Next Article in Journal
The Coral Reefs and Fishes of St. Brandon, Indian Ocean Archipelago: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries
Previous Article in Journal
The Fishery Biology of Two Deep-Water Skates, Bathyraja schroederi and Amblyraja frerichsi (Rajiformes: Rajidae), from the Southeast Pacific Ocean
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Contribution to the Study of the Flora and Vegetation of Mnemba Island, Zanzibar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Botany Teaching–Learning Proposal Using the Phytosociological Method for University Students’ Study of the Diversity and Conservation of Forest Ecosystems for University Students

by
Ana Cano-Ortiz
1,
José Carlos Piñar Fuentes
2,
Carmelo Maria Musarella
3 and
Eusebio Cano
2,*
1
Department of Didactics of Experimental, Social and Mathematical Sciences, UCM, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Department of Animal and Plant Biology and Ecology (Botany), University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
3
Department of AGRARIA, University “Mediterranea” of Reggio Calabria, Loc. Feo di Vito Snc, I-89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(12), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120708
Submission received: 18 September 2024 / Revised: 6 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 21 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Diversity on Islands)

Abstract

:
We propose a method consisting of four steps for phytosociological research and education on flora and vegetation diversity. We demonstrate the application of this method using as an example a territory of special interest due to its high index of endemism (Dominican Republic Island), which is a biodiversity hotspot and hosts several protected areas, such as the Jaragua-Bahoruco-Enriquillo Biosphere Reserve. Nonetheless, this model, based on teaching the phytosociological method, can be extrapolated to any location worldwide. As an example, we analyzed the dry and humid forests. Through the four research phases, this study revealed a greater number of endemic species in the dry forest compared to the humid forest, with more endemics found in districts A12 and A16. The sequenced teaching of the research phases allows for the training of university students, future managers, and educators. The model enables learning sampling techniques, developing analysis and interpretation skills, and assessing the need for conservation of habitats rich in endemic species. The teaching outcomes of this study provide optimal training for the management and dissemination of ecological values, which allow broader society to learn to respect the environment.

1. Introduction

Studies on the endemic vegetation and flora of poorly known or unexplored areas remain highly important today [1], which is the case for the island territory of the Dominican Republic, for which the proposed teaching method is applicable.
The continuous monitoring of phytocenoses and the conservation of plant species contribute to the management and preservation of their habitats [2,3,4]. To achieve this, it is necessary to train managers and educators in bioclimatic, biogeographic, and vegetation knowledge, which is used in the construction of species distribution models [5].
This approach will facilitate the recovery of degraded forests in developing countries, where deforestation is a primary cause of habitat loss. In Central American tropical areas, deforestation is exacerbated by hurricanes, which result in the replacement of forests by secondary shrublands.
However, the deforestation of the humid forests of Cuba and the Dominican Republic leads to the emergence of a phytocenosis of pteridophytes, represented in the study area by Gleichenia bifia (Willd.) Spreng. and Dicranopteris flexuosa (Schrad.) Underw. These dense formations hinder the regeneration of well-developed forests.
Only small areas of well-preserved forests remain in the mountainous regions, which are the areas with the highest diversity and endemism [6,7,8]. These forests are crucial for maintaining the island’s biodiversity [9,10,11], as well as for preserving the relationship between forest stands and the water cycle, which is of utmost importance to society [12,13].
Given the high botanical and ecological value of the Dominican Republic, with its rich floristic diversity and numerous endemic species, it is essential to foster social awareness to achieve habitat conservation. This awareness arises when the floristic and habitat richness of the territories is understood, and this understanding is enhanced through the educational system. Many university students go on to become educators, capable of transmitting this knowledge to society, which is the primary reason for selecting these territories and proposing a model for research dissemination.
This method aims to promote sustainable development for the conservation of species and habitats by involving the educational system in conservation efforts [14,15].
This vision of conservation, which society acquires through the educational system, can be achieved through the use of natural spaces that act as laboratories. This educational model is based on in situ learning through the sampling of plant communities using the phytosociological method, as well as conducting floristic analysis and assessing the conservation status of habitats by analyzing characteristic and companion species.
There are more than 20 protected areas in the Dominican Republic (Biosphere Reserves, National Parks, Scientific Reserves, and Nature Reserves) that can serve as highly valuable educational resources, as stated by Ballantyne et al. and Ballantyne and Packer [15,16,17]. In this context, the Saragua-Bahoruco-Enriquillo Biosphere Reserve and Monte Cristi National Park (Cibao Valley) can function as laboratories for research on dry forests and their vegetation dynamics. The Ébano Verde Scientific Reserve, Los Haitises National Park, and Sierra de Neiba Park are well-suited for the study of rainforest ecosystems and their vegetation dynamics.
Several studies on green spaces and infrastructures [18,19] analyze how their influence contributes to sustainable development through enhanced environmental education. The investigation of forest diversity in the Dominican Republic enhances students’ learning environments, requiring knowledge and awareness of plants and green spaces to improve their academic performance [20]. For this, not only is flexibility in the teaching model necessary, but it is also essential to integrate botanical content into the curricula [21].
The use of green spaces for teaching is of particular interest, according to some researchers [22,23,24,25], as it improves both the academic and health outcomes of the population by fostering greater cognitive development.
Research and learning are two interrelated concepts; it is essential to learn how to research, developing curiosity and the ability to observe the natural environment. For this, there must be flexibility in the teaching model, as suggested by Waite et al. [26], where theoretical and practical teaching are combined. In the case of studying forest diversity in the Dominican Republic, the flexibility of the teaching model allows students to immerse themselves in their natural environment. The natural environment serves as a laboratory for observation and experimentation, enabling students to learn about vegetation in a practical manner.
The main objective of this study was to apply a research-based teaching method, using as an example the research conducted by various authors, along with our own contributions, on the island of the Dominican Republic (Caribbean).
The island of the Dominican Republic was chosen to propose the application of the research–teaching method due to its unique characteristics, as it has a high index of endemic species, which stimulates students’ knowledge and interest in research.
Authors such as Tilbury [27] emphasize the need for environmental education and analyze its integration into educational curricula, with a particular focus on teaching for the conservation of plants and ecosystems. Society plays a key role in the preservation and conservation of natural habitats and the endemic species they harbor [28,29,30,31,32,33].
Authors such as Mayoral García-Berlanga [34] and Rodríguez [35] argue that botany can play a crucial role in the development of scientific skills within society, especially among university students. To achieve this, it is essential to implement pedagogical approaches that make science education more accessible, highlighting the value of botany as an educational tool. This discipline not only provides a wealth of information but is also easily applicable in learning environments. Furthermore, it is important to move away from purely expository teaching methods to increase contact with nature, facilitating a better understanding and appreciation of the plant world [36,37,38,39,40,41].
The objectives of this research had two fundamental aspects:
  • The first objective was to understand the diversity of forests and their conservation status: This objective focused on identifying and documenting the variety of forest types present in areas of special interest on the island of the Dominican Republic, evaluating their floristic diversity and the degree of conservation of each one.
  • The second objective was to propose a model to transmit research through immersion in a natural environment, aimed at university students: Based on the study of the forests of the Dominican Republic, we aimed to establish a research model that could be followed by undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral students, as well as scholars of the natural world.
The initial hypothesis of this study was that the forests of the island of the Dominican Republic, due to their unique bioclimate and substrate diversity, exhibit a high rate of endemism and a distinctive vegetation structure that can be used as a model for teaching research methodologies to university students (future educators).
It was expected that through the application of this research, students would gain a better understanding of the diversity, conservation, and dynamics of forest ecosystems in areas of biogeographic interest, through an educational model that promotes learning by immersion in the natural environment. This approach would also revalue the environment as a didactic tool, generating meaningful experiences in nature that would influence the development of environmental sensitivity in adulthood.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

We proceeded to establish and delimit the study area, selected based on its edaphic and climatic diversity, which condition to a certain extent the type of vegetation [42,43].
Although there are few phytosociological studies on Caribbean vegetation, some relevant plant ecology research on the flora and vegetation in the Dominican Republic has proven highly valuable for subsequent studies [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
The study area corresponds to the different biogeographic units of the Dominican Republic. The sampling of the various types of forests was conducted by applying the phytosociological method established by Braun-Blanquet [59]. This was followed by the statistical and phytosociological analytical phase to describe the plant communities. Using the published floras [50], we differentiated the endemic species from the non-endemic ones.
The location of the Antilles (Caribbean) in a subtropical environment, with a distinct distribution of rainfall influenced by the trade winds, is a key factor determining the type of vegetation present. The climate is bixeric, characterized by two rainy periods and two dry periods. Bioclimatically, the Dominican Republic has an ombrothermal index ranging from semi-arid to humid, with values of Io = 1.3–7.9, which defines the existence of two types of forests: humid forest and dry forest [42].
The highest precipitation values are found in the Central, Septentrional, Oriental, Sierra Bahoruco, and Samaná Peninsula mountain ranges, generally above 1000 m, with values exceeding 2000 mm. The lowest precipitation values are observed in the areas of Azua and the Cibao Valley, where rainfall ranges between 400 and 800 mm.
Bioclimatic diagrams were created using climatic data on temperatures and precipitation, following the criteria established by Professor Rivas-Martínez in his work Bioclimatic Classification of the Earth, as referenced in Cano et al. [42].
In certain situations, such as in the eastern plains with a sub-humid ombrotype, the territory behaves as if it were dry due to the limestone and serpentine coral substrates. This results in the development of phytocenoses that depend on the substrate, while in the mountainous areas, where rainfall is very high, humid forests emerge. All of this contributes to the existence of unique habitats characterized by high biodiversity and endemism (Figure 1).

2.2. Methodology for Teaching Research

In general, two main methodologies for studying vegetation are widely accepted: the ecological approach favored by the Anglo-Saxon school and the phytosociological approach of Central Europe. While both methods share similarities and distinctions, we chose the phytosociological methodology, which is widely applied in EU countries.
This method includes defining the study area, conducting a bibliographic search, selecting sampling plots, performing phytosociological and bioclimatic analyses, carrying out statistical treatment, and developing vegetation catalogs to evaluate conservation and phytocoenotic diversity.
To apply that method, we focused this study on a specific territory (Dominican Republic) with forest vegetation as the theme.
This territory was chosen due to the uniqueness of the Dominican Republic, which hosts a high percentage of endemic species. This motivates students to understand the need for ecosystem conservation, training them for environmental management. This method can be applied not only in the study area but also in other parts of the world.
There are four steps to follow in the investigation:
  • Characterization of the study area.
  • Literature review and update.
  • Phytosociological approach and treatment.
  • Data analysis (tables, characteristic species).
The following steps are developed below:
  • Locating the research area.
  • Searching for bibliographic references related to the study area and other territories that help frame the research problem. These references should cover the geological, edaphic, climatic, bioclimatic, and biogeographical characteristics of the study area. Sections one and two are essential for starting the research.
    The initial bibliographic analysis revealed more than a hundred floristic and vegetation articles published in the journal Moscosoa. However, there were only our contributions on phytosociological studies. The selection of the study territory was based on its botanical and ecological values for conservation. In this subtropical territory, the selected sampling plots ranged between 1000 and 2000 m2, with plots that were ecologically and floristically homogeneous. Once a plot was selected, the species were listed, and the abundance and dominance indices of each species were recorded. This sampling technique is commonly used in territories with different climates.
  • Subsequently, selecting the types of sampling plots and the phytosociological methodology to be followed, which must be determined according to the Central European school [59,60]. In this case, we opted for the phytosociological methodology, which requires the transmission of basic geobotanical concepts [61,62].
    Following the phytosociological methodology, two types of forests in the Dominican Republic were studied, and the species they contained were recorded using abundance–dominance indices (+,1,2,3,4,5) [59]. The dry forest (R1–R48) and the cloud forest (C49–C65) were analyzed, and the flora of the Dominican Republic was used for species identification [50].
  • Transforming phytosociological indices into those of Van der Maarel [63] for statistical treatment. To differentiate the two forest groups, statistical treatments, dendrograms, TWISPAN, and, for the bioclimatic influence on species distribution, linear regression analysis and CCA were employed, using Analysis Package III and XLSTAT software 2023.3.1.
  • For the biogeographic and bioclimatic study, we relied on previous works [42,43], following the framework established by Rivas-Martínez [5,64,65]. The bioclimatic diagrams were obtained based on the research of Professor Rivas-Martínez in his work Bioclimatic Classification of the Earth [66].
  • After completing the statistical treatment and distinguishing between the two major forest types (wet and dry), we proceeded to the phytosociological phase, classifying each forest type into a specific association and placing it within a hierarchical system of ranks.
  • Based on this framework, a comparative analysis was conducted between the diversity of characteristic and companion species within the association. By examining the relationship between characteristic and companion species and the index of endemism, the conservation status could be evaluated.
  • Subsequently, a vegetation catena was constructed, in which the geosigmetum (Ridge-Lake-Valley) was investigated, highlighting a new method for landscape understanding, where different sigmetum or vegetation series are in contact. The geosigmetum should be understood as a contiguous spatial sequence of vegetation series. It is, therefore, the sum of a set of vegetation series in contact, forming an integrated landscape unit, equivalent to a vegetation catena.
The elaboration of phytosociological and synthetic tables is of great interest for clarifying the conservation status of dry and humid forests. In the preparation of the synthetic tables, indexes I to V are used, with I representing the lowest presence in the number of phytosociological inventories and V representing the highest presence. The percentage equivalence is as follows: IV–V = 80–100%, III–IV = 50–80%, II–III = 30–50%, and I–II < 30%.

3. Results

The research methodology established responded to objective one, allowing us to obtain results related to floristic richness and conservation status. It proceeded with the selection of the study area, search for bibliographic references, study of physical, bioclimatic, and biogeographical factors, and then phytosociological sampling, statistical treatment, phytosociological analysis, and diversity analysis.
The model has been applied in European countries, but it has not yet been applied in most Asian, American, and Australian countries, though this model is transposable to these countries.

3.1. Bioclimatic and Biogeographic Analysis

The highest pluviometric values are found in the mountains, which act as barriers to the trade winds, while the lowest values are recorded in the southwest of the island, where the ombrotype becomes semi-arid (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
However, the Samaná Peninsula has low continentality (Ic = 3.8), high oceanity (Io = 7.4), and high thermicity (It/Itc = 750), which gives the territory an upper infratropical thermotype, and its ombrotype is classified as lower humid, with sub-humid to humid forests.
These Io values increase in the Cordillera Central, Sierras de Bahoruco, Neiba, and Cordillera Oriental, where sub-humid to humid forests dominate, including genera such as Swietenia, Magnolia, Prestoea, and Cyathea [67]. Conversely, at the opposite end of the island (Pedernales), the diagram indicates the same upper infratropical thermotype but a lower dry ombrotype, approaching semi-arid conditions, which allows for the presence of dry forest.
This dry forest is also found in the eastern plain with a sub-humid ombrotype, which is attributed to water loss through the porous substrate of coral origin. This phenomenon can be explained by incorporating the ombroedaphoxeric index into the bioclimatic study: Ioex = Pp − e/Tp × WR, where Pp = mean annual precipitation, Tp = positive temperature, e = residual evapotranspiration, and WR = water retention capacity of the soil [9,68,69,70]. Regarding biogeography, we relied on the sector map developed by Cano et al. [43] (Figure 4).

3.2. Analysis of Plant Communities

The cluster and Twinspan analyses distinguished two main forest groups in the Dominican Republic: humid forest (A) and dry forest (B). This classification serves as a primary criterion for differentiating these two broad groups. In the Twinspan analysis (Figure 5), two groups of inventories were observed: A) The humid forest, dominated by Didymopanax tremulus Krug & Urb., Hyeronima domingensis Urb., Magnolia hamorii Howard, Magnolia pallescens Urb. & Ekm., Prestoea montana (Grah.) Nichol., Alchornea latifolia Sw., Cyathea arborea (L.) J.E. Smith, and Cyathea furfuracea Baker.
Subgroups A1 and A2 are included in group A. A1 represents the humid forests of the Eastern Cordillera and Haitises, which are altered forests with a low rate of endemism, as their Shannon_E diversity index (diversity of endemics) is zero according to the study by Cano-Ortiz et al. [67]. Subgroup A2 includes the humid forests of the Cordillera Central and Sierra de Bahoruco, with both populations at equivalent relative distances. The forests of Magnolia hamori Howard are specific to Sierra Bahoruco, while those of Magnolia pallescens Urb. & Ekm. are specific to the Central Cordillera.
(B) The dry forest, dominated by Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg., Metopium toxiferum (L.) Krug & Urb., Pilosocereus polygonus (Lam.) B. & R., Sideroxylon foetidissimum Jacq., Sideroxylon salicifolium (L.) Sw., Prosopis juliflora L., Lemairocereus hystrix Britt & Rose, and Acacia macracantha H. & B. Ex Willd.
This group includes subgroup B1, which represents the forests of the eastern plains developed on coral limestone, with a sub-humid ombrotype. However, due to the low water retention capacity, the territory behaves as if dry (biogeographic unit 2.4). Subgroup B2 includes the semi-arid populations of Azua, Enriquillo, and Pedernales (biogeographic units 2.1 and 2.3).
To subgroup B1 (TWISPAN) belong the associations Ass. Zamio debilis-Metopietum toxiferi and Ass. Chrysophyllo oliviformi-Sideroxyletum salicifolii, phytocenoses that develop in sub-humid environments and on coral-origin substrates, where high water loss occurs, allowing the entry of xerophytic species.
To subgroup B2 (TWISPAN) belong the associations: As. Coccotrino gracili-Burseretum simarubae, As. Harrisio nashii-Prosopidetum juliflorae, As. Crotono poitaei-Erythrosyletum rotundifolii, As. Lonchocarpo pycnophylli-Cylindropuntietum caribaeae, and As. Neoabbottio paniculatae-Guaiacetum officinali [69].
Group A, which includes the type (C) inventories, represents the cloud forest with the associations Hyeronimo montanae-Magnolietum pallescentis, Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum montanae, Hyeronimo dominguensis-Magnolietum hamorii, and Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae.
In the dendrogram shown in Figure 6, three distinct groups of plant communities are identified at the cut-off level: Group B, which contains two subgroups, G1 and G2, including the type (R) inventories associated with dry forest communities.
The results of the regression analysis are Maha: y = 0.08585x − 1.5, R2 = −0.951; Sisa: y = 0.5799x − 0.4, R2 = 0.9994; Meto: y = 0.4065x − 0.5, R2 = 0.9979; Sifo: y = 0.0633x − 0.5, R2 = 0.9708, highlighting the clear correlation between the abundance values for these species and the values for Io and ETP (Figure 7).
The CCA analysis (Figure 8) shows two groups of inventories: R1-R39 (dendrogram), representing the dry forest and dominated by Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg., Meto = Metopium toxiferum (L.) Krug. & Urb., Pilosocereus polygonus (Lam.) B. & R., Sifo = Sideroxylon foetidissimum Jacq., Sisa = Sideroxylon salicifolium (L.) Sw., Prosopis juliflora L., Lemairocereus hystrix Britt & Rose, and Acacia macracantha H. & B. Ex Willd.; and the group C40-C65, dominated by Didymopanax tremulus Krug. & Urb., Hyeronima domingensis Urb., Maha = Magnolia hamorii Howard, Magnolia pallescens Urb. & Ekm., Prestoea montana (Grah.) Nichol., Alchornea latifolia Sw., Cyathea arborea (L.) J.E. Smith, and Cyathea furfuracea Baker.
All the habitats described on the island of the Dominican Republic have a high index of endemic species, which highlights their special conservation importance, particularly those located on special substrates such as serpentinites [47] (Table 1). From a landscape perspective, the vegetation on serpentinites constitutes a catena (Geosigmetum) of conservation interest due to its high percentage of endemic floristic elements associated with serpentinites (Figure 9).
The humid forest (A) is well represented in the biogeographic district units A1, A5, A6, A12, and A16 (Figure 10), with Cordillera Central (A16) harboring the greatest number of endemic species and where the humid forest (broadleaf) is better conserved. The following rainforest associations belong to this group: Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum montanae, Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae, Hyeronimo montanae-Magnolietum pallescentis, and Hyeronimo dominguensis-Magnolietum hamorii, each differentiated by the presence of endemic species exclusive to each syntaxon (Table 2) [67].
These associations in the vegetation catenas are located in areas with higher precipitation, forming distinct landscape units depending on the existing substrates (Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12).
Some species, such as Pinus caribaea, form mixed forests with other tropical tree species and give name to the vegetation class Byrsonimo-Pinetea caribaea Samek & Borhidi in Borhidi et al. 1979 [71,72]. This tropical species, outside its native distribution area (Central America), can become invasive in some Asian countries [73]. For the catenal contact between different forest types, we follow Rivas-Martínez [74].
The biogeographical study conducted was primarily based on the distribution of 1582 endemic species across 19 areas (A1–A19) with a regional range (Figure 13), with the highest number of endemics located in the Bahoruco-La Selle (A12) and Cordillera Central (A16) areas [10].
The study of the 19 areas of Hispaniola showed a total diversity of 2094 endemic species, of which 1162 are specific to each of the 19 biogeographic districts. As shown in Figure 14, the areas with the highest diversity of specific endemisms are A12 and A16, while those with the lowest index of endemisms are A5, A8, and A10 [11].
In relation to the second objective of this proposal, to establish a model of educational intervention through immersion in a natural environment, numerous authors highlight the effectiveness of this methodology, based on the direct interaction of the individual with the environment. Authors such as Samper and Ramírez [75] indicate that experiential learning allows the student to participate directly in the construction of their learning, working from the same context with new content.
Based on the findings of these previous authors, the natural environment was revalued as an educational medium, and through this work, we came to propose the four steps of our purely active proposal:
  • Status of the Research Area. Biogeographic and Bioclimatic Study:
    ο
    Description of the study area.
    ο
    Initial contextualization to understand the relevance of the topic.
    ο
    Based on previous research and the work of Rivas-Martínez.
    ο
    Obtaining bioclimatic diagrams to classify the area.
  • Bibliographic Reference Search:
    ο
    Compilation of geological, edaphological, climatic, bioclimatic, and biogeographical information.
    ο
    These references frame the problem and provide a solid basis for the research.
  • Plot Selection and Phytosociological Methodology. Transformation of Phytosociological Indices. Statistical Treatment and Forest Separation:
    ο
    Decision on sampling plots.
    ο
    Use of phytosociological methodology according to the Central European school.
    ο
    Species identification using abundance–dominance indices.
    ο
    Transformation of the indices to Van der Maarel’s indices for statistical treatment.
    ο
    Twinspan application to differentiate dry and wet forests.
    ο
    Analysis of invasive and catenal species among forest types.
  • Phytosociological analysis. Comparative Analysis of Species Diversity:
    ο
    Classification of forests into specific associations (Appendix A)
    ο
    Inclusion in a hierarchical system of ranks (Appendix A)
    ο
    Evaluation of the diversity of characteristic and companion species.
    ο
    Estimation of conservation status based on relationship and abundance of endemism.
    ο
    Integrated landscape analysis
The following phases in the analysis were studied: the area, the flora [50], the differentiation between characteristic and companion species [62], and the inclusion of the previously described associations and their catenary contacts [74].

4. Discussion

The four research steps outlined in the methodology guide the university researcher in learning how to establish a rationale for the work sequence, acquiring essential concepts such as the concept of association and characteristic or companion species [62], ultimately leading to the elaboration of phytosociological tables and an analysis of the flora, with a special emphasis on the endemic species present in the association [8,9].
From the presence in the phytosociological inventories, synthetic tables are elaborated, focusing on the endemisms present, to discern the endemic character of the plant association and to establish the degree of conservation. In this case, districts A5, A8, and A10 are those with the lowest number of endemisms, particularly in district A5 (Eastern Cordillera), where the association Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae (As4) is located, with only Bactris plumeriana Mart. found as endemic, due to significant anthropic action.
In the comparative study of the diversity of the four associations As1–As4 by Cano-Ortiz et al. [67], using the Shannon index, the total diversity of the association is analyzed, including the totality of species present in the association, Shannon_T, versus the diversity of characteristic and companion species, Shannon_Ca and Shannon_Co. The difference between these last two values reflects the conservation status of the association and, consequently, the habitats.
Whenever Shannon_Ca > Shannon_Co, we accept that the association is stabilized, while there is a risk of disappearance if Shannon_Ca ≤ Shannon_Co.
Considering that alpha diversity (α) represents local diversity, and since several plant associations can coexist in the same locality, with beta diversity (β) representing the replacement of local species by species from other communities, the oscillation in the number of individuals [76,77] means that it is not always clear whether the plant association is well conserved.
As the plant association consists of a set of faithful characteristic species and other introgressive species from neighboring communities, it is logical to apply the diversity indices to all species present in the association, to the characteristic species, and to the companions to determine whether the association is stable or not.
In the case of humid forests, associations As1–As3 are well conserved. However, As4, located in the Eastern Cordillera is endangered due to anthropic action, which has caused the disappearance of endemic species.
According to Mejía & Jiménez [57], the endemicity was 32%, and the subsequent number of endemic taxa was 2050 out of a total of 6000 species, representing 34.16%. These species are included in 1284 genera, making the island of Hispaniola one of the world’s main biodiversity hotspots due to its high percentage of endemicity. This highlights the need to promote the island’s high conservation value at both social and educational levels [14,15].
Based on previous research conducted by the authors and a series of articles published in the journal Moscosoa on the flora and vegetation of the Dominican Republic [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58], we proceeded to establish the method for teaching research. We considered that learning about vegetation, and especially forest diversity, enhances the cognitive development of individuals [78], promotes interdisciplinary learning, develops students’ observation skills, and fosters problem-solving abilities [79,80]. To develop learning about the two types of forests and their conservation status, teaching for sustainable development is desirable, emphasizing a critical and nature-centered approach [81,82,83].
This vegetation teaching proposal enables students to conduct a comparative analysis of ecological and phytosociological methodologies. While both methods share the ultimate goal of enhancing vegetation knowledge, they display both similarities and differences, as highlighted in various studies [84,85,86,87,88]. Methodologically, these approaches align in certain aspects, such as the analysis of environmental factors and the determination of minimum area requirements. However, they diverge in the selection of sampling plots: ecological methods often employ random transects, whereas in the phytosociological approach, sampling plots must be ecologically and physiognomically homogeneous. Additionally, there are differences in the indices used to determine species abundance. Both methodologies are clearly effective for vegetation study, though we chose the phytosociological method of the Central European school, a widely adopted approach in EU countries.
However, this is not always possible, either due to institutional barriers [89] or a lack of knowledge among those managing the education of green spaces, which leads them to undervalue these areas as formative laboratories. For these reasons, we propose the following model, consisting of a series of steps within the exploration process, which can have a significant impact on the research of young people beginning their journey in this field.
The proposed methodology promotes the direct immersion of students in the natural environment to foster experiential learning [90,91]. Through this methodological proposal, inquiry and direct observation are established, allowing students to freely explore the environment, observing and documenting their findings. Subsequently, practical and experiential activities will be carried out [92,93], including activities such as sample collection and phytosociological analysis.
In this teaching method, it is important to note that theoretical instruction typically outweighs practical teaching in most universities and research centers, a tradition that has persisted over time. To address this, we propose a practical, field-based approach outside the classroom, known as the ‘flipped classroom’ [94,95], alongside project-based learning. This approach includes field practices where students learn to collect ecological and floristic data and develop sampling techniques, complemented by a bibliographic study to obtain essential climatic data needed for calculating bioclimatic indices and creating bioclimatic diagrams.
Through a discussion process, critical thinking and the exchange of ideas about the environment and its conservation will be encouraged, which can be assessed through a structured interview [96].
The proposed didactic model not only facilitates the understanding of the diversity and conservation of the forests of the Dominican Republic, in line with what Ardoin et al. propose on education and conservation [15], but also serves as an effective pedagogical tool for training future researchers, strengthening the learning and integration of students in the natural environment [17,20,21,34]. This methodological approach enables students to acquire practical and theoretical skills through direct application in a natural environment. By following the phases of the model, students learn to carry out the following:
  • Identify and select relevant study areas.
  • Develop skills in the search and analysis of bibliographic and field information.
  • Apply phytosociological sampling and analysis techniques: enabling students to understand the structure and composition of phytocenoses and to identify plant associations.
  • Perform statistical treatments and biogeographical analysis: facilitating data interpretation and predictive modeling.
  • Evaluate the conservation and dynamics of ecosystems: through the study of vegetation catenas and the identification of factors affecting biodiversity.
Student learning with the proposed method, in which education, sustainability, and development are interrelated according to Kopnina [81] and Garvey [83], should be enhanced, especially in developing countries with high botanical–ecological values.
It is observed that learning via this methodological research proposal is highly satisfactory for university students. In this context, the student learns and is motivated by knowledge, gaining the ability to identify vegetation associations and catenas, internalizing the ridge–slope–valley concept, and ultimately making an integrative interpretation of the landscape [97]. This learning enables effective environmental management in any territory, as the proposed methodology has universal applicability.
With this sequential research method, students acquire sufficient knowledge to act in real life as environmental managers. In addition, there is an increase in self-esteem, and they improve their environmental, social, and leadership skills, which is highly beneficial for transmitting these values to society [98,99,100]. Studies by various authors clearly demonstrate the significant influence of environmental education on academic performance and the acquisition of positive attitudes toward the environment [100,101,102,103,104]. This impact is observed universally across different environments and countries, reinforcing the rationale for this educational proposal aimed at university students.

5. Conclusions

Once the four steps proposed for the investigation of the territory have been completed, which any university student can follow using this model, the following conclusions can be drawn.
The insular phenomenon of the island of Hispaniola results in a high rate of endemism both in the mountains and in the valleys. This particularity also makes the habitats themselves endemic, requiring special protection measures to preserve the unique biodiversity of the region.
It is essential to promote a thorough knowledge of the habitats, including a detailed initial description of their flora and plant associations. This knowledge is crucial for the implementation of effective and well-informed conservation strategies.
The biodiversity of the endemic habitats of the Dominican Republic’s forests and their dynamic stages are represented in 35 plant associations, 14 alliances, 9 orders, and 9 phytosociological classes, according to the proposed taxonomic scheme. This detailed classification highlights the complexity and ecological richness of the island’s forest ecosystems.
The conservation status of humid and dry forests shows significant differences depending on the level of anthropic action in each area. It is essential to apply specific conservation measures tailored to each forest type to ensure their long-term preservation.
Based on existing information on Caribbean vegetation, the conservation of all phytocenoses with a high percentage of endemic species is proposed. This action is crucial not only to maintain biodiversity but also to preserve the essential ecological functions of these forest ecosystems.
The research method proposed in this study not only advances scientific knowledge but also serves as an effective didactic tool for training future researchers. Students acquire essential practical and theoretical skills through the direct application of the method in a real study environment.
Finally, the application of this method in higher education fosters the development of critical research skills in students, preparing them to contribute effectively to biodiversity conservation and management in their future careers. This approach to teaching ensures that the next generation of researchers will be well-prepared to address the environmental challenges of the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.-O. and E.C.; methodology, A.C.-O.; software, J.C.P.F.; validation, A.C.-O., J.C.P.F. and E.C.; formal analysis, A.C.-O.; research, E.C.; resources, E.C.; data curation, J.C.P.F.; writing—original draft, A.C.-O.; writing—revising and editing, E.C.; visualization, A.C.-O. and C.M.M.; supervision, E.C. and C.M.M.; project administration, E.C.; fundraising, E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has not received external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

We collect in this appendix the syntaxa published so far on the island of Hispaniola (9 phytosociological classes, 9 orders, 14 alliances and 35 associations).
  • CHRYSOBALANO-ANNONETEA GLABRAE Borhidi & Muñiz in Borhidi, Muñiz & Del-Risco 1979
  • Tabebuio-Bucidetalia (Lvov 1967) Borhidi & Del-Risco in Borhidi, Muñiz & Del-Risco 1979
  • Marcgravio rubrae-Pterocarpion officinalis Cano, Velóz, Cano-Ortiz et Esteban Ruiz 2009
  • 1-Roystoneo hispaniolanae-Pterocarpetum officinalis Cano, Velóz, Cano-Ortiz et Esteban Ruiz 2009
  • BYRSONIMO-PINETEA CARIBAE Samek and Borhid in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Pinetalia occidentalis-maestrensis Knapp 1964 in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Ilici tuerckheimi-Pinion occidentalis Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2011
  • 1-Dendropemon phycnophylli-Pinetum occidentalis Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2011
  • 2-Cocotrino scopari-Pinetum occidentalis Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2011
  • RHIZOPHORO-AVICENNIETEA GERMINANTIS Knapp (1964) em. Borhidi & Del-Risco in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Rhizophoretalia Cuatrecasas 1958
  • Al. Dalbergio-Rhizophorion manglis (Borhidi 1991) Cano, Cano-Ortiz, Velóz, Alatorre et Otero 2012
  • 1-Machario lunati-Rhizophoretum manglis Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano, Cano-Ortiz, Velóz, Alatorre et Otero 2012
  • Avicennietalia germinantis Cuatrecasas 1958
  • Conocarpo-Laguncurion racemosae Cuatrecasas 1958
  • 2-Batidi-Avicennietum germinantis Borhidi & Del-Risco & Borhidi 1991
  • (syn. As. Laguncurio racemosae-Avicennietum germinantis Reyes & Acosta 2003; As. Avicennietum germinantis Reyes & Acosta 2003)
  • 3-Rhabdadenio biflorae-Laguncularietum racemosae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano, Cano-Ortiz, Velóz, Alatorre et Otero 2012
  • 4-Conocarpo erectae-Coccolobetum uviferae Reyes in Reyes & Acosta 2003
  • (syn. Conocarpetum erectae Reyes in Reyes & Acosta 2003)
  • 5-Sthalio monospermae-Laguncularietum racemosae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano, Cano-Ortiz, Velóz, Alatorre et Otero 2012
  • 6-Lonchocarpo pycnifolii-Conocarpetum erecti Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano, Cano-Ortiz, Velóz, Alatorre et Otero 2012
  • TABEBUIO-BURSERETEA Knapp (1964) Borhidi 1991
  • Tabebuio-Burseretalia Knapp (1964) Borhidi 1991
  • Leptogono buchii-Tabebuion berterii Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • 1-Coccotrino argentei-Tabebuietum berterii Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • 2-Zombio antillari-Leptogonetum buchii Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • Calliandro haematommae-Phyllanthion nummularioidis Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • 3-Garcinio glaucescentis-Phyllanthetum numularioidis Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • 4-Tabebuio ophiolithicae-Randietum aculeati Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • PHYLLANTHO-NEOBRACETEA VALENZUELANAE Borhidi & Muñiz in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Ariadno-Phyllanthetalia Borhidi & Muniz in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Tetramicro canaliculatae-Leptochloopsion virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • 1-Leptogono buchii-Leptochloopsietum virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • Rondeletio christii-Pinion occidentalis Cano, Cano-Ortiz, del Río, Velóz et Esteban Ruíz 2014
  • 2-Leptogono buchii-Pinetum occidentalis Cano, Veloz & Cano Ortiz 2011
  • COCCOTHRINACETO-PLUMERIETEA Knapp in Boirhi 1991
  • Lantano-Cordietalia Borhidi in Borhidi et al. 1979
  • Crotono poitaei- Leptochloopsion virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • 1-Crotono astrophori-Leptochloopsietum virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • 2-Melocacto pedernalensis-Leoptochloopsietum virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • 3-Solano microphylli-Leptochloopsietum virgatae Cano, Velóz et Cano-Ortiz 2010
  • Pseudocarpidio-Guettardion Borhidi & Muñiz in Borhidi 1986
  • 1-Guettardo ellipticae-Guapiretum discoloris García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • Eugenio-Metopietalia toxiferi Knapp (1942) Borhidi 1991
  • Eugenio-Capparidion Borhidi in Borhidi et al. 1959
  • 4-Chrysophyllo oliviformi-Sideroxyletum salicifolii Cano & Velóz 2012
  • 5-Zamio debilis-Metopietum toxiferi Cano & Velóz 2012
  • 6-Coccotrino gracili-Burseretum simarubae Cano, Cano-Ortiz et Velóz 2015
  • CERCIDI-CEREETEA Borhidi 1996
  • Ritterocereetalia hystricis Borhidi 1996
  • Harrio nashii–Acacion skleroxylae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano-Ortiz, Musarella, Spampinato, Velóz 2015
  • 1-Harrisio nashii–Prosopidetum juliflorae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano-Ortiz, Musarella, Spampinato, Velóz 2015
  • 2-Crotono poitaei–Erythroxyletum rotundifolii Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano-Ortiz, Musarella, Spampinato, Velóz 2015
  • 3-Lonchocarpo pycnophylli–Cylindropuntietum caribaeae Cano, Cano-Ortiz &Velóz ex Cano-Ortiz, Musarella, Spampinato, Velóz 2015
  • 4-Neoabbottio paniculatae–Guaiacetum officinalis Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Velóz ex Cano-Ortiz, Musarella, Spampinato, Velóz
  • 5-Simaroubetum berteroani García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • 6-Phllostylo rhamnoidis-Prosopidetum juliflorae García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • 7-Consoleo moniliformis-Camerarietum linearifoliae García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • 8-Lemairoceo hystricis-Prosopidetum juliflorae García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • 9-Lycio americani-Prosopidetum juliflorae García Fuentes et al. 2015
  • WEINMANNIO-CYRILLETEA Knapp 1964
  • Weinmannio-Cyrilletalia Knapp 1964
  • Rondeletio ochraceae-Clusion roseae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020
  • 1-Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum motanae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020
  • 2-Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020
  • OCOTEO-MAGNOLIETEA Borhidi and Muñiz in Borhdi et al. 1979
  • Ocoteo-Magnolietalia Muñiz in Borhdi et al. 1979
  • Rondeletio ochraceae-Didymopanion tremuli Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020
  • 1-Hyeronimo montanae-Magnolietum pallescentis Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020
  • 2-Hyeronimo dominguensis-Magnolietum hamorii Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2020

References

  1. Cianfaglione, K.; Pedrotti, F. El haya roja en la “Montagna di Torricchio”, región de Las Marcas, Italia central. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2019, 47, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bonari, G.; Fantinato, E.; Lazzaro, L.; Sperandii, M.G.; Acosta, A.T.R.; Allegrezza, M.; Assini, S.; Caccianiga, M.; Di Cecco, V.; Frattaroli, A.; et al. Shedding light on typical species: Implications for habitat monitoring. Plant Sociol. 2021, 58, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pisani, D.; Pazienza, P.; Perrino, E.V.; Caporale, D.; De Lucia, C. The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services of Biodiversity Components in Protected Areas: A Review for a Framework of Analysis for the Gargano National Park. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, S.; Singh, B.; Surmal, O.; Bhat, M.N.; Singh, B.; Musarella, C.M. Fragmented Forest Patches in the Indian Himalayas Preserve Unique Components of Biodiversity: Investigation of the floristic composition and phytoclimate of the unexplored Bani Valley. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rivas-Martínez, S.; Rivas-Sáenz, S.; Penas-Merino, A. Sistema mundial de clasificación bioclimática. Glob. Geobot. 2011, 1, 1–634. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xiang, W.; Liu, S.; Lei, X.; Frank, S.C.; Tian, D.; Wang, G.; Deng, X. Secondary floristic composition, structure and spatial pattern in subtropical China. J. For. Res. 2013, 18, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saito, S. Effects of Severe typhoon on Forest Dynamics in a Warn-temperature Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Southwestern Japan. J. For Res. 2002, 7, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maunder, M.; Leiva, A.; Santiago-Valentín, E.; Stevenson, D.W.; Acevedo-Rodríguez, P.; Meerow, A.W.; Mejía, M.; Clubbe, C.; Francisco-Ortega, J. Plant Conservation in the Caribbean Island Biodiversity Hotspot. Bot. Rev. 2008, 74, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cano, E.; Cano-Ortiz, A.; Del Río, S.; Veloz, A.; Esteban Ruiz, F.J. A phytosociological survey of some serpentine plant communities in the Dominican Republic. Plant Biosyst. 2014, 148, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cano-Ortiz, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Cano, E. Biogeographical Areas of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic, Republic of Haiti). In Plant Ecology; IntechOpen Plubisher: London, UK, 2017; pp. 165–189. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cano-Ortiz, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Piñar Fuentes, J.C.; Pinto Gomes, C.J.; Cano, E. Distribution patterns of endemic flora to define hotspots on Hispaniola. Syst. Biodivers. 2016, 14, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaimowitz, D. Forest and water: A political perspective. J. For. Res. 2004, 9, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uzawa, H. Common forest and social capital. J. For. Res. 2004, 9, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Stern, M.J.; Powell, R.B.; Hill, D. Environmental Education Program Evaluation in the New Millennium: What Do We Measure and What Have We Learned? Environ. Educ. Res. 2014, 20, 581–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ardoin, N.M.; Bowers, A.W.; Gaillard, E. Environmental Education Outcomes for Conservation: A Systematic Review. Biol. Conserv. 2020, 241, 108224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ballantyne, R.; Packer, J.; Hughes, K. Environmental Awareness, Interests and Motives of Botanic Gardens Visitors: Implications for Interpretive Practice. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ballantyne, R.; Packer, J. Introducing a Fifth Pedagogy: Experience-Based Strategies for Facilitating Learning in Natural Environments. Environ. Educ. Res. 2009, 15, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Desha, C.; Caldera, S.; Beer, T. Roles of Urban Green Spaces for Children in High-Density Metropolitan Areas during Pandemics: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kanelli, A.A.; Vardaka, M.L.; Malesios, C.; Katima, Z.J.; Kalantzi, O.-I. Can Campus Green Spaces Be Restorative? A Case Study fromTanzania. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Martínez, J.; Thompson, H. Integrating Nature into Education: The Role of Vegetation in Enhancing Learning Environments. Land 2023, 12, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sinakou, E.; Donche, V.; Boeve-de Pauw, J.; Van Petegem, P. Designing Powerful Learning Environments in Education for Sustainable Development: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maller, C.; Townsend, M.; Pryor, A.; Brown, P.; St Leger, L. Healthy Nature Healthy People: ‘Contact with Nature’ as an Upstream Health Promotion Intervention for Populations. Health Promot. Int. 2006, 21, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Berman, M.G.; Jonides, J.; Kaplan, S. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gill, T. The Benefits of Children’s Engagement with Nature: A Systematic Literature Review. Child. Youth Environ. 2014, 24, 10–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Becker, C.; Lauterbach, G.; Spengler, S.; Dettweiler, U.; Mess, F. Effects of Regular Classes in Outdoor Education Settings: A Systematic Review on Students’ Learning, Social and Health Dimensions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Waite, S.; Rogers, S.; Evans, J. Freedom, Flow and Flexibility: Practitioners’ Views on the Benefits of Outdoor Learning. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 2013, 13, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tilbury, D. Environmental Education for Sustainability: Defining the New Focus of Environmental Education in the 1990s. Environ. Educ. Res. 1995, 1, 195–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Álvarez, P.; Vega, P. Actitudes ambientales y conductas sostenibles. Implicaciones para la educación ambiental. Rev. Psicodidáct. 2009, 4, 245–260. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cantú, P. Educación ambiental y la escuela como espacio educativo para la promoción de la sustentabilidad. Rev. Educ. 2014, 18, 39–52. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandoval, M. Comportamiento sustentable y educación ambiental: Una visión desde las prácticas culturales. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2012, 44, 181–196. [Google Scholar]
  31. Guerrero Fernández, A.; Rodríguez Marín, F.; López Lozano, L.; Solís Ramírez, E. Alfabetización ambiental en la formación inicial docente: Diseño y validación de un cuestionario. Enseñ. Cienc. 2022, 40, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kostøl, K.B.; Bøe, M.V.; Skår, A.R. Nature of Science in Norway’s Recent Curricula Reform. Sci. Educ. 2023, 32, 1561–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De Rivas, R.; Vilches, A.; Mayoral., O. Secondary School Students’ Perceptions and Concerns on Sustainability and Climate Change. Climate 2024, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mayoral García-Berlanga, O. Las plantas como recurso didáctico. La botánica en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Flora Montiberica 2017, 73, 93–99. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rodríguez, D.S. La Botánica en el marco de las ciencias naturales: Diversas miradas desde el saber pedagógico. Biografía 2011, 4, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mendoza Fernandez, A.J.; MartínezHernández, F.; Salmerón-Sánchez, E.; Pérez-García, F.J.; Merlo, E.; Mota, J. Proposal for Didactic Innovation Through the Monitoring of Threatened Biodiversity. Res. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2023, 2, 60–68. Available online: https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/rjees/article/view/495 (accessed on 30 October 2024). [CrossRef]
  37. Caruso, G. Calabrian Native Project: Botanical Education Applied to Conservation and Valorization of Autochthonous Woody Plants. Res. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2022, 2, 47–59. Available online: https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/rjees/article/view/387 (accessed on 30 October 2024). [CrossRef]
  38. Rodríguez Angarita, T.E.; Mora Penagos, W. El sentido educativo de los espacios no convencionales de educación (ENCE) tipo jardines botánicos: Un estudio de caso. Bio-grafía 2020, 13, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baig, M.I.; Yadegaridehkordi, E. Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2023, 20, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crespo Castellanos, J.M.; Cruz Naimi, L.A.; Gómez Ruiz, M.L. Una aproximación a los Parques Nacionales y sus paisajes a través de itinerarios didácticos. Espac. Tiempo Forma Ser. VI Geogr. 2018, 11, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vilches, A.; Gil-Pérez, D. The Transition to Sustainability as an Urgent Objective for Overcoming the Current Systemic Crisis. Eureka J. Sci. Educ. Dissem. 2016, 13, 395–407. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/18296 (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  42. Cano, E.; Cano Ortiz, A.; del Río González, S.; Alatorre Cobos, J.; Velóz, A. Bioclimatic map of the Dominican Republic. Plant Sociol. 2012, 49, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cano, E.; Veloz, A.; Cano Ortiz, A. Contribution to the biogeography of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic, Haiti). Acta Bot. Gallica 2010, 157, 581–598. [Google Scholar]
  44. Galán de Mera, A. Clasificación fitosociológica de la vegetación de la región del Caribe y Sudamérica. Arnaldoa 2005, 12, 86–111. [Google Scholar]
  45. García, R.; Mejía, M.; Zanoni, T. Composición florística y principales asociaciones vegetales de la Reserva Científica Evano Verde, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana. Moscosoa 1994, 8, 86–130. [Google Scholar]
  46. García, R.; Castillo, D. Ecología, estado y usos de Neoabbottia paniculata (Cactaceae) endémica de la isla República Dominicana. Moscosoa 1994, 8, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  47. García, R.; Mejía, M. Vegetación y flora serpentícola de la República Dominicana. Moscosoa 2008, 16, 217–253. [Google Scholar]
  48. Guerrero, A.; Jiménez, F.; Höner, D.; Zanoni, T. La flora y vegetación de la Loma Barbacoa, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana. Moscosoa 1997, 9, 84–116. [Google Scholar]
  49. Höner, D.; Jiménez, F. Flora vascular y vegetación de Loma la Herradura (Cordillera Oriental), República Dominicana. Moscosoa 1994, 8, 65–85. [Google Scholar]
  50. Liogier, A.H. La Flora de la Hispaniola. Available online: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL3814428M/La_flora_de_la_Hispaniola (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  51. May, T.; Peguero, B. Vegetación y flora de Loma el Mogote, Jarabacoa, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana. Moscosoa 2000, 11, 11–37. [Google Scholar]
  52. May, T. Etapas tempranas de la sucesión en un bosque húmedo de Magnolia pallescens después de un incendio (Loma de Casabito, Reserva Científica Evano Verde, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana). Moscosoa 1997, 9, 117–144. [Google Scholar]
  53. May, T. Tres años de observaciones fenológicas en el bosque húmedo de Casabito (Reserva Científica Ebano Verde, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana). Moscosoa 1998, 10, 164–178. [Google Scholar]
  54. May, T. Respuesta de la vegetación en un “calimetal” de Dicranopteris pectinata después de un incendio, Cordillera Central Oriental, República Dominicana. Moscosoa 2000, 11, 113–132. [Google Scholar]
  55. May, T. Composición, estructura y diversidad en los bosques húmedos latifoliados de la Reserva Científica Ébano Verde (Cordillera Central, República Dominicana). Moscosoa 2007, 15, 156–176. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mejía, M.; García, R.; Jiménez, F. Subregión fitogeográfica Barbacoa-Casabito: Riqueza florística y su importancia en la conservación de la flora de la isla República Dominicana. Moscosoa 2000, 11, 57–106. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mejía, M.; Jiménez, F. Flora y vegetación de la Loma La Humeadora, Cordillera Central, República Dominicana. Moscosoa 1998, 10, 10–25. [Google Scholar]
  58. Peguero, B.; Jiménez, F.; Rodríguez, R.A.; Bastardo, R.H. Composición y estructura de la vegetación del área importante para la conservación de aves en Honduras (AICA-Honduras) y sus alrededores. Baní. Provincia Peravia. República Dominicana. Moscosoa 2013, 18, 14–56. [Google Scholar]
  59. Braun Blanquet, J. Fitosociología. Bases para el Estudio de las Comunidades Vegetales; Ed. Blume; 1979. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  60. Gehú, J.M.; Rivas-Martínez, S. Notions Fondamentales de Phytosociologie in Syntaxonomie; Ed. kramer, USA; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pott, R. Phytosociology: A Modern Geobotanical Method. Plant Biosyst. 2011, 145, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cano Ortiz, A.; Piñar Fuentes, J.C.; Ighbareyh, J.M.H.; Quinto Canas, R.; Musarella, C.M.; Cano, E. Geobotanical field activities for learning landscape interpretation concepts and methods for university students. Special issue “Didactics of Experimental Sciences”. J. Res. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 2022, 2, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van Der Maarel, E. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 1979, 39, 97–114. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rivas-Martínez, S. Sinopsis biogeográfica, bioclimática y vegetacional de Norteamérica. Fitosociología 2004, 41, 19–52. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rivas-Martínez, S.; Navarro, G.; Penas, A.; Costa, M. Mapa biogeográfico de América del Sur. Un estudio preliminar. Int. J. Geobot. Res. 2011, 1, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rivas-Martínez, S. Clasificación Bioclimática de la Tierra. Globalbioclimatics. Available online: https://naturalezaenhispania.com/6%20ManyGUIAingles.htm (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  67. Cano Ortiz, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Pinto Gomes, C.J.; Quinto Canas, R.; Piñar Fuentes, J.C.; Cano, E. Phytosociological Study, Diversity and Conservation Status of the Rainforest in the Dominican Republic. Plants 2020, 9, 741. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/6/741 (accessed on 30 October 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cano, E.; Cano-Ortiz, A.; Veloz, A. Contribution to the knowledge of the edaphoxerophilous communities of the Samana peninsula (Dominican Republic). Plant Sociol. 2015, 52, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  69. Cano-Ortiz, A.; Musarella, C.M.; Piñar Fuentes, J.C.; Veloz, A.; Cano, E. Vegetation of the dry bioclimatic areas in the Dominican Republic. Plant Biosyst. 2015, 149, 451–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. García Fuentes, A.; Torres Cordeo, J.A.; Ruiz Valenzuela, L.; Lendinez Barriga, M.L.; Quesada Rincón, J.; Valle Tendero, F.; Veloz, A.; León, Y.M.; Salazar Mendías, C. A study of the dry forest communities in the Dominican Republic. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 2015, 87, 249–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Borhidi, A. Fitogeografía y Ecología de la Vegetación de Cuba; Academiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  72. Borhidi, A. Fitogeografía y Ecología de la Vegetación de Cuba; Academiai Kiado: Budapest, Hungary, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wei, Y.; Ouyang, Z.; Miao, H.; Zheng, H. Exotic Pinus caribaea causes soil quality to deteriorate on former abandoned land compared to an indigenous Podocarpus plantation in the tropical forest area of southern China. J. For. Res. 2009, 14, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rivas-Martínez, S. Notions on dynamic-catenary phytosociology as a basis for landscape science. Plant Biosyst. 2005, 139, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Samper, A.; Ramírez, A. Diseño de una Propuesta Pedagógica de Educación para la Seguridad Vial Estructurada Bajo el Modelo de Aprendizaje Experiencial. Uniminuto. 2014. Available online: https://repository.uniminuto.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/df21c205-3903-40dc-823e-f7ebb556fa09/content (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  76. Chao, A.; Kubota, Y.; Zelený, D.; Chiu, C.; Li, C.; Kusumoto, B.; Yasuhara, M.; Thorn, S.; Wei, C.; Costello, M.J.; et al. Quantifying Sample Completeness and Comparing Diversities among Assemblages. Ecol. Res. 2020, 35, 292–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chao, A.; Colwell, R.K.; Gotelli, N.J.; Thorn, S. Proportional Mixture of Two Rarefaction/Extrapolation Curves to Forecast Biodiversity Changes under Landscape Transformation. Ecol. Lett. 2019, 22, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rickinson, M.; Dillon, J.; Teamey, K.; Morris, M.; Choi, M.Y.; Sanders, D.; Benefield, P. A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. In National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London. 2004. Available online: https://informalscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Review-of-research-on-outdoor-learning.pdf (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  79. Brookes, A. Lost in the Australian Bush: Outdoor Education as Curriculum. J. Curric. Stud. 2002, 34, 405–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hernández-Ramos, J.; Pernaa, J.; Cáceres-Jensen, L.; Rodríguez-Becerra, J. The Effects of Using Socio-Scientific Issues and Technology in Problem-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kopnina, H. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): The Turn Away from ‘Environment’ in Environmental Education? Environ. Educ. Res. 2012, 18, 699–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Higgins, P.; Kirk, G. Sustainability Education in Scotland: The Impact of National and International Initiatives on Teacher Education and Outdoor Education. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 2006, 6, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Garvey, G. Education for Sustainability: A Practical Guide; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kent, M.; Coker, P. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  85. Matteucci, S.D.; Colma, A. Metodología para el Estudio de la Vegetación; Programa Regional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico; Secretaria General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos: Washington, DC, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  86. Mostacedo, B.; Fredericksen, F.S. Manual de Métodos Básicos de Muestreo y Análisis en Ecología Vegetal; Proyecto de Manejo Forestal Sostenible (BOLFOR): Santa Cruz, Bolivia, 2000; pp. 1–87.
  87. Vicia García, M.; Muñoz Municio, M.C. Propuesta metodológica para la detección de áreas singulares de vegetación y flora en las áreas no protegidas de la comunidad de Madrid. GeoFocus 2007, 7, 37–55. [Google Scholar]
  88. Orlando Ranget, J.; Vazquez, A. Métodos de estudio de la vegetación. In Colombia Diversidad Biótica II: Tipos de Vegetación en Colombia; Publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020; pp. 59–87. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339510090 (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  89. Stevenson, R.B. Schooling and Environmental Education: Contradictions in Purpose and Practice. Environ. Educ. Res. 2007, 13, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Moore, R.C.; Wong, H.H. Natural Learning: The Life History of an Environmental Schoolyard: Creating Environments for Rediscovering Nature’s Way of Teaching; Illustrated, Reprint; MIG Communications: Berkeley, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pelo, A. The Goodness of Rain: Developing an Ecological Identity in Young Children. Child. Youth Environ. 2013, 23, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Piaget, J. Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child; Viking Press: New York, NJ, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  93. Kirschner, P.A.; Sweller, J.; Clark, R.E. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educ. Psychol. 2006, 41, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Caraballo Vidal, I.; Pezelj, L.; Ramos-Álvarez, J.J.; Guillen-Gamez, F.D. Level of Satisfaction with the Application of the Collaborative Model of the Flipped Classroom in the Sport of Sailing. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Köpeczi-Bócz, T. The Impact of a Combination of Flipped Classroom and Project-Based Learning on the Learning Motivation of University Students. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Grawitz, M. Métodos y Técnicas de las Ciencias Sociales. Editia Mexicana. 1984, p. 455. Available online: https://books.google.es/books/about/M%C3%A9todos_y_t%C3%A9cnicas_de_las_ciencias_soc.html?id=K0LQOgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed on 30 October 2024).
  97. Rivas Martínez, S. Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España. Parte I. Itinera Geobot. 2011, 18, 5–424. [Google Scholar]
  98. Mejía, M. Flora de República Dominicana: Conocimiento actual y estado de conservación. In Proceedings of the Actas IX Congreso Latinoamericano de Botánica, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 18–25 June 2006; Ed. Jardín Botánico Nacional Dr.Rafael Ma. Moscoso: Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 2006; pp. 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  99. Truong, S.; Gray, T.; Ward, K. “Sowing and growing” life skills through garden-based learning to re-engage disengaged youth. Learn. Landsc. 2016, 10, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cooley, S.J.; Holland, M.J.G.; Cumming, J.; Novakovic, E.G.; Burns, V.E. Introducing the use of a semi-structured video diary room to investigate students’ learning experiences during an outdoor adventure education groupwork skills course. High. Educ. 2014, 67, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sturrock, G.R.; Zandvliet, D.B. Citizenship outcomes and place-based learning environments in an integrated environmental studies program. Educ. Sci. 2023, 13, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ardoin, N.M.; Bowers, A.W. Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 2020, 31, 100353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Otto, S.; Pensini, P.M. Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Glob. Environ. Change 2017, 47, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ruiz-Gallardo, J.R.; Verde, A.; Valdés, A. Garden-Based Learning: An Experience with “At Risk” Secondary Education Students. J. Environ. Educ. 2013, 44, 252–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biogeographic distribution of humid forests (Hf) in the Cordillera Central (1.1), Haitises, Samaná Peninsula, and Cordillera Septentrional (2.5). Sub-humid forests (Drsh) in the eastern lowlands (2.4). Dry forests (Drf) in Pedernales, Azua, and the Cibao Valley.
Figure 1. Biogeographic distribution of humid forests (Hf) in the Cordillera Central (1.1), Haitises, Samaná Peninsula, and Cordillera Septentrional (2.5). Sub-humid forests (Drsh) in the eastern lowlands (2.4). Dry forests (Drf) in Pedernales, Azua, and the Cibao Valley.
Diversity 16 00708 g001
Figure 2. Bioclimatic diagram of the Samaná Peninsula, Dominican Republic. P = annual precipitation, T = mean annual temperature, M = mean temperature of the maximums of the coldest month, m = mean temperature of the minimums of the coldest month, T′= mean monthly temperature of the absolute maximums, m′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute minimums, Tp = annual positive temperature, Tn = negative annual temperature, Ic = continentality index, Io = ombrothermal index, Itc = compensated thermicity index.
Figure 2. Bioclimatic diagram of the Samaná Peninsula, Dominican Republic. P = annual precipitation, T = mean annual temperature, M = mean temperature of the maximums of the coldest month, m = mean temperature of the minimums of the coldest month, T′= mean monthly temperature of the absolute maximums, m′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute minimums, Tp = annual positive temperature, Tn = negative annual temperature, Ic = continentality index, Io = ombrothermal index, Itc = compensated thermicity index.
Diversity 16 00708 g002
Figure 3. Bioclimatic diagram of Pedernales, Dominican Republic. P = annual precipitation, T = mean annual temperature, M = mean temperature of the maximums of the coldest month, m = mean temperature of the minimums of the coldest month, T′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute maximums, m′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute minimums, Tp = positive annual temperature, Tn = negative annual temperature, Ic = continentality index, Io = ombrothermal index, Itc = compensated thermicity index.
Figure 3. Bioclimatic diagram of Pedernales, Dominican Republic. P = annual precipitation, T = mean annual temperature, M = mean temperature of the maximums of the coldest month, m = mean temperature of the minimums of the coldest month, T′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute maximums, m′ = mean monthly temperature of the absolute minimums, Tp = positive annual temperature, Tn = negative annual temperature, Ic = continentality index, Io = ombrothermal index, Itc = compensated thermicity index.
Diversity 16 00708 g003
Figure 4. Map of the biogeographic sectors of La islã Española. 1.1 Centers. 2.1 Bahoruco-Hotense. 2.2 Neiba-Matheux-Northwest. 2.3 Azua- San Juán-Hoya Enriquillo-Puerto-Príncipe-Artiobonite-Gonaivës. 2.4 Caribe-Cibense. 2.5 North [43].
Figure 4. Map of the biogeographic sectors of La islã Española. 1.1 Centers. 2.1 Bahoruco-Hotense. 2.2 Neiba-Matheux-Northwest. 2.3 Azua- San Juán-Hoya Enriquillo-Puerto-Príncipe-Artiobonite-Gonaivës. 2.4 Caribe-Cibense. 2.5 North [43].
Diversity 16 00708 g004
Figure 5. Twinspan dendrogram in which the red and blue colors express the relative distances between species populations. (A) Humid forest with subgroups A1 and A2. (B) Dry forest with two subgroups B1 and B2.
Figure 5. Twinspan dendrogram in which the red and blue colors express the relative distances between species populations. (A) Humid forest with subgroups A1 and A2. (B) Dry forest with two subgroups B1 and B2.
Diversity 16 00708 g005
Figure 6. Diversity of forest types. Dry forest (R1–R48) (B) and cloud forest (C49–C65) (A). Dendrogram in which group A includes the inventories of the humid forest, dominated by species of Cyathea, Prestoea, Didymopanax, Alchornea, Hyeronima, and Magnolia. Group B includes two large subgroups, G1 and G2, which include the dry forest populations of Azua, Enriquillo, Pedernales, Cibao Valley, and Eastern Plains (biogeographic units 2.1, 2.3, and 2.4, respectively).
Figure 6. Diversity of forest types. Dry forest (R1–R48) (B) and cloud forest (C49–C65) (A). Dendrogram in which group A includes the inventories of the humid forest, dominated by species of Cyathea, Prestoea, Didymopanax, Alchornea, Hyeronima, and Magnolia. Group B includes two large subgroups, G1 and G2, which include the dry forest populations of Azua, Enriquillo, Pedernales, Cibao Valley, and Eastern Plains (biogeographic units 2.1, 2.3, and 2.4, respectively).
Diversity 16 00708 g006
Figure 7. Regression analysis: Maha, Sifo, Sisa, Meto, and Io, ETP Maha = Magnolia hamorii Howard, Meto = Metopium toxiferum (L.) Krug. & Urb., Sisa = Sideroxylon salicifolium (L.) Sw., Sifo = Sideroxylon foetidissimum Jacq., Io = ombrothermic index, ETP = potential evapotranspiration.
Figure 7. Regression analysis: Maha, Sifo, Sisa, Meto, and Io, ETP Maha = Magnolia hamorii Howard, Meto = Metopium toxiferum (L.) Krug. & Urb., Sisa = Sideroxylon salicifolium (L.) Sw., Sifo = Sideroxylon foetidissimum Jacq., Io = ombrothermic index, ETP = potential evapotranspiration.
Diversity 16 00708 g007
Figure 8. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). R1–R39 and C49–C65 of the dendrogram.
Figure 8. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). R1–R39 and C49–C65 of the dendrogram.
Diversity 16 00708 g008
Figure 9. Dry sub-humid forest on serpentinites in the Sierra de Yamasa. 1 and 2: Palm forest (Coccothrinax argentea) present in the Crotono poitaei-Erythrosyletum rotundifolii association, with abundant intricate thickets rich in serpentine species.
Figure 9. Dry sub-humid forest on serpentinites in the Sierra de Yamasa. 1 and 2: Palm forest (Coccothrinax argentea) present in the Crotono poitaei-Erythrosyletum rotundifolii association, with abundant intricate thickets rich in serpentine species.
Diversity 16 00708 g009
Figure 10. 1. Broadleaf forest. 2. As. Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum motanae. 3. Phytocenosis of Didymopanax morotononi. 4 and 5. Pinus occidentalis pine forest with Danthonia dominguensis in the open areas.
Figure 10. 1. Broadleaf forest. 2. As. Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum motanae. 3. Phytocenosis of Didymopanax morotononi. 4 and 5. Pinus occidentalis pine forest with Danthonia dominguensis in the open areas.
Diversity 16 00708 g010
Figure 11. Humid–hyperhumid vegetation of the Haitises (Mogotes). 1. Cultivated coconut trees. 2 and 5. Forests of Swietenia mahagoni. 3. As. Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae. 4. and 5. Didymopanax morotononi forest. 6. Mangrove.
Figure 11. Humid–hyperhumid vegetation of the Haitises (Mogotes). 1. Cultivated coconut trees. 2 and 5. Forests of Swietenia mahagoni. 3. As. Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae. 4. and 5. Didymopanax morotononi forest. 6. Mangrove.
Diversity 16 00708 g011
Figure 12. Vegetation of rainy environments (Sierra de Neiba). 1. Pinus occidentalis pine forest. 2. Forest of Prestoea montana. 3. Broadleaf forest of Swietenia mahagoni.
Figure 12. Vegetation of rainy environments (Sierra de Neiba). 1. Pinus occidentalis pine forest. 2. Forest of Prestoea montana. 3. Broadleaf forest of Swietenia mahagoni.
Diversity 16 00708 g012
Figure 13. Map of the biogeographic zones (districts) of Hispaniola. A1. Northern Cordillera. A2. Coastal-Atlantic District. A3. Cibao Valley. A4. Samanense. A5. Oriental. A6. Haitian. A7. Oriental-Caribbean. A8. Yamasense. A9. Azua-Sán Juan-Lake Herniquillo. A10. Central Plain (Haiti). A11. Port-au-Prince-Ariobonita-Gonaivës. A12. Bahoruco-La Selle. A13. Hottense. A14. Neiba-Matheux. A15. Northwest Haiti. A16. Central-East. A17. Center-West (Massif du Nord). A18. Gonave Island. A19. Tortuga Island.
Figure 13. Map of the biogeographic zones (districts) of Hispaniola. A1. Northern Cordillera. A2. Coastal-Atlantic District. A3. Cibao Valley. A4. Samanense. A5. Oriental. A6. Haitian. A7. Oriental-Caribbean. A8. Yamasense. A9. Azua-Sán Juan-Lake Herniquillo. A10. Central Plain (Haiti). A11. Port-au-Prince-Ariobonita-Gonaivës. A12. Bahoruco-La Selle. A13. Hottense. A14. Neiba-Matheux. A15. Northwest Haiti. A16. Central-East. A17. Center-West (Massif du Nord). A18. Gonave Island. A19. Tortuga Island.
Diversity 16 00708 g013
Figure 14. Analysis of the diversity of endemisms unique to a biogeographic district (1) and the total number of endemisms in that district (2). Districts A1–A19.
Figure 14. Analysis of the diversity of endemisms unique to a biogeographic district (1) and the total number of endemisms in that district (2). Districts A1–A19.
Diversity 16 00708 g014
Table 1. Syntaxis of the different associations (endemic = E).
Table 1. Syntaxis of the different associations (endemic = E).
1234567ST
Acacia skleroxyla Tuss.II IIIE
Agave antillarum Descourt. VIIIVIIIE
Serjania sinuata (Poir.) Schum.I IIVIE
Guapira brevipetiolata (Heimerl) AlainI II VE
Pictetia sulcata (P. Beauv) Beyra & LavinI I IVE
Leptocereus weingartianus (Hartn.) Britt. & RoseIIIV I E
Cissus oblongo-lanceolata Krug & Urb.III I E
Coeloneurum ferrugineum (Spreng.) Urb.II V E
Galactia dictyophylla Urb.I V E
Malpighia setosa SprengelI I E
Eugenia samanensis Alain I I E
Comocladia cuneata BrittonIIII E
Pereskia quisqueyana AlainII E
Hyperbaena brevipes Urb.II E
Lonchocarpus neurophyllus Urb.II E
Goetzea ekmanii O.E. SchulzII E
Poitaea dubia (Poiret) LavinI E
Pseudophoenix sargentei Wendl subsp. saoanae (O.F.Cook.) RealI E
Diospyros domingensis (Urb.) AlainI E
Exostema acuminatum Urb.I E
Comocladia domingensis BrittonI E
Consolea picardae (Urb.) ArecesI E
Isidorea pungens (Lam.) B. L. Rob.I E
Melicococcus jimenezii (Alain) Acev. Rodr.I E
Cordia fitchii Urb. I E
Guettarda dictyophylla Urb. I E
Tabebuia obovata Urb. I E
Croton astrophorus Urb. IIIII E
Coccotrinax gracilis Burret V E
Ipomoea viridiflora Urb. IV E
Pictetia sulcata (P. Beauv) Beyra & Lavin var. ternata (DC.) Urb. I E
Harrisia nashii Britt. & Rose VIVVIE
Pavonia coccinea Cav. II E
Cordia salvifolia Juss. ex Poir. I III E
Scolosanthus triacanthus (Spreng.) DC. III IIIE
Melocactus lemairei (Monv.) Miq. III IIIE
Gochnatia microcephala var buchii (Urb.) Alain II IE
Croton poitaei Urb. IIII E
Caesalpinia buchii Urb. III E
Crossopetalum decussatum (Baill.) Lourteig III E
Karwinskia coloneura Urb. I E
Justicia abeggii Urb. & Ekm. I E
Lantana leonardorum Moldenke II E
Eupatorium sinuatum Lam. var viscigerum Urb. & Ekm. II E
Guettarda tortuensis Urb. & Ekm. II E
Solanum polyacanthum Lam. I E
Coccothrinax argentea (Lodd.) Sarg. I E
Lantana ciferriana Mold. I E
Catesbaea glabra Urb. I E
Cassine lanceolata (Urb. & Ekm.) Alain I E
Coccoloba leoganensis Jacq. I E
Coccoloba buchii Urb. I E
Lantana buchii Urb. I E
Galactia synandra Urb. I E
Isidorea pedicellaris Urb. & Ekm. I E
Poitaea multiflora (Sw.) Urb. I E
Solanum aquartia Dunal var luxurians (O.E. Schulz) Alain I E
Lantana pauciflora Urb. I E
Pseudocarpidium domingense (Urb. & Ekm.) Mold. I E
Croton gonaivensis Urb. & Ekm. I E
Lonchocarpus pycnophyllus Urb. V E
Cameraria linearifolia Urb. V E
Bonania domingensis Urb. III E
Bursera spinescens Urb. & Ekm. III E
Reynosia cuneifolia Urb. & Ekm. III E
Thouinidium inaequilaterum Alain III E
Caesalpinia domingensis Urb. III E
Ipomoea desrousseauxii Steud. III E
Annona bicolor Urb. III E
Coccoloba incrassata Urb. I E
Guettarda stenophylla Urb. I E
Eugenia pomifera (Aubl.) Urb. I E
Malpighia micropetala Urb. I E
Calliandra pedicellata Benth. I E
Chamaesyce adenoptera (Bertol.) Small I E
Melocactus pedernalensis M. Mejía & R. García I E
Thouinia domingensis Urb. & Radlk. IIIIE
Neoabbottia paniculata (Lam.) Britt. & Rose VE
Plumeria subsessilis DC A.. IE
Solanum microphyllum (Lam.) Dunal IVE
Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright IIIE
Eugenia lindalhlii Urb. & Ekm. IE
Coccotrinax spissa Bailey VE
1.-As. Zamio debilis-Metopietum toxiferi Cano & Veloz 2012. 2.-As. Chrysophyllo oliviformi-Sideroxyletum salicifolii Cano & Veloz 2012. 3.-Coccotrino gracili-Burseretum simarubae Cano, Cano-Ortiz & Veloz 2015. 4.-Harrisio nashii-Prosopidetum juliflorae Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2015. 5.-Crotono poitaei-Erythrosyletum rotundifolii Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2015. 6.-Lonchocarpo pycnophylli-Cylindropundietum caribaeae. Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2015. 7.-Neoabbottio paniculatae-Guaiacetum officinali. Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2015. ST = status. E = endemic.
Table 2. Summary table of the different associations (endemic = E).
Table 2. Summary table of the different associations (endemic = E).
As1As2As3As4ST
Rondeletia ochracea Urb.VIIIV E
Arthrostylidium multispicatum PilgerVVII E
Didymopanax tremulus Krug. & Urb.IVIIV E
Mikania venosa A. LiogierIIIIIV E
Lobelia rotundifolia Juss.IIIII E
Macrocarpaea domingensis Urb.IV II E
Polygala fuertesii (Urb.) BlakeIII II E
Marcgravia rubra A. LiogierIV I E
Odontadenia polyneura (urb.) Wood.III E
Pleurothallis domingensis Cogn.III E
Cestrum coelophlebium O. E. SchulzIII E
Gonocalyx tetrapterus A. LiogierV E
Hyeronima montana A. LiogierV E
Magnolia pallescens Urb. & Ekm.V E
Persea oblongifolia Kopp.V E
Styrax ochraceus Urb.V E
Tabebuia vinosa A. GentryV E
Cinnamomum alainii (C.K. Allen) A. LiogierIV E
Pinguicula casabitoana J. JiménezIII E
Chaetocarpus domingensis ProctorII E
Lyonia alainii W. Judd.I E
Myrsine nubicola A. LiogierI E
Sagraea fuertesii (Cogn.in Urb.) Alain III E
Senecio lucens (Poir) Urb. III E
Tabebuia bullata A. Gentry IV E
Blechnum tuerckheimii A. Brause III E
Cestrum inclusum Urb. I E
Ipomoea furcyensis Urb. I E
Lobelia robusta Graham I E
Malpighia macracantha Ekm. & Nied. I E
Pilea geminata Urb. I E
Columnea domingensis (Urb.) Wiehler V E
Lasianthus bahorucanus Zanoni V E
Magnolia hamorii Howard V E
Mecranium ovatum Cog. V E
Vriesea tuercheimii (Mez.) L.B. Smith V E
Calyptrantes selleanus Urb. & Ekm. IV E
Hedyosmum domingense Urb. IV E
Hyeronima domingensis Urb. IV E
Hypolepis hispaniolica Mason II E
Meriania involucrata (Desv.) Naud. II E
Ocotea acarina C. K. allen II E
Cestrum daphnoides Griseb. I E
Cordia dependens Urb. & Ekm. I E
Ilex tuerckheimii Loes. I E
Leandra limoides (Urb.) W. Judd & Skean I E
Bactris plumeriana Mart. IIIE
As1.—Hyeronimo montanae-Magnolietum pallescentis Cano et al., 2020. As2.—Cyatheo furfuracei-Prestoetum motanae Cano, Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2020. As3.—Hyeronimo dominguensis-Magnolietum hamorii Cano, Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2020. As4.—Ormosio krugii-Prestoetum montanae Cano, Cano Ortiz & Veloz in Cano Ortiz et al., 2020. ST = status. E = endemic.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cano-Ortiz, A.; Piñar Fuentes, J.C.; Musarella, C.M.; Cano, E. Botany Teaching–Learning Proposal Using the Phytosociological Method for University Students’ Study of the Diversity and Conservation of Forest Ecosystems for University Students. Diversity 2024, 16, 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120708

AMA Style

Cano-Ortiz A, Piñar Fuentes JC, Musarella CM, Cano E. Botany Teaching–Learning Proposal Using the Phytosociological Method for University Students’ Study of the Diversity and Conservation of Forest Ecosystems for University Students. Diversity. 2024; 16(12):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cano-Ortiz, Ana, José Carlos Piñar Fuentes, Carmelo Maria Musarella, and Eusebio Cano. 2024. "Botany Teaching–Learning Proposal Using the Phytosociological Method for University Students’ Study of the Diversity and Conservation of Forest Ecosystems for University Students" Diversity 16, no. 12: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120708

APA Style

Cano-Ortiz, A., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Musarella, C. M., & Cano, E. (2024). Botany Teaching–Learning Proposal Using the Phytosociological Method for University Students’ Study of the Diversity and Conservation of Forest Ecosystems for University Students. Diversity, 16(12), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop