20,21], and the codon composition of the target gene may have a great impact on translation efficiency [22], codon optimization was utilized and successfully improved the level of recombinant protein production in Y. lipolytica [18,23]. Gene dosage is also a key factor that may affect expression levels, and a common approach used to enhance heterologous protein expression is to increase gene copy number [24,25]. Additionally, protein folding also has a greater effect on recombinant protein expression. The accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) would cause the unfolded protein response, which would then result in up-regulating some genes involved in protein folding to relieve ER stress, such as the transcriptional activator Hac1, protein disulfide isomerase (Pdi), and chaperone Kar2 [26,27,28,29]. Until now, overexpression of these helper proteins to assist protein folding has been widely used to enhance protein expression in many yeast species, such as S. cerevisiae or P. pastoris, but has remained relatively rare in Y. lipolytica [30].
In order to employ genetic engineering strategies to construct high-yield recombinant strains, multiple rounds of gene integration in a single strain are often required. However, the availability of selection markers for Y. lipolytica is limited [5], and the use of antibiotic markers may be detrimental to its GRAS status, which makes it difficult to perform multiple genetic modifications in Y. lipolytica. To address this problem, a method based on the Cre/loxP recombination system that could achieve post-transformational marker rescue was widely used in Y. lipolytica [24,31,32]. The approach involves integrating a target fragment with a marker gene flanked by two loxP sites into the host genome, followed by introducing a plasmid with a cre gene cassette via a second transformation to eliminate the marker gene by Cre/loxP recombination. Then, a subsequent culture step is needed to move the cre-expressing vector [31]. Obviously, markerless integration using this method requires two rounds of transformation with two different selection markers, which is time-consuming and laborious. Therefore, there is still a need to develop more convenient strategy to achieve markerless integration in Y. lipolytica.
Although Y. lipolytica has been widely used as an expression platform for the efficient production of numerous recombinant proteins [5,30], to our knowledge, Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (TLL), an important thermostable lipase used in various industrial areas [33], has not been efficiently expressed in Y. lipolytica. Based on the above analyses, in this study, 11 truncated fragments upstream of the enolase gene were first employed to identify the pENO promoter and its strength, and the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene (egfp) was used as a reporter. Then, seven of the truncated promoters were selected to examine their ability for driving TLL expression. Following this, a set of enolase hybrid promoters was constructed to enhance the expression of TLL. Additionally, a new self-excisable vector for markerless integration was designed. Using this tool, the expression of TLL was further enhanced by optimizing gene dosage and co-expressing the helper proteins Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the Core Region of Enolase Promoter

To identify the enolase promoter, the plasmids pENOn-egfp (n = 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) and hp4d-egfp (control) were introduced into Po1f to construct strains with eGFP under the control of various truncated enolase promoters. Due to the large quantities of extracellular enolase found during fermentation in BMSY medium [18], this medium was also used here to study the enolase promoter. After fermentation, the eGFP fluorescence of Po1f/pENOn-egfp (n = 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) was assayed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 1, no fluorescence was observed as the promoter length of enolase was 75 bp, while the promoter length was above 100 bp, eGFP fluorescence was clearly visible, and the intensity increased significantly with the increase in the promoter length.
To determine whether the enolase promoter has the potential to be used for expression of the recombinant protein, seven enolase promoters with varying lengths (100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) were further selected for TLL expression. As seen in Figure 2, TLL was successfully expressed using these enolase truncated promoters, and TLL activity increased clearly as the promoter length was increased between 100 and 400 bp. However, unlike the expression of eGFP, further increases in promoter length did not result in a rise in TLL activity. Obviously, the different truncated enolase promoters could be used to drive the secreted expression of exogenous proteins.

2.2. Engineering Enolase Hybrid Promoter to Increase Promoter Strength

Numerous promoters were strengthened by the upstream fusion of multiple UAS elements [8,14,16,17]. To investigate whether the enolase promoter could also be enhanced using a similar strategy, several enolase hybrid promoters hp4en (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) were constructed by introducing a four UAS1B sequence upstream of the corresponding truncated promoter and then used for TLL expression. The experimental results revealed that the fusion of four UAS1B upstream of different enolase promoters all had a significant positive effect on TLL expression (Figure 3a). Interestingly, the shorter the truncated enolase promoter, the greater the increase in TLL expression. This may be due to the fact that the distance between the UAS and the core promoter has an effect on the strength of the promoter [34]. As a result, the strain Po1f/hp4e100-tll harboring hp4e100 hybrid promoter showed the highest TLL activity (305 U/mL), which was comparable to that of the strain Po1f/hp4d-tll containing the commonly used hp4d promoter. These results suggested that UAS1B can also be used to increase the strength of the enolase promoter.
To examine whether an increase in the copy number of UAS1B could further enhance the strength of the enolase promoter, based on hp4e100, a series of enolase hybrid promoters hpxe100 (x = 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32) harboring varying copies of UAS1B were created via the biobrick method, as previously reported [18,35]. As expected, the strength of enolase hybrid promoter was further improved, the results of TLL expression under the control of these hybrid promoters are shown in Figure 3b. When the copy number of UAS1B did not exceed 16, the TLL activities of the strains were gradually enhanced as the UAS1B dosage was increased. However, an excessive increase in the copy number of UAS1B resulted in no further improvement in TLL activity, but rather a decrease. The recombinant strain Po1f/hp16e100-tll harboring the hp16e100 enolase hybrid promoter showed the highest lipase activity of 447 U/mL, which was 14.9-fold higher than that of the control strain Po1f/pENO100-tll (30 U/mL), suggesting that upstream fusion of multi-copies of UAS1B is also an effective strategy to increase the strength of enolase promoter.

2.3. Construction of a Self-Excising Vector for Optimizing the Gene Dosage of Tll

With the aim of further enhancing the TLL expression level, the strategy of optimizing gene dosage was employed to achieve this goal. For this purpose, a new self-excising vector, pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll, allowing gene marker-free integration in Y. lipolytica, was first designed and constructed. The plasmid harbors a lox71-cre-Ura3-Amp-ori-lox66 fragment, with the left-arm mutant lox71 and the right-arm mutant lox66 sites oriented in the same direction. The cre gene is regulated by the inducible promoter pPOX2, and the lac operator gene of the lactose operon (lacO) is introduced upstream of the cre gene to block the leakage expression of Cre in Escherichia coli [36]. The processes for markerless integration of the tll gene using this plasmid are shown in Figure 4a.
To test whether the self-excising vector could achieve marker-free integration, pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll was linearized within the upAxp homologous fragment and then transformed into Po1f. The transformants were first incubated twice in MD-Leu liquid medium without uracil to screen Ura+ transformants. Following that, the Ura+ recombinants were then inoculated into MO-Leu-Ura medium, which uses oleic acid as the sole carbon source. In this circumstance, pPOX2 was substantially induced and then activated Cre expression. After 24 h of induction in MO-Leu-Ura medium, the recombinants were streaked onto an YPD plate to isolate single colonies. Then, 32 clones were randomly picked to both MD-Leu and BMSY-tri plates to examine the Ura3 phenotype. As seen in Figure 4b, all clones grew well in the BMSY-tri plate, while 29 of them could not grow on the MD-Leu plate, hinting that the ura3 marker gene was efficiently removed by Cre recombination. To further prove this, 19 Ura3- recombinants were randomly selected for identification by genomic PCR using primer pair XprTT-F2/Axpout-R. As a result, all recombinants were able to obtain the target fragment of about 2400 bp (Figure S1), and the PCR products were then confirmed by DNA sequencing. As expected, the ura3 marker gene was successfully removed by the desired recombination event, and a double-mutant lox72 site was retained in the genome. It is difficult for the lox72 site to participate in subsequent recombination reactions [36,37], which greatly reduces the risk of gene rearrangement when using this self-excising vector for repeat gene integration in the same host. Furthermore, ten positive strains were further selected for verification by PCR with the primers TLL-F and TLL-R, and all of these strains contain the target tll gene (Figure S1). These results showed that the vector pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll achieved efficient marker-free integration of the tll gene in Y. lipolytica, and the resulting strain was named Po1f/tll.
To obtain strains containing multiple copies of the tll gene, the vector pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll was re-transformed into the strain Po1f/tll again. After transformation and marker rescue, the strain Po1f/2tll, harboring two copies of tll gene, was constructed. Similarly, the strains Po1f/3tll and Po1f/4tll were created in turn. The gene copy number of these strains were verified by RT-PCR, and the results showed that the strains harbored the desired number of copies of the tll gene (Table 1).
Subsequently, recombinant strains Po1f/ntll (n = 1, 2, 3, and 4) were fermented in shaking flasks, and the fermentation supernatants were used for lipase assays and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analyses. As displayed in Figure 5a and Table S1, the TLL expression level was improved as the tll gene copy number increased from one to three. However, when the tll copy number was further enhanced to four, the expression of TLL did not increase and even decreased to some extent. SDS-PAGE results (Figure 5b) showed that two protein bands with molecular masses slightly larger than 35 kDa were clearly separated, and the concentration of the protein bands in the different strains was consistent with their TLL activity. The fermented supernatant was further treated with Endo H (NEB, America). After deglycosylation, the larger band disappeared and the smaller band became more intense (Figure S2a), suggesting that the larger band was caused by glycosylation modifications. Subsequently, the protein band was validated by mass spectrometry. The results showed that the peptides matched the TLL protein sequence (Figure S2b), confirming that the two bands were all target protein TLL. Thus, the strain Po1f/3tll with three copies of the tll gene exhibited the highest TLL activity and maximum extracellular protein concentration of 579 U/mL and 0.438 g/L, which were approximately 30% and 43% higher than those of the single-copy strain Po1f/tll, respectively.

2.4. Shaking Flask Culture Optimization for Po1f/3tll

Several fermentation parameters were optimized in shaking flasks to favor the efficient expression of TLL (Figure S3). Obviously, 4% (m/v) of D-sorbitol was more suitable for the TLL expression. Based on this, when 2% (v/v) strain Po1f/3tll was inoculated into 500 mL shake flasks containing 30 mL BMSY medium and fermented at pH 6.0 for 120 h, the maximum lipase activity and the total protein concentration of the strain were increased to 720 U/mL and 0.530 g/L, respectively.

2.5. Co-Expressing Helper Genes to Enhance TLL Expression

In an attempt to further increase the expression level of TLL, three helper proteins (Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2) that aid in protein folding were employed to co-express with TLL. For this purpose, the vectors pUXpr7166-hp4e100 (control), pUXpr7166-hac1, pUXpr7166-kar2, and pUXpr7166-pdi harboring different helper genes under the control of hp4e100 enolase hybrid promoter were linearized within the upXpr homologous fragments and then introduced into the strain Po1f/3tll, respectively. After marker rescue, recombinant strains were cultured in 500 mL shaking flasks. As shown in Figure 6, overexpression of Kar2 and Pdi resulted in a slight increase in the production of TLL, with the TLL activities reaching 742 U/mL and 763 U/mL in the strains Po1f/3tll-kar2 and Po1f/3tll-pdi, respectively. Co-expression of Hac1 led to a 25% improvement in TLL activity, and the recombinant strain Po1f/3tll-hac1 exhibited lipase activity and an extracellular protein concentration of 900 U/mL and 0.620 g/L, respectively. The results indicating that the folding-related proteins had a positive effect on TLL expression.
To investigate the influence of co-expression of multiple helper proteins on TLL expression, the plasmids pUXpr7166-pdi and pUXpr7166-kar2 were used to transform the best-performing engineered Po1f/3tll-hac1 to produce recombinant strains Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi and Po1f/3tll-hac1-kar2, respectively. The lipase activity of the different strains was measured after 120 h of fermentation (Figure 7), the activities of the strains Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi and Po1f/3tll-hac1-kar2, respectively, were enhanced to 1107 U/mL and 1050 U/mL. Furthermore, the plasmid pUXpr7166-kar2 was further introduced into Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi so that these three helper proteins were co-expressed with TLL. As a result, a maximum TLL activity of 1197 U/mL was gained in the strain Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi-kar2, which was 66% higher than that of the strain Po1f/3tll. Additionally, the extracellular protein concentration of Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi-kar2 further increased to 0.779 g/L. These results suggest that Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2 had a synergistic effect on TLL expression.

3. Discussion

Previous research discovered that Y. lipolytica secreted large amounts of enolase when it expressed recombinant proteins [18,19], hinting that the promoter of enolase might be strong. However, the enolase promoter has not been developed for the secretory expression of recombinant proteins. With the aim of developing the enolase promoter for efficient expression of recombinant proteins, the enolase promoter was first identified using a common strategy [16,38] by the expression of an egfp reporter gene regulated by 11 truncated promoters with different lengths (75–1300 bp). The eGFP expression experiments revealed that the 100-bp pENO100 was capable of driving protein expression, with longer promoters exhibiting increased activity, indicating that the 100 bp upstream fragment of the enolase gene contains the core promoter region required for promoter activity, and the region between 100 bp and 1300 bp may contain multiple elements that can enhance promoter activity. Following that, several truncated enolase promoters (100–1300 bp) were selected for attempts to express TLL. The results revealed that TLL was successfully expressed. Similar to eGFP, the expression of TLL gradually improved as the length of the enolase promoter increased within 400 bp. However, contrary to the expression of eGFP, further increasing the length of the promoter (700–1300 bp) did not enhance the expression of TLL. This is similar to previously reported findings that stronger promoters do not always lead to higher protein yields when expressing proteins using different modalities (intracellularly or extracellularly) [39]. In fact, TLL was secreted extracellularly, whereas eGFP was expressed intracellularly. In addition to the effect of promoter strength, TLL expression may also be influenced by the secretory pathway. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate that the enolase promoter can be used for the expression of recombinant proteins.
Several strong hybrid promoters have been developed by fusing multiple repeats of UAS fragments upstream of the promoter [10,15,17,39]. A similar strategy was adopted to construct several enolase hybrid promoters by fusing UAS1B. As expected, the strength of enolase promoter could also be enhanced by the UAS1B sequence. It is worth mentioning that the effect of UAS1B on the strength of the enolase hybrid promoter depends not only on its distance with the core promoter region but also on its copy number, which is consistent with previous studies [17,34,39]. Among the several engineered enolase hybrid promoters, TLL expression using the hp4e100 promoter was comparable to that of hp4d, while strain Po1f/hp16e100-tll harboring the optimal hybrid promoter hp16e100 achieved an even higher TLL activity of 447 U/mL, which was 14.9-fold higher than that of pENO100. By truncating the promoter and constructing hybrid promoters, a series of enolase promoters with different strengths were obtained (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Of these, the truncated promoters pENOn yielded relatively low lipase activity, while promoters hp4e1300, hp4e100, hp8e100, hp12e100, and hp16e100 resulted in TLL activities ranging from 251 to 447 U/mL at intervals of approximately 50 U/mL, which allowed promoters with different gradients of strength to be applied to fine-tune the protein expression levels when required.
It is well known that gene dosage is one of the key parameters for optimizing the expression of recombinant proteins. To facilitate the optimization of gene dosage to enhance the TLL expression and avoid the introduction of antibiotic gene that affect the GRAS status, a new self-excisable vector based on the Cre/loxP recombination system was designed and successfully achieved efficient markerless integration in Y. lipolytica. Previously, a Cre/loxP-based method has been widely used for marker-free integration in Y. lipolytica [31,40]. However, in this traditional approach, an additional vector containing the cre gene expression cassette was required to achieve marker rescue, and, therefore, two rounds of transformations were necessary to complete marker-free integration [31]. In contrast, the two lox sites (lox71 and lox66) and the cre gene expression cassette were combined in the self-excisable vector, and the cre gene was under the control of the pPOX2 inducible promoter, allowing marker-free integration with only one transformation. Therefore, the use of the new tool significantly reduces the experimental period and workload compared to traditional methods.
Using this self-excisable vector, recombinant strains carrying one to four copies of tll gene were constructed. As a result, three-copy tll gene resulted in the highest yield. While the tll copy number increased from three to four, the expression level of TLL decreased instead. The reason might be that when tll gene dosage was moderately increased, the transcription of tll gene increases, resulting in an increase in its expression, while the high gene dosage might have resulted in the excessive aggregation of abnormal proteins in the ER and caused cellular stress, which, in turn, decreased the expression level [2,27,28]. By optimizing the gene dosage, the TLL activity was increased by about 30%, and the recombinant strain Po1f/3tll had a maximum lipase activity of 579 U/mL. Fermentation also has a greater impact on TLL expression of a recombinant strain. After optimization of the fermentation parameters, the TLL activity of the optimal strain Po1f/3tll was further increased to 720 U/mL.
With the aim of further increasing the yield of TLL, the helper proteins Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2, which aid in protein folding [26,29], were selected to co-express with TLL in the strain Po1f/3tll. The fermentation results found that the three folding-related proteins all had a positive effect on TLL expression. Among them, overexpression of Hac1, resulting in 25% improvement in TLL activity, and strain Po1f/3tll-hac1 had a lipase activity of 900 U/mL. To explore whether co-expression of multiple helper proteins was beneficial for the expression of TLL, the helper proteins Kar2 and/or Pdi were transformed into strain Po1f/3tll-hac1 to achieve this goal. Excitingly, the TLL activities were further improved to 1050 U/mL, 1107 U/mL in the strains Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi, Po1f/3tll-hac1-kar2, respectively. Furthermore, co-expression of Hac1, Pdi, and Kar2 with TLL in the strain Po1f/3tll-hac1-pdi-kar2 reached the highest TLL activity of 1197 U/mL, which was about 66% higher than that of the strain Po1f/3tll. These results showed that the folding-related proteins had a synergistic positive influence on TLL expression. This might be due to the fact that protein folding efficiency was a bottleneck for high-level TLL expression in the Po1f/3tll, while the protein folding efficiency was improved by co-expression of the folding-related proteins, which allowed for a further increase in the expression of TLL. Obviously, the results presented here show that co-expression of folding-related proteins is also a feasible option for improving the heterologous protein production in Y. lipolytica.
In conclusion, a series of enolase hybrid promoters with different strengths and a new self-excisable vector for efficient marker-free integration were developed in this study, which extends the toolbox of Y. lipolytica. Furthermore, the TLL was successfully expressed in Y. lipolytica for the first time and significantly enhanced (39.9-fold) by using an enolase strong hybrid promoter, optimizing gene dosage, and co-expressing multiple folding-related proteins. This combined strategy might also be useful in optimizing the expression of other recombinant proteins in Y. lipolytica.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains, Plasmids, and Media

E. coli Top10 and Top10F’ were commercially obtained from Shanghai Weidi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Y. lipolytica Po1f (Ura− Leu−) [41] was used as hosts. The plasmids hp4d-rml [18], Cre-Y3 [42], Cre-axp1 [42], T-egfp (unpublished), and Mlu-vgb (unpublished) were stored in our laboratory. The T4 DNA ligase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), PrimeStar HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa), and ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) were used for gene amplification and genome identification. All strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are, respectively, listed in Tables S2 and S3.
The E. coli strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Y. lipolytica strains were grown in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD), minimal dextrose (MD), minimal oleic acid (MO), buffered sorbitol-complex medium (BMSY), BMSY containing 10 mL/L glyceryl tributyrate (BMSY-tri), according to experimental needs. The media and the cultural conditions have been previously described [18,42]. To meet auxotrophic requirements, leucine (262 mg/L) and/or uracil (22.4 mg/L) were added as needed.

4.2. Vector Construction

The egfp gene was amplified from T-egfp using primers egfp-F and egfp-R then subcloned to HindIII/KpnI-digested hp4d-rml to produce hp4d-egfp (Figure S4A). The various lengths of enolase (YALI0F16819g) promoter fragments were cloned from the genomic DNA of Po1f using primer pENOn-F1 and pENO-R1, the PCR products were, respectively, digested with BamHI and HindIII and inserted into the BamHI/HindIII-opened plasmid hp4d-egfp, generating pENOn-egfp (n = 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) (Figure S4B) encoding eGFP under the control of desired enolase promoters. The mature tll gene (Genbank accession no. AF054513.1) lacking the signal sequence was synthesized according to the codon usage database of Y. lipolytica [20], which was then amplified by the primer pair TLL-F/TLL-R. The PCR products were inserted into SfiI/KpnI-digested hp4d-rml by homologous recombination (HR) to form hp4d-tll (Figure S4C). Subsequently, the XPR2 pre and tll gene was isolated from hp4d-tll by double digestion with HindIII and KpnI, the digested product then, respectively, cloned into plasmids pENOn-egfp to replace the egfp gene, generating pENOn-tll (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) (Figure S4D).
To construct the enolase hybrid promoter, the desired promoters were, respectively, amplified from the genomic DNA of Po1f using pENOn-F2 (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) and pENO-R1, followed by digestion with BglII and HindIII to obtain pENOn. In parallel, the plasmid hp4d-tll was double digested with SalI/BglII to isolate the four-UAS1B sequence. Then, pENOn and four-UAS1B were ligated into SalI/HindIII-digested hp4d-tll, replacing the mLeu2 promoter to form hp4en-tll (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp), respectively (Figure S4E). Based on hp4e100-tll, hpxe100-tll (x = 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32) containing different copies of UAS1B were constructed via the biobrick method as previously reported (Figure S5) [18].
Using plasmid Cre-Y3 as a template, the fragments lip2TT-lox66 and Xpr2TT-lox71 were amplified using primer pairs dwCre-F/lipTT66-R1 and XprTT-F/Xprlox71-R, respectively. The segment upAxp was cloned from the genomic DNA of Po1f using primers 66upAxp-F and upAxp-R, the hp4d promoter was amplified from hp4d-rml by hp4d-F/Xpr2pre-R, and the Rhizopus oryzae lipase (ROL) gene was obtained from Cre-axp1 by PCR using primers ROL-F and kpnROL-R. The above five products were ligated by overlap PCR to produce lip2TT-lox66-upAxp-hp4d-rol-XprTT-lox71, and the product was inserted into AvrII/EcoRI-digested Cre-Y3 by HR to generate pUAxp7166-rol. Then, the tll gene cassette was isolated from hp12e100-tll by double digestion with BamHI and NheI, followed by subcloned into the BglII/NheI-digested pUAxp7166-rol to obtain pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll (Figure S6A).
The Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene (vgb) from Vitreoscilla stercoraria was cloned using Yvgb-F and Yvgb-R, and Mlu-vgb as the template; using pUAxp7166-rol as a template, the fragments mLeu and Xpr2TT were amplified using primer pairs mLeu-F/mLeu-R and XprTT-F2/Ampup-R, respectively. The three PCR products were ligated by overlap PCR then subcloned into BglII-NheI sites of pUAxp7166-rol, forming pUAxp7166-vgb. The fragments lip2t-lox66 was amplified by primer pairs dwCre-F/lipTT66-R2 using pUAxp7166-rol as the template, and the fragment upXpr was cloned from the chromosomal DNA of Po1f using primers 66upXpr-F and upXpr-R. These two products were ligated by overlap PCR then inserted into pUAxp7166-vgb using AvrII-SpeI sites to replace the homologous fragment upAxp, generating pUXpr7166-vgb. Using Po1f genomic DNA as the template, the fragments pENO100-BglII, pENO100-BamHI, pENO100-NotI, kar2, and pdi were, respectively, cloned via primer pairs pENO100-F3/pENO-R2, pENO100-F4/pENO-R2, pENO100-F3/pENO-R3, Kar2-F/Kar2-R and Pdi-F/Pdi-R. Additionally, the hac1 gene without intron was amplified from Cre-Y3-hac1 using primer pair Hac1-F and Hac1-R. Subsequently, the fragments pENO100-BglII and hac1 gene were ligated by overlap PCR to produce pENO100-hac1, then pENO100-NotI and pENO100-hac1 were inserted into pUXpr7166-vgb via BglII-NotI sites, obtaining pUXpr7166-hp4e100 and pUXpr7166-hac1, respectively. Similarly, the genes kar2 and pdi were ligated with pENO100-BamHI then subcloned into BamHI-NotI sites of pUXpr7166-vgb, forming pUXpr7166-kar2 and pUXpr7166-pdi, respectively. The schematic diagram of the pUXpr7166-type plasmids is presented in Figure S6B.
Gene synthetic and DNA sequencing were performed by Tsingke Biological Technology Co. (Wuhan, China).

4.3. Transformation of Y. lipolytica

The plasmids pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll, pUXpr7166-hp4e100, pUXpr7166-hac1, pUXpr7166-kar2, and pUXpr7166-type were, respectively, linearized by NsiI and transformed into Po1f competent cells. The Ura+ transformants were enriched twice in 5 mL of MD-Leu liquid medium, then transferred into MO-Leu-Ura medium to induce Cre expression, followed by the cells being streaked onto YPD plates. The phenotype of isolated colonies was identified using MD-Leu and BMSY-tri plates. Other plasmids were linearized with ApaI then transformed into Po1f, transformants were screened in MD-Leu plate. The plasmid transformation was performed according to the protocol described by Chen et al. [43].

4.4. Shaking Flask Fermentation and Optimization

After transformation, the transformants were further verified by genome PCR. Subsequently, the recombinant strains were cultured in 5 mL YPD medium overnight and then inoculated into 50 mL of BMSY medium at 28 °C for 120 h. In order to optimize the fermentation conditions in a shaking flask, different incubation parameters were investigated, including D-sorbitol concentration, inoculation density, initial pH, culture medium volume, and fermentation time.

4.5. Fluorescence Analysis

The cells were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then re-suspended in PBS solution. Fluorescence images were obtained with an Olympus FV3000 laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and eGFP was excited by a 488 nm confocal laser. Additionally, fluorescence acquisition was conducted using a flow cytometer (Cytoflex, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) in the FITC channel, with 1 × 105 cells per sample were acquired for each collection.

4.6. Enzyme Assay and Total Protein Concentration

The TLL activity was determined by titration using olive oil as a substrate [44]. A spectrophotometric approach was used to quantify total protein concentration using bovine serum albumen as a standard [45]. Measurements were repeated three times for every sample.

4.7. Determination of Gene Copy Number

The real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using a StepOnePlus instrument with StepOne software version 2.3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously [35]. The standard plasmids hp4d-tll and pMD19-act1 [18] were used to establish the standard curve of target or reference genes, respectively. The gene copy number was calculated via absolute quantification by the method described by Abad et al. [46].

4.8. SDS-PAGE Analysis and Mass Spectrometry

Thirty microliters of fermentation supernatant from different strains were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. SDS-PAGE was performed with a 12% separating polyacrylamide gel in a vertical mini gel apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The proteins in SDS-PAGE gel were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Amresco, Solon, OH, USA). The target protein was further identified by mass spectrometry at ProtTech Inc (Suzhou, China).

4.9. Statistical Analyses

The results of the study were shown as mean ± standard. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24010719/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.J., W.L. and Q.Z.; methodology, L.J., W.L. and Y.L.; validation, L.J., W.L., Y.L., Q.Z., M.Z. and G.Z.; formal analysis, L.J., W.L., Y.L., H.Z. and Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, L.J. and W.L.; writing—review and editing, L.J., W.L., H.Z. and Y.Y.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos: 31070089, 31170078, J1103514), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Nos: 2011AA02A204, 2013AA065805, 2014AA093510), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2015CFA085), and the Fundamental Research Funds for HUST (Nos. 2014NY007, 2017KFYXJJ212, 2017KFXKJC010, 2017KFTSZZ001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and the Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We express gratitude to the Research Core Facilities for Life Science (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) for their valuable assistance in RT-PCR measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Demain, A.L.; Vaishnav, P. Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Baghban, R.; Farajnia, S.; Rajabibazl, M.; Ghasemi, Y.; Mafi, A.; Hoseinpoor, R.; Rahbarnia, L.; Aria, M. Yeast expression systems: Overview and recent advances. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 365–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. van Ooyen, A.; Dekker, P.; Huang, M.; Olsthoorn, M.; Jacobs, D.I.; Colussi, P.A.; Taron, C.H. Heterologous protein production in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006, 6, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Macauley-Patrick, S.; Fazenda, M.L.; McNeil, B.; Harvey, L.M. Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast 2005, 22, 249–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Madzak, C. Yarrowia lipolytica: Recent achievements in heterologous protein expression and pathway engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2015, 99, 4559–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Groenewald, M.; Boekhout, T.; Neuveglise, C.; Gaillardin, C.; van Dijck, P.; Wyss, M. Yarrowia lipolytica: Safety assessment of an oleaginous yeast with a great industrial potential. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 40, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fickers, P.; Benetti, P.H.; Wache, Y.; Marty, A.; Mauersberger, S.; Smit, M.S.; Nicaud, J.M. Hydrophobic substrate utilisation by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, and its potential applications. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005, 5, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sun, M.; Shi, T.; Lin, L.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Ji, X. Advancing Yarrowia lipolytica as a superior biomanufacturing platform by tuning gene expression using promoter engineering. Bioresource Technol. 2022, 347, 126717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nicaud, J.M.; Fabre, E.; Beckerich, J.M.; Fournier, P.; Gaillardin, C. Cloning, sequencing and amplification of the alkaline extracellular protease (XPR2) gene of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Biotechnol. 1989, 12, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trassaert, M.; Vandermies, M.; Carly, F.; Denies, O.; Thomas, S.; Fickers, P.; Nicaud, J. New inducible promoter for gene expression and synthetic biology in Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Juretzek, T.; Wang, H.; Nicaud, J.; Mauersberger, S.; Barth, G. Comparison of promoters suitable for regulated overexpression of β-galactosidase in the alkane-utilizing yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E 2000, 5, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muller, S.; Sandal, T.; Kamp-Hansen, P.; Dalboge, H. Comparison of expression systems in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha, Klyveromyces lactis, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica. Cloning of two novel promoters from Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast 1998, 14, 1267–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Madzak, C.; Blanchin-Roland, S.; Otero, R.; Gaillardin, C. Functional analysis of upstream regulating regions from the Yarrowia lipolytica XPR2 promoter. Microbiology+ 1999, 145, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Park, Y.K.; Korpys, P.; Kubiak, M.; Celinska, E.; Soudier, P.; Trebulle, P.; Larroude, M.; Rossignol, T.; Nicaud, J.M. Engineering the architecture of erythritol-inducible promoters for regulated and enhanced gene expression in Yarrowia lipolytica. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019, 19, foy105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blazeck, J.; Reed, B.; Garg, R.; Gerstner, R.; Pan, A.; Agarwala, V.; Alper, H.S. Generalizing a hybrid synthetic promoter approach in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2013, 97, 3037–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussain, M.S.; Gambill, L.; Smith, S.; Blenner, M.A. Engineering promoter architecture in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016, 5, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Madzak, C.; Treton, B.; Blanchin-Roland, S. Strong hybrid promoters and integrative expression/secretion vectors for quasi-constitutive expression of heterologous proteins in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Mol. Microb. Biotech. 2000, 2, 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, Q.H.; Jiao, L.C.; Qiao, Y.G.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, J.Y.; Yan, Y.J. Overexpression of GRAS Rhizomucor miehei lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via optimizing promoter, gene dosage and fermentation parameters. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 306, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Swietalski, P.; Hetzel, F.; Seitl, I.; Fischer, L. Secretion of a low and high molecular weight β-glycosidase by Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb. Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakamura, Y.; Gojobori, T.; Ikemura, T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: Status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sharp, P.M.; Cowe, E. Synonymous codon usage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1991, 7, 657–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parvathy, S.T.; Udayasuriyan, V.; Bhadana, V. Codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 539–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gasmi, N.; Fudalej, F.; Kallel, H.; Nicaud, J. A molecular approach to optimize hIFN α2b expression and secretion in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2011, 89, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, Y.; Vandermies, M.; Soudier, P.; Telek, S.; Thomas, S.; Nicaud, J.; Fickers, P. Efficient expression vectors and host strain for the production of recombinant proteins by Yarrowia lipolytica in process conditions. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Madzak, C. Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for use in biotechnological applications: A review of major achievements and recent innovations. Mol. Biotechnol. 2018, 60, 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Korpys-Woźniak, P.; Celińska, E. Global transcriptome profiling reveals genes responding to overproduction of a small secretory, a high cysteine- and a high glycosylation-bearing protein in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delic, M.; Gongrich, R.; Mattanovich, D.; Gasser, B. Engineering of protein folding and secretion-strategies to overcome bottlenecks for efficient production of recombinant proteins. Antioxid. Redox Sign. 2014, 21, 414–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ogrydziak, D.M.; Nicaud, J.M. Characterization of Yarrowia lipolytica XPR2 multi-copy strains over-producing alkaline extracellular protease—A system for rapidly increasing secretory pathway cargo loads. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12, 938–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Korpys-Woźniak, P.; Kubiak, P.; Celińska, E. Secretory helpers for enhanced production of heterologous proteins in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 32, e00669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Celinska, E.; Nicaud, J.M. Filamentous fungi-like secretory pathway strayed in a yeast system: Peculiarities of Yarrowia lipolytica secretory pathway underlying its extraordinary performance. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2019, 103, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Fickers, P.; Le Dall, M.T.; Gaillardin, C.; Thonart, P.; Nicaud, J.M. New disruption cassettes for rapid gene disruption and marker rescue in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2003, 55, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, N.; Chi, P.; Zou, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xu, S.; Bilal, M.; Fickers, P.; Cheng, H. Metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for thermoresistance and enhanced erythritol productivity. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus: Uses and prospects as an industrial biocatalyst. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym. 2010, 62, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Redden, H.; Alper, H.S. The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jiao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Su, Z.; Xu, L.; Yan, Y. High-level extracellular production of Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris via a strategy combining optimization of gene-copy number with co-expression of ERAD-related proteins. Protein Expr. Purif. 2018, 147, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, D.; Zhang, B.; Li, S.; Zhou, J.; Cao, H.; Huang, Y.; Cui, Z. A novel vector for construction of markerless multicopy overexpression transformants in Pichia pastoris. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Lutz, B. Cre recombinase-mediated inversion using lox66 and lox71: Method to introduce conditional point mutations into the CREB-binding protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, e90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shabbir Hussain, M.; Wheeldon, I.; Blenner, M.A. A strong hybrid fatty acid inducible transcriptional sensor built from Yarrowia lipolytica upstream activating and regulatory sequences. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12, 1700248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dulermo, R.; Brunel, F.; Dulermo, T.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Vion, J.; Trassaert, M.; Thomas, S.; Nicaud, J.; Leplat, C. Using a vector pool containing variable-strength promoters to optimize protein production in Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lv, Y.; Edwards, H.; Zhou, J.; Xu, P. Combining 26s rDNA and the Cre-loxP system for iterative gene integration and efficient marker curation in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Madzak, C.; Gaillardin, C.; Beckerich, J.M. Heterologous protein expression and secretion in the non-conventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: A review. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 109, 63–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhou, Q.; Jiao, L.; Li, W.; Hu, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, M.; Xu, L.; Yan, Y. A novel Cre/lox-Based genetic tool for repeated, targeted and markerless gene integration in Yarrowia lipolytica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, D.C.; Beckerich, J.M.; Gaillardin, C. One-step transformation of the dimorphic yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fang, Z.; Xu, L.; Pan, D.; Jiao, L.; Liu, Z.; Yan, Y. Enhanced production of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase in Pichia pastoris via genetic and fermentation strategies. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abad, S.; Kitz, K.; Hormann, A.; Schreiner, U.; Hartner, F.S.; Glieder, A. Real-time PCR-based determination of gene copy numbers in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 00719 g001 550
Figure 1. eGFP fluorescence of recombinant strains Po1f/pENOn-egfp harboring different truncated enolase promoters pENOn (n = 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp). (a) Fluorescence detection by laser confocal microscopy. The red arrow represents a cell with fluorescence; (b) fluorescence intensity analysis by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 1. eGFP fluorescence of recombinant strains Po1f/pENOn-egfp harboring different truncated enolase promoters pENOn (n = 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 300, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp). (a) Fluorescence detection by laser confocal microscopy. The red arrow represents a cell with fluorescence; (b) fluorescence intensity analysis by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 00719 g001
Ijms 24 00719 g002 550
Figure 2. TLL activity of recombinant strains Po1f/pENOn-tll harboring different truncated enolase promoter pENOn (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp). Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 2. TLL activity of recombinant strains Po1f/pENOn-tll harboring different truncated enolase promoter pENOn (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp). Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 00719 g002
Ijms 24 00719 g003 550
Figure 3. TLL activity of recombinant strains (a) Po1f/hp4en-tll (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) and (b) Po1f/hpxe100-tll (x = 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32). Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 3. TLL activity of recombinant strains (a) Po1f/hp4en-tll (n = 100, 125, 200, 400, 700, 1000, and 1300 bp) and (b) Po1f/hpxe100-tll (x = 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32). Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 00719 g003
Ijms 24 00719 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of markerless integration using the self-excisable vector pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll. DNA elements: upAXP, upstream homologous fragment of the acid extracellular protease gene (axp1); XPR2 pre, XPR2 signal peptide; XPR2t, xpr2 gene terminator; Amp-ori, ampicillin resistance gene and origin of replication in E. coli; (b) A total of 32 recombinants were randomly selected and inoculated onto MD-Leu and BMSY-tri plates to screen positive colonies after the marker-free integration.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of markerless integration using the self-excisable vector pUAxp7166-hp16e100-tll. DNA elements: upAXP, upstream homologous fragment of the acid extracellular protease gene (axp1); XPR2 pre, XPR2 signal peptide; XPR2t, xpr2 gene terminator; Amp-ori, ampicillin resistance gene and origin of replication in E. coli; (b) A total of 32 recombinants were randomly selected and inoculated onto MD-Leu and BMSY-tri plates to screen positive colonies after the marker-free integration.
Ijms 24 00719 g004
Ijms 24 00719 g005 550
Figure 5. Cultivation results of the recombinant strains Po1f/ntll (n = 1, 2, 3, and 4) harboring different copies of tll gene in shaking flasks. (a) TLL activity; Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01. (b) SDS-PAGE analysis.
Figure 5. Cultivation results of the recombinant strains Po1f/ntll (n = 1, 2, 3, and 4) harboring different copies of tll gene in shaking flasks. (a) TLL activity; Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01. (b) SDS-PAGE analysis.
Ijms 24 00719 g005
Ijms 24 00719 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of co-expressing a single folding-related helper protein on TLL production in the strain Po1f/3tll. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Effect of co-expressing a single folding-related helper protein on TLL production in the strain Po1f/3tll. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. ns: no significant difference; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Ijms 24 00719 g006
Ijms 24 00719 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of co-expressing multiple folding-related helper proteins on TLL production in the strain Po1f/3tll. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Effect of co-expressing multiple folding-related helper proteins on TLL production in the strain Po1f/3tll. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired T-test analysis. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Ijms 24 00719 g007
Table
Table 1. Recombinant strains with different copy numbers of the tll gene.
Table 1. Recombinant strains with different copy numbers of the tll gene.
StrainsGene Copy Number
Po1f (control)0
Po1f/tll1
Po1f/2tll2
Po1f/3tll3
Po1f/4tll4
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiao, L.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhu, M.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y. Employing Engineered Enolase Promoter for Efficient Expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via a Self-Excisable Vector. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010719

AMA Style

Jiao L, Li W, Li Y, Zhou Q, Zhu M, Zhao G, Zhang H, Yan Y. Employing Engineered Enolase Promoter for Efficient Expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via a Self-Excisable Vector. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(1):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiao, Liangcheng, Wenjuan Li, Yunchong Li, Qinghua Zhou, Mengqin Zhu, Guowei Zhao, Houjin Zhang, and Yunjun Yan. 2023. "Employing Engineered Enolase Promoter for Efficient Expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via a Self-Excisable Vector" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 1: 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010719

APA Style

Jiao, L., Li, W., Li, Y., Zhou, Q., Zhu, M., Zhao, G., Zhang, H., & Yan, Y. (2023). Employing Engineered Enolase Promoter for Efficient Expression of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase in Yarrowia lipolytica via a Self-Excisable Vector. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(1), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010719

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop