Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms Related to Burns, Burn Wound Healing and Scarring
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution and Expression of the Meprin and TRAF Homology Domain-Containing Gene Family in Solanaceae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ni Substitution on the Structural, Magnetic, and Electronic Structure Properties of Gd0.4Tb0.6(Co1−xNix)2 Compounds
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 10
10.3390/ijms24108778
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Semimetallic, Half-Metallic, Semiconducting, and Metallic States in Gd-Sb Compounds

by
Semyon T. Baidak
1,2 and
Alexey V. Lukoyanov
1,2,*
1
Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University Named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
2
M.N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8778; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108778
Submission received: 12 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 15 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetism and Electronic Structure of Intermetallic Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The electronic and band structures of the Gd- and Sb-based intermetallic materials have been explored using the theoretical ab initio approach, accounting for strong electron correlations of the Gd-4f electrons. Some of these compounds are being actively investigated because of topological features in these quantum materials. Five compounds were investigated theoretically in this work to demonstrate the variety of electronic properties in the Gd-Sb-based family: GdSb, GdNiSb, Gd4Sb3, GdSbS2O, and GdSb2. The GdSb compound is a semimetal with the topological nonsymmetric electron pocket along the high-symmetry points Γ–X–W, and hole pockets along the L–Γ–X path. Our calculations show that the addition of nickel to the system results in the energy gap, and we obtained a semiconductor with indirect gap of 0.38 eV for the GdNiSb intermetallic compound. However, a quite different electronic structure has been found in the chemical composition Gd4Sb3; this compound is a half-metal with the energy gap of 0.67 eV only in the minority spin projection. The molecular GdSbS2O compound with S and O in it is found to be a semiconductor with a small indirect gap. The GdSb2 intermetallic compound is found to have a metallic state in the electronic structure; remarkably, the band structure of GdSb2 has a Dirac-cone-like feature near the Fermi energy between high-symmetry points Г and S, and these two Dirac cones are split by spin-orbit coupling. Thus, studying the electronic and band structure of several reported and new Gd-Sb compounds revealed a variety of the semimetallic, half-metallic, semiconducting, or metallic states, as well topological features in some of them. The latter can lead to outstanding transport and magnetic properties, such as a large magnetoresistance, which makes Gd-Sb-based materials very promising for applications.

1. Introduction

Quantum materials [1] include wide classes of topological materials [2]. These materials resulted in tremendous research efforts and attracted interest because of their exotic physics [3,4] and the various exciting applications of insulators, superconductors, metals, or semimetals [5]. A number of those topological compounds contain antimony Sb [6]. Additionally, the Sb-containing compounds have exhibited superconducting [7] or thermoelectric properties [8].
Recently, a family of the binary RX compounds, where R designates a rare-earth metal and X is a s/p element, attracted newfound attention for their unusual electronic properties, with topological features in some such compounds. Research for electronic states with non-trivial topology in the RX compounds started in 2016 with the study of LaBi, where Dirac-cone-like features were found [9,10,11]. Although some studies reported the absence of band inversion and suggested the trivial topology of electronic states in some similar compounds, such as LaSb, CeSb, LuBi, and YBi [12,13]. In another work on the LaBi compound, the nontrivial band anticrossing along the Г–X direction and two distinct topological surface states were identified [14]. Then, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements for a whole series of RSb compounds were performed and revealed two hole and two electron pockets at high-symmetry points Г and X, respectively [15]. Another study predicted topologically non-trivial states, such as band inversion and the presence of Weyl fermions in the band structure of GdSb and GdBi [16]. Both these compounds are ordered antiferromagnetically below 23.4 and 25.8 K, respectively [17]. Experimental optical studies of GdSb and TbSb revealed an anomalous behavior of the optical conductivity dependences in the low-energy region, the semimetallic type of the conductivity of these compounds, predicted by calculations of the density of states, is confirmed by optical studies [18]. The existence of electronic states with non-trivial topology in the band structure of compounds can lead to unusual magnetic properties, such as extremely large unsaturated magnetoresistance (XMR) [19], and some even report this being the case for the LuSb compound [20], which is why it is such a popular topic of interest. Large magnetoresistance has also been observed in other compounds from the rare-earth monoantimonide family, such as TbSb and HoSb [21,22,23].
By adding one more element, T, which stands for a transition metal, to the family of binary RX compounds, one obtains another family of ternary RTX compounds with a variety of different properties [24,25,26]. One can observe a Dirac-like state at the high-symmetry point X, which is very close to the RTX family compound GdSbTe [27,28]. Electronic structure calculations for some compounds from the family were conducted, and they show that the low-temperature phase of the GdNiSb compound is a narrow-gap semiconductor [29,30] and GdPtSb is metallic in nature [30]. Some of the other RTX compounds, such as a half-Heusler GdPtBi alloy, similarly to the binary RX compounds, show the semimetallic behavior and host Weyl points in the magnetic field [31,32]. In this work, RNiSb compounds were investigated in terms of magnetic properties, and it was found that most of them show Curie–Weiss behavior with magnetic ordering temperatures below 4 K [33], and magnetism is dominated by the magnetic moments of rare-earth elements [34]. These ternary RNiSb compounds also have remarkable thermoelectric properties [35,36,37], with the highest thermoelectric figure of merit ZT being up to ~0.7 for a wide range of temperatures in ErNiSb [37]. The electronic structure of ErNiSb was reported in [38] and the indirect band gap 0.25 eV was confirmed.
While the equiatomic Gd-Sb compounds have already been investigated using various experimental and theoretical methods, the non-equiatomic Gd-Sb compounds have been studied quite poorly. Some of the rare-earth diantimonides were synthesized with a LaSb2 type of structure and high-pressure orthorhombic type of structure, see [39] and references. The Gd-Sb system was also studied in another work using high-temperature differential thermal analysis (DTA) [40]; four compounds were formed, GdSb, GdSb2, Gd4Sb3, and Gd5Sb3. Another interesting Gd-Sb compound, namely, GdSbS2O, belongs to the LnSbS2O family; it was reported as having been synthesized with the p-type semiconductor properties [41]. It is similar in its structure and composition to the series of molecular Gd2SO2-based doped compounds, which found numerous applications in cold neutron imaging as ultrathin screens [42] and in the biomedical field [43] because of their controllable particle size [44] and photoluminescence properties [43].
In this work, we investigate and compare the electronic structure and magnetic properties of several intermetallic Gd-Sb compounds and discuss topological features in the band structure. The revealed variety of the semimetallic, half-metallic, semiconducting, or metallic states can be related with different anomalous properties of these compounds.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. GdSb Compound

In Figure 1, the electronic structure of the GdSb intermetallic compound is plotted for two opposite spin directions. Two intense peaks in the total density of states (DOS) for the majority and minority spin directions of GdSb in Figure 1a are composed of the 4f Gd states at the following energies: about −8 eV and 4 eV below the valence and inside the conduction bands, respectively. These Gd-4f states result in the moment of the Gd ion being 7.16  μ B , in GdSb the magnetic moments of the Gd ions compensate each other and form an antiferromagnetic ordering with almost a zero value of magnetization [45]. The magnetic moment of the GdSb binary compound is composed of the gadolinium ion moment, whereas the stibium ion in this compound is calculated to be negligible. The close value of the total moment for Gd in GdSb is equal to 6.98  μ B , and it was calculated for the most relevant set of the U and J parameters in the previous local density approximation (LDA)+U calculations [46]. Additionally, in [46], similar positions (about −8 eV and 4 eV) of the occupied 4f bands are found for fitting with spectra and HSE06 hybrid functional calculations [47].
One can note the contributions of Gd-5d and Sb-5p states in the valence band of the GdSb compound, as seen in Figure 1b,c. For both spin projections, the Gd-5d electronic states are located in the conduction band, and are mostly not occupied (Figure 1b). In [18], it was discussed that these energy positions of the electronic states allow one to reproduce and interpret the semimetallic behavior of the experimental optical conductivity curve for GdSb. The other electronic states (not shown in Figure 1) have negligible contributions.
In Figure 2, one can see the band structure of both spin projections of the binary GdSb compound. It is obvious in the figure that this phase is gapless with the valence and conduction bands nearly touching. Bands near the Г point from the valence band spread above the Fermi level creating a hole pocket, same with bands from the conduction band, which create an electron pocket near the X point; such features are typical for semimetals [18]. There are noticeable flat bands at energies −8.0 eV for one spin direction, see Figure 2a, and 4 eV for other spin direction, see Figure 2b, which correspond to the Gd-4f intense peaks with the same energies plotted in red in Figure 1a. One can also notice few points with degenerate bands near the Fermi energy, moving from the Г high-symmetry point to X for the majority spin projection, as it is clearly seen in Figure 2a. The similar semimetallic band structure was obtained using HSE06 hybrid functional without spin-orbit coupling [47]. The Figure 2c panel shows a small part of the band structure near the Fermi level with spin-orbit coupling (SOC). The degeneration at point X is lifted, and one of the bands at point Г shifted a few tenths of eV lower. In the HSE06 hybrid, functional with SOC [47], the changes of the bands are very similar; there the difference in the degeneracy of the bands at the Г point and the electronic pocket at X are closer to the Fermi energy. The very recent ARPES measurements for a 20 nm thick GdSb magnetic semimetal film [48] revealed an ellipsoidal electron pocket at the bulk X point, two nearly spherical light-hole spin-orbit split-off bands at the bulk Г point, and a warped heavy-hole band resembling a square Fermi surface. The authors of [48] used the DFT+U band structure, which is very similar to the one depicted in Figure 2c, to interpret the ARPES bands; however, the band dispersion in Figure 2c with SOC can better reproduce the β and δ bands (Figure 3 and Figure 4 in [48]) with the valence and conduction bands almost touching near point X.

2.2. GdNiSb Compound

In Figure 3, the electronic structure of the GdNiSb intermetallic compound is plotted for two opposite spin directions. Similar to Figure 1a, one can see two intense peaks from the 4f Gd states being a little bit higher than in the binary GdSb compound energies: −7.7 eV and 4.3 eV. Two other noticeable intense peaks lay at −1.9 eV for both spin projections, and belong to the electronic states of the occupied 3d Ni shell, similar to the position of this peak in the calculations [35]. The valence band here mostly comprises the 3d Ni states with the smaller contributions from the 5d Gd and 5p Sb states, and the main contributors to the conduction band are the 5d Gd states, see Figure 3b,c. All shown electronic states except 4f Gd are non-polarized. The other electronic states (not shown in Figure 3) have negligible contributions. This picture of the electronic states is different from local spin-density approximation (LSDA) [29] because the corrections for strong electron correlations and SOC are required for the 4f shell and bands near the Fermi energy. The calculations resulted in the magnetic moment being 7.20  μ B  in GdNiSb, the magnetization measured being 8.1(5)  μ B [33], and previous theoretical calculations being 7.00 [29,30] and 6.949  μ B [35].
In Figure 4 one can see the band structure of both spin projections of the ternary GdNiSb compound. The first observation is that the addition of nickel to the GdSb formula opens the gap in the band structure with the value of 0.26 eV in the minority spin direction, as calculated from the band structure, see Figure 4b. Indirect band gaps of 0.292 [30] and 0.279 eV [35] in GdNiSb were also found earlier in the similar band structure obtained in the FP-LAPW(+lo, version 19) Wien2k calculations. At the same time, the distance between the occupied and empty states is equal to 0.52 eV for the majority spin direction, Figure 4a. The high-symmetry point Г is still the point with the highest energy from the valence band, and there still could be some kind of a hole pocket but much smaller than in the GdSb compound. The same feature can be found at the high-symmetry point X with the lowest energy from the conduction band. Such band structure features indicate that the ternary GdNiSb compound is a semiconductor with an indirect gap of 0.26 eV, as calculated from the band structure. Similar to Figure 2, there are flat bands at energies −7.7 eV for one spin direction in Figure 4a and at 4.3 eV for the other spin direction (Figure 4b), which correspond to the Gd-4f intense peaks, see Figure 3a. Panel c shows a small part of the band structure near the Fermi level with spin-orbit coupling taken into account. Such an effect mostly manifests itself by a slight increase of the energy gap value from 0.26 to 0.38 eV. The experimental value of the band gap in GdNiSb has not been reported in the literature; this value is close to the one in RNiSb [34].

2.3. Gd4Sb3 Compound

In Figure 5, the electronic structure of the Gd4Sb3 intermetallic compound is plotted for two opposite spin directions. Similar to Figure 1a and Figure 3a, one can see two intense peaks from the 4f Gd states at the following energies: −8.4 eV and 3.0 eV. The valence band is composed of the 5p Sb states and less amount of the 5d Gd states, and the main contributors to the conduction band are the 5d Gd states, see Figure 5b,c. One can notice that the density of states is quite high around the Fermi energy for the majority spin projection, Figure 5a,b which suggests the metallic nature of the compound, but in the minority spin projection, there is an obvious energy gap. Such a band structure is typical of half-metals, and it is a key feature of this Gd-bearing compound. The other electronic states (not shown in Figure 5) have negligible contributions.
In Figure 6, one can see the band structure of both spin projections of the Gd4Sb3 compound. The change of stoichiometry in Gd-Sb from 1:1 (GdSb) to 4:3 (Gd4Sb3) results in opening the energy gap in the minority spin projection (Figure 6b), and vice versa, increasing the density of states near the Fermi energy in the majority spin projection, Figure 6a. Such a band structure is a good indicator that the compound in question is a half-metal. The energy gap in the minority spin direction, see Figure 6b, is a direct gap with the smallest value of 0.67 eV at the Г high-symmetry point, as it is estimated from the band structure. The band structure of the majority spin direction is metallic, with a number of crossing bands near the Fermi level. Similar to Figure 2 and Figure 4, there are localized states at energies corresponding to the Gd-4f intense peaks, as can be seen in Figure 5a. Panel c in Figure 6 shows a small part of the band structure near the Fermi level with the spin-orbit coupling taken into account in a separate calculation. The main effect of SOC is seen in this panel as a lift of the degeneration at the Г point right below the Fermi energy and a shift of the batch of bands at H point (by a few tenths of eV higher) closer to the Fermi level. The total magnetic moment of Gd4Sb3 is obtained in our calculations as 31.00  μ B /f.u.; no experimental value has been reported in the literature for this compound. In the Gd5Sb3 compound, no half-metallic state has been found; the metallic DOS is calculated for both spin projections [49].

2.4. GdSbS2O Compound

In Figure 7, the electronic structure of the GdSbS2O compound is plotted for two opposite spin directions. Similar to Figure 1a, Figure 3a and Figure 5a, one can see two intense peaks from the 4f Gd states at energies −6.1 and 5.2 eV, which are higher than in previous compounds. The main contributors to the valence band here are the 3p S1, S2, and 2p O electronic states added to the structure with S and O atoms. The conduction band is now mostly made of the 5p Sb electronic states, which built the valence band in the three previous compounds, and the 5d Gd electronic states moved to higher energies. The other electronic states (not shown in Figure 7) have negligible contributions. One can notice what looks like the absence of electronic states between valence and conduction bands, which suggests that there might be a small gap in the band structure.
In Figure 8, one can see the band structure of both spin projections of the GdSbS2O compound. As we guessed from the densities of the states, the addition of S2O to the GdSb formula opens a gap with the value 0.20 eV in the band structure in the majority spin direction, see Figure 8a. At the same time, the distance between the occupied and empty states is equal to 0.21 eV for the minority spin direction, Figure 8b. The smallest value of the energy gap is between two points close to the high-symmetry point X (not exactly at the X point), which suggests that GdSbS2O is a semiconductor with a direct gap of 0.20 eV, as it is estimated from the band structure. From the electrical conductivity of GdSbS2O, a thermal gap of 1 eV [41] was reported; there are no other experimental data for this molecular compound. Similar to Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 6, there are flat bands at energies −6.1 eV for one spin direction in Figure 8a, and at 5.2 eV for the other spin direction (Figure 8b), which correspond to the Gd-4f intense peaks, see Figure 7a. Figure 7c shows a small part of the band structure near the Fermi level when spin-orbit coupling is taken into account in additional calculations. The effect of SOC in this situation significantly reduces the gap value from 0.20 to 0.03 eV and changes the direct gap to an indirect gap, with the new point of highest energy from the valence band at the high-symmetry point Г, which indicates that GdSbS2O is actually a semiconductor with the small indirect gap of 0.03 eV.
Additional calculations were performed for this molecular compound, and a Van der Waals correction was included because of the layered crystal structure of the GdSbS2O compound. The impact of long-range interactions is found to be negligible with the change of the energy gap in the order of ~10−3 eV. The total magnetic moment of GdSbS2O is obtained in our calculations as 6.98  μ B /f.u.; no experimental value has been reported in the literature.

2.5. GdSb2 Compound

In Figure 9, the electronic structure of the GdSb2 intermetallic compound is plotted for the two opposite spin directions. Similar to the previous electronic structures, one can see two intense peaks from the 4f Gd states at the following energies: −8.1 eV and 3.2 eV. The valence band is composed of the hybridized 5p Sb1, Sb2, and 5d Gd electronic states, and the main contributors to the conduction band are the 5d Gd electronic states, see Figure 9b,c. One can notice that there is non-zero density of states around the Fermi energy with the valence and conduction bands overlapping for both spin projections Figure 9a suggests the metallic nature of the compound. The other electronic states (not shown in Figure 9) have negligible contributions.
In Figure 10, one can see the band structure of both spin projections of the GdSb2 compound. The change of stoichiometry in Gd-Sb from 1:1 (GdSb) to 1:2 (GdSb2) results in the overlapping of the valence and conduction bands with several crossings of the Fermi level around T and Y high-symmetry points. However, the other parts of the band structure still maintain some distance between occupied and empty electronic states, which leads to the small but non-zero density of states around the Fermi energy, see Figure 9a. These features of the band and electronic structures indicate that this compound is a metal. Like in all above investigated compounds, there are localized states at energies corresponding to the Gd-4f intense peaks, as can be seen in Figure 9a. One can also notice a Dirac-cone-like feature near the Fermi level between high-symmetry points Г and S. Panel c in Figure 10 shows a small part of the band structure near the Fermi level with spin-orbit coupling taken into account in a separate calculation. The effect of SOC brings no significant changes in the band structure, although there is a small splitting of the two Dirac cones in the Г–S high-symmetry direction. The total magnetic moment of GdSb2 is obtained in our calculations as 7.03  μ B /f.u.; to our knowledge, no experimental value has been reported in the literature. In binary rare-earth pnictide compounds, topological features are related with outstanding spectral and magnetic properties, including large magnetoresistance [19,20]; thus, additional experimental studies on GdSb2 are required.

3. Materials and Methods

The crystal structure motives of all five compounds are plotted in Vesta [50] in Figure 11. Lattice parameters and atomic positions are shown in Table 1 below. One can see that the Sb atom in the ternary GdNiSb (b) has an environment of four Ni atoms in the form of a tetrahedron, and if one removes the Ni atoms from it, the exact binary GdSb (a) structure is obtained. In the molecular compound GdSbS2O (d), one can notice a layered structure with the alternation of two Sb–S and one S–Gd–O layers. The GdSb2 (e) compound also has a layered structure with the alternation of two distorted Gd–Sb layers and one Sb layer with square lattice, where one distorted Gd–Sb layer is actually two separate square Gd and Sb lattices very close to each other.
In this work, band and electronic structures were calculated using the Quantum Espresso program set [53,54], taking into account correlation effects as LSDA(GGA)+U [55]. This method is justified for strong electron correlations taken in the 4f shells of rare-earth elements. The exchange correlation functional form was used in the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof (PBE-version) [56].
In our GGA+U calculations, the exchange (Hund) parameter J as 0.7 eV and direct Coulomb interaction U as 6.7 eV were used for Gd as in previous works [55,57,58]. In this work we assume that the magnetic moments of rare-earth elements have ferromagnetic ordering. In our study, the standard potentials from the library of pseudopotential (Quantum ESPRESSO) for Ni, Sb, S, and O [59], as well as the projected augmented wave method (PAW) scalar relativistic potentials for gadolinium [60]. These pseudopotentials were used in our calculations, with the electronic configurations for generation given in parentheses [61]. One should note that all-electron full-potential codes, such as the Elk code [62], may be more precise in total energy and other parameters than pseudopotential-based codes. This is important for magnetic properties, e.g., for Gd3Cu3Sb4 in [63]. On the other hand, the systematic comparisons of different calculated values, including band gap, revealed that modern pseudopotentials can provide similar precision [64]. Wave functions were expanded in plane waves; we used a smearing of 0.01 Ry in the Marzari–Vanderbilt–De Vita–Payne smearing scheme [61] in Brillouin-zone integration for a 12 × 12 × 12 k-mesh. The method of plane-augmented waves was taken to include interactions between ions and valence electrons. SOC was additionally accounted for within full relativistic ultrasoft pseudopotentials from the standard Quantum Espresso library [59], listed here [61]. In additional calculations, long-range interactions (Van der Waals forces) were considered for the layered GdSbS2O compound with many-body dispersion (MBD) correction [65].

4. Conclusions

In this work, we explored different Gd-Sb materials for electronic and band structure features. The compounds based on these two elements are being actively investigated because of topological features and the large magnetic moment. Five compounds were investigated theoretically to demonstrate the variety of electronic properties in these Gd-Sb-based compounds, namely, GdSb, GdNiSb, Gd4Sb3, GdSbS2O, and GdSb2. We started with the main representative from the Gd-Sb system, which is the GdSb compound with the semimetallic properties and topological nonsymmetric electron pocket along Γ–X–W and the hole pockets in the L–Γ–X path. Our calculations show that the addition of nickel atoms to the system results in the energy gap, and we obtain a semiconductor with an indirect gap of 0.38 eV for the GdNiSb intermetallic compound. By changing chemical composition from 1:1 (GdSb) to 4:3 (Gd4Sb3), one can obtain a half-metal with the energy gap of 0.67 eV only in the minority spin projection. The GdSbS2O compound with S and O in its composition is found to be a semiconductor with the small indirect gap. GdSb2 is the last compound in this series, which has a metallic nature, with overlapping valence and conduction bands, as it has been shown with calculated electronic and band structures. Nevertheless, the band structure of GdSb2 has a Dirac-cone-like feature near the Fermi energy between high-symmetry points Г and S; these two Dirac cones are split by spin-orbit coupling. Additional experimental studies of the Gd-Sb-based compounds are required. Thus, the semimetallic, half-metallic, semiconducting, or metallic states in the electronic structure, as well as the topological features in the band structure and the large magnetic moment from the rare-earth element demonstrate that the combination of Gd and Sb in quantum materials may result in very promising properties for applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, writing—review and editing, S.T.B. and A.V.L.; project administration, supervision, A.V.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-42-02021) for the electronic structure calculations in Section 2.1, Section 2.2 and Section 2.5, the magnetic moments calculations (Section 2.3 and Section 2.4) were done within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme “Electron” No. 122021000039-4) and UrFU project 273/LKP-429-2023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Keimer, B.; Moore, J.E. The physics of quantum materials. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 1045–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hasan, M.Z.; Kane, C.L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 3045–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. He, K.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Q.-K. Topological materials: Quantum anomalous Hall system. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2018, 9, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Franz, M.; Rozali, M. Mimicking black hole event horizons in atomic and solid-state systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hasan, M.Z.; Xu, S.-Y.; Bian, G. Topological insulators, topological superconductors and Weyl fermion semimetals: Discoveries, perspectives and outlooks. Phys. Scr. 2015, 2015, 014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huan, S.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Su, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Yu, N.; et al. Multiple Magnetic Topological Phases in Bulk van der Waals Crystal MnSb4Te7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 246601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, M.; McNally, G.M.; Kim, H.H.; Oudah, M.; Gibbs, A.S.; Manuel, P.; Green, R.J.; Sutarto, R.; Takayama, T.; Yaresko, A.; et al. Superconductivity in (Ba,K)SbO3. Nat. Mater. 2022, 21, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pan, Y.; Fan, F.R.; Hong, X.; He, B.; Le, C.; Schnelle, W.; He, Y.; Imasato, K.; Borrmann, H.; Hess, C.; et al. Thermoelectric Properties of Novel Semimetals: A Case Study of YbMnSb2. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2003168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, Y.; Kong, T.; Wang, L.-L.; Johnson, D.D.; Mou, D.; Huang, L.; Schrunk, B.; Bud’ko, S.L.; Canfield, P.C.; Kaminski, A. Asymmetric mass acquisition in LaBi: Topological semimetal candidate. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 081108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niu, X.H.; Xu, D.F.; Bai, Y.H.; Song, Q.; Shen, X.P.; Xie, B.P.; Sun, Z.; Huang, Y.B.; Peets, D.C.; Feng, D.L. Presence of exotic electronic surface states in LaBi and LaSb. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 165163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nayak, J.; Wu, S.-C.; Kumar, N.; Shekhar, C.; Singh, S.; Fink, J.; Rienks, E.E.D.; Fecher, G.H.; Parkin, S.S.P.; Yan, B.; et al. Multiple Dirac cones at the surface of the topological metal LaBi. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 13942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oinuma, H. Three-dimensional band structure of LaSb and CeSb: Absence of band inversion. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 041120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pavlosiuk, O. Magnetoresistance in LuBi and YBi semimetals due to nearly perfect carrier compensation. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 235132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lou, R. Evidence of topological insulator state in the semimetal LaBi. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 115140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y.; Lee, Y.; Kong, T.; Mou, D.; Jiang, R.; Huang, L.; Bud’ko, S.L.; Canfield, P.C.; Kaminski, A. Electronic structure of RSb (R = Y, Ce, Gd, Dy, Ho, Tm, Lu) studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 035134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Xu, D.-D.; Ning, S.-Y.; Su, H.; Iitaka, T.; Tohyama, T.; Zhang, J.-X. Predicted Weyl fermions in magnetic GdBi and GdSb. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2017, 31, 1750217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, D.X.; Haga, Y.; Shida, H.; Suzuki, T. Electrical transport properties of semimetallic GdX single crystals (X = P, As, Sb, and Bi). Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 10483–10491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Knyazev, Y.V.; Kuz’min, Y.I.; Baidak, S.T.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Investigation of semimetallic properties of GdSb and TbSb compounds: A first-principle and optical study. Solid State Sci. 2023, 136, 107085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niu, R. Materials and possible mechanisms of extremely large magnetoresistance: A review. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2021, 34, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pavlosiuk, O.; Kleinert, M.; Swatek, P.; Kaczorowski, D.; Wiśniewski, P. Fermi surface topology and magnetotransport in semimetallic LuSb. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Volkov, M.P. Magnetization and giant magnetoresistance of polycrystalline TbSb at low temperatures. Phys. Solid State 2019, 61, 1416–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.-Y.; Sun, L.-L.; Xu, S.; Su, Y.; Xia, T.-L. Unusual magnetotransport in holmium monoantimonide. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 045137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xia, Z.-L.; Tang, F.; Xu, C.-Q.; Cong, S.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, L.; Han, Z.-D.; Qian, B.; Jiang, X.-F.; Ke, X.; et al. Influence of magnetization anisotropy on angular magnetoresistance in the antiferromagnetic topological semimetal HoSb. Phys. Rev. B 2022, 106, 115137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuchin, A.G.; Platonov, S.P.; Mukhachev, R.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Volegov, A.S.; Gaviko, V.S.; Yakovleva, M.Y. Large magnetic entropy change in GdRuSi optimal for magnetocaloric liquefaction of nitrogen. Metals 2023, 13, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gupta, S.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Knyazev, Y.V.; Kuz’min, Y.I.; Suresh, K.G. Field induced metamagnetism and large magnetic entropy change in RRhSi (R = Tb, Dy, Ho) rare earth intermetallics. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 888, 161493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gupta, S.; Suresh, K.G.; Nigam, A.K.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Magnetism in RRhGe (R = Tb, Dy, Er, Tm): An experimental and theoretical study. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 640, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hosen, M.M.; Dhakal, G.; Dimitri, K.; Maldonado, P.; Aperis, A.; Kabir, F.; Sims, C.; Riseborough, P.; Oppeneer, P.M.; Kaczorowski, D.; et al. Discovery of topological nodal-line fermionic phase in a magnetic material GdSbTe. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sankar, R. Crystal Growth and Magnetic Properties of Topological Nodal-Line Semimetal GdSbTe with Antiferromagnetic Spin Ordering. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 11730–11737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, X.-P.; Hu, X.-R.; Dai, Y.-C.; Lei, T.; Chu, S.-B.; Deng, J.-B. Electronic Structure of Ternary Antimonides GdNiSb. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2011, 119, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sahariya, J.; Kumar, P.; Bhamu, K.C.; Soni, A. Electronic structure of Gd based transition metal antimonides GdTSb (T = Ni, Pt). AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1953, 110010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hirschberger, M.; Kushwaha, S.; Wang, Z.; Gibson, Q.; Liang, S.; Belvin, C.A.; Bernevig, B.A.; Cava, R.J.; Ong, N.P. The chiral anomaly and thermopower of Weyl fermions in the half-Heusler GdPtBi. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shekhar, C. Anomalous Hall effect in Weyl semimetal half-Heusler compounds RPtBi (R = Gd and Nd). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 9140–9144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hartjes, K.; Jeitschko, W. Crystal structures and magnetic properties of the lanthanoid nickel antimonides LnNiSb (Ln = La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Tm, Lu). J. Alloys Compd. 1995, 226, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baidak, S.T.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Common topological features in band structure of RNiSb and RSb compounds for R = Tb, Dy, Ho. Materials 2023, 16, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saini, S.M. Electronic Structure and Thermoelectric Performance of Narrow-Gap GdNiSb Half Heusler Compound: Density Functional Calculations. Phys. Status Solidi B 2021, 258, 2000491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ciesielski, K.; Synoradzki, K.; Veremchuk, I.; Skokowski, P.; Szymański, D.; Grin, Y.; Kaczorowski, D. Thermoelectric Performance of the Half-Heusler Phases RNiSb (R = Sc, Dy, Er, Tm, Lu): High Mobility Ratio between Majority and Minority Charge Carriers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 14, 054046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Satyam, J.K.; Saini, S.M. Role of R-f states on electronic structure and thermoelectric performance of RNiSb (R = Gd, Er and Lu) half Heusler compounds: Narrow gap thermoelectric materials. Appl. Phys. A 2021, 127, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lukoyanov, A.V.; Baidak, S.T. Ab initio investigation of electronic structure and topological features in ErNiSb and ErSb compounds. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1263, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eatough, N.L.; Hall, H.T. High-pressure synthesis of rare earth diantimonides. Inorg. Chem. 1969, 8, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abdusalyamova, M.N.; Burnashev, O.R.; Mironov, K.Y. The alloy systems ln-Sb. J. Less-Common Met. 1986, 125, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aliev, O.M.; Tanryverdiev, V.S. Rare-Earth Oxysulfostibnites: Synthesis and Some Physical Properties. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 42, 1761–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, L.; Wu, Y.; Huo, H.; Tang, B.; Ma, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Zhou, S. Nanoscale Gd2O2S:Tb Scintillators for High-Resolution Fluorescent Imaging of Cold Neutrons. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 8440–8447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ortega-Berlanga, B.; Betancourt-Mendiola, L.; Angel-Olarte, C.; Hernández-Adame, L.; Rosales-Mendoza, S.; Palestino, G. An Overview of Gadolinium-Based Oxide and Oxysulfide Particles: Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lian, J.; Sun, X.; Li, J.-G.; Xiao, B.; Duan, K. Characterization and optical properties of (Gd1−x, Prx)2O2S nano-phosphors synthesized using a novel co-precipitation method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 122, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, J.J.; Tang, F.; Zhou, W.; Fang, Y.; Yu, H.L.; Han, Z.D.; Qian, B.; Jiang, X.F.; Wang, D.H.; Du, Y.W. Extremely large magnetoresistance in the antiferromagnetic semimetal GdSb. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 3026–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ghosh, D.B.; De, M.; De, S.K. Electronic, magnetic, and optical properties of Gd monopnictides: An LDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 045140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khalid, S.; Sharan, A.; Janotti, A. Hybrid functional calculations of electronic structure and carrier densities in rare-earth monopnictides. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 125105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Inbar, H.S.; Ho, D.Q.; Chatterjee, S.; Pendharkar, M.; Engel, A.N.; Dong, J.T.; Khalid, S.; Chang, Y.H.; Guo, T.; Fedorov, A.V.; et al. Epitaxial growth, magnetoresistance, and electronic band structure of GdSb magnetic semimetal films. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2022, 6, L121201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shanmukharao Samatham, S.; Patel, A.K.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Suresh, K.G. Magnetization, resistivity, specific heat and ab initio calculations of Gd5Sb3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2018, 30, 295802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abdusalyamova, M.N.; Shokirov, H.S.; Rakhmatov, O.I. Investigation of the rare earth monoantimonides. J. Less-Common Met. 1990, 166, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pecharskii, V.K.; Pankevich, Y.V.; Bodak, O.I. Crystal structures of the compounds RNiSb with various rare earth elements. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 1983, 28, 97–98. [Google Scholar]
  53. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Chiarotti, G.L.; Cococcioni, M.; Dabo, I.; et al. Quantum ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for Quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 395502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Giannozzi, P.; Andreussi, O.; Brumme, T.; Bunau, O.; Buongiorno Nardelli, M.; Calandra, M.; Car, R.; Cavazzoni, C.; Ceresoli, D.; Cococcioni, M.; et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017, 29, 465901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anisimov, V.I.; Aryasetiawan, F.; Lichtenstein, A.I. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: The LDA+U method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1997, 9, 767–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Knyazev, Y.V.; Kuz’min, Y.I.; Kuchin, A.G.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Nekrasov, I.A. Optical absorption and structure of energy bands of GdNi5−xCux intermetallic compounds. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2009, 107, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Baglasov, E.D.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Electronic structure of intermetallic antiferromagnet GdNiGe. Symmetry 2019, 11, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Quantum ESPRESSO. Available online: https://www.quantum-espresso.org/pseudopotentials (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  60. Topsakal, M.; Wentzcovitch, R. Accurate projected augmented wave (PAW) datasets for rare-earth elements (RE = La–Lu). Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 95, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marzari, N.; Vanderbilt, D.; De Vita, A.; Payne, M.C. Thermal contraction and disordering of the Al(110) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. The Elk Code. Available online: https://elk.sourceforge.io (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  63. Goraus, J.; Witas, P.; Grelska, J.; Calvayrac, F.; Czerniewski, J.; Balin, K. Magnetic properties of Gd3Cu3Sb4. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 550, 169075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lejaeghere, K.; Bihlmayer, G.; Björkman, T.; Blaha, P.; Blügel, S.; Blum, V.; Caliste, D.; Castelli, I.E.; Clark, S.J.; Dal Corso, A.; et al. Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids. Science 2016, 351, aad3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ambrosetti, A.; Reilly, A.M.; DiStasio, R.A.; Tkatchenko, A. Long-range correlation energy calculated from coupled atomic response functions. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 18A508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 08778 g001 550
Figure 1. Electronic structure of GdSb: (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p from states from density functional theory (DFT)+U [18]. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Figure 1. Electronic structure of GdSb: (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p from states from density functional theory (DFT)+U [18]. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Ijms 24 08778 g001
Ijms 24 08778 g002 550
Figure 2. Band structure of GdSb: (a) Majority (up arrow); (b) Minority (down arrow) spin projections from DFT+U; (c) With spin-orbit coupling [18].
Figure 2. Band structure of GdSb: (a) Majority (up arrow); (b) Minority (down arrow) spin projections from DFT+U; (c) With spin-orbit coupling [18].
Ijms 24 08778 g002
Ijms 24 08778 g003 550
Figure 3. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdNiSb. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d, Ni-3d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical dashed line.
Figure 3. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdNiSb. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d, Ni-3d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical dashed line.
Ijms 24 08778 g003
Ijms 24 08778 g004 550
Figure 4. Band structure of GdNiSb: (a) Majority (up arrow); (b) Minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in GdNiSb.
Figure 4. Band structure of GdNiSb: (a) Majority (up arrow); (b) Minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in GdNiSb.
Ijms 24 08778 g004
Ijms 24 08778 g005 550
Figure 5. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for Gd4Sb3. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Figure 5. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for Gd4Sb3. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb-5p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Ijms 24 08778 g005
Ijms 24 08778 g006 550
Figure 6. Band structure of Gd4Sb3: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in Gd4Sb3.
Figure 6. Band structure of Gd4Sb3: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in Gd4Sb3.
Ijms 24 08778 g006
Ijms 24 08778 g007 550
Figure 7. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdSbS2O. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d, Sb-5p; (c) Partial density of states for S1-3p, S2-3p, O-2p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Figure 7. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdSbS2O. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d, Sb-5p; (c) Partial density of states for S1-3p, S2-3p, O-2p. The plot is shifted relative to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Ijms 24 08778 g007
Ijms 24 08778 g008 550
Figure 8. Band structure of GdSbS2O: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling.
Figure 8. Band structure of GdSbS2O: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling.
Ijms 24 08778 g008
Ijms 24 08778 g009 550
Figure 9. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdSb2. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb1-5p, Sb2-5p. The plot is shifted relatively to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Figure 9. Densities of electronic states from DFT+U for GdSb2. (a) Total and partial Gd-4f densities of states; (b) Partial density of states for Gd-5d; (c) Partial density of states for Sb1-5p, Sb2-5p. The plot is shifted relatively to the Fermi energy, shown at zero as a vertical line.
Ijms 24 08778 g009
Ijms 24 08778 g010 550
Figure 10. Band structure of GdSb2: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in GdSb2.
Figure 10. Band structure of GdSb2: (a) majority (up arrow) and (b) minority (down arrow) spin projections. Panel (c) shows the effect of spin-orbit coupling in GdSb2.
Ijms 24 08778 g010
Ijms 24 08778 g011 550
Figure 11. Crystal structure of: (a) GdSb; (b) GdNiSb; (c) Gd4Sb3; (d) GdSbS2O; (e) GdSb2 compounds plotted in Vesta [50]. Gd atoms are shown in blue, Ni in green, Sb in red, S in yellow, and O in dark green.
Figure 11. Crystal structure of: (a) GdSb; (b) GdNiSb; (c) Gd4Sb3; (d) GdSbS2O; (e) GdSb2 compounds plotted in Vesta [50]. Gd atoms are shown in blue, Ni in green, Sb in red, S in yellow, and O in dark green.
Ijms 24 08778 g011
Table
Table 1. Lattice parameters and atomic positions for GdSb, GdNiSb, Gd4Sb3, GdSbS2O, and GdSb2 compounds.
Table 1. Lattice parameters and atomic positions for GdSb, GdNiSb, Gd4Sb3, GdSbS2O, and GdSb2 compounds.
CompoundSpace Group (No.)Lattice Parameters (Å)Atomic Positions
abcElementWyckoff SymbolXYZ
GdSb [51]2256.2106.2106.210Gd4a000
Sb4b0.50.50.5
GdNiSb [33,52]2166.3246.3246.324Gd4a000
Ni4c0.250.250.25
Sb4b0.50.50.5
Gd4Sb3 [40]2209.2209.2209.220Gd16c0.08330.08330.0833
Sb12a0.37500.25
GdSbS2O [41]1293.9003.90013.700Gd2c0.250.250.0936
Sb2c0.250.250.6263
S12c0.250.250.379
S22c0.250.250.813
O2a0.750.250
GdSb2 [39]646.1575.98617.830Gd8f00.13470.3902
Sb18f00.13140.0640
Sb28e0.250.37780.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baidak, S.T.; Lukoyanov, A.V. Semimetallic, Half-Metallic, Semiconducting, and Metallic States in Gd-Sb Compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108778

AMA Style

Baidak ST, Lukoyanov AV. Semimetallic, Half-Metallic, Semiconducting, and Metallic States in Gd-Sb Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(10):8778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baidak, Semyon T., and Alexey V. Lukoyanov. 2023. "Semimetallic, Half-Metallic, Semiconducting, and Metallic States in Gd-Sb Compounds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 10: 8778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108778

APA Style

Baidak, S. T., & Lukoyanov, A. V. (2023). Semimetallic, Half-Metallic, Semiconducting, and Metallic States in Gd-Sb Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(10), 8778. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop