Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Activity of Anthocyanins and Anthocyanidins: A Critical Review
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of the Respiratory Epithelium Physiology by Flavonoids—Insights from 16HBEσcell Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Plant Genomics and Breeding 2.0
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Allelic Mutations in Dw3 Gene That Affect the Height of Sorghum Plants

1
Institute of Plant Protection, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
2
Institute of Sorghum, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(22), 12000; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212000
Submission received: 5 October 2024 / Revised: 1 November 2024 / Accepted: 7 November 2024 / Published: 8 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Plant Genomics and Breeding: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Breeding for dwarfing traits in sorghum is crucial. However, only three genes (Dw1Dw3) that control plant height have been mapped. In this study, 634 sorghum cultivars were collected to investigate plant height and genotypes. Four were genotyped Dw1DW2Dw3 (wild type) but with different plant heights, and they were selected to construct two populations and map new dwarf genes. Bulked segregant analysis with whole-genome resequencing of the two populations identified the candidate gene in one same genomic region—on chromosome 7. Then, it was narrowed down to a region containing nine genes. Amino acid and DNA sequence analysis of the parent and offspring plants revealed that two novel allelic mutations in the Dw3 gene play a role in reducing the plant height—8R262 or 8R417, including 1 bp substitution and 2 bp deletions. Furthermore, we sequenced 19 cultivars that primarily exhibited a “one-dwarf” hybrid or wild-type and presumed another allelic mutation via the amino acid alignment of 8R019, 8R100, and 8R402, which was another one-base substitution. These results indicate that multiple types of allelic mutations in the Dw3 gene should be considered when identified or applied.

1. Introduction

A variety of biomass energy sources can produce biofuels, including crops, energy crops, aquatic plants, and forestry waste [1,2]. Among them, Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] is a staple food crop for half a billion people and an emerging biofuel crop [3]. Furthermore, sorghum is an important crop species for farmers in semiarid and arid regions. Because rising temperatures and reduced precipitation due to climate change make some areas unsuitable for maize and rice production, the importance of drought-tolerant crops like sorghum is likely to increase [4].
Breeding for dwarfing traits in sorghum is crucial because it enables mechanical harvesting, improves lodging resistance, and increases fertilizer use efficiency. Four major dwarfing genes, identified as Dw1Dw4, control height by modifying the internode length [5]. In 2016, the gene corresponding to Dw1 underwent map-based cloning using an F2 population and HIFs derived from Hegari and 80M. It was shown that the Dw1 protein could affect cell proliferation activity in the internodes [6,7]. As a result of mutations, dw2, located on chromosome 6, greatly reduces internode lengths [8,9]. Similarly, Dw3, located on chromosome 7, was finally shown to encode a transmembrane protein of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily involved in auxin efflux, which was cloned decades ago. The Dw3 mutant allele contained an 882 bp tandem duplication in exon 5 that abolished the enzyme’s function. This allele is known to be unstable, with the progeny of a homozygous dw3 plant reverting to a tall Dw3 wild type at a rate of around 1/600 [10]. In 2024, three InDel mutations in the Dw3 gene, including an 82 bp deletion, a 6 bp duplication, and a 15 bp deletion, were discovered [11].
Although Dw4 has not been cloned, it is inferred to be located on chromosome 4 or 6 [12,13]. In the early stages of hybrid utilization in China, sorghum primarily exhibited a “one-dwarf”, reaching heights of 2.5–3 m, leading to serious lodging. Recognizing the need for dwarf hybrids (approximately 2 m in height) for efficient production, Liang et al. advocated for sorghum dwarf breeding [14].
Bulked Sergeant Analysis (BSA) is a fast, convenient, and efficient method of determining the linkage between markers and traits by constructing DNA pools of extreme traits. It has been widely adopted in gene-mapping studies in recent years [15,16,17,18,19]. Compared with traditional linkage mapping, where progeny are individually genotyped and phenotyped, BSA requires the preparation of fewer samples for genotyping and allows for more efficient phenotyping. This is because only individuals that represent the extreme phenotypes of a population need to be identified [15].
China is the world’s eighth-largest producer of sorghum, which is mainly used as food, feed biofuels, and alcoholic beverages. It was introduced through the spreading of Indian cultivars during the silkworm trade or directly from the eastern coast of Africa by returning Chinese seamen [19,20]. Between the 1930s and 1950s, sorghum was grown as a traditional cereal on 10 million hectares, but the production area drastically declined to about 2 million hectares by 1990 and then further to 0.6 million hectares by 2008. Instead, sorghum has become increasingly popular as animal feed, and in recent years, the Chinese government has invested in research into improved varieties for this purpose [3]. In addition, sorghum is also a major ingredient in liquor production in China’s food industry [21]. Almost all famous Chinese brands of distilled liquors, such as Moutaijiu (Moutai aroma liquor), Luzhoulaojiao, Wuliangye (strong aroma liquor), and Fenjiu (light aroma liquor), are brewed with sorghum grain as a key ingredient [22]. Sorghum has been planted in China for a long time and is rich in germplasm resources. Therefore, finding new genes by typing the genes affecting plant height in common sorghum cultivars in China is helpful. The corresponding research is of great benefit to sorghum breeding.
In this study, the genotypes were systematically investigated in 634 sorghum cultivars, which contain a number of Chinese sorghum landraces, and 4 cultivars were identified, Dw1Dw2Dw3, with significant differences in plant height. Subsequently, two groups of plants were generated for BSA-seq analysis to map the new genes affecting plant height. By using a recombinant-derived progeny testing strategy [23,24], the candidate gene was narrowed to a region that includes nine genes between 59.75 and 59.86 Mbp. Amino acid sequence analysis of the parent and offspring plants revealed that the novel mutated Dw3 genes, rather than the novel genes, play a role in reducing the plant height of 8R262 or 8R417. The genotypes of 19 sorghum cultivars primarily exhibited a “one-dwarf” hybrid or wild-type (Dw1Dw2Dw3), and a plant height of less than 2 m was identified. Meanwhile, two novel allelic mutations were identified in Chinese sorghum landraces, and another one was inferred through the sequencing results of the Indian cultivars. Consequently, this discovery pointed to the potential existence of different dwarf mutations in the dw3 gene, some of which could be additional stable sources of the trait. Overall, our study provides new insights into the Dw3 gene and novel theoretical support for its applications.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotyping and Genetic Analysis of Dwarf Sorghum Cultivars

In order to seek the fourth or more genes that affect sorghum height, 634 sorghum cultivars were planted in Shenyang city (42° N, 123° E) and numbered to investigate plant height and genotypes. We genotyped Dw1 and Dw2 via Sanger sequencing and Dw3 using the PCR amplification method, which has been commonly employed because the dw3 mutant allele contains an insertion of a fragment that can be clearly identified [10,25].
As shown in Table 1 and Table S1, the plant heights of three Chinese sorghum landraces (8R262, 8R277, and 8R417) and one sorghum cultivar (8R037) from Morocco were investigated. The plant heights of 8R262 and 8R417 were 107 ± 10 cm and 133 ± 6 cm, while those of 8R277 and 8R037 were 170 ± 10 cm and 175 ± 7 cm, respectively. Although they differed significantly in plant height, all four cultivars were identified as Dw1Dw2Dw3 and selected for subsequent hybridization manipulations because they had relatively close heading times.
The tall cultivars, 8R277 and 8R037, were used as the female parents to cross the dwarf cultivars 8R262 and 8R417, respectively, in an inheritance study and during the construction of the mapping population (Table 2, Figure 1). All F1 plants showed a tall plant height, and the F2 plants displayed different heights corresponding to the parents. Therefore, the dwarf-to-tall was a completely recessive trait in two groups of populations. According to the law of segregation, the ratio of dominant-trait individuals to recessive homozygous-trait individuals was 3 to 1 in F2 populations. Among the 708 F2 individuals in the 8R262 × 8R277 population, 536 exhibited a tall plant height, and 172 showed a dwarf plant height, corresponding to a segregation ratio of 3:1 determined using the Chi-square test (χ2 = 0.19 < 3.84, p-value = 0.67 > 0.05). χ2 ≤ 3.84 indicates that the theoretical segregation ratio significantly correlates with the actual ratio. Similarly, in the 8R037 × 8R417 population, F2 individuals also showed a 3:1 segregation ratio of tall and dwarf (χ2 = 0.99 < 3.84, p-value = 0.32 > 0.05) (Table 2). These results demonstrate that a single recessive gene should control the dwarf trait.

2.2. BSA-Seq Analysis and Mapping of Candidate Gene

To map the new genes affecting plant height, we generated two groups of plants for BSA-seq analysis, as shown in Figure 1. Fifty plants with an extreme plant height were selected as the highly tall pool or extreme dwarf pool in both groups, respectively. On the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform, a total of 725,474,232 raw reads for group 1 and 771,050,148 raw reads for group 2 were generated after sequencing the two groups of parent plants and extreme mixing pools (Table 3). By using quality-control measures, such as removing joints and low-quality reads, 108,821,134,800 and 115,657,522,200 clean bases for groups 1 and 2 were obtained, respectively. The quality of the sequencing data was evaluated, and the sequencing error rate and statistical Q20, Q30, and GC contents were calculated, as shown in Table 2. The quality evaluation showed that the GC contents of these reads were 43.64–43.78% (group 1) and 44.62~45.55% (group 2). The two groups of sequencing data had high quality (Q20 ≥ 93%, Q30 ≥ 97) and could be adopted for further analysis.
The GATK software toolkit (Version 4.1.8.1) was used for SNP detection and filtration. A total of 862,470 (group 1) and 1,285,629 (group 2) SNPs were identified, of which 45,340 were located in the exon regions, including 29,271 non-synonymous mutations, 545 stop gain mutations, and 75 stop loss mutations (group 1). The data from group 2 suggest that 67,802 were located in the exon regions, containing 47,584 non-synonymous mutations, 847 stop gain mutations, and 133 stop loss mutations. To determine the genomic region linked to plant height, we utilized the ΔSNP-index method to assess the allele segregation of the SNPs and InDels between the two DNA pools representing the extreme groups. According to the fitted △SNP-index computer simulation experiment, taking the threshold of 99% confidence (red line in the figure), the association region was located in the range of 10.5 Mb on chromosome 7 of 8R262 plants. Meanwhile, it was located within an 8.2 Mb region on chromosome 7 of 8R417 plants, as indicated by the arrows in Figure 2.
After several screenings, we successively obtained 123 recombinants and narrowed the candidate gene to an interval flanked by the markers InDel-6 and InDel-15. Coincidentally, the interval almost coincided with the region of the most credible prediction in BSA-seq analysis. To further locate the candidate gene, another 10 InDel markers were applied to seek the limited individuals’ recombinants. Due to the finding of the last four recombinants, the candidate gene was narrowed to a region that includes nine genes between 59.75 and 59.86 Mbp (Figure 3). Dw3 was among them, as annotated and listed in Table 4. Moreover, a similar experiment was carried out in group 2, and consistent results were obtained.

2.3. Identification of the Candidate Gene Related to Plant Height in Sorghum Plants

We performed Sanger sequencing for all nine genes in the male and female parents to identify the candidate gene. Although the DNA sequences of the nine genes were not identical, only Dw3 had a non-synonymous mutation in the amino acid sequence of 8R262 or 8R417 plants, as shown in Figure 4. To illustrate the variations, CDS sequences (Figure 4a,c) and amino acid sequences (Figure 4b,d) of Dw3 were arranged for further analysis. In contrast to 8R277 and other cultivars, the amino acid sequence of 8R262 had a substitution of proline for glutamine at position 898 (Figure 4b), which was caused by the conversion of “A” to “C” at position 2693 in the CDS sequence (Figure 4a). The CDS sequence 8R417 also had a two-base deletion at position 3254 (Figure 4c), resulting in the frameshift mutation starting at position 1085 (Figure 4d).
Furthermore, we identified the Dw3 gene of 8R262 and 8R417 varieties again using the traditional PCR method, and the results showed that the Dw3 gene of these two varieties did not have fragment insertion compared with the BTx623 sorghum reference genome (Figure S1). The integrated results revealed that the novel mutated Dw3 genes, rather than a novel gene, play a role in determining the plant height of 8R262 and 8R417. Hence, the genotypes of some common sorghum cultivars primarily exhibiting a “one-dwarf” hybrid or wild-type (Dw1Dw2Dw3) and plant heights of less than 2 m are re-summarized and listed in Table 5 since two novel mutant forms of Dw3 were identified. Furthermore, the Dw3 genes of these cultivars were also determined using Sanger sequencing. As shown in Table S2, both the CDS sequences of 8R258 and 8R428 also had a two-base deletion at position 3254, consistent with 8R417, and a significantly lower plant height. Therefore, it can be inferred that this type of mutation is not an isolated phenomenon. In addition, in contrast to other cultivars, the amino acid sequences of 8R019, 8R100, and 8R402 had a substitution of arginine for lysine at position 985, which was caused by the conversion of “A” to “G” at position 2954 in the CDS sequence (Table S2). At the same time, the plant height of the cultivars decreased significantly, which may be a new mutation type and needs further determination.

3. Discussion

Over the past few years, the application of BSA-seq technology in sorghum gene mapping has gradually attracted the attention of researchers. In 2022, Mendu et al. identified and characterized three allelic thick leaf mutants (thl1, thl2, and thl3). BSA-seq analysis showed that the causal mutation for the thl phenotype is in the endo-1,4-β-glucanase gene (SbKOR1) [26]. De Riseis et al. identified two distinct mutations in the Sorghum bicolor Id1 (SbId1) homolog through BSA-seq analysis, which both delayed the flowering time [27]. Moreover, Demeke B. Mewa reported mapping via BSA-seq of ANTHRACNOSE RESISTANCE GENE 2 (ARG2) encoding a nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) protein that confers race-specific resistance to Colletotrichum sublineola strains [28]. These successful examples indicate the feasibility of using BSA-seq in this study to map genes affecting the height of sorghum plants.
A great many factors can affect plant height. In sorghum, plant height is controlled by a few major dwarfing genes. Quinby and Karper identified four loci (Dw1Dw4) that control the internode length by measuring the height of the stem from the ground to the flag leaf. At each Dw locus, the dominant allele increased the internode length [5,29]. Only three of the four genes (Dw13) were mapped and cloned, and they were located on chromosomes 9, 6, and 7, respectively [6,8,10].
The fourth classical dwarfing locus in sorghum, Dw4, is known to be unlinked to the other dwarfing loci and is believed to be on chromosome 4 or 6, but associated genes remain uncloned [12,13]. In our study, 19 markers were developed after BSA-seq analysis. After several rounds of screening, the gene affecting plant height was mapped on chromosome 7 (Figure 2), which was quite different from previous inferences for Dw4 [12].
Since the nonfunctional dw3 allele is the result of an 882 bp tandem duplication in exon 5 that disrupts protein function and the plant’s ability to establish an auxin gradient in the intermediate internodes, the PCR amplification method was adopted to identify mutations [10]. As illustrated in Table 1, although no fragment insertion was observed in the Dw3 gene sequences, plant height was lower in several cultivars. Subsequently, in the BSA-seq analysis, genes affecting plant height were mapped to an interval containing nine open reading frames (ORFs). At the same time, the Sanger sequencing results showed that only the Dw3 gene had a non-synonymous mutation in the amino acid sequence (Figure 4). The mutant form of the Dw3 gene differed from previous studies [10,25]. This allele is known to be unstable, with the progeny of a homozygous dw3 plant reverting to a tall Dw3 wild type at a rate of around 1/600 [10].
All the results above suggest that mutations in the Dw3 gene reduce plant height, and two novel mutation forms were identified.
In China, sorghum has been a critical ingredient for brewing liquors since the Yuan Dynasty (1270-1368 CE) [30,31]. Sorghum is mainly cultivated in China’s southwest, north, and northeast regions, and more than 80% of sorghum grain is used for liquor-making [18,32]. Therefore, there are abundant sorghum germplasm resources in China, which provide more convenience for the selection and breeding of new cultivars. This study systematically identified the main genotypes affecting plant height genes of 19 sorghum cultivars (Table 5), which contain a number of Chinese sorghum landraces. In our study, two novel allelic mutations identified using BSA-seq were only found in Chinese sorghum landraces. In addition, we also inferred another allelic mutation by studying the sequencing results of the Indian cultivars (8R019 and 8R100) or 8R402 (a Chinese sorghum landrace). Our article pointed to the potential existence of different dwarf mutations in the dw3 gene, some of which could be additional stable sources of the trait.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Phenotyping, DNA Extraction, and Sanger Sequencing

To investigate plant height and genotypes, 397 sorghum cultivars were obtained from the China National Center for Sorghum Improvement. Similarly, 237 sorghum cultivars were obtained from the Sorghum Mini Core Collection (MCC) to identify additional genes influencing sorghum height [33]. The field trials to evaluate the phenotypic performance of sorghums were conducted in Shenyang city (42° N, 123° E) in the 2014 summer season.
In order to improve pollination success and find suitable crosses, the heading date (HD) was recorded when 50% of the plants in the plot showed 50% flowering. Three plots of sorghum plants of each cultivar were planted. Three individual plants from the middle of each plot were selected for phenotype evaluation. Plant height was evaluated at maturity, as described by Zou et al. [34].
Genomic DNA (5–6 plants per accession) was extracted from 30-day-old seedlings by using the CTAB protocol [35]. DNA concentration and quality were estimated with an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) and by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gels with a lambda DNA standard.
Fragments of Dw1, Dw2, and Dw3 were amplified. PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction containing 2× EXtaqMix (Takara, Kusatsu-shi, Japan), 0.4 μM of each primer, 0.125 μg of DNA, and double-distilled water. A PCR protocol was used to amplify the fragments, including an initial denaturation cycle at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 57 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2.5 min. Primers for Sanger sequencing and PCR-amplification were listed in Table S3, and PCR products were sequenced by Biomarker Technologies Corporation (Beijing, China).

4.2. SNP Library Construction and High-Throughput Sequencing

The specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) employed in this study was performed following Sun et al. with minor modifications [36]. The SLAF library was constructed as follows. First, a SLAF pre-design experiment was performed to establish conditions to optimize SLAF yield, avoid repetitive SLAFs, and obtain an even distribution of SLAFs for maximum SLAF-seq efficiency. These considerations improved the efficiency of SLAF-seq. Next, the SLAF library was constructed in accordance with the pre-designed scheme. Genomic DNA was incubated at 37 °C with Mse I (New England Biolabs, NEB.; Ipswich, MA, USA), T4 DNA ligase (NEB), ATP (NEB), and Mse I adapter. The reaction was heat-inactivated at 65 °C and then digested for the additional restriction enzyme Alu I at 37 °C. Then, polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were carried out using diluted restriction ligation samples, dNTP, Taq DNA polymerase (NEB), and Mse I primer containing barcode1. Using E.Z.N.A.H Cycle Pure Kit (Omega, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland), the PCR productions were purified and pooled. The pooled samples were incubated at 37 °C with Mse I, T4 DNA ligase, ATP, and Solexa adapter, purified using a Quick Spin column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and then run out on a 2% agarose gel. Using a Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), fragments of 450–500 bp (with indexes and adaptors) in size were isolated. These fragment productions were then subjected to PCR amplification with Phusion Master Mix (NEB) and Solexa Amplification primer mix (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to add barcode 2 according to the Illumina sample preparation guide.
Samples were gel-purified by excising DNA of 450–500 bp and diluted for paired-end sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencing platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in Beijing (http://www.biomarker.com.cn (accessed on 7 November 2024)). SNP genotyping and evaluation were then performed.
All SLAF paired-end reads with clear index information were clustered according to sequence similarity, which was detected using one-to-one alignment by BLAT (−tileSize = 10 − stepSize = 5) [37]. Sequences with over 90% identity were grouped in one SLAF locus. Using the minor allele frequency (MAF) evaluation, alleles were defined in each SLAF.
In mapping populations of sorghum, one locus can contain at most four genotypes, so the groups containing more than four tags were filtered out as repetitive SLAFs. SLAFs with a sequence depth of less than 107 were filtered out of the following analysis. SLAFs with 2–4 tags were identified as polymorphic SLAFs, which were considered potential markers. Tags with at least 10× total coverage were retained. Sequences were mapped to the BTx623 sorghum reference genome using BWA [38,39], and SNPs were called with the TASSEL 3.0 GBS pipeline (www.maizegenetics.net/tassel/ (accessed on9 January 2024)). Missing data were imputed with NPUTE [40].

5. Conclusions

Three novel allelic mutations were discovered by BSA-seq analysis and amino acid sequence alignment. Two of them were only identified from Chinese sorghum landraces. Multiple types of allelic mutations in the Dw3 gene should be considered when identified or applied.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms252212000/s1.

Author Contributions

P.W. and B.L.: Formal analysis, Writing—original draft. X.L.: Conceptualization. Z.L. and C.W.: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation. L.Z.: Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. P.W. and X.L.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Liaoning Province Special Program for Germplasm Innovation and Store Grain in Technology (2023JH1/10200009) and the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-06-14.5-A3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from P.W.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yibin Zhang (Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) for useful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Demirbas, A. Biofuels sources, biofuel policy, biofuel economy and global biofuel Projections. Energy. Convers. Manag. 2008, 49, 2106–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stamenković, O.S.; Siliveru, K.; Veljković, V.B.; Banković-Ilić, I.B.; Tasić, M.B.; Ciampitti, I.A.; Đalović, I.G.; Mitrović, P.M.; Sikora, V.Š.; Vara, P.V. Prasad Production of biofuels from sorghum. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020, 124, 109769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mundia, C.W.; Secchi, S.; Akamani, K.; Wang, G. A regional comparison of factors affecting global Sorghum production: The case of north America, Asia and Africa’s sahel. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lobell, D.B.; Burke, M.B.; Tebaldi, C.; Mastrandrea, M.D.; Falcon, W.P.; Naylor, R.L. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 2008, 319, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Karper, E.R.; Quinby, R.J. Sorghum-Its production, utilization and breeding. Econ. Bot. 1947, 1, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hilley, J.; Truong, S.; Olson, S.; Morishige, D.; Mullet, J. Identification of Dw1, a regulator of sorghum stem internode length. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamaguchi, M.; Fujimoto, H.; Hirano, K.; Araki-Nakamura, S.; Ohmae-Shinohara, K.; Fujii, A.; Tsunashima, M.; Song, X.J.; Ito, Y.; Nagae, R.; et al. Sorghum Dw1, an agronomically important gene for lodging resistance, encodes a novel protein involved in cell proliferation. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 28366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Klein, R.R.; Mullet, J.E.; Jordan, D.R.; Miller, F.R.; Rooney, W.L.; Menz, M.A.; Franks, C.D.; Klein, P.E. The effect of tropical sorghum conversion and inbred development on genome diversity as revealed by high-resolution genotyping. Crop. Sci. 2008, 48, S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morishige, D.T.; Klein, P.E.; Hilley, J.L.; Sahraeian, S.M.E.; Sharma, A.; Mullet, J.E. Digital genotyping of sorghum—A diverse plant species with a large repeat-rich genome. BMC. Genom. 2013, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Multani, D.S.; Briggs, S.P.; Chamberlin, M.A.; Blakeslee, J.J.; Murphy, A.S.; Johal, G.S. Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science 2003, 302, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diatta-Holgate, E.; Bergsma, B.; Tuinstra, M.R. Mutations in the dwarf3 gene confer height stability in sorghum. Plant. Genome 2024, 17, e20466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Morris, G.P.; Ramu, P.; Deshpande, S.P.; Hash, C.T.; Shah, T.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Riera-Lizarazu, O.; Brown, P.J.; Acharya, C.B.; Mitchell, S.E.; et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xin, L.; Xian, R.L.; Eyal, F.; Jian, M.Y. Dissecting repulsion linkage in the dwarfing gene Dw3 region for sorghum plant height provides insights into heterosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11823–11828. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liang, T.; Bi, N. Scientific research road in the sorghum field-Chinese famous sorghum breeder cattle paradise. Seed. Technol. 2014, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Michelmore, R.W.; Paran, I.; Kesseli, R. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 9828–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, K.; Yuan, M.; Xia, H.; He, L.Q.; Ma, J.; Wang, M.X.; Zhao, H.L.; Hou, L.; Zhao, S.Z.; Li, P.C.; et al. BSA-seq and genetic mapping reveals AhRt2 as a candidate gene responsible for red testa of peanut. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 1529–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Klein, H.; Xiao, Y.G.; Conklin, P.A.; Govindarajulu, R.; Kelly, J.A.; Scanlon, M.J.; Whipple, C.J.; Bartlett, M. Bulked-segregant analysis coupled to whole genome sequencing (BSA-Seq) for rapid gene cloning in maize. G3-Genes. Genome Genet. 2018, 8, 3583–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vogel, G.; Laplant, K.E.; Mazourek, M.; Gore, M.A.; Smart, C.D. A combined BSA-Seq and linkage map approach identifies genomic regions associated with Phytophthora root and crown rot resistance in squash. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 1015–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. USDA. World Agricultural Production; Circular Series WAP 3–19; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iqbal, M.A.; Iqbal, A. Overview on Sorghum for food, feed, forage and fodder: Opportunities and problems in Pakistan’s perspectives. Am. Eurasian. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2015, 15, 1818–1826. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, B.R.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, G.P.; Zhu, Z.X.; Xu, N.; Shi, G.S.; Yu, M.; Wang, N.; Li, J.H.; Hou, J.M. Genome-wide association study for starch content and constitution in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, L.Y.; Xu, X.J.; Ding, Y.Q.; Cao, N.; Gao, X.; Feng, Z.; Li, K.Y.; Cheng, B.; Zhou, L.B.; Ren, M.J.; et al. GWAS of grain color and tannin content in Chinese sorghum based on whole-genome sequencing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2023, 136, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, Q.; Zhang, D.F.; Xu, M.L. A sequential quantitative trait locus fine-mapping strategy using recombinant-derived progeny. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 2012, 54, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zuo, W.L.; Chao, Q.; Zhang, N.; Ye, J.R.; Tan, G.Q.; Li, B.L.; Xing, Y.X.; Zhang, B.Q.; Liu, H.J.; Fengler, K.A.; et al. A maize wall-associated kinase confers quantitative resistance to head smut. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Barrero Farfan, I.D.; Bergsma, B.R.; Johal, G.; Tuinstra, M.R. A stable dw3 allele in sorghum and a molecular marker to facilitate selection. Crop. Sci. 2012, 52, 2063–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mendu, L.; Jalathge, G.; Dhillon, K.K.; Singh, N.P.; Balasubramanian, V.K.; Fewou, R.; Gitz, D.C.; Chen, J.; Xin, Z.; Mendu, V. Mutation in the endo-β-1,4-glucanase (KORRIGAN) is responsible for thick leaf phenotype in sorghum. Plants 2022, 11, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Riseis, S.; Chen, J.; Xin, Z.; Harmon, F.G. Sorghum bicolor INDETERMINATE1 is a conserved primary regulator of flowering. Front. Plant. Sci. 2023, 14, 1304822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mewa, D.B.; Lee, S.; Liao, C.J.; Adeyanju, A.; Helm, M.; Lisch, D.; Mengiste, T. Anthracnose Resistance GENE2 confers fungal resistance in sorghum. Plant. J. 2023, 113, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Quinby, J.R. Sorghum Improvement and the Genetics of Growth; Texas A&M University Press: College Station, TX, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  30. Shinoda. Baijiu—The Introduction of Sorghum; Taiwan Elite Publishing Co., Ltd.: Taipei, Taiwan, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Guo, X.K.; Guo, R.; Shao, Q.; Liu, Q.S. Effect of tannin content of sorghum on bacterial community in fermented grains of Fen-flavor Daqu Baijiu. China Brew. 2020, 39, 6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cui, Z.H.; Luo, J.H.; Qi, C.H.Y.; Ruan, Y.Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, A.; Yang, X.H.; He, Y. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) reveals the genetic architecture of four husk traits in maize. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 946–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Upadhyay, H.D.; Pundir, R.P.S.; Dwivedi, S.L.; Gowda, C.L.L.; Reddy, V.G.; Singh, S. Developing a mini core collection of sorghum for diversified utilization of germplasm. Crop. Sci. 2009, 49, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zou, G.H.; Yan, S.; Zhai, G.W.; Zhang, Z.P.; Zou, J.Q.; Tao, Y.Z. Genetic variability and correlation of stalk yield related traits and sugar concentration of stalk juice in a sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) population. Australian. J. Crop. Sci. 2011, 5, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mace, E.S.; Buhariwalla, K.K.; Buhariwalla, H.K.; Crouch, J.H. A high-throughput DNA extraction protocol for tropical molecular breeding programs. Plant. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2003, 21, 459–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, X.W.; Liu, D.Y.; Zhang, X.F.; Li, W.B.; Liu, H.; Hong, W.G.; Jiang, C.B.; Guan, N.; Ma, C.X.; Zeng, H.P.; et al. SLAF-seq: An efficient method of large-scale De novo SNP discovery and genotyping using high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kent, W.J. BLAT—The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome. Res. 2002, 12, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Paterson, A.H.; Bowers, J.E.; Bruggmann, R.; Dubchak, I.; Grimwood, J.; Gundlach, H.; Haberer, G.; Hellsten, U.; Mitros, T.; Poliakov, A.; et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Roberts, A.; McMillan, L.; Wang, W.; Parker, J.; Rusyn, I.; Threadgill, D. Inferring missing genotypes in large SNP panels using fast nearest-neighbor searches over sliding windows. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crossing and extreme pool design.
Figure 1. Crossing and extreme pool design.
Ijms 25 12000 g001
Figure 2. Genome-wide association mapping of plant height. The candidate SNPs and InDels of group 1 (a) and group 2 (b) using the ΔSNP-index algorithm with a cutoff of ΔSNP-index > 0.5. The arrow indicates the region where the predicted candidate gene was located.
Figure 2. Genome-wide association mapping of plant height. The candidate SNPs and InDels of group 1 (a) and group 2 (b) using the ΔSNP-index algorithm with a cutoff of ΔSNP-index > 0.5. The arrow indicates the region where the predicted candidate gene was located.
Ijms 25 12000 g002
Figure 3. Fine mapping of the candidate gene. Narrowing the candidate region through recombinant-derived progeny testing strategy produced the genetic linkage map of a candidate region of Chr.7. The genes and diagnostic markers in the 0.11 Mb interval.
Figure 3. Fine mapping of the candidate gene. Narrowing the candidate region through recombinant-derived progeny testing strategy produced the genetic linkage map of a candidate region of Chr.7. The genes and diagnostic markers in the 0.11 Mb interval.
Ijms 25 12000 g003
Figure 4. CDS and amino acid sequence analysis of Dw3 genes from different cultivars. The CDS (a,c) and amino acid (b,d) sequences of Dw3 were arranged to show the variations, respectively. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the espript 3.0 online tool (https://espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/cgi-bin/ESPript.cgi (accessed on 1 September 2024)). Arrows point to locations where there are variations in the sequences.
Figure 4. CDS and amino acid sequence analysis of Dw3 genes from different cultivars. The CDS (a,c) and amino acid (b,d) sequences of Dw3 were arranged to show the variations, respectively. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the espript 3.0 online tool (https://espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/cgi-bin/ESPript.cgi (accessed on 1 September 2024)). Arrows point to locations where there are variations in the sequences.
Ijms 25 12000 g004
Table 1. Genotyping of genes affecting plant height and statistics of plant height and heading date.
Table 1. Genotyping of genes affecting plant height and statistics of plant height and heading date.
Cultivar NumberPlant Height (cm)Heading Date (Day)
8R277170 ± 10 a68
8R262107 ± 10 c65
8R037175 ± 7 a72
8R417133 ± 6 b70
Data marked with different letters (a–c) indicate significant differences, as analyzed by SPSS 23.0 software (Duncan’s multiple range test, α = 0.05).
Table 2. The phenotype analysis results of tall/dwarf plant height in the two sorghum populations.
Table 2. The phenotype analysis results of tall/dwarf plant height in the two sorghum populations.
PopulationGenerationTotal PlantsTallDwarfa Expected Ratiob χ2c p-Value
8R262 × 8R277 F27085361723:10.190.67
8R037 × 8R417F25944561383:10.990.32
a Expected ratio: dominant-trait individual: recessive-trait individual = 3:1. b χ2: χ2 < 3.84 is considered significantly correlated. c p-value: p-value > 0.05 indicates no statistically significant difference.
Table 3. Sequencing statistics for BSA-seq samples.
Table 3. Sequencing statistics for BSA-seq samples.
SampleClean ReadsClean
Bases
Mapped
(%)
Properly Mapped (%)Average DepthQ20 (%)Q30 (%)GC Content (%)
Group 1B8R262106,444,21415,966,632,10098.4090.032197.7193.3843.64
B8R277110,755,78416,613,367,60098.3389.732297.8093.6243.78
Dwarf pool256,010,21238,401,531,80096.0489.164998.1894.4344.63
Tall pool252,264,02237,839,603,30097.8190.064997.8893.6643.71
Group 2B8R03759,041,6448,856,246,60096.1588.821198.0994.1545.21
B8R41762,894,4809,434,172,00096.9490.731297.7193.3745.55
Dwarf pool338,573,16450,785,974,60094.9187.236298.2994.7744.81
Tall pool310,540,86046,581,129,00096.3889.465798.3194.8644.62
Table 4. Gene descriptions from the NCBI of 9 genes in the predictive region.
Table 4. Gene descriptions from the NCBI of 9 genes in the predictive region.
Gene NumberAnnotation
SORBI_3007G163300NA
SORBI_3007G143400Tetraspanin-8, Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
SORBI_3007G163433NA
SORBI_3007G163466NA
SORBI_3007G143500Uncharacterized protein, Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
SORBI_3007G153600Protein HVA22, Hordeum vulgare (Barley).
SORBI_3007G163700NA
SORBI_3007G163800ABC transporter B family member 1 (Dw3, Sorghum)
SORBI_3007G163901NA
Genes were blasted on the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 4 December 2023)). “NA” indicates no annotations.
Table 5. The genotyping of genes affecting plant height.
Table 5. The genotyping of genes affecting plant height.
Cultivar NumberOriginGenotypePlant Height (cm)
8R019IndiaDw1dw2dw3111 ± 16 ef
8R037MoroccoDw1Dw2Dw3170 ± 10 abc
8R082South AfricaDw1Dw2Dw3192 ± 11 ab
8R100IndiaDw1dw2bdw3122 ± 12 ef
8R105Sultandw1Dw2Dw3121 ± 21 ef
8R151IndiaDw1Dw2Dw3199 ± 48 a
8R205ZimbabweDw1dw2Dw3142 ± 11 cde
8R206ZimbabweDw1dw2Dw3144 ± 8 cdef
8R219South KoreaDw1dw2Dw3165 ± 7 abcd
8R260ChinaDw1Dw2Dw3184 ± 17 ab
8R258ChinaDw1dw2Dw3129 ± 6 def
8R262ChinaDw1Dw2dw3107 ± 10 f
8R277ChinaDw1Dw2Dw3169 ± 10 abc
8R281ChinaDw1Dw2Dw3160 ± 24 bcd
8R315IndiaDw1dw2Dw3157 ± 22 bcd
8R390The United StatesDw1dw2Dw3159 ± 11 bcd
8R402ChinaDw1Dw2dw3122 ± 11 ef
8R417ChinaDw1Dw2dw3120 ± 29 ef
8R428ChinaDw1Dw2Dw3170 ± 4 abc
The genotypes of some common sorghum cultivars primarily exhibiting a “one-dwarf” hybrid or wild-type (Dw1Dw2Dw3) and a plant height of less than 2 m are listed in the table. Data marked with different letters (a–f) indicate significant differences, as analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software (Duncan’s multiple range test, α = 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, P.; Liang, B.; Li, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.; Lu, X. Novel Allelic Mutations in Dw3 Gene That Affect the Height of Sorghum Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212000

AMA Style

Wang P, Liang B, Li Z, Wang C, Zhang L, Lu X. Novel Allelic Mutations in Dw3 Gene That Affect the Height of Sorghum Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(22):12000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212000

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Ping, Bingbing Liang, Zhengjun Li, Chunyu Wang, Lixia Zhang, and Xiaochun Lu. 2024. "Novel Allelic Mutations in Dw3 Gene That Affect the Height of Sorghum Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 22: 12000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212000

APA Style

Wang, P., Liang, B., Li, Z., Wang, C., Zhang, L., & Lu, X. (2024). Novel Allelic Mutations in Dw3 Gene That Affect the Height of Sorghum Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(22), 12000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212000

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop