Next Article in Journal
Use of 3′ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (3′ RACE)-Based Targeted RNA Sequencing for Profiling of Druggable Genetic Alterations in Urothelial Carcinomas
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Lipid Metabolism in Adipose Tissue and Liver of Chinese Soft-Shelled Turtle Pelodiscus sinensis During Hibernation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Contribution of Genetic and Epigenetic Factors: An Emerging Concept in the Assessment and Prognosis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Underneath the Gut–Brain Axis in IBD—Evidence of the Non-Obvious

by
Lidiya V. Boldyreva
1,*,
Anna A. Evtushenko
1,
Maria N. Lvova
2,
Ksenia N. Morozova
2 and
Elena V. Kiseleva
2
1
Scientific-Research Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia
2
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(22), 12125; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212125
Submission received: 7 October 2024 / Revised: 6 November 2024 / Accepted: 8 November 2024 / Published: 12 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease)

Abstract

:
The gut–brain axis (GBA) plays a pivotal role in human health and wellness by orchestrating complex bidirectional regulation and influencing numerous critical processes within the body. Over the past decade, research has increasingly focused on the GBA in the context of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Beyond its well-documented effects on the GBA–enteric nervous system and vagus nerve dysregulation, and gut microbiota misbalance—IBD also leads to impairments in the metabolic and cellular functions: metabolic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, cationic transport, and cytoskeleton dysregulation. These systemic effects are currently underexplored in relation to the GBA; however, they are crucial for the nervous system cells’ functioning. This review summarizes the studies on the particular mechanisms of metabolic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, cationic transport, and cytoskeleton impairments in IBD. Understanding the involvement of these processes in the GBA may help find new therapeutic targets and develop systemic approaches to improve the quality of life in IBD patients.

1. Introduction: The GBA Imbalance in IBD

The gut–brain axis (GBA) is a complex and bidirectional communication system driven by neural, hormonal, metabolic, immunological, and microbial signals, playing a crucial role in linking the state of the gastrointestinal tract with neural functions. The GBA can influence intestinal motility and secretion, cause visceral hypersensitivity, and induce cell modifications in the enteroendocrine and immune systems [1,2]. Numerous neurological disorders have been shown to be associated with changes in gut health [3,4]. Systematic data have shown that both brain–gut and gut–brain dysfunctions occur, with the former being particularly dominant in irritable bowel syndrome [5]. In patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), the quality of life is significantly reduced, and eating behaviors and nutritional patterns often undergo inevitable changes [6,7]. IBD is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, encompassing Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, which are differentiated by the location of the lesions. Crohn’s disease is marked by inflammation and lesions along the entire length of the gastrointestinal tract, predominantly in the terminal ileum and proximal colon [8], whereas ulcerative colitis mainly affects the colon and rectum [9]. Regardless of injury location, both diseases share common symptoms: persistent diarrhea, abdominal pain, blood in stools, weight loss, and chronic fatigue [8,10]. Various factors contribute to the development of IBD: genetic predispositions (with several hundred associated genes identified [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]), immune response dysregulation [19,20,21,22], impaired intestinal microbiota (due to antibacterial and other drug administrations or specific dietary patterns) [23,24,25], and changes in environmental factors (such as nutrition, stress, toxins, etc.) [26]. IBD is a serious global issue, as the number of diagnosed patients continues to rise [27,28,29]. Increasing evidence suggests a connection between IBD and neuroinflammatory as well as neurodegenerative diseases [30,31]. According to the meta-analysis results published in 2024, IBD is moderately associated with an increased risk of stroke, dementia of various etiologies, and Parkinson’s disease [32]. In addition, the risk for the development of depression and anxiety in patients and animal models with IBD has been found higher compared to the general population, and stress is a significant trigger that causes exacerbation of the disease [33,34]. Moreover, IBD-related negative effects including intestinal inflammation, dysbiosis, poor nutrition, physical and psychical discomfort, chronic fatigue, and stress are frequently self-reinforcing due to the GBA imbalance resulting from IBD [34,35,36].

1.1. The Current Gut–Brain Axis Paradigm

The GBA commonly accepted key components include the vagus nerve, the enteric nervous system (ENS), and the gut microbiota. The vagus nerve serves as the primary neural pathway connecting the gut and the brain, comprising sensory and motor fibers that facilitate bidirectional communication [37]. Sensory fibers transmit impulses from the gut to the brain, relaying signals related to satiety, nutrient availability, and gastrointestinal discomfort, while motor fibers convey instructions from the brain to modulate gut functions such as gastric secretion and motility [38]. This bidirectional communication ensures continuous feedback and regulation between the gut and the brain. The ENS is an extensive network of intrinsic neurons throughout the gastrointestinal tract, functioning independently of the central nervous system (CNS) and regulating essential gastrointestinal processes, including peristalsis, nutrient absorption, and gut motility [39]. Although numerous studies highlight the evident disruption of vagus nerve and ENS functions in IBD [40,41,42], the underlying molecular and cellular processes, as well as the involved signaling triggers, remain underexplored. In the following sections, we describe the relevant data on the processes significantly disrupted in IBD that have yet to be investigated in the context of GBA dysregulation. These underexplored areas may hold the key to understanding the intricate mechanisms linking gut and brain health in IBD.
The gut microbiota, a diverse community of microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract, plays beneficial roles in metabolism, vitamin and essential metabolite synthesis, and pathogen inhibition [43,44,45]. As the result of inflammation in IBD, as a consequence of specific IBD treatments, gut microbiota undergoes dramatic changes, observed in both patients and animal models [46,47]. An imbalance in the gut microbiota reflected in the disproportion between pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria may occur in addition to the loss of bacterial diversity calling dysbiosis. Dysbiosis, through effects on certain cytokines like tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 6, and interleukin beta, can induce an inflammatory process associated with an increase in the permeability of the intestinal barrier due to the depletion of apical junction complexes’ (AJCs) proteins [48,49,50]. Animal and human studies have shown that dysbiosis can affect the onset and progression of IBD, as well as autism, diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s diseases [51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Animal studies have shown that microbiota can significantly impact brain function and behavior, with “germ-free” mice displaying deviations in brain volume, myelination, as well as CNS deficits, such as anxiety-like behaviors, memory and sociability impairments, and depressive symptoms [58,59,60]. Both animal and human studies demonstrate that individuals with depression often present a microbial imbalance characterized by reduced microbial abundance and species diversity. It has been demonstrated that the transfer of microbiota from patients with depression to rats induces depression-like behavior along with alterations in tryptophan metabolism in the recipient animals [61]. In another experiment involving the transfer of microbiota from patients to “germ-free” mice, not only were neurobehavioral changes observed, but there was also evidence of shifts in metabolic regulation [62]. Changes in the microbiota composition have been observed in patients with autism, and the ability of fecal supernatant from autism spectrum disorder patients to induce gastrointestinal epithelium and ENS malfunctions in mice has also been demonstrated [63,64]. Therefore, symbiotic and pathogenic microbiota can also be involved in the GBA by producing biologically active metabolites: short-chain fatty acids and their precursors, particular neurotransmitters, and a variety of signaling molecules that can influence neural activity, immune response, as well as other physiological processes within the host organism [65,66]. In this review, we compile evidence regarding the currently underrated processes through which microbiota may contribute to the GBA imbalance in the course of IBD pathogenesis.

1.2. Diet Effects and Food Behavior in IBD

Studies exploring the involvement of diet in IBD patients have uncovered a significant impact of dietary preferences and food behavior both on neural functions and IBD progression. IBD patients with high food involvement tend to seek pleasurable food; however, individuals with high health engagement levels have a better emotional state and demonstrate lower hospitalization rates and relapses [7,67]. At the same time, avoidant eating behaviors common in IBD patients pose a high risk of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). This, along with impaired absorption of nutrients in IBD, can result in supplemental deficits, digestive malfunction, and metabolic dysregulation [68]. Murine studies have found dietary effects on intestinal microbial diversity associated with changes in cognitive ability and behavior [69,70,71] and similar observations have been made in human studies [72,73]. Specific dietary schemes are now widely discussed as an approach to ameliorate mental health, with growing evidence from preclinical and clinical studies of the dietary impact on neurologic and psychiatric disorders, including neuroinflammation, cognitive decline, depression, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s diseases [74,75].
Thus, the interrelation between gut microbiota, diet, and metabolism represents a finely balanced equilibrium that not only plays an essential role in the overall health but also in brain physiology, influencing behavior and mental health. In IBD, this equilibrium is inevitably imbalanced, along with chronic and recurrent inflammatory processes. Together, these factors lead to malfunctions of fundamental cellular mechanisms such as metabolic homeostasis, ion transport, and cytoskeletal and mitochondrial functions. In turn, these profound changes make IBD difficult to treat and cause associated disease complications, substantially involving GBA dysregulation [76,77]. The GBA in IBD has been the focus of recent research, with accumulating data on the impact of main IBD-related processes on the GBA, including inflammation, microbiome, and vagus nerve and ENS functions. At the same time, cellular and molecular processes essential for nervous system function that are impaired in IBD remain largely unexplored.
The purpose of this review is to summarize research data on metabolic homeostasis, mitochondrial function, ion transport, and cytoskeleton function involvement in IBD-related pathological processes concerning GBA imbalance (Figure 1) and consider in detail the possible pathways and cellular and molecular mechanisms that link these effects to each other, leading to the self-exacerbation of the negative effects of IBD. This review intends to put a research focus on these currently underexplored areas in regard to GBA. We believe that elucidating the role of these mechanisms in the GBA could open prospects for new systemic therapeutic approaches in IBD.

2. Metabolic Dysregulation

In IBD patients, significant alterations in metabolic processes and pathways are commonly observed [78,79,80]. Metabolic profiling is currently being explored as a method for early identification of IBD [79,80,81]. Specific interrelationships have been established between changes in metabolite levels in IBD and the induction and development of immune responses, oxidative process dysregulation, mitochondrial malfunction [82,83,84,85], and remarkable lipidome deregulation [86,87]. In animal models of colitis, mass spectrometry assays have also revealed substantially altered lipid ratios and levels of enzymes that regulate major metabolic signaling cascades, including oxidative stress, β-oxidation, glycolysis, and the citric acid cycle [88,89,90,91,92] (Figure 2a). The lipidome homeostasis is fundamental to neural cell function and the nervous system makes great use of all classes of lipids (fatty acids, triglycerides, phospholipids, sterol lipids, and sphingolipids) and also contains the greatest proportion of lipids in the human body [93]. Lipids also play a key role in maintaining total metabolic homeostasis through cellular processes mediated by leukotriene, prostanoid, and endocannabinoid signaling; they also attenuate inflammation, regulate metabolic diseases, and control physiological processes [94,95,96,97,98]. The involvement of fatty acids and their derivatives in intracellular signaling is well documented [99,100,101]. Since phospholipids are main structural components of cellular and organelle membranes, dysregulation of the lipidome may contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction via membrane structure impairments [102,103,104]. Transmembrane proteins’ conformation and functionality, including receptors and ion channels’, are also highly dependent on membrane lipid composition [104,105]. Therefore, regarding metabolic dysregulation in IBD, the lipidome imbalance may play a key role in GBA dysregulation (Figure 2b). Despite the critical role of lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis in neural functions, the involvement of these processes in GBA dysregulation in IBD remains poorly understood.

2.1. PUFAs’ Role and Therapeutic Potential in GBA Balance Restoration in IBD

Among major classes of lipids in CNS, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have the most well-defined regulatory role. n-3 PUFAs have been shown to be a limiting factor for proper neurodevelopment during the perinatal period [106]. PUFAs are implicated in neuronal signaling, neurogenesis control, vesicular processes, and central glucose homeostasis and are known for their ability to affect the mood and cognition [101,107]. Neural tissue is enriched with two major PUFAs, arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, which are crucial for brain development and neural functions [108,109,110]. PUFAs’ primary targets are fatty acid-activated receptors, the most studied of which are the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). PPARβ and PPARδ in the brain have been shown to regulate inflammatory responses and fatty acid metabolism [111]. PUFAs’ involvement is also known in multiple distinct signaling pathways in neural cells. Anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, the arachidonic acid derivatives, are the major forms of endocannabinoids in the brain and are known to bind to cannabinoid receptor types 1 and 2 both in neuronal and glial cells to suppress neurotransmitter release [112,113]. This has been shown to mediate short-term synaptic plasticity and long-term depression in excitatory and inhibitory synapses [114]. A relationship between n-3 PUFAs and the gut microbiota has been shown: n-3 PUFAs intake alters the abundance and species composition of the microbiome. An imbalanced consumption of n-3/n-6 PUFAs in the diet can induce dysbiosis, in particular a significant increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, which was shown to be associated with metabolic imbalance [115]. An n-3 PUFA deficit has been shown to impair the microbiota composition in metabolic disorders. Conversely, the gut microbiota can also significantly affect the metabolism and absorption of PUFAs [116].
The beneficial effects of PUFAs on the GBA balance have been demonstrated in both murine models and clinical trials, leading to their consideration as a supportive supplement in the complex therapy of neuropsychiatric pathologies [117,118]. In IBD, the anti-inflammatory effects of PUFAs have been observed in murine colitis models [119,120,121], along with a preventive effect on liver inflammation and oxidative stress [120,122]. However, clinical studies on the effects of PUFAs intake in IBD have produced contradictory results [123,124]. PUFAs likely exert an indirect regulatory effect on IBD-related processes [125] and are possibly involved in the complex regulation of lipid homeostasis. Thus, PUFAs have been shown to downregulate Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1 (SREBP1) activity, which is a crucial actor in mitochondrial lipogenesis [126]. Studying specific PUFA supplements that may benefit GBA in IBD and understanding the involved regulatory pathways appear to be a promising direction for the research and therapeutic implication.

2.2. Phospholipid Involvement in GBA Misbalance in IBD

Lipidome dysregulation can lead to cellular membrane damage, as well as significant changes in crucial cell signaling, excitotoxicity due to excitatory amino acid production rise, and increased apoptosis [94]. A growing body of evidence highlights the importance of phospholipid (PL) metabolism dysregulation in the pathological changes associated with neuronal functions [127,128]. Dysregulation of PL metabolism is implicated in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, as well as other neural pathologies [102,129]. At the same time, PL play a significant role in the pathological processes related to IBD [130]. Inflammation-induced cell membrane destruction, a common trait of IBD, can affect both enterocytes and ENS cells during both acute and chronic phases of IBD. Consequently, receptor-mediated pathways involving PL cleavage into secondary messengers may substantially contribute to the GBA imbalance in IBD.
The catabolism of the major membrane phospholipid, phosphatidylcholine (PC), is associated with crucial regulatory pathways in both enteric epithelial and neural cells [130,131,132]. PC was found to have an effect in the IBD treatment by the gut barrier function modulation, polarization of macrophages regulation, and by reducing the inflammation and is also known to have a potential in remodeling gut microbiota [133,134,135]. Concurring mechanisms are known for PC hydrolysis, including protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent and independent pathways. The activation of M-cholinergic receptors due to an increased need for choline, the precursor of acetylcholine, induces the stimulation of PC-sensitive phospholipase D [136]. Cholinergic neuron hyperactivation reduces the concentration of extracellular choline, potentially limiting its entry into neighboring neurons and interfering with the synthesis of membrane PC [132]. Additionally, phospholipase D activation is mediated by adrenergic stimulation [137], glutamate, and metabotropic receptors’ stimulation [138]. The PKC impact on phospholipase D catalytic activity is dual: stimulation via an ATP-independent pathway or inhibition under phosphorylation [139,140]. PC can also be utilized via the activation of phospholipase A2 that is mediated by the glutamate effect on NMDA receptors [141,142]. Notably, NMDA receptor stimulation, which mediates the cleavage of choline from PC, prevents its reutilization into PC by inhibiting choline phosphotransferase activity. This pathway of glutamatergic activation for acetylcholine synthesis can precede neuronal death [138]. Therefore, PC is a crucial component and biochemical regulator of neuronal functions, and its impaired levels and catabolism in IBD may act as a trigger in GBA imbalance.
Phosphatidylinositol (PI) and its metabolites also play a crucial role in neuronal functions, orchestrating the membrane transport of mediators, including processes like endocytosis, exocytosis, and vesicle binding [136,143]. PI metabolism and the formation of its derivatives have been shown to be impaired in IBD both in patients and in animal models [144,145,146]. Phosphorylated forms of PI are crucial regulators in neurotransmission through the mediators’ release from presynaptic membranes modulation acting on postsynaptic receptors [147]. At least 15 cytoskeletal actin-binding proteins have been reported to interact with or being regulated by phosphoinositides, whose synthesis is regulated by extracellular signals [148]. Hyperinduction of phosphoinositides hydrolysis leads to calcium transport impairments that can result in neuronal damage and death [149]. The decrease in neuronal level PI metabolite, PI-(4,5)-diphosphate, enhances the formation of β-amyloid from APP, and this process is Ca2+-dependent [150]. PI-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate has been found to be reduced in the brain of Alzheimer’s disease patients and in mouse models, in association with endosomal system impairments [151]. Conversely, β-amyloid is known to affect transmembrane signaling, affecting the metabolism of PI and PI-(4,5)-diphosphate. PI and PI-(4)-monophosphate are thought to perform a neuroprotective role, since their addition to the culture of hippocampal neurons eliminated the toxic effect of β-amyloid [152]. Low concentrations of β-amyloid peptide were shown to stimulate, but high concentrations to inhibit, phospholipase C activity [153]. Decreased phospholipase C expression in the brain is associated with the terminal stage of dendrite degradation [154]. Catabolism of PI is under the control of phospholipase A2, which exhibits activity both under increased Ca2+ concentration (Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2) or in Ca2+ absence, the latter being limited by PL metabolites (Ca2+-independent phospholipase A2) [155]. The activation of phospholipase A2 is responsible for the biosynthesis of secondary PL messengers: arachidonic acid, eicosanoids, PAF, and diglycerides [156]. Phospholipase A2 is also involved in processes associated with increased dendritic growth and neuronal differentiation during the nervous system development, as well as involved in cognitive functions [157,158].
Dietary modulation and therapeutic approaches towards normalizing PL metabolism, as far as the PL membrane composition maintaining the organelle health, may emerge as a novel approach in the systemic therapy of IBD and its related effects on the GBA.

2.3. Bile Acids’ Shift in IBD and Their Regulatory Potential in GBA

Bile acids (BAs) are among key metabolic regulators of microbial origin in the intestine; primary bile acids, cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), are synthesized in liver hepatocytes from cholesterol. The intestinal microflora is responsible for deconjugation, desulfation, conjugation with amino acids, and the formation of secondary BAs in the intestinal lumen [159,160]. Bacteria belonging to the phylum Firmicutes, such as Clostridium cluster XIVa, are responsible for the production of secondary BAs [161,162]. BAs perform a range of regulatory functions, acting as signaling molecules in cholesterol, lipid, steroid, and glucose metabolic cycles [163]. Changes in the composition of the microbiota and its enzymatic activity, characteristic of IBD, lead to alterations in the luminal pool of BAs and the range of functions they perform; this contributes to the maintenance of chronic inflammation and the formation of metabolic disorders [164,165,166,167,168] (Figure 2b). BA metabolism and signaling are substantially altered in IBD, with bacteria producing significant amounts of unusual BAs, whose roles remain to be fully elucidated [165,169]. In IBD patients, particularly those with Crohn’s disease, the impairments in the deconjugation, transformation, and desulfation activities of the gut microbiota are observed. This disruption leads to increased levels of sphingolipids and the primary bile acids CA and CDCA in the stool, alongside a depletion of secondary bile acids (lithocholic acid (LCA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA)) [170]. Significant reductions in secondary BAs (LCA and DCA) have been observed in the stool and serum samples of Crohn’s disease patients with psychological disorders. These patients’ stool samples showed an enrichment of primary BAs (CA and CDCA), while their serum exhibited elevated concentrations of dehydrocholic acid (DHCA) compared to healthy volunteers [171]. Additionally, levels of taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA), taurolithocholic acid (TLCA), and tauro-β-muricholic acid (TβMCA) in feces positively correlated with anxiety scores [171,172]. High levels of sulfated fatty acids have also been identified in the feces of IBD patients, a characteristic trait of the disease [165]. Furthermore, Crohn’s disease patients exhibit elevated levels of BAs conjugated with phenylalanine, tyrosine, or leucine [160]. Comprehensive omics analyses of fecal samples from patients with various types of IBD have shown shifts in bacterial taxa with marked sensitivity to BA-rich environments, including Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Gammaproteobacteria u Blautia spp. [173,174]. IBD patients with significant depression or anxiety displayed markedly reduced fecal microbiota diversity and lower counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii compared to patients without psychological disorders [171]. Studies in rats have demonstrated that these bacteria possess therapeutic effects in alleviating depressive and anxious states, highlighting their potential role in managing psychological symptoms in IBD patients [175]. Recent clinical findings have confirmed the involvement of gut microbiota dysbiosis and altered BA metabolism in the psychological disorders associated with Crohn’s disease [171].
BAs have been shown to penetrate the blood–brain barrier [176], and numerous studies have identified both primary and secondary BAs in the brains of humans and rats [177,178,179,180]. The unconjugated bile acids CA, CDCA, DCA, and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) can pass through the phospholipid bilayer of the blood–brain barrier due to their hydrophobic properties [173,177], and their concentrations in the brain correlate with their concentrations in serum [141]. Conjugated BAs, due to their greater hydrophilicity and size, can pass through the blood–brain barrier via active transport. Expression of mRNAs of various bile acids transporters was found in the vascular plexus of rat brain ventricles [181]. It was shown that the increase in BA concentration in the blood serum in rats after bile duct ligation or intravenous injection of DCA and CDCA caused structural damage, increased blood–brain barrier permeability, and increased concentration of these BAs in the brain [182,183]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that BAs can disrupt tight junctions in monolayers of rat brain microvascular endothelial cells by causing phosphorylation of occludins and increasing permeability via a Rac1-dependent pathway [182]. In a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) combined with moderate chronic colitis, alterations in the composition and levels of BAs were observed. These changes were accompanied by an increase in the protein S100β, a marker of brain permeability and glial cell activation, in the blood serum, along with a significant reduction in the tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludins [184].
The most extensively studied bile acid receptors are the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and the membrane-bound receptor G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (GPBAR1), also known as Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) [185,186]. These receptors are highly conserved in humans and mice [187]. FXR is the primary regulator of BA synthesis and enterohepatic circulation. The signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms through which FXR and TGR5 interact with BAs in the enterohepatic organs are comprehensively reviewed in [188]. These and other BA receptors have also been identified in the brains of humans and rodents [189]. Studies on FXR knockout mice have demonstrated that FXR plays a role in the homeostasis of glutamatergic, GABAergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic neurotransmitter systems in the hippocampus and cerebellum, influencing locomotor and cognitive functions as well as behavior [190]. In mouse models of hepatic encephalopathy, the activation of FXR receptors in brain neurons by bile acids is associated with neurological decline [191]. Increased expression of FXR in the hippocampus of naïve rats induces depressive-like behavior and reduces the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [192]. Conversely, the knockdown of hippocampal FXR completely prevents the negative effects of chronic unpredictable mild stress on rat behavior [192]. In cell culture studies, conjugates with the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, or leucine have been identified as potent agonists of the human FXR. These conjugates are comparable in efficacy to CDCA, the most powerful natural FXR agonist. It was shown that the level of BAs conjugated with the three listed amino acids was significantly higher in the dysbiotic state of patients with Crohn’s disease but not in patients with ulcerative colitis [160]. When mice were fed these compounds, there was a notable reduction in the expression of downstream FXR target genes responsible for bile acid synthesis in the liver. [160]. In the brain, the bile acid receptor TGR-5 is present on neurons, astrocytes, and microglial cells. Studies on a mouse model of hepatic encephalopathy, as well as in vitro studies on primary neurons and the mouse microglia cell line (EOC-20), have shown that the central activation via intracerebroventricular infusion of a TGR-5 agonist leads to reduced neuronal expression of chemokine ligand 2 (CCL-2), decreased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and reduced microglial proliferation [193]. Both in vitro and in vivo studies in mouse models of acute neuroinflammation have demonstrated that the binding of tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) to TGR-5 exerts anti-inflammatory effects, influences microglial phenotype, reduces NFκB activation, and induces the TGFβ pathway [194]. Another bile acid receptor, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR2), is expressed by endothelial cells and neurons. In mice, S1pr2−/− knockout showed weaker disruption of the blood–brain barrier and reduced neutrophil infiltration during systemic inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide compared to S1pr2+/− littermates, indicating S1PR2’s role as a mediator of cerebrovascular inflammation [195]. In an azoxymethane-induced mouse model of hepatic encephalopathy, high levels of the conjugated primary bile acid taurocholic acid in the blood led to the activation of S1PR2 in brain neurons (cortex and hippocampus), resulting in increased expression of mRNA and secretion of CCL2. This activation subsequently stimulated microglia, leading to increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and sustained neuroinflammation [196]. The specific ways of brain-localized bile acid receptors’ contribution to neurological changes remain largely unclear. However, many of these receptors are considered potential therapeutic targets for treating neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders [194,195,197,198].
Recently, the first clinical data confirming the involvement of gut dysbiosis and BA metabolism alteration in psychological disorders in Crohn’s disease were obtained [171]. As our understanding of BAs’ roles in neural functions grows, they are becoming perspective actors in the gut–brain axis in the context of IBD and gut microbiota misbalance.
Metabolic dysregulation is fundamentally involved in IBD and should be considered in relation to the GBA dysregulation. Currently, data are fragmentary, and specific pathways are poorly understood, necessitating a systematic approach to identify the metabolic pathways disrupted in IBD and their involvement in the GBA, as far as targeted strategies for their normalization are concerned. A promising avenue in diagnostics is a personalized metabolomics analysis approach. Potential methods for metabolic correction may include (i) the therapeutic and dietary compensation of supplementary deficiencies, addressing specific metabolic deficits defined, and (ii) the development of pharmaceuticals to modulate metabolic pathways and restore metabolic homeostasis.

3. Mitochondrial Functions

Currently, an increasing number of studies identify mitochondria as a crucial component of the GBA [199,200]. In IBD pathogenesis, mitochondrial dysfunction significantly contributes to the disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier [90,201]. Mitochondria play a central role in cellular energy supply, ATP production, neural signal transduction, actin cytoskeleton dynamics (Figure 3); they are also involved in the homeostasis of cellular cations such as calcium and potassium, thereby participating in the regulation of various signaling pathways that either prevent or initiate inflammation and cell death [202,203,204]. Mitochondria are believed to adapt to intracellular changes in energy balance to maintain homeostasis. However, when metabolic dysregulations exceed the adaptive capabilities, mitochondrial dysfunction occurs, resulting in decreased energy production, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis [105,205]. Given the pivotal roles that mitochondria play in the physiology of neural cells, understanding the mechanisms of mitochondria involvement in GBA dysregulation in connection with IBD-related pathological processes, including metabolic dysregulation, could open new avenues for IBD research and therapy (Figure 3a).

3.1. Lipid Homeostasis Interrelation with Mitochondrial Functions

Lipid metabolism begins with the emulsification and absorption of lipids in the intestine and continues through their uptake and transport into cellular organelles, including mitochondria [130,206]. Depending on the availability of metabolic substrates, energy balance, and endocrine signaling, fats are either stored in lipid droplets within adipose tissue or oxidized in mitochondria and peroxisomes. Mitochondria are one of the main compartments for the synthesis of PL, such as phosphatidylethanolamine, which is the substrate for biosynthesis of PC, the main phospholipid of membranes and lipid droplets [104]. Unlike the transfer of free fatty acids (FFAs) from lipid droplets to mitochondria for energy production, mitochondria–lipid droplet contact can also facilitate the transfer of lipids from mitochondria to lipid droplets. Both mitochondria and lipid droplets are highly dynamic organelles. Contact sites between mitochondria and lipid droplets have been shown to support the expansion of lipid droplets by increasing ATP synthase-dependent triacylglycerol (TAG) synthesis or by stimulating lipid droplet transport [207,208]. It was hypothesized that atypical contacts between mitochondria and lipid droplets increased under conditions of high energy demand and were essential for both lipolysis and lipogenesis in response to various metabolic triggers [209]. Several members of the nuclear receptor superfamily influence all aspects of lipid metabolism [210]. PPARs and liver X receptors (LXRs), acting in concert with PPARγ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α), regulate insulin sensitivity and lipid processing [211,212,213]. These receptors are the focus of intensive pharmacological research aimed at expanding the arsenal of small molecule ligands for the treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome [210].
Increasing evidence suggests that mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and lipid droplets are functionally interconnected to facilitate the exchange of small molecules and metabolites through membrane contact sites. These contact sites are critical for maintaining organelle function and overall cellular homeostasis, including lipid homeostasis [214,215]. Current research highlights the importance of contact sites between mitochondria and the ER, as well as between mitochondria and lipid droplets, in regulating cellular lipid metabolism [216]. For instance, under starvation conditions, cells adapt by switching their metabolism from glycolysis to fatty acid oxidation. This metabolic shift is primarily achieved through the breakdown of lipid droplets and the subsequent transport of FFAs into the mitochondria for β-oxidation [217]. Given the chronic digestion and absorption impairments in IBD [218], ENS cells may enter the starvation condition. Additionally, cells can activate autophagy as an adaptive response to starvation, breaking down organelles and cell membrane proteins to generate biomolecules, such as amino acids and FFAs, necessary for survival [219]. However, excessive FFAs can be toxic to cells, generating ROS and mitochondrial damage leading to cell death due to lipotoxicity [220,221]. In the nervous system, autophagy is the most important mechanism for regulating cellular functions and neuronal homeostasis; impairments in autophagy are associated with many neurodegenerative diseases [222,223,224]. Both constitutive and stress-induced autophagy in neural cells is involved in the control and renewal of damaged mitochondria ER and other organelles [219]. Lipid homeostasis also has a significant impact on autophagy processes in neural cells [225], and the related mitochondrial dysfunction in IBD may be one of the clues to the GBA dysregulation in IBD.

3.2. The Role of Lipid Droplets and Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes in Mitochondrial Functions and Pathology

Mitochondria contain most of the enzymes necessary for triglyceride metabolism, emphasizing their close functional connection with lipid substrates. Lipid droplets are dynamic intracellular organelles that vary in size and primarily store TAG and sterol esters as sources of bioenergy [208]. Lipid droplets are typically located near the rough ER, and lately, their regulatory role is emerging, particularly in lipid metabolism and energy regulation [226]. Lipid droplet accumulation in nervous cells has been widely shown as the characteristic trait upon neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative processes [227]. Despite the lack of research on lipid droplets in IBD-related processes, lipid droplets in the enterocytes are considered as a functional link between lipid homeostasis and inflammatory processes [228]. Two types of interactions between lipid droplets and mitochondria are distinguished: dynamic contact, where lipid droplets bind to mitochondria via protein complexes, and stable contact, where proteins facilitate a strong and stable membrane attachment of mitochondria to lipid droplets [229]. Proteins involved in the contact between mitochondria and lipid droplets include the surface proteins of lipid droplets PLN1, PLN5, and the outer mitochondrial membrane protein MIGA2, which directly connects mitochondria with lipid droplets (Figure 3b). These contacts promote the synthesis of fatty acids, their conversion to triglycerides, and their accumulation in lipid droplets [209]. Peridroplet mitochondria, which are located in close proximity to lipid droplets, have a distinct biochemical profile compared to the rest of the cytosolic mitochondria population [209]. The fusion of lipid droplets with the mitochondrial matrix is thought not only to facilitate the use of lipids for metabolic needs but also their accumulation, as the mitochondrial matrix contains most of the enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, which remain active in peridroplet mitochondria [209,230]. The fusion of mitochondria with lipid droplets, observed in macula cells of the human vocal cords, suggests the use of triglycerides from lipid droplets for the cell’s metabolic needs [231]. Impaired glycolysis, characteristic of intestinal tissues in IBD [232], can be assumed to secondarily inhibit mitochondrial metabolism due to a decrease in the amount of pyruvate entering the glycolytic pathway. This inhibition, in turn, may activate transcription factors and corresponding enzymes that promote more active oxidation of fatty substrates, as well as stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis necessary to restore ATP production and compensate for energy deficits [233]. Increased lipid droplet biogenesis was found in association with oxidative stress and elevated ROS production [234]. The recent elegant study in a mouse model demonstrating the involvement of the GBA showed an association between targeting ROS in the intestine and behavioral changes [235].
The outer membrane of mitochondria and the membrane of the adjacent ER can form common areas, known as mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAMs), which are essential for proper communication between these organelles (Figure 3b). Currently, MAM contacts are associated with the regulation of metabolism, autophagy, aging, and the production of ROS [236]. One of the primary functions of MAMs is the transport of calcium from the ER to mitochondria, allowing fine regulation of organelle activity and their role in executing physiological and pathological signals within the cell [237]. The protein composition of MAMs is dynamic and depends on the conditions and metabolic activity of the cell; according to proteomic data, MAMs can include more than 1000 proteins [238]. The structure and function of MAMs are critical for many cellular processes. Recent studies have shown that ion transport regulation is supported by the transmission of signals between the ER and mitochondria through MAMs by several proteins located within these structures. These proteins include those encoded by the PARK genes and some proteins associated with neurodegeneration, such as huntingtin and presenilin [239]. The alteration of MAMs contributes to pathogenesis features such as autophagy dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and more recently, neuronal death. These alterations are associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and Huntington’s disease [103,240,241].

3.3. The Mitophagy Regulation Importance in Neuronal Cell Health and Function

In neuronal cells, the efficient removal of damaged mitochondria through mitophagy, a highly conserved cellular process, is fundamental for maintaining mitochondrial and metabolic homeostasis, energy provision, and neuronal survival [242,243]. In healthy tissue, damaged and dysfunctional mitochondria are removed by mitophagy, preventing the accumulation of defective organelles and the development of pathological effects [242,244]. Maintaining mitochondrial function is crucial for cellular homeostasis and viability, and cells have developed a broad arsenal of quality control mechanisms to detect and eliminate defects in mitochondrial activity [244]. These mechanisms include mitochondrial biogenesis control, integrated stress response, fission and fusion events, and the selective autophagic removal of damaged or excess organelles via mitophagy. Defects in mitophagy, particularly in neuronal cells, have been found in association with neuropathology, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases [245,246]. Mitophagy is mediated by the major proteins PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) and Parkin [247]. In normal mitochondria, PINK1 resides on the outer mitochondrial membrane but is degraded by the inner mitochondrial membrane protease PARL, suppressing the mitophagy signal [247]. However, in damaged mitochondria with reduced membrane potential, PINK1’s amount was shown to be elevated and recognized by the Parkin protein, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, marking the mitochondria for subsequent degradation [248]. Most Parkin ubiquitination targets are localized within the mitochondria. During the early stage of mitophagy, Parkin translocates to dysfunctional mitochondria, activates PINK1, and ubiquitinates outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) proteins [249]. During mitophagy induction, PINK1 accumulates on the OMM of damaged mitochondria, where it recruits and activates Parkin through phosphorylation. Subsequently, the factor p62 binds to ubiquitinated mitochondrial proteins, resulting in the encapsulation of mitochondria by LC3 autophagosomes, which are then degraded with the lysosomes involvement [250]. Animal models have shown that knockout of key genes responsible for mitophagy, particularly Atg5 or Pink1, leads to an increase in ROS levels [251]. The accumulation of a large number of dysfunctional mitochondria contributes to cell damage, a further increase in ROS levels, and a general inhibition of cellular energy production [219,243]. Impaired mitophagy results in the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and cellular dysfunction, contributing to neurodegeneration [244,246,252].
Mitophagy ensures the removal of dysfunctional mitochondria through several pathways that control, initiate, and facilitate this process. Mitophagy disruptions can adversely affect neuronal functions, as functional mitochondria are crucial for neurotransmitter synthesis, release, and reuptake at the synapse [243,244]. The accumulation of damaged mitochondria can lead to synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration, whereas mitophagy maintains synaptic integrity by eliminating damaged organelles. Damaged mitochondria can also be removed via autolysosomes, and if mitophagy is blocked, mitochondria can induce cell death (apoptosis and necrosis) [243,253]. Signal transduction between microglia, astrocytes, and neurons, which is essential for glial cell function, is also modulated by mitophagy-related pathways. Transcellular mitophagy, a process in which cells release mitochondria to be engulfed and degraded by neighboring cells, has been demonstrated in the brain [254]. For instance, glial cells can transfer mitochondria to neurons during a stroke. Dysregulation of this process can lead to neuroinflammation and loss of proteostasis [255]. Receptor-mediated transcellular mitophagy, activated under specific conditions, is driven by mitochondrial receptor proteins located on the outer or inner mitochondrial membrane containing various motifs. Although the process of transcellular mitophagy is not yet well understood and requires further study, it holds significant implications for neuronal health. Mitophagy and mitochondrial health control are valuable questions requiring further research in the context of the GBA [202,256]. Maintaining a functionally active mitochondrial network and the approaches to regulate the population of these organelles in IBD-related conditions could be ultimately essential for the GBA function.
Thus, understanding the roles of mitochondrial functions in the GBA could reveal novel insights into the IBD pathophysiology and related dysfunctions, leading to the development of new therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving or restoring mitochondrial health in IBD. The interactions between lipid droplets and mitochondria, particularly through membrane contact sites, are believed to be crucial for the regulation of lipid metabolism and the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Further research into the roles and regulation of these processes within the context of GBA may provide valuable insights into restoring metabolic pathways in IBD.

4. Cationic Transport Dysregulation

Dysregulation of cationic balance is a crucial factor in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including those affecting the nervous system. The study of the roles of cations (Zn2⁺, Ca2⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Mg2⁺) in CNS function remains highly relevant both under normal conditions and in pathological processes [257,258,259,260]. Calcium ions (Ca2⁺) play a decisive role in maintaining physiological and biochemical processes within cells. As a vital intracellular messenger, Ca2⁺ is actively involved in numerous physiological functions, including neuronal excitation, muscle contraction, blood clotting, and enzyme activation. It also plays roles in cell differentiation, apoptosis, the immune response, and tumorigenesis. This broad range of functions necessitates a homeostatic regulatory system [261]. It is also involved in cell differentiation and apoptosis, in the immune response, and plays a significant role in tumorigenesis [262,263]. This broad range of functions necessitates a homeostatic regulatory system [264]. The CNS is particularly dependent on calcium homeostasis, and its deregulation is closely associated with several diseases, notably neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases [260], including IBD [265]. It is highly plausible that Ca2⁺ homeostasis plays a significant role in the GBA (Figure 4).
Modulating calcium influx into cells and targeting calcium-mediated signaling pathways may represent promising therapeutic approaches for these diseases. In this context, calcium channels are considered potential targets in IBD [266,267,268]. Intracellularly, three major groups of channels are responsible for releasing calcium from the ER: ryanodine receptors (RyR) [269], inositol-3-phosphate receptors (IP3R) [264,269], and two-pore channels (TPC) [270]. Several calcium channels within the plasma membrane are also crucial for CNS cell function, including voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC) [271], ionotropic glutamate receptors [272,273], calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channels [274], purinergic P2X receptors [275], and transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels [276]. Understanding and targeting Ca2+ channels and their regulatory pathways could provide new insights and therapeutic opportunities for managing GBA function in IBD, underscoring the importance of maintaining cationic balance in both gut and mental health.

4.1. TRP Ion Channels’ Role in the Inflammation and ENS Dysregulation in IBD

TRP ion channels are a large group of cation channels through which cells respond to various external stimuli. These channels are sensitive to temperature, tactile, and pain stimuli, are involved in mechanical and taste sensitivity, visual perception, and play an important role in the immune response and nociception. TRP ion channels are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as in non-neuronal cells such as those of the skin, bladder, pancreas, and spleen [277,278,279,280,281]. The currently known TRP ion channels form a large and heterogeneous superfamily, numbering more than 28 types and subdivided into subfamilies. In mammals, there are six subfamilies: TRPC (canonical), TRPV (vanilloid), TRPM (melastatin), TRPA (ankyrin), TRPP (polycystin), and TRPML (mucolipin) [280,282,283]. Accumulating evidence from clinical and animal studies supports the significant contribution of TRP ion channels to the pathophysiology of IBD. In this regard, they represent an attractive target for developing new therapeutic approaches [266,268,284,285,286]. TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPA1, TRPM2, and TRPM8 have been shown to be involved in the mechanisms of chronic inflammation and pain observed in IBD [287,288,289,290,291]. In the gastrointestinal tract, TRP ion channels are expressed in primary afferent sensory neurons and enteric neurons that jointly innervate the gastrointestinal tract [266,292,293]. TRP channels are also present in gastrointestinal non-neuronal cells, including enterocytes and enteroendocrine cells, such as enterochromaffin cells [294,295].
The activation of TRPV1, TRPA1, TRPV4, and TRPM8 have been shown to mediate the release of immunomodulatory neuropeptides by afferent neurons, including calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP), which induce inflammatory responses [267,296,297]. The alterations of expression levels of these ion channels have been detected in IBD patients, as well as in mouse colitis models [267,268,289,298,299]. TRPV1 and TRPA1 ion channels are the most studied in the context of their involvement in intestinal inflammation. Both in IBD patients and rodent models, a significant change in the levels (both mRNA and protein) of TRPV1 and TRPA1 has been shown, which may indicate an important role of these ion channels in the inflammatory response regulation [300]. TRPV1 is hypothesized to be responsible for neuropathic inflammatory pain [300,301], as its activation promotes an increase in intracellular Ca2⁺ concentration and subsequent release of neuropeptides SP and CGRP from afferent sensory neurons, along with key proinflammatory cytokines [302]. TRPA1 is known to be involved in inflammatory reactions and the development of mechanical and chemical hypersensitivity in the colon [303]. The activation of TRPA1 may have a protective effect in IBD by reducing the expression of some proinflammatory neuropeptides, cytokines, and chemokines [300]. TRPV4 mRNA expression is increased in IBD patients [304], and selective blockade of TRPV4 in a mouse model of ulcerative colitis reduced intestinal inflammation and relieved pain [305]. A review summarizing data of experimental and clinical studies concluded that the TRPV4 ion channel could be considered as a therapeutic target for IBD [306].
The members of the TRPM subfamily have also been shown to be involved in IBD. Heat-sensing TRPM2 is involved in inflammatory pain and promotes visceral hypersensitivity by stimulating a range of immune functions [307]. In the gastrointestinal tract, TRPM2 is expressed mainly in mucosal macrophages and mast cells [308]. In a rat model of ulcerative colitis, the increased expression of TRPM2 was detected in the colon, and TRPM2 inactivation reduced inflammation in a mouse model of DSS-induced colitis [288]. TRPM8 ion channel activation by the agonist icilin in a mouse colitis model demonstrated strong anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect [290]. These effects may also occur due to icilin suppressing activity on another ion channel, TRPV1, which is a nociceptor that can be co-expressed with TRPM8 [309].

4.2. TRP Ion Channels and Gut Microbiota

Due to their immunomodulatory function through neuropeptides and immune cells, TRP channels are associated with immunity and gastrointestinal inflammation. IBD is closely associated with changes in intestinal microbial composition and metabolism, suggesting that the interaction of the gut microbiota with the CNS may occur through receptors such as TRP ion channels [294,310,311]. ENS sensory neurons innervating the intestine abundantly express TRP channels [266]. An increasing number of studies aim to identify the relationship between TRP ion channels and the intestinal microbiota [311,312]. For instance, Perez-Burgos et al. found that Lactobacillus reuteri dose-dependently reduced capsaicin-induced activation of jejunal afferent nerves in mice [313], suggesting that TRP channels may interact with gut microbiota and related metabolites, thereby influencing intestinal homeostasis. Interestingly, TRPV1 denervation by high doses of resiniferatoxin caused a decrease in bacterial metabolites and affected bacterial abundance in the gut [312]. In a study examining the possible interaction of TRPA1 and TRPV1 ion channels (involved in pain perception) with the gut microbiota, Nagpal et al. showed that Trpa1−/− and Trpv1−/− knockout mice were as different in microbiota composition from each other and from wild-type mice [311]. Further research into the mechanisms of the relationship between TRP ion channels and the intestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites may provide new insight into the role of these channels in physiological processes in the intestine, the GBA, and the pathophysiology of pain that occurs in IBD.
TRP cation channels play a significant role in the pathogenesis of IBD, through cation transport regulation and interactions with the intestinal microbiota. Given this, as well as the established involvement of these ion channels in neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory diseases, it is plausible that TRP ion channels constitute a crucial link in the regulation of the GBA. Understanding the specific mechanisms by which TRP ion channels influence both gut and brain function could provide valuable insights into the interconnected nature of gastrointestinal and neurological health. This underscores the potential of targeting TRP ion channels in developing therapeutic strategies for IBD and related GBA dysregulation.

5. Cytoskeleton Dysregulation

The actin cytoskeleton plays an essential role in enterocytes maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier and performs vital functions in neurons [314,315,316,317,318,319]. Actin is one of the highly conserved and abundant elements of the cytoskeleton that can form highly ordered and highly dynamic linear bundles, two-dimensional networks, and three-dimensional gels depending on cellular functions and signals [320,321]. Cytoskeletal F-actin is dynamically assembled from monomeric G-actin in an ATP-dependent manner, mediated by actin nucleators and crosslinkers such as formins, fascin, and ARP2/3 [322,323]. The dynamics and stability of the actin cytoskeleton are closely related to mitochondrial health and cellular cationic transport process (Figure 5a). The dynamics of actin fibers is ATP-dependent, so mitochondrial processes have a substantial impact on cytoskeletal functions (Figure 3c). Cellular responses to environmental factors, in turn, largely occur through mitochondria-cytoskeleton interactions, involving mitochondrial dynamics, positioning, and function regulated by the cytoskeletal network [324,325]. F-actin also participates in the regulation of mitochondrial ROS production, dynamics, and positioning, with myosins implicated in mitochondrial fission events [324,326]. Cytoskeletal microtubules’ growth suppresses the fission of bound mitochondria and provides transport and anchorage tracks, while PI-(4,5)-diphosphate INF2-mediated nucleation of actin filaments promotes mitochondrial fission and dynamics [327,328]. The actin cytoskeleton mediates a variety of cellular functions, especially important for both enterocytes and neuronal cells: the maintenance of cell shape and intercellular contacts, mitochondrial health and dynamics, and vesicle formation.

5.1. Actin Cytoskeleton Role in Neuronal Cells and GBA Function

For proper neuronal function, the actin cytoskeleton is essential for axonal growth, mitochondrial movement within axons, and the process of mitophagy [253,329]. It is also crucial for the formation of synaptic vesicles and the reuptake of neurotransmitters [330,331]. As a result of inflammation, dysregulation of cation transport, and ATP production by mitochondria in IBD, the actin cytoskeleton may be disrupted not only in enterocytes but also in the cells of the ENS, also potentially affecting the functions of the vagus nerve (Figure 5b). Although these aspects have not been studied, they may offer promising directions for understanding ENS and vagus nerve dysfunctions within the GBA in the context of IBD. Deregulated cytoskeleton dynamics, in turn, may exacerbate mitochondrial movement and mitophagy impairments in neural cells [332]. These processes are critically important for neuronal health and proper nerve impulse transmission. Exploring therapeutic approaches to restore actin cytoskeleton function in IBD may yield systemic positive effects. Besides restoring the integrity of the intestinal barrier by reestablishing intercellular contacts, it could also improve the functions of the ENS and vagus nerve within the GBA. Given the current lack of data in this area, but recognizing the existing premises, it makes sense to focus research on the role of neuronal actin cytoskeleton dysregulation in IBD. Understanding these mechanisms may provide new insights and potential therapeutic targets to alleviate GBA-related dysfunctions in IBD.
Another possible pathway of actin cytoskeleton involvement in GBA is circulating microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids, which include butyrate and propionate [333]. Gut microbiota is known to regulate gut epithelial barrier integrity in an actin-dependent manner with butyrate [334]. These compounds have also been shown to influence the integrity of the blood–brain barrier [335,336]. The brain endothelium, a major interface between circulating metabolic signals and the brain, is a critical component of the blood–brain barrier and also depends on the actin cytoskeleton state. In an in vitro model of the tight junctions, butyrate and propionate were shown to affect the actin cytoskeleton and the structure of tight junction proteins [337]. Both these short-chain fatty acids were shown to induce distinct changes in the orientation of F-actin bundles. Additionally, they increased the number of tight junction proteins and protected against LPS-induced degradation of tight junctions, thereby improving intercellular contacts integrity and also modulating mitochondrial network dynamics [337]. These findings provide a foundation for further research into the role of actin cytoskeleton function implications for the GBA in IBD.

5.2. Actin Cytoskeleton Dysregulation Involvement in Gut Epithelium Barrier Dysfunction in IBD

The idea of the actin cytoskeleton’s important role in the gut epithelium barrier integrity is widely supported by findings that the destabilization of the actin network with cytoskeleton-disrupting toxins, inflammatory signaling molecules, or bacterial pathogens leads to the loss of AJC, along with an actin filament breakdown [317]. The intestinal barrier function is provided by intercellular junctions (adherent and tight junctions) of enterocytes accompanied with the mucous layer [338,339,340,341]. As a consequence of intestinal inflammation in IBD, an intestinal barrier disruption occurs [342,343,344]. Or conversely, intestinal barrier dysfunction may trigger immune activation [345,346,347]. Studies in IBD patients have revealed changes in the expression of genes of AJC proteins [348,349]. Mass spectrometry proteomic studies on human samples and animal models have also identified measurable changes in actin expression in the inflamed gut [350,351]. Several actin-binding proteins, such as cofilin, Arp3, and cortactin, colocalize with reorganized contractile rings in models of “leaky gut” induced by calcium depletion [352]. The motor protein myosin II, localized in these reorganized ring structures, is essential for AJC disassembly, as evidenced by the inhibition of its function with blebbistatin blocking that process, suggesting the involvement of actin-binding proteins in AJC regulation [353]. Recent studies have shown that the depletion of the actin-related protein (ARP2/3) inhibitor, ARPIN, alters the architecture of tight and adherent junctions while increasing actin content and epithelial barrier permeability [354]. This is supported by in vivo data in a mice model showing that ARPIN level decreases in response to DSS, and the suppression of ARPIN levels is also observed in highly inflamed areas of IBD patient samples [354]. Synaptopodin, found in actin stress fibers and tight junctions in epithelial cells, has been shown to exacerbate colitis in synaptopodin-deficient mice in response to dextran sodium sulfate [334]. There is substantial evidence of the association between calcium transport via TRP ion channels and the actin cytoskeleton, demonstrating the functional involvement of calcium transport [355,356]. Cationic transport through TRP ion channels has been shown to modulate cytoskeletal rearrangements [355,356].
In neural inflammation, calcium transport is also known to be impaired [357]. TNF-α is known to induce an F-actin rearrangement and additionally promotes the phosphorylation of the myosin light chain, leading to the disruption of tight junctions [358,359,360,361]. However, in chronic IBD, pro-inflammatory cytokine levels can be unelevated, and their effects can be balanced by anti-inflammatory cytokines, raising questions about the mechanisms of intestinal permeability changes during chronic inflammation. Studies on Crohn’s disease patients and their immediate family members have revealed genetically determined increased intestinal permeability in relatively healthy individuals, which cannot be solely explained by cytokine-induced permeability changes [362,363]. Increased intestinal permeability is also characteristic of various animal models of IBD. Animals with a null mutation in the Nod2 gene exhibit increased intestinal permeability, mucin-2 secretion deficiency, and a predisposition to intestinal inflammation [364]. The Il10-deficient mouse strain, a popular model of IBD, also shows increased intestinal permeability, with mutations in the Il10 gene associated with a predisposition to IBD in humans [365]. While the immune pathways inducing intestinal barrier loss have been extensively studied, the contribution of cytoskeletal dynamics and metabolism remains underexplored. Interestingly, mice with a predisposition to IBD due to mutations in the Muc2 gene exhibit increased intestinal permeability, behavioral changes, metabolic dysregulation, and impaired mitochondrial function [366]. This suggests that immune activation mechanisms might not be the primary cause of intestinal barrier impairments in IBD.
The disruption of the intestinal barrier inevitably leads to an immune response due to the penetration of pathogenic factors, complicating the study of the actin cytoskeleton’s role in IBD pathogenesis. However, restoring the balance of the actin cytoskeleton to recover the epithelial barrier function presents a promising direction for IBD therapy. Understanding and targeting the actin cytoskeleton dysregulation in IBD could provide novel insights and therapeutic opportunities for managing IBD and also restoring GBA functions. Regarding cytoskeletal modulation, new strategies may emerge to alleviate the chronic inflammation and neural dysfunctions associated with IBD.

6. Discussion: Clinical Applications and Translational Perspective

Considering recent data in patients with various forms and at different stages of IBD experiencing significant metabolic dysregulation [80,167,170,173,367,368], the extensive studies of pathophysiological mechanisms and regulatory pathway involved in the interrelations of these processes with GBA function become a highly relevant area. In this review, we systematically summarized the research data which shed light on the range of systemic effects of metabolic dysregulation in IBD on molecular and cellular processes critical for GBA functioning. The most significant effects of IBD in relation to metabolic dysregulation are the substantial lipidome deregulation [86,87] along with oxidative processes’ dysregulation and mitochondrial malfunction [82,83,84,85]. Dysregulation of the lipidome entails multiple dramatic consequences, which consist not only in systemic processes’ distortions, but also in basic cellular functions’ lesions. Lipid metabolism is extremely important in biosignaling, since major classes of lipids, such as PUFAs and phospholipids, are precursors to a spectrum of messengers that mediate metabolic regulation and also the development and control of inflammation, as well as the regulation of nervous activity and signaling processes [368]. Along with this, the disproportions of phospholipids levels and phospholipid processing impairments lead to various crucial structural and signaling consequences [369]. Thus, changes in the composition and proportions of phospholipids play a significant role in the function of membrane cell structures and the integrity of the epithelial barrier (both intestinal and blood–brain barriers). Moreover, phospholipids perform important functions in intracellular transport and other intracellular membranous structures, in particular in the organelles’ health, and to a significant extent, in mitochondrial health [369,370]. Data are just emerging identifying specific lipid indicators as clinical predictors for IBD [79,87,146]. However, this area has not yet been studied enough to offer specific targeted therapeutic approaches for metabolic dysregulation correction in IBD patients, in particular, lipidome dysregulation. However, it becomes clear that this direction contains great translational prospects, especially in relation to the GBA balance restoration in IBD.
The GBA, especially in the clinical context of IBD, is currently often considered to include the liver function, which is inevitably affected by pathological processes associated with both chronic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation [371]. In particular, BAs are coming to the fore in the therapeutic perspective. Patients with different types and stages of IBD have different bile acid profiles [171,172,173,174]. As more clinical data accumulate, the composition of BAs in serum and feces may have a diagnostic or prognostic value [372]. The microbiota have long been and are currently undoubtedly considered the most important component of the GBA, and a great amount of research shows the clinical and prognostic significance and a great therapeutic potential of the microbiota in IBD. The imbalance in the gut microbiome found in patients with neurodegenerative diseases saw a rise in the exploration of the clinical application of microbiome-based therapies involving the GBA, including prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). This direction was supported by studies showing the human gut microbiome as a major determinant of the plasma metabolome, potentially playing a more dominant clinical role than the patients’ genome [373,374,375]. Although significant overall positive effects have been shown from taking probiotics, as well as synbiotics and signaling substances produced by the microbiota, in particular on the mood and cognition in IBD and IBS patients, there is still a substantial lack of fundamental understanding of the underlying molecular pathways and cellular mechanisms to develop reliable therapeutic strategies [199,376,377,378]. As BAs perform a bactericidal function and are important components of the intestine’s innate immunity participating in the control of its bacterial composition, they are promising in relation to the regulation of the GBA. It has been shown that primary taurocholic acid is required for the development of Clostridioides difficile [379], whereas secondary LCA and UDCA inhibit the growth of C. difficile [380]. Intestinal inflammation caused by this pathogen is often observed in patients with IBD [381]. Thus, in FMT in children with IBD as a treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection, only a temporary restoration of the diversity of bacterial microflora was observed and by 6 months it corresponded to the donor level, whereas in children with and without IBD, during the same time, there was a decrease in primary and an increase in secondary BAs, but only in children with IBD did the level reach the donor level [381]. Similar changes in secondary bile acid levels, as well as increases in short-chain fatty acid butyrate, acetate, and propionate levels, were observed after FMT in adult patients [382]. It is likely that the ratio changes of BAs in feces are one of the mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of FMT. Secondary bile acids are currently used in complex therapy of the nervous system pathologies, for example, TUDCA has a neuroprotective, anti-apoptotic effect, and also acts as a mitochondrial stabilizer in various brain disorders, including when taken orally [383]. In addition, secondary bile acids, for example, UDCA, have anti-inflammatory, cytoprotective, and anti-apoptotic effects and are applied in therapies for a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease [383]. A number of studies in both animal models and patient data suggest that UDCA also may have a therapeutic role in IBD in regard to GBA influencing intestinal microbiota [384]. Thus, oral administration of UDCA or its taurine- or glycine-conjugated species to mice with experimental colitis reduced its severity, normalized the increased ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes associated with colitis, but did not restore bacterial diversity [385]. Currently, there is a lack of therapeutic observations of the effect of BAs on the condition of patients with IBD and nervous system disorders. At the moment, there is only one study that provides clinical results confirming the involvement of gut dysbiosis and BAs metabolic alteration in psychological disorders in Crohn’s disease [171].
The next important interconnected links in the chain of GBA balance are the cation transport, actin cytoskeleton, and mitochondrial health (Figure 5). Regarding these basic cellular processes, there are currently few data that could prove their direct interconnection in IBD [386]. However, substantial impairments of all these anchors have been shown in animal models of IBD [85,89,90,387], as well as in several clinical studies [388,389]. To date, one of the well-studied candidates linking these processes within the GBA concept seems to be TRP ion channels families. TRP ion channels are widely expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and peripheral and central nervous systems, performing a number of important functions there [268,294] (Figure 4). It is known that expression or activity changes, as well as mutations in TRP genes, are often associated with a wide range of intestinal epithelial disorders, including IBD, IBS, fibrosis, visceral hyperalgesia, and colorectal cancer [390]. Therefore, TRP channels are considered potential targets for new analgesics effective within the research and development of new approaches targeting TRP to reduce inflammation and relieve pain in IBD. It has now been shown that TRP channels play a significant role in the pathogenesis of IBD through the regulation of cation transport and interaction with the intestinal microbiota [391]. Currently, the most studied in this regard are TRPV1 and TRPA1, which are known as nociceptors [392,393]. TRPV1 has been shown to be responsible for neuropathic inflammatory pain [300,301] and hyperalgesia [394]. In this context, the interesting clinical study of biopsies from IBS showed that the number of nerve fibers expressing TRPV1 in the colon was markedly increased in relation to a healthy control group, and this increase was correlated with pain severity [395]. TRPA1 is also known to be involved in inflammatory responses and the development of mechanical and chemical hypersensitivity in the colon [303]. It has been shown that the activation of TRPA1 may have a protective effect in IBD by reducing the expression of certain pro-inflammatory neuropeptides, cytokines, and chemokines [300]. Meseguer et al. reported that bacterial lipopolysaccharides could activate TRPA1 channels, causing acute intestinal inflammation and visceral pain [396]. On the other hand, it has been shown that TRP ion channels play a critical role in the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton [356]. Both the integrity of the intestinal barrier and mitochondrial health in the intestinal cells and neural cells depend on the actin cytoskeleton dynamics [85,317,397]. Mitochondrial functions also depend strictly on both the proper cytoskeleton functioning and calcium transport within the cell. In this review, we summarized data on the involvement and interrelations between these processes in the context of the GBA function misbalance in IBD. The search for new approaches to restore the function of each of these GBA links in IBD may offer ways to achieve long-term and self-sustaining positive therapeutic effects.

7. Conclusions

Numerous studies in both patients and animal models highlight the extensive involvement and importance of the GBA in IBD. Despite the significant interest in the GBA and the extensive research on its role and function in IBD, many aspects of this complex relationship remain unclear. Beyond the primary components of the GBA—vagus nerve function, ENS function, and microbiota—IBD leads to impairments in metabolic regulation, mitochondrial function, cationic transport, and cytoskeleton dynamics in intestinal cells. These mechanisms are also crucial for the proper functioning of neuronal cells. Acute and chronic inflammation, dysbiosis, and impaired digestion and absorption in IBD result in significant metabolic dysregulation. This dysregulation majorly affects the lipidome and cellular energy cycles, which are essential for the nervous system functions. Additionally, due to multiple changes in regulatory metabolic signals, cation transport and mitochondrial functions are disrupted in IBD. Consequently, actin cytoskeleton dysregulation might occur in both enterocytes and nervous system cells. Proper calcium transport is critical for neuronal and mitochondrial functions and is vital for maintaining the integrity of the epithelial barrier. Therefore, all the described processes are interconnected through direct and reverse regulatory pathways, potentially leading to the self-reinforcement of pathology. Deciphering these complex interrelations and their effects on the GBA is crucial. This knowledge may reveal new directions in the search for therapeutic targets and means to improve the quality of life for IBD patients. Despite the large number of studies, there is still a limited clinical arsenal for IBD treatment; mostly, a temporary alleviation of IBD symptoms is possible. Only a small percentage of patients stably respond to therapy, and only a small percentage achieves a complete cure, along with frequent relapses and self-reinforcement, in which GBA imbalance is shown to play a significant role. A further in-depth study of the systemic effects associated with GBA misbalance in IBD, summarized in this review, as well as the discovery of new therapeutic approaches to the restoration of impaired metabolic, cellular, and organelle functions within the GBA in IBD patients could suggest great translational prospects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.V.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.V.B., A.A.E., K.N.M., M.N.L. and E.V.K.; writing—review and editing, L.V.B., A.A.E., K.N.M., M.N.L. and E.V.K.; visualization, A.A.E., K.N.M. and L.V.B.; funding acquisition, L.V.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation grant no. 23-25-00417, https://rscf.ru/project/23-25-00417/ (accessed on 9 November 2024).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Elena N. Kozhevnikova for the valuable discussion and constructive criticism, Oleg V. Eliseev for the positive attitude and inspiration, Andrey A. Gorchakov for the helpful advice, and Snezhanna S. Medvedeva for the support and minor varied help. Authors acknowledge Biorender.com for the images and graphical materials used in figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mayer, E.A.; Nance, K.; Chen, S. The Gut-Brain Axis. Annu. Rev. Med. 2022, 73, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barton, J.R.; Londregan, A.K.; Alexander, T.D.; Entezari, A.A.; Covarrubias, M.; Waldman, S.A. Enteroendocrine cell regulation of the gut-brain axis. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1272955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wiley, N.C.; Dinan, T.G.; Ross, R.P.; Stanton, C.; Clarke, G.; Cryan, J.F. The microbiota-gut-brain axis as a key regulator of neural function and the stress response: Implications for human and animal health. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 3225–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gunther, C.; Rothhammer, V.; Karow, M.; Neurath, M.; Winner, B. The Gut-Brain Axis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Current and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koloski, N.A.; Jones, M.; Kalantar, J.; Weltman, M.; Zaguirre, J.; Talley, N.J. The brain--gut pathway in functional gastrointestinal disorders is bidirectional: A 12-year prospective population-based study. Gut 2012, 61, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Day, A.S.; Yao, C.K.; Costello, S.P.; Andrews, J.M.; Bryant, R.V. Food-related quality of life in adults with inflammatory bowel disease is associated with restrictive eating behaviour, disease activity and surgery: A prospective multicentre observational study. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2022, 35, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palamenghi, L.; Usta, D.; Leone, S.; Graffigna, G. Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dolinger, M.; Torres, J.; Vermeire, S. Crohn’s disease. Lancet 2024, 403, 1177–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hendrickson, B.A.; Gokhale, R.; Cho, J.H. Clinical aspects and pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baumgart, D.C.; Sandborn, W.J. Inflammatory bowel disease: Clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies. Lancet 2007, 369, 1641–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cleynen, I.; Boucher, G.; Jostins, L.; Schumm, L.P.; Zeissig, S.; Ahmad, T.; Andersen, V.; Andrews, J.M.; Annese, V.; Brand, S.; et al. Inherited determinants of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: A genetic association study. Lancet 2016, 387, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cleynen, I.; Vazeille, E.; Artieda, M.; Verspaget, H.W.; Szczypiorska, M.; Bringer, M.A.; Lakatos, P.L.; Seibold, F.; Parnell, K.; Weersma, R.K.; et al. Genetic and microbial factors modulating the ubiquitin proteasome system in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2014, 63, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jostins, L.; Ripke, S.; Weersma, R.K.; Duerr, R.H.; McGovern, D.P.; Hui, K.Y.; Lee, J.C.; Schumm, L.P.; Sharma, Y.; Anderson, C.A.; et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2012, 491, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, J.Z.; van Sommeren, S.; Huang, H.; Ng, S.C.; Alberts, R.; Takahashi, A.; Ripke, S.; Lee, J.C.; Jostins, L.; Shah, T.; et al. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 979–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McCole, D.F. IBD candidate genes and intestinal barrier regulation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 1829–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Momozawa, Y.; Dmitrieva, J.; Theatre, E.; Deffontaine, V.; Rahmouni, S.; Charloteaux, B.; Crins, F.; Docampo, E.; Elansary, M.; Gori, A.S.; et al. IBD risk loci are enriched in multigenic regulatory modules encompassing putative causative genes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stankey, C.T.; Bourges, C.; Haag, L.M.; Turner-Stokes, T.; Piedade, A.P.; Palmer-Jones, C.; Papa, I.; Silva Dos Santos, M.; Zhang, Q.; Cameron, A.J.; et al. A disease-associated gene desert directs macrophage inflammation through ETS2. Nature 2024, 630, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Minea, H.; Singeap, A.M.; Minea, M.; Juncu, S.; Muzica, C.; Sfarti, C.V.; Girleanu, I.; Chiriac, S.; Miftode, I.D.; Stanciu, C.; et al. The Contribution of Genetic and Epigenetic Factors: An Emerging Concept in the Assessment and Prognosis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McCarthy, D.A.; Rampton, D.S.; Liu, Y.C. Peripheral blood neutrophils in inflammatory bowel disease: Morphological evidence of in vivo activation in active disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1991, 86, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Somasundaram, R.; Nuij, V.J.; van der Woude, C.J.; Kuipers, E.J.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Fuhler, G.M. Peripheral neutrophil functions and cell signalling in Crohn;s disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e84521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xavier, R.J.; Podolsky, D.K. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2007, 448, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hanai, H.; Takeuchi, K.; Iida, T.; Kashiwagi, N.; Saniabadi, A.R.; Matsushita, I.; Sato, Y.; Kasuga, N.; Nakamura, T. Relationship between fecal calprotectin, intestinal inflammation, and peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2004, 49, 1438–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Singh, S.; Graff, L.A.; Bernstein, C.N. Do NSAIDs, antibiotics, infections, or stress trigger flares in IBD? Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 104, 1298–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Felder, J.B.; Korelitz, B.I.; Rajapakse, R.; Schwarz, S.; Horatagis, A.P.; Gleim, G. Effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on inflammatory bowel disease: A case-control study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 95, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ungaro, R.; Bernstein, C.N.; Gearry, R.; Hviid, A.; Kolho, K.L.; Kronman, M.P.; Shaw, S.; Van Kruiningen, H.; Colombel, J.F.; Atreja, A. Antibiotics associated with increased risk of new-onset Crohn’s disease but not ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 1728–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piovani, D.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Nikolopoulos, G.K.; Lytras, T.; Bonovas, S. Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 647–659.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. M’Koma, A.E. Inflammatory bowel disease: An expanding global health problem. Clin. Med. Insights Gastroenterol. 2013, 6, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nishida, A.; Inoue, R.; Inatomi, O.; Bamba, S.; Naito, Y.; Andoh, A. Gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Carroll, M.W.; Kuenzig, M.E.; Mack, D.R.; Otley, A.R.; Griffiths, A.M.; Kaplan, G.G.; Bernstein, C.N.; Bitton, A.; Murthy, S.K.; Nguyen, G.C.; et al. The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Children and Adolescents with IBD. J. Can. Assoc. Gastroenterol. 2019, 2, S49–S67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.S.; Chen, M.H.; Wang, H.E.; Lu, C.L.; Wang, Y.P.; Zhang, B. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Gut Liver 2023, 17, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kociszewska, D.; Vlajkovic, S.M. The Association of Inflammatory Gut Diseases with Neuroinflammatory and Auditory Disorders. Front. Biosci. 2022, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zamani, M.; Ebrahimtabar, F.; Alizadeh-Tabari, S.; Kasner, S.E.; Elkind, M.S.V.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Choden, T.; Rubin, D.T.; Malekzadeh, R. Risk of Common Neurological Disorders in Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2024, 30, 2195–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Belei, O.; Basaca, D.G.; Olariu, L.; Pantea, M.; Bozgan, D.; Nanu, A.; Sirbu, I.; Marginean, O.; Enatescu, I. The Interaction between Stress and Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pediatric and Adult Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fairbrass, K.M.; Lovatt, J.; Barberio, B.; Yuan, Y.; Gracie, D.J.; Ford, A.C. Bidirectional brain-gut axis effects influence mood and prognosis in IBD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2022, 71, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Suman, S. Enteric Nervous System Alterations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Perspectives and Implications. Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Collins, S.M. Interrogating the Gut-Brain Axis in the Context of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Translational Approach. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2020, 26, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Powley, T.L. Brain-gut communication: Vagovagal reflexes interconnect the two “brains”. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 321, G576–G587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Furness, J.B.; Callaghan, B.P.; Rivera, L.R.; Cho, H.J. The enteric nervous system and gastrointestinal innervation: Integrated local and central control. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 817, 39–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fleming, M.A., 2nd; Ehsan, L.; Moore, S.R.; Levin, D.E. The Enteric Nervous System and Its Emerging Role as a Therapeutic Target. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2020, 8024171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Villanacci, V.; Bassotti, G.; Nascimbeni, R.; Antonelli, E.; Cadei, M.; Fisogni, S.; Salerni, B.; Geboes, K. Enteric nervous system abnormalities in inflammatory bowel diseases. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2008, 20, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Giorgio, R.; Guerrini, S.; Barbara, G.; Stanghellini, V.; De Ponti, F.; Corinaldesi, R.; Moses, P.L.; Sharkey, K.A.; Mawe, G.M. Inflammatory neuropathies of the enteric nervous system. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 1872–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lindgren, S.; Stewenius, J.; Sjolund, K.; Lilja, B.; Sundkvist, G. Autonomic vagal nerve dysfunction in patients with ulcerative colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1993, 28, 638–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Adak, A.; Khan, M.R. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 473–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Belizario, J.E.; Faintuch, J.; Garay-Malpartida, M. Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis and Immunometabolism: New Frontiers for Treatment of Metabolic Diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 2037838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Afzaal, M.; Saeed, F.; Shah, Y.A.; Hussain, M.; Rabail, R.; Socol, C.T.; Hassoun, A.; Pateiro, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Rusu, A.V.; et al. Human gut microbiota in health and disease: Unveiling the relationship. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 999001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zuo, T.; Ng, S.C. The Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khan, I.; Ullah, N.; Zha, L.; Bai, Y.; Khan, A.; Zhao, T.; Che, T.; Zhang, C. Alteration of Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): Cause or Consequence? IBD Treatment Targeting the Gut Microbiome. Pathogens 2019, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kaminsky, L.W.; Al-Sadi, R.; Ma, T.Y. IL-1beta and the Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction Barrier. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 767456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Longo, L.; Tonin Ferrari, J.; Rampelotto, P.H.; Hirata Dellavia, G.; Pasqualotto, A.; Oliveira, C.P.; Thadeu Schmidt Cerski, C.; Reverbel da Silveira, T.; Uribe-Cruz, C.; Alvares-da-Silva, M.R. Gut Dysbiosis and Increased Intestinal Permeability Drive microRNAs, NLRP-3 Inflammasome and Liver Fibrosis in a Nutritional Model of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in Adult Male Sprague Dawley Rats. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2020, 13, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barbara, G.; Barbaro, M.R.; Fuschi, D.; Palombo, M.; Falangone, F.; Cremon, C.; Marasco, G.; Stanghellini, V. Inflammatory and Microbiota-Related Regulation of the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 718356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wallen, Z.D.; Demirkan, A.; Twa, G.; Cohen, G.; Dean, M.N.; Standaert, D.G.; Sampson, T.R.; Payami, H. Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tan, A.H.; Chong, C.W.; Lim, S.Y.; Yap, I.K.S.; Teh, C.S.J.; Loke, M.F.; Song, S.L.; Tan, J.Y.; Ang, B.H.; Tan, Y.Q.; et al. Gut Microbial Ecosystem in Parkinson Disease: New Clinicobiological Insights from Multi-Omics. Ann. Neurol. 2021, 89, 546–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fritsch, J.; Garces, L.; Quintero, M.A.; Pignac-Kobinger, J.; Santander, A.M.; Fernandez, I.; Ban, Y.J.; Kwon, D.; Phillips, M.C.; Knight, K.; et al. Low-Fat, High-Fiber Diet Reduces Markers of Inflammation and Dysbiosis and Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 1189–1199.e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Elzayat, H.; Mesto, G.; Al-Marzooq, F. Unraveling the Impact of Gut and Oral Microbiome on Gut Health in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dash, N.R.; Al Bataineh, M.T.; Alili, R.; Al Safar, H.; Alkhayyal, N.; Prifti, E.; Zucker, J.D.; Belda, E.; Clement, K. Functional alterations and predictive capacity of gut microbiome in type 2 diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mehra, A.; Arora, G.; Sahni, G.; Kaur, M.; Singh, H.; Singh, B.; Kaur, S. Gut microbiota and Autism Spectrum Disorder: From pathogenesis to potential therapeutic perspectives. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2023, 13, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shoubridge, A.P.; Choo, J.M.; Martin, A.M.; Keating, D.J.; Wong, M.L.; Licinio, J.; Rogers, G.B. The gut microbiome and mental health: Advances in research and emerging priorities. Mol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 1908–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yeo, X.Y.; Chae, W.R.; Lee, H.U.; Bae, H.G.; Pettersson, S.; Grandjean, J.; Han, W.; Jung, S. Nuanced contribution of gut microbiome in the early brain development of mice. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2283911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, W.H.; Chuang, H.L.; Huang, Y.T.; Wu, C.C.; Chou, G.T.; Wang, S.; Tsai, Y.C. Alteration of behavior and monoamine levels attributable to Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in germ-free mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 298, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Campos, A.C.; Rocha, N.P.; Nicoli, J.R.; Vieira, L.Q.; Teixeira, M.M.; Teixeira, A.L. Absence of gut microbiota influences lipopolysaccharide-induced behavioral changes in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 312, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kelly, J.R.; Borre, Y.; O’Brien, C.; Patterson, E.; El Aidy, S.; Deane, J.; Kennedy, P.J.; Beers, S.; Scott, K.; Moloney, G.; et al. Transferring the blues: Depression-associated gut microbiota induces neurobehavioural changes in the rat. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2016, 82, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zheng, P.; Zeng, B.; Zhou, C.; Liu, M.; Fang, Z.; Xu, X.; Zeng, L.; Chen, J.; Fan, S.; Du, X.; et al. Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive-like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host’s metabolism. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 786–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gonzales, J.; Marchix, J.; Aymeric, L.; Le Berre-Scoul, C.; Zoppi, J.; Bordron, P.; Burel, M.; Davidovic, L.; Richard, J.R.; Gaman, A.; et al. Fecal Supernatant from Adult with Autism Spectrum Disorder Alters Digestive Functions, Intestinal Epithelial Barrier, and Enteric Nervous System. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hsiao, E.Y.; McBride, S.W.; Hsien, S.; Sharon, G.; Hyde, E.R.; McCue, T.; Codelli, J.A.; Chow, J.; Reisman, S.E.; Petrosino, J.F.; et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013, 155, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y. Regulation of Neurotransmitters by the Gut Microbiota and Effects on Cognition in Neurological Disorders. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Collins, S.M.; Surette, M.; Bercik, P. The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Godala, M.; Gaszynska, E.; Durko, L.; Malecka-Wojciesko, E. Dietary Behaviors and Beliefs in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yelencich, E.; Truong, E.; Widaman, A.M.; Pignotti, G.; Yang, L.; Jeon, Y.; Weber, A.T.; Shah, R.; Smith, J.; Sauk, J.S.; et al. Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Prevalent Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 1282–1289.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, W.; Dowd, S.E.; Scurlock, B.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Lyte, M. Memory and learning behavior in mice is temporally associated with diet-induced alterations in gut bacteria. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 96, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Magnusson, K.R.; Hauck, L.; Jeffrey, B.M.; Elias, V.; Humphrey, A.; Nath, R.; Perrone, A.; Bermudez, L.E. Relationships between diet-related changes in the gut microbiome and cognitive flexibility. Neuroscience 2015, 300, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Beilharz, J.E.; Maniam, J.; Morris, M.J. Short exposure to a diet rich in both fat and sugar or sugar alone impairs place, but not object recognition memory in rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014, 37, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Martin, S.E.; Kraft, C.S.; Ziegler, T.R.; Millson, E.C.; Rishishwar, L.; Martin, G.S. The Role of Diet on the Gut Microbiome, Mood and Happiness. medRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Salehi, Z.; Ghosn, B.; Rahbarinejad, P.; Azadbakht, L. Macronutrients and the state of happiness and mood in undergraduate youth of a military training course. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2023, 53, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Horn, J.; Mayer, D.E.; Chen, S.; Mayer, E.A. Role of diet and its effects on the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of mental disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 2022, 12, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ayten, S.; Bilici, S. Modulation of Gut Microbiota Through Dietary Intervention in Neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2024, 13, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gracie, D.J.; Hamlin, P.J.; Ford, A.C. The influence of the brain-gut axis in inflammatory bowel disease and possible implications for treatment. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 4, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Peppas, S.; Pansieri, C.; Piovani, D.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Tsantes, A.G.; Brunetta, E.; Tsantes, A.E.; Bonovas, S. The Brain-Gut Axis: Psychological Functioning and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Aldars-Garcia, L.; Gisbert, J.P.; Chaparro, M. Metabolomics Insights into Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hua, X.; Ungaro, R.C.; Petrick, L.M.; Chan, A.T.; Porter, C.K.; Khalili, H.; Nurses’ Health, S.; Collaborators, P. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Associated With Prediagnostic Perturbances in Metabolic Pathways. Gastroenterology 2023, 164, 147–150.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Santoru, M.L.; Piras, C.; Murgia, F.; Leoni, V.P.; Spada, M.; Murgia, A.; Liggi, S.; Lai, M.A.; Usai, P.; Caboni, P.; et al. Metabolic Alteration in Plasma and Biopsies From Patients With IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2021, 27, 1335–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bauset, C.; Gisbert-Ferrandiz, L.; Cosin-Roger, J. Metabolomics as a Promising Resource Identifying Potential Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kinter, C.S.; Lundie, J.M.; Patel, H.; Rindler, P.M.; Szweda, L.I.; Kinter, M. A quantitative proteomic profile of the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response of macrophages to oxidized LDL determined by multiplexed selected reaction monitoring. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Chiurchiu, V.; Maccarrone, M. Chronic inflammatory disorders and their redox control: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 2605–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tian, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Pathomechanisms of Oxidative Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Potential Antioxidant Therapies. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 4535194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Haberman, Y.; Karns, R.; Dexheimer, P.J.; Schirmer, M.; Somekh, J.; Jurickova, I.; Braun, T.; Novak, E.; Bauman, L.; Collins, M.H.; et al. Ulcerative colitis mucosal transcriptomes reveal mitochondriopathy and personalized mechanisms underlying disease severity and treatment response. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, H.; Li, W.; Hu, J.; Xu, F.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Shen, H. Association of serum lipids with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1198988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fan, F.; Mundra, P.A.; Fang, L.; Galvin, A.; Moore, X.L.; Weir, J.M.; Wong, G.; White, D.A.; Chin-Dusting, J.; Sparrow, M.P.; et al. Lipidomic Profiling in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Comparison Between Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Noh, J.Y.; Farhataziz, N.; Kinter, M.T.; Yan, X.; Sun, Y. Colonic Dysregulation of Major Metabolic Pathways in Experimental Ulcerative Colitis. Metabolites 2024, 14, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Damiani, C.R.; Benetton, C.A.; Stoffel, C.; Bardini, K.C.; Cardoso, V.H.; Di Giunta, G.; Pinho, R.A.; Dal-Pizzol, F.; Streck, E.L. Oxidative stress and metabolism in animal model of colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22, 1846–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Borisova, M.A.; Achasova, K.M.; Morozova, K.N.; Andreyeva, E.N.; Litvinova, E.A.; Ogienko, A.A.; Morozova, M.V.; Berkaeva, M.B.; Kiseleva, E.; Kozhevnikova, E.N. Mucin-2 knockout is a model of intercellular junction defects, mitochondrial damage and ATP depletion in the intestinal epithelium. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Higueras, C.; Sainz, A.; Garcia-Sancho, M.; Rodriguez-Franco, F.; Rey, A.I. Faecal Short-Chain, Long-Chain, and Branched-Chain Fatty Acids as Markers of Different Chronic Inflammatory Enteropathies in Dogs. Animals 2024, 14, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Baur, P.; Martin, F.P.; Gruber, L.; Bosco, N.; Brahmbhatt, V.; Collino, S.; Guy, P.; Montoliu, I.; Rozman, J.; Klingenspor, M.; et al. Metabolic phenotyping of the Crohn’s disease-like IBD etiopathology in the TNF(DeltaARE/WT) mouse model. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5523–5535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Osetrova, M.; Tkachev, A.; Mair, W.; Guijarro Larraz, P.; Efimova, O.; Kurochkin, I.; Stekolshchikova, E.; Anikanov, N.; Foo, J.C.; Cazenave-Gassiot, A.; et al. Lipidome atlas of the adult human brain. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hornburg, D.; Wu, S.; Moqri, M.; Zhou, X.; Contrepois, K.; Bararpour, N.; Traber, G.M.; Su, B.; Metwally, A.A.; Avina, M.; et al. Dynamic lipidome alterations associated with human health, disease and ageing. Nat. Metab. 2023, 5, 1578–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Maccarrone, M. Deciphering Complex Interactions in Bioactive Lipid Signaling. Molecules 2023, 28, 2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. van Meer, G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Serhan, C.N. Pro-resolving lipid mediators are leads for resolution physiology. Nature 2014, 510, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Levy, B.D.; Clish, C.B.; Schmidt, B.; Gronert, K.; Serhan, C.N. Lipid mediator class switching during acute inflammation: Signals in resolution. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Papackova, Z.; Cahova, M. Fatty acid signaling: The new function of intracellular lipases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 3831–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hidalgo, M.A.; Carretta, M.D.; Burgos, R.A. Long Chain Fatty Acids as Modulators of Immune Cells Function: Contribution of FFA1 and FFA4 Receptors. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 668330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Falomir-Lockhart, L.J.; Cavazzutti, G.F.; Gimenez, E.; Toscani, A.M. Fatty Acid Signaling Mechanisms in Neural Cells: Fatty Acid Receptors. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Tong, B.; Ba, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, C.; Su, K.; Qi, H.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Targeting dysregulated lipid metabolism for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease: Current advancements and future prospects. Neurobiol. Dis. 2024, 196, 106505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sammeta, S.S.; Banarase, T.A.; Rahangdale, S.R.; Wankhede, N.L.; Aglawe, M.M.; Taksande, B.G.; Mangrulkar, S.V.; Upaganlawar, A.B.; Koppula, S.; Kopalli, S.R.; et al. Molecular understanding of ER-MT communication dysfunction during neurodegeneration. Mitochondrion 2023, 72, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mavuduru, V.A.; Vadupu, L.; Ghosh, K.K.; Chakrabortty, S.; Gulyas, B.; Padmanabhan, P.; Ball, W.B. Mitochondrial phospholipid transport: Role of contact sites and lipid transport proteins. Prog. Lipid Res. 2024, 94, 101268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bonora, M.; Giorgi, C.; Pinton, P. Molecular mechanisms and consequences of mitochondrial permeability transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 266–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Leyrolle, Q.; Decoeur, F.; Briere, G.; Amadieu, C.; Quadros, A.; Voytyuk, I.; Lacabanne, C.; Benmamar-Badel, A.; Bourel, J.; Aubert, A.; et al. Maternal dietary omega-3 deficiency worsens the deleterious effects of prenatal inflammation on the gut-brain axis in the offspring across lifetime. Neuropsychopharmacology 2021, 46, 579–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bazinet, R.P.; Laye, S. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and their metabolites in brain function and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 771–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Brenna, J.T.; Carlson, S.E. Docosahexaenoic acid and human brain development: Evidence that a dietary supply is needed for optimal development. J. Hum. Evol. 2014, 77, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kyle, D.J.; Schaefer, E.; Patton, G.; Beiser, A. Low serum docosahexaenoic acid is a significant risk factor for Alzheimer’s dementia. Lipids 1999, 34 (Suppl. 1), S245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Tokuda, H.; Kontani, M.; Kawashima, H.; Kiso, Y.; Shibata, H.; Osumi, N. Differential effect of arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on age-related decreases in hippocampal neurogenesis. Neurosci. Res. 2014, 88, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tyagi, S.; Gupta, P.; Saini, A.S.; Kaushal, C.; Sharma, S. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor: A family of nuclear receptors role in various diseases. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011, 2, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Howlett, A.C.; Mukhopadhyay, S. Cellular signal transduction by anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 108, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kim, D.J.; Thayer, S.A. Activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors inhibits neurotransmitter release from identified synaptic sites in rat hippocampal cultures. Brain Res. 2000, 852, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kano, M.; Ohno-Shosaku, T.; Hashimotodani, Y.; Uchigashima, M.; Watanabe, M. Endocannabinoid-mediated control of synaptic transmission. Physiol. Rev. 2009, 89, 309–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lee, J.Y.; Plakidas, A.; Lee, W.H.; Heikkinen, A.; Chanmugam, P.; Bray, G.; Hwang, D.H. Differential modulation of Toll-like receptors by fatty acids: Preferential inhibition by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Lipid Res. 2003, 44, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Watson, H.; Mitra, S.; Croden, F.C.; Taylor, M.; Wood, H.M.; Perry, S.L.; Spencer, J.A.; Quirke, P.; Toogood, G.J.; Lawton, C.L.; et al. A randomised trial of the effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements on the human intestinal microbiota. Gut 2018, 67, 1974–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tung, T.H.; Chen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.T.; Huang, S.Y. N-3 PUFA Ameliorates the Gut Microbiota, Bile Acid Profiles, and Neuropsychiatric Behaviours in a Rat Model of Geriatric Depression. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Keller, L.; Dempfle, A.; Dahmen, B.; Schreiber, S.; Adan, R.A.H.; Andreani, N.A.; Danner, U.N.; Eisert, A.; Fetissov, S.; Fischmeister, F.P.S.; et al. The effects of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) administration on the microbiome-gut-brain axis in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (the MiGBAN study): Study protocol for a longitudinal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Trials 2022, 23, 545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Charpentier, C.; Chan, R.; Salameh, E.; Mbodji, K.; Ueno, A.; Coeffier, M.; Guerin, C.; Ghosh, S.; Savoye, G.; Marion-Letellier, R. Dietary n-3 PUFA May Attenuate Experimental Colitis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 8430614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Martin, F.P.; Lichti, P.; Bosco, N.; Brahmbhatt, V.; Oliveira, M.; Haller, D.; Benyacoub, J. Metabolic phenotyping of an adoptive transfer mouse model of experimental colitis and impact of dietary fish oil intake. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 1911–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Vargas Robles, H.; Citalan Madrid, A.F.; Garcia Ponce, A.; Silva Olivares, A.; Shibayama, M.; Betanzos, A.; Del Valle Mondragon, L.; Nava, P.; Schnoor, M. Experimental Colitis Is Attenuated by Cardioprotective Diet Supplementation That Reduces Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Mucosal Damage. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 8473242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Rohwer, N.; Jelleschitz, J.; Hohn, A.; Weber, D.; Kuhl, A.A.; Wang, C.; Ohno, R.I.; Kampschulte, N.; Pietzner, A.; Schebb, N.H.; et al. Prevention of colitis-induced liver oxidative stress and inflammation in a transgenic mouse model with increased omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Redox Biol. 2023, 64, 102803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ajabnoor, S.M.; Thorpe, G.; Abdelhamid, A.; Hooper, L. Long-term effects of increasing omega-3, omega-6 and total polyunsaturated fats on inflammatory bowel disease and markers of inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 2293–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Arslan, G.; Brunborg, L.A.; Froyland, L.; Brun, J.G.; Valen, M.; Berstad, A. Effects of duodenal seal oil administration in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lipids 2002, 37, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bassaganya-Riera, J.; Hontecillas, R. CLA and n-3 PUFA differentially modulate clinical activity and colonic PPAR-responsive gene expression in a pig model of experimental IBD. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 25, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Infantino, V.; Iacobazzi, V.; De Santis, F.; Mastrapasqua, M.; Palmieri, F. Transcription of the mitochondrial citrate carrier gene: Role of SREBP-1, upregulation by insulin and downregulation by PUFA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 356, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shevchenko, A.; Simons, K. Lipidomics: Coming to grips with lipid diversity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, B.; Tontonoz, P. Phospholipid Remodeling in Physiology and Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 81, 165–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Leskova, G.F.; Kryzhanovskiĭ, G.N. Dysregulation of phospholipid metabolism of neuronal membranes in the nervous system pathology. Zhurnal Nevrol. I Psikhiatrii Im. SS Korsakova. 2010, 110, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  130. Boldyreva, L.V.; Morozova, M.V.; Saydakova, S.S.; Kozhevnikova, E.N. Fat of the Gut: Epithelial Phospholipids in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Billah, M.M.; Anthes, J.C. The regulation and cellular functions of phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis. Biochem. J. 1990, 269, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Klein, J. Membrane breakdown in acute and chronic neurodegeneration: Focus on choline-containing phospholipids. J. Neural. Transm. 2000, 107, 1027–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, Q.; Chen, G.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, W.; Qi, S.; Xue, X.; Wang, K.; Wu, L. Effects of dietary phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin on DSS-induced colitis by regulating metabolism and gut microbiota in mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2022, 105, 109004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Stremmel, W.; Merle, U.; Zahn, A.; Autschbach, F.; Hinz, U.; Ehehalt, R. Retarded release phosphatidylcholine benefits patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. Gut 2005, 54, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Treede, I.; Braun, A.; Sparla, R.; Kuhnel, M.; Giese, T.; Turner, J.R.; Anes, E.; Kulaksiz, H.; Fullekrug, J.; Stremmel, W.; et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of phosphatidylcholine. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 27155–27164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bajjalieh, S.M.; Scheller, R.H. The biochemistry of neurotransmitter secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 1971–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Llahi, S.; Fain, J.N. Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase D in rat cerebral cortex. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 3679–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gasull, T.; Sarri, E.; DeGregorio-Rocasolano, N.; Trullas, R. NMDA receptor overactivation inhibits phospholipid synthesis by decreasing choline-ethanolamine phosphotransferase activity. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 4100–4107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Min, D.S.; Park, S.K.; Exton, J.H. Characterization of a rat brain phospholipase D isozyme. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 7044–7051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bollag, W.B.; Zhong, X.; Dodd, M.E.; Hardy, D.M.; Zheng, X.; Allred, W.T. Phospholipase d signaling and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and -2 phosphorylation (activation) are required for maximal phorbol ester-induced transglutaminase activity, a marker of keratinocyte differentiation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 312, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rodriguez De Turco, E.B.; Jackson, F.R.; DeCoster, M.A.; Kolko, M.; Bazan, N.G. Glutamate signalling and secretory phospholipase A2 modulate the release of arachidonic acid from neuronal membranes. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002, 68, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Shen, Y.; Kishimoto, K.; Linden, D.J.; Sapirstein, A. Cytosolic phospholipase A(2) alpha mediates electrophysiologic responses of hippocampal pyramidal neurons to neurotoxic NMDA treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6078–6083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Morgan, C.P.; Skippen, A.; Segui, B.; Ball, A.; Allen-Baume, V.; Larijani, B.; Murray-Rust, J.; McDonald, N.; Sapkota, G.; Morrice, N.; et al. Phosphorylation of a distinct structural form of phosphatidylinositol transfer protein alpha at Ser166 by protein kinase C disrupts receptor-mediated phospholipase C signaling by inhibiting delivery of phosphatidylinositol to membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 47159–47171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Winkelmann, P.; Unterweger, A.L.; Khullar, D.; Beigel, F.; Koletzko, L.; Siebeck, M.; Gropp, R. The PI3K pathway as a therapeutic intervention point in inflammatory bowel disease. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2021, 9, 804–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Thakur, P.C.; Davison, J.M.; Stuckenholz, C.; Lu, L.; Bahary, N. Dysregulated phosphatidylinositol signaling promotes endoplasmic-reticulum-stress-mediated intestinal mucosal injury and inflammation in zebrafish. Dis. Model. Mech. 2014, 7, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yang, Q.; Huang, Z.; Diao, N.; Tang, J.; Zhu, X.; Guo, Q.; Chao, K.; Gao, X. Lipidomics reveals significant alterations associated with exclusive enteral nutrition treatment in adult patients with active Crohn’s disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2022, 10, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cremona, O.; Di Paolo, G.; Wenk, M.R.; Luthi, A.; Kim, W.T.; Takei, K.; Daniell, L.; Nemoto, Y.; Shears, S.B.; Flavell, R.A.; et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell 1999, 99, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wu, C.Y.; Lin, M.W.; Wu, D.C.; Huang, Y.B.; Huang, H.T.; Chen, C.L. The role of phosphoinositide-regulated actin reorganization in chemotaxis and cell migration. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 5541–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Castillo, M.R.; Babson, J.R. Ca2+ -dependent mechanisms of cell injury in cultured cortical neurons. Neuroscience 1998, 86, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Berman, D.E.; Dall’Armi, C.; Voronov, S.V.; McIntire, L.B.; Zhang, H.; Moore, A.Z.; Staniszewski, A.; Arancio, O.; Kim, T.W.; Di Paolo, G. Oligomeric amyloid-beta peptide disrupts phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate metabolism. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Morel, E.; Chamoun, Z.; Lasiecka, Z.M.; Chan, R.B.; Williamson, R.L.; Vetanovetz, C.; Dall’Armi, C.; Simoes, S.; Point Du Jour, K.S.; McCabe, B.D.; et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate regulates sorting and processing of amyloid precursor protein through the endosomal system. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wu, B.; Kitagawa, K.; Yagyu, K.; Zhang, N.Y.; Hattori, N.; Inagaki, C. Phosphatidylinositol and PI-4-monophosphate recover amyloid beta protein-induced inhibition of Cl− -ATPase activity. Life Sci. 2002, 72, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Wallace, M.A. Effects of Alzheimer’s disease-related beta amyloid protein fragments on enzymes metabolizing phosphoinositides in brain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1994, 1227, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Sieber, F.E.; Traystman, R.J.; Martin, L.J. Delayed neuronal death after global incomplete ischemia in dogs is accompanied by changes in phospholipase C protein expression. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1997, 17, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hirabayashi, T.; Murayama, T.; Shimizu, T. Regulatory mechanism and physiological role of cytosolic phospholipase A2. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 1168–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Norris, P.C.; Gosselin, D.; Reichart, D.; Glass, C.K.; Dennis, E.A. Phospholipase A2 regulates eicosanoid class switching during inflammasome activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 12746–12751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Schaeffer, E.L.; Gattaz, W.F. Cholinergic and glutamatergic alterations beginning at the early stages of Alzheimer disease: Participation of the phospholipase A2 enzyme. Psychopharmacology 2008, 198, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Sun, G.Y.; Xu, J.; Jensen, M.D.; Simonyi, A. Phospholipase A2 in the central nervous system: Implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J. Lipid Res. 2004, 45, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gerard, P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens 2013, 3, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Quinn, R.A.; Melnik, A.V.; Vrbanac, A.; Fu, T.; Patras, K.A.; Christy, M.P.; Bodai, Z.; Belda-Ferre, P.; Tripathi, A.; Chung, L.K.; et al. Global chemical effects of the microbiome include new bile-acid conjugations. Nature 2020, 579, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Juarez-Fernandez, M.; Porras, D.; Garcia-Mediavilla, M.V.; Roman-Saguillo, S.; Gonzalez-Gallego, J.; Nistal, E.; Sanchez-Campos, S. Aging, Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Diseases: Management through Physical Exercise and Nutritional Interventions. Nutrients 2020, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Van den Abbeele, P.; Belzer, C.; Goossens, M.; Kleerebezem, M.; De Vos, W.M.; Thas, O.; De Weirdt, R.; Kerckhof, F.M.; Van de Wiele, T. Butyrate-producing Clostridium cluster XIVa species specifically colonize mucins in an in vitro gut model. ISME J. 2013, 7, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Hylemon, P.B.; Zhou, H.; Pandak, W.M.; Ren, S.; Gil, G.; Dent, P. Bile acids as regulatory molecules. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Cai, J.; Rimal, B.; Jiang, C.; Chiang, J.Y.L.; Patterson, A.D. Bile acid metabolism and signaling, the microbiota, and metabolic disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 237, 108238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Duboc, H.; Rajca, S.; Rainteau, D.; Benarous, D.; Maubert, M.A.; Quervain, E.; Thomas, G.; Barbu, V.; Humbert, L.; Despras, G.; et al. Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 2013, 62, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Eckburg, P.B.; Bik, E.M.; Bernstein, C.N.; Purdom, E.; Dethlefsen, L.; Sargent, M.; Gill, S.R.; Nelson, K.E.; Relman, D.A. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005, 308, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Franzosa, E.A.; Sirota-Madi, A.; Avila-Pacheco, J.; Fornelos, N.; Haiser, H.J.; Reinker, S.; Vatanen, T.; Hall, A.B.; Mallick, H.; McIver, L.J.; et al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Sokol, H.; Seksik, P.; Furet, J.P.; Firmesse, O.; Nion-Larmurier, I.; Beaugerie, L.; Cosnes, J.; Corthier, G.; Marteau, P.; Dore, J. Low counts of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in colitis microbiota. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009, 15, 1183–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fiorucci, S.; Carino, A.; Baldoni, M.; Santucci, L.; Costanzi, E.; Graziosi, L.; Distrutti, E.; Biagioli, M. Bile Acid Signaling in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 674–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Vich Vila, A.; Hu, S.; Andreu-Sanchez, S.; Collij, V.; Jansen, B.H.; Augustijn, H.E.; Bolte, L.A.; Ruigrok, R.; Abu-Ali, G.; Giallourakis, C.; et al. Faecal metabolome and its determinants in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2023, 72, 1472–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Feng, L.; Zhou, N.; Li, Z.; Fu, D.; Guo, Y.; Gao, X.; Liu, X. Co-occurrence of gut microbiota dysbiosis and bile acid metabolism alteration is associated with psychological disorders in Crohn’s disease. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Sun, R.; Jiang, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.; Chen, H. Alterations of Serum Bile Acid Profile in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2022, 2022, 1680008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Gonzalez, C.G.; Mills, R.H.; Zhu, Q.; Sauceda, C.; Knight, R.; Dulai, P.S.; Gonzalez, D.J. Location-specific signatures of Crohn’s disease at a multi-omics scale. Microbiome 2022, 10, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Connors, J.; Dunn, K.A.; Allott, J.; Bandsma, R.; Rashid, M.; Otley, A.R.; Bielawski, J.P.; Van Limbergen, J. The relationship between fecal bile acids and microbiome community structure in pediatric Crohn’s disease. ISME J. 2020, 14, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hao, Z.; Wang, W.; Guo, R.; Liu, H. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (ATCC 27766) has preventive and therapeutic effects on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression-like and anxiety-like behavior in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 104, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kamp, F.; Hamilton, J.A.; Kamp, F.; Westerhoff, H.V.; Hamilton, J.A. Movement of fatty acids, fatty acid analogues, and bile acids across phospholipid bilayers. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 11074–11086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Higashi, T.; Watanabe, S.; Tomaru, K.; Yamazaki, W.; Yoshizawa, K.; Ogawa, S.; Nagao, H.; Minato, K.; Maekawa, M.; Mano, N. Unconjugated bile acids in rat brain: Analytical method based on LC/ESI-MS/MS with chemical derivatization and estimation of their origin by comparison to serum levels. Steroids 2017, 125, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mano, N.; Goto, T.; Uchida, M.; Nishimura, K.; Ando, M.; Kobayashi, N.; Goto, J. Presence of protein-bound unconjugated bile acids in the cytoplasmic fraction of rat brain. J. Lipid Res. 2004, 45, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Pan, X.; Elliott, C.T.; McGuinness, B.; Passmore, P.; Kehoe, P.G.; Holscher, C.; McClean, P.L.; Graham, S.F.; Green, B.D. Metabolomic Profiling of Bile Acids in Clinical and Experimental Samples of Alzheimer’s Disease. Metabolites 2017, 7, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zheng, X.; Chen, T.; Zhao, A.; Wang, X.; Xie, G.; Huang, F.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; et al. The Brain Metabolome of Male Rats across the Lifespan. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Choudhuri, S.; Cherrington, N.J.; Li, N.; Klaassen, C.D. Constitutive expression of various xenobiotic and endobiotic transporter mRNAs in the choroid plexus of rats. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2003, 31, 1337–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Quinn, M.; McMillin, M.; Galindo, C.; Frampton, G.; Pae, H.Y.; DeMorrow, S. Bile acids permeabilize the blood brain barrier after bile duct ligation in rats via Rac1-dependent mechanisms. Dig. Liver Dis. 2014, 46, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Lalic-Popovic, M.; Vasovic, V.; Milijasevic, B.; Golocorbin-Kon, S.; Al-Salami, H.; Mikov, M. Deoxycholic Acid as a Modifier of the Permeation of Gliclazide through the Blood Brain Barrier of a Rat. J. Diabetes Res. 2013, 2013, 598603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Fiaschini, N.; Mancuso, M.; Tanori, M.; Colantoni, E.; Vitali, R.; Diretto, G.; Lorenzo Rebenaque, L.; Stronati, L.; Negroni, A. Liver Steatosis and Steatohepatitis Alter Bile Acid Receptors in Brain and Induce Neuroinflammation: A Contribution of Circulating Bile Acids and Blood-Brain Barrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Stanimirov, B.; Stankov, K.; Mikov, M. Pleiotropic functions of bile acids mediated by the farnesoid X receptor. Acta Gastroenterol. Belg. 2012, 75, 389–398. [Google Scholar]
  186. Kawamata, Y.; Fujii, R.; Hosoya, M.; Harada, M.; Yoshida, H.; Miwa, M.; Fukusumi, S.; Habata, Y.; Itoh, T.; Shintani, Y.; et al. A G protein-coupled receptor responsive to bile acids. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 9435–9440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Fogelson, K.A.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Zarrinpar, A.; Knight, R. The Gut Microbial Bile Acid Modulation and Its Relevance to Digestive Health and Diseases. Gastroenterology 2023, 164, 1069–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Perino, A.; Demagny, H.; Velazquez-Villegas, L.; Schoonjans, K. Molecular Physiology of Bile Acid Signaling in Health, Disease, and Aging. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 683–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Fleishman, J.S.; Kumar, S. Bile acid metabolism and signaling in health and disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Huang, F.; Wang, T.; Lan, Y.; Yang, L.; Pan, W.; Zhu, Y.; Lv, B.; Wei, Y.; Shi, H.; Wu, H.; et al. Deletion of mouse FXR gene disturbs multiple neurotransmitter systems and alters neurobehavior. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. McMillin, M.; Frampton, G.; Quinn, M.; Ashfaq, S.; de los Santos, M., 3rd; Grant, S.; DeMorrow, S. Bile Acid Signaling Is Involved in the Neurological Decline in a Murine Model of Acute Liver Failure. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Chen, W.G.; Zheng, J.X.; Xu, X.; Hu, Y.M.; Ma, Y.M. Hippocampal FXR plays a role in the pathogenesis of depression: A preliminary study based on lentiviral gene modulation. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 264, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. McMillin, M.; Frampton, G.; Tobin, R.; Dusio, G.; Smith, J.; Shin, H.; Newell-Rogers, K.; Grant, S.; DeMorrow, S. TGR5 signaling reduces neuroinflammation during hepatic encephalopathy. J. Neurochem. 2015, 135, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Yanguas-Casas, N.; Barreda-Manso, M.A.; Nieto-Sampedro, M.; Romero-Ramirez, L. TUDCA: An Agonist of the Bile Acid Receptor GPBAR1/TGR5 with Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Microglial Cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 2231–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Xiang, P.; Chew, W.S.; Seow, W.L.; Lam, B.W.S.; Ong, W.Y.; Herr, D.R. The S1P(2) receptor regulates blood-brain barrier integrity and leukocyte extravasation with implications for neurodegenerative disease. Neurochem. Int. 2021, 146, 105018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. McMillin, M.; Frampton, G.; Grant, S.; Khan, S.; Diocares, J.; Petrescu, A.; Wyatt, A.; Kain, J.; Jefferson, B.; DeMorrow, S. Bile Acid-Mediated Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 2 Signaling Promotes Neuroinflammation during Hepatic Encephalopathy in Mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Xu, N.; Bai, Y.; Han, X.; Yuan, J.; Wang, L.; He, Y.; Yang, L.; Wu, H.; Shi, H.; Wu, X. Taurochenodeoxycholic acid reduces astrocytic neuroinflammation and alleviates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Immunobiology 2023, 228, 152388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Wang, H.; Tan, Y.Z.; Mu, R.H.; Tang, S.S.; Liu, X.; Xing, S.Y.; Long, Y.; Yuan, D.H.; Hong, H. Takeda G Protein-Coupled Receptor 5 Modulates Depression-like Behaviors via Hippocampal CA3 Pyramidal Neurons Afferent to Dorsolateral Septum. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 89, 1084–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Loh, J.S.; Mak, W.Q.; Tan, L.K.S.; Ng, C.X.; Chan, H.H.; Yeow, S.H.; Foo, J.B.; Ong, Y.S.; How, C.W.; Khaw, K.Y. Microbiota-gut-brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Song, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z. Interactions Between Intestinal Microbiota and Neural Mitochondria: A New Perspective on Communicating Pathway From Gut to Brain. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 798917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ozsoy, M.; Stummer, N.; Zimmermann, F.A.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Sperl, W.; Weghuber, D.; Schneider, A.M. Role of Energy Metabolism and Mitochondrial Function in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2022, 28, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Borbolis, F.; Mytilinaiou, E.; Palikaras, K. The Crosstalk between Microbiome and Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Neurodegeneration. Cells 2023, 12, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Austin, S.; Nowikovsky, K. LETM1: Essential for Mitochondrial Biology and Cation Homeostasis? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2019, 44, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Pain, P.; Spinelli, F.; Gherardi, G. Mitochondrial Cation Signalling in the Control of Inflammatory Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Schirrmacher, V. Mitochondria at Work: New Insights into Regulation and Dysregulation of Cellular Energy Supply and Metabolism. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Iqbal, J.; Hussain, M.M. Intestinal lipid absorption. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, E1183–E1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Benador, I.Y.; Veliova, M.; Mahdaviani, K.; Petcherski, A.; Wikstrom, J.D.; Assali, E.A.; Acin-Perez, R.; Shum, M.; Oliveira, M.F.; Cinti, S.; et al. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets Have Unique Bioenergetics, Composition, and Dynamics that Support Lipid Droplet Expansion. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 869–885.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Olzmann, J.A.; Carvalho, P. Dynamics and functions of lipid droplets. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Benador, I.Y.; Veliova, M.; Liesa, M.; Shirihai, O.S. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets: Where Mitochondrial Dynamics Regulate Lipid Storage and Utilization. Cell Metab. 2019, 29, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Alaynick, W.A. Nuclear receptors, mitochondria and lipid metabolism. Mitochondrion 2008, 8, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Barish, G.D.; Downes, M.; Alaynick, W.A.; Yu, R.T.; Ocampo, C.B.; Bookout, A.L.; Mangelsdorf, D.J.; Evans, R.M. A Nuclear Receptor Atlas: Macrophage activation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2005, 19, 2466–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Bookout, A.L.; Jeong, Y.; Downes, M.; Yu, R.T.; Evans, R.M.; Mangelsdorf, D.J. Anatomical profiling of nuclear receptor expression reveals a hierarchical transcriptional network. Cell 2006, 126, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Hassan, F.U.; Nadeem, A.; Li, Z.; Javed, M.; Liu, Q.; Azhar, J.; Rehman, M.S.; Cui, K.; Rehman, S.U. Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) in Energy Homeostasis of Dairy Animals: Exploiting Their Modulation through Nutrigenomic Interventions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Valm, A.M.; Cohen, S.; Legant, W.R.; Melunis, J.; Hershberg, U.; Wait, E.; Cohen, A.R.; Davidson, M.W.; Betzig, E.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Applying systems-level spectral imaging and analysis to reveal the organelle interactome. Nature 2017, 546, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Scorrano, L.; De Matteis, M.A.; Emr, S.; Giordano, F.; Hajnoczky, G.; Kornmann, B.; Lackner, L.L.; Levine, T.P.; Pellegrini, L.; Reinisch, K.; et al. Coming together to define membrane contact sites. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Ma, X.; Qian, H.; Chen, A.; Ni, H.M.; Ding, W.X. Perspectives on Mitochondria-ER and Mitochondria-Lipid Droplet Contact in Hepatocytes and Hepatic Lipid Metabolism. Cells 2021, 10, 2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Rambold, A.S.; Cohen, S.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Fatty acid trafficking in starved cells: Regulation by lipid droplet lipolysis, autophagy, and mitochondrial fusion dynamics. Dev. Cell 2015, 32, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Hartman, C.; Eliakim, R.; Shamir, R. Nutritional status and nutritional therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 2570–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Liu, S.; Yao, S.; Yang, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y. Autophagy: Regulator of cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2023, 14, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Bulow, M.H.; Wingen, C.; Senyilmaz, D.; Gosejacob, D.; Sociale, M.; Bauer, R.; Schulze, H.; Sandhoff, K.; Teleman, A.A.; Hoch, M.; et al. Unbalanced lipolysis results in lipotoxicity and mitochondrial damage in peroxisome-deficient Pex19 mutants. Mol Biol. Cell 2018, 29, 396–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Bosma, M.; Dapito, D.H.; Drosatos-Tampakaki, Z.; Huiping-Son, N.; Huang, L.S.; Kersten, S.; Drosatos, K.; Goldberg, I.J. Sequestration of fatty acids in triglycerides prevents endoplasmic reticulum stress in an in vitro model of cardiomyocyte lipotoxicity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1841, 1648–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Komatsu, M.; Waguri, S.; Chiba, T.; Murata, S.; Iwata, J.; Tanida, I.; Ueno, T.; Koike, M.; Uchiyama, Y.; Kominami, E.; et al. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 2006, 441, 880–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Friedman, L.G.; Lachenmayer, M.L.; Wang, J.; He, L.; Poulose, S.M.; Komatsu, M.; Holstein, G.R.; Yue, Z. Disrupted autophagy leads to dopaminergic axon and dendrite degeneration and promotes presynaptic accumulation of alpha-synuclein and LRRK2 in the brain. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 7585–7593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. La Barbera, L.; Vedele, F.; Nobili, A.; Krashia, P.; Spoleti, E.; Latagliata, E.C.; Cutuli, D.; Cauzzi, E.; Marino, R.; Viscomi, M.T.; et al. Nilotinib restores memory function by preventing dopaminergic neuron degeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2021, 202, 102031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Hernandez-Diaz, S.; Soukup, S.F. The role of lipids in autophagy and its implication in neurodegeneration. Cell Stress 2020, 4, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Fan, H.; Tan, Y. Lipid Droplet-Mitochondria Contacts in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Mallick, K.; Paul, S.; Banerjee, S.; Banerjee, S. Lipid Droplets and Neurodegeneration. Neuroscience 2024, 549, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Wit, M.; Trujillo-Viera, J.; Strohmeyer, A.; Klingenspor, M.; Hankir, M.; Sumara, G. When fat meets the gut-focus on intestinal lipid handling in metabolic health and disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 2022, 14, e14742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Cui, L.; Liu, P. Two Types of Contact between Lipid Droplets and Mitochondria. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 618322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Fernie, A.R.; Carrari, F.; Sweetlove, L.J. Respiratory metabolism: Glycolysis, the TCA cycle and mitochondrial electron transport. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Sato, K.; Chitose, S.I.; Sato, K.; Sato, F.; Kurita, T.; Umeno, H. Metabolic activity of cells in the macula flava of the human vocal fold from the aspect of mitochondrial microstructure. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2019, 4, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Xia, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ocansey, D.K.W.; Tu, Q.; Mao, F.; Sheng, X. Role of glycolysis in inflammatory bowel disease and its associated colorectal cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1242991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Cogliati, S.; Frezza, C.; Soriano, M.E.; Varanita, T.; Quintana-Cabrera, R.; Corrado, M.; Cipolat, S.; Costa, V.; Casarin, A.; Gomes, L.C.; et al. Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell 2013, 155, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Jin, Y.; Tan, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Z. Reactive Oxygen Species Induces Lipid Droplet Accumulation in HepG2 Cells by Increasing Perilipin 2 Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Ikeda, Y.; Saigo, N.; Nagasaki, Y. Direct evidence for the involvement of intestinal reactive oxygen species in the progress of depression via the gut-brain axis. Biomaterials 2023, 295, 122053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Simoes, I.C.M.; Morciano, G.; Lebiedzinska-Arciszewska, M.; Aguiari, G.; Pinton, P.; Potes, Y.; Wieckowski, M.R. The mystery of mitochondria-ER contact sites in physiology and pathology: A cancer perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Rizzuto, R.; Duchen, M.R.; Pozzan, T. Flirting in little space: The ER/mitochondria Ca2+ liaison. Sci. STKE 2004, 2004, re1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Porter, G.A., Jr.; Beutner, G. Cyclophilin D, Somehow a Master Regulator of Mitochondrial Function. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Vodickova, A.; Koren, S.A.; Wojtovich, A.P. Site-specific mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegeneration. Mitochondrion 2022, 64, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Rodriguez-Arribas, M.; Yakhine-Diop, S.M.S.; Pedro, J.M.B.; Gomez-Suaga, P.; Gomez-Sanchez, R.; Martinez-Chacon, G.; Fuentes, J.M.; Gonzalez-Polo, R.A.; Niso-Santano, M. Mitochondria-Associated Membranes (MAMs): Overview and Its Role in Parkinson’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 6287–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Parakh, S.; Perri, E.R.; Jagaraj, C.J.; Ragagnin, A.M.G.; Atkin, J.D. Rab-dependent cellular trafficking and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 53, 623–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Yoo, S.M.; Jung, Y.K. A Molecular Approach to Mitophagy and Mitochondrial Dynamics. Mol. Cells 2018, 41, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Han, S.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Sheshadri, P.; Su, X.; Cai, Q. Mitophagy regulates integrity of mitochondria at synapses and is critical for synaptic maintenance. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e49801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Lou, G.; Palikaras, K.; Lautrup, S.; Scheibye-Knudsen, M.; Tavernarakis, N.; Fang, E.F. Mitophagy and Neuroprotection. Trends Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Martinez-Vicente, M. Neuronal Mitophagy in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Cai, Q.; Jeong, Y.Y. Mitophagy in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cells 2020, 9, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Lazarou, M.; Sliter, D.A.; Kane, L.A.; Sarraf, S.A.; Wang, C.; Burman, J.L.; Sideris, D.P.; Fogel, A.I.; Youle, R.J. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 2015, 524, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Rakovic, A.; Shurkewitsch, K.; Seibler, P.; Grunewald, A.; Zanon, A.; Hagenah, J.; Krainc, D.; Klein, C. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1)-dependent ubiquitination of endogenous Parkin attenuates mitophagy: Study in human primary fibroblasts and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 2223–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Jin, S.M.; Youle, R.J. PINK1- and Parkin-mediated mitophagy at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Padman, B.S.; Nguyen, T.N.; Uoselis, L.; Skulsuppaisarn, M.; Nguyen, L.K.; Lazarou, M. LC3/GABARAPs drive ubiquitin-independent recruitment of Optineurin and NDP52 to amplify mitophagy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kang, C.; Badr, M.A.; Kyrychenko, V.; Eskelinen, E.L.; Shirokova, N. Deficit in PINK1/PARKIN-mediated mitochondrial autophagy at late stages of dystrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Subramaniam, S.R.; Chesselet, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013, 106–107, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Cardanho-Ramos, C.; Faria-Pereira, A.; Morais, V.A. Orchestrating mitochondria in neurons: Cytoskeleton as the conductor. Cytoskeleton 2020, 77, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Davis, C.H.; Marsh-Armstrong, N. Discovery and implications of transcellular mitophagy. Autophagy 2014, 10, 2383–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Swerdlow, N.S.; Wilkins, H.M. Mitophagy and the Brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, K. Microglial mitophagy integrates the microbiota-gut-brain axis to restrain neuroinflammation during neurotropic herpesvirus infection. Autophagy 2023, 19, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Smart, T.G.; Hosie, A.M.; Miller, P.S. Zn2+ ions: Modulators of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic activity. Neuroscientist 2004, 10, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Brini, M.; Cali, T.; Ottolini, D.; Carafoli, E. Neuronal calcium signaling: Function and dysfunction. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014, 71, 2787–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Schwalfenberg, G.K.; Genuis, S.J. The Importance of Magnesium in Clinical Healthcare. Scientifica 2017, 2017, 4179326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Enders, M.; Heider, T.; Ludwig, A.; Kuerten, S. Strategies for Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis and the Role of Calcium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Jedrzejewska-Szmek, J.; Dorman, D.B.; Blackwell, K.T. Making time and space for calcium control of neuron activity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2023, 83, 102804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Moon, D.O. Calcium’s Role in Orchestrating Cancer Apoptosis: Mitochondrial-Centric Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Patergnani, S.; Danese, A.; Bouhamida, E.; Aguiari, G.; Previati, M.; Pinton, P.; Giorgi, C. Various Aspects of Calcium Signaling in the Regulation of Apoptosis, Autophagy, Cell Proliferation, and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Berridge, M.J. The Inositol Trisphosphate/Calcium Signaling Pathway in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1261–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Feske, S. Calcium signalling in lymphocyte activation and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Holzer, P. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels as drug targets for diseases of the digestive system. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 131, 142–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Chen, Y.; Mu, J.; Zhu, M.; Mukherjee, A.; Zhang, H. Transient Receptor Potential Channels and Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Du, Y.; Chen, J.; Shen, L.; Wang, B. TRP channels in inflammatory bowel disease: Potential therapeutic targets. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022, 203, 115195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Santulli, G.; Marks, A.R. Essential Roles of Intracellular Calcium Release Channels in Muscle, Brain, Metabolism, and Aging. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2015, 8, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Patel, S.; Kilpatrick, B.S. Two-pore channels and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2018, 1865, 1678–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Schampel, A.; Kuerten, S. Danger: High Voltage-The Role of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels in Central Nervous System Pathology. Cells 2017, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Li, S.; Wong, A.H.; Liu, F. Ligand-gated ion channel interacting proteins and their role in neuroprotection. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Connolly, C.N.; Wafford, K.A. The Cys-loop superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels: The impact of receptor structure on function. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2004, 32, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Gwack, Y.; Srikanth, S.; Feske, S.; Cruz-Guilloty, F.; Oh-hora, M.; Neems, D.S.; Hogan, P.G.; Rao, A. Biochemical and functional characterization of Orai proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16232–16243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Del Puerto, A.; Wandosell, F.; Garrido, J.J. Neuronal and glial purinergic receptors functions in neuron development and brain disease. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Moran, M.M.; Xu, H.; Clapham, D.E. TRP ion channels in the nervous system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Clapham, D.E. TRP channels as cellular sensors. Nature 2003, 426, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Toth, B.I.; Olah, A.; Szollosi, A.G.; Biro, T. TRP channels in the skin. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2568–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Wyatt, A.; Wartenberg, P.; Candlish, M.; Krasteva-Christ, G.; Flockerzi, V.; Boehm, U. Genetic strategies to analyze primary TRP channel-expressing cells in mice. Cell Calcium. 2017, 67, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Zhang, M.; Ma, Y.; Ye, X.; Zhang, N.; Pan, L.; Wang, B. TRP (transient receptor potential) ion channel family: Structures, biological functions and therapeutic interventions for diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Yan, Q.; Gao, C.; Li, M.; Lan, R.; Wei, S.; Fan, R.; Cheng, W. TRP Ion Channels in Immune Cells and Their Implications for Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Montell, C.; Birnbaumer, L.; Flockerzi, V.; Bindels, R.J.; Bruford, E.A.; Caterina, M.J.; Clapham, D.E.; Harteneck, C.; Heller, S.; Julius, D.; et al. A unified nomenclature for the superfamily of TRP cation channels. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Li, H. TRP Channel Classification. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017, 976, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Zielinska, M.; Jarmuz, A.; Wasilewski, A.; Salaga, M.; Fichna, J. Role of transient receptor potential channels in intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: Novel targets in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Khalil, M.; Alliger, K.; Weidinger, C.; Yerinde, C.; Wirtz, S.; Becker, C.; Engel, M.A. Functional Role of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Immune Cells and Epithelia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Koivisto, A.P.; Belvisi, M.G.; Gaudet, R.; Szallasi, A. Advances in TRP channel drug discovery: From target validation to clinical studies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Massa, F.; Sibaev, A.; Marsicano, G.; Blaudzun, H.; Storr, M.; Lutz, B. Vanilloid receptor (TRPV1)-deficient mice show increased susceptibility to dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid induced colitis. J. Mol. Med. 2006, 84, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Yamamoto, S.; Shimizu, S.; Kiyonaka, S.; Takahashi, N.; Wajima, T.; Hara, Y.; Negoro, T.; Hiroi, T.; Kiuchi, Y.; Okada, T.; et al. TRPM2-mediated Ca2+ influx induces chemokine production in monocytes that aggravates inflammatory neutrophil infiltration. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. D’Aldebert, E.; Cenac, N.; Rousset, P.; Martin, L.; Rolland, C.; Chapman, K.; Selves, J.; Alric, L.; Vinel, J.P.; Vergnolle, N. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 activated inflammatory signals by intestinal epithelial cells and colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Ramachandran, R.; Hyun, E.; Zhao, L.; Lapointe, T.K.; Chapman, K.; Hirota, C.L.; Ghosh, S.; McKemy, D.D.; Vergnolle, N.; Beck, P.L.; et al. TRPM8 activation attenuates inflammatory responses in mouse models of colitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7476–7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Issa, C.M.; Hambly, B.D.; Wang, Y.; Maleki, S.; Wang, W.; Fei, J.; Bao, S. TRPV2 in the development of experimental colitis. Scand. J. Immunol. 2014, 80, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  292. Holzer, P.; Izzo, A.A. The pharmacology of TRP channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2469–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Zernov, N.; Popugaeva, E. Role of Neuronal TRPC6 Channels in Synapse Development, Memory Formation and Animal Behavior. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Boesmans, W.; Owsianik, G.; Tack, J.; Voets, T.; Vanden Berghe, P. TRP channels in neurogastroenterology: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 162, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Bellono, N.W.; Bayrer, J.R.; Leitch, D.B.; Castro, J.; Zhang, C.; O’Donnell, T.A.; Brierley, S.M.; Ingraham, H.A.; Julius, D. Enterochromaffin Cells Are Gut Chemosensors that Couple to Sensory Neural Pathways. Cell 2017, 170, 185–198.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Engel, M.A.; Becker, C.; Reeh, P.W.; Neurath, M.F. Role of sensory neurons in colitis: Increasing evidence for a neuroimmune link in the gut. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Yu, X.; Yu, M.; Liu, Y.; Yu, S. TRP channel functions in the gastrointestinal tract. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Yiangou, Y.; Facer, P.; Dyer, N.H.; Chan, C.L.; Knowles, C.; Williams, N.S.; Anand, P. Vanilloid receptor 1 immunoreactivity in inflamed human bowel. Lancet 2001, 357, 1338–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Rizopoulos, T.; Papadaki-Petrou, H.; Assimakopoulou, M. Expression Profiling of the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid (TRPV) Channels 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Mucosal Epithelium of Human Ulcerative Colitis. Cells 2018, 7, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Kun, J.; Szitter, I.; Kemeny, A.; Perkecz, A.; Kereskai, L.; Pohoczky, K.; Vincze, A.; Godi, S.; Szabo, I.; Szolcsanyi, J.; et al. Upregulation of the transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 ion channel in the inflamed human and mouse colon and its protective roles. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Salas, M.M.; Hargreaves, K.M.; Akopian, A.N. TRPA1-mediated responses in trigeminal sensory neurons: Interaction between TRPA1 and TRPV1. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 1568–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Melnick, C.; Kaviany, M. Thermal actuation in TRPV1: Role of embedded lipids and intracellular domains. J. Theor. Biol. 2018, 444, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  303. Lapointe, T.K.; Altier, C. The role of TRPA1 in visceral inflammation and pain. Channels 2011, 5, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  304. Toledo Maurino, J.J.; Fonseca-Camarillo, G.; Furuzawa-Carballeda, J.; Barreto-Zuniga, R.; Martinez Benitez, B.; Granados, J.; Yamamoto-Furusho, J.K. TRPV Subfamily (TRPV2, TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPV5, and TRPV6) Gene and Protein Expression in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 2906845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Fichna, J.; Mokrowiecka, A.; Cygankiewicz, A.I.; Zakrzewski, P.K.; Malecka-Panas, E.; Janecka, A.; Krajewska, W.M.; Storr, M.A. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 blockade protects against experimental colitis in mice: A new strategy for inflammatory bowel diseases treatment? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012, 24, e557–e560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Vergnolle, N. TRPV4: New therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel diseases. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 89, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Jang, Y.; Cho, P.S.; Yang, Y.D.; Hwang, S.W. Nociceptive Roles of TRPM2 Ion Channel in Pathologic Pain. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 6589–6600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Matsumoto, K.; Takagi, K.; Kato, A.; Ishibashi, T.; Mori, Y.; Tashima, K.; Mitsumoto, A.; Kato, S.; Horie, S. Role of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) channels in visceral nociception and hypersensitivity. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 285, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Harrington, A.M.; Hughes, P.A.; Martin, C.M.; Yang, J.; Castro, J.; Isaacs, N.J.; Blackshaw, A.L.; Brierley, S.M. A novel role for TRPM8 in visceral afferent function. Pain 2011, 152, 1459–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Morreale, C.; Bresesti, I.; Bosi, A.; Baj, A.; Giaroni, C.; Agosti, M.; Salvatore, S. Microbiota and Pain: Save Your Gut Feeling. Cells 2022, 11, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Nagpal, R.; Mishra, S.K.; Deep, G.; Yadav, H. Role of TRP Channels in Shaping the Gut Microbiome. Pathogens 2020, 9, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Kumar, V.; Mahajan, N.; Khare, P.; Kondepudi, K.K.; Bishnoi, M. Role of TRPV1 in colonic mucin production and gut microbiota profile. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 888, 173567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Perez-Burgos, A.; Wang, L.; McVey Neufeld, K.A.; Mao, Y.K.; Ahmadzai, M.; Janssen, L.J.; Stanisz, A.M.; Bienenstock, J.; Kunze, W.A. The TRPV1 channel in rodents is a major target for antinociceptive effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 3943–3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Parato, J.; Bartolini, F. The microtubule cytoskeleton at the synapse. Neurosci. Lett. 2021, 753, 135850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  315. Groschwitz, K.R.; Hogan, S.P. Intestinal barrier function: Molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Luissint, A.C.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Inflammation and the Intestinal Barrier: Leukocyte-Epithelial Cell Interactions, Cell Junction Remodeling, and Mucosal Repair. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 616–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Ivanov, A.I.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Cytoskeletal regulation of epithelial barrier function during inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Lamprecht, R. Actin Cytoskeleton Role in the Maintenance of Neuronal Morphology and Long-Term Memory. Cells 2021, 10, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Konietzny, A.; Bar, J.; Mikhaylova, M. Dendritic Actin Cytoskeleton: Structure, Functions, and Regulations. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Rajan, S.; Kudryashov, D.S.; Reisler, E. Actin Bundles Dynamics and Architecture. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Carlsson, A.E. Membrane bending by actin polymerization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 50, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  322. Firat-Karalar, E.N.; Welch, M.D. New mechanisms and functions of actin nucleation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Isogai, T.; Danuser, G. Discovery of functional interactions among actin regulators by analysis of image fluctuations in an unperturbed motile cell system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20170110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  324. Huang, D.; Chen, S.; Xiong, D.; Wang, H.; Zhu, L.; Wei, Y.; Li, Y.; Zou, S. Mitochondrial Dynamics: Working with the Cytoskeleton and Intracellular Organelles to Mediate Mechanotransduction. Aging Dis. 2023, 14, 1511–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Svitkina, T. The Actin Cytoskeleton and Actin-Based Motility. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2018, 10, a018267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Yang, C.; Svitkina, T.M. Ultrastructure and dynamics of the actin-myosin II cytoskeleton during mitochondrial fission. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Shen, J.; Zhang, J.H.; Xiao, H.; Wu, J.M.; He, K.M.; Lv, Z.Z.; Li, Z.J.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Y.Y. Mitochondria are transported along microtubules in membrane nanotubes to rescue distressed cardiomyocytes from apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Mehta, K.; Chacko, L.A.; Chug, M.K.; Jhunjhunwala, S.; Ananthanarayanan, V. Association of mitochondria with microtubules inhibits mitochondrial fission by precluding assembly of the fission protein Dnm1. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 3385–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Cai, Q.; Sheng, Z.H. Mitochondrial transport and docking in axons. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 218, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Doussau, F.; Augustine, G.J. The actin cytoskeleton and neurotransmitter release: An overview. Biochimie 2000, 82, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. Gentile, J.E.; Carrizales, M.G.; Koleske, A.J. Control of Synapse Structure and Function by Actin and Its Regulators. Cells 2022, 11, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Moore, A.S.; Holzbaur, E.L.F. Mitochondrial-cytoskeletal interactions: Dynamic associations that facilitate network function and remodeling. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2018, 3, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Sasso, J.M.; Ammar, R.M.; Tenchov, R.; Lemmel, S.; Kelber, O.; Grieswelle, M.; Zhou, Q.A. Gut Microbiome-Brain Alliance: A Landscape View into Mental and Gastrointestinal Health and Disorders. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2023, 14, 1717–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  334. Wang, R.X.; Lee, J.S.; Campbell, E.L.; Colgan, S.P. Microbiota-derived butyrate dynamically regulates intestinal homeostasis through regulation of actin-associated protein synaptopodin. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11648–11657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Hoyles, L.; Snelling, T.; Umlai, U.K.; Nicholson, J.K.; Carding, S.R.; Glen, R.C.; McArthur, S. Microbiome-host systems interactions: Protective effects of propionate upon the blood-brain barrier. Microbiome 2018, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Li, H.; Sun, J.; Wang, F.; Ding, G.; Chen, W.; Fang, R.; Yao, Y.; Pang, M.; Lu, Z.Q.; Liu, J. Sodium butyrate exerts neuroprotective effects by restoring the blood-brain barrier in traumatic brain injury mice. Brain Res. 2016, 1642, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Knox, E.G.; Aburto, M.R.; Tessier, C.; Nagpal, J.; Clarke, G.; O’Driscoll, C.M.; Cryan, J.F. Microbial-derived metabolites induce actin cytoskeletal rearrangement and protect blood-brain barrier function. iScience 2022, 25, 105648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Ulluwishewa, D.; Anderson, R.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Moughan, P.J.; Wells, J.M.; Roy, N.C. Regulation of tight junction permeability by intestinal bacteria and dietary components. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Horowitz, A.; Chanez-Paredes, S.D.; Haest, X.; Turner, J.R. Paracellular permeability and tight junction regulation in gut health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Paradis, T.; Begue, H.; Basmaciyan, L.; Dalle, F.; Bon, F. Tight Junctions as a Key for Pathogens Invasion in Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Schroeder, B.O. Fight them or feed them: How the intestinal mucus layer manages the gut microbiota. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2019, 7, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  342. Wang, F.; Graham, W.V.; Wang, Y.; Witkowski, E.D.; Schwarz, B.T.; Turner, J.R. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha synergize to induce intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction by up-regulating myosin light chain kinase expression. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 166, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Schulzke, J.D.; Bojarski, C.; Zeissig, S.; Heller, F.; Gitter, A.H.; Fromm, M. Disrupted barrier function through epithelial cell apoptosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1072, 288–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. McElroy, S.J.; Prince, L.S.; Weitkamp, J.H.; Reese, J.; Slaughter, J.C.; Polk, D.B. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1-dependent depletion of mucus in immature small intestine: A potential role in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011, 301, G656–G666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. McLean, M.H.; Neurath, M.F.; Durum, S.K. Targeting interleukins for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease-what lies beyond anti-TNF therapy? Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  346. Ordas, I.; Mould, D.R.; Feagan, B.G.; Sandborn, W.J. Anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: Pharmacokinetics-based dosing paradigms. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 91, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Johansson, M.E.; Gustafsson, J.K.; Holmen-Larsson, J.; Jabbar, K.S.; Xia, L.; Xu, H.; Ghishan, F.K.; Carvalho, F.A.; Gewirtz, A.T.; Sjovall, H.; et al. Bacteria penetrate the normally impenetrable inner colon mucus layer in both murine colitis models and patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 2014, 63, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Gassler, N.; Rohr, C.; Schneider, A.; Kartenbeck, J.; Bach, A.; Obermuller, N.; Otto, H.F.; Autschbach, F. Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with changes of enterocytic junctions. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2001, 281, G216–G228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Zeissig, S.; Burgel, N.; Gunzel, D.; Richter, J.; Mankertz, J.; Wahnschaffe, U.; Kroesen, A.J.; Zeitz, M.; Fromm, M.; Schulzke, J.D. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn’s disease. Gut 2007, 56, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Moriggi, M.; Pastorelli, L.; Torretta, E.; Tontini, G.E.; Capitanio, D.; Bogetto, S.F.; Vecchi, M.; Gelfi, C. Contribution of Extracellular Matrix and Signal Mechanotransduction to Epithelial Cell Damage in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Proteomic Study. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1700164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Lechuga, S.; Naydenov, N.G.; Feygin, A.; Cruise, M.; Ervasti, J.M.; Ivanov, A.I. Loss of beta-Cytoplasmic Actin in the Intestinal Epithelium Increases Gut Barrier Permeability in vivo and Exaggerates the Severity of Experimental Colitis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 588836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  352. Gehren, A.S.; Rocha, M.R.; de Souza, W.F.; Morgado-Diaz, J.A. Alterations of the apical junctional complex and actin cytoskeleton and their role in colorectal cancer progression. Tissue Barriers 2015, 3, e1017688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  353. Ivanov, A.I.; McCall, I.C.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Role for actin filament turnover and a myosin II motor in cytoskeleton-driven disassembly of the epithelial apical junctional complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 2639–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  354. Chanez-Paredes, S.; Montoya-Garcia, A.; Castro-Ochoa, K.F.; Garcia-Cordero, J.; Cedillo-Barron, L.; Shibayama, M.; Nava, P.; Flemming, S.; Schlegel, N.; Gautreau, A.M.; et al. The Arp2/3 Inhibitory Protein Arpin Is Required for Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Integrity. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 625719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Smani, T.; Dionisio, N.; Lopez, J.J.; Berna-Erro, A.; Rosado, J.A. Cytoskeletal and scaffolding proteins as structural and functional determinants of TRP channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Clark, K.; Middelbeek, J.; van Leeuwen, F.N. Interplay between TRP channels and the cytoskeleton in health and disease. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 87, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Sama, D.M.; Norris, C.M. Calcium dysregulation and neuroinflammation: Discrete and integrated mechanisms for age-related synaptic dysfunction. Ageing Res. Rev. 2013, 12, 982–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Marchiando, A.M.; Shen, L.; Graham, W.V.; Edelblum, K.L.; Duckworth, C.A.; Guan, Y.; Montrose, M.H.; Turner, J.R.; Watson, A.J. The epithelial barrier is maintained by in vivo tight junction expansion during pathologic intestinal epithelial shedding. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1208–1218.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Su, L.; Nalle, S.C.; Shen, L.; Turner, E.S.; Singh, G.; Breskin, L.A.; Khramtsova, E.A.; Khramtsova, G.; Tsai, P.Y.; Fu, Y.X.; et al. TNFR2 activates MLCK-dependent tight junction dysregulation to cause apoptosis-mediated barrier loss and experimental colitis. Gastroenterology 2013, 145, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Watari, A.; Sakamoto, Y.; Hisaie, K.; Iwamoto, K.; Fueta, M.; Yagi, K.; Kondoh, M. Rebeccamycin Attenuates TNF-alpha-Induced Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction by Inhibiting Myosin Light Chain Kinase Production. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 1924–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  361. Ye, X.; Sun, M. AGR2 ameliorates tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced epithelial barrier dysfunction via suppression of NF-kappaB p65-mediated MLCK/p-MLC pathway activation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  362. Buhner, S.; Buning, C.; Genschel, J.; Kling, K.; Herrmann, D.; Dignass, A.; Kuechler, I.; Krueger, S.; Schmidt, H.H.; Lochs, H. Genetic basis for increased intestinal permeability in families with Crohn’s disease: Role of CARD15 3020insC mutation? Gut 2006, 55, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  363. Fries, W.; Renda, M.C.; Lo Presti, M.A.; Raso, A.; Orlando, A.; Oliva, L.; Giofre, M.R.; Maggio, A.; Mattaliano, A.; Macaluso, A.; et al. Intestinal permeability and genetic determinants in patients, first-degree relatives, and controls in a high-incidence area of Crohn’s disease in Southern Italy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2005, 100, 2730–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  364. Barreau, F.; Madre, C.; Meinzer, U.; Berrebi, D.; Dussaillant, M.; Merlin, F.; Eckmann, L.; Karin, M.; Sterkers, G.; Bonacorsi, S.; et al. Nod2 regulates the host response towards microflora by modulating T cell function and epithelial permeability in mouse Peyer’s patches. Gut 2010, 59, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Arrieta, M.C.; Madsen, K.; Doyle, J.; Meddings, J. Reducing small intestinal permeability attenuates colitis in the IL10 gene-deficient mouse. Gut 2009, 58, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Morozova, M.V.; Borisova, M.A.; Snytnikova, O.A.; Achasova, K.M.; Litvinova, E.A.; Tsentalovich, Y.P.; Kozhevnikova, E.N. Colitis-associated intestinal microbiota regulates brain glycine and host behavior in mice. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  367. Adolph, T.E.; Meyer, M.; Jukic, A.; Tilg, H. Heavy arch: From inflammatory bowel diseases to metabolic disorders. Gut 2024, 73, 1376–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Gao, Y.; Xiang, H.; Zhang, C.; Ding, P.; Wu, T.; Ji, G. Metabolomics window into the diagnosis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in recent 5 years. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 113, 109472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Torres, M.; Rossello, C.A.; Fernandez-Garcia, P.; Llado, V.; Kakhlon, O.; Escriba, P.V. The Implications for Cells of the Lipid Switches Driven by Protein-Membrane Interactions and the Development of Membrane Lipid Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  370. Casares, D.; Escriba, P.V.; Rossello, C.A. Membrane Lipid Composition: Effect on Membrane and Organelle Structure, Function and Compartmentalization and Therapeutic Avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Yan, M.; Man, S.; Sun, B.; Ma, L.; Guo, L.; Huang, L.; Gao, W. Gut liver brain axis in diseases: The implications for therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  372. Gnewuch, C.; Liebisch, G.; Langmann, T.; Dieplinger, B.; Mueller, T.; Haltmayer, M.; Dieplinger, H.; Zahn, A.; Stremmel, W.; Rogler, G.; et al. Serum bile acid profiling reflects enterohepatic detoxification state and intestinal barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 3134–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  373. Chen, L.; Zhernakova, D.V.; Kurilshikov, A.; Andreu-Sanchez, S.; Wang, D.; Augustijn, H.E.; Vich Vila, A.; Lifelines Cohort, S.; Weersma, R.K.; Medema, M.H.; et al. Influence of the microbiome, diet and genetics on inter-individual variation in the human plasma metabolome. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2333–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  374. Visconti, A.; Le Roy, C.I.; Rosa, F.; Rossi, N.; Martin, T.C.; Mohney, R.P.; Li, W.; de Rinaldis, E.; Bell, J.T.; Venter, J.C.; et al. Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  375. Diener, C.; Dai, C.L.; Wilmanski, T.; Baloni, P.; Smith, B.; Rappaport, N.; Hood, L.; Magis, A.T.; Gibbons, S.M. Genome-microbiome interplay provides insight into the determinants of the human blood metabolome. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 1560–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. El-Ansary, A.; Bacha, A.B.; Bjorklund, G.; Al-Orf, N.; Bhat, R.S.; Moubayed, N.; Abed, K. Probiotic treatment reduces the autistic-like excitation/inhibition imbalance in juvenile hamsters induced by orally administered propionic acid and clindamycin. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 1155–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Ashique, S.; Mohanto, S.; Ahmed, M.G.; Mishra, N.; Garg, A.; Chellappan, D.K.; Omara, T.; Iqbal, S.; Kahwa, I. Gut-brain axis: A cutting-edge approach to target neurological disorders and potential synbiotic application. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Messaoudi, M.; Lalonde, R.; Violle, N.; Javelot, H.; Desor, D.; Nejdi, A.; Bisson, J.F.; Rougeot, C.; Pichelin, M.; Cazaubiel, M.; et al. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Sorg, J.A.; Sonenshein, A.L. Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2505–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Thanissery, R.; Winston, J.A.; Theriot, C.M. Inhibition of spore germination, growth, and toxin activity of clinically relevant C. difficile strains by gut microbiota derived secondary bile acids. Anaerobe 2017, 45, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  381. Chen, L.A.; Oliva-Hemker, M.; Radin, A.; Weidner, M.; O’Laughlin, B.D.; Sears, C.L.; Javitt, N.B.; Hourigan, S.K. Longitudinal Bile Acid Composition Changes Following Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children With and Without Underlying Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Crohns Colitis 2023, 17, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  382. Seekatz, A.M.; Theriot, C.M.; Rao, K.; Chang, Y.M.; Freeman, A.E.; Kao, J.Y.; Young, V.B. Restoration of short chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolism following fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 2018, 53, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Vang, S.; Longley, K.; Steer, C.J.; Low, W.C. The Unexpected Uses of Urso- and Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid in the Treatment of Non-liver Diseases. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2014, 3, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  384. Keely, S.J.; Steer, C.J.; Lajczak-McGinley, N.K. Ursodeoxycholic acid: A promising therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel diseases? Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2019, 317, G872–G881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  385. Van den Bossche, L.; Hindryckx, P.; Devisscher, L.; Devriese, S.; Van Welden, S.; Holvoet, T.; Vilchez-Vargas, R.; Vital, M.; Pieper, D.H.; Vanden Bussche, J.; et al. Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Its Taurine- or Glycine-Conjugated Species Reduce Colitogenic Dysbiosis and Equally Suppress Experimental Colitis in Mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e02766-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  386. Chen, W.; Zhao, H.; Li, Y. Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease: Mechanisms and potential targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  387. Vetrano, S.; Rescigno, M.; Cera, M.R.; Correale, C.; Rumio, C.; Doni, A.; Fantini, M.; Sturm, A.; Borroni, E.; Repici, A.; et al. Unique role of junctional adhesion molecule-a in maintaining mucosal homeostasis in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  388. Vermeire, S.; Pierik, M.; Hlavaty, T.; Claessens, G.; van Schuerbeeck, N.; Joossens, S.; Ferrante, M.; Henckaerts, L.; Bueno de Mesquita, M.; Vlietinck, R.; et al. Association of organic cation transporter risk haplotype with perianal penetrating Crohn’s disease but not with susceptibility to IBD. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 1845–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  389. Perez-Torras, S.; Iglesias, I.; Llopis, M.; Lozano, J.J.; Antolin, M.; Guarner, F.; Pastor-Anglada, M. Transportome Profiling Identifies Profound Alterations in Crohn’s Disease Partially Restored by Commensal Bacteria. J. Crohns Colitis 2016, 10, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Alaimo, A.; Rubert, J. The Pivotal Role of TRP Channels in Homeostasis and Diseases throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  391. Guo, R.; Chen, L.H.; Xing, C.; Liu, T. Pain regulation by gut microbiota: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 123, 637–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  392. Fernandes, E.S.; Fernandes, M.A.; Keeble, J.E. The functions of TRPA1 and TRPV1: Moving away from sensory nerves. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  393. Puthumana, E.A.; Muhamad, L.; Young, L.A.; Chu, X.P. TRPA1, TRPV1, and Caffeine: Pain and Analgesia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  394. Balemans, D.; Boeckxstaens, G.E.; Talavera, K.; Wouters, M.M. Transient receptor potential ion channel function in sensory transduction and cellular signaling cascades underlying visceral hypersensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2017, 312, G635–G648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Akbar, A.; Yiangou, Y.; Facer, P.; Brydon, W.G.; Walters, J.R.; Anand, P.; Ghosh, S. Expression of the TRPV1 receptor differs in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease with or without abdominal pain. Gut 2010, 59, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Meseguer, V.; Alpizar, Y.A.; Luis, E.; Tajada, S.; Denlinger, B.; Fajardo, O.; Manenschijn, J.-A.; Fernandez-Pena, C.; Talavera, A.; Kichko, T.; et al. TRPA1 channels mediate acute neurogenic inflammation and pain produced by bacterial endotoxins. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  397. Scuto, M.; Rampulla, F.; Reali, G.M.; Spano, S.M.; Trovato Salinaro, A.; Calabrese, V. Hormetic Nutrition and Redox Regulation in Gut-Brain Axis Disorders. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic overview of metabolic dysregulation, mitochondrial function, cationic transport, and cytoskeletal dysregulation roles within GBA imbalance in IBD pathogenesis. Blue arrows indicate normal interactions; red arrows and broken arrows indicate negative effects of IBD-related processes and IBD treatment, accordingly.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of metabolic dysregulation, mitochondrial function, cationic transport, and cytoskeletal dysregulation roles within GBA imbalance in IBD pathogenesis. Blue arrows indicate normal interactions; red arrows and broken arrows indicate negative effects of IBD-related processes and IBD treatment, accordingly.
Ijms 25 12125 g001
Figure 2. Schematic overview of mechanisms of metabolic dysregulation impact on GBA functions in IBD. (a) Schematic presentation of IBD-induced metabolic dysregulation effects on neural cells’ functions and signaling within GBA. Red boxes indicate metabolic processes found impaired in IBD; blue boxes indicate neural cellular functions subject to metabolic dysregulation effects; red arrows indicate negative effects of IBD-related processes; (b) Schematic presentation of IBD-related lipidome dysregulation effects on cellular and organelle membranes and functions; biosignaling processes; and extracellular transport and blood–brain barrier permeability. Red boxes indicate classes of compounds whose metabolism is impaired in IBD; blue boxes indicate cellular functions subject to the corresponding lipidome dysregulation effects; red arrows indicate negative effects of lipidome dysregulation.
Figure 2. Schematic overview of mechanisms of metabolic dysregulation impact on GBA functions in IBD. (a) Schematic presentation of IBD-induced metabolic dysregulation effects on neural cells’ functions and signaling within GBA. Red boxes indicate metabolic processes found impaired in IBD; blue boxes indicate neural cellular functions subject to metabolic dysregulation effects; red arrows indicate negative effects of IBD-related processes; (b) Schematic presentation of IBD-related lipidome dysregulation effects on cellular and organelle membranes and functions; biosignaling processes; and extracellular transport and blood–brain barrier permeability. Red boxes indicate classes of compounds whose metabolism is impaired in IBD; blue boxes indicate cellular functions subject to the corresponding lipidome dysregulation effects; red arrows indicate negative effects of lipidome dysregulation.
Ijms 25 12125 g002
Figure 3. Mitochondrial functions’ involvement in GBA imbalance in IBD. (a) Mitochondrial health is highly crucial for neural cells’ function being subject to IBD-related pathological processes. (b) Lipid droplets and mitochondrion-associated membranes’ role in mitochondrial functions and calcium transport regulation. MAM—mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane, IP3R—inositol triphosphate receptor (a membrane glycoprotein complex that acts as a Ca2⁺ channel), VDAC—voltage-dependent anion channels, PLN1 and PLN5—surface proteins of lipid droplets involved in the contact of lipid droplets with mitochondria, MIGA2 is an outer mitochondrial membrane protein that directly links mitochondria to lipid droplets. (c) Mitochondria regulate actin filament dynamics that are crucial for intracellular junctions’ integrity through ATP production. Mitochondrial respiration also promotes mitochondria-associated intra-axonal translation of actin regulatory proteins involved in axonal branching. Both the mitochondria-dependent regulation of actin dynamics and intra-axonal translation are regulated by the modulation of mitochondrial respiration by metabolic signals and cytoskeleton dynamics. Blue arrows indicate the directions of influence between the interconnected processes shown in the schemes.
Figure 3. Mitochondrial functions’ involvement in GBA imbalance in IBD. (a) Mitochondrial health is highly crucial for neural cells’ function being subject to IBD-related pathological processes. (b) Lipid droplets and mitochondrion-associated membranes’ role in mitochondrial functions and calcium transport regulation. MAM—mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane, IP3R—inositol triphosphate receptor (a membrane glycoprotein complex that acts as a Ca2⁺ channel), VDAC—voltage-dependent anion channels, PLN1 and PLN5—surface proteins of lipid droplets involved in the contact of lipid droplets with mitochondria, MIGA2 is an outer mitochondrial membrane protein that directly links mitochondria to lipid droplets. (c) Mitochondria regulate actin filament dynamics that are crucial for intracellular junctions’ integrity through ATP production. Mitochondrial respiration also promotes mitochondria-associated intra-axonal translation of actin regulatory proteins involved in axonal branching. Both the mitochondria-dependent regulation of actin dynamics and intra-axonal translation are regulated by the modulation of mitochondrial respiration by metabolic signals and cytoskeleton dynamics. Blue arrows indicate the directions of influence between the interconnected processes shown in the schemes.
Ijms 25 12125 g003
Figure 4. TRP ion channels’ functions in the gut enterocytes and neurons. Blue arrows indicate the key effects of TRP-mediated cationic transport dysregulation: calcium transport and calcium deficit significantly affects mitochondrial function’s and actin dynamics in both enterocytes and neurons; TRP ion channels perform crucial functions in enteric nervous system (ENS) neurons and regulate calcium transport and response to various signals; calcium transport affects gut epithelial integrity, and calcium deficit induces “leaky gut” syndrome; TRP ion channels and cationic transport regulate immune responses via immune cells receptors’ signaling.
Figure 4. TRP ion channels’ functions in the gut enterocytes and neurons. Blue arrows indicate the key effects of TRP-mediated cationic transport dysregulation: calcium transport and calcium deficit significantly affects mitochondrial function’s and actin dynamics in both enterocytes and neurons; TRP ion channels perform crucial functions in enteric nervous system (ENS) neurons and regulate calcium transport and response to various signals; calcium transport affects gut epithelial integrity, and calcium deficit induces “leaky gut” syndrome; TRP ion channels and cationic transport regulate immune responses via immune cells receptors’ signaling.
Ijms 25 12125 g004
Figure 5. Actin cytoskeleton dynamics involved both in the intestinal barrier integrity maintenance and neuronal cell functions. (a) Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and actin filament formation depends on mitochondrial ATP production and sufficient Ca2+ cellular levels. Blue arrows show influence of ATP and Ca2+ levels on the assembly and disassembly of actin filaments (F-actin) from monomeric globular actin (G-actin). (b) Actin cytoskeleton involved in intestinal barrier integrity maintenance via intercellular junctions’ stabilization. In neuronal cells, actin cytoskeleton is essential for proper vesicle formation, transmembrane receptors’ positioning and action, axonal growth, mitochondrial movement within axons, and mitophagy.
Figure 5. Actin cytoskeleton dynamics involved both in the intestinal barrier integrity maintenance and neuronal cell functions. (a) Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and actin filament formation depends on mitochondrial ATP production and sufficient Ca2+ cellular levels. Blue arrows show influence of ATP and Ca2+ levels on the assembly and disassembly of actin filaments (F-actin) from monomeric globular actin (G-actin). (b) Actin cytoskeleton involved in intestinal barrier integrity maintenance via intercellular junctions’ stabilization. In neuronal cells, actin cytoskeleton is essential for proper vesicle formation, transmembrane receptors’ positioning and action, axonal growth, mitochondrial movement within axons, and mitophagy.
Ijms 25 12125 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boldyreva, L.V.; Evtushenko, A.A.; Lvova, M.N.; Morozova, K.N.; Kiseleva, E.V. Underneath the Gut–Brain Axis in IBD—Evidence of the Non-Obvious. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212125

AMA Style

Boldyreva LV, Evtushenko AA, Lvova MN, Morozova KN, Kiseleva EV. Underneath the Gut–Brain Axis in IBD—Evidence of the Non-Obvious. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(22):12125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boldyreva, Lidiya V., Anna A. Evtushenko, Maria N. Lvova, Ksenia N. Morozova, and Elena V. Kiseleva. 2024. "Underneath the Gut–Brain Axis in IBD—Evidence of the Non-Obvious" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 22: 12125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212125

APA Style

Boldyreva, L. V., Evtushenko, A. A., Lvova, M. N., Morozova, K. N., & Kiseleva, E. V. (2024). Underneath the Gut–Brain Axis in IBD—Evidence of the Non-Obvious. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(22), 12125. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop