Next Article in Journal
Recent Advancements in Cell-Based Therapies in Melanoma
Next Article in Special Issue
The Interstitial Gland as a Source of Pro- or Anti-Senescent Cells during Chinchilla Rabbit Ovarian Aging
Previous Article in Journal
McWRKY43 Confers Cold Stress Tolerance in Michelia crassipes via Regulation of Flavonoid Biosynthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
mTOR and SGLT-2 Inhibitors: Their Synergistic Effect on Age-Related Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alterations of Liver Morphology in Senescent Rats

by
Ruth Maldonado-Rengel
1,2,
Zaida Sócola-Barsallo
2 and
Bélgica Vásquez
3,4,*
1
Doctoral Program in Morphological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile
2
Department of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto, Calle París, Loja 110107, Ecuador
3
Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile
4
Centre of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies, Universidad de La Frontera, Avenida Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco 4811230, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(18), 9846; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189846
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 4 September 2024 / Published: 12 September 2024

Abstract

:
Age-related liver changes can have important implications for health and metabolic function. This study aimed to describe the morphoquantitative alterations of the liver in senescent rats compared to adult rats. Twelve male rats were used, divided into 6-month-old adults (group A) and 36-month-old senescent rats (group S). Morphometric and histopathological studies, quantification of collagen types I and III, and stereological analyses were performed to determine the volume density of mononucleated (VvhepM) and binucleated (VvhepB) hepatocyte nuclei, surface area density (SvhepM), and number density (NvhepM) of mononucleated hepatocyte nuclei. The findings reveal an alteration of the normal liver tissue architecture in senescent rats and the presence of inflammatory lesions and fibrosis. In addition, there was a decrease in body and liver mass and volume. Group S showed a significant reduction in VvhepM and NvhepM; however, SvhepM was significantly higher. No significant differences were noted in the percentage of binucleated hepatocytes between the two groups. This study reveals substantial morphological changes in the aging liver, with possible functional implications. More research is needed on the underlying mechanisms and their consequences at older ages.

1. Introduction

The liver is a vital organ in mammalian physiology, playing crucial roles in metabolism, detoxification, plasma protein synthesis, and nutrient storage [1]. Its correct functioning is essential to maintaining organismal homeostasis. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) are often used as experimental subjects in scientific research to examine physiological and pathological mechanisms owing to their biological and genetic similarities to humans [2].
Aging or senescence is a natural process that leads to a progressive decline in physiological function and increased vulnerability to disease. Using senescent rats as models to study aging in mammals provides valuable information on age-related changes occurring in various organs, including the liver. Studying liver alterations in senescent rats is of great importance for understanding age-related liver diseases in humans, such as fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer [3,4,5].
Numerous studies have characterized liver morphology in young and adult rats, establishing a reference framework for identifying aging-related changes. The liver presents a well-organized architecture in young rats with uniformly sized hepatocytes and a regular sinusoidal network [6]. The liver undergoes noticeable morphological changes as it ages, such as the buildup of lipofuscin, which indicates increased oxidative stress and fibrosis. These changes are linked to a decline in the regenerative capacity of the liver [7,8,9]. Other studies have reported alterations in the structure of the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction and reduced efficiency of protein processing [10]. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells also thicken, and their fenestrations decrease. This, along with impaired endocytosis and increased leukocyte adhesion, reduces hepatic perfusion and affects lipoprotein metabolism [11,12].
A recent study by Baiocchi et al. [5] highlights how aging affects liver cells and contributes to the development of liver diseases, focusing on the biliary and vascular compartments. The results show that aging leads to dysfunctions in cell proliferation, increased oxidative stress, and changes in the hepatic microvasculature, which combined promote the progression of fibrosis and cirrhosis and, eventually, liver cancer.
Several biological mechanisms are believed to contribute to age-related hepatic alterations. Mitochondrial dysfunction is one of the main factors leading to increased oxidative stress and accumulation of cellular damage [13]. In addition, activation of chronic inflammatory responses may contribute to liver tissue degeneration and the development of fibrosis [9]. Cell signaling and DNA repair capacity changes also play a crucial role in hepatic aging [14]. The aging process involves a decline in the liver’s ability to metabolize drugs and toxins, increasing susceptibility to liver diseases [4].
Despite advances in understanding age-related hepatic morphological changes, knowledge gaps remain, especially in the detailed characterization of these alterations in senescent rats. Considering the above, this study aimed to describe the morphoquantitative alterations of the liver in senescent rats compared to adult rats. A better understanding of these alterations has important clinical and biomedical implications. It could contribute to developing strategies to prevent and treat age-related liver diseases, thereby improving the quality of life of the aging population [8].

2. Results

2.1. Descriptive Histopathological Analysis of Rat Liver Reveals Key Differences between Adult and Senescent Specimens

In group A, the liver was histologically characterized by a lobular structure that did not present the classic hexagonal shape. Several large veins were observed in its structure, some of which were central and other interlobular veins in the portal spaces. The portal space, surrounded by a continuous row of hepatocytes, contained stromal lax connective tissue and the hepatic triad, composed of the artery, vein, and interlobular bile duct lined by cuboidal cells. Between one and two biliary ducts were seen in each portal space, in addition to peribiliary lymphatic vessels. Occasionally, segmental lymphocytes and leukocytes were visualized in the connective tissue. There were anastomosed cords of hepatocytes between the portal space and the central vein, separated by interconnected sinusoids leading to the central vein. Polyhedral-shaped hepatocytes were observed on higher magnification. The large, pale, centrally located nuclei were clearly defined by a thin border of violet-blue-stained chromatin near the nuclear membrane. Large, dark nucleoli were evident. There was also variation in the size of the nuclei, and some hepatocytes were binucleated (Figure 1A–D).
In contrast, a loss of the normal architecture of the liver tissue was observed in group S, with alterations in the cord-like arrangement and formation of hepatocyte clusters in some microscopic fields. The portal spaces frequently showed enlargement, with over three interlobular bile ducts. These ducts were bordered by fibrous tissue, which, in certain instances, extended into the periportal regions. In general, the inflammation was limited to the portal space. The nuclei of the hepatocytes were enlarged, and hyperchromatic and necrotic cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm were identified (Figure 1E–H).

2.2. The Liver Tissue of Senescent Rats Shows Inflammatory Lesions and Fibrosis Predominantly Confined to the Portal Space

In group S, the modified Scheuer scale for portal inflammation and interphase hepatitis revealed that 66.7% of the cases presented grade 1, while 33.3% showed grade 2. As for lobular activity, 33.3% showed grade 1 and 66.7% showed grade 2. Regarding the extent of liver fibrosis, 50% presented stage 1 and 16.7% stage 2, while the remaining samples showed no fibrosis. On the other hand, no histopathological alterations were observed in group A.
Using Sirius Red staining, the liver samples from both groups showed the presence of types I and III collagen fibers, with a greater prominence in the portal spaces (Figure 2). Assessment of fibrosis by quantitative measurement of collagen revealed significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen content was higher in group S than in group A (p = 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the two groups in type III collagen content (p = 0.541; Table 1).
Regarding the morphological changes of the interlobular bile ducts, the Scheuer stage scale of primary biliary cholangitis indicated that 83.3% of the cases in group S were classified as stage 1. In contrast, no alterations in the interlobular bile ducts were noted in group A.

2.3. In Senescent Rats, the Reduction of Body and Liver Morphometric Parameters Is Accompanied by Significant Cellular Changes: The Hepatic Nuclei Increase in Size While Their Number Decreases

Significant differences in morphometric parameters were observed between the A and S groups. Senescent rats showed a notable decrease in body mass, liver mass, and volume compared to adult rats (Table 2).
Group S presented a reduction in the volume and number density of mononuclear hepatocyte nuclei, with significantly lower mean values than group A. However, the surface area density was significantly higher. No significant differences were observed in the percentage of binucleated hepatocytes between the two groups (Table 3).

3. Discussion

This study describes the morphological and quantitative changes in the liver of senescent rats compared to adult rats. The findings reveal a clear loss of normal liver tissue architecture, inflammatory lesions, fibrosis, reduced body and liver morphometric parameters, and changes in the size and number of hepatocyte nuclei in aging rats.
Our data revealed the presence of portal and lobular inflammation in senescent rats, which is consistent with the activation of chronic inflammatory responses reported in other studies [9]. Chronic inflammation in the aging liver can be attributed to several biological factors. One of the main mechanisms is mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to increased oxidative stress and accumulation of cellular damage [10,13]. The imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) plays a crucial role in this process, as the excessive production of ROS/RNS leads to oxidative stress, which further damages cellular components, contributing to liver inflammation and fibrosis [15]. Mitochondrial dynamics, including fission and fusion processes, are also altered in aging livers, exacerbating oxidative stress and disrupting cellular homeostasis [16].
Another important mechanism is the activation of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Senescent cells secrete a variety of proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and proteases that contribute to an inflammatory microenvironment [17,18,19,20]. The SASP is characterized by the secretion of multiple signaling molecules that include interleukins (e.g., IL-6, IL-8), chemokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These factors not only perpetuate cellular damage by maintaining a state of chronic inflammation but also actively remodel the tissue environment. This remodeling can promote fibrosis by stimulating the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells, leading to excessive deposition of extracellular matrix components such as collagen [17,19].
Moreover, the SASP factors are known to reinforce the senescent state both in an autocrine and paracrine manner, creating a self-sustaining loop that exacerbates tissue dysfunction and senescence spread to neighboring cells [18,20]. The inflammatory milieu created by SASP also contributes to the disruption of normal tissue architecture and function, further accelerating the decline in liver function observed in aging [20]. Importantly, the nature and intensity of the SASP can vary depending on the cell type and the stressor that induced senescence, highlighting the complex role of SASP in both promoting tissue repair and contributing to pathological conditions such as fibrosis and liver dysfunction [17]. Ogrodnik et al. [21] highlighted that SASP secretion could lead to cell cycle retention and increased ribosome biogenesis, resulting in lower-quality protein production and increased oxidative stress.
On the other hand, portal inflammation, in particular, may be linked to the liver’s adaptive response to microvascular dysfunction. This dysfunction is frequently driven by damage to the endothelial cells lining the blood vessels, which plays a critical role in regulating vascular tone. Endothelial damage disrupts the production of nitric oxide (NO), a key molecule responsible for inducing vasodilation, the process by which blood vessels widen to increase blood flow. When NO production is imbalanced, the blood vessels are unable to dilate properly, leading to sustained vasoconstriction. This impaired vasodilation not only restricts blood flow but also exacerbates pressure within the liver’s microvasculature, contributing significantly to hepatic microvascular dysfunction. As a result, the liver’s ability to efficiently perfuse and oxygenate its tissues is compromised, potentially leading to further liver damage and inflammation [22,23]. Maeso-Díaz et al. [24] reinforced this idea by showing that impaired microcirculatory function and a change in sinusoidal phenotype can influence adaptive responses in the aging liver, exacerbating fibrosis and inflammation. For their part, Baiocchi et al. [5] showed that aging affects the hepatic microvasculature, which may reduce hepatic perfusion and contribute to the inflammation and fibrosis seen in senescent rats.
Regarding liver fibrosis, our findings align with previous studies [8,9]. They reveal a significant buildup of fibrosis in senescent rats, with a predominant distribution in portal spaces and, to a lesser degree, in periportal regions. This fibrosis, classified in stages 1 and 2 according to the Scheuer scale, indicates a critical imbalance between the production and degradation of the extracellular matrix, a phenomenon that triggers increased fibrinogenesis [9]. The liver fibrosis observed is characterized by excessive synthesis and reduced degradation of extracellular matrix components, mainly collagen. This process alters the liver’s normal architecture, increasing tissue stiffness and promoting the activation of hepatic stellate cells, considered the main mediators of fibrogenesis [25]. The imbalance in extracellular matrix homeostasis perpetuates fibrosis and can lead to progressive liver dysfunction [9]. The buildup of fibrotic tissue compromises the hepatic lobular structure, potentially affecting portal blood flow and hepatocyte function, which could eventually result in decreased liver function [26]. Importantly, the presence of fibrosis at early stages (1 and 2) in senescent rats suggests that aging per se may contribute to the development of liver fibrosis, possibly due to the accumulation of oxidative damage, cellular senescence, and chronic inflammation associated with age.
Furthermore, there was a rise in the number of interlobular bile ducts and observed alterations in their structure, which align with the early phase of primary biliary cholangitis as per the Scheuer scale [27]. These findings are consistent with the study by Baiocchi et al. [5], who note how aging affects the biliary compartment and contributes to the development of chronic liver diseases.
A significant finding of our study was the increased size of hepatocyte nuclei in senescent rats, evidenced by a higher surface density of mononuclear hepatocyte nuclei (SvhepM), which was significantly higher (p = 0.001) in senescent rats than in adult rats. These results are consistent with previous studies that have reported an increase in hepatocyte nuclear size during aging, both in human [28,29] and animal models [30]. This finding suggests an increase in relative cell surface area, which could indicate increased compensatory cellular activity in response to senescence [14]. The increase in nuclear size could be related to several age-related factors, including gene expression changes, chromatin alterations, and a reduced DNA repair capacity [14,30]. Neurohr et al. [18] reported that cell overgrowth is characterized by cytoplasm dilution, which leads to senescence. This occurs because the cell cannot adjust nucleic acid and protein biosynthesis to match the increasing cell volume. In this vein, Ge et al. [31] describe hepatic senescent cells as exhibiting distinctive morphological features, such as an increase in cell size, the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles, and changes in the structure of the nucleus, including enlargement and changes in heterochromatin.
Additionally, the observed morphometric changes and lower volume density (VvhepM) and number (NvhepM) of mononuclear hepatocytes can be explained by several mechanisms associated with cellular aging and senescence. In aging, cells experience telomere shortening and DNA damage, leading to cell cycle arrest and a decrease in the proliferative capacity of the hepatocytes [32,33]. In addition, apoptosis increases, further reducing cell numbers [34]. This decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis result in a lower volume density and number of hepatocytes. These findings underscore the importance of cellular senescence in the morphological and functional alteration of the liver during aging, providing evidence of significant changes in hepatocyte structure.
Despite the significant findings, this study has some limitations. First, the sample was limited to a single animal model, so extrapolating these results to humans should be conducted with caution. Second, the analysis focused mainly on morphological and structural changes without comprehensively assessing functional changes. Furthermore, evaluating the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed alterations could provide a deeper understanding of hepatic aging processes.
Future studies should prioritize the investigation of the intricate molecular pathways that contribute to chronic inflammation in the aging liver. Studies analyzing the interaction between mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and the inflammatory response could provide a more comprehensive understanding of these processes. In addition, exploring therapeutic interventions that can mitigate SASP and reduce inflammation could present novel opportunities to manage age-related liver diseases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

Experimental procedures were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [35], and the experimental protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera, Chile (File Number 041_24). Twelve male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into six 6-month-old adult rats (group A) and six 36-month-old rats (group S). All rats were obtained from the vivarium in the Center of Excellence in Morphological and Surgical Studies (CEMyQ), Universidad de La Frontera, Chile. The rats were kept in controlled environmental conditions regarding temperature, environmental noise, and a cycle of 12 h light/12 h darkness. In addition, they received food and water ad libitum. The choice of male rats is justified because hormonal differences between sexes may influence the physiological and morphological response of the liver. Previous studies have shown that female rats can exhibit hormonal variations that affect the interpretation of results [36]. Furthermore, employing only one gender eliminates an additional variable and enables a more precise evaluation of the impact of age on liver alterations [37].
The sample size determination was based on the bioethical principles of Russell and Burch’s 3 Rs [38] for animal experimentation (replacement, reduction, and refinement) using the minimum number needed to achieve a significant difference [39].
The mass of each animal was recorded before euthanasia, which was performed using an overdose of 160/20 mg/kg ketamine/xylazine [40]. Then, the liver was dissected to determine its mass using an analytical balance (A&D Orion® HR 120, A&D Technology, Saitama, Japan) and volume using the Scherle method [41]. Several liver fragments were immersed in fixative (1.27 mol/L formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2) for 48 h at room temperature.

4.2. Histological Processing and Staining

Once the samples were fixed, they were dehydrated and embedded in Paraplast Plus (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Once the blocks were obtained, 5 μm thick sections were made on a microtome (Leica® RM 2255, Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA). Five sections were made from each block for histopathological and stereological analysis. The sections were stained with H&E to examine tissue structure and with Sirius Red to identify and measure collagen fibers of types I and III. The histological images were obtained using a Leica® DM750 microscope with a Leica® ICC50 HD digital camera and projected onto an LCD View Sonic®.

4.3. Histopathological Analyses

A descriptive analysis of liver tissue was performed on both groups. The modified Scheuer grade and stage scale [27] was used for the semiquantitative analysis of histological sections. The analysis was performed independently by the authors RME and ZSB. Disagreements were discussed until a consensus was reached. This scale is widely used to assess the severity of liver impairment, especially in chronic liver disease. It provides a detailed framework for quantifying both inflammation (grade) and fibrosis (stage) (Table 4). Briefly, grading refers to the scoring of necroinflammatory injury of hepatitis, including the different types and degrees of hepatocellular damage and the location and extent of the inflammatory process. Staging records the extent of fibrosis and changes in structure. The score ranges from 0 (absence of histopathological signs) to 4 (severity and extent of histopathological signs). Although initially developed for humans, the Scheuer grade and stage scale has been adapted for animal research, including rats [42]. Since senescent rats can show signs of chronic liver damage, this scale makes it possible to assess both acute and chronic lesions present in the liver of these rats. To evaluate the morphological changes of the interlobular bile ducts, the Scheuer scale of the stages of primary biliary cholangitis was used [27]. Scheuer’s stages are described in Table 5.

4.4. Quantification of Collagen Fibers

To detect collagenous fibers types I and III in the liver, histological sections were stained with Sirius Red F3BA 0.1% w/v (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h in saturated aqueous picric acid solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, they were rinsed in 0.01 N hydrochloric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 2 min, washed in distilled water, stained with Harris hematoxylin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 2 min, and washed in running water. Finally, the sections were dehydrated in ascending alcohols, rinsed in Xylene (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and mounted with Entellan® (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Histological images were obtained using a Leica® DM750 microscope with a Leica® ICC50 HD camera and projected on a View Sonic® LCD (ViewSonic, Brea, CA, USA). The total area (μm2) of types I and III collagen fibers was measured using the Image Pro Premier 9.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Warrendale, PA, USA).

4.5. Liver Stereology

For the stereological analysis of the liver, 5 random microscopic fields were observed for each histological slice, and 240 fields were analyzed in total (120 in each group) [43]. The slides were visualized under a Leica® DM2000 LED stereological microscope and photographed with a Leica® MC170 HD digital camera. The 36-point test system designed by STEPanizer® (https://www.stepanizer.com/) was used, and the following parameters were determined: volume density of mononucleated (VvhepM) and binucleated (VvhepB) hepatocyte nuclei, surface density (SvhepM), and number (NvhepM) of mononucleated hepatocyte nuclei. The volume density was estimated using the following formula: Vv = PP/PT (100%), where PP is the number of points touching the structure of interest, and PT is the total number of points in the system (36 points). The surface density was evaluated using the equation Sv = 2 × I/LT, where I is the number of intersections touching the structure of interest and LT is the total line length of the 36-point test system. The number density was quantified according to the equation Nv = Q-/(AT × t), where Q- is the number of observations of the structures of interest counted in a given area, including the forbidden lines and the forbidden plane, AT is the total area of the test system, and (t) is the thickness of the dissector. The slides were viewed under a Leica® DM2000 LED stereomicroscope and photographed with a Leica® MC170 HD digital camera.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were performed to obtain the mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values of the measured body and liver mass and volume. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test assessed the data’s normality, and the Levene test verified homoscedasticity. The Student’s t-test for independent samples was used to compare means between groups. The same normality and homoscedasticity tests were applied to the quantitative collagen fiber and stereological data. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare medians for type I collagen fibers, while the Student’s t-test was used for type III collagen fibers. For stereological data, means between groups were compared using a one-way analysis of the variance of general linear models. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 21.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the liver of senescent rats exhibits a loss of normal tissue architecture with alterations in the arrangement of hepatocytes and the formation of cellular clusters. Inflammatory lesions and fibrosis predominantly occupying the portal space are observed in aging rats. Interlobular bile ducts in senescent rats show morphological changes compatible with the initial stage of primary biliary cholangitis. In senescence, there is an increase in the size of hepatocyte nuclei and a reduction in their volume density and number. The morphological and histopathological alterations found in the liver of senescent rats are consistent with processes involved in age-related chronic liver diseases in humans. These findings enhance our understanding of the mechanisms involved in hepatic aging and their significance in investigating human chronic liver diseases. They may also provide guidance for the creation of more efficient therapeutic approaches for the aging population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.-R. and B.V.; methodology, R.M.-R., B.V.; validation, R.M.-R., Z.S.-B., and B.V.; formal analysis, R.M.-R., Z.S.-B., and B.V.; investigation, R.M.-R., Z.S.-B., and B.V.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.-R., Z.S.-B., and B.V.; writing—review and editing, B.V.; visualization, R.M.-R., and B.V.; supervision, B.V.; project administration, R.M.-R. and B.V.; funding acquisition, B.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of the Universidad de La Frontera (File Number 041_24/2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Los datos se encuentran en este artículo. Los datos y materiales sin procesar son análisis realizados con el software IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 21, disponible a pedido de los autores.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kalra, A.; Yetiskul, E.; Wehrle, C.J.; Tuma, F. Physiology, Liver. [Updated 2023 May 1]. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535438/ (accessed on 6 August 2024).
  2. Sengupta, P. The laboratory rat: Relating its age with human’s. Int. J Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Le Couteur, D.G.; McLean, A.J. The aging liver. Drug clearance and an oxygen diffusion barrier hypothesis. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1998, 34, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Anantharaju, A.; Feller, A.; Chedid, A. Aging liver. A review. Gerontology 2002, 48, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baiocchi, L.; Glaser, S.; Francis, H.; Kennedy, L.; Felli, E.; Alpini, G.; Gracia-Sancho, J. Impact of aging on liver cells and liver disease: Focus on the biliary and vascular compartments. Hepatol. Commun. 2021, 5, 1125–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jungermann, K.; Katz, N. Functional specialization of different hepatocyte populations. Physiol. Rev. 1989, 69, 708–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brunk, U.T.; Terman, A. The mitochondrial-lysosomal axis theory of aging: Accumulation of damaged mitochondria as a result of imperfect autophagocytosis. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 1996–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schmucker, D.L. Age-related changes in liver structure and function: Implications for disease? Exp. Gerontol. 2005, 40, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Krizhanovsky, V.; Yon, M.; Dickins, R.A.; Hearn, S.; Simon, J.; Miething, C.; Yee, H.; Zender, L.; Lowe, S.W. Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis. Cell 2008, 134, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Terman, A.; Brunk, U.T. Oxidative stress, accumulation of biological ‘garbage’, and aging. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2006, 8, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Le Couteur, D.G.; Cogger, V.C.; McCuskey, R.S.; De Cabo, R.; Smedsrød, B.; Sorensen, K.K.; Warren, A.; Fraser, R. Age-related changes in the liver sinusoidal endothelium: A mechanism for dyslipidemia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1114, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Le Couteur, D.G.; Warren, A.; Cogger, V.C.; Smedsrød, B.; Sørensen, K.K.; De Cabo, R.; Fraser, R.; McCuskey, R.S. Old age and the hepatic sinusoid. Anat. Rec. 2008, 291, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sastre, J.; Pallardó, F.V.; Viña, J. Mitochondrial oxidative stress plays a key role in aging and apoptosis. IUBMB Life 2000, 49, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nakad, R.; Schumacher, B. DNA damage response and immune defense: Links and mechanisms. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jones, D.P.; Sies, H. The Redox Code. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2015, 23, 734–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Youle, R.J.; van der Bliek, A.M. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science 2012, 337, 1062–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sun, Y.; Coppé, J.P.; Lam, E.W. Cellular senescence: The sought or the unwanted? Trends Mol. Med. 2018, 24, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Neurohr, G.E.; Terry, R.L.; Lengefeld, J.; Bonney, M.; Brittingham, G.P.; Moretto, F.; Miettinen, T.P.; Vaites, L.P.; Soares, L.M.; Paulo, J.A.; et al. Excessive cell growth causes cytoplasm dilution and contributes to senescence. Cell 2019, 176, 1083–1097.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kowald, A.; Passos, J.F.; Kirkwood, T.B.L. On the evolution of cellular senescence. Aging Cell 2020, 19, e13270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, W.; Hickson, L.J.; Eirin, A.; Kirkland, J.L.; Lerman, L.O. Cellular senescence: The good, the bad and the unknown. Nature reviews. Nephrology 2022, 18, 611–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogrodnik, M.; Salmonowicz, H.; Gladyshev, V.N. Integrating cellular senescence with the concept of damage accumulation in aging: Relevance for clearance of senescent cells. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Donato, A.J.; Morgan, R.G.; Walker, A.E.; Lesniewski, L.A. Cellular and molecular biology of aging endothelial cells. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2015, 89, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pasarín, M.; La Mura, V.; Gracia-Sancho, J.; García-Calderó, H.; Rodríguez-Vilarrupla, A.; García-Pagán, J.C.; Bosch, J.; Abraldes, J.G. Sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction precedes inflammation and fibrosis in a model of NAFLD. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maeso-Díaz, R.; Ortega-Ribera, M.; Fernández-Iglesias, A.; Hide, D.; Muñoz, L.; Hessheimer, A.J.; Vila, S.; Francés, R.; Fondevila, C.; Albillos, A.; et al. Effects of aging on liver microcirculatory function and sinusoidal phenotype. Aging Cell 2018, 17, e12829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Friedman, S.L. Hepatic stellate cells: Protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 125–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schuppan, D.; Afdhal, N.H. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 2008, 371, 838–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lefkowitch, J.H. Scheuer’s Liver Biopsy Interpretation, 10th ed.; Elsevier Health Sciences: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 155–186. [Google Scholar]
  28. Watanabe, T.; Tanaka, Y. Age-related alterations in the size of human hepatocytes. Virchows Archiv. B Cell Pathol. 1982, 39, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nakajima, T.; Nakashima, T.; Okada, Y.; Jo, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Mitsumoto, Y.; Katagishi, T.; Kimura, H.; Itoh, Y.; Kagawa, K.; et al. Nuclear size measurement is a simple method for the assessment of hepatocellular aging in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Comparison with telomere-specific quantitative FISH and p21 immunohistochemistry. Pathol. Int. 2010, 60, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, M.J.; Chen, F.; Lau, J.T.Y.; Hu, Y.P. Hepatocyte polyploidization and its association with pathophysiological processes. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ge, T.; Shao, Y.; Bao, X.; Xu, W.; Lu, C. Cellular senescence in liver diseases: From mechanisms to therapies. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 121, 110522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Crouch, J.; Shvedova, M.; Thanapaul, R.J.R.S.; Botchkarev, V.; Roh, D. Epigenetic regulation of cellular senescence. Cells 2022, 11, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rossiello, F.; Jurk, D.; Passos, J.F.; d’Adda di Fagagna, F. Telomere dysfunction in ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Cell Biol. 2022, 24, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, S.J.; Jiang, S.S.; Zhang, J.; Luo, D.; Yu, B.; Yang, L.Y.; Zhong, H.H.; Yang, M.W.; Liu, L.Y.; Hong, F.F.; et al. Effects of apoptosis on liver aging. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kümmecke, A.M.; Zieglowski, L.; Ernst, L.; Palme, R.; Tolba, R.H. Does sex matter in liver surgery? Comparison of severity assessments between female and male rats after partial hepatectomy: A pilot study. Eur. Surg. Res. 2023, 64, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rikans, L.E.; Moore, D.R.; Snowden, C.D. Sex-dependent differences in the effects of aging on antioxidant defense mechanisms of rat liver. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1991, 1074, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Russell, W.M.S.; Burch, R.L. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique; Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, UK, 1959; reprinted in 1992. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cruz-Orive, L.M.; Weibel, E.R. Recent stereological methods for cell biology: A brief survey. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 258, L148–L156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, 2nd ed.; Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, ON, USA, 1998; Volume 1, Available online: https://ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/Experimental_Animals_Vol1.pdf (accessed on 13 August 2024).
  41. Scherle, W. A simple method for volumetry of organs in quantitative stereology. Mikroskopie 1970, 26, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  42. Klopfleisch, R. Multiparametric and semiquantitative scoring systems for the evaluation of mouse model histopathology—A systematic review. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C.A.; del Sol, M. Tips for studies with quantitative morphology (Morphometry and Stereology). Int. J. Morphol. 2017, 35, 1482–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Liver of adult Sprague Dawley rats (group A) (AD) versus senescent rats (group S) (EH). PA: portal area; CV: central vein, IA: interlobular artery; IV: interlobular vein; IBD: interlobular bile duct; H: hepatocyte; S: sinusoid; SM: stellate macrophage; MN: macronucleus; PC: perisinusoidal cell; L: leukocytes; NG: neutrophilic granule. H&E staining.
Figure 1. Liver of adult Sprague Dawley rats (group A) (AD) versus senescent rats (group S) (EH). PA: portal area; CV: central vein, IA: interlobular artery; IV: interlobular vein; IBD: interlobular bile duct; H: hepatocyte; S: sinusoid; SM: stellate macrophage; MN: macronucleus; PC: perisinusoidal cell; L: leukocytes; NG: neutrophilic granule. H&E staining.
Ijms 25 09846 g001
Figure 2. Presence of type I collagen fibers (red) in the liver tissue of adult Sprague Dawley rats (group A) versus senescent rats (group S). (A,C,E,G,I,K), staining with Sirius Red without polarization. (B,D,F,H,J,L), stained with Sirius Red with polarization.
Figure 2. Presence of type I collagen fibers (red) in the liver tissue of adult Sprague Dawley rats (group A) versus senescent rats (group S). (A,C,E,G,I,K), staining with Sirius Red without polarization. (B,D,F,H,J,L), stained with Sirius Red with polarization.
Ijms 25 09846 g002
Table 1. Quantifying collagen content in liver tissue from adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats using Image Pro Premier.
Table 1. Quantifying collagen content in liver tissue from adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats using Image Pro Premier.
CollagenMedian ± SDp
Group AGroup S
Type I (µm2)18.18 ± 3.2324.63 ± 9.990.001 *
Type III (µm2)15.22 ± 3.0215.75 ± 3.740.541
* Significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Comparison of body mass, liver mass, and volume in adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats.
Table 2. Comparison of body mass, liver mass, and volume in adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats.
VariablesGroup AGroup Sp
Mean ± SDMin–MaxMean ± SDMin–Max
Body mass (g)462.17 ± 46.21401.00–519.00366.73 ± 45.84302.00–415.190.005 *
Liver mass (g)20.85 ± 3.7714.87–26.2115.51 ± 1.4013.98–18.030.009 *
Liver volume (cm3)19.00 ± 3.4614.00–24.0014.33 ± 1.6312.00–17.000.014 *
* Significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Stereological analysis of the liver of adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats.
Table 3. Stereological analysis of the liver of adult (A) versus senescent (S) male Sprague Dawley rats.
ParametersMean ± SDp
Group AGroup S
VvhepM (%)10.85 ± 2.528.65 ± 2.180.001 *
VvhepB (%)1.01 ± 1.400.98 ± 1.620.086
SvhepM (mm−1)27.78 ± 7.3744.05 ± 11.390.001 *
NvhepM (mm−3)177,579.37 ± 42,953.28103,174.60 ± 45,478.430.001 *
* Significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Simple scoring system for chronic hepatitis modified from Scheuer.
Table 4. Simple scoring system for chronic hepatitis modified from Scheuer.
Grade
Portal inflammation and interphase hepatitis
0Absent or minimal.
1Portal inflammation only.
2Mild or localized interface hepatitis.
3Moderate or more extensive interface hepatitis.
4Severe and widespread interface hepatitis.
Lobular activity
0None.
1Inflammatory cells but no hepatocellular damage.
2Focal necrosis or apoptosis.
3Severe hepatocellular damage.
4Damage includes bridging confluent necrosis.
Stage
0No fibrosis.
1Fibrosis confined to portal tracts.
2Periportal or portal–portal septa but intact vascular relationships.
Intact vascular relationships.
3Fibrosis with distorted structure but no obvious cirrhosis.
(septal fibrosis, bridging fibrosis).
4Probable or definite cirrhosis.
Table 5. Stages of Scheuer’s Primary Biliary Cholangitis.
Table 5. Stages of Scheuer’s Primary Biliary Cholangitis.
StageRating
1The florid duct lesion, portal hepatitis. *
2Ductular reaction and periportal hepatitis.
3Scarring, bridging necrosis, septal fibrosis.
4Cirrhosis.
* Three components present: inflammation, damage of the ductal epithelium, and disruption of the bile duct basement membrane.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maldonado-Rengel, R.; Sócola-Barsallo, Z.; Vásquez, B. Alterations of Liver Morphology in Senescent Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189846

AMA Style

Maldonado-Rengel R, Sócola-Barsallo Z, Vásquez B. Alterations of Liver Morphology in Senescent Rats. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(18):9846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189846

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maldonado-Rengel, Ruth, Zaida Sócola-Barsallo, and Bélgica Vásquez. 2024. "Alterations of Liver Morphology in Senescent Rats" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 18: 9846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189846

APA Style

Maldonado-Rengel, R., Sócola-Barsallo, Z., & Vásquez, B. (2024). Alterations of Liver Morphology in Senescent Rats. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(18), 9846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189846

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop