Next Article in Journal
Retroviral Replicating Vectors Mediated Prodrug Activator Gene Therapy in a Gastric Cancer Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictive Factors and ACE-2 Gene Polymorphisms in Susceptibility to Long COVID-19 Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Dual PI3K/mTOR Inhibitor, XIN-10, for the Treatment of Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Short Survey on the Protein Modifications in Plasma during SARS-CoV-2 Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms241914822
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dynamics of the Microbiota and Its Relationship with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

by
Nidia Carolina Moreno-Corona
1,
Orestes López-Ortega
2,
Cesar Augusto Pérez-Martínez
3,
Macario Martínez-Castillo
4,
Luis Adrián De Jesús-González
5,
Guadalupe León-Reyes
6 and
Moisés León-Juárez
7,*
1
Laboratory of Human Lymphohematopoiesis, Imagine Institute, INSERM UMR 1163, Université de Paris, 75015 Paris, France
2
Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S1151, CNRS UMR-S8253, Institute Necker Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France
3
Departamento de Física, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico
4
Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
5
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica de Zacatecas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Zacatecas 98000, Mexico
6
Laboratorio de Nutrigenética y Nutrigenómica, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica (INMEGEN), México City 16610, Mexico
7
Laboratorio de Virología Perinatal y Diseño Molecular de Antígenos y Biomarcadores, Departamento de Inmunobioquímica, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Mexico City 11000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(19), 14822; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914822
Submission received: 10 August 2023 / Revised: 24 September 2023 / Accepted: 28 September 2023 / Published: 1 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research and Insights into COVID-19)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which can be asymptomatic or present with multiple organ dysfunction. Many infected individuals have chronic alterations associated with neuropsychiatric, endocrine, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal symptoms, even several months after disease onset, developing long-COVID or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). Microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the onset and progression of many viral diseases, including COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 manifestations, which could serve as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This review aimed to discuss the most recent findings on gut microbiota dysbiosis and its relationship with the sequelae of PACS. Elucidating these mechanisms could help develop personalized and non-invasive clinical strategies to identify individuals at a higher risk of experiencing severe disease progression or complications associated with PACS. Moreover, the review highlights the importance of targeting the gut microbiota composition to avoid dysbiosis and to develop possible prophylactic and therapeutic measures against COVID-19 and PACS in future studies.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infection caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); it can be asymptomatic or produce mild symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, malaise, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, with critical manifestations including respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction [1,2]. In addition, many people may exhibit chronic alterations associated with neuropsychiatric, endocrine, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal symptoms, even several months after disease onset, developing long-COVID or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) [3,4].
The pathogenesis of PACS is unclear and may be multifactorial, involving prolonged inflammation, immune-mediated vascular dysfunction, thromboembolism, and nervous system dysfunction [5]. In addition, gut microbiota imbalance or dysbiosis may be critical for the emergence of PACS [6]. The human microbiota can be described as a diverse microbial community which can reside symbiotically in various anatomical sites of the human body [7]. SARS-CoV-2 mainly disrupts respiratory and gastrointestinal microbiota homeostasis in infected individuals [8,9,10,11,12]. This dysbiosis has detrimental effects on patients with COVID-19; for instance, it promotes a reduction in the abundance of beneficial symbiotic bacteria and an increase in the abundance of opportunistic pathogens [10,12]. Specifically, gut dysbiosis is associated with the occurrence of complications in COVID-19, disease severity, and persistent symptoms several months after initial infection [6,13,14,15,16].
Considering that microbiota imbalances may persist after recovery from acute COVID-19 symptoms, this review aims to summarize the dynamic relationship between gut microbiota communities and the pathophysiology of PACS.

2. Definition of Prevalence and Symptoms of Long COVID-19

On average, COVID-19 symptoms last between 1 and 4 weeks. However, a subgroup of patients worldwide present with persistent symptoms for many months [17]. These patients are diagnosed with long COVID or PACS [17].
PACS was first observed in the spring of 2020 when patients with COVID-19 continued to exhibit symptoms several weeks after their acute infections and soon after the first cases evolved [18]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), PACS is defined as a condition that occurs with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, generally 3 months from the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis [19].
Individuals with PACS report a wide range of symptoms, including fatigue, shortness of breath, pain, mental disorders, cognitive dysfunction, and olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions. Symptoms may also fluctuate or relapse over time [18,19,20].
According to symptom severity, the following three clinical phenotypes have been described within PACS: permanence (unchanged during the follow-up period), relapse/remission (fluctuating episodes with intervals of exacerbation and remission), and slow progressive improvement [21].
The exact cause of PACS remains unknown; however, several hypotheses have been proposed, including direct viral tissue damage [22]. SARS-CoV-2 can access various tissues in the body, since the virus receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), is expressed by different cells [23]. Elevated C-reactive protein levels have been persistently detected during SARS-CoV-2 infection in some patients with PACS. For these particular cases, the etiology of the symptoms could be related to a specific increase in the CD8+ T cell response [23].
In addition to uncertainty about the etiology of PACS symptons, the prevalence in these patients remains unclear. The estimated prevalence depends on the follow-up duration, ethnicity, and symptoms defined in each PACS report [24]. Recently, community-based studies have suggested a low prevalence of persistent symptoms, while the majority of the people hospitalized following COVID-19 do not fully recover (50–70%) [25]. Several studies and meta-analyses have reported a wide range of prevalence for post-COVID-19. For example, a 2021 study of patients with COVID-19 who were followed up for up to 9 months after the illness revealed that approximately 30% of the patients exhibited persistent symptoms [17]. Another study estimated the possible incidence of post-COVID-19 sequelae to be between 10% and 35% [18]. Han et al. [26] reported that the most common symptoms at 1 year post-infection were fatigue/weakness, dyspnea, arthromyalgia, depression, anxiety, memory loss, concentration difficulties, and insomnia. Another study performed in a Danish population followed up to 3 months after COVID-19 diagnosis found that 39% of the patients had persistent symptoms and 8% of the patients had severe persistent symptoms, with the most common symptoms being fatigue, loss of smell, and taste dysfunction [20]. A study conducted in Italy found that 40.5% of the infected patients reported at least one of these symptoms 12 months post-infection [27].
As mentioned, the clinical presentation of patients with persistent COVID-19 is heterogeneous. More than 200 symptoms affecting different organs and systems have been reported. The most common long-term symptoms are fatigue (52%), cardiorespiratory symptoms (30–42%), and neurological symptoms (40%), including dysautonomia [21].
Attempts have been made to categorize the symptoms. One report classified symptom severity in acute and post-acute COVID-19 as follows: no severe multisystemic persistence of dyspnea (the main symptom in this category), followed by severe to critical COVID-19 when patients presented with multi-organ failure, and acute respiratory distress syndrome [28].
PACS heterogeneity is still unclear and the criteria for treatment and classification have evolved with time and with information availability. One factor involved in the recovery or susceptibility to PACS is related to the gut microbiota.

3. General Concepts of the Gut Microbiome and Its Association with the Lungs and Gastrointestinal Tract

The microbiome comprises the community of symbiotic, commensal, and pathogenic microorganisms of the human body. These microbes are particularly abundant in the gut, skin, and oral cavity [29].
Interestingly, although the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts are anatomically and functionally different, the epithelia of the gut and lungs develop from a common embryonic structure and its microbial colonization is similar in early-life and in changes throughout life [30].
The gut microbiota is composed of bacteria (such as Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia), fungi (Candida, Saccharomyces, Malassezia, and Cladosporium), viruses, phages, and archaea [31]. The lung microbiota includes the following four phyla: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The most abundant genera in healthy lungs are Prevotella, Streptococcus, Veilonella, Neisseria, Haemophilus, and Fusobacterium [32,33].
The gut microbiota participates in several functions, such as the fermentation of food, vitamin synthesis, immune system maturation, and protection against pathogens; hence, it is fundamental for maintaining health [31,34]. The lung microbiota avoids chronic inflammation, favoring the establishment of an immune-tolerant environment, particularly through the development, activation, and recruitment of immune-regulatory cells, such as regulatory T cells, M2-macrophages, and tolerogenic dendritic cells [33].
In addition to individual functions, crosstalk exists between the gastrointestinal tract and pulmonary microbiota which constitutes a functional gut–lung axis, which is essential for maintaining homeostasis and stimulating the host immune system in both organs [35]. For instance, gut segmented filamentous bacteria can activate the Th17 response, which modulates memory B cells in the lungs; conversely, the CCL25/CCR9 pathway induces the recruitment of lung-derived CD4+T cells in the intestinal tract, thus altering its microbiota [36,37]. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is associated with lung disorders and respiratory infections such as asthma and allergic inflammation. and in some patients with chronic lung disorders, irritable bowel syndrome develops as a consequence of gut microbiota disturbance [38,39].
This axis allows the passage of gut microbiota metabolites, endotoxins, and cytokines into the bloodstream connecting the intestinal tissues with the lungs. The main mechanism of this bidirectional regulation is the participation of bacterial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate) that can modulate immune response activation by the engagement of G-protein coupled receptors and the inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in different cell types [38].

4. Gut Microbiome Association with Clinical Manifestations in Viral Infections

Viral infections attack several tissues and organs; human pathogenic viruses include those of the upper respiratory tract and lungs (e.g., adenovirus, influenza, rhinoviruses, and severe PACS-SARS-CoV-2), colon (e.g., enteroviruses, rotavirus, and norovirus), liver (e.g., hepatitis B virus), spinal cord (e.g., poliovirus), vascular endothelial cervix (e.g., human papillomavirus), cells (e.g., Ebola), and white blood cells (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-cell leukemia virus) [40].
The mucosa is the main route of cellular entry from the environment [41]. The three main lines of defense on mucosal surfaces against pathogenic viruses are the mucus layer, innate immune defenses, and adaptive immune defenses [40,42]. Microbiota in the gut mucosa play an essential role in the immune response against viral infections by modulating both innate and adaptive immunity [40,41]
For viral entry into the cell, the virus particle should attach to the host cell; some examples of how the microbiota inhibit this step are as follows. For the vesicular stomatitis virus, some strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium cause steric hindrance between the receptor and the virus. In addition, Lactobacillus expresses CD4 receptors that are capable of binding to HIV, thereby reducing viral infections [40]. Microbiota lipopolysaccharide (LPS) also exhibits antiviral mechanisms; immune cells primed with LPS show better activation mediated by toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4); thus, the influenza virus demonstrates decreased efficiency [43].
Metalloproteases produced by the microbiota play an essential role as antivirals. A study characterizing the genome of different populations of the S24_7 bacterial family identified M6 metalloproteases and immunoglobin A-degrading peptidase in some populations [44]. Microbial metabolites regulate the host immune system, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the most essential metabolites of the gut microbiota. These SCFAs, including acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid, are produced in millimolar quantities by the fermentation of dietary fibers [45]. Generally, SCFAs restrict the growth and adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms, improving epithelial integrity, and further enhance systemic host immunity by reducing intestinal pH, thus increasing mucin production [40,46]. For example, butyrate is associated with the reactivation of latent Epstein–Barr virus, due to its ability to regulate HDAC [47]. In addition, acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced disease by enhancing the response to type 1 interferon (IFN) and increasing IFN-stimulated gene expression through activation of the membrane receptor GPR43 [48].
A common mechanism by which the gut microbiota influences antiviral control is by modulating the IFN response. Basal IFN secretion is necessary to maintain the immune system with constant vigilance for a robust response to infections [49,50].
It has been demonstrated that nasal and pharyngeal microbiota mediate susceptibility to influenza A (H3N2) and B infections. Staphylococci induce IFN production, which generates an innate response, resulting in a protective function of the microbiota against viruses [41]. In addition, desaminotyrosine (DAT), which is produced by a clostridial obligate anaerobe, promotes the synthesis of IFN-stimulated genes in the lungs and pulmonary phagocytes by augmenting type I IFN signaling [50]. Similarly, acetic acid produced by gut microbiota can inhibit RSV by inducing IFN-β production in the lungs, which activates the type I IFN signaling pathway [51]. Acetate also protects against RSV by activating the membrane receptor GPR43, which increases gene expression in response to type 1 interferons in the lung epithelial cells [48].
Another study mentioned that microbiota induces an enteric IFN-λ response in intestinal epithelial cells at homeostasis in the intestines of specific pathogen-free mice. Mice lacking the Ifnlr1 gene are susceptible to murine rotavirus infections [52]. Glycolipids from Bacteroides fragilis signal through TLR4 to induce of IFN-β expression by colon DCs [53]. SCFAs and DAT produced by Bacteroidetes and/or Clostridium can enhance influenza-specific CD8+ T-cell function and type I IFN signaling in macrophages, thereby enhancing protection against influenza infection [54] As mentioned, microbiota in the lung–gut axis plays an essential role in mediating viral infections; therefore, microbiota dysbiosis may play an important role in COVID-19 infection.

5. Gut Microbiota and Its Dynamics in Typical COVID-19

Although SARS-CoV-2 infection is a pulmonary disease, ACE2 expression, the lung–gut axis, and antibiotic treatment can alter the gut microbiome [55]. COVID-19 is known to reduce the gut microbiome diversity in adult [13,56,57,58,59,60,61] and pediatric patients [62]. The loss of diversity in the gut microbiome is associated with other diseases [63], indicating the importance of the microbiome in health.
Specifically, dysbiosis caused by COVID-19 is characterized by a decreased abundance of commensal bacteria, including L-isoleucine and SCFA-producing bacteria [6,10,13,15,59,60,64,65]. Several beneficial effects of SCFAs have been reported, including anti-inflammatory properties and preventing colonic atrophy [66,67]. These effects are attributed to bacteria such as Roseburia inulinivorans [57], Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [60]. Notably, F. prausnitzii has been underrepresented among patients with COVID-19 [6,10,13,15,60,64]. F. prausnitzii, which is associated with an anti-inflammatory effect independent of SCFA production [68], is positively correlated with an increased number of blood neutrophils [64], and negatively correlated with the severity of COVID-19 [6,13,15,60,64]. Other Faecalibacterium species are associated with fewer bloodstream infections [59]. Li et al. also reported an increase in the abundance of other butyrate-producing bacteria (Paraprevotella sp., Streptococcus thermophilus, Clostridium ramosum, and Bifidobacterium animalis) to compensate for the loss of SCFAs; however, this effect was not observed in other studies [57,60]. In summary, SCFA-producing bacteria play an essential role in the microbiome disrupted by SARS-CoV-2 infection, affecting the overall health and increasing the severity of infection.
In contrast, bacteria that were overrepresented during COVID-19 infection included the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes [59], and Proteobacteria in adults [13,58] and children [62]. Proteobaceria abundance is correlated with infection severity and fatality [58]. Several studies of patients with COVID-19 have reported the prevalence of opportunistic pathogens such as some species of Clostridium (Clostridium ramosum and Clostridium hathewayi) [10,57], Escherichia, Veillonella, Rothia, and Streptococcus [56,65]. Some bacteria, such as Streptococcus thermophilus, Bacteroides oleiciplenus, Fusobacterium ulcerans, and Prevotella bivia, are found only in patients with COVID-19 [57]. Interestingly, Prevotella bivia infection is correlated with low monocyte levels [57] and can cause bacterial vaginosis [69]. Moreover, patients with COVID-19 exhibit high gut levels of interleukin (IL)-18, a proinflammatory factor [70] that correlates with the prevalence of Peptostreptococcus, Fusobacterium, and Citrobacter [65]. Zhang et al. reported a correlation between the severity of COVID-19 and urea-producing bacteria [60]. However, no species have been implicated in this research. Overall, dysbiosis in patients with COVID-19 is characterized by an increase in the abundance of opportunistic bacteria, which correlates with the severity of infection.
Although antibiotic treatment was once used empirically in COVID-19 treatment, it is no longer recommended [71,72]. Patients treated with antibiotics present more depletion of beneficial bacteria than patients with COVID-19 who have not been administered antibiotics [10]. In 2022, Schult et al. reported that antibiotic treatment was too diverse to determine its effect on the microbiota [13]. In addition, in 2022, Vestad et al. found similar microbiota in antibiotic-treated and non-treated patients with COVID-19 [61]. Moreover, Yeoh et al. identified that the microbiota from COVID-19-recovered patients who were not treated with antibiotics was more similar to the healthy control microbiota than those of the recovered patients treated with antibiotics [15]. Thus, considering these conflicting results, the effect of antibiotics on the microbiota of patients with COVID-19 needs further investigation.
Other respiratory infections also induce changes in microbiota composition and diversity [62,65,73], but they differ from the changes observed in patients with COVID-19. The reported differences are summarized in Table 1. Patients with severe RSV infections exhibited a greater abundance of the genera Odoribacter and Oribacterium, while those with moderate infections exhibited Clostridiales and Coriobacteriaceae, but no changes in microbiome diversity [74]. Patients with seasonal flu also exhibited a greater abundance of Oribacterium, Bulleidia, and Aggregatibacter species [65]. Patients infected with H7N9 showed no changes in the overall abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria. However, a decrease in the abundance of F. prausnitzii was observed in antibiotic-treated patients, but they shared a loss of diversity, a decrease in commensal bacteria, and an increase in the opportunistic bacteria observed in patients with COVID-19 [75,76]. A comparison between patients infected with COVID-19 and those with other respiratory infections revealed similarities in dysbiosis between patients with H1N1 and those with COVID-19, representing a loss of diversity and SCFA-producing bacteria. However, patients with COVID-19 exhibited increased abundance of opportunistic bacteria, such as Streptococcus and Blautia, whereas those with H1N1 exhibited an increased abundance of Prevotella and Ezakiella [56]. Moreover, COVID-19 induced the most dramatic loss of diversity, compared with other inflammatory diseases [62,65]. Together, these observations indicated a specific response of the gut microbiota when infected with SARS-CoV-2 which was not observed in infection with other respiratory viruses.
Gut microbiota can affect the expression of ACE2 in human cells [77,78], thereby altering the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into intestinal cells. Zuo et al. reported that four Bacteroides species (Bacteroides dorei, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bacteroides massiliensis, and Bacteroides ovatus) negatively correlated with the viral load in the gut [10]. These species are associated with low ACE2 expression in mice [79]. F. prautnitzii and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reduce ACE2 expression in Caco-2 cells [80], and both bacteria are negatively correlated with COVID-19 [6,10,13,15,60]. Altering ACE2 expression can, in turn, affect amino acid uptake and other immunological processes [81]; these changes can affect disease severity, although this remains to be investigated. Thus, the absence of certain types of bacteria can increase ACE2 expression by cells in the gut; however, its effect on the overall disease remains to be determined.
In summary, changes in the gut microbiota during COVID-19 imply profound and specific alterations caused by the virus. These changes include an intense loss of diversity, an increased abundance of opportunistic bacteria, and a decreased abundance of commensal bacteria. These commensal bacteria include SCFA-producing species, such as F. prautnitzii. Changes in the overall abundance of different species can affect ACE2 expression, which in turn can affect disease severity. All these changes are expected in other respiratory infections, but patients with COVID-19 seem to be the most affected by these characteristics.

6. Gut Microbiota and Long COVID-19—Friend or Foe?

To date, the symptoms of COVID-19 have been widely described. However, the clinical features of patients with post-acute COVID-19 have not been fully elucidated. The possible explanations for the development of this syndrome are still unclear. The most probable hypothesis of this syndrome involves viral infection-induced altered inflammatory responses that could lead to exacerbated inflammation and cellular damage [82]. Additionally, intestinal microbiota changes have emerged as another potential explanation for these symptoms [6,10]. Several studies highlighted the involvement of the gut microbiota during infection, and even after its resolution (Table 2). Patients with COVID-19 exhibited significant changes in their fecal microbiome, displaying an enrichment in opportunistic pathogens and decreased abundance of beneficial bacteria [6,10] Gut commensals, such as F. prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale, and Bifidobacteria, which possess immunomodulatory effects, are less abundant in patients during the active phase of the disease and one month after the infection has resolved. For example, the relative abundances of members of the genera Ruminococcus and Bifidobacterium changed significantly in patients with COVID-19 and controls, with means of 3% vs. 6.75% for Ruminococcus and 16% vs. 19% for Bifidobacterium [6]. At six months, patients with PACS showed significantly lower prevalences of Collinsella aerofaciens, F. prausnitzii, and Blautia obeum and higher prevalences of Ruminococcus gnavus and Bacteroides vulgatus than those of the controls [6,10] In addition, populations of opportunistic pathogens, such as Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus vestibularis, Streptococccus gordonii, and Clostridium disporicum, are abundant in patients with PACS [6,73,74]. These changes in the intestinal bacterial population modify the immune response based on contact with commensal organisms rather than opportunistic organisms, leading to elevated inflammation, since the gastrointestinal tract is an essential site of immune interaction between the host and pathogen, and may affect the recovery process of patients infected with COVID-19 [83]. Recently, F. prausnitzii has been described as possessing immunomodulatory properties, such as decreasing the inflammatory response by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway and, subsequently, the synthesis and secretion of IL-8, as well as inducing IL-10, which is an anti-inflammatory cytokine contributing to host defense.
A strong association between bacteria and COVID-19 is indicated by the fact that several Firmicutes bacteria can regulate ACE2 expression in the murine intestine [84]—possibly modulating viral infection [6,64,85]. According to these data, any alteration in the Firmicutes/Bacteroides ratio has a strong impact on the regulation of the immune response. These modifications in bacterial ratios have been observed in patients with COVID-19 and may play an important role in disease severity (Figure 1). In patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 symptoms, these ratios are 0.68, 0.65, and 0.58, respectively, indicating a correlation between the reduction in this ratio and disease severity [6,64,85].
Table 2. Recent studies of association between gut microbiota and long COVID.
Table 2. Recent studies of association between gut microbiota and long COVID.
PopulationStudy GroupsAgeMain FindingsReference
China
(Hong Kong)		PACS COVID-19 diagnostic patients (n = 106)
non-COVID-19 controls patients (n = 68)		48.3 (33–62)Patients without PACS showed recovered gut microbiome profile at 6 months comparable to that of non-COVID-19 controls.
Gut microbiome of patients with PACS were characterized by higher levels of Ruminococcus gnavus and Bacteroides vulgatus and lower levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.
Persistent respiratory symptoms were correlated with opportunistic gut pathogens, and neuropsychiatric symptoms and fatigue were correlated with nosocomial gut pathogens, including Clostridium innocuum and Actinomyces naeslundii.
Butyrate-producing bacteria, including Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum and F. prausnitzii, showed the largest inverse correlations with PACS at 6 months. 		[57]
Italy
(Roma)		Post SARS-CoV-2 positive (n = 31)
SARS-CoV-2 negative (n = 18).		66.7 ± 14.4
67.1 ± 17.5		Bacteroidetes’ relative abundance was higher (≈36.8%) in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and declined to 18.7% when SARS-CoV-2 infection resolved (Six months).
Firmicutes were prevalent (≈75%) in controls and in samples collected after SARS-CoV-2 infection resolution.
Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Blautia increased after SARS-CoV-2 infection resolution six months after.
Lachnospiraceae (Fusicantibacter and Roseburia) and Ruminococcaceae were increased after SARS-CoV-2 infection resolution.		[85]
Norway
Oslo		Patients with 3 months after hospitalization COVID-19 (PACS) (n = 83)59 (50–71)Three months after hospitalization for COVID-19, patients with respiratory dysfunction showed a lower microbiota diversity and an altered global gut microbiota composition than patients with normal respiratory function. These microbiota alterations included reduced abundance of Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 and increased abundance of Veillonella and Flavonifractor.[61]
China
(Hong Kong)		Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (n = 302)
Healthy controls (n = 893)		54.9Klebsiella pneumoniae, an opportunistic pathogen, was positively associated with PACS patients.
Roseburia intestinalis, a probiotic, was negatively correlated with PACS patients. Subjects with PACS showed a significant increase in abundance of Bacteroides vulgatus and Bacteroides xylanisolvens, compared with healthy controls.		[86]
China
(Hong Kong)		Patients non-COVID-19 (n = 66)
Patients COVID-19 (n = 66)
With PACS (n = 48)
Without PACS (n = 18)		47.9 (28–64)
49.2 (33–63)		Post-acute COVID-19-syndrome patients exhibited increased prevalence of Klebsiella sp.[86]
United State of America
(New Jersey)		Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, single patient.Not specifiedASV002A_Bacteroides was positively correlated with all PACS COVID-19 symptoms and positively correlated with the severity of anxiety.
The ASV0AKS_Oscillibacter, ASV009F_Anaerofustis, ASV02YT_Blautia, ASV07LA_Blautia, and ASV0AM6_Eubacterium hallii amplicon sequence variants were potential SCFA-producing bacteria, which were associated with the alleviation of PACS COVID-19 symptoms. 		[87]
Russia (Moscow)post-COVID-19 syndrome patients (n = 30)62 (53–67)Excessive bacterial growth (92%) of proinflammatory microorganisms (Bacteroides fragilis group, Candida spp., S. aureus, Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., and Citrobacter spp.) exceeded the reference values by 1.5–2 times, and low levels of Bacteroides thetaiotimicron and Akkermansia muciniphila compared with the reference values.
High ratio of Bacteoides fragilis group/Faecalibacterium prausnitzii associated with inflammatory diseases in post-COVID-19 patients.		[88]
China
(Hong Kong)		Overall: COVID-19 patients n = 133
Cluster 1: severe and post-acute COVID-19 (n = 63)
Cluster 2 non-severe COVID-19 (n = 70)		42.2 (26–59)The multi-biome composition of patients in Cluster 1 was characterized by a predominance of bacteria Ruminococcus gnavus, Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, Erysipelatoclostridium ramosum, Clostridium bolteae, and Clostridium innocuum, and lower relative abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.[89]
China (Shanghai)Post severe/critical COVID-19 infection patients (n = 14)
Post mild/moderate COVID-19 infection patients (n = 31)
Healthy controls (n = 31)		60.5 (49.5–70.5)
51.0 (42.7–56.2)		The diversity of the gut microbiome was reduced in severe/critical COVID-19 cases compared to mild/moderate cases.
The abundance of some gut microbes altered post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and related to disease severity, such as Enterococcus faecium, Coprococcus comes, Roseburia intestinalis, Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides cellulosilyticus, and Blautia obeum. 		[90]
China
(Wuhan)		Asymptomatic group (n = 103)
long COVID-19 symptomatic patients (n = 84)		59 (48–66)
57 (45–67)		Symptomatic recovered patients (long COVID) had gut microbiota dysbiosis, including significantly reduced bacterial diversities and lower relative abundance of SCFAs-producing salutary symbionts, such as Eubacterium hallii group, Subdoligranulum, Ruminococcus, Dorea, Coprococcus, and Eubacterium ventriosum group, compared with healthy controls.
The relative abundance of Eubacterium hallii group, Subdoligranulum, and Ruminococcus showed decreasing tendencies in healthy controls, the asymptomatic group, and the symptomatic long COVID group.		[91]
This association between microbiota and immune-system regulation is known; several studies have correlated gut microbiome alterations with chronic diseases, including gastrointestinal, inflammatory, metabolic, neurological, and respiratory diseases [31]. These findings in patients with long-term COVID-19 suggest a possible correlation between microbiota and some PACS symptoms, which may act as predictors of the development of disease-specific symptoms.
Current evidence on the mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection promotes microbiome dysbiosis is limited. However, the immunological response is hypothesized to be exacerbated during an acute infection, and the persistence or latent state of the virus in tissues, such as the intestine, may be related to post-COVID pathogenic events and microbiome dysbiosis [65,92]. Several viruses regulate the expression of genes involved in pro-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic processes, resulting in chronic inflammation. Additionally, various viruses that can persist in different anatomical regions and in biological fluids after acute infection has been identified [93]. For example, the Zika virus persisted for several months in the cerebrospinal fluid and lymph nodes of infected animals after passing through the convalescent phase [94]. The possible presence of SARS-CoV-2 for a long time in the intestinal tract of patients with COVID-19 could be contributing to the degradation of the intestinal mucosa through unexplored mechanisms [95,96]. Thus, some viral proteins can induce apoptosis in infected cells, or viral factors secreted by infected cells may participate in damaging neighboring cells; therefore, these mechanisms could be evaluated in the future to further understand how this microbial ecological deregulation occurs in the intestine.

7. Applications and Prospects of Gut Microbiota for the Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19 and PACS

The human microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host health by participating in the maturation, regulation, and induction of immune responses. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for innovative strategies to diagnose, manage, and treat the disease, as it poses unprecedented challenges to global healthcare systems [97]. Consequently, human microbiota has become a promising pathway for potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic applications, particularly in the context of COVID-19 and its long-term sequelae, PACS [98,99].
The dysbiosis observed in the gut microbiota and respiratory tract of patients with COVID-19 highlights the compelling association between the microbiota and the host immune response to the virus [100]. As described above, these perturbations in microbial composition have been linked to the severity of COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 manifestations and have been postulated as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Such biomarkers may prove critical for identifying individuals at higher risk of severe disease progression or complications [101,102].
Identifying the microbial biomarkers correlated with COVID-19 severity may help in the development of personalized treatment strategies. The use of both intestinal [99,102,103] and airway [104,105,106,107,108] microbiota profiling techniques, such as metagenomic sequencing and metatranscriptomic profiling, could offer a comprehensive perspective on the population composition and functional activity of the microbial community and facilitate the development of microbial biomarkers to identify COVID-19 severity and PACS [109,110].
Furthermore, fecal microbiota signatures can be used as noninvasive diagnostic markers for COVID-19 [111]. The potential of microbiota-based diagnostics also extends to patients with PACS, where specific bacterial taxa have been reported to correlate with symptom severity (as discussed above). Microbiota-based diagnostic techniques could provide non-invasive tools to diagnose and manage PACS [112,113,114].
Moreover, intestinal microbiota modulation has been explored as a therapeutic option for COVID-19 or PACS through interventions such as probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which have shown promising therapeutic results [3]. These approaches may help to reduce inflammation, improve immune dysregulation, and decrease the risk of secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 and PACS [115,116]. However, further research is needed to establish standardized methodologies for microbiota-based therapies and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that govern the complex interplay between gut microbiota and host immune response during COVID-19 infection.
The use of FMT as a treatment for COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 has been found to restore alterations in the microbiota and the intestinal immune response—even restoring the airway microbiota (through the intestine-lung axis). However, healthy donors must be selected, based on specific criteria such as physical and laboratory examinations [116,117,118].
In addition, Xavier-Santos et al. [115], through a systematic literature review, demonstrated that the administration of probiotics and prebiotics improved the composition of intestinal microbiota, reduced inflammation, improved vaccination efficacy, and prevented and/or alleviated the symptoms of COVID -19 and prolonged COVID-19. The species most commonly used in probiotic and prebiotic clinical trials are Bifidobacterium longum and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Loigolactobacillus coryniformis, Ligilactobacillus salivarius, Enterococcus faecium, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 2) [115,119,120].
The relationship between the gut microbiome and COVID-19 is complex and multifaceted. Understanding how the metabolites derived from this microbiome influence the disease may reveal new strategies for its treatment and prevention. During COVID-19 infection, metabolites such as glucose, glucosamine, galactose, and catechol are present in patients who are at a high risk of pulmonary complications. These metabolites are suggested to play a role in disease progression [121].
Moreover, SCFAs, such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which are primarily produced by bacteria of the Clostridium genus, are essential for the body’s immune response to SARS-CoV-2. These SCFAs can reduce ACE2 receptor expression, decrease viral load, and enhance adaptive immunity against viruses. Additionally, they possess anti-inflammatory properties that can mitigate excessive immune responses. In murine models, vancomycin has been shown to reduce the abundance of certain commensal bacteria and increase those of Clostridium, with the aim of increasing SCFAs. However, further human studies are required to determine their efficacy against COVID-19 (Figure 2) [122].
Notably, the ACE2 enzyme is vital for regulating the gut microbiota and strengthening innate immunity; however, it is also used by SARS-CoV-2 as a receptor to enter cells. Decreased ACE2 expression can compromise the intestinal barrier, leading to a leaky gut, which can exacerbate the cytokine storm in patients with severe COVID-19. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the interactions among the gut microbiome, SCFAs, ACE2, and SARS-CoV-2. This understanding could lead to innovative therapeutic approaches, such as gut microbiota modulation and SCFA supplementation, for patients with PACS, potentially improving clinical outcomes [123].
In summary, the intricate relationship between the gut microbiome and COVID-19 reveals several opportunities. Detailed investigations have revealed that the human gut microbiota has significant potential for devising new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic techniques. Understanding the nuanced interplay between the microbiota and the host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is paramount. Together, advancements in microbiota profiling and the identification of microbial biomarkers linked to COVID-19 severity hold promise for personalized treatment strategies for patients with COVID-19 and PACS.

8. Conclusions

Although PACS is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome with unclear causes, the hypothesis that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota participates in its pathogenesis has been proposed, based on recent data. These data suggest that a dynamic relationship could be established between the pathophysiological mechanisms activated by acute COVID-19 and PACS and intestinal microbiota. The displacement of commensal microorganisms by opportunistic pathogens is associated with detrimental complications and increased disease severity in infected patients. In addition, these data show the importance, in future studies, of targeting the gut microbiota composition to avoid dysbiosis and to develop possible prophylactic and therapeutic measures against COVID-19 and PACS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.-J., N.C.M.-C., O.L.-O. and M.M.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, N.C.M.-C., C.A.P.-M. and L.A.D.J.-G.; writing—review and editing, G.L.-R., O.L.-O. and M.L.-J.; visualization. N.C.M.-C. and G.L.-R.; supervision M.L.-J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.L.-J., O.L.-O., C.A.P.-M., M.M.-C., G.L.-R. and L.A.D.J.-G. acknowledge their memberships in the National System of Research (SNI CONAHCYT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Da Rosa Mesquita, R.; Francelino Silva Junior, L.C.; Santos Santana, F.M.; Farias De Oliveira, T.; Campos Alcântara, R.; Monteiro Arnozo, G.; Rodrigues Da Silva Filho, E.; Galdino Dos Santos, A.G.; Oliveira Da Cunha, E.J.; Salgueiro De Aquino, S.H.; et al. Clinical Manifestations of COVID-19 in the General Population: Systematic Review. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2021, 133, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines; National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2023.
  3. Wang, B.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Dai, T.; Qin, Z.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, L. Alterations in Microbiota of Patients with COVID-19: Potential Mechanisms and Therapeutic Interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nalbandian, A.; Sehgal, K.; Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; McGroder, C.; Stevens, J.S.; Cook, J.R.; Nordvig, A.S.; Shalev, D.; Sehrawat, T.S.; et al. Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maltezou, H.C.; Pavli, A.; Tsakris, A. Post-COVID Syndrome: An Insight on Its Pathogenesis. Vaccines 2021, 9, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, Q.; Mak, J.W.Y.; Su, Q.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Lui, G.C.-Y.; Ng, S.S.S.; Zhang, F.; Li, A.Y.L.; Lu, W.; Hui, D.S.-C.; et al. Gut Microbiota Dynamics in a Prospective Cohort of Patients with Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. Gut 2022, 71, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rastogi, S.; Mohanty, S.; Sharma, S.; Tripathi, P. Possible Role of Gut Microbes and Host’s Immune Response in Gut–Lung Homeostasis. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 954339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, R.; Lu, R.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Q.; Cai, W.; Han, X.; Wan, Z.; Jin, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, C. Temporal Association between Human Upper Respiratory and Gut Bacterial Microbiomes during the Course of COVID-19 in Adults. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hernández-Terán, A.; Mejía-Nepomuceno, F.; Herrera, M.T.; Barreto, O.; García, E.; Castillejos, M.; Boukadida, C.; Matias-Florentino, M.; Rincón-Rubio, A.; Avila-Rios, S.; et al. Dysbiosis and Structural Disruption of the Respiratory Microbiota in COVID-19 Patients with Severe and Fatal Outcomes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zuo, T.; Zhang, F.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Li, A.Y.L.; Zhan, H.; Wan, Y.; Chung, A.C.K.; Cheung, C.P.; Chen, N.; et al. Alterations in Gut Microbiota of Patients With COVID-19 During Time of Hospitalization. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 944–955.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mizutani, T.; Ishizaka, A.; Koga, M.; Ikeuchi, K.; Saito, M.; Adachi, E.; Yamayoshi, S.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Yasuhara, A.; Kiyono, H.; et al. Correlation Analysis between Gut Microbiota Alterations and the Cytokine Response in Patients with Coronavirus Disease during Hospitalization. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01689-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gang, J.; Wang, H.; Xue, X.; Zhang, S. Microbiota and COVID-19: Long-Term and Complex Influencing Factors. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 963488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schult, D.; Reitmeier, S.; Koyumdzhieva, P.; Lahmer, T.; Middelhoff, M.; Erber, J.; Schneider, J.; Kager, J.; Frolova, M.; Horstmann, J.; et al. Gut Bacterial Dysbiosis and Instability Is Associated with the Onset of Complications and Mortality in COVID-19. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2031840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Ma, W.-L.; Wang, X. Linking the Gut Microbiota to Persistent Symptoms in Survivors of COVID-19 after Discharge. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yeoh, Y.K.; Zuo, T.; Lui, G.C.-Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, A.Y.; Chung, A.C.; Cheung, C.P.; Tso, E.Y.; Fung, K.S.; et al. Gut Microbiota Composition Reflects Disease Severity and Dysfunctional Immune Responses in Patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021, 70, 698–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hazan, S.; Stollman, N.; Bozkurt, H.S.; Dave, S.; Papoutsis, A.J.; Daniels, J.; Barrows, B.D.; Quigley, E.M.; Borody, T.J. Lost Microbes of COVID-19: Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium Depletion and Decreased Microbiome Diversity Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Severity. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022, 9, e000871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Proal, A.D.; VanElzakker, M.B. Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): An Overview of Biological Factors That May Contribute to Persistent Symptoms. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 698169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pavli, A.; Theodoridou, M.; Maltezou, H.C. Post-COVID Syndrome: Incidence, Clinical Spectrum, and Challenges for Primary Healthcare Professionals. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Post COVID-19 Condition (Long Covid). Available online: Https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-clinical_case_definition-2021.1 (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  20. Petersen, M.S.; Kristiansen, M.F.; Hanusson, K.D.; Foldbo, B.M.; Danielsen, M.E.; á Steig, B.; Gaini, S.; Strøm, M.; Weihe, P. Prevalence of Long COVID in a National Cohort: Longitudinal Measures from Disease Onset until 8 Months’ Follow-Up. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 122, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-Sampalo, A.; Bernal-López, M.R.; Gómez-Huelgas, R. Síndrome de COVID-19 persistente. Una revisión narrativa. Rev. Clínica Esp. 2022, 222, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, A.; Madhavan, M.V.; Sehgal, K.; Nair, N.; Mahajan, S.; Sehrawat, T.S.; Bikdeli, B.; Ahluwalia, N.; Ausiello, J.C.; Wan, E.Y.; et al. Extrapulmonary Manifestations of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Desai, A.D.; Lavelle, M.; Boursiquot, B.C.; Wan, E.Y. Long-Term Complications of COVID-19. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2022, 322, C1–C11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carod Artal, F.J. Síndrome post-COVID-19: Epidemiología, criterios diagnósticos y mecanismos patogénicos implicados. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 72, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brightling, C.E.; Evans, R.A. Long COVID: Which Symptoms Can Be Attributed to SARS-CoV-2 Infection? Lancet 2022, 400, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Han, Q.; Zheng, B.; Daines, L.; Sheikh, A. Long-Term Sequelae of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Follow-Up Studies on Post-COVID Symptoms. Pathogens 2022, 11, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fumagalli, C.; Zocchi, C.; Tassetti, L.; Silverii, M.V.; Amato, C.; Livi, L.; Giovannoni, L.; Verrillo, F.; Bartoloni, A.; Marcucci, R.; et al. Factors Associated with Persistence of Symptoms 1 Year after COVID-19: A Longitudinal, Prospective Phone-Based Interview Follow-up Cohort Study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 97, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yong, S.J.; Liu, S. Proposed Subtypes of post-COVID-19 Syndrome (or long-COVID) and Their Respective Potential Therapies. Rev. Med. Virol. 2022, 32, e2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Georgiou, K.; Marinov, B.; Farooqi, A.A.; Gazouli, M. Gut Microbiota in Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chunxi, L.; Haiyue, L.; Yanxia, L.; Jianbing, P.; Jin, S. The Gut Microbiota and Respiratory Diseases: New Evidence. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 2340670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.-X.; Chen, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in Health and Diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Invernizzi, R.; Lloyd, C.M.; Molyneaux, P.L. Respiratory Microbiome and Epithelial Interactions Shape Immunity in the Lungs. Immunology 2020, 160, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sommariva, M.; Le Noci, V.; Bianchi, F.; Camelliti, S.; Balsari, A.; Tagliabue, E.; Sfondrini, L. The Lung Microbiota: Role in Maintaining Pulmonary Immune Homeostasis and Its Implications in Cancer Development and Therapy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2020, 77, 2739–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Joseph, S.W.; Carnahan, A.; Rollins, D.; Walker, R.I. Aeromonas and Plesiomonas in the Environment: Value of Differential Biotyping of Aeromonads. J. Diarrhoeal Dis. Res. 1988, 6, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Dang, A.T.; Marsland, B.J. Microbes, Metabolites, and the Gut-Lung Axis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McAleer, J.P.; Nguyen, N.L.H.; Chen, K.; Kumar, P.; Ricks, D.M.; Binnie, M.; Armentrout, R.A.; Pociask, D.A.; Hein, A.; Yu, A.; et al. Pulmonary Th17 Antifungal Immunity Is Regulated by the Gut Microbiome. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, J.; Tian, Z. How Lung Infection Leads to Gut Injury. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 42394–42395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, A.; Lei, Y.; Tang, L.; Hu, S.; Yang, M.; Wu, L.; Yang, S.; Tang, B. Gut Microbiota: The Emerging Link to Lung Homeostasis and Disease. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e00454-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, H.; Liu, J.-S.; Peng, S.-H.; Deng, X.-Y.; Zhu, D.-M.; Javidiparsijani, S.; Wang, G.-R.; Li, D.-Q.; Li, L.-X.; Wang, Y.-C.; et al. Gut-Lung Crosstalk in Pulmonary Involvement with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. World, J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 6794–6804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Harper, A.; Vijayakumar, V.; Ouwehand, A.C.; ter Haar, J.; Obis, D.; Espadaler, J.; Binda, S.; Desiraju, S.; Day, R. Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 596166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mizutani, T.; Ishizaka, A.; Koga, M.; Tsutsumi, T.; Yotsuyanagi, H. Role of Microbiota in Viral Infections and Pathological Progression. Viruses 2022, 14, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bosch, A.A.T.M.; Biesbroek, G.; Trzcinski, K.; Sanders, E.A.M.; Bogaert, D. Viral and Bacterial Interactions in the Upper Respiratory Tract. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Man, W.H.; de Steenhuijsen Piters, W.A.A.; Bogaert, D. The Microbiota of the Respiratory Tract: Gatekeeper to Respiratory Health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ormerod, K.L.; Wood, D.L.A.; Lachner, N.; Gellatly, S.L.; Daly, J.N.; Parsons, J.D.; Dal’Molin, C.G.O.; Palfreyman, R.W.; Nielsen, L.K.; Cooper, M.A.; et al. Genomic Characterization of the Uncultured Bacteroidales Family S24-7 Inhabiting the Guts of Homeothermic Animals. Microbiome 2016, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.-J.; Bakker, B.M. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in the Interplay between Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Host Energy Metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Woods Acevedo, M.A.; Pfeiffer, J.K. Microbiota-Immune System Interactions and Enteric Virus Infection. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021, 46, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Feng, C.; Jin, C.; Liu, K.; Yang, Z. Microbiota-Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids: Their Role and Mechanisms in Viral Infections. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 160, 114414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Antunes, K.H.; Fachi, J.L.; de Paula, R.; da Silva, E.F.; Pral, L.P.; dos Santos, A.Á.; Dias, G.B.M.; Vargas, J.E.; Puga, R.; Mayer, F.Q.; et al. Microbiota-Derived Acetate Protects against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection through a GPR43-Type 1 Interferon Response. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Erttmann, S.F.; Swacha, P.; Aung, K.M.; Brindefalk, B.; Jiang, H.; Härtlova, A.; Uhlin, B.E.; Wai, S.N.; Gekara, N.O. The Gut Microbiota Prime Systemic Antiviral Immunity via the cGAS-STING-IFN-I Axis. Immunity 2022, 55, 847–861.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sencio, V.; Machado, M.G.; Trottein, F. The Lung–Gut Axis during Viral Respiratory Infections: The Impact of Gut Dysbiosis on Secondary Disease Outcomes. Mucosal Immunol. 2021, 14, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lv, Z.; Xiong, D.; Shi, J.; Long, M.; Chen, Z. The Interaction Between Viruses and Intestinal Microbiota: A Review. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 3597–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van Winkle, J.A.; Peterson, S.T.; Kennedy, E.A.; Wheadon, M.J.; Ingle, H.; Desai, C.; Rodgers, R.; Constant, D.A.; Wright, A.P.; Li, L.; et al. Homeostatic Interferon-Lambda Response to Bacterial Microbiota Stimulates Preemptive Antiviral Defense within Discrete Pockets of Intestinal Epithelium. eLife 2022, 11, e74072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stefan, K.L.; Kim, M.V.; Iwasaki, A.; Kasper, D.L. Commensal Microbiota Modulation of Natural Resistance to Virus Infection. Cell 2020, 183, 1312–1324.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. He, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, F.; Shi, Y. Main Clinical Features of COVID-19 and Potential Prognostic and Therapeutic Value of the Microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 Infections. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Aan, F.J.; Glibetic, N.; Montoya-Uribe, V.; Matter, M.L. COVID-19 and the Microbiome: The Gut-Lung Connection. In Comprehensive Gut Microbiota; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 442–458. ISBN 978-0-12-822036-8. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gu, S.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gao, H.; Lv, L.; Guo, F.; Zhang, X.; Luo, R.; Huang, C.; et al. Alterations of the Gut Microbiota in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 or H1N1 Influenza. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 2669–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, S.; Yang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Disoma, C.; Dong, Z.; Du, A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, W.; Chen, J.; et al. Microbiome Profiling Using Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing Identified Unique Microorganisms in COVID-19 Patients With Altered Gut Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 712081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stutz, M.R.; Dylla, N.P.; Pearson, S.D.; Lecompte-Osorio, P.; Nayak, R.; Khalid, M.; Adler, E.; Boissiere, J.; Lin, H.; Leiter, W.; et al. Immunomodulatory Fecal Metabolites Are Associated with Mortality in COVID-19 Patients with Respiratory Failure. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bernard-Raichon, L.; Venzon, M.; Klein, J.; Axelrad, J.E.; Zhang, C.; Sullivan, A.P.; Hussey, G.A.; Casanovas-Massana, A.; Noval, M.G.; Valero-Jimenez, A.M.; et al. Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis in Antibiotic-Treated COVID-19 Patients Is Associated with Microbial Translocation and Bacteremia. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, F.; Wan, Y.; Zuo, T.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhan, H.; Lu, W.; Xu, W.; Lui, G.C.Y.; et al. Prolonged Impairment of Short-Chain Fatty Acid and L-Isoleucine Biosynthesis in Gut Microbiome in Patients With COVID-19. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 548–561.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vestad, B.; Ueland, T.; Lerum, T.V.; Dahl, T.B.; Holm, K.; Barratt-Due, A.; Kåsine, T.; Dyrhol-Riise, A.M.; Stiksrud, B.; Tonby, K.; et al. Respiratory Dysfunction Three Months after Severe COVID-19 Is Associated with Gut Microbiota Alterations. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 291, 801–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Romani, L.; Del Chierico, F.; Macari, G.; Pane, S.; Ristori, M.V.; Guarrasi, V.; Gardini, S.; Pascucci, G.R.; Cotugno, N.; Perno, C.F.; et al. The Relationship Between Pediatric Gut Microbiota and SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 908492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mosca, A.; Leclerc, M.; Hugot, J.P. Gut Microbiota Diversity and Human Diseases: Should We Reintroduce Key Predators in Our Ecosystem? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tang, L.; Gu, S.; Gong, Y.; Li, B.; Lu, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.; Gao, X.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; et al. Clinical Significance of the Correlation between Changes in the Major Intestinal Bacteria Species and COVID-19 Severity. Engineering 2020, 6, 1178–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tao, W.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X.; Guo, M.; Zeng, W.; Xu, Z.; Cao, D.; Pan, A.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; et al. Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiota in COVID-19 Patients and Its Correlation with the Inflammatory Factor IL-18. Med. Microecol. 2020, 5, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Diversity, Metabolism and Microbial Ecology of Butyrate-Producing Bacteria from the Human Large Intestine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 294, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Andoh, A.; Tsujikawa, T.; Fujiyama, Y. Role of Dietary Fiber and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Sokol, H.; Pigneur, B.; Watterlot, L.; Lakhdari, O.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Gratadoux, J.-J.; Blugeon, S.; Bridonneau, C.; Furet, J.-P.; Corthier, G.; et al. Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Is an Anti-Inflammatory Commensal Bacterium Identified by Gut Microbiota Analysis of Crohn Disease Patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16731–16736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Larsen, J.M. The Immune Response to Prevotella Bacteria in Chronic Inflammatory Disease. Immunology 2017, 151, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Novick, D.; Kim, S.; Kaplanski, G.; Dinarello, C.A. Interleukin-18, More than a Th1 Cytokine. Semin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ceramella, J.; Iacopetta, D.; Sinicropi, M.S.; Andreu, I.; Mariconda, A.; Saturnino, C.; Giuzio, F.; Longo, P.; Aquaro, S.; Catalano, A. Drugs for COVID-19: An Update. Molecules 2022, 27, 8562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Granata, G.; Schiavone, F.; Pipitone, G.; Taglietti, F.; Petrosillo, N. Antibiotics Use in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Groves, H.T.; Cuthbertson, L.; James, P.; Moffatt, M.F.; Cox, M.J.; Tregoning, J.S. Respiratory Disease Following Viral Lung Infection Alters the Murine Gut Microbiota. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Harding, J.N.; Siefker, D.; Vu, L.; You, D.; DeVincenzo, J.; Pierre, J.; Cormier, S.A. Altered Gut Microbiota in Infants Is Associated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Severity. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lu, H.; Zhang, C.; Qian, G.; Hu, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, C.; Liang, W.; Gao, H.; Yang, Y.; Li, L. An Analysis of Microbiota-Targeted Therapies in Patients with Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H7N9 Infection. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Qin, N.; Zheng, B.; Yao, J.; Guo, L.; Zuo, J.; Wu, L.; Zhou, J.; Liu, L.; Guo, J.; Ni, S.; et al. Influence of H7N9 Virus Infection and Associated Treatment on Human Gut Microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ou, X.; Liu, Y.; Lei, X.; Li, P.; Mi, D.; Ren, L.; Guo, L.; Guo, R.; Chen, T.; Hu, J.; et al. Characterization of Spike Glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on Virus Entry and Its Immune Cross-Reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Geva-Zatorsky, N.; Sefik, E.; Kua, L.; Pasman, L.; Tan, T.G.; Ortiz-Lopez, A.; Yanortsang, T.B.; Yang, L.; Jupp, R.; Mathis, D.; et al. Mining the Human Gut Microbiota for Immunomodulatory Organisms. Cell 2017, 168, 928–943.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ahmadi Badi, S.; Malek, A.; Paolini, A.; Rouhollahi Masoumi, M.; Seyedi, S.A.; Amanzadeh, A.; Masotti, A.; Khatami, S.; Siadat, S.D. Downregulation of ACE, AGTR1, and ACE2 Genes Mediating SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis by Gut Microbiota Members and Their Postbiotics on Caco-2 Cells. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 173, 105798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, Y.; Wang, B.; Gao, H.; Gao, L.; Hua, R.; Xu, J.-D. ACE2 in the Gut: The Center of the 2019-nCoV Infected Pathology. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 708336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cheon, S.Y.; Koo, B.-N. Inflammatory Response in COVID-19 Patients Resulting from the Interaction of the Inflammasome and SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yoo, J.; Groer, M.; Dutra, S.; Sarkar, A.; McSkimming, D. Gut Microbiota and Immune System Interactions. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Beyerstedt, S.; Casaro, E.B.; Rangel, É.B. COVID-19: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Expression and Tissue Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. De Maio, F.; Ianiro, G.; Coppola, G.; Santopaolo, F.; Abbate, V.; Bianco, D.M.; Del Zompo, F.; De Matteis, G.; Leo, M.; Nesci, A.; et al. Improved Gut Microbiota Features after the Resolution of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Gut Pathog. 2021, 13, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Su, Q.; Liu, Q.; Lau, R.I.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Leung, T.W.H.; Tang, W.; Zhang, L.; Liang, J.Q.Y.; et al. Faecal Microbiome-Based Machine Learning for Multi-Class Disease Diagnosis. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, Y.; Wu, G.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W. Nutritional Modulation of Gut Microbiota Alleviates Severe Gastrointestinal Symptoms in a Patient with Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. mBio 2022, 13, e03801-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zurabov, F.M.; Chernevskaya, E.A.; Beloborodova, N.V.; Zurabov, A.Y.; Petrova, M.V.; Yadgarov, M.Y.; Popova, V.M.; Fatuev, O.E.; Zakharchenko, V.E.; Gurkova, M.M.; et al. Bacteriophage Cocktails in the Post-COVID Rehabilitation. Viruses 2022, 14, 2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, Q.; Su, Q.; Zhang, F.; Tun, H.M.; Mak, J.W.Y.; Lui, G.C.-Y.; Ng, S.S.S.; Ching, J.Y.L.; Li, A.; Lu, W.; et al. Multi-Kingdom Gut Microbiota Analyses Define COVID-19 Severity and Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, X.; Zhang, W.; Guo, M.; Xiao, C.; Fu, Z.; Yu, S.; Jiang, L.; Wang, S.; Ling, Y.; Liu, F.; et al. Integrated Analysis of Gut Microbiome and Host Immune Responses in COVID-19. Front. Med. 2022, 16, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, Y.; Chen, P.; Tang, J.; Yang, B.; Li, H.; Liang, M.; Xue, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Correlates With Long COVID-19 at One-Year After Discharge. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2023, 38, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Trottein, F.; Sokol, H. Potential Causes and Consequences of Gastrointestinal Disorders during a SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cell Rep. 2020, 32, 107915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Thorson, A.E.; Deen, G.F.; Bernstein, K.T.; Liu, W.J.; Yamba, F.; Habib, N.; Sesay, F.R.; Gaillard, P.; Massaquoi, T.A.; McDonald, S.L.R.; et al. Persistence of Ebola Virus in Semen among Ebola Virus Disease Survivors in Sierra Leone: A Cohort Study of Frequency, Duration, and Risk Factors. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Aid, M.; Abbink, P.; Larocca, R.A.; Boyd, M.; Nityanandam, R.; Nanayakkara, O.; Martinot, A.J.; Moseley, E.T.; Blass, E.; Borducchi, E.N.; et al. Zika Virus Persistence in the Central Nervous System and Lymph Nodes of Rhesus Monkeys. Cell 2017, 169, 610–620.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Walsh, K.A.; Jordan, K.; Clyne, B.; Rohde, D.; Drummond, L.; Byrne, P.; Ahern, S.; Carty, P.G.; O’Brien, K.K.; O’Murchu, E.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Detection, Viral Load and Infectivity over the Course of an Infection. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xu, E.; Xie, Y.; Al-Aly, Z. Long-Term Gastrointestinal Outcomes of COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Filip, R.; Gheorghita Puscaselu, R.; Anchidin-Norocel, L.; Dimian, M.; Savage, W.K. Global Challenges to Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Pandemic Measures and Problems. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Farsi, Y.; Tahvildari, A.; Arbabi, M.; Vazife, F.; Sechi, L.A.; Shahidi Bonjar, A.H.; Jamshidi, P.; Nasiri, M.J.; Mirsaeidi, M. Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Roles of Gut Microbiota in COVID-19: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 804644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, J.; Garrett, S.; Sun, J. Gastrointestinal Symptoms, Pathophysiology, and Treatment in COVID-19. Genes Dis. 2020, 8, 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. De, R.; Dutta, S. Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 736397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Papadopoulou, G.; Manoloudi, E.; Repousi, N.; Skoura, L.; Hurst, T.; Karamitros, T. Molecular and Clinical Prognostic Biomarkers of COVID-19 Severity and Persistence. Pathogens 2022, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Neag, M.A.; Vulturar, D.-M.; Gherman, D.; Burlacu, C.-C.; Todea, D.A.; Buzoianu, A.D. Gastrointestinal Microbiota: A Predictor of COVID-19 Severity? World, J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 6328–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mazzarelli, A.; Giancola, M.L.; Fontana, A.; Piselli, P.; Binda, E.; Trivieri, N.; Mencarelli, G.; Marchioni, L.; Vulcano, A.; De Giuli, C.; et al. Gut Microbiota Composition in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients with Mild or Severe Symptoms. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alsayed, A.R.; Abed, A.; Khader, H.A.; Al-Shdifat, L.M.H.; Hasoun, L.; Al-Rshaidat, M.M.D.; Alkhatib, M.; Zihlif, M. Molecular Accounting and Profiling of Human Respiratory Microbial Communities: Toward Precision Medicine by Targeting the Respiratory Microbiome for Disease Diagnosis and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zhu, T.; Jin, J.; Chen, M.; Chen, Y. The Impact of Infection with COVID-19 on the Respiratory Microbiome: A Narrative Review. Virulence 2022, 13, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ren, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, J.; Li, X.; Xiao, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Fan, G.; Guo, L.; Shen, Z.; et al. Dynamics of the Upper Respiratory Tract Microbiota and Its Association with Mortality in COVID-19. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 204, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Durán-Manuel, E.M.; Loyola-Cruz, M.Á.; Cruz-Cruz, C.; Ibáñez-Cervantes, G.; Gaytán-Cervantes, J.; González-Torres, C.; Quiroga-Vargas, E.; Calzada-Mendoza, C.C.; Cureño-Díaz, M.A.; Fernández-Sánchez, V.; et al. Massive Sequencing of the V3-V4 Hypervariable Region of Bronchoalveolar Lavage from Patients with COVID-19 and VAP Reveals the Collapse of the Pulmonary Microbiota. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Merenstein, C.; Liang, G.; Whiteside, S.A.; Cobián-Güemes, A.G.; Merlino, M.S.; Taylor, L.J.; Glascock, A.; Bittinger, K.; Tanes, C.; Graham-Wooten, J.; et al. Signatures of COVID-19 Severity and Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract Microbiome. mBio 2021, 12, e01777-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ojala, T.; Kankuri, E.; Kankainen, M. Understanding Human Health through Metatranscriptomics. Trends Mol. Med. 2023, 29, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Athanasopoulou, K.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Scorilas, A. Unveiling the Human Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiome: The Past, Present, and Future of Metagenomics. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mańkowska-Wierzbicka, D.; Zuraszek, J.; Wierzbicka, A.; Gabryel, M.; Mahadea, D.; Baturo, A.; Zakerska-Banaszak, O.; Slomski, R.; Skrzypczak-Zielinska, M.; Dobrowolska, A. Alterations in Gut Microbiota Composition in Patients with COVID-19: A Pilot Study of Whole Hypervariable 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Conti, V.; Corbi, G.; Sabbatino, F.; De Pascale, D.; Sellitto, C.; Stefanelli, B.; Bertini, N.; De Simone, M.; Liguori, L.; Di Paola, I.; et al. Long COVID: Clinical Framing, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fernández-Lázaro, D.; Sánchez-Serrano, N.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; García-Hernández, J.L.; González-Bernal, J.J.; Seco-Calvo, J. Long COVID a New Derivative in the Chaos of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: The Emergent Pandemic? J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Scarpellini, E.; Tack, J. Post-COVID-19 Gastro-Intestinal Disturbances. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2023, 18, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Xavier-Santos, D.; Padilha, M.; Fabiano, G.A.; Vinderola, G.; Gomes Cruz, A.; Sivieri, K.; Costa Antunes, A.E. Evidences and Perspectives of the Use of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics as Adjuvants for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kazemian, N.; Kao, D.; Pakpour, S. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation during and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Biliński, J.; Winter, K.; Jasiński, M.; Szczęś, A.; Bilinska, N.; Mullish, B.H.; Małecka-Panas, E.; Basak, G.W. Rapid Resolution of COVID-19 after Faecal Microbiota Transplantation. Gut 2022, 71, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ianiro, G.; Mullish, B.H.; Kelly, C.R.; Sokol, H.; Kassam, Z.; Ng, S.C.; Fischer, M.; Allegretti, J.R.; Masucci, L.; Zhang, F.; et al. Screening of Faecal Microbiota Transplant Donors during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Suggestions for Urgent Updates from an International Expert Panel. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 430–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Khaled, J.M.A. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and COVID-19 Infection: A Review Article. Saudi, J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 865–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ray, M.; Manjunath, A.; Halami, P.M. Effect of Probiotics as an Immune Modulator for the Management of COVID-19. Arch. Microbiol. 2023, 205, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Chang, W.; Zhang, L. The Relationship between Gut Microbiota and COVID-19 Progression: New Insights into Immunopathogenesis and Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Brown, J.A.; Sanidad, K.Z.; Lucotti, S.; Lieber, C.M.; Cox, R.M.; Ananthanarayanan, A.; Basu, S.; Chen, J.; Shan, M.; Amir, M.; et al. Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites Confer Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2105609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ballesteros, R.V.; Gámez, M.A.; Macaya-Ten, F.; Martínez, M.V.; Tejedor, A.V. An Uncommon Cause of Anterior ST-Segment Elevation. Eur. Heart, J. Case Rep. 2023, 7, ytad299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 14822 g001
Figure 1. Changes in the microbiota as a function of the stage of COVID-19 infection. Alterations in the abundances of various types of bacteria, such as Firmicutes or Bacteriodetes, have been associated with the severity of infection and may have a patient-specific immunoimmunomodulatory function.
Figure 1. Changes in the microbiota as a function of the stage of COVID-19 infection. Alterations in the abundances of various types of bacteria, such as Firmicutes or Bacteriodetes, have been associated with the severity of infection and may have a patient-specific immunoimmunomodulatory function.
Ijms 24 14822 g001
Ijms 24 14822 g002
Figure 2. Therapeutic applications of microbiota for COVID-19 or PACS. One of the alternatives for treating secondary infections or PACS is fecal microbiota transplantation, which can restore the microbiota modified by the disease and restore the intestinal immune response. Additionally, probiotics and prebiotics can help improve the microbiota, reduce inflammation, and increase the effectiveness of vaccination.
Figure 2. Therapeutic applications of microbiota for COVID-19 or PACS. One of the alternatives for treating secondary infections or PACS is fecal microbiota transplantation, which can restore the microbiota modified by the disease and restore the intestinal immune response. Additionally, probiotics and prebiotics can help improve the microbiota, reduce inflammation, and increase the effectiveness of vaccination.
Ijms 24 14822 g002
Table 1. Differences in the dysbiosis produced by respiratory infections.
Table 1. Differences in the dysbiosis produced by respiratory infections.
Loss of
Diversity		Increased
Opportunistic
Bacteria		Decreased
Commensal Bacteria		Decreased SCFA
Producing Bacteria		Decreased
F. prausnitzii		Detected Specific BacteriaReferences
COVID-19+++++++Streptococcus thermophilus, Bacteroides oleiciplenus, Blautia, Fusobacterium ulcerans, and Prevotella bivia[6,10,13,15,57,59,60,64,65]
RSV--ND--Odoribacter, Oribacterium, Clostridiales, and Coriobacteriaceae[74]
Seasonal flu++----Oribacterium, Bulleidia, and Aggregatibacter[60]
H1N1++++++ Prevotella and Ezakiella[56,62]
H7N9+++-+ (Only in AB treated patients)Clostridium sp., Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecium[75,76]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moreno-Corona, N.C.; López-Ortega, O.; Pérez-Martínez, C.A.; Martínez-Castillo, M.; De Jesús-González, L.A.; León-Reyes, G.; León-Juárez, M. Dynamics of the Microbiota and Its Relationship with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914822

AMA Style

Moreno-Corona NC, López-Ortega O, Pérez-Martínez CA, Martínez-Castillo M, De Jesús-González LA, León-Reyes G, León-Juárez M. Dynamics of the Microbiota and Its Relationship with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(19):14822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moreno-Corona, Nidia Carolina, Orestes López-Ortega, Cesar Augusto Pérez-Martínez, Macario Martínez-Castillo, Luis Adrián De Jesús-González, Guadalupe León-Reyes, and Moisés León-Juárez. 2023. "Dynamics of the Microbiota and Its Relationship with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 19: 14822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914822

APA Style

Moreno-Corona, N. C., López-Ortega, O., Pérez-Martínez, C. A., Martínez-Castillo, M., De Jesús-González, L. A., León-Reyes, G., & León-Juárez, M. (2023). Dynamics of the Microbiota and Its Relationship with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(19), 14822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop