Next Article in Journal
Correction: Mo et al. Land Use, Microorganisms, and Soil Organic Carbon: Putting the Pieces Together. Diversity 2022, 14, 638
Previous Article in Journal
The Evolution of Collembola Higher Taxa (Arthropoda, Hexapoda) Based on Mitogenome Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Stump Removal on Communities of Ectomycorrhizal and Other Soil Fungi in Norway Spruce Stands of Latvia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fungi Present in the Organic and Mineral Layers of Six Broad-Leaved Tree Plantations as Assessed by the Plate Dilution Method

by
Nijolė Maršalkienė
1,
Vizma Nikolajeva
2,*,
Māris Seņkovs
3 and
Laima Česonienė
4
1
Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Str. 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
3
Microbial Strain Collection of Latvia, University of Latvia, Jelgavas Str. 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
4
Department of Environment and Ecology, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Ecology, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010008
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 18 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Fungi Diversity and Their Ecological Significance)

Abstract

:
This study examined the distribution of culturable fungi and predominant genera in the organic layer and in the upper layers of the mineral soil of six broad-leaved tree plantations in autumn, after the full fall of leaves. In total, 1335 fungal isolates were recovered from an organic layer and two mineral layers (0–4 cm and 5–8 cm) of soil. The structure of fungal genera differed in the tree plantations and in the three studied soil layers. The organic layer was the layer most populated by fungi compared to the mineral layers. In the organic layer, Penicillium and phyllosphere fungi such as Cladosporium and Phoma dominated. Deeper in the soil, the dominance of certain genera decreased with the increase in Trichoderma, Mucor, Mortierella, and entomopathogenic fungi such as Paecilomyces and Beauveria. Penicillium was one of the most abundant fungi in all soil layers studied.

1. Introduction

Forest ecosystem processes are driven by interactions between above- and below-ground components, and their stability and sustainability depend on nutrient conversion [1]. Trees strongly influence soil processes through their metabolism, accumulation, and decomposition of nutrients [2]. Tree litter is an important part of the biological nutrient cycling process [3,4] and, together with roots, constitutes the largest proportion of soil organic matter in forest soils and modifies soil chemistry [5]. Microorganisms play a crucial role in the biodegradation of plant residues in terrestrial ecosystems [6]. Previous studies have shown that plants can form and maintain specific communities of saprotrophic microorganisms in soil [7,8,9]. Along with bacteria, fungi are important as decomposers in the soil food web [10,11]. Fungi are a very diverse group of organisms and a very important part of forest ecosystems [12,13], providing a wide range of ecosystem services, such as organic matter decomposition, element cycling, plant nutrition, and plant protection [8,14]. Fungi convert hard-to-digest organic material such as cellulose and lignin into forms that other organisms can use [10,15,16]. Microscopic saprophytic fungi are dominant in forest soil, and fungal community compositions differ within tree species and soil quality [17]. The ecological importance of fungi as symbionts and decomposers is well recognized, and new research continues to increase knowledge of their role in ecosystem functioning. However, compared to their ecological and evolutionary diversity, fungi have only recently started to receive attention from the wider ecological research community [18,19]. The interactions of mycorrhizal (symbiotic) and pathogenic fungi with native and alien trees have been studied quite extensively, but still, little attention has been paid to saprotrophic fungi, which are the most abundant in the forest floor and in the soil [20,21].
An increasing number of forests, especially subtropical forests, are undergoing a long-term transformation from natural forests to plantations [22]. The soil microbial communities and functions of such plantations remain poorly understood [23]. In cities and other urbanized areas, plantations are also increasingly being established with naturally occurring and introduced tree species and homogeneous stands that are not characteristic of natural native ecosystems [24,25]. It is therefore essential to understand the structure and function of soil microbial communities in order to predict the response of such ecosystems to changes in environmental conditions. The influence of trees is most pronounced in mature stands. Changes in soil properties are evident in stands older than 40–50 years [26]. However, soil changes can be reversed or ‘masked’ by differences in soil taxonomy and different silvicultural practices [27].
The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of popular plantations of deciduous trees in urbanized areas on the abundance of culturable fungi and dominant fungal genera in the organic layer and in the upper layers of mineral soil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The study was carried out in central Lithuania (54°53′ N, 23°49′ E) in the hemiboreal zone of European transitional deciduous mixed forests [28]. The average annual temperature ranges from +6.5 to +7.1 °C, with an average temperature of −3.6 °C in January (the coldest month) and +17.7 °C in July (the warmest month). The average annual rainfall is 600–700 mm. Permanent snow cover lasts between 75 and 90 days [29].
The study was carried out after a mass leaf fall in October 2020, in the homogeneous plantations of deciduous native (Quercus robur L., Betula pendula Roth, Tilia cordata Mill.) and alien (Quercus rubra L., Aesculus hippocastanum L., Sorbus intermedia (Ehrh.) Pers.) monocultures in the Arboretum Park of the Agriculture Academy of Vytautas Magnus University in Kaunas district. The age of the studied plantations was 60 years and the area of the stands varied from 0.14 to 0.31 ha (Table 1). They were dominated by anthropogenic Endocalcari–Epihypogleic Cambisols.

2.2. Sample Collection

The sites were visited on 30 October 2020. Composite samples of the organic layer (forest floor) and mineral topsoil with depths of 0–4 cm and 5–8 cm were taken randomly from 10 sites of each investigated tree plantation. One combined and thoroughly mixed sample of each site was produced per plot and per layer. Soil samples were sieved (<4 mm) and cleaned of visible plants, while their roots remained. For microbiological analyses, the samples were stored at 4 °C. All the microbial determinations were performed within one week of sampling.

2.3. Microbiological Analyses

The abundance of culturable fungi was determined in the organic layer and in the mineral soil layers (0–4 cm and 5–8 cm depth). The soil serial dilution method was used. Then, 10 g of the soil samples was suspended in 90 mL of sterile water in 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks by shaking at room temperature at 150 rpm for 30 min. In total, 0.1 mL of tenfold serial dilutions of the suspensions was plated on the potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Biolife, Italy) for fungal count. Inoculated Petri plates were incubated at 21 ± 2 °C for 7–14 days. The detection limit was ten CFU g−1 of wet soil. Every soil sample was analyzed in three replicates.
Based on colony and cell morphology, predominant fungi were isolated from the highest dilutions of soil suspensions and purified. Fungal genera were identified using macroscopic and microscopic appearance [30].

2.4. Statistics

Data are reported as means with the standard deviation (Statistical significance was assessed with the coefficient p (if p < 0.05). Duncan’s new multiple range test (MRT) was used. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Fungi

The fungal abundance in the organic layer (Figure 1A) of English oak was higher than in the other tree plantations and was 2.6 times higher than the overall average fungal number in the organic layer of all plantations (1.6 × 106 CFU g−1). The fungal abundance of linden and chestnut in this layer was also among the highest (1.6 and 1.2 times higher than the average, respectively). Red oak and whitebeam had the lowest abundance of fungi (p < 0.05) in the organic layer of all the plantations studied.
The situation in the mineral soil layers was different. In the 0–4 cm layer of mineral soil (Figure 1B), the mean abundance of fungi was 16 times lower than in the organic layer and 26 times lower than in the 5–8 cm depth layer (Figure 1C). The highest fungal abundance was found in the linden, birch, and red oak 0–4 cm mineral soil layer and in the birch 5–8 cm soil layer. Both investigated English oak and chestnut mineral soil layers had the lowest fungal number.

3.2. Fungal Genera in Soil Layers

3.2.1. Organic Layer

In total, 634 fungal isolates were recovered from the organic layer of soil. In both oak stands, the Penicillium genus dominated, accounting for more than 60% of the total population of fungi found (Figure 2). Penicillium was also abundant in the whitebeam plantation, accounting for more than 1/3 of all fungi. Mucor spp. dominated the chestnut plantation, accounting for more than half of the fungi found in the organic layer. Penicillium and Mucor were absent from the organic layer of linden trees, where the Cladosporium genus was predominant. Phoma formed the majority of the fungal population in the organic layer of the birch plantation, while Penicillium made up only a small part. Phoma was common in stands of English oak and whitebeam. Alternaria, Fusarium, Onychophora, and Knufia were found in small amounts (Figure 2).

3.2.2. Mineral Layer 0–4 cm

In total, 354 fungal isolates were recovered from the 0–4 cm mineral soil layer. The dominance of individual genera (Figure 3) was not as pronounced as in the organic layer. Penicillium was one of the dominant genera in all plantations. This genus was most dominant in the red oak mineral layer, as well as in the organic layer. Mucor spp. were abundant in all plantations, except red oak. In this layer, Trichoderma accounted for a large part of the fungal population in all the plantations. Mortierella was one of the predominant genera in linden, chestnut, English oak, and birch soils. This layer contained fungi of the Beauveria genus, which was not found only in the soil of linden and chestnut plantations.

3.2.3. Mineral Layer 5–8 cm

In total, 347 fungal isolates were recovered from the 5–8 cm mineral soil layer. Compared to the upper layer, the occurrence of Penicillium decreased (Figure 4), while Trichoderma increased, especially in chestnut and whitebeam stands. Beauveria spp. were found in all plantations except linden. Beauveria was particularly abundant in the soil of both oaks and, to a lesser extent, in birch. As in the 0–4 cm layer, fungi of the genera Mucor were abundant in the soil of linden, but Mortierella spp. were abundant in the soil of linden and birch. Fungi of the genus Paecilomyces were found in significant numbers in some plantations, which were not previously found in the organic layer and in small numbers in the upper 0–4 cm of the soil layer. Fungi of the genus Chaetomium were also common.

4. Discussion

As the depth increased, the amount of fungi in the soil decreased in the plantations of all six trees. This was expected because it is known that as the proportion of organic matter decreases with depth, the abundance of saprotrophic fungi decreases, while the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi increases [31,32]. In our study, it was not possible to investigate the prevalence of mycorrhizal fungi due to methodological limitations.
Penicillium spp., carbohydrate-degrading fungi capable of degrading primary lignin [33], accounted for almost a third of all the fungi found in the study and was abundant in all the layers, especially in the organic layer (Figure 2). The most abundant fungi of the genus Penicillium in all layers studied were in the red oak plantation. Mucor, which prefers carbohydrates but does not degrade lignin [33], was the second most abundant fungal genus in both the organic layer and the mineral soil and was dominant in chestnut and linden plantations. Trichoderma, which is best adapted to degrade cellulose and xylan [34], unlike the fast-degrading and carbohydrate-loving Penicillium or Mucor [33,35], was abundant in all layers, especially in the 0–4 cm mineral soil layer. Trichoderma fungi were especially abundant in plantations of chestnut and whitebeam at a depth of 5–8 cm. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between tree plantations and the frequency of Trichoderma fungi.
Phyllosphere fungi, such as Phoma and Cladosporium, were also among the most common in the studied plantations, especially in the organic layer of local tree stands of linden and birch. These fungi were also found in the deeper layers, but in much smaller numbers (Figure 3 and Figure 4). According to the literature [36], tree phyllosphere fungi are specifically adapted to colonize and utilize dead host tissues, and some phyllosphere fungi with marked abilities to decompose litter components play important roles in the decomposition of structural components, nutrient dynamics, and soil organic matter accumulation.
Mortierella possess the ability to secrete lytic enzymes that hydrolyze compounds such as cellulose, while hemicellulose [37] was found abundantly only in mineral soil, especially in the 0–4 cm layer. Mortierella was particularly abundant in the mineral soil layer of chestnut, linden, and birch soils. According to Jayasinghe et al. [38], fast-growing genera (e.g., Mucor, Penicillium, and Trichoderma) are more tolerant of actinomycete antagonism than slow-growing and moderately slow-growing genera such as Cladosporium and Mortierella.
One of the most important genera of entomopathogenic fungi distributed worldwide is Beauveria [39,40] which was abundantly found only in mineral soil layers, especially in the 5–8 cm layer (Figure 4). A statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) was found between the occurrence of these fungi and the soil layers. Paecilomyces, which is also entomopathogenic [41] and known for its nematophagous capacity [42], was rarely found in the organic layer of the litter, but, like Beauveria, was common in the mineral soil, especially in the 0–4 cm layer. Paecilomyces was mainly found in whitebeam mineral topsoil. There was a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) between the plantation type and the frequency of Paecilomyces.
Fungi of the genera Verticillium, Acremonium, and Acrostalagmus were found in all the layers studied, but mainly in the 5–8 cm layer of mineral soil. Gliocladium spp. were also found only in mineral soil, at a depth of 0–4 cm.
The biochemical characteristics of stands in deciduous tree plantations will be investigated in the future.

5. Conclusions

The structure of fungal genera differed in the tree plantations and in the three soil layers studied. The organic layer was the layer most populated by fungi compared to the mineral layers. In the organic layer, Penicillium and phyllosphere fungi such as Cladosporium and Phoma dominated in different plantations. Deeper in the soil, the dominance of certain genera decreased with the increase in Trichoderma, Mucor, Mortierella, and entomopathogenic fungi such as Paecilomyces and Beauveria. Paecilomyces and especially Beauveria were abundant in the mineral soil layers. Penicillium was one of the most abundant fungi in all the studied layers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M. and V.N.; methodology, V.N.; software, V.N.; validation, N.M., V.N. and M.S.; formal analysis, L.Č.; investigation, N.M. and M.S.; resources, L.Č.; data curation, N.M.; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.; writing—review and editing, M.S.; supervision, N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.M. thanks the third round of the project “Strengthening the doctoral capacity of the University of Latvia within the framework of the new doctoral model”, project identification no. 8.2.2.0/20/I/006, UL registration no. ESS2021/434, co-financed by the European Social Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Gannes, V.; Bekele, I.; Dipchansingh, D.; Wuddivira, M.N.; De Cairies, S.; Boman, M.; Hickey, W.J. Microbial community structure and function of soil following ecosystem conversion from native forests to teak plantation forests. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Haghverdi, K.; Kooch, Y. Effects of diversity of tree species on nutrient cycling and soil-related processes. Catena 2019, 178, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Strickland, M.S.; McCulley, R.L.; Bradford, M.A. The effect of a quorum-quenching enzyme on leaf litter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 64, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Z.; Arif, M.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Li, C. Effects of hydrological regime on foliar decomposition and nutrient release in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 661865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Litton, C.M.; Ryan, M.G.; Knight, D.H.; Stahl, P.D. Soil-surface carbon dioxide efflux and microbial biomass in relation to tree density 13 years after a stand replacing fire in a lodgepole pine ecosystem. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003, 9, 680–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Purahong, W.; Wubet, T.; Lentendu, G.; Schloter, M.; Pecyna, M.J.; Kapturska, D.; Hofrichter, M.; Krüger, D.; Buscot, F. Life in leaf litter: Novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 4059–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Keiser, A.D.; Strickland, M.S.; Fierer, N.; Bradford, M.A. The effect of resource history on the functioning of soil microbial communities is maintained across time. Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Voříšková, J.; Baldrian, P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J. 2013, 7, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prescott, C.E.; Grayston, S.J. Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: Current knowledge and research needs. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 309, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ingham, E.R. Soil Biology. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2009. Available online: http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/concepts/soil_biology/fungi.html (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  11. Ceci, A.; Pinzari, F.; Russo, F.; Persiani, A.M.; Gadd, G.M. Roles of saprotrophic fungi in biodegradation or transformation of organic and inorganic pollutants in co-contaminated sites. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morton, J.P. Fungi. In Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Gentry, T., Fuhrmann, J., Zuberer, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 149–170. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bahram, M.; Netherway, T. Fungi as mediators linking organisms and ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2022, 46, fuab058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van der Heijden, M.G.; Martin, F.M.; Selosse, M.A.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1406–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baldrian, P.; Větrovský, T.; Cajthaml, T.; Dobiášová, P.; Petránková, M.; Šnajdr, J.; Eichlerová, I. Estimation of fungal biomass in forest litter and soil. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baldrian, P. Forest microbiome: Diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 109–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kubartová, A.; Ranger, J.; Berthelin, J.; Beguiristain, T. Diversity and decomposing ability of saprophytic fungi from temperate forest litter. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 58, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nguyen, N.H.; Song, Z.; Bates, S.T.; Branco, S.; Tedersoo, L.; Menke, J.; Schilling, J.S.; Kennedy, P.G. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016, 20, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dighton, J. Fungi in Ecosystem Processes, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; p. 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Urcelay, C.; Longo, S.; Geml, J.; Tecco, P.A. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from non-invaded montane ecosystems facilitate the growth of alien trees? Mycorrhiza 2019, 29, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vlk, L.; Tedersoo, L.; Antl, T.; Větrovský, T.; Abarenkov, K.; Pergl, J.; Albrechtová, J.; Vosátka, M.; Baldrian, P.; Pyšek, P.; et al. Alien ectomycorrhizal plants differ in their ability to interact with co-introduced and native ectomycorrhizal fungi in novel sites. ISME J. 2020, 14, 2336–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Biró, M.; Molnár, Z.; Öllerer, K.; Demeter, L.; Bölöni, J. Behind the general pattern of forest loss and gain: A long-term assessment of semi-natural and secondary forest cover change at country level. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 220, 104334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, J.; Feng, H.; McNie, P.; Wang, W.; Peng, C.; Feng, L.; Sun, J.; Pan, C.; Yu, Y. The effect of the conversion from natural broadleaved forests into Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook.) plantations on soil microbial communities and nitrogen functional genes. Forests 2022, 13, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Snieškienė, V.; Žeimavičius, K.; Stankevičienė, A. New Lithuanian urban street plantings. Urban Plant. Form. (In Lithuanian). 2010, 1, 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fineschi, S.; Loreto, F. A survey of multiple interactions between plants and the urban environment. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2020, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marcos, E.; Calvo, L.; Marcos, J.A.; Taboada, A.; Tarrega, R. Tree effects on the chemical topsoil features of oak, beech and pine forests. Eur. J. Forest Res. 2010, 29, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vaičys, M.; Rauguotis, A.; Kubertavičiene, L.; Armolaitis, K. Properties of Lithuanian forest litters. Balt. For. 1996, 2, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  28. Europe’s Biodiversity–Biogeographical Regions and Seas; EEA Report No 1/2002. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/report_2002_0524_154909 (accessed on 13 August 2022).
  29. Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service under the Ministry of Environment. Climate Atlas of Lithuania; Lithuanian Hydrometeorological Service under the Ministry of Environment: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Seifert, K.; Morgan-Jones, G.; Gams, W.; Kendrick, B. The Genera of Hyphomycetes; CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; p. 997. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dickie, I.A.; Xu, B.; Koide, R.T. Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytol. 2002, 156, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mundra, S.; Kjønaas, O.J.; Morgado, L.N.; Krabberød, A.K.; Ransedokken, Y.; Kauserud, H. Soil depth matters: Shift in composition and inter-kingdom co-occurrence patterns of microorganisms in forest soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021, 97, fiab022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Song, F.; Tian, X.; Fan, X.; He, X. Decomposing ability of filamentous fungi on litter is involved in a subtropical mixed forest. Mycologia 2010, 102, 20–26. Available online: http://wwwjstororg/stable/20619264 (accessed on 20 August 2022). [CrossRef]
  34. Pečiulyte, D.; Lugauskas, A. Improvement of Trichoderma viride biotic activity by copper sulfate introduction into soil. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Biol. Sci. 2001, 49, 299–307. [Google Scholar]
  35. Golec, A.F.C.; Pérez, P.G.; Lokare, C. Effective microorganisms: Myth or reality? Rev. Peru. Biol. 2007, 14, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Osono, T. Role of phyllosphere fungi of forest trees in the development of decomposer fungal communities and decomposition processes of leaf litter. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ansel, P.J.; Young, T.W.K. Association of Mortierella chlamydospora and Mortierella indohii with plants in culture. Microbios Lett. 1982, 19, 193–244. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jayasinghe, B.A.T.D.; Parkinson, D. Actinomycetes as antagonists of litter decomposer fungi. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2008, 38, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Imoulan, A.; Hussain, M.; Kirk, P.M.; El Meziane, A.; Yao, Y.-J. Entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria: Host specificity, ecology and significance of morpho-molecular characterization in accurate taxonomic classification. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2017, 20, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niemczyk, M.; Sierpińska, A.; Tereba, A.; Sokolowski, K.; Przybylski, P. Natural occurrence of Beauveria spp. in outbreak areas of cockchafers (Melolontha spp.) in forest soils from Poland. BioControl 2019, 64, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kovač, M.; Tkaczuk, C.; Pernek, M. First report of entomopathogenic fungi occurrence in forest soils in Croatia. Forests 2021, 12, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moreno-Gavíra, A.; Huertas, V.; Diánez, F.; Sanchez-Montesinos, B.; Santos, M. Paecilomyces and its importance in the biological control of agricultural pests and diseases. Plants 2020, 9, 1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Total number of fungal colony-forming units (× 104 CFU g−1) in plantation soil layers under different tree species. (A)—in the organic layer, (B)—in the mineral soil layer at 0–4 cm depth, (C)—in the mineral soil layer at 5–8 cm depth; Q rob—Quercus robur, Q rub—Q. rubra, T cor—Tilia cordata, A hip—Aesculus hippocastanum, B pen—Betula pendula, S int—Sorbus intermedia. Significantly different mean values in the same graph are indicated by different letters (a, b) (Duncan; p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Total number of fungal colony-forming units (× 104 CFU g−1) in plantation soil layers under different tree species. (A)—in the organic layer, (B)—in the mineral soil layer at 0–4 cm depth, (C)—in the mineral soil layer at 5–8 cm depth; Q rob—Quercus robur, Q rub—Q. rubra, T cor—Tilia cordata, A hip—Aesculus hippocastanum, B pen—Betula pendula, S int—Sorbus intermedia. Significantly different mean values in the same graph are indicated by different letters (a, b) (Duncan; p < 0.05).
Diversity 15 00008 g001
Figure 2. The structure of fungal genera in the soil organic layer in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Figure 2. The structure of fungal genera in the soil organic layer in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Diversity 15 00008 g002
Figure 3. The structure of fungal genera in the 0–4 cm layer of mineral soil in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Figure 3. The structure of fungal genera in the 0–4 cm layer of mineral soil in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Diversity 15 00008 g003
Figure 4. The structure of fungal genera in the 5–8 cm mineral soil layer in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Figure 4. The structure of fungal genera in the 5–8 cm mineral soil layer in plantations of different broad-leaved trees. The number of fungal isolates (n) is given after the tree names.
Diversity 15 00008 g004
Table 1. Species and area of investigated tree stands.
Table 1. Species and area of investigated tree stands.
Tree SpeciesArea, haFamilyNatural Habitat
Native
Quercus robur L.
English oak
0.31Fagaceae DumortMost of Europe, west of the Caucasus
Betula pendula Roth
Silver birch
0.14Betulaceae GreyEurope and parts of Asia
Tilia cordata Mill.
Small-leaved linden
0.29Tiliaceae JussEurope to the Caucasus and western Asia
Alien
Quercus rubra L.
Northern red oak
0.18Fagaceae DumortEast of North America
Aesculus hippocastanum L.
Horse chestnut
0.23Hippocastanaceae A. RichBalkan Peninsula
Sorbus intermedia (Ehrh.) Pers.
Swedish whitebeam
0.29Rosaceae JussNorth-western Europe
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maršalkienė, N.; Nikolajeva, V.; Seņkovs, M.; Česonienė, L. Fungi Present in the Organic and Mineral Layers of Six Broad-Leaved Tree Plantations as Assessed by the Plate Dilution Method. Diversity 2023, 15, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010008

AMA Style

Maršalkienė N, Nikolajeva V, Seņkovs M, Česonienė L. Fungi Present in the Organic and Mineral Layers of Six Broad-Leaved Tree Plantations as Assessed by the Plate Dilution Method. Diversity. 2023; 15(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maršalkienė, Nijolė, Vizma Nikolajeva, Māris Seņkovs, and Laima Česonienė. 2023. "Fungi Present in the Organic and Mineral Layers of Six Broad-Leaved Tree Plantations as Assessed by the Plate Dilution Method" Diversity 15, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010008

APA Style

Maršalkienė, N., Nikolajeva, V., Seņkovs, M., & Česonienė, L. (2023). Fungi Present in the Organic and Mineral Layers of Six Broad-Leaved Tree Plantations as Assessed by the Plate Dilution Method. Diversity, 15(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop