Next Article in Journal
Walking Secure: Safe Routing Planning Algorithm and Pedestrian’s Crossing Intention Detector Based on Fuzzy Logic App
Next Article in Special Issue
Consistency of Suspended Particulate Matter Concentration in Turbid Water Retrieved from Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Finger-Vein Recognition Using Heterogeneous Databases by Domain Adaption Based on a Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
High Spatiotemporal Resolution Mapping of Surface Water in the Southwest Poyang Lake and Its Responses to Climate Oscillations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predicting Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Hyperspectral Images in a Regulated River

1
Water Quality Assessment Research Division, Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea
2
Water Environment Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(2), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020530
Submission received: 3 December 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Water Quality and Water Environment)

Abstract

:
Process-based modeling for predicting harmful cyanobacteria is affected by a variety of factors, including the initial conditions, boundary conditions (tributary inflows and atmosphere), and mechanisms related to cyanobacteria growth and death. While the initial conditions do not significantly affect long-term predictions, the initial cyanobacterial distribution in water is particularly important for short-term predictions. Point-based observation data have typically been used for cyanobacteria prediction of initial conditions. These initial conditions are determined through the linear interpolation of point-based observation data and may differ from the actual cyanobacteria distribution. This study presents an optimal method of applying hyperspectral images to establish the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code-National Institute of Environment Research (EFDC-NIER) model initial conditions. Utilizing hyperspectral images to determine the EFDC-NIER model initial conditions involves four steps that are performed sequentially and automated in MATLAB. The EFDC-NIER model is established using three grid resolution cases for the Changnyeong-Haman weir section of the Nakdong River Basin, where Microcystis dominates during the summer (July to September). The effects of grid resolution on (1) water quality modeling and (2) initial conditions determined using cumulative distribution functions are evaluated. Additionally, the differences in Microcystis values are compared when applying initial conditions using hyperspectral images and point-based evaluation data. Hyperspectral images allow detailed initial conditions to be applied in the EFDC-NIER model based on the plane-unit cyanobacterial information observed in grids, which can reduce uncertainties in water quality (cyanobacteria) modeling.

1. Introduction

In South Korea, four types of cyanobacteria, Microcystis, Anabaena, Oscillatoria, and Aphanizomenon, that produce trace amounts of odorous substances and toxins (microcystin, anatoxin, saxitoxin, etc.) have been designated harmful cyanobacteria and managed accordingly. Algae alert systems monitor the number of harmful cyanobacterial cells in water sources every seven days. The South Korean algae alert system divides alerts into four stages (below 1000 cells/mL is considered “normal,” between 1000 cells/mL and 10,000 cells/mL is the “advisory” level, between 10,000 cells/mL and 1,000,000 cells/mL indicates “caution,” and above 1,000,000 cells/mL is a “bloom”). Data acquisition on the growth and death of algae in grid units is not conducted for an entire river section. The location and composition of a large-scale algae bloom can alter in a short period due to environmental conditions such as light (sunshine), water temperature, nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), and residence time. There are temporal and spatial limits for algae management when only using algae data from water source areas. The algae concentration measured in a target area does not necessarily represent the distribution and concentration of algae for the entire region. Remote sensing can be used to address these problems by identifying a wide range of algae bloom conditions at a resolution not available with field measurements [1]. Recently, various remote sensing techniques have been studied using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [2,3,4,5]. In addition, chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), which corresponds to algal blooms, has also been monitored using UAVs [4,6].
Both domestic and foreign studies have utilized hyperspectral images in algae forecasts. Choi et al. [7] estimated the Chl-a concentration in the Nakdong River Basin in South Korea using high-resolution satellite images. Park et al. [8] reviewed and analyzed studies on the application of hyperspectral sensors in monitoring water quality, particularly for phytoplankton. Kim et al. [9] used UAVs to capture aerial images of the Dodong pier in the middle of the Nakdong River and to derive an exponential formula for detecting algae. This exponential formula was highly correlated with the phytoplankton quantity, and it demonstrated the potential applications of algae monitoring using UAVs. Recently, a study monitored algae using remote sensing data from the Landsat 8 satellite. Lim et al. [10] estimated the total nitrogen and total phosphorous concentrations in the Geumgang River basin using image data from the Landsat 8 satellite. The study monitored the occurrence of algae by comparing and verifying the total nitrogen and total phosphorous concentrations using multiple linear regression formulas. Jang et al. [11] quantified the nutritional status of Jinyang Lake by analyzing its Chl-a concentration spatial distribution using Landsat 8 images. Satellite remote sensing data have also been used to monitor water quality items related to algae concentration or blooms. Zhang et al. [12] used satellite remote sensing technology to monitor the Chl-a trend, and Adam [13] developed an empirical remote sensing model to estimate Chl-a and harmful cyanobacteria. Hansen et al. [14] utilized remote sensing technology to predict algal growth using Landsat data. Additionally, Ortiz et al. [15] addressed issues related to atmospheric correction, noise reduction, and mixed hyperspectral image pixels using composition analysis. Sawtell et al. [16] monitored the behavior of harmful cyanobacteria in real-time based on high-resolution images by performing noise reduction and atmospheric correction on National Aeronautics and Space Administration hyperspectral images. Woude et al. [17] collected hyperspectral images to monitor the propagation of harmful cyanobacteria in the United States Great Lakes. The temporal and spatial variations of harmful cyanobacteria were then analyzed using the collected data. Thus, the occurrence and behavior of algae have been monitored in real-time using both point and plane units and hyperspectral images.
Most water quality-monitoring studies have used satellite data and hyperspectral images to predict the algal behavior or monitor water quality items that cause algae to bloom. In other fields, remote sensing data are not only used for monitoring but are also integrated into models for data analysis, including that for evapotranspiration estimation [18], atmospheric wind prediction [19], and ground surface radiation and energy estimation [20] in the meteorological field and flood risk assessment in the flood disaster field. Recently, a study was conducted in the water quality field to predict pollution in Donghu Lake by applying remote sensing data to the MIKE 21 and multi-source nonlinear regression fitting models [21]. There are few studies in which remote sensing data are directly applied in numerical models to predict harmful algae. This is because modeling living organisms, such as algae, involves many uncertainties. Therefore, remote sensing data from ungauged areas can be utilized to confirm and validate modeling results [22,23]. However, remote sensing data have not yet been directly applied to model future algal blooms.
The National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) acquires hyperspectral images using UAVs to observe Chl-a and phycocyanin concentrations [24,25,26,27,28]. Recently, the occurrence and behavior of algae have been accurately monitored in real-time using remote sensing data. However, to identify and manage water environment problems, such as repeated summertime algal blooms, it is necessary to predict changes in short-term algae concentration using water quality prediction models. The initial condition of algae distribution in water is particularly important for the prediction of short-term algae concentration because it affects the accuracy of the prediction result. Thus, the use of an accurate initial condition of algae can reduce uncertainties in the prediction results. Hyperspectral images encompassing the actual algae concentration values across the entire section can be used to determine accurate algae initial conditions.
The purpose of this study is to generate the initial conditions for the current water quality prediction model Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC)-NIER using hyperspectral image data and evaluate its applicability in short-term algae forecasts. The optimal method for applying hyperspectral image data in EFDC-NIER grids and the optimal grid resolution of the EFDC-NIER model to predict algae are presented. The study was conducted in the following steps: (1) an EFDC-NIER model was constructed for the Changnyeong-Haman weir section with a dominant algae presence, (2) the representative Chl-a concentration was calculated to apply hyperspectral images in determining the EFDC-NIER initial condition, (3) the prediction sensitivity of cyanobacteria based on the calculated Chl-a concentration and the predictive powers of three grid resolutions (5 partitions, 10 partitions, and 20 partitions) were compared and analyzed, (4) the optimal grid resolution for applying hyperspectral images in EFDC-NIER was presented, and (5) the applicability of the hyperspectral image-based initial condition for the water quality model was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. EFDC-NIER

The EFDC model is a three-dimensional numerical model developed by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in the early 1990s; it has since been managed and supplemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EFDC model is widely used worldwide to understand hydraulic and water quality behaviors in various areas, including rivers, lakes, estuaries, and seas. Since 2010, the National Institute of Environmental Research has improved the function of the EFDC (20100328 version) source code to suit the conditions of major waters in South Korea and has developed the necessary modules to officially use the model as a water quality forecast model for major sections of South Korean rivers. The improved model was named EFDC-NIER. The EFDC-NIER model has been equipped with new features, such as incorporating the weir function of major rivers in South Korea, multi-species algae simulation, the vertical movement mechanism of cyanobacteria, dormant spore generation and germination, wind stress, and bottom-water nutrient elution variations due to changes in oxidation and reduction conditions (Figure 1).
Since the Four Major Rivers Project, the EFDC-NIER model has been improved to more accurately reflect changes in flow rate and water level due to artificial hydraulic structures, such as multifunctional weirs, thereby improving the simulation accuracy of the changed river environments. In particular, the existing EFDC model simulates algae by classifying them into three different species (cyanobacteria, diatoms, and other algae), making it difficult to predict the rapid dominance and transitions of certain algae. However, the EFDC-NIER model can be utilized to quantitatively predict the occurrence of algae, including their rapid dominance and transitions because the algae module has been enhanced to allow for multi-species simulation (Figure 2).

2.2. Hyperspectral Image Application Method in EFDC-NIER Model

In this study, hyperspectral images were taken of the Changnyeong-Haman weir section of the Nakdong River Basin, and the algae monitoring data observed using this remote sensing technique were applied to determine the initial condition of the EFDC-NIER model (Figure 3).
The hyperspectral images were acquired using the AISA Eagle sensor mounted on a UAV. The acquired images were radiometrically and geometrically corrected using Caligeo Pro, and an atmospheric correction was performed using ATCOR-4. The spectral data of the water measured on-site on the day of filming, phycocyanin pigment concentration, and cyanobacteria cell count from the same location were used to obtain the cyanobacterial information of the hyperspectral image data [27]. First, the genetic algorithm method was used to estimate the phycocyanin pigment concentration based on the spectral data, and the R2 value (0.85) of the learning and verification data indicated strong explanatory power. The cyanobacterial cell count was derived from the phycocyanin concentration and linear regression analysis. The R2 value of the regression equation was 0.71, indicating strong explanatory power. In this study, the cyanobacteria cell count distribution generated through the process described earlier was applied to the initial condition of the EFDC model.
There are various modeling input conditions, such as weather, boundary, initial, and hydraulic structure operation conditions, for modeling Microcystis in the EFDC-NIER model. Of these, the initial condition acts as an important element in the short-term forecast for Microcystis. The initial condition was applied in the model based on the linear interpolation of the observed point-to-point data. Using the Chl-a values obtained at the observation points across the water quality monitoring network, the EFDC-NIER model grids were interpolated using the nearest neighbor interpolation method and then applied to the initial condition for modeling. When the distance between the monitoring network points is large, the initial distribution of algae cannot be accurately reflected. In contrast, as grid-format data observed through aerial imaging, hyperspectral images can provide an initial algae distribution that is similar to that in reality. The procedure for applying hyperspectral images in the EFDC-NIER model is displayed in Figure 4. The steps were automated using MATLAB.
The first step is to extract the Chl-a concentration value of each grid in the hyperspectral image and group the corresponding data using the EFDC-NIER model grid. Various Chl-a concentration values from the hyperspectral image are entered into each EFDC-NIER model grid, depending on the difference in the spatial resolution between the two datasets (Figure 5).
The second step is to interpolate the no data that contain no hyperspectral Chl-a concentration values due to hydraulic structures, such as bridges and weirs, using the average concentration value of the adjacent EFDC-NIER grids. The third step is to calculate the representative Chl-a concentration value of the hyperspectral image data grouped into EFDC-NIER model grids. It is difficult to calculate the representative concentration value because the concentration value distribution varies for each grid. Thus, to calculate the representative Chl-a concentration values, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) and mean, representing the appropriate properties of the set of values, were applied. For each grid, the Chl-a concentration values were calculated using CDFs in the first quartile (25%), middle quartile (50%), and third quartile (75%). Additionally, the mean Chl-a concentration value for each grid was arithmetically determined. As the final step, the initial algae field file (WQWCRSTX.inp) was generated by converting the representative Chl-a value of each EFDC-NIER model grid to carbon according to the carbon ratio of each Phytoplankton Functional Group (PFG) codon.
To apply the generated initial condition of the hyperspectral data to the EFDC-NIER model, nine representative PFG codons were selected based on the algal species listed by Reynolds et al. [29] and Padisak et al. [30], and those observed in the Nakdong River Basin (Table A1, Appendix A). Figure 6 displays the 684 algal species found 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir in the Nakdong River Basin grouped by PFG codon and the cell count by codon observed between 7 January 2019, and 23 December 2019. The biovolume value per unit cell in Figure 6 was calculated using the average cell length, width, and thickness of each algal species found in the Nakdong River in 2016, as listed in Table A2 (Appendix A) [25]. The carbon content per codon was calculated by converting the cell count of the observed algal species based on the pgC/cell for each species provided in Table A2 (Appendix A). For example, given a cell count of 10,000 cells/mL for Microcystis spp., the carbon content is 10,000 × 10.95/1,000,000 = 0.1095 mg C/L. Based on the cell counts of the 684 algal species observed in the water quality monitoring network 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir, the monthly carbon ratio was calculated for each of the nine PFG codons (Figure 6). The monthly carbon ratio defines the carbon content of each codon in the tributary inflow as the boundary condition in the EFDC-NIER model. The monthly carbon ratio for the initial condition was calculated using the same method, based on the cell count for each codon observed on the same day as when the hyperspectral image was taken 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir. The carbon ratio was calculated for each PFG codon by measuring the cell count of the 684 algal species found 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir on 6 July 2019. The harmful cyanobacteria, Microcystis (Codon M), resulted in 9.5%.
The carbon–Chl-a ratio (β) is required to convert the Chl-a value into carbon. For the eight observation points in the Nakdong River Basin (Sangju weir, Nakdan weir, Gumi weir, Chilgok weir, Gangjeong-Goryeong weir, Dalseong weir, Hapcheon-Changnyeong weir, Changnyeong weir, Changnyeong weir, and Changnyeong-Haman weir), the ratio of the carbon contents per codon to the Chl-a values observed between 2013 and 2018 was 0.12 on average. Therefore, a β of 0.12 was applied in this study. The equation for converting the representative Chl-a value of each EFDC-NIER model grid extracted from the hyperspectral image to the carbon content by codon is provided below:
Codon X a l l c a r b o n =   i = 1 9 ( β × C o d o n X i c a r b o n   r a t i o   × C h l a   c o n c e n t r a t i o n )
where i represents the codon (M, H1, D, C, X2, P, G, J, and LO), and β is the carbonChl-a concentration ratio (0.12).
The results of applying the calculated carbon content of Codon M in the initial condition of the EFDC-NIER model using both the hyperspectral image (grid unit) and monitoring network data (point unit) are illustrated in Figure 7. The initial condition generated with the monitoring network data simplified the initial field because the ungauged grids were linearly interpolated using the point-to-point observation data from 500 m upstream of each multifunctional weir. In contrast, the initial condition generated using the hyperspectral image reflected the actual algae occurrences because the Chl-a concentration values were measured for all grids (Figure 7).

2.3. Study Area and Model Construction

In this study, the Changnyeong-Haman weir section of the Nakdong River Basin was selected as the target area to assess the applicability of hyperspectral images in water quality (algae) prediction (Figure 8).
The Nakdong River Basin is an area with frequent summertime algal blooms due to its topographical features. In particular, the Changnyeong-Haman weir section, located in the downstream area of the Nakdong River Basin, serves as a water source, making it a suitable section for the study. Factors affecting the water supply, such as tributaries flowing into the primary river stream, sewage plant discharges, and water intake stations, were reflected in the model as boundary conditions. A “mask” was set on the grids where multifunctional weirs were located, and the upstream inflows were set to be discharged downstream using a hydraulic structure module. Municipal meteorological observation data from the Korea Meteorological Administration open weather data portal, daily operation data provided by K-water for Changnyeong-Haman weir water level management, daily dam discharge data from the Water Resources Management Information System, flow rate observation data from the Ministry of Environment, and water quality monitoring network data from the Ministry of Environment were used in the study.
The Chl-a values in the 2 × 2 m lattices of the hyperspectral image were matched to the EFDC-NIER model grids and grouped to calculate the representative Chl-a values. Depending on the grid resolution of the EFDC-NIER model, the Chl-a value varied for each EFDC-NIER model grid. The EFDC-NIER model with the same resolution as the 2 × 2 m grid in the hyperspectral image did not require a representative Chl-a value calculation, and more grids in the EFDC-NIER model resulted in a longer modeling time. The optimal grid resolution for predicting water quality (algae) while achieving an efficient calculation was evaluated in this study. There were three cases based on the number of horizontal grids. To build the EFDC-NIER model with various study area resolutions, different numbers of grids were set for the stream longitudinal (I-direction) and latitudinal (J-direction) directions. In Case 3, grids were constructed within a range that ensured orthogonality with 20 grid partitions in the J-direction (Figure 9c). Based on Case 3, the I- and J-direction grids in Case 2 were divided in half (10 partitions, Figure 9b), and the I- and J-direction grids were divided in half again (5 partitions) in Case 1 (Figure 9a). The total numbers of horizontal grids were 1105 for Case 1, 4430 for Case 2, and 17,700 for Case 3. The vertical direction (K-direction) grid was set in five partitions for all three cases.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Long-Term Water Quality Sensitivity Analysis by Grid Resolution

In this study, the EFDC-NIER model was constructed with three different grid resolutions. The effect of grid resolution on water quality (algae) prediction was first evaluated. Parameter correction was performed on the water quality items and algae-related water quality based on Case 3, which exhibited the highest grid resolution. The discharge water from the Hapcheon-Changnyeong weir was applied as the upstream boundary, and the water level at the Samrangjin Water Level Monitoring Station was applied as the downstream boundary. Within this constructed section of the model, the Changnyeong-Haman weir was reflected as a hydraulic structure. The evaluation period was set from 20 June 2019, to 10 August 2019, and a comparison with the observed values was conducted based on a point located 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir.
Model parameter correction was conducted using the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). MAE is the average of the absolute error of the observed and simulated values, and it can be used to compare the residuals between the models, while RMSE is the average error of the observed and simulated values which indicates the model precision. The values listed in Table 1 were used as the primary parameters of the algae and water quality analyses. The RMSE and MAE analysis results for the simulation period are provided in Table 2. Based on the results, the model reasonably simulated the changing water flow characteristics (water level and water temperature) in the weir section, which fundamentally dictates algal blooms and behavior patterns, and water quality items (nutrients and organics) that are highly correlated to algal blooms and behavior patterns.
MAE = i = 1 N | O i P i | N
RMSE = 1 N i = 1 N ( O i P i ) 2
where Pi is the simulated value at time i, Oi is the observed value at time i, and N is the number of observed values for the entire period.
Figure 10 displays a graphical representation of the analysis results and observed values of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), Chl-a, and cyanobacterial cell counts simulated 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir. Under identical environmental conditions, including weather, boundary, initial, and hydraulic structure operation conditions, changes in grid resolution did not appear to affect the water quality model results. Thus, the sensitivity of the water quality model to grid resolution can be considered small for a one-dimensional time series analysis. In one-dimensional time series modeling, a multidimensional model is no more accurate than a one-dimensional numerical model. The increased grid resolution in a multidimensional model can disrupt fast decision-making because it requires a longer simulation time. Therefore, a one-dimensional model or a low-resolution multidimensional model is deemed sufficient when decisions must be made quickly.

3.2. Applicability of EFDC-NIER Initial Condition Based on Representative Concentration Value and Grid Resolution

Figure 11 displays the Microcystis cell count results 500 m upstream of the Changnyeong-Haman weir in the short-term, with three-day predictions performed by applying the hyperspectral image data taken on 2 August 2018, to the initial condition for each case and CDF. If the EFDC-NIER model was built with the same grid as the 2 m × 2 m grid resolution of the hyperspectral image, the average and CDF (25%, 50%, and 75% quartiles) achieve the same modeling results. As illustrated in Figure 11, the difference between the CDF 75% and 25% quartile models was the smallest in Case 3. The spread between the two values increased in the order of Case 3 < Case 2 < Case 1. The higher the grid resolution of the EFDC-NIER model, the smaller the short-term Microcystis forecast deviation was when applying the representative Chl-a value from the hyperspectral image, resulting in identical CDF 50% quartile and average values. High water temperatures of 30.7 °C and 31.8 °C were observed on 30 July 2018, and 6 August 2018, respectively, providing the optimal conditions for Microcystis to grow. A representative EFDC-NIER grid value should represent the respective grid value. The lowest values were typically found with CDF 50%, with no significant difference in the simulation results when the CDF 50% and average values were used. Therefore, it was deemed appropriate to calculate the representative Chl-a values using the median CDF 50% values from the hyperspectral images of the Changnyeong-Haman weir section.
Figure 12 displays the short-term prediction results of the Microcystis cell count after applying the initial condition of 50% CDF to each grid resolution case using Chl-a data from the hyperspectral image observed on 6 July 2019. The results correspond to a 7 days modeling period from 6 July 2019, to 13 July 2019, which demonstrated that the higher the grid resolution, the more accurately the algal distribution was expressed. Case 3, which exhibited a small spread and precise distribution of algae, is considered the optimal grid resolution because the optimal method for calculating representative concentrations can vary depending on the environmental conditions. In particular, the maximum algae bloom in the dead water zone on the right riverbank near a river island was predicted to be 22,009 cells/mL in Case 2 and 21,735 cells/mL in Case 3, which were higher than the 16,164 cells/mL prediction in Case 1.

3.3. Hyperspectral Image Applicability in Water Quality Model Initial Field

Figure 13 displays the result of modeling Microcystis cell count from 6 July 2019, to 22 July 2019, by applying the Chl-a values from the hyperspectral image (HSI) taken on 6 July 2019, and the carbon content by the PFG codon measured at the monitoring network in the initial condition of the EFDC-NIER model. While the effect of the initial condition used in the two methods varied for the first seven days, from 6 July 2019, to 13 July 2019, the Microcystis cell count modeling results were still similar, and the effect of the initial conditions was no longer noticeable (Figure 13). Different results were observed depending on how the initial conditions were applied. The water temperature was 24 °C on 1 July 2019; 26.2 °C on 8 July 2019; and 25.6 °C on 15 July 2019, a low water temperature compared to the average of 31.4 °C between 30 July 2018, and 6 August 2018. This result indicated that the effect of the initial condition based on CDF was small. The application of the initial conditions calculated by linearly interpolating the algal data between the observation points of the monitoring network in the EFDC-NIER model can either over- or under-apply the carbon content. In contrast, the use of hyperspectral images allows detailed initial conditions to be applied in the EFDC-NIER model based on plane-unit algae data measured in grids, reducing uncertainties in water quality modeling (Figure 14).

4. Conclusions

This study presented the optimal method for applying hyperspectral images as a remote sensing technique in the initial condition for the short-term prediction of Microcystis. (1) A sensitivity analysis of the water quality simulation for different EFDC-NIER model grid resolutions, (2) a comparison of results at different grid resolutions and data resampling between the hyperspectral image and EFDC-NIER model, and (3) a comparison of results between the existing point-based initial conditions from the data observed at the monitoring network and the grid-unit hyperspectral image-based initial condition were performed in this study. The major findings of this study are as follows.
  • The sensitivity of the water quality simulation was small for varying initial conditions, boundary conditions, and parameters. In a one-dimensional time series analysis, a multidimensional model is no more accurate than a one-dimensional numerical model, even at a higher grid resolution. While a multidimensional model is necessary when modeling a dead water zone that requires high spatial accuracy, a low-resolution model is deemed sufficient for quick decision-making and conducting a one-dimensional time series analysis. It is critical to select and operate a model that is appropriate for the purpose and circumstances.
  • When resampling different grid resolutions between the hyperspectral image and EFDC-NIER model, the dispersion of the results with different CDFs decreased as the EFDC-NIER model grid resolution increased. Case 3 is the most optimal grid resolution, and CDF 50% should be used to reduce the effect of various environmental conditions on the modeling result.
  • When using linearly interpolated algae data from the observation points across the monitoring network, the carbon content may be under- or over-applied. The use of hyperspectral images can reduce uncertainties in the modeling results because detailed initial conditions can be applied to the target section.
  • As various remote sensing techniques, such as satellite images, are being studied in addition to hyperspectral images, if the Chl-a or algal cell count data can be directly observed and provided, these data can be used in the initial condition of hydrodynamic models using the method presented in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.A.; data curation, J.M.A., B.K., J.J., G.N., L.J.P., S.P. and J.K.; formal analysis, J.M.A. and J.K.; funding acquisition, T.K. and J.-K.L.; investigation, J.M.A., G.N., S.P. and J.K.; methodology, J.M.A. and B.K.; project administration, J.M.A. and J.K.; resources, J.J. and L.J.P.; software, J.M.A.; supervision, J.K.; validation, J.M.A.; visualization, J.J. and L.J.P.; writing—original draft, J.M.A.; writing—review and editing, T.K., J.-K.L. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), which is funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea, grant number NIER-2020-01-01-012.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

In our study, the procedure for calculating the amount of carbon using chlorophyll-a in hyperspectral images is as follows:
<1 Step> As shown in Table A1 and Table A2,
(1) We grouped 684 algae species observed in the Nakdong river as shown in Table A2, based on the PFG presented in Table A1
(2) The result of the biomass per unit cell for each algae species are presented in parentheses in Table A2.
As shown in Figure 6,
(3) We observed the cell number of each algae species from January to December 2019 for 684 algae species observed in the Nakdong river at 7 days intervals.
(4) The biomass for each algae species can be calculated using the biomass data per unit cell for each algae species shown in Table A2.
(5) The occupancy ratio of biomass can be calculated for each codon of PFG.
(6) Finally, it is possible to calculate the occupancy ratio of biomass by PFG for each month.
<2 Step>
When modeling algae, the amount of carbon is applied to each algae group in EFDC model. If the Chlorophyll-a value has a concentration of 100 as 100%, it is assumed that the amount of carbon is as much as the occupancy ratio shown in Figure 6. Therefore, if there is an observed chlorophyll-a value, the amount of carbon is calculated using the biomass occupancy calculated in Figure 6 and Equation (1).
Table A1. PFG environmental characteristics at primary channels of four major rivers.
Table A1. PFG environmental characteristics at primary channels of four major rivers.
CodonHabitat *Tolerances *Sensitivities *Typical Representatives *
DShallow, enriched turbid waters, including riversFlushingNutrient depletionStephanodiscus spp. and Synedra spp.
X2Shallow, clear mixed layersStratificationMixing
and filter feeding
Cryptomonas spp. and Rhodomonas spp.
Peutrophic epilimnia Mild light and C-deficiencyStratification,
Si depletion
Closterium spp. and
Fragilaria spp.
CSmall to medium mixed, eutrophic lakesLight and
C-deficiency
Si exhaustion and stratificationCyclotella spp.,
Asterionella spp., and
Aulacoseira spp.
LoSummer epilimnia in mesotrophic lakesSegregated nutrientsProlonged or deep mixingPeridinium spp. andMerismopedia spp.
GShort, nutrient-rich water columnsHigh lightNutrient deficiencyEudorina spp. and Volvox spp.
JShallow, enriched lakes, ponds, and rivers-Settling into low lightPediastrum spp. and
Coelastrum spp.
MDielly mixed layers of small, eutrophic, and low-latitude lakesHigh insolationFlushing and
low total light
Microcystis spp.
H1Dinitrogen-fixing and nostocaleansLow N and low CMixing, poor light, and low PAnabaena spp. and
Aphanizomenon spp.
* [29] (pp. 420–421).
Table A2. Classification by algal species codon observed in Nakdong River Basin and carbon content by cell count.
Table A2. Classification by algal species codon observed in Nakdong River Basin and carbon content by cell count.
GroupSpecies(pgC/cell)
Codon DNitzschia spp. (56.2), Skeletonema spp. (127.8), Stephanodiscus spp. (520.5), and Synedra spp. (516.1)
Codon X2Chroomonas spp. (407.5), Cryptomonas spp. (407.5), and Chlamydomonas spp. (446.5)
Codon PAulacoseira spp. (201.3), Fragilaria spp. (68.9), Melosira spp. (705.1), Closteriopsis spp. (130.4), Closterium spp. (143.5), and Staurastrum spp. (13,651.8)
Codon CAsterionella spp. (125.2) and Cyclotella spp. (301.5)
Codon LOCeratium spp. (361.8), Gymnodinium spp. (1,303.15), Peridinium spp. (2244.5), and Merismopedia spp. (0.4)
Codon GCarteria spp. (27.1), Eudorina spp. (161.6), and Pandorina spp. (204.4)
Codon JActinastrum spp. (9.3), Coelastrum spp. (123.4), Crucigenia spp. (12.9), Golenkinia spp. (54.7), Pediastrum spp. (8.5), Scenedesmus spp. (10.6), Tetraedron spp. (90.4), and Tetrastrum spp. (6.4)
Codon MMicrocystis spp. (10.95)
Codon H1Anabaena spp. (164.1) and Aphanizomenon spp. (9.5)
Among the 9 PFG codons, the harmful cyanobacteria groups are codon M and codon H1. Codon M includes microcystis spp., and CodonH1 includes Apanizomenon spp. and Anabena spp. Table A3 is the result of listing monthly carbon occupancy ratio by codon of PFG. Looking at the codon M, which corresponds to the cell number of microcystis, it can be seen that the carbon occupancy ratio is high in June to September. Figure A1 and Figure A2 represents between the chlorophyll-a value and the number of harmful cyanobacteria observed from June to September from 2014 to 2020.
In the case of the codon M and codon H1, which are mainly floating in the surface layer, the correlation between the harmful cyanobacteria and the chlorophyll-a concentration observed in the surface layer was high (Figure A1). However, the correlation was relatively low between harmful cyanobacteria and average chlorophyll-a concentration in water (Figure A2). In addition, Figure A3 shows the correlation between the chlorophyll-a observed in the surface layer and the hyperspectral image index (713/688) in the study area from June to September from 2015 to 2016. This is result of taking a hyperspectral image and analyzing the chlorophyll-a value of the water body at the study area. The correlation between the index (713/688) and the chlorophyll-a concentration was 0.72.
When the above two results were combined, it is believed that the chlorophyll-a observed in the surface layer can be used as an index that can represent the degree of harmful algal blooms at the time when microcystis spp. dominates. However, phycocyanin is an index that can more accurately represent cyanobacteria. Therefore, it is also necessary to predict cyanobacteria using phycocyanin in future studies.
Table A3. Monthly carbon occupancy ratio (%) by codon of PFG.
Table A3. Monthly carbon occupancy ratio (%) by codon of PFG.
CodonJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Codon M0.00.00.00.00.14.230.144.28.30.20.00.0
Codon H10.00.00.00.04.11.13.11.33.21.30.70.4
Codon P12.117.415.48.626.768.539.623.227.07.736.01.8
Codon D59.571.070.241.816.52.03.71.05.59.68.553.4
Codon G0.00.00.00.00.01.08.42.21.51.20.00.0
Codon X216.08.89.546.849.014.718.623.828.645.333.635.8
Codon J0.00.00.01.91.70.40.44.015.20.50.20.3
Codon LO0.00.20.20.30.60.43.21.25.026.80.90.3
Codon C12.42.64.70.61.38.71.31.37.28.620.18.0
Figure A1. The correlation between harmful cyanobacteria and chlorophyll-a in the surface layer.
Figure A1. The correlation between harmful cyanobacteria and chlorophyll-a in the surface layer.
Sensors 21 00530 g0a1
Figure A2. The correlation between harmful cyanobacteria and average chlorophyll-a concentration in water.
Figure A2. The correlation between harmful cyanobacteria and average chlorophyll-a concentration in water.
Sensors 21 00530 g0a2
Figure A3. The correlation between the chlorophyll-a in the surface layer and the hyperspectral image index (713/688).
Figure A3. The correlation between the chlorophyll-a in the surface layer and the hyperspectral image index (713/688).
Sensors 21 00530 g0a3

References

  1. Park, Y.J.; Ruddick, K. Detection of algal blooms in European waters based on satellite chlorophyll data from MERIS and MODIS. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 6567–6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Flynn, K.F.; Chapra, S.C. Remote Sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation in a shallow Non-turbid river using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Korean J. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 12815–12836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pajares, G. Overview and current status of remote sensing applications based on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Am. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2015, 81, 281–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Su, T.C.; Chou, H.T. Application of multispectral sensors carried on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to trophic state mapping of small reservoirs: A case study of Tain-Pu reservoir in Kinmen, Taiwan. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 10078–10097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zaman, B.; Jensen, A.; Clemens, S.R.; McKee, M. Retrieval of spectral reflectance of high resolution multispectral imagery acquired with an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle. Am. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 80, 1139–1150. [Google Scholar]
  6. Su, T.C. A study of a matching pixel by pixel (MPP) algorithm to establish an empirical model of water quality mapping, as based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform. 2017, 58, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, E.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, J.K. Estimation of Chlorophyll-a Concentrations in the Nakdong River Using High-Resolution Satellite Image. Korean J. Remote Sens. 2011, 27, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Park, Y.J.; Jang, H.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Baik, K.H.; Lee, H.S. A Research on the Applicability of Water Quality Analysis using the Hyperspectral Sensor. J. Korean Soc. Environ. Anal. 2014, 17, 113–125. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, H.M.; Jang, S.W.; Yoon, H.J. Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Image for Detection of Algal Bloom in Nakdong River. J. Kiecs 2017, 12, 457–464. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim, J.; Baik, J.; Kim, H.; Chol, M. Estimation of Water Quality using Landsat 8 Images for Geum-river, Korea. J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 2015, 48, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jang, M.W.; Cho, H.K.; Kim, S.M. Analysis of a Spatial Distribution and Nutritional Status of Chlorophyll-a Concentration in the Jinyang Lake Using Landsat 8 Satellite Image. J. Korean Soc. Water Environ. 2018, 35, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Qin, B.; Woerd, H.; Li, J.; Li, Y. Modeling Remote-Sensing Reflectance and Retrieving Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Extremely Turbid Case-2 Waters(Lake Taihu, China). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adam, T. Remote Sensing Models of Algal Blooms and Cyanobacteria in Lake Champlain; University of Massachesetts Amherst: Amherst, MA, USA, 2012; Environmental & Water Resources Engineering Masters Projects. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hansen, C.; Burian, S.; Dennison, P.; Williams, G. Spatiotemporal Variability of Lake Water Quality in the Context of Remote Sensing Models. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ortiz, J.; Avouris, D.; Schiller, S.; Luvall, J.; Lekki, J.; Tokars, R.; Anderson, R.; Shuchman, R.; Sayers, M.; Becker, R. Evaluating visible derivative spectroscopy by varimax-rotated, principal component analysis of aerial hyperspectral images from the western basin of Lake Erie. J. Great Lakes Res. 2019, 45, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sawtell, R.; Anderson, R.; Tokars, R.; Lekki, J.; Shuchman, R.; Bosse, K.; Sayers, M. Real time HABs mapping using NASA Glenn hyperspectral imager. J. Great Lakes Res. 2019, 45, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Woude, A.V.; Ruberg, S.; Johengen, T.; Miller, R.; Stuart, D. Spatial and temporal scales of variability of cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms from NOAA GLERL airborne hyperspectral imagery. J. Great Lakes Res. 2019, 45, 536–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Courault, D.; Seguin, B.; Olioso, A. Review on estimation of evapotranspiration from remote sensing data: From empirical to numerical modeling approaches. Irrig. Drain. Sys. 2005, 19, 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chan, P. Atmospheric turbulence in complex terrain: Verifying numerical model results with observations by remote-sensing instruments. Meteor. Atmos. Phys. 2009, 103, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liang, S.; Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Wild, M. Review on Estimation of Land Surface Radiation and Energy Budgets from Ground Measurement, Remote Sensing and Model Simulations. IEEE J. Sel. Top. App. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2010, 3, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Huang, M.; Wang, R. Numerical Simulation of Donghu Lake Hydrodynamics and Water Quality Based on Remote Sensing and MIKE 21. Isprs Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, i9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kageyama, Y.; Nishida, M. Water Quality Analysis based on Remote Sensing Data and Numerical Model. J. Geo. 2000, 109, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kouts, T.; Sipelgas, L.; Sabinit, N.; Raudsepp, U. Environmental monitoring of water quality in coastal sea area using remote sensing and modeling. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE US/EU Baltic International Symposium, Klaipeda, Lithuania, 23–26 May 2006; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, H.; Park, S.; Kang, T.; Kim, K.; Nam, G.; Ha, R.; Shin, H. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Algal Distribution Using Inherent Optical Properties; NIER: Incheon, Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, H.; Park, S.; Kim, K.; Kang, T.; Nam, G.; Ha, R.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.; Lee, J. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Algal Distribution Using Inherent Optical Properties (Ⅱ); NIER: Incheon, Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, H.; Park, S.; Kim, K.; Nam, G.; Ha, R.; Shin, H. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Algal Distribution Using Inherent Optical Properties (‘17); NIER: Incheon, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, H.; Kang, T.; Park, S.; Lee, M.; Kim, B.; Nam, G.; Ha, R.; Shin, H.; Song, H.; Byun, M. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Algal Distribution Using Inherent Optical Properties (‘18); NIER: Incheon, Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. Park, S.; Kang, T.; Lee, S.; Nam, G.; Yoo, J.; Shin, H.; Song, H. A Study on Predicting Water Environment Change Using Hyperspectral Imagery (I)—Focused on Accuracy Evaluation of Algae Remote Sensing Technique by Each River Section; NIER: Incheon, Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Reynolds, C.S.; Huszar, V.; Kruk, C.; Naselli-Flores, L.; Melo, S. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 2002, 24, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Padisak, J.; Crossetti, L.O.; Naselli-Flores, L. Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: A critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia 2009, 621, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code-National Institute of Environment Research (EFDC-NIER) schematic.
Figure 1. Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code-National Institute of Environment Research (EFDC-NIER) schematic.
Sensors 21 00530 g001
Figure 2. Multi-species algae simulation module schematic.
Figure 2. Multi-species algae simulation module schematic.
Sensors 21 00530 g002
Figure 3. Algal distribution hyperspectral remote sensing using inherent optical properties [28].
Figure 3. Algal distribution hyperspectral remote sensing using inherent optical properties [28].
Sensors 21 00530 g003
Figure 4. Procedure for applying hyperspectral remote sensing data in initial field of EFDC-NIER model.
Figure 4. Procedure for applying hyperspectral remote sensing data in initial field of EFDC-NIER model.
Sensors 21 00530 g004
Figure 5. Resampling from the hyperspectral image grid to the EFDC-NIER model grid.
Figure 5. Resampling from the hyperspectral image grid to the EFDC-NIER model grid.
Sensors 21 00530 g005
Figure 6. Calculation of carbon ratio for each Phytoplankton Functional Group (PFG).
Figure 6. Calculation of carbon ratio for each Phytoplankton Functional Group (PFG).
Sensors 21 00530 g006
Figure 7. Initial condition application for Microcystis using hyperspectral and monitoring point network data.
Figure 7. Initial condition application for Microcystis using hyperspectral and monitoring point network data.
Sensors 21 00530 g007
Figure 8. Study area (Left: Nakdong River Basin; Right: Changnyeong-Haman weir section).
Figure 8. Study area (Left: Nakdong River Basin; Right: Changnyeong-Haman weir section).
Sensors 21 00530 g008
Figure 9. Model construction for each grid resolution: (a) Grid resolution of case 1; (b) Grid resolution of case 2; (c) Grid resolution of case 3.
Figure 9. Model construction for each grid resolution: (a) Grid resolution of case 1; (b) Grid resolution of case 2; (c) Grid resolution of case 3.
Sensors 21 00530 g009
Figure 10. Sensitivity of long-term water quality parameters by case: (a) water level; (b) temperature; (c) BOD; (d) T-N; (e) T-P; (f) cyanobacteria.
Figure 10. Sensitivity of long-term water quality parameters by case: (a) water level; (b) temperature; (c) BOD; (d) T-N; (e) T-P; (f) cyanobacteria.
Sensors 21 00530 g010
Figure 11. Results of applying hyperspectral image-based initial conditions for representative Chl-a concentration estimations: (a) microcystis modeling results in Case 1; (b) microcystis modeling results in Case 2; (c) microcystis modeling results in Case 3.
Figure 11. Results of applying hyperspectral image-based initial conditions for representative Chl-a concentration estimations: (a) microcystis modeling results in Case 1; (b) microcystis modeling results in Case 2; (c) microcystis modeling results in Case 3.
Sensors 21 00530 g011
Figure 12. Results of applying cumulative distribution function (CDF) 50% to the initial field in each case: (a) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 1; (b) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 2; (c) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 3.
Figure 12. Results of applying cumulative distribution function (CDF) 50% to the initial field in each case: (a) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 1; (b) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 2; (c) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image in Case 3.
Sensors 21 00530 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of initial field application method modeling results in each case. (a) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 1; (b) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 2; (c) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 3.
Figure 13. Comparison of initial field application method modeling results in each case. (a) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 1; (b) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 2; (c) microcystis modeling results using HSI and Monitoring data in Case 3.
Sensors 21 00530 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of initial condition monitoring results based on hyperspectral and monitoring network data: (a) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image; (b) carbon concentration of monitoring point.
Figure 14. Comparison of initial condition monitoring results based on hyperspectral and monitoring network data: (a) carbon concentration of hyperspectral image; (b) carbon concentration of monitoring point.
Sensors 21 00530 g014
Table 1. Major parameters and ranges.
Table 1. Major parameters and ranges.
EFDC
Parameter *
UnitDefinitionNakdong River
PMxCodon M dMaximum Growth Rate3.0–4.0
Codon H10.2–3.0
Codon P 1.3–3.0
Codon D 3.0–4.0
Codon G 0.8–1.8
Codon X21.5–3.5
Codon J 1.2–1.5
Codon LO 0.2–2.0
Codon C 1.0–3.5
KHNxCodon M mg/LNitrogen Half-Saturation0.03
Codon H10.03
Codon P 0.07
Codon D 0.07
Codon G 0.05
Codon X20.05
Codon J 0.05
Codon LO 0.05
Codon C 0.07
KHPxCodon M mg/LPhosphorus Half-Saturation0.01
Codon H10.02
Codon P 0.01
Codon D 0.01
Codon G 0.01
Codon X20.01
Codon J 0.01
Codon LO 0.01
Codon C 0.01
TMX1Codon M °CLower Optimal Temperature20.0
Codon H110.0
Codon P 5.0
Codon D 2.0
Codon G 20.0
Codon X22.0
Codon J 18.0
Codon LO 10.0
Codon C 5.0
TMX2Codon M °CUpper Optimal Temperature35.0
Codon H135.0
Codon P 35.0
Codon D 13.0
Codon G 35.0
Codon X230.0
Codon J 32.0
Codon LO 30.0
Codon C 30.0
WQRHOMNCodon Mkg/m3Algae Minimum Density985
Codon H1920
Codon G970
Codon LO920
WQRHOMXCodon Mkg/ m3Algae Maximum Density1,005
Codon H11,030
Codon G1,065
Codon Lo1,030
WQCOEF1Codon Mkg/ m3/minDensity Increase Rate Constant0.030
Codon H10.070
Codon G0.045
Codon Lo0.070
WQCOEF2Codon Mkg/ m3/minDensity Decrease Rate Constant0.001
Codon H10.001
Codon G0.001
Codon Lo0.001
WQCOEF3Codon Mkg/ m3/minDensity Increase Minimum Rate0.013
Codon H10.023
Codon G0.011
Codon Lo0.023
WQRCodon MmAlgae Effective Radius0.00008
Codon H10.000005
Codon G0.00025
Codon Lo0.00002
CChlx mg C/μg Chl-aCarbon–Chl-a Ratio for Algae0.012
CIa, CIb, Clc -Weighting Factor for Solar Radiation at 0 d, 1 d, and 2 d0.80, 0.15, and 0.05
BMRx /dBasal Metabolism Rate for Algae0.05–0.1
PRRx /dPredation Rate for Algae0.02
CPprm1 g C/g PConstant for Algae Phosphorous–Carbon Ratio40
CPprm2 g C/g PConstant for Algae Phosphorous–Carbon Ratio85
CPprm3 mg/LConstant for Algae Phosphorous–Carbon Ratio200
ANCx g N/gNitrogen–Carbon Ratio for Algae0.18
L_Factor1 W/m2Conver Light Unit4.57
F_PAR Temperature and Light Average Time0.44
* Subscript c, d, g, and x indicate cyanobacteria, diatom, green algae, and algae, respectively.
Table 2. Model performance based on parameter correction results.
Table 2. Model performance based on parameter correction results.
GroupWater Level
(m)
Water Temperature
(°C)
BOD
(mg/L)
TN
(mg/L)
TP
(mg/L)
MAE0.11 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.04
RMSE0.15 0.69 0.62 0.61 0.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahn, J.M.; Kim, B.; Jong, J.; Nam, G.; Park, L.J.; Park, S.; Kang, T.; Lee, J.-K.; Kim, J. Predicting Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Hyperspectral Images in a Regulated River. Sensors 2021, 21, 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020530

AMA Style

Ahn JM, Kim B, Jong J, Nam G, Park LJ, Park S, Kang T, Lee J-K, Kim J. Predicting Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Hyperspectral Images in a Regulated River. Sensors. 2021; 21(2):530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahn, Jung Min, Byungik Kim, Jaehun Jong, Gibeom Nam, Lan Joo Park, Sanghyun Park, Taegu Kang, Jae-Kwan Lee, and Jungwook Kim. 2021. "Predicting Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Hyperspectral Images in a Regulated River" Sensors 21, no. 2: 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020530

APA Style

Ahn, J. M., Kim, B., Jong, J., Nam, G., Park, L. J., Park, S., Kang, T., Lee, J. -K., & Kim, J. (2021). Predicting Cyanobacterial Blooms Using Hyperspectral Images in a Regulated River. Sensors, 21(2), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop