Next Article in Journal
Event-Based Communication and Finite-Time Consensus Control of Mobile Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring
Next Article in Special Issue
A Non-Invasive Medical Device for Parkinson’s Patients with Episodes of Freezing of Gait
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Semi-Supervised Feature Extraction Method and Its Application in Automotive Assembly Fault Diagnosis Based on Vision Sensor Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children

by
Victor M. Peñeñory
1,*,†,
Cristina Manresa-Yee
2,*,†,
Inmaculada Riquelme
3,†,
Cesar A. Collazos
4,5,† and
Habib M. Fardoun
6,†
1
Multimedia Engineering Program, University of San Buenaventura, Ave. 10 de Mayo, La Umbria, 760031 Cali, Colombia
2
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of the Balearic Islands, Crta. Valldemossa km. 7.5, 07122 Palma, Spain
3
Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Institute of Health Sciences Research, University of Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma, Spain
4
Systems Program, University of Cauca, Cl. 5 No. 4–70, 190001 Popayan, Colombia, [email protected]
5
King Abdulaziz University, Al Ehtifalat St, Al-Ruwais, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
6
Teaching Excellence Department, Ahlia University, Bld 41 Rd 18, Al Hoora 310, Bahrain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sensors 2018, 18(8), 2546; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082546
Submission received: 8 June 2018 / Revised: 30 July 2018 / Accepted: 31 July 2018 / Published: 3 August 2018

Abstract

:
Objectives: The aim of this work is to provide a scoping review to compile and classify the systems helping train and enhance psychomotor skills in hearing impaired (HI) children. Methods: Based on an exhaustive review on psychomotor deficits in HI children, the procedure used to carry out a scoping review was: select keywords and identify synonyms, select databases and prepare the queries using keywords, analyze the quality of the works found using the PEDro Scale, classify the works based on psychomotor competences, analyze the interactive systems (e.g., sensors), and the achieved results. Results: Thirteen works were found. These works used a variety of sensors and input devices such as cameras, contact sensors, touch screens, mouse and keyboard, tangible objects, haptic and virtual reality (VR) devices. Conclusions: From the research it was possible to contextualize the deficits and psychomotor problems of HI children that prevent their normal development. Additionally, from the analysis of different proposals of interactive systems addressed to this population, it was possible to establish the current state of the use of different technologies and how they contribute to psychomotor rehabilitation.

1. Introduction

Hearing loss in children can vary from mild to profound [1]. Hearing damage can occur due to diseases, infections or vestibular damage producing hearing loss. This problem can interfere with the sensorimotor function, causing delays for hearing impaired (HI) children, in their psychomotor development, i.e., motor skill, balance, dynamic coordination, visual-motor coordination performance, among other aspects [2,3,4,5].
Psychomotricity integrates the cognitive, emotional, symbolical and physical interactions in the individual’s capacity to be and to act in a psychosocial context. Motor development lays the basis for higher complex psychological abilities, such as emotion regulation or symbolism. Thus, the adequate acquisition of basic psychomotor areas, such as body schema (an essential part of body awareness, body image and self-esteem), gross motor skills (i.e., posture, balance), fine motor skills, space, time and rhythm are determinant for the development of cognition, emotion and social interactions.
As hearing impairment may impact the psychomotor development of HI children, the objective of the present work was to revise the literature to compile and classify the systems used to help train psychomotor skills in HI children. Particularly, the aim of this review was to compile the endeavors being done in the field, to show which areas could be enriched with the use of technologies and interactive systems. Technology is being increasingly incorporated to rehabilitation processes, providing additional benefits such as providing real-time feedback or making the exercises more attractive, increasing adherence to treatment [6,7].

2. Background

2.1. Psychomotor Limitations in Hearing Impaired Children

Psychomotor abilities are usually classified into fundamental motor skills (i.e., body schema, body image, posture, balance and coordination), perceptual motor skills (i.e., space, time and rhythm) and cognitive skills (executive functions, such as memory or reasoning processes). The present study is focused on psychomotor abilities associated with motor skills, in relation with psychological processes.

2.1.1. Fundamental Motor Skills

HI children typically have lower scores on psychomotor scales than normal hearing (NH) children [2,8]. For instance, more than the 30% of HI children showed retardation in the acquisition of head control or independent gait [9]. Poor motor performance does not appear to affect self-efficacy in HI children [10], but it has been related to language deficiencies, poorer symbolic play, emotion dysregulation and social difficulties in interacting with other children [8,11]. Children with cochlear implanta show a drop in their gross motor performance coinciding with surgery, and a period of at least two years is needed to recover the developmental delay [12]. HI children exhibit worse gait performance than NH children, with abnormal ground reaction forces, higher propulsion and lower free movements [13,14]. Higher hearing impairment determines worse postural recovery and gait performance [14,15] and hearing aids and cochlear implants may help promote improvements in gait and stability during walking [16].
Body perception. Hearing impairment disturbs the experience of the own body and body-related abilities. Body perception deficits may play an important role in the action performance and be the cause of many unexplained daily difficulties suffered by HI children [17].
Posture is determined by the internal representation of the body in the surrounding space. Posture is permanently adjusted to environmental modifications by the continuous central integration of multisensory inputs that trigger motor commands for allowing stability. Thus, the unceasing inputs coming from the visual, vestibular and proprioceptive systems provide the brain with information of spatial context, head movement and position, and movement and position of the different body segments, respectively, which is crucial for posture maintenance and balance. HI children show higher postural instability and less ample head movements than NH children, which may indicate damage of the vestibular system [3,18]. Postural stability of HI individuals improves with adaptive sensory compensation (visual and vestibular) [19]; thus, HI children may benefit from exercise programs aimed at improving the body posture maintenance and balance control [20].
Balance is the ability to adapt postural control to be stable on different modifications of the environment. Balance develops during childhood, becoming a paramount parameter for the achievement of gross motor skills, such as running or jumping/standing on one leg [21]. Auditory inputs provide additional cues to control balance, creating a hearing “map” of surroundings that NH individuals use to maintain balance control and reduce postural sway [16,22]. HI children may experience balance difficulties, especially those with vestibular deficits [23,24] or within the first year of cochlear implants, when children exhibit higher rates of vestibular loss [25,26,27,28]. Thus, HI children have shown lower stability limits, faster and higher body sway, and higher energy expenditure to keep balance than NH children, indicating a deficit in static and dynamic balance [14,26,29,30]. HI children tend to use visual feedback in a higher amount than NH children, especially when balance is compromised by sensory disturbance (e.g., irregular surface) and the risk of falling increases [29,30]. Hearing aids, vestibular rehabilitation and physical exercise have proven effective to enhance vestibular adaptation and improve balance in HI children or after cochlear implant surgery [22,25,31]. HI individuals with additional vestibular deficits seem to exploit auditory cues in a higher degree, due to the reduced sensory redundancy [22]. On the other hand, vestibular dysfunction and its resulting balance deficits have been identified as risk factors for cochlear implant failures [32].
Coordination is defined as the global functionality of muscle groups, in a specific temporal order, resulting in the progressive contraction of agonists and the simultaneous inhibition of antagonists to achieve a motor outcome. Coordination is present in all motor functions (e.g., visuomotor, bimanual …). In gross motor function, coordination is refined later in HI children, who will achieve accurate execution of large body actions (e.g., running) in older ages than NH children [12]. Thus, motor skills such as catching a ball, requiring visuomotor, spatial and temporal coordination, are impaired longer in HI children, with higher reaction times than NH children [33]. Auditory deprivation also affects motion perception [34] and motor sequence learning [35]. Fine motor function (i.e., manipulation or manual dexterity) experiences a delay when prelingually HI children grow up [35,36]. Associations between fine motor function and receptive and expressive language in HI children post-implant [36] suggest common brain networks and seem to indicate that auditory deprivation leads to atypical motor and language development. Visuomotor integration development is impacted by early auditory and linguistic experience and seem to elicit different cognitive resources in HI children [36].

2.1.2. Perceptual Motor Skills

Spatial skills are defined as the mechanisms allowing the awareness of object position and its relationships in the environment [37]. HI children compensate auditory deprivation highlighting attention to stimuli in the near and far space visual fields (to visual central stimuli in far space and to peripheral visual stimuli in near space) [38,39]. Other adaptation mechanisms in HI children are higher location memory [40] and higher visual and tactile orientation in the allocentric frame of reference (encoding the position of an object in relation to others), which allows a fast attention to targets [38,41]. Nevertheless, the discrimination at midline and lateral positions [29] and the egocentric frame of reference (encoding the position of an object in relation to the own body) seem to be abnormal in HI children. In this sense, goal-directed movements towards the objects, based in the egocentric frame of reference, are slower than in NH [41]. In addition, auditory deprivation affects brain spatial organization; thus, in contrast with NH children, who have shown right hemisphere activation for spatial attention, an atypical bilateral or left hemisphere activation has been seen in HI children [40,42]. Furthermore, spatial cognition is promoted by an expertise in spatial language [43] and language absence results in poor performance on non-linguistic spatial tasks, particularly those combining different spatial representations [44]. For example, a consistent linguistic marking of left-right is associated with search under disorientation or a consistent marking of ground information is associated to search in rotated arrays in deaf signers [43]. In contrast with temporal abilities, spatial competence are likely to improve in HI children, particularly with the use of sign language [45].
Temporal skills recall the order, timing and sequence of stimuli [46]. Hearing loss diminishes the capacity of using fine temporal signals for recognizing speech and non-speech cues out of the variable environmental noise [47]. Temporal processing of proprioceptive and tactile signals is also compromised in children with HI [48]. Event-related brain potentials revealed less precise phonological representations of rhythm of oral language or location of sign language in HI, compared to NH children [49]. Nevertheless, cochlear implant users had similar performance in temporal organization tasks than NH individuals [50]. On the other hand, cross-modal plasticity driven by experience may allow HI individuals a normal performance when synchronizing temporally discrete visual stimuli and visual timing [51].

3. Methods

3.1. Search Strategy

The following databases were used for the search: Science Direct, ACM Digital Library, IEEEXplore, NCI (PubMed, Bethesda, MD, USA), Springer Link and CiteSeerX. The following key words were used: auditory deficiencies, children, psychomotor, Human Computer Interaction (HCI), interactive systems, serious games and synonyms (e.g., hearing impairments, videogames, virtual systems). During the bibliographic analysis, we identified different contributions to the area of psychomotor training in HI children. Inclusion criteria were: studies whose title or abstract was related with helping train and enhance psychomotor skills in hearing impaired (HI) children, studies published in the last ten years in recognized journals or international events in the areas of health, biomedicine, computer science and HCI and studies describing the electronics or interactive elements used in systems aiming at the psychomotor skills improvement. Exclusion criteria were: studies addressing cognitive psychomotor skills and repeated studies. Thirty eight papers were identified in the first search (applying the key words), which were reduced to 13 after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These contributions were classified into fundamental motor skills (posture, coordination and balance) and perceptual motor skills (spatial, temporal and rhythm). No references related to body image or body schema were found.

3.2. Quality

The PEDro Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the 13 papers found in the search and therefore, included in the review. This scale, based on the consensus of health experts, aims at identifying the works that have sufficient validity and statistical information to make their results interpretable [52]. The PEDro Scale evaluates the quality using eleven criteria, such as the selection criteria, the random assignment of the study subjects, the participation of the therapists and evaluators, or the comparison and visualization of the data. The criteria of the PEDro Scale assigns three values of quality: low risk of bias (1), unclear risk of bias (2), high risk of bias (3).
In the case of our review, papers following our inclusion criteria were scarce. The PEDro scale showed high values for unclear risk of bias (2) in most of the studies. In many of those studies, the evaluation with patients did not follow the standard procedures, which reduces the reliability of the data. One of the reasons explaining this fact, could be that most of the papers were published in conferences focused on human-computer interaction, therefore, the objective of the work was the presentation of the design and evaluation of the system, instead of analyzing a long-term progress of psychomotor skills. Figure 1 shows the quality of the works included in the review, according to the PEDro scale criteria.

3.3. Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills

3.3.1. Fundamental Motor Skills

In this section, we present the interactive systems and applications that aimed at training the fundamental motor skills of HI children, which involved coordination, posture and balance.
Iversen and Kortbek [53] built an interactive floor for children with cochlear implants to interact with body movements. Their proposal includes a set of games aiming at language training and implant calibration.
To rehabilitate the upper body limbs, Wille et al. [54] used a VR environment and tested the system with children during three weeks. The games presented in the environment, helped children to rehabilitate the motor skills without stress. Further, children improved their hand function.
Marnik et al. [23] developed a system that can be used for therapy and education based on natural body movements and gestures interaction. The system uses computer vision techniques to detect the body movement and presents an attractive application to engage the user. The system is addressed to children with developmental problems, e.g., ASD or HI children, and presents simple physical exercises or gives instructions, such as “standing on a specified place and rise hands”, for the child to follow. Egusa et al. [55] developed a system based on Microsoft Kinect to allow HI children to enjoy and participate in a puppet show, while developing their body expression.
Radovanovic [56] examined the influence of specialized software on the visual-motor integration of profoundly deaf children. The evaluation was done with 70 children, 43 of whom formed an experimental group that used the computer once a week for five months. Results showed higher scores for the experimental group in a subtest of the Acadia test, but they were significantly higher only for seven-year-olds. Nevertheless, the authors supported the benefits of using videogames to improve visual-motor skills.
Noorhidawati et al. [57] compiled situations in which children engage with mobile apps to better understand how they learn through such interaction. They carried out a qualitative approach by observing 18 pre-schoolers interactions when using 20 mobile apps. The analysis demonstrated that learning in this environment takes place through cognitive, psychomotor-based, and affective means. Further, the use of these apps can help in improving the aforementioned skills.
To improve the body posture when performing physical exercises such as squats, Conner et al. [58] proposed a system based on computer vision techniques (via Microsoft Kinect). Results of the evaluation showed an improvement of the children’s body posture when following the instructions of the system.
Zhu et al. [59] used tangible objects to interact with digital elements in a role-playing collaborative game. Children trained their body expression and movements while playing with their teammates by fighting against the enemies, waving weapons according to different rhythms.

3.3.2. Perceptual Motor Skills

The rehabilitation of perceptual motor skills develops the perception of space, time and rhythm in HI children. However, few contributions were found by our review.
To train rhythm, Jouhtimäki et al. [60] developed an educational tool which aimed at improving the children’s skills to identify and produce rhythmic patterns. These abilities also support language perception and literacy.
Pérez-Arevalo et al. [39] designed a similar game as the previous work, but they selected to deploy it in mobile devices. The proposal presents a game to train rhythm and coordination (visual motor) for HI children based on visual and auditory stimuli. They evaluated the system with nine children who had cochlear implants or used auditive aids. Children enjoyed the game and they all liked the emotional aspects of the design such as the customization of the main character, the graphical design of the character and the app or the storyline.
Correa et al. [58] proposed the construction of an interactive multimodal system for rehabilitating skills such as hand-eye coordination, memory, rhythm and tempo. The proposal is a multimodal system, similar to a piano, that allows visualization and feedback of musical notes through vibrations and exploits the perceptual phenomenon of synesthesia, which relates colors and sounds. The goal of the system is the improvement of the rhythmic perceptual skills through coordination, visualization of colors, and tempo.
Sogono and Richards [61] proposed the design of a game involving electronic elements, which would allow HI children to perform sound localization activities in closed spaces. In addition to this, they also proposed templates to facilitate the design of this type of multisensory environments.
Finally, Aditya et al. [62] proposed a project to help children understand better abstract concepts such as time, from the use of tangible objects together with visual feedback. With the proposal they built an intelligent clock that represented each of the activities that the child carried out in his or her daily life.

3.3.3. Summary of Works

Table 1 shows the classification of the works according to the type of skill that they impact (fundamental motor skills and perceptual motor skills).

4. Results

We analyzed the sensors used in the systems found in the research to study the current technology used to work psychomotor skills in HI children.

4.1. Computer Vision

When the computer is able to “see”, it can use the visual information for interaction purposes. The use of one or more cameras, i.e., webcams or Microsoft Kinect, allows the computer to sense the user and his/her actions, gestures or postures. Works by Egusa et al. [55] or Conner et al. [63] used RGBD cameras to sense the user’s body posture and the gestures performed, whereas, the work by Marnik et al. [23] focuses on computer vision algorithms to recognize gestures. During the assessment, researchers concluded that the use of computer vision techniques in motor training allowed participants to be immersed in the proposed activities and they found them motivating.

4.2. Interactive Floors

Interactive floors are frequently classified into sensor-based or vision-based. In the case of Iversen and Kortbek [53], they combine both types to construct an interactive floor setup with vision tracking limb contact points from below the floor surface. During the evaluation of their system, the authors found that interactive floor-based systems invited participants to interact actively and collaboratively, allowing an exchange of knowledge and communication between users. It also offered children a way to create their own games related to the exercises they had to do, which increased motivation and engagement.

4.3. Touch Screens

Touch screens are present in mobile devices, tablets and mobile phones. The increase of these devices and the familiarity with this interaction mode helps children to focus directly on the tasks to carry out [39,62]. Researchers used tablets [39] or smart watches [62] to teach children rhythm and eye-hand coordination. During the evaluation, authors stated that interactive systems based on game actions related to activities of daily living (ADL), and with a smooth learning curve, allowed the children to quickly develop skills related to the rehabilitation goals in an amusing and motivating way.

4.4. Mouse and Keyboard

Mouse and keyboard are still the traditional input devices to desktop computers and have been used to control the interaction of applications for HI children [60]. During the evaluation of this proposal, authors found that using these devices in an interactive game supported children with some kind of disability to acquire rhythm patterns, which may enhance language development.

4.5. Tangible Artifacts

By using Arduino or similar hardware boards, researchers created artifacts for HI children to hold and manipulate, which controlled the interaction and informed about their position or movement through accelerometers [59]. In the evaluation of the system, participants were more motivated to participate collaboratively in the activity due to the use of tangible elements such as swords, shields and wands. However, some participants had difficulties due to the lack of tempo management and music knowledge, therefore, authors concluded that visual aids should be used.

4.6. Multimodal Systems

We also found sensors integrated in multimodal systems, which combined different input and output modalities, such as touch, computer vision and tangible objects together with visual and haptic feedback [58,61]. Researchers concluded that the use of non-traditional interaction devices made participants consider the activities to be entertaining and attractive because they invited to use different senses and effectors.

4.7. VR Devices

The use of VR devices such as data gloves and head-mounted displays (HMD) have also been used [54] to interact in a VR environment. During the evaluation [54], some participants presented evidence of improvement in activities proposed by the interactive system. However, despite the fact that participants showed a high degree of motivation when performing the different actions in the game, some did not progress as expected, showing a low level of progress in therapy.

5. Discussion

5.1. Computer Vision

The results obtained by [23,55,63] were achieved thanks to the use of technologies and sensors that allowed the tracking of the different movements of the patient’s body, offering an accurate feedback in real time of their movements and informing them of the correctness. Additionally, when presenting these exercises as play activities, participants felt more comfortable and motivated with the activity, because they were immersed in the exercise [64,65].

5.2. Interactive Floors

The use of a contact surface, together with a projection and a camera, allowed the creation of different interactive spaces. Users had fun while performing physical activities [66]. Some of the results of the use of this technology can be observed in [53] where, based on the proposed interactive environment, children were more motivated to carry out the rehabilitation activities and the technology provided allowed them to be in a playful and collaborative environment with the freedom to make different activities.

5.3. Touch Screens

The use of touch technologies allowed patients to use their upper limbs to train fine motor skills and hand-eye coordination [67]. The use of this type of technology in the proposals [39,62] allowed participants to visualize and interact with the applications in real time while training fine motor and hand-eye coordination skills.

5.4. Mouse and Keyboard

The acquisition of motor skills in upper limbs can be carried out with traditional devices such as keyboards and mice. The game to train rhythm skills proposed by [60], allowed the user to perform each of the activities comfortably following the patterns and exercises offered by the game.

5.5. Tangible Artifacts

Tangible objects can be used in motor training and play activities because they count with different sensors such as accelerometers, gyroscopes and radio frequency identifiers, which allow patients to interact directly with them. Further, the system outputs in real-time video and audio accordingly to the patient’s actions on the objects. The proposal by [59] clearly shows that the use of tangible objects contributed to a greater willingness to participate in the activities and collaborate with other children while performing the exercises and having fun.

5.6. Multimodal Systems

Multimodal systems allow the construction of interactive environments in which users can use different senses and carry out play activities that contribute to their psychomotor development [68,69,70,71]. This case can be clearly seen in [58,61] where the created devices involved different feedback, such as haptic and visual cues, that allowed the patient to perceive the information through multiple senses and react to the stimuli, causing the activity to be more engaging.

5.7. VR Devices

VR systems allow interact in a virtual world. Users can perform actions and receive a direct feedback through the objects of the virtual world with which they interact. This type of technology allows children with different types of psychomotor problems to carry out actions that cannot be done naturally in the real world, obtaining a satisfaction feeling while doing the activity. This fact is clearly observed in proposal [51], as the use of VR devices such as the glasses, helps children to participate in the rehabilitation process with a high level of motivation.

5.8. Limitations

This study has some limitations that must be taken into account for the correct interpretation of the results. The quality of the selected works, by the use of the PEDro scale, was performed only by one researcher; although PEDro criteria are clear and well-defined, the separate evaluation by different researchers would have allowed increasing the reliability of the scores.

6. Conclusions

HI children present deficits in their psychomotor development, which affect physical, social or emotional dimensions of their development. Therefore, research aiming at the improvement of the psychomotor skills of this population is needed. Based on an exhaustive review on psychomotor deficits in HI children, the aim of this work was to compile the endeavors being done in the field, to show which areas could be enriched with the use of technologies and interactive systems.
During the review it was evidenced the use of different interaction technologies such as touch screens, tangible objects, traditional devices (mouse and keyboard), cameras and VR devices that together with different electronic elements like Arduino, RFID or buttons, allowed the creation of interactive environments and aimed to create more entertaining and motivating activities.
The results of the analyzed proposals showed that HI children felt more satisfied with the activities. This feeling was due to the fact that the different technologies offered the children a real-time direct feedback on the performance of the different actions, which allowed them to feel part of their rehabilitation process. Thus, technology could increase the enjoyment of the rehabilitation sessions and increase the adherence to treatment, which is of paramount importance at these ages.
Despite these results, this review showed that there is a lack of tools to support HI children during their therapy, due to reasons such as the cost of the technology or the limitation to access children with this kind of disability. This should encourage the scientific and academic community to actively participate in the generation of interactive systems that address the psychomotor development needs of HI children in a motivating and attractive context, offering interactive tools that use low-cost digital and electronic elements. In addition, studies showed a high prevalence of unknown risk of bias, which made difficult to test their success in improving psychomotor skills in HI children. Many reasons can cause this low quality: lack of long clinical trials, cost of certain technologies and creation of systems, etc. Investigating the barriers in the use of the technology in clinical settings would help identify the essential reasons. Moreover, long-term studies investigating the effects in the improvement of psychomotor skills would increase the quality of the present knowledge.

Funding

This work has been partially supported by the project TIN2016-81143-R (AEI/FEDER, UE) funded by MICINN (Government of Spain) and OCDS-CUD2016/13 funded by the OCDS at the University of Balearic Islands.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Universidad de San Buenaventura, Universidad del Cauca (Colombia) and Ahlia University (Bahrain) for its support of the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. National Deaf Children’s Society. Supporting the Achievement of Hearing Impaired Children in Early Years Settings. Appendix I: Types and Levels of Deafness. 2015. Available online: www.ndcs.org.uk (accessed on 2 August 2018).
  2. Gheysen, F.; Loots, G.; Van waelvelde, H. Motor development of deaf children with and without cochlear implants. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 2008, 13, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Melo, R.D.S.; Lemos, A.; Macky, C.F.; Ferraz, K.M. Postural control assessment in students with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 81, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rajendran, V.; Roy, F.G. An overview of motor skill performance and balance in hearing impaired children. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2011, 37, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wiegersma, P.H.; Vander, V.A. Motor Development of Deaf Children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1983, 24, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Musselman, K.E.; Shah, M.; Zariffa, J. Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: Translational potential of current trends. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2018, 15, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gaebler-Spira, D.; Peri, E.; Lunardini, F.; Sanchez-Santed, F.; Duff, M. Rehabilitation technologies for cerebral palsy. In Biosystems and Biorobotics; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 87–108. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fellinger, M.J.; Holzinger, D.; Aigner, M.; Beitel, C.; Fellinger, J. Motor performance and correlates of mental health in children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2015, 57, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Masuda, T.; Kaga, K. Relationship between acquisition of motor function and vestibular function in children with bilateral severe hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2014, 134, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Engel-Yeger, B.; Weissman, D. A comparison of motor abilities and perceived self-efficacy between children with hearing impairments and normal hearing children. Disabil. Rehabil. 2009, 31, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Leigh, G.; Ching, T.Y.C.; Crowe, K.; Cupples, L.; Marnane, V.; Seeto, M. Factors affecting psychosocial and motor development in 3-year-old children who are deaf or hard of hearing. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 2015, 20, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Kegel, A.; Maes, L.; Van Waelvelde, H.; Dhooge, I. Examining the impact of cochlear implantation on the early gross motor development of children with a hearing loss. Ear Hear 2015, 36, e113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jafarnezhadgero, A.A.; Shad, M.M.; Majlesi, M.; Granacher, U. A comparison of running kinetics in children with and without genu varus: A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Melo, R.S.; Marinho, S.E.; Freire, M.E.A.; Souza, R.A.; Damasceno, H.A.M.; Raposo, M.C.F. Static and dynamic balance of children and adolescents with sensorineural hearing loss. Einstein 2017, 15, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Greters, M.E.; Bittar, R.S.M.; Grasel, S.S.; Oiticica, J.; Bento, R.F. Desempenho auditivo como preditor de recuperação postural em usuários de implante coclear. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 83, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Weaver, T.S.; Shayman, C.S.; Hullar, T.E. The Effect of Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants on Balance during Gait. Otol. Neurotol. 2017, 38, 1327–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Houde, M.S.; Landry, S.P.; Page, S.; Maheu, M.; Champoux, F. Body Perception and Action Following Deafness. Neural Plast. 2016. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Melo, R.S. Gait performance of children and adolescents with sensorineural hearing loss. Gait Posture 2017, 57, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. An, M.H.; Yi, C.H.; Jeon, H.S.; Park, S.Y. Age-related changes of single-limb standing balance in children with and without deafness. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 73, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Walowska, J.; Bolach, B.; Bolach, E. The influence of Pilates exercises on body balance in the standing position of hearing impaired people. Disabil. Rehabil. 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Maes, L.; De Kegel, A.; Van Waelvelde, H.; Dhooge, I. Association Between Vestibular Function and Motor Performance in Hearing-impaired Children. Otol. Neurotol. 2014, 35, e343–e347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vitkovic, J.; Le, C.; Lee, S.L.; Clark, R.A. The contribution of hearing and hearing loss to balance control. Audiol. Neurotol. 2016, 21, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Marnik, J.; Samolej, S.; Kapu, T.; Oszust, M.; Wysocki, M. Using Computer Graphics, Vision and Gesture Recognition Tools for Building Interactive Systems Supporting Therapy of Children. Hum. Comput. Syst. Interact. Backgrounds Appl. 2012, 2, 539–553. [Google Scholar]
  24. Oyewumi, M.; Wolter, N.E.; Heon, E.; Gordon, K.A.; Papsin, B.C.; Cushing, S.L. Using Balance Function to Screen for Vestibular Impairment in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Cochlear Implants. Otol. Neurotol. 2016, 37, 926–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zur, O.; Shimron, H.B.-R.; Leisman, G.; Carmeli, E. Balance versus hearing after cochlear implant in an adult. BMJ Case Rep. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Movallali, G.; Ebrahimi, A.-A.; Jamshidi, A.A.; Haghgoo, H.A.; Rahgozar, M. Balance Performance of Deaf Children With and Without Cochlear Implants. Acta Med. Iran 2016, 54, 737–742. [Google Scholar]
  27. Parietti-Winkler, C.; Lion, A.; Montaut-Verient, B.; Grosjean, R.; Gauchard, G.C. Effects of unilateral cochlear implantation on balance control and sensory organization in adult patients with profound hearing loss. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Janky, K.; Givens, D. Vestibular, visual acuity and balance outcomes in children with cochlear implants: A preliminary report. Ear Hear 2015, 36, e364–e372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cai, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liang, M.; Zhao, F.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, G. Auditory spatial discrimination and the mismatch negativity response in hearing-impaired individuals. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wolter, N.E.; Cushing, S.L.; Madrigal, L.D.V.; James, A.L.; Campos, J.; Papsin, B.C.; Gordon, K.A. Unilateral Hearing Loss Is Associated With Impaired Balance in Children. Otol. Neurotol. 2016, 37, 1589–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vidranski, T.; Farkaš, D. Motor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children with or without Cochlear Implant—A Systematic Review. Coll. Antropol. 2015, 39, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Wolter, N.E.; Gordon, K.A.; Papsin, B.C.; Cushing, S.L. Vestibular and Balance Impairment Contributes to Cochlear Implant Failure in Children. Otol. Neurotol. 2015, 36, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Savelsbergh, G.; Netelenbos, J.; Whiting, H. Auditory perception and the control of spatially coordinated action of deaf and hearing impaired children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 1991, 32, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Armstrong, B.A.; Neville, H.J.; Hillyard, S.A.; Mitchell, T.V. Auditory deprivation affects processing of motion, but not color. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 14, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lévesque, J.; Théoret, H.; Champoux, F. Reduced procedural motor learning in deaf individuals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Horn, D.L.; Fagan, M.K.; Dillon, C.M.; Pisoni, D.B.; Miyamoto, R.T. NIH Public Access. Sci. York 2008, 117, 2017–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Conway, C.M.; Kronenberger, W.G. NIH Public Access. Medicine 2010, 18, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prasad, M.; Russell, M.I.; Hammond, T.A. A user centric model to design tactile codes with shapes and waveforms. In Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symp HAPTICS, Houston, TX, USA, 23–26 February 2014; pp. 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pérez-Arévalo, C.; Manresa-Yee, C.; Beltrán, V.M.P. Game to develop rhythm and coordination in children with hearing impairments. In Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Cancun, Mexico, 25–27 September 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cattani, A.; Clibbens, J. Atypical lateralization of memory for location: Effects of deafness and sign language use. Brain Cogn. 2005, 58, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zhang, M.; Tan, X.; Shen, L.; Wang, A.; Geng, S.; Chen, Q. Interaction between allocentric and egocentric reference frames in deaf and hearing populations. Neuropsychologia 2014, 54, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cattaneo, Z.; Lega, C.; Cecchetto, C.; Papagno, C. Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection. Exp. Brain Res. 2014, 232, 2767–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pyers, J.E.; Shusterman, A.; Senghas, A.; Spelke, E.S.; Emmorey, K. Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107, 12116–12120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gentner, D.; Özyürek, A.; Gürcanli, Ö.; Goldin-Meadow, S. Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition 2013, 127, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Arnold, P.; Mills, M. Memory for faces, shoes, and objects by deaf and hearing signers and hearing nonsigners. J. Psycholinguist Res. 2001, 30, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nava, E.; Bottari, D.; Zampini, M.; Pavani, F. Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 192, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moore, B.C.J. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. JARO J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2008, 9, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bharadwaj, S.V.; Matzke, P.L.; Daniel, L.L. Multisensory processing in children with cochlear implants. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2012, 76, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Colin, C.; Zuinen, T.; Bayard, C.; Leybaert, J. Phonological processing of rhyme in spoken language and location in sign language by deaf and hearing participants: A neurophysiological study. Neurophysiol. Clin. 2013, 43, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Campos, P.D.; Alvarenga, K.D.F.; Frederigue, N.B.; do Nascimento, L.T.; Sameshima, K.; Filho, O.A.C.; Bevilacqua, M.C. Temporal organization skills in cochlear implants recipients. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 74, 884–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Iversen, J.R.; Patel, A.D.; Nicodemus, B.; Emmorey, K. Synchronization to auditory and visual rhythms in hearing and deaf individuals. Cognition 2015, 134, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Centre for Evidence-Based Physiotherapy PEDro 2018. Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Available online: https://www.pedro.org.au/ (accessed on 2 August 2018).
  53. Iversen, O.; Kortbek, K. Stepstone: An interactive floor application for hearing impaired children with a cochlear implant. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Aalborg, Denmark, 6–8 June 2007; pp. 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wille, D.; Eng, K.; Holper, L.; Chevrier, E.; Hauser, Y.; Kiper, D.; Pyk, P.; Schlegel, S.; Meyer-Heim, A. Virtual reality-based paediatric interactive therapy system (PITS) for improvement of arm and hand function in children with motor impairment—A pilot study. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2009, 12, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Egusa, R.; Wada, K.; Namatame, M. Development of an Interactive Puppet Show System for the Hearing-Impaired People. In Proceedings of the CONTENT 2012: The Fourth International Conference on Creative Content Technologies, Nice, France, 22–27 July 2012; pp. 69–71. [Google Scholar]
  56. Radovanovic, V. The influence of computer games on visual-motor integration in profoundly deaf children. Br. J. Spec. Educ. 2013, 40, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Noorhidawati, A.; Ghalebandi, S.G.; Siti Hajar, R. How Do Young Children Engage with Mobile Apps? Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Perspective. Comput. Educ. 2015, 87, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Correa, R.A.; Osorio, A. CASETO: Sistema Interactivo Basado en Sinestesia Para La Enseñanza/Aprendizaje De La Música Para Niños Con Discapacidad Auditiva Entre 7 a 11 Años. Editorial Bonaventuriana—Universidad Autonoma de Occidente. Obras colectivas en ciencias de la computación. 2017; pp. 37–52. ISBN 978-958-5415-19-5. Available online: http://bibliotecadigital.usb.edu.co/bitstream/10819/4662/1/Caseto_Sistema_Interactivo_Correa_2017.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2018).
  59. Zhu, F.; Sun, W.; Zhang, C.; Ricks, R. BoomChaCha. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jouhtimäki, J.; Kitunen, S.; Plaisted, M.; Rainò, P. The Brave Little Troll—A Rhythmic Game for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era, Tampere, Finland, 30 September–2 October 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sogono, M.C.; Richards, D. A design template for multisensory and multimodal games to train and test children for sound localisation acuity. In Proceedings of the 9th Australas Conference Interact Entertain Matters Life Death, Melbourne, Australia, 30 September–1 October 2013; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aditya, V.; Dhenki, S.; Amarvaj, L.; Karale, A.; Singh, H. Saathi: Making It Easier for Children with Learning Disabilities to Understand the Concept of Time. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Conner, C. Correcting Exercise Form Using Body Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 3028–3034. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cheng, D.; Chi, P.-Y.; Kwak, T.; Hartmann, B.; Wright, P. Body-tracking camera control for demonstration videos. In Proceedings of the CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April–2 May 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gonçalves, D.; Jesus, R.; Grangeiro, F.; Romão, T.; Correia, N. Tag Around: A 3D Gesture Game for Image Annotation. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Yokohama Japan, 3–5 December 2008; pp. 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grønbæk, K.; Iversen, O.; Kortbek, K. Interactive floor support for kinesthetic interaction in children learning environments. Interact 2007, 4663, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cano, S.; Peñeñory, V.; Collazos, C.A.; Fardoun, H.M.; Alghazzawi, D.M. Training with Phonak: Serious Game as Support in Auditory—Verbal Therapy for Children with Cochlear Implants. In Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques REHAB ’15, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–2 October 2015; pp. 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nanayakkara, S.C.; Wyse, L.; Ong, S.H.; Taylor, E.A. Enhancing musical experience for the hearing-impaired using visual and haptic displays. Hum. Comput. Interact 2013, 28, 115–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Baijal, A.; Kim, J.; Branje, C.; Fels, D.I.; Russo, F. Composing vibrotactile music: A multi-sensory experience with the emoti-chair. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Haptics Symposium, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4–7 March 2012; pp. 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shneiderman, B.; Plaisant, C. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction; Pearson: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  71. Adamo-Villani, N. A Virtual Learning Environment for Deaf Children: Design and evaluation. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 2007, 2, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Results of the total scores of the PEDro Scale for the works included in the present review.
Figure 1. Results of the total scores of the PEDro Scale for the works included in the present review.
Sensors 18 02546 g001
Table 1. Classification of contributions according to their impact on fundamental motor skills and perceptual motor skills.
Table 1. Classification of contributions according to their impact on fundamental motor skills and perceptual motor skills.
SkillsCompetencesWorks
Fundamental motor skillsCoordination[56]
Balance[23,53,54,55,57,59]
Posture[63]
Perceptual motor skillsSpace[61]
Time[62]
Rhythm[39,58,59,60]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peñeñory, V.M.; Manresa-Yee, C.; Riquelme, I.; Collazos, C.A.; Fardoun, H.M. Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children. Sensors 2018, 18, 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082546

AMA Style

Peñeñory VM, Manresa-Yee C, Riquelme I, Collazos CA, Fardoun HM. Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children. Sensors. 2018; 18(8):2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082546

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peñeñory, Victor M., Cristina Manresa-Yee, Inmaculada Riquelme, Cesar A. Collazos, and Habib M. Fardoun. 2018. "Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children" Sensors 18, no. 8: 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082546

APA Style

Peñeñory, V. M., Manresa-Yee, C., Riquelme, I., Collazos, C. A., & Fardoun, H. M. (2018). Scoping Review of Systems to Train Psychomotor Skills in Hearing Impaired Children. Sensors, 18(8), 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082546

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop