Next Article in Journal
Cembrane Diterpenes Possessing Nonaromatic Oxacycles from the Hainan Soft Coral Sarcophyton mililatensis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Sorbent Composition on Sorption Properties of Materials Based on Ti-Ca-Mg Phosphates
Previous Article in Journal
Exploration of the Main Antibiofilm Substance of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917 and Its Effect against Streptococcus mutans
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Efficient Removal of Uranium from an Aqueous Solution by a Novel Phosphonic Acid-Functionalized Magnetic Microsphere Adsorbent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of CeO2-Reinforcement on Pb Absorption by Coconut Coir-Derived Magnetic Biochar

1
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou 510640, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 1974; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031974
Submission received: 24 December 2022 / Revised: 11 January 2023 / Accepted: 17 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adsorption Materials and Adsorption Behavior)

Abstract

:
Magnetic separable biochar holds great promise for the treatment of Pb2+-contaminated wastewater. However, the absorption effect of unmodified magnetic biochar is poor. Considering this gap in knowledge, CeO2-doped magnetic coconut coir biochar (Ce-MCB) and magnetic coconut coir biochar (MCB) for Pb2+ absorption were prepared by the impregnation method, and the efficiency of Ce-MCB for Pb2+ absorption was evaluated in comparison with MCB. Conducting the absorption experiments, the study provided theoretical support for the exploration of the absorption mechanism. The quantitative analysis exposed that the enhanced absorption capacity of Ce-MCB was attributed to the increase in oxygen-containing functional groups and mineral precipitation. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm model showed that Ce-MCB is a suitable adsorbent for Pb2+. The absorption characteristics of Ce-MCB was fit well with the pseudo-second-order (PSO) and Langmuir models, which revealed that the absorption of Pb2+ in water was monolayer chemisorption with a maximum theoretical adsorption capacity of 140.83 mg·g−1. The adsorption capacity of Ce-MCB for Pb(II) was sustained above 70% after four cycles. In addition, the saturation magnetization intensity of Ce-MCB was 7.15 emu·g−1, which was sufficient to separate out from the solution. Overall, Ce-MCB has wide application prospects in terms of biomass resources recycling and environmental conservation.

1. Introduction

The widespread occurrence of pollution in surface water and groundwater, especially toxic elements, due to human activities may be exceptionally detrimental to the ecosystem [1]. Heavy metals are persistent in the environment and accumulate in organisms through the food chain, negatively impacting the growth of plants and animals. Pb2+ is one of the toxic and harmful pollutants present in industrial wastewater [2]. Over the last two centuries, Pb2+ has been widely used in production and daily life such as those from battery production, electroplating, mining, metal smelting, and the use of irrigation, which has proliferated the spread of lead into the environment [3]. Pb can enter the human body mainly through drinking water and food, which creates severe toxicity to human organs. High concentrations of Pb cause adverse effects such as anemia, kidney dysfunction, and gastric cancer [4,5]. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (IARC) identified Pb2+ as one of the most hazardous elements [6].
Currently, prevailing technologies have been adopted for controlling Pb2+ pollution, including electrochemical treatment technologies [7], flocculation [8], coagulation [9], absorption [10], and precipitation [11]. Absorption is regarded as one of the most promising methods, which is cost-effective, technically effective, and environmentally friendly. Several adsorbents such as microplastic particles [12], hydrogel balls [13], mineral [14], slag [15], and nano-adsorbent [16] have been used to treat polluted environments. However, disadvantages such as high preparation cost, difficult separation, and low efficiency limit their application.
Biochar as a carbon-rich material is considered a cost-effective and environmentally friendly adsorbent, and has received more concern because of its simple preparation, wide range of sources, low price, and strong effect. It has sufficient selectivity and applicability in removing toxic heavy metal ions from various water environments. [17]. Coconut coir is a typical abundant and inexpensive agricultural waste, which is still mainly used for the production of low value-added products, with only a small amount for biochar production. More than 420,000 tons coconuts are produced annually in China, and the production of coconut skin can reach 250 million pieces [18]. In the current study, Li et al. [19] reported that coconut-coir-derived biochar can provide binding sites for Pb2+. However, the ability of pristine biochar to remove heavy metals is not impressive, and it is difficult to separate from aqueous solution. In general, biochar magnetically treated by means of Fe2+/Fe3+ solution or natural hematite can be easily separated from the solution by external magnets, but magnetic biochar without modification has poor adsorption performance [20]. As magnetic biochar has a low adsorption capacity, it was modified to expand the absorption capacity of the biochar while retaining the magnetic properties.
There are few studies that have reported the use of cerium-nitrate-modified magnetic biochar for Pb2+ removal in aqueous environments. Previous research has shown that the absorbents have been modified by loading transition metal oxides and alkaline earth mental oxides on the surface of biochar [21,22]. CeO2 is one of the most industrially useful rare earth metal oxides with low toxicity, and its pure metal has a high emission threshold to the environment, which makes the absorbent less toxic [23,24]. CeO2 nanoparticles, as a new absorption material, have great potential in heavy metal removal. In Malinee’s study, samaria-doped ceria nanopowder had a high removal capacity at low Pb2+ concentrations, but was confined by the aggregation of nanoparticles. In addition, the theoretical maximum absorption capacity of the adsorbent is 23 mg·g−1 [25]. Market-Borayo reported the efficiency of Pb2+ absorption by CeO2 nanoparticles, while the results were comparable in a previous study [15]. Recillas et al. [26] synthesized CeO2 nanocrystal precipitates, where they showed strong absorption capacities of Pb2+ up to 189 mg·g−1. Nevertheless, CeO2 nanocrystal precipitates presented a high phytotoxicity, which undoubtedly poses a great threat to aqueous organisms and human health. In order to fully utilize the excellent adsorption performance of CeO2, its high toxicity disadvantage needs to be overcome as a priority. In this study, we propose the stabilization of CeO2 on magnetic carbon materials by high-temperature calcination to make it easy to separate.
In the study, the synthesis of magnetic biochar doped with CeO2 (noted as Ce-MCB) via a simple impregnation method is reported to improve the adsorption performance of Pb2+. The physicochemical properties (surface morphology, pore structure, chemical composition, magnetic properties, etc.) of magnetic biochar (MCB) and CeO2-doped magnetic biochar (Ce-MCB) were explored. Moreover, the effects of time dependence, pH, and Pb2+ concentration on the absorption capacity of two magnetic biochars were also analyzed. The corresponding models of isotherms and kinetics were further developed to describe the adsorption process. In terms of the adsorption mechanism, XPS, XRD, and FTIR analyses were performed on the biochar before and after adsorption to qualitatively explore the adsorption mechanism, and the adsorption rate of each component was quantified by the acid washing method. The experimental procedure is shown in Scheme 1.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphology Characteristics

In order to understand the surface characteristics and elemental composition of Ce-MCB, a systematic characterization of the as-prepared magnetic adsorbent was performed. Additionally, to investigate the effect of Ce addition on the adsorption performance, MCB was also prepared and tested for physicochemical properties.
The morphology and composition of MCB and Ce-MCB were carried out by SEM. As can be seen from Figure 1a–d, Ce-MCB had a richer pore structure compared to MCB. Meanwhile, Ce-MCB also exhibited a rougher surface, which affords a vast range of available surface-active sites. These differences suggest that the added Ce(NO3)3, which can act as a chemical activator during pyrolysis at high temperatures, lead to a significant change in the textural properties of the biochar [27]. In addition, the presence of Fe on MCB and the presence of Ce and Fe on Ce-MCB were detected by the SEM-EDX test, which indicates the successful preparation of the adsorbents (Figure 1e,f).
The specific surface area (SSA) and pore size distribution of biochar were analyzed and the results are shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. As seen from Figure 2a, the N2 adsorption isotherms of both samples belonged to the type IV mode with a clear hysteresis loop according to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification, which indicates the presence of mesoporous structures in them [28,29,30]. The curve of MCB was open, which is attributed to the difficulty of completely desorbing the gas from pores of MCB after adsorption due to the complex of the pore structure for biochar and the tendency to produce elastic or ink-bottle-like pores [31,32]. The BET surface area of Ce-MCB was 246.32 m2·g−1, which was higher than that of MCB (234.35 m2·g−1). As shown in the BJH pore size distribution curve (Figure 2b), a large abundance of microporous and mesoporous structures were present in the prepared adsorbents. Notably, the quantity of Ce-MCB mesopores was significantly increased compared to MCB, especially in the size range of 2.5–5 nm, which suggests that the incorporation of cerium oxide had a certain activating effect on the development of pore structure in biochar [33,34].
The G and D bands measured by RS were widely used to evaluate the microstructure of biochar. The G peak (1580–1600 cm−1) was generated by the in-plane tangential vibration of sp2 carbon atoms, while the D peak (1340–1357 cm−1) was produced by the oscillation of disordered carbon materials [35,36]. The defect degree of biochar can be indicated by the ID/IG value in the Raman spectrum, and the higher the ID/IG ratio of the sample, the greater the degree of defect on the surface [37]. From the results in Figure 3, the ID/IG value of Ce-MCB (0.875) was larger than that of MCB (0.851), which demonstrated that Ce-MCB possessed higher activity with more abundant defects and functional groups [38]. The increased degree of defects in the biochar modified with Ce(NO3)3 may be related to the destruction of the original graphitized structure by the doped CeO2 and NO3. In addition, the attaching metal oxides on the surface of biochar could also act as the active sites of the adsorbent, thus promoting the reaction efficiency [36].
The zeta potential is a technique for measuring the surface charge of materials based on the fact that the number of surface charges of biochar varies with the pH value of the solution [39]. When the pH was lower than the point of zero charge (pHpzc), the surface of the material was positively charged, which was unfavorable for the absorption of Pb2+, due to the electrostatic repulsion. With increasing pH, the carboxylic acid groups and hydroxyl groups were deprotonated. Under the condition that the pH was greater than pHpzc, the surface of the biochar was negatively charged, which enhanced the electrostatic attraction [40]. As shown in Figure 4, the point of zero charge of MCB was 2.72, while that of Ce-MCB was increased to 3.94. The zeta potential ranged from 18.3 to −37.5 mV for MCB and from 10.2 to −31.1 mV for Ce-MCB over the pH range of 2–10. It is thus that both biochar surfaces were negatively charged over a wide pH range and that the zeta potential of Ce-MCB was slightly higher than that of MCB. The above result is in accordance with P et al. that Ce-MCB provides more positive charge as compared to MCB, which could be attributed to the greater formation of metal oxide [41].
Previous studies have shown a positive correlation between hydrophilic and contact angle for biochar [42]. Biochar had wettability and was capable of absorbing water rapidly as well [43]. The hydrophilic properties of biochar were expressed by measuring the contact angle, as shown in Figure 5. The contact angle of the MCB was 8°, indicating that it was a hydrophilic material. In contrast, Ce-MCB had a contact angle of 0° and was a superhydrophilic material. The results showed that the hydrophilicity of Ce-MCB was higher than that of MCB, which is associated with the preferential orientation of the polar oxygen-containing groups (e.g., hydroxyl groups) enriched on the surface of Ce-MCB toward water [44]. The FTIR test results also prove the presence of these polar groups. Remarkably, the cerium oxide loaded on the Ce-MCB surface was inherently hydrophilic [45].
FTIR measurements were performed on MCB and Ce-MCB to characterize the functional groups present on the adsorbent surface, which were essential for the absorption process of metal ions. As shown in Figure 6, several peaks were observed in the spectra at about 3440, 1610, 1350, and 1070 cm−1. The bands at about 3440 cm−1 and 1350 cm−1 indicated -OH asymmetric stretching vibration. In the aqueous environment, Ce3+ can be used as active sites for the dissociation of H2O to form -OH [46]. The bands of 1610 cm−1 could be attributable to C=O (COO) stretching and bending vibrations [47]. The 1070 cm−1 band corresponded to the vibration of C-O. The peaks of carboxyl and hydroxyl groups were greatly enhanced after Ce(NO3)3 modification, which facilitates the absorption of heavy metals. The FTIR analysis results were in agreement with RS as well as contact angle results.
The hysteresis loops of MCB and Ce-MCB were represented as magnetic properties. Figure 7 shows that the saturation magnetization of MCB and Ce-MCB were found to be 11.054 emu·g−1 and 7.149 emu·g−1, respectively. Although the saturation magnetization intensity of the Ce-MCB was lower than that of MCB, it is sufficient to support an external magnet to magnetically separate it from the solution. The introduction of CeO2 decreased the saturation magnetization intensity of biochar. This might be attributed to the oxidation of Ce(NO3)3, causing the oxidation of iron in the biochar, which can be inferred from the XPS results. The magnetic properties of the biochar remained almost unchanged after absorption of Pb2+, indicating that the magnetic properties of the adsorbent were stable.
XRD patterns of biochar are presented in Figure 8. The characteristic peaks of the spectrum were located at 30.2°, 35.6°, 43.3°, 53.7°, 57.2°, and 62.9° for γ-Fe2O3 (JCPDS no. 85-1436) [48]. Additionally, significant diffraction peaks were also observed at 28.5°, 33.1°, 47.5°, 56.3°, 59.1°, 69.4°, 76.7°, and 79.1° in the XRD spectra of Ce-MCB, which corresponded to the (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331), and (420) planes of the CeO2 (JCPDS card no. 34-0394) [49,50].
The elements surface compositions of each element in magnetic biochar were investigated by XPS, as shown in Figure 9. The C1s spectrum of Ce-MCB can be divided into three parts: C-C (285.08 eV), C-O (286.88 eV), and O-C=O (286.18 eV) [51]. For Ce-MCB, the binding energies of the C-C/C=C, C-O, and O-C=O peaks were shifted to 248.78 eV, 286.18 eV, and 288.98 eV, respectively [52]. Compared with MCB, the percentage of C=C in Ce-MCB decreased while the content of C-O increased. Three peaks of the Ce-MCB O1s spectrum corresponded to M-O (529.88 eV), M-OH (532.18 eV), and C-OH (533.48 eV) [53]. The proportion of M-O increased significantly after modification, indicating the successful loading of rare earth metal oxides.
In the Fe 2p spectrum, there were two asymmetric peaks at 711.38 eV and 725.18 eV attributed to Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2, respectively [54]. Compared with MCB, Ce-MCB had a higher proportion of Fe3+ on its surface. The result is consistent with the VSM findings. The Ce oxidation state on the Ce-MCB surface was further studied and the Ce3d5/2 and Ce3d3/2 spectra are shown in Figure 9i. The spectra were deconvoluted into 10 peaks, where v0, v2, u0, and u2 (peaks marked in blue) corresponded to Ce3+ and the rest (peaks marked in red) corresponded to Ce4+ [55,56].

2.2. Pb2+ Absorption Experiments

2.2.1. Effect of Solution pH

The absorption capacity of biochar for heavy metals varies substantially with pH because the presence of Pb2+ is influenced by the pH of the solution. Considering that Pb2+ generates precipitation, Pb2+ begins to precipitate to a pH of solution greater than 5.8 [57]. At solution pH values greater than 6, the Pb2+ in solution is readily converted to hydroxide complexes, including but not limited to Pb(OH)2+, Pb(OH)2, Pb2(OH)3+, and Pb3(OH)24+ [58]. When the pH of the solution is around 7, the Pb2+ almost completely converts to Pb(OH)2(s) [59]. Therefore, the initial pH of the solution was adjusted between ~2 and ~6. Figure 10 reveals that the pH of the initial solution significantly influenced the absorption of Pb2+ by magnetic biochar. For both biochars, the absorption capacity of Pb2+ increased markedly when the pH increased from 2 to 5. This may be due to the decrease in the concentration of H+ ions in the solution and the deprotonation of surface groups, which favored the interaction of biochar with Pb2+ [60]. However, between pH 5 and 6, a slight decrease in absorption capacity was observed. The variation might be explained by the presence of Pb2+ existing in the form of Pb(OH), which could precipitate and become the main factor affecting the Pb2+ removal. Compared with MCB, the absorption capacity of Ce-MCB was more significantly affected by pH. The result may be explained by the fact that the part of the Ce-MCB surface that played a dominant role in absorption was dissolved in the acidic solution, resulting in a significant decrease in the absorption capacity of Ce-MCB. When the pH increased to 5, the absorption capacity of Pb2+ of biochar was highest. Therefore, the subsequent experiments were performed at an optimal solution initial pH of 5.

2.2.2. Absorption Kinetics

To evaluate absorption kinetics, the effects of contact time on the absorption of Pb2+ by MCB and Ce-MCB are illustrated in Figure 11. The parameters of the fitting results for PFO (pseudo-first-order) and PSO (pseudo-second-order) are shown in Table 2. Although the R2 value for the PSO (R2 = 0.9680, 0.9985) was better than that of the PFO (R2 = 0.9429, 0.9928), the PSO also fit the experimental data well. The absorption of Pb2+ increased rapidly in the first 200 min and slowed in 200–500 min. After 500 min, the absorption process of the adsorbents reached dynamic equilibrium. The results revealed that chemisorption might be dominated and physical absorption might supplement the absorption process of Pb2+ on biochar, and the theoretical maximum absorption values were closer to the values of the actual absorption experiment.
To further explore the potential absorption mechanisms of Ce-MCB and MCB, the Elovich and intra-particle diffusion models were also used to formulate the absorption kinetics, and the results are shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13. As shown in Table 3, the intraparticle diffusion model with R2 > 0.89 characterizes the adsorption process in stages. The Elovich model with R2 > 0.95 (Table 4) also appropriately depicted the absorption process, accounting that the absorption of Pb2+ on Ce-MCB was a complex process that might have a linear dependence over a wide time range. Based on the studies of former users, the intra-particle diffusion model was divided into three stages [61,62,63]. In the first stage, Pb2+ diffused rapidly on the adsorbent surface and the absorption process occurred on the external surface. With time, the second phase began, the absorption sites were occupied, and the absorption rate gradually decreased until equilibrium. The fitted graphs for three stages deviated from the origin, indicating that chemisorption had an effect on the absorption rate.

2.2.3. Absorption Isotherms

The Langmuir isotherm equation postulates that the surface of the biochar is homogeneous with the same affinities and that reaction takes place in a monolayer absorption pattern [64]. The Freundlich equation describes the multilayer sorption that occurs on heterogeneous surfaces, in which the availability of absorption sites has different absorption forces [65]. The Langmuir and Freundlich parameters for the absorption of Pb2+ are listed in Table 5. The higher correlation coefficient values of the Langmuir model compared to the Freundlich model indicated that the Langmuir model was more suitable for describing the absorption process. As can be seen from Figure 14, the theoretical maximum absorption capacities of MCB and Ce-MCB were 29.61 mg·g−1 and 140.83 mg·g−1, respectively. The absorption process was attributed to single-molecular-layer absorption and the active sites of biochar were relatively uniformly distributed. In addition, the separation factor (RL) allowed for assessing the favorability of the absorption, which is defined by: RL = 1/(1 + KLC0). The value of this parameter indicates the basic characteristics of the absorption process, which is irreversible (RL = 0), favorable (0 < RL < 1), linear (RL = 1), or unfavorable (RL > 1) [25]. In this study, the value of RL was calculated to be between 0.0079 and 0.023, which confirmed that the absorption process was easy to carry out. The result might be explained by the fact that the high initial concentration of the solution provides the mass transfer driving force for the absorption process.

2.2.4. Reusability Studies

The absorption efficiencies of MCB and Ce-MCB for Pb2+ after four cycles were investigated (Figure 15). The results demonstrated that after the fourth cycle, the absorption of Ce-MCB and MCB decreased from 114.74 mg·g−1 to 82.63 mg·g−1 and 27.01 mg·g−1 to 17.47 mg·g−1, respectively. These reductions in absorption capacity were mainly due to the partial loss of minerals from the adsorbent surface during the desorption process.

2.2.5. Effect of Coexisting Alkali Metal Ions

There are common metal cations (Na+, K+, and Mg2+) in industrial wastewater, which might interfere with the removal of Pb2+ [66]. The effects of alkali metal ions (K+, Na+, and Ca2+) and strength on Pb2+ absorption by Ce-MCB were investigated. As displayed in Figure 16, the presence of K+ and Na+ had little effect on the sorption capacity of Pb2+. This may be ascribed to the low charge density of K+ and Na+, which did not compete with Pb2+ for absorption sites [67]. However, the absorption capacity of Ce-MCB for Pb2+ was significantly affected by Ca2+, while in 5 mM, we can conclude that Ca2+ had a stronger inhibitory effect on the absorption process of Pb2+ compared to K+ and Na+. On the one hand, the absorption of Pb2+ decreased by more than 10%, and the presence of Ca2+ formed a competitive absorption with Pb2+, occupying part of the absorption site of Pb2+. On the other hand, the presence of Ca2+ led to the aggregation of CeO2 nanoparticles [68], resulting in the compression of the electric double layer and the formation of a dense structure, which reduces the effective available area for biochar absorption and decreases the active sites.
Table 6 shows the maximum absorption capacity (Qm) of Ce-MCB for Pb2+ in comparison with those gained in other investigations. Despite the different experimental conditions used, the comparison of Qm values was useful because the absorption capacity was the criterion that provided the performance of Ce-MCB relative to other materials. Among the listed materials, the Ce-MCB showed excellent performance based on Pb2+ removal efficiency.

2.3. Absorption Mechanisms

2.3.1. FTIR Analysis

The hydroxyl and carboxyl functional group on the surface perform an essential role in the Pb absorption process. In the FTIR spectra of biochar after absorption (see Figure 17), the peak of Ce-MCB biochar at 3440 cm−1 (-OH bending vibration) was significantly attenuated. In addition, the peak at 1382 cm−1 (O-H bending vibration) shifted mildly to 1375 cm−1. These changes indicated that -OH was involved in the absorption process of Pb2+ and formed a monodentate complex on the biochar surface [75,76].The absorption peak located at 1610 cm−1 was weakened, indicating that the carboxyl group was also involved in the absorption of Pb2+. MCB-Pb showed a similar variation to Ce-MCB-Pb.

2.3.2. XRD Analysis

The XRD analysis of MCB and Ce-MCB after Pb2+ absorption is shown in Figure 18. After the absorption of Pb2+, new diffraction peaks were observed on the surface of biochar. The emerging peaks corresponded to the diffraction peaks of PbCO3 and Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2, showing the chemical reactions that occurred during the absorption of Pb2+ and the formation of PbCO3 and Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 crystals. Therefore, it could be determined that the precipitation formed on the surface of biochar was one of the mechanisms of Pb2+ removal, which may be caused by the co-precipitation reaction between Pb2+ and minerals (such as CO32− and HCO3) [77].

2.3.3. XPS Analysis

XPS was also used to analyze the absorption mechanism. XPS surveys of biochar after absorption are presented in Figure 19. The binding energies and ratios of the three peaks in the O1s spectra changed significantly. After absorption of Pb2+, the C-C peak area ratio of Ce-MCB decreased from 77.52% to 55.23%, suggesting that π–π on the adsorbent surface had cation–π interaction with Pb2+ [78]. The O1s spectrum of after absorption showed that the proportion of both M-O and M-OH was increased, indicating the formation of a monodentate (-O-Pb-OH) and bidentate complex (-O-Pb-O). C-OH decreased from 36.38% to 7.90%, indicating that the absorption consumed -OH and there was monodentate chelation. These values emphasized that M-O, M-OH, and C-OH were the critical groups for Pb2+ absorption.

2.3.4. Relative Distributions of Absorption Mechanisms

The removal of Pb2+ was ascribed to three fractions: Qm, Qπ, and Qf. Compared with MCB, the Qm and Qf values of Ce-MCB increased significantly, while the values of Qπ remained almost unchanged. As shown in Figure 20, the value of the oxygen functional groups contribution increased from 1.24 mg·g−1 to 10.37 mg·g−1. The increase in Qf was due to the Ce(NO3)3 treatment, which introduced more oxygen-containing functional groups and enhanced the absorption properties of the functional groups. Due to the high adsorption capacity of minerals to heavy metals, the increase in the proportion of minerals caused by the loading of CeO2 on the surface of biochar is also an important reason for the improvement of adsorption capacity. Compared with MCB, the Qm value of Ce-MCB was increased by 80.899 mg·g−1. However, the Qπ values of MCB and Ce-MCB were almost similar, indicating that the CeO2-doped was free of a significant effect on Qπ [79].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Reagents including ferric nitrate hydrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O), cerium nitrate hydrate (Ce(NO3)3·9H2O), lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2), potassium chloride (KCl), calcium chloride (CaCl2), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), HCl, HNO3, and absolute ethyl alcohol were purchased from Shanghai Maclean Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Preparation of Magnetic Biochar

The coconut skin fiber was purchased from an orchard site in Haikou, Hainan province. The ingredients were washed with deionized water to remove the impurities, and subsequently dried in an oven at 105 °C to a constant weight. After crushing into powder and passing through a 20-mesh sieve, the coconut coir was stored in a plastic zip lock bag in the laboratory.
Coconut skin fiber (CS) of 11.22 g and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O of 4.04 g were mixed with 100 mL of ethanol in a magnetic stirrer for 24 h. For Ce(NO3)3/Fe(NO3)3 co-modification, the coconut skin of 11.22 g was mixed with 4.04 g of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and 4.34 g of Ce(NO3)3·6H2O and stirred for 24 h. The suspensions were mixed in ultrasound for 1 hour and then dried in oven at 65 °C. The Fe(NO3)3-loaded CS (MCS) and Ce(NO3)3/Fe(NO3)3-loaded CS (Ce-MCS) were dried and packed in a crucible, which was placed in a tube furnace and calcined to 600 °C with a ramp of 10 °C min−1 and under flowing N2 for 2 h. The obtained biochar was named as MCB and Ce-MCB.

3.3. Characterization of the Biochars

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi Limited SU-70, Tokyo, Japan) was used to be examined the appearance and morphology of biochar samples. The specific surface areas (SSAs), total pore volume (Vt), and porosity were measured by an N2 absorption and desorption analyzer (Quantachrome, QI3, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) at 77 K. The surface organic functional groups were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo Fisher Nicolet iS50, Waltham, MA, USA). Raman spectroscopy (Raman, HORIBA Jobin Yvon LabRAM HR800, Montpellier, French) recorded the degree of defects and graphitization. X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical X’Pert Pro MPD, Heracles Almelo, The Netherlands) was used to characterize the crystalline structure of biochar. The surface composition and chemical valence of biochar was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Scientific Thermo Fisher K-Alpha, Waltham, MA, USA). Hydrophilic properties were calculated using the contact angle gauges. The zeta potential of biochar was determined using the laser particle sizer (Zeta, Malvern nano ZS & Mastersizer, Malvern, UK). A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lake Shore Lake Shore 7404, Westerville, OH, USA) was used to detect the magnetization of biochar.

3.4. Absorption Experiment

The Pb(NO3)3 of 1.598 g was dissolved in deionized water to configure a solution with a concentration of 1 g L−1. The solution was diluted with ultrapure water to the required concentration and the initial pH (LICHEN pH-100, Changsha, China) of the solution was controlled at 5 by 1 M NaOH and 1 M HCl. The experimental conditions were adjusted to 5 ± 0.2 and the ion concentration was 200 mg·L−1 (the absorption amount was close to saturation at the ion concentration of 200 mg·L−1).
Absorption kinetics of Pb2+ onto 0.3 g of biochar were placed in conical flasks containing 300 mL of aqueous solution. In a typical reaction, the flask was shaken in a water bath shaker with a fixed speed of 200 rpm. At predetermined time intervals, 2 mL of solution was collected and its residual Pb2+ concentration was detected by ICP-OES.
Absorption isotherms of Pb2+ onto 10 mg of biochar were added to the centrifugal tubes with 10 mL of Pb2+ solution where the concentration was from 0 to 1000 mg L−1. The tubes were shaken at 200 rpm in a water bath shaker for 48 h. After the absorption equilibrium, all samples were filtered, and the heavy metal concentrations were determined by the same method.
To investigate the reusability of magnetic biochar in a real environment, the regeneration was conducted. In each cycle, the Pb2+ adsorbed MCB or Ce-MCB was magnetically separated from the absorption mixture and then transferred to another conical flask containing 300 mL of CH3COONa aqueous (1 mol·L−1 for a 2 h desorption). The desorption–absorption experiment was repeated for 4 cycles.
Investigating the influence of pH value on absorption behavior, 10 mL Pb2+ (200 mg L−1) solutions were added in centrifugal tubes. The initial pH of the solution was adjusted to 2.0–6.0 by droplets of 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. In the test for the effect of co-existing alkali metal ions, the solution with different concentrations of K+/Na+/Ca2+ was added to the Pb2+ (200 mg L−1). An amount of 10 mg of biochar was added to the solution and the tubes were shaken at 200 rpm for 48 h. The Pb2+ concentration in all samples was detected by ICP-OES.

3.5. Model Fitting

The biochar equilibrium absorption amount qt (mg g−1) of Pb2+ was calculated by Equation (1):
q t = C 0 C t   V M
where C0 (mg L−1) represents the initial concentration of Pb2+; Ct (mg L−1) is the concentration of Pb2+ in the solution at time t (h); V (mL) is the volume of absorption solution; M (mg) is the mass of biochar; qt (mg g−1) is the Pb2+-adsorbed amount at a time t (min).
To explain the details of absorption kinetics, the pseudo-first-order kinetic model (PFO), pseudo-second-order kinetic model (PSO), Elovich model, and intra-particle diffusion model were used to describe the absorption kinetics, and the results of the fits are shown below [51,80].
PFO :   q t = q e 1 e k 1 t
PSO :   q t = k 2 q e 2 t 1 + k 2 q e t
Elovich :   q t = 1 β ln α β + 1 β l n t
Intra - particle   diffusion :   q t = k i d t 1 / 2
where k1 is the absorption rate constant of PFO; k2 represents the equilibrium rate constant of PSO; qe (mg g−1) is the Pb2+ adsorbed amount at equilibrium; α is the initial absorption rate constant; β is the desorption rate constant; kid (mg·g−1·min−1/2) is the intra-particle diffusion rate constant.
The models of Langmuir and Freundlich were used to describe the absorption isotherm [81]:
Langmuir :   q e = Q 0 K L C e 1 + K L C e
Freundlich :   q e = K F C e 1 / n
where KF and KL represent the absorption rate constants of the Langmuir and Freundlich equations, respectively; Q0 is the Langmuir static theoretical absorption capacity; Ce is the concentration of equilibrium adsorbent in the aqueous phases; n is the isothermal constant of the Freundlich isotherm curvature.

3.6. Quantitative Analysis of the Different Absorption Mechanisms

The absorption mechanism of Pb2+ was composed of three parts: surface complexation of functional groups (Qf), mineral precipitation (Qm), and coordination of metal–π–electron (Pb2+-π) interaction (Qπ).
The biochar was acid-washed and demineralized for removal, at which point there was no change in the functional groups on the surface of the biochar. The reduced absorption capacity during the de-ashed biochar was the contribution of the minerals. The mechanism of absorption following de-ashed biochar includes oxygen functional groups and π interaction. During the contribution of oxygen functional groups, hydroxyl and carboxyl groups released H+ into solution by the reaction. Therefore, the pH of the solution was measured before and after absorption of demineralized biochar, the amount of H+ released was calculated, and, accordingly, the amount of Pb2+ adsorbed by the functional group complexation (Qf) was calculated. The remainder of de-ashed biochar was considered to be π–electron interaction (Qπ), as shown in Equation (9). [57]
Qm = QeQa
Qπ = QaQf
where Qa is the absorption capacity of biochar after HCl washing, Qm is the absorption by mineral precipitation, Qe is the total absorption, Qπ is the absorption by π–electron interaction, and Qf is the absorption by complexation of oxygen-containing functional groups.

4. Conclusions

The combination of magnetic coconut coir biochar and CeO2 has proven to be a valuable option for creating high-capacity and reusable adsorbents. FTIR, XRD, and XPS analysis demonstrated that Ce(NO3)3 modification greatly increased the content of the inorganic mineral fraction and oxygen-containing functional groups of the biochar, which provided more active sites for the adsorption of Pb2+. The VSM results showed that the Ce-MCB had sufficient magnetic properties to readily achieve magnetic separation. The modified adsorbent displayed enhanced adsorption capacity for Pb2+ with a maximum theoretical adsorption capacity of 140.83 mg·g−1, which was 4.8 times higher than that of MCB. Ce-MCB exhibited good reusability characteristics in sequential cycling experiments, maintaining a high adsorption capacity after four cycles still. Additionally, a comprehensive characterization of the Ce-MCB after Pb adsorption revealed that the primary absorption mechanism of Ce-MCB was the acidic oxygen-containing functional group complexation (Qm = 98.11 mg·g−1), π–electron interaction (Qπ = 6.26 mg·g−1), and inorganic precipitation (Qf = 10.37 mg·g−1). These results demonstrate the outstanding performance of Ce-MCB in biomass recycling for environmental remediation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y., F.Z. and R.S.; methodology, Y.Y., R.S., Y.X., F.Z. and H.Y.; validation, Y.Y. and Y.X.; formal analysis, Y.Y.; investigation, Y.Y. and R.S.; resources, Y.Y., R.S., H.Y. and Y.C.; data curation, Y.Y., R.S. and Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y. and R.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y., R.S., F.Z. and Y.X.; supervision, Y.Y. and H.Y.; project administration, H.Y. and Y.C.; funding acquisition, H.Y. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan, China (2020YFC1908900), the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, China (2021A1515012263), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202002030365) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021B1515020068).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

No applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support received from the State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan, China (2020YFC1908900), the Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province, China (2021A1515012263), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202002030365) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021B1515020068). In addition, the authors thank the CAS Key Laboratory of Renewable Energy of Guangzhou.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xiao, H.; Shahab, A.; Li, J.; Xi, B.; Sun, X.; He, H.; Yu, G. Distribution, ecological risk assessment and source identification of heavy metals in surface sediments of Huixian karst wetland, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 185, 109700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tume, P.; Barrueto, K.; Olguin, M.; Torres, J.; Cifuentes, J.; Ferraro, F.X.; Roca, N.; Bech, J.; Cornejo, O. The influence of the industrial area on the pollution outside its borders: A case study from Quintero and Puchuncavi districts, Chile. Environ. Geochem. Health 2020, 42, 2557–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Abdel-Halim, S.H.; Shehata, A.M.A.; El-Shahat, M.F. Removal of lead ions from industrial waste water by different types of natural materials. Water Res. 2003, 37, 1678–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jarup, L. Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tan, Y.; Wan, X.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Yin, X.; Ma, A.; Wang, N. Novel Zn-Fe engineered kiwi branch biochar for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, J.; Shen, L.; Shan, S.; Liu, W.; Qi, Z.; Liu, C.; Gao, X. Optimizing magnetic functionalization conditions for efficient preparation of magnetic biochar and adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 151442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Amrulloh, H.; Kurniawan, Y.S.; Ichsan, C.; Jelita, J.; Simanjuntak, W.; Situmeang, R.T.M.; Krisbiantoro, P.A. Highly efficient removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions using magnesium hydroxide nanostructure prepared from seawater bittern by electrochemical method. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 631, 127687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jagaba, A.H.; Kutty, S.R.M.; Hayder, G.; Baloo, L.; Ghaleb, A.A.S.; Lawal, I.M.; Abubakar, S.; Al-dhawi, B.N.S.; Almahbashi, N.M.Y.; Umaru, I. Degradation of Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb and Zn by Moringa-oleifera, zeolite, ferric-chloride, chitosan and alum in an industrial effluent. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bora, A.J.; Dutta, R.K. Removal of metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, and Co) from drinking water by oxidation-coagulation-absorption at optimized pH. J. Water Process Eng. 2019, 31, 100839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fang, Y.; Ren, G.; Ma, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, M.; Pang, X.; Pan, Q.; Li, J. Adsorption and reutilization of Pb(II) based on acid-resistant metal-organic gel. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 295, 121253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. He, W.; Zheng, S.; Chen, X.; Lu, D.; Zeng, Z. Alkaline aging significantly affects Mn(II) adsorption capacity of polypropylene microplastics in water environments: Critical roles of natural organic matter and colloidal particles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mu, R.; Liu, B.; Chen, X.; Wang, N.; Yang, J. Hydrogel adsorbent in industrial wastewater treatment and ecological environment protection. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Orucoglu, E.; Tournassat, C.; Robinet, J.-C.; Made, B.; Lundy, M. From experimental variability to the sorption related retention parameters necessary for performance assessment models for nuclear waste disposal systems: The example of Pb adsorption on clay minerals. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 163, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mercado-Borrayo, B.M.; Contreras, R.; Sanchez, A.; Font, X.; Schouwenaars, R.; Ramirez-Zamora, R.M. Optimisation of the removal conditions for heavy metals from water: A comparison between steel furnace slag and CeO2 nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 1712–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajendran, S.; Priya, A.K.; Kumar, P.S.; Hoang, T.K.A.; Sekar, K.; Chong, K.Y.; Khoo, K.S.; Ng, H.S.; Show, P.L. A critical and recent developments on adsorption technique for removal of heavy metals from wastewater-A review. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Q.; Wang, B.; Lee, X.; Lehmann, J.; Gao, B. Sorption and desorption of Pb(II) to biochar as affected by oxidation and pH. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 634, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, W.; Li, J.; Niazi, N.K.; Muller, K.; Chu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, G.; Lu, K.; Song, Z.; Wang, H. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on lead immobilization by chemically modified coconut fiber-derived biochars in aqueous environments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 22890–22896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Li, J.; Wang, S.-L.; Zheng, L.; Chen, D.; Wu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Wu, W.; Niazi, N.K.; Ok, Y.S.; Rinklebe, J.; et al. Sorption of lead in soil amended with coconut fiber biochar: Geochemical and spectroscopic investigations. Geoderma 2019, 350, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, S.Y.; Tang, Y.K.; Chen, C.; Wu, J.T.; Huang, Z.N.; Mo, Y.Y.; Zhang, K.X.; Chen, J.B. Regeneration of magnetic biochar derived from eucalyptus leaf residue for lead(II) removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 186, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, Q.; Zhang, H.; Shahab, A.; Zeng, H.; Zeng, H.; Bacha, A.-U.-R.; Nabi, I.; Siddique, J.; Ullah, H. Efficient performance of magnesium oxide loaded biochar for the significant removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solution. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 221, 112426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yin, G.; Bi, L.; Song, X.; Luo, H.; Ji, P.; Lin, Q.; Liu, Q.; Tang, G. Adsorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution by Pennisetum sp. straw biochars derived from different modification methods. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 7024–7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tong, S.; Deng, H.; Wang, L.; Huang, T.; Liu, S.; Wang, J. Multi-functional nanohybrid of ultrathin molybdenum disulfide nanosheets decorated with cerium oxide nanoparticles for preferential uptake of lead (II) ions. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hua, M.; Zhang, S.; Pan, B.; Zhang, W.; Lv, L.; Zhang, Q. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 211, 317–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meepho, M.; Sirimongkol, W.; Ayawanna, J. Samaria-doped ceria nanopowders for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 214, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Recillas, S.; Garcia, A.; Gonzalez, E.; Casals, E.; Puntes, V.; Sanchez, A.; Font, X. Use of CeO2, TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the removal of lead from water Toxicity of nanoparticles and derived compounds. Desalination 2011, 277, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Patwardhan, P.R.; Satrio, J.A.; Brown, R.C.; Shanks, B.H. Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4646–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mian, M.M.; Liu, G.J.; Yousaf, B.; Fu, B.; Ullah, H.; Ali, M.U.; Abbas, Q.; Munir, M.A.M.; Ruijia, L. Simultaneous functionalization and magnetization of biochar via NH3 ambiance pyrolysis for efficient removal of Cr (VI). Chemosphere 2018, 208, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Singh, V.; Srivastava, V.C. Self-engineered iron oxide nanoparticle incorporated on mesoporous biochar derived from textile mill sludge for the removal of an emerging pharmaceutical pollutant. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mei, Y.L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Fan, S.S.; Xu, H.C. Effect of Fe-N modification on the properties of biochars and their adsorption behavior on tetracycline removal from aqueous solution. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ren, J.; Li, N.; Li, L.; An, J.K.; Zhao, L.; Ren, N.Q. Granulation and ferric oxides loading enable biochar derived from cotton stalk to remove phosphate from water. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 178, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gupta, A.D.; Giri, B.S.; Rene, E.R.; Chaturvedi, P.; Goswami, M.; Singh, H. Batch and continuous reactor studies for the adsorption of As(III) from wastewater using a hybrid biochar loaded with transition metal oxides: Kinetics and mass transfer analysis. Environ. Eng. Res. 2021, 26, 200438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kikuchi, Y.; Qian, Q.R.; Machida, M.; Tatsumoto, H. Effect of ZnO loading to activated carbon on Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution. CARBON 2006, 44, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, K.-J. Biowaste-Derived Bimetallic Ru-MoOx Catalyst for the Direct Hydrogenation of Furfural to Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 12858–12866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schoenfelder, R.; Aviles, F.; Knupfer, M.; Azamar-Barrios, J.A.; Gonzalez-Chi, P.I.; Ruemmeli, M.H. Influence of architecture on the Raman spectra of acid-treated carbon nanostructures. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2014, 9, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bao, D.; Li, Z.; Tang, R.; Wan, C.; Zhang, C.; Tan, X.; Liu, X. Metal-modified sludge-based biochar enhance catalytic capacity: Characteristics and mechanism. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 284, 112113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, S.; Liang, Q.; Geng, J.; Luo, H.; Wei, Q. Sulfurized biochar prepared by simplified technic with superior adsorption property towards aqueous Hg(II) and adsorption mechanisms. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 238, 121919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fan, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Li, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Xiao, H.; Li, F.; Pan, B. Using sewage sludge with high ash content for biochar production and Cu (II) sorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, C.-Y.; Li, Q.-R.; Geng, Z.-C.; Hu, F.-N.; Zhao, S.-W. Surface properties and suspension stability of low-temperature pyrolyzed biochar nanoparticles: Effects of solution chemistry and feedstock sources. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luo, S.; Qin, J.; Wu, Y.; Feng, F. Tetracycline adsorption on magnetic sludge biochar: Size effect of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022, 9, 210805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Shen, D.; Shen, F.; Li, T. Phosphate adsorption on lanthanum loaded biochar. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Useviciute, L.; Baltrenaite, E. Methods for Determining Lignocellulosic Biochar Wettability. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 4457–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moradi-Choghamarani, F.; Moosavi, A.A.; Sepaskhah, A.R.; Baghernejad, M. Physico-hydraulic properties of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar: The role of pyrolysis temperature. Cellulose 2019, 26, 7125–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jayalakshmi, A.; Rajesh, S.; Senthilkumar, S.; Mohan, D. Epoxy functionalized poly(ether-sulfone) incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane for the removal of chromium ions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 90, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lundy, R.; Byrne, C.; Bogan, J.; Nolan, K.; Collins, M.N.; Dalton, E.; Enright, R. Exploring the Role of Adsorption and Surface State on the Hydrophobicity of Rare Earth Oxides. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13751–13760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Seo, J.; Moon, J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.; Hwang, J.; Yoon, H.; Yi, D.K.; Paik, U. Role of the oxidation state of cerium on the ceria surfaces for silicate adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 389, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tan, G.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, D. Preparation of manganese oxides coated porous carbon and its application for lead ion removal. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, C.Q.; Wang, H. Pb(II) sorption from aqueous solution by novel biochar loaded with nano-particles. Chemosphere 2018, 192, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, J.-M.; Chen, S.-Y.; Shen, Y.-L.; Tsai, C.-H.; Feng, S.-W.; Tung, H.-T.; Chen, I.-G. Effect of surface physics of metal oxides on the ability to form metallic nanowires. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 285, 450–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, S.; Ahmed, F.; Ahmad, N.; Shaalan, N.M.; Kumar, R.; Alshoaibi, A.; Arshi, N.; Dalela, S.; Alvi, P.A.; Kumari, K. Influence of Fe and Cu Co-Doping on Structural, Magnetic and Electrochemical Properties of CeO2 Nanoparticles. Materials 2022, 15, 4119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, J.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, X. A novel magnetic biochar/MgFe-layered double hydroxides composite removing Pb2+ from aqueous solution: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 567, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, T.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, L. Removal mechanisms of Cd from water and soil using Fe-Mn oxides modified biochar. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liang, T.; Li, L.; Zhu, C.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Su, Q.; Ye, J.; Geng, B.; Tian, Y.; Sardar, M.F.; et al. Adsorption of As(V) by the Novel and Efficient Adsorbent Cerium-Manganese Modified Biochar. Water 2020, 12, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, M.; Liu, H.; Chen, T.; Dong, C.; Sun, Y. Synthesis of magnetic biochar composites for enhanced uranium (VI) adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 1020–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. He, S.; Wu, L.; Zeng, Y.; Jia, B.; Liang, L. Preparation of Ce-Ag bimetallic modified biochar composite for the efficient removal of sulfathiazole and its mechanism. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Matharu, J.; Cabailh, G.; Lindsay, R.; Pang, C.L.; Grinter, D.C.; Skala, T.; Thornton, G. Reduction of thin-film ceria on Pt(111) by supported Pd nanoparticles probed with resonant photoemission. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 1062–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, C.; Chen, T.; Huang, Q.; Wang, J.; Lu, S.; Yan, J. Enhanced adsorption for Pb(II) and Cd(II) of magnetic rice husk biochar by KMnO4 modification. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 8902–8913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kypritidou, Z.; El-Bassi, L.; Jellali, S.; Kinigopoulou, V.; Tziritis, E.; Akrout, H.; Jeguirim, M.; Doulgeris, C. Lead removal from aqueous solutions by olive mill wastes derived biochar: Batch experiments and geochemical modelling. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 318, 115562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tiwari, D.; Laldanwngliana, C.; Choi, C.-H.; Lee, S.M. Manganese-modified natural sand in the remediation of aquatic environment contaminated with heavy metal toxic ions. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Aran, D.; Antelo, J.; Fiol, S.; Macias, F. Influence of feedstock on the copper removal capacity of waste-derived biochars. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 212, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wu, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, W.P. A novel modified method for the efficient removal of Pb and Cd from wastewater by biochar: Enhanced the ion exchange and precipitation capacity. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yao, C.; Zhu, C. A new method of characterizing mass transfer controlling mechanism in pollutant adsorption from aqueous solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 301, 112455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, Z.; Yu, H.; Zhu, R.; Zhan, X.; Yan, L. Phosphate adsorption performance and mechanisms by nanoporous biochar-iron oxides from aqueous solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 28132–28145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Li, J.; Li, B.; Huang, H.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, M.; Cao, L. Investigation into lanthanum-coated biochar obtained from urban dewatered sewage sludge for enhanced phosphate adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 112455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gao, L.-Y.; Deng, J.-H.; Huang, G.-F.; Li, K.; Cai, K.-Z.; Liu, Y.; Huang, F. Relative distribution of Cd2+ adsorption mechanisms on biochars derived from rice straw and sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, P.; Rao, D.; Zou, L.; Teng, Y.; Yu, H. Capacity and potential mechanisms of Cd(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by blue algae-derived biochars. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 767, 145447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sheng, G.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Dong, Y.; Wang, X. Adsorption of Pb(II) on diatomite as affected via aqueous solution chemistry and temperature. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 339, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hou, J.; Ci, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, C.; Lv, B.; Miao, L.; You, G. Nanoparticle tracking analysis versus dynamic light scattering: Case study on the effect of Ca2+ and alginate on the aggregation of cerium oxide nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 360, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El-Deen, G.E.S.; El-Deen, S.E.A.S. Kinetic and isotherm studies for adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution onto coconut shell activated carbon. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 28910–28931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; Lang, J.; Ding, W.; Yong, Y. Removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from aqueous solutions by ultraviolet irradiation-modified biochar. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 82, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Anirudhan, T.S.; Sreekumari, S.S. Adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions from industrial effluents using activated carbon derived from waste coconut buttons. J. Environ. Sci. 2011, 23, 1989–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Phuong-Thao, H.; Ngoc-Tuan, N.; Ha Nguyen, V.; Phuong-Tung, N.; Trinh Duy, N.; Van-Phuc, D. Modeling and optimization of biosorption of lead (II) ions from aqueous solution onto pine leaves (Pinus kesiya) using response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 173, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shi, S.; Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xu, D. Electrospinning fabrication of flexible Fe3O4 fibers by sol-gel method with high saturation magnetization for heavy metal adsorption. Mater. Des. 2020, 186, 108298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zahedifar, M.; Seyedi, N.; Shafiei, S.; Basij, M. Surface-modified magnetic biochar: Highly efficient adsorbents for removal of Pb(II) and Cd(II). Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 271, 124860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; He, C.; Lyu, W.; Yan, W.; Yang, L. Enhanced antimonate (Sb(V)) removal from aqueous solution by La-doped magnetic biochars. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 354, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tan, G.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, D. Removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated rice straw biochar—A low-cost and highly effective sorbent. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018, 84, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ji, Y.; Zheng, N.; An, Q.; Sun, S.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Li, P.; Hua, X.; Dong, D.; Zhao, C.; et al. The effect of carbonization temperature on the capacity and mechanisms of Cd(II)-Pb(II) mix-ions adsorption by wood ear mushroom sticks derived biochar. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 239, 113646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yamada, S. Cation-pi interactions in organic crystals. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 415, 213301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, L.; Zhao, N.; Tong, L.; Lv, Y. Structural and adsorption characteristics of potassium carbonate activated biochar. Rsc Adv. 2018, 8, 21012–21019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhang, C.-L.; Qiao, G.-L.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y. Thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of ciprofloxacin adsorption onto modified coal fly ash from aqueous solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2011, 163, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, D.; Qiu, S.K.; Li, M.M.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, L.S.; Feng, M.H.; Yuan, M.Y.; Zhang, K.Q.; Wang, F. Modified biochar improves the storage capacity and adsorption affinity of organic phosphorus in soil. Environ. Res. 2022, 205, 112455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of biochar preparation and adsorption experiments.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of biochar preparation and adsorption experiments.
Ijms 24 01974 sch001
Figure 1. SEM image of MCB (a,b) and Ce-MCB (c,d), EDX spectra of MBC (e) and Ce-MCB (f).
Figure 1. SEM image of MCB (a,b) and Ce-MCB (c,d), EDX spectra of MBC (e) and Ce-MCB (f).
Ijms 24 01974 g001aIjms 24 01974 g001b
Figure 2. The N2 adsorption-desorption curves (a) and pore size distribution (b) of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 2. The N2 adsorption-desorption curves (a) and pore size distribution (b) of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectra of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 3. Raman spectra of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g003
Figure 4. Zeta potential of MCB and Ce-MCB at different solution pH.
Figure 4. Zeta potential of MCB and Ce-MCB at different solution pH.
Ijms 24 01974 g004
Figure 5. Images of contact angle of (a) MCB and (b) Ce-MCB in deionized water.
Figure 5. Images of contact angle of (a) MCB and (b) Ce-MCB in deionized water.
Ijms 24 01974 g005
Figure 6. FTIR curves of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 6. FTIR curves of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g006
Figure 7. Magnetization curve of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 7. Magnetization curve of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g007
Figure 8. The XRD patterns of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 8. The XRD patterns of MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g008
Figure 9. The XPS surveys of MCB and Ce-MCB (a,b). High-resolution XPS spectra of O1s (c,d), C 1 s (e,f), and Fe2p (g,h). Ce3d spectra of the Ce-MCB (i).
Figure 9. The XPS surveys of MCB and Ce-MCB (a,b). High-resolution XPS spectra of O1s (c,d), C 1 s (e,f), and Fe2p (g,h). Ce3d spectra of the Ce-MCB (i).
Ijms 24 01974 g009aIjms 24 01974 g009b
Figure 10. Effect of initial solution pH on Pb2+ removal by MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 10. Effect of initial solution pH on Pb2+ removal by MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g010
Figure 11. Pseudo-second-order and pseudo-first-order model of biochar to Pb2+.
Figure 11. Pseudo-second-order and pseudo-first-order model of biochar to Pb2+.
Ijms 24 01974 g011
Figure 12. Intra-particle diffusion model of biochar to Pb2+.
Figure 12. Intra-particle diffusion model of biochar to Pb2+.
Ijms 24 01974 g012
Figure 13. Elovich model of magnetic biochar for Pb2+.
Figure 13. Elovich model of magnetic biochar for Pb2+.
Ijms 24 01974 g013
Figure 14. Absorption isotherm of Pb2+ adsorbed on biochars.
Figure 14. Absorption isotherm of Pb2+ adsorbed on biochars.
Ijms 24 01974 g014
Figure 15. Regeneration of Pb2+ absorption on magnetic biochars.
Figure 15. Regeneration of Pb2+ absorption on magnetic biochars.
Ijms 24 01974 g015
Figure 16. Effects of different concentration of coexisting cations on Pb2+ absorption on to Ce-MCB.
Figure 16. Effects of different concentration of coexisting cations on Pb2+ absorption on to Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g016
Figure 17. FTIR spectrum of biochar after Pb2+ absorption.
Figure 17. FTIR spectrum of biochar after Pb2+ absorption.
Ijms 24 01974 g017
Figure 18. XRD patterns of MCB-Pb and Ce-MCB-Pb.
Figure 18. XRD patterns of MCB-Pb and Ce-MCB-Pb.
Ijms 24 01974 g018
Figure 19. The XPS surveys of MCB-Pb and Ce-MCB-Pb (a) C 1 s (b) and O1s (c) spectra for the Ce-MCB-Pb.
Figure 19. The XPS surveys of MCB-Pb and Ce-MCB-Pb (a) C 1 s (b) and O1s (c) spectra for the Ce-MCB-Pb.
Ijms 24 01974 g019
Figure 20. Quantitative study on the mechanism of Pb2+ absorption by MCB and Ce-MCB.
Figure 20. Quantitative study on the mechanism of Pb2+ absorption by MCB and Ce-MCB.
Ijms 24 01974 g020
Table 1. Pore structural parameters of biochar.
Table 1. Pore structural parameters of biochar.
SamplesSpecific Surface Area
(m2·g−1)
Pore Volume
(cm3·g−1)
Average Pore Size
(nm)
MCB234.350.0304.99
Ce-MCB246.320.0705.14
Table 2. The fitting parameters of pseudo second-order and pseudo first-order.
Table 2. The fitting parameters of pseudo second-order and pseudo first-order.
AdsorbentsPFOPSO
QeK1R2QeK2R2
MCB24.47020.009280.942926.47024.9319 × 10−40.9680
Ce-MCB108.78950.006570.9928122.76136.3576 × 10−50.9985
Table 3. The fitting parameters of intra-particle diffusion.
Table 3. The fitting parameters of intra-particle diffusion.
AdsorbentsIntra-Particle Diffusion
R12R22R32
MCB0.93120.91700.8942
Ce-MCB0.97140.94300.9492
Table 4. The fitting parameters of Elovich.
Table 4. The fitting parameters of Elovich.
AdsorbentsElovich
α
(mg·(g·min)−1)
β
(g·mg−1)
R2
MCB−3.88824.13660.9528
Ce-MCB−41.929821.34920.9696
Table 5. The fitting parameters of absorption kinetics.
Table 5. The fitting parameters of absorption kinetics.
AdsorbentsLangmuirFreundlich
KLQmR2nKFR2
MCB0.0408329.60600.97415.01328.40630.8975
Ce-MCB0.1253140.83370.99285.381545.88080.8445
Table 6. Results of the study on the absorption capacity of adsorbed Pb2+.
Table 6. Results of the study on the absorption capacity of adsorbed Pb2+.
MaterialsQm (mg·g−1)Concentration (mg·L−1)ActivationReference
Coconut skin fiber140.83200Fe(NO3)3, Ce(NO3)2This work
29.61200Fe(NO3)3
Coconut shell26.14//[69]
49.92/HPO3
Coconut shell66.86/Ultraviolet (UV)[70]
Waste coconut buttons92.72300/[71]
Pine leaves31.04//[72]
Precursor fibers22.95100Fe3O4[73]
Raw date leaves and stalks61.2525HNO3, DDCFeCl2, FeCl3[74]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, Y.; Shan, R.; Xiao, Y.; Zhao, F.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y. Effect of CeO2-Reinforcement on Pb Absorption by Coconut Coir-Derived Magnetic Biochar. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031974

AMA Style

Yang Y, Shan R, Xiao Y, Zhao F, Yuan H, Chen Y. Effect of CeO2-Reinforcement on Pb Absorption by Coconut Coir-Derived Magnetic Biochar. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3):1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Yujia, Rui Shan, Yaoxin Xiao, Fengxiao Zhao, Haoran Yuan, and Yong Chen. 2023. "Effect of CeO2-Reinforcement on Pb Absorption by Coconut Coir-Derived Magnetic Biochar" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 3: 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031974

APA Style

Yang, Y., Shan, R., Xiao, Y., Zhao, F., Yuan, H., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effect of CeO2-Reinforcement on Pb Absorption by Coconut Coir-Derived Magnetic Biochar. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(3), 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop