Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Key Action Areas of Smart City
1.1.1. Smart Economy
1.1.2. Smart Governance
1.1.3. Smart Environment
1.1.4. Smart Mobility
1.1.5. Smart Population
1.1.6. Smart Living Environment
1.2. Major Contributions
- Comprehensive analysis of the CPS, highlighting its working mechanism, application areas, opportunities, issues, and challenges in its realization.
- Highlighting the advancements in CPS from an Indian perspective.
- Identifying the role of various enabling technologies in a smart city with regard to cyber-physical systems.
1.3. Smart Cities-Indian Perspective
2. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in Smart Cities
- Actuator
- Data Management
- Sensors and Sensing Module
- Network and Communication
- Data Storage Module
2.1. Working of CPS
2.2. Security Threats in CPS with Respect to Smart Cities
- The deployment of ICT-based smart vehicles enables malicious individuals to gain control of the automobile, endangering the lives of the driver and other passengers [131] The attacker might ask for a ransom to release control of the automobile. Similarly, hackers may encrypt important files on a CPS-connected device and ask the owner for a ransom to grant access (ransomware).
- The lack of security updates in CPS linked devices, together with device misconfiguration and the prevalent use of default passwords and settings, as well as the absence of encrypted communication between devices, also presents a serious security loophole. Similarly, poor credentials threaten the security of both the user and their business, as cybercriminals can set up remote sessions to track them. These intruders can identify a user’s physical location by using IP addresses or GPS modules of the CPS devices [130,131,132].
- Artificial intelligence applications in CPSs are susceptible to data manipulation attacks where cybercriminals can steal sensitive information to generate superficially legitimate input to mislead the algorithm. These attacks could be driven by financial or political rivalry, powered by the tremendous expansion of built-in computing capacity.
- Hackers could seize control of CPS linked devices and use them to disrupt business activities, use them as spam email servers, or turn them into botnets for carrying out DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks. Individuals with malice can access all smart appliances such as televisions, cameras, and refrigerators, and transform them into attack carriers.
2.3. Current Developments in CPS in India
3. Role of Technology in Smart Cities
3.1. Internet of Things
3.2. ICT and Sensors
3.3. Artificial Intelligence
3.4. Blockchain Technology
3.5. 5G and SDN Technology
3.6. Deep Learning
4. Opportunities, Issues and Challenges in Smart Cities
4.1. Opportunities
4.1.1. Businesses and Manufacturing
4.1.2. Jobs
4.1.3. Innovations
4.1.4. Startups
4.1.5. Optimal Utilization of Resources
4.1.6. Promotes Sustainability
4.2. Issues and Challenges
4.2.1. Technical Issues
Lack of Infrastructure
Scarcity of Technical Knowhow
Privacy and Security
Interoperability
Unstructured Data
Absence of Unified Standards
4.2.2. Socioeconomic Issues
Budget Constraints
Rigid Policies
4.2.3. Social Issues
Social Divide and Mindset
High Implementation Costs
Lack of Skilled Labor
4.2.4. Environmental Challenges
4.2.5. Societal Issues
4.2.6. Ethical Issues
5. Conclusions and Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ruhlandt, R.W.S. The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities 2018, 81, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batty, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Giannotti, F.; Pozdnoukhov, A.; Bazzani, A.; Wachowicz, M.; Ouzounis, G.; Portugali, Y. Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012, 214, 481–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bakıcı, T.; Almirall, E.; Wareham, J. A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, P.P.; Iqbal, M.A. A perspective on migration and community engagement in Smart Cities. In Smart Cities—Opportunities and Challenges; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 521–526. [Google Scholar]
- Kramers, A.; Höjer, M.; Lövehagen, N.; Wangel, J. Smart sustainable cities–Exploring ICT solutions for reduced energy use in cities. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 56, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glasmeier, A.; Christopherson, S. Thinking about smart cities. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2015, 8, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Lee, H. Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Gov. Inf. Q. 2014, 31, S93–S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Muñoz, J.M.; Vercher, J.B.; Muñoz, L.; Galache, J.A.; Presser, M.; Gómez, L.A.H.; Pettersson, J. Smart cities at the forefront of the future internet. In Future Internet Assembly; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 447–462. [Google Scholar]
- Arroub, A.; Zahi, B.; Sabir, E.; Sadik, M. A literature review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), Fez, Morocco, 26–29 October 2016; pp. 180–186. [Google Scholar]
- Mboup, G.; Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. Relevance of smart economy in smart cities in Africa. In Smart Economy in Smart African Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, T.V.; Dahiya, B. Smart economy in smart cities. In Smart Economy in Smart Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 3–76. [Google Scholar]
- Letaifa, S.B. How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1414–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razmjoo, A.; Østergaard, P.A.; Denai, M.; Nezhad, M.M.; Mirjalili, S. Effective policies to overcome barriers in the development of smart cities. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 79, 102175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Liu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Forrest, J.Y.L. Does the smart city policy promote the green growth of the urban economy? Evidence from China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopes, N.V. Smart governance: A key factor for smart cities implementation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), Singapore, 23–26 July 2017; pp. 277–282. [Google Scholar]
- Barns, S. Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City Cult. Soc. 2018, 12, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razaghi, M.; Finger, M. Smart governance for smart cities. Proc. IEEE 2018, 106, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolívar, M.P.R.; Meijer, A.J. Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2016, 34, 673–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashidi, P.; Cook, D.J.; Holder, L.B.; Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2010, 23, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kumar, V. Smart environment for smart cities. In Smart Environment for Smart Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 1–53. [Google Scholar]
- Aletà, N.B.; Alonso, C.M.; Ruiz, R.M.A. Smart mobility and smart environment in the Spanish cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 24, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Caballero, A.; Martínez-Rodrigo, A.; Pastor, J.M.; Castillo, J.C.; Lozano-Monasor, E.; López, M.T.; Zangróniz, R.; Latorre, J.M.; Fernández-Sotos, A. Smart environment architecture for emotion detection and regulation. J. Biomed. Inform. 2016, 64, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullo, S.L.; Sinha, G.R. Advances in smart environment monitoring systems using IoT and sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kalluri, B.; Chronopoulos, C.; Kozine, I. The concept of smartness in cyber–physical systems and connection to urban environment. Annu. Rev. Control 2020, 51, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, D.; Quinton, C.; Duchien, L.; Seinturier, L.; Valdez, C. SmartyCo: Managing cyber-physical systems for smart environments. In European Conference on Software Architecture; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 294–302. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrer, B.R.; Mohammed, W.M.; Lastra, J.L.M.; Villalonga, A.; Beruvides, G.; Castaño, F.; Haber, R.E. Towards the adoption of cyber-physical systems of systems paradigm in smart manufacturing environments. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto, Portugal, 18–20 July 2018; pp. 792–799. [Google Scholar]
- Elshenawy, M.; Abdulhai, B.; El-Darieby, M. Towards a service-oriented cyber–physical systems of systems for smart city mobility applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2018, 79, 575–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möller, D.P.; Vakilzadian, H. Cyber-physical systems in smart transportation. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT), Grand Forks, ND, USA, 19–21 May 2016; pp. 0776–0781. [Google Scholar]
- Sargolzaei, A.; Crane, C.D.; Abbaspour, A.; Noei, S. A machine learning approach for fault detection in vehicular cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 15th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Anaheim, CA, USA, 18–20 December 2016; pp. 636–640. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, F.; Ma, J. Building smart communities with cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on from Digital Footprints to Social and Community Intelligence, Beijing, China, 18 September 2011; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Lu, R.; Liang, X.; Shen, X.; Chen, J.; Lin, X. Smart community: An internet of things application. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, Q.; Martini, B.; Choo, K.K.R. Cyber-physical systems information gathering: A smart home case study. Comput. Netw. 2018, 138, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Z.Y.; Huang, X.Y. Design and implementation of a cyber physical system for building smart living spaces. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2012, 8, 764186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munir, S.; Stankovic, J.A. Depsys: Dependency aware integration of cyber-physical systems for smart homes. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), Berlin, Germany, 14–17 April 2014; pp. 127–138. [Google Scholar]
- Geisberger, E.; Broy, M. (Eds.) Living in a Networked World: Integrated Research Agenda Cyber-Physical Systems (agendaCPS); Herbert Utz Verlag: Munich, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Papa, R.; Fistola, R. (Eds.) Smart Energy in the Smart City: Urban Planning for a Sustainable Future; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Pieroni, A.; Scarpato, N.; Di Nunzio, L.; Fallucchi, F.; Raso, M. Smarter city: Smart energy grid based on blockchain technology. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2018, 8, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lund, H.; Østergaard, P.A.; Connolly, D.; Mathiesen, B.V. Smart energy and smart energy systems. Energy 2017, 137, 556–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvarna, M.; Büth, L.; Hejny, J.; Mennenga, M.; Li, J.; Ng, Y.T.; Herrmann, C.; Wang, X. Smart manufacturing for smart cities—Overview, insights, and future directions. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2020, 2, 2000043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Choi, S.; Kim, H.; Park, J.H.; Son, J.Y.; Kim, B.H.; Do Noh, S. Smart manufacturing: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2016, 3, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaur, A.; Scotney, B.; Parr, G.; McClean, S. Smart city architecture and its applications based on IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 52, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cyber Physical Systems. Available online: https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/projects/cps/ (accessed on 5 September 2021).
- Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H.A. A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, B.; Yang, S.; Kao, H.A.; Lee, J. Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 1622–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yilma, B.A.; Panetto, H.; Naudet, Y. Systemic formalisation of Cyber-Physical-Social System (CPSS): A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. 2021, 129, 103458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latif, S.A.; Wen, F.B.X.; Iwendi, C.; Li-li, F.W.; Mohsin, S.M.; Han, Z.; Band, S.S. AI-empowered, blockchain and SDN integrated security architecture for IoT network of cyber physical systems. Comput. Commun. 2021, 181, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taha, A.F.; Gatsis, N.; Summers, T.; Nugroho, S. Actuator selection for cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 American Control Conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, USA, 24–26 May 2017; pp. 5300–5305. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, C.; Saifullah, A.; Li, B.; Sha, M.; Gonzalez, H.; Gunatilaka, D.; Wu, C.; Nie, L.; Chen, Y. Real-time wireless sensor-actuator networks for industrial cyber-physical systems. Proc. IEEE 2015, 104, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gudivada, V.N.; Ramaswamy, S.; Srinivasan, S. Data management issues in cyber-physical systems. In Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 173–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, K.D.; Son, S.H. Real-time data services for cyber physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 The 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, Beijing, China, 17–20 June 2008; pp. 483–488. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, F.J.; Kao, Y.F.; Tseng, Y.C. From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2011, 7, 397–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Al Balushi, T.; Nadir, Z.; Hussain, O.K. WSN security mechanisms for CPS. In Cyber Security for Cyber Physical Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 65–87. [Google Scholar]
- Vallimayil, A.; Raghunath, K.K.; Dhulipala, V.S.; Chandrasekaran, R.M. Role of relay node in wireless sensor network: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, Kanyakumari, India, 8–10 April 2011; Volume 5, pp. 160–167. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, T.; Tian, B.; Ai, Y.; Wang, F.Y. Parallel reinforcement learning-based energy efficiency improvement for a cyber-physical system. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2020, 7, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinnici, M.; De Chiara, D.; Quintiliani, A. Data center, a cyber-physical system: Improving energy efficiency through the power management. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 15th Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 3rd Intl Conf on Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech), Orlando, FL, USA, 6–10 November 2017; pp. 269–272. [Google Scholar]
- Parolini, L.; Sinopoli, B.; Krogh, B.H.; Wang, Z. A cyber–physical systems approach to data center modeling and control for energy efficiency. Proc. IEEE 2011, 100, 254–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Molina, E.; Jacob, E. Software-defined networking in cyber-physical systems: A survey. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2018, 66, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moura, J.; Hutchison, D. Modeling cooperative behavior for resilience in cyber-physical systems using SDN and NFV. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsufyani, A.; Alotaibi, Y.; Almagrabi, A.O.; Alghamdi, S.A.; Alsufyani, N. Optimized intelligent data management framework for a cyber-physical system for computational applications. Complex Intell. Syst. 2021, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhry, N.; Yousaf, M.M.; Khan, M.T. Security assessment of data management systems for cyber physical system applications. J. Softw. Evol. Process 2020, 32, e2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canizo, M.; Conde, A.; Charramendieta, S.; Minon, R.; Cid-Fuentes, R.G.; Onieva, E. Implementation of a large-scale platform for cyber-physical system real-time monitoring. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 52455–52466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukkala, V.K.; Tunnell, J.; Pasricha, S.; Bradley, T. Advanced driver-assistance systems: A path toward autonomous vehicles. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2018, 7, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Criado, J.; Asensio, J.A.; Padilla, N.; Iribarne, L. Integrating cyber-physical systems in a component-based approach for smart homes. Sensors 2018, 18, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Park, J.; Park, K. Construction of a remote monitoring system in smart dust environment. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 2020, 16, 733–741. [Google Scholar]
- Warneke, B.; Last, M.; Liebowitz, B.; Pister, K.S. Smart dust: Communicating with a cubic-millimeter computer. Computer 2001, 34, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.; Xia, H.; He, Z.; Wang, Z. Design of a water environment monitoring system based on wireless sensor networks. Sensors 2009, 9, 6411–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hussain, I.; Park, S.J. Prediction of myoelectric biomarkers in post-stroke gait. Sensors 2021, 21, 5334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petropoulos, A.; Sikeridis, D.; Antonakopoulos, T. Wearable smart health advisors: An IMU-enabled posture monitor. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2020, 9, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yang, L.T.; Xie, X.; Jin, J.; Deen, M.J. A cloud-edge computing framework for cyber-physical-social services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Miao, Y.; Li, W. Big health application system based on health internet of things and big data. IEEE Access 2016, 5, 7885–7897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammed, T.; Mehmood, R.; Albeshri, A.; Katib, I. UbeHealth: A personalized ubiquitous cloud and edge-enabled networked healthcare system for smart cities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 32258–32285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishvan, O.R.; Zois, D.S.; Soyata, T. Machine intelligence in healthcare and medical cyber physical systems: A survey. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46419–46494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Park, S.J. HealthSOS: Real-Time Health Monitoring System for Stroke Prognostics. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 213574–213586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, I.; Park, S.J. Big-Ecg: Cardiographic Predictive Cyber-Physical System for Stroke Management. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 123146–123164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.J.; Hong, S.; Kim, D.; Hussain, I.; Seo, Y. Intelligent in-car health monitoring system for elderly drivers in connected car. In Congress of the International Ergonomics Association; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 40–44. [Google Scholar]
- Casalino, G.; Castellano, G.; Zaza, G. On the use of FIS inside a Telehealth system for cardiovascular risk monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2021 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), Puglia, Italy, 22–25 June 2021; pp. 173–178. [Google Scholar]
- Pazienza, A.; Anglani, R.; Fasciano, C.; Tatulli, C.; Vitulano, F. Evolving and Explainable Clinical Risk Assessment at the Edge. In Evolving Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Khaitan, S.K.; McCalley, J.D. Design techniques and applications of cyberphysical systems: A survey. IEEE Syst. J. 2014, 9, 350–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, V.; Peter, S.; Givargis, T.; Vahid, F. A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. (TIIS) 2014, 8, 4242–4268. [Google Scholar]
- Munoz, D.J.; Montenegro, J.A.; Pinto, M.; Fuentes, L. Energy-aware environments for the development of green applications for cyber–physical systems. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 91, 536–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horcas, J.M.; Pinto, M.; Fuentes, L. Context-aware energy-efficient applications for cyber-physical systems. Ad. Hoc. Netw. 2019, 82, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basile, F.; Chiacchio, P.; Coppola, J.; Gerbasio, D. Automated warehouse systems: A cyber-physical system perspective. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 20th Conf. Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), Luxembourg, 8–11 September 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Wiesner, S.; Marilungo, E.; Thoben, K.D. Cyber-physical product-service systems—Challenges for requirements engineering. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 2017, 11, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.T.; Jacob, M.; Akingba, G.; Wachs, J.P. A cyber-physical management system for delivering and monitoring surgical instruments in the OR. Surg. Innov. 2013, 20, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tercero, C.; Kodama, H.; Shi, C.; Ooe, K.; Ikeda, S.; Fukuda, T.; Arai, F.; Negoro, M.; Kwon, G.; Najdovski, Z. Technical skills measurement based on a cyber-physical system for endovascular surgery simulation. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 2013, 9, e25–e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonntag, D.; Zillner, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Lorincz, A.; Strommer, E.; Serafini, L. The medical cyber-physical systems activity at EIT: A look under the hood. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 27th Int. Symp. Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), New York, NY, USA, 27–29 May 2014; pp. 351–356. [Google Scholar]
- Dogaru, D.I.; Dumitrache, I. Cyber-physical systems in healthcare networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), Iasi, Romania, 19–21 November 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Bradley, J.M.; Atkins, E.M. Optimization and control of cyber-physical vehicle systems. Sensors 2015, 15, 23020–23049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kantarci, B. Cyber-physical alternate route recommendation system for paramedics in an urban area. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), New Orleans, LA, USA, 9–12 March 2015; pp. 2155–2160. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Mo, Z.; Xiao, Q.; Chen, S.; Yin, Y. Privacy-preserving transportation tra±c measurement in intelligent cyber-physical road systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2016, 65, 3749–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; An, J.; Huang, Z.; Cao, Z. Sensor data fusion based on an improved dempaster- shafer evidence theory in vehicular cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium Intelligent Control (ISIC), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 21–23 September 2015; pp. 683–687. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, N.; Bali, R.S.; Iqbal, R.; Chilamkurti, N.; Rho, S. Optimized clustering for data dissemination using stochastic coalition game in vehicular cyber-physical systems. J. Supercomput. 2015, 71, 3258–3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, S. State estimation for distributed cyber-physical power systems under data attacks. Int. J. Model. Identif. Control 2016, 26, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, J.; Yan, H.; Li, D.; Zhou, K.; Zeng, L. Cyber-physical systems for optimal energy management scheme of autonomous electric vehicle. Comput. J. 2013, 56, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurgen, L.; Gunalp, O.; Benazzouz, Y.; Gallissot, M. Self-aware cyber-physical systems and applications in smart buildings and cities. In Proceedings of the 2013 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Grenoble, France, 18–22 March 2013; pp. 1149–1154. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, M.; Åhlund, C. Smart buildings as Cyber-Physical Systems: Data-driven predictive control strategies for energy efficiency. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 742–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehdipour, F. Smart field monitoring: An application of cyber-physical systems in agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAIAAI), Kokura, Japan, 31 August–4 September 2014; pp. 181–184. [Google Scholar]
- Mehdipour, F.; Nunna, K.C.; Murakami, K.J. A smart cyber-physical systems-based solution for pest control. In Proceedings of the Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE Int. Conf. and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Beijing, China, 20–23 August 2013; pp. 1248–1253. [Google Scholar]
- Caramihai, S.I.; Dumitrache, I. Agricultural enterprise as a complex system: A cyber physical systems approach. In Proceedings of the 2015 20th Int. Conf. Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), Bucharest, Romania, 27–29 May 2015; pp. 659–664. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, A.M.K. An undergraduate cyber-physical systems course. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGBED Int. Workshop on Design, Modeling, and Evaluation of Cyber-Physical Systems, Berlin, Germany, 14–17 April 2014; pp. 31–34. [Google Scholar]
- Peter, S.; Momtaz, F.; Givargis, T. From the browser to the remote physical lab: Programming cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), El Paso, TX, USA, 21–24 October 2015; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Lawlor, O.; Bogosyan, S.; Vural, Y.; Thompson, I.; Moss, M.; Gokasan, M. AERO-beam: An open-architecture test-bed for research and education in cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2015-41st Annual Conference of the IEEE, Yokohama, Japan, 9–12 November 2015; pp. 005080–005086. [Google Scholar]
- Pester, A.; Madritsch, C.; Klinger, T. Collaborative learning with cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tallinn, Estonia, 18–20 March 2015; pp. 184–188. [Google Scholar]
- Schoitsch, E. Special session TET-DEC (teaching, education and training for dependable embedded and cyber-physical systems) An E&T use case in a European Project. In Proceedings of the 2015 41st Euromicro Conf. Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Madeira, Portugal, 26–28 August 2015; pp. 280–289. [Google Scholar]
- Azad, A.K.M.; Hashemian, R. Cyber-Physical Systems in STEM Disciplines. In Proceedings of the 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), London, UK, 13–15 July 2016; pp. 868–874. [Google Scholar]
- Van Tendeloo, Y.; Vangheluwe, H. Teaching the fundamentals of the modelling of cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the Symp. Theory of Modeling & Simulation, Society for Computer Simulation International, Pasadena, CA, USA, 3–6 April 2016; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- Ardimento, P.; Bernardi, M.L.; Cimitile, M.; De Ruvo, G. Mining Developer’s Behavior from Web-Based IDE Logs. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), Napoli, Italy, 12–14 June 2019; pp. 277–282. [Google Scholar]
- Picerno, P.; Pecori, R.; Raviolo, P.; Ducange, P. Smartphones and exergame controllers as BYOD solutions for the e-tivities of an online sport and exercise sciences university program. In International Workshop on Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 217–227. [Google Scholar]
- Casalino, G.; Cafarelli, B.; del Gobbo, E.; Fontanella, L.; Grilli, L.; Guarino, A.; Limone, P.; Schicchi, D.; Taibi, D. Framing automatic grading techniques for open-ended questionnaires responses. A short survey, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. In teleXbe—Technology Enhanced Learning Environments for Blended Education; Publisher CEUR-WS: Foggia, Italy, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
- Klimeš, J. Using formal concept analysis for control in cyber-physical systems. Procedia Eng. 2014, 69, 1518–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, C.; Tan, L.; Dong, Y. Period selection for integrated controller tasks in cyber-physical systems. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2015, 28, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Medhat, R.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Kumar, D.; Fischmeister, S. Runtime monitoring of cyber-physical systems under timing and memory constraints. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 2015, 14, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, R.; Zhao, X.; Yu, Y.; Guan, Q.; Hu, W.; Li, M. A cyber-physical system for girder hoisting monitoring based on smartphones. Sensors 2016, 16, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sanchez, B.B.; Alcarria, R.; Sańchez-De-Rivera, D.; Sańchez-Picot, A. Enhancing process control in industry 4.0 scenarios using cyber-physical systems. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl. 2016, 7, 41–64. [Google Scholar]
- Decker, L.; Leite, D.; Giommi, L.; Bonacorsi, D. Real-time anomaly detection in data centers for log-based predictive maintenance using an evolving fuzzy-rule-based approach. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Glasgow, UK, 19–24 July 2020; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Sierla, S.; O’Halloran, B.M.; Karhela, T.; Papakonstantinou, N.; Tumer, I.Y. Common cause failure analysis of cyber-physical systems situated in constructed environments. Res. Eng. Des. 2013, 24, 375–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanislav, T.; Mois, G.; Folea, S.; Miclea, L.; Gambardella, G.; Prinetto, P. A cloud-based cyber-physical system for environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2014 3rd Mediterranean Conf. Embedded Computing (MECO), Budva, Montenegro, 15–19 June 2014; pp. 6–9. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Yu, H. Analysis of the composition of non-deducibility in cyber-physical systems. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2014, 8, 3137–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, K.; Alagar, V. Context-aware security solutions for cyber-physical systems. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2014, 19, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyn, K.G.; Lerner, L.W.; McCarty, C.J.; Patterson, C.D. The trustworthy autonomic interface guardian architecture for cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM), Liverpool, UK, 26–28 October 2015; pp. 1803–1810. [Google Scholar]
- Niu, H.; Jagannathan, S. Optimal defense and control of dynamic systems modeled as cyber-physical systems. J. Def. Model. Simul. 2015, 12, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puttonen, J.; Afolaranmi, S.O.; Moctezuma, L.G.; Lobov, A.; Lastra, J.L.M. Security in cloud-based cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 10th Int. Conf. P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), Krakow, Poland, 4–6 November 2015; pp. 671–676. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, E.B. Threat modeling in cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, 14th Int. Conf. Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, 2nd Int. Conf. Big Data Intelligence and Computing and Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTech), Auckland, New Zealand, 8–12 August 2016; pp. 448–453. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, P.H.; Ali, S.; Yue, T. Model-based security engineering for cyber-physical systems: A systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2017, 83, 116–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassandras, C.G. Smart cities as cyber-physical social systems. Engineering 2016, 2, 218–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazumdar, S.; Ayguade, E.; Bettin, N.; Bueno, J.; Ermini, S.; Filgueras, A.; Giorgi, R. AXIOM: A hardware-software platform for cyber physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 Euromicro Conf. Digital System Design (DSD), Limassol, Cyprus, 31 August–2 September 2016; pp. 539–546. [Google Scholar]
- Seiger, R.; Huber, S.; Schlegel, T. Toward an execution system for self-healing workflows in cyber-physical systems. Softw. Syst. Model. 2018, 2, 551–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seiger, R.; Struwe, S.; Lemme, D.; Schlegel, T. An interactive mobile control center for cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Int. Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, ACM, Heidelberg, Germany, 12–16 September 2016; pp. 193–196. [Google Scholar]
- Walker-Roberts, S.; Hammoudeh, M.; Aldabbas, O.; Aydin, M.; Dehghantanha, A. Threats on the horizon: Understanding security threats in the era of cyber-physical systems. J. Supercomput. 2020, 76, 2643–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coviello, G.; Avitabile, G.; Florio, A. The importance of data synchronization in multiboard acquisition systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Palermo, Italy, 16–18 June 2020; pp. 293–297. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes, E.; Rahmati, A.; Jung, J.; Prakash, A. Security implications of permission models in smart-home application frameworks. IEEE Secur. 2017, 15, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Xie, G.; Qu, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y. Security and privacy in smart cities: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46134–46145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habibzadeh, H.; Nussbaum, B.H.; Anjomshoa, F.; Kantarci, B.; Soyata, T. A survey on cybersecurity, data privacy, and policy issues in cyber-physical system deployments in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alguliyev, R.; Imamverdiyev, Y.; Sukhostat, L. Cyber-physical systems and their security issues. Comput. Ind. 2018, 100, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biron, K.; Bazzaza, W.; Yaqoob, K.; Gawanmeh, A.; Fachkha, C. A big data fusion to profile CPS security threats against operational technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 21st International Symposium on ”A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks” (WoWMoM), Cork, Ireland, 31 August–3 September 2020; pp. 397–402. [Google Scholar]
- Pal, R.; Prasanna, V. The STREAM mechanism for CPS security the case of the smart grid. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016, 36, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abie, H. Cognitive cybersecurity for CPS-IoT enabled healthcare ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 2019 13th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), Oslo, Norway, 8–10 May 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Burg, A.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Lam, K.Y. Wireless communication and security issues for cyber–physical systems and the Internet-of-Things. IEEE 2017, 106, 38–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhetri, S.R.; Wan, J.; Al Faruque, M.A. Cross-domain security of cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 22nd Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), Chiba, Japan, 16–19 January 2017; pp. 200–205. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatasubramanian, K.K.; Nabar, S.; Gupta, S.K.; Poovendran, R. Cyber physical security solutions for pervasive health monitoring systems. In E-Healthcare Systems and Wireless Communications: Current and Future Challenges; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2012; pp. 143–162. [Google Scholar]
- Gifty, R.; Bharathi, R.; Krishnakumar, P. Privacy and security of big data in cyber physical systems using Weibull distribution-based intrusion detection. Neural Comput. Appl. 2019, 31, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panoff, M.; Dutta, R.G.; Hu, Y.; Yang, K.; Jin, Y. On Sensor Security in the Era of IoT and CPS. SN Comput. Sci. 2021, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Zhou, C.J.; Yang, S.H.; Qin, Y.Q. Cyber-physical system security for networked industrial processes. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 2015, 12, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahad, M.A.; Paiva, S.; Tripathi, G.; Feroz, N. Enabling technologies and sustainable smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bifulco, F.; Tregua, M.; Amitrano, C.C.; D’Auria, A. ICT and sustainability in smart cities management. Int. J. Public Sect. Manag. 2016, 29, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxena, S.; Bhushan, B.; Ahad, M.A. Blockchain based solutions to secure IoT: Background, integration trends and a way forward. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2021, 181, 103050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arasteh, H.; Hosseinnezhad, V.; Loia, V.; Tommasetti, A.; Troisi, O.; Shafie-khah, M.; Siano, P. Iot-based smart cities: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), Florence, Italy, 7–10 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.H.; Ramos, C.; Mohammed, S. Smart City and IoT. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2017, 76, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferro, E.; Caroleo, B.; Leo, M.; Osella, M.; Pautasso, E. The role of ICT in smart cities governance. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government; Donau-Universität Krems: Krems an der Donau, Austria, 2013; pp. 133–145. [Google Scholar]
- Pla-Castells, M.; Martinez-Dura, J.J.; Samper-Zapater, J.J.; Cirilo-Gimeno, R.V. Use of ICT in Smart Cities. A practical case applied to traffic management in the city of Valencia. In Proceedings of the 2015 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP), Prague, Czech Republic, 24–25 June 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Dameri, R.P. Using ICT in smart city. In Smart City Implementation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 45–65. [Google Scholar]
- Shit, R.C.; Sharma, S.; Puthal, D.; Zomaya, A.Y. Location of Things (LoT): A review and taxonomy of sensors localization in IoT infrastructure. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 2028–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, Z.; Al-Turjman, F.; Mostarda, L.; Gagliardi, R. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart cities. Comput. Commun. 2020, 154, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibba, S.; Pinna, A.; Seu, M.; Pani, F.E. CitySense: Blockchain-oriented smart cities. In Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Cologne, Germany, 22–26 May 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Hakak, S.; Khan, W.Z.; Gilkar, G.A.; Imran, M.; Guizani, N. Securing smart cities through blockchain technology: Architecture, requirements, and challenges. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majeed, U.; Khan, L.U.; Yaqoob, I.; Kazmi, S.A.; Salah, K.; Hong, C.S. Blockchain for IoT-based smart cities: Recent advances, requirements, and future challenges. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2021, 181, 103007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makhdoom, I.; Zhou, I.; Abolhasan, M.; Lipman, J.; Ni, W. PrivySharing: A blockchain-based framework for privacy-preserving and secure data sharing in smart cities. Comput. Secur. 2020, 88, 101653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crosby, M.; Pattanayak, P.; Verma, S.; Kalyanaraman, V. Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Appl. Innov. 2016, 2, 71. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 June 2017; pp. 557–564. [Google Scholar]
- Yli-Huumo, J.; Ko, D.; Choi, S.; Park, S.; Smolander, K. Where is current research on blockchain technology?—A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, B.; Khamparia, A.; Sagayam, K.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Ahad, M.A.; Debnath, N.C. Blockchain for smart cities: A review of architectures, integration trends and future research directions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, G.; Ahad, M.A.; Paiva, S. S2HS-A blockchain based approach for smart healthcare system. In Healthcare; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Volume 8, p. 100391. [Google Scholar]
- Guevara, L.; Auat Cheein, F. The role of 5G technologies: Challenges in smart cities and intelligent transportation systems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minoli, D.; Occhiogrosso, B. Practical aspects for the integration of 5G networks and IoT applications in smart cities environments. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2019, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rao, S.K.; Prasad, R. Impact of 5G technologies on smart city implementation. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2018, 100, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, B.K.; Pappu, S.I.; Islam, M.J.; Acharjee, U.K. An SDN based distributed IoT network with NFV implementation for smart cities. In International Conference on Cyber Security and Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 539–552. [Google Scholar]
- Rametta, C.; Baldoni, G.; Lombardo, A.; Micalizzi, S.; Vassallo, A. S6: A Smart, Social and SDN-based Surveillance System for Smart-cities. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 110, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, U.; Chatterjee, P.; Shetty, S.; Datta, R. An SDN-IoT− Based Framework for Future Smart Cities: Addressing Perspective. In Internet of Things and Secure Smart Environments; Chapman and Hall/CRC: London, UK, 2020; pp. 441–468. [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharya, S.; Somayaji, S.R.K.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Alazab, M.; Maddikunta, P.K.R. A review on deep learning for future smart cities. Internet Technol. Lett. 2020, e187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammad, A.N.; Aseere, A.M.; Chiroma, H.; Shah, H.; Gital, A.Y.; Hashem, I.A.T. Deep learning application in smart cities: Recent development, taxonomy, challenges and research prospects. Neural Comput. Appl. 2021, 33, 2973–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atitallah, S.B.; Driss, M.; Boulila, W.; Ghézala, H.B. Leveraging Deep Learning and IoT big data analytics to support the smart cities development: Review and future directions. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2020, 38, 100303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bélissent, J. Getting clever about smart cities: New opportunities require new business models. Camb. MA USA 2010, 193, 244–277. [Google Scholar]
- Ahuett-Garza, H.; Kurfess, T. A brief discussion on the trends of habilitating technologies for Industry 4.0 and Smart manufacturing. Manuf. Lett. 2018, 15, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharida, A.; Hamdan, A.; Mukhtar, A.H. Smart cities: The next urban evolution in delivering a better quality of life. In Toward Social Internet of Things (SIoT): Enabling Technologies, Architectures and Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 287–298. [Google Scholar]
- Ménascé, D.; Vincent, C.E.; Martin Moreau, M. Smart Cities and new forms of employment. Field Actions Sci. Rep. J. Field Actions 2017, 16, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
- Куприянoвский, В.П.; Щичкo, А.C.; Намиoт, Д.Е.; Куприянoвская, Ю.В. “Reasonable Water”: Integrated Water Resources Management on the basis of smart technologies and models for smart cities. Int. J. Open Inf. Technol. 2016, 4, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
- Canizes, B.; Pinto, T.; Soares, J.; Vale, Z.; Chamoso, P.; Santos, D. Smart city: A GECAD-BISITE energy management case study. In International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 92–100. [Google Scholar]
- Zavratnik, V.; Podjed, D.; Trilar, J.; Hlebec, N.; Kos, A.; Stojmenova Duh, E. Sustainable and community-centred development of smart cities and villages. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Las Heras, A.; Luque-Sendra, A.; Zamora-Polo, F. Machine learning technologies for sustainability in smart cities in the post-covid era. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilkington, M. Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research Handbook on Digital Transformations; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Akhtar, M.M.; Rizvi, D.R. Traceability and Detection of Counterfeit Medicines in Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Using Blockchain-Based Architecture. In Sustainable and Energy Efficient Computing Paradigms for Society; Ahad Mohd Abdul, P.S., Ed.; Springer/EAI: Cham Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Paiva, S.; Ahad, M.A.; Tripathi, G.; Feroz, N.; Casalino, G. Enabling Technologies for Urban Smart Mobility: Recent Trends, Opportunities and Challenges. Sensors 2021, 21, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, G.; Ahad, M.A.; Sathiyanarayanan, M. The role of blockchain in internet of vehicles (IoV): Issues, challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), Singapore, 12–14 December 2019; pp. 26–31. [Google Scholar]
- Ahad, M.A.; Paiva, S.; Tripathi, G.; Haq, Z.A.; Nafis, M.T.; Feroz, N. Big Data and Modern-Day Technologies in COVID-19 Pandemic: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Avenues. Emerg. Technol. Battling Covid-19 Appl. Innov. 2021, 1, 79–106. [Google Scholar]
- Givehchi, O.; Landsdorf, K.; Simoens, P.; Colombo, A.W. Interoperability for industrial cyber-physical systems: An approach for legacy systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2017, 13, 3370–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürdür, D.; El-Khoury, J.; Seceleanu, T.; Lednicki, L. Making interoperability visible: Data visualization of cyber-physical systems development tool chains. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2016, 4, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L. A framework to model big data driven complex cyber physical control systems. In Proceedings of the 2014 20th International Conference on Automation and Computing, Cranfield, UK, 12–13 September 2014; pp. 283–288. [Google Scholar]
- Inderwildi, O.; Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Kraft, M. The impact of intelligent cyber-physical systems on the decarbonization of energy. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 744–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thekkilakattil, A.; Dodig-Crnkovic, G. Ethics aspects of embedded and cyber-physical systems. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, Taichung, Taiwan, 1–5 July 2015; Volume 2, pp. 39–44. [Google Scholar]
- Trentesaux, D.; Rault, R. Designing ethical cyber-physical industrial systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017, 50, 14934–14939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S. No | Smart City Component | Application | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Manufacturing | The manufacturing process can be automated to optimize the productivity of goods and enhance the delivery of services. | [82,83] |
2 | Healthcare | Smart Healthcare systems are designed for realtime monitoring of patients and support remote healthcare services using semiautomatic medical devices. | [76,84,85,86,87] |
3 | Transportation | A smart transportation system in a smart city uses embedded sensors for realtime information sharing and processing for traffic management. Advanced sensing, communication, control, and computations enable the efficient working of autonomous vehicles. | [88,89,90,91,92] |
4 | Energy | The integration of cyber and physical systems helps to provide a reliable, safe, and secure supply of energy and led to the development of smart grids. | [93,94] |
5 | Infrastructure | The use of sensors in buildings helps to minimize the overall cost of functioning by optimizing the processes based on the data analysis and feedback mechanism. | [95,96] |
6 | Agriculture | Regular monitoring of environmental conditions helps to improve agricultural production. Using IoT and sensor technologies helps to implement smart water management, soil monitoring, and efficient supply chains. | [97,98,99] |
7 | Education | CPS implementation into conventional education systems can help to develop smart learning environments where all entities can share information and data. | [100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109] |
8 | Business | The integration of smart techniques to enhance and automate business processes has led to the development of Industry 4.0. | [110,111,112,113,114,115] |
9 | Environment monitoring | CPS implementation in geographical areas such as rivers, forests, etc., can be used for remote monitoring and quick response systems. The process of monitoring can be completed using minimal energy and no human intervention in the circumstances of natural and manmade disasters. | [116,117] |
10 | Security | The information collected from various sensors and other connected devices can be processed for fast decision making and enhancing security and privacy in a smart city ecosystem. | [118,119,120,121,122,123,124] |
11 | Smart homes | Smart homes are one of the most widely adopted applications of CPS. The various components of a regular household such as a security camera, electronic devices, home assistants, etc., are connected to automate the various processes. | [125,126,127,128,129,130] |
S.No | Ref | Focus Area | Threats | Mitigation |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | [134] | Context-Aware CPS security. Provided the notion of context-awareness in CPS. | False data injection, DoS attacks | Different categories of context concerning CPS were identified and a corresponding security mechanism was proposed |
2 | [135] | CPS in operational technology | Near realtime cyber attacks | Trap-based monitoring systems were proposed using a big data fusion model |
3 | [136] | CPS for smart grid | Malicious adversaries | STREAM approach for improving integrity and availability |
4 | [137] | CPS for healthcare | Data theft, impersonation, user profiling attacks, etc. | Cognitive cybersecurity framework using AI |
5 | [138] | WSN in CPS | Internal and external threats in WSN | Several mitigation approaches were discussed along with a comparison among them |
6 | [139] | Cross-domain CPS security | DoS and DDoS attacks, hacking, etc. | A security analysis framework was proposed identifying both discrete and continuous signal information flow in cross domain CPS |
7 | [140] | CPS for pervasive health monitoring systems | BAN attacks | PSKA and CAAC mechanisms were proposed |
8 | [141] | Securing big data in CPS | Identified various big data security issues | Discussed various security mechanisms for big data security using Weibull distribution. |
9 | [142] | Security of sensors in CPS | False data injection, spoofing, etc. | Discussed sensor attacks on edge and point of positions. Proposed classification of different kinds of attacks on sensors. |
10 | [143] | CPS for industrial processes | Deception attacks, DoS attacks, etc. | The concept of intrusion tolerance was proposed to secure industrial control systems. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ahmad, M.O.; Ahad, M.A.; Alam, M.A.; Siddiqui, F.; Casalino, G. Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. Sensors 2021, 21, 7714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227714
Ahmad MO, Ahad MA, Alam MA, Siddiqui F, Casalino G. Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. Sensors. 2021; 21(22):7714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227714
Chicago/Turabian StyleAhmad, Md. Onais, Mohd Abdul Ahad, M. Afshar Alam, Farheen Siddiqui, and Gabriella Casalino. 2021. "Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges" Sensors 21, no. 22: 7714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227714
APA StyleAhmad, M. O., Ahad, M. A., Alam, M. A., Siddiqui, F., & Casalino, G. (2021). Cyber-Physical Systems and Smart Cities in India: Opportunities, Issues, and Challenges. Sensors, 21(22), 7714. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227714