Next Article in Journal
Ecological Basis of Ecosystem Services and Management of Wetlands Dominated by Common Reed (Phragmites australis): European Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Isolating Greater Cane Rat Populations (Thryonomys swinderianus) from Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania: Linking Diversity to Morphometric and Molecular Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Introduced, Mixed, and Peripheral: Conservation of Mitochondrial-DNA Lineages in the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L.) Population in the Urals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Insights into Intraspecific Taxonomy and Genetic Diversity of Argali (Ovis ammon)

1
L.K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 142132 Podolsk, Russia
2
Institute of Genome Biology, Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
3
Population Genomics Group, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
4
Institute of Livestock Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria
5
Department of Game Management and Bioecology, Irkutsk State University of Agriculture, 664038 Molodezhny, Russia
6
Tuva Institute for the Integrated Development of Natural Resources of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 667007 Kyzyl, Russia
7
Khovd Branch School of National University of Mongolia, Jargalant 67301, Mongolia
8
Irbis Mongolia Center, Ulaanbaatar 13380, Mongolia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(5), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050627
Submission received: 29 March 2023 / Revised: 30 April 2023 / Accepted: 2 May 2023 / Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity in Ungulate Populations)

Abstract

:
Argali (Ovis ammon), the largest species among all wild sheep, is native to mountainous regions of Central and East Asia, spreading mainly throughout such countries as Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Russia and China. Intraspecific taxonomy of argali remains unclear, and currently, most researchers recognize up to nine subspecies. The aim of our work was to investigate the phylogenetic relationship between populations of O. ammon based on genome-wide SNP analysis. Five subspecies, Altai (O. a. ammon) (n = 6), Gobi (O. a. darwini) (n = 5), Pamir (O. a. polii) (n = 12), Tian Shan (O.a. karelini) (n = 15) and Kyzylkum (O. a. severtzovi) (n = 4), were genotyped using Illumina OvineHD BeadChip. In addition, complete mitogenome sequences from 30 of those samples were obtained. After quality control procedures, 65,158 SNPs were selected for the subsequent analyses. Neighbor-Net dendrogram and principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the five subspecies could be grouped into four clusters. It was shown that a population from Altai formed a cluster with Gobi subspecies. The highest pairwise FST genetic distance was between O. a. ammon and O. a. severtzovi (0.421) and the lowest were between O. a. polii and O.a. karelini (0.083) and between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini (0.040) subspecies. Genetic diversity was higher in Central Asian argali as compared to East Asian populations. O. a. severtzovi had an admixed origin and consisted of two genetic components—73.5 ± 0.2% of O. a. polli and 26.5 ± 0.2% of urial (O. vignei). TreeMix analysis revealed a migration event from urial to O. a. severtzovi argali. The analysis of complete mitogenomes supported the results based on whole-genome genotyping. Considering that all the mtDNA sequences of O. a severtzovi belonged to O. ammon and not to O. vignei, we concluded that gene flow in this group was associated with urial males. As this is only the first work on intraspecific taxonomy and genetic diversity of argali based on genome-wide SNP genotyping and the analysis of complete mitogenomes, we suggest that more genetic studies are needed to clarify the status of Gobi and Tian Shan argali.

1. Introduction

Argali (Ovis ammon) is the largest species among all wild sheep that can weigh over 200 kg, have a body length up to two meters and be up to 137 cm in height [1]. The range of O. ammon includes mountainous areas in Central and East Asia, and spreads out from the Altai Mountains (Russia, Mongolia) and Niyaz range (Kazakhstan) in the north to the Himalaya mountains (China, Nepal) in the south, and from Nuratau ridge (Uzbekistan) in the west to the Khentii mountains (Mongolia) in the east.
The chromosome diploid number in all the studied populations of argali is 56 and that distinguishes this species from the other representatives of the genus Ovis. Snow sheep (O. nivicola) has 2n = 52 chromosomes; bighorn (O. canadensis), thinhorn (O. dalli), mouflon (O. gmelini), domestic sheep (O. aries) have 2n = 54 chromosomes; and urial (O. vignei) has 2n = 58 chromosomes. According to Sanna et al. [2,3], O. ammon diverged from its closest relative species—O. gmelini and O. vignei—1.11 million years ago (MYA) and from the other Ovis group which includes Siberian snow sheep (O. nivicola) as well as North American bighorn (O. canadensis) and thinhorn (O. dalli) 2.66 MYA.
The most fundamental intraspecific classifications of argali were proposed by Lydekker in 1898 [4], Nasonov in 1923 [5], Tsalkin in 1951 [6], Nadler et al. in 1973 [7], Schaller in 1977 [8], Valdez in 1982 [9] and Geist in 1991 [10]. In those works, from 4 to 16 subspecies were recognized. Currently most researchers [11,12] agree with the taxonomy proposed by the IUCN Caprinae Specialist Group in 1997 [13], in which they recognized nine subspecies of argali (O. ammon): Altai (O. a. ammon), Gobi (O. a. darwini), Pamir or Marco Polo sheep (O. a. polii), Tian Shan (O. a. karelini), Kyzylkum or Severtsov’s sheep (O. a. severtzovi), Northern Chinese (O. a. jubata), Tibetan (O. a. hodgsonii), Kazakhstan (O. a. collium) and Karatau (O. a. nigrimontana).
In our work, we investigated five subspecies of argali: O. a. ammon from Russia, O. a. darwini from Mongolia, O. a. polli from Tajikistan, O. a. karelini from Kyrgyzstan and O. a. severtzovi from Uzbekistan using genome-wide SNP analysis and complete mitochondrial genomes. Two samples of O. a. karelini were collected in the area of Kyrgyz argali (O. a. humei) habitat, the subspecies that was described by Lydekkker in 1913, but is considered invalid by most researchers [1]. Since the habitat of this group of argali is located at the intersection of O. a. karelini and O. a. polii ranges, it was usually attributed to either the former [9] or the latter [11]. O. a. ammon inhabits the Altai Mountains in Russia and Mongolia. The census size of this subspecies, estimated by WWF in 2019, was 4851 individuals in total (1431 in Russia and 3420 in Mongolia). O. a. darwini is distributed patchily in mountains, hills and canyons of the Gobi Desert and Gobi steppe in Mongolia [14]. The surveys indicated that approximately 10,000–12,000 individuals belong to this subspecies. O. a. polii inhabits the Pamir Alai Mountain System in Tajikistan and adjacent regions of Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and China. The estimated population size in the Eastern Pamirs in the survey conducted in December of 2009 was 23,711 argali in 510 herds [15]. A total of 4013 animals attributed to this subspecies were revealed in 2017 in Kyrgyzstan. Tian Shan argali (O. a. karelini) is distributed across the Tian Shan Mountains in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and China [12]. The estimated census size of this population in 2017 was around 12,500 individuals in Kyrgyzstan and around 2500 in Kazakhstan. O. a. severtzovi is the smallest in size among all the subspecies of argali. Its current habitat is limited to Nuratau ridge and Central Kyzylkum Mountains in Uzbekistan. According to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, less than 2000 animals of this subspecies persist in Uzbekistan. A small number of O. a. severtzovi were also recorded in the territories of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan bordering Uzbekistan [16].
In recent years, more and more refinements in the taxonomy of animals have been made by molecular genetic studies. Different mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers were used to clarify phylogenetic relationships in ungulate species [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Until now, molecular genetic studies of argali have been carried out using mitochondrial DNA [23,24] and microsatellites [25,26,27].
Currently, the use of SNP chips developed for domestic species is one of the promising methods for studying their wild relatives. For example, the SNP chip developed for domestic sheep has been successfully used in the research of wild Ovis species: O. canadensis [28], O. dalli [29,30], O. aries musimon [31] and O. nivicola [20]. The analysis of mitochondrial DNA has been successfully implemented in phylogenetic studies for years [2,17,18,19,21,32]. Unlike nuclear, mitochondrial DNA is characterized by maternal inheritance, high mutation rate and lack of recombination. Such differences in these genetic markers can lead to dissimilar conclusions on the relationships of both individuals and populations. The combined use of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA gives a more complete picture of evolution.
The aim of our work was to investigate the phylogenetic relationship between populations of O. ammon based on genome-wide SNP analysis and complete mitochondrial genomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Ethic Statement

In our study, we examined 42 specimens of argali belonging to five subspecies: O. a. polii (n = 12), O. a. karelini (n = 15), O. a. severtzovi (n = 4), O. a. ammon (n = 6) and O. a. darwini (n = 5). Ten specimens of urials (O. vignei) from Iran (O. v. arkal, n = 4) and Pakistan (O. v. blanfordi, n = 3), (O. v. punjabienis, n = 3) were included in the dataset as an outgroup. The sampling sites of the studied specimens are presented in Figure 1. Muscle tissue samples of O. ammon and O. vignei were obtained during scientific expeditions and from trophy hunters, who were officially licensed to hunt argali and urials during hunting season. The protocol for the study, No. 2 (28 April 2022), was approved by the Commission on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry.

2.2. Data Quality Control and Processing of Whole-Genome SNP Data

DNA extraction was carried out using Nexttec columns (Nexttec Biotechnology GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany). The genotyping was performed using Illumina Ovine HD Beadchip [33]. SNP quality control filtering was performed in PLINK 1.9 [34] software. Only autosomal SNPs with known positions were selected. SNPs that were genotyped in less than 90% of individuals (−−geno 0.1), with a minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 5% (−−maf 0.05) and in linkage disequilibrium (−−indep-pairwise 50 5 0.5) were pruned. PLINK 1.9 was also used to perform principal component analysis (PCA) (−−pca 4) and calculate pairwise identity-by-state (IBS) distances (−−distance 1-ibs). Pairwise FST [35] and Reynolds genetic distances [36] were calculated in the R packages “StAMPP” [37] and “adegenet” [38], respectively. Neighbor-Net dendrograms were constructed in SplitsTree 4.14.6 program [39]. Visualization of PCA was generated with the R package “ggplot2” (ver. 3.3.2) [40]. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using Treemix 1.13 software [41]. We used a block size of 500 SNPs and ran ten iterations of 0 to 9 migration events. The optimum number of migration events was found using the R package “OptM” [42]. Cluster analysis was performed in the program Admixture 1.3 [43] with visualization in the R package “pophelper” [44].
Genetic diversity characteristics including allelic richness, observed and unbiased expected heterozygosity were calculated in the R package “diveRsity” [45]. Multilocus heterozygosity (MLH) was calculated in the R package “inbreedR” [46].

2.3. Processing of Complete Mitogenomes

Using NGS technology, we obtained 30 complete mitochondrial genomes of O. ammonO. a. polii (n = 10), O. a. karelini (n = 7), O. a. severtzovi (n = 4), O. a. ammon (n = 4), O. a. darwini (n = 5)—and five mitogenomes of O. vigneiO. v. arkal (n = 1), O. v. blanfordi (n = 2), O. v. punjabienis (n = 2). To perform phylogenetic analysis, we used sequences of concatenated 2 rRNA and 13 protein coding genes that were extracted from complete mitochondrial genomes and consisted of 13,879 bp. For the alignment of the sequences, the program Muscle 3.8.31 was used [47].
The best evolution model was determined in the software Partitionfinder 2 [48]. The Bayesian phylogenetic tree was constructed in the program MrBayes 3.2.6 [49]. The analysis was carried out running 10,000,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) generations, sampling every 500 generations with a burn-in of 25%. The visualization was performed in the FigTree 1.4.2 program [50].

2.4. The map of Sampling Sites

The map of sampling sites was created with R packages “maps” [51] and “ggplot2”.

3. Results

3.1. Whole-Genome SNP Analysis

After quality control filtering, 42 argali samples and 65,158 SNPs were selected for the subsequent analyses. The principal component analysis (Figure 2A) showed that the five studied populations formed four clusters: (1). O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini; (2). O. a. karelini; (3). O. a. polii; (4). O. a. severtzovi subspecies. The first component divided East Asian populations—O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini (PC1 < 0)—from Central Asian—O. a. polii, O. a. karelini and O. a. severtzovi (PC1 > 0). The second component separated O. a. polii and O. a. karelini from O. a. severtzovi. The separation of O. a. polii and O. a. karelini subspecies was observed at PC3 (Figure S1).
Neighbor-Net dendrogram based on IBS distances (Figure 2B) demonstrated that O. a. polli, O. a. karelini, O. a. severtzovi as well as O. vignei, taken as an outgroup, each formed their own separate clusters. In contrast, O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini samples were placed in the same cluster.
Calculation of cross-validation (CV) error (Figure S2) for the admixture analysis run for values of K from 1 to 10 indicated that the optimal number of populations in our dataset was determined as three (K = 3). At K = 3 (Figure 2C), O. ammon was divided into two groups—East Asian and Central Asian. East Asian argali—O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini—had identical genetic components. In Central Asian populations, only O. a. polli was not admixed. O. a. karelini had 97.5 ± 0.2% of genetic components of O. a. polli and 2.4 ± 0.2% of East Asian argali. O. a. severtzovi also consisted of two components—73.5 ± 0.2% of O. a. polli and 26.5 ± 0.2% of O. vignei. The separation of O. a. polli and O. a. karelini was observed at K = 5 (Figure S3). Starting from K = 4, O. a. severtzovi was presented as a non-admixed population.
Pairwise FST and Reynolds genetic distances were calculated to estimate the differentiation between the studied populations of argali (Table 1). The lowest values for both distances were observed between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini, and O. a. polli and O. a. karelini. The highest genetic divergence was found between East Asian populations of argali and O. a. severtzovi. Both FST and Reynolds values revealed that O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini were genetically closer to the separate species O. vignei than to O. a. severtzovi.
The migration events for the populations of O. ammon were assessed by constructing a maximum likelihood tree as implemented in the Treemix analysis (Figure 3). To infer the optimum number of migration events, the Treemix results were evaluated using the Evanno method which revealed a maximum value for delta m of 14.8122 at m = 2 edges (Figure S6). To select the best-fit tree, the residual fit plot was created (Figure S7). This allowed us to check if all the parts of the tree had been well modeled. The first migration event we observed was from a ghost population or the unknown ancestor of all O. ammon subspecies to O. a. severtzovi (p = 2.22 × 10−308). The second migration event (p = 0.049) with less weight revealed a gene flow from O. vignei to the common ancestor of O. a. polii and O. a. severtzovi.
The highest values of genetic diversity were observed in Central Asian argali populations, composed of O. a. karelini and O. a. polii. The unbiased expected heterozygosity in the above-mentioned subspecies was 0.295 ± 0.001 and 0.286 ± 0.001, and allelic richness was 1.714 ± 0.001 and 1.685 ± 0.001, respectively (Table 2). In the East Asian populations, all the genetic diversity parameters were significantly lower—unbiased expected heterozygosity did not exceed 0.208 ± 0.001 and allelic richness ranged from 1.484 ± 0.002 to 1.499 ± 0.002. The inbreeding coefficient (Fis) was positive in all the studied populations. The deficit of heterozygotes was lower in Central Asian argali—from 0.011 in O. a. severtzovi to 0.024 in O. a. polii—than in East Asian populations—from 0.092 in O. a. darwini to 0.128 in O. a. ammon.
Multilocus heterozygosity (MLH) values, which reflect individual genome-wide heterozygosity, ranged from 0.110 in one specimen of O. a. ammon, which could be considered an outlier, to 0.299 in a specimen of O. a. karelini. Graphical visualization of MLH is presented in Figure 4.
O. vignei samples were included in this analysis to identify the variance in heterozygosity among individuals of the species which was taken as an outgroup. The comparison of O. ammon and O. vignei is not being discussed as these results might have been influenced by ascertainment bias.

3.2. Complete Mitochondrial Genomes Analysis

The analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes was conducted by constructing the Bayesian phylogenetic tree (Figure 5) based on concatenated sequences of 2 rRNAs and 13 protein-coding genes. All the clades in the tree were strongly supported by high posterior probability values, which varied from 0.97 to 1.
East Asian argali belonged to two different groups. The clade that had more a distant common ancestor with Central Asian populations contained three sequences of O. a. ammon and two sequences of O. a. darwini. The other clade included one and three sequences of those subspecies, respectively. The Central Asian populations clustered separately from each other. All the O. a. severtzovi specimens had almost identical haplotypes and they were genetically closer to O. a. polli. Two different subclades could be distinguished in the O. a. karelini cluster. We did not observe any O. vignei haplotypes among the studied sequences of O. ammon.

4. Discussion

Here, we present the first work on genetic diversity and intraspecific relationships between populations of O. ammon based on genome-wide SNP genotyping and the analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes. The genome-wide genotyping of 42 specimens belonging to 5 subspecies allowed the selection of more than 65 thousand SNPs. To corroborate the results inferred by the analyses carried out on the nuclear DNA, 30 mitogenome sequences from the studied specimens were included in our research.
The results of our study pointed out high genetic differentiation between East Asian and Central Asian groups of argali. O. a. severtzovi had high FST values with all the other studied populations—from 0.237 (O. a. karelini) to 0.421 (O. a. ammon). These results agree with the taxonomy based on morphology [9,10,52,53]. Such an increased genetic distance could also be the result of admixture with foreign subspecies.
Genetic diversity values, such as allelic richness, observed and expected heterozygosity, did not differ much in the neighboring groups. In East Asian argali, these parameters were much lower than in Central Asian populations. Similar results were reported in the study of Tserenbataa et al. [24] where the comparison of nucleotide diversity in populations of argali from Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan was made. We suggest that harsh climatic conditions and partial glaciation of the Altai Mountains during the last glacial maximum could lead to a decrease in genetic diversity in East Asian populations of argali.

4.1. The Phylogenetic Relationship between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini

The phylogenetic relationship between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini was previously studied using phenotypic traits, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites. Based on craniological features, body proportions and color variation, Valdez [9], Sopin [52], Geist [10] and Kapitanova et al. [53] confirmed the subspecies rank of O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini. In the study of the mitochondrial control region and 14 microsatellite loci of argali from the Altai Mountains, Hangay Mountains and eastern Gobi Desert, Feng et al. [25] indicated genetic differentiation among these groups. Using mitochondrial control region hypervariable segment sequence (598 bp) and three microsatellite markers Delgerzul et al. [27] stated that the genetic difference between Altai and Gobi populations was at the subspecies level. The results of our work agree with the study of Tserenbataa et al. [24], where using the ND5 gene of mitochondrial DNA, the authors revealed low genetic differentiation and a high level of gene flow among populations and concluded that O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini should be considered a single subspecies. In our work, the analysis of more than 65 thousand SNPs located throughout the genome, did not reveal the separation of these groups from each other. All the samples were in the same cluster both in the PCA and on the Neighbor-Net dendrogram. No differences between the individuals were observed in the admixture analysis. Pairwise FST genetic distances revealed low differentiation between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini—0.04. However, the value of Reynolds genetic distances was even higher (0.377), than between O. a. polii and O. a. karelini argali (0.346). The analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes revealed that O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini formed two clades. Three samples of O. a. ammon belonged to the clade that was genetically more distant from Central Asian argali and one sample to the clade, which had a more recent common ancestor with this group. O. a. darwini samples also belonged to these two clades—two and three samples, respectively.
Based on our results, we suggest that additional research with more specimens representing all habitats in Altai and Gobi Mountain systems is needed to determine the taxonomic status of these populations.

4.2. The phylogenetic Relationship between O. a. polii, O. a. karelini, and O. a. humei

O. a. polii and O. a. karelini are usually regarded as different groups even though their ranges overlap. Morphological features characteristic of each of these populations are considered by most researchers to be sufficient to distinguish them into separate subspecies [5,6,9,10,53]. In contrast in the work of Sopin [52], based on the analysis of cranial proportions, the two groups were combined into one subspecies—O. a. polii. The analysis of mitochondrial control region (D-loop) [54] demonstrated that specimens from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan had unique haplotypes but were all placed in the neighboring clades. In our study of complete mitochondrial genomes, we obtained similar results—ten samples of O. a. polii and seven samples of O. a. karelini formed separate clusters. The first comparison of these populations on a nuclear genome-wide level, performed in the present study, revealed moderate genetic differentiation (FST value—0.084). All the studied samples clustered separately within their respective groups in principal component analysis and on the Neighbor-Net dendrogram. In the admixture analysis, O. a. polii and O. a. karelini are divided from each other at K = 5, a result that supports their classification as distinct subspecies.
Among the O. a. karelini samples, two were obtained from habitats of Kyrgyz argali (O. a. humei) which most researchers do not recognize as a valid subspecies [1]. In our study, no genetic distinctiveness was found in the O. a. humei samples that therefore were regarded as O. a. karelini. Based on such results, we suggest that O. a. humei, which morphologically resembles both O. a. polii and O. a. karelini, should not be considered a separate subspecies but should be attributed to O. a. karelini.

4.3. The Evolution and Phylogeny of O. a. severtzovi

Kyzylkum argali was first described as a separate species—Ovis severtzovi in 1914 by Nasonov [55], who later regarded it as a subspecies of argali [5]. During the 20th century, many attempts to classify this group of wild sheep were made. Due to its morphological similarity to both O. ammon and O. vignei, some researchers attributed it to argali [8], and others to urials [6,9]. Geptner et al. [56], followed by Groves and Grubb [57] suggested the possible hybrid origin of Kyzylkum argali.
In 1998, Bunch et al. [58] performed the cytogenetic investigation and determined that Severtzov’s sheep had a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 56. This makes it consistent with the other subspecies of O. ammon, but not with O. vignei, whose diploid chromosome number is 58. Wu et al. [23] in 2003 analyzed the sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control region (1206 bp) and concluded that it was reasonable to classify Severtzov’s sheep as a subspecies of argali. In 2010, Rezaei et al. [17] conducted a study on the taxonomy of wild species of the genus Ovis based on combined mitochondrial DNA—cytochrome b gene (1140 bp) and four nuclear loci—Interleukin 4 (IL4), Kappa casein (CSN3), Keratin associated protein 1.3 (KAP13) and Interleukin 16 (IL16). According to that work, as well as in the above-mentioned molecular genetic studies, Severtzov’s sheep was clearly recognized as O. ammon.
In our study, the whole genome SNP genotyping of four specimens of Severtzov’s sheep allowed us to classify this population as a subspecies of argali that had an admixture with O. vignei. We identified that its genome contained about a quarter of urials’ genetic components. The hybrid origin was also confirmed by the TreeMix analysis, which revealed a migration event from a ghost population related to O. vignei to O. a. severtzovi. It should be noted that O. a. severtzovi belongs to Central Asian argali, as its pairwise genetic distances, both FST and Reynolds, with East Asian argali were even higher than with O. vignei. The Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction based on complete mitochondrial genomes demonstrated that all the studied sequences of Severtzov’s sheep belonged to O. ammon. The comparison of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA-based results allowed us to suggest that gene flow from O. vignei to O. a. severtzovi was associated with migrations of urial males.

5. Conclusions

In our study, we investigated the genetic structure and phylogeny of five groups of O. ammon, based on whole-genome SNP analysis and complete mitochondrial genomes. We observed high genetic differentiation of O. a. severtzovi from all the other populations and low differentiation between O. a. ammon and O. a. darwini. Despite the fact that O. a. polii and O. a. karelini clustered separately, genetic differentiation between them was moderate. O. a. severtzovi was found to have an admixed origin and consisted of two genetic components—from O. a. polli and O. vignei. Mitochondrial DNA analysis revealed that gene flow was associated with urial males. We suggest that more genetic studies are needed to clarify the status of Gobi and Tian Shan argali.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15050627/s1, Figure S1: Principle component analysis (PC1 and PC3) of the studied populations of O. ammon; Figure S2. Cross validation (CV) error for the Admixture analysis for values of K from 1 to 10; Figure S3. Admixture analysis of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei for K from 2 to 5; Figure S4. Neighbor-Net dendrogram of the studied populations of O. ammon based on FST pairwise genetic distances; Figure S5. Neighbor-Net dendrogram of the studied populations of O. ammon based on Reynolds pairwise genetic distances; Figure S6. The optimal number of migration edges for the Treemix analysis evaluated using the Evanno method; Figure S7. The residual fit plot corresponding to Treemix analysis with two migration events.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.D. and N.Z.; methodology, A.D., O.K., T.D., H.R., G.M., E.K., K.W., J.S. and I.M.; software, A.D. and A.S.; validation, A.D. and S.P.; formal analysis, A.D. and A.S.; investigation, A.D.; resources, D.M., A.K., G.B.-E. and B.M.; data curation, A.D. and N.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.; writing—review and editing, N.Z. and V.K.; visualization, A.D.; supervision, N.Z.; project administration, N.Z. and V.B.; funding acquisition, A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the RSF within project No. 21-46-00001 (SNP genotyping) and the RMSHE (DNA collection and mitochondrial DNA sequencing) within project No. FGGN-2022-0002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Commission on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry (the protocol No. 2 (28 April 2022)).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

SNP data in PLINK format was deposited to Figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22722616. The complete mitochondrial genomes of argali and urials were deposited to NCBI Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore, accessed on 28 March 2023) under accession numbers OQ509380—OQ509402, OQ513280—OQ513289 and OQ534873—OQ534874.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Bendersky E.V. and the Mountain Hunters Club (www.kgo-club.ru, accessed on 28 March 2023) for providing the samples of Ovis ammon and Ovis vignei. We thank our reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript. The equipment of the Center for Biological Resources and Bioengineering of Agricultural Animals (L.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry) was used in the research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Damm, G.R.; Franco, N. CIC Caprinae Atlas of the World; CIC International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation: Budakeszi, Hungary; Rowland Ward Publications: Johannesburg, South Africa, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sanna, D.; Barbato, M.; Hadjisterkotis, E.; Cossu, P.; Decandia, L.; Trova, S.; Pirastru, M.; Leoni, G.; Naitana, S.; Francalacci, P.; et al. The First Mitogenome of the Cyprus Mouflon (Ovis gmelini ophion): New Insights into the Phylogeny of the Genus Ovis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Machová, K.; Málková, A.; Vostrý, L. Sheep Post-Domestication Expansion in the Context of Mitochondrial and Y Chromosome Haplogroups and Haplotypes. Genes 2022, 13, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lydekker, R. Wild Oxen, Sheep, and Goats of All Lands; Rowland Ward: London, UK, 1898; p. 239. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nasonov, N.V. Geographical Distribution of Old-World Wild Sheep; Printing house of Russian State Academy: Petrograd, Russia, 1923; p. 255. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Tsalkin, V.I. Wild Sheep of Europe and Asia; Moskovskoe Obschestvo Ispytatelei Prirody: Moscow, Russia, 1951; p. 344. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Nadler, C.F.; Hoffmann, R.S.; Woolf, A. G-band patterns as chromosomal markers, and the interpretation of chromosomal evolution in wild sheep (Ovis). Experientia 1973, 29, 117–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schaller, B. Mountain Monarchs; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  9. Valdez, R. The Wild Sheep of the World; The Wild Goat and Sheep International: Mesilla, NM, USA, 1982; p. 186. [Google Scholar]
  10. Geist, V. On the taxonomy of giant sheep (Ovis ammon Linnaeus, 1766). Can. J. Zool. 1991, 69, 706–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed.; Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M. (Eds.) The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005; Volume 1–2, 2142p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fedosenko, A.K.; Blank, D.A. Ovis ammon. Mamm. Species 2005, 773, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shackleton, D.M.; Lovari, S. Classification adopted for the Caprinae survey. In Wild Sheep and Goats and Their Relatives. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Caprinae; Shackleton, D.M., Ed.; IUCN/SSC Caprinae Specialist Group: Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK, 1997; pp. 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  14. Amgalanbaatar, S.; Reading, R.P. Altai argali. In Endangered Animals: Conflicting Issues; Reading, R.P., Miller, B., Eds.; Greenwood Press: Westport, CT, USA, 2000; pp. 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Michel, S.; Muratov, R. Survey on Marco Polo Sheep and Other Mammal Species in the Eastern Pamir (Republic of Tajikistan, GBAO); Nature Protection Team, Khorog and Institute of Zoology and Parasitology of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan: Dushanbe, Tajikistan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reading, R.; Michel, S.; Amgalanbaatar, S. Ovis ammon. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2020; p. e.T15733A22146397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rezaei, H.R.; Naderi, S.; Chintauan-Marquier, I.C.; Taberlet, P.; Virk, A.T.; Naghash, H.R.; Rioux, D.; Kaboli, M.; Pompanon, F. Evolution and taxonomy of the wild species of the genus Ovis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ludt, C.J.; Schroeder, W.; Rottmann, O.; Kuehn, R. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 31, 1064–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ropiquet, A.; Hassanin, A. Molecular evidence for the polyphyly of the genus Hemitragus (Mammalia, Bovidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2005, 36, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dotsev, A.V.; Deniskova, T.E.; Okhlopkov, I.M.; Mészáros, G.; Sölkner, J.; Reyer, H.; Wimmers, K.; Brem, G.; Zinovieva, N.A. Genome-wide SNP analysis unveils genetic structure and phylogeographic history of snow sheep (Ovis nivicola) populations inhabiting the Verkhoyansk Mountains and Momsky Ridge (northeastern Siberia). Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 8000–8010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dotsev, A.V.; Kunz, E.; Kharzinova, V.R.; Okhlopkov, I.M.; Lv, F.-H.; Li, M.-H.; Rodionov, A.N.; Shakhin, A.V.; Sipko, T.P.; Medvedev, D.G.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA Analysis Clarifies Taxonomic Status of the Northernmost Snow Sheep (Ovis nivicola) Population. Life 2021, 11, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dotsev, A.V.; Rodionov, A.N.; Kharzinova, V.R.; Petrov, S.N.; Medvedev, D.G.; Bagirov, V.A.; Brem, G.; Zinovieva, N.A. An Assessment of Applicability of SNP Chip Developed for Domestic Goats in Genetic Studies of Caucasian Tur (Capra caucasica). Diversity 2021, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, C.H.; Zhang, Y.P.; Bunch, T.D.; Wang, S.; Wang, W. Mitochondrial control region sequence variation within the argali wild sheep (Ovis ammon): Evolution and conservation relevance. Mammalia 2003, 67, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tserenbataa, T.; Ramey, R.R.; Ryder, O.A.; Quinn, T.W.; Reading, R.P. A population genetic comparison of argali sheep (Ovis ammon) in Mongolia using the ND5 gene of mitochondrial DNA; implications for conservation. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 1333–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Feng, J.; Frisina, M.R.; Webster, M.S.; Ulziimaa, G. Genetic Differentiation of Argali Sheep Ovis ammon in Mongolia Revealed by Mitochondrial Control Region and Nuclear Microsatellites Analyses. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 2009, 106, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
  26. Luikart, G.; Amish, S.J.; Winnie, J.; Beja-Pereira, A.; Godinho, R.; Allendorf, F.W.; Harris, R.B. High connectivity among argali sheep from Afghanistan and adjacent countries: Inferences from neutral and candidate gene microsatellites. Conserv. Genet. 2011, 12, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delgerzul, B.; Unudbayasgalan, Z.; Bilguun, T.; Battsetseg, C.; Galbadrahk, B.; Tserendulam, B. Genetic comparison of Altai and Gobi argali sheep (Ovis ammon) populations using mitochondrial and microsatellite markers: Implication on conservation. Proc. Mong. Acad. Sci. 2019, 59, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miller, J.; Poissant, J.; Kijas, J.; Coltman, D. The International Sheep Genomics Consortium. A genome-wide set of SNPs detects population substructure and long range linkage disequilibrium in wild sheep. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 11, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sim, Z.; Hall, J.C.; Jex, B.; Hegel, T.M.; Coltman, D.W. Genome-wide set of SNPs reveals evidence for two glacial refugia and admixture from postglacial recolonization in an alpine ungulate. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 3696–3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sim, Z.; Coltman, D.W. Heritability of Horn Size in Thinhorn Sheep. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barbato, M.; Hailer, F.; Orozco-terWengel, P.; Kijas, J.; Mereu, P.; Cabras, P.; Mazza, R.; Pirastru, M.; Bruford, M.W. Genomic signatures of adaptive introgression from European mouflon into domestic sheep. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, C.; Xiang, C.; Qi, W.; Xia, S.; Tu, F.; Zhang, X.; Moermond, T.; Yue, B. Phylogenetic analyses and improved resolution of the family Bovidae based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 48, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kijas, J.W.; Porto-Neto, L.; Dominik, S.; Reverter, A.; Bunch, R.; Mcculloch, R.; Hayes, B.J.; Brauning, R.; McEwan, J. The International Sheep Genomics Consortium. Linkage disequilibrium over short physical distances measured in sheep using a high-density SNP chip. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 754–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weir, B.S.; Cockerham, C.C. Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984, 38, 1358–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Reynolds, J.B.; Weir, B.S.; Cockerham, C.C. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: Basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 1983, 105, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pembleton, L.W.; Cogan, N.O.; Forster, J.W. StAMPP: An R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013, 13, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jombart, T.; Ahmed, I. Adegenet 1.3-1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 3070–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huson, D.H.; Bryant, D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pickrell, J.K.; Pritchard, J.K. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fitak, R.R. OptM: Estimating the optimal number of migration edges on population trees using Treemix. Biol. Methods Protoc. 2021, 6, bpab017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alexander, D.H.; Novembre, J.; Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1655–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Francis, R.M. pophelper: An R package and web app to analyze and visualize population structure. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2017, 17, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Keenan, K.; McGinnity, P.; Cross, T.F.; Crozier, W.W.; Prodöhl, P.A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stoffel, M.A.; Esser, M.; Kardos, M.; Humble, E.; Nichols, H.; David, P.; Hoffman, J.I. inbreedR: An R package for the analysis of inbreeding based on genetic markers. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1331–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Edgar, R.C. Quality measures for protein alignment benchmarks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 2145–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lanfear, R.; Frandsen, P.B.; Wright, A.M.; Senfeld, T.; Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 772–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. FigTree. 2014. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 15 January 2023).
  51. Becker, R.A.; Wilks, A.R.; Brownrigg, R.; Minka, T.P.; Deckmyn, A. Maps: Draw Geographical Maps. R Package Version 3.3.0. 2018. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maps (accessed on 28 March 2023).
  52. Sopin, A.V. Intraspecific relationships in Ovis ammon (Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Zool. Zhurnal 1982, 61, 1882–1892. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kapitanova, D.V.; Lopatin, A.V.; Subbotin, A.E.; Wall, W.A. Cranial morphometry and taxonomy of argali, Ovis ammon (Artiodactyla, Bovidae), from former Soviet Union and Mongolia. Russ. J. Theriol. 2004, 3, 89–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Danilkin, A.A. Mammals of Russia and Adjacent Regions: Hollow-Horned Ruminants (Bovidae); KMK: Moscow, Russia, 2005. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  55. Nasonov, N. Űber Ovis severtzovi Nas. und über die Methode der Untersuchungen der Hörner der Wildschafe in systematischer Hinsicht. Bull. Académie Impériale Sci. St.-Pétersbourg 1914, 8, 761–778. [Google Scholar]
  56. Geptner, V.G.; Nasimovich, A.A.; Bannikov, A.G. Mammals of the Soviet Union. Ungulates and Odd-Toed Ungulates; Higher School: Moscow, Russia, 1961; Volume 1, p. 776. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  57. Groves, C.P.; Grubb, P. Ungulate Taxonomy; The John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bunch, T.D.; Vorontsov, N.N.; Lyapunova, E.A.; Hoffmann, R.S. Chromosome number of Severtsov’s sheep (Ovis ammon severtzovi): G-banded karyotype comparisons within Ovis. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sampling sites of the studied specimens of argali (O. ammon) and urial (O. vignei).
Figure 1. Sampling sites of the studied specimens of argali (O. ammon) and urial (O. vignei).
Diversity 15 00627 g001
Figure 2. (A)—Principal component analysis of the studied populations of O. ammon; (B)—Neighbor-Net dendrogrm of the studied populations of O. ammon with O. vignei taken as an outgroup; (C)—Admixture analysis of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
Figure 2. (A)—Principal component analysis of the studied populations of O. ammon; (B)—Neighbor-Net dendrogrm of the studied populations of O. ammon with O. vignei taken as an outgroup; (C)—Admixture analysis of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
Diversity 15 00627 g002
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with two migration events, which are indicated by the arrows. Migration arrows are colored according to their weight.
Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with two migration events, which are indicated by the arrows. Migration arrows are colored according to their weight.
Diversity 15 00627 g003
Figure 4. Boxplot indicating multilocus heterozygosity (MLH) in the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
Figure 4. Boxplot indicating multilocus heterozygosity (MLH) in the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
Diversity 15 00627 g004
Figure 5. Rooted Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei (outgroup) based on complete mitochondrial genome sequences. Posterior probability values are indicated on the nodes.
Figure 5. Rooted Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei (outgroup) based on complete mitochondrial genome sequences. Posterior probability values are indicated on the nodes.
Diversity 15 00627 g005
Table 1. Pairwise FST (below diagonal) and Reynolds (above diagonal) genetic distances between the groups of argali (O. ammon) and urial (O. vignei).
Table 1. Pairwise FST (below diagonal) and Reynolds (above diagonal) genetic distances between the groups of argali (O. ammon) and urial (O. vignei).
O. a. poliiO. a. kareliniO. a. severtzoviO. a. ammonO. a. darwiniO. vignei
O. a. polii0.0000.3460.5810.5920.5920.609
O. a. karelini0.0830.0000.5570.5600.5610.599
O. a. severtzovi0.2660.2370.0000.6960.6950.639
O. a. ammon0.2900.2510.4210.0000.3770.679
O. a. darwini0.284 0.2440.4140.0400.0000.677
O. vignei0.3390.3330.3250.3970.3860.000
Table 2. Genetic diversity characteristics of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
Table 2. Genetic diversity characteristics of the studied populations of O. ammon and O. vignei.
PopulationnHo ± seuHe ± seFis [CI 95%]AR ± seMLH Mdn [Range]
O. a. polii120.277 ± 0.0010.286 ± 0.0010.024 [0.022; 0.026]1.685 ± 0.0010.279 [0.212; 0.290]
O. a. karelini150.289 ± 0.0010.295 ± 0.0010.019 [0.017; 0.021]1.714 ± 0.0010.288 [0.259; 0.299]
O. a. severtzovi40.242 ± 0.0010.245 ± 0.0010.011 [0.007; 0.015]1.570 ± 0.0020.240 [0.237; 0.248]
O. a. ammon60.173 ± 0.0010.203 ± 0.0010.128 [0.124; 0.132]1.484 ± 0.0020.179 [0.110; 0.191]
O. a. darwini50.185 ± 0.0010.208 ± 0.0010.092 [0.088; 0.096]1.499 ± 0.0020.180 [0.171; 0.208]
O. vignei100.312 ± 0.0010.356 ± 0.0010.111 [0.108; 0.114]1.813 ± 0.0010.313 [0.268; 0.329]
Notes: n—number of samples, Ho—observed heterozygosity, uHe—unbiased expected heterozygosity, se—standard error, Fis—inbreeding coefficient, CI 95%—95% confidence interval, Ar—allelic richness, MLH—multilocus heterozygosity, Mdn—median.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dotsev, A.; Koshkina, O.; Kharzinova, V.; Deniskova, T.; Reyer, H.; Kunz, E.; Mészáros, G.; Shakhin, A.; Petrov, S.; Medvedev, D.; et al. Genome-Wide Insights into Intraspecific Taxonomy and Genetic Diversity of Argali (Ovis ammon). Diversity 2023, 15, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050627

AMA Style

Dotsev A, Koshkina O, Kharzinova V, Deniskova T, Reyer H, Kunz E, Mészáros G, Shakhin A, Petrov S, Medvedev D, et al. Genome-Wide Insights into Intraspecific Taxonomy and Genetic Diversity of Argali (Ovis ammon). Diversity. 2023; 15(5):627. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dotsev, Arsen, Olga Koshkina, Veronika Kharzinova, Tatiana Deniskova, Henry Reyer, Elisabeth Kunz, Gábor Mészáros, Alexey Shakhin, Sergey Petrov, Dmitry Medvedev, and et al. 2023. "Genome-Wide Insights into Intraspecific Taxonomy and Genetic Diversity of Argali (Ovis ammon)" Diversity 15, no. 5: 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050627

APA Style

Dotsev, A., Koshkina, O., Kharzinova, V., Deniskova, T., Reyer, H., Kunz, E., Mészáros, G., Shakhin, A., Petrov, S., Medvedev, D., Kuksin, A., Bat-Erdene, G., Munkhtsog, B., Bagirov, V., Wimmers, K., Sölkner, J., Medugorac, I., & Zinovieva, N. (2023). Genome-Wide Insights into Intraspecific Taxonomy and Genetic Diversity of Argali (Ovis ammon). Diversity, 15(5), 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop