Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Overview of Alzheimer’s Disease: Etiological Insights and Degradation Strategies
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial Protein Density, Biomass, and Bioenergetics as Predictors for the Efficacy of Glioma Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
Yohimbine Inhibits PDGF-Induced Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation and Migration via FOXO3a Factor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure-Inherent Tumor-Targeted IR-783 for Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Photothermal Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms25136900
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

To Erase or Not to Erase: Non-Canonical Catalytic Functions and Non-Catalytic Functions of Members of Histone Lysine Demethylase Families

by
Elena Di Nisio
1,
Valeria Manzini
1,2,
Valerio Licursi
2 and
Rodolfo Negri
1,2,*
1
Department of Biology and Biotechnologies “C. Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM), National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 6900; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136900
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 20 June 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Oncology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Histone lysine demethylases (KDMs) play an essential role in biological processes such as transcription regulation, RNA maturation, transposable element control, and genome damage sensing and repair. In most cases, their action requires catalytic activities, but non-catalytic functions have also been shown in some KDMs. Indeed, some strictly KDM-related proteins and some KDM isoforms do not act as histone demethylase but show other enzymatic activities or relevant non-enzymatic functions in different cell types. Moreover, many studies have reported on functions potentially supported by catalytically dead mutant KDMs. This is probably due to the versatility of the catalytical core, which can adapt to assume different molecular functions, and to the complex multi-domain structure of these proteins which encompasses functional modules for targeting histone modifications, promoting protein–protein interactions, or recognizing nucleic acid structural motifs. This rich modularity and the availability of multiple isoforms in the various classes produced variants with enzymatic functions aside from histone demethylation or variants with non-catalytical functions during the evolution. In this review we will catalog the proteins with null or questionable demethylase activity and predicted or validated inactive isoforms, summarizing what is known about their alternative functions. We will then go through some experimental evidence for the non-catalytical functions of active KDMs.

1. Introduction

N-terminal histone tails can be dynamically modified by the addition and/or the removal of post-translational modifications, including methylation [1]. Histone methylation is deeply involved in the control of crucial biological processes such as transcription regulation [2], DNA replication [3], and genomic damage signaling and repair [4,5]. For this reason, it is tightly controlled during cellular processes [6] by the coordinated and balanced action of histone methyltransferases and demethylases [7]. Lysine demethylases (KDMs) include the class of flavine-dependent amine oxidases (also known as the KDM1 subfamily), which act on mono- and di-methylated lysines, and the large class of Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing proteins (also known as the KDM2–KDM8 subfamilies), which are Fe(II) and 2-oxoglutarate (2OG)-dependent enzymes [8,9]. All the members of this second group are JmjC domain-sharers but, depending on the degree of homology and the presence of other domains, they can be classified into subfamilies, often sharing common substrates [10]. Lysine demethylation can also occur on non-histone proteins and has been implicated in human tumorigenesis (reviewed in [11]). Here, we will focus on the non-canonical catalytic functions and the catalytic-independent functions of proteins belonging to the lysine demethylase families. Indeed, evolutionary branching has occurred in the history of the 2OG-dependent oxygenases, thereby distinguishing hydroxylases and demethylases with distinct cellular functions [12]. Interestingly, JmjC-only proteins mainly act by modifying other proteins or ssRNA [13], rather than by catalyzing demethylation [8]. JmjC proteins can therefore act as hydroxylases, functioning as oxygen sensors, or perhaps as endopeptidases, to regulate both protein–protein interactions and protein stability, but also transcription-related processes. Besides the catalytic activities different from lysine demethylation, a section of this review will be dedicated to emerging topics related to the demethylase-independent functions of some KDM proteins. We speculate how some KDM transcripts may potentially or effectively give rise to multiple protein isoforms including—or not—JmjN and/or JmjC domains, both of which are required for the catalytic activity of KDM4s and KDM5s, in light of the potential relevance of such isoforms’ role in demethylase-independent functions.

2. Different Functions Besides Histone Demethylation Activity

In addition to active histone demethylases, the KDM family includes proteins with no or uncertain histone demethylase activity, such as JARID2 and UTY, and JmjC-only domain proteins with other catalytic functions. Moreover, some catalytically active KDMs possess catalytic-independent functions. These three different groups are listed in Table 1.

2.1. Proteins Containing Jumonji Domains But Retaining No or Uncertain Histone Demethylase Activity

2.1.1. JARID2: Inactive But Essential

JARID2 shows high sequence homology with the KDM5 subfamily [8,14] at its C-term portion [60]. Despite the different spatial organization of the conserved domains, they share the Jumonji N (JmjN) domain, the A-T rich interaction domain (ARID), the Jumonji C (JmjC) domain, and the Zinc-finger (zf)-C5HC2 domain [8]. However, they differ in the presence of the Plant homeodomains (PHDs), absent in JARID2 [8], and in the N-terminal portion, which is not shared by the KDM5 members. The Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) interacting domain, the nucleosome binding domain, and the ubiquitin-interaction motif reside at the N-term region of JARID2 [60,61,62]. Intriguingly, evolutionarily conserved substitutions in crucial catalytic residues of JARID2 impair its demethylase activity [8,63], representing a clue for the presence of important histone demethylation-independent functions. JARID2 is indeed required for the proper differentiation of embryonic stem cells, resulting in an essential component for normal embryonic development [14,60,64,65,66,67]. In keeping with this, JARID2 mutant mice experienced lethality in later embryonic stages [14]. Despite being inactive as histone demethylase, JARID2 influences the distribution of the H3K27me3 mark during developmental and cellular differentiation processes [14,60,63,68,69,70,71,72,73,74] by modulating the chromatin association of PRC2 complex, and potentially its enzymatic activity [61,68,70]. The JARID2-mediated recruitment of PRC2 on target genes can be accomplished by the putative DNA-binding properties of its ARID and zf-C5HC2 domains [70], by its N-terminal region’s ability to interact with nucleosomes [61], by favoring lncRNA-mediated interaction [75,76] or by binding to the H2AK119ub modification, which is deposited by the PRC1 complex [62]. JARID2 thus exerts a crucial role in PRC2 recruitment for gene expression regulation. Accordingly, in lineage-committed human cells, the production of a cleaved ∆N-JARID2 form that lacks the N-terminal PRC2-interacting domain can promote activation switching of differentiation genes. However, the consolidated role of JARID2 in PRC2 recruitment [60,62,68] is not limited to simple targeting. Growing evidence shows that JARID2 might regulate the methyltransferase activity of the PCR2 complex differently depending on the chromatin context [14,61,69,71], also functioning itself as a PRC2 substrate [77] and inducing allosteric activation to increase the catalytic activity of the complex [73]. Beyond the modulation of the H3K27me3 mark, JARID2 can also mediate the distribution of other epigenetic repressive marks, including H3K9me1 and H3K9me2/3, which mediate the recruitment of methyltransferases including G9a–GLP complex and SETDB1 [78,79,80]. In conclusion, although catalytically inactive, JARID2 can target chromatin by exploiting the ARID and the zf-C5HC2 domains or the N-terminal region and exerts a crucial non-catalytical regulatory function on the assembly of repressive complexes and histone modification.

2.1.2. UTY: A Catalytically Inactive KDM6 Subfamily Member?

The KDM6 group includes three members, KDM6A (ubiquitously transcribed tetracopeptide repeat on X chromosome, also known as UTX), KDM6B (or JMJD3), and UTY (ubiquitously transcribed tetracopeptide repeat on Y chromosome, also named KDM6C). Unlike KDM6A and KDM6B, current in vitro and in vivo evidence suggest that UTY possesses null or very low demethylase activity due to sequence variation within its catalytic domain [15,16,17,58]. It nevertheless seems to have relevant functions during development [15]. Homozygous KDM6A-KO mouse females, but not hemizygous KDM6A-KO male embryos expressing normal levels of UTY, exhibit embryonic lethality, suggesting that UTY is functionally compensating for certain aspects necessary for development in males lacking KDM6A [15]. The compensation is not dependent on H3K27 demethylation activity, but, rather, linked to other proteins and protein complexes that broadly regulate transcription [15,81]. Interestingly, the expression patterns of KDM6A and UTY differ greatly in mouse brains, with male mice displaying a much higher expression of UTY than KDM6A in the hypothalamus, suggesting a new role for UTY in neuroendocrine regulation [82]. In adult mice, developmental transcriptomic patterns can be altered by transgenic overexpression of UTY [81]. Specifically, a global UTY expression caused a masculinization in the female gene expression patterns in both the placenta and hypothalamus [81], which respond to changes in the intrauterine environment in a sex-specific manner. However, as the authors admitted, the limitation of such an experiment is the absence of a conditional and tissue-specific expression of the gene that should be performed to rule out indirect effects due to changes in other tissues [81]. Overall, if the extensive sequence homology between UTY and KDM6A may suggest similar and possibly partially redundant functions, some differences, such as the presence of conserved substitutions that abolish the ability of UTY to demethylate the H3K27me2/3 or the different tissue-specific and sex-dependent expression patterns of these two proteins, do suggest the existence of important functions of UTY that are independent on its demethylase activity and not yet fully understood.

2.2. The JmjC Domain-Only Family: Enzymes with Unclear Demethylase Activity But Which Show Different Catalytic Functions

The majority of JmjC hydroxylases catalyze the demethylation of histone lysines, playing a role in epigenetics [8]. However, the JmjC-only members retain only the JmjC domain and no other identifiable protein domains possibly involved in chromatin biology [8]. They were initially considered bona fide histone demethylases for the presence of the Jumonji C domain, but they showed questionable histone demethylase activity (Table 1), and, rather, turned out to have different enzymatic activities. It has been proposed that these proteins might have diverged in higher eukaryotes to carry out biological functions independently of histone demethylation [8], but more recent structural analyses surprisingly support the hypothesis that, conversely, KDMs evolved from the JmjC-only hydroxylase family [12].
So far, ten 2OG-dependent oxygenases have been identified as JmjC-only proteins in humans: HIF1AN, HSPBAP1, JMJD4-8, RIOX1, RIOX2, and TYW5 [21]. These enzymes catalyze oxidative reactions such as hydroxylation and possibly demethylation, always through a mechanism of demethylation via a hydroxylation reaction [21]. Some JmjC-only proteins, such as JMJD7, are known to localize to the cytoplasm; others, such as HSPBAP1, at the mitochondria; and others, such as the RIOX1/RIOX2 group, are prevalently nuclear or can shuffle between the cytoplasm and nucleus, as in the case of HIF1AN. These small enzymes exert several functions by hydroxylating proteins and RNA, and their dysregulation has been linked to cancer development (reviewed in [22]).

2.2.1. HSPBAP1

Heat shock-associated protein 1 (HSPBAP1, also known as PASS1 for protein associated with small stress protein 1) was identified as an interactor of the 27kDa heat shock protein (HSP27) which negatively regulates its capacity to protect cells from heat shock [18]. Since its discovery, little has been known about this protein, whose orthologues exist from flies to humans [83]. In Drosophila, it appears to be involved in ethanol tolerance [84]. In humans, it is expressed in a wide variety of tissues, but it has been found abnormally expressed in the anterior temporal neocortex of patients with intractable epilepsy (IE) [85], suggesting its pathogenic role in these patients. Apart from the observed correlation between HSPBAP expression and the associated phenotypes, the significance and the molecular mechanism underlying them are still unclear. It has been indeed hypothesized that the effects of HSPBAP1 depend on its opposite effect on Hsp27. However, besides their molecular interaction, no further investigation has been conducted to clarify the possible involvement of oxidative reactions, such as hydroxylation, as post-translational modifications that might impact Hsp27 stability or activity, as often occurs for other hydroxylases belonging to this group.

2.2.2. RIOX1/RIOX2

Ribosomal oxygenase 1 (RIOX1), also known as Nucleolar protein 66 (NO66), and Ribosomal oxygenase 2 (RIOX2), also known as myc-induced nuclear antigen (MINA), are hydroxylases highly selective for histidine residues [86]. This ribosomal oxygenase group has orthologues from prokaryotes to humans [20,87]. They share a similar protein domain architecture, consisting of a JmjC domain with the evolutionarily conserved aa triad HDH for enzymatic activity, a dimerization domain, and a winged-helix domain (WH) [87]. In addition, RIOX1 possesses an extended N-terminal domain with a nucleolar localization signal [87]. Consistent with their nucleolar subcellular localization [20,87,88,89,90], RIOX1 and RIOX2 interact with the 60S ribosomal proteins RPL8 and RPL27A, respectively, catalyzing their hydroxylation on specific histidine residues [12,20,21,22]. The nucleolar accumulation of RIOX2 seems strictly connected to the cell’s metabolic state, since it occurs mainly under cell proliferation stimuli, in occurrence with active ribosomal gene transcription [90]. Interestingly, c-myc positively regulates both the expression of genes involved in the synthesis and processing of rRNA and ribosomal proteins [91] and RIOX2 expression, but lacks a clear correlation in this case [90]. Nevertheless, RIOX2 knockdown reduces the proliferation of transformed rodent and human cell lines, indicating a potential role in cell proliferation induced by c-myc [88,92], and RIOX2 expression levels are increased as a result of exposure to cancer-associated chemical elements [93,94], suggesting a potential role in cancer onset. In addition to nucleolar accumulation, RIOX1 is also a component of other intranuclear bodies, including clusters of late replicating chromatin, employing a putative role in the establishment or maintenance of some heterochromatic regions [89], besides those in ribosome biogenesis. A RIOX1 function in demethylating lysines 4 and 36 of H3 histone has also been suggested, even if it is still not clear how it can accomplish this function without a known protein domain essential for chromatin interaction [19]. Similarly, a putative regulation of H3K9 methylation by RIOX2 in lung and breast cancer has been reported [23,95]. However, the experimental evidence of such activity is controversial [20], since no demethylation activity was observed in vitro for these putative demethylases towards any methylated histone H3 fragment peptides [96], and the structure of these proteins is not fully compatible with efficient histone demethylase activity [12]. Overall, the prominent role of RIOX1 and RIOX2 proteins as ribosome hydroxylases indicates a role in ribosome maturation, but this remains to be fully understood.

2.2.3. HIF1AN

The hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit alpha inhibitor (HIF1AN), also known as FIH1, was identified in 2001 as a protein able to negatively modulate the biological activity of HIF-1 (hypoxia-inducible factor-1) [97,98], the master transcription regulator that leads to the activation of critical adaptive genes during low oxygen stress by recruiting coactivators histone acetyltransferases CBP and p300 through its α-subunit [99]. In normal oxygen conditions, HIF-1 is highly unstable and approaches rapid proteasomal degradation but can escape this destiny in hypoxia [100]. In normoxia, two post-translational modifications negatively regulate HIF-1 stability and activity: the prolyl (P) hydroxylation mediated by the oxygen-dependent prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) promotes the interaction of HIF-1 with the von Hippel Lindau protein (VHL) E3 ubiquitin-ligase adaptor, favoring its proteasomal degradation; at the same time, the asparagine (N) hydroxylation catalyzed by the oxygen-dependent asparaginyl hydroxylase HIF1AN abrogates the interaction between HIF-1 and its transcriptional coactivators, preventing the expression of hypoxia-induced genes [24,101]. Considering the requirement of dioxygen as a co-substrate for the hydroxylation reactions, HIF1AN may act as an oxygen sensor [25,102], as well as regulate the Notch signal activation pathway [103,104]. However, several other HIF1AN substrates have been recently described outside the HIF pathway (reviewed in [25,105]). Moreover, the enzymatic activity of HIF1AN appears highly promiscuous and not restricted to asparagine hydroxylation [24,25], opening up the possibility of regulating physiological functions still unknown.

2.2.4. JMJD4

JMJD4 was shown to hydroxylate a lysine residue of eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) to improve translational termination efficiency [26] without any known function of histone modification. It was recently reported to interact with Hsp70 to mediate the turnover of PKM2, coding for a pyruvate kinase which is normally absent in healthy adult cardiomyocytes but elevated in cardiomyopathy [27]. According to the evidence, Jmjd4 interacts with Hsp70 and catalyzes the hydroxylation of K66 of PKM2 to promote its degradation through a chaperone-mediated autophagy mechanism.

2.2.5. KDM8 (Alias JMJD5) and JMJD7

JMJD5 and JMJD7 are structurally similar and act as hydroxylases [106] potentially involved in ribosome biogenesis [38] and osteoclastogenesis [28,107]. However, the evidence for arginine hydroxylation has been shown with peptide substrates in vitro without providing in vivo evidence [106]. JMJD5 and JMJD7 have been also identified as proteases that cleave the N-terminal tails of histones H2, H3, and H4 containing methylated arginine or lysine residues (reviewed in [31]), but this remains to be proven. Indeed, despite the presence of a double-strand beta-helix that might remember hydrolytic enzymes, structural insights in their catalytic domain corroborate their function as hydroxylases rather than hydrolases [38]. For JMJD5, it has been proposed there may also a exist demethylase function towards H3K36me2, but this activity was later questioned because of difficulties with experimental in vitro reproducibility [96,106] and due to JMJD5′s catalytic site structure, which is not idoneous to accommodate methylated lysine residues [108,109]. Besides their uncertain catalytic roles, JMJD5 and JMJD7 may have indirect effects on protein stability. It has been recently shown that both wild-type and catalytically inactive mutants of JMJD5 cooperate with E3 ligase HUWE1 to destabilize EGFR and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant mutants for proteasomal degradation in lung cancer cells [110]. A study reported that JMJD5, despite being mostly a nuclear protein, can shuttle between the cytoplasm and cell nucleus [111]. However, it is still unclear which are the cellular conditions regulating its subcellular localization. Evidence that JMJD5 and JMJD7 may have both pro- and anti-cancer functions is discussed in Oh et al., 2019 [22]. Curiously, a natural readthrough transcription between the JMJD7 locus and the downstream neighbor phospholipase A2, group IVB (PLA2G4B), occurs in tumor tissues, encoding the fusion protein JMJD7-PLA2G4B including a partial JmjC domain and the C2 and phospholipase A2 domains. The incomplete JmjC domain predicts the absence of any enzymatic activity so that the functions of this fusion protein likely match those of phospholipase A2 [22], making it difficult to distinguish the worth of JMJD7′s contribution in such tumor tissues.

2.2.6. JMJD6

JMJD6 is one of the most debated proteins in biology [112,113]. It was originally described as a phosphatidyl-serine receptor [114], and hence first named PSR (phosphatidylserine receptor), then, later identified as a nuclear protein unrelated to this putative function [115,116], but surprisingly able to bind PS [117,118]. To date, JMJD6 has been characterized as demethylase toward histone [32,33] and non-histone arginines [119] or towards methylated ssRNA [33], but also as lysine hydroxylase [34,37,120,121,122,123,124] and is even able to indirectly influence RNA splicing processes [34,36,125,126]. Moreover, in vitro assays suggested the ability of JMJD6 to non-specifically interact with single-strand RNA (ssRNA) [13], but the eventual biological significance of this possible interaction in vivo remains to be proven. Although inconsistent demethylation activity toward histone arginine [120,123] or lysine [35] has also been reported, structural peculiarities of JMJD6 resemble KDM enzymes, suggesting that its function as a demethylase cannot be ruled out [127]. To make the scenario even more confusing, JMJD6 turned out to have proteolytic activity (reviewed in [31]) and a putative new tyrosine kinase function [128].
However, independently of its catalytic activity, JMJD6 may also have a role in the modulation of DNA damage promoting the downregulation of H4K16ac around DSBs through its physical association with SIRT1 [129], as well as in its response to DNA double-strand breaks at rDNA repeats by regulating the recruitment of the nucleolar protein NSB1 upon DNA damage [130]. Because of the disparate, countless, and sometimes conflicting functions attributed to JMJD6 over the years, there is an urgent need to elucidate many outstanding points, including the catalytic activity of this highly debated protein by conducting systematic, comprehensive, and independent investigation counting not only in vitro assays.

2.2.7. JMJD8

JMJD8 is the first JmjC domain-containing protein found in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum possibly involved in protein complex assembly and protein folding [131]. JMJD8 acts as a positive regulator of the TNF-induced NF-κB signaling pathway [132] and regulates STING-induced type I IFN responses [133]. Its regulatory role in the NF-kB pathway is related to its demethylation action on trimethylated lysine of AKT1, with a subsequent alteration of its protein function [40]. The protein has also been shown to interact with pyruvate kinase M2 and to play a role in angiogenesis and cellular metabolism [39]. Overall, little is known about JMJD8, and more examinations are required to establish its functions.

2.2.8. TYW5

The tRNA yW-synthesizing enzyme 5 (TYW5) enables several functions, including iron ion binding activity and protein homodimerization activity, but, more importantly, it acts as an RNA hydroxylase. TYW5 is involved in the carbon hydroxylation of wybutosine (yW), a hypermodified guanosine nucleoside that is essential for correct phenylalanine codon translation [41], into hydroxywybutosine (OHyW) in tRNA (Phe) [134]. While the regulatory functions of its action have not been dissected, TYW5 has been recently identified as a schizophrenia risk gene [135]. Again, the biological functions of this protein should be more deeply examined.

2.3. Non-Catalytic Functions of Active Histone Demethylases

In this section, we report some relevant biological effects which have been observed when catalytically active KDMs were modulated, and which did not depend on their demethylase activity.

2.3.1. KDM6A (Alias UTX) and KDM6B (Alias JMJD3)

KDM6A and KDM6B are active histone lysine demethylases that specifically act on H3K27me2/3, thus playing a central role in histone code especially in regulating HOX genes and development [56,57,58,136]. KDM6A is an X-linked gene that escapes X-inactivation [137]. KDM6B is an autosomal gene that shares high sequence homology with KDM6A and UTY, despite its lack of the tetracopeptide repeats [58]. Although catalytically active, KDM6A and KDM6B play demethylase-independent roles in the chromatin remodeling of differentiated cells to regulate T-box family members’ expression, mediating the recruitment of SWI–SNF complex [138]. In mouse embryonic stem cells, KDM6A, independently of its enzymatic activity, controls mesoderm differentiation and UTY expression [139]. KDM6A, redundant with UTY, shows high demethylase-independent activity [15,139,140]. Indeed, the overlapping activity of KDM6A and UTY in embryonic development is likely due to H3K27 demethylase-independent mechanisms [15]. The demethylase activity of UTX-1, the C. elegans homologous of mammalian KDM6A, was also dispensable for embryonic development and viability, suggesting the presence of important demethylase-independent functions during nematode development [141]. A core intrinsically disordered region (cIDR) of KDM6A has been described as crucial for histone methyltransferase MLL4 recruitment to cell condensates [142,143], shedding light on a possible mechanism underlying the functions besides the enzymatic activity of KDM6A [144]. On the other hand, KDM6B prevents the full reprogramming of MEFs (mouse embryonic fibroblasts) to iPSCs (induced pluripotent stem cells) through a demethylase-independent pathway that involves it in the regulation of PHD finger protein 20 (PHF20) degradation [145]. Like KDM6A and KDM6B, many other chromatin-modifying enzymes retain functions in the absence of their catalytic activity [142].

2.3.2. KDM1A

Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A (KDM1A, also known as LSD1) demethylates H3K4me1/2 and H3K9me1/me2 in the context of a variety of developmental processes [8]. This functional complexity involves an association with nuclear factors and non-coding RNA which occur both at catalytic and non-catalytic regions of the enzyme [145]. In many regulatory processes, KDM1A operates in strict cooperation with multi-subunit complexes such as CoREST, CtBP, or NuRD [42]. While in these contexts it is very difficult to separate KDM1A’s catalytic and non-catalytic contributions, distinct functions completely independent from demethylase activity have been described. KDM1A destabilizes the F-box protein FBXW7 and abrogates its functions independent of its demethylase activity [146]. This protein acts as a substrate recognition subunit of SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and targets human oncoproteins, such as Cyclin E, c-JUN, c-MYC, NOTCH-1, and MCL-1, for ubiquitylation and proteasome degradation [147]. In this regard, FBXW7 functions as a typical tumor suppressor [148]. KDM1A directly binds to FBXW7 and competitively decreases the binding ability of FBXW7 on its bona fide substrates. More importantly, KDM1A reduces the protein level and half-life of FBXW7 [146]. This is also observed in the case of enzymatically dead mutants and cannot be blocked by KDM1A inhibitors [147]. Another case in which KDM1A binds to and destabilizes a protein regards p62, a key component of autophagic machinery that promotes autophagy activation [149]. The final effect of this action in gynecologic cancers is autophagy inhibition. In a different context, the association with KDM1A leads to protein stabilization. This is the case when KDM1A binds to ERRα, the Estrogen-related receptor α, an orphan nuclear receptor without a natural ligand, acting as a transcriptional regulator. KDM1A binding protects it from proteasome-dependent degradation [150]. Recently, new evidence has provided insights into the demethylase-independent roles of KDM1A in regulating cellular differentiation [151]. KDM1A catalytically inactive mutants caused a mild effect on gene expression during mammalian embryogenesis, while KDM1A depletion determined an increase in H3K27ac and p300 acetyl-transferase occupancy at KDM1A-regulated enhancer regions, allowing for a global transcriptional de-repression and impairing cell fate transition [151]. KDM1A also seems to repress the p53 signaling pathway in a demethylase-independent manner to promote prostate cancer reprogramming [152].

2.3.3. KDM1B

Lysine-specific demethylase 2 (KDM1B, also known as LSD2) acts on H3L4me2/3, but it could also perform functions beyond its catalytic activity of demethylase; however, very little is known about this. In S. pombe, both KDM1A and KDM1B are involved in the repression of heterochromatic regions through demethylase-dependent and -independent mechanisms [153]. It has been proposed that the N-terminal Zf-CW domain of KDM1B is essential to exploit demethylase-independent repression functions [154].

2.3.4. KDM2B

Lysine-specific demethylase 2B (KDM2B, also named JHDM1B) demethylates H3K4me3 and H3K36me2, but some authors report that it may also demethylate H3K79 [49]. KDM2B is a component of the Polycomb complex 1 subtype 1 (PRC1.1) and is required for its recruitment to unmethylated CpGs. PRC2 can subsequently be recruited [155,156]. Studies with mESCs show that both PRC1 and PRC2 complexes can interact with KDM2B. However, while the actual recruitment of the PRC1.1 complex to chromatin by KDM2B is not dependent on its demethylase activity, its enzyme activity could be involved in other functions stimulated by these interactions (discussed in [157]).

2.3.5. KDM4A

Lysine-specific demethylase 4A (KDM4A), also termed JMJD2A and JHDM3A, can demethylate histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and 36 (H3K36) and H1.4K26 [8,50,51,158]. KDM4A may also bind in vitro the methylated H3K4 and the H4K20 through its Tudor domains, but the biological consequences of this binding remain to be established [159]. Besides its catalytic functions on chromatin, KDM4A has been shown to have a crucial role in the induction of senescence-associated phenotypes. In a ternary complex, it interacts with the methylated form of p53 and FBX022. This association facilitates ubiquitylation of p53 by SCF complexes. In this case, KDM4A is likely to act as a scaffold independent of its demethylase activity. Downregulation of methylated p53 by SCFFbxo22 is required for the induction of p16 and senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (SASPs), the former of which is critical for permanent cessation of cell proliferation upon any mitogen stimuli [160].

2.3.6. KDM4B

Lysine-specific demethylase 4B (KDM4B), also termed as JMJD2B and JHDM3B, has the same substrate specificity of KDM4A but shows distinct non-catalytic functions. KDM4B is essential for ER-mediated transcription in breast cancer cell lines through direct interaction with ER and with its regulatory targets [161]. While its demethylase activity is required for this function, non-catalytic functions may also be involved. KDM4B has been shown to interact with several transcription factors and members of chromatin modification complexes, including components of the SWI/SNF-B [162] and MLL2 [161] complexes. KDM4B interacts with the transcription factor GATA-3 in breast cancer cell lines and directly co-activates transcription factor activity in reporter-based experiments [163]. It is not clear to what extent KDM4B demethylation of repressive H3K9me3 marks within upstream regulatory regions of the ER gene is required to allow the binding of GATA-3 to drive receptor expression. KDM4B contributes to the formation of an active complex with transactivation function 1 (AF1) and steroid receptor coactivator 3 (SRC-3) in the presence of estrogen [163]. Moreover, KDM4B and ER were shown to form a ternary complex with FBX022 [164]. The amount of this complex plays a key role in cofactor dynamics in ER, as shown by perturbation of its protein turnover [164,165].

2.3.7. KDM5 Demethylases

Jamshidi et al. (2021) [166] characterized a mouse strain expressing a KDM5B splicing variant lacking the ARID domain and five amino acids in the JmjN domain. They showed that, although the protein is catalytically inactive, the mouse is viable and fertile, contrary to the KDM5B knockout mouse, which displays an embryonic lethal phenotype [157]. These data demonstrate that while the loss of KDM5B catalytic function can be surrogated by the other KDM5 demethylases active during development, the protein cannot be substituted in some non-catalytic functions that are essential for normal embryonic development. Many experimental observations support the biological effects of KDM5 demethylases, independently of their catalytic activity [167,168,169,170]. Indeed, KDM5 proteins can also act as transcriptional repressors in a demethylase activity-independent manner by recruiting other repressive complexes [167,168]. For example, KDM5B has been involved in anti-tumor immunity by favoring the SETDB1-dependent repression of retroelements in melanoma [168]. Conversely, KDM5s can sometimes directly support transcription independently of their demethylase activity, functioning as a scaffold for transcription factors in specific cell contexts [171]. For instance, KDM5A in a complex with CLOCK–BMAL can inhibit the activity of the histone deacetylase HDAC1, enhancing histone acetylation and transcriptional activation at the Per2 promoter [169].
KDM5A and KDM5B are overexpressed in many cancers and play a role in the response to genomic damage and drug tolerance [5,172]. It has been reported that both proteins contribute to replication stress response and tolerance [170]. First, they positively regulate RRM2, the regulatory subunit of ribonucleotide reductase and a major determinant of replication stress tolerance. Moreover, they are also required for optimal levels of activated Chk1, a major player of the intra-S phase checkpoint that protects cells from replication stress [170]. KDM5A is enriched at ongoing replication forks and associates with both PCNA and Chk1. Therefore, KDM5A/B proteins are required for both RRM2 overexpression and tolerance to hydroxyurea. Altogether, these results indicate that KDM5A/B are major players in the cell response to replication stress. A striking result of the study is that drugs targeting the enzymatic activity of KDM5 proteins do not attenuate the effects of KDM5A/B overexpression [170]. In the context of cancer, there is compelling evidence of direct interactions and close interplay of KDM5A and KDMB with the Retinoblastoma protein RB, and both catalytic and not-catalytic KDM5 functions are involved in this cross-talk (reviewed in [173]).
A new frontier in the non-catalytic functions of the KDM5 class is represented by their effects on RNA maturation. It was shown that KDM5B can recruit protein complexes involved in the mRNA processing machinery, implying an alternative and not catalytic epigenetic action mediated by this protein in gene regulation [174].
Drosophila KDM5 (Lid) is a direct regulator of genes required for mitochondrial structure and function [175,176]. Significantly, this regulatory function occurs independently of KDM5 histone demethylase activity. Instead, it requires the association to methylated H3K4 mediated by the PHD domain. Genome-wide, KDM5 binding overlaps with the active chromatin mark H3K4me3, and a fly strain specifically lacking H3K4me2/3 binding shows defective KDM5 promoter recruitment and gene activation [175]. KDM5 therefore plays a central role in regulating mitochondrial function by utilizing its ability to recognize specific chromatin contexts. Recent data suggest that KDM5-mediated regulation of mitochondrial activity is also likely to play a key role in humans [177]. A recent screening on Lid interactors shed new light on other potential demethylase-independent activities of KDM5 [178].

3. KDM Isoforms without Catalytic Activity

KDM genes generally produce a great variety of transcripts due to multiple transcription initiation sites and/or alternative splicing. These transcripts may potentially or effectively give rise to multiple protein isoforms. Some of these isoforms may show drastically different functional properties. In particular, the KDM4 and KDM5 classes encompass predicted protein isoforms without the amino-terminal part, thus lacking the JmjN domain which, together with the JmjC domain and some residues of the ARID domain, is required for their histone demethylase activity [179,180] (Figure 1). We recently showed that a predicted KDM5B amino-terminal truncated isoform (KDM5B-NTT) is indeed expressed in several cancer cell lines [181]. The transcript giving rise to KDM5B-NTT originates from a secondary transcription start site located downstream of the first ATG and makes use for translation of a downstream ATG in the fourth exon. The resulting protein isoform lacks the JmjN domain and part of the ARID domain [181] and is therefore catalytically inactive [179,180].
It also includes an additional exon (exon-6) previously attributed to other putative isoforms [182]. While the KDM5B-NTT transcript is much less abundant than that one giving rise to the canonical PLU-1 isoform, the truncated protein is much more stable to proteasome degradation and can accumulate in breast cancer cells, although its relative amount is variable in different cell lines. We showed that KDM5B-NTT over-expression in breast cancer cell lines leads to a significant increase in H3K4 tri-methylation of bulk chromatin and transcriptional induction of several genes, including genes previously found directly regulated by the canonical PLU-1 isoform. Therefore, KDM5B-NTT may compete with the PLU-1 isoform acting as a negative modulator [181]. This is somewhat expected, since the truncated isoform is inactive but retains the PHD domains and is potentially able to address it to target chromatin loci [54,180] (Figure 2). Besides these antagonistic effects, KDM5B-NTT could retain some of the non-catalytical functions of PLU-1, starting with those determined by protein–protein interactions which are based on domains that are shared with PLU-1. N-truncated predicted isoforms also exist in the KDM4 class (Figure 1) where JmjN is also required for catalytic activity, so it will be very relevant to test their effective expression.
The expression of inactive demethylase isoforms corroborates the existence of functions not strikingly linked to histone demethylase activity and might help truly distinguish between direct and indirect actions on chromatin modifications.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

After twenty years of research, the superfamily of histone lysine demethylases appears as an extremely versatile group of proteins that expanded their potential by acquiring novel catalytic activities and non-catalytic functions (Figure 3).
This has been possible thanks to the complexity of their catalytic cores and their richness in structural modules capable of interacting with other proteins and nucleic acids’ structural motifs. While most of the effort of the scientific community has been focused on the catalytic functions of the various classes and the effects of their impairment by mutations and chemical inhibitors, individual members and peculiar isoforms have shown biological effects independent from demethylase activity. This is a very relevant aspect to be considered for a true understanding of the biological role of these proteins. We think that in the future more energy should be invested in distinguishing between the catalytic and non-catalytic effects of this fascinating group of proteins.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25136900/s1, reference citation [183].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization R.N. and E.D.N.; data curation, E.D.N., V.M. and V.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.D.N., V.M., V.L. and R.N.; writing—review and editing, E.D.N., V.M., V.L. and R.N.; visualization, E.D.N., V.M. and V.L.; supervision, R.N.; funding acquisition, R.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union’s NextGenerationEU, PRIN 2022 PNRR D.D. 1409, 14-09-2022—grant N. 2022MHRCC4, CUP N. B53D23016390006.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bannister, A.J.; Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Han, J. The Role of Histone Modification in DNA Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Frigerio, C.; Di Nisio, E.; Galli, M.; Colombo, C.V.; Negri, R.; Clerici, M. The Chromatin Landscape around DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast and Its Influence on DNA Repair Pathway Choice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Nisio, E.; Lupo, G.; Licursi, V.; Negri, R. The Role of Histone Lysine Methylation in the Response of Mammalian Cells to Ionizing Radiation. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 639602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Allis, C.D.; Jenuwein, T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jambhekar, A.; Dhall, A.; Shi, Y. Roles and regulation of histone methylation in animal development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Klose, R.J.; Kallin, E.M.; Zhang, Y. JmjC-domain-containing proteins and histone demethylation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pedersen, M.T.; Helin, K. Histone demethylases in development and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kooistra, S.M.; Helin, K. Molecular mechanisms and potential functions of histone demethylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamamoto, R.; Saloura, V.; Nakamura, Y. Critical roles of non-histone protein lysine methylation in human tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chowdhury, R.; Sekirnik, R.; Brissett, N.C.; Krojer, T.; Ho, C.-H.; Ng, S.S.; Clifton, I.J.; Ge, W.; Kershaw, N.J.; Fox, G.C.; et al. Ribosomal oxygenases are structurally conserved from prokaryotes to humans. Nature 2014, 510, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hong, X.; Zang, J.; White, J.; Wang, C.; Pan, C.-H.; Zhao, R.; Murphy, R.C.; Dai, S.; Henson, P.; Kappler, J.W.; et al. Interaction of JMJD6 with single-stranded RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14568–14572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Landeira, D.; Fisher, A.G. Inactive yet indispensable: The tale of Jarid2. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shpargel, K.B.; Sengoku, T.; Yokoyama, S.; Magnuson, T. UTX and UTY Demonstrate Histone Demethylase-Independent Function in Mouse Embryonic Development. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Walport, L.J.; Hopkinson, R.J.; Vollmar, M.; Madden, S.K.; Gileadi, C.; Oppermann, U.; Schofield, C.J.; Johansson, C. Human UTY(KDM6C) Is a Male-specific Nϵ-Methyl Lysyl Demethylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 18302–18313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gažová, I.; Lengeling, A.; Summers, K.M. Lysine demethylases KDM6A and UTY: The X and Y of histone demethylation. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 127, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, C.; Gilmont, R.R.; Benndorf, R.; Welsh, M.J. Identification and characterization of a novel protein from Sertoli cells, PASS1, that associates with mammalian small stress protein hsp27. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 18724–18731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sinha, K.M.; Yasuda, H.; Coombes, M.M.; Dent, S.Y.R.; de Crombrugghe, B. Regulation of the osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix by NO66, a Jumonji family histone demethylase. EMBO J. 2010, 29, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ge, W.; Wolf, A.; Feng, T.; Ho, C.-H.; Sekirnik, R.; Zayer, A.; Granatino, N.; E Cockman, M.; Loenarz, C.; Loik, N.D.; et al. Oxygenase-catalyzed ribosome hydroxylation occurs in prokaryotes and humans. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 960–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bundred, J.R.; Hendrix, E.; Coleman, M.L. The emerging roles of ribosomal histidyl hydroxylases in cell biology, physiology and disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 4093–4105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Oh, S.; Shin, S.; Janknecht, R. The small members of the JMJD protein family: Enzymatic jewels or jinxes? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Rev. Cancer 2019, 1871, 406–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, Y.; Beezhold, K.; Chang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Rojanasakul, Y.; Zhao, H.; Castranova, V.; Shi, X.; Chen, F. Lung cancer-associated JmjC domain protein mdig suppresses formation of tri-methyl lysine 9 of histone H3. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fiorini, G.; Schofield, C.J. Biochemistry of the hypoxia-inducible factor hydroxylases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2024, 79, 102428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Volkova, Y.L.; Pickel, C.; Jucht, A.E.; Wenger, R.H.; Scholz, C.C. The Asparagine Hydroxylase FIH: A Unique Oxygen Sensor. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2022, 37, 913–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Feng, T.; Yamamoto, A.; Wilkins, S.E.; Sokolova, E.; Yates, L.A.; Münzel, M.; Singh, P.; Hopkinson, R.J.; Fischer, R.; Cockman, M.E.; et al. Optimal translational termination requires C4 lysyl hydroxylation of eRF1. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tang, Y.; Feng, M.; Su, Y.; Ma, T.; Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Wang, X.; Shi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Jmjd4 Facilitates Pkm2 Degradation in Cardiomyocytes and Is Protective Against Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2023, 147, 1684–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Youn, M.-Y.; Yokoyama, A.; Fujiyama-Nakamura, S.; Ohtake, F.; Minehata, K.-I.; Yasuda, H.; Suzuki, T.; Kato, S.; Imai, Y. JMJD5, a Jumonji C (JmjC) Domain-containing Protein, Negatively Regulates Osteoclastogenesis by Facilitating NFATc1 Protein Degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12994–13004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hsia, D.A.; Tepper, C.G.; Pochampalli, M.R.; Hsia, E.Y.C.; Izumiya, C.; Huerta, S.B.; Wright, M.E.; Chen, H.-W.; Kung, H.-J.; Izumiya, Y. KDM8, a H3K36me2 histone demethylase that acts in the cyclin A1 coding region to regulate cancer cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9671–9676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marcon, E.; Ni, Z.; Pu, S.; Turinsky, A.L.; Trimble, S.S.; Olsen, J.B.; Silverman-Gavrila, R.; Silverman-Gavrila, L.; Phanse, S.; Guo, H.; et al. Human-chromatin-related protein interactions identify a demethylase complex required for chromosome segregation. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, H.; Wei, P.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, G. The Novel Protease Activities of JMJD5-JMJD6-JMJD7 and Arginine Methylation Activities of Arginine Methyltransferases Are Likely Coupled. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chang, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Bruick, R.K. JMJD6 Is a Histone Arginine Demethylase. Science 2007, 318, 444–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, W.; Ma, Q.; Wong, K.; Li, W.; Ohgi, K.; Zhang, J.; Aggarwal, A.K.; Rosenfeld, M.G. Brd4 and JMJD6-Associated Anti-Pause Enhancers in Regulation of Transcriptional Pause Release. Cell 2013, 155, 1581–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Webby, C.J.; Wolf, A.; Gromak, N.; Dreger, M.; Kramer, H.; Kessler, B.; Nielsen, M.L.; Schmitz, C.; Butler, D.S.; Yates, J.R.; et al. Jmjd6 Catalyses Lysyl-Hydroxylation of U2AF65, a Protein Associated with RNA Splicing. Science 2009, 325, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hahn, P.; Wegener, I.; Burrells, A.; Böse, J.; Wolf, A.; Erck, C.; Butler, D.; Schofield, C.J.; Böttger, A.; Lengeling, A. Analysis of Jmjd6 Cellular Localization and Testing for Its Involvement in Histone Demethylation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jablonowski, C.M.; Quarni, W.; Singh, S.; Tan, H.; Bostanthirige, D.H.; Jin, H.; Fang, J.; Chang, T.-C.; Finkelstein, D.; Cho, J.-H.; et al. Metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells by JMJD6-mediated pre-mRNA splicing associated with therapeutic response to splicing inhibitor. eLife 2024, 12, RP90993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Manfredi, J.; Wang, F.; He, L.; Huangyang, P.; Liang, J.; Si, W.; Yan, R.; Han, X.; Liu, S.; Gui, B.; et al. JMJD6 Promotes Colon Carcinogenesis through Negative Regulation of p53 by Hydroxylation. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12, e1001819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Markolovic, S.; Zhuang, Q.; Wilkins, S.E.; Eaton, C.D.; Abboud, M.I.; Katz, M.J.; McNeil, H.E.; Leśniak, R.K.; Hall, C.; Struwe, W.B.; et al. The Jumonji-C oxygenase JMJD7 catalyzes (3S)-lysyl hydroxylation of TRAFAC GTPases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boeckel, J.-N.; Derlet, A.; Glaser, S.F.; Luczak, A.; Lucas, T.; Heumüller, A.W.; Krüger, M.; Zehendner, C.M.; Kaluza, D.; Doddaballapur, A.; et al. JMJD8 Regulates Angiogenic Sprouting and Cellular Metabolism by Interacting With Pyruvate Kinase M2 in Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2016, 36, 1425–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, J. JMJD8 Functions as a Novel AKT1 Lysine Demethylase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kato, M.; Araiso, Y.; Noma, A.; Nagao, A.; Suzuki, T.; Ishitani, R.; Nureki, O. Crystal structure of a novel JmjC-domain-containing protein, TYW5, involved in tRNA modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Perillo, B.; Tramontano, A.; Pezone, A.; Migliaccio, A. LSD1: More than demethylation of histone lysine residues. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 1936–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, F.; Yang, H.; Dong, Z.; Fang, J.; Wang, P.; Zhu, T.; Gong, W.; Fang, R.; Shi, Y.G.; Li, Z.; et al. Structural insight into substrate recognition by histone demethylase LSD2/KDM1b. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fang, R.; Chen, F.; Dong, Z.; Hu, D.; Barbera, A.J.; Clark, E.A.; Fang, J.; Yang, Y.; Mei, P.; Rutenberg, M.; et al. LSD2/KDM1B and its cofactor NPAC/GLYR1 endow a structural and molecular model for regulation of H3K4 demethylation. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marabelli, C.; Marrocco, B.; Pilotto, S.; Chittori, S.; Picaud, S.; Marchese, S.; Ciossani, G.; Forneris, F.; Filippakopoulos, P.; Schoehn, G.; et al. A Tail-Based Mechanism Drives Nucleosome Demethylation by the LSD2/NPAC Multimeric Complex. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 387–399.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jiang, Y.; Qian, X.; Shen, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, R.; Xia, Y.; Chen, Q.; Peng, G.; Lin, S.-Y.; et al. Local generation of fumarate promotes DNA repair through inhibition of histone H3 demethylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Frescas, D.; Guardavaccaro, D.; Bassermann, F.; Koyama-Nasu, R.; Pagano, M. JHDM1B/FBXL10 is a nucleolar protein that represses transcription of ribosomal RNA genes. Nature 2007, 450, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tsukada, Y.; Fang, J.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Warren, M.E.; Borchers, C.H.; Tempst, P.; Zhang, Y. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 2006, 439, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kang, J.-Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Park, J.W.; Cho, H.; Hahm, J.Y.; Chae, Y.; Kim, D.; Kook, H.; Rhee, S.; et al. KDM2B is a histone H3K79 demethylase and induces transcriptional repression via sirtuin-1-mediated chromatin silencing. FASEB J. 2018, 32, 5737–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Young, N.L.; Dere, R. Mechanistic insights into KDM4A driven genomic instability. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021, 49, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Walport, L.J.; Hopkinson, R.J.; Chowdhury, R.; Zhang, Y.; Bonnici, J.; Schiller, R.; Kawamura, A.; Schofield, C.J. Mechanistic and structural studies of KDM-catalysed demethylation of histone 1 isotype 4 at lysine 26. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 3264–3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Whetstine, J.R.; Nottke, A.; Lan, F.; Huarte, M.; Smolikov, S.; Chen, Z.; Spooner, E.; Li, E.; Zhang, G.; Colaiacovo, M.; et al. Reversal of histone lysine trimethylation by the JMJD2 family of histone demethylases. Cell 2006, 125, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tu, S.; Teng, Y.-C.; Yuan, C.; Wu, Y.-T.; Chan, M.-Y.; Cheng, A.-N.; Lin, P.-H.; Juan, L.-J.; Tsai, M.-D. The ARID domain of the H3K4 demethylase RBP2 binds to a DNA CCGCCC motif. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Klein, B.J.; Piao, L.; Xi, Y.; Rincon-Arano, H.; Rothbart, S.B.; Peng, D.; Wen, H.; Larson, C.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, X.; et al. The histone-H3K4-specific demethylase KDM5B binds to its substrate and product through distinct PHD fingers. Cell Rep. 2014, 6, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Guo, X.; Rong, N.; Song, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lan, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Xu, Y.; et al. The PHD1 finger of KDM5B recognizes unmodified H3K4 during the demethylation of histone H3K4me2/3 by KDM5B. Protein Cell 2014, 5, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lan, F.; Bayliss, P.E.; Rinn, J.L.; Whetstine, J.R.; Wang, J.K.; Chen, S.; Iwase, S.; Alpatov, R.; Issaeva, I.; Canaani, E.; et al. A histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase regulates animal posterior development. Nature 2007, 449, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Agger, K.; Cloos, P.A.C.; Christensen, J.; Pasini, D.; Rose, S.; Rappsilber, J.; Issaeva, I.; Canaani, E.; Salcini, A.E.; Helin, K. UTX and JMJD3 are histone H3K27 demethylases involved in HOX gene regulation and development. Nature 2007, 449, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hong, S.; Cho, Y.-W.; Yu, L.-R.; Yu, H.; Veenstra, T.D.; Ge, K. Identification of JmjC domain-containing UTX and JMJD3 as histone H3 lysine 27 demethylases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18439–18444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. De Santa, F.; Totaro, M.G.; Prosperini, E.; Notarbartolo, S.; Testa, G.; Natoli, G. The histone H3 lysine-27 demethylase Jmjd3 links inflammation to inhibition of polycomb-mediated gene silencing. Cell 2007, 130, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pasini, D.; Cloos, P.A.C.; Walfridsson, J.; Olsson, L.; Bukowski, J.-P.; Johansen, J.V.; Bak, M.; Tommerup, N.; Rappsilber, J.; Helin, K. JARID2 regulates binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells. Nature 2010, 464, 7286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Son, J.; Shen, S.S.; Margueron, R.; Reinberg, D. Nucleosome-binding activities within JARID2 and EZH1 regulate the function of PRC2 on chromatin. Genes. Dev. 2013, 27, 2663–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cooper, S.; Grijzenhout, A.; Underwood, E.; Ancelin, K.; Zhang, T.; Nesterova, T.B.; Anil-Kirmizitas, B.; Bassett, A.; Kooistra, S.M.; Agger, K.; et al. Jarid2 binds mono-ubiquitylated H2A lysine 119 to mediate crosstalk between Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Landeira, D.; Sauer, S.; Poot, R.; Dvorkina, M.; Mazzarella, L.; Jørgensen, H.F.; Pereira, C.F.; Leleu, M.; Piccolo, F.M.; Spivakov, M.; et al. Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Petracovici, A.; Bonasio, R. Distinct PRC2 subunits regulate maintenance and establishment of Polycomb repression during differentiation. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 2625–2639.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jung, J.; Mysliwiec, M.R.; Lee, Y. Roles of JUMONJI in mouse embryonic development. Dev. Dyn. 2005, 232, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kinkel, S.A.; Galeev, R.; Flensburg, C.; Keniry, A.; Breslin, K.; Gilan, O.; Lee, S.; Liu, J.; Chen, K.; Gearing, L.J.; et al. Jarid2 regulates hematopoietic stem cell function by acting with polycomb repressive complex 2. Blood 2015, 125, 1890–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cho, E.; Mysliwiec, M.R.; Carlson, C.D.; Ansari, A.; Schwartz, R.J.; Lee, Y. Cardiac-specific developmental and epigenetic functions of Jarid2 during embryonic development. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 11659–11673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peng, J.C.; Valouev, A.; Swigut, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Sidow, A.; Wysocka, J. Jarid2/Jumonji coordinates control of PRC2 enzymatic activity and target gene occupancy in pluripotent cells. Cell 2009, 139, 1290–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shen, X.; Kim, W.; Fujiwara, Y.; Simon, M.D.; Liu, Y.; Mysliwiec, M.R.; Yuan, G.-C.; Lee, Y.; Orkin, S.H. Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 2009, 139, 1303–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, G.; Margueron, R.; Ku, M.; Chambon, P.; Bernstein, B.E.; Reinberg, D. Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Holoch, D.; Margueron, R. Mechanisms Regulating PRC2 Recruitment and Enzymatic Activity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Al-Raawi, D.; Jones, R.; Wijesinghe, S.; Halsall, J.; Petric, M.; Roberts, S.; A Hotchin, N.; Kanhere, A. A novel form of JARID2 is required for differentiation in lineage-committed cells. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e98449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kasinath, V.; Beck, C.; Sauer, P.; Poepsel, S.; Kosmatka, J.; Faini, M.; Toso, D.; Aebersold, R.; Nogales, E. JARID2 and AEBP2 regulate PRC2 in the presence of H2AK119ub1 and other histone modifications. Science 2021, 371, 6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Loh, C.H.; Veenstra, G.J.C. The Role of Polycomb Proteins in Cell Lineage Commitment and Embryonic Development. Epigenomes 2022, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kaneko, S.; Bonasio, R.; Saldaña-Meyer, R.; Yoshida, T.; Son, J.; Nishino, K.; Umezawa, A.; Reinberg, D. Interactions between JARID2 and noncoding RNAs regulate PRC2 recruitment to chromatin. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. da Rocha, S.T.; Boeva, V.; Escamilla-Del-Arenal, M.; Ancelin, K.; Granier, C.; Matias, N.R.; Sanulli, S.; Chow, J.; Schulz, E.; Picard, C.; et al. Jarid2 Is Implicated in the Initial Xist-Induced Targeting of PRC2 to the Inactive X Chromosome. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Sanulli, S.; Justin, N.; Teissandier, A.; Ancelin, K.; Portoso, M.; Caron, M.; Michaud, A.; Lombard, B.; da Rocha, S.T.; Offer, J.; et al. Jarid2 Methylation via the PRC2 Complex Regulates H3K27me3 Deposition during Cell Differentiation. Mol. Cell 2015, 57, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mozzetta, C.; Pontis, J.; Fritsch, L.; Robin, P.; Portoso, M.; Proux, C.; Margueron, R.; Ait-Si-Ali, S. The histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases G9a and GLP regulate polycomb repressive complex 2-mediated gene silencing. Mol. Cell 2014, 53, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shirato, H.; Ogawa, S.; Nakajima, K.; Inagawa, M.; Kojima, M.; Tachibana, M.; Shinkai, Y.; Takeuchi, T. A jumonji (Jarid2) protein complex represses cyclin D1 expression by methylation of histone H3-K9. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mysliwiec, M.R.; Carlson, C.D.; Tietjen, J.; Hung, H.; Ansari, A.Z.; Lee, Y. Jarid2 (Jumonji, AT Rich Interactive Domain 2) Regulates NOTCH1 Expression via Histone Modification in the Developing Heart. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rock, K.D.; Folts, L.M.; Zierden, H.C.; Marx-Rattner, R.; Leu, N.A.; Nugent, B.M.; Bale, T.L. Developmental transcriptomic patterns can be altered by transgenic overexpression of Uty. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xu, J.; Deng, X.; Watkins, R.; Disteche, C.M. Sex-specific differences in expression of histone demethylases Utx and Uty in mouse brain and neurons. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 4521–4527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Shalaby, N.A.; Sayed, R.; Zhang, Q.; Scoggin, S.; Eliazer, S.; Rothenfluh, A.; Buszczak, M. Systematic discovery of genetic modulation by Jumonji histone demethylases in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Pinzón, J.H.; Reed, A.R.; Shalaby, N.A.; Buszczak, M.; Rodan, A.R.; Rothenfluh, A. Alcohol-Induced Behaviors Require a Subset of Drosophila JmjC-Domain Histone Demethylases in the Nervous System. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 41, 2015–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Xi, Z.-Q.; Sun, J.-J.; Wang, X.-F.; Li, M.-W.; Liu, X.-Z.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zhu, X.; Xiao, F.; Li, J.-M.; Gong, Y.; et al. HSPBAP1 is found extensively in the anterior temporal neocortex of patients with intractable epilepsy. Synapse 2007, 61, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Türkmen, V.A.; Hintzen, J.C.J.; Tumber, A.; Moesgaard, L.; Salah, E.; Kongsted, J.; Schofield, C.J.; Mecinović, J. Substrate selectivity and inhibition of histidine JmjC hydroxylases MINA53 and NO66. RSC Chem. Biol. 2023, 4, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bräuer, K.E.; Brockers, K.; Moneer, J.; Feuchtinger, A.; Wollscheid-Lengeling, E.; Lengeling, A.; Wolf, A. Phylogenetic and genomic analyses of the ribosomal oxygenases Riox1 (No66) and Riox2 (Mina53) provide new insights into their evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tsuneoka, M.; Koda, Y.; Soejima, M.; Teye, K.; Kimura, H. A novel myc target gene, mina53, that is involved in cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35450–35459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Eilbracht, J.; Reichenzeller, M.; Hergt, M.; Schnölzer, M.; Heid, H.; Stöhr, M.; Franke, W.W.; Schmidt-Zachmann, M.S. NO66, a highly conserved dual location protein in the nucleolus and in a special type of synchronously replicating chromatin. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 1816–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Eilbracht, J.; Kneissel, S.; Hofmann, A.; Schmidt-Zachmann, M.S. Protein NO52—A constitutive nucleolar component sharing high sequence homologies to protein NO66. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 84, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shiio, Y.; Donohoe, S.; Yi, E.C.; Goodlett, D.R.; Aebersold, R.; Eisenman, R.N. Quantitative proteomic analysis of Myc oncoprotein function. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5088–5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Grandori, C.; Gomez-Roman, N.; Felton-Edkins, Z.A.; Ngouenet, C.; Galloway, D.A.; Eisenman, R.N.; White, R.J. c-Myc binds to human ribosomal DNA and stimulates transcription of rRNA genes by RNA polymerase I. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sun, J.; Yu, M.; Lu, Y.; Thakur, C.; Chen, B.; Qiu, P.; Zhao, H.; Chen, F. Carcinogenic metalloid arsenic induces expression of mdig oncogene through JNK and STAT3 activation. Cancer Lett. 2014, 346, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yuan, B.-Z.; Castranova, V.; Shi, X.; Stauffer, J.L.; Demers, L.M.; Chen, F. The Human mineral dust-induced gene, mdig, is a cell growth regulating gene associated with lung cancer. Oncogene 2005, 24, 4873–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Thakur, C.; Chen, B.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, Z.-Q.; Chen, F. Loss of mdig expression enhances DNA and histone methylation and metastasis of aggressive breast cancer. Sig Transduct. Target. Ther. 2018, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Williams, S.T.; Walport, L.J.; Hopkinson, R.J.; Madden, S.K.; Chowdhury, R.; Schofield, C.J.; Kawamura, A. Studies on the catalytic domains of multiple JmjC oxygenases using peptide substrates. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 1596–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mahon, P.C.; Hirota, K.; Semenza, G.L. FIH-1: A novel protein that interacts with HIF-1α and VHL to mediate repression of HIF-1 transcriptional activity. Genes. Dev. 2001, 15, 2675–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lando, D.; Peet, D.J.; Gorman, J.J.; Whelan, D.A.; Whitelaw, M.L.; Bruick, R.K. FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Genes. Dev. 2002, 16, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dames, S.A.; Martinez-Yamout, M.; De Guzman, R.N.; Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. Structural basis for Hif-1 alpha/CBP recognition in the cellular hypoxic response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 5271–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jaakkola, P.; Mole, D.R.; Tian, Y.-M.; Wilson, M.I.; Gielbert, J.; Gaskell, S.J.; von Kriegsheim, A.; Hebestreit, H.F.; Mukherji, M.; Schofield, C.J.; et al. Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science 2001, 292, 468–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lando, D.; Peet, D.J.; Whelan, D.A.; Gorman, J.J.; Whitelaw, M.L. Asparagine hydroxylation of the HIF transactivation domain a hypoxic switch. Science 2002, 295, 858–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hewitson, K.S.; McNeill, L.A.; Riordan, M.V.; Tian, Y.-M.; Bullock, A.N.; Welford, R.W.; Elkins, J.M.; Oldham, N.J.; Bhattacharya, S.; Gleadle, J.M.; et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) asparagine hydroxylase is identical to factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) and is related to the cupin structural family. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 26351–26355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Coleman, M.L.; McDonough, M.A.; Hewitson, K.S.; Coles, C.; Mecinovicí, J.; Edelmann, M.; Cook, K.M.; Cockman, M.E.; Lancaster, D.E.; Kessler, B.M.; et al. Asparaginyl Hydroxylation of the Notch Ankyrin Repeat Domain by Factor Inhibiting Hypoxia-inducible Factor. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 24027–24038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ferrante, F.; Giaimo, B.D.; Friedrich, T.; Sugino, T.; Mertens, D.; Kugler, S.; Gahr, B.M.; Just, S.; Pan, L.; Bartkuhn, M.; et al. Hydroxylation of the NOTCH1 intracellular domain regulates Notch signaling dynamics. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cai, X.; Wang, R.; Zhu, J.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Ouyang, G.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhu, C.; Deng, H.; et al. Factor inhibiting HIF negatively regulates antiviral innate immunity via hydroxylation of IKKϵ. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 113606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wilkins, S.E.; Islam, S.; Gannon, J.M.; Markolovic, S.; Hopkinson, R.J.; Ge, W.; Schofield, C.J.; Chowdhury, R. JMJD5 is a human arginyl C-3 hydroxylase. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, Y.; Arai, A.; Kim, T.; Kim, S.; Park, N.-H.; Kim, R.H. Histone Demethylase Jmjd7 Negatively Regulates Differentiation of Osteoclast. Chin. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 21, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Del Rizzo, P.A.; Krishnan, S.; Trievel, R.C. Crystal structure and functional analysis of JMJD5 indicate an alternate specificity and function. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 32, 4044–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, H.; Zhou, X.; Wu, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Tao, Y.; Chen, N.; Zang, J. Structure of the JmjC-domain-containing protein JMJD5. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69 Pt 10, 1911–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shen, J.; Liu, G.; Qi, H.; Xiang, X.; Shao, J. JMJD5 inhibits lung cancer progression by facilitating EGFR proteasomal degradation. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Huang, X.; Zhang, L.; Qi, H.; Shao, J.; Shen, J. Identification and functional implication of nuclear localization signals in the N-terminal domain of JMJD5. Biochimie 2013, 95, 2114–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Vangimalla, S.S.; Ganesan, M.; Kharbanda, K.K.; Osna, N.A. Bifunctional Enzyme JMJD6 Contributes to Multiple Disease Pathogenesis: New Twist on the Old Story. Biomolecules 2017, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Böttger, A.; Islam, M.S.; Chowdhury, R.; Schofield, C.J.; Wolf, A. The oxygenase Jmjd6—A case study in conflicting assignments. Biochem. J. 2015, 468, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Fadok, V.A.; Bratton, D.L.; Rose, D.M.; Pearson, A.; Ezekewitz, R.A.B.; Henson, P.M. A receptor for phosphatidylserine-specific clearance of apoptotic cells. Nature 2000, 405, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cui, P.; Qin, B.; Liu, N.; Pan, G.; Pei, D. Nuclear localization of the phosphatidylserine receptor protein via multiple nuclear localization signals. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 293, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wolf, A.; Schmitz, C.; Böttger, A. Changing story of the receptor for phosphatidylserine-dependent clearance of apoptotic cells. EMBO Rep. 2007, 8, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Neumann, B.; oakley, S.; Giordano-Santini, R.; Linton, C.; Lee, E.S.; Nakagawa, A.; Xue, D.; Hilliard, M.A. EFF-1-mediated regenerative axonal fusion requires components of the apoptotic pathway. Nature 2015, 517, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Yang, H.; Chen, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Godfroy, J.I.; Liang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Yuan, Q.; et al. A lysine-rich motif in the phosphatidylserine receptor PSR-1 mediates recognition and removal of apoptotic cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Tsai, W.-C.; Reineke, L.C.; Jain, A.; Jung, S.Y.; Lloyd, R.E. Histone arginine demethylase JMJD6 is linked to stress granule assembly through demethylation of the stress granule-nucleating protein G3BP1. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 18886–18896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Han, G.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Mao, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.D. The hydroxylation activity of Jmjd6 is required for its homo-oligomerization. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 113, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mantri, M.; Krojer, T.; Bagg, E.A.; Webby, C.J.; Butler, D.S.; Kochan, G.; Kavanagh, K.L.; Oppermann, U.; McDonough, M.A.; Schofield, C.J. Crystal Structure of the 2-Oxoglutarate- and Fe(II)-Dependent Lysyl Hydroxylase JMJD6. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 401, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Unoki, M.; Masuda, A.; Dohmae, N.; Arita, K.; Yoshimatsu, M.; Iwai, Y.; Fukui, Y.; Ueda, K.; Hamamoto, R.; Shirakawa, M.; et al. Lysyl 5-Hydroxylation, a Novel Histone Modification, by Jumonji Domain Containing 6 (JMJD6). J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6053–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Islam, M.S.; McDonough, M.A.; Chowdhury, R.; Gault, J.; Khan, A.; Pires, E.; Schofield, C.J. Biochemical and structural investigations clarify the substrate selectivity of the 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase JMJD6. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 11637–11652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Cockman, M.E.; Sugimoto, Y.; Pegg, H.B.; Masson, N.; Salah, E.; Tumber, A.; Flynn, H.R.; Kirkpatrick, J.M.; Schofield, C.J.; Ratcliffe, P.J. Widespread hydroxylation of unstructured lysine-rich protein domains by JMJD6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2201483119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Boeckel, J.-N.; Guarani, V.; Koyanagi, M.; Roexe, T.; Lengeling, A.; Schermuly, R.T.; Gellert, P.; Braun, T.; Zeiher, A.; Dimmeler, S. Jumonji domain-containing protein 6 (Jmjd6) is required for angiogenic sprouting and regulates splicing of VEGF-receptor 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3276–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Heim, A.; Grimm, C.; Müller, U.; Häußler, S.; Mackeen, M.M.; Merl, J.; Hauck, S.M.; Kessler, B.M.; Schofield, C.J.; Wolf, A.; et al. Jumonji domain containing protein 6 (Jmjd6) modulates splicing and specifically interacts with arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains of SR- and SR-like proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 7833–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Markolovic, S.; Leissing, T.M.; Chowdhury, R.; Wilkins, S.E.; Lu, X.; Schofield, C.J. Structure–function relationships of human JmjC oxygenases—Demethylases versus hydroxylases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016, 41, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Liu, Y.; Long, Y.-H.; Wang, S.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Li, Y.-F.; Mi, J.-S.; Yu, C.-H.; Li, D.-Y.; Zhang, J.-H.; Zhang, X.-J. JMJD6 regulates histone H2A.X phosphorylation and promotes autophagy in triple-negative breast cancer cells via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Oncogene 2019, 38, 980–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Huo, D.; Chen, H.; Cheng, Y.; Song, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, M.J.; Xuan, C. JMJD6 modulates DNA damage response through downregulating H4K16ac independently of its enzymatic activity. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27, 1052–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fages, J.; Chailleux, C.; Humbert, J.; Jang, S.-M.; Loehr, J.; Lambert, J.-P.; Côté, J.; Trouche, D.; Canitrot, Y. JMJD6 participates in the maintenance of ribosomal DNA integrity in response to DNA damage. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yeo, K.S.; Tan, M.C.; Lim, Y.-Y.; Ea, C.-K. JMJD8 is a novel endoplasmic reticulum protein with a JmjC domain. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yeo, K.S.; Tan, M.C.; Wong, W.Y.; Loh, S.W.; Lam, Y.L.; Tan, C.L.; Lim, Y.-Y.; Ea, C.-K. JMJD8 is a positive regulator of TNF-induced NF-κB signaling. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Yi, J.; Wang, L.; Du, J.; Wang, M.; Shen, H.; Liu, Z.; Qin, Y.; Liu, J.; Hu, G.; Xiao, R.; et al. ER-localized JmjC domain-containing protein JMJD8 targets STING to promote immune evasion and tumor growth in breast cancer. Dev. Cell 2023, 58, 760–778.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Noma, A.; Ishitani, R.; Kato, M.; Nagao, A.; Nureki, O.; Suzuki, T. Expanding role of the jumonji C domain as an RNA hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 34503–34507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, L.; Liang, R.; Deng, W.; Guo, W.; Wang, Q.; Hu, X.; Du, X.; Sham, P.C.; et al. Comprehensive and integrative analyses identify TYW5 as a schizophrenia risk gene. BMC Med. 2022, 20, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Lee, M.G.; Villa, R.; Trojer, P.; Norman, J.; Yan, K.-P.; Reinberg, D.; Di Croce, L.; Shiekhattar, R. Demethylation of H3K27 regulates polycomb recruitment and H2A ubiquitination. Science 2007, 318, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Greenfield, A. The UTX gene escapes X inactivation in mice and humans. Human. Mol. Genet. 1998, 7, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Miller, S.A.; Mohn, S.E.; Weinmann, A.S. Jmjd3 and UTX play a demethylase-independent role in chromatin remodeling to regulate T-box family member-dependent gene expression. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, C.; Lee, J.-E.; Cho, Y.-W.; Xiao, Y.; Jin, Q.; Liu, C.; Ge, K. UTX regulates mesoderm differentiation of embryonic stem cells independent of H3K27 demethylase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 15324–15329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Tran, N.; Broun, A.; Ge, K. Lysine Demethylase KDM6A in Differentiation, Development, and Cancer. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 40, e00341-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Vandamme, J.; Lettier, G.; Sidoli, S.; Di Schiavi, E.; Jensen, O.N.; Salcini, A.E. The C. elegans H3K27 Demethylase UTX-1 Is Essential for Normal Development, Independent of Its Enzymatic Activity. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Oliveros, H.C.; Sabari, B.R. Disordered and dead, but in good company: How a catalytically inactive UTX retains its function. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 4577–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Shi, B.; Shi, B.; Li, W.; Li, W.; Song, Y.; Song, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ju, R.; Ju, R.; et al. UTX condensation underlies its tumour-suppressive activity. Nature 2021, 597, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wang, S.-P.; Tang, Z.; Chen, C.-W.; Shimada, M.; Koche, R.P.; Wang, L.-H.; Nakadai, T.; Chramiec, A.; Krivtsov, A.V.; Armstrong, S.A.; et al. A UTX-MLL4-p300 Transcriptional Regulatory Network Coordinately Shapes Active Enhancer Landscapes for Eliciting Transcription. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 308–321.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Zhao, W.; Li, Q.; Ayers, S.; Gu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Wang, R.-F. Jmjd3 inhibits reprogramming by upregulating expression of INK4a/Arf and targeting PHF20 for ubiquitination. Cell 2013, 152, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lan, H.; Tan, M.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, F.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Xiong, X.; Sun, Y. LSD1 destabilizes FBXW7 and abrogates FBXW7 functions independent of its demethylase activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12311–12320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Gu, F.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Ye, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lan, H. Biological roles of LSD1 beyond its demethylase activity. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 3341–3350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Welcker, M.; Clurman, B. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: A tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008, 8, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Chao, A.; Lin, C.-Y.; Chao, A.-N.; Tsai, C.-L.; Chen, M.-Y.; Lee, L.-Y.; Chang, T.-C.; Wang, T.-H.; Lai, C.-H.; Wang, H.-S. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) destabilizes p62 and inhibits autophagy in gynecologic malignancies. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 74434–74450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Carnesecchi, J.; Forcet, C.; Zhang, L.; Tribollet, V.; Barenton, B.; Boudra, R.; Cerutti, C.; Billas, I.M.L.; Sérandour, A.A.; Carroll, J.S.; et al. ERRα induces H3K9 demethylation by LSD1 to promote cell invasion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3909–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zeng, C.; Chen, J.; Cooke, E.W.; Subuddhi, A.; Roodman, E.T.; Chen, F.X.; Cao, K. Demethylase-independent roles of LSD1 in regulating enhancers and cell fate transition. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Kumaraswamy, A.; Duan, Z.; Flores, D.; Zhang, C.; Sehrawat, A.; Hu, Y.-M.; Swaim, O.A.; Rodansky, E.; Storck, W.K.; Kuleape, J.A.; et al. LSD1 promotes prostate cancer reprogramming by repressing TP53 signaling independently of its demethylase function. JCI Insight 2023, 8, e167440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Marayati, B.F.; Tucker, J.F.; De La Cerda, D.A.; Hou, T.-C.; Chen, R.; Sugiyama, T.; Pease, J.B.; Zhang, K. The Catalytic-Dependent and -Independent Roles of Lsd1 and Lsd2 Lysine Demethylases in Heterochromatin Formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cells 2020, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Stewart, D.M.; Qi, S.; Yamane, K.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wong, J. AOF1 is a histone H3K4 demethylase possessing demethylase activity-independent repression function. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Farcas, A.M.; Blackledge, N.P.; Sudbery, I.; Long, H.K.; McGouran, J.F.; Rose, N.R.; Lee, S.; Sims, D.; Cerase, A.; Sheahan, T.W.; et al. KDM2B links the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of CpG islands. Elife 2012, 1, e00205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. He, J.; Shen, L.; Wan, M.; Taranova, O.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y. Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Burchell, J.M. Histone Methylases and Demethylases Regulating Antagonistic Methyl Marks: Changes Occurring in Cancer. Cells 2022, 11, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Couture, J.-F.; Collazo, E.; Ortiz-Tello, P.A.; Brunzelle, J.S.; Trievel, R.C. Specificity and mechanism of JMJD2A, a trimethyllysine-specific histone demethylase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Huang, Y.; Fang, J.; Bedford, M.T.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, R.-M. Recognition of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation by the double tudor domain of JMJD2A. Science 2006, 312, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Johmura, Y.; Sun, J.; Kitagawa, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Kuno, T.; Naiki-Ito, A.; Sawada, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Okabe, A.; Aburatani, H.; et al. SCF(Fbxo22)-KDM4A targets methylated p53 for degradation and regulates senescence. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Shi, L.; Sun, L.; Li, Q.; Liang, J.; Yu, W.; Yi, X.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Han, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Histone demethylase JMJD2B coordinates H3K4/H3K9 methylation and promotes hormonally responsive breast carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7541–7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Kawazu, M.; Saso, K.; Tong, K.I.; McQuire, T.; Goto, K.; Son, D.-O.; Wakeham, A.; Miyagishi, M.; Mak, T.W.; Okada, H. Histone demethylase JMJD2B functions as a co-factor of estrogen receptor in breast cancer proliferation and mammary gland development. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gaughan, L.; Stockley, J.; Coffey, K.; O’neill, D.; Jones, D.L.; Wade, M.; Wright, J.; Moore, M.; Tse, S.; Rogerson, L.; et al. KDM4B is a master regulator of the estrogen receptor signalling cascade. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 6892–6904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Johmura, Y.; Maeda, I.; Suzuki, N.; Wu, W.; Goda, A.; Morita, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Nagasawa, S.; Kojima, Y.; et al. Fbxo22-mediated KDM4B degradation determines selective estrogen receptor modulator activity in breast cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 5603–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Johmura, Y.; Harris, A.S.; Ohta, T.; Nakanishi, M. FBXO22, an epigenetic multiplayer coordinating senescence, hormone signaling, and metastasis. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 2718–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Jamshidi, S.; Catchpole, S.; Chen, J.; So, C.W.E.; Burchell, J.; Rahman, K.M.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. KDM5B protein expressed in viable and fertile ΔARID mice exhibit no demethylase activity. Int. J. Oncol. 2021, 59, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ren, Z.; Kim, A.; Huang, Y.-T.; Pi, W.-C.; Gong, W.; Yu, X.; Qi, J.; Jin, J.; Cai, L.; Roeder, R.G.; et al. A PRC2-Kdm5b axis sustains tumorigenicity of acute myeloid leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2122940119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zhang, S.-M.; Cai, W.L.; Liu, X.; Thakral, D.; Luo, J.; Chan, L.H.; McGeary, M.K.; Song, E.; Blenman, K.R.M.; Micevic, G.; et al. KDM5B promotes immune evasion by recruiting SETDB1 to silence retroelements. Nature 2021, 598, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. DiTacchio, L.; Le, H.D.; Vollmers, C.; Hatori, M.; Witcher, M.; Secombe, J.; Panda, S. Histone lysine demethylase JARID1a activates CLOCK-BMAL1 and influences the circadian clock. Science 2011, 333, 1881–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Gaillard, S.; Charasson, V.; Ribeyre, C.; Salifou, K.; Pillaire, M.-J.; Hoffmann, J.-S.; Constantinou, A.; Trouche, D.; Vandromme, M. KDM5A and KDM5B histone-demethylases contribute to HU-induced replication stress response and tolerance. Biol. Open 2021, 10, bio057729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Ohguchi, Y.; Ohguchi, H. Diverse Functions of KDM5 in Cancer: Transcriptional Repressor or Activator? Cancers 2022, 14, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Pippa, S.; Mannironi, C.; Licursi, V.; Bombardi, L.; Colotti, G.; Cundari, E.; Mollica, A.; Coluccia, A.; Naccarato, V.; La Regina, G.; et al. Small Molecule Inhibitors of KDM5 Histone Demethylases Increase the Radiosensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells Overexpressing JARID1B. Molecules 2019, 24, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Pavlenko, E.; Ruengeler, T.; Engel, P.; Poepsel, S. Functions and Interactions of Mammalian KDM5 Demethylases. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 906662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Xue, S.; Lam, Y.M.; He, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Mbadhi, M.N.; Zheng, L.; Cheng, Z.; et al. Histone lysine demethylase KDM5B maintains chronic myeloid leukemia via multiple epigenetic actions. Exp. Hematol. 2020, 82, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Liu, X.; Secombe, J. The Histone Demethylase KDM5 Activates Gene Expression by Recognizing Chromatin Context through Its PHD Reader Motif. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 2219–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Rogers, M.F.; Marshall, O.J.; Secombe, J. KDM5-mediated activation of genes required for mitochondrial biology is necessary for viability in Drosophila. Development 2023, 150, dev202024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Deogharia, M.; Venegas-Zamora, L.; Agrawal, A.; Shi, M.; Jain, A.K.; McHugh, K.J.; Altamirano, F.; Marian, A.J.; Gurha, P. Histone demethylase KDM5 regulates cardiomyocyte maturation by promoting fatty acid oxidation, oxidative phosphorylation, and myofibrillar organization. Cardiovasc. Res. 2024, 120, 630–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Yheskel, M.; Sidoli, S.; Secombe, J. Proximity labeling reveals a new in vivo network of interactors for the histone demethylase KDM5. Epigenetics Chromatin 2023, 16, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Horton, J.R.; Engstrom, A.; Zoeller, E.L.; Liu, X.; Shanks, J.R.; Zhang, X.; Johns, M.A.; Vertino, P.M.; Fu, H.; Cheng, X.l. Characterization of a Linked Jumonji Domain of the KDM5/JARID1 Family of Histone H3 Lysine 4 Demethylases. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 2631–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Johansson, C.; Velupillai, S.; Tumber, A.; Szykowska, A.; Hookway, E.S.; Nowak, R.P.; Strain-Damerell, C.; Gileadi, C.; Philpott, M.; Burgess-Brown, N.; et al. Structural analysis of human KDM5B guides histone demethylase inhibitor development. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Di Nisio, E.; Licursi, V.; Mannironi, C.; Buglioni, V.; Paiardini, A.; Robusti, G.; Noberini, R.; Bonaldi, T.; Negri, R. A truncated and catalytically inactive isoform of KDM5B histone demethylase accumulates in breast cancer cells and regulates H3K4 tri-methylation and gene expression. Cancer Gene Ther. 2023, 30, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Roesch, A.; Becker, B.; Meyer, S.; Wild, P.; Hafner, C.; Landthaler, M.; Vogt, T. Retinoblastoma-binding protein 2-homolog 1: A retinoblastoma-binding protein downregulated in malignant melanomas. Mod. Pathol. 2005, 18, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information. NCBI Gene RefSeq Database; National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information: Bethesda, MD, USA, 1988. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 6 April 2017).
Ijms 25 06900 g001
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the predicted and validated transcripts for KDM4 and KDM5 genes (from NCBI Gene RefSeq database). Each of these transcripts could generate different predicted or validated protein isoforms with or without known protein domains, resulting in non-truncated or truncated isoforms. Among the truncated protein isoforms, we highlighted the absence of JmjN, JmjC, or both of these domains, using orange, purple, and blue, respectively. Green arrows show the translational start sites for transcripts giving rise to shorter protein isoforms. For KDM4A, KDM4D, KDM5A, KDM5C, and KDM5D, no truncated protein isoforms were predicted. More details are in Table S1. Figure 1 was created using R v4.3.1 and ggplot2 package v3.5.1. Final editing with Inkscape 1.3.2.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the predicted and validated transcripts for KDM4 and KDM5 genes (from NCBI Gene RefSeq database). Each of these transcripts could generate different predicted or validated protein isoforms with or without known protein domains, resulting in non-truncated or truncated isoforms. Among the truncated protein isoforms, we highlighted the absence of JmjN, JmjC, or both of these domains, using orange, purple, and blue, respectively. Green arrows show the translational start sites for transcripts giving rise to shorter protein isoforms. For KDM4A, KDM4D, KDM5A, KDM5C, and KDM5D, no truncated protein isoforms were predicted. More details are in Table S1. Figure 1 was created using R v4.3.1 and ggplot2 package v3.5.1. Final editing with Inkscape 1.3.2.
Ijms 25 06900 g001
Ijms 25 06900 g002
Figure 2. Model of the competitive action of the KDM5B-NTT isoform on the KDM5B-PLU1 targets. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Model of the competitive action of the KDM5B-NTT isoform on the KDM5B-PLU1 targets. Created with BioRender.com.
Ijms 25 06900 g002
Ijms 25 06900 g003
Figure 3. Schematic representation of different protein domains that confer demethylase activity or determine demethylase-independent functions, including other enzymatic activities, which in turn regulate many biological processes. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of different protein domains that confer demethylase activity or determine demethylase-independent functions, including other enzymatic activities, which in turn regulate many biological processes. Created with Biorender.com.
Ijms 25 06900 g003
Table 1. Table of KDM proteins with described demethylase-independent functions and/or non-canonical catalytic functions. The description of the principal protein domains is shown in the inset legend. Created with BioRender.com.
Table 1. Table of KDM proteins with described demethylase-independent functions and/or non-canonical catalytic functions. The description of the principal protein domains is shown in the inset legend. Created with BioRender.com.
Jumonji Histone Demethylases with No or Uncertain Histone Demethylase Activity
Official Symbol (Synonyms)Protein NameUniprot EntryProtein DomainsSubstratesCatalytic
Activity		Refs
JARID2
(JMJ, DIDDF7)		Protein JumonjiQ92833Ijms 25 06900 i001-None[8,14]
UTY
(KDM6C, KDM6AL)		Ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat containing, Y-linkedO14607Ijms 25 06900 i002H3K27me2/3Demethylase (uncertain)[15,16,17]
JmjC-Only Domain Proteins with Different Catalytic Functions
Official Symbol (Synonyms)Protein NameUniprot EntryProtein DomainsSubstratesCatalytic
Activity		Refs
HSPBAP1 (PASS1)HSPB1-associated protein 1Q96EW2Ijms 25 06900 i003HSP27Not investigated[18]
RIOX1
(MAPJD, NO66, C14orf169, JMJD9)		Ribosomal oxygenase 1Q9H6W3Ijms 25 06900 i004RPL8, H3K4me1/2/3, H3K36me2/3Hydroxylase, Demethylase (uncertain)[12,19,20,21,22]
RIOX2
(MINA53, NO52, JMJD10, MINA, MDIG)		Ribosomal oxygenase 2Q8IUF8Ijms 25 06900 i005RPL27A, H3K9me3Hydroxylase, Demethylase (uncertain)[12,20,21,22,23]
HIF1AN
(FIH)		Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit alpha inhibitorQ9NWT6Ijms 25 06900 i006HIF1-2α, self hydroxylation at Trp-296, ankyrin repeat domain (ARD)-containing proteinsHydroxylase[24,25]
JMJD4Jumonji domain-containing 4Q9H9V9Ijms 25 06900 i007eRF1, PKM2Hydroxylase[26,27]
KDM8
(JMJD5)		Lysine demethylase 8Q8N371Ijms 25 06900 i008H3K9me1, HEK36me2, NFATc1Hydroxylase, Demethylase?
Protease?		[28,29,30,31]
JMJD6 (KIAA0585, PTDSR1, PTDSR, PSR)Jumonji domain-containing 6Q6NYC1Ijms 25 06900 i009Arginines, lysines H3R2me, H4R3me, 7SK, MePCE, p53, GLS RNAHydroxylase, Demethylase (uncertain), Protease?[31,32,33,34,35,36,37]
JMJD7Jumonji domain-containing 7P0C870Ijms 25 06900 i010H3R2me2, H4R3me2, DRG1/2
Hydroxylase, Protease?[31,38]
JMJD8
(C16orf20, PP14397)		Jumonji domain-containing 8Q96S16Ijms 25 06900 i011AKT1Demethylase[39,40]
TYW5
(C2orf60,
HTYW5)		tRNA wybutosine-synthesizing protein 5A2RUC4Ijms 25 06900 i012yW-72 in tRNA(Phe)Hydroxylase[41]
Catalytically Active KDMs with Catalytic-Independent Functions
Official Symbol (Synonyms)Protein NameUniprot EntryProtein DomainsSubstratesCatalytic
Activity		Refs
KDM1A
(LSD1, AOF2, BHC110, CPRF, KDM1, KIAA0601)		Lysine-specific histone demethylase 1AO60341Ijms 25 06900 i013H3K4me1/2 H3K9me1/2Demethylase[8,42]
KDM1B
(LSD2, AOF1, C6orf193)		Lysine-specific histone demethylase 2Q8NB78Ijms 25 06900 i014H3K4me1/2Demethylase[43,44,45]
KDM2B
(CXXC2, FBL10, FBXL10, JHDM1B, NDY1, PCCX2)		Lysine-specific demethylase 2BQ8NHM5Ijms 25 06900 i015H3K4me3 H3K36me2 H3K79me2/3Demethylase[46,47,48,49]
KDM4A (JHDM3A, JMJD2, JMJD2A, KIAA0677, TDRD14A)Lysine-specific demethylase 4AO75164Ijms 25 06900 i016H3K9me3
H3K36me3 H1.4K26		Demethylase[8,50,51]
KDM4B (JHDM3B, JMJD2B, KIAA0876, MRD65, TDRD14B)Lysine-specific demethylase 4BO94953Ijms 25 06900 i017H3K9me3Demethylase[52]
KDM5A
(RBP2, RBBP2, JARID1A)		Lysine-specific demethylase 5AP29375Ijms 25 06900 i018H3K4me2/3Demethylase[53]
KDM5B
(PLU-1, CT31, RBBP2H1A, PPP1R98, JARID1B)		Lysine-specific demethylase 5BQ9UGL1Ijms 25 06900 i019H3K4me2/3Demethylase[54,55]
KDM6A
(UTX)		Lysine-specific demethylase 6AO15550Ijms 25 06900 i020H3K27me2/3Demethylase[56,57,58]
KDM6B
(JMJD3, KIAA0346)		Lysine-specific demethylase 6BO15054Ijms 25 06900 i021H3K27me2/3Demethylase[56,57,58,59]
Ijms 25 06900 i022
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Nisio, E.; Manzini, V.; Licursi, V.; Negri, R. To Erase or Not to Erase: Non-Canonical Catalytic Functions and Non-Catalytic Functions of Members of Histone Lysine Demethylase Families. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136900

AMA Style

Di Nisio E, Manzini V, Licursi V, Negri R. To Erase or Not to Erase: Non-Canonical Catalytic Functions and Non-Catalytic Functions of Members of Histone Lysine Demethylase Families. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(13):6900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Nisio, Elena, Valeria Manzini, Valerio Licursi, and Rodolfo Negri. 2024. "To Erase or Not to Erase: Non-Canonical Catalytic Functions and Non-Catalytic Functions of Members of Histone Lysine Demethylase Families" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 13: 6900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136900

APA Style

Di Nisio, E., Manzini, V., Licursi, V., & Negri, R. (2024). To Erase or Not to Erase: Non-Canonical Catalytic Functions and Non-Catalytic Functions of Members of Histone Lysine Demethylase Families. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(13), 6900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25136900

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop