Next Article in Journal
From Source to Tap: Tracking Microbial Diversity in a Riverbank Filtration-Based Drinking Water Supply System under Changing Hydrological Regimes
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Regulating Population Stand Structure in Blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima: Rosaceae), a Masting North American Desert Shrub
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genus Apterocuris Jacobson, 1901 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the Subfamily Chrysomelinae with Description of a New Species and Remarks on Significance of Preimaginal Characters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diversity
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/d15050620
diversity-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phylogeny of Scissicauda Species, with Eight New Species, including the First Photinini Fireflies with Biflabellate Antennae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

by
Leandro Felipe Zeballos
1,*,
André Silva Roza
2,3,
Lucas Campello-Gonçalves
2,3,
Stephanie Vaz
4,5,
Cláudio Ruy Vasconcelos Da Fonseca
1,
Sara Cristina Rivera
6 and
Luiz Felipe Lima da Silveira
6
1
Coordenação de Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Sistemática e Ecologia de Coleoptera (LASEC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus 69067-001, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-402, Brazil
3
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20940-040, Brazil
4
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biologia Evolutiva–Laboratório de Entomologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
5
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia—Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, Departamento de Ecologia, A0-111 and Laboratório de Polychaeta, Departamento de Zoologia, A0-108, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
6
206 Stillwell Building, Biology Department, Western Carolina University, 1 University Drive, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(5), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050620
Submission received: 16 February 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 2 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Ecology of Coleoptera)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photinini is the largest tribe of Lampyrinae fireflies, with over 30 genera and nearly 750 species, and includes taxa where adults may or may not have light organs. A focus on taxa with bioluminescent adults left the taxonomy of dark fireflies in poor condition compared to taxa with lit adults. A recent phylogenetic study based on molecular data supported the transfer of Scissicauda McDermott, 1964—traditionally placed in Amydetinae due to the flabellate antenna of its type species—to Photinini at a branch sided with Pyropyga Motschulsky, 1852 and Pyractonema Solier, 1849. Such placement had never been recovered before in morphology-based studies, and the consequences for the interpretation of character evolution in this lineage are yet to be addressed. Moreover, Scissicauda was previously thought to be endemic to the Atlantic Forest. Here, through phylogenetic analyses of 38 taxa and 108 morphological characters, we (i) expand on the concept of Scissicauda to include S. antennata sp. nov., S. asymmetrica sp. nov., S. aurata sp. nov., S. biflabellata sp. nov., S. gomesi sp. nov., S. jamari sp. nov., S. neyi sp. nov., S. truncata sp. nov., and (ii) transfer Lucidota malleri Pic, 1935 and, therefore, S. malleri comb. nov. We also recover Pyropyga + Pyractonema as sister to Scissicauda + Haplocauda, providing the first morphological evidence for their sisterhood. Noteworthy, the new species S. biflabellata sp. nov. and S. asymmetrica sp. nov. stand out as the first known Photinini species with biflabellate antennae. In addition, our study reports the first Scissicauda species in the Amazon (S. antennata sp. nov., S. aurata sp. nov., S. gomesi sp. nov., S. jamari sp. nov., and S. truncata sp. nov.) and Cerrado biome (S. neyi sp. nov.). Our study highlights the value of continued sampling and phylogenetic analyses of South American fireflies towards a revised classification and deeper understanding of this lineage.

1. Introduction

Fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) are a cosmopolitan beetle family with around 2500 species worldwide [1]. Although charismatic, their taxonomy is poorly defined across levels, especially in Central and South America, where they are most diverse. Recent studies brought about significant improvements at the subfamily (e.g., [2]] and genus levels (e.g., [3,4,5,6]). Many genera have been revised or at least better delimited in the last decade, helping to reduce the taxonomic impediment of this family (e.g., [3,4,7,8,9,10,11]). However, most genera remain poorly delimited.
Lampyrinae stands out as the largest firefly subfamily, with about half of the genera in the family, including the speciose Photinus Laporte, 1833 and Lucidota Laporte, 1833. Photinini LeConte, 1881 is the largest of six Lampyrine tribes, with over 30 genera and nearly 750 species, and includes taxa where adults may or may not have light organs [6,12]. A focus on taxa with bioluminescent adults has left the taxonomy of dark fireflies in especially poor condition compared to taxa with lit adults (e.g., [13]). Recent studies have been reshaping the classification of Photinini by combining recently collected materials, extensive surveys of historical collections, and phylogenetic analyses (e.g., [5,14]). These studies provided further support to the idea that sensory traits traditionally used in genus-level diagnoses of fireflies are largely homoplastic, calling for taxonomic revisions, particularly of Photinini.
Scissicauda McDermott, 1964 was traditionally placed in Amydetinae: Psilocladina due to the flabellate and bristly antennae of its type species, S. disjuncta Olivier, 1986, traits also seen in Psilocladus Blanchard, 1846 and Photoctus McDermott, 1961. The genus was recently revised, and a second species was described with serrated male antennae [9], which led to an updated diagnosis. In the broader phylogenies of Lampyridae, the subtribe Psilocladina sensu McDermott, 1966 was deemed polyphyletic, and despite the antennal similarity of its constituent taxa, only Psilocladus remained after the subtribe was elevated to Psilocladinae [2,15,16]. The most conspicuous diagnostic features of Scissicauda are sternum IX completely covered by VIII, male pygidium deeply indented medially on both the anterior and posterior margins, and the phallus consisting of a dorsal plate basally fused to parameres and an elongate ventral plate [9].
A recent phylogenetic study based on molecular data supported the transfer of Scissicauda to Lampyrinae incertae sedis at a branch sided with Pyropyga Motschulsky, 1852 and Pyractonema Solier, 1849 [2]. Such a placement had never been recovered before in morphology-based studies, and the consequences for the homology and interpretation of the character evolution in this lineage are yet to be addressed. In addition, a recent phylogenetic analysis based on morphological characters found Scissicauda as a sister to the recently described Haplocauda Silveira, Lima, and McHugh, 2022, united by synapomorphic traits of their distinctive abdomen: pygidium with posterolateral angles extending beyond the central third of the posterior margin, with a strongly emarginate anterior margin; sternum IX with lateral rods fused anteriorly, completely covered by VIII; and a dorsal plate with a subapical groove and folded ventrally [5]. However, Pyropyga and Pyractonema were not included in the latter study. Therefore, the relationships among these Scissicauda, Haplocauda, and the other Photinini remain unclear.
Recent sampling efforts in the Atlantic Forest hotspot by our research group [17], combined with visits to important Brazilian entomological collections by our group (e.g., MNRJ, DZUP, MZUSP, and INPA), allowed us to identify a previously described species and eight species undescribed that are at least partially consistent with the diagnosis of Scissicauda. These include two Photinini species with biflabellate antennae previously unknown for this tribe. Here, we explore the taxonomic limits of Scissicauda, as well as its phylogenetic affinities. Our study supports the placement of the eight new species and Lucidota malleri Pic, 1935 in Scissicauda and found morphological evidence for a close relationship between this genus Haplocauda and Pyropyga + Pyractonema. We update the diagnosis of the genus and provide illustrations of the new species and Scissicauda malleri comb. nov. distribution map and identification key for all Scissicauda species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphology, Terminology, and Map

Specimens included in this study are deposited at six institutions: Coleção Entomológica Professor José Alfredo Pinheiro Dutra, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (DZRJ); Coleção Entomológica Pe. Jesus Santiago Moura, Universidade Federal do Paraná, PR, Brazil (DZUP); Coleção Zoológica da Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso (UFMT); Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris (MNHN); Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil (MZUSP); and Coleção de Invertebrados, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, AM, Brazil (INPA). One entire male and one female specimens of each species, when available, were dissected and soaked in 10% KOH for 24–36 h. Specimens were examined and imaged with a Leica M205C stereomicroscope coupled with a DFC 450 digital camera with Leica Application Suite CV3 Software or with a Leica M165 C coupled with a DFC295 camera, using the Leica Application Suite X for auto-stacking images. The photographs were edited and assembled in plates using Adobe Photoshop CS6. We based our classification on [2] and the anatomical terminology on [9], except for the hind wing morphology, which followed [18]. Distribution maps of the species were made using QGIS 3.16.16 [19]. We recorded label data for all specimen types using the following conventions: double quotes (“ ”) for label data quoted verbatim, double forward slashes (//) to separate labels, double comma („) for line breaks, and brackets [ ] to enclose our comments or notes.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

Given the overlapping diagnostic features of Scissicauda and many Photinini taxa, we performed phylogenetic analyses to test the hypothesis that Lucidota malleri Pic, 1935 (Supplementary Material S3) and the eight undescribed species form a monophyletic group with the two described species in the genus.
The subfamilial classification of lampyrids remains unsteady, and the relationships among the genera, as well as their monophyly, remain largely unexplored outside Luciolinae [3,4,5,14,20,21]. To test Scissicauda monophyly, in addition to current and putative Scissicauda species, we included in our taxon sampling representatives the four subtribes of Photinini: Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849 and Pyractonema haemorrhoa Fairmaire & Germain, 1861 (Figure 17A–D, Figure 18A–D, Figure 19A,B, Figure 20A,B, 21A,B, Figure 22A–D, Figure 23A–D, Figure 24A–D and Figure 25A–F); Pyropyga minuta LeConte, 1852 and Pyropyga nigricans Say, 1823 (Figure 17E–H, Figure 18E–H, Figure 19C,D, Figure 20C,D, Figure 21C,D, Figure 22E–H, Figure 23E–H, Figure 24E–H and Figure 25G–L); Lucidota atra G. Olivier, 1790 (Figure 17I,J, Figure 18I,J, Figure 19E, Figure 20E, Figure 21E, Figure 22I,J, Figure 23I,J, Figure 24I,J and Figure 25M–O); Photinus pyralis Linnaeus, 1758 and Photinus corruscus Linnaeus, 1767 (Figure 17K–N, Figure 18K–N, Figure 19F,G, Figure 20F,G, Figure 21F,G, Figure 22K–N, Figure 23K–N, Figure 24K–N and Figure 25P–U); in addition to the incertae sedis taxon Vesta thoracica (Olivier, 1790) (Figure 17O,P and Figure 20H), historically placed in Photinini. We included a broad sampling of Photinini, because Scissicauda was transferred to Lampyrinae in [2], but its relationships with its tribal members remain poorly understood. The material examined is given below for Scissicauda species (see Results), and additional material used in the phylogenetic analyses is provided in Supplementary Materials S1.
We built a matrix with 38 taxa scored for 108 characters following the logical basis given in [22] in MESQUITE [23], reanalyzing 93 characters from [5] and [24], in addition to 15 new characters (see Results; Supplementary Materials S2). To compare the outcomes of different phylogenetic approaches, we performed maximum parsimony (MP) analyses in TNT [25] and Bayesian inference (BI) in MrBayes 3.2.7a [26,27].
We performed the MP analyses using New Technology heuristic searches with a maximum of 99,999 trees, Tree Bisection and Reconnection, and compared the outputs of equal and implied weights (EW and IW, respectively). For the IW analysis, we explored the topologies obtained under different concavity constant values (k = 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, and 100). The k values were not chosen with regular intervals, because high k values tend to generate uniform results that are close to analyses with EW [28,29]. Node support for MP analyses support was assessed using the Bremer decay index, in addition to the resampling techniques of bootstrap (for MPEW) or symmetric resampling (for MPIW) with 1000 replicates. Unambiguous character evolution was optimized using WINCLADA [30].
To identify the appropriate model for the BI analysis, a model selection analysis was implemented in IQTREE2 [31] with ModelFinder [32]. The best model for our dataset was MKF + G4 + ASC, a modification of the MKmodel with 4 gamma categories, which takes into account the ascertainment bias due to the prior exclusion of invariant characters in our matrix [33]. The BI was implemented in MrBayes 3.2.7a through The CIPRES Science Gateway V. 3.3 (https://www.phylo.org/portal2/login!input.action, accessed on 21 November 2022) [34]. Our search ran 50,000,000 generations and saved trees each 2000 generations, discarding the first 25% as burn-in. We checked for convergence using Tracer v1.6 [35]. Trees were read in FigTree version 1.4.4 (obtained at https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases), and the different measures of node support obtained (Bremer index, Symmetric Resampling, Ultrafast Bootstrap, and posterior probabilities) were combined on the preferred topology (see below) using Adobe Photoshop 2021.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characters

Our matrix included morphological characters from male specimens covering the three tagmata: head (11), thorax (20), and abdomen (77). Encoded as binary (N = 64) or multistate (N = 44). Based on the EW consensus tree, we indicate for each character the number of steps (L), the consistency index (CI), and the retention index (RI).
  • Antenna, antennomeres III–IX, core, shape: (0) serrate, (1) cylindrical. The number of steps—length (L) = 8; the consistency index (CI) = 12; the retention index (RI) = 56.
  • Antenna, antennomeres III–IX, single lamella: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 50.
  • Antenna, single flabellae insertion, position: (0) basal, (1) apical, (2) progressively apical. L = 1; CI = 0; RI = 0.
  • Antenna, antennomeres III–IX, double lamellae: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Antenna, upright bristles: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.
  • Clypeus, connection to frons: (0) connected by membrane throughout, (1) completely obliterate, (2) connate by median third. L = 5; CI = 40; RI = 57.
  • Mandible, orientation in frontal view: (0) largely overlapping, (1) crossed, (2) convergent. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Labrum, sclerite, anterior margin, shape: (0) straight, (1) emarginate. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 75.
  • Labium, submentum, anterior margin, shape: (0) straight, (1) notched. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Labium, submentum, lateral margins, shape: (0) subparallel to slightly convergent posteriorly, (1) abruptly constrained posteriorly, (2) strongly convergent posteriorly. L = 6; CI = 33; RI = 50.
  • Labium, palp, palpomere III, lateral margins, shape: (0) obconical, (1) subparallel, (2) divergent apically. L = 3; CI = 66; RI = 50.
  • Pronotum, anterior margin, shape: (0) acuminate anteriorly, (1) evenly rounded. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 40.
  • Pronotum (lateral view), anterior expansion, curvature: (0) curved upwards, (1) straight. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 75.
  • Pronotum, lateral margin, length relative to disc: (0) less than a third, (1) nearly half, (2) at least 1. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 75.
  • Pronotum, disc, sagittal depression: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Pronotum, by the disc, posterior margin, shape: (0) strongly sinuose, (1) almost straight. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Hypomeron (lateral view), ratio between hypomeron depth and pronotal lateral expansion width: (0) about as long, (1) at least a 1/5 shorter, (2) at least a 1/5 longer. L = 5; CI = 40; RI = 82.
  • Pronotum, posterior corner, notch, presence: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 77.
  • Hypomeron (ventral view), area anterior to prosternal insertion, shape: (0) projecting outwards, (1) straight. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Prosternum, anterior margin, shape: (0) medially sinuose, (1) straight. L = 6; CI = 16; RI = 58.
  • Mesoscutellum, posterior margin, shape: (0) rounded, (1) truncate. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 62.
  • Elytron, outer margin, shape: (0) straight, (1) rounded, (2) convergent posteriorly. L = 6; CI = 33; RI = 75.
  • Wing, position of MP3+4 split, relative to CuA1: (0) more basal, (1) more apical. L = 7; CI = 14; RI = 50.
  • Wing, AA3 vein, shape: (0) short (almost as long as wide) and almost perpendicular to AA4, (1) elongated and with an acute angle to AA4. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 60.
  • Wing, r3: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.
  • Proleg, anterior claw, tooth: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 86.
  • Proleg, tibial spurs, count:(0) zero, (1) one, (2) two. L = 9; CI = 22; RI = 66.
  • Mesoleg, anterior claw, tooth: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 86.
  • Mesoleg, tibial spurs, count: (0) zero, (1) one, (2) two. L = 6; CI = 33; RI = 60.
  • Metaleg, tibial spurs, count: (0) zero, (1) one, (2) two. L = 7; CI = 28; RI = 58.
  • Metaleg, tibial spurs, length symmetry: (0) symmetrical, (1) asymmetrical. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 0.
  • Tergum I, laterotergite, shape: (0) indistinct, (1) triangular, (2) trapezoidal, (3) quadrangular. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Tergum VII, posterior angles, shape: (0) projected, embracing anterior angles of pygidium, (1) rudimentary, slightly projected backwards. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Sterna II–VIII, width variation: (0) progressively narrow, (1) widest by sterna III–IV. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.
  • Sternum VI, lantern: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 20.
  • Sternum VIII, length relative to VII: (0) as long as, (1) slightly longer, (2) at least a 1/5 shorter, (3) 2× as long, (4) at least 3× longer. L = 6; CI = 50; RI = 66.
  • Sternum VIII, posterior margin, shape: (0) almost straight, (1) sinuose. L = 4; CI = 50; RI = 71.
  • Sternum VIII, posterior margin, median projection: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 8; CI = 12; RI = 46.
  • Sternum VIII, posterior margin, median projection, shape: (0) tiny, (1) elongate, (2) wide, triangular. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Sternum VIII, width relative to anterior 1/3 of pygidium: (0) as wide, (1) distinctly narrower. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 66.
  • Sternum VIII, spiracles, position: (0) dorsal, (1) ventral.L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Pygidium, relation between length and width: (0) at least a 1/5 wider than long, (1) as long as wide, (2) at least a 1/5 longer than wide. L = 10; CI = 20; RI = 52.
  • Pygidium, anterior corners, blunt anterior projections: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Pygidium, anterior margin, shape: (0) slightly emarginate, (1) V-shaped, (2) U-shaped. L = 3; CI = 66; RI = 80.
  • Pygidium, lateral margins, shape: (0) subparallel, (1) rounded, (2) divergent posteriorly, (3) convergent posteriorly. L = 4; CI = 75; RI = 75.
  • Pygidium, posterior margin, central third, shape:(0) almost straight, (1) rounded, (2) emarginate, (3) medially notched. L = 12; CI = 25; RI = 35.
  • Pygidium, posterolateral corners, degree of development: (0) well-developed, (1) barely conspicuous. L = 7; CI = 14; RI = 60.
  • Pygidium, posterolateral corners, length relative to central third: (0) shorter, (1) as long as, (2) longer. L = 10; CI = 20; RI = 55.
  • Syntergite, shape (proportion): (0) longer than wide, (1) wider than long. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 62.
  • Syntergite, lateral margin, shape: (0) convergent posteriorly, (1) subparallel. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 87.
  • Syntergite, anterior margin, shape: (0) mildly emarginated, (1) strongly indented, (2) almost straight. L = 3; CI = 66; RI = 83.
  • Syntergite, pattern of sclerotization: (0) evenly sclerotized, (1) completely divided by a membranous line. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Syntergite, posterior-apical connection with sternum IX: (0) separated, (1) fused. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Syntergite, length relative to sternum IX: (0) 1/3, (1) 1/2, (2) 2/3, (3) 1/5. L = 6; CI = 50; RI = 70.
  • Syntergite, posterolateral corners, chaetotaxy: (0) glabrous, (1) covered in setae, (2) with dome-shaped sensillae. L = 7; CI = 28; RI = 68.
  • Sternum IX, lateral rods, shape: (0) subparallel, (1) evenly convergent, (2) abruptly convergent, (3) biconcave. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Sternum IX, lateral rods, tips, connection: (0) separated, (1) fused. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 76.
  • Sternum IX, length relative to aedeagus (including phallobase): (0) slightly shorter, (1) slightly longer, (2) a 1/3 longer. L = 7; CI = 42; RI = 71.
  • Sternum IX, lateral rods, anterior thickening: (0) absent, (1) absent. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Sternum IX, position relative to VIII: (0) completely covered, (1) partially exposed. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 83.
  • Sternum IX, posterior half, degree of excavation: (0) evenly sclerotized, (1) deeply clefted (to at least a 1/5 sternum length). L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.
  • Sternum IX, posterior margin, shape: (0) rounded, (1) acute, (2) emarginate, (3) with a pointed projection, (4) medially indented. L = 4; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallobase, bilateral symmetry: (0) symmetrical, (1) asymmetrical. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 66.
  • Phallobase, lateral margin, shape: (0) rounded, (1) straight and apically divergent, (2) emarginated. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 71.
  • Phallobase, length relative to phallus: (0) at least a 1/4 shorter, (1) as long as, (2) at least a 1/4 longer. L = 7; CI = 28; RI = 58.
  • Phallobase, sagittal line: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 78.
  • Phallobase, sagittal line, extension: (0) throughout phallobase, (1) not reaching apical margin. L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 70.
  • Phallobase, apical margin, shape: (0) slightly emarginate, (1) deeply emarginate (C-shaped), (2) medially clefted. L = 7; CI = 28; RI = 77.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, median connection to parameres: (0) connected by membrane, (1) connate, (2) fused. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, median fusion to parameres, extent: (0) up to a third of dorsal plate length, (1) up to half of dorsal plate length. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 50.
  • Phallus, struts, condition:(0) absent, (1) present (visible through the phallobase). L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 88.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subapical paired spikes. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 0.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, apical half, lateral margins, shape: (0) acuminate and rounded, (1) acuminate and straight, (2) sinuose, (3) subparallel-sided. L = 4; CI = 75; RI = 85.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subcleft transverse groove: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subcleft transverse groove, depth:(0) shallow, (1) deep. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, ventrobasal processes, presence: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, ventrobasal processes, shape: (0) divergent, (1) convergent. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, basal protuberances, shape (in apical view): (0), (1). L = 1; CI = 0; RI = 0.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subcleft groove, condition: (0) more apical, not coupled to the phallo-parameral fusion, (1) delimiting the phallo-parameral fusion. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, length relative to parameres: (0) nearly a fifth longer, (1) at least a 1/5 shorter, (2) as long as, (3) twice as long. L = 5; CI = 60; RI = 50.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, condition: (0) entire, (1) medially split. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus (dorsal view), dorsal plate, anterior margin, shape: (0) rounded, (1) pointed, (2) truncate, (3) clefted. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, degree of medial indentation: (0) nearly a 1/3 plate length, (1) nearly a 1/2 plate length, (2) nearly a 1/2 plate length, (3) completely divided, (4) slightly emarginate. L = 6; CI = 33; RI = 69.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, apical arms (of indented Phallus), shape: (0) widely distanced and slightly convergent, (1) contiguous, (2) fused, (3) apically divergent. L = 6; CI = 50; RI = 57.
  • Phallus (lateral view), dorsal plate, overall shape: (0) straight, (1) bent dorsally, (2) slightly bent ventrally, (3) sinuose, (4) with a basal acute angle. L = 9; CI = 33; RI = 70.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, basal constriction: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subapical outer keel: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 66.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, subapical outer spikes: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 0.
  • Phallus, dorsal plate, basal joint: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, ventral plate: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 66.
  • Phallus, ventral plate, shape: (0) I-shaped, (1) Y-shaped, (2) abruptly narrowed towards apex, (3) triangular. L = 3; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, ventral plate, length relative to dorsal plate: (0) half as long, (1) as long as or slightly longer, (2) a third shorter. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Phallus, endossac, opening, shape: (0) cylindrical, (1) cul-de-sac. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 66.
  • Phallus, endossac, opening, position relative to dorsal plate: (0) terminal, (1) subterminal. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Base of parameres, connection between parameres: (0) widely separated, (1) separated by a narrow groove, (2) connate, (3) fused. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Base of paramere, basal projection: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Paramere, subapical ventral tooth, presence: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 3; CI = 33; RI = 71.
  • Paramere, apex, curvature in lateral view: (0) straight, (1) slightly curved ventrally, (2) evenly curved inwards, (3) curved dorsally, (4) embracing phallus ventrally, (5). L = 7; CI = 57; RI = 81.
  • Paramere, apex, sclerotization relative to core paramere: (0) as sclerotized, (1) distinctly membranous, (2) more sclerotized (darker). L = 4; CI = 25; RI = 57.
  • Paramere, apex (tip), shape: (0) rounded, (1) blunt, (2) pointed, (3) truncated. L = 5; CI = 60; RI = 75.
  • Paramere (lateral view), basal lobe: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Paramere (lateral view), basal lobe, shape: (0) robust, rounded, (1) narrow and acute, (2) rudimentary. L = 2; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Paramere, midlength, pattern of sclerotization: (0) absent, (1) forming a ring round projected apex. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Paramere, ventral rod, presence: (0) absent, (1) present. L = 1; CI = 100; RI = 100.
  • Paramere (ventral view), ventral rod, position: (0) at apical 2/3, (1) at apical 1/3. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 0.
  • Paramere, ventral rod, length: (0) shorter than phallus, (1) extending at least a 1/5 beyond phallus, (2) rudimentary. L = 3; CI = 66; RI = 66.
  • Paramere, base, orientation relative to phallus: (0) dorsal, (1) lateral (coplanar), (2) ventral. L = 5; CI = 20; RI = 77.
  • Paramere, inner face, shape: (0) smooth, (1) excavate. L = 2; CI = 50; RI = 50.

3.2. Phylogeny

All analyses recovered a polyphyletic Lucidota, with the three species of this genus included found to be very distantly related (Figure 1 and Figure 2). In fact, one of the latter, Lucidota malleri, was found nested among Scissicauda species. After the inclusion of Scissicauda malleri comb. nov. and the eight new species (Figure 3 and Figure 4), this genus is recovered as monophyletic—with moderate support—in all our analyses (MPEW, MPIE, and IB). Scissicauda monophyly is supported by two homoplasies and three uncontroverted synapomorphies as follows: phallobase with a sagittal line (Character 66:1), phallobase with a medially clefted apical margin (Character 68:2), ventral plate of phallus Y-shaped (Character 91:1), ventral plate of phallus 1/3 shorter than dorsal plate (Character 92:1), and paramere bearing a ventral rod (Character 104:1).
Within Scissicauda, a well-supported clade consisting of S. disjuncta + (S. balena + (S. asymmetrica + S. biflabellata)), heretofore “typical” Scissicauda (i.e., with modified terminalia), was consistently recovered in all analyses, supported by the following characters: tergum VII with posterior angles projected (Character 33:0), pygidium with posterior margin medially notched (Character 46:3), Syntergite fused with sternum IX in posterior-apical connection (Character 53:1), syntergite half the height of the sternum IX (Character 54:1), Sternum IX 1/3 longer than aedeagus (Character 58:2), dorsal plate of phallus (lateral view) overall straight (Character 85:0), and apex of paramere straight (Character 98:0).
Another branch containing the remaining “atypical Scissicauda” (i.e., with “simple/unmodified” terminalia) species was also recovered in the MP analyses with low support but not in the BI. The latter group shares a sternum VIII distinctly narrower than the anterior 1/3 of pygidium (Character 40:1) and a pygidium at least 1/5 wider than long (Character 42:2). The topology within these “atypical Scissicauda” varied among analyses.
Scissicauda is consistently recovered as a sister of Haplocauda, whose species share a transverse groove on the dorsal plate of phallus (Character 74:1), and seven other homoplasies (Figure 1 and Figure 2). A clade including Scissicauda + Haplocauda, sister to Pyropyga + Pyractonema (Figure 1 and Figure 2), is also recovered with the high support in all analyses. These genera share the following uncontroverted synapomorphies: submentum notched (Character 9:1), syntergite completely divided (Character 52:1), and dorsal plate of phallus fused to parameres (Character 69:2).
Diversity 15 00620 g001 550
Figure 1. Consensus tree with the phylogenetic relationship of Scissicauda based on 4 trees found by the maximum parsimony analysis with equal weights. Homoplastic synapomorphies (black squares) and non-homoplastic synapomorphies (white squares) are mapped on the consensus tree. Support values are given in red for the Bremer index (above) and bootstrap (below).
Figure 1. Consensus tree with the phylogenetic relationship of Scissicauda based on 4 trees found by the maximum parsimony analysis with equal weights. Homoplastic synapomorphies (black squares) and non-homoplastic synapomorphies (white squares) are mapped on the consensus tree. Support values are given in red for the Bremer index (above) and bootstrap (below).
Diversity 15 00620 g001
Diversity 15 00620 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship of Scissicauda recovered by the Bayesian analysis (left) and the implied weights (K = 3) Maximum Parsimony analysis (right). The node posterior probabilities (in IB at left) and the symmetric resampling values (in IW at right) are given at branches.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship of Scissicauda recovered by the Bayesian analysis (left) and the implied weights (K = 3) Maximum Parsimony analysis (right). The node posterior probabilities (in IB at left) and the symmetric resampling values (in IW at right) are given at branches.
Diversity 15 00620 g002

3.3. Taxonomy

Lampyrinae Rafinesque, 1815
Photinini LeConte, 1881
Scissicauda McDermott, 1964 Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16
Scissicauda McDermott, 1964: 10, 39; 1966: 87.
Schistura Olivier, 1911:51 (nec Schistura McClevelland, 1838 Actinopterygii).
Aethra Laporte, 1833 (partim). Olivier in Wytsman 1907: 16; Blackwelder 1944: 353. Lychnuris Motschulsky, 1853 (partim). McDermott 1966 (quid pro quo).
Schistura Olivier, 1911: 51; McDermott 1964: 10, 39.
Diagnosis. Antenna 11-segmented (Figure 6), antenommeres III–X compressed and serrate or cylindrical and flabellate, uniramose or biramose, with dense, upright bristles, rami at most twice longer than antennomere body (smaller than antennomere in S. asymmetrica), attached basally (distally in S. asymmetrica). Antennal sockets large (Figure 5A–D,I–L), two-thirds of frontal width, close-set, reniform, antennifer process distinct. Occiput as wide as one-third head width. Apical maxillary palpomere lanceolate. Apical labial palpomere securiform. Pronotum roughly semilunate (except in S. neyi), with a marginal row of gross, deep punctures in dorsal view (Figure 7A–H). Abdominal terga with posterior angles progressively produced and acute (except in S. aurata). Tibial spurs present. Tarsomere I 2× longer than II, II 2× longer than III, III of subequal length as IV. Tarsomere IV bilobed, lobes reaching two-thirds of length of tarsomere V (Figure 8). Abdominal sterna VI and VII without lanterns, VII with posterior angles projected, embracing anterior angles of pygidium, or poorly developed (Figure 10). Males with sternum IX retracted under VIII or partially exposed (Figure 3B,D,F,H,J,L and Figure 4B,D,F) 2× or 3× as long as syntergite (Figure 12A–Q). Phallus with dorsal and ventral plates, with dorsal plate basally fused to parameres, symmetric; ventral plate with lateral margins sinuose, weakly sclerotized; parameres symmetric, apically rounded, with a ventrobasal process rudimentary or extended beyond phallus (Figure 13).
Diversity 15 00620 g003 550
Figure 3. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B), Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D), Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F), Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (G,H), Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J), Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L), and Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–L).
Figure 3. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B), Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D), Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F), Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (G,H), Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J), Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L), and Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–L).
Diversity 15 00620 g003
Diversity 15 00620 g004 550
Figure 4. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (C,D), Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (E,F), and Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–F).
Figure 4. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (C,D), Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (E,F), and Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–F).
Diversity 15 00620 g004
Diversity 15 00620 g005 550
Figure 5. Head capsule, frontal and occipital views. (A,E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (B,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (C,G) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (D,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,M) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (J,N) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (K,O) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (L,P) Scissicauda biflabellatasp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–P).
Figure 5. Head capsule, frontal and occipital views. (A,E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (B,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (C,G) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (D,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,M) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (J,N) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (K,O) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (L,P) Scissicauda biflabellatasp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–P).
Diversity 15 00620 g005
Diversity 15 00620 g006 550
Figure 6. Antenna, lateral view. (A) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (H) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (H,I); 2 mm (A–G).
Figure 6. Antenna, lateral view. (A) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (H) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (H,I); 2 mm (A–G).
Diversity 15 00620 g006
Diversity 15 00620 g007 550
Figure 7. Male pronotum, dorsal view. (A) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (G) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–I).
Figure 7. Male pronotum, dorsal view. (A) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (G) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–I).
Diversity 15 00620 g007
Diversity 15 00620 g008 550
Figure 8. Detail of tarsus and claws: proleg, mesoleg, and metaleg, respectively. (A) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (B) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–I).
Figure 8. Detail of tarsus and claws: proleg, mesoleg, and metaleg, respectively. (A) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (B) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–I).
Diversity 15 00620 g008
Diversity 15 00620 g009 550
Figure 9. Hind wing, dorsal. (A) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. CAS = Cubitoanal Strut (Cu + CuP + AA3), MSP = Medial spur, r = radial cross-vein, AA = Anal Anterior, CuA = Cubitus Anterior, MP = Media Posterior (Lawrence et al. 2021 [18]). Scale bar: 2 mm (A–H).
Figure 9. Hind wing, dorsal. (A) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (B) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (C) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (H) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. CAS = Cubitoanal Strut (Cu + CuP + AA3), MSP = Medial spur, r = radial cross-vein, AA = Anal Anterior, CuA = Cubitus Anterior, MP = Media Posterior (Lawrence et al. 2021 [18]). Scale bar: 2 mm (A–H).
Diversity 15 00620 g009
Diversity 15 00620 g010 550
Figure 10. Abdominal sclerites, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (Q,R) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–R).
Figure 10. Abdominal sclerites, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (Q,R) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–R).
Diversity 15 00620 g010
Diversity 15 00620 g011 550
Figure 11. Sternum VIII, ventral view and pygidium, dorsal view. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (Q,R) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–R).
Figure 11. Sternum VIII, ventral view and pygidium, dorsal view. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (Q,R) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–R).
Diversity 15 00620 g011
Diversity 15 00620 g012 550
Figure 12. Syntergite, dorsal view and sternite IX, ventral view. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (J,K) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (L,M) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (N,O) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (P,Q) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–Q).
Figure 12. Syntergite, dorsal view and sternite IX, ventral view. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (J,K) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (L,M) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (N,O) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. (P,Q) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–Q).
Diversity 15 00620 g012
Diversity 15 00620 g013 550
Figure 13. Aedeagus, dorsal and ventral views. (A–C) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (D–F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G–I) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (J–L) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (M–O) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (P–R) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (S–U) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (V–X) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (Y–AA) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–AA).
Figure 13. Aedeagus, dorsal and ventral views. (A–C) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (D–F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G–I) Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. (J–L) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (M–O) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (P–R) Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. (S–U) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (V–X) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (Y–AA) Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–AA).
Diversity 15 00620 g013
Redescription. Male. Head (Figure 5) entirely covered by pronotum in dorsal view; capsule almost 2× wider than long, slightly longer than high. Frons slightly prominent dorsally, swollen. Antennal sockets reniform, about two-thirds of frons width; antennifer process conspicuous. Vertex somewhat convex. Antenna (Figure 6) 11-segmented, scape constricted basally, pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially or basally, antennomeres III–X serrate to flabellate, compressed, subequal in length (III slightly smaller than IV in S. biflabellata), with double or single lamellae present (with dense upright bristles) or absent, lamellae slender, apical antennomere slightly longer than the subapical one. Frontoclypeus slightly curved. Labrum connected to frontoclypeus by a membranous suture, 2× as wide as long, anterior margin poorly defined. Mandibles long and slender, arcuate, apex acute, internal tooth absent, external margin sparsely setose in basal ½. Maxilla with cardo well-sclerotized, stipe oblong in ventral view, posterior margins truncate, weakly or well-sclerotized, palpi 4-segmented; palpomere III subtriangular; IV lanceolate, with internal margin covered with minute, dense bristles, almost 3× longer than III. Labium with mentum weakly or well-sclerotized and bristled, completely divided sagittally; submentum weakly or well-sclerotized and bristled, subcordiform, elongate; palpi 3-segmented, palpomere III securiform. Gular sutures almost indistinct; gular bar transverse, 2× as wide as the submentum minimal width. Occiput piriform, as wide as one-third posterior width (Figure 5E–H,M–P). Tentorium long and slender, almost as high as half head high, projected internally almost on the half of its length, strongly curved backwards. Thorax. Pronotum (Figure 7) semilunar, posterior angles acute; disc subquadrate in dorsal view, notably convex, regularly punctured, punctures small and bristled; with a line of distinct deep marginal punctures; pronotal expansions well-developed, anterior expansion maximal length almost half as long as the disc, posterior expansions straight; slightly wider than humeral distance. Hypomeron 3× longer than tall. Prosternum 4× as wide as its major length; slightly constricted parasagittally (in S.balena and S.disjuncta). Proendosternite elongated or clavate, slightly longer than prosternal process minimal width. Mesoscutellum with posterior margin rounded. Elytra rounded (subparallel in S. disjuncta), 3–5× as long as wide, pubescent, secondary pubescence absent, with a line of conspicuous punctures all over sutural and lateral margins. Hind wing (Figure 9) well-developed, posterior margin sinuose, 2× as long as wide, r3 almost as long as r4, radial cell 2–3× wider than long, almost reaching anterior margin, costal row of setae inconspicuous; CuA1, CuA2, CuA3+4 (absent in S. aurata), CAS, MP3+4, AA3+4, and AA4 present; MSP of three fourths r4 length, reaching or almost reaching distal margin, J indistinct. Allinotum slightly wider than long, lateral margins slightly convergent posteriad, posterior margin straight; prescutum extending slightly less than half metascutum length; rounded area of scutum weakly sclerotized, scutum–prescutal plates sclerotized, extending ridges almost up to posterior margin; metascutellum glabrous. Mesosternum weakly sclerotized, acute medially, attached to metasternum by a suture almost as wide as mesosternum. Mesoepimeron attached to metasternum by membrane. Mesosternum/mesanepisternum suture inconspicuous. Mesanepisternum/mesepimeron suture conspicuous. Metasternum oblique and strongly depressed by mesocoxae, anterior medial keel prominent up to anterior one-third, discrimen indistinct, lateral margins divergent posteriad up to lateral-most part of metacoxa, then convergent posteriad, posterior margin bisinuose. Femur slightly shorter or same length as tibia. Anterior pro- and mesoclaws with posterior branch toothed. Tibial spurs formula 2-2-2, symmetric or asymmetric (Figure 8). Tarsomere I 2–2.6× longer than II, II 2× longer than III, III subequal in length to IV, IV bilobed, lobes reaching two-thirds V length. Mesendosternum with two parasagittal projections directed outwards, irregularly alate. Metendosternum spatulate, 1.5–2× longer than wide, median projection acute anteriad, with two lateral laminae. Abdomen (Figure 10). Tergum I with anterior margin membranous, laterotergite membranous; spiracle obliquely attached to thorax, more vertically. Terga II–VII with posterior angles progressively produced and acute posteriad (except in S. aurata, not progressively produced), posterior margins progressively bisinuose or emarginate. Sterna II–VIII or II–IX visible, sternum II with two median close-set vitreous spots. Spiracles dorsal, at almost half sterna lengths. Sternum VIII with larval lanterns elongate or absent. Sternum VIII (Figure 11A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O,Q) clearly longer than VII or slightly longer; Pygidium (Figure 11B,D,F,H,J,L,N,P) almost 2× longer than VIII, anterior margin emarginated or indented, posterior margin sub-rounded, truncated, indented, emarginated or bisinuose; Sternum IX (Figure 12) asymmetric, posterior margin acute, truncate or subrounded. Syntergite (Figure 12B,D,F,H,I,K,M,O,Q) consisting of paired lateral plates convergent posteriad (putatively tergite IX or paraproct), median transversal suture absent or medially divided, bearing bristles posteriorly, membrane-connected at sternum IX, 1/3 or 2/3 shorter than sternum IX, membrane-connected at sternum IX along its length. Aedeagus (Figure 13) with phallus consisting of a dorsal plate basally fused to parameres, symmetric, medially grooved, projected dorsolaterally toward apex; ventral plate with lateral margins sinuose, weakly sclerotized; parameres symmetric, apically rounded, with a ventrobasal process rudimentary or projected and extended beyond the phallus.
Female. Pygidium (Figure 15A,C,E,G,I,K,M) with sides rounded, posterior margin subrounded, truncate, or slightly emarginate. Sternum VIII as long as wide, spiculum ventrale long and slender, as long as 3/4 or 2/4 as the core sternum length (Figure 15B,D,F,H,J,L,N). Internal genitalia (Figure 16H–N) with a large and somewhat rounded spermatophore-digesting gland anterior to the common oviduct, and a more anterior and a slightly larger spermatophore-digesting gland. Valvifers free, twisted basally, 3× longer than coxite; coxites medially fused, coxital baculi well developed, sclerotized, divergent basally; styli minute, sclerotized; proctiger indistinct (Figure 16). In [9] interpretation of the internal parts of S. disjuncta suggests that it lacks a spermatophore. We suggest that this interpretation be revisited upon the availability of new specimens to be dissected. An alternative interpretation is that what [9] regards as the spermatophore-digesting gland and common oviduct are instead the spermatheca and the spermatophore-digesting gland, respectively.
Remarks. Scissicauda is recovered here as closest to Haplocauda, then Pyropyga + Pyractonema. While Pyropyga + Pyractonema have the central third of the frons fused to labrum and lack claw teeth, Haplocauda and Scissicauda have the labrum entirely connected to frons by membrane and have toothed pro- and mesoclaws. Scissicauda can be distinguished from these three aforementioned genera by male genitalic traits. The most distinctive feature is the dorsal plate with a deep transversal groove (Figure 13). “Typical Scissicauda” (i.e., with modified terminalia; see below) are somewhat similar to Haplocauda, from which it can be distinguished by the lack of a median pointed projection on the sternum VIII (Figure 11A,C,E,G,I,K,M,O,Q). “Atypical Scissicauda” (i.e., with regular/unmodified terminalia; see below) are externally similar to many Lucidota and the smaller Pyractonema species, from which it can be distinguished by the aedeagal morphology, especially the dorsal plate bearing a deep transversal groove. A more thorough comparison with the rather distant Costalampys was provided in [4].
Scissicauda was placed in Lampyrinae: incertae sedis in [2].Here, based on its regular-sized arcuate mandibles, pronotum bearing anterior and lateral expansions, dorsal abdominal spiracles, and asymmetrical aedeagal sheath, in addition to the phylogenetic results in [2,5], and this paper (see above), Scissicauda is herein placed in Photinini.
Distribution. The distribution of Scissicauda and its species may be underestimated due to lack of targeted sampling. However, a few interesting patterns emerge from their distribution (Figure 26). “Typical” Scissicauda” seems to be restricted to the Atlantic Forest biome (in the Parana dominion sensu 36), and it is likely to be endemic to it, since they were never found elsewhere. On the other hand, “atypical” Scissicauda are scattered across South America eastern to the Andes, mainly in the Amazon Basin (Boreal and Southern Brazilian dominions sensu 36). Notable exceptions are S. malleri comb. nov., the only “atypical” Scissicauda in the Atlantic Forest, and S. neyi in the Cerrado biome (in the Chacoan dominion).
Checklist of Scissicauda species
Scissicauda antennata sp. nov.
Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov.
Scissicauda aurata sp. nov.
Scissicauda balena (Silveira, Mermudes & Bocakova, 2016)
Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov.
Scissicauda disjuncta (E. Olivier, 1896)
Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov.
Scissicauda jamari sp. nov.
Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov.
Scissicauda neyi sp. nov.
Scissicauda truncata sp. nov.
Key to Scissicauda species based on males
1Antennae uniflabellate or biflabellate (Figure 6H,I)........................................................................................................2
1′Antennae serrate (Figure 6A–G).........................................................................................................................................4
2Antennae with lamellae as long as core antennomere (Figure 6I); pygidium emarginated on anterior margins
(Figure 11P).......................................................................................................................Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov.
2′Antennae with lamellae longer than core antennomere (Figure 6H); pygidium strongly indented or slightly
emarginated on anterior margins (Figure 11N)………………………………………………...........................................3
3Antennae biflabellate (Figure 6H); sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11M); pygidium with
anterior margin strongly indented (Figure 11N); paramere with a long ventral rod (Figure 13S–U)..........................
................................................................................................................................................Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov.
3′Antennae uniflabellate; sternum VIII with posterior margin trisinuose; pygidium with anterior margin slightly
emarginate; paramere with a rudimentary ventral rod (see [9])......................Scissicauda disjuncta (E. Olivier, 1896).
4Sternum IX retracted under VIII; paramere with a long ventral rod (see [9]) .............................................................
…………………………………………………………….…..Scissicauda balena Silveira, Mermudes & Bocakova, 2016.
4′Sternum IX partially exposed (Figure 3B); parameres with a rudimentary ventral rod (Figure 13J) .........................5
5Tibial spurs of metaleg distinctly asymmetrical in length (Figure 8A–C); Sternum VIII with anterior margin
distinctly narrower than anterior 1/3 of the pygidium (Figure 11G–H) ........................................................................6
5′Tibial spurs of metaleg symmetrical in length (Figure 8D–I); Sternum VIII with anterior margin as wide as
anterior 1/3 of pygidium (Figure 11B,F,J) .........................................................................................................................8
6Antennae almost as long as whole body (Figure 3C); pygidium 1.8× wider than anterior margin (Figure 11D)…..
...................................................................................................................................................Scissicauda antennata sp. nov.
6′Antennae shorter than body length (Figure 3A); pygidium 2.5× wider than anterior margin (Figure 11H).............7
7Antennomeres X–XI yellowish (Figure 6D); pygidium with anterior margin emarginated (Figure 11H); sternum
IX with posterior margin rounded (Figure 12G)...................................................................Scissicauda jamari sp. nov.
7′Antennae entirely brown (Figure 6G); pygidium with anterior margin medially indented (Figure 11L); sternum
IX with posterior margin acuminate (Figure 12N)……................................Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov.
8Pygidium with posterior margin subrounded (Figure 11F,J); parameres curved dorsally in lateral view
(Figure 13E)...........................................................................................................................................................................9
8′Pygidium with posterior margin truncate or posterolateral angles longer than the midline, rounded (Figure 11B,R);
parameres almost straight in lateral view (Figure 13B,Q)……………………………………................................……10
9Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight (Figure 11J); phallic ventral plate at least 2× longer than phallobase
(Figure 13O), parameres with ventral rod at the basal half of paramere (Figure 13O) …Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov.
9′Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated (Figure 11F); phallic ventral plate at least 3× longer than phallobase;
parameres with ventral rod at the apical half of paramere (Figure 13F).............................Scissicauda aurata sp. nov.
10Pronotum with anterior expansion 1.4× longer than lateral expansion (Figure 7A); pygidium with posterior
margin truncate (Figure 11B)..................................................................................................Scissicauda truncata sp. nov.
10′Pronotum with anterior expansion almost 2× longer than lateral expansion (Figure 7I); pygidium with
posterolateral angles longer than the midline (Figure 11R)......................................................Scissicauda neyi sp. nov.

3.3.1. Scissicauda antennata sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 3C,D, Figure 5C–G, Figure 6A, Figure 7B, Figure 8B, Figure 9D, Figure 10C,D, Figure 11C,D, Figure 12C,D, Figure 13G–I and Figure 14E,F.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B97D4A19-E3EE-48A9-801E-F5367B66B7E9
Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, Rondônia: Nova, Mamoré, Parque Estadual de, Guajará-Mirim. Rio Formoso//101926 S–643388 W, 20-, 27.x.1995, J. Vidal & L.S., Aquino. Arm. de Malaise//Scissicauda antennata HOLOTYPE [red label]”. PARATYPES: (4 ♂, INPA, pinned, 1 completely dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin) “BRAZIL, Rondônia: Nova, Mamoré, Parque Estadual de, Guajará-Mirim. Rio Formoso//101926 S–643388 W, 20-, 27.x.1995, J. Vidal & L.S., Aquino. Arm. de Malaise [yellow label]”. (2 ♂, INPA, pinned) “BRAZIL, Rondônia, Guajará-, Rio Ouro Preto, Bananal, 105823 S–650539 W//20–27.x.1995, J. A., Rafael & A.L.Henriques, Arm. Malaise [yellow label]”. (1 ♂, INPA, pinned) “BRAZIL: AM, QUERARI, São Gabriel da Cachoeira, 2° Pel. Esp. de Fronteira, 01°05″ N/69°51″ W//05.iv-27.v.1993, Vidal, J; Ferreira, R.L.M. col.//Malaise [yellow label]”.
Type locality. Brazil, Rondônia: Nova Mamoré, Parque Estadual de Guajará-Mirim.
Material examined. (5 ♂, INPA, pinned) “BRAZIL, Rondônia: Nova, Mamoré, Parque Estadual de, Guajará-Mirim. Rio Formoso//101926 S–643388 W, 20-, 27.x.1995, J. Vidal & L.S., Aquino. Arm. de Malaise”. (5 ♂, INPA, pinned) “BRAZIL, Rondônia, Guajará-, Rio Ouro Preto, Bananal, 105823S-650539W//20–27.x.1995, J. A., Rafael & A.L.Henriques, Arm. Malaise”. (1 ♂, INPA, pinned) “BRAZIL: AM, QUERARI, São Gabriel da Cachoeira, 2° Pel. Esp. de Fronteira, 01°05”N/69°51”W//05.iv-27.v.1993, Vidal, J; Ferreira, R.L.M. col.//Malaise”.
Distribution: Brazil: Rondônia, Nova Mamoré (see South Brazilian dominion in Figure 26) e Amazonas, São Gabriel da Cachoeira (see Boreal Brazilian dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: Antennata is a Latin adjective that means “which bears an antennae”. This epithet is given because of the long male antennae.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, as long as body length, (Figure 6A). Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical not reaching half the length of first tarsomere (Figure 8B). Pygidium with posterior margin bisinuose (Figure 11D). Sternum IX (Figure 12C) with posterior margin rounded. Syntergite completely divided by a membranous line (Figure 12D). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally not reaching half the length of the phallobase; phallic groove rudimentary; phallic ventral plate as long as paramere length; parameres curved dorsally (lateral view); ventrobasal process rudimentary (Figure 13G–I). Females. Sternum VIII (Figure 14F) longer than wide. Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin subrounded (Figure 14E).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall blackish-brown to light brown. Scape and pedicel blackish-brown to light brown, rest of antennomeres dark brown (Figure 6A). Pronotum largely yellowish at sides and slenderly anterior at the disc, pronotal disc brown (Figure 7B); hypomeron yellowish or light brown with margins yellowish. Elytron with pale yellow lateral-longitudinal vittae on the anterior 2/3 of the elytron, sutural margin blackish-brown to pale yellow and outer lateral line light brown (Figure 3C). Sternites blackish-brown, coxae, trochanters, and femora blackish-brown to light brown. Abdominal sternites brown to light brown (Figure 3D). Pygidium medially light brown, posterior margin blackish-brown (Figure 11D).
Male. Antennae (Figure 6A) pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres III slightly smaller than IV, antennomeres IV–X subequal in length, antennomere XI slightly longer than the X, compressed. Pronotum 1.2× wider than long (Figure 7B). Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical not reaching half the length of first tarsomere (Figure 8B). Elytral expansion half of pronotal disc width. Hind wing with cross-veins CuA1 (more apical than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present, forming a continuous line (Figure 9D). Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginated (Figure 11C). Sternum IX with posterior margin rounded, almost a quarter longer than the aedeagus. Syntergite completely divided into two asymmetric plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12C–D). Pygidium with sides rounded, posterior margin bisinuose, anterior margin emarginate (Figure 11D). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, phallic groove at half of its length, moderately curved; dorsal plate arms projecting ventrally towards the apex, embracing the ventral plate, with apical margin truncate and wide; ventral plate slightly longer than phallobase; parameres curved in lateral, with apical margin rounded, ventrobasal process rudimentary (Figure 13G–I). Female. Sternum VIII (Figure 14F) longer than wide, convergent posteriorly, posterior margin indented medially, Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin subrounded (Figure 14E).
Remarks. S. antennata sp. nov. (Figure 3C) is similar in dorsal coloration pattern (overall blackish-brown to light brown) to S. gomesi sp. nov. (Figure 3I). Scissicauda antennata is unique among its congenerics by the antenna as long as total body length, and by the wing with a cross-vein CuA1 more apical than MP3+4 split (Figure 9D).

3.3.2. Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 4C,D, Figure 6I, Figure 7H, Figure 8I, Figure 10Q,R, Figure 11O,P, Figure 12J,K, Figure 13V–X, Figure 14C,D, Figure 15K,L and Figure 16F,J.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BB7868F2-9DD6-47C0-A59D-0EE7C4A89E63
Type material. Holotype (♂, DZRJ, pinned dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin), label data: “Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Angra dos Reis, Ilha grande x.2017, malaise 23°08′47″ S, 441 m 44°11′09.4″ W, L. Silveira, L. Campello, S. Vaz col. Paratypes (3 ♀, DZRJ), label data: “Brasil, RJ, Itatiaia, P. N. de, Itatiaia. Malaise, Pensario p2 1280m, XII.2014, R. Monteiro col.”; (♂, DZRJ, dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin), label data: “Brasil, RJ, Itatiaia, Parque Nacional de Itatiaia, 1 male, sendo predado por fêmea de Photuris sp., 31.I.2012, Silveira L., Araújo C. col.; (♂, DZRJ) label data: “Brasil, MG, Itajubá, R.B.M. Serra dos Toledos, Malaise, 16.II-17.III.2017, Rosa e Lopes col.”.
Type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Parque Estadual da Ilha grande.
Distribution: Brazil: Rio de Janeiro, Angra dos Reis e Itatiaia; e Minas Gerais, Itajubá (see Parana dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: Asymmetrica is a Latin adjective that means “asymmetric”. This epithet is given because of the asymmetrical lamellae of the male antenna.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere III–IX compressed, filiform with double apical lamellae asymmetrical in size, the internal much smaller, antennomere XI with single apical lamellae (Figure 6I). Metatibial spurs symmetrical (Figure 8I). Pygidium (Figure 11P) strongly indented on both anterior and posterior margins, with lateral margins subparallel and posterior margin obliquely prolonged externally. Sternum IX abruptly constricted anteriad at half its length, posterior margin convergent. Syntergite consisting of paired lateral plates, joined posteriad (Figure 12J–K). Phallus dorsal plate subtruncate basally, phallic groove at half of its length, moderately curved; ventral plate 2× phallobase length; parameres straight (lateral view), ventrobasal process digitiform, extending slightly beyond ventral plate, shorter than paramere itself (Figure 13V–X). Females. Sternum VIII (Figure 15L) longer than wide. Spiculum ventrale 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15L). Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin slightly emarginated (Figure 15K).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall blackish-brown to light brown. Scape and pedicel brown or yellowish, rest of antennomeres brown except VIII which can be yellowish, and IX–XI which are always yellowish (Figure 6I). Pronotum yellowish at sides and anterior margin, with a paired yellow parasagittal vittae (Figure 7H); hypomeron yellowish. Elytron with pale yellow lateral-longitudinal and thin sutural vittae (Figure 4D). Sternites light brown, coxae, trochanters and femora yellowish to light brown, tibiae and tarsi brown. Abdominal sternites light brown, VIII paired rounded yellow parasagittal vittae near the margin or almost completely yellowish (Figure 4C). Pygidium laterally and medially dark brownish (Figure 11P).
Male. Antennae with pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres III slightly smaller than IV, IV–X subequal in length, IX–XI progressively thinner, and III–IX compressed filiform with double apical lamellae, which are asymmetrical in size, the internal much smaller, X with a single apical lamellae, XI one-third longer than X (Figure 6I). Pronotum 1.7× wider than long (Figure 7H). Metatibial spurs symmetrical (Figure 8I). Elytral expansion as long as disc width (Figure 4C). Hind wing with anterior cross-vein CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present. Sternum VIII with posterior margin rounded (Figure 11O). Sternum IX abruptly constricted anteriad at half its length, one-third longer than aedeagus, posterior margin convergent (Figure 12J). Syntergite consisting of paired lateral plates, joined posteriad (Figure 12K). Pygidium strongly indented on both anterior and posterior margins, with lateral margins subparallel and posterior margin obliquely prolonged externally (Figure 11P). Phallus dorsal plate subtruncate basally, phallic groove at half of its length, moderately curved; ventral plate 2× phallobase length; parameres straight (lateral view), ventrobasal process digitiform, extending slightly beyond ventral plate, shorter than paramere itself (Figure 13V–X). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, constricted at posterior third, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15L). Pygidium with anterior margin constricted, almost straight, constricted at posterior third (Figure 15K).
Remarks. S. asymmetrica sp. nov. (Figure 4C) is similar in dorsal coloration pattern (overall blackish-brown to light brown) to the other “typical Scissicauda”. S. asymmetrica shares with S. biflabellata (Figure 4A) the biflabellate antennae. In Scissicauda asymmetrica, the lamellae are asymmetrical and inserted apically in the antennomere (versus basally inserted and symmetrical lamellae in S. biflabellata).

3.3.3. Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 3K,L, Figure 5B–F, Figure 6C, Figure 7C, Figure 8D, Figure 9F, Figure 10E,F, Figure 11E,F, Figure 12E,F, Figure 13D–F, Figure 14K,L, Figure 15E,F and Figure 16C,H.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A7F2C55C-933B-484D-B3D9-383527742DF1
Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Novo Aripuanã, Res. Soka gakkai, Malaise-ár. aberta, 06–10.xii.1999, J. Vidal//INPA-COL, 001245. Scissicauda aurata”. PARATYPE (♂, ♀, INPA, pinned, completely dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Reserva Ducke 6–8.x.21, Pensilvânia, luz negra, Bento & Bevilaqua legs.//Scissicauda aurata”.
Type locality: Brazil: Amazonas, Novo Aripuanã.
Distribution: Brazil: Amazonas, Manaus e Novo Aripuanã (see South Brazilian dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: Aurata is a Latin adjective meaning “golden”. Refers to the predominant color of that species.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half length of body (Figure 6C). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8D). Pygidium with posterior margin sub-rounded (Figure 11F). Sternum IX with posterior margin rounded. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12E–F). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, with phallic groove phallic groove in the basal half, moderately curved; phallic ventral plate at least 3× phallobase length; parameres curved dorsally, ventrobasal process rudimentary in the apical half of paramere (Figure 13D–F). Females (Figure 14K–L) with Sternum VIII longer than wide. Spiculum ventrale 3/4 sternum length (Figure 15E). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior slightly emarginated (Figure 15F).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall yellowish. Scape and pedicel light brown, antennomeres IV–IX blackish-brown, antennomeres X–XI yellowish (Figure 6C). Pronotum, elytron, hypomeron, sternites, legs and abdominal sternites yellowish. (Figure 7C). Pygidium anteriorly translucent and posteriorly yellowish (Figure 11F). Female. Antennomeres IX–XI yellowish.
Male. Antennae (Figure 6C) with the scape constricted basally, pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres IV–X subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X. Pronotum 1.3× wider than long (Figure 7C). Anterior, pro- and mesoclaws bifid, metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8D). Elytral expansion 1/3 of pronotal disc width (Figure 3K). Hind wing with cross-vein CuA1 more basal than MP3+4 split, cross-vein CuA3+4 absent. Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11E). Sternum IX with anterior margin rounded, slightly longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12E–F). Pygidium with posterior margin sub-rounded (Figure 11F). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, phallic groove at half length, moderately curved; ventral plate at least 3× phallobase length; parameres slightly curved dorsally (lateral view), ventrobasal process rudimentary in the apical half of paramere (Figure 13D–F). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, constricted at posterior third, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 3/4 sternum length (Figure 15F). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin slightly emarginated, constricted at posterior quarter (Figure 15E).
Remarks. S. aurata sp. nov. is similar to S. truncata sp. nov. and S. gomesi sp. nov. in having the posterolateral corners of the pygidium barely conspicuous and smaller than the median third (Figure 11B,F,J). Scissicauda aurata and S. neyi sp. nov. are the only ones with a pronotum completely yellowish (Figure 7C,I). S. aurata is unique by its integument color (almost entirely yellowish; Figure 3K,L), ventral plate of phallus at least 3× phallobase length (Figure 13F), parameres with ventrobasal process rudimentary in the apical half of paramere (Figure 13F).

3.3.4. Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 4A,B, Figure 5L–P, Figure 6H, Figure 7G, Figure 8H, Figure 9A, Figure 10O,P, Figure 11M,N, Figure 12L,M, Figure 13S–U, Figure 15A,B and Figure 16A,I.
urna:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E4CAD15D-2D72-47F8-ABE1-EA39D538FBF9
Type material. HOLOTYPE: (♂, DZUP, pinned) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 11.9.1969, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 429998//Scissicauda biflabellata, HOLOTYPE, det. Roza 2023.” PARATYPES: (♂, DZUP, pinned) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 8–14.X.1968, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 430019//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.” (♂, DZUP, pinned) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 11.VIII.1969, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 430015//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.” (♂, DZUP, pinned) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 11.IX.1969, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 429999//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.” (♂, DZUP, pinned) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 17.IX.1969, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 430017//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.” (♀, DZUP, pinned, abdomen dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 17.IX.1969, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 430016//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.” (♂, DZUP, pinned, entire specimen dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin) label data: “Dept° Zool, UF-Parana//Brazil. Espirito Santo. Conceição da Barra, 5.I.1970, C & C.T. Elias col.//DZUP 430018//Scissicauda biflabellata, PARATYPE, det. Roza 2023.”.
Type locality: Brazil. Espírito Santo, Conceição da Barra.
Distribution: Brazil. Espírito Santo, Conceição da Barra (see Parana dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: Biflabellata is a Latin adjective meaning “with double lamellae”.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, filiform, with basal double lamellae symmetrical in size (Figure 6H). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibial spurs symmetrical (Figure 8H). Pygidium strongly indented on both anterior and posterior margins, with lateral margins subparallel and posterior margin obliquely prolonged externally (Figure 11M,N). Sternum IX abruptly constricted anteriad at half its length, one-third longer than aedeagus, posterior margin convergent. Syntergite consisting of paired lateral plates joined posteriad (Figure 12L–M). Phallus dorsal plate rounded basally, phallic groove at half of its length, moderately curved; ventral plate subequal to phallobase length; parameres straight (lateral view), ventrobasal process digitiform, extending slightly beyond ventral plate, shorter than paramere itself (Figure 13S–U). Females with Sternum VIII longer than wide. Spiculum ventrale 3/4 the sternum length (Figure 15A). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin truncated (Figure 15B).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall blackish-brown (Figure 4B). Scape and pedicel brown, antennomeres IX–XI yellowish (Figure 6H). Pronotum largely yellowish at sides and with anterior portion of the expansion medially brown and laterally yellowish, with paired yellow parasagittal vittae at disc; hypomeron yellowish with lateral and ventral margins darkened (Figure 7G). Elytron with pale yellow lateral-longitudinal and sutural vittae (Figure 4A). Sternites blackish-brown, trochanters and femorae yellowish, tibiae and tarsi dark brown (Figure 4B). Abdominal sternites light brown (Figure 10O), except sternite VIII which is yellowish. Pygidium laterally and medially dark brownish (Figure 11N).
Male. Antennae with pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres III slightly smaller than IV, IV–X subequal in length, compressed, filiform, with basal double lamellae, lamellae almost 2× as long as antennomere IV, progressively smaller until antennomere X, which is one-third longer than antennomere; antennomere XI 1.5× longer than the X (Figure 6H). Pronotum 1.4× wider than long (Figure 7G). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibial spurs symmetrical (Figure 8H). Elytral expansion two-thirds of elytral disc width (Figure 4A). Hind wing with anterior cross-vein CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present (Figure 9A). Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginated (Figure 11M). Sternum IX abruptly constricted anteriad at half its length, one-third longer than aedeagus, posterior margin convergent (Figure 12L). Syntergite consisting of paired lateral plates joined posteriad (Figure 12M). Pygidium strongly indented on both anterior and posterior margins, with lateral margins subparallel and posterior margin obliquely prolonged externally (Figure 11N). Phallus dorsal plate rounded basally, phallic groove at half of its length, moderately curved; ventral plate subequal to phallobase length; parameres straight (lateral view), ventrobasal process digitiform, extending slightly beyond ventral plate, shorter than paramere itself (Figure 13S–U). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, convergent posteriorly, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 3/4 sternum length (Figure 15B). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin truncated, convergent posteriorly (Figure 15A).
Remarks. S. biflabellata sp. nov. (Figure 4A) is similar in dorsal color pattern (in general dark brown to light brown) to other “typical Scissicauda”. S. biflabellata shares biflabellate antennae with S. asymmetrica but with longer lamellae (Figure 6H) (versus short in S. asymmetrica).

3.3.5. Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 3I,J, Figure 5A–E, Figure 6E, Figure 7E, Figure 8E, Figure 9C, Figure 10I,J, Figure 11I,J, Figure 12I, Figure 13M–O, Figure 14M,N, Figure 15I,J and Figure 16E,N.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7A3DF14C-C12C-4D9B-AF0B-482E12B8F462
Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, PA, Repartimento, Vicinal 08, 042642S-, 495425W, 28.xi.2001, J.A., Rafael & J. Vidal, Malaise.//Scissicauda gomesi HOLOTYPE [red label]”. PARATYPES: (8 ♂, 1 ♀, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, PA, Repartimento, Vicinal 08, 042642S-, 495425W, 28.xi.2001, J.A., Rafael & J. Vidal, Malaise.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (3 ♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, PA, Tucuruí, Morro do Senador, 035923 S; 494445 W, 01.xii.2001, Malaise, J.A. Rafael & J. Vidal.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (1 ♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, Pará, Tucuruí, Ig. Água Fria, 035052S-, 494704W, 02.xii.2001.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (3 ♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, Pará, Tucuruí, Faz. Senador, 035948 S-, 494603 W, 01.xii.2001, J.A., Rafael & J. Vidal, Malaise.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (1 ♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, Pará, Tucuruí, Próx. Barragem, 02.xii., 2001, J.A.Rafael & J. Vidal, Malaise.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”.(1 ♂, MZUSP, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, PA, Abel Figueiredo, 4.850128° S 48.531963° W, 27.XI.2013, T. Camijo col.//Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (4 ♂, 1 ♀, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, MA, Vila Nova, dos Martirios, F. Sta Rosa//050707S-481519W, 06.xii., 2001, F.L. Oliveira &, J. Vidal, arm. Malaise. Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (7 ♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, MA, S. Pedro da, Água Branca, F. Esplanada, 045905S-480803W, 05.xii., 2001, J.A. Rafael; F.L., Oliveira & J. Vidal, Malaise. Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”. (2 ♂, 3 ♀, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, MA, S. Pedro da, Água Branca, F. Esplanada, 045905S-480803W, 07.xii., 2001, J.A. Rafael; F.L., Oliveira & J. Vidal, Malaise. Scissicauda gomesi PARATYPES [yellow label]”.
Type locality: Novo Repartimento, Pará, Brazil.
Distribution: Brazil, Pará, Novo Repartimento (see South-eastern Amazonian dominion in Figure 26) and Maranhão, Vila Nova (see Boreal Brazilian dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: This species was named in honor of the lampyrid researcher William Gomes, of the National Institute for Research in the Amazon, who helped locate and sort the specimens used in this paper.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half the length of the body (Figure 6E). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8E). Pygidium with the length of median region longer than posterior angles (Figure 11J). Sternum IX with posterior margin rounded. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates, connected by membrane, with a long projection on the posterior margin of each plate (Figure 12I). Phallus dorsal plate subtruncate basally, reaching half the length of the phallobase, phallic groove moderately curved, phallic ventral plate as long as the paramere length, base of paramere nearby in the ventral region, paramere ventrobasal process short, in basal third of paramere, paramere slightly curved dorsally in lateral view (Figure 13M–O). Females (Figure 14M–N) with Sternum VIII longer than wide. Spiculum ventrale 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15I). Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin truncated (Figure 15J).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall blackish-brown to light brown. Scape and pedicel blackish-brown to light brown, antennomeres X–XI blackish-brown, and apex of XI light brown (Figure 6E). Pronotum largely yellowish at sides and slenderly anterior at the disc; disc blackish-brown (Figure 7E) and hypomeron yellowish. Elytron with pale yellow lateral-longitudinal, sutural margin blackish-brown and outer lateral line light brown (Figure 3I). Sternites, coxae, trochanters, femora and abdominal sternites blackish-brown to light brown (Figure 3J). Pygidium overall blackish-brown, with anterior corners yellowish pale (Figure 11J).
Male. Antennae (Figure 6E) with scape constricted basally, pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres IV–XI subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X. Pronotum 1.2× wider than long (Figure 7E). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid, metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8E). Elytral expansion almost 1/3 of pronotal disc width (Figure 3I). Hind wing with cross-vein CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present, forming a continuous line. Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate, pygidium with the length of median region longer than the posterior angles (Figure 11I). Sternum IX with anterior margin rounded, slightly longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates, connected by a membrane, with a long projection on the posterior margin of each plate (Figure 12I). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, dorsal plate arms projecting ventrally, embracing the ventral plate, with apical margin rounded, phallic grooves at half length, moderately curved; ventral plate almost as long than phallobase, with a row of bristles on the side margins; parameres slightly curved dorsally (lateral view), base of paramere nearby in the ventral region, parameres ventrobasal process rudimentary (Figure 13M–O). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, constricted at posterior third, posterior margin slightly emarginated. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15N). Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin truncated, convergent posteriorly (Figure 15M).
Remarks. S. gomesi sp. nov. is similar to S. antennata sp. nov. by the overall coloration of integument (blackish-brown to light brown; Figure 3C,I). S. gomesi is unique among the aforementioned species in having a posterior projection in the syntergite (absent in the other species) and by the length of the ventral phallus plate as long as the phallobase (Figure 13O).

3.3.6. Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 3G,H, Figure 5D–H, Figure 6D, Figure 7D, Figure 8C, Figure 9B, Figure 10G,H, Figure 11G,H, Figure 12G,H, Figure 13J–L, Figure 14G,H, Figure 15G,H and Figure 16D,M.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A7D01EBD-28F7-4321-814A-F8817ED78811
Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, RO, Itapuã do Oeste, Flona Jamari, Igarapé Preto, 09°11′16.0″ S–62°56′57.0″ W//07.x.2014, Varredura, J.A., Rafael, F.F. Xavier F°, R.M., Vieira & R.H. Aquino.//Scissicauda jamari HOLOTYPE [red label]”. PARATYPES: (1 ♂, 2 ♀, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, RO, Itapuã do Oeste, Flona Jamari, Igarapé Preto, 09°11′16.0″ S–62°56′57.0″ W//07.x.2014, Varredura, J.A., Rafael, F.F. Xavier F°, R.M., Vieira & R.H. Aquino.//Scissicauda jamari PARATYPE [yellow label]”. (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Reserva Ducke 6–8.x.21, Lençol, luz mista, Bento & Bevilaqua legs. Scissicauda jamari PARATYPE [yellow label]”. (3 ♂, INPA), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Manicoré, cachoeira. 05°29′44″ S; 60°, 49′21″ W. Malaise de solo, Floresta úmida. ix.2004, Silva & Pena leg. Scissicauda jamari PARATYPE [yellow label]”. (3 ♂, INPA), label data: “BRAZIL, Amazonas, Reserva F. Ducke, Malaise. 04.ix.1990., J. Vidal. Scissicauda jamari PARATYPE [yellow label]”.
Type locality: Brazil, Rondônia, Itapuã do Oeste, Flona Jamari.
Distribution: Brazil, Rondônia, Itapuã do Oeste (see South Brazilian dominion in Figure 26) e Amazonas, Manaus e Manicoré (see Boreal Brazilian dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: The specific epithet is based on the Jamari National Forest, a Sustainable Use Conservation Unit located in the municipality of Itapuã do Oeste, in Rondônia, where the type specimen was collected. Noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half length of body (Figure 6D). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical, exceeding half the length of the first tarsomere (Figure 8C). Pygidium with the length of posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin emarginate, 3× smaller than the greatest width of pygidium (Figure 11H). Sternum IX with posterior margin rounded. Syntergite divided into two plates connected by a membrane, with the posterior region with a long projection (Figure 12G–H). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, slightly projected but not reaching half the length of the phallobase, phallic groove moderately curved, phallic ventral plate symmetrically or asymmetrically, paramere ventrobasal process short, at apical 2/3, parameres slightly curved dorsally in the lateral view (Figure 13J–L). Females (Figure 14G–H) with Sternum VIII longer than wide. Spiculum ventrale 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15G). Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin emarginated (Figure 15H).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall yellowish to blackish-brown. Scape, pedicel and antennomeres XI yellowish to light brown, III–X and apex of IX yellowish, antennomeres V–VIII and ¾ basal of IX blackish-brown (Figure 6D). Pronotum largely yellowish at sides and anterior margin, disc with central and posterior regions blackish-brown (Figure 7D), hypomeron yellowish. Elytron completely blackish-brown or with lateral-longitudinal vittae, sutural margin, and outer lateral line yellowish (Figure 3G). Sternites yellowish to blackish-brown, coxae, trochanters, and femora yellowish to blackish-brown. Abdominal sternites yellowish to light brown (Figure 3H). Pygidium overall brown, anterior corner pale yellow (Figure 11H).
Male. Antennae (Figure 6D) with scape constricted basally, pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres IV–X subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X. Pronotum 1.3× wider than long (Figure 7D). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical, exceeding half the length of the first tarsomere (Figure 8C). Elytral expansion 1/3 of pronotal disc width (Figure 3G). Hind wing with cross-veins CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present, forming a continuous line (Figure 9B). Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11G). Sternum IX with anterior margin rounded, 1.2× longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12G–H). Pygidium with the length of the posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin emarginate, 3x smaller than the greatest width of pygidium. Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, phallic groove at half-length, moderately curved; ventral plate 2.5× longer than phallobase; parameres curved dorsally in lateral view, ventrobasal process rudimentary (Figure 13J–L). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, convergent posteriorly, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15H). Pygidium with anterior margin almost straight, posterior margin slightly emarginated, constricted at the posterior quarter (Figure 15G).
Remarks. S. jamari sp. nov. is similar to S. antennata sp. nov. and S. malleri comb. nov. in having metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical (Figure 8A–C). The general yellowish coloration of the integument of S. jamari sp. nov. is superficially similar to S. aurata sp. nov., except in variations with blackish-brown integument (Figure 3K,L). Scissicauda jamari can be distinguished from other species by having the length of the ventral phallus plate twice longer than the phallobase (Figure 13L).

3.3.7. Scissicauda malleri (Pic, 1935) comb. nov.

Figure 3E,F, Figure 5I–M, Figure 6G, Figure 7F, Figure 8A, Figure 9H, Figure 10K,L, Figure 11K,L Figure 12N–O, Figure 13Y–AA, Figure 14O,P, Figure 15M,N and Figure 16G,H, Supplementary Material S3.
Type material. HOLOTYPE (Supplementary Material S3) (♂, MNHN, pinned), label data: voi Lucidota imcopta//Lucidota malleri//Ma 248, h, 12//TYPE”.
Examined material. (4 ♂, DZRJ, pinned), label data: “MG, RPPN Caraça, 19–20/XI/22, Trilha do Tanque, Pensilvania, M. L. Monné//Scissicauda malleri”. (1 ♀, DZRJ, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, RIO DE JANEIRO, Parque Nacional de Itatiaia, 2018, A. Soares col.//Scissicauda malleri”. (1 ♂, DZRJ, pinned), label data: “Serra do Caraça, MG BRAZIL, 27.XI a 5.xii.1972, Exp. Mus. Zool.//Scissicauda malleri”. (2♂, UFRJ, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, MG, Passa Quatro, Roza, Leocádio col.//Scissicauda malleri”. (1♂, DZRJ, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, MG, Passa Quatro, 26.xi.2016 Mermudes, Roza, Leocádio e Lopez col.//Scissicauda malleri”. (4 ♂, MNRJ, pinned), label data: “MG. RPPN Caraça, 19.20/XI/22, Trilha do Tanque, Pensilvania, M.L.Monné//Scissicauda malleri”. (1 ♀, MNRJ, pinned), label data: “Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, 2018, A. Soares col.//MNRJ- ENT7-43147//Scissicauda malleri”.
Type locality: Corupá, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Distribution: Brazil, Santa Catarina, Corupá; Rio de Janeiro, Parque Nacional de Itatiaia; Minas Gerais, Passa Quatro e Serra do Caraça (see Parana dominion in Figure 26).
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half the length of the body (Figure 6G). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical, less than half the length of the first tarsomere (Figure 8A). Pygidium with the length of posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin indented, 3× smaller than the greatest width of pygidium (Figure 11L). Sternum IX with posterior margin lanceolate. Syntergite divided into two plates connected by a membrane (Figure 12N–O). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, slightly projected but not reaching half the length of the phallobase, phallic groove moderately curved, phallic ventral plate with apical margin strongly emarginate, parameres slightly curved dorsally (lateral view), ventrobasal process rudimentary, almost in the middle of paramere (Figure 13Y–AA).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall yellowish to blackish-brown. Scape, pedicel and antennomeres XI blackish-brown (Figure 6G). Pronotum yellowish, disc blackish-brown (Figure 7F); hypomeron yellowish. Elytron entirely yellowish (Figure 3E). Sternites yellowish to blackish-brown, coxae, trochanters, and femora yellowish to blackish-brown. Abdominal sternites yellowish to light brown (Figure 3F). Pygidium overall yellowish (Figure 11L).
Male. Antennae (Figure 6G) with scape constricted basally, pedicel with lateral margins divergent apically; antennomeres IV–XI subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X. Pronotum 1.4× wider than long (Figure 7F). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs asymmetrical, less than half length of first tarsomere (Figure 8A). Elytral expansion 1/3 of the elytra width (Figure 3E). Hind wing with cross-vein CuA1 (more apical than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 present. Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11K). Sternum IX with anterior margin lanceolate, almost longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12N–O). Pygidium with the length of posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin indented, 3× smaller than the greatest width of pygidium (Figure 12L). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, slightly projected but not reaching half the length of the phallobase, phallic groove at half-length, moderately curved; ventral plate 1.7× longer than phallobase, with apical margin strongly emarginate; parameres slightly curved dorsally (lateral view), ventrobasal process rudimentary (Figure 13Y–AA). Female. Sternum VIII longer than wide, rounded, constricted at posterior third, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 3/4 sternum length (Figure 15N). Pygidium with anterior margin indented medially, posterior margin rounded (Figure 15M).
Remarks. S. malleri sp. nov. is superficially similar to S. antennata sp. nov., S. neyi sp. nov. and S. gomesi sp. nov. in having the antennae entirely blackish-brown (Figure 3A,E–G). S. malleri is unique among the aforementioned species in having sternum IX with posterior margin acuminate (Figure 12N). Additionally, we noted that the reference cited in McDermott (1966) for the original description of Lucidota malleri should be corrected to: Pic, M. 1935. Mélanges Exotico Entomologiques, 66 (i.e., instead of Êchange LI, 1935, p. 9).

3.3.8. Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 4E,F, Figure 5K–O, Figure 6F, Figure 7I, Figure 8F, Figure 9G, Figure 10M,N, Figure 11Q,R, Figure 12P,Q and Figure 13P–R.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3C9370C5-3145-45AE-839B-38DA940D8165.
Type material. Holotype. (♂, DZUP, stored in alcohol), label data: “Brasil, MT, Chapada dos Guimarães, P1.1, 12–18.XI.2013, Malaise, G. Melo col.” Paratypes. (22 ♂, DZUP, pinned, 1 dissected and stored in microvial with glycerin). (8 ♂, MZSP, stored in alcohol) label data: “Brasil, MS, Aquidauana, Malaise, 08, 20°25′59″ S, 55°39′20.8″ W, 11–26.XI.2011, Lamas, Nihei e Eq. col. Sisbiota CNPq Fapesp”
Type locality: Brazil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimarães.
Distribution: Brazil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimarães; Mato Grosso do Sul, Aquidauana (see Chacoan dominion in Figure 26).
Etymology: This species was named in honor of Ney de Souza Pereira, known by the stage name of Ney Matogrosso. Ney is a shining artist originally from the Mato Grosso state, where part of the type series, including the holotype, was collected.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half length of body (Figure 6F). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two symmetrical spurs (Figure 8F). Pygidium with the length of posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin emarginate, 2× smaller than the greatest width of pygidium (Figure 11R). Sternum IX with posterior margin truncate and slightly emarginate. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12P–Q). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, fleebly projected, barely reaching the phallobase, phallic groove moderately curved, phallic ventral plate symmetrically Y-shaped, paramere ventrobasal process short, slightly past the height of phallic groove, parameres almost straight in the lateral view (Figure 13P–R).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall yellowish to blackish-brown. Scape, pedicel and antennomeres III yellowish to light brown, antennomeres IV–XI blackish-brown (Figure 6F). Pronotum largely yellowish at sides and anterior margin, disc orange-yellowish, sometimes with central paired longitudinal brownish macula (Figure 7I); hypomeron yellowish. Elytron with lateral-longitudinal vittae, sutural margin and outer lateral line yellowish (Figure 4E). Prosternum yellowish brown, meso- and metasternum blackish-brown, coxae, trochanters, and femora yellowish to blackish-brown. Abdominal sternites light brown to blackish-brown, with yellowish margins (Figure 4F). Pygidium medially light brown, anterior corners whiteish, lateral and posterior margins yellowish brown (Figure 11R).
Male. Antennae with scape constricted basally, pedicel as long as wide and constricted medially; III–X antennomeres compressed, serrate, III–IX slightly crescent in length, IX and X subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X (Figure 6F). Pronotum 1.1–1.2× wider than long, anterior margin rounded, lateral margins subparallel (Figure 7I). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two symmetrical spurs (Figure 8F). Elytral expansion 1/3 of pronotal disc width (Figure 4E). Hind wing with cross-vein CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 forming a continuous line (Figure 9G). Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11Q). Sternum IX with anterior margin truncate and slightly emarginate, 1.2× longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 11P–Q). Pygidium with the length of posterior angles longer than the median region, with sides rounded, anterior margin emarginate, 2× smaller than the greatest width of pygidium (Figure 11R). Phallus dorsal plate strongly rounded basally, feebly projected, barely reaching the phallobase, phallic groove slightly past the half-length, moderately curved, phallus ventral plate symmetrically Y-shaped, 1.5× longer than phallobase, paramere almost straight (lateral view), ventrobasal process short, slightly past the height of phallic groove (Figure 13P–R).
Female. Unknown.
Remarks. Scissicauda neyi sp. nov. is the only Scissicauda species with a pronotum with an anterior expansion almost 2× longer than lateral expansion (Figure 7I). All the other species have anterior expansion up to 1.7× greater than lateral expansion. S. neyi sp. nov. is also the first species of this genus known from the Cerrado biome (Figure 26).

3.3.9. Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. Zeballos, Roza, and Silveira

Figure 3A,B, Figure 5J–N, Figure 6B, Figure 7A, Figure 8G, Figure 9E, Figure 10A,B, Figure 11A,B, Figure 12A,B, Figure 13A–C, Figure 14A,B, Figure 15C,D and Figure 16B,K.
urna:lsid:zoobank.org:act:529EE2A3-6702-4F85-B741-760245F861C2.
Type material. HOLOTYPE (♂, INPA, pinned), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Reserva Ducke 6–8.x.21, Pensilvânia, luz negra, Bento & Bevilaqua legs. Scissicauda truncata HOLOTYPE”. PARATYPES: (3 ♂, INPA), label data: “BRAZIL, AM, Reserva Ducke 6–8.x.21, Pensilvânia, luz negra, Bento & Bevilaqua legs. Scissicauda truncata PARATYPES. (♂, INPA), label data: “BRAZIL, Amazonas, Manaus- INPA, 22-x-1979, Jorge Arias. Scissicauda truncata PARATYPES [yellow label]”.
Type locality: Fragment of the Ducke Reserve, in Manaus, close to the accommodations.
Etymology: “Truncata” is a Latin adjective that means “truncate”. Refers to the shape of the posterior margin of the pygidium.
Diagnosis. Males with antennomere compressed, serrate, with antennal lamellae absent, slightly longer than half length of body (Figure 6B). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8G). Pygidium with posterior margin truncate, anterior margin slightly emarginate, with sides rounded (Figure 11B). Sternum IX with posterior margin oval. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, with posterior projection absent (Figure 12A,B). Phallus dorsal plate subtruncate basally, not reaching half the length of the phallobase, phallic groove strongly curved, phallic ventral plate as long as the paramere length, paramere ventrobasal process short, at the height of phallic groove, paramere almost straight in lateral view (Figure 13A–C). Females (Figure 14A,B) with Sternum VIII as long as wide. Spiculum ventrale 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15C). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin truncated (Figure 15D).
Description. Color pattern. Integument overall blackish-brown to yellowish. Scape, pedicel and antennomere III brown to yellowish, antennomere IV–VIII and base of IX blackish-brown, apex of antennomere IX and antennomeres X–XI yellowish (Figure 6B). Pronotum yellowish at sides and anterior margin, central region of disc brown (Figure 7A), hypomeron yellowish. Elytron with yellowish lateral-longitudinal, sutural margin blackish-brown and outer lateral line yellowish (Figure 3A). Sternites, trochanters and coxae yellowish, femora yellowish to blackish-brown. Abdominal sternites brown to yellowish (Figure 3B). Pygidium dark brown and anterior angles creamy white (Figure 11B).
Male. Antennae with scape constricted basally, pedicel almost as long as wide and constricted medially; antennomeres III–X subequal in length, XI slightly longer than the X (Figure 6B). Pronotum 1.2× wider than long (Figure 7A). Anterior pro- and mesoclaws bifid. Metatibia with two spurs symmetrical (Figure 8G). Elytral expansion 1/3 of pronotal disc width (Figure 3A). Hind wing with cross-vein CuA1 (more basal than MP3+4 split) and CuA3+4 forming a continuous line (Figure 9E). Sternum VIII with posterior margin emarginate (Figure 11A). Sternum IX with anterior margin oval, 1.4× longer than aedeagus. Syntergite divided into two asymmetrical plates connected by a membrane, without posterior projection (Figure 12A–B). Pygidium with posterior margin truncate, with sides rounded (Figure 11B). Phallus dorsal plate subtruncate basally, phallic groove at half length, moderately curved; ventral plate almost as long as phallobase; parameres ventrobasal process rudimentary, parameres slightly curved dorsally in the lateral view (Figure 13A–C). Female. Sternum VIII as long as wide, rounded, convergent posteriorly, posterior margin indented medially. Spiculum ventrale long and slender, 2/4 sternum length (Figure 15D). Pygidium with anterior margin emarginated, posterior margin truncated, convergent posteriorly (Figure 15C).
Remarks. In the aedeagus, the shape of the dorsal (Figure 13A,P,Y) and ventral phallus plate (Figure 3C,R,AA) of S. truncata sp. nov. (Figure 3A) is similar to S. malleri sp. nov. (Figure 3E) and S. neyi sp. nov. (Figure 4E). S. truncata is distinct from these other two species by its pygidium with posterior margin truncate and posterior angles not developed (versus posterior angles of the pygidium well-developed in S. neyi and S. malleri) (Figure 11B).
Diversity 15 00620 g014 550
Figure 14. Female habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda antennata. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda malleri comb. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–F,I–L, O–P); 3 mm (G,H,M,N).
Figure 14. Female habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda antennata. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (O,P) Scissicauda malleri comb. nov. Scale bar: 2 mm (A–F,I–L, O–P); 3 mm (G,H,M,N).
Diversity 15 00620 g014
Diversity 15 00620 g015 550
Figure 15. Pygidium, dorsal view (A,C,E,G,I,K,M) and Sternum VIII, ventral view (B,D,F,H,J,L,N). (A,B) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda malleri. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–N).
Figure 15. Pygidium, dorsal view (A,C,E,G,I,K,M) and Sternum VIII, ventral view (B,D,F,H,J,L,N). (A,B) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (C,D) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (E,F) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (I,J) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (K,L) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (M,N) Scissicauda malleri. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g015
Diversity 15 00620 g016 550
Figure 16. Ovipositor, dorsal view (A–G) and Internal anatomy of the reproductive tract (H–N). (A,I) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (B,K) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,H) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D,M) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E,N) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F,J) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda malleri. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–N).
Figure 16. Ovipositor, dorsal view (A–G) and Internal anatomy of the reproductive tract (H–N). (A,I) Scissicauda biflabellata sp. nov. (B,K) Scissicauda truncata sp. nov. (C,H) Scissicauda aurata sp. nov. (D,M) Scissicauda jamari sp. nov. (E,N) Scissicauda gomesi sp. nov. (F,J) Scissicauda asymmetrica sp. nov. (G,H) Scissicauda malleri. Scale bar: 1 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g016

4. Discussion

Our study led to a significant expansion of Scissicauda, with the addition of eight species—seven described as new and one moved from Lucidota, S. malleri comb. nov. Our findings have important unfoldings for the classification, distribution [36], and evolution of Scissicauda and its neighboring branches.

4.1. Phylogeny of Scissicauda

Our analyses agree upon (i) the monophyly of Scissicauda sensu nov., (ii) the existence of two large clades—“typical” and “atypical” Scissicauda, and (iii) the species relationships among “typical Scissicauda” species.
The monophyly of Scissicauda sensu nov. was rather surprising, given their disparate external morphology, particularly regarding their sensory and abdominal traits. Previously known Scissicauda species had flabellate or serrate male antennae [9], and here, we described species with symmetrical and asymmetrical biflabellate antennae. Likewise, both previously known Scissicauda species had abdominal modifications, and we expanded this genus concept to include species with simple terminalia. Below, we discuss the meanings of these results.
Noteworthy, “typical” and “atypical” Scissicauda vary substantially in external characters traditionally used in lampyrid classification (e.g., shape of the antennae, sternum VIII, and pygidium; see in McDermott 1964). In contrast, our phylogenetic analyses recovered a monophyletic Scissicauda sensu nov. based on interesting synapomorphic traits of the aedeagus (i.e., Character 66:1, Character 68:2, Character 91:1, Character 92:1, and Character 104:1), many of which are newly delimited here. These results highlight the value of terminalia and genitalic traits in Photinini taxonomy at the genus- and species levels, as found elsewhere [24].
“Typical” Scissicauda species differ substantially in the morphology of male antennae and terminalia, which are otherwise less labile across “atypical” Scissicauda. Regarding the “typical” Scissicauda, our analyses agree that S. disjuncta, with flabellate antennae, is sister to S. balena (S. asymmetrica + S. biflabellata). S. balena males have serrate antennae, whereas S. asymmetrica and S. biflabellata males have biflabellate antennae. This remarkable antennal variation among closely related species is unprecedented for any lampyrid genus, and points to a faster evolution of this structure in this lineage, possibly including multiple gains and losses of lamellae.
Conversely, such an antennal diversification is not seen in “atypical” Scissicauda, in which serrate antennae are predominant in all species. One possible explanation for this pattern is that males of “typical” Scissicauda were subjected to higher selective pressure on sensory perception (except for S. balena, which has serrated antennae) than the “atypical” Scissicauda. Elsewhere in Photinini, males of most genera have simple (filiform or serrate) antennae, lacking lamellae [12]. Some Photinini males have flabellate antennae (e.g., several Lucidota and Costalampys spp.), but biflabellate antennae were previously unknown. In our work, we described the first Scissicauda—and therefore, Photinini—species with biflabellate antennae. Thus, biflabellate antennae independently evolved in at least three subfamilies (Cyphonocerinae, Lampyrinae, and Psilocladinae), and at least three times just within Lampyrinae, namely in Lamprocerini, Pleotomini, and Photinini (i.e., Scissicauda) [2,37,38].
The relationship among “atypical” Scissicauda varied across analyses. For example, the EW consensus recovers the branch (S. aurata + S. truncata + S. gomesi) in a polytomy with the other four species of “atypical Scissicauda” (Figure 1), while the BI recovers (S. neyi + (S. malleri + S. jamari + S. antennata)) in a polytomy with the other three species. Furthermore, IW recovers ((S. aurata + S. truncata + S. gomesi) + (S. neyi + (S. malleri + S. jamari + S. antennata))) (Figure 2). The unsteady topology and the low supports within “atypical” Scissicauda may be linked to their grouping based on homoplastic characters. For example, in the MPEW analysis (Figure 1), in the branch (S. aurata + S. truncata + S. gomesi) within the “atypical” Scissicauda, all characteristics are homoplastic, shared with the other “atypical” Scissicauda (i.e., Character 105:0) or other genera (i.e., Character 47:1 in Pyropyga; Character 48:0 in Costalampys).
We recovered only one potential synapomorphy of the “atypical” Scissicaud: the anterior third of the pygidium is narrower than sternum VIII (MPEW, Character 40:1). However, this is missing in S. truncata, S. aurata, and S. gomesi (Figure 1), which may be a reversal. Furthermore, we see in the terminalia of the “atypical Scissicauda” a sternum IX partially exposed and a relatively stouter syntergite, which is not posteriorly fused to the sternum IX. The physiological consequences of such differences for the species’ reproductive biology are yet to be gathered from observations of mating behavior.
The group (S. antennata + S. malleri + S. jamari) found in IW and IB (Figure 2) shares a modification indirectly related to copulation. For these three species, one side of each pair of metatibial spurs is longer, making each pair asymmetrical (Figure 8A–C). We hypothesize that this feature may function to stimulate and to hold the female down during mating by inducing forced insemination and/or preventing other males from gaining access to the female, similar to the hooked elytral tips and terminalia of Pteroptyx and Luciuranus, respectively [38,39].
Interestingly, the aedeagal morphology is distinctly more disparate among the sympatric species S. truncata, S. aurata, and S. jamari (Figure 26). This pattern could be explained by evolutionary reinforcement preventing hybridization in sympatric species [40,41]. Gathering data on female internal morphology across species would be critical to explore the possibility of a “lock-and-key scenario”. However, females of some Scissicauda species remain unknown.
Our analyses showed that the presence of long pygidium posterior corners (Character 48:2), sternum VIII longer than sternum VII (Character 36), sternum IX partially exposed (Character 60:1) and toothed claws (Character 26:1; Character 28:1) are homoplastic synapomorphies across Lampyrinae genera. The presence of these characters may allow for greater stability during copulation, as hypothesized for Haplocauda ([5]; this paper).
In our analysis, longer segment VIII (pygidium and sternum VIII) connects Haplocauda and Scissicauda, as previously observed [5]. However, only the “typical” Scissicauda present this apomorphy, rendering two equally plausible scenarios: either the elongation of this segmentevolved twice independently, or this represents the ancestral state secondarily reversed in the “atypical” Scissicauda.
Our study was the first to recover Pyractonema + Pyropyga and place this node sister to Scissicauda + Haplocauda using morphological data. This is in agreement with DNA-based analyses, which recovered (Pyractonema + Pyropyga) + Scissicauda [2]. Our work sheds light on the morphological traits supporting these relationships and on the morphological evolution in these lineages and contributes to future revisionary taxonomic works on Photinini. The sister relationship of (Pyractonema + Pyropyga) + (Haplocauda + Scissicauda) is linked to different mobility of the mouthparts (Character 9:1) and a different form of coupling for sperm transfer (Character 50:1; Character 52:1; Character 68:0; Character 69:2). How these traits impact the animals’ physiology remains unknown. The convergent recovery of this clade across different kinds of datasets ([2]; this work) highlights the need for an update in the subtribal classification of Photinini, since they are from different subtribes: Pyropyga from Photinina and Pyractonema from Lucidotina.
Interestingly, all species in these four taxa lack functional adult lanterns (on sterna VI and VI; common across lampyrids) and are mostly restricted to South America, with the exception of Pyropyga, in which a few species reach Central and North America [12,42]. Pyropyga was recently introduced in Japan, supposedly by humans [43].

4.2. On Lucidota, Again

Lucidota is the second-largest genus of Photinini, with about 150 species distributed across South, Central, and North America. This genus is poorly defined, very likely artificial and was traditionally a taxonomic “wastebin”. In fact, the diagnosis of Lucidota overlaps with many other Photinini genera, which complicates the taxonomy of this tribe [3,4,12]. As such, many Lucidota species likely belong elsewhere, as mirrored in the many transfers recently made to other Photinini genera, including Dilychnia and Costalampys [3,4].
Important steps towards the revision of Lucidota have been recently taken, including the revision and phylogenetic analysis of select species—particularly upon the inclusion of the type L. banoni, which subsidized nomenclatural changes [3,4]. Thus, by including a few Lucidota species in phylogenetic analyses with a broader Photinini sampling, our group paved a way towards the clarification of this genus taxonomy.
The three Lucidota species in our sampling were found far apart from each other, consistent with the clearly artificial nature of this taxon. Our study provides another step towards a revision and better definition of the genus by (i) providing a phylogenetic basis for transferring a former Lucidota species to Scissicauda (thus generating S. malleri comb. nov.), (ii) recovering Lucidota atra sister of Phosphaenus and Phosphaenopterus (consistent with the topology in 2), (iii) recovering Lucidota banoni sister of Ybytyramoan, and (iv) confirming the polyphyletic nature of Lucidota and identifying meaningful differences among its species.
Diversity 15 00620 g017 550
Figure 17. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). (O,P) Vesta thoracica (G. Olivier, 1790). Scale bar: 2.5 mm (A–P).
Figure 17. Male habitus, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). (O,P) Vesta thoracica (G. Olivier, 1790). Scale bar: 2.5 mm (A–P).
Diversity 15 00620 g017
Diversity 15 00620 g018 550
Figure 18. Head capsule, frontal and occipital views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Figure 18. Head capsule, frontal and occipital views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g018
Diversity 15 00620 g019 550
Figure 19. Antenna, lateral view. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 1 mm (A–G).
Figure 19. Antenna, lateral view. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 1 mm (A–G).
Diversity 15 00620 g019
Diversity 15 00620 g020 550
Figure 20. Male pronotum, dorsal view. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). (H) Vesta thoracica. Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–H).
Figure 20. Male pronotum, dorsal view. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). (H) Vesta thoracica. Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–H).
Diversity 15 00620 g020
Diversity 15 00620 g021 550
Figure 21. Detail of tarsus and claws: proleg, mesoleg, and metaleg, respectively. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 1 mm (A–G).
Figure 21. Detail of tarsus and claws: proleg, mesoleg, and metaleg, respectively. (A) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (B) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (C) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (D) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (E) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier 1790). (F) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (G) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 1 mm (A–G).
Diversity 15 00620 g021
Diversity 15 00620 g022 550
Figure 22. Abdominal sclerites, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F), Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 2 mm (A–N).
Figure 22. Abdominal sclerites, dorsal and ventral views. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F), Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 2 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g022
Diversity 15 00620 g023 550
Figure 23. Sternum VIII, ventral view and pygidium, dorsal view. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Figure 23. Sternum VIII, ventral view and pygidium, dorsal view. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g023
Diversity 15 00620 g024 550
Figure 24. Syntergite, dorsal view and sternite IX, ventral view. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Figure 24. Syntergite, dorsal view and sternite IX, ventral view. (A,B) Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (C,D) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (E,F) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte, 1852). (G,H) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (I,J) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (K,L) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (M,N) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A–N).
Diversity 15 00620 g024
Diversity 15 00620 g025 550
Figure 25. Aedeagus, dorsal and ventral views. (A–C), Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (D–F) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (G–I) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte 1852). (J–L) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (M–O) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (P–R) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (S–U) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.25 mm (A–U).
Figure 25. Aedeagus, dorsal and ventral views. (A–C), Pyractonema compressicornis Solier, 1849. (D–F) Pyractonema haemorrhoa (Fairmaire & Germain, 1861). (G–I) Pyropyga minuta (LeConte 1852). (J–L) Pyropyga nigricans (Say, 1823). (M–O) Lucidota atra (G. Olivier, 1790). (P–R) Photinus pyralis (Linnaeus, 1758). (S–U) Photinus corruscus (Linnaeus, 1767). Scale bar: 0.25 mm (A–U).
Diversity 15 00620 g025
Diversity 15 00620 g026 550
Figure 26. Distribution of Scissicauda species on a map superimposed with the biogeographic provinces as in Morrone et al. 2022. Above the “atypical Scissicauda” species and below the “typical Scissicauda”.
Figure 26. Distribution of Scissicauda species on a map superimposed with the biogeographic provinces as in Morrone et al. 2022. Above the “atypical Scissicauda” species and below the “typical Scissicauda”.
Diversity 15 00620 g026

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15050620/s1: Supplementary Materials S1. Material examined of the outgroup taxa. Supplementary Materials S2. Data matrix, as simplified nexus. Supplementary Materials S3. Lucidota malleri, holotype. Male habitus (A), dorsal (B), ventral (C), and left metaleg (D).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.Z. and L.F.L.d.S.; methodology, L.F.L.d.S. and A.S.R.; software, L.F.L.d.S. and A.S.R.; validation, L.F.Z. and L.F.L.d.S.; formal analysis, L.F.L.d.S. and A.S.R.; investigation, L.F.Z., A.S.R., L.C.-G., S.V., S.C.R. and L.F.L.d.S.; resources, C.R.V.D.F. and L.F.L.d.S.; data curation, L.F.Z., A.S.R., L.C.-G., S.V., S.C.R. and L.F.L.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.F.Z., A.S.R., L.C.-G., S.V., S.C.R. and L.F.L.d.S.; writing—review and editing, L.F.Z., A.S.R., L.C.-G., S.V., S.C.R. and L.F.L.d.S.; visualization, L.F.Z., A.S.R., L.C.-G., S.V., S.C.R. and L.F.L.d.S.; supervision, L.F.L.d.S.; project administration, L.F.L.d.S.; and funding acquisition, C.R.V.D.F. and L.F.L.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Several specimens included in the study were dissected under equipment funded by NSF#2001683 CSBR: Natural History: Development of the Catamount Biological Collections to Enhance Biodiversity Research and Education in Southern Appalachia. L.F.Z. was funded by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM)-POSGRAD Fellowship. A.S.R. was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) fellowship 150747/2022-5. L.C-G. was funded by the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) E-26/204.036/2022. S.V. funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. C.R.V.F. was funded by Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação – Brasil (MCTI) - PRJ 12.303. L.F.L.S. and S.C.R. were funded by NSF#2001683 CSBR: Natural History: Development of the Catamount Biological Collections to Enhance Biodiversity Research and Education in Southern Appalachia.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and its supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sonia Casari (MZSP), Marcio Oliveira (INPA), Marc Branham (USNM), A. Mantilleri (MNHN), and Lucia Massuti (UFPR) for granting access to specimens included in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ferreira, V.S.; Keller, O.; Branham, M.A. Multilocus Phylogeny Support the Nonbioluminescent Firefly Chespirito as a New Subfamily in the Lampyridae (Coleoptera: Elateroidea). Insect Syst. Divers. 2020, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Martin, G.J.; Stanger-Hall, K.F.; Branham, M.A.; Silveira LFLDa Lower, S.E.; Hall, D.W.; Li, X.Y.; Lemmon, A.R.; Lemmon, E.M.; Bybee, S.M. Higher-Level Phylogeny and Reclassification of Lampyridae (Coleoptera: Elateroidea). Insect Syst. Divers. 2019, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vaz, S.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Paiva, P.C.; Da Silveira, L.F.L. Systematic review and phylogeny of the firefly genus Dilychnia (Lampyridae: Lampyrinae), with notes on geographical range. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2020, 190, 844–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silveira, L.F.L.; Roza, S.A.; Vaz, S.; Mermudes, J.R.M. Description and phylogenetic analysis of a new firefly genus from the Atlantic Rainforest, with five new species and new combinations (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Lampyrinae). Arthropod Syst. Phylogeny 2021, 79, 79–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. da Silveira, L.F.L.; Lima, W.; da Fonseca, C.R.V.; McHugh, J. Haplocauda, a New Genus of Fireflies Endemic to the Amazon Rainforest (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Insects 2022, 13, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zaragoza-Caballero, S.; Zurita-García, M.L.; Ramírez-Ponce, A. The on–off pattern in the evolution of the presence of bioluminescence in a derived lineage from fireflies of Mexico (Coleoptera, Lampyridae). Zool. Anz. 2023, 302, 266–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silveira, L.F.L.; Mermudes, J.R.M. Memoan ciceroi gen. et sp. nov., a remarkable new firefly genus and species from the Atlantic Rainforest (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Zootaxa 2013, 3640, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silveira, L.F.L.; Mermudes, J.R.M. Systematic review of the firefly genus Amydetes Illiger, 1807 (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), with description of 13 new species. Zootaxa 2014, 3765, 201–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. da Silveira, L.F.L.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Bocakova, M. Systematic review of the firefly genus Scissicauda (Coleoptera, Lampyridae, Amydetinae) from Brazil. ZooKeys 2016, 558, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silveira, L.F.L.; Rosa, S.P.; C, S.V.N.; Mermudes, J.R.M. Systematic review of the firefly genus Lucernuta Laporte, 1833 (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Ann. Zool. 2019, 69, 293–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Campello, L.; Vaz, S.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Ferreira, A.L.D.; Silveira, L.F.L. Comparative morphology and key to Amydetinae genera, with description of three new firefly species (Coleoptera, Lampyridae). ZooKeys 2022, 1114, 131–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McDermott, F.A. The taxonomy of the Lampyridae (Coleoptera). Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 1964, 90, 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  13. Silveira, L.; Khattar, G.; Souto, P.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Takyia, D.M.; Monteiro, R.F. Integrative taxonomy of new firefly taxa from the Atlantic Rainforest. Syst. Biodivers. 2016, 14, 371–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roza, A.S.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Silveira, L.F.L. A New Genus and Two New Species of Fireflies from South America (Lampyridae: Lampyrinae: Photinini). Diversity 2022, 14, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakane, T. Lampyrid insects of the world. In The Reconstruction of Firefly Environments; Reconquista SP. No. 1; The Association of Nature Restoration of Japan: Siedeku, Tokyo, Japan, 1991; 136p, pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeng, M.L.; Yang, P.S.; Satô, M. The genus Cyphonocerus (Coleoptera, Lampyridae) from Taiwan and Japan, with notes on the subfamily Cyphonocerinae. Elytra Tokyo 1998, 26, 379–398. [Google Scholar]
  17. Silveira, L.F.L.; Khattar, G.; Vaz, S.; Wilson, V.A.; Souto, P.M.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Stanger-Hall, K.F.; Macedo, M.V.; Monteiro, R.F. Natural history of the fireflies of the Serra dos Órgãos mountain range (Brazil: Rio de Janeiro)–one of the ‘hottest’ firefly spots on Earth, with a key to genera (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). J. Nat. Hist. 2020, 54, 275–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lawrence, J.F.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Lemann, C.; Sinclair, B.; Slipinski, A. Morphology, Nomenclature and phylogenetic significance. Parte 1. General discussion and Archostemata-Elateroidea. Ann. Zool. 2021, 71, 421–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. QGIS. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. 2022. Available online: http://www.qgis.org (accessed on 4 March 2022).
  20. Ballantyne, L.A.; Lambkin, C.L.; Ho, J.-Z.; Jusoh, W.F.A.; Nada, B.; Nak-Eiam, S.; Thancharoen, A.; Wattanachaiyingcharoen, W.; Yiu, V. The Luciolinae of SE Asia and the Australopacific region: A revisionary checklist (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) including description of three new genera and 13 new species. Zootaxa 2019, 4687, 1–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vaz, S.; Guerrazzi, M.C.; Rocha, M.; Faust, L.; Khattar, G.; Mermudes, J.; Silveira, L.F.L. On the intertidal firefly genus Micronaspis Green, 1948, with a new species and a phylogeny of Cratomorphini based on adult and larval traits (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Zool. Anz. 2021, 292, 64–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sereno, P.C. Logical basis for morphological characters in phylogenetics. Cladistics 2007, 23, 565–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maddison, W.P.; Maddison, D.R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. 2018. Available online: http://www.mesquiteproject.org (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  24. Peñuela, A.G.L.; Bottero, J.P.; Silveira, L.F.L. First phylogeny of Pseudolychnuris reveals its polyphyly and a staggering case of convergence at the 2 Andean Paramos (Lampyridae: Lampyrini). Insects 2022, 13, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goloboff, P.A.; Catalano, S.A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 2016, 32, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar]
  28. Goloboff, P.A.; Farris, J.S.; Nixon, K.C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 2008, 24, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mirande, J.M. Weighted parsimony phylogeny of the family Characidae (Teleostei: Characiformes). Cladistics 2009, 25, 574–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nixon, K.C. WinClada (Software); Published by the author: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 734–745. [Google Scholar]
  31. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; Von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.; Von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lewis, P.O. A Likelihood Approach to Estimating Phylogeny from Discrete Morphological Character Data. Syst. Biol. 2001, 50, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. The CIPRES science gateway: Enabling high-impact science for phylogenetics researchers with limited resources. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Bridging from the Extreme to the Campus and Beyond, Chicago, IL, USA, 16th–20th July 2012; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rambaut, A.; Suchard, M.A.; Xie, D.; Drummond, A.J. Tracer v1. 6. Computer Program and Documentation Distributed by the Author. 2014. Available online: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/tracer (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  36. Morrone, J.J.; Escalante, T.; Rodríguez-Tapia, G.; Carmona, A.; Arana, M.; Mercado-Gómez, J.D. Biogeogr aphic regionalization of the Neotropical region: New map and shapefile. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2022, 94, e20211167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeng, M.L. Comprehensive phylogenetics, systematics, and evolution of neoteny of Lampyridae (Insecta: Coleoptera). PhD Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin, G.J.; Branham, M.A.; Whiting, M.F.; Bybee, S.M. Total evidence phylogeny and the evolution of adult bioluminescence in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 107, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wing, S.R.; Lloyd, J.E.; Hongtrakul, T. Male competition in Pteroptyx fireflies: Wing-cover clamps, female anatomy, and mating plugs. Fla. Entomol. 1983, 66, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silveira, L.F.L.; Souto, P.; Khattar, G.; Takiya, D.M.; Nunes, V.; Mermudes, J.R.M.; Monteiro, R.; Macedo, M. Unlocking the evolution of abdominal specializations in Luciuranus fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae). Zool. Scr. 2022, 51, 708–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Masly, J.P. 170 years of “lock-and-key”: Genital morphology and reproductive isolation. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2012, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. McDermott, F.A. Lampyridae. In Coleopterorum Catalogus Supplementa. Pars 9, 2nd ed.; Steel, O.W., Ed.; W. Junk, s-Gravenhage: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1966; pp. 1–149. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kawashima, I. External Characters of the Naturalized Species, Pyropyga alticola Green, 1961 (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Lampyrinae: Photinini) Settled in the Kantô Plain, Central Honshû, Japan. Jpn. J. Syst. Entomol. 2018, 24, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeballos, L.F.; Roza, A.S.; Campello-Gonçalves, L.; Vaz, S.; Da Fonseca, C.R.V.; Rivera, S.C.; da Silveira, L.F.L. Phylogeny of Scissicauda Species, with Eight New Species, including the First Photinini Fireflies with Biflabellate Antennae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Diversity 2023, 15, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050620

AMA Style

Zeballos LF, Roza AS, Campello-Gonçalves L, Vaz S, Da Fonseca CRV, Rivera SC, da Silveira LFL. Phylogeny of Scissicauda Species, with Eight New Species, including the First Photinini Fireflies with Biflabellate Antennae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Diversity. 2023; 15(5):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeballos, Leandro Felipe, André Silva Roza, Lucas Campello-Gonçalves, Stephanie Vaz, Cláudio Ruy Vasconcelos Da Fonseca, Sara Cristina Rivera, and Luiz Felipe Lima da Silveira. 2023. "Phylogeny of Scissicauda Species, with Eight New Species, including the First Photinini Fireflies with Biflabellate Antennae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)" Diversity 15, no. 5: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050620

APA Style

Zeballos, L. F., Roza, A. S., Campello-Gonçalves, L., Vaz, S., Da Fonseca, C. R. V., Rivera, S. C., & da Silveira, L. F. L. (2023). Phylogeny of Scissicauda Species, with Eight New Species, including the First Photinini Fireflies with Biflabellate Antennae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Diversity, 15(5), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop