Next Article in Journal
Economics of a Feeding Budget: A Case of Diversity of Host Plants for Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera) Feeding on Leaves and Needles
Next Article in Special Issue
Phylogenomic Insights into the Phylogeography of Halophila baillonii Asch.
Previous Article in Journal
New Records of the Hydrozoan Coryne hincksi Bonnevie, 1898 on Red King Crabs in the Barents Sea
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Resolution Mapping of Seagrass Biomass Dynamics Suggests Differential Response of Seagrasses to Fluctuating Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Plant and Meadow Structure Characterisation of Posidonia oceanica in Its Westernmost Distribution Range

by
Tomás Azcárate-García
1,2,*,
Pedro Beca-Carretero
3 and
Fernando G. Brun
4
1
Department of Marine Biology and Oceanography, Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37–49, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
2
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences & Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio), University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
3
Department of Oceanography, Institute of Marine Research (IIM-CSIC), 36208 Vigo, Galicia, Spain
4
Department of Biology, Division of Ecology, Faculty of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Cadiz (UCA), 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(1), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010101
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecology, Diversity and Conservation of Seagrass)

Abstract

:
Posidonia oceanica is an endemic seagrass species from the Mediterranean Sea that provides critical ecological services to coastal environments. This species is distributed from the Turkish to the Spanish coast, where its westernmost record was documented in Punta Chullera, Malaga (36°18′36.45′′ N, 5°14′54.31′′ W). Nevertheless, previous studies suggested that its distribution was even further west, although these populations were never described. In this study, we documented and characterised the only known P. oceanica population on the coast of Cadiz, in Cala Sardina (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W). The newly documented population of P. oceanica presented a fragmented structure, consisting of nine patches found in a rocky shallow area surrounded by the invasive algae Rugulopteryx okamurae, with a total size of 61.14 m2. Shoots had a relatively small size (21.0 ± 2.9 cm) in comparison with centrally-distributed populations. The relatively small size of the plants, alongside the observed low shoot density (437 ± 42 shoots m−2) and leaf area index (4.8 ± 0.7 m2 m−2), may indicate that this meadow could be exposed to sub-optimal environmental conditions for plant development. By contrast, the meadow showed relatively high production rates (0.03 ± 0.01 leaf day−1 shoot−1) in comparison with other Mediterranean populations. The percentage of carbon in plant leaves was 38.73 ± 1.38%, while the nitrogen and C/N were 1.38 ± 0.37% and 29.93 ± 6.57, respectively. The documentation of this meadow extends the distribution of this species to the Mediterranean coast of Cadiz, making this region the place with the highest seagrass biodiversity (four species) in the Iberian Peninsula, and potentially in Europe. This exploratory study provides a baseline to examine the potential effects of climate change, anthropogenic disturbances or the presence of invasive species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seagrasses are marine flowering plants that provide a wide variety of ecosystem services, such as their capacity to act as a carbon sink capturing great amounts of atmospheric CO2 and burying it into sediments, the reduction of pathogens in the environment or the enhancement of biodiversity [1,2]. Posidonia oceanica is a large-sized seagrass species endemic to the Mediterranean Sea that grows from the shallows to depths of up to 40 m in clear waters (e.g., Liguria) in sandy and rocky substrates [3]. It is distributed from the Turkish coast (eastern Mediterranean) to the southern Spanish coast (western Mediterranean), covering an extension of approximately 12,247 km2 [4]. However, the high level of endemism, together with slow growth rates, makes this species highly vulnerable to anthropogenic pressures and climate change effects [5,6]. In the last few decades, several P. oceanica meadows have disappeared due to anthropogenic causes (e.g., illegal trawling or pollutants), estimating a reduction of approximately 10 to 30% of its extension over the last 50 years [4,7].
Posidonia oceanica is one of the most abundant seagrass species along the Mediterranean Iberian Peninsula coast. It is distributed from PortBou, Girona, Catalonia (north-eastern Spanish coast; 42°25′47.08′′ N, 3°9′58.64′′ E) to Punta Chullera, Malaga, Andalusia (southern Spanish coast; 36°18′36.45′′ N, 5°14′54.31′′ W) [8,9]. Extensive and well-established meadows are found in Cabo de Gata-Nijar Natural Park, Almeria, Andalusia (south-eastern Spanish coast). However, its distribution decreases towards the west, being to date very scarce in Malaga, where they have experienced a dramatic regression in the last few decades [9]. Although Malaga has been historically described as the westernmost area of distribution of this species [9,10], some chronicles have suggested its presence in the inner bay of Algeciras (eastern coast of Cadiz region) [11], but these populations were never documented [12]. Shaw (1993) also suggested the presence of P. oceanica specimens in the port of Gibraltar (36°8′38.73′′ N, 5°21′48.63′′ W), at approximately 20 km from the westernmost P. oceanica population registered to date [13]. Recently, an attempt to verify the presence of this population in the port of Gibraltar was made by Bull et al. (2010); however, no P. oceanica specimens or remaining dead mattes were found [14].
Seagrass populations inhabiting the edges of their geographical distribution range are often exposed to less favourable environmental conditions for living in comparison with centrally distributed ones [15,16,17]. For instance, it could be expected that Andalusian P. oceanica populations, influenced by Atlantic water masses, are exposed to colder seawater temperature and lower salinity levels in comparison with populations from other Mediterranean regions [9]. Therefore, the study of these populations is of high relevance to examine the potential effects of global change alongside the shifts in their habitat range [18]. Seagrass traits, such as morphology, population structure, production or biochemistry have been widely used in seagrass ecosystems to assess changes in their health status due to their fast responsiveness to environmental changes [19,20,21].
With these considerations in mind, the main objective of this study was to document and characterise undescribed P. oceanica populations at their westernmost distribution limit by conducting a seagrass survey on the eastern coast of the Cadiz region, where previous chronicles and spatial models have suggested the presence of this species [11,13,22]. We hypothesise that the newly documented population exhibits relatively smaller aboveground sizes and displays lower growth rates than centrally and warmer adapted plants due to the less favourable environmental conditions of the study area.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Based on the existing literature, using satellite-derived images, and the contribution of local divers, we identified Cala Sardina (Algeciras, Cadiz, Andalusia, Spain; 36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W; Figure 1) as a potential area for the presence of P. oceanica meadows. A snorkelling-based survey was then conducted in August 2021 to cross-over the potential presence of the target species. The confirmed patchy meadow was located in a shallow (2–4 m depth) rocky area surrounded by the non-native algae Rugulopteryx okamurae (Figure 2). This meadow was located 530 meters to the west of the previously westernmost documented meadow at Punta Chullera, Malaga [8,9]. Moreover, a small patch of Cymodocea nodosa was found near to the P. oceanica patches at a depth of 1–2 m.
Cala Sardina is located in the western Alboran Sea, bordering with the Strait of Gibraltar, where the colder and fresher Atlantic water flowing eastward interacts with the deeper, warmer and saline Mediterranean water flowing westward. Moreover, the influence of strong winds favours an upwelling mechanism of subsurface waters, increasing the nutrient input to surface waters, especially in coastal areas. As a result of these interactions, a more productive, cold (Winter: 15 °C; Summer: 22 °C) and less saline (37 PSS) water mass is generated [23,24].
Figure 1. (A) Map of satellite-derived data of mean annual sea surface temperature (SST [°C]; https://www.bio-oracle.org/ (accessed on 9 May 2022)) in the Spanish Mediterranean coast and (B) map of the northwestern coast of the Alboran Sea showing the known locations of P. oceanica populations (brown circles) and the newly reported population (red circle). Records of known P. oceanica populations were derived from Chefaoui et al. (2017) [25]. (C) Map of the eastern coast of Cadiz region showing the locations of the newly documented P. oceanica meadow (red circle), the Punta Chullera’s meadow (yellow circle; Record obtained from Ruiz et al. (2015) [9]), the port of Gibraltar (purple circle) and the bay of Algeciras (green circle). (D) Satellite image of Cala Sardina, Cadiz (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W; Google Earth Pro (https://earth.google.com (accessed on 9 May 2022)) showing the newly discovered patches of P. oceanica. (E) A photograph of one of the new documented P. oceanica patches.
Figure 1. (A) Map of satellite-derived data of mean annual sea surface temperature (SST [°C]; https://www.bio-oracle.org/ (accessed on 9 May 2022)) in the Spanish Mediterranean coast and (B) map of the northwestern coast of the Alboran Sea showing the known locations of P. oceanica populations (brown circles) and the newly reported population (red circle). Records of known P. oceanica populations were derived from Chefaoui et al. (2017) [25]. (C) Map of the eastern coast of Cadiz region showing the locations of the newly documented P. oceanica meadow (red circle), the Punta Chullera’s meadow (yellow circle; Record obtained from Ruiz et al. (2015) [9]), the port of Gibraltar (purple circle) and the bay of Algeciras (green circle). (D) Satellite image of Cala Sardina, Cadiz (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W; Google Earth Pro (https://earth.google.com (accessed on 9 May 2022)) showing the newly discovered patches of P. oceanica. (E) A photograph of one of the new documented P. oceanica patches.
Diversity 15 00101 g001
Figure 2. Photographs of the newly documented P. oceanica population surrounded by the invasive algae R. okamurae at Cala Sardina (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W).
Figure 2. Photographs of the newly documented P. oceanica population surrounded by the invasive algae R. okamurae at Cala Sardina (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W).
Diversity 15 00101 g002

2.2. Morphometric Analyses

To evaluate morphometric descriptors, we randomly collected three vertical (orthotropic) shoots in each of the five largest patches (n = 5). Collected shoots were transported to the laboratory within zip-lock bags filled with seawater and stored in a cooler container. Once in the laboratory, each shoot was carefully cleaned of epiphytes and sediment. For each shoot, all leaves were numbered from the oldest (outermost leaf) to the youngest (innermost leaf). Plant analysis included measurements of leaf lengths (cm), leaf widths (cm), leaf thickness (mm) and number of leaves per shoot (leaves shoot−1). To obtain the leaf biomass (mg DW), leaves were cut at the height of the base and then the blades without sheaths were dried at 60 °C for 48 hours and then weighed. Finally, shoot leaf biomass (mg DW shoot−1) was estimated by summing the weights of each leaf within a single plant.

2.3. Population Analyses

In each patch, x and y axes were measured and an elliptic shape was used to estimate patch area (m2). Population descriptors were also studied on the five largest patches. Shoot density (shoots m−2) was calculated by counting the number of shoots present in three 20 × 20 cm quadrants randomly placed within each patch (n = 3). Data were then normalised per m2. To avoid damaging the meadow, aboveground (AG) biomass (kg DW m−2) was estimated by the product of shoot leaf biomass (weight of the leaves without sheath) and shoot density. Finally, the leaf area index (LAI; m2 m−2) was assessed by multiplying the total leaf area per shoot (m2) of the patches by the shoot density (shoots m−2). In addition, a comparative study of the extension of the meadow from 2008 to 2022 was conducted by analysing satellite-derived images taken from Google Earth Pro every 4 years (Figure S1). Analyses of the extension of the patches were calculated by measuring the longitudinal extension of the marked patches in meters using Google Earth Pro (https://earth.google.com (accessed on 9 May 2022)).

2.4. Production Analyses

Productivity descriptors were assessed by implementing a modified version adapted to P. oceanica of the punching method described by Peralta et al. (2000) [26]. A plastic tie and a small floater were allocated to the base of marked shoots to facilitate its recognition (August 2021). After 44 days (September 2021), marked shoots were collected and transported to the laboratory within zip-lock bags filled with seawater and stored in a cooler container. Once in the laboratory, each shoot was carefully cleaned of epiphytes and sediment, and then leaf growth rate (cm day−1 shoot−1), leaf biomass production (mg DW day−1 shoot−1) and leaf production (leaf day−1 shoot−1) were assessed by implementing the following equations [27].
G R = i = 1 n [ ( L L i f L L i 0 ) > 0 ] t f t 0
B P = i = 1 n [ ( L L i f L L i 0 ) > 0 ] t f t 0     D W L L
L P =   N L t f t 0
where GR is leaf growth rate (cm day−1 shoot−1); BP is leaf biomass production (mg DW day−1 shoot−1); LP is leaf production (leaf day−1 shoot−1); LL is the leaf length (cm), subscript i refers to the i t h leaf of the shoot, subscript f refers to the final moment and subscript 0 refers to the initial moment; t f t 0 refers to the marked period in days; D W L L refers to the dry weight-length ratio (mg DW cm−1 leaf−1); NL refers to the number of new (unmarked) leaves (new leaves shoot−1).

2.5. Biochemical Analyses

Intact green leaves without signs of necrosis (second youngest leaf) were randomly collected from the four largest patches for biochemical analysis (n = 4). Leaves were frozen at −80 °C for 48 h and then freeze-dried. Carbon and nitrogen contents were analysed by using a high temperature catalytic oxidation with an elemental analyser Perkin Elmer 2400.

3. Results

The studied morphometric descriptors of the newly described population, including leaf length, width and thickness, showed average values of 21.0 ± 2.9 cm, 1.0 ± 0.03 cm and 0.31 ± 0.03 mm, respectively, while the average of maximum shoot length was 29.9 ± 4.2 cm (Table 1). The number of leaves was 6 ± 1 leaves shoot−1, where the majority of the oldest leaves showed signs of herbivory. Shoot biomass was 633.0 ± 77.1 mg DW shoot−1. The newly documented P. oceanica population was formed by 9 patches separated approximately 2–7 m from each other with a total extension of 61.14 m2. Shoot density showed an average value of 437 ± 42 shoots m−2 and an AG biomass of 0.28 ± 0.03 kg DW m−2 (Table 2). Leaf area index (LAI) had a mean value of 4.8 ± 0.7 m2 m−2. In relation to the productivity parameters, only four labelled shoots were found after 44 days. The leaf growth rate, leaf biomass production and leaf production of the four shoots reported mean values of 0.7 ± 0.2 cm day−1 shoot−1, 4.3 ± 1.2 mg DW day−1 shoot−1 and 0.03 ± 0.01 leaf day−1 shoot−1, respectively. Based on our results, the studied meadow yielded an annual leaf biomass production of 0.68 ± 0.18 kg DW m−2 year−1, which could correspond to an annual carbon fixation of 0.98 ± 0.26 kg CO2 m−2 year−1. Carbon content in seagrass leaves was 38.73 ± 1.38%, while nitrogen was 1.38 ± 0.37%, and C/N was 29.93 ± 6.57. Lastly, satellite-derived images showed that the extension of the patchy meadow remained constant over the last 14 years.

4. Discussion

In this study, as a result of the coastal survey conducted in Cala Sardina (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W) during August 2021, we documented and characterised the only known P. oceanica population along the coast of Cadiz, potentially resulting in the westernmost described population to date in the literature. Furthermore, the documentation of this population increases the number of seagrass species in Cadiz coasts up to four (Zostera marina, Z. noltei, C. nodosa and P. oceanica), turning Cadiz into the region with the highest seagrass biodiversity of the Iberian Peninsula, and potentially of Europe.
Most of the morphometric descriptors of the newly documented population, including leaf width, thickness and number of leaves, were within the expected ranges for this species [28,29,30]. Shoot size was relatively small compared with shoots lengths (20 to 100 cm) from warmer and centrally adapted populations [31,32,33], but it was in agreement with those reported in populations from the southern Iberian Peninsula (16 to 33 cm), exposed to similar environmental settings [31,34]. Small plant sizes (12 to 36 cm) were also observed in disturbed and cold-adapted populations from Liguria [35,36].
The newly described population presented a fragmented patchy structure. In addition, based on satellite-derived images (Figure S1), we estimated that the number and extension of the meadow has remained relatively constant over the past 14 years. However, since only the largest five of the nine patches were identified by using satellite-derived images, our estimation should be considered as exploratory. Patches smaller than 1 m2 were not ascertained by using satellite images. The observed densities of the population are especially low compared with meadows from the southern Iberian Peninsula (800 shoots m−2) and western-distributed shallow populations from Catalonia (>700 shoots m−2) [10,37]. However, our results are more similar to those observed in anthropogenically impacted meadows [38], as for example in Murcia or Liguria, where densities lower than 400 shoots m−2 have been reported [36,39,40]. The LAI of the meadows was also low in comparison with centrally and warmer distributed populations. For instance, shallow populations from the Adriatic Sea or from Greece showed a LAI ranging from 8 to 12 m2 m−2 [41,42]. The lower plant size, densities and LAI observed in the patchy population from Cadiz could be attributed to sub-optimal seawater temperatures for plant development, associated with the influence of cold Atlantic waters [31,43,44], thus partially confirming our stated hypothesis. Notably, other reasons may also explain the observed morphological and population characteristics of the newly documented meadows: (i) the shallow location of the population (2–4 m) could limit plant development due its exposure to high hydrodynamic forces [45,46], (ii) plants may suffer photo-inhibition due to high irradiances [47], and (iii) plants growing in rocky substrates usually do not develop large aboveground structures [48].
Surprisingly, leaf production of the newly documented population was relatively high (10.37 ± 3.59 leaves per year) compared with centrally distributed populations along the Mediterranean Sea, such as France, eastern Spain, Italy or Turkey, which produce between 6 to 8 leaves per year [49,50,51]. Carbon content and C/N on leaves of the studied population also appeared to be high compared with warm-adapted populations, while leaf nitrogen content was likely similar [52,53,54]. Noteworthy, it is important to note that our measurements were taken only one time during the season of maximum production, therefore our results should be considered as exploratory.
Seagrass distribution is mainly controlled by abiotic factors (e.g., temperature, salinity, light conditions and nutrient levels), but also by biotic factors (e.g., invasive species, grazing) [55]. In the context of climate change, predicted increases in SST would threaten the survival of P. oceanica in most of the Mediterranean Sea [5,22]. However, despite this dramatic projection, it is also expected that P. oceanica may find refuge in the western Mediterranean Sea, where SST will not exceed the thermal threshold of this species [25]. Moreover, the survival of the newly documented population could be endangered by the high abundance of R. okamurae. This invasive algae species showed an exceptional capacity to colonize new ecosystems due to diverse ecological and environmental acclimations (e.g., toxic natural compounds), and it is currently endangering the biodiversity of the Strait of Gibraltar [56,57]. However, the are no studies to date assessing the biological interaction of P. oceanica and R. okamurae. Notably, genetic studies will be of interest to determine the genetic connection of this population with southern meadows and from other Mediterranean regions.
Lastly, the creation of a baseline for this species at its western limit of distribution in the Mediterranean Sea is of great ecological and conservation value for several reasons: (i) to increase the ecological knowledge in areas under-studied, where meadows have reported a progressive habitat loss in the last few decades, (ii) to assess whether seagrass meadows acclimate to less favourable environmental conditions, and also (iii) to examine the long-term effects of global change.

5. Conclusions

This study describes and characterises the only documented P. oceanica population in the region of Cadiz, increasing knowledge of the ecology of this species in its western geographical limit. Our results indicate that the newly described population may be exposed to suboptimal climate conditions for plant and meadow development. Furthermore, it could be threatened by the presence of the invasive algae R. okamurae. To conclude, more research should be carried out to assess the effects of global change in order to implement effective science-based conservation initiatives in this region.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15010101/s1, Figure S1: Satellite images of the newly reported P. oceanica meadow at Cala Sardina (36°18′38.80″ N, 5°15′15.13″ W) taken from Google Earth Pro (https://earth.google.com (accessed on 9 May 2022)) every 4 years, from 2008 to 2020.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A.-G. and F.G.B.; Methodology, T.A.-G., F.G.B. and P.B.-C.; Formal Analysis, T.A.-G.; Investigation, T.A.-G., F.G.B. and P.B.-C.; Resources, F.G.B. and P.B.-C.; Data Curation, T.A.-G.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, T.A.-G. and P.B.-C.; Writing—Review & Editing, F.G.B.; Funding Acquisition, F.G.B. and P.B.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by the GLOCOMA [FEDERUCA18-107243] project of Fernando G. Brun, co-funded by the 2014–2020 ERDF Operational Programme and by the Department of Economy, Knowledge, Business and University of the Regional Government of Andalusia. Also, the study was supported by the Spanish government through the “Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence” accreditation (CEX2019-000928-S) and the Severo Ochoa FPI fellowship of Tomás Azcárate-García. Biochemical analyses were financed by the Juan de la Cierva postdoctoral fellowship of Dr Pedro Beca-Carretero (ID FJC2019-039583-I).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study will be available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the associate editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments during the review process, to André Barany and Juan Antonio Gómez for facilitating the necessary information to find the studied P. oceanica population, to Joan M. Horrach Pou and Andrea Casaucao Aguilar for their helpful comments and to Maria J. Pazó, Vanessa Vieitez and X.A. Álvarez-Salgado for their support in the C and N analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; De Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nordlund, L.M.; Jackson, E.L.; Nakaoka, M.; Samper-Villarreal, J.; Beca-Carretero, P.; Creed, J.C. Seagrass ecosystem services–What’s next? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 134, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pérez-Lloréns, J.L.; Vergara, J.J.; Olivé, I.; Mercado, J.M.; Conde-Álvarez, R.; Pérez-Ruzafa, Á.; Figueroa, F.L. Autochthonous seagrasses. In Mediterranean Sea: Its History and Present Challenges; Goffredo, S., Dubinsky, Z., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  4. Telesca, L.; Belluscio, A.; Criscoli, A.; Ardizzone, G.; Apostolaki, E.T.; Fraschetti, S.; Gristina, M.; Knittweis, L.; Martin, C.S.; Pergent, G.; et al. Seagrass meadows (Posidonia oceanica) distribution and trajectories of change. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Marbà, N.; Duarte, C.M. Mediterranean warming triggers seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) shoot mortality. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 16, 2366–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pazzaglia, J.; Santillán-Sarmiento, A.; Ruocco, M.; Dattolo, E.; Ambrosino, L.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Procaccini, G. Local environment modulates whole-transcriptome expression in the seagrass Posidonia oceanica under warming and nutrients excess. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 303, 119077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marbà, N.; Díaz-Almela, E.; Duarte, C.M. Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) loss between 1842 and 2009. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 176, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moreno, D.; Luque, A.A.; Templado, J. Las praderas de Posidonia oceanica. Distribución en Andalucía. In Praderas Y Bosques Marinos de Andalucía; Luque, A.A., Templado, J., Eds.; Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía: Sevilla, Spain, 2004; pp. 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ruiz, J.M.; Guillén, J.E.; Ramos-Segura, A.; Otero, M.M. Atlas de Praderas Marinas de España; Instituto Español de Oceanografía: Madrid, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Urra, J.; Mateo, A.; Marina, P.; Rueda, J.L.; García-Raso, J.E. First records of Posidonia oceanica flowering at its westernmost distributional limit (Malaga, Alboran Sea). Bot. Mar. 2011, 54, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. García-Gómez, J.C. Estudio comparado de las tanatocenosis y biocenosis malacológicas del Estrecho de Gibraltar y áreas próximas. Iberus 1983, 3, 75–90. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sánchez-Moyano, J.E.; Estacio, F.J.; García-Adiego, E.M.; García-Gómez, J.C. Las praderas submarinas de la Bahía de Algeciras. Evolución histórica y planes para su restauración y conservación. Almoraima 1998, 19, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shaw, E. The sea-grass meadows of Gibraltar. Alcctoris 1993, 8, 66–69. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bull, J.C.; Kenyon, E.J.; Edmunds, D.; Cook, K.J. Recent loss of Gibraltar seagrasses. Bot. Mar. 2010, 53, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Clausen, K.; Krause-Jensen, D.; Olesen, B.; Marbà, N. Seasonality of eelgrass biomass across gradients in temperature and latitude. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 506, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ito, M.; Lin, H.; O’Connor, M.; Nakaoka, M. Large-scale comparison of biomass and reproductive phenology among native and non-native populations of the seagrass Zostera japonica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2021, 675, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azcárate-García, T.; Beca-Carretero, P.; Cara-Ortega, C.L.; Villamayor, B.; Cosnett, E.; Bermejo, R.; Hernández, I.; Brun, F.G.; Stengel, D.B. Seasonal plant development and meadow structure of Irish and southern Spanish seagrass populations. Aquat. Bot. 2022, 183, 103569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bennett, S.; Wernberg, T.; Joy, B.A.; De Bettignies, T.; Campbell, A. Central and rear-edge populations can be equally vulnerable to warming. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Roca, G.; Alcoverro, T.; Krause-Jensen, D.; Balsby, T.; van Katwijk, M.; Marbà, N.; Santos, R.; Arthur, R.; Mascaró, O.; Fernández-Torquemada, Y.; et al. Response of seagrass indicators to shifts in environmental stressors: A global review and management synthesis. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 63, 310–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pazzaglia, J.; Reusch, T.B.; Terlizzi, A.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Procaccini, G. Phenotypic plasticity under rapid global changes: The intrinsic force for future seagrasses survival. Evol. Appl. 2021, 14, 1181–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beca-Carretero, P.; Azcárate-García, T.; Teichberg, M.; Patra, P.; Feroze, F.; González, M.J.; Medina, I.; Winters, G. Predicted warming intensifies the negative effects of nutrient increase on tropical seagrass: A physiological and fatty acid approach. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 142, 109184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chefaoui, R.M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrão, E.A. Dramatic loss of seagrass habitat under projected climate change in the Mediterranean Sea. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 4919–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vargas-Yáñez, M.; Plaza, F.; García-Lafuente, J.; Sarhan, T.; Vargas, J.; Vélez-Belchi, P. About the seasonal variability of the Alboran Sea circulation. J. Mar. Syst. 2002, 35, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shaltout, M.; Omstedt, A. Recent sea surface temperature trends and future scenarios for the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanologia 2014, 56, 411–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chefaoui, R.M.; Duarte, C.M.; Serrão, E.A. Palaeoclimatic conditions in the Mediterranean explain genetic diversity of Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Peralta, G.; Pérez-Lloréns, J.L.; Hernández, I.; Brun, F.; Vergara, J.J.; Bartual, A.; Gálvez, J.A.; García, C.M. Morphological and physiological differences between two morphotypes of Zostera noltii Hornem. from the south-western Iberian Peninsula. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2000, 54, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peralta, G.; Godoy, O.; Egea, L.; de los Santos, C.B.; Jiménez-Ramos, R.; Lara, M.; Brun, F.; Hernández, I.; Olivé, I.; Vergara, J.; et al. The morphometric acclimation to depth explains the long-term resilience of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa in a shallow tidal lagoon. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Duarte, C.M. Allometric scaling of seagrass form and productivity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Oldend. 1991, 77, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Via, J.D.; Sturmbauer, C.; Schönweger, G.; Sötz, E.; Mathekowitsch, S.; Stifter, M.; Rieger, R. Light gradients and meadow structure in Posidonia oceanica: Ecomorphological and functional correlates. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998, 163, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gnisci, V.; de Martiis, S.C.; Belmonte, A.; Micheli, C.; Piermattei, V.; Bonamano, S.; Marcelli, M. Assessment of the ecological structure of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on the northern coast of Lazio, Italy (central Tyrrhenian, Mediterranean). Ital. Bot. 2020, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Marbà, N.; Duarte, C.; Cebrián, J.; Gallegos, M.; Olesen, B.; Sand-Jensen, K. Growth and population dynamics of Posidonia oceanica on the Spanish Mediterranean coast:elucidating seagrass decline. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996, 137, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balestri, E.; Cinelli, F.; Lardicci, C. Spatial variation in Posidonia oceanica structural, morphological and dynamic features in a northwestern Mediterranean coastal area: A multi-scale analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 250, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fernández-Torquemada, Y.; Díaz-Valdés, M.; Izquierdo-Muñoz, A.; Sánchez-Lizaso, J.L.; Ramos-Esplá, A.A. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Posidonia oceanica Monitoring Indicators, Valencian Community, Spain. Water 2020, 12, 3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Urra, J.; Ramírez, Á.M.; Marina, P.; Salas, C.; Gofas, S.; Rueda, J.L. Highly diverse molluscan assemblages of Posidonia oceanica meadows in northwestern Alboran Sea (W Mediterranean): Seasonal dynamics and environmental drivers. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 117, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Micheli, C.; Cupido, R.; Lombardi, C.; Belmonte, A.; Peirano, A. Changes in Genetic Structure of Posidonia oceanica at Monterosso al Mare (Ligurian Sea) and Its Resilience Over a Decade (1998–2009). Environ. Manag. 2012, 50, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rigo, I.; Paoli, C.; Dapueto, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Pergent, G.; Oprandi, A.; Montefalcone, M.; Bianchi, C.N.; Morri, C.; Vassallo, P. The Natural Capital Value of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica in the North-Western Mediterranean. Diversity 2021, 13, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Olesen, B.; Enríquez, S.; Duarte, C.M.; Sand-Jensen, K. Depth-acclimation of photosynthesis, morphology and demography of Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa in the Spanish Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 236, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Buia, M.C.; Gambi, M.C.; Dappiano, M. Seagrass systems. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 2004, 10, 133–183. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruiz, J.M.; Romero, J. Effects of disturbances caused by coastal constructions on spatial structure, growth dynamics and photosynthesis of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2003, 46, 1523–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peirano, A.; Damasso, V.; Montefalcone, M.; Morri, C.; Bianchi, C.N. Effects of climate, invasive species and anthropogenic impacts on the growth of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile in Liguria (NW Mediterranean Sea). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 50, 817–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Guidetti, P.; Lorenti, M.; Buia, M.C.; Mazzella, L. Temporal Dynamics and Biomass Partitioning in Three Adriatic Seagrass Species: Posidonia oceanica, Cymodocea nodosa, Zostera marina. Mar. Ecol. 2002, 23, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsirika, A.; Skoufas, G.; Haritonidis, S. Seasonal and bathymetric variations of epiphytic macroflora on Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile leaves in the National Marine Park of Zakynthos (Greece). Mar. Ecol. 2007, 28, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Drew, E.A. Factors affecting photosynthesis and its seasonal variation in the seagrasses Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Aschers, and Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile in the mediterranean. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1978, 31, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, K.-S.; Park, S.R.; Kim, Y.K. Effects of irradiance, temperature, and nutrients on growth dynamics of seagrasses: A review. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2007, 350, 144–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. West, R. Depth-related structural and morphological variations in an Australian Posidonia seagrass bed. Aquat. Bot. 1990, 36, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pace, M.; Borg, J.A.; Galdies, C.; Malhotra, A. Influence of wave climate on architecture and landscape characteristics of Posidonia oceanica meadows. Mar. Ecol. 2017, 38, e12387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Figueroa, F.L.; Jiménez, C.; Viñegla, B.; Pérez-Rodríguez, E.; Aguilera, J.; Flores-Moya, A.; Altamirano, M.; Lebert, M.; Häder, D.P. Effects of solar UV radiation on photosynthesis of the marine angiosperm Posidonia oceanica from southern Spain. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 230, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Giovannetti, E.; Lasagna, R.; Montefalcone, M.; Bianchi, C.N.; Albertelli, G.; Morri, C. Inconsistent responses to substratum nature in Posidonia oceanica meadows: An integration through complexity levels? Chem. Ecol. 2008, 24, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pergent, G.; Romero, J.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Mateo, M.; Boudouresque, C.-F. Primary production, stocks and fluxes in the Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1994, 106, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pergent-Martini, C.; Rico-Raimondino, V.; Pergent, G. Primary production of Posidonia oceanica in the Mediterranean Basin. Mar. Biol. 1994, 120, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marbà, N.; Duarte, C.M.; Holmer, M.; Martínez, R.; Basterretxea, G.; Orfila, A.; Jordi, A.; Tintoré, J. Effectiveness of protection of seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) populations in Cabrera National Park (Spain). Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Alcoverro, T.; Cerbiān, E.; Ballesteros, E. The photosynthetic capacity of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Influence of nitrogen and light. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2001, 261, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gacia, E.; Duarte, C.M.; Middelburg, J.J. Carbon and nutrient deposition in a Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadow. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2002, 47, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pergent-Martini, C.; Pergent, G.; Monnier, B.; Boudouresque, C.-F.; Mori, C.; Valette-Sansevin, A. Contribution of Posidonia oceanica meadows in the context of climate change mitigation in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2021, 165, 105236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Greve, T.M.; Binzer, T. Which factors regulate seagrass growth and distribution. In European Seagrasses: An Introduction to Monitoring and Management; Borum, J., Duarte, C.M., Krausen-Jensen, D., Greve, T.M., Eds.; M and MS Project: Brussels, Belgium, 2004; pp. 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  56. García-Gómez, J.C.; Sempere-Valverde, J.; González, A.R.; Martínez-Chacón, M.; Olaya-Ponzone, L.; Sánchez-Moyano, E.; Ostalé-Valriberas, E.; Megina, C. From exotic to invasive in record time: The extreme impact of Rugulopteryx okamurae (Dictyotales, Ochrophyta) in the strait of Gibraltar. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Casal-Porras, I.; Zubía, E.; Brun, F.G. Dilkamural: A novel chemical weapon involved in the invasive capacity of the alga Rugulopteryx okamurae in the Strait of Gibraltar. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2021, 257, 107398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Morphometric descriptors: leaf (L) length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf thickness (mm), leaf biomass (mg DW), shoot leaf biomass (mg DW shoot−1), number of leaves (leaves shoot−1) and production descriptors: leaf growth rate (cm day−1 shoot−1), leaf biomass production (mg DW day−1 shoot−1), leaf production (leaf day−1 shoot−1) of shoots from the newly reported P. oceanica population (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W) studied during August 2021. Data represents mean ± standard deviation. (-): no data available. * Youngest leaves (<5 cm) were not taken into account for the calculation of the mean value.
Table 1. Morphometric descriptors: leaf (L) length (cm), leaf width (cm), leaf thickness (mm), leaf biomass (mg DW), shoot leaf biomass (mg DW shoot−1), number of leaves (leaves shoot−1) and production descriptors: leaf growth rate (cm day−1 shoot−1), leaf biomass production (mg DW day−1 shoot−1), leaf production (leaf day−1 shoot−1) of shoots from the newly reported P. oceanica population (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W) studied during August 2021. Data represents mean ± standard deviation. (-): no data available. * Youngest leaves (<5 cm) were not taken into account for the calculation of the mean value.
Leaf (L)
DescriptorsL-1L-2L-3L-4L-5L-6Leaf Average
Leaf length (cm)18.2 ± 5.123.5 ± 6.427.6 ± 5.221.5 ± 3.713.7 ± 4.04.3 ± 1.921.0 ± 2.9 *
Leaf width (cm)1.1 ± 0.021.1 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.01.0 ± 0.03
Leaf thickness (mm)0.51 ± 0.060.38 ± 0.050.32 ± 0.050.23 ± 0.030.18 ± 0.010.15 ± 0.010.31 ± 0.03
Leaf biomass (mg DW) 109.0 ± 31.9141.9 ± 40.2167.9 ± 32.6129.7 ± 23.180.6 ± 25.122.1 ± 12.0108.5 ± 47.2 *
Shoot leaf biomass (mg DW shoot−1)------633.0 ± 77.1
Shoot leaves (leaves shoot−1)------6 ± 1
Growth rate (cm day−1 shoot−1) ------0.7 ± 0.2
Biomass production (mg DW day−1 shoot−1) ------4.3 ± 1.2
Leaf production (leaf day−1 shoot−1) ------0.03 ± 0.01
Table 2. Population descriptors: shoot density (shoots m−2), aboveground (AG) biomass (kg DW m−2) and leaf area index (LAI; m2 m−2) of the newly reported P. oceanica population (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W) studied during August 2021. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation. (-): no data available. * Patches with a size of <1 m2 were excluded from the calculation of the mean.
Table 2. Population descriptors: shoot density (shoots m−2), aboveground (AG) biomass (kg DW m−2) and leaf area index (LAI; m2 m−2) of the newly reported P. oceanica population (36°18′38.80′′ N, 5°15′15.13′′ W) studied during August 2021. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation. (-): no data available. * Patches with a size of <1 m2 were excluded from the calculation of the mean.
Patch SizeShoot DensityAG BiomassLAI
Patch(m2)(Shoots m−2)(kg DW m−2)(m2 m−2)
110.0408 ± 420.26 ± 0.034.4 ± 1.2
217.6475 ± 200.30 ± 0.015.8 ± 0.8
320.2425 ± 200.27 ± 0.015.3 ± 1.8
45.2408 ± 310.26 ± 0.023.8 ± 0.5
55.7467 ± 310.30 ± 0.024.8 ± 1.1
61.0---
70.5---
80.5---
90.5---
Mean9.8 ± 6.5 *437 ± 420.28 ± 0.034.8 ± 0.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Azcárate-García, T.; Beca-Carretero, P.; Brun, F.G. Plant and Meadow Structure Characterisation of Posidonia oceanica in Its Westernmost Distribution Range. Diversity 2023, 15, 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010101

AMA Style

Azcárate-García T, Beca-Carretero P, Brun FG. Plant and Meadow Structure Characterisation of Posidonia oceanica in Its Westernmost Distribution Range. Diversity. 2023; 15(1):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010101

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azcárate-García, Tomás, Pedro Beca-Carretero, and Fernando G. Brun. 2023. "Plant and Meadow Structure Characterisation of Posidonia oceanica in Its Westernmost Distribution Range" Diversity 15, no. 1: 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010101

APA Style

Azcárate-García, T., Beca-Carretero, P., & Brun, F. G. (2023). Plant and Meadow Structure Characterisation of Posidonia oceanica in Its Westernmost Distribution Range. Diversity, 15(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010101

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop