Next Article in Journal
Fetuin-A: A Novel Biomarker of Bone Damage in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis. Results of an Interim Analysis of the SPACE Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Spike Antibodies Present in the Milk of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinated Mothers Are Complement-Activating
Previous Article in Journal
Biomarkers from Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid (PICF) as Predictors of Peri-Implant Bone Loss: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immune Checkpoint Receptors Signaling in T Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms24043195
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy: New and Old Pathogenetic Mechanisms

by
Silvia D’Ippolito
1,
Greta Barbaro
1,
Carmela Paciullo
1,
Chiara Tersigni
1,
Giovanni Scambia
1,2 and
Nicoletta Di Simone
3,4,*
1
Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), L. go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L. go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Milan, Italy
4
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(4), 3195; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043195
Submission received: 30 December 2022 / Revised: 8 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 6 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Molecular Immunology in Italy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized, according to the Sydney criteria, by the persistent presence of autoantibodies directed against phospholipid-binding proteins associated with thrombosis and/or obstetrical complications. The most frequent complications in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome are recurrent pregnancy losses and premature birth due to placental insufficiency or severe preeclampsia. In recent years, vascular APS (VAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS) have been described as two different clinical entities. In VAPS, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) interfere with the mechanisms of coagulation cascade and the ‘two hit hypothesis’ has been suggested to explain why aPL positivity does not always lead to thrombosis. OAPS seems to involve additional mechanisms, such as the direct action of anti-β2 glycoprotein-I on trophoblast cells that can lead to a direct placental functional damage. Furthermore, new actors seem to play a role in the pathogenesis of OAPS, including extracellular vesicles, micro-RNAs and the release of neutrophil extracellular traps. The aim of this review is to investigate the state-of-the-art antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis in pregnancy, in order to provide a comprehensive overview of both old and new pathogenetic mechanisms involved in this complex disease.

1. Introduction

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder whose diagnostic criteria were revised in 2006 at the Sydney workshop in Australia. Concisely, APS is characterized by persistent positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies [aPL, including lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein1 antibodies (anti-β 2GPI)], thrombotic events and/or severe pregnancy morbidity [1,2,3,4]. Beyond the APS-related thrombotic and pregnancy complications, additional clinical conditions, such as cutaneous (livedo reticularis, cutaneous ulcers) haematological (thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia), cardiac (cardiac valvular disease), nephrological and neurological manifestations are associated to APS [5].
The reported annual incidence and prevalence of APS in adults of 2.1 per 100,000 and 50 per 100,000, respectively, with both incidence and prevalence similar in both sexes [6].
APS can be defined as “primary APS” when it is isolated, or “secondary APS” when it occurs associated to other autoimmune diseases, mainly systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) [7]. Cervera et al. found that the 53.1% of patients had “primary APS”, 36.2% had systemic lupus erythematosus, 5.0% had lupus-like syndrome, 2.2% had primary Sjögren’s syndrome, 1.8% had rheumatoid arthritis, 0.7% had systemic sclerosis, 0.7% had systemic vasculitis and 0.5% had dermatomyositis [8]. Noteworthy, several non-autoimmune conditions, such as infections, malignancies and medications can determine a positivity for aPL [9,10]. Patients with primary APS and patients with secondary APS associated to SLE, have a higher prevalence and a higher level of IgA aCL and IgA anti-β 2GPI, when compared to patients with SLE or other autoimmune diseases and without APS. Moreover, these antibodies demonstrate an important correlation with thrombotic events [11]. aPLs positivity can worsen the prognosis of several diseases, which was well demonstrated by Ruaro and coll., who described a correlation between antiphospholipid antibody positivity and pulmonary embolism events in sarcoidosis patients [12]. In the recent years, a further classification of APS distinguishes vascular APS (VAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS) [13]. VAPS is mainly characterized by venous, arterial and small vessel thrombotic events in different organs. OAPS is characterized by serious pregnancy complications including recurrent pregnancy losses, ≥1 fetal loss beyond 10 weeks of gestation, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency. All of these complications in pregnancy are not necessarily associated to placental thrombotic phenomena [14].
Most patients can show both clinical manifestations related to OAPS and VAPS, however some patients can show just vascular or obstetric symptoms [15]. In the present review, we will focus on OAPS, and in particular on the pathogenesis of pregnancy complications observed in the syndrome. The aim of this review is to investigate the state-of-the-art antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis in pregnancy with an innovative approach examining all of the known pathogenetic mechanisms contributing to the obstetric clinical manifestations of this complex disease, hoping that this work could provide the reader with an overview as complete as possible to better understand the clinical and therapeutic implications.

2. Classification Criteria of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

The initial APS diagnostic criteria, inherited by the 8th International APS Symposium of Sapporo (Japan) were revised in 2006, at the Sydney workshop in Australia. The revised diagnostic criteria include the presence of at least one of the clinical and one of the laboratory criteria (Table 1). The Sydney classification included the addition of anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies (anti-β 2GPI) among the laboratory criteria, which were not considered in the previous classification, and a subclassification of APS in four different subgroups, according to different aPL positivity combinations [16]. Of note, there have been reported cases of APS showing a low titer of aPL or only one positive test, and therefore not in agreement with the Sydney criteria. These cases are classified as non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS) and four different subsets, based to the degree of fulfilling the standard diagnostic criteria, have been recently proposed [17].
There is also a severe form of APS termed catastrophic APS (CAPS) characterized by widespread thrombotic microangiopathy and multiorgan failure. It affects about 1% of APS patients and has a fulminant course with >40% mortality [18].

3. Obstetric Clinical Manifestations

The pregnancy morbidity in OAPS encloses >3 consecutive and spontaneous early miscarriages before 10 weeks of gestation, at least one unexplained fetal death after the 10th week of gestation of a morphologically normal fetus, a premature birth before the 34th week of gestation of a normal neonate due to eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia or placental insufficiency [19].
Early pregnancy loss has been found as the most frequent obstetrical complication in APS [20]. In 2019, the European Register of Obstetrical APS (EUROAPS) published data on a cohort of 1000 obstetrical APS patients from 30 European hospitals reporting a prevalence of 38.6% for miscarriage (38.6%), 18.1% for early preeclampsia and 16.1% for early intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR) [21]. APS contributes to about 15% of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) cases [22]. Furthermore, Saccone et al. assessed the obstetrical complications rate in pregnant women with primary APS. They divided women into two groups, according to the positivity of the laboratory tests: group I with more than one positivity to antibodies and group II with only one positivity to antibodies. In particular, triple-positive women in group I showed a lower live birth rate and a significant incidence rate of IUGR. No differences were found in the rate of preeclampsia, venous thromboembolism, pregnancy loss, preterm birth, stillbirth and neonatal mortality, between the two groups [23].
A recent metanalysis by Walter et al. tried to identify possible predictors of pregnancy complications and the magnitude of their effect in women with APS. They found that previous thrombosis was associated with a decreased risk of live birth (OR 0.60, p < 0.01, I2 = 40%), and an increased risk of neonatal mortality (OR 15.19, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), antenatal or postpartum thrombosis (OR 6.26, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%). This group also showed an increased risk of delivering a small for gestational age neonate (SGA) (OR 2.60, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). In addition, patients with a double or triple aPL positivity had a decreased risk of live birth (OR 0.66, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), an increased risk of SGA (OR 1.86, p = 0.01, I2 = 43%), of preterm birth (OR 1.35, p < 0.01, I2 = 49%) and preeclampsia (OR 2.43, p = 0.02, I2 = 35%). Finally, patients with lupus anticoagulant positivity showed an increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 2.10, p = 0.02, I2 = 48%), SGA (OR 1.78, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and preterm birth (OR 3.56, p = 0.01, I2 = 48%). Therefore, (i) previous thrombosis, (ii) laboratory double or triple positivity and (iii) lupus anticoagulant positivity can be considered the most important predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes [24].
In a case-control study, Marchetti et al. determined the incidence of aPLs, 6 months after delivery in women with a history of non-severe preeclampsia (PE) or severe PE. They concluded that severe PE was a distinct entity from non-severe PE and was mainly correlated with the plasma titers of anti-β2GP1 [25].
Furthermore, the presence of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT antibodies) in APS patients seems to be associated to pregnancy complications. These antibodies target other cell membrane antigens that are not routinely required to define APS. APS pregnant women with aPS/PT antibodies have a higher rate of pregnancy complications, such as intrauterine fetal death, preterm labor, preeclampsia, and IUGR, as compared to APS pregnant women without aPS/PT antibodies. Moreover, the titer of aPS/PT IgG antibodies is inversely proportional to the neonatal weight at birth and multiple markers of vascular injury are described in IUGR placentas with aPS/PT positive patients [26]. Of interest, it has been reported that aPS/PT positivity represents a risk factor of RPL even in the absence of a clear diagnosis of APS, hence suggesting an independent pathogenic activity of these antibodies [27].

4. Pathogenesis of the Prothrombotic State in APS

The main mechanisms involved in the aPL-mediated thrombosis include inhibition of the anticoagulant cascade, reduction of the fibrinolytic activity, procoagulant activation of endothelial cells, increased platelet aggregation and complement activation [28]. However, in spite of the persistent aPL positivity, patients only occasionally show thrombotic events. This evidence led to theorize the ‘second hit hypothesis’, according to which, despite the presence of an induced procoagulant phenotype which may be genetically determined and finally defines the so-called first hit, an additional inciting factor, namely, “second hit,” is necessary for the clinical manifestations of APS [29]. Currently, infections are considered one of the most relevant environmental factors responsible for both aPL production and APS development. Furthermore, non infective conditions, such as obesity, smoking, immobility, estrogen pharmacological stimulation, other genetic prothrombotic diseases have been recognized as “second hit” [30].
Antiphospholipid antibodies can lead to the thrombotic event by affecting several mechanisms. They can inhibit the anticoagulant cascade, enhance hypofibrinolysis, interact and activate both endothelial cells and platelets and induce the complement cascade (Figure 1). It has been shown that antiphospholipid antibodies inhibit the protein C system [31,32] and interfere with the protein S and protein Z activation [33,34,35]. Anti-β2GPI also interfere with the binding of β2GPI to factor XI, hence decreasing the generation of factor X and an increase the thrombin production [36,37]. Furthermore, they impair fibrinolytic activity, possibly inducing high levels of inhibitor of plasminogen type 1 (PAI-1) or reducing the release of the activator of tissue plasminogen (tPA) by endothelial cells (ECs). The imbalance between PAI-1/tPA has been suggested as a crucial event in the APS-related thrombosis [38]. It is known that lipoprotein a (Lpa) impairs the fibrinolytic activity inhibiting tPA and increasing the expression of PAI-1 in ECs [39]. Of interest, Atsumi et al. reported increased levels of plasmatic Lpa in APS patients [40,41]. This might explain the reduction of fibrinolysis in these patients. Furthermore, the existence of antibodies specifically interacting with tPA could represent a further mechanism of reduced fibrinolysis [42].
Antiphospholipid antibodies can directly interact with ECs and monocytes through specific receptors. It has been reported that aPLs induce tissue factor (TF) and endothelin 1 expression in ECs and monocytes [43]. The interaction between aPLs and target cells are related to an externalization of phosphatidylserine, which is essential for the binding [28]. Annexin A2 is expressed on ECs and the monocyte acting as receptor for tPA and plasminogen. Once adhered, the complex β2GPI/anti-β2GPI on ECs interacts with Toll-like receptors (TLR)-4 and cause the signaling cascade activation. TLR-4 acts also as an adaptor for annexin 2 [44]. In addition, megalin/gp330 is an endocytic receptor that internalizes multiple ligands, including apolipoprotein E and B100. It has been reported that megalin is a receptor of the β2GPI molecule and the β2GPI-phospholipid complex [45]. Recently, apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) has been proposed as a receptor for β2GPI on platelets. β2GPI/anti-β2GPI antibody complex blocks ApoER2 leading to a loss of adhesion of platelets to collagen [46]. As further mechanisms, β2GPI can bind GPIbα, a subunit of the platelet adhesion molecule. This enables anti-β2GPI antibodies binding hence determining the activation of platelets, resulting both in thromboxane production, activation of the phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway, both mechanisms leading to platelet adhesion and aggregation. These pathways lead to the translocation of nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) that brings it to the transcription of several genes, finally causing an amplification of the production of TF and adhesion molecules [47].
Animal models have suggested the complement activation in the pathophysiology of thrombosis in APS, with more recent data from human studies confirming the interaction between the coagulation and complement pathways. Activation of the complement cascade via aPL can cause cellular injury and promote coagulation via multiple mechanisms [48].

5. Pathogenesis of the Placental Damage in APS

Thrombotic events were initially considered the major pathological cause of pregnancy complications in OAPS [49]. It is now accepted that thrombosis alone cannot explain the pregnancy morbidity observed in OAPS. Indeed, the observation that not all OAPS placentas showed thrombotic phenomena, lead to suggest further direct pathogenic actions of aPL on the placental tissue [18]. Accordingly, animal models have demonstrated the direct aPL-mediated functional damage on placental tissue and/or the inflammatory processes involving the complement cascade [50,51] as the most relevant pathogenic mechanisms contributing to the poor obstetric outcome [52,53,54]. Each of these mechanisms is not mutually exclusive and may act together or in different combinations at different times of pregnancy. This can explain the reason why the clinical manifestations of the OAPS span from early to late miscarriages or preeclampsia [14,55]. During placentation, there is an intense trophoblast remodeling that causes the exposition of anionic phospholipids (PL) on the extracellular surface [56]. This externalization allows the interaction between PLs and β2GPI, usually expressed on the external surface of the trophoblast causing the formation of the complex anti-β2GPI/β2GPI + PL [57]. Meroni et al. suggested that a ‘second hit’ is not required in this context, since β2GPI is overexpressed on trophoblast cells and represents an easily accessible target for aPLs in the absence of the stimulation of a “second hit”. Furthermore, vascular and hormonal changes in pregnancy are suggested to resemble themselves as a ‘second hit’ [10]. Beyond trophoblasts, β2GPI has been shown to react with human stromal decidual cells and human endometrial endothelial cells, hence suggesting the heterogeneity of the effects of anti-β2GPI antibodies on placental tissue [58,59,60]. Following the binding to trophoblast cells, several consequences have been reported. In particular, aPL disrupt the annexin V shield on trophoblast cells. This protein acts as a powerful thromboregulatory molecule and seems necessary for the maintenance of placental integrity [28,52,61]. In addition, the complex anti-β2GPI/β2GPI + PL increases trophoblast cells apoptosis and decreases the trophoblast differentiation, as shown by the reduced secretion of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) [51,60]. Furthermore, aPL impair trophoblast invasiveness, as observed in an in vitro Matrigel assay by inhibiting the expression/activity of the matrix metalloproteases-2 and -9, the main enzymes involved in the extracellular degradation during the trophoblast invasion [51,60,62,63]. Further effects on trophoblast functions include the inhibition of heparin binding-epidermal growth factor, HB-EGF, an important mitogen agent enhancing the trophoblast proliferation and differentiation [64].
Beyond the trophoblast cells, aPL can interact both with decidual and endometrial endothelial cells. Following the treatment of mice with aPL, the histological examination of the placentas showed both decidual necrosis, with prominent intravascular deposition of IgG and fibrin, and signs of inflammatory activation of decidual cells, as confirmed by the increased deposition of C3 and C5 [59]. In line with such observations, Berman et coll. reported that the aPL injection in pregnant mice produces an inflammatory damage in the placentas leading to fetal growth restriction and fetal resorption. Histological features in these placentas include deposition of human aPLs and mouse complement, neutrophil infiltration and local TNF secretion [65]. In a further experimental model of pregnancy loss, it has been found that the deletion of the chemokine-binding protein D6, a placental scavenger receptor controlling local inflammation by degrading the majority of inflammatory chemokines, induces fetal loss after the passive infusion with a small amount of human aPL IgG, as compared to wild-type mice or mice infused with normal IgG [66]. Altogether, these findings suggest that a local acute inflammatory response might have a role in experimental aPL-mediated fetal loss.
We previously observed that aPLs block endometrial angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo, by inhibiting the human endometrial ECs angiogenic differentiation and the production of specific factors which are up-regulated during angiogenesis, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [58].
Taken together these observations suggest that the multiple aPL-mediated activities on the different cellular components of placental tissue might contribute to a final cellular insult determining a defective placentation and finally the poor obstetric outcome observed in APS women (Figure 2). Furthermore, these findings suggest that APS-associated pregnancy complications can be mediated by several distinct pathogenic events not necessarily related to the procoagulant action of aPL.
In recent years, new actors seem to be involved in the pathogenesis of pregnancy morbidity, including the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis), the extracellular vesicles (EVs) (Figure 3), and micro-RNAs (miRNAs).
NETosis is a form of programmed cell death representing an innate immune response where decondensed chromatin is spread outside the cell and acts as a trap for pathogens [67]: neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have antimicrobial functions, but NETosis can contribute to generate a proinflammatory state, even in the absence of an infection [68]. NETosis has been studied in several organ injuries and in reproductive disorders [69]. Neutrophil activation, including the expression of TF, the release of NETs and interleukin-8, may also be an important element of antiphospholipid-antibody-associated thrombosis [70,71,72]. In particular, NETosis seems to be activated by the interaction between aPLs and neutrophils, while in placental models, NETosis seems to begin with the interaction of aPL antibodies with placental cells. Recent evidence demonstrates that, in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus, APS and preeclampsia, a higher number of NETs in the placental intervillous spaces is associated with a marked inflammation and the presence of vascular modifications [73].
Lackner et al., in a recent review, pointed out the role of extracellular vesicles [74]: APS patients have a higher number of EVs in circulation, but their role is not clear [75]. EVs are phospholipid bilayer-enclosed vesicles, very heterogeneous in size, shed from the plasma membrane, carrying antigens, cell surface receptors and ligands. According to Wu et al., aPL antibodies can induce the discharge of specific EVs from endothelial cells: these seems to be carrier of proinflammatory molecules. These EVs released in patients with APS containing IL-1β and specific single-strand-RNA molecules are able to activate the Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) mediated pathway. It means that these specific vesicles, released after aPL binding, amplify the inflammatory response [76]. Similar observations on the role of placenta derived extracellular vesicles were reported by Tong in 2017 [77]: the vesicles, carrying several alarmins, such as mitochondrial DNA, were able to activate endothelial cells through the TLR9 pathway.
Actually, there is increasing interest on the role of microRNA in APS. miRNAs are very short non-coding single-stranded RNA molecules. miRNAs can regulate gene expression paring with complementary messenger RNAs (mRNAs), modulating mRNA stability. miRNAs are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases, including APS [78]. The data were focused on two microRNAs, miR-19b and miR-20a: their downregulation in monocytes obtained from APS patients caused an increased expression of TF, contributing to generate a prothrombotic state [79,80,81].

6. Conclusions

Antiphospholipid syndrome still represents an important treatable cause of pregnancy morbidity. Despite the large amount of data in the literature, taken together, the above reported studies underlie the complexity and heterogeneity of the mechanisms beyond the poor obstetric outcome in APS. What is now well accepted is the ability of aPLs to directly bind the maternal and fetal side of the placental tissue and to impair placentation without necessarily activating prothrombotic phenomena. The understanding of aPL-mediated activity on the placenta is crucial for the therapeutical implications.
Standard treatment for obstetrics APS includes preconception low dose aspirin (LDA, 100 mg/day, orally) combined with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic doses (0.4–0.6 mg/kg/day; 4000–6000 IU/day, subcutaneously) from the moment of the positive pregnancy test. Usually, LDA combined with LMWH treatment is continued throughout pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum. In patients with previous thrombotic events, secondary thromboprophylaxis with full unfractionated or LMWH doses or anti-vitamin K therapy should be administered. The latter must be avoided between weeks 5 and 12 of gestation [82]. A recent metanalysis evaluated the efficacy of heparin alone or in combination with LDA for the treatment of women with RPL and aPL positivity. It was found that heparin (alone or in association with LDA) improves the live birth rate, as compared to LDA or a placebo. Such an observation was not found for LDA alone [83]. A likelihood of a good pregnancy outcome in women with APS of around 75–80% under correct management has been estimated. The initial assumption of intraplacental thrombotic phenomena leading to pregnancy morbidity led to consider heparin as a useful treatment for OAPS. However the demonstration of additional pathogenic mechanisms of aPL-mediated placental damage and the efficacy of the drug in OAPS has now suggested additional mechanisms of action. Actually, LMWH is able to block the binding of aPL to trophoblast cells and to endometrial EC. As a consequence, the LMWH is able to prevent the negative activity of aPL on trophoblast invasiveness, proliferation and differentiation, as well as on EC angiogenic processes at the endometrial level [63,84,85,86]. In addition, Girardi et al. reported that heparin has an important anti-complement activity [85].
Unfortunately, up to 20–25% of cases will not respond to standard treatment. These cases are named refractory OAPS. In this situation, other treatment schedules, mainly hydroxicloroquine (HCQ), low-prednisone dose, increasingly LMWH dose, IVIG or plasma exchange, have been considered. A possible explanation for the high proportion of refractory APS might be that not all of the mechanisms underlying aPL-mediated pregnancy complications have been clarified. Further studies and novel alternative therapies are urgently needed, among them biological therapies based on the use of immunomodulatory drugs or monoclonal antibodies which are able to prevent the aPL mediated activation of the complement and aPL pro-coagulant and pro-abortive effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.D.S., S.D. and C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.D., G.B. and C.P.; writing—review and editing, N.D.S., S.D. and G.B.; supervision G.S., C.T. and N.D.S. All authors contributed to revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We used Biorender.com accessed on 30 December 2022, for the figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mehdi, A.; Uthman, I.; Khamashta, M. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Pathogenesis and a window of treatment opportunities in the future. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 40, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arachchillage, D.R.J.; Laffan, M. Pathogenesis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome. Br. J. Haematol. 2017, 178, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anunciación-Llunell, A.; Muñoz, C.; Roggenbuck, D.; Frasca, S.; Pardos-Gea, J.; Esteve-Valverde, E.; Alijotas-Reig, J.; Miró-Mur, F. Differences in Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile between Patients with Obstetric and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stanisavljevic, N.; Stojanovich, L.; Djokovic, A.; Todic, B.; Dopsaj, V.; Saponjski, J.; Saponjski, D.; Markovic, O.; Belizna, C.; Zdravkovic, M.; et al. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Is a Marker of Endothelial Dysfunction in Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sammaritano, L.R. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 34, 101463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Duarte-García, A.; Pham, M.M.; Crowson, C.S.; Amin, S.; Moder, K.G.; Pruthi, R.K.; Warrington, K.J.; Matteson, E.L. The Epidemiology of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Population-Based Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019, 71, 1545–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pons-Estel, G.J.; Andreoli, L.; Scanzi, F.; Cervera, R.; Tincani, A. The antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Autoimmun. 2017, 76, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cervera, R.; Piette, J.C.; Font, J.; Khamashta, M.A.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Camps, M.T.; Jacobsen, S.; La-kos, G.; Tincani, A.; Kontopou-lou-Griva, I.; et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1,000 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Negrini, S.; Pappalardo, F.; Murdaca, G.; Indiveri, F.; Puppo, F. The antiphospholipid syndrome: From pathophysiology to treatment. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 17, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ruaro, B.; Sulli, A.; Alessandri, E.; Fraternali-Orcioni, G.; Cutolo, M. Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s disease associated with systemic lupus erythematous: Difficult case report and literature review. Lupus 2014, 23, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reshetnyak, T.; Cheldieva, F.; Cherkasova, M.; Lila, A.; Nasonov, E. IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ruaro, B.; Confalonieri, P.; Santagiuliana, M.; Wade, B.; Baratella, E.; Kodric, M.; Berria, M.; Jaber, M.; Torregiani, C.; Bruni, C.; et al. Correlation between Potential Risk Factors and Pulmonary Embolism in Sarcoidosis Patients Timely Treated. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gomez-Puerta, J.A.; Cervera, R. Diagnosis and classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome. J. Autoimmun. 2014, 48–49, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cervera, R. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Thromb. Res. 2017, 151, S43–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Meroni, P.L.; Borghi, M.O.; Grossi, C.; Chighizola, C.B.; Durigutto, P.; Tedesco, F. Obstetric and vascular antiphospholipid syndrome: Same antibodies but different diseases? Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018, 14, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Solano, C.; Lamuño, M.; Vargas, A.; Amezcua-Guerra, L.M. Comparison of the 1999 Sapporo and 2006 revised criteria for the classification of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2009, 27, 914–919. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pires da Rosa, G.; Bettencourt, P.; Rodríguez-Pintó, I.; Cervera, R.; Espinosa, G. “Non-criteria” antiphospholipid syndrome: A nomenclature proposal. Autoimmun. Rev. 2020, 19, 102689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chaturvedi, S.; Braunstein, E.M.; Brodsky, R.A. Antiphospholipid syndrome: Complement activation, complement gene mutations, and therapeutic implications. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 19, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miyakis, S.; Lockshin, M.D.; Atsumi, T.; Branch, D.W.; Brey, R.L.; Cervera, R.; Derksen, R.H.W.M.; De Groot, P.G.; Koike, T.; Meroni, P.L.; et al. International classification consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006, 4, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cervera, R.; Khamashta, M.A.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Camps, M.T.; Jacobsen, S.; Kiss, E.; Zeher, M.M.; Tincani, A.; Kontopoulou-Griva, I.; Galeazzi, M.; et al. Euro-Phospholipid Project Group (European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies). Morbidity and mortality in the antiphospholipid syndrome during a 5-year period: A multicentre proprospective study. Ann. Rheum. 2009, 68, 1428–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alijotas-Reig, J.; Esteve-Valverde, E.; Ferrer-Oliveras, R.; Sáez-Comet, L.; Lefkou, E.; Mekinian, A.; Belizna, C.; Ruffatti, A.; Tinca-ni, A.; Marozio, L.; et al. EUROAPS Study Group. The European Registry on Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome (EUROAPS): A survey of 1000 consecutive cases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: A committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012, 98, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saccone, G.; Berghella, V.; Maruotti, G.M.; Ghi, T.; Rizzo, G.; Simonazzi, G.; Rizzo, N.; Facchi-netti, F.; Dall’Asta, A.; Visentin, S.; et al. Antiphospholipid antibody profile based obstetric outcomes of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The PREGNANTS study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 525.e1–525.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Walter, I.J.; Klein Haneveld, M.J.; Lely, A.T.; Bloemenkamp, K.W.M.; Limper, M.; Kooiman, J. Pregnancy outcome predictors in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marchetti, T.; de Moerloose, P.; Gris, J.C. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the risk of severe and non-severe pre-eclampsia: The NOHA case-control study. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2016, 14, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Canti, V.; Del Rosso, S.; Tonello, M.; Lucianò, R.; Hoxha, A.; Coletto, L.A.; Tessitore, I.V.; Rosa, S.; Manfredi, A.A.; Castiglioni, M.T.; et al. Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome with Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Preeclampsia. J. Rheumatol. 2018, 45, 1263–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pleguezuelo, D.E.; Cabrera-Marante, O.; Abad, M.; Rodriguez-Frias, E.A.; Naranjo, L.; Vazquez, A.; Villar, O.; Gil-Etayo, F.J.; Serrano, M.; Perez-Rivilla, A.; et al. Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies in Healthy Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Atsumi, T.; Amengual, O.; Koike, T. Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Pathogenesis. In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Willis, R.; Nigel Harris, E.; Pierangeli, S.S. Pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome. In Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis; Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 305–321. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schreiber, K.; Sciascia, S.; de Groot, P.G.; Devreese, K.; Jacobsen, S.; Ruiz-Irastorza, G.; Salmon, J.E.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Shovman, O.; Hunt, B.J. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cariou, R.; Tobelem, G.; Bellucci, S.; Soria, J.; Soria, C.; Maclouf, J.; Caen, J. Effect of lupus anticoagulant on antithrombotic properties of endothelial cells. Inhibition of thrombomodulin-dependent protein C activation. Thromb. Haemost. 1988, 60, 054–058. [Google Scholar]
  32. Marciniak, E.; Romond, E.H. Impaired catalytic function of activated protein C: A new in vitro manifestation of lupus anticoagulant. Blood 1989, 74, 2426–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ames, P.R.; Tommasino, C.; Iannaccone, L.; Brillante, M.; Cimino, R.; Brancaccio, V. Coagulation activation and fibrinolytic imbalance in subjects with idiopathic antiphospholipid antibodies. A crucial role for acquired free protein S deficiency. Thromb. Haemost. 1996, 76, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ginsberg, J.; Demers, C.; Brill-Edwards, P.; Bona, R.; Johnston, M.; Wong, A. Acquired free protein S deficiency is associated with antiphospholipid antibodies and increased thrombin generation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am. J. Med. 1995, 98, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Forastiero, R.R.; Martinuzzo, M.E.; Lu, L.; Broze, G.J. Autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies impair the inhibition of activated factor X by protein Z/protein Z-dependent protease inhibitor. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2003, 1, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shi, T.; Iverson, G.M.; Qi, J.C.; Cockerill, K.A.; Linnik, M.D.; Konecny, P. Beta 2-glycoprotein I binds factor XI and inhibits its activation by thrombin and factor XIIa: Loss of inhibition by clipped beta 2-glycoprotein I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3939–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sheng, Y.; Reddel, S.W.; Herzog, H.; Wang, Y.X.; Brighton, T.; France, M.P. Impaired thrombin generation in b2-glycoprotein I null mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13817–13821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jurado, M.; Paramo, J.A.; Gutierrez-Pimentel, M.; Rocha, E. Fibrinolytic potential and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and other connective tissue disorders. Thromb. Haemost. 1992, 68, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Etingin, O.R.; Hajjar, D.P.; Hajjar, K.A.; Harpel, P.C.; Nachman, R.L. Lipoprotein (a) regulates plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 2459–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Atsumi, T.; Khamashta, M.A.; Andujar, C.; Leandro, M.J.; Amengual, O.; Ames, P.R. Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) level and its association with impaired fibrinolysis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. J. Rheumatol. 1998, 25, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yamazaki, M.; Asakura, H.; Jokaji, H.; Saito, M.; Uotani, C.; Kumabashiri, I. Plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) are elevated in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Thromb. Haemost. 1994, 71, 424–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cugno, M.; Cabibbe, M.; Galli, M.; Meroni, P.L.; Caccia, S.; Russo, R. Antibodies to tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Evidence of interaction between the antibodies and the catalytic domain of tPA in 2 patients. Blood 2004, 103, 2121–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kornberg, A.; Blank, M.; Kaufman, S.; Shoenfeld, Y. Induction of tissue factor-like activity in monocytes by anti-cardiolipin antibodies. J. Immunol. 1994, 153, 1328–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.; McCrae, K.R. Annexin A2 mediates endothelial cell activation by antiphospholipid/anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies. Blood 2005, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moestrup, S.K.; Schousboe, I.; Jacobsen, C.; Leheste, J.R.; Christensen, E.I.; Willnow, T.E. Beta2-glycoprotein-I (apolipoprotein H) and beta2-glycoprotein-Iephospholipid complex harbor a recognition site for the endocytic receptor megalin. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 102, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lutters, B.C.; Derksen, R.H.; Tekelenburg, W.L.; Lenting, P.J.; Arnout, J.; de Groot, P.G. Dimers of beta 2-glycoprotein I increase platelet deposition to collagen via interaction with phospholipids and the apolipoprotein E receptor 20. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 33831–33838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Shi, T.; Giannakopoulos, B.; Yan, Z.; Yu, P.; Berndt, M.C.; Andrews, R.K. Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies in complex with beta2-glycoprotein I can activate platelets in a dysregulated manner via glycoprotein Ib-IX-V. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2558–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De Wolf, F.; Carreras, L.O.; Moerman, P.; Vermylen, J.; Van Assche, A.; Renaer, M. Decidual vasculopathy and extensive placental infarction in a patient with repeated thromboembolic accidents, recurrent fetal loss, and a lupus anticoagulant. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1982, 142, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lyden, T.W.; Vogt, E.; Ng, A.K.; Johnson, P.M.; Rote, N.S. Monoclonal antiphospholipid antibody reactivity against human placental trophoblast. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1992, 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Viall, C.A.; Chamley, L.W. Histopathology in the placentae of women with antiphospholipid antibodies: A systematic review of the literature. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 446–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Di Simone, N.; Meroni, P.L.; de Papa, N.; Raschi, E.; Caliandro, D.; De Carolis, C.S.; Khamashta, M.A.; Atsumi, T.; Hughes, G.R.; Balestrieri, G.; et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies affect trophoblast gonadotropin secretion and invasiveness by binding directly and through adhered beta2-glycoprotein I. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Meroni, P.L.; Borghi, M.O.; Raschi, E.; Tedesco, F. Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: Understanding the antibodies. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2011, 7, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pierangeli, S.; Chen, P.; Raschi, E.; Scurati, S.; Grossi, C.; Borghi, M.; Palomo, I.; Harris, E.; Meroni, P. Antiphospholipid antibodies and the antiphospholipid syndrome: Pathogenic mechanisms. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2008, 34, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Meroni, P.L.; Raschi, E.; Grossi, C.; Pregnolato, F.; Trespidi, L.; Acaia, B.; Borghi, M.O. Obstetric and vascular APS: Same autoantibodies but different diseases? Lupus 2012, 21, 708–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. D’Ippolito, S.; Meroni, P.L.; Koike, T.; Veglia, M.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: A recent classify cation for an old defined disorder. Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. McIntyre, J.A. Immune recognition at the maternal-fetal interface: Overview. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1992, 28, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Matsuura, E.; Igarashi, Y.; Yasuda, T.; Triplett, D.A.; Koike, T. Anticardiolipin antibodies recognize beta 2-glycoprotein I structure altered by interacting with an oxygen modified solid phase surface. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 179, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Di Simone, N.; Di Nicuolo, F.; D’Ippolito, S.; Castellani, R.; Tersigni, C.; Caruso, A.; Meroni, P.; Marana, R. Antiphospholipid antibodies affect human endometrial angiogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 83, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Borghi, M.O.; Raschi, E.; Broggini, V.; Grossi, C.; D’Amelio, F.; Chen, P. Antiphospholipid antibodies reactivity with human decidual cells: An additional mechanism of pregnancy complications in APS and a potential target for innovative therapeutic intervention. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 68, 216–221. [Google Scholar]
  60. Di Simone, N.; Raschi, E.; Testoni, C.; Castellani, R.; D’Asta, M.; Shi, T.; Krilis, S.A.; Caruso, A.; Meroni, P.L. Pathogenic role of anti β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in antiphospholipid-associated fetal loss: Characterisation of β2-glycoprotein I binding to trophoblast cells and functional effects of anti β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in vitro. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005, 64, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rand, J.H.; Wu, X.-X.; Lapinski, R.; Van Heerde, W.L.; Reutelingsperger, C.P.; Chen, P.P.; Ortel, T.L. Detection of antibody mediated reduction of annexin A5 anticoagulant activity in plasmas of patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood 2004, 104, 2783–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Di Simone, N.; Ferrazzani, S.; Castellani, R.; De Carolis, S.; Mancuso, S.; Caruso, A. Heparin and low-dose aspirin restore placental human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion abolished by antiphospholipid antibody-containing sera. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 12, 2061–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Di Simone, N.; Caliandro, D.; Castellani, R.; Ferrazzani, S.; De Carolis, S.; Caruso, A. Low-molecular weight heparin restores in-vitro trophoblast invasiveness and differentiation in presence of immunoglobulin G fractions obtained from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Di Simone, N.; Marana, R.; Castellani, R.; Di Nicuolo, F.; D’Alessio, M.C.; Raschi, E.; Borghi, M.O.; Chen, P.P.; Sanguinetti, M.; Caruso, A.; et al. Decreased expression of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor as a newly identified patho-genic mechanism of antiphospholipid-mediated defective placentation. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 1504–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Berman, J.; Girardi, G.; Salmon, J.E. TNF-alpha is a critical effector and a target for therapy in antiphospholipid anti-body-induced pregnancy loss. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Martinez de la Torre, Y.; Buracchi, C.; Borroni, E.M.; Dupor, J.; Bonecchi, R.; Nebuloni, M.; Pasqualini, F.; Doni, A.; Lauri, E.; Agostinis, C.; et al. Protection against inflammation and autoantibody-caused fetal loss by the chemokine decoy receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 2319–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Thiam, H.R.; Wong, S.L.; Wagner, D.D.; Waterman, C.M. Cellular Mechanisms of NETosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 36, 191–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. de Bont, C.M.; Boelens, W.C.; Pruijn, G.J.M. NETosis, complement, and coagulation: A triangular relationship. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2019, 16, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cahilog, Z.; Zhao, H.; Wu, L.; Alam, A.; Eguchi, S.; Weng, H.; Ma, D. The Role of Neutrophil NETosis in Organ Injury: Novel Inflammatory Cell Death Mechanisms. Inflammation 2020, 43, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Meng, H.; Yalavarthi, S.; Kanthi, Y.; Mazza, L.F.; Elfline, M.A.; Luke, C.E.; Pinsky, D.J.; Henke, P.K.; Knight, J.S. In vivo role of neutrophil extracellular traps in antiphospholipid anti-body-mediated venous thrombosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017, 69, 665–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yalavarthi, S.; Gould, T.J.; Rao, A.N.; Mazza, L.F.; Morris, A.E.; Núñez-Álvarez, C.; Hernández-Ramírez, D.; Bockenstedt, P.L.; Liaw, P.C.; Cabral, A.R.; et al. Release of neutrophil extra-cellular traps by neutrophils stimulated with antiphospholipid antibodies: A newly identified mechanism of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015, 67, 2990–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gladigau, G.; Haselmayer, P.; Scharrer, I.; Munder, M.; Prinz, N.; Lackner, K.; Schild, H.; Stein, P.; Radsak, M.P. A role for Toll-like receptor mediated signals in neutrophils in the patho-genesis of the anti-phospholipid syndrome. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Marder, W.; Knight, J.S.; Kaplan, M.J.; Somers, E.C.; Zhang, X.; O’Dell, A.A.; Padmanabhan, V.; Lieberman, R.W. Placental histology and neutrophil extracellular traps in lupus and pre-eclampsia pregnancies. Lupus Sci. Med. 2015, 3, e000134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lackner, K.J.; Müller-Calleja, N. Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: Recent insights and emerging concepts. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 15, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chaturvedi, S.; Alluri, R.; McCrae, K.R. Extracellular vesicles in the antiphospholipid syndrome. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2018, 44, 493–504. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu, M.; Barnard, J.; Kundu, S.; McCrae, K.R. A novel pathway of cellular activation mediated by antiphospholipid anti-body-induced extracellular vesicles. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 13, 1928–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tong, M.; Johansson, C.; Xiao, F.; Stone, P.R.; James, J.L.; Chen, Q.; Cree, L.M.; Chamley, L.W. Antiphospholipid antibodies increase the levels of mitochondrial DNA in placental extracellular vesicles: Alarming for preeclampsia. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Kotyla, P.J.; Islam, M.A. MicroRNA (miRNA): A New Dimension in the Pathogenesis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Teruel, R.; Pérez-Sánchez, C.; Corral, J.; Herranz, M.T.; Pérez-Andreu, V.; Saiz, E.; García-Barberá, N.; Martínez-Martínez, I.; Roldán, V.; Vicente, V.; et al. Identification of miRNAs as potential modulators of tissue factor expression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011, 9, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pérez-Sánchez, C.; Aguirre, M.A.; Ruiz-Limón, P.; Barbarroja, N.; Jiménez-Gómez, Y.; de La Rosa, I.A.; Rodriguez-Ariza, A.; Collantes-Estévez, E.; Segui, P.; Velasco, F.; et al. Atherothrombosis-associated microRNAs in antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pérez-Sánchez, C.; la Rosa, I.A.-D.; Aguirre, M.; Luque-Tévar, M.; Ruiz-Limón, P.; Barbarroja, N.; Jiménez-Gómez, Y.; Ábalos-Aguilera, M.C.; Collantes-Estévez, E.; Segui, P.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers of disease and typification of the atherothrombotic status in antiphospholipid syndrome. Haematologica 2018, 103, 908–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alijotas-Reig, J.; Esteve-Valverde, E.; Anunciación-Llunell, A.; Marques-Soares, J.; Pardos-Gea, J.; Miró-Mur, F. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management of Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hamulyák, E.N.; Scheres, L.J.; Marijnen, M.C.; Goddijn, M.; Middeldorp, S. Aspirin or heparin or both for improving pregnancy outcomes in women with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 5, CD012852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hoppe, B.; Burmester, G.R.; Dörner, T. Heparin or aspirin or both in the treatment of recurrent abortions in women with antiphospholipid antibody (syndrome). Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2011, 23, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Girardi, G.; Redecha, P.; Salmon, J.E. Heparin prevents antiphospholipid antibody-induced fetal loss by inhibiting complement activation. Nat Med. 2004, 10, 1222–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. D’Ippolito, S.; Marana, R.; Di Nicuolo, F.; Castellani, R.; Veglia, M.; Stinson, J.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs) on antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL)-mediated inhibition of endometrial angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 03195 g001 550
Figure 1. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) prothrombotic activity. aPLs interact with several coagulation cascade proteins, reduce fibrinolytic activity, activate complement and have a direct effect on endothelial cells and platelets. All of these mechanisms finally contribute to the characteristic thrombotic events observed in APS. aPLs = antiphospholipid antibodies; PAI-1 = inhibitor of plasminogen type 1; tPA = activator of tissue plasminogen; TF = tissue factor; fX = factor X.
Figure 1. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) prothrombotic activity. aPLs interact with several coagulation cascade proteins, reduce fibrinolytic activity, activate complement and have a direct effect on endothelial cells and platelets. All of these mechanisms finally contribute to the characteristic thrombotic events observed in APS. aPLs = antiphospholipid antibodies; PAI-1 = inhibitor of plasminogen type 1; tPA = activator of tissue plasminogen; TF = tissue factor; fX = factor X.
Ijms 24 03195 g001
Ijms 24 03195 g002 550
Figure 2. Obstetric APS mechanisms. Here are summarized the main known pathogenetic mechanisms of Anti-β2GPI and their effects on pregnancy outcomes. PL = phospholipid; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; Anti-β2GPI = β2 glicorpotein1-antibodies; β2GPI = β2 glycoprotein 1; RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss; IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction.
Figure 2. Obstetric APS mechanisms. Here are summarized the main known pathogenetic mechanisms of Anti-β2GPI and their effects on pregnancy outcomes. PL = phospholipid; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; Anti-β2GPI = β2 glicorpotein1-antibodies; β2GPI = β2 glycoprotein 1; RPL = recurrent pregnancy loss; IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction.
Ijms 24 03195 g002
Ijms 24 03195 g003 550
Figure 3. NETosis and extracellular vesicles in obstetrical APS pathogenesis. aPLs can lead to neutrophil NETosis promoting an inflammatory state in placental stroma that can induce trophoblast apoptosis. aPLs can promote endothelial cells (ECs) EVs generation, containing IL-1β and ss-RNA that can activate, by a paracrine action, other ECs via TLR7. EV shedding is promoted also by aPLs interaction with trophoblast. Trophoblast EVs can contain several alarmins, such as mitochondrial DNA, that can activate endothelial cells via TLR9. aPLs = antiphospholipid antibodies. EVs = extracellular vesicles; TLR7 = Toll-like receptor 7; TLR9 = Toll-like receptor 9.
Figure 3. NETosis and extracellular vesicles in obstetrical APS pathogenesis. aPLs can lead to neutrophil NETosis promoting an inflammatory state in placental stroma that can induce trophoblast apoptosis. aPLs can promote endothelial cells (ECs) EVs generation, containing IL-1β and ss-RNA that can activate, by a paracrine action, other ECs via TLR7. EV shedding is promoted also by aPLs interaction with trophoblast. Trophoblast EVs can contain several alarmins, such as mitochondrial DNA, that can activate endothelial cells via TLR9. aPLs = antiphospholipid antibodies. EVs = extracellular vesicles; TLR7 = Toll-like receptor 7; TLR9 = Toll-like receptor 9.
Ijms 24 03195 g003
Table
Table 1. Sydney criteria for APS.
Table 1. Sydney criteria for APS.
1. Vascular thrombosis≥1 clinical episode of thrombosis (arterial or venous), in any tissue or organ.
2. Pregnancy morbidity
  • ≥1 morphologically normal fetal loss, ≥10th week of gestation, or
  • ≥1 premature birth of a normal neonate before the 34th week because of: (i) eclampsia or severe preeclampsia or (ii) due to placental insufficiency,
  • ≥3 unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions < 10th week of gestation (maternal or paternal anatomic, hormonal or chromosomal causes excluded).
3. Laboratory criteria
  • Lupus anticoagulant (LA) present in plasma, in ≥2 samples,
  • Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibody IgG and/or IgM present in medium or high titer, on ≥2 occasions at a distance of 12 weeks,
  • Anti-β2 glycoprotein-I (anti-β 2GPI) antibody IgG and/or IgM present in medium or high titer, on ≥2 occasions at a distance of 12 weeks.
Subclassification of APS patients (according to aPL positivity)
  • Type I: >1 laboratory criterion present (any combination),
  • Type IIa: LA antibodies only,
  • Type IIb: aCL antibodies only,
  • Type IIc: anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibody only.
Multiple aPL positivity is correlated with a more serious course of the syndrome.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Ippolito, S.; Barbaro, G.; Paciullo, C.; Tersigni, C.; Scambia, G.; Di Simone, N. Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy: New and Old Pathogenetic Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043195

AMA Style

D’Ippolito S, Barbaro G, Paciullo C, Tersigni C, Scambia G, Di Simone N. Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy: New and Old Pathogenetic Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(4):3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043195

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Ippolito, Silvia, Greta Barbaro, Carmela Paciullo, Chiara Tersigni, Giovanni Scambia, and Nicoletta Di Simone. 2023. "Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy: New and Old Pathogenetic Mechanisms" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 4: 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043195

APA Style

D’Ippolito, S., Barbaro, G., Paciullo, C., Tersigni, C., Scambia, G., & Di Simone, N. (2023). Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnancy: New and Old Pathogenetic Mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop