Next Article in Journal
α-Fe2O3/, Co3O4/, and CoFe2O4/MWCNTs/Ionic Liquid Nanocomposites as High-Performance Electrocatalysts for the Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in a Neutral Medium
Next Article in Special Issue
Mutations in Genes Encoding Subunits of the RNA Exosome as a Potential Novel Cause of Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Apolipoproteins in Health and Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Glimpse into Humoral Response and Related Therapeutic Approaches of Takayasu’s Arteritis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Ectopic Activation of Fgf8 in Dental Mesenchyme Causes Incisor Agenesis and Molar Microdontia

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7045; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137045
by Yu Wang 1,2,†, Jingjing Wang 2,†, Tian Xu 2, Shuhui Yang 2, Xinran Wang 2, Lei Zhu 2, Nan Li 2, Bo Liu 3, Jing Xiao 2,* and Chao Liu 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7045; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137045
Submission received: 17 May 2024 / Revised: 21 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 27 June 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors, 

Congratulations of the job you have done and presented in this manuscript. I believe that your work is significant to the field and might be of high interest for the general reader. However, for the moment, I cannot recommend publication of this paper in a such  prestigious journal. please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor revisions are required

Author Response

Since the comments were labeled in the manuscript in a PDF format, we answer the comments point to point in the labled manuscript. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors, 

you made a great work! However, some improvements are suggested before acceptance. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Comment 1: In the Results section, are the figures included protected by copyright? (Fig. 1 2 3 4 5 6). Do you think it is possible, without reducing the number of paragraphs, to summarize this section which I believe to be complete, but quite didactic and narrative in some sections, such as: 2.3 and 2.6.

Response: All the images and figures are the original work in our lab. There is no copyright conflict in these images and figures. We also added the summary sentences for Results 2.3 and 2.6 to make it easier to be understand by readers. 

Comments 2: Bibliography should be formatted respecting the journal’s requirements and no improper citations are evidenced.

Response: Since we added new references in the revised manuscript as reviewer required, we double checked and confirmed the format of the references.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a relevant study that investigated the potential factors and mechanisms related to dental agenesis and microdontia.
Some considerations:
1) I suggest that the Authors better highlight the objective of the study in “Abstract”;
2) Add sufficiently detailed information in “Materials and Methods” to allow for reproducibility and clarity of the study. Additionally, add more precise information about animal procedures (such as number of animals, euthanasia);
3) The results could be discussed more extensively by the Authors, especially the molecular and cellular aspects of odontogenesis and genetic, metabolic and environmental factors that influence and regulate the formation and development of dental tissues, including dental mineralization, as well as the association between conditions oral and systemic.

Author Response

This is a relevant study that investigated the potential factors and mechanisms related to dental agenesis and microdontia.

Some considerations:

1) I suggest that the Authors better highlight the objective of the study in “Abstract”;

Response: Thank reviewer's suggestion. We rewrite the Abstract and hightlight the object of the study.

2) Add sufficiently detailed information in “Materials and Methods” to allow for reproducibility and clarity of the study. Additionally, add more precise information about animal procedures (such as number of animals, euthanasia);

Reponse:We added the exact precedures and mpuse numbers used in each experiment as reviewer required.

3) The results could be discussed more extensively by the Authors, especially the molecular and cellular aspects of odontogenesis and genetic, metabolic and environmental factors that influence and regulate the formation and development of dental tissues, including dental mineralization, as well as the association between conditions oral and systemic.

Reponse: We added new paragraphs and new references to extensively discuss the content mentioned by reviewer. We also added a conclusion section to summarize the Results and Discussion.

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors, I believe that you took advantage of the reviewers comments and improved a lot the paper. I have no further comments.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The adjustments improved and complemented the manuscript.

Back to TopTop