Next Article in Journal
Prospective Use of High-Refractive Index Materials for Single Molecule Detection in Flow Cytometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Broadband Dual-Polarized Base Station Antenna for Fifth-Generation (5G) Applications
Previous Article in Journal
GWS—A Collaborative Load-Balancing Algorithm for Internet-of-Things
Previous Article in Special Issue
A 3-D Meandered Probe-Fed Dual-Band Circularly Polarized Dielectric Resonator Antenna
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Solar Panel-Integrated Modified Planner Inverted F Antenna for Low Earth Orbit Remote Sensing Nanosatellite Communication System

1
Centre of Advanced Electronic and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor 43600, Malaysia
2
Laboratory of Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering (LaSEINE), Kyushu Institute of Technology, Kitakyushu 804-8550, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(8), 2480; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082480
Submission received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 27 July 2018 / Accepted: 27 July 2018 / Published: 31 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Technologies for Microwave Sensors)

Abstract

:
One of the most efficient methods to observe the impact of geographical, environmental, and geological changes is remote sensing. Nowadays, nanosatellites are being used to observe climate change using remote sensing technology. Communication between a remote sensing nanosatellite and Earth significantly depends upon antenna systems. Body-mounted solar panels are the main source of satellite operating power unless deployable solar panels are used. Lower ultra-high frequency (UHF) nanosatellite antenna design is a crucial challenge due to the physical size constraint and the need for solar panel integration. Moreover, nanosatellite space missions are vulnerable because of antenna and solar panel deployment complexity. This paper proposes a solar panel-integrated modified planner inverted F antenna (PIFA) to mitigate these crucial limitations. The antenna consists of a slotted rectangular radiating patch with coaxial probe feeding and a rectangular ground plane. The proposed antenna has achieved a −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 6.0 MHz (447.5 MHz–453.5 MHz) with a small-sized (80 mm× 90 mm× 0.5 mm) radiating element. In addition, the antenna achieved a maximum realized gain of 0.6 dB and a total efficiency of 67.45% with the nanosatellite structure and a solar panel. The challenges addressed by the proposed antenna are to ensure solar panel placement between the radiating element and the ground plane, and provide approximately 55% open space to allow solar irradiance into the solar panel.

1. Introduction

Remote sensing is the technology of achieving information regarding climate change by a sensing device mounted on aircraft or spacecraft platform [1]. Nanosatellite technology can facilitate remote sensing applications including greenhouse gas monitoring, maritime tracking and messaging, multispectral Earth imaging etc. for academic, government, and commercial organizations [2]. Nanosatellites experience “smaller, cheaper, faster, better space missions” and introduce a revolutionary concept to remote sensing space research [3]. This concept has led to enthusiastic scientific, private, and government missions because of the use of low-cost miniature electronics with low power consumption [3,4]. Over the last few years, the number of nanosatellite missions has increased dramatically for low-earth orbit missions. Recently, nanosatellites have attracted attention for NASA space exploration missions beyond Earth’s orbit [5]. Every nanosatellite has some common functions for satellite operations, such as altitude control and determination, a power system, and uplink-downlink communications. Solar panels are used to manage the required power, and antennas are used to establish uplink-downlink communications. The ultra-high frequency (UHF)-band, especially the frequency range 420–450 MHz, is highly desirable for nanosatellite researchers, because the International Telecommunication Union has allocated this band as the International amateur satellite frequency band [6]. Antenna design for nanosatellites especially for lower frequencies presents its own challenge and has been a critical matter for CubeSat researchers [7]. In addition, solar panel integration presents another major problem because of the limited surface of the nanosatellite body [8]. These limitations were overcome by using deployable solar panels and antennas in recent nanosatellite missions [9]. However, mechanical deployment is quite sophisticated and this might increase the chance of mission failure [10]. Several small satellite missions have failed as a result of antenna deployment complexity [11,12] and solar panel deployment complexity [13]. In contrast to the deployable antenna, the patch antenna is an effective replacement to improve mission reliability. However, a UHF patch antenna occupies a large area of the nanosatellite body surface and introduces complexity in terms of integrating sufficient solar cells.
Various approaches have been reported to address the problem of integrating a solar panel with the antenna [14,15]. For instance, transparent antennas were placed above the solar panels on the CubeSat. Even though transparent antennas provide up to 90% of transparency for solar penetration, these types of antennas require expensive transparent substrates such as quartz or Lexan. In addition, their fabrication process is complex and expensive. Nontransparent subsolar antennas are placed beneath the solar panels with the constraint that the patch must not be covered by the solar panel, and this enlarges the antenna size for lower UHF applications [14,16]. Thus, designing an UHF antenna that is strategically integrated with the solar panel and that does not require mechanical deployment has become a major challenge for nanosatellite and antenna researchers.
This paper proposes a nanosatellite body-mounted slotted planner inverted F antenna (PIFA) antenna for a remote sensing UHF communication system. The antenna is designed to fit into commercially available 1U and 2U nanosatellites to avoid deployment complexity and to mitigate power scarcity. As the antenna structure is stable and, unlike the conventional deployable antenna, it does not require deployment, this antenna addresses the risk of mission failure due to antenna deployment. Moreover, as the proposed antenna provides space for additional placement of a solar panel, it helps to address the power scarcity in a nanosatellite. The proposed approach is a viable alternative based on the above-mentioned circumstances.

2. Materials and Methods

The proposed antenna is designed for established 1U, 2U and other nanosatellite structures, and addresses the problems associated with the limited volume and surface area for solar panel and antenna placement. First, the resonant condition for the nanosatellite structure was examined. Then an inverted-F antenna was designed, considering one face of the nanosatellite body as the ground plane that functions as an infinite ground plane to achieve lower UHF frequency. Sufficient space for placing the solar panel between the radiating element and ground plane was given priority in the initial design. The resonant frequency of the inverted-F antenna was initially estimated by the Equation (1) [17], where, c is the light velocity, and L and W are the length and width of the radiator, respectively.
f = c 4 ( L + W )
The design was optimized with the nanosatellite structure maintaining both electromagnetic and structural constraints. Estimation of the antenna performance was carried out with the commercially available numerical simulator Computer Simulation Technology (CST). The proposed lower UHF antenna is illustrated in Figure 1. The antenna consists of a rectangular radiating patch with a shorting wall, two linear slots on the patch, and a 50 Ω radio frequency (RF) coaxial feed. Two rectangular slots were etched out such that the equivalent inductance caused by the shorting pins and feeding probe were reduced, and more than fifty percent of the surface area of the radiating element remained uncovered to ensure proper solar penetration on the solar panel.
The design parameters are distinctively studied to investigate their influences on the resonant frequency, and the other parameters remained unchanged. The effect of the rectangular slot width a on the antenna reflection coefficient, efficiency, and realized gain was studied, and is shown in Figure 2. The figure shows that decreasing the slot width causes the resonant frequency to shift upwards, i.e., an inverse relation is formed between the resonant frequency and slot width due to the change in effecting the electrical area. The total efficiency and realized gain were observed to have shifted in accordance with the resonant frequency.
The dimension of the parameters e and f have an influence on the antenna reflection coefficient, total efficiency, and realized gain, as shown in Figure 3. It is observed from Figure 3 that, the radiating element e had a strong influence on the resonant frequency rather than f. Thus, it was easier to tune the resonant frequency by varying the length of e. It is seen from Figure 1 that variation of the slots dimension had a direct effect on the open space for solar penetration. Therefore, these parameters were numerically investigated.
The effect of antenna performance on the gap between the radiating element and ground plane was investigated and is plotted in Figure 4. The resonating frequency remained almost unchanged as the gap height increased, but the gain and total efficiency increased. Despite the relation between the gap and antenna radiation performance, the gap between the radiating element and ground plane could not be increased randomly because of the constraint introduced by the satellite structure. On the other hand, when the gap was decreased to below 4 mm, the resonant frequency was shifted as well, thereby decreasing the gain and efficiency. This occurs because of the close interaction of the antenna radiator with the lossy solar panel [8]. Based on the aforementioned parametric study, the optimized antenna design parameters were arranged to achieve proper impedance matching, as tabulated in Table 1.
The surface current distribution of the modified PIFA is depicted in Figure 5. The majority current was observed in the vicinity of the shorting wall and some strong current arose at the slot corner. This indicates the formation of a larger electrical patch to achieve lower frequency, even though more than 55% of the radiating element was truncated. Moreover, the current flow was distributed across the structure as well as the ground plane, which reduced interference with external objects that affected antenna performance.

3. Results

The antenna was fabricated according to the optimized parameters listed in Table 1, illustrated in Figure 6. The reflection coefficient of the antenna was analyzed in two conditions, one was without integrating solar panel and another was integrating solar panel between antenna and ground plane, shown in Figure 7. The solar panel affected the antenna impedance of the antenna and shifted the resonant frequency by 3 MHz. The resonant frequency was tuned by optimizing its parameters. The proposed antenna achieved a −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 6.0 MHz (447.5 MHz–453.5 MHz).
The radiation characteristics of the proposed UHF antenna with the satellite structure were measured in the Satimo near-field measurement system. The measured radiation pattern in both the azimuth and elevation planes, along with the 3D pattern at 450 MHz is illustrated in Figure 8, where it can be observed that the antenna shows a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern at the azimuth plane. According to the results in Figure 9, the total efficiency of the proposed UHF antenna at the resonance frequency was approximately 67.45% with 0.6 dB of realized gain, although the lossy nature of the solar cells degraded the antenna efficiency.
The output power of the solar panel was measured using the solar simulator. The schematic layout of the measurement setup is depicted in Figure 10. At first, the solar panel was placed in the setup and the output power was measured. The output power measurement was conducted using a fixed load. Then the solar panel was placed between the antenna and the ground plane and the solar panel output power was measured. Both results are plotted in Figure 11a, which shows that more than 75% of the solar output was achieved compared with the open space solar output condition. The respective short-circuit current was also shown in the figure. Moreover, according to [18] the open circuit voltage and short circuit current had the open circuit voltage and the short circuit current was investigated by varying the antenna input power from 0.1 W to 0.5 W; this is plotted in Figure 11b. This investigation confirms that the antenna radiation power had no visible effect on the solar panel performance.
Random vibration and sine vibration tests of the proposed antenna integrated with nanosatellite structure were carried out to examine the stability of the antenna structure under vibration conditions. The test was performed in the Laboratory of Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering (LaSEINE), Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan. The test setup is presented in Figure 12. No malfunctions occurred during excitation and after excitation. The antenna was in the exact position as it was before the vibration test. A summary of the antenna is presented in Table 2. The performance of the proposed antenna was compared with existing UHF antennas, tabulated in Table 3. Considering the comparison criteria in the lower UHF band, it can be seen that the proposed antenna was a potential candidate for the nanosatellite communication system.
The proposed design provides a significant trade-off between the antenna size and performance in terms of gain, efficiency and operating band. In context of deployment, nanosatellite engineers have to go through complexities for the design and operation of the deployment mechanism. Certainly, the proposed antenna has the potential to provide deployment-free operation and this allows the satellite engineers to focus on other design criteria. The amount of gain provided by the antenna is satisfactory for smooth uplink and downlink communication in the UHF band. Moreover, the gain achieved by the antenna is measured while antenna is integrated with the nanosatellite structure. So, there is no risk of decreasing the gain after integration with the nanosatellite structure that usually happens in patch antennas. There are commercially available UHF nanosatellite antennas that have approximately 0 dB gain [26]. Based on the aforementioned design constraints, the proposed antenna has achieved its potential for nanosatellite UHF remote sensing applications.

4. Conclusions

This communication presents the modified PIFA antenna, which was designed to exclusively feature a UHF application with 55% of open space on a remote sensing nanosatellite’s single face for solar irradiance penetration. The antenna was fabricated and integrated with a 1U nanosatellite structure. The antenna shows S11 < −15 dB at 450 MHz with 67.45% total efficiency and 0.6 dB realized gain. This proposed antenna will facilitate the sensing nanosatellite’s power scarcity.

Author Contributions

T.A. and M.T.I. conceptualized the proposed antenna, participated in critically revising the article for important intellectual contents, and supervised the whole study. T.A. and M.A.U. made significant contributions to this study regarding the conception, design, analysis and writing of the manuscript. M.C. provided measurement facilities and intellectual suggestions.

Funding

This research was funded by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia research grant No. GUP-2017-095.

Acknowledgments

This research is a collaboration work between Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and the Laboratory of Spacecraft Environment Interaction Engineering (LaSEINE), Kyushu Institute of Technology, Japan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Temiz, F.; Durduran, S.S. Monitoring Coastline Change Using Remote Sensing and Gis Technology: A Case Study of Acıgöl Lake, Turkey; IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2016; p. 042033. [Google Scholar]
  2. Peral, E.; Im, E.; Wye, L.; Lee, S.; Tanelli, S.; Rahmat-Samii, Y.; Horst, S.; Hoffman, J.; Yun, S.-H.; Imken, T. Radar technologies for earth remote sensing from cubesat platforms. Proc. IEEE 2018, 106, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heidt, H.; Puig-Suari, J.; Moore, A.; Nakasuka, S.; Twiggs, R. Cubesat: A new generation of picosatellite for education and industry low-cost space experimentation. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 24 August 2001. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouwmeester, J.; Guo, J. Survey of worldwide pico-and nanosatellite missions, distributions and subsystem technology. Acta Astronautica 2010, 67, 854–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hodges, R.E.; Chahat, N.; Hoppe, D.J.; Vacchione, J.D. A deployable high-gain antenna bound for mars: Developing a new folded-panel reflectarray for the first cubesat mission to mars. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Council, N.R. Handbook of Frequency Allocations and Spectrum Protection for Scientific Uses; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao, S.; Clark, K.; Unwin, M.; Zackrisson, J.; Shiroma, W.; Akagi, J.; Maynard, K.; Garner, P.; Boccia, L.; Amendola, G. Antennas for modern small satellites. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2009, 51, 440–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yekan, T.; Baktur, R. Conformal integrated solar panel antennas: Two effective integration methods of antennas with solar cells. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rahmat-Samii, Y.; Manohar, V.; Kovitz, J.M. For satellites, think small, dream big: A review of recent antenna developments for cubesats. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ernest, A.J.; Tawk, Y.; Costantine, J.; Christodoulou, C.G. A bottom fed deployable conical log spiral antenna design for cubesat. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernandes, G.; Santos, M.; Silva, V.; Almeida, J.; Nogueira, P. Thermal tests for cubesat in Brazil: Lessons learned and the challenges for the future. In Proceedings of the 67th International Astronautical Congress, Guadalajara, Mexico, 27 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Atcitty, S. Aihec/tcu Advanced Manufacturing Network Initiative; Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM): Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Crisp, N.; Smith, K.; Hollingsworth, P. Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems. Acta Astronaut. 2015, 114, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, X.; Jackson, D.R.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Fink, P.W.; Lin, G.Y.; Neveu, N. Transparent and nontransparent microstrip antennas on a cubesat: Novel low-profile antennas for cubesats improve mission reliability. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yasin, T.; Baktur, R.; Furse, C. A comparative study on two types of transparent patch antennas. In Proceedings of the 2011 XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 13–20 August 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roh, W.-L.; Woo, J.-M. Miniaturization of microstrip antenna using folded structure with attaching plates for satellite communication terminal. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 9–15 June 2007; pp. 4709–4712. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haruki, H. The inverted-f antenna for portable radio units. Conv. Rec. IECE Jpn. 1982. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tanaka, M.; Suzuki, Y.; Araki, K.; Suzuki, R. Microstrip antenna with solar cells for microsatellites. Electron. Lett. 1995, 31, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarabandi, K.; Buerkle, A.M.; Mosallaei, H. Compact wideband uhf patch antenna on a reactive impedance substrate. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2006, 5, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kakoyiannis, C.G.; Constantinou, P. A compact microstrip antenna with tapered peripheral slits for cubesat rf payloads at 436 MHz: Miniaturization techniques, design & numerical results. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications, Toulouse, France, 1–3 October 2008; pp. 255–259. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, F.; Bin, F.; Sun, Q.; Fan, J.; Ye, H. A compact uhf antenna based on complementary fractal technique. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 21118–21125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Podilchak, S.K.; Murdoch, A.P.; Antar, Y.M. Compact, microstrip-based folded-shorted patches: Pcb antennas for use on microsatellites. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sato, T.; Mitsuhashi, R.; Satori, S. Attitude estimation of nano-satellite “hit-sat” using received power fluctuation by radiation pattern. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Charleston, SC, USA, 1–5 June 2009; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pittella, E.; Pisa, S.; Nascetti, A. Design of an antenna system for cubesat satellites. In Proceedings of the 2nd IAA Conference on University Satellites Missions and CubeSat Winter Workshop, Roma, Italy, 3–9 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Leao, T.F.C.; Mooney-Chopin, V.; Trueman, C.W.; Gleason, S. Design and implementation of a diplexer and a dual-band vhf/uhf antenna for nanosatellites. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2013, 12, 1098–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ISIS. Innovative Solutions in Space. Available online: https://www.isispace.nl/product/dipole-antenna/ (accessed on 26 July 2018).
Figure 1. (a) Design layout of the proposed antenna; yellow radiating patch and gray ground plane, (b) antenna integrated with 1U nanosatellite structure, solar panel placed in between the radiating patch and the ground plane.
Figure 1. (a) Design layout of the proposed antenna; yellow radiating patch and gray ground plane, (b) antenna integrated with 1U nanosatellite structure, solar panel placed in between the radiating patch and the ground plane.
Sensors 18 02480 g001
Figure 2. Parametric study on slot length a; (a) reflection coefficient, (b) total efficiency and, (c) realized gain: decreasing the slot length causes the resonant frequency to shift upwards.
Figure 2. Parametric study on slot length a; (a) reflection coefficient, (b) total efficiency and, (c) realized gain: decreasing the slot length causes the resonant frequency to shift upwards.
Sensors 18 02480 g002
Figure 3. (a) Parametric study on the length of e and (b) parametric study on the length of the f: the radiating element e has a strong influence on the resonant frequency rather than f.
Figure 3. (a) Parametric study on the length of e and (b) parametric study on the length of the f: the radiating element e has a strong influence on the resonant frequency rather than f.
Sensors 18 02480 g003
Figure 4. Parametric study of the gap between patch and ground plane; the gap cannot be increased randomly because of the design constraint of the satellite structure.
Figure 4. Parametric study of the gap between patch and ground plane; the gap cannot be increased randomly because of the design constraint of the satellite structure.
Sensors 18 02480 g004
Figure 5. Surface current distribution of the planner inverted F antenna (PIFA) antenna at 450 MHz; starting from the feed point, the travelling current forms a larger electrical path to achieve resonance at a lower frequency.
Figure 5. Surface current distribution of the planner inverted F antenna (PIFA) antenna at 450 MHz; starting from the feed point, the travelling current forms a larger electrical path to achieve resonance at a lower frequency.
Sensors 18 02480 g005
Figure 6. Fabricated prototype of the proposed antenna integrated with the solar panel; the solar panel is placed in between the radiating patch and ground plane.
Figure 6. Fabricated prototype of the proposed antenna integrated with the solar panel; the solar panel is placed in between the radiating patch and ground plane.
Sensors 18 02480 g006
Figure 7. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna. Reflection coefficients are measured with and without the solar panel and the measured −10 dB operating bandwidth is 447.5 MHz–453.5 MHz.
Figure 7. Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna. Reflection coefficients are measured with and without the solar panel and the measured −10 dB operating bandwidth is 447.5 MHz–453.5 MHz.
Sensors 18 02480 g007
Figure 8. Measured radiation pattern at 450 MHz (a) azimuth and elevation (b) 3D pattern showing omnidirectional radiation characteristics.
Figure 8. Measured radiation pattern at 450 MHz (a) azimuth and elevation (b) 3D pattern showing omnidirectional radiation characteristics.
Sensors 18 02480 g008
Figure 9. Simulated and measured total efficiency and gain of the fabricated prototype; where 67.45% efficiency is achieved with 0.6 dB of realized gain.
Figure 9. Simulated and measured total efficiency and gain of the fabricated prototype; where 67.45% efficiency is achieved with 0.6 dB of realized gain.
Sensors 18 02480 g009
Figure 10. Solar panel output power measurement setup. The components are: Solar-simulator, vector network analyzer (VNA), Multi-meter and the proposed Antenna. The output power measurement was conducted using a fixed load.
Figure 10. Solar panel output power measurement setup. The components are: Solar-simulator, vector network analyzer (VNA), Multi-meter and the proposed Antenna. The output power measurement was conducted using a fixed load.
Sensors 18 02480 g010
Figure 11. (a) Solar output power and short circuit current measurement without and with antenna placement; (b) Solar characterization with varying antenna power from 0.1 W to 0.5 W.
Figure 11. (a) Solar output power and short circuit current measurement without and with antenna placement; (b) Solar characterization with varying antenna power from 0.1 W to 0.5 W.
Sensors 18 02480 g011
Figure 12. Vibration test setup of the proposed antenna with nanosatellite structure. Aluminum 7075 material based 2U nanosatellite structure was considered for the test as 100+/−0.1 mm wide (+X, +Y axes); 227+/−0.1 mm tall (+Z axis) and maximum weight was 2.6 kg.
Figure 12. Vibration test setup of the proposed antenna with nanosatellite structure. Aluminum 7075 material based 2U nanosatellite structure was considered for the test as 100+/−0.1 mm wide (+X, +Y axes); 227+/−0.1 mm tall (+Z axis) and maximum weight was 2.6 kg.
Sensors 18 02480 g012
Table 1. Antenna design parameters.
Table 1. Antenna design parameters.
ParametersValue (mm)ParametersValue (mm)
L80e60
W90f31
a24.25g5
b64h12
c68i9.6
d28j8.5
Table 2. Summary of the proposed ultra-high frequency (UHF) antenna.
Table 2. Summary of the proposed ultra-high frequency (UHF) antenna.
ParameterSpecificationsUnit
Frequency447.5–453.5MHz
Impedance bandwidth (−10 dB)6MHz
PolarizationLinear-
Realized Gain0.6dB
Antenna Size80 × 90mm
Efficiency67.45%
MaterialBrass-
RF input50 Ω mmcx connector-
Vibration TestQualified-
RF: radio frequency.
Table 3. Comparison of Characteristics of Different UHF antennas.
Table 3. Comparison of Characteristics of Different UHF antennas.
Ref. No.Antenna TypeOperating Frequency (MHz)Antenna Size (mm)GainSolar Integration FacilityRemarks
[19]Printed patch410–485220 × 220 × 28.55.2 dBnoToo large for 1U, 2U nanosatellites.
[20]Microstrip patch435–437170 × 120 × 6.40.7 dBnoToo large to fit with 1U nanosatellites.
[21]Fractal shaped700–4710120 × 120 × 1.61.71 dBnoNot compact enough. Does not cover lower UHF frequency (450 MHZ)
[14]Printed patch427.38–437.17320 × 80 × 3.172.12 dBnoLarge dimension
[22]Microstrip patch384–410150 × 150 × 370.4 dBnoLow gain with large dimension.
[23]Dipole4301602.15 dByesExternally mounted with satellite structure
[24]Monopole435–4381752.35 dBiyesDeployable complexity
[25]Monopole146 & 438513.6 × 10 × 102.06 dBi at 146 MHz
3.35 dBi at 438 MHz
yesDeployable complexity
Proposed AntennaModified PIFA447.5–453.580 × 90 × 0.50.6 dByesDeployable complexity free

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alam, T.; Islam, M.T.; Ullah, M.A.; Cho, M. A Solar Panel-Integrated Modified Planner Inverted F Antenna for Low Earth Orbit Remote Sensing Nanosatellite Communication System. Sensors 2018, 18, 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082480

AMA Style

Alam T, Islam MT, Ullah MA, Cho M. A Solar Panel-Integrated Modified Planner Inverted F Antenna for Low Earth Orbit Remote Sensing Nanosatellite Communication System. Sensors. 2018; 18(8):2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alam, Touhidul, Mohammad Tariqul Islam, Md. Amanath Ullah, and Mengu Cho. 2018. "A Solar Panel-Integrated Modified Planner Inverted F Antenna for Low Earth Orbit Remote Sensing Nanosatellite Communication System" Sensors 18, no. 8: 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082480

APA Style

Alam, T., Islam, M. T., Ullah, M. A., & Cho, M. (2018). A Solar Panel-Integrated Modified Planner Inverted F Antenna for Low Earth Orbit Remote Sensing Nanosatellite Communication System. Sensors, 18(8), 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop