Digital Twin for Automatic Transportation in Industry 4.0
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Digital Twin from Industry 4.0 Conception
3. Objectives and Methodology
- Definition and design of a communications architecture to provide connectivity to the equipment located in the industrial plant which constitutes the IEN.
- Access the IEN from the outside in order to monitor and control processes allowing an external intelligent process planning.
- Implement cybersecurity standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 to protect the industrial plant from any internal or external threat. Therefore, the security of IEN equipment and information is increased.
- Provide connectivity to the new service associated with the DT by integrating it into the IEN. In this way a Modelling and Simulations as a Service (MSaaS) is developed [56].
- Definition, design and programming of the framework associated with the DT service.
- The virtualization of the real scenarios in the virtual environment with the aim of comparing both results.
- Modelling of the AGV to predict its behaviour in virtual environments.
- Design and programming of the HSI where the simulation will be monitored. In the HSI, data is visualised and actions are transmitted.
- Automate actions in the simulation for the elaboration of user-customised missions.
- Extracting information associated with the simulation results in different formats and media using hyperconnectivity.
4. Communications Architecture
- The industrial plant is modelled in the E3 laboratory and the hall of the engineering school of the University of León. This is where some of the equipment (e.g., MIR100, UR5e, cameras, engineering station) necessary to simulate and develop industrial processes related to transport is located.
- The external service consists of an internet-connected server from which the industrial plant and the remote engineering station can be accessed. This external service is used to perform computational tasks necessary for process optimisation. This avoids installing computers in the plant with its associated problems (e.g., dust, electrical noise, ATEX zone [62]). By outsourcing the DT’s computer service, no maintenance is required at the industrial plant and the software remains privately owned. The service can be accessed remotely from the industrial plant using the network infrastructure, such as cloud computing. In this paper, the DT service runs from this external service.
- The remote location of the engineering station makes it possible to delocalise the supervision of the industrial plant from any device connected to the internet. In addition, external services can be accessed from the several device if preferred.
4.1. Industrial Ethernet Network (IEN)
4.2. Outside Connection
4.3. Cybersecurity
5. Digital Twin as an External Service
5.1. Framework
- The ROS ecosystem is composed of the navigation libraries and Gazebo [68]. The navigation libraries communicate bi-directionally with the Node-red server program and the gazebo application. The Gzserver is a server that runs in parallel to the Gazebo application allowing access to the application from a web browser.
- The Node-red programming environment communicates bidirectionally with external services (e.g., e-mail, database) conferring hyperconnectivity to the DT. Furthermore, the Gzserver application has been embedded in the HSI to monitor the simulation in real-time from a single interface.
- From external services and applications (e.g., MES, SCADA) information can be sent to run simulations. Besides, this server can be used as a gateway to provide hyperconnectivity to other applications with cybersecurity in mind.
5.2. ROS Ecosystem
- Move_base_node aims to model the AGV behaviour. In order to model the movement of the AGV, a navigation stack is required to recreate the movements of the real model. For this purpose, the node subscribes to the information offered by the sensors that the AGV incorporates as well as the navigation goals in order to publish the response to the actuators. In addition, this node publishes information in simulation time such as the state of the AGV, the position, the linear and angular velocity, among other parameters. Furthermore, for a correct simulation, it is necessary to know where the actuators (e.g., wheels) and sensors (e.g., LIDAR) are located in order to model the dynamic behaviour of the AGV. For this purpose, the parameters are defined in a Unified Robot Description Format (URDF) [71] file in XML format which represents the model of the AGV.
- The virtualisation of the scenario which is necessary for the development of the DT is performed through the programming of Gazebo. This node defines the space where the AGV will navigates with the definition of walls, objects and obstacles. Under this same scenario, the three-dimensional model of the move_base_node will be loaded in order to simulate the information received by the sensors (e.g., LIDAR, ultrasound) that depend on the environment. In this way it is possible to simulate the data that would be obtained in a real scenario. These data are published to the move_base_node that elaborates a response that will receive the virtual model in Gazebo. In the simulated environment, the AGV will move accordingly, generating new data and completing the loop. Furthermore, from this node it is possible to import three-dimensional models that have already been designed in order to provide the DT with greater realism. In real-time simulation, the virtual environment can be modified by observing the dynamic response of the AGV. In addition, the environment can be altered in simulation time in the same way as it happens in reality.
- The Node-red is used as a bridge to communicate with the Node-red server responsible for the supervision and control of the virtual simulation. This node is subscribed to the information (e.g., position, navigation status) of the move_base_node. Besides, this node publishes the navigation goals due to the automation of the missions by Node-red.
- The Amcl node is responsible for calculating the position of the AGV in the environment. For this purpose, it uses the LIDAR data in conjunction with the previous mapping to calculate the position. Based on the position information, it is important for decision making in the autonomous navigation of the AGV.
5.3. Node-Red Server
6. Scenario Description
6.1. Targets and Missions
6.2. Scenario 1
6.3. Scenario 2
7. Results
7.1. Characterization of the Mission Parameters
7.2. Scenario 1
7.3. Scenario 2
7.4. Navigation and HSI
7.5. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ACK | Acknowledgement |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
AR | Augmented Reality |
AGV | Automatic Guided Vehicle |
CSNA/CD | Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection |
CSV | Comma-Separated Values |
CIM | Computer-Integrated Manufacturing |
CPS | Cyber-physical Systems |
DPI | Deep Package Inspection |
DT | Digital Twin |
DCS | Distributed Control System |
DDoS | Distributed Denial of Service |
ERP | Enterprise Resource Planning |
FLP | Facility Layout Problem |
HSI | Human Simulation Interface |
IE | Industrial Ethernet |
IEN | Industrial Ethernet Network |
IIoT | Industrial Internet of Things |
IoT | Internet of Things |
IPv4 | Internet Protocol version 4 |
ISP | Internet Service Provider |
JSON | JavaScript Object Notation |
JSSP | Job Shop Scheduling Problem |
LIDAR | Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging |
M2M | Machine to Machine |
MES | Manufacturing Execution Systems |
MRP | Material Requirement Planning |
MQTT | Message Queuing Telemetry Transport |
PLC | Program Logic Control |
QoS | Quality of Service |
RFID | Radio Frequency Identification |
ROS | Robot Operating System |
SM | Smart Manufacturing |
SCADA | Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition |
URDF | Unified Robot Description Format |
VLAN | Virtual Local Area Networks |
VPN | Virtual Network Protocol |
VR | Virtual Reality |
WAN | Wide Area Network |
WLAN | Wireless Local Area Network |
References
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.D.P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, D.-I.T.; Hoffmann, D.-H.M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, C.; Chen, Y. A Review of Research Relevant to the Emerging Industry Trends: Industry 4.0, IoT, Blockchain, and Business Analytics. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lins, T.; Oliveira, R.A.R.; Correia, L.H.A.; Silva, J.S. Industry 4.0 Retrofitting. In Proceedings of the 2018 VIII Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC), Salvador, Brazil, 6–9 November 2018; Volume 2018, pp. 8–15. [Google Scholar]
- Aijaz, A.; Sooriyabandara, M. The Tactile Internet for Industries: A Review. Proc. IEEE 2019, 107, 414–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ch, G.D.S.; Venegas, C.; Baca, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Marrone, L. Open Middleware proposal for IoT focused on Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 2nd Colombian Conference on Robotics and Automation (CCRA), Barranquilla, Colombia, 1–3 November 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kousi, N.; Gkournelos, C.; Aivaliotis, S.; Giannoulis, C.; Michalos, G.; Makris, S. Digital twin for adaptation of robots’ behavior in flexible robotic assembly lines. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 28, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manik, M.; Pandey, C.; Singh, M.H.; Sharma, M.H.; Sharma, M.M. Future of IOT/IIOT Technologies-Hyper Connectivity & Computation. J. Nat. Remedies 2020, 21, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Jazdi, N. Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, Stuttgart, Germany, 22–24 May 2014; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Tamas, L.; Murar, M. Smart CPS: Vertical integration overview and user story with a cobot. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 32, 504–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masood, T.; Sonntag, P. Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Comput. Ind. 2020, 121, 103261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeba, A.G.; Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod; Strossmayer, J.J. The Role of Rfid Technology in the Intelligent Manufacturing; Scientific Technical Union of Mechanical Engineering “Industry 4.0”: Slavonski, Croatia, 2018; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Elbasani, E.; Siriporn, P.; Choi, J.S. A survey on RFID in industry 4.0. In EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing; Springer Science and Business: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Li, L.; Shi, H.; Chong, D. The transformation and upgrade of China’s manufacturing industry in Industry 4.0 era. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2020, 37, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monostori, L.; Kádár, B.; Bauernhansl, T.; Kondoh, S.; Kumara, S.; Reinhart, G.; Sauer, O.; Schuh, G.; Sihn, W.; Ueda, K. Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2016, 65, 621–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ćoćkalo, D.; Đorđević, D.; Bogetić, S.; Bakator, M.; Bešić, C. Competitiveness of Domestic Enterprises in Changing Markets and Industry 4.0. In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Pleiades Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 113–127. [Google Scholar]
- Negrão, L.L.L.; Filho, M.G.; Marodin, G. Lean practices and their effect on performance: A literature review. Prod. Plan. Control. 2016, 28, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keys, J.B.; Miller, T.R. The Japanese Management Theory Jungle. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1984, 9, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calderón Godoy, A.J.; González Pérez, I. Integration of Sensor and Actuator Networks and the SCADA System to Promote the Migration of the Legacy Flexible Manufacturing System towards the Industry 4.0 Concept. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2018, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, J.; Ding, G.; Zou, Y.; Qin, S.; Fu, J. Review of job shop scheduling research and its new perspectives under Industry 4.0. J. Intell. Manuf. 2019, 30, 1809–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Zubaidi, S.Q.D.; Fantoni, G.; Failli, F. Analysis of drivers for solving facility layout problems: A Literature review. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2021, 21, 100187. [Google Scholar]
- Davis, J.; Edgar, T.; Graybill, R.; Korambath, P.; Schott, B.; Swink, D.; Wang, J.; Wetzel, J. Smart Manufacturing. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2015, 6, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dalenogare, L.S.; Benitez, G.B.; Ayala, N.F.; Frank, A.G. The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 204, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullrich, G.; Ullrich, G. The History of Automated Guided Vehicle Systems. In Automated Guided Vehicle Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Digani, V.; Sabattini, L.; Secchi, C.; Fantuzzi, C. Ensemble Coordination Approach in Multi-AGV Systems Applied to Industrial Warehouses. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2015, 12, 922–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golan, M.; Cohen, Y.; Singer, G. A framework for operator—Workstation interaction in Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 2421–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez, R.; Diez-Gonzalez, J.; Verde, P.; Perez, H. Comparative Performance Analysis of Time Local Positioning Architectures in NLOS Urban Scenarios. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 225258–225271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Díez-González, J.; Álvarez, R.; González-Bárcena, D.; Sánchez-González, L.; Castejón-Limas, M.; Perez, H. Genetic Algorithm Approach to the 3D Node Localization in TDOA Systems. Sensors 2019, 19, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, T.-C.; Tong, C.-S.; Xu, B.-L. AGV navigation analysis based on multi-sensor data fusion. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2020, 79, 5109–5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, K.Y.H.; Zheng, P.; Chen, C.-H.; Huang, L. A digital twin-enhanced system for engineering product family design and optimization. J. Manuf. Syst. 2020, 57, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhary, R.R.; Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Kamal, R. Orchestrator Controlled Navigation of Mobile Robots in a Static Environment. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 107, pp. 193–206. [Google Scholar]
- Rabah, S.; Assila, A.; Khouri, E.; Maier, F.; Ababsa, F.; Bourny, V.; Maier, P.; Mérienne, F. Towards improving the future of manufacturing through digital twin and augmented reality technologies. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 17, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsuchiya, A.; Fraile, F.; Koshijima, I.; Ortiz, A.; Poler, R. Software defined networking firewall for industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2018, 11, 318–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Quigley, M.; Gerkey, B.; Conley, K.; Faust, J.; Foote, T.; Leibs, J.; Berger, E.; Wheeler, R.; Ng, A. ROS: An Open-Source Robot Operating System. In ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software; University of Southern California: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Walenta, R.; Schellekens, T.; Ferrein, A.; Schiffer, S. A Decentralised System Approach for Controlling AGVs with ROS. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE AFRICON: Science, Technology and Innovation for Africa, AFRI-CON 2017, Cape Town, South Africa, 18–20 September 2017; pp. 1436–1441. [Google Scholar]
- Whybark, D.C.; Williams, J.G. Material Requirements Planning Under Uncertainty. Decis. Sci. 1976, 7, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durão, L.F.C.S.; Haag, S.; Anderl, R.; Schützer, K.; Zancul, E. Digital Twin Requirements in the Context of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the Collaboration in a Hyperconnected World, 17th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, PRO-VE 2016, Porto, Portugal, 3–5 October 2016; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; Volume 540, pp. 204–214. [Google Scholar]
- Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grieves, M.W. Product lifecycle management: The new paradigm for enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 2005, 2, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaessgen, E.; Stargel, D. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 23–26 April 2012; p. 1818. [Google Scholar]
- Grieves, M.; Vickers, J. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 85–113. [Google Scholar]
- Negri, E.; Berardi, S.; Fumagalli, L.; Macchi, M. MES-integrated digital twin frameworks. J. Manuf. Syst. 2020, 56, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Fang, S.; Dong, H.; Xu, C. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vachalek, J.; Bartalsky, L.; Rovny, O.; Sismisova, D.; Morhac, M.; Loksik, M. The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept. In Proceedings of the 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC), Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, 6–9 June 2017; pp. 258–262. [Google Scholar]
- Pfohl, H.-C.; Yahsi, B.; Kersten, W.; Blecker, T.; Ri, C.M.; Kurnaz, T. The impact of industry supply chain. In Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains, Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, Hamburg, Germany, 24–25 September 2015; HICL: Guernsey, UK, 2015; pp. 31–58. [Google Scholar]
- Weyer, S.; Meyer, T.; Ohmer, M.; Gorecky, D.; Zühlke, D. Future Modeling and Simulation of CPS-based Factories: An Example from the Automotive Industry. IFAC PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grover, P.; Kar, A.K. Big Data Analytics: A Review on Theoretical Contributions and Tools Used in Literature. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2017, 18, 203–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Qin, S.; Fu, J.; Zhang, J.; Ding, G. How to model and implement connections between physical and virtual models for digital twin application. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, F.; Alkan, B.; Ahmad, B.; Harrison, R. Improving Just-in-Time Delivery Performance of IoT-Enabled Flexible Manufacturing Systems with AGV Based Material Transportation. Sensors 2020, 20, 6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foit, K.; Gołda, G.; Kampa, A. Integration and Evaluation of Intra-Logistics Processes in Flexible Production Systems Based on OEE Metrics, with the Use of Computer Modelling and Simulation of AGVs. Processes 2020, 8, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottani, E.; Cammardella, A.; Murino, T.; Vespoli, S. From the Cyber-Physical System to the Digital Twin: The Process Development for Behaviour Modelling of a Cyber Guided Vehicle in M2M Logic. In Proceedings of the XXII Summer School Francesco TurcoIndustrial Systems Engineering, Palermo, Italy, 13–15 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cardoso, L.F.D.S.; Mariano, F.C.M.Q.; Zorzal, E.R. A survey of industrial augmented reality. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 106159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Qi, L.; Luan, W.; Guo, X.; Ma, H. Load-In-Load-Out AGV Route Planning in Automatic Container Terminal. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 157081–157088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liao, X.; Zhao, X.; Han, K.; Tiwari, P.; Barth, M.J.; Wu, G. A Digital Twin Paradigm: Vehicle-to-Cloud Based Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), Antwerp, Belgium, 25–28 May 2020; Volume 2020, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Siegfried, R. Implementing the Modelling and Simulation as a Service (MSaaS) Paradigm. In Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 67–88. [Google Scholar]
- Munirathinam, S. Industry 4.0: Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT). In Advances in Organometallic Chemistry; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 117, pp. 129–164. [Google Scholar]
- Industry Connections Ethernet Bandwidth Assessment Ad Hoc. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Bandwidth Assessment IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group Communication From: IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group 1 Subject: IEEE Industry Connections Ethernet Bandwidth Assessment; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Li, D.; Cui, W.; Zhang, R. Research based on OSI model. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, Xi’an, China, 27–28 May 2011; pp. 554–557. [Google Scholar]
- Kiesel, W.; Kuehn, P. A New CSMA-CD Protocol for Local Area Networks with Dynamic Priorities and Low Collision Probability. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983, 1, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Li, D.; Wan, J.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Lai, C.-F.; Wang, S. A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of Industry 4.0. Wirel. Netw. 2017, 23, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferlin, M.; Kurela, M.; Monge, O.; Castgnet, C. Smart Operations in ATEX RLV Environment. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference for Aeronautics and Space Sciences (EUCASS), Madrid, Spain, 1–4 July 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, K.K.V.V.; Gupta, H. A New Approach for the Security of VPN. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, New York, NY, USA, 4–5 March 2016; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, Q.; Huang, W.; Luo, X.; Gong, Q.; Yu, F.R. A Multi-Level DDoS Mitigation Framework for the Industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dharmapurikar, S.; Krishnamurthy, P.; Sproull, T.; Lockwood, J. Deep packet inspection using parallel Bloom filters. In Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on High Performance Interconnects, Stanford, CA, USA, 20–22 August 2003; pp. 44–51. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Lai, W. Security analysis of VLAN-based Virtual Desktop Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Educational and Network Technology, Qinhuangdao, China, 25–27 June 2010; pp. 301–304. [Google Scholar]
- Rashid, A.; Chaturvedi, A. Cloud Computing Characteristics and Services: A Brief Review Proposing an In-novative Approach for Dynamic Resource Scaling Especially in Multi-Tenancy Cases On Cloud Networks View Project Face Recognition and Artificial Intellgenence View Project Cloud Computing Characteristics and Services: A Brief Review. Artic. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, W.; Xia, Z.; Xiong, J.; Gan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Weng, S.; Deng, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J. Manipulation task simulation using ROS and Gazebo. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014), Bali, Indonesia, 5–10 December 2014; pp. 2594–2598. [Google Scholar]
- Naik, N. Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), Vienna, Austria, 11–13 October 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Koubaa, A.; Alajlan, M.; Qureshi, B. ROSLink: Bridging ROS with the Internet-of-Things for Cloud Robotics. In Econometrics for Financial Applications; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; Volume 707, pp. 265–283. [Google Scholar]
- Kunze, L.; Roehm, T.; Beetz, M. Towards semantic robot description languages. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, 9–13 May 2011; pp. 5589–5595. [Google Scholar]
Workshop (Machine) | X-Axis | Y-Axis | Orientation |
---|---|---|---|
Drilling | 2.6 m | 5.3 m | 0 degrees |
Turning | 7 m | 7.8 m | 90 degrees |
Milling | 5.5 m | 4.8 m | 90 degrees |
Pick and place | 3.5 m | 8.8 m | 180 degrees |
Workshop (Machine) | X-Axis | Y-Axis | Orientation |
---|---|---|---|
Drilling | 12 m | 26 m | 0 degrees |
Turning | 10 m | 10 m | 270 degrees |
Milling | 8 m | 20 m | 180 degrees |
Pick and place | 12 m | 1 m | 0 degrees |
Parameters | Data |
---|---|
AGV model | MIR100 by Mobile Universal Robots |
AGV load | 0 kg |
AGV battery charge | >85% |
maximum linear speed | 1.5 m/s |
maximum angular speed | 1.5 rad/s |
measurement of times | manufacturer’s application |
predefined missions | manufacturer’s software |
Mission (Targets in Order) | Digital Twin Time (s) | Real Implementation Time (s) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Milling—Drilling—Turning | 52.3 | 51 | 97.51 |
Milling—Turning—Drilling | 54.1 | 55 | 98.36 |
Turning—Drilling—Milling | 55.4 | 56 | 98.93 |
Turning—Milling—Drilling | 50.8 | 50 | 98.43 |
Drilling—Turning—Milling | 53.1 | 51 | 96.05 |
Drilling—Milling—Turning | 37.4 | 38 | 98.42 |
Mission (Targets in Order) | Digital Twin Time (s) | Real Implementation Time (s) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Milling—Drilling—Turning | 81.6 | 81 | 99.26 |
Milling—Turning—Drilling | 95.0 | 96 | 98.96 |
Turning—Drilling—Milling | 76.3 | 75 | 98.30 |
Turning—Milling—Drilling | 72.5 | 73 | 99.32 |
Drilling—Turning—Milling | 95.8 | 95 | 99.16 |
Drilling—Milling—Turning | 85.2 | 87 | 97.93 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Martínez-Gutiérrez, A.; Díez-González, J.; Ferrero-Guillén, R.; Verde, P.; Álvarez, R.; Perez, H. Digital Twin for Automatic Transportation in Industry 4.0. Sensors 2021, 21, 3344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103344
Martínez-Gutiérrez A, Díez-González J, Ferrero-Guillén R, Verde P, Álvarez R, Perez H. Digital Twin for Automatic Transportation in Industry 4.0. Sensors. 2021; 21(10):3344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103344
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartínez-Gutiérrez, Alberto, Javier Díez-González, Rubén Ferrero-Guillén, Paula Verde, Rubén Álvarez, and Hilde Perez. 2021. "Digital Twin for Automatic Transportation in Industry 4.0" Sensors 21, no. 10: 3344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103344
APA StyleMartínez-Gutiérrez, A., Díez-González, J., Ferrero-Guillén, R., Verde, P., Álvarez, R., & Perez, H. (2021). Digital Twin for Automatic Transportation in Industry 4.0. Sensors, 21(10), 3344. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103344