Next Article in Journal
Zooplankton as an Indicator: A Dramatic Shift in Its Composition Following a Sudden Temporal Brownification of a Tropical Oligotrophic Lake in Southern Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Greening up the City with Native Species: Challenges and Solutions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Karyotype Analysis and Genome Size Estimation Using Flow Cytometry of the Genus Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae)

1
College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
National Key Laboratory for Tropical Crop Breeding, Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571737, China
3
The Engineering Technology Research Center of Tropical Ornamental Plant Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, Haikou 571737, China
4
Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement in Southern China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Haikou 571737, China
5
Key Laboratory of Tropical Crops Germplasm Resources Genetic Improvement and Innovation of Hainan Province, Haikou 571737, China
6
Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya 572000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(1), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17010057
Submission received: 14 December 2024 / Revised: 10 January 2025 / Accepted: 14 January 2025 / Published: 17 January 2025

Abstract

:
Encyclia Hook. is a tropical orchid known for its delightful fragrance and distinctive flower shapes, which have been widely used as superior parents for inter and intrageneric breeding. In this study, karyotype analysis shows that the number of chromosomes in diploid plants of Encyclia is 40, with all species exhibiting mesial and central filamentous chromosomes. The karyotype of diploid plants is primarily 2B. Among the three detected intergeneric hybrids, both Enanthleya Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’ and Guaricyclia Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’ are triploid, while Robertsara ‘Green Wonder’ is tetraploid. By evaluating various lysates and tissues, a flow cytometry system (FCM) is developed with Galbraith’s buffer (GLB) and tender leaves. By using Dendrobium officinale as an external reference, the genome size of the Encyclia species and its intra and intergeneric hybrids are assessed, which ranges from 1.07 Gb to 3.23 Gb. These results will establish a foundation for high-throughput identification of germplasms, advance crossbreeding efforts, and enhance the understanding of the genome in Encyclia.

1. Introduction

Encyclia Hook. is a genus of Neotropical orchids found from Florida and Mexico to southeastern Brazil [1,2,3]. It currently includes 213 species, with 179 officially described and 25 likely of hybrid origin [4]. Within the Encyclia genus, there are several supposedly related species that exhibit distinct morphological traits, such as the shape of central lobe of the labellum, the presence of warts on the ovaries with peduncles, and the existence or absence of columnar processes on the column [5]. These plants typically grow in clusters, featuring short internodes that connect ovate and pear-shaped pseudobulbs. Each pseudobulb bears one to four jointed fleshy leaves and a single apical panicle [2].
Karyotype represents the initial phenotypic expression of a genotype [6] and can reflect chromosome number and structure, heterochromatic band diversity, and gene location. Changes in karyotypic symmetry typically involve changes in chromosome size and shape [6,7]. Detailed karyotyping is essential to identify chromosomal signatures and further determine differences and relationships between species and taxa [8,9,10]. Genome size (GS) reflects the ecological adaptability of species [11] and significantly affects certain epigenetic traits as well as the growth and development of plants [12]. Techniques for measuring genome size include genome sequencing [13], flow cytometry [14], and Feulgen densitometry [15].
The number and morphology of chromosomes in a few species of the genus Encyclia, such as E. flava (Lindl.) Porto & Brade, E. oncidioides (Lindl.) Schltr., E. seidelii Pabst, have been investigated and their genome size had been roughly estimated, with the smallest genome being E. seidelii with 2C = 2.87 pg and the largest being E. oncidioides and E. flava with 2C = 5.20 pg [16]. However, these species studied in the past are only a small part of the genus Encyclia and they are not common in practical production and ornamental applications. In addition, previous studies only focused on chromosome number and morphology but lacked detailed karyotyping and did not establish efficient systematic methods for assessing ploidy and genome size. This study aims to conduct karyotyping analysis of widely cultured Encyclia species and hybrids, establishing a high-throughput flow cytometry (FCM) analysis technique to assess ploidy and genome size, which will further facilitate species identification, crossbreeding and genomic research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The accessions include Encyclia species, as well as hybrids that are commonly grown (Table 1 and Figure A1). All of them are cultivated in the germplasm nursery of the Tropical Crop Genetic Resource Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Science (Danzhou, China).

2.2. Preparation and Staining of Chromosomes

The root tip was pretreated with saturated p-dichlorobenzene solution for 4 h at 4 °C. It was rinsed with ultrapure water and transferred to a Carnoy solution consisting of absolute ethanol and glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 h at 4 °C. After that, it was placed in 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid solution for 8 min at 60 °C. Finally, it was stained with modified carbolic acid magenta. The number of chromosomes was observed and counted under a microscope, and cells with well-defined and scattered chromosome morphology were selected for karyotyping photos. Chromosomes were measured using Image J v1.54g, and the measurement data were organized. Karyotyping was conducted according to the Stebbins classification criteria [17], and the karyotype asymmetry coefficient was calculated using Arano’s method [18]. Chromosomes were classified according to the method outlined by Levan [19].

2.3. Construction of Flow Cytometry System for Encyclia

Galbraith buffer (GLB), Woody Plant buffer (WPB), and Modified Gitschier buffer (mGb), as well as root tips, tender leaves and mature leaves of E. alata (Bateman) Schltr., were used to establish a systematic flow cytometry evaluation system. GLB buffer was chosen as the buffer for the experiment because of its single and sharp peak of flow in the cytometry histogram. The three plant tissues were placed in 1 mL of pre-chilled GLB lysate, quickly minced by a blade, and then stained for 1 min with 20 μL of DAPI fluorescent dye before being detected by the Sysmex CyFlow Ploidy Analyzer. Tender leaves were selected as the plant tissue material for experiments because of their flow cytometry histogram with a single and sharp peak.

2.4. Flow Cytometric Estimation of 2C DNA Content

The genome sizes of Encyclia species and hybrids were estimated according to the established flow cytometry system of Encyclia. Diploid Dendrobium officinale Kimura et Migo with a genome size of 1.1 Gb was used as a reference plant using the following formula:
Genome   size = 1.1   Gb × Mean   florescence   value   of   the   tested   samples Mean   florescence   value   of   D .   officinale

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The number of replicates performed for the experiments on karyotyping and FCM was three. The FCM data collected were analyzed, and flow histograms of the test samples were plotted using FCS Express version 3. The data were summarized using Excel, and one-way ANOVA was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software.

3. Results

3.1. Karyotype Analysis

As shown in Figure 1, with a chromosome base of 20, six species were diploid (2n = 2x = 40), except for Robertsara Green Wonder, which was tetraploid (2n = 4x = 80) (Figure 1). The seven species studied included both metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes, with only E. cordigera var. alba having a pair of acrocentric chromosomes (Figure 2). Being tetraploid, Roertsara Green Wonder exhibited the greatest variation in relative lengths and the highest ratio of the longest to the shortest chromosome, as well as the highest nuclear asymmetric coefficient, categorized as karyotype type 2C. Among the diploid species, E. Shinfong Smile, an intrageneric hybrid, had the largest range of relative lengths and the highest ratio of the longest to the shortest chromosome, while the other diploid species were all unique. Both E. alata and E. cordigera var. alba had the same karyotype type, which was type 3B, while the other diploid species were classified as type 2B (Table 2).

3.2. Flow Cytometry Analysis of Encyclia

Flow cytometry histograms indicated that all three lysates produced peaks, but there were variations in fluorescence intensity and CV values, with the WPB sample exhibiting notably higher CV values compared to the other two samples (Table 3). The flow cytometry histograms for WPB and mGb displayed multiple and prominent impurity peaks, whereas GLB showed a single and sharp peak (Figure 3). Consequently, GLB was selected as the lysate for further experiments. Tender leaves were chosen as the experimental material due to their flow cytometry histogram with a single and sharp peak.

3.3. Genome Size Estimation of Encyclia

Using GLB as the lysate and the tender leaves from each sample as the material, the genome size was estimated through flow cytometry, maintaining the CV value within 5%. The flow histograms of the samples were obtained (Figure 4). The genome size of the sample being measured was calculated using a formula with diploid Dendrobium officinale as the external reference sample (Table 4). Among the species, E. alata, E. cordigera var. rosea, and E. tampensis ‘Gem’ were found to be diploid, with genome sizes of (1.12 ± 0.02) Gb, (1.11 ± 0.03) Gb, and (1.07 ± 0.04) Gb, respectively. E. granitica was identified as triploid, with a genome size of (1.79 ± 0.05) Gb. E. Orchid Jungle and E. Shinfong Smile, both intrageneric hybrids of Encyclia, were diploid with genome sizes of (1.13 ± 0.03) Gb and (1.09 ± 0.04) Gb, respectively. As intergeneric hybrids, Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’ and Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’ were triploid, while Robertsara Green Wonder was tetraploid, with genome sizes of (1.71 ± 0.04) Gb, (1.94 ± 0.01) Gb, and (3.23 ± 0.08) Gb, respectively.

4. Discussion

The research revealed that six species exhibited somatic chromosomes with a configuration of 2n = 2x = 40, consistent with findings from other species within the same genus, such as E. flava, E. oncidioides and E. seidelii, in earlier studies [16]. In contrast, Robertsara Green Wonder displayed a chromosome count of 2n = 4x = 80, indicating it is tetraploid. In this study, the tetraploid Robertsara Green Wonder showed a higher asymmetry coefficient. Chromosomal morphological diversity may result from changes in chromosomal symmetry due to intragenomic translocations, interarm inversions, fusions, or divisions, which may or may not influence genome size [6,20].
The fusion of 2n gametes is one of the mechanisms of polyploidy formation, and it has been observed that distant hybridization has a higher probability of producing 2n gametes compared to species [21,22]. Through intrageneric, and even intergeneric hybridization with more distant relatives, a 2n gamete could be obtained with a high probability compared with the species, resulting in polyploidy [21,23]. As a triploid, the male parent of Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’ is an intergeneric hybrid, and the female parent is a species. Robertsara Green Wonder is a tetraploid intergeneric hybrid, and its parents are both intergeneric hybrids. Most of the other species are diploids, which shows that polyploidy can be formed through distant hybridization.
In previous experiments, plant leaves were commonly used as material for flow cytometry [24,25]. However, the presence of high concentrations of starch, polysaccharides or other cellular metabolites in mature leaves have a certain impact on the results of flow cytometry analysis. Containing the appropriate concentration of TritonX-100, GLB is used to remove sugars, phenols and other viscous substances from cells, resulting in a uniform and sharp peak. Therefore, GLB and young leaves were used as lysates and tissue materials for flow cytometry detection in this experiment. Intranuclear replication was prevalent in Orchidaceae, which showed two peaks on the flow cytometry histogram. In this study, E. cordigera var. rosea is judged to be mixoploid because it produces a signal peak lower than the G0/G1 period in the G2/M range of histogram.
As a genus of the subtribe Laeliinae (Orchidaceae), the genome size ranges from 1.07 to 1.79 Gb. Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’, Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’ and Robertsara Green Wonder were obtained by crossing a member of the genus Encyclia with a related genus, with genome sizes ranging from 1.71 to 3.23 Gb. The DNA content varied in the range of 2C = 2.85 pg (Prosthechea fragrans) ~ 2C = 5.76 pg (Laelia gouldiana), and the minimum diploid genome in the genus was 2C = 2.93 pg (E. ionosma), while the maximum diploid genome in this study was 2C = 1.13 Gb (1.15 pg) [16]. Flow cytometry of 60 Phalaenopsis varieties showed that the genome size was 1.93~7.78 Gb, and there was a significant difference between varieties [26]. Therefore, there are some differences in the genome size of different species within the same genus, which may be related to parentage.

5. Conclusions

This research utilized karyotype analysis to examine the chromosomal features of diploid plants belonging to the genus Encyclia. Additionally, a flow cytometry system for Encyclia was developed to assess the genome size of four native species, two hybrids within the genus, and three hybrids between different genera, providing valuable insights for future genomic studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z. and J.N.; methodology, C.Z. and Q.L.; software, C.Z. and J.L.; validation, C.Z., J.L. and Q.L.; investigation, C.Z. and J.L.; resources, S.X. and J.N.; data curation, C.Z. and J.N.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.N. and D.P.; visualization, C.Z.; supervision, J.N.; project administration, S.X., J.Y. and J.N.; funding acquisition, J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (Grant No. 1630032023014), and the Hainan Major Science and Technology Program (ZDKJ2021015).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study were included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Species and hybrids of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. cordigera var. alba, (C) E. cordigera var. rosea, (D) E. granitica, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. tampensis var. alba, (G) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (H) E. Ochid Jungle, (I) E. Shinfong Smile, (J) Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’, (K) Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’, (L) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Figure A1. Species and hybrids of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. cordigera var. alba, (C) E. cordigera var. rosea, (D) E. granitica, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. tampensis var. alba, (G) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (H) E. Ochid Jungle, (I) E. Shinfong Smile, (J) Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’, (K) Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’, (L) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Diversity 17 00057 g0a1

References

  1. Dressler, R.; Pollard, G. The Genus Encyclia in Mexico. Mex. Asoc. Mex. Orquideologia 1974, 24, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leopardi-Verde, C.L.; Carnevali, G.; Romero-González, G.A. A Phylogeny of the Genus Encyclia (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae), with Emphasis on the Species of the Northern Hemisphere. J. Sytematics Evol. 2017, 55, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lipińska, M.M.; Olędrzyńska, N.; Dudek, M.; Naczk, A.M.; Łuszczek, D.; Szabó, P.; Speckmaier, M.; Szlachetko, D.L. Characters Evolution of Encyclia (Laeliinae-Orchidaceae) Reveals a Complex Pattern Not Phylogenetically Determined: Insights from Macro- and Micromorphology. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carnevali, G.; Tamayo-Cen, I.; Méndez-Luna, C.E.; Ramírez-Morillo, I.M.; Tapia-Muñoz, J.L.; Cetzal-Ix, W.; Romero-González, G.A. Phylogenetics and Historical Biogeography of Encyclia (Laeliinae: Orchidaceae) with an Emphasis on the E. adenocarpos Complex, a New Species, and a Preliminary Species List for the Genus. Org. Divers. Evol. 2023, 23, 41–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Leopardi-Verde, C. Sistemática y Evolución de Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae), Con Énfasis en Megaméxico III. Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, México. 2014. Available online: http://cicy.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1003/1427 (accessed on 10 April 2014).
  6. Guerra, M. Chromosome Numbers in Plant Cytotaxonomy: Concepts and Implications. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 120, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dash, C.K.; Rahman, M.O.; Sultana, S.S. Karyological Investigation on Three Zephyranthes Species and Its Taxonomic Significance. Cytologia 2020, 85, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dehery, S.K.; Panda, E.; Saha, P.R.; Sinha, R.K.; Das, A.B. Chromosome Diversity and Karyotype Asymmetry Analysis in Four Cultivated Triploid and Three Diploid Wild Genotypes of Musa from North-East India. Nucleus 2021, 64, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Basu, S. Elucidating Karyotype Structure and Affinity through Application of Karyomorphological Parameters and Multivariate Analysis, as Discerned from the Study of Four Important Legumes. Nucleus 2023, 66, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patel, P.; Dehery, S.K.; Jena, S.N.; Pradhan, C.; Das, A.B. Chromosomal Variations in Twelve Ecotypes of a Medicinal Plant Drimia Indica (Roxb.) Jessop: Karyotypes and 2C DNA Content Analysis. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2024, 71, 621–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Fan, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Liao, K. Determination of Genome Size and Chromosome Ploidy of Selected Taxa from Prunus Armeniaca by Flow Cytometry. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 108987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Müller, L.-L.B.; Zotz, G.; Albach, D.C. Bromeliaceae Subfamilies Show Divergent Trends of Genome Size Evolution. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Sun, L.; Zhao, F.; Huang, B.; Yang, W.; Tao, Y.; Wang, J.; Yuan, Z.; Fan, G.; et al. The Genome of Prunus Mume. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chu, Z.; Wen, J.; Yang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Meng, Y. Genome Size Variation and Evolution in the Grape Family Vitaceae. J. Sytematics Evol. 2018, 56, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, S.; Yu, J.; Li, D.; Zhou, P.; Fang, Q.; Yin, L. DNA C-Values of 138 Herbaceous Species and Their Biological Significance. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 35, 6516–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Querino, B.C.; Ferraz, M.E.; Mata-Sucre, Y.; Souza, G.; Felix, L.P. Cytomolecular Diversity of the Subtribe Laeliinae (Epidendroidae, Orchidaceae) Suggests No Relationship between Genome Size and Heterochromatin Abundance. Plant Syst. Evol. 2020, 306, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stebbins, G.L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants; Edward Arnold Ltd.: London, UK, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  18. Arano, H. Cytological Studies in Subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan IX. The Karyotype Analysis and Phylogenic Considerations on Pertya and Ainsliaea (2). Shokubutsugaku Zasshi 1963, 76, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levan, A.; Fredga, K.; Sandberg, A.A. Nomenclature for Centromeric Position on Chromosomes. Hereditas 2009, 52, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vimala, Y.; Lavania, S.; Lavania, U.C. Chromosome Change and Karyotype Differentiation–Implications in Speciation and Plant Systematics. Nucleus 2021, 64, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramsey, J.; Schemske, D.W. Pathways, Mechanisms, and Rates of Polyploid Formation in Flowering Plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29, 467–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeng, R.-Z.; Zhu, J.; Xu, S.-Y.; Du, G.-H.; Guo, H.-R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Xie, L. Unreduced Male Gamete Formation in Cymbidium and Its Use for Developing Sexual Polyploid Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Song, C.; Liu, S.; Xiao, J.; He, W.; Zhou, Y.; Qin, Q.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y. Polyploid Organisms. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012, 55, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wu, J.; Sang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, P. Colchicine in Vitro Tetraploid Induction of Populus Hopeiensis from Leaf Blades. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ. Cult. 2020, 141, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiu, Y.; Hamernick, S.; Ortiz, J.B.; Watkins, E. DNA Content and Ploidy Estimation of Festuca Ovina Accessions by Flow Cytometry. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 2757–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, Y.-I.; Tseng, Y.; Lee, Y.-C.; Chung, M.-C. Chromosome Constitution and Nuclear DNA Content of Phalaenopsis Hybrids. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 109089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Somatic chromosome diagrams of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. tampensis var. alba, (C) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (D) E. cordigera var. alba, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. Shinfong Smile, (G) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Figure 1. Somatic chromosome diagrams of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. tampensis var. alba, (C) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (D) E. cordigera var. alba, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. Shinfong Smile, (G) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Diversity 17 00057 g001
Figure 2. Karyotype pattern diagrams of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. tampensis var. alba, (C) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (D) E. cordigera var. alba, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. Shinfong Smile, (G) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Figure 2. Karyotype pattern diagrams of Encyclia. (A) E. alata, (B) E. tampensis var. alba, (C) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (D) E. cordigera var. alba, (E) E. rufa, (F) E. Shinfong Smile, (G) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Diversity 17 00057 g002
Figure 3. Flow cytometry histograms of three lysates and three tissue sites. Tender leaves treated with different lysates: (A) Galbraith’s buffer (GLB), (B) Woody Plant Buffer (WPB), and (C) Modified Gitschier buffer (mGb). Three types of tissue sites of E. alata: (D) root tip, (E) mature leaf, and (F) tender leaf.
Figure 3. Flow cytometry histograms of three lysates and three tissue sites. Tender leaves treated with different lysates: (A) Galbraith’s buffer (GLB), (B) Woody Plant Buffer (WPB), and (C) Modified Gitschier buffer (mGb). Three types of tissue sites of E. alata: (D) root tip, (E) mature leaf, and (F) tender leaf.
Diversity 17 00057 g003
Figure 4. Flow cytometry histograms of species and hybrids of Encyclia. (A) D. officinale, (B) E. alata, (C) E. cordigera var. rosea, (D) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (E) E. granitica, (F) E. Orchid Jungle, (G) E. Shinfong Smile, (H) Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’, (I) Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’, (J) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Figure 4. Flow cytometry histograms of species and hybrids of Encyclia. (A) D. officinale, (B) E. alata, (C) E. cordigera var. rosea, (D) E. tampensis ‘Gem’, (E) E. granitica, (F) E. Orchid Jungle, (G) E. Shinfong Smile, (H) Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’, (I) Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’, (J) Robertsara Green Wonder.
Diversity 17 00057 g004
Table 1. Species and hybrids of Encyclia.
Table 1. Species and hybrids of Encyclia.
NameTypesGenusSeed ParentPollen Parent
E. alataSpeciesEncyclia--
E. cordigera var. albaSpeciesEncyclia--
E. cordigera var. roseaSpeciesEncyclia--
E. graniticaSpeciesEncyclia--
E. rufaSpeciesEncyclia--
E. tampensis var. albaSpeciesEncyclia--
E. tampensis ‘Gem’SpeciesEncyclia--
E. Orchid JungleIntrageneric hybridEncycliaE. alataE. phoenicea
E. Shinfong SmileIntrageneric hybridEncycliaE. Shinfong ThomasE. cordigera
Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’Intergeneric hybridEnanthleyaCattlianthe Trick or TreatE. correllii
Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’Intergeneric hybridGuaricycliaGuarianthe aurantiacaE. incumbens
Robertsara Green WonderIntergeneric hybridRobertsaraEpicyclia Mabel KandaCattlianthe Loog Tone
Table 2. Chromosome characteristics of Encyclia.
Table 2. Chromosome characteristics of Encyclia.
NameKaryotype
Formula
Relative Length
Range (%)
Average Arm
Ratio
Asymmetry
Index (%)
Longest/
Shortest
Scale of Arm
Ratio > 2 (%)
Karyotype
E. alata2n = 2x = 40 = 8 m + 32 sm0.27~0.542.1166.712.330.533B
E. tampensis var. alba2n = 2x = 40 = 24 m + 16 sm0.43~0.881.7763.332.110.202B
E. tampensis ‘Gem’2n = 2x = 40 = 8 m + 32 sm0.40~0.811.9064.572.130.382B
E. cordigera var. alba2n = 2x = 40 = 4 m + 34 sm + 2 st0.32~0.722.1967.912.420.583B
E. rufa2n = 2x = 40 = 26 m + 14 sm0.31~0.661.5560.432.200.082B
E. Shinfong Smile2n = 2x = 40 = 24 m + 16 sm0.70~2.001.7662.243.030.25 2B
Robertsara Green Wonder2n = 4x = 80 = 60 m + 20 sm1.01~2.501.6280.005.160.142C
Table 3. Flow cytometry results for three different lysates.
Table 3. Flow cytometry results for three different lysates.
Lysis SolutionFluorescence IntensityCoefficient of Variation (%)
GLB6881.17 ± 138.32 c4.11 ± 0.11 ab
WPB7796.33 ± 5.51 a4.37 ± 0.03 a
mGb7571.50 ± 75.75 b3.84 ± 0.35 b
Note: Lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments of different lysates at the 0.05 level using a Tukey test.
Table 4. Genome size estimation of native species and hybrids of Encyclia.
Table 4. Genome size estimation of native species and hybrids of Encyclia.
NameFluorescence IntensityRatioGenome Size (Gb)Coefficient of Variation (%)Ploidy Level
D. officinale6313.33 ± 119.261.00 1.114.53 ± 0.37Diploidy
E. alata6395.33 ± 17.391.01 ± 0.021.12 ± 0.024.56 ± 0.02Diploidy
E. cordigera var. rosea6320.17 ± 62.121.00 ± 0.021.11 ± 0.034.53 ± 0.27Mixoploidy
E. tampensis ‘Gem’6061.50 ± 165.400.96 ± 0.041.07 ± 0.044.64 ± 0.14Diploidy
E. granitica10,194.17 ± 102.381.62 ± 0.051.79 ± 0.054.44 ± 0.06Triploidy
E. Orchid Jungle6421.67 ± 94.031.02 ± 0.031.13 ± 0.034.15 ± 0.59Diploidy
E. Shinfong Smile6181.83 ± 156.860.98 ± 0.041.09 ± 0.044.95 ± 0.03Diploidy
Eny. Circus Lady ‘Coastal Star’9708.17 ± 122.681.54 ± 0.041.71 ± 0.044.59 ± 0.05Triploidy
Gcy. Kyoguchi ‘Fumi’11,008.67 ± 157.331.74 ± 0.011.94 ± 0.014.63 ± 0.18Triploidy
Robertsara Green Wonder18,351.50 ± 421.002.91 ± 0.073.23 ± 0.083.31 ± 0.12Tetraploidy
Note: Ratio means fluorescence intensity of the sample to be tested/fluorescence intensity of the external reference sample.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, C.; Leng, Q.; Lu, J.; Xu, S.; Peng, D.; Yin, J.; Niu, J. Karyotype Analysis and Genome Size Estimation Using Flow Cytometry of the Genus Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae). Diversity 2025, 17, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17010057

AMA Style

Zhou C, Leng Q, Lu J, Xu S, Peng D, Yin J, Niu J. Karyotype Analysis and Genome Size Estimation Using Flow Cytometry of the Genus Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae). Diversity. 2025; 17(1):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17010057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Chengcheng, Qingyun Leng, Jinping Lu, Shisong Xu, Donghui Peng, Junmei Yin, and Junhai Niu. 2025. "Karyotype Analysis and Genome Size Estimation Using Flow Cytometry of the Genus Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae)" Diversity 17, no. 1: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17010057

APA Style

Zhou, C., Leng, Q., Lu, J., Xu, S., Peng, D., Yin, J., & Niu, J. (2025). Karyotype Analysis and Genome Size Estimation Using Flow Cytometry of the Genus Encyclia Hook. (Orchidaceae: Laeliinae). Diversity, 17(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17010057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop