Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles Secreted by Adipose Tissue during Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Influence Reverse Cholesterol Transport-Related Gene Expression in Human Macrophages
Next Article in Special Issue
The Synergistic Benefit of Combination Strategies Targeting Tumor Cell Polyamine Homeostasis
Previous Article in Journal
The Protective Role of Magnoliae Flos in Preventing Ovotoxicity and Managing Ovarian Function: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Insights into the Mechanisms Underlying Polyaminopathies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spermidine Synthase Localization in Retinal Layers: Early Age Changes

by
Astrid Zayas-Santiago
1,†,
Christian J. Malpica-Nieves
2,*,†,
David S. Ríos
3,
Amanda Díaz-García
4,
Paola N. Vázquez
5,
José M. Santiago
5,
David E. Rivera-Aponte
4,
Rüdiger W. Veh
6,
Miguel Méndez-González
7,
Misty Eaton
4 and
Serguei N. Skatchkov
4,8,*
1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
2
School of Chiropractic, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
3
College of Science and Health Professions, Universidad Central de Bayamón, Bayamón, PR 00960, USA
4
Department of Biochemistry, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
5
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico-Carolina, Carolina, PR 00984, USA
6
Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Zell- und Neurobiologie, Centrum 2, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
7
Department of Natural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Aguadilla, PR 00603, USA
8
Department of Physiology, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón, PR 00956, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6458; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126458
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 6 June 2024 / Accepted: 8 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polyamines in Aging and Disease)

Abstract

:
Polyamine (PA) spermidine (SPD) plays a crucial role in aging. Since SPD accumulates in glial cells, particularly in Müller retinal cells (MCs), the expression of the SPD-synthesizing enzyme spermidine synthase (SpdS) in Müller glia and age-dependent SpdS activity are not known. We used immunocytochemistry, Western blot (WB), and image analysis on rat retinae at postnatal days 3, 21, and 120. The anti-glutamine synthetase (GS) antibody was used to identify glial cells. In the neonatal retina (postnatal day 3 (P3)), SpdS was expressed in almost all progenitor cells in the neuroblast. However, by day 21 (P21), the SpdS label was pronouncedly expressed in multiple neurons, while GS labels were observed only in radial Müller glial cells. During early cell adulthood, at postnatal day 120 (P120), SpdS was observed solely in ganglion cells and a few other neurons. Western blot and semi-quantitative analyses of SpdS labeling showed a dramatic decrease in SpdS at P21 and P120 compared to P3. In conclusion, the redistribution of SpdS with aging indicates that SPD is first synthesized in all progenitor cells and then later in neurons, but not in glia. However, MCs take up and accumulate SPD, regardless of the age-associated decrease in SPD synthesis in neurons.

1. Introduction

The polyamines (PAs) spermidine (SPD) and spermine (SPM) are extremely important biomolecules and their content is critical for central nervous system (CNS) function [1,2,3,4,5,6]. PA levels decline during aging in some organs [7,8] while, in the CNS, it is relatively stable [7,9]. It is not clear if adult glial cells perform their own synthesis of PAs, or if these cells only uptake PA [10,11,12] via (i) low-affinity polyspecific organic cation transporters (OCT) such as SLC22A-1,2,3 [13] and SLC18B1 [14] and (ii) a high-affinity transporter ATP13A2/PARK9 [15,16], together with (iii) Cx43 hemichannels as an alternative pathway for PAs [17]. In fact, glial cells accumulate PAs [2,5,6,10,11,12]. Intriguingly, radiolabeled SPM [18] or biotinylated SPM (b-SPM) [6] cannot essentially pass through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The limitations are probably due to (i) low-affinity transport and (ii) low concentrations of SPM and SPD (in the sub-micromolar range [19]) in the blood plasm. Indeed, the equilibrium constants (K50) of SLC transporters are a thousand times higher (mM range [13]) than the SPD plasm level. Conversely, b-SPM enters the brain from the cerebral-spinal fluid, and the astrocytes accumulate b-SPM [6]. This demonstrates an alternative PA pathway from external sources to the CNS. Natively, Müller retinal cells accumulate SPD/SPM [12,20], similar to astrocytes [21], and SPD dietary supplements help in guarding against cell malfunction in the aging CNS [22] and in retinal neuron survival [23].
In the retina, cone photoreceptor maturation [24] requires PAs, while the loss of the ATP13A2 transporter function in astrocytes contributes to neuronal pathology [25]. PA cations bind to negatively charged phosphates, DNA, RNA, and acid proteins [26,27], but retinal glial cells accumulate SPD/SPM to high levels [28] reaching an almost 1 mM concentration of free cations SPM+4 in adult Müller retinal glial cells [29]. In contrast, mechanical brain trauma [30], ischemia [31], and gliotoxins [32] cause the massive release of PAs from glial cells [32]. Catabolic PA degradation [7,31,32,33,34,35,36], oxidation, and the production of toxic acrolein [36,37] can lead to multiple CNS diseases such as Parkinson’s [38,39,40], Alzheimer’s, [41,42], and Huntington’s [43], and PAs are also key players in EAST/SeSAME, Snyder–Robinson, Down, and Rett syndromes [11,44,45]. However, unmodified PAs (i) protect against oxidative stress [46,47,48], (ii) glutamate toxicity [33], and (iii) DNA damage [36,49], and serve in (iv) improving memory [50,51] and (v) increasing longevity [52,53,54,55,56].
In the retina, PAs regulate the glial Kir4.1 channels in Müller cells [28,45,57,58,59,60] and can permeate Kir4.1 [59]. PAs open glial Cx43 channels [61,62,63] that are expressed in Müller retinal glial cells [63] and rescue Cx43 channels from hydrogen and calcium block. In addition, PAs may permeate Cx43 [61,62,63,64,65] and open a traffic pathway for other molecules [61,62,63,64,65]. Therefore, Müller cells, astrocytes, and the glial–neuronal communication in the retina need PAs [45,62,63]. PAs are extremely effective in various CNS functions [4,50,56,66,67], and SPD has been found to ameliorate or suppress oxidative stress in an animal model of optic nerve multiple sclerosis [68]. Inhibitors of PA oxidases, such as aminoguanidine, (i) help to restore facial nerves after injury in rats [69], while (ii) MDL72527 (spermine oxidase (SMOX) inhibitor) reduces DNA damage [36]. Restoring PA content in the retina and brain helps in trauma and aging [23,50,56,70,71]. Essentially, a daily intake of SPD reduces retinal ganglion cell death and enhances optic nerve regeneration following optic nerve injury [23], whereas PA deficiency disrupts retinal pigment epithelial cell migration and survival [72].
Intriguingly, retinal concentrations of SPD and SPM increase during development, followed by a decrease after 16 postnatal days [24,73]. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (i) determine the localization of the SPD synthesis and (ii) examine possible changes in SPD synthesis with age in the rat retina. These are critical, since polyamine content in the CNS, specifically SPD, can promote longevity [53,54,55,56].
Previously, we showed that SpdS is localized in adult ganglion retinal cells [11] and in the synapses of adult brain neurons that are tightly surrounded by astrocytes [74,75]. However, there is a lack of data on (i) the age-dependent crosslink between storage and (ii) the synthesis of PAs in the retina [12]. Therefore, we investigated the localization and translocation of SPD synthase (SpdS) in the retina and SpdS age-associated changes. Since SPD controls many neuronal and glial receptors, age-dependent changes in the synthesis and content of PAs can be considered key elements of retinal function.

2. Results

2.1. Immunocytochemistry and Western Blot Analysis for Spermidine Synthase and Localization of Markers: Glutamine Synthetase in Glia, and DAPI in Nuclei

The retinae from rats in the neonatal period (3 days postnatal: P3), in the weanling period (21days postnatal: P21), and in early adulthood (120 days postnatal: P120) were analyzed for the expression of the biosynthetic enzyme spermidine synthase (SpdS). We used glutamine synthetase (GS), a specific glial marker, to identify the co-localization of spermidine synthetase in Müller retinal glial cells. DAPI, a marker of cell nuclei, was used to differentiate between retinal layers.
At the early postnatal age (P3) where cells are not yet matured, the staining process for DAPI (blue color, Figure 1a, left panel) shows two main cell layers: the ganglion cell layer (GCL, with newborn ganglion cells) and a neuroblast layer (NBL, the nuclei of most future neurons such as bipolar cells, horizontal cells (future inner nuclear layer (INL), photoreceptor cells, rods and cones (the future outer nuclear layer (ONL)). No DAPI staining was observed in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) because it is a future large synaptic zone. The outer nuclear layer (i) is not yet separated from the inner nuclear layer in NBL and (ii) the outer plexiform layer (OPL) has not yet formed.
Spermidine synthase, SpdS (the green color in Figure 1a), is already strongly expressed in (i) the area of newborn ganglion cells and (ii) in the neuroblast. At this point, young neurons are growing and differentiating from neuroglial progenitors in the NBL. SpdS is strongly expressed throughout the retinal tissue, specifically in the ganglion cell layer, where no overlap with the glial marker GS is observed. Inside the NBL, the nuclei of new neurons that synthesize spermidine are migrating along the glial fibers (Figure 1a; yellow arrows).
During this early postnatal stage, P3, we found the robust expression of glutamine synthetase, GS, (red labeling, Figure 1a) across all retinal layers. Glutamine synthetase is a vital glial marker, representing active glial radial cells. We did not use GFAP, another glial marker, because it represents reactive glia but not resting glia, while GS is a glial marker producing glutamine, which is released from glial cells and is used by neurons to produce the neurotransmitter glutamate. In P3 rats, GS was located across all layers (Figure 1a, red), given that most cells at this age are glial progenitor cells. It is also clear that glial cells surround all cell nuclei in the NBL.
When merged, the SpdS expression is mildly co-localized with GS (Figure 1a, right panel), only in the NBL and distal processes of Müller cells, but not in ganglion cells (GCL). At this stage, retinal cells in the NBL are mostly characterized by progenitors, which are not yet well differentiated into neuronal or glial types. Studying the exact type of neuronal cells is not the goal of the current study.
In P21 rats (Figure 1b) and P120 rats (Figure 1c), GS immunoreactivity was not observed in the neurons but was clearly present in all Müller cell compartments, including the somata, stalks, and distal processes in the outer nuclear layer (ONL), with strong expression in the INL (inner nuclear layer, where the bipolar cell and Müller cell somata are located), in the OPL (outer plexiform layer, where the synapses of photoreceptors are located) and in the ONL (outer nuclear layer, the layer of inner segments of photoreceptor cells, cones, and rods). Müller cells span the entire ONL, up to the outer segments of rods and cones (Figure 1b,c).
In P120 rats (Figure 1c), SpdS is most strongly expressed in the ganglion cells and their terminals and synapses in the IPL (Figure 1c, green). Weak labeling is observed in neurons of the INL. Several neurons in the INL have no SpdS staining. When merged, SpdS expression is not co-localized with GS (Figure 1c, right panel). At this stage, the ganglion cells are undergoing maturation. GS immunoreactivity is not observed in neurons but appears robustly in all Müller cell compartments, including the somata, proximal processes (stalks), and distal processes, with strong expression through the INL (where the Müller cell somata are located) and through the ONL (the layer of inner segments of the photoreceptor cells, cones, and rods). Müller cells extend their processes across all retinal layers up to the outer segments of rods and cones. GS labeling in P120 rats relates to mature glial radial cells.
As shown previously [12], in P120 rats, the accumulation of polyamine spermidine was found mostly in the proximal stalks of Müller cells around the ganglion cell body and in the endfeet of Müller cells, which also form the inner limiting membrane area (ILM) [12,20,29]. The ILM represents the Müller cell endfeet contacting the vitreous space of the retina where GS labeling is most intensive (Figure 1c), but no SpdS is found (Figure 1c, green). At this time, spermidine accumulation is found in precisely these compartments of Müller cells, where the glia lack SpdS, thus accumulating spermidine without synthesis. Intriguingly, in P120 rats, there were practically no spermidine labels in the ONL (the inner segment area of the photoreceptors) [12].

2.2. Western Blot Analysis for SpdS

Western blot analysis was used to quantify the changes in the concentration of SpdS within the whole of the retinal tissue at the three ages studied. Results showed that the amount of SpdS in the whole retina decreases with age (Figure 2). Retinae from P3 rats have 50% more SpdS protein present than the retinae of P21 and P120 rats. During early development from 3 to 21-days, SpdS activity drops dramatically, while, during the extended period of early adulthood from 21 to 120 days, the SpdS activity remains stable. There was no statistical difference in the percent fold measure between P21 and P120 rats. To evaluate the distribution of SpdS in each retinal layer, we used further semi-quantitative image analysis (Figure 3).
The loading control, β-actin, was used to normalize the data and justify stable conditions for all measurements of SpdS concentrations.

2.3. Analysis of SpdS Redistribution during Aging and between Retinal Layers

Images with SpdS fluorescence and co-localized images with both GS and SpdS obtained from confocal microscopy were analyzed using ImageJ software (version 2.1.0/1.53c), which allows for the comparison of signals. We measured the fluorescence spots in each area from three different regions of the retina where the most changes in SpdS labeling were observed during aging. For the SpdS images, we measured 15–20 fluorescence spots in 3 different cell types and regions of the retina: (i) ganglion cells in the end foot area; (ii) the inner nuclear layer (INL); and (iii) distal processes in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) in every image taken from the retinal samples. In every measurement, the images taken from retinal samples (n = 3) were analyzed (Figure 3a). It is clear that in P3 rats, the SpdS signal (Figure 3a, black columns) is slightly different between the GCL and distal processes (ONL), while in P21 (red columns), and specifically in P120 rats (grey columns), this difference became robust. For the co-localized images with GS and SpdS (Figure 3b), we measured 15–20 fluorescence spots in the inner segments of the photosensitive cells, rods, and cones located in the ONL. For both experiments, the fluorescence in each spot was measured and the mean of the spot fluorescence was imported to PRISM (Version 9.4.1 (458), GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) for statistical analysis. It is clear that there is practically no overlap of SpdS and GS signals at the P21 and P120 stages, while there is a strong overlap at the P3 age. The data clearly show the shift of SpdS labels from the multiple processes of progenitor cells and Müller cells at a young age to the neuronal body of ganglion cells, amacrine cells, and bipolar cells (in the GCL and INL retinal layers), but not in the distal processes.

3. Discussion

Recent advances in molecular biology have shown unique PA machinery and turnover in the CNS [6,17,21,35,76]. In this work, we studied SpdS behavior in the retina to find direct sources of spermidine production at different aging periods.
We made several key findings. (i) SpdS was expressed in glial progenitors during the early period of cell proliferation and differentiation (P3), but Müller cells showed no further synthesis of SPD during retinal maturation (P21) and, specifically, during yearly aging (P120). (ii) Since SpdS showed strong co-localization with neurons but not with the glial marker GS in Müller cells during maturation (P21) and during the early aging (P120) period, we concluded that neurons produce SPD. (iii) SpdS was almost exclusively expressed in ganglion cells (rarely occurring in other neurons) with age (Figure 1c), and such a translocation of SPD synthesis is associated with SPD accumulation in cell compartments called the endfeet of Müller cells, which surround the ganglion cells [12,20,28]. This indicates the local translocation of SPD from neurons to the glial endfeet. (iv) Most interestingly, the finding that, together with a near-complete decline with age of SPD content in neurons in the brain [74,75] and retina [12], the most important players that store SPD vitally are glial cells, regardless of a lack of synthesis in such adult glia.
In summary, such PA accumulation was observed in the Müller cells of different animals and in humans [11,12,20,28], showing stable evolution-associated SPD accumulation in such glia. Therefore, it is only at the earlier development stage that glial cells express PA synthesis. Similarly, cultured astrocytes showed the synthesis of polyamine putrescine (a precursor of spermidine) by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC); if ODC was inhibited, the astrocyte did not survive and did not proliferate. However, if PAs were restored by SPD supplementation [21], the survival and proliferation of astrocytes were restored. Such protection of growing glial cells by SPD was possible only if the transport systems were not inhibited from taking up SPD [21].
This makes Müller cells the key players in PA exchange. We suggest that if glial Müller cells hold spermidine regardless of the synthesis absence in such adult glia, such cells may be donors of SPD for neurons in critical times and may support neuroprotection when SPD is released from the glia. However, if glial cells lack such an accumulation (due to trauma or diseases), the aging neurons may not provide enough of their own SPD. Therefore, external sources of SPD are vitally important for retinal ganglion cell survival [23]. In the future, it will be necessary to investigate PA uptake/release mechanisms by glia using older stages of animal models and models of diseases.
Interestingly, the aging CNS suffers multiple disorders based on PA turnover malfunction, which is probably based on PA loss by glial cells. We, therefore, pose key questions for future investigation: (i) What are the mechanisms that underlie SPD redistribution and accumulation in different cells in the retina? (ii) What are the consequences of aging for SpdS relocation within the retina among the neurons and glia? Such a finding may help us to understand the dramatic PA-dependent neuronal network switch [77] and the roles of glial PA storage in retinal disorders and diseases [11,20]. Since the role of glia and SPD storage in retinal function and dysfunction are unclear, we demonstrated that there is no synthesis of SPD in the glia, while the storage of SPD was found in the glia [12]. Consequently, radial Müller glial cells are important during the development and neuronal migration of neurons, photoreceptors, and, possibly, other cells (astrocytes, endothelial cells, pigment epithelium, etc.), and are a main capacitor of SPD with aging in the retina [12]. As was observed in rabbit retinae, the concentration of PAs was found to decrease with age [24], and similar evidence was found in fractioned rat retinae [73].
In addition, glial Cx43 channels are facilitated for opening by PUT, SPD, and SPM [61,62,63,64,65], while glia-to-glia and glial-to-neuron communications are supported by PAs via connexin gap junctions between the retinal Müller glial cells [63] and between Müller cells and cones [63]. Since PAs regulate numerous ion channels [11,13,17,20,28,44,45,59,60,62,64,78,79], a release of PAs from the glia [17] may regulate neuronal receptors and channels [2,11].
Among the polyamines, SPD is found to be highest in the human brain [80] and increases in the plasm in aging humans [81], while biotinylated SPM does not permeate from the blood to the brain [6]. This mystery of such a PA increase in human plasm was interpreted as a marker of Alzheimer’s disease, but it may have the opposite meaning: that SPD is imported into the brain from the digestive system as a neuroprotector. Indeed, the intake of dietary SPD (i) increases cortical mass [82], restores age-induced memory impairment [50], improves cognitive performance [83], and restores the immune response of old human B cells [8]. Among its other roles, SPD also acts as an endogenous free radical scavenger, inhibiting the action of reactive oxygen species [39], restoring age-related memory impairment [50,55], preventing synaptic aging [56,67], preserving telomere length [84], and providing cardioprotection [54]. It was found that SPD boosts autophagy to protect from aging [55,56,66], and, as noticed above, spermidine dietary supplementation induces the regeneration of ganglion cells in the retina [23] and increases longevity [52]. However, if biotinylated SPM does not permeate the blood–brain barrier [6], there could be other as-yet unknown pathways to accumulate SPD and other PAs in the brain from either external or internal sources [6].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Tissues

Al experiments were performed under IACUC rules and approval and were in accordance with NIH requirements and the ARVO statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. All procedures were carried out in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines for the humane treatment of laboratory animals and with the approval of the Universidad Central del Caribe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, protocol # 018-2021-04-00.
Eyes were obtained from Sprague–Dawley rats (3, 21, and 120 days old) that were housed in a standard cage in a 12-h light–dark cycle room and had access to food (standard rat chow) and water freely. The rats were sacrificed and the eyes were rapidly enucleated and then processed for immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis.

4.2. Immunohistochemistry

Following enucleation, the eyes were fixed with two different solutions in glass vials for 45 min. The first solution (for spermidine synthase (SpdS) labeling) consisted of 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, P6148, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a phosphate-buffered solution at 0.1M (PBS: NaCl 136.9 mM, KCl 2.7 mM, Na2HPO4 10.1 mM, KH2PO4 1.8 mM with pH 7.4), The eyes were punctured with a 25 G needle in the ora serrata and fixed for an additional 20 min with fresh fixative solution. The eyes were washed 3 times with PBS 0.1 M before extracting the retinae in a cold PBS solution using a stereoscopic microscope (Fisher Stereomaster, FW00-20-1613, Waltham, MA, USA). The fixed retinae were embedded in 4% agarose (Gibco BRL, 15510-019, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) in PBS at 0.1 M. A Leica VT 1000 S Vibratome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to create 20 μm retinal sections.
Samples were moved to a 24-well plate and permeabilized for 20 min with 1% DMSO (MP Biomedicals, 02196055, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma, T9284) in PBS 0.1 M solution. The permeabilization solution was removed and replaced with a blocking solution containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, A4503) and either 5% normal horse serum (Vector, S-2000, Burlingame, CA, USA) or 5% normal goat serum (Vector, S-1000), depending on the secondary antibody, with 1% DMSO (MP, 196055) and 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma, T9284) in PBS 0.1 M for 1 h. The blocking solution was replaced with a fresh solution containing primary antibodies and left shaking overnight at 4 °C.
The following primary antibodies were used for the detection of glutamine synthetase (GS) (mouse anti-glutamine synthetase (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA, MABN1182, dilution 1:250)); spermidine synthase (SpdS) (unconjugated rabbit polyclonal anti-spermidine synthase (Abcam, ab111884, dilution 1:250)) and SPD (Abcam, anti-spermidine ab7318, 1/100, Cambridge, UK) were used to determine SPD localization. (Note: since the SPD antibodies have a weak cross-reaction with SPM (reported by the company), we will use the terminology SPD immunolabel. The antibody for GS and for SpdS had strong immunoreactivity without cross-reactivity. After retinal section incubation with the primary antibody, the primary antibody aliquot was removed and the permeabilization solution was used to wash the samples 3 times for 10 min while shaking. Then, green fluorescence anti-rabbit FITC (Vector, Fl-1000, 1:200) and red fluorescence anti-mouse Texas Red (Vector, Tl-2000, 1:200) were used while diluted in the permeabilization solution and were added to the samples. The 24-well plate was covered from light and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C while shaking. Samples were washed 3 times for 10 min with PBS 0.1 M and once with distilled water. The tissues were then mounted on slides, left to dry for 5 min, and Fluoroshield with DAPI (Sigma, F6057) or Hard Set Vectashield with nuclear stain DAPI (Vector, H-1500) was added before sealing with coverslips. Therefore, all retinal samples were triple-labeled: with GS, a specific marker of glial cells; with SpdS, a marker of spermidine synthesis; and with DAPI, a marker of nuclei and retinal layers.

4.3. Confocal Microscopy

Confocal images were acquired using an Olympus BX60 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) outfitted with the Olympus FV1000 confocal laser-scanning system. Images were taken using 40× magnification. To ensure veracity, experiments were performed in triplicate. All images were taken using image processing with the Fluoview program, ImageJ (NIH), when all key sets of confocal parameters were the same for all captured images. Adobe Photoshop was used to create the figures.

4.4. Western Blot Analysis

The tissue homogenization buffer (pH 7.5) contained (in mM): 20 Tris–HCl, 150 NaCl, 1.0 EDTA, 1.0 EGTA, 1.0 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1% Triton X-100, and an additional mixture of protease inhibitors (leupeptin, bestatin, pepstatin, and aprotinin). Proteins were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide–SDS gel (20 µg to 80 µg of protein/lane). Electroblotting was performed using the trans-blot turbo transfer system (cat. #1704150, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with Odyssey Blocking Buffer (cat. #927-40,000, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The primary antibodies used to immunodetect the proteins assessed in this study were: anti-rabbit SpdS antibody; 1:5000 (cat. #ab111884, Abcam, Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge, UK) in blocking solution. These were incubated overnight at 4 °C. For the secondary antibodies, we used goat anti-rabbit 1:25,000 (cat. #926-32211, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Our loading control was β-actin; therefore, we used an anti-mouse β-actin antibody, 1:5000 (cat. #A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After that, we used goat anti-mouse 1:25,000 (cat. #926-32210, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) as the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Infrared signals from the membranes were detected using the LICOR Odyssey model CLx scanner (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). The membranes were stained with India ink for total protein to quantify small differences in the sample loading. Final detection was performed with the enhanced chemiluminescence methodology (SuperSignal® West Dura Extended Duration Substrate; Rockford, IL, USA), as described by the manufacturer, and the signal was quantified using a gel documentation system (ChemiDoc, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The image was obtained using the Image Lab software (Version 6.1, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.5. Semi-Quantitative Image Analysis of Fluorescent Staining

All images were analyzed using ImageJ software (version 2.1.0/1.53c). We measured 7 fluorescence spots in 3 different regions of the retina: (i) the endfoot area, (ii) the inner nuclear layer, and (iii) the distal processes of the Müller cells (outer limiting membrane area) in every image taken of the retinal samples (n = 3). Images with the SpdS fluorescence and co-localized images with (GS and SpdS) obtained from confocal microscopy were analyzed using ImageJ software (version 2.1.0/1.53c). For the SpdS images, we measured 15–20 fluorescence spots in 3 different cell types and regions of the retina: (i) ganglion cells in the end foot area, (ii) neuroblast in the inner nuclear layer, and (iii) distal processes in the outer nuclear layer in every image taken of the retinal samples. For the colocalized images with GS and SpdS, we measured 15–20 fluorescence spots in the outer segments—the photosensitive segments of the photoreceptors. For both experiments, the fluorescence in each spot was measured, and the mean of the spot fluorescence was imported to PRISM (Version 9.4.1 (458), GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) for statistical analysis.

4.6. Data Analysis and Statistics

A two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparison test) was used to compare the mean fluorescence of the SpdS samples and a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (Tukey’s multiple comparison test) was used to compare the mean fluorescence of the colocalized samples. Statistical difference was established to be represented by p-values of lower than 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.N.S., R.W.V. and M.E.; research plan: A.Z.-S., M.E., R.W.V., D.E.R.-A. and S.N.S.; immunocytochemical data acquisition: A.Z.-S., D.E.R.-A., A.D.-G. and S.N.S.; Western blot data acquisition and analyses: D.E.R.-A., C.J.M.-N., P.N.V., J.M.S., M.E. and S.N.S.; optical image analysis and graphics: C.J.M.-N., M.M.-G. and S.N.S. resources: A.Z.-S., M.E., S.N.S. and UCC-core; supervision: A.Z.-S., M.E. and S.N.S.; visualization: A.Z.-S., D.S.R., C.J.M.-N., D.E.R.-A. and S.N.S.; writing of the initial part of the manuscript: A.Z.-S., C.J.M.-N. and S.N.S.; finalizing the manuscript: M.E., C.J.M.-N., R.W.V., A.Z.-S., D.E.R.-A., M.M.-G. and S.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS-R01-NS065201 and R15NS116478 to SNS); the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD-G12 MD007583 for the institutional core facilities). This work was also supported by the US Department of Education: (USDE-Title-VPO31S130068 to A.Z-S) and U54-MD007587. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Universidad Central del Caribe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted according to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. A breeding colony was established using Sprague–Dawley rats obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Protocol number #018-2021-04-00; approval date: March 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Additional data supporting the conclusions of this finding will be made available without undue reservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Priscila Sanabria, director of the Imagine Center, for excellent optical imaging facility assistance; Betzaida Torres, supervisor of the animal resources center, for the exquisite care of our animals; Yanitza Perez for animal care and assistance in experiments; Zorelys Padua, Yael Piñero, and Santos Santos for their valuable help in and contribution to the experiments, Wined Ramirez Lopes, Luis Rojas, ad Diana Fernandez for scientific discussions, advice, and student care, and Jennifer Guzman and Vicmag Cabrera for their organizational help and contribution to the finalization of this project and for their great scientific, administrative, and technical help.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that can be identified as influencing the impartiality of the research presented herein.

References

  1. Piletz, J.E.; Aricioglu, F.; Cheng, J.-T.; Fairbanks, C.A.; Gilad, V.H.; Haenisch, B.; Halaris, A.; Hong, S.; Lee, J.E.; Li, J.; et al. Agmatine: Clinical Applications after 100 Years in Translation. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 880–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Skatchkov, S.; Woodbury, M.; Eaton, M. The Role of Glia in Stress: Polyamines and Brain Disorders. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 37, 653–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miller-Fleming, L.; Olin-Sandoval, V.; Campbell, K.; Ralser, M. Remaining Mysteries of Molecular Biology: The Role of Polyamines in the Cell. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 3389–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Laube, G.; Bernstein, H.-G. Agmatine: Multifunctional Arginine Metabolite and Magic Bullet in Clinical Neuroscience? Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 2619–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rieck, J.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Derst, C.; Eaton, M.J.; Veh, R.W. Unique Chemistry, Intake, and Metabolism of Polyamines in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and Its Body. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weiss, T.; Bernard, R.; Laube, G.; Rieck, J.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Veh, R.W. As Verified with the Aid of Biotinylated Spermine, the Brain Cannot Take up Polyamines from the Bloodstream Leaving It Solely Dependent on Local Biosynthesis. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nishimura, K.; Shiina, R.; Kashiwagi, K.; Igarashi, K. Decrease in Polyamines with Aging and Their Ingestion from Food and Drink. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, H.; Alsaleh, G.; Feltham, J.; Sun, Y.; Napolitano, G.; Riffelmacher, T.; Charles, P.; Frau, L.; Hublitz, P.; Yu, Z.; et al. Polyamines Control eIF5A Hypusination, TFEB Translation, and Autophagy to Reverse B Cell Senescence. Mol. Cell 2019, 76, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Minois, N.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Madeo, F. Polyamines in Aging and Disease. Aging 2011, 3, 716–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Laube, G.; Veh, R.W. Astrocytes, Not Neurons, Show Most Prominent Staining for Spermidine/Spermine-like Immunoreactivity in Adult Rat Brain. Glia 1997, 19, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Skatchkov, S.N.; Antonov, S.M.; Eaton, M.J. Glia and Glial Polyamines. Role in Brain Function in Health and Disease. Biochem. Moscow. Suppl. Ser. A 2016, 10, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ríos, D.S.; Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Díaz-García, A.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Changes in the Localization of Polyamine Spermidine in the Rat Retina with Age. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sala-Rabanal, M.; Li, D.C.; Dake, G.R.; Kurata, H.T.; Inyushin, M.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Nichols, C.G. Polyamine Transport by the Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 1450–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hiasa, M.; Miyaji, T.; Haruna, Y.; Takeuchi, T.; Harada, Y.; Moriyama, S.; Yamamoto, A.; Omote, H.; Moriyama, Y. Identification of a Mammalian Vesicular Polyamine Transporter. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Estrada-Cuzcano, A.; Martin, S.; Chamova, T.; Synofzik, M.; Timmann, D.; Holemans, T.; Andreeva, A.; Reichbauer, J.; De Rycke, R.; Chang, D.-I.; et al. Loss-of-Function Mutations in the ATP13A2/PARK9 Gene Cause Complicated Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (SPG78). Brain 2017, 140, 287–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dang, T.; Cao, W.-J.; Zhao, R.; Lu, M.; Hu, G.; Qiao, C. ATP13A2 Protects Dopaminergic Neurons in Parkinson’s Disease: From Biology to Pathology. J. Biomed. Res. 2022, 36, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera, Y.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Phanstiel, O.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Uptake of Biotinylated Spermine in Astrocytes: Effect of Cx43 siRNA, HIV-Tat Protein and Polyamine Transport Inhibitor on Polyamine Uptake. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shin, W.W.; Fong, W.F.; Pang, S.F.; Wong, P.C. Limited Blood-Brain Barrier Transport of Polyamines. J. Neurochem. 1985, 44, 1056–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sanayama, H.; Ito, K.; Ookawara, S.; Uemura, T.; Sakiyama, Y.; Sugawara, H.; Tabei, K.; Igarashi, K.; Soda, K. Whole Blood Spermine/Spermidine Ratio as a New Indicator of Sarcopenia Status in Older Adults. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Krusek, J.; Veh, R.W.; Biedermann, B.; Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Orkand, R.K.; Reichenbach, A. Spatial Distribution of Spermine/Spermidine Content and K(+)-Current Rectification in Frog Retinal Glial (Müller) Cells. Glia 2000, 31, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Tejeda-Bayron, F.A.; Mayor, A.M.; Phanstiel, O.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. The Involvement of Polyamine Uptake and Synthesis Pathways in the Proliferation of Neonatal Astrocytes. Amino Acids 2020, 52, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, Y.; Piao, C.; Beuschel, C.B.; Toppe, D.; Kollipara, L.; Bogdanow, B.; Maglione, M.; Lützkendorf, J.; See, J.C.K.; Huang, S.; et al. eIF5A Hypusination, Boosted by Dietary Spermidine, Protects from Premature Brain Aging and Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 108941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Noro, T.; Namekata, K.; Kimura, A.; Guo, X.; Azuchi, Y.; Harada, C.; Nakano, T.; Tsuneoka, H.; Harada, T. Spermidine Promotes Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Optic Nerve Regeneration in Adult Mice Following Optic Nerve Injury. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Withrow, C.; Ashraf, S.; O’Leary, T.; Johnson, L.R.; Fitzgerald, M.E.C.; Johnson, D.A. Effect of Polyamine Depletion on Cone Photoreceptors of the Developing Rabbit Retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3081–3090. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsunemi, T.; Ishiguro, Y.; Yoroisaka, A.; Valdez, C.; Miyamoto, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Saiki, S.; Akamatsu, W.; Hattori, N.; Krainc, D. Astrocytes Protect Human Dopaminergic Neurons from α-Synuclein Accumulation and Propagation. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 8618–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Watanabe, S.; Kusama-Eguchi, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Igarashi, K. Estimation of Polyamine Binding to Macromolecules and ATP in Bovine Lymphocytes and Rat Liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20803–20809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. D’Agostino, L.; di Pietro, M.; Di Luccia, A. Nuclear Aggregates of Polyamines. IUBMB Life 2006, 58, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Biedermann, B.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Brunk, I.; Bringmann, A.; Pannicke, T.; Bernstein, H.G.; Faude, F.; Germer, A.; Veh, R.; Reichenbach, A. Spermine/Spermidine Is Expressed by Retinal Glial (Muller) Cells and Controls Distinct K+ Channels of Their Membrane. Glia 1998, 23, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Shuba, Y.M.; Antonov, S.M.; Inyushin, M.Y.; Cubano, L.; Pearson, W.L.; Kurata, H.; Reichenbach, A.; Veh, R.W.; Nichols, C.G.; et al. Complex Rectification of Muller Cell Kir Currents. Glia 2008, 56, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zahedi, K.; Huttinger, F.; Morrison, R.; Murray-Stewart, T.; Casero, R.A.; Strauss, K.I. Polyamine Catabolism Is Enhanced after Traumatic Brain Injury. J. Neurotrauma 2010, 27, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adibhatla, R.M.; Hatcher, J.F.; Sailor, K.; Dempsey, R.J. Polyamines and Central Nervous System Injury: Spermine and Spermidine Decrease Following Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Brain Res. 2002, 938, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kovács, Z.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Veh, R.W.; Szabó, Z.; Németh, K.; Szabó, P.T.; Kardos, J.; Héja, L. Critical Role of Astrocytic Polyamine and GABA Metabolism in Epileptogenesis. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2022, 15, 787319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gilad, G.M.; Gilad, V.H. Treatment with Polyamines Can Prevent Monosodium Glutamate Neurotoxicity in the Rat Retina. Life Sci. 1989, 44, 1963–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cervetto, C.; Averna, M.; Vergani, L.; Pedrazzi, M.; Amato, S.; Pelassa, S.; Giuliani, S.; Baldini, F.; Maura, G.; Mariottini, P.; et al. Reactive Astrocytosis in a Mouse Model of Chronic Polyamine Catabolism Activation. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cervelli, M.; Averna, M.; Vergani, L.; Pedrazzi, M.; Amato, S.; Fiorucci, C.; Rossi, M.N.; Maura, G.; Mariottini, P.; Cervetto, C.; et al. The Involvement of Polyamines Catabolism in the Crosstalk between Neurons and Astrocytes in Neurodegeneration. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Uemura, T.; Matsunaga, M.; Yokota, Y.; Takao, K.; Furuchi, T. Inhibition of Polyamine Catabolism Reduces Cellular Senescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sakamoto, A.; Terui, Y.; Igarashi, K.; Kashiwagi, K. Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) Channel Mediates Acrolein Cytotoxicity in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Damier, P.; Kastner, A.; Agid, Y.; Hirsch, E.C. Does Monoamine Oxidase Type B Play a Role in Dopaminergic Nerve Cell Death in Parkinson’s Disease? Neurology 1996, 46, 1262–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sharma, S.; Kumar, P.; Deshmukh, R. Neuroprotective Potential of Spermidine against Rotenone Induced Parkinson’s Disease in Rats. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 116, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vrijsen, S.; Houdou, M.; Cascalho, A.; Eggermont, J.; Vangheluwe, P. Polyamines in Parkinson’s Disease: Balancing Between Neurotoxicity and Neuroprotection. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2023, 92, 435–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wirth, M.; Schwarz, C.; Benson, G.; Horn, N.; Buchert, R.; Lange, C.; Köbe, T.; Hetzer, S.; Maglione, M.; Michael, E.; et al. Effects of Spermidine Supplementation on Cognition and Biomarkers in Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SmartAge)-Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2019, 11, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Polis, B.; Karasik, D.; Samson, A.O. Alzheimer’s Disease as a Chronic Maladaptive Polyamine Stress Response. Aging 2021, 13, 10770–10795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guerra, G.P.; Rubin, M.A.; Mello, C.F. Modulation of Learning and Memory by Natural Polyamines. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 112, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sala-Rabanal, M.; Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Nichols, C.G. Molecular Mechanisms of EAST/SeSAME Syndrome Mutations in Kir4.1 (KCNJ10). J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 36040–36048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Olsen, M.L.; Khakh, B.S.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Zhou, M.; Lee, C.J.; Rouach, N. New Insights on Astrocyte Ion Channels: Critical for Homeostasis and Neuron-Glia Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 13827–13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pegg, A.E.; Casero, R.A. Current Status of the Polyamine Research Field. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 720, 3–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pegg, A.E. The Function of Spermine. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bang, E.; Park, C.; Hwangbo, H.; Shim, J.-H.; Leem, S.-H.; Hyun, J.W.; Kim, G.-Y.; Choi, Y.H. Spermidine Attenuates High Glucose-Induced Oxidative Damage in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells by Inhibiting Production of ROS and NF-κB/NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Igarashi, K.; Kashiwagi, K. Polyamine Modulon in Escherichia Coli: Genes Involved in the Stimulation of Cell Growth by Polyamines. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gupta, V.K.; Scheunemann, L.; Eisenberg, T.; Mertel, S.; Bhukel, A.; Koemans, T.S.; Kramer, J.M.; Liu, K.S.; Schroeder, S.; Stunnenberg, H.G.; et al. Restoring Polyamines Protects from Age-Induced Memory Impairment in an Autophagy-Dependent Manner. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fabbrin, S.B.; Girardi, B.A.; de Lorena Wendel, A.; Coelho Ilha Valin, C.; Pillat, M.M.; Viero, F.T.; Mello, C.F.; Rubin, M.A. Spermidine-Induced Improvement of Memory Consolidation Involves PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway. Brain Res. Bull. 2020, 164, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Eisenberg, T.; Knauer, H.; Schauer, A.; Buttner, S.; Ruckenstuhl, C.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Ring, J.; Schroeder, S.; Magnes, C.; Antonacci, L.; et al. Induction of Autophagy by Spermidine Promotes Longevity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1305–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hofer, S.J.; Simon, A.K.; Bergmann, M.; Eisenberg, T.; Kroemer, G.; Madeo, F. Mechanisms of Spermidine-Induced Autophagy and Geroprotection. Nat. Aging 2022, 2, 1112–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eisenberg, T.; Abdellatif, M.; Schroeder, S.; Primessnig, U.; Stekovic, S.; Pendl, T.; Harger, A.; Schipke, J.; Zimmermann, A.; Schmidt, A.; et al. Cardioprotection and Lifespan Extension by the Natural Polyamine Spermidine. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1428–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sigrist, S.J.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Gupta, V.K.; Bhukel, A.; Mertel, S.; Eisenberg, T.; Madeo, F. Spermidine-Triggered Autophagy Ameliorates Memory during Aging. Autophagy 2014, 10, 178–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bhukel, A.; Madeo, F.; Sigrist, S.J. Spermidine Boosts Autophagy to Protect from Synapse Aging. Autophagy 2017, 13, 444–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Oliver, D.; Hahn, H.; Antz, C.; Ruppersberg, J.P.; Fakler, B. Interaction of Permeant and Blocking Ions in Cloned Inward-Rectifier K+ Channels. Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 2318–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Oliver, D.; Baukrowitz, T.; Fakler, B. Polyamines as Gating Molecules of Inward-Rectifier K+ Channels. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 5824–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Pearson, W.L.; Kurata, H.T.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Nichols, C.G. Polyamine Permeation and Rectification of Kir4.1 Channels. Channels 2007, 1, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nichols, C.G.; Lee, S.-J. Polyamines and Potassium Channels: A 25-Year Romance. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 18779–18788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Benedikt, J.; Inyushin, M.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Rivera, Y.; Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Nichols, C.G.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. Intracellular Polyamines Enhance Astrocytic Coupling. Neuroreport 2012, 23, 1021–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Benedikt, J.; Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Rivera, Y.; Méndez-González, M.; Nichols, C.G.; Veh, R.W.; Eaton, M.J.; Skatchkov, S.N. The Polyamine Spermine Potentiates the Propagation of Negatively Charged Molecules through the Astrocytic Syncytium. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zayas-Santiago, A.; Agte, S.; Rivera, Y.; Benedikt, J.; Ulbricht, E.; Karl, A.; Dávila, J.; Savvinov, A.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Inyushin, M.; et al. Unidirectional Photoreceptor-to-Müller Glia Coupling and Unique K+ Channel Expression in Caiman Retina. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Skatchkov, S.N.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Benedikt, J.; Inyushin, M.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V. Intracellular Spermine Prevents Acid-Induced Uncoupling of Cx43 Gap Junction Channels. Neuroreport 2015, 26, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Benedikt, J.; Cubano, L.A.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Bukauskas, F.F.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V. Polyamines Preserve Connexin 43-Mediated Gap Junctional Communication during Intracellular Hypercalcemia and Acidosis. Neuroreport 2017, 28, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Madeo, F.; Eisenberg, T.; Pietrocola, F.; Kroemer, G. Spermidine in Health and Disease. Science 2018, 359, eaan2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Maglione, M.; Kochlamazashvili, G.; Eisenberg, T.; Rácz, B.; Michael, E.; Toppe, D.; Stumpf, A.; Wirth, A.; Zeug, A.; Müller, F.E.; et al. Spermidine Protects from Age-Related Synaptic Alterations at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber-CA3 Synapses. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Guo, X.; Harada, C.; Namekata, K.; Kimura, A.; Mitamura, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Matsumoto, Y.; Harada, T. Spermidine Alleviates Severity of Murine Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 2696–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gilad, V.H.; Tetzlaff, W.G.; Rabey, J.M.; Gilad, G.M. Accelerated Recovery Following Polyamines and Aminoguanidine Treatment after Facial Nerve Injury in Rats. Brain Res. 1996, 724, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ghosh, I.; Sankhe, R.; Mudgal, J.; Arora, D.; Nampoothiri, M. Spermidine, an Autophagy Inducer, as a Therapeutic Strategy in Neurological Disorders. Neuropeptides 2020, 83, 102083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sturman, J.A.; Ingoglia, N.A.; Lindquist, T.D. Interconversion of Putrescine, Spermidine and Spermine in Goldfish and Rat Retina. Life Sci. 1976, 19, 719–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Johnson, D.A.; Fields, C.; Fallon, A.; Fitzgerald, M.E.C.; Viar, M.J.; Johnson, L.R. Polyamine-Dependent Migration of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 1228–1233. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ientile, R.; Russo, P.; Macaione, S. Polyamine Localization and Biosynthesis in Chemically Fractionated Rat Retina. J. Neurochem. 1986, 47, 1356–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Krauss, M.; Weiss, T.; Langnaese, K.; Richter, K.; Kowski, A.; Veh, R.W.; Laube, G. Cellular and Subcellular Rat Brain Spermidine Synthase Expression Patterns Suggest Region-Specific Roles for Polyamines, Including Cerebellar Pre-Synaptic Function. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Krauss, M.; Langnaese, K.; Richter, K.; Brunk, I.; Wieske, M.; Ahnert-Hilger, G.; Veh, R.W.; Laube, G. Spermidine Synthase Is Prominently Expressed in the Striatal Patch Compartment and in Putative Interneurones of the Matrix Compartment. J. Neurochem. 2006, 97, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Seiler, N. Catabolism of Polyamines. Amino Acids 2004, 26, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rozov, A.; Burnashev, N. Polyamine-Dependent Facilitation of Postsynaptic AMPA Receptors Counteracts Paired-Pulse Depression. Nature 1999, 401, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ahern, G.P.; Wang, X.; Miyares, R.L. Polyamines Are Potent Ligands for the Capsaicin Receptor TRPV1 *. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 8991–8995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Maksaev, G.; Yuan, P.; Nichols, C.G. Blockade of TRPV Channels by Intracellular Spermine. J. Gen. Physiol. 2023, 155, e202213273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Morrison, L.D.; Kish, S.J. Brain Polyamine Levels Are Altered in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 197, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wortha, S.M.; Frenzel, S.; Bahls, M.; Habes, M.; Wittfeld, K.; Van der Auwera, S.; Bülow, R.; Zylla, S.; Friedrich, N.; Nauck, M.; et al. Association of Spermidine Plasma Levels with Brain Aging in a Population-Based Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2023, 19, 1832–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Schwarz, C.; Horn, N.; Benson, G.; Wrachtrup Calzado, I.; Wurdack, K.; Pechlaner, R.; Grittner, U.; Wirth, M.; Flöel, A. Spermidine Intake Is Associated with Cortical Thickness and Hippocampal Volume in Older Adults. Neuroimage 2020, 221, 117132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Schroeder, S.; Hofer, S.J.; Zimmermann, A.; Pechlaner, R.; Dammbrueck, C.; Pendl, T.; Marcello, G.M.; Pogatschnigg, V.; Bergmann, M.; Müller, M.; et al. Dietary Spermidine Improves Cognitive Function. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 108985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wirth, A.; Wolf, B.; Huang, C.-K.; Glage, S.; Hofer, S.J.; Bankstahl, M.; Bär, C.; Thum, T.; Kahl, K.G.; Sigrist, S.J.; et al. Novel Aspects of Age-Protection by Spermidine Supplementation Are Associated with Preserved Telomere Length. Geroscience 2021, 43, 673–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Localization of spermidine synthase (SpdS) in progenitors and adult neurons, but not in glial Müller cells. (a) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 3-day-old (newborn: P3) rat retina. SpdS (green) is strongly expressed in the nuclei of retinal progenitors, including new neurons migrating along the glial fibers (yellow arrows) in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and in the neuroblast layer (NBL). SpdS is, therefore, expressed in all cell types at this early stage of retinal development. (Scale = 20 µm; GCL—ganglion cell layer; IPL—inner plexiform layer, the developing synaptic area; NBL—neuroblast layer, the proliferative zone of the inner optic cup, consisting of retinal progenitor cells). (b) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 21-day-old (weanling: P21) rat retina. (A)—SpdS (green) is localized in the neuronal cells: in ganglion cell bodies and in cells in the inner nuclear layer, while GS is in the glial cells. No co-localization was found between GS and SpdS. The insert shows Müller cells (red) and no co-localization with SpdS (green). (B)—The enlarged representation of the absence of co-localization of SpdS and GS, taken randomly from the inner nuclear layer of a P21 rat. (Scale = 20 µm; ILM—inner limiting membrane, where the endfeet of Müller cells make a border between the retina and vitreal humor; GCL—ganglion cell layer where the ganglion cell bodies are surrounded by Müller cell processes; INL—inner nuclear layer, the neuronal bodies, the cell nuclei of young bipolar, horizontal cells and Müller cells; OPL—outer plexiform layer, the synaptic area between photoreceptors and bipolar cells; ONL—outer nuclear layer, the bodies of rod and cone photoreceptors). (c) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 120-day-old (young adult: P120) rat retina. SpdS (green) has been localized in the neurons (ganglion cells, bipolar cells and synapses), but not in the Müller cell compartments. Compared to the P21 retina (b), SpdS is less pronounced in the neurons of these older rats. (Scale = 20 µm; ILM—inner limiting membrane where the endfeet of Müller cells make a border between the retina and vitreal humor; GCL—ganglion cell layer; INL—inner nuclear layer, the neuronal bodies of bipolar, horizontal cells and Müller cells; OPL—outer plexiform layer, the synaptic area between photoreceptors and bipolar cells; ONL—outer nuclear layer, the cell nuclei of the rod and cone photoreceptors).
Figure 1. Localization of spermidine synthase (SpdS) in progenitors and adult neurons, but not in glial Müller cells. (a) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 3-day-old (newborn: P3) rat retina. SpdS (green) is strongly expressed in the nuclei of retinal progenitors, including new neurons migrating along the glial fibers (yellow arrows) in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and in the neuroblast layer (NBL). SpdS is, therefore, expressed in all cell types at this early stage of retinal development. (Scale = 20 µm; GCL—ganglion cell layer; IPL—inner plexiform layer, the developing synaptic area; NBL—neuroblast layer, the proliferative zone of the inner optic cup, consisting of retinal progenitor cells). (b) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 21-day-old (weanling: P21) rat retina. (A)—SpdS (green) is localized in the neuronal cells: in ganglion cell bodies and in cells in the inner nuclear layer, while GS is in the glial cells. No co-localization was found between GS and SpdS. The insert shows Müller cells (red) and no co-localization with SpdS (green). (B)—The enlarged representation of the absence of co-localization of SpdS and GS, taken randomly from the inner nuclear layer of a P21 rat. (Scale = 20 µm; ILM—inner limiting membrane, where the endfeet of Müller cells make a border between the retina and vitreal humor; GCL—ganglion cell layer where the ganglion cell bodies are surrounded by Müller cell processes; INL—inner nuclear layer, the neuronal bodies, the cell nuclei of young bipolar, horizontal cells and Müller cells; OPL—outer plexiform layer, the synaptic area between photoreceptors and bipolar cells; ONL—outer nuclear layer, the bodies of rod and cone photoreceptors). (c) Spermidine synthase (SpdS) and glutamine synthetase (GS) immunolabeling in a 120-day-old (young adult: P120) rat retina. SpdS (green) has been localized in the neurons (ganglion cells, bipolar cells and synapses), but not in the Müller cell compartments. Compared to the P21 retina (b), SpdS is less pronounced in the neurons of these older rats. (Scale = 20 µm; ILM—inner limiting membrane where the endfeet of Müller cells make a border between the retina and vitreal humor; GCL—ganglion cell layer; INL—inner nuclear layer, the neuronal bodies of bipolar, horizontal cells and Müller cells; OPL—outer plexiform layer, the synaptic area between photoreceptors and bipolar cells; ONL—outer nuclear layer, the cell nuclei of the rod and cone photoreceptors).
Ijms 25 06458 g001
Figure 2. Western blot analysis of SpdS content during aging in the whole retina. Quantification of spermidine synthase (SpdS) using Western blot analysis. The graph displays the quantification of the chemiluminescence intensity ± the standard error of the mean (SEM) of SpdS protein in whole retina lysates from rats of 3, 21, and 120 days old. SpdS was detected as a band at 34 kDa, which is consistent with the predicted molecular weight of spermidine synthase. The results of 3 separate experiments using different rats are shown. The asterisks indicate a significant difference from control (P3) to (P21) and (P120), but no difference was seen between P21 and P120. (one-way ANOVA). β-Actin was used as a loading control to normalize the data. (One-way ANOVA results: ***; p < 0.001, values depicted are mean + SEM; n = 3, p = 0.0003; F (2,6) = 43.40).
Figure 2. Western blot analysis of SpdS content during aging in the whole retina. Quantification of spermidine synthase (SpdS) using Western blot analysis. The graph displays the quantification of the chemiluminescence intensity ± the standard error of the mean (SEM) of SpdS protein in whole retina lysates from rats of 3, 21, and 120 days old. SpdS was detected as a band at 34 kDa, which is consistent with the predicted molecular weight of spermidine synthase. The results of 3 separate experiments using different rats are shown. The asterisks indicate a significant difference from control (P3) to (P21) and (P120), but no difference was seen between P21 and P120. (one-way ANOVA). β-Actin was used as a loading control to normalize the data. (One-way ANOVA results: ***; p < 0.001, values depicted are mean + SEM; n = 3, p = 0.0003; F (2,6) = 43.40).
Ijms 25 06458 g002
Figure 3. Semi-quantitative analysis of SpdS redistribution during aging and between retinal layers from 3-, 21-, and 120-day-old rat retinae. (a) SpdS fluorescence comparison between three retinal layers (ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and neuro blast (NBL). The NBL contains the future inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) where the distal processes of Müller cells are passing through. In the graph, the statistical difference within a group (same day) is shown. In addition, there were statistical differences among the groups in the endfoot (P3 vs. P120 and P21 vs. P120) and somatic area (P3 vs. P21 and P21 vs. P120). Distal processes (ONL) did not present any statistical difference. (b) Colocalization of the fluorescence showed by SpdS and GS was measured. The 3-day-old rat retina demonstrated major colocalization compared with 21- and 120-day-old rats’ retinae. In both panels (a,b), the samples with an asterisk (*) indicate p-values lower than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered statistically different. (ns) indicates that there was no statistical difference among the samples.
Figure 3. Semi-quantitative analysis of SpdS redistribution during aging and between retinal layers from 3-, 21-, and 120-day-old rat retinae. (a) SpdS fluorescence comparison between three retinal layers (ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), and neuro blast (NBL). The NBL contains the future inner nuclear layer (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) where the distal processes of Müller cells are passing through. In the graph, the statistical difference within a group (same day) is shown. In addition, there were statistical differences among the groups in the endfoot (P3 vs. P120 and P21 vs. P120) and somatic area (P3 vs. P21 and P21 vs. P120). Distal processes (ONL) did not present any statistical difference. (b) Colocalization of the fluorescence showed by SpdS and GS was measured. The 3-day-old rat retina demonstrated major colocalization compared with 21- and 120-day-old rats’ retinae. In both panels (a,b), the samples with an asterisk (*) indicate p-values lower than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval, which was considered statistically different. (ns) indicates that there was no statistical difference among the samples.
Ijms 25 06458 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zayas-Santiago, A.; Malpica-Nieves, C.J.; Ríos, D.S.; Díaz-García, A.; Vázquez, P.N.; Santiago, J.M.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Veh, R.W.; Méndez-González, M.; Eaton, M.; et al. Spermidine Synthase Localization in Retinal Layers: Early Age Changes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126458

AMA Style

Zayas-Santiago A, Malpica-Nieves CJ, Ríos DS, Díaz-García A, Vázquez PN, Santiago JM, Rivera-Aponte DE, Veh RW, Méndez-González M, Eaton M, et al. Spermidine Synthase Localization in Retinal Layers: Early Age Changes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(12):6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zayas-Santiago, Astrid, Christian J. Malpica-Nieves, David S. Ríos, Amanda Díaz-García, Paola N. Vázquez, José M. Santiago, David E. Rivera-Aponte, Rüdiger W. Veh, Miguel Méndez-González, Misty Eaton, and et al. 2024. "Spermidine Synthase Localization in Retinal Layers: Early Age Changes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 12: 6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126458

APA Style

Zayas-Santiago, A., Malpica-Nieves, C. J., Ríos, D. S., Díaz-García, A., Vázquez, P. N., Santiago, J. M., Rivera-Aponte, D. E., Veh, R. W., Méndez-González, M., Eaton, M., & Skatchkov, S. N. (2024). Spermidine Synthase Localization in Retinal Layers: Early Age Changes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(12), 6458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop