Next Article in Journal
A New Invasion of the Common Slider on a Mediterranean Island (Lesvos, Greece): A Potential Threat to Native Terrapin Populations?
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Ecological Engineering on Waterbird Diversity in Different Habitats within the Xianghai Nature Reserve
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 14
Issue 12
10.3390/d14121017
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanisms of Seed-To-Seed Interactions between Dominant Species in the Yangtze River Estuary under Saline Condition

by
Cheng-Huan Wang
1,
Zhen-Lin Yu
1,
Yuerenisha Yasenjiang
1,
Long Tang
2,
Yang Gao
3 and
Chun-Jing Zou
1,*
1
Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, China
2
School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, 28 Xianning West Road, Xi’an 710049, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China, Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-Electric Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, 5 South Jinhua Road, Xi’an 710048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(12), 1017; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121017
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 19 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Plant Invasion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plant community assembly is the central issue in community ecology. As plant traits differ in different life history stages, the form, intensity and mechanism of interspecific interactions may change with the ontogenetic process of plants. However, our understanding of interspecific interaction mechanisms during germination is still limited. Here, we conducted a laboratory germination experiment using five dominant species in Chongming Dongtan (Spartina alterniflora, Scirpus mariqueter, Phragmites australis, Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare) to assess their germination performance in control (monoculture), allelopathy and mixture treatments. The results indicated that seeds could affect germination performance of neighbors through both allelopathy and salinity modification. Salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after seed germination decreased significantly in most species combinations in competition treatment, and was negatively correlated with the number of total germinated seeds. Seed leachate of invasive Spartina alterniflora significantly accelerated the germination of two native halophytes Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare, but not Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis. The salt absorption by Spartina alterniflora seeds had inconsistent effects compared with that of its seed leachate. On the other hand, seed leachate of native Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis significantly slowed down the germination of invasive Spartina alterniflora. The effect of salinity modification of Scirpus mariqueter on Spartina alterniflora was positive, whereas that of other species was neutral. Considering seed-to-seed interactions is an important perspective to understand the underlying mechanisms of community dynamics, species diversity maintenance and invasion of alien species, and can improve the effectiveness in the management of invaded coastal wetlands.

1. Introduction

The spatial distribution pattern of different plants and the underlying mechanism of species coexistence (i.e., plant community assembly mechanisms) have been central issues in community ecology for decades [1,2]. Interspecific interactions are thought of as the driving force of plant community assembly, especially in the later successional stages [3,4]. Positive interactions often occur in stressful environment, and plants can facilitate the survival, growth and reproduction of their neighbors via habitat modification [5]. In relatively benign environment, competition is more common, which can negatively affect the performance of adjacent plant species through resource contention, allelopathy and other mechanisms [6].
Previous studies on interspecific interactions mainly focused on established seedlings and ramets [7,8,9]. However, as plant traits differ in different life history stages, the form, intensity and mechanism of interspecific interactions may change with the ontogenetic process of plants [10,11,12]. Researchers have recognized the importance of regeneration on community assembly and investigated some adult-to-seed and seed-to-seed interactions in recent years [13,14,15], but our understanding of interspecific interaction mechanisms during early life history stage of plants (i.e., germination) is still limited.
Seed germination is vital for plant life cycle. Difference in germination percentage and germination timing under various conditions has a significant impact on recruitment and potential competitive ability of seedlings [16,17], which then determines population distribution and community structure [18]. A great number of studies have demonstrated the effects of environmental factors (e.g., temperature, light, soil moisture and salinity) on seed germination [19,20,21,22], but few considered the biotic interactions among seeds. In field sites, seeds of different species often appear in the same place due to the dispersal by wind, tide or animals [23,24], which makes the germination process affected by neighboring conspecific or heterospecific seeds.
Resource competition and direct interference such as allelopathy are well-known underlying mechanisms of interspecific interactions [25,26]. Due to the small size and relatively low resource requirement of seeds, allelopathy has been considered the driving force mediating seed-to-seed interactions in grasslands and croplands [27,28,29,30], and the interaction intensity usually change with the concentration of allelochemicals [31]. On the other hand, many ecosystem engineers have indirect effects on adjacent species through habitat modification [32], which may also work during germination. To our knowledge, no study has directly examined the potential effects of microenvironment modification (e.g., salinity absorption) by seeds on germination process.
Chongming Dongtan wetland of international importance is located in the Yangtze River estuary, and plays a crucial part in water purification, biodiversity maintenance and flood control [33]. Spartina alterniflora originated in the Atlantic coast of North America, and was introduced to China in 1979 for siltation promotion, beach and levee protection. This invasive species has caused great negative ecosystem impacts through competition with native species and habitat modification these years [34]. Spartina alterniflora produces a large number of seeds [35], which disperse in a wide area in coastal salt marshes and often mix with other native species [36]. Although a lot of studies have investigated the competition between invasive Spartina alterniflora and dominant native species in Chongming Dongtan, such as Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis [37,38,39], few took into account their interspecific interactions during germination (however, see [13]). As a result, we lack enough understanding of the mechanisms of seed-to-seed interactions.
This study tried to assess the interspecific interactions during germination and the underlying mechanisms using five dominant species in Chongming Dongtan (Spartina alterniflora, Scirpus mariqueter, Phragmites australis, Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare). Specifically, the following two questions are addressed: (1) Do these plants germinate differently in monoculture, in seed leachate of competitors and in mixture with competitor seeds? (2) Does salinity modification by germinating seeds have any impact on the germination process? We predicted that Spartina alterniflora seeds may significantly influence the germination of native species through allelopathy and microenvironment modification (i.e., regulation of salinity) as well. The results of this study contribute to our understanding of the regeneration and community assembly mechanisms in salt marshes and provide a basis for wetland ecosystem management and restoration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Chongming Dongtan is located at the east end of Chongming Island (121°50′~122°05′ E, 31°25′~31°38′ N). It covers about 320 km2 and has a subtropical monsoon climate. Dongtan has an annual average rainfall of 1145 mm and annual average temperature of 15.7 °C. The highest temperature is in July with a long-term average temperature of 27.3 °C, and the lowest temperature is in January with a long-term average temperature of 4.2 °C [40]. The salinity of surface soil in Chongming Dongtan usually varies from 2‰ to 15‰, and can exceed 20‰ during salt water intrusion [41].
Major native plant communities in Chongming Dongtan are sedge meadows dominated by Scirpus mariqueter (Sm) in middle to low marshes and grass marshes dominated by Phragmites australis (Pa) at higher elevations. Scirpus mariqueter is a perennial rhizomatous species mainly distributed in the Yangtze River estuary and the Hangzhou Bay. It can reproduce both via seeds and via corms and rhizomes. As a pioneer species, it can colonize stressful habitats where other plants cannot survive [36]. Phragmites australis (Pa) is a perennial species that commonly distributes in inland or coastal wetlands [42]. It mainly relies on vegetative reproduction through rhizomes in mature populations, whereas seedlings play important roles in colonization of bare patches. In high marsh, Suaeda glauca (Sg) and Tripolium vulgare (Tv) often occurs in hypersaline bare patches. Suaeda glauca is an annual halophyte which often forms large scale communities around saline-alkaline lakes. It has high salt tolerance and can also grow in intertidal zones frequently affected by tides [43]. Tripolium vulgare is also an annual forb which often grows in alkaline lake wetlands with soil pH ranges from 8.10 to 9.15. It can invade Phragmites australis community under saline and dry conditions [44]. After the introduction of Spartina alterniflora (Sa), this invasive species thrived in Chongming Dongtan from middle to high marsh and formed Scirpus mariqueter-Spartina alterniflora and Spartina alterniflora-Phragmites australis mixtures [13].

2.2. Experimental Design

The seeds of Spartina alterniflora (Sa), Scirpus mariqueter (Sm), Phragmites australis (Pa), Suaeda glauca (Sg) and Tripolium vulgare (Tv) were collected in the pure stands of each species in Chongming Dongtan in early October, 2017. The collected seeds were stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. Spartina alterniflora and Scirpus mariqueter seeds were immersed in fresh water and the others were kept in dry condition to maintain seed vigor [13]. The germination experiment began on 13 March 2018. All the seeds were washed with distilled water for 3~5 min three times and then placed in a Petri dish (9 cm in diameter) with two pieces of filter paper on the bottom. The Petri dishes were placed in a light incubator (PGX-600B) for germination, with the setting of 30 °C and 100% light intensity (12,000 lux) in the daytime (from 08:00 to 20:00) and 18 °C and 0% light intensity in the night (from 20:00 to 08:00).
For preparation of seed leachate, 50 g of Spartina alterniflora, Scirpus mariqueter, Phragmites australis, Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare seeds were placed in a 500 mL conical flask, respectively. A total of 400 mL of distilled water was added into each flask. The flasks were sealed and vibrated in a shaker at room temperature for 48 h to extract the maximum concentration of allelochemicals from seeds [45]. After that, NaCl was added into the flasks to reach the salinity of 1%, which is close to the condition of their natural habitats in Chongming Dongtan.
To highlight the effects of invasive plant on native species during germination, this study focused on the interactions between the seeds of invasive species and native species rather than those between different native species. Hence, there were four species combinations: Sa + Sm, Sa + Pa, Sa + Sg and Sa + Tv. We set three different treatments to all species combinations: control (target species seeds in monoculture), allelopathy (target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate) and competition (target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). In the control treatment, 20 seeds of a single species were evenly placed in a Petri dish and 6 mL of 1% NaCl solution was added. In the allelopathy treatment, 20 seeds of each species were evenly placed in a Petri dish with 6 mL seed leachate of its competitor seeds. Spartina alterniflora seeds were treated by leachate of Scirpus mariqueter, Phragmites australis, Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare, respectively. Similarly, four native species seeds were treated by Spartina alterniflora leachate, respectively. In the competition treatment (Sa + Sm, Sa + Pa, Sa + Sg and Sa + Tv), 20 seeds of each competing species were placed in mixture in each Petri dish and 6 mL of 1% NaCl solution was added. Our experiment followed an additive design to focus on interspecific interactions rather than intraspecific interactions among these species. The two density levels (20 seeds per dish or 3144 seeds m−2, 40 seeds per dish or 6288 seeds m−2) were set according to the soil seed bank density in Chongming Dongtan (250~8500 seeds m−2 for Scirpus mariqueter and 500~6900 seeds m−2 for Spartina alterniflora) [36]. There were 17 treatments in all (5 control + 8 allelopathy + 4 competition) and each treatment was replicated four times, making a total of 68 dishes.
Distilled water was added into each Petri dish every day to maintain a shallow layer of water. The number of germinated seeds (where root tips had protruded from the seed coat) of each species was counted and recorded every day, and then, all the Petri dishes were randomly rotated to change its position in the incubator until no seeds germinated within a week. The germination experiment lasted for about a month (13 March to 16 April). After germination, the solution in each Petri dish was diluted to 30 mL, and the salinity was determined by a portable salinometer (SANXIN 5052).

2.3. Data Analysis

Time lag was calculated as the time between the beginning of the experiment and the first germination of each species. Germination period was the time between the first germination and the last germination of each species. Germination percentage was calculated as the proportion of total germinated seeds of each species. Germination index (GI) was calculated as follows [46]:
GI = ∑Gi/Di
Mean time to germination (MTG) was calculated as follows [47]:
MTG = ∑(Gi × Di)/∑Gi,
where Gi is the number of germinating seeds on the ith day and Di is the number of days after the beginning of the germination experiment.
One-way ANOVA (post hoc Tukey’s HSD test) was used to examine the differences of germination traits (time lag, germination period and germination index) of each species in the control treatment. For each competing species in each species combination, one-way ANOVA (post hoc Tukey’s HSD test) was used to examine the effects of different treatments on germination percentage, MTG and the final salinity of solution in Petri dishes after germination. The relationships between final salinity and the number of total germinated seeds were analyzed using linear regression for each species combination. The original germination data were log transformed if necessary to meet the assumption of homogeneity of variance. The significance level was set to 0.05 (p < 0.05). All the statistical analyses were carried out by STATISTICA 13.5 (TIBCO software).

3. Results

3.1. Germination Traits of Dominant Species

Tripolium vulgare had the highest time lag among the species studied, followed by Scirpus mariqueter. Spartina alterniflora and Suaeda glauca had a significantly lower time lag than Tripolium vulgare and Scirpus mariqueter, while Phragmites australis fell in between (Figure 1a). Tripolium vulgare had a significantly higher germination period than Phragmites australis, while Spartina alterniflora, Suaeda glauca and Scirpus mariqueter had an intermediate germination period (Figure 1b). The germination index of Suaeda glauca and Spartina alterniflora was significantly higher than that of Phragmites australis, Scirpus mariqueter and Tripolium vulgare (Figure 1c).

3.2. Effects of Interspecific Interaction on Germination

In species combination of Sa + Sm, the germination percentage of both species was significantly promoted in competition treatment than in control and allelopathy treatments (Table 1, Figure 2a). The germination percentage of Phragmites australis seeds was also significantly affected by interspecific interaction (Table 1). The allelopathy treatment inhibited the germination of Phragmites australis seeds, resulting in a significantly lower germination percentage than in the competition treatment, which had a promotion effect (Figure 2b). Interspecific interactions between Spartina alterniflora and native halophytes Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare did not significantly affect their germination percentage (Table 1, Figure 2c,d).
The germination speed of most species (indicated by mean time to germination) was significantly affected by interspecific interaction treatment except for Phragmites australis seeds (Table 2). The germination of Spartina alterniflora seeds was the fastest (with the lowest mean time to germination) in control treatment and was significantly slowed down in allelopathy treatment with Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis leachate (Figure 3a,b) and in competition treatment with Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare seeds (Figure 3c,d). Competition treatment with Spartina alterniflora seeds significantly slowed down the germination of Scirpus mariqueter (Figure 3a), whereas allelopathy treatment with Spartina alterniflora leachate significantly promoted the germination speed of Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare (Figure 3c,d).

3.3. Salinity Modification during Germination

The final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination differed significantly among different interspecific interaction treatments for Spartina alterniflora in species combinations of Sa + Sm and Sa + Sg, and for Scirpus mariqueter, Phragmites australis and Tripolium vulgare (Table 3). In most species combinations, final salinity was significantly lower in competition treatment than in control and allelopathy treatments, except for Spartina alterniflora in species combinations of Sa + Pa and Sa + Tv, and for Suaeda glauca in species combination of Sa + Sg (Figure 4).
In all species combinations, the final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination significantly decreased with an increasing total germinated seed number (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Seed germination is an irreversible process and the weakest stage in the life cycle of plants [48], which plays important roles in maintaining plant populations and communities. The findings in this and previous studies [41] suggested that the interaction between seeds is more complicated than we realized before. Our study indicated that the leachate of competitor seeds and the entire competitor seeds had inconsistent effects on germination of target species. This, together with the reduction of solution salinity in Petri dishes, implied that seeds could affect germination performance of neighbors through both allelochemical release and microenvironment modification.

4.1. Effects of Allelopathy on Seed Germination

In a natural environment, soil seed banks usually consist of seeds of different species, which makes seed-to-seed interactions ubiquitous. Adult plants can affect neighbors in a number of ways (e.g., resource competition and direct interference), whereas seeds interact with each other primarily through allelopathy [49]. In addition, the nature and magnitude of interspecific interactions among seeds usually vary with different types and concentration of allelochemicals [50].
In our experiment, the leachate of invasive Spartina alterniflora seeds slightly reduced (but not significantly) both the germination percentage and germination speed of native Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis (Figure 2a,b and Figure 3a,b). That is to say, only a small part of seeds of these species germinated slowly, while the others failed. This effect was probably caused by allelochemicals released from Spartina alterniflora seeds. As the shape and anatomical structure of seeds (e.g., seed coat thickness, wax content and embryo position) play important roles in seed response to external conditions [48,51], seed leachate will have different effects on different species. That might be the reason why the germination process of Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare was significantly accelerated (Figure 3c,d).
The leachate of native Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis seeds altered the microenvironment and significantly reduced the germination speed of invasive Spartina alterniflora seeds (Figure 3a,b). That means that more Spartina alterniflora seeds (especially those with poor germination ability) were activated to germination. These asymmetric effects between invasive and native seeds may be due to their substantial mass difference [35,52,53,54]. During germination, all the seeds may absorb allelochemicals from surrounding leachate, but accumulate them in different concentration, and the allelopathic effects of these chemicals usually depend on the concentration [31,50]. We are not clear what kind of allelochemical was released in the seed leachate of these species and how the interaction effects vary with their concentration, which needs further validation.

4.2. Effects of Salinity Modification on Seed Germination

During germination, seeds can absorb ions from the surrounding solution, which allow them to regulate osmotic potential [55,56]. We found a decrease in salinity after germination in most species combinations in competition treatment (Figure 4), which indicated the importance of microenvironment modification in mediating seed-to-seed interactions. Under the additive design, seed density in competition treatment was twice that of other treatments, which might be the main cause of decreased salinity in mixture. However, the change of total density is also a part of the influence of competing species. Future research following a response surface design can help us understand the effects of both intraspecific and interspecific interactions in different species proportion and total density levels. Notably, seeds in the mixture treatment are affected by allelopathy and microenvironment modification simultaneously, and we are not able to separate them from each other.
In our experiment, invasive Spartina alterniflora seeds had inconsistent effects compared with seed leachate and promoted the germination percentage of Scirpus mariqueter seeds (Figure 2a,b). Meanwhile, the germination speed of Scirpus mariqueter was significantly slowed down (Figure 3a), whereas that of Phragmites australis was not affected (Figure 3b). This can be explained by the positive effects of decrease in solution salinity in mixture. Scirpus mariqueter seeds are salt sensitive [13]. When the seeds of this native species germinate alone in 1% NaCl treatment, they will suffer from high osmotic and ion-toxicity stress, and only a small proportion of seeds successfully germinate. As Spartina alterniflora seeds are more salt tolerant, a great deal of salt ions will be absorbed during germination when this invasive plant is present, which led to a significant decrease in solution salinity. The positive effect of salinity modification by Spartina alterniflora on native species seemed to be stronger than the negative effect of its seed leachate, as the germination percentage of Scirpus mariqueter seeds was the highest in the mixture (Figure 2a). Conversely, halophyte Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare seeds are much more salt tolerant, and require a certain concentration of salt during germination. Hence, alleviation of salt stress by competing Spartina alterniflora seeds in mixture had minor effects, which did not significantly affect the germination percentage (Figure 2c,d) and germination speed of these two species (Figure 3c,d).
For Spartina alterniflora, salt-sensitive Scirpus mariqueter seeds significantly promoted its germination percentage (Figure 2a), whereas the seeds of halophyte Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare significantly delayed its germination process (Figure 3c,d). The net effects of microenvironment modification (i.e., regulation of salinity) on this invasive plant differed in different combinations with native species, which was also related to their salt preference. Despite of different species combinations and treatments, the extent of solution salinity decrease in Petri dishes after seed germination is all significantly correlated with the number of total germinated seeds (Figure 5), indicating that the salinity modification effect by competing seeds was mainly due to the change of total density level rather than the biological attributes of competitors. Surprisingly, the Sa + Sg combination had the lowest efficiency of salt absorption per single seed (Figure 5c), even though these two species were the most salt tolerant ones among the five species used in our study. Whether there is another interaction mechanism during seed germination needs further investigation.

4.3. Implications for Community Assembly

Interspecific interactions play important roles in species coexistence and biodiversity. As seeds of different species coexist universally in the field, they may interact with each other through leachate or the modification of microenvironment in the soil. Seeds that germinate earlier usually have an advantage over those germinate later in competition [57]. For invasive plants, high seed yield, high germination percentage and short germination time are important traits which facilitate their invasion into native plant communities [58]. However, sometimes, rapid germination causes seeds to be exposed to a stressful environment, and is bad for subsequent plant survival [59]. Previous studies found that there exists a special mechanism for seeds to “sense” the surrounding environment via allelochemicals, which allow them to assess the optimal germination timing for more competitive advantages [57,60,61]. Among the five species used in our study, Phragmites australis had the shortest germination period (Figure 1b), and hence, the lowest potential of germination timing regulation. On the contrary, Tripolium vulgare had the longest germination period (Figure 1b), which may improve its adaptability to changing environments. It should be noted that due to the difference in germination timing, seeds that germinate later will not only affected by neighboring seeds, but also by seedlings from early germinated seeds [62]. Future research on the interaction between seeds and seedlings will contribute to our understanding of the role of the germination process in community assembly.
Our study found inconsistent effects of seed leachate and salinity modification on germination of both invasive and native species in Chongming Dongtan. On the whole, Spartina alterniflora had more positive effects on Scirpus mariqueter and Phragmites australis seeds during germination than on halophyte Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare, and vice versa. Although invasive Spartina alterniflora promoted the germination percentage of Scirpus mariqueter seeds, it may still gain competitive advantage over native Scirpus mariqueter, Tripolium vulgare and Phragmites australis due to its short time lag (Figure 1a) and high germination index (Figure 1c). Besides, the strong competitive ability of Spartina alterniflora in subsequent life stages would promote its invasion into these native plant communities and had caused a series of negative ecosystem impacts [37,63,64]. The competitive mechanisms between invasive Spartina alterniflora and native species during germination stage were quite different from those between adult individuals, which highlighted the importance of including regeneration into the framework of community assembly.
In Chongming Dongtan, perennial clonal plants Spartina alterniflora, Phragmites australis and Scirpus mariqueter are heavily dependent on vegetative reproduction in mature patches, whereas seed dispersal and germination play important roles in new habitat colonization [13]. Therefore, eradication of both the aboveground and belowground part of Spartina alterniflora before its florescence is critical for control of this invasive species. After the elimination of Spartina alterniflora, transplantation of Phragmites australis should be implemented due to its relatively low seed vigor in saline water, whereas Scirpus mariqueter has the potential to recover from its persistent seed bank [65]. Artificial reduction of sediment salinity will be an effective measure to facilitate the recovery of these native species, but the cost is too high under current conditions. On the other hand, seed dispersal and germination are crucial for the recruitment of annual Suaeda glauca and Tripolium vulgare, but they are less affected by invasive Spartina alterniflora in their hypersaline habitats. Seed addition of these halophytes may also be beneficial to community biodiversity, as there is intransitive competition among the dominant species in Chongming Dongtan during germination stage [66].
Seed-to-seed interactions are an important perspective to understand the underlying mechanisms of community dynamics, species diversity maintenance and invasion of alien species and can improve the effectiveness in the management of invaded coastal wetlands. However, it should be noted that due to the frequent scouring of tide in the field, the concentration of allelochemicals in the soil will be much lower than in laboratory treatment, and seeds will have minor effects of salinity modification. We need to be very careful to extrapolate our laboratory results to natural ecosystems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-H.W. and C.-J.Z.; Data curation, Y.Y.; Formal analysis, C.-H.W., L.T. and C.-J.Z.; Investigation, Z.-L.Y.; Methodology, Z.-L.Y. and Y.Y.; Project administration, Y.Y.; Software, C.-H.W. and Y.G.; Supervision, C.-J.Z.; Validation, Y.Y. and Y.G.; Writing—original draft, C.-H.W. and Z.-L.Y.; Writing—review and editing, C.-H.W. and L.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31870405, 31872032) and by the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (grant number 22ZR1421500).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Shanghai Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve for providing convenience in seeds collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rosindell, J.; Hubbell, S.P.; Etienne, R.S. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography at Age Ten. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rosenzweig, M.L. Species Diversity in Space and Time; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  3. Purschke, O.; Schmid, B.C.; Sykes, M.T.; Poschlod, P.; Michalski, S.G.; Durka, W.; Kuehn, I.; Winter, M.; Prentice, H.C. Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long-term succession: Insights into assembly processes. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, Y.; Dong, S.; Li, S.; Shen, H. Research progress on ecological filtering mechanisms for plant community assembly. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2019, 39, 2267–2281. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, X.; Liang, C.; Wang, W. Balance between facilitation and competition determines spatial patterns in a plant population. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2014, 59, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, A.L.; Atwater, D.Z.; Kim, W.; Haak, D.C.; Barney, J.N. Invasive plant rhizome production and competitiveness vary based on neighbor identity. J. Plant Ecol. 2021, 14, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, C.-h.; Li, B. Salinity and disturbance mediate direct and indirect plant-plant interactions in an assembled marsh community. Oecologia 2016, 182, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wehnert, A.; Wagner, S.; Huth, F. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Carabids Influenced by Small-Scale Admixture of Oak Trees in Pine Stands. Diversity 2020, 12, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mikami, O.K.; Kawata, M. Does interspecific territoriality reflect the intensity of ecological interactions—A theoretical model for interspecific territoriality. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2004, 6, 765–775. [Google Scholar]
  10. Le Roux, P.C.; Shaw, J.D.; Chown, S.L. Ontogenetic shifts in plant interactions vary with environmental severity and affect population structure. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schiffers, K.; Tielborger, K. Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants. J. Ecol. 2006, 94, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brooker, R.W.; Callaghan, T.V. The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: A model. Oikos 1998, 81, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, W.-l.; Wang, T.-h.; Wang, C.-h. Effects of interspecific interactions on seed germination between dominant species in the Yangtze River Estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2020, 232, 106483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Margreiter, V.; Walde, J.; Erschbamer, B. Competition-free gaps are essential for the germination and recruitment of alpine species along an elevation gradient in the European Alps. Alp. Bot. 2021, 131, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elsalahy, H.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.; Kautz, T.; Doering, T. Effects of mixing two legume species at seedling stage under different environmental conditions. Peerj 2021, 9, e10615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Afonso, A.; Castro, S.; Loureiro, J.; Mota, L.; de Oliveira, J.C.; Torices, R. The Effects of Achene Type and Germination Time on Plant Performance in the Heterocarpic Anacyclus clavatus (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zacchello, G.; Vinyeta, M.; Agren, J. Strong stabilizing selection on timing of germination in a Mediterranean population of Arabidopsis thaliana. Am. J. Bot. 2020, 107, 1518–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, H.; Wu, B.; Yu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wei, M.; Wang, C.; Du, D. The allelopathy of horseweed with different invasion degrees in three provinces along the Yangtze River in China. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roman, A.M.; Truta, A.M.; Viman, O.; Morar, I.M.; Spalevic, V.; Dan, C.; Sestras, R.E.; Holonec, L.; Sestras, A.F. Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Robinia pseudoacacia Depending on the Origin of Different Geographic Provenances. Diversity 2022, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fernandez-Torquemada, Y.; Luis Sanchez-Lizaso, J. Effects of salinity on seed germination and early seedling growth of the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 119, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hayasaka, D.; Nakagawa, M.; Maebara, Y.; Kurazono, T.; Hashimoto, K. Seed germination characteristics of invasive Spartina alterniflora Loisel in Japan: Implications for its effective management. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Xiaojun, Y.; Shangli, S.; Ruijun, L.; Fang, W.; Benjian, C. Research progress on effects of ecological factors on seed germination. Pratacultural Sci. 2006, 23, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  23. Reynolds, C.; Cumming, G.S. Seed traits and bird species influence the dispersal parameters of wetland plants. Freshw. Biol. 2016, 61, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Soons, M.B. Wind dispersal in freshwater wetlands: Knowledge for conservation and restoration. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2006, 9, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Partzsch, M. Warming differently affects the inter- and intraspecific interactions among semi-dry grassland species. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2019, 40, 125481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thorpe, A.S.; Aschehoug, E.T.; Atwater, D.Z.; Callaway, R.M. Interactions among plants and evolution. J. Ecol. 2011, 99, 729–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rashidi, S.; Reza Yousefi, A.; Goicoechea, N.; Pouryousef, M.; Moradi, P.; Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M. Allelopathic Interactions between Seeds of Portulaca oleracea L. and Crop Species. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Laterra, P.; Bazzalo, M.E. Seed-to-seed allelopathic effects between two invaders of burned Pampa grasslands. Weed Res. 1999, 39, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suman, A.; Shahi, H.N.; Singh, P.; Gaur, A. Allelopathic influence of Vigna mungo (black gram) seeds on germination and radical growth of some crop plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2002, 38, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Bao, X.; Niu, K. Seed-to-seed potential allelopathic effects between Ligularia virgaurea and native grass species of Tibetan alpine grasslands. Ecol. Res. 2011, 26, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mercedes Aguilar-Franco, Z.; Flores-Palacios, A.; Flores-Morales, A.; Perea-Arango, I.; de Jesus Arellano-Garcia, J.; Valencia-Diaz, S. Density-dependent effect of allelopathy on germination and seedling emergence in two Ipomoea species. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 2019, 92, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Badano, E.I.; Cavieres, L.A. Ecosystem engineering across ecosystems: Do engineer species sharing common features have generalized or idiosyncratic effects on species diversity? J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, Y.A.; Ma, Z.J. Chongming Dongtan Wetland of International Importance; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  34. Xie, B.; Han, G.; Qiao, P.; Mei, B.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, A.; Song, W.; Guan, B. Effects of mechanical and chemical control on invasive Spartina alterniflora in the Yellow River Delta, China. Peerj 2019, 7, e7655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Xiao, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Z. A study on seed characteristics and seed bank of Spartina alterniflora at saltmarshes in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2009, 83, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, C.-H.; Tang, L.; Fei, S.-F.; Wang, J.-Q.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, J.-K.; Li, B. Determinants of seed bank dynamics of two dominant helophytes in a tidal salt marsh. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Z.Y.; Li, B.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, J.K. Local competitive effects of introduced Spartina alterniflora on Scirpus mariqueter at Dongtan of Chongming Island, the Yangtze River estuary and their potential ecological consequences. Hydrobiologia 2004, 528, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Q.; Wang, C.H.; Zhao, B.; Ma, Z.J.; Luo, Y.Q.; Chen, J.K.; Li, B. Effects of growing conditions on the growth of and interactions between salt marsh plants: Implications for invasibility of habitats. Biol. Invasions 2006, 8, 1547–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuan, Y.; Wang, K.; Li, D.; Pan, Y.; Lv, Y.; Zhao, M.; Gao, J. Interspecific Interactions between Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora along a Tidal Gradient in the Dongtan Wetland, Eastern China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, D. Seed production of Spartina alterniflora and its response of germination to temperature at Chongming Dongtan, Shanghai. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 1574–1581. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Q.; Shi, H.H.; Yu, Z.L.; Wang, T.H.; Wang, C.H. Effects of salinity and interspecific interaction on germination and growth of Scirpus mariqueter and Spartina alterniflora. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2022, 42, 8300–8310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lissner, J.; Schierup, H.H. Effects of salinity on the growth of Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 1997, 55, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Peng, Y.; Xie, T.; Zhou, F.; Wan, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhai, R.; Zheng, Q.; Zheng, C.; Liu, Z. Response of plant growth and photosynthetic characteristics in Suaeda glauca and Atriplex triangularis seedlings to different concentrations of salt treatments. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2012, 21, 64–74. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gong, J.-n.; Wang, K.-y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y.-l. Invasion and its effects of xerarch halophytes in reclaimed tidal wetlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 20, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  45. De Souza Coelho, L.C.; Broch Mignoni, D.S.; Barbedo, C.J.; Braga, M.R. Seed leachates of the tropical legume Sesbania virgata: Their effects on germination and seedling growth of tomato and rice. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2022, 44, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schmer, M.R.; Xue, Q.; Hendrickson, J.R. Salinity effects on perennial, warm-season (C-4) grass germination adapted to the northern Great Plains. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 92, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Brenchley, J.L.; Probert, R.J. Seed germination responses to some environmental factors in the seagrass Zostera capricorni from eastern Australia. Aquat. Bot. 1998, 62, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pellissier, F. Improved germination bioassays for allelopathy research. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guido, A.; Hoss, D.; Pillar, V.D. Exploring seed to seed effects for understanding invasive species success. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 2017, 15, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Chester, D.W.; Smith, M. Ethylene as a possible cue for seed germination of Schoenoplectus hallii (Cyperaceae), a rare summer annual of occasionally flooded sites. Am. J. Bot. 2003, 90, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, J.; Shi, W.; Liu, R.; Xu, Y.; Sui, N.; Zhou, J.; Feng, G. The role of the seed coat in adaptation of dimorphic seeds of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa to salinity. Plant Species Biol. 2017, 32, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, S.C.; Gao, X.M.; Cai, Y.L. Variations in sexual and asexual reproduction of Scirpus mariqueter along an elevational gradient. Ecol. Res. 2001, 16, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, G.-L.; Du, G.-Z.; Shi, Z.-H. Germination strategies of 20 alpine species with varying seed mass and light availability. Aust. J. Bot. 2013, 61, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. McKee, J.; Richards, A.J. Variation in seed production and germinability in common reed (Phragmites australis) in Britain and France with respect to climate. New Phytol. 1996, 133, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, H.; Irving, L.J.; McGill, C.; Matthew, C.; Zhou, D.; Kemp, P. The effects of salinity and osmotic stress on barley germination rate: Sodium as an osmotic regulator. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Rehman, S.; Harris, P.J.C.; Bourne, W.F.; Wilkin, J. The effect of sodium chloride on germination and the potassium and calcium contents of Acacia seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 1997, 25, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dyer, A.R.; Fenech, A.; Rice, K.J. Accelerated seedling emergence in interspecific competitive neighbourhoods. Ecol. Lett. 2000, 3, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Williams, L.K.; Kristiansen, P.; Sindel, B.M.; Wilson, S.C.; Shaw, J.D. Quantifying the seed bank of an invasive grass in the sub-Antarctic: Seed density, depth, persistence and viability. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 2093–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Orrock, J.L.; Christopher, C.C. Density of Intraspecific Competitors Determines the Occurrence and Benefits of Accelerated Germination. Am. J. Bot. 2010, 97, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fenesi, A.; Kelemen, K.; Sandor, D.; Ruprecht, E. Influential neighbours: Seeds of dominant species affect the germination of common grassland species. J. Veg. Sci. 2020, 31, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Houseman, G.R.; Mahoney, A.K. Intraspecific seed interactions alter seedling emergence of Lespedeza cuneata under field conditions. Popul. Ecol. 2015, 57, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tielboerger, K.; Prasse, R. Do seeds sense each other? Testing for density-dependent germination in desert perennial plants. Oikos 2009, 118, 792–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tang, L.; Wolf, A.A.; Gao, Y.; Wang, C.H. Photosynthetic tolerance to non-resource stress influences competition importance and intensity in an invaded estuary. Ecology 2018, 99, 1327–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, B.; Liao, C.-H.; Zhang, X.-D.; Chen, H.-L.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Gan, X.-J.; Wu, J.-H.; Zhao, B.; Ma, Z.-J.; et al. Spartina alterniflora invasions in the Yangtze River estuary, China: An overview of current status and ecosystem effects. Ecol. Eng. 2009, 35, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hu, Z.; Ma, Q.; Cao, H.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, C.; Zhang, L.; Ge, Z. A trial study on revegetation of the native Scirpus mariqueter population in the coastal wetland of the Yangtze Estuary. Ecol. Sci. 2016, 35, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  66. Shi, H.H.; Xue, Q.; Yu, Z.L.; Wang, C.H. Effects of density and species proportion on intraspecific and interspecific interactions between salt marsh plants during germination. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar]
Diversity 14 01017 g001 550
Figure 1. Germination traits of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in control treatment (target species in monoculture). (a) Time lag before first germination, (b) Germination period from the first germination to the last germination, (c) Germination index. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different species. Error bars are standard errors.
Figure 1. Germination traits of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in control treatment (target species in monoculture). (a) Time lag before first germination, (b) Germination period from the first germination to the last germination, (c) Germination index. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different species. Error bars are standard errors.
Diversity 14 01017 g001
Diversity 14 01017 g002 550
Figure 2. Seed germination percentage of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Figure 2. Seed germination percentage of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Diversity 14 01017 g002
Diversity 14 01017 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean time to seed germination of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Figure 3. Mean time to seed germination of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Diversity 14 01017 g003
Diversity 14 01017 g004 550
Figure 4. Final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Sa: Spartina alterniflora, Sm: Scirpus mariqueter, Pa: Phragmites australis, Sg: Suaeda glauca, Tv: Tripolium vulgare. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Figure 4. Final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Sa: Spartina alterniflora, Sm: Scirpus mariqueter, Pa: Phragmites australis, Sg: Suaeda glauca, Tv: Tripolium vulgare. Different lower cases denote significant differences among different interspecific interaction treatments of the same species. Error bars are standard errors.
Diversity 14 01017 g004
Diversity 14 01017 g005 550
Figure 5. Relationship between final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination and total germinated seed number in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Sa: Spartina alterniflora, Sm: Scirpus mariqueter, Pa: Phragmites australis, Sg: Suaeda glauca, Tv: Tripolium vulgare.
Figure 5. Relationship between final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after germination and total germinated seed number in different interspecific interaction treatments (control: target species in monoculture, allelopathy: target species seeds + competitor seeds leachate, competition: target species seeds + competitor seeds in mixture). (a) Species combination of Sa + Sm, (b) Species combination of Sa + Pa, (c) Species combination of Sa + Sg, (d) Species combination of Sa + Tv. Sa: Spartina alterniflora, Sm: Scirpus mariqueter, Pa: Phragmites australis, Sg: Suaeda glauca, Tv: Tripolium vulgare.
Diversity 14 01017 g005
Table
Table 1. Results of one-way ANOVA testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on seed germination percentage of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) seeds in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Table 1. Results of one-way ANOVA testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on seed germination percentage of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) seeds in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Source of VariationSa + Sm (Sa)Sa + Pa (Sa)Sa + Sg (Sa)Sa + Tv (Sa)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment211.860.00322.550.13322.110.17720.300.746
Source of variationSa + Sm (Sm)Sa + Pa (Pa)Sa + Sg (Sg)Sa + Tv (Tv)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment214.350.00224.520.04421.910.20421.280.325
Table
Table 2. Results of one-way ANOVA testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on the mean time to seed germination of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Table 2. Results of one-way ANOVA testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on the mean time to seed germination of invasive Spartina alterniflora (Sa) and four native species (Scirpus mariqueter, Sm, Phragmites australis, Pa, Suaeda glauca, Sg, and Tripolium vulgare, Tv) in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Source of VariationSa + Sm (Sa)Sa + Pa (Sa)Sa + Sg (Sa)Sa + Tv (Sa)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment25.400.02928.030.01024.510.04425.270.030
Source of variationSa + Sm (Sm)Sa + Pa (Pa)Sa + Sg (Sg)Sa + Tv (Tv)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment28.310.02621.600.29125.320.030211.020.005
Table
Table 3. Results of one-way ANOVA, testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on the final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after seed germination in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Table 3. Results of one-way ANOVA, testing the effects of interspecific interaction treatment on the final salinity of the solution in Petri dishes after seed germination in different species combinations. The abbreviations in brackets after species combinations denote the target species considered. Significant p values are in bold.
Source of VariationSa + Sm (Sa)Sa + Pa (Sa)Sa + Sg (Sa)Sa + Tv (Sa)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment216.490.00123.820.06327.090.01421.850.212
Source of variationSa + Sm (Sm)Sa + Pa (Pa)Sa + Sg (Sg)Sa + Tv (Tv)
DfFpDfFpDfFpDfFp
treatment278.77<0.001230.89<0.00122.000.191213.330.002
Sa: Spartina alterniflora, Sm: Scirpus mariqueter, Pa: Phragmites australis, Sg: Suaeda glauca, Tv: Tripolium vulgare.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.-H.; Yu, Z.-L.; Yasenjiang, Y.; Tang, L.; Gao, Y.; Zou, C.-J. Mechanisms of Seed-To-Seed Interactions between Dominant Species in the Yangtze River Estuary under Saline Condition. Diversity 2022, 14, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121017

AMA Style

Wang C-H, Yu Z-L, Yasenjiang Y, Tang L, Gao Y, Zou C-J. Mechanisms of Seed-To-Seed Interactions between Dominant Species in the Yangtze River Estuary under Saline Condition. Diversity. 2022; 14(12):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Cheng-Huan, Zhen-Lin Yu, Yuerenisha Yasenjiang, Long Tang, Yang Gao, and Chun-Jing Zou. 2022. "Mechanisms of Seed-To-Seed Interactions between Dominant Species in the Yangtze River Estuary under Saline Condition" Diversity 14, no. 12: 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121017

APA Style

Wang, C. -H., Yu, Z. -L., Yasenjiang, Y., Tang, L., Gao, Y., & Zou, C. -J. (2022). Mechanisms of Seed-To-Seed Interactions between Dominant Species in the Yangtze River Estuary under Saline Condition. Diversity, 14(12), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop