Next Article in Journal
Montelukast Increased IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP via Epigenetic Regulation in Airway Epithelial Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Interfering with the Ubiquitin-Mediated Regulation of Akt as a Strategy for Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Different Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Four Homeostasis Knights: In Balance upon Post-Translational Modifications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms24021231
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A New Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer in Ubiquitin-Like Proteins—UBL3

by
Hengsen Zhang
1,
Bin Chen
1,
A. S. M. Waliullah
1,
Shuhei Aramaki
1,2,
Yashuang Ping
1,
Yusuke Takanashi
3,
Chi Zhang
1,4,
Qing Zhai
1,
Jing Yan
1,
Soho Oyama
1,
Tomoaki Kahyo
1,5 and
Mitsutoshi Setou
1,4,5,*
1
Department of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
2
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
3
First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
4
Department of Systems Molecular Anatomy, Institute for Medical Photonics Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics, Education & Research Center, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
5
International Mass Imaging Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021231
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 31 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 8 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Molecules in Cancer)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) are involved in a variety of biological processes through the modification of proteins. Dysregulation of Ubl modifications is associated with various diseases, especially cancer. Ubiquitin-like protein 3 (UBL3), a type of Ubl, was revealed to be a key factor in the process of small extracellular vesicle (sEV) protein sorting and major histocompatibility complex class II ubiquitination. A variety of sEV proteins that affects cancer properties has been found to interact with UBL3. An increasing number of studies has implied that UBL3 expression affects cancer cell growth and cancer prognosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the relationship between various Ubls and cancers. We mainly introduce UBL3 and its functions and summarize the current findings of UBL3 and examine its potential as a therapeutic target in cancers.

1. Introduction

Post-translational modification (PTM) of proteins is the addition of modifying groups to specific amino acids in a conjugate manner after protein biosynthesis to precisely modulate protein properties and optimize cellular processes. Ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like proteins (Ubls) have been identified as the third-most-common type of PTMs after phosphorylation and glycosylation [1]. They play a critical role in protein homeostasis by regulating a large number of biological processes, such as transcription, DNA repair, signal transduction, autophagy, cell-cycle control, and protein stability [2,3]. Ubls are a family of small proteins, structurally similar to Ub, and most Ubls have been identified to be involved in PTMs of cellular proteins. Ub and Ubls have now been shown to be involved in the pathological processes of a variety of diseases, including various types of cancers [4].
Ubiquitin-like 3 (UBL3), a highly conserved Ubl called membrane-anchored ubiquitin-fold protein (MUB), was identified in Arabidopsis [5]. With the deep investigation of UBL3, the functions of UBL3 have been gradually revealed. UBL3 has been reported to interact non-covalently with Arabidopsis group VI ubiquitin-conjugating E2 enzymes in vitro, and prevent E2 activation and E2 ubiquitin formation via anchoring at the plasma membrane [6]. In 2018, it was reported that UBL3 can act as a protein post-translational modifier to sort specific proteins, including RAS oncoprotein, into small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) [7]. sEVs are nanoscale bimolecular lipid vesicles secreted from multivesicular bodies (MVBs) in cells. The exosome is an sEV, defined by sizes of 30–150 nm in diameter. The roles of sEVs have been discussed in the context of progression and metastasis in various cancers [8,9,10]. sEVs are capable of transporting molecular cargo from one cell to another through vascular vessels and intercellular spaces. As a form of intercellular communication, the sEV system regulates the function and phenotype of recipient cells [11].
UBL3 was also reported to regulate the membrane-associated RING-CH (MARCH) E3 ligases that promote the ubiquitination of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) and cluster of differentiation 86 (CD86) and affect dendritic cell number and function [12]. This revealed an essential role of UBL3 in the immune system. Dendritic cell presentation of tumor antigens to CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes is critical for tumor immunity, and CD86 has also been found to be a biomarker for a variety of tumor immune-related prognoses [13,14,15]. UBL3 has the potential to be a key target for cancer therapy.
In this review, we provide an overview of the research on Ubls in cancer. Particularly, we highlight UBL3’s function, its relationship with various cancers, and the potential in cancer therapy.

2. Ub and Ubls

Ub is a highly conserved protein consisting of 76 amino acids and is expressed in nearly all eukaryotic cells [16]. Ub can regulate protein homeostasis by participating in protein degradation through covalent bonding with target proteins (mainly via an isopeptide bond between the Ub C-terminal glycine carboxylic group and lysine ε-amino group). Protein ubiquitination is a sequential enzymatic cascade reaction, in which Ub is sequentially added to the protein substrate using Ub-activating enzyme (E1), conjugating enzyme (E2), and ligase (E3) [4]. The ubiquitinated proteins are then degraded by the 26s proteasome, while the Ub is removed from the substrate by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) and enters the next ubiquitination pathway. This system constitutes the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS). UPS is the major protein hydrolysis control system in cells, which regulates the clearance of misfolded and aggregated proteins and most excess produced normal proteins [17].
Ubls are a class of PTM proteins structurally similar to Ub. Most of them have a similar β-grasp fold and a conserved C-terminus with one or two glycine motifs that conjugate to substrates [18,19]. Dozens of Ubls, such as small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs), neural precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated gene 8 (NEDD8, also known as Rub1), autophagy-related protein 8 (ATG8), autophagy-related protein 12 (ATG12), ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (URM1), ubiquitin-fold modifier 1 (UFM1), HLA-F-adjacent transcript 10 (FAT10), and UBL3, have been identified as PTM proteins. The number of substrates recognized by different Ubls varies widely, with Ub recognizing millions of substrates [20]. These Ubls have been shown to be involved in oncogenic and tumor-suppressor pathways in many types of cancers, while some cases of Ubl modifications are not directly involved in proteolysis.

3. Ubls and Cancers

3.1. SUMO

PTMs with SUMOs are involved in various cellular processes, including cell-cycle progression and DNA damage response [21]. The binding of SUMO to substrate proteins is called SUMOylatoin [22] and three subtypes of SUMOs are known as SUMO1, SUMO2, and SUMO3. SUMOylation involves a range of cascade proteins, including SUMO E1; SUMO-activating enzyme subunits (SAE1/SAE2 complex), SUMO E2; Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 I (UBC9), SUMO E3; a variety of types, such as protein inhibitor of activated STAT family [23]; and SUMO/sentrin-specific peptidases (SENPs). The expression of those proteins is known to be involved in various cancers (Table 1). At present, SAE1/SAE2, UBC9, and SENPs are the targets of cancer therapeutics. Inhibitors of SAE1/SAE2 and UBC9 block the SUMOylation cascade, while inhibitors of SENPs block deSUMOylation of a subset of their targets. To date, no small-molecule inhibitors of SUMO E3 have been identified. For example, TAK-98, an inhibitor of SUMO E1 synthesis 1, is the only SUMOylation inhibitor currently being evaluated in three cancer clinical trials (i, ii, iii). Spectomycin B1, also known as an antibiotic, binds to UBC9 and inhibits the formation of E2-SUMO intermediates, inhibiting the estrogen-dependent growth of human breast cancer cells [24].

3.2. NEDD8

Neuronal precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated protein 8 (NEDD8) is encoded by the NEDD8 gene in humans [2]. NEDD8 is a well-known Ubl, which has the highest similarity of 76% in amino acid composition with Ub [25]. NEDD8 functions in embryogenesis and controlling the cell cycle by conjugating to some cellular proteins via the process of NEDDylation. Cullin-group proteins are well-known substrates of NEDD8 [26]. The molecular scaffold for Cullin–RING ligases (CRLs) is provided by Cullins [27,28]. In renal carcinoma cells, NEDDylation of von Hippel-Lindau protein was downregulated [29]. NEDDylation over-activation in tumor cells controls tumor-derived signals to enhance the tumor microenvironment [30]. Downregulation of NEDD8 was found in prostate malignancy [31]. NEDDylation was enhanced in squamous cell carcinoma cell lines [32]. The therapeutic strategy targeting the NEDD8 pathway is currently being investigated. Recently, MLN4924, an inhibitory drug of the NEDD8-activating enzyme, was found to be potent in acute myeloid leukemia, melanoma, and solid [33].

3.3. ISG15

The modification with the Interferon-stimulated gene (ISG15) is known as ISGylation. ISG15 was the first identified Ubl [19,34]. ISG15 is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, where tumor-associated macrophages secrete ISG15 [35]. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1-like protein, an enzyme responsible for ISGylation, is downregulated in lung cancer cells [36]. Constitutive expression of ISG15 is associated with melanoma by inciting E-Cadherin expression on dendritic cells in human [37]. ISG15 is overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancers and contributes to its progression [38]. Similarly, ISGylation level was found to be higher in hepatocellular carcinoma and colon cancer compared to normal tissues [39,40]. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, the expression of ISG15 upregulated the cancer stem cell phenotypes, such as pluripotency, tumorigenicity, and tumor-sphere formation [41]. Currently, few drugs (i.e., irinotecan and topotecan) targeting the ISG15 pathway are available to treat colorectal and ovarian cancers [42].

3.4. ATG8

ATG8 includes two subfamilies, the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) and microtubule-associated protein 1 light-chain 3 (LC3) subfamilies, both of which are involved in the process of autophagy induction to autophagosome–lysosome fusion via conjugation to the lipid phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and have been elucidated to play an important role in cancer progression [43]. The levels of autophagic flux in cancer cells directly affect the expression levels of ATG8 family proteins [44]. ATG8 family proteins apparently act as tumor suppressors, mainly by participating in the selective degradation of oncogenic proteins or damaged organelles [45]. On the other hand, some researchers also reported that the expression of LC3 was upregulated and facilitates the progression of patients with gastrointestinal cancers, especially in early carcinogenesis [46]. The change in ATG8 expression levels was positively correlated with a good prognosis in several cancer types, including hematopoietic cancer, renal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and gastric cancer [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. In summary, this evidence supports that ATG8 could be a potential therapeutic target to develop new anticancer therapies.

3.5. ATG12

Another autophagy protein, ATG12, participates in the formation and expansion of autophagosomal membranes by forming an irreversible ATG12–ATG5–ATG16L1 complex together with ATG5 and ATG16L1. This series of cascade mechanisms is similar to the E1-E2-E3 cascade in the ubiquitination pathway [54]. Single-nucleotide repeat shift mutations in ATG12 may be involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of gastric and colorectal cancer through the deregulation of autophagy [55]. However, the mechanism of ATG12 expression in tumorigenesis is still unclear. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, lower ATG12 expression was correlated with better prognosis [56]. On the other hand, drug or gene therapy inhibiting ATG12 has been reported to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer, breast cancer, renal cancer, and pancreatic cancer [57]. Hu J L et al. also reported that inhibition of ATG12-mediated autophagy sensitized colorectal cancer cells to radiation therapy [58]. Therefore, ATG12 is worthy of further investigation as a potential anticancer therapeutic target.

3.6. FAT10

The FAT10 protein is known as human leukocyte antigen-F adjacent transcript 10 or ubiquitin D (UBD), which was first identified by Fan et al. in 1996 [59]. The main role of FAT10 modification is to mediate proteasomal degradation of the target protein [60]. FAT10 is also involved in cancer development. For example, FAT10 upregulated HOXB9 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), through the β-catenin/TCF4 signaling pathway and facilitates HCC invasion in vitro [61]. In bladder cancer, FAT10 promoted the proliferation of cancer cells through direct interaction with Survivin [62]. Moreover, FAT10 expression was highly upregulated in many different cancer types, such as colon and breast cancer, where it enhanced cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis formation [63]. In addition, FAT10 is known to regulate several pathways, such as NF-κB, Akt, or Wnt signaling, involved in cancer development, and also to directly interact with downstream targets, such as p53, β-catenin, SMAD2, and MAD2, leading to enhanced survival, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis formation of cancer cells but also of non-malignant cells [64]. As FAT10 overexpression has significant pro-malignant properties in different cancer types, and FAT10 affects substrate proteins and results in bio-functional change, it could be a novel therapeutic strategy based on targeting FAT10 signaling for cancer treatments [65].

4. UBL3

UBL3 was originally identified as a novel Ubl in Drosophila melanogaster in 1999 [66]. Its orthologues were later revealed to be present also in animals, filamentous fungi, and plants, and reported to be a membrane-anchored UB-fold protein [5]. After the human and mouse orthologues were cloned and sequenced, UBL3 was found to be located on human chromosome 13q12-13 and mouse chromosome 5 telomeres (MMU5), within a region of gene order shared by human and mouse chromosomes. Although it was not found in yeast, UBL3 is considered to be a highly conserved Ubl like Ub, SUMO, and NEDD8. Although UBL3 has been identified in a variety of species for decades and its expression is widespread in different human organs, mainly including the brain, lung, kidney, stomach, esophagus, colon, endometrium, gall bladder, and thyroid, the role of UBL3 has been less studied.

4.1. UBL3 Structure

UBL3 has structural homology with Ub [5]. UBL3 in humans has 117 amino acids, of which residues 10 to 88 are Ub-folding structural domains. Like all proteins in the β-grasp structural domain superfamily, UBL3 consists of five β strands and an α helix. The β fold forms a mixed β fold in the order 2-1-5-3-4, and the α helix (residues 31–41) is located in the notch of the β fold. This is similar to other Ubl structural domains, including SUMOs, NEDD8, ATG8, ATG12, etc. Another feature of UBL3 is the carboxy-terminal CAAX box (C is a cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, X is any amino acid) replacing the C terminus ending in a di-glycine motif in Ubl. The CAAX box is a typical motif for protein isoprenylation. The CAAX sequence of UBL3 is composed of C, valine (V), isoleucine (I), and leucine (L). Its 113th amino acid cysteine, linked to this CAAX box, forms the end of two consecutive cysteine residues, CCVIL. In the research of Ageta et al., the mutation in residue C114, a part of the CAAX motif, reduced the membrane localization of UBL3 compared to mutations in C113 [7]. Therefore, C114 undergoes isoprenylation and is involved in membrane anchoring of UBL3. This is consistent with the findings of Downes et al. that the C114 residue of UBL3 in AT is responsible for membrane localization [5].

4.2. UBL3 Function

The role of UBL3 as a post-transcriptional modifier (Figure 1) was revealed [7]. The protein modification with UBL3 is completely different from the modification of Ub and other Ubls. The two consecutive glycine residues at the C terminus in Ub, SUMOs, and Nedd8 are involved in the modification process by conjugating to the lysine residues of the target proteins through an isopeptide bond. In the case of UBL3, the characteristic terminus, CCAAX, is thought to be the key for UBL3 to exert as a PTM factor [7]. The mutation in the CCAAX sequence reduced the UBL3 modification levels in the MDA-MB-231 cells. However, details on the chemical modification between UBL3 and a target protein are not yet known. In Ubl3-knockout mouse, the amount of sEV proteins was reduced. A comprehensive proteomic analysis by Ageta et al. identified 1241 proteins interacting with UBL3, 29% of which were annotated as “extracellular vesicle exosomes” from Gene Ontology (GO) for enrichment analysis. These suggest that UBL3 modification is involved in the sorting of exosome proteins. Among those UBL3-interacting proteins, a variety of cancer-related proteins, such as HRAS, KRAS, TGFBR1, RB1, ITGA6, ITGB4, mTOR, TSC2, and APLP2, is included. These imply that UBL3 may play an important role in cancer invasion and metastasis via sEVs. sEVs are mediators of intercellular communication, and sEV-mediated cancer-normal cell communication in the tumor microenvironment is a key process in cancer progression [67]. Cancer-derived sEVs promoted the spread and colonization of cancer cells by remodeling the tumor microenvironment and altering the extracellular matrix [68]. Cancer sEVs play a role in six major areas: angiogenesis, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasive metastasis, immune escape, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and drug resistance [69]. UBL3 may influence these processes by being involved in sorting proteins into sEVs.
UBL3 has also recently been identified as a key regulator of MARCH-mediated ubiquitination of MHC II and CD86 [12]. C114, which is an isoprenylation site and located at the C-terminus CAAX motif of the UBL3 protein, was a key site for UBL3 to participate in MARCH-mediated MHC II ubiquitination, suggesting that membrane anchoring of UBL3 is a prerequisite for participation in this process [6,12]. UBL3 may regulate the ubiquitination of MHC II by transferring an E2 enzyme to the cell membrane anchor site of MARCH1, a Ub-E3 ligase (Figure 1). MHC II is an antigen-presenting molecule that is mainly expressed on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, and B cells [70]. MARCH-mediated ubiquitination of MHC II is essential for its maintenance of endocytosis, recirculation, and turnover rate [71,72]. Defective ubiquitination of MHC II caused functional and immunological defects in dendritic cells, such as reduced number of splenic DCs, altered DC cytokine production, impaired hydrolysis of Ag proteins in DCs, and, ultimately, reduced antigen presentation in vivo, impaired cytotoxic T lymphocytes immune response, and suppressed humoral immunity [73]. Similar functional defects in DCs were observed in Ubl3-knockout mice [11]. By presenting antigens, DC-mediated T-cell activation can elicit antitumor immune responses, which are essential for antitumor immune responses [74]. It has been found that DC infiltration is positively correlated with T-cell infiltration and cancer survival, and that preventing DC cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment is one of the strategies for tumor escape [75]. Therefore, DCs are widely explored as tools for immunotherapy. UBL3, as a key molecule affecting DC function, must have the same potential in immunotherapy of cancer. Further studies are needed to determine whether tumorigenesis mediated by immunodeficiency is related to UBL3 and whether UBL3 overexpression can improve the body’s immune response to tumors.

5. UBL3 and Cancers

5.1. Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most-common cause of cancer-related deaths, causing 1.8 million deaths worldwide each year [76]. Lung cancer includes small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of which NSCLC accounts for 80% of lung cancers in the United States and two-thirds is diagnosed at advanced stages [77]. Zhao et al. found that the expression of UBL3 was significantly downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer and the tumor growth was reduced in the xenograft of A549 NSCLS cells expressing UBL3 to mice compared to the parent A549 cells [78]. It has also been shown that the expression of UBL3 positively correlated with NSCLC patient survival. This result is consistent with a positive correlation between DC and progression-free survival of NSCLC patients [79], from the view point that UBL3 affects DC function. This gives rise to the speculation that UBL3 may maintain dendritic cell function and immunity by mediating MARCH ubiquitination of MHC II and stimulating the body’s immune response to tumor cells. Another interesting finding was that UBL3 expression was higher in non-smoking NSCLC patients than in NSCLC patients with a history of smoking [78]. It has also been observed in mouse and human DC cell lines that smoking extracts impeded the ability of DCs to stimulate and activate antigen-specific T cells [80,81]. Whether UBL3 is involved in the process of smoking leading to impaired antigen presentation in DC cells is an intriguing direction to investigate.
UBL3 itself and some sEV proteins are known to be related to NSCLC (Table 2). For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was overexpressed in serum sEVs of NSCLC patients, and the EGFR protein level of sEVs was negatively correlated with overall survival [82]. The sEV protein transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) regulated invasion and metastasis through the loss of epithelial markers and the acquisition of mesenchymal markers in lung cancer cell lines. Its induction of EMT is the main feature of invasion and metastasis in tumor progression [83,84]. TGF-β induced demethylation of H3K27Me3 in the SNAI1 promoter and overexpression of SNAI1 in lung cancer cells leading to EMT [85].

5.2. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) surpassed lung cancer in women as the most-common cancer and fifth-leading cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020 [76]. Lee et al. identified UBL3 as a novel susceptibility locus using a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for Asian women carrying BRCA1/2-Negative, high-risk breast cancer (BRCAX) [111]. Ephrin type A receptor 2 (EhpA2) is one of the UBL3-interacting proteins [7]. Gao et al. found that the sEV EphA2 from drug-resistant cancer cells activated the ERK1/2 signaling pathway by inducing reverse Ephrin signaling to stimulate aggressive phenotypic metastasis of drug-sensitive cancer cells and promote migration and invasion of breast cancer [89]. UBL3 also interacted with integrins and integrin-related proteases [7]. α6β1 integrin was detected in breast cancer and the expression of the α6β1 integrin was significantly increased in lymph node metastases, indicating that the α6β1 integrin plays an important role in the migration of breast cancer [112]. The α3β1 integrin promoted the production of prostaglandin E2, which, in turn, induces breast cancer tumor angiogenesis and metastasis [113]. Lin et al. found that ADAMs and MMPs, both of which are integrin-related proteases, were upregulated by aspartate β-hydroxylase in the process of invasive and metastatic breast cancer cells [91]. This upregulation was mediated by sEVs, specifically containing Notch receptors with ligands [91]. The expression of ADAM10 in CD9-positive sEVs increased in breast and ovarian cancers in another study [114]. In summary, UBL3 may play an important function in the process of invasion and metastasis of breast cancer, but further studies are needed to verify this.

5.3. Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cancer of the digestive tract, with approximately 1 million new cases of gastric cancer pathology worldwide in 2020, accounting for 5.6% of all cancers [76]. One article reported that UBL3 was significantly downregulated in gastric cancer by RNA-seq measuring 24 pairs of cancerous tissues versus normal gastric tissues [115]. Among the UBL3-interacting proteins, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, proteasome 20S subunit α3 (PSMA3), PSMA6, CD97, and CD44 were reported to be involved in the progression of GC through the sEV system. ICAM-1, secreted from the omental tissue, increased the migratory and invasive properties of gastric cancer cells in vitro [92]. PSMA3 and PSMA6 were found to be remarkably higher in serum sEVs of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) than in healthy controls and patients with early GC [93]. This suggests that proteasome subunits may be involved in GC metastasis via sEVs. CD97, sEV-dependent, from high lymph node metastatic GC cells promoted self-lymph node metastasis and play an essential role in the formation of pre-metastatic ecological sites [94]. sEV CD44 from GC cells activated YAP-CPT1A-mediated (yes-associated protein and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A) reprogramming of fatty acid oxidation to deliver lymph node metastatic capacity between GC cells [95]. In summary, UBL3 may act as a promoter of tumor invasion and metastasis in GC, while there is inconsistency about the apparent downregulation of UBL3 in GC. It may be that UBL3 plays different roles in different stages of cancer.

5.4. Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis and it has the lowest five-year survival rate of all tumors in the United States at 11% [116]. Liu et al. constructed a three-gene risk profile containing UBL3, CDKN2A, and BRCA1for predicting overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients [117]. The study used multivariate cox regression analysis to show that three-gene characteristics could be an independent predictor of prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients. Among them, UBL3 expression was significantly downregulated in the high-risk group and negatively correlated with risk score [117]. EphA2 and MMP14, which are UBL3-interacting sEV proteins, are known to be key molecules for PC drug responses. EphA2 can transfer chemo resistance from Gemcitabine (GEM)-resistant PC cells to GEM-sensitive PC cells via sEVs [99]. sEV-mediated transfer of MMP14 enhanced drug resistance and promoted sphere formation and migratory capacity of receptor-sensitive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [100]. In the context of MHC II, UBL3 may also be involved in the immune system in PC. sEVs enriched with tumor-associated antigens, such as tubulin beta (TUBB), further depleted antibodies with associated immune cells by binding to circulating autoantibodies, leading to the suppression of complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [118]. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, antigen-presenting CAF showed a high expression of MHC II and appears to play an important immune role in the immune microenvironment of this tumor [119]. Whether UBL3 can affect the expression of MHC II on the surface of this antigen-presenting CAF is worth exploring.

5.5. Other Cancers

The association of UBL3 with several other cancers has also been provided. Promoter methylation and downregulation of the UBL3 gene were found in patients with esophageal cancer in northeast India [120]. LNCap showed upregulation of UBL3 expression after exposure to silvestrol, a natural product from the flavagline family [121]. A study of melanocytic tumors identified that UBL3 appeared as a fusion partner of MAP3K8 [122]. In patients with early-stage cervical cancer, UBL3 could be used to predict recurrence and survival with a negative correlation with relapse-free survival [123].
Considering the UBL3-interacting proteins, bladder cancer, and liver fibrosis, the latter of which is a major risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, may also be related to UBL3. In bladder cancer, EMT-mediated invasion occurred through TGF-β in sEVs. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) secreted sEVs containing glycolysis-related molecules glucose transporter protein GLUT1 and pyruvate kinase M2 upon activation that are closely associated with liver fibrosis [124,125]. As for immune cells and UBL3, in tumor tissues of patients with esophageal cancer, low expression and function of tumor-infiltrating DCs have been reported, and the proportion of MHC-II-positive DCs was also significantly reduced, while it is not still clear whether the effect of UBL3 on DC cell expression and function via MHC II ubiquitination plays a role in tumors [126]. Overall, there is a relationship between UBL3 and the development, metastasis, and prognosis of some cancers, but more in-depth studies are still needed.

6. Prospective

UBL3 is downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, and pancreatic cancer and it has been identified as a tumor suppressor in NSCLC, while in breast cancer, it is a susceptibility gene for high-risk breast cancer and is an MAP3K8 fusion partner in melanocytic tumors. These reports seem that the UBL3 functions may be different in different cancers and at different stages of cancer. As we mentioned, regarding the hypothesis in [127], there are two possible functions played by UBL3 in cancers: UBL3 acts as a “guardian” in cells to inhibit cancer development and metastasis by collecting tumor-promoting-related factors in cancer cells and isolating these factors into sEVs. For example, MMP14 is involved in angiogenesis, extracellular matrixization, and epithelial mesenchymalization in breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, and sarcoma, which promote tumor invasion and metastasis [128,129,130,131]. The interaction of UBL3 with MMP14 may be to segregate MMP14 into sEVs to inhibit cancer progression. For the alternative hypothesis, UBL3 is involved in the dissemination of tumor factors mediated through sEVs, promoting tumor metastasis, invasion, and drug resistance. Two proto-oncogene proteins, KRAS and HRAS, are also identified as UBL3-interacting proteins, and RasG12V, a constitutively active one, caused its downstream activation via sEVs isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells depending on UBL3 [7]. Whether UBL3 is an inhibitor or a promoter of cancer, UBL3 has the potential to be a target for cancer therapy. Alterations in sEV-related content in cancer cells by inhibiting or activating UBL3 function inhibits cancer cell invasion and metastasis.
There is also potential for UBL3 function in cancers that tumor tissues lead to defective MHC II ubiquitination through downregulation of UBL3, thus, affecting DC cell function as one approach for tumor cell immune escape. This seems to explain the downregulation of UBL3 and the correlation between UBL3 expression and survival in lung cancer. A highly immunosuppressed tumor microenvironment, characterized by reduced numbers and impaired function of effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells, especially dendritic cells, remains a key obstacle to improving the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy [132,133]. If UBL3 can cause infiltration of DCs CD4+ and CD8+ in tumors, which, in turn, enhances the body’s immune response to tumor cells, this would address the problem of tumor immunosuppression from another perspective.
There is widespread interest in using sEVs as a tool for treating a range of diseases, including cancer [134,135]. sEVs, as therapeutic tools, have advantages, such as easier blood circulation clearance, large capacity for ex vivo expansion, biocompatibility due to their endogenous origin, and high cellular uptake [135,136,137]. In particular, sEVs can overcome biological barriers, such as the blood–brain barrier and lung clearance [138,139]. UBL3, a key molecule for sorting sEV proteins, can be used as a tool for engineering the desired proteins and for generating sEVs.

7. Conclusions

Using UBL3, an emerging Ubl, as a targeting site to regulate sEV protein and immune function in cancer will provide a potential new direction for cancer treatment. UBL3 has been found to play a critical role in sEV protein sorting and maintenance of the body’s immune function. The relationship between UBL3 and various cancers has also been gradually uncovered. However, further studies on the function of UBL3, its mechanism of action, and its effects on various cancers are still needed to understand UBL3 more deeply.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Z., B.C., A.S.M.W., S.A. and Y.P.; writing—review and editing, M.S., T.K., H.Z., Y.T., C.Z., Q.Z., J.Y. and S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by JSPS KAKENHI, grant number JP22H02793.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herhaus, L.; Dikic, I. Expanding the Ubiquitin Code through Post-Translational Modification. EMBO Rep. 2015, 16, 1071–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kerscher, O.; Felberbaum, R.; Hochstrasser, M. Modification of Proteins by Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22, 159–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Roberts, J.Z.; Crawford, N.; Longley, D.B. The Role of Ubiquitination in Apoptosis and Necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2022, 29, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hwang, J.-T.; Lee, A.; Kho, C. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Proteins in Cancer, Neurodegenerative Disorders, and Heart Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Downes, B.P.; Saracco, S.A.; Lee, S.S.; Crowell, D.N.; Vierstra, R.D. MUBs, a Family of Ubiquitin-Fold Proteins That Are Plasma Membrane-Anchored by Prenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27145–27157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dowil, R.T.; Lu, X.; Saracco, S.A.; Vierstra, R.D.; Downes, B.P. Arabidopsis Membrane-Anchored Ubiquitin-Fold (MUB) Proteins Localize a Specific Subset of Ubiquitin-Conjugating (E2) Enzymes to the Plasma Membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 14913–14921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ageta, H.; Ageta-Ishihara, N.; Hitachi, K.; Karayel, O.; Onouchi, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kahyo, T.; Hatanaka, K.; Ikegami, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; et al. UBL3 Modification Influences Protein Sorting to Small Extracellular Vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Channon, L.M.; Tyma, V.M.; Xu, Z.; Greening, D.W.; Wilson, J.S.; Perera, C.J.; Apte, M.V. Small Extracellular Vesicles (Exosomes) and Their Cargo in Pancreatic Cancer: Key Roles in the Hallmarks of Cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2022, 1877, 188728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, Z.-L.; Liu, J.-Y.; Chen, G. Small Extracellular Vesicle PD-L1 in Cancer: The Knowns and Unknowns. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 2022, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, W.; Hu, X.; Jiang, Z. Small Extracellular Vesicles: Key Forces Mediating the Development and Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer. Cells 2022, 11, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ageta, H.; Tsuchida, K. Post-Translational Modification and Protein Sorting to Small Extracellular Vesicles Including Exosomes by Ubiquitin and UBLs. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 4829–4848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, H.; Wilson, K.R.; Firth, A.M.; Macri, C.; Schriek, P.; Blum, A.B.; Villar, J.; Wormald, S.; Shambrook, M.; Xu, B.; et al. Ubiquitin-like Protein 3 (UBL3) Is Required for MARCH Ubiquitination of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II and CD86. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, X.; Du, G.-W.; Chen, Z.; Liu, T.-Z.; Li, S. CD86 Molecule Might Be a Novel Immune-Related Prognostic Biomarker for Patients With Bladder Cancer by Bioinformatics and Experimental Assays. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 679851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, G.; Jiang, L.; Ye, C.; Qin, G.; Luo, Z.; Mo, Y.; Chen, J. The Ratio of CD86+/CD163+ Macrophages Predicts Postoperative Recurrence in Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 724429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qiu, H.; Tian, W.; He, Y.; Li, J.; He, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, N.; Li, J. Integrated Analysis Reveals Prognostic Value and Immune Correlates of CD86 Expression in Lower Grade Glioma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 654350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Martín-Villanueva, S.; Gutiérrez, G.; Kressler, D.; de la Cruz, J. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins and Domains in Ribosome Production and Function: Chance or Necessity? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pellegrino, N.E.; Guven, A.; Gray, K.; Shah, P.; Kasture, G.; Nastke, M.-D.; Thakurta, A.; Gesta, S.; Vishnudas, V.K.; Narain, N.R.; et al. The Next Frontier: Translational Development of Ubiquitination, SUMOylation, and NEDDylation in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hochstrasser, M. Evolution and Function of Ubiquitin-like Protein-Conjugation Systems. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2, E153–E157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hochstrasser, M. Origin and Function of Ubiquitin-like Protein Conjugation. Nature 2009, 458, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, T.; Zhou, T.; He, B.; Yu, H.; Guo, X.; Song, X.; Sha, J. MUbiSiDa: A Comprehensive Database for Protein Ubiquitination Sites in Mammals. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flotho, A.; Melchior, F. Sumoylation: A Regulatory Protein Modification in Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 357–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gareau, J.R.; Lima, C.D. The SUMO Pathway: Emerging Mechanisms That Shape Specificity, Conjugation and Recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kahyo, T.; Nishida, T.; Yasuda, H. Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor P53. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hirohama, M.; Kumar, A.; Fukuda, I.; Matsuoka, S.; Igarashi, Y.; Saitoh, H.; Takagi, M.; Shin-ya, K.; Honda, K.; Kondoh, Y.; et al. Spectomycin B1 as a Novel SUMOylation Inhibitor That Directly Binds to SUMO E2. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 2635–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mergner, J.; Schwechheimer, C. The NEDD8 Modification Pathway in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schulman, B.A.; Harper, J.W. Ubiquitin-like Protein Activation by E1 Enzymes: The Apex for Downstream Signalling Pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chiba, T.; Tanaka, K. Cullin-Based Ubiquitin Ligase and Its Control by NEDD8-Conjugating System. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2004, 5, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petroski, M.D.; Deshaies, R.J. Function and Regulation of Cullin-RING Ubiquitin Ligases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stickle, N.H.; Chung, J.; Klco, J.M.; Hill, R.P.; Kaelin, W.G.; Ohh, M. PVHL Modification by NEDD8 Is Required for Fibronectin Matrix Assembly and Suppression of Tumor Development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 3251–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhou, L.; Jiang, Y.; Luo, Q.; Li, L.; Jia, L. Neddylation: A Novel Modulator of the Tumor Microenvironment. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Meehan, K.L.; Holland, J.W.; Dawkins, H.J.S. Proteomic Analysis of Normal and Malignant Prostate Tissue to Identify Novel Proteins Lost in Cancer. Prostate 2002, 50, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chairatvit, K.; Ngamkitidechakul, C. Control of Cell Proliferation via Elevated NEDD8 Conjugation in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 306, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nawrocki, S.T.; Griffin, P.; Kelly, K.R.; Carew, J.S. MLN4924: A Novel First-in-Class Inhibitor of NEDD8-Activating Enzyme for Cancer Therapy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 1563–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haas, A.L.; Ahrens, P.; Bright, P.M.; Ankel, H. Interferon Induces a 15-Kilodalton Protein Exhibiting Marked Homology to Ubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 11315–11323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sainz, B.; Martín, B.; Tatari, M.; Heeschen, C.; Guerra, S. ISG15 Is a Critical Microenvironmental Factor for Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 7309–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kok, K.; Hofstra, R.; Pilz, A.; van den Berg, A.; Terpstra, P.; Buys, C.H.; Carritt, B. A Gene in the Chromosomal Region 3p21 with Greatly Reduced Expression in Lung Cancer Is Similar to the Gene for Ubiquitin-Activating Enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 6071–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Padovan, E.; Terracciano, L.; Certa, U.; Jacobs, B.; Reschner, A.; Bolli, M.; Spagnoli, G.C.; Borden, E.C.; Heberer, M. Interferon Stimulated Gene 15 Constitutively Produced by Melanoma Cells Induces E-Cadherin Expression on Human Dendritic Cells1. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3453–3458. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Forys, J.T.; Kuzmicki, C.E.; Saporita, A.J.; Winkeler, C.L.; Maggi, L.B.; Weber, J.D. ARF and P53 Coordinate Tumor Suppression of an Oncogenic IFN-β-STAT1-ISG15 Signaling Axis. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Qiu, X.; Hong, Y.; Yang, D.; Xia, M.; Zhu, H.; Li, Q.; Xie, H.; Wu, Q.; Liu, C.; Zuo, C. ISG15 as a Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 17140–17150. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brown, A.R.; Simmen, R.C.M.; Raj, V.R.; Van, T.T.; MacLeod, S.L.; Simmen, F.A. Krüppel-like Factor 9 (KLF9) Prevents Colorectal Cancer through Inhibition of Interferon-Related Signaling. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 946–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, R.-H.; Du, Y.; Han, P.; Wang, H.-B.; Liang, F.-Y.; Feng, G.-K.; Zhou, A.-J.; Cai, M.-Y.; Zhong, Q.; Zeng, M.-S.; et al. ISG15 Predicts Poor Prognosis and Promotes Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 16910–16922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Desai, S.D.; Wood, L.M.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Hsieh, T.-S.; Marks, J.R.; Scott, G.L.; Giovanella, B.C.; Liu, L.F. ISG15 as a Novel Tumor Biomarker for Drug Sensitivity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 1430–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Jacquet, M.; Guittaut, M.; Fraichard, A.; Despouy, G. The Functions of Atg8-Family Proteins in Autophagy and Cancer: Linked or Unrelated? Autophagy 2021, 17, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. De Narvajas, A.A.-M.; Gomez, T.S.; Zhang, J.-S.; Mann, A.O.; Taoda, Y.; Gorman, J.A.; Herreros-Villanueva, M.; Gress, T.M.; Ellenrieder, V.; Bujanda, L.; et al. Epigenetic Regulation of Autophagy by the Methyltransferase G9a. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 3983–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Poillet-Perez, L.; Jacquet, M.; Hervouet, E.; Gauthier, T.; Fraichard, A.; Borg, C.; Pallandre, J.-R.; Gonzalez, B.J.; Ramdani, Y.; Boyer-Guittaut, M.; et al. GABARAPL1 Tumor Suppressive Function Is Independent of Its Conjugation to Autophagosomes in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 55998–56020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yoshioka, A.; Miyata, H.; Doki, Y.; Yamasaki, M.; Sohma, I.; Gotoh, K.; Takiguchi, S.; Fujiwara, Y.; Uchiyama, Y.; Monden, M. LC3, an Autophagosome Marker, Is Highly Expressed in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Int. J. Oncol. 2008, 33, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Brigger, D.; Torbett, B.E.; Chen, J.; Fey, M.F.; Tschan, M.P. Inhibition of GATE-16 Attenuates ATRA-Induced Neutrophil Differentiation of APL Cells and Interferes with Autophagosome Formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 438, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hervouet, E.; Claude-Taupin, A.; Gauthier, T.; Perez, V.; Fraichard, A.; Adami, P.; Despouy, G.; Monnien, F.; Algros, M.-P.; Jouvenot, M.; et al. The Autophagy GABARAPL1 Gene Is Epigenetically Regulated in Breast Cancer Models. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Liu, C.; Xia, Y.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, L. Low Expression of GABARAPL1 Is Associated with a Poor Outcome for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 31, 2043–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Su, W.; Li, S.; Chen, X.; Yin, L.; Ma, P.; Ma, Y.; Su, B. GABARAPL1 Suppresses Metastasis by Counteracting PI3K/Akt Pathway in Prostate Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 4449–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Uhlen, M.; Zhang, C.; Lee, S.; Sjöstedt, E.; Fagerberg, L.; Bidkhori, G.; Benfeitas, R.; Arif, M.; Liu, Z.; Edfors, F.; et al. A Pathology Atlas of the Human Cancer Transcriptome. Science 2017, 357, eaan2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wu, S.; Sun, C.; Tian, D.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; He, S.; Li, T. Expression and Clinical Significances of Beclin1, LC3 and MTOR in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 3882–3891. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Yu, S.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Chen, C.; Cai, S.; He, Y. Low Expression of MAP1LC3B, Associated with Low Beclin-1, Predicts Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis of Gastric Cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 15007–15017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mizushima, N.; Kuma, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Matsubae, M.; Takao, T.; Natsume, T.; Ohsumi, Y.; Yoshimori, T. Mouse Apg16L, a Novel WD-Repeat Protein, Targets to the Autophagic Isolation Membrane with the Apg12-Apg5 Conjugate. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 1679–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kang, M.R.; Kim, M.S.; Oh, J.E.; Kim, Y.R.; Song, S.Y.; Kim, S.S.; Ahn, C.H.; Yoo, N.J.; Lee, S.H. Frameshift Mutations of Autophagy-Related Genes ATG2B, ATG5, ATG9B and ATG12 in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers with Microsatellite Instability. J. Pathol. 2009, 217, 702–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Keulers, T.G.; Koch, A.; van Gisbergen, M.W.; Barbeau, L.M.O.; Zonneveld, M.I.; de Jong, M.C.; Savelkouls, K.G.M.; Wanders, R.G.; Bussink, J.; Melotte, V.; et al. ATG12 Deficiency Results in Intracellular Glutamine Depletion, Abrogation of Tumor Hypoxia and a Favorable Prognosis in Cancer. Autophagy 2022, 18, 1898–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wu, X.; Huang, J.; Chen, W.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Xue, W. MiR-30a-3p Inhibits Renal Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis through Targeting ATG12. Transl. Urol. 2020, 9, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, J.L.; He, G.Y.; Lan, X.L.; Zeng, Z.C.; Guan, J.; Ding, Y.; Qian, X.L.; Liao, W.T.; Ding, Y.Q.; Liang, L. Inhibition of ATG12-Mediated Autophagy by MiR-214 Enhances Radiosensitivity in Colorectal Cancer. Oncogenesis 2018, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fan, W.; Cai, W.; Parimoo, S.; Schwarz, D.C.; Lennon, G.G.; Weissman, S.M. Identification of Seven New Human MHC Class I Region Genes around the HLA-F Locus. Immunogenetics 1996, 44, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schmidtke, G.; Aichem, A.; Groettrup, M. FAT10ylation as a Signal for Proteasomal Degradation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yuan, R.; Wang, K.; Hu, J.; Yan, C.; Li, M.; Yu, X.; Liu, X.; Lei, J.; Guo, W.; Wu, L.; et al. Ubiquitin-like Protein FAT10 Promotes the Invasion and Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Modifying β-Catenin Degradation. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 5287–5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dong, D.; Jiang, W.; Lei, J.; Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Ge, J.; Che, B.; Xi, X.; Shao, J. Ubiquitin-like Protein FAT10 Promotes Bladder Cancer Progression by Stabilizing Survivin. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81463–81473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Aichem, A.; Sailer, C.; Ryu, S.; Catone, N.; Stankovic-Valentin, N.; Schmidtke, G.; Melchior, F.; Stengel, F.; Groettrup, M. The Ubiquitin-like Modifier FAT10 Interferes with SUMO Activation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Aichem, A.; Groettrup, M. The Ubiquitin-like Modifier FAT10 in Cancer Development. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 79, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Xiang, S.; Shao, X.; Cao, J.; Yang, B.; He, Q.; Ying, M. FAT10: Function and Relationship with Cancer. Curr. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 13, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chadwick, B.P.; Kidd, T.; Sgouros, J.; Ish-Horowicz, D.; Frischauf, A.-M. Cloning, Mapping and Expression of UBL3, a Novel Ubiquitin-like Gene. Gene 1999, 233, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Möller, A.; Lobb, R.J. The Evolving Translational Potential of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Costa-Silva, B.; Aiello, N.M.; Ocean, A.J.; Singh, S.; Zhang, H.; Thakur, B.K.; Becker, A.; Hoshino, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; et al. Pancreatic Cancer Exosomes Initiate Pre-Metastatic Niche Formation in the Liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, Y.; Zhao, R.; Jiao, X.; Wu, L.; Wei, Y.; Shi, F.; Zhong, J.; Xiong, L. Small Extracellular Vesicles: Functions and Potential Clinical Applications as Cancer Biomarkers. Life 2021, 11, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Oh, J.; Shin, J.-S. Molecular Mechanism and Cellular Function of MHCII Ubiquitination. Immunol. Rev. 2015, 266, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Oh, J.; Wu, N.; Baravalle, G.; Cohn, B.; Ma, J.; Lo, B.; Mellman, I.; Ishido, S.; Anderson, M.; Shin, J.-S. MARCH1-Mediated MHCII Ubiquitination Promotes Dendritic Cell Selection of Natural Regulatory T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2013, 210, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liu, H.; Wilson, K.R.; Schriek, P.; Macri, C.; Blum, A.B.; Francis, L.; Heinlein, M.; Nataraja, C.; Harris, J.; Jones, S.A.; et al. Ubiquitination of MHC Class II Is Required for Development of Regulatory but Not Conventional CD4+ T Cells. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 1207–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wilson, K.R.; Jenika, D.; Blum, A.B.; Macri, C.; Xu, B.; Liu, H.; Schriek, P.; Schienstock, D.; Francis, L.; Makota, F.V.; et al. MHC Class II Ubiquitination Regulates Dendritic Cell Function and Immunity. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 2255–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sabado, R.L.; Balan, S.; Bhardwaj, N. Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 74–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Böttcher, J.P.; Bonavita, E.; Chakravarty, P.; Blees, H.; Cabeza-Cabrerizo, M.; Sammicheli, S.; Rogers, N.C.; Sahai, E.; Zelenay, S.; Reis e Sousa, C. NK Cells Stimulate Recruitment of CDC1 into the Tumor Microenvironment Promoting Cancer Immune Control. Cell 2018, 172, 1022–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, Q.; Gao, S.; Liu, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, G.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, G. Identification of a Potential Tumor Suppressor Gene, UBL3, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 2020, 17, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, Y.; Zhao, N.; Wu, Z.; Pan, N.; Shen, X.; Liu, T.; Wei, F.; You, J.; Xu, W.; Ren, X. New Insight on the Correlation of Metabolic Status on 18F-FDG PET/CT with Immune Marker Expression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Givi, M.E.; Folkerts, G.; Wagenaar, G.T.M.; Redegeld, F.A.; Mortaz, E. Cigarette Smoke Differentially Modulates Dendritic Cell Maturation and Function in Time. Respir. Res. 2015, 16, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Robbins, C.S.; Franco, F.; Mouded, M.; Cernadas, M.; Shapiro, S.D. Cigarette Smoke Exposure Impairs Dendritic Cell Maturation and T Cell Proliferation in Thoracic Lymph Nodes of Mice. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 6623–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sandfeld-Paulsen, B.; Aggerholm-Pedersen, N.; Bæk, R.; Jakobsen, K.R.; Meldgaard, P.; Folkersen, B.H.; Rasmussen, T.R.; Varming, K.; Jørgensen, M.M.; Sorensen, B.S. Exosomal Proteins as Prognostic Biomarkers in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2016, 10, 1595–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Lee, S.H.; Shin, J.H.; Shin, M.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Chung, K.S.; Song, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.Y.; Jung, J.Y.; Kang, Y.A.; et al. The Effects of Retinoic Acid and MAPK Inhibitors on Phosphorylation of Smad2/3 Induced by Transforming Growth Factor Β1. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2019, 82, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Katsuno, Y.; Lamouille, S.; Derynck, R. TGF-β Signaling and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Progression. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2013, 25, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kim, B.N.; Ahn, D.H.; Kang, N.; Yeo, C.D.; Kim, Y.K.; Lee, K.Y.; Kim, T.-J.; Lee, S.H.; Park, M.S.; Yim, H.W.; et al. TGF-β Induced EMT and Stemness Characteristics Are Associated with Epigenetic Regulation in Lung Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Huang, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Rong, J.; Ye, S. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Containing Exosomes Induce Tumor-Specific Regulatory T Cells. Cancer Investig. 2013, 31, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kalvala, A.; Wallet, P.; Yang, L.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Nam, A.; Nathan, A.; Mambetsariev, I.; Poroyko, V.; Gao, H.; et al. Phenotypic Switching of Naïve T Cells to Immune-Suppressive Treg-Like Cells by Mutant KRAS. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Cho, J.A.; Park, H.; Lim, E.H.; Lee, K.W. Exosomes from Breast Cancer Cells Can Convert Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Myofibroblast-like Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gao, Z.; Han, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tian, R.; Wang, Z.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Z.; Niu, R.; Zhang, F. Drug-Resistant Cancer Cell-Derived Exosomal EphA2 Promotes Breast Cancer Metastasis via the EphA2-Ephrin A1 Reverse Signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hoshino, A.; Costa-Silva, B.; Shen, T.-L.; Rodrigues, G.; Hashimoto, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; Kohsaka, S.; Di Giannatale, A.; Ceder, S.; et al. Tumour Exosome Integrins Determine Organotropic Metastasis. Nature 2015, 527, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Lin, Q.; Chen, X.; Meng, F.; Ogawa, K.; Li, M.; Song, R.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Kong, X.; Xu, Q.; et al. ASPH-Notch Axis Guided Exosomal Delivery of Prometastatic Secretome Renders Breast Cancer Multi-Organ Metastasis. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kersy, O.; Loewenstein, S.; Lubezky, N.; Sher, O.; Simon, N.B.; Klausner, J.M.; Lahat, G. Omental Tissue-Mediated Tumorigenesis of Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastases. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Ding, X.-Q.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Xia, D.; Wang, R.-X.; Pan, X.-R.; Tong, J.-H. Proteomic Profiling of Serum Exosomes From Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, D.; Li, C.; Trojanowicz, B.; Li, X.; Shi, D.; Zhan, C.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L. CD97 Promotion of Gastric Carcinoma Lymphatic Metastasis Is Exosome Dependent. Gastric Cancer 2016, 19, 754–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Wang, M.; Yu, W.; Cao, X.; Gu, H.; Huang, J.; Wu, C.; Wang, L.; Sha, X.; Shen, B.; Wang, T.; et al. Exosomal CD44 Transmits Lymph Node Metastatic Capacity Between Gastric Cancer Cells via YAP-CPT1A-Mediated FAO Reprogramming. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 860175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Che, Y.; Geng, B.; Xu, Y.; Miao, X.; Chen, L.; Mu, X.; Pan, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, T.; Wang, C.; et al. Helicobacter Pylori-Induced Exosomal MET Educates Tumour-Associated Macrophages to Promote Gastric Cancer Progression. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 5708–5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhang, H.; Deng, T.; Liu, R.; Bai, M.; Zhou, L.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Li, J.; et al. Exosome-Delivered EGFR Regulates Liver Microenvironment to Promote Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Li, Q.; Peng, K.; Chen, E.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, S.; Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Liu, T. IntegrinB5 Upregulated by HER2 in Gastric Cancer: A Promising Biomarker for Liver Metastasis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fan, J.; Wei, Q.; Koay, E.J.; Liu, Y.; Ning, B.; Bernard, P.W.; Zhang, N.; Han, H.; Katz, M.H.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Chemoresistance Transmission via Exosome-Mediated EphA2 Transfer in Pancreatic Cancer. Theranostics 2018, 8, 5986–5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, X.; Li, K.; Li, M.; Lin, X.; Mei, Y.; Huang, X.; Yang, H. Chemoresistance Transmission via Exosome-Transferred MMP14 in Pancreatic Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 844648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, Z.; von Au, A.; Schnölzer, M.; Hackert, T.; Zöller, M. CD44v6-Competent Tumor Exosomes Promote Motility, Invasion and Cancer-Initiating Cell Marker Expression in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer Cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 55409–55436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kimura, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Harada, T.; Fumoto, K.; Osugi, Y.; Sada, R.; Maehara, N.; Hikita, H.; Mori, S.; Eguchi, H.; et al. CKAP4, a DKK1 Receptor, Is a Biomarker in Exosomes Derived from Pancreatic Cancer and a Molecular Target for Therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 1936–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Yuan, Y.; Wang, L.; Ge, D.; Tan, L.; Cao, B.; Fan, H.; Xue, L. Exosomal O-GlcNAc Transferase from Esophageal Carcinoma Stem Cell Promotes Cancer Immunosuppression through up-Regulation of PD-1 in CD8+ T Cells. Cancer Lett. 2021, 500, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dai, J.; Escara-Wilke, J.; Keller, J.M.; Jung, Y.; Taichman, R.S.; Pienta, K.J.; Keller, E.T. Primary Prostate Cancer Educates Bone Stroma through Exosomal Pyruvate Kinase M2 to Promote Bone Metastasis. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 2883–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bijnsdorp, I.V.; Geldof, A.A.; Lavaei, M.; Piersma, S.R.; van Moorselaar, R.J.A.; Jimenez, C.R. Exosomal ITGA3 Interferes with Non-Cancerous Prostate Cell Functions and Is Increased in Urine Exosomes of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2013, 2, 22097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Vlaeminck-Guillem, V. Extracellular Vesicles in Prostate Cancer Carcinogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Abd Elmageed, Z.Y.; Yang, Y.; Thomas, R.; Ranjan, M.; Mondal, D.; Moroz, K.; Fang, Z.; Rezk, B.M.; Moparty, K.; Sikka, S.C.; et al. Neoplastic Reprogramming of Patient-Derived Adipose Stem Cells by Prostate Cancer Cell-Associated Exosomes. Stem Cells 2014, 32, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Ramteke, A.; Ting, H.; Agarwal, C.; Mateen, S.; Somasagara, R.; Hussain, A.; Graner, M.; Frederick, B.; Agarwal, R.; Deep, G. Exosomes Secreted under Hypoxia Enhance Invasiveness and Stemness of Prostate Cancer Cells by Targeting Adherens Junction Molecules. Mol. Carcinog. 2015, 54, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Peinado, H.; Alečković, M.; Lavotshkin, S.; Matei, I.; Costa-Silva, B.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Hergueta-Redondo, M.; Williams, C.; García-Santos, G.; Nitadori-Hoshino, A.; et al. Melanoma Exosomes Educate Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells toward a Pro-Metastatic Phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Ni, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Huang, H.; Guo, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, C.; Xu, J.-X.; Nie, C.-P.; Li, K.; et al. T Cell-Intrinsic STING Signaling Promotes Regulatory T Cell Induction and Immunosuppression by Upregulating FOXP3 Transcription in Cervical Cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e005151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.-W.; Park, S.K.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, M.H.; Suh, Y.J.; Noh, D.-Y.; Son, B.H.; Cho, Y.U.; et al. BRCA1/2-Negative, High-Risk Breast Cancers (BRCAX) for Asian Women: Genetic Susceptibility Loci and Their Potential Impacts. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Nadkarni, S.; Dalli, J.; Hollywood, J.; Mason, J.C.; Dasgupta, B.; Perretti, M. Investigational Analysis Reveals a Potential Role for Neutrophils in Giant-Cell Arteritis Disease Progression. Circ. Res. 2014, 114, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Subbaram, S.; DiPersio, C.M. Integrin A3β1 as a Breast Cancer Target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2011, 15, 1197–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Tamkovich, S.N.; Yunusova, N.V.; Tugutova, E.; Somov, A.K.; Proskura, K.V.; Kolomiets, L.A.; Stakheeva, M.N.; Grigor’eva, A.E.; Laktionov, P.P.; Kondakova, I.V. Protease Cargo in Circulating Exosomes of Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2019, 20, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Shi, Y.; Qi, L.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Guan, Q.; He, J.; Li, M.; Guo, Z.; Yan, H.; Li, P. Identification of Genes Universally Differentially Expressed in Gastric Cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 7326853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fuchs, H.E.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022, 72, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, T.; Chen, L.; Gao, G.; Liang, X.; Peng, J.; Zheng, M.; Li, J.; Ye, Y.; Shao, C. Development of a Gene Risk Signature for Patients of Pancreatic Cancer. J. Health Eng. 2022, 2022, 4136825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Capello, M.; Vykoukal, J.V.; Katayama, H.; Bantis, L.E.; Wang, H.; Kundnani, D.L.; Aguilar-Bonavides, C.; Aguilar, M.; Tripathi, S.C.; Dhillon, D.S.; et al. Exosomes Harbor B Cell Targets in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Exert Decoy Function against Complement-Mediated Cytotoxicity. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Dominguez, C.X.; Müller, S.; Keerthivasan, S.; Koeppen, H.; Hung, J.; Gierke, S.; Breart, B.; Foreman, O.; Bainbridge, T.W.; Castiglioni, A.; et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Stromal Evolution into LRRC15+ Myofibroblasts as a Determinant of Patient Response to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 232–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Singh, V.; Singh, L.C.; Vasudevan, M.; Chattopadhyay, I.; Borthakar, B.B.; Rai, A.K.; Phukan, R.K.; Sharma, J.; Mahanta, J.; Kataki, A.C.; et al. Esophageal Cancer Epigenomics and Integrome Analysis of Genome-Wide Methylation and Expression in High Risk Northeast Indian Population. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2015, 19, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mi, Q.; Kim, S.; Hwang, B.Y.; Su, B.-N.; Chai, H.; Arbieva, Z.H.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Swanson, S.M. Silvestrol Regulates G2/M Checkpoint Genes Independent of P53 Activity. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 3349–3356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Houlier, A.; Pissaloux, D.; Masse, I.; Tirode, F.; Karanian, M.; Pincus, L.B.; McCalmont, T.H.; LeBoit, P.E.; Bastian, B.C.; Yeh, I.; et al. Melanocytic Tumors with MAP3K8 Fusions: Report of 33 Cases with Morphological-Genetic Correlations. Mod. Pathol. 2020, 33, 846–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Huang, L.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, Q.-M.; Zhang, M.-Y.; Yu, Y.-H.; Yun, J.-P.; Wang, H.-Y. Identification of a 7-Gene Signature That Predicts Relapse and Survival for Early Stage Patients with Cervical Carcinoma. Med. Oncol. 2012, 29, 2911–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Franzen, C.A.; Blackwell, R.H.; Todorovic, V.; Greco, K.A.; Foreman, K.E.; Flanigan, R.C.; Kuo, P.C.; Gupta, G.N. Urothelial Cells Undergo Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition after Exposure to Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Exosomes. Oncogenesis 2015, 4, e163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Jiao, Y.; Xu, P.; Shi, H.; Chen, D.; Shi, H. Advances on Liver Cell-derived Exosomes in Liver Diseases. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pei, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, L. The Expression and Clinical Value of Tumor Infiltrating Dendritic Cells in Tumor Tissues of Patients with Esophageal Cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2021, 12, 1996–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Takanashi, Y.; Kahyo, T.; Kamamoto, S.; Zhang, H.; Chen, B.; Ping, Y.; Mizuno, K.; Kawase, A.; Koizumi, K.; Satou, M.; et al. Ubiquitin-like 3 as a New Protein-Sorting Factor for Small Extracellular Vesicles. Cell Struct. Funct. 2022, 47, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Niland, S.; Riscanevo, A.X.; Eble, J.A. Matrix Metalloproteinases Shape the Tumor Microenvironment in Cancer Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Gonzalez-Molina, J.; Gramolelli, S.; Liao, Z.; Carlson, J.W.; Ojala, P.M.; Lehti, K. MMP14 in Sarcoma: A Regulator of Tumor Microenvironment Communication in Connective Tissues. Cells 2019, 8, 991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Pezeshkian, Z.; Nobili, S.; Peyravian, N.; Shojaee, B.; Nazari, H.; Soleimani, H.; Asadzadeh-Aghdaei, H.; Ashrafian Bonab, M.; Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad, E.; Mini, E. Insights into the Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Precancerous Conditions and in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 6226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Poincloux, R.; Lizárraga, F.; Chavrier, P. Matrix Invasion by Tumour Cells: A Focus on MT1-MMP Trafficking to Invadopodia. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122, 3015–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Phuengkham, H.; Ren, L.; Shin, I.W.; Lim, Y.T. Nanoengineered Immune Niches for Reprogramming the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment and Enhancing Cancer Immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wang, H.; Mooney, D.J. Biomaterial-Assisted Targeted Modulation of Immune Cells in Cancer Treatment. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nikfarjam, S.; Rezaie, J.; Kashanchi, F.; Jafari, R. Dexosomes as a Cell-Free Vaccine for Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yeo, R.W.Y.; Lai, R.C.; Zhang, B.; Tan, S.S.; Yin, Y.; Teh, B.J.; Lim, S.K. Mesenchymal Stem Cell: An Efficient Mass Producer of Exosomes for Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yamashita, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Nishikawa, M.; Takakura, Y. Effect of Exosome Isolation Methods on Physicochemical Properties of Exosomes and Clearance of Exosomes from the Blood Circulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 98, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Soltani, F.; Parhiz, H.; Mokhtarzadeh, A.; Ramezani, M. Synthetic and Biological Vesicular Nano-Carriers Designed for Gene Delivery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 6214–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, M. Exosome-Based Cancer Therapy: Implication for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells. Front. Pharm. 2017, 7, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Khongkow, M.; Yata, T.; Boonrungsiman, S.; Ruktanonchai, U.R.; Graham, D.; Namdee, K. Surface Modification of Gold Nanoparticles with Neuron-Targeted Exosome for Enhanced Blood–Brain Barrier Penetration. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 01231 g001 550
Figure 1. Model diagram of Ubiquitin-like protein 3 (UBL3) function. Left part: Proteins are modified with UBL3, which is free or membrane-anchored (exact mechanism of modification is not clear). The modified proteins are recruited into the endosomes, forming multivesicular bodies (MVBs) containing small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), and sEVs are secreted out of the cell. Right part: major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) α and β chains are assembled and complexed with Ii in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Upon entry into the endosome, Ii is degraded to class II-associated invariant chain peptide (CLIP). HLA-DM catalyzes the release of CLIP and binding of antigen. The stable antigen–MHC II complex is transferred to the cell surface to present the antigen to T cells. UBL3 recruits a Ub-E2 enzyme to the membrane and promotes ubiquitination of MHC II by membrane-associated RING-CH (MARCH) 1, a Ub-E3 ligase, and then MHC II is targeted into the lysosome for degradation.
Figure 1. Model diagram of Ubiquitin-like protein 3 (UBL3) function. Left part: Proteins are modified with UBL3, which is free or membrane-anchored (exact mechanism of modification is not clear). The modified proteins are recruited into the endosomes, forming multivesicular bodies (MVBs) containing small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), and sEVs are secreted out of the cell. Right part: major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) α and β chains are assembled and complexed with Ii in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Upon entry into the endosome, Ii is degraded to class II-associated invariant chain peptide (CLIP). HLA-DM catalyzes the release of CLIP and binding of antigen. The stable antigen–MHC II complex is transferred to the cell surface to present the antigen to T cells. UBL3 recruits a Ub-E2 enzyme to the membrane and promotes ubiquitination of MHC II by membrane-associated RING-CH (MARCH) 1, a Ub-E3 ligase, and then MHC II is targeted into the lysosome for degradation.
Ijms 24 01231 g001
Table
Table 1. Identity with Ub, representative substrates, and related cancers of Ubls.
Table 1. Identity with Ub, representative substrates, and related cancers of Ubls.
UblsIdentity with UbRepresentative SubstratesRelated Cancers
SUMO18% *p53, c-JUN, IκBαAcute promyelocytic leukemia, Acute myeloid leukemia, lymphoma, Myeloma, Glioma, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Lung cancer, Breast cancer, Prostate cancer
NEDD876%Cullins, pVHL, p53Prostate cancer, Renal cancer, Squamous cell carcinoma, Acute myeloid leukemia, Melanoma
ISG1531%Cyclin D1, p63, HIF-1αPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Lung cancer, Melanoma, Triple-negative breast cancer, Breast cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Colon cancer, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Ovarian cancer
ATG814%NBR1, NDP52, Rab7Hematopoietic cancer, Renal cancer, Prostate cancer, Breast cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Gastric cancer, Head and neck carcinoma, Thyroid cancer, Colorectal cancer, Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Melanoma
ATG1210%ATG3, Bcl-2Gastric cancer, Colorectal cancer, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Breast cancer, Renal cancer, Pancreatic cancer
FAT1036%S5a, Survivin, p53Hepatocellular carcinoma, Non-small-cell lung cancer, Gastric cancer, Breast cancer, Bladder cancer, Colorectal cancer, Cervical cancer, Glioma
*: SUMO1.
Table
Table 2. Summary of the relationship between UBL3 and tumors.
Table 2. Summary of the relationship between UBL3 and tumors.
CancerUBL3 ExpressionEffect of UBL3 on Survival/Risk Tumor-Related sEV Proteins Interacting with UBL3
Lung cancerDownregulation *Protective *TGF-β, Induce epithelial mesenchymal transition in BALB/c nude mice [85]
EGFR, Inhibition of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ cells in vitro [86]
KRAS, Induced CD4+ T phenotypic conversion to Treg-like cells that are immune-suppressive in vitro [87]
Breast cancerUpregulation #High risk #TGF-β, Increased myofibroblast-like phenotype of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro [88]
EphA2, Activation of EPK1/2 signaling promotes cancer metastasis in xenograft tumor model SCID mice [89]
Integrin α6, Promotion of lung metastasis of breast cancer cells in NCr nude mice [90]
ADAM, MMP, Promotion of breast cancer metastasis in BALB/c nude mice [91]
Gastric cancerDownregulationUnclearICAM-1, Promotion of AGS gastric cancer cells metastasis in vitro [92]
PSMA2, PSMA6, Upregulated in metastatic gastric cancer patient exosomes [93]
CD97, CD44, Promotion of lymph node metastasis in BALB/c nude mice [94,95]
MET, Mediated the pro-tumorigenic effects of macrophages in nude mice [96]
EGRF, Promote gastric cancer liver metastasis in BALB/c nude mice [97]
ITGβ5, Promotes N87 gastric cancer cells migration and invasion in vitro [98]
Pancreatic cancerDownregulationProtectiveEphA2, Promotes transfer of drug resistance of pancreatic cancer cell lines [99]
MMP14, Promotion of pancreatic ductal carcinoma cell migration [100]
CD44, Enhance PC cells migration and invasion in SCID mice [101]
CKAP4, Proliferation and migration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [102]
Esophageal cancerDownregulationUnclearO-GlcNAc, Promote the immune escape of ALDH+ cells [103]
Prostate cancerUnclear
(Upregulated after exposure to silvestrol)		UnclearPKM, Promotion of bone metastasis in SCID mice [104]
ITGA3, Promotes epithelial cell migration in vitro [105]
MMP14, Promotion of prostate cancer cell growth in vitro [106]
Rab1A, Rab1B, Rab11A, Promotion of prostate cancer cell growth in nude mice [107]
HSP90, ILK, Increase stemness, metastasis, and CAFs formation in vitro [108]
MelanocytomaUnclear
(Involved in MAP3K8 gene fusion)		High riskRab1A, Rab5B, RAB27A, Induced vascular leakiness at pre-metastatic sites in C57BI/6 mice [109]
Met, Enhance lung metastasis in C57BI/6 mice [109]
Cervical cancerUnclearHigh riskTGF-β, Induce T regulatory cell expansion in vitro [110]
* in NSCLC; # in BRCAX.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Chen, B.; Waliullah, A.S.M.; Aramaki, S.; Ping, Y.; Takanashi, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhai, Q.; Yan, J.; Oyama, S.; et al. A New Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer in Ubiquitin-Like Proteins—UBL3. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021231

AMA Style

Zhang H, Chen B, Waliullah ASM, Aramaki S, Ping Y, Takanashi Y, Zhang C, Zhai Q, Yan J, Oyama S, et al. A New Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer in Ubiquitin-Like Proteins—UBL3. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Hengsen, Bin Chen, A. S. M. Waliullah, Shuhei Aramaki, Yashuang Ping, Yusuke Takanashi, Chi Zhang, Qing Zhai, Jing Yan, Soho Oyama, and et al. 2023. "A New Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer in Ubiquitin-Like Proteins—UBL3" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021231

APA Style

Zhang, H., Chen, B., Waliullah, A. S. M., Aramaki, S., Ping, Y., Takanashi, Y., Zhang, C., Zhai, Q., Yan, J., Oyama, S., Kahyo, T., & Setou, M. (2023). A New Potential Therapeutic Target for Cancer in Ubiquitin-Like Proteins—UBL3. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(2), 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021231

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop