Next Article in Journal
Current Insights and Future Directions in the Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Validation of Key Genes Related to Preferred Flavour Profiles in Australian Commercial Papaya (Carica papaya L.)
Previous Article in Journal
MLLT11 Regulates Endometrial Stroma Cell Adhesion, Proliferation and Survival in Ectopic Lesions of Women with Advanced Endometriosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Identification and Expression Analysis of the WUSCHEL Homeobox-Containing Protein Family Reveals Their Special Role in Development and Abiotic Stress Response in Zea mays L.

School of Life Sciences, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(1), 441; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010441
Submission received: 10 December 2023 / Revised: 24 December 2023 / Accepted: 27 December 2023 / Published: 28 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Breeding and Genetic Regulation of Crops)

Abstract

:
Maize is an important food and cash crop worldwide. The WUSCHEL (WUS)-related homeobox (WOX) transcription factor (TF) family plays a significant role in the development process and the response to abiotic stress of plants. However, few studies have been reported on the function of WOX genes in maize. This work, utilizing the latest maize B73 reference genome, results in the identification of 22 putative ZmWOX gene family members. Except for chromosome 5, the 22 ZmWOX genes were homogeneously distributed on the other nine chromosomes and showed three tandem duplication and 10 segmental duplication events. Based on phylogenetic characteristics, ZmWOXs are divided into three clades (e.g., WUS, intermediate, and ancient groups), and the majority of ZmWOXs in same group display similar gene and protein structures. Cross-species collinearity results indicated that some WOX genes might be evolutionarily conservative. The promoter region of ZmWOX family members is enriched in light, plant growth/hormone, and abiotic stress-responsive elements. Tissue-specific expression evaluation showed that ZmWOX genes might play a significant role in the occurrence of maize reproductive organs. Transcriptome data and RT-qPCR analysis further showed that six ZmWOX genes (e.g., ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18) were positively or negatively modulated by temperature, salt, and waterlogging stresses. Moreover, two ZmWOXs, ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18, both were upregulated by abiotic stress. ZmWOX18 was localized in the nucleus and had transactivation activities, while ZmWOX1 was localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, without transactivation activity. Overall, this work offers new perspectives on the evolutionary relationships of ZmWOX genes and might provide a resource for further detecting the biological functions of ZmWOXs.

1. Introduction

The development of apical meristematic tissue and the differentiation of lateral organs affect the plant shape and height. The homeobox (HB) gene family is a large group of plants (containing 14 subfamilies). Mutations in these classes of genes can lead to embryonic or other periods of developmental abnormalities [1]. The WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) TF gene group is among the most important HB families. The protein N-terminus of its family members contains a conserved DNA-binding region consisting of three α-helices (e.g., homeodomain and HD, including 60–66 amino acids) [2]. In addition to the conservative HD motif, the WOX protein also contains some functional domains in the C-terminal, such as the typical WUS-box structural domain (TLXLFP, seven amino acids, X indicates any amino acid), EAR motif (ERF-associated amphiphilic repression), and acidic domain [3,4]. The WOX proteins in many species may be divided into three groups based on their structural similarity: ancient, intermediate, and modern/WUS [5]. Ancient WOX genes are widely distributed in plants. Intermediate group members are found in vascular plants. Finally, WUS exists only in seed plants [6].
According to bioinformatics analysis, the WOX gene family has been identified in many plants, such as Arabidopsis (15 members) [7,8,9], melons (Cucumis melo L.) (11 members) [10], Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) (15 members) [11], tomatoes (10 members) [12], upland cotton (40 members) [13], sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) (18 members) [14], bread wheat (14 members) [15], rice (13 members) [16,17], and sorghum (11 members) [18]. The functions of WOX in the regulation of primary and secondary growth processes of shoot apical meristem (SAM)/root apical meristem (RAM)/vascular meristems and organ (embryo and flower) development have been systematically reported in Arabidopsis [19,20]. The AtWUS protein maintains stem cell homeostasis in the SAM to ensure normal plant development [21,22,23]. Like AtSUS, AtWOX5 is essential for stem cell homeostasis in the RAM [21,24]. AtWOX3 functions in the initiation and growth of lateral organs [25]. AtWOX4 is abundantly functional with AtWOX14 and accepts the signal from the CLE41/44-PXY complex to be responsible for vascular organization [26]. AtWOX14 also enhances gibberellin (GA) synthesis to promote vascular cell development [27]. The AtWOX13 gene participates in root and flower development [28]. In rice, the OsWUS gene is expressed in leaf primordium and RAM [17]. OsWOX3, which is homologous to AtWOX3, may play a significant role in the development of leaves [29]. OsWOX4 plays a crucial regulatory role in early leaf development. The knockdown of OsWOX4 leads to leaf development defects [30]. OsWOX11 is expressed in newborn coronal roots and subsequently in the cell division region of root meristem tissue [31].
In addition to playing a crucial regulatory role in plant development, WOX TFs could also be modulated by various abiotic stresses (e.g., drought, low temperature, and salt) [32]. In rice, OsWOX11 regulates the development process of root hair to increase rice drought tolerance [31]. Eight OsWOX genes, including OsWUS, positively responded to drought stress. For instance, OsWOX3 and OsWOX5 could be induced by salt, while four members of OsWOX respond positively to cold [29]. Some WOX gene family members in cotton and cucumber also respond positively or negatively to several environmental stresses [18,33]. The OsWOX13 gene is modulated by drought, cold, and salt. Overexpression of OsWOX13 in rice significantly enhanced plant drought stress tolerance [34]. Overexpression of MdWOX13-1 also enhanced plant drought stress resistance by activating the reactive oxygen species scavenging system [35].
Maize is an important crop worldwide. Previous studies have shown 21 ZmWOX genes in maize based on ancient genome data [16]. Four ZmWOX genes (e.g., ZmNS1, ZmNS2, ZmWUS1, and ZmWUS2) were also involved in leaf development and promoted somatic embryogenesis in maize. Double mutants of ZmNS1 and ZmNS2 result in narrow leaf width but unchanged leaf length [36]. Both ZmWUS1 and ZmWUS2 are homologous to AtWUS. At the same time, the expression patterns of these two genes have significant differences; the transcript of ZmWUS1 is in dynamic change during the nutrient growth stage, and the ZmWUS2 gene is specifically expressed in young leaf primordia [37]. Meanwhile, co-overexpression of ZmWUS2 and BBM genes in maize notably enhances somatic embryogenesis and shortens the time of genetic transformation [38]. Despite the above findings, the function of ZmWOX genes in maize development and the abiotic stress response is largely unknown.
In this work, we identified 22 WOX genes in maize and conducted a comprehensive analysis of these genes according to the newly assembled maize B73 reference genome (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0). The expression level of ZmWOXs under normal and abiotic conditions was also explored. Meanwhile, the subcellular localization and transcriptional activation activity of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 were analyzed. This study provides new information about the evolutionary relationships of the ZmWOX genes and may help further understand the possible functions of ZmWOXs.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Characterization of ZmWOX Genes

A 2010 study reported a maize genome containing 21 WOX genes [16]. In this study, based on a new version of the maize B73 genome (NAM-5.0), a homology search was performed using known AtWOX and OsWOX sequences [15,16] as detectors. After removing duplicates and confirming the conservative HD domain, 22 putative WOX genes were identified in maize (Table 1). The detailed location site of each ZmWOX gene was obtained after searching the genome (Supplementary Table S1). The 22 ZmWOX genes were labeled ZmWOX1 to ZmWOX22 according to their location in the chromosomal region (Supplementary Table S1). Except for chromosome 5, the other nine chromosomes all contained ZmWOXs. Chromosome 8 had the most ZmWOX genes (five members), followed by four members located on chromosome 3, while chromosomes 1, 7, and 9 only included one ZmWOX gene, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). The coding sequence (CDS) of ZmWOXs ranged from 252 bp (ZmWOX8) to 1551 bp (ZmWOX7), and 22 ZmWOX proteins contained 83–516 amino acids (aa) (average: 287 aa) (Table 1). The isoelectric points (PI) and molecular weights of the ZmWOXs ranged from 5.56 to 10.52 (average: 8.00) and 10.01 to 53.26 kDa (average: 30.67), respectively (Table 1). According to the predicted results of the website, most ZmWOX proteins (17 members) were distributed in the nucleus (Table 1), consistent with the localization of transcription factors (TF). The other five members were distributed in the chloroplast (three members) and mitochondrion (two members), respectively (Table 1). It may be responsible for the transcriptional regulation of genes in plastids.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of ZmWOX Proteins

The Arabidopsis genome includes 15 WOXs, and the protein sequences of these genes can be classified into three groups (e.g., modern/WUS, intermediate, and ancient) according to evolutionary relationships [39]. We constructed a phylogenetic tree using the protein sequences of known WOXs in sorghum [16] (12 WOX members in sorghum, Supplementary Table S1), rice (Supplementary Table S2) [17], wheat (Supplementary Table S2) [15], Arabidopsis (Supplementary Table S2) [8], and the newly identified ZmWOXs to understand the evolutionary relationships of WOX genes in maize. As shown in Figure 1, 76 WOX proteins from five plants could also be grouped into three clades (e.g., WUS, intermediate, and ancient), each containing 40, 28, and 8 WOX genes, respectively (Figure 1). For the maize WOX family, twelve ZmWOXs (e.g., ZmWOX2–5, 9–11, 14, 16, 17, 21, 22) belong to the WUS group, eight ZmWOX proteins (e.g., WOX1, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20) are in the intermediate clade, and only two ZmWOXs (e.g., ZmWOX6 and 18) are subdivided into the ancient group (Figure 1). The WOX proteins in each group were all from five plants, revealing that the WOX genes in these species may experience similar evolutionary models (Figure 1). Meanwhile, ZmWOX genes in all clades were more closely related to SbWOX genes than to the other WOXs (Figure 1), indicating maize and sorghum are evolutionary orthologous relationships.

2.3. Structural Analysis of ZmWOX Genes

MEME and TBtools were used to analyze the protein motifs and gene structure of ZmWOXs. According to the MEME-detected results, 10 conserved motifs were in 22 ZmWOXs. The conserved HD domain (e.g., motifs 1 and 2, Helix1-Loop-Helix2-Turn-Helix3) (Figure S1) was present in all ZmWOXs (Figure 2A). Except for motifs 1 and 2, some motifs were only present in special groups, reflecting the diversity of ZmWOXs. The intermediate clade members contained motifs 3, 4, 6, 9, and 10. Meanwhile, both members included motifs 3–4 in the C terminal, except for ZmWOX8 (short sequence) (Figure 2A). ZmWOX6 and ZmWOX18 (ancient members) also contained motif 4 at the N-terminus (Figure 2A). In Arabidopsis, WUS subfamily members contained two conserved domains: WUS box and EAR-like. All members contained the WUS box, while the EAR motif was found only in AtWUS [39]. As shown in Figure 2A, except for ZmWOX9, 11, and 14 (short sequence), motif 5 (WUS box, TLXLFP, Figure S1) was identified in all maize WUS members. We also found the EAR domain in ZmWOX2 (ZmWUS1) and ZmWOX22 (ZmWUS2) (Figure S2).
We analyzed the exon–intron distribution of ZmWOX genes using TBtools. Except for ZmWOX9 and ZmWOX11, which had only one exon and no intron, all ZmWOXs contained at least two exons and one intron (Figure 2B). The exon and intron lengths were similar in the same clade. Still, it displayed wide variation between the different subfamilies, mainly due to the differences in the intron sequence (Figure 2B). The intermediate members contained longer exon sequences than the WUS and ancient clades (Figure 2B), leading to longer protein sequences (Figure 2A). Overall, these results revealed that the same clade of ZmWOX genes shows less variation in gene and protein structure and may display the same functions.

2.4. Gene Duplication and Synteny Analysis of the ZmWOX Genes

Except for chromosome 5, the 22 ZmWOXs were widely distributed in the remaining nine chromosomes (Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 3). Some ZmWOX genes were located close together and formed three tandem duplication events (ZmWOX4/5/6, ZmWOX16/17/18, and ZmWOX21/22) (Figure 3). According to the gene duplication events analysis, except for three tandem duplication events (Figure 3), 10 pairs of segmental duplication (homologous) in ZmWOX genes were also identified in the maize genome (Figure 3). Among these 10 pairs, five belonged to the WUS family (e.g., ZmWOX2/22, ZmWOX3/9, ZmWOX4/16, ZmWOX5/17, and ZmWOX10/14), four in the intermediate clade (e.g., ZmWOX1/13, ZmWOX1/19, ZmWOX7/12, and ZmWOX7/15), and only ZmWOX6/18 in the ancient group (Figure 3). These results indicate that segmental duplication may be the main force driving the extension of the ZmWOXs family.
A collinear analysis between maize and the other four species (i.e., wheat, sorghum, rice, and Arabidopsis) was constructed to further understand the evolutionary mechanism of the ZmWOX genes. As shown in Figure 4, an amount of 40, 17, 16, and four collinear gene pairs (a total of 77) were identified between maize and wheat, maize and sorghum, maize and rice, and maize and Arabidopsis, respectively. This result indicated that the amount of WOX homologous genes is high in crops and that paralogous homologous genes may play a significant role in the WOX family evolution process. ZmWOX4 (Chr 3), 7 (Chr 3), 14 (Chr 8), and 17 (Chr 8) showed homologous pairs in all five plants (Figure 4), indicating that these four genes may have existed before the evolution of these five plant species. The results suggest that the ZmWOX family genes may have similar functions to the WOXs of other species.

2.5. The Cis-Element Analysis of the ZmWOX Promoter

A 2 kb sequence upstream of the start codon of each gene was downloaded from the maize genome NAM 5.0 and submitted to the online PlantCARE database to detect the diversity of cis-elements present in the promoter regions of the ZmWOX genes. As shown in Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S3, except for the TATA box and CAAT box, 1037 elements were found in the promoter of 22 ZmWOXs. These elements could be divided into four classes: light responsive (e.g., Box 4, G-box, I-box, AE-box, MRE, Sp1, and Gap-box), hormones responsive (e.g., ABA-responsive elements (ABRE), TCA-element, TGA-element, TATC-box, P-box, TCA, ERE, and AuxRR-core), plant growth (e.g., ARE, CAT-box, circadian, MBSI, MSA-like, O2-site, AT-rich element, and RY-element), and stress-responsive elements (e.g., STRE, Myc, MYB site, W box, MBS, LTR, drought-responsive elements (DRE) core, and TC-rich repeats). Some elements were widely located in the ZmWOXs promoter, such as ABRE (contained in 20 members), MYB/MYC binding site elements related to abiotic stress and plant growth (contained in all members), and STRE elements (18 ZmWOXs) (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S3). These results suggest that the ZmWOX genes might be involved in stress resistance and the maize growth/hormone pathway.

2.6. Expression Patterns of ZmWOX Genes in Different Maize Tissues

Published RNA-seq datasets [40] (Supplementary Table S4) from 15 maize tissues with varied developmental periods were used to explore the expression patterns of ZmWOX genes in the maize growth and development stage. As shown in Figure 6, except for ZmWOX8 and ZmWOX11, all tissues had no expression. The other 20 genes showed high expression levels in specific tissues, especially for ZmWOX6 and 18 displayed high expression levels in all tissues. Meanwhile, ZmWOXs in reproductive organs (e.g., ear, embryo, inflorescence, and tassel) showed relatively higher transcript amounts compared to nutrient tissue (e.g., leaf, stem, and root) (Figure 6). Except for ZmWOX6, 16, 18, 21, and 22, the peak expression level of the other genes was in all reproductive tissues (Figure 6). For example, the expression of ZmWOX1 in embryo was almost triple as high as that in the roots (Figure 6). These results indicate that ZmWOXs might play an important role in maize development, especially in the occurrence of reproductive organs.

2.7. Expression Patterns of ZmWOXs under Abiotic Stress Conditions

We used the published transcriptome data about drought [41] (Supplementary Table S5), salt [42] (Supplementary Table S5), temperature [43] (Supplementary Table S5), and waterlogging [44] (Supplementary Table S5) stresses to analyze the expression patterns of ZmWOX genes under abiotic stresses. As shown in Figure 7, ZmWOX6 was downregulated by heat and cold treatments. ZmWOX13 and ZmWOX22 (ZmWUS2) positively responded to cold stress, while cold stress inhibited ZmWOX17. The other members of ZmWOXs did not seem to be influenced by temperature stress (Figure 7). For salt stress, whether in salt-stress-sensitive or salt-tolerant maize lines, ZmWOX1, ZmWOX2, ZmWOX6, ZmWOX13, and ZmWOX18 were positively modulated by salt stress (Figure 7). For waterlogging maize root stress, except for ZmWOX4 and 6 (downregulated by waterlogging), the other 20 ZmWOXs were all induced by the waterlogging stress (Figure 7), implying that these genes might show a key function in maize root response to low oxygen stress. Unlike the above three abiotic stresses, the ZmWOXs did not seem to respond to drought stress (Figure 7), even though some of the promoters of these genes contained DRE (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S3).

2.8. RT-qPCR Analysis of ZmWOX Genes under Abiotic Stresses

ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18 were simultaneously positively or negatively modulated by temperature, salt, and waterlogging stresses (Figure 7). These genes were chosen to further explore the expression levels of ZmWOX genes in heat, cold, salt, and waterlogging stresses in treated maize lines using RT-qPCR. ZmWOX1, ZmWOX16, and ZmWOX18 were induced by heat shock, and ZmWOX6 and 13 were downregulated by heat and cold stress. In contrast, ZmWOX4 did not respond to temperature stress (Figure 8). For salt stress (200 mM NaCl), except for ZmWOX4 (no change), the transcript levels of the other five genes were upregulated by salt stress (Figure 8). Although ZmWOX4 was not responsible for temperature and salt stresses, the expression level of this gene was reduced under waterlogging treatment (Figure 8). Low oxygen stress also induced the other four genes (ZmWOX1, 13, 16, and 18) or downregulated ZmWOX6. Overall, six ZmWOX genes displayed different expression patterns in abiotic stresses.

2.9. Subcellular Localization and Transactivation Activity Assays of ZmWOX1 and 18

ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18, exhibiting positive response patterns under RT-qPCR analysis (Figure 8), were chosen to explore subcellular localization and transactivation activity to further determine the functions of ZmWOX genes. The 35S∷ZmWOX1/18-GFP and GFP empty vector (control) were cotransformed with the nucleus marker vector (mCherry) into tobacco leaves using the Agrobacterium-mediated method. The fluorescence signals of GFP and ZmWOX1-GFP were distributed in the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus. In contrast, the fluorescence signal of the ZmWOX18-GFP was only distributed in the nucleus, indicating that ZmWOX18 is localized in the nucleus, and ZmWOX1 was widely distributed in cells (Figure 9A). The transactivation activities of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 were assessed using the Y2H yeast system. Like the positive control, yeast cells carrying pGBKT7-ZmWOX18 (BD-WOX18) and pGADT7 empty vectors grew well on an SD medium without tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine (SD/-Trp/-Leu/-Ade/-His). They could show a blue color after adding X-α-gal. In contrast, the negative control and BD-WOX1+AD groups did not survive (Figure 9B). This result revealed that ZmWOX18 had transcriptional activity in yeast, while ZmWOX1 showed no transcriptional activity.

3. Discussion

WOX genes play an important role in various periods of plant development and environmental stress response [5,16,18,45]. Previous studies have reported 21 WOX genes in maize [16], named ZmWOX2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4, 5A, 5B, 9A, 9B, 9C, 11, 12A, 12B, 13A-D, ZmNS1, ZmNS2, ZmWUS1, and ZmWUS2. Based on the newly released and assembled maize genome, this work identified 22 ZmWOX family members and renamed these 22 genes according to their chromosomal locations (Supplementary Table S1). After searching the NCBI database and comparing with our characterization results, we found ZmWOX12A and 12B, ZmWOX13A and ZmWOX13D, and ZmWOX13B and ZmWOX13C were the same gene, and named them ZmWOX13, ZmWOX6, and ZmWOX18 in this study, respectively. The other reported ZmWOX genes, including ZmWOX2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4, 5A, 5B, 9A, 9B, 9C, 11, ZmNS1, ZmNS2, ZmWUS1, and ZmWUS2 correspond, respectively, to ZmWOX5, 17, 10, 14, 21, 16, 4, 15, 7, 12, 20, 3, 9, 2, 22 identified in this work (Table 1). ZmWOX1, 8, 11, and 19, obtained in the recent genome (Table 1), are the new WOX members, not previously reported.
The 22 ZmWOX genes were widely distributed on the genome except chromosome 5 (Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 3). Gene duplication (containing tandem and segmental events) is a broad phenomenon in the evolution of plant gene family members [46]. In this work, three tandem and 10 segment events were identified in ZmWOX genes (Figure 3), indicating that the relatively high-segmental duplications in the maize WOX gene family might be the main driving forces for the expansion of ZmWOXs. In other species, such as sunflower [14], melon [10], cotton [13], and Sacred Lotus [11], the main driving forces for increasing the WOX members are also segmental duplications, indicating the WOX family in plants might prefer using segmental duplications in the evolutionary process. Notably, ZmWOX8, 11, 20, and 21 were not included in gene duplication events (Figure 3), although ZmWOX20/21 showed high expression levels in embryo, stem, and submergence stress (Figure 6 and Figure 7). ZmWOX8 and 11 have almost no expression in maize development and abiotic stress response (Figure 6 and Figure 7), suggesting that these two genes might be the ancient and silenced genes. Evolutionary relationship analysis using WOX protein full-length sequences of maize and four other plant species (e.g., sorghum, wheat, rice, and Arabidopsis) indicated that the maize WOX family was divided into three clades (e.g., WUS, intermediate, and ancient) (Figure 1). This condition was consistent with the classification of the WOX family in other species [5]. In addition to the evolutionary tree, we also used cross-species collinearity analysis to explore the relationship of the WOX family. A high homology was observed between maize and the other three Poaceae plants (Figure 4). Although there was a low collinear relationship between maize and Arabidopsis, there were also two pairs of homologous genes in these two species (Figure 4). These results indicate that WOX genes may undergo conservative evolutionary progress in plants and might have similar biological functions among different species. Notably, ZmWOX8 and 9 on chromosome 4, without relationships with the other four plants (Figure 4), imply that some WOXs might have special features only displayed in their species.
All ZmWOXs containing the typical HD conserve domain (motifs 1 and 2) (Figure 2) and members in the same groups display similar gene and protein structures (Figure 1 and Figure 2). This reveals that different group members might show different functionalities. In other plants, WOX members in the same evolutionary group also display similar gene and protein structures, though with greater structural differences in different groups [10,11,13,14], suggesting that structural differences may account for functional differences of WOX genes in the same or different species.
In plants, the WOX genes mainly participate in plant growth and development, for example, in the maintenance and stabilization of SAM [23], RAM [47], inflorescence [48], and vascular [27] tissues. We found many cis-acting elements related to light, development, hormones, and abiotic stress response located in the promoter region of ZmWOX genes (Figure 5 and Supplementary Table S3). Further analysis of the published RNA-seq data about different maize tissues suggests that ZmWOX genes might be involved in nutrition and reproductive organ development (Figure 6). Two maize WOX genes, ZmWOX6 and 18, showed wide expression patterns in testing tissues, indicating their important role in maize development. Until now, four ZmWOX genes (e.g., ZmNS1, ZmNS2, ZmWUS1, and ZmWUS2, named in this work as ZmWOX3, 9, 2, and 22, respectively) have been reported. Double mutants of ZmNS1 and ZmNS2 caused maize leaves to become narrow, but single mutants displayed no obvious difference [36,49]. This indicated the functional redundancy of ZmWOX3 and 9. Both two genes were highly expressed in inflorescence (Figure 6), implying that they may influence the reproductive process of maize. In Arabidopsis, the CLAVATA-WUSCHEL (CLV-WUS) model elaborates the regulation of division and differentiation of SAM [50]. ZmWUS1 and 2 are homologous AtWUS gene but showed different expression patterns [37]. Our study indicated ZmWUS1 (ZmWOX2) mainly expressed in the ear and inflorescence (Figure 6). At the same time, ZmWUS2 (ZmWOX22) showed high transcript levels in leaf tips (Figure 6), suggesting that ZmWUS1 and ZmWUS2 might be functionally differentiated. A recent study indicated that overexpression of TaWOX5 (homologous with AtWUS) in wheat could overcome the defects of genetic transformation relay on the genotype [51]. The co-overexpression of ZmWUS2 and BBM genes in maize also improved genetic transformation efficiency [38]. In addition to being responsible for growth and development, WOX genes also respond to abiotic stress [32]. Except for ZmWOX4 and ZmWOX6, the other 20 WOX genes were positively modulated by waterlogging stress (Figure 7), suggesting that ZmWOXs may be involved in the morphological reconstruction of roots under hypoxic stress. Further RT-qPCR analysis indicated ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18 were positively or negatively modulated by abiotic stress (e.g., temperature, salt, and waterlogging) (Figure 8), indicating that ZmWOXs might also play a significant role in abiotic stress.
ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 were positively modulated by heat, cold, salt, and waterlogging stress (Figure 8). We further explored the localization and transactivation activity of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. ZmWOX18 was localized in the nucleus, while ZmWOX1 was present in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 9A). ZmWOX18 had transactivation activity in yeast, but ZmWOX1 seemed unable to activate downstream genes (Figure 9B). Although ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 are positively regulated by abiotic stress signals, ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 may play opposite roles in maize stress responses or even act reciprocally to obstruct the functioning of each other. However, this hypothesis needs to be further studied by using transgenic maize. Meanwhile, due to ZmWOX18 being induced by many abiotic stresses (Figure 8), and ZmWOX18 exhibited activating activity (Figure 9B). It might be a useful gene for agricultural practices for breeding stress-resilient maize varieties. Our findings may offer valuable information for future crop improvement strategies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Stress Treatments

A maize B73 inbred line was used in this work. Surface sterilized B73 seeds were planted in soil and grown under a 16/8 h day/night photoperiod at 25 °C in a greenhouse. V3-stage maize seedlings were used to assess abiotic stress. The seedlings were placed in a 42 °C or 4 °C growth chamber for either heat or cold stress for 0, 2, 4, or 8 h [52]. The seedlings were transferred to a water solution containing 200 mM NaCl for 0, 2, 4, or 6 h for salt stress. The roots were collected for waterlogging by maintaining a 2 cm water layer above the first leaf for 0, 2, 4, or 6 h. There were three replicates for each treatment and three pots of seedlings for each replicate. The maize leaves (e.g., heat, cold, and salt) or roots (waterlogging) were harvested after stress treatments and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use.

4.2. Identification of ZmWOX Genes

The identification of maize WOX genes was performed using lasted assembly genome data (Zm-B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0) (download in MaizeGDB, https://maizegdb.org, accessed on 28 September 2023) of inbred line B73. AtWOXs and OsWOXs protein sequences (relative ID shown in Supplementary Table S2) (download in Ensembl Plants, http://plants.ensembl.org, accessed on 28 September 2023) were used as queries to compare with maize genome using BLASTP (package v2.6.0+) (E-value: 1 × 10−5 and identity threshold > 50%). The obtained non-redundant protein sequences were further used to refine the selection and identify whether the conserved DNA-binding motif-Homeodomain (HMM, hidden Markov model, login number: PF00046) was present. This was made using searches in the Pfam database (http://pfam-legacy.xfam.org/, accessed on 28 September 2023) [53]. The physical parameters and subcellular localization of maize WOX proteins were determined by the online software ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 7 October 2023) and WoLF PSORT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 7 October 2023).

4.3. Phylogenetic and Structural Analyses of ZmWOX Genes

The identified maize WOX proteins and reported WOXs in rice, wheat, Sorghum, and Arabidopsis (relative ID shown in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2) [15,16] were aligned with MUSCLE v.5.1.0 [54]. MEGA7 (Version 7.0) was used to build the phylogenetic tree under the neighbor-joining approach (model: Jones, Taylor, and Thornton) with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The conserved motifs of ZmWOXs were analyzed by MEME (Version 5.5.0, parameters: -nmotifs 10) [55] and visualized by TBtools (v1.120) [56]. The exon–intron structures of ZmWOX genes were also visualized with TBtools (v1.120) (default parameters) [56].

4.4. Chromosomal Localization and Collinearity Analysis

The chromosomal location information of the ZmWOXs was obtained from its genome annotation file in Maize GDB. Using MCScan (Version X, default parameters) [57] to explore the covariance relationships of WOX genes in different species, the result of chromosomal localization and collinearity analysis (using one-step MCScanX function) were then visualized by TBtools (v1.120) [56].

4.5. Cis-Acting Element Analysis

The 2000 bp promoter sequences upstream of the transcription start site of each ZmWOX gene were downloaded from the Maize GDB database (https://maizegdb.org, accessed on 13 November 2023). The online software PLACE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 17 November 2023) [58] were used to predict possible cis-elements, and the results were visualized by TBtools (v1.120) with default parameters [56].

4.6. Transcriptome Data Analysis

The RNA-seq data used for tissue-specific expression analysis were obtained in a published report [40]. The transcriptome sequencing data of maize under heat/cold [43], drought [41], waterlogging [44], and salt [42] stresses were used to explore the ZmWOX gene expression patterns under abiotic stress. All RNA-seq data were reanalyzed using the new maize B73 genome information (Section 4.2). Heatmap construction was made according to the fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) values of sequencing data (2–3 biological replicates were plotted using mean values) and visualized by TBtools (v1.120) [56]. The NCBI RNA-seq data links are shown in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5.

4.7. RT-qPCR Analysis of Gene Expression

The total leaf RNA extraction was performed following a published protocol [59]. About 1 μg RNA was used for first-strand cDNA synthesis according to the description in the kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China). The RT-qPCR Mix (20 μL) included 6 μL diluted cDNA, 2 μL RNase-free water, a total of 2 μL each primer, and 10 μL SYBR Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR was performed on a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) following this procedure: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 43 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 25 s. Melting curves were obtained at 65–95 °C in the final step. There are three biological replicates (mixing three independent individuals for one biological replicate) for each sample and two technical replicates (calculation of mean values) for each biological replicate. The transcripts’ relative abundance was calculated by the 2−∆∆Ct method [60]. The ZmActin1 gene (Zm00001eb348450) was used as the internal control. All primers are listed in Supplementary Table S6.

4.8. Subcellular Localization

The CDS of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 were amplified using primers ZmWOX1-F/R and ZmWOX18-F/R (Supplementary Table S6) for subcellular localization of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. They were then ligated into the pROKII vector [59]. GFP (Empty pROKII vector) control or ZmWOX1/18-GFP vectors were separately cotransformed with a nuclear localization marker (D53-RFP) into 4-week-old tobacco epidermal cells following a published report [61]. The cells were dark cultured for one day, under 16 h/8 h light/dark at 25 °C for two days. GFP, RFP, and chlorophyll autofluorescence signals (ChI) were observed with a scanning confocal microscope (Andor Revolution WD, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK).

4.9. Transactivation Activity Assays

The CDS of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 was amplified using specific primers (ZmWOX1-Y-F/R and ZmWOX18-Y-F/R) listed in Supplementary Table S6, and ligated into pGBKT7, fused with the Gal4-DNA-binding domain (BD-WOX1 and BD-WOX18). The pGADT7 and BD-WOX1/18 vectors were cotransformed into yeast strain Y2HGold. pGBKT7-p53 + pGADT7-largeT and pGBKT7-laminC + pGADT7-largeT were positive and negative controls, respectively. The transformed yeast cells were successively cultured in SD/-Trp/-Leu and SD-Trp/-Leu/-His/-Ade/medium with or without X-α-Gal for four days.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Significance was assessed using the Student’s t-test. One or two asterisks against error bars of histograms are used to indicate means that are statistically different at p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively. “n” indicates the number of independent biological replicates. For RT-qPCR, the results are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates, mixing three independent individuals for one biological replicate).

5. Conclusions

This study identified 22 ZmWOX genes, and a systematic analysis in maize was performed based on the last B73 genome data. All ZmWOX genes can be divided into three groups, and segmental duplication may be the main contribution to ZmWOX family expansion. Some WOX genes may be evolutionarily conservative in maize, wheat, sorghum, rice, and Arabidopsis. Published transcriptome data analysis showed that, except for ZmWOX6 and ZmWOX8, the expression of other ZmWOXs displayed tissue-specific patterns, suggesting that these genes may be involved in maize growth and development. Furthermore, six members of the ZmWOX genes, ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18, responded to the abiotic stresses. Meanwhile, ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 might play opposite regulatory roles in maize responses to stress. This study provides a reference for the subsequent ZmWOX gene function verification study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25010441/s1.

Author Contributions

L.G. conceived research plans and designed experiments. X.C. and Y.H. conducted experiments. L.G. and X.C. wrote the draft. X.C., Y.H., Y.C. and B.W. analyzed the data. L.G. reviewed and edited this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 32160434]; the Guizhou Provincial Key Technology R&D Program [grant number Qian Kehe Support (2022) key026], and the Guizhou Provincial Basic Research Program (Natural Science) [grant number QKHJCZK (2022) YB305].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Robert, J.S. Interpreting the homeobox: Metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evol. Dev. 2001, 3, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wolberger, C. Homeodomain interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 6, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dolzblasz, A.; Nardmann, J.; Clerici, E.; Causier, B.; van der Graaff, E.; Chen, J.; Davies, B.; Werr, W.; Laux, T. Stem Cell Regulation by Arabidopsis WOX Genes. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1028–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, C.C.; Li, F.W.; Kramer, E.M. Large-scale phylogenomic analysis suggests three ancient superclades of the WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX transcription factor family in plants. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van der Graaff, E.; Laux, T.; Rensing, S.A. The WUS homeobox-containing (WOX) protein family. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Segatto, A.L.; Thompson, C.E.; Freitas, L.B. Molecular evolution analysis of WUSCHEL-related homeobox transcription factor family reveals functional divergence among clades in the homeobox region. Dev. Genes Evol. 2016, 226, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aichinger, E.; Kornet, N.; Friedrich, T.; Laux, T. Plant stem cell niches. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 615–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haecker, A.; Gross-Hardt, R.; Geiges, B.; Sarkar, A.; Breuninger, H.; Herrmann, M.; Laux, T. Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2004, 131, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mukherjee, K.; Brocchieri, L.; Burglin, T.R. A comprehensive classification and evolutionary analysis of plant homeobox genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26, 2775–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tang, L.; He, Y.; Liu, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, G. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization Analysis of WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox Family in Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, G.Z.; Huang, J.; Lin, Z.C.; Wang, F.; Yang, S.M.; Jiang, X.; Ahmad, S.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Lan, S.; Liu, Z.J.; et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox Gene Family in Sacred Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, X.; Hamyat, M.; Liu, C.; Ahmad, S.; Gao, X.; Guo, C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y. Identification and Characterization of the WOX Family Genes in Five Solanaceae Species Reveal Their Conserved Roles in Peptide Signaling. Genes 2018, 9, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sun, R.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.; Liu, C. Identification and Evolutionary Analysis of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) WOX Family Genes and Their Potential Function in Somatic Embryogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Riccucci, E.; Vanni, C.; Vangelisti, A.; Fambrini, M.; Giordani, T.; Cavallini, A.; Mascagni, F.; Pugliesi, C. Genome-Wide Analysis of WOX Multigene Family in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Xia, Y.; Li, Z.; Jing, D.; Du, J.; Niu, N.; Ma, S.; Wang, J.; Song, Y.; et al. Identification of the WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox (WOX) Gene Family, and Interaction and Functional Analysis of TaWOX9 and TaWUS in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, X.; Zong, J.; Liu, J.; Yin, J.; Zhang, D. Genome-wide analysis of WOX gene family in rice, sorghum, maize, Arabidopsis and poplar. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 1016–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kamiya, N.; Nagasaki, H.; Morikami, A.; Sato, Y.; Matsuoka, M. Isolation and characterization of a rice WUSCHEL-type homeobox gene that is specifically expressed in the central cells of a quiescent center in the root apical meristem. Plant J. 2003, 35, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Z.E.; Gong, Q.; Qin, W.Q.; Yang, Z.R.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, L.L.; Ge, X.Y.; Zhang, C.J.; Wu, Z.X.; Li, F.G. Genome-wide analysis of WOX genes in upland cotton and their expression pattern under different stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deveaux, Y.; Toffano-Nioche, C.; Claisse, G.; Thareau, V.; Morin, H.; Laufs, P.; Moreau, H.; Kreis, M.; Lecharny, A. Genes of the most conserved WOX clade in plants affect root and flower development in Arabidopsis. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fiume, E.; Fletcher, J.C. Regulation of Arabidopsis embryo and endosperm development by the polypeptide signaling molecule CLE8. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1000–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nardmann, J.; Reisewitz, P.; Werr, W. Discrete shoot and root stem cell-promoting WUS/WOX5 functions are an evolutionary innovation of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mayer, K.F.; Schoof, H.; Haecker, A.; Lenhard, M.; Jurgens, G.; Laux, T. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 1998, 95, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yadav, R.K.; Perales, M.; Gruel, J.; Girke, T.; Jonsson, H.; Reddy, G.V. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 2025–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kong, X.P.; Lu, S.C.; Tian, H.Y.; Ding, Z.J. WOX5 is Shining in the Root Stem Cell Niche. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 601–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shimizu, R.; Ji, J.; Kelsey, E.; Ohtsu, K.; Schnable, P.S.; Scanlon, M.J. Tissue specificity and evolution of meristematic WOX3 function. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Etchells, J.P.; Provost, C.M.; Mishra, L.; Turner, S.R. WOX4 and WOX14 act downstream of the PXY receptor kinase to regulate plant vascular proliferation independently of any role in vascular organisation. Development 2013, 140, 2224–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Denis, E.; Kbiri, N.; Mary, V.; Claisse, G.; Conde, E.S.N.; Kreis, M.; Deveaux, Y. WOX14 promotes bioactive gibberellin synthesis and vascular cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2017, 90, 560–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Romera-Branchat, M.; Ripoll, J.J.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Pelaz, S. The WOX13 homeobox gene promotes replum formation in the Arabidopsis thaliana fruit. Plant J. 2013, 73, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zhao, Y. The rice WUSCHEL-related homeobox genes are involved in reproductive organ development, hormone signaling and abiotic stress response. Gene 2014, 549, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yasui, Y.; Ohmori, Y.; Takebayashi, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Hirano, H.Y. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 acts as a key regulator in early leaf development in rice. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Dai, M.; Huang, L.; Zhou, D.X. The WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene WOX11 is required to activate shoot-borne crown root development in rice. Plant Cell. 2009, 21, 736–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Zhou, X.A. Genome-Wide Analysis of the WOX Gene Family and Function Exploration of GmWOX18 in Soybean. Plants 2019, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Han, N.; Tang, R.; Chen, X.; Xu, Z.; Ren, Z.; Wang, L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of WOX genes in Cucumis sativus. Genome 2021, 64, 761–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Minh-Thu, P.T.; Kim, J.S.; Chae, S.; Jun, K.M.; Lee, G.S.; Kim, D.E.; Cheong, J.J.; Song, S.I.; Nahm, B.H.; Kim, Y.K. A WUSCHEL Homeobox Transcription Factor, OsWOX13, Enhances Drought Tolerance and Triggers Early Flowering in Rice. Mol. Cells 2018, 41, 781–798. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Lv, J.; Feng, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, G.; Wu, T.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Han, Z. Genome-wide identification of WOX family members in nine Rosaceae species and a functional analysis of MdWOX13-1 in drought resistance. Plant Sci. 2023, 328, 111564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Scanlon, M.J.; Schneeberger, R.G.; Freeling, M. The maize mutant narrow sheath fails to establish leaf margin identity in a meristematic domain. Development 1996, 122, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nardmann, J.; Werr, W. The shoot stem cell niche in angiosperms: Expression patterns of WUS orthologues in rice and maize imply major modifications in the course of mono- and dicot evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 2492–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hoerster, G.; Wang, N.; Ryan, L.; Wu, E.; Anand, A.; McBride, K.; Lowe, K.; Jones, T.; Gordon-Kamm, B. Use of non-integrating vectors to enhance maize transformation Non-integrating WUS2 enhances transformation. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2020, 56, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, H.; Niu, L.; McHale, N.A.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Mysore, K.S.; Tadege, M. Evolutionarily conserved repressive activity of WOX proteins mediates leaf blade outgrowth and floral organ development in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, W.; Miao, X.; Qian, J.; Chen, S.; Jin, Q.; Li, M.; Han, L.; Zhong, W.; Xie, D.; Shang, X.; et al. A translatome-transcriptome multi-omics gene regulatory network reveals the complicated functional landscape of maize. Genome Biol. 2023, 24, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, C.T.; Ru, J.N.; Liu, Y.W.; Yang, J.F.; Li, M.; Xu, Z.S.; Fu, J.D. The Maize WRKY Transcription Factor ZmWRKY40 Confers Drought Resistance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Gong, S.; Yan, S.; Li, G.; Hu, G.; Ren, H.; Yang, J.; et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant maize reveals potential mechanisms to enhance salt resistance. Genes Genom. 2019, 41, 781–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gou, Z.; Qi, X.; Zhang, J. Transcriptomic Analysis Revealed the Common and Divergent Responses of Maize Seedling Leaves to Cold and Heat Stresses. Genes 2020, 11, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, F.; Tan, Z.; Fang, T.; Tang, K.; Liang, K.; Qiu, F. A Comprehensive Transcriptomics Analysis Reveals Long Non-Coding RNA to be Involved in the Key Metabolic Pathway in Response to Waterlogging Stress in Maize. Genes 2020, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lian, G.; Ding, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Xu, J. Origins and evolution of WUSCHEL-related homeobox protein family in plant kingdom. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 534140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sarkar, A.K.; Luijten, M.; Miyashima, S.; Lenhard, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Nakajima, K.; Scheres, B.; Heidstra, R.; Laux, T. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers. Nature 2007, 446, 811–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lenhard, M.; Bohnert, A.; Jurgens, G.; Laux, T. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 2001, 105, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scanlon, M.J.; Chen, K.D.; McKnight, C.I. The narrow sheath duplicate genes: Sectors of dual aneuploidy reveal ancestrally conserved gene functions during maize leaf development. Genetics 2000, 155, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aguirre, L.; Hendelman, A.; Hutton, S.F.; McCandlish, D.M.; Lippman, Z.B. Idiosyncratic and dose-dependent epistasis drives variation in tomato fruit size. Science 2023, 382, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, K.; Shi, L.; Liang, X.; Zhao, P.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Chang, Y.; Hiei, Y.; Yanagihara, C.; Du, L.; et al. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic transformation. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gu, L.; Cao, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, B.; Du, X.; Sun, Y. The Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Expression Analysis of the Strictosidine Synthase-like Family in Maize (Zea mays L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Prakash, A.; Jeffryes, M.; Bateman, A.; Finn, R.D. The HMMER Web Server for Protein Sequence Similarity Search. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2017, 60, 3-15-1–3-15-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Higo, K.; Ugawa, Y.; Iwamoto, M.; Korenaga, T. Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gu, L.; Chen, X.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhu, B.; Du, X. ZmWRKY70 activates the expression of hypoxic responsive genes in maize and enhances tolerance to submergence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zuo, D.; Hu, M.; Zhou, W.; Lei, F.; Zhao, J.; Gu, L. EcAGL enhances cadmium tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana through inhibits cadmium transport and ethylene synthesis pathway. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of WOX homologs in maize (Zm), sorghum (Sb), rice (Os), wheat (Ta), and Arabidopsis (At). The unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree building by MEGA 7.0 (10,000 bootstrap replicates) was divided into three groups. Each branch is represented by specific colors.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of WOX homologs in maize (Zm), sorghum (Sb), rice (Os), wheat (Ta), and Arabidopsis (At). The unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree building by MEGA 7.0 (10,000 bootstrap replicates) was divided into three groups. Each branch is represented by specific colors.
Ijms 25 00441 g001
Figure 2. Gene structure and conserved protein motifs of ZmWOXs. The clustering of ZmWOX genes was based on the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 1. (A) Distribution of 10 conserved motifs (differently colored boxes) in ZmWOX proteins. The common sequences of motifs 1–10 are shown in Figure S1. (B) Exon–intron structure of 22 ZmWOXs. Introns as lines.
Figure 2. Gene structure and conserved protein motifs of ZmWOXs. The clustering of ZmWOX genes was based on the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 1. (A) Distribution of 10 conserved motifs (differently colored boxes) in ZmWOX proteins. The common sequences of motifs 1–10 are shown in Figure S1. (B) Exon–intron structure of 22 ZmWOXs. Introns as lines.
Ijms 25 00441 g002
Figure 3. Gene duplication events for ZmWOX genes in the maize genome. Schematic diagram of the relationship of ZmWOX genes between chromosomes. The chromosome locations of each ZmWOX gene are shown in the figure. The heatmap in the outside circles indicates chromosome gene density. The gray lines on the inside indicate collinear gene pairs in the maize genome. The collinear ZmWOX genes are connected through red line.
Figure 3. Gene duplication events for ZmWOX genes in the maize genome. Schematic diagram of the relationship of ZmWOX genes between chromosomes. The chromosome locations of each ZmWOX gene are shown in the figure. The heatmap in the outside circles indicates chromosome gene density. The gray lines on the inside indicate collinear gene pairs in the maize genome. The collinear ZmWOX genes are connected through red line.
Ijms 25 00441 g003
Figure 4. The collinearity diagram of WOX genes between maize, wheat, sorghum, rice, and Arabidopsis. The gray line in the background represents the collinear gene pairs between the two species, and the WOX collinear genes are connected by red lines.
Figure 4. The collinearity diagram of WOX genes between maize, wheat, sorghum, rice, and Arabidopsis. The gray line in the background represents the collinear gene pairs between the two species, and the WOX collinear genes are connected by red lines.
Ijms 25 00441 g004
Figure 5. The cis-element analysis in promoter regions of ZmWOX genes. A promoter region of about 2 kb upstream of the ZmWOX genes was downloaded from the genome for analysis. Different colors represent different genes. The cis-element names and counts are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
Figure 5. The cis-element analysis in promoter regions of ZmWOX genes. A promoter region of about 2 kb upstream of the ZmWOX genes was downloaded from the genome for analysis. Different colors represent different genes. The cis-element names and counts are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
Ijms 25 00441 g005
Figure 6. The heatmap of ZmWOX gene expression levels in different maize tissue. The heatmap construction is based on the fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM) values of published RNA-seq data (Supplementary Table S4). The name of the tissues is labeled in the Figure. SAM: shoot apical meristem.
Figure 6. The heatmap of ZmWOX gene expression levels in different maize tissue. The heatmap construction is based on the fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM) values of published RNA-seq data (Supplementary Table S4). The name of the tissues is labeled in the Figure. SAM: shoot apical meristem.
Ijms 25 00441 g006
Figure 7. Heatmap of ZmWOX gene expression levels under temperature, salt, waterlogging, and drought stresses. Different stresses are labeled in the figure. The data (except drought stress) represent the mean value of three replicates of published transcriptomic data (Supplementary Table S5). For salt stress, ‘S’ indicates a salt-sensitive maize-inbred line (L29). ‘T’ indicates a salt-tolerant maize-inbred line (L87). Heatmap construction is based on the fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM) values.
Figure 7. Heatmap of ZmWOX gene expression levels under temperature, salt, waterlogging, and drought stresses. Different stresses are labeled in the figure. The data (except drought stress) represent the mean value of three replicates of published transcriptomic data (Supplementary Table S5). For salt stress, ‘S’ indicates a salt-sensitive maize-inbred line (L29). ‘T’ indicates a salt-tolerant maize-inbred line (L87). Heatmap construction is based on the fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (FPKM) values.
Ijms 25 00441 g007
Figure 8. RT-qPCR analysis of the expression of ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18 genes in maize seedlings under heat (A), cold (B), 200 mM NaCl (C), and waterlogging (D) stresses. Treatment times and conditions are labeled in the figure. Values are means ± SD; n = 3. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 compared with 0 h (Student’s t-test).
Figure 8. RT-qPCR analysis of the expression of ZmWOX1, 4, 6, 13, 16, and 18 genes in maize seedlings under heat (A), cold (B), 200 mM NaCl (C), and waterlogging (D) stresses. Treatment times and conditions are labeled in the figure. Values are means ± SD; n = 3. ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 compared with 0 h (Student’s t-test).
Ijms 25 00441 g008
Figure 9. Subcellular localization and transactivation activity assays of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. (A) Subcellular localization of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. The GFP or 35S∷ZmWOX1/18-GFP fusion expression vectors were cotransformed with mCherry (nuclear marker) into tobacco leaves using an Agrobacterium-mediated method. The GFP, mCherry, and chlorophyll autofluorescence (ChI) signals are labeled green, red, and purple, respectively. The empty GFP vector was used as a control. GFP: green fluorescent protein. Bars = 50 μm. (B) Transcription activation analysis of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 in yeast. Full-length ZmWOX1 or ZmWOX18 was fused with the GAL4-DNA BD in the pGBKT7 vector (BD-WOX1 or BD-WOX18). BD-WOX1/18 and pGADT7(AD) were cotransformed into yeast Y2H gold. The yeast cells were cultured on a synthetic dextrose medium (SD) lacking tryptophan and leucine (SD-LW), then transferred to an SD medium without tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine (SD-LWHA, containing or not containing X-α-gal) to detect interactions. The positive or negative controls are labeled in the figure, respectively.
Figure 9. Subcellular localization and transactivation activity assays of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. (A) Subcellular localization of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18. The GFP or 35S∷ZmWOX1/18-GFP fusion expression vectors were cotransformed with mCherry (nuclear marker) into tobacco leaves using an Agrobacterium-mediated method. The GFP, mCherry, and chlorophyll autofluorescence (ChI) signals are labeled green, red, and purple, respectively. The empty GFP vector was used as a control. GFP: green fluorescent protein. Bars = 50 μm. (B) Transcription activation analysis of ZmWOX1 and ZmWOX18 in yeast. Full-length ZmWOX1 or ZmWOX18 was fused with the GAL4-DNA BD in the pGBKT7 vector (BD-WOX1 or BD-WOX18). BD-WOX1/18 and pGADT7(AD) were cotransformed into yeast Y2H gold. The yeast cells were cultured on a synthetic dextrose medium (SD) lacking tryptophan and leucine (SD-LW), then transferred to an SD medium without tryptophan, leucine, histidine, and adenine (SD-LWHA, containing or not containing X-α-gal) to detect interactions. The positive or negative controls are labeled in the figure, respectively.
Ijms 25 00441 g009
Table 1. Characteristics of WOX genes in maize.
Table 1. Characteristics of WOX genes in maize.
MazieGDB IDGene NameCDS
(bp)
Protein
Size (aa)
MW
(kDa)
pISubcellular
Location
Zm00001eb015500 ZmWOX194531432.016.31Nucleus
Zm00001eb067310ZmWOX296332033.098.21Chloroplast
Zm00001eb092480ZmWOX378926227.848.37Nucleus
Zm00001eb147630 ZmWOX466622124.768.36Nucleus
Zm00001eb148390ZmWOX597532434.819.16Nucleus
Zm00001eb149680ZmWOX682227330.396.06Nucleus
Zm00001eb157360ZmWOX7155151652.907.15Nucleus
Zm00001eb180280ZmWOX82528310.0110.52Cytosol/Nucleus
Zm00001eb197430ZmWOX939913214.929.85Mitochondrion
Zm00001eb265710ZmWOX1077725827.477.13Nucleus
Zm00001eb280440ZmWOX1138112614.269.55Nucleus
Zm00001eb295920ZmWOX12151850553.267.21Nucleus
Zm00001eb330990ZmWOX1378025927.527.02Nucleus
Zm00001eb355310 ZmWOX1452517419.389.60Nucleus
Zm00001eb359810ZmWOX15154551453.247.27Mitochondrion
Zm00001eb367200ZmWOX1670823526.479.72Nucleus
Zm00001eb367990ZmWOX17102634136.779.18Nucleus
Zm00001eb368970ZmWOX1884928230.986.46Nucleus
Zm00001eb395430ZmWOX1994831532.416.84Nucleus
Zm00001eb414580ZmWOX2088529431.377.91Nucleus
Zm00001eb432140ZmWOX2175325027.728.63Chloroplast
Zm00001eb433010ZmWOX2297832533.175.56Chloroplast
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Hou, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wei, B.; Gu, L. A Comprehensive Identification and Expression Analysis of the WUSCHEL Homeobox-Containing Protein Family Reveals Their Special Role in Development and Abiotic Stress Response in Zea mays L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010441

AMA Style

Chen X, Hou Y, Cao Y, Wei B, Gu L. A Comprehensive Identification and Expression Analysis of the WUSCHEL Homeobox-Containing Protein Family Reveals Their Special Role in Development and Abiotic Stress Response in Zea mays L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(1):441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010441

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xuanxuan, Yunyan Hou, Yongyan Cao, Bo Wei, and Lei Gu. 2024. "A Comprehensive Identification and Expression Analysis of the WUSCHEL Homeobox-Containing Protein Family Reveals Their Special Role in Development and Abiotic Stress Response in Zea mays L." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 1: 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010441

APA Style

Chen, X., Hou, Y., Cao, Y., Wei, B., & Gu, L. (2024). A Comprehensive Identification and Expression Analysis of the WUSCHEL Homeobox-Containing Protein Family Reveals Their Special Role in Development and Abiotic Stress Response in Zea mays L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(1), 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010441

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop