Next Article in Journal
Deep Reinforcement Learning for UAV Trajectory Design Considering Mobile Ground Users
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of a Deployable Helix Antenna at L-Band for a 1-Unit CubeSat: From Theoretical Analysis to Flight Model Results
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Signal Design and Performance Analysis in NavCom Based on LEO Constellation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multifunctional Partially Reflective Surface for Smart Blocks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Quad-Port Multiservice Diversity Antenna for Automotive Applications

by
Lekha Kannappan
1,
Sandeep Kumar Palaniswamy
1,*,
Lulu Wang
2,*,
Malathi Kanagasabai
3,
Sachin Kumar
1,
Mohammed Gulam Nabi Alsath
4 and
Thipparaju Rama Rao
1
1
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 603203, India
2
Biomedical Device Innovation Center, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
3
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India
4
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SSN College of Engineering, Chennai 603110, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(24), 8238; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248238
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 3 November 2021 / Published: 9 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antennas for Integrated Sensors Systems)

Abstract

:
A quad-element multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with ultra-wideband (UWB) performance is presented in this paper. The MIMO antenna consists of four orthogonally arranged microstrip line-fed hexagonal monopole radiators and a modified ground plane. In addition, E-shaped and G-shaped stubs are added to the radiator to achieve additional resonances at 1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz. The reliability of the antenna in the automotive environment is investigated, with housing effects taken into account. The housing effects show that the antenna performs consistently even in the presence of a large metal object. The proposed MIMO antenna has potential for various automotive applications, including vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), vehicle-to-everything (V2X), intelligent transport system (ITS), automatic vehicle identifier, and RFID-based electronic toll collection.

1. Introduction

The quest for high data rates has led to increased research into ultra-wideband (UWB) and multiband antennas. UWB antennas are used for a variety of automotive applications, including keyless entry, security, autonomous driving, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication, digital keys, and finding a vehicle in crowded parking lots. UWB technology can also be used for vehicle tracking, localization, and parking guidance. The vehicular antenna can be mounted in various locations, such as the back window, windshield, roof, or side mirror. The antenna may be readily fitted with the help of a shark-fin casing and chassis cavity.
Modern automobiles are becoming more intelligent, providing comfort and safety to drivers by enabling automated driving assistance and infotainment systems. Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication technology provides real-time traffic updates and safer driving by communicating directly with other vehicles. The key technologies for V2X communication in the unlicensed 5.9 GHz band are long-term evolution and wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE). The notable features of V2X communication include automated driving with optimized fuel consumption, an integrated entertainment system, and the ability to send breakdown prevention information to drivers. In the literature, various antenna configurations have been proposed for automobile applications [1,2,3,4,5]. In [1], a square patch loaded with an inverted U-slot and a coupled C-slot was reported. In [2], a wheel-shaped fractal antenna was designed on the transparent polyvinyl chloride material substrate. In [3], a compact-sized dual-band antenna was presented with left-handed metamaterial. In [4], fractal geometry was used to design a microstrip patch antenna with a small footprint. In [5], a wheel-like fractal antenna was proposed for short-range communication, and the antenna was placed on a virtual car model to test its on-vehicle performance.
Signals in the automotive environment are received from multiple paths, resulting in multipath fading and interference. Diversity techniques such as spatial, pattern, and polarization are used to encounter multipath interference. Therefore, a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO)/diversity antenna could be advantageous for vehicular communications [6,7,8,9]. But, the main problem with MIMO antennas is high coupling between resonating elements. For improving inter-element coupling in uniplanar wideband MIMO antennas, electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) and other decoupling techniques were proposed in [10,11,12,13]. In [14,15,16,17], dual-port MIMO/diversity antennas with split-ring resonators (SRRs) were presented with improved isolation. In [18], a 3-D UWB MIMO configuration was reported, with the antenna elements positioned orthogonally to each other to reduce mutual coupling. An eight-element UWB MIMO antenna was designed [19], with the antenna elements placed orthogonally to offer dual polarization. A rectangular-shaped patch antenna was proposed in [20], with high inter-element isolation. A multiband dual-polarized antenna was developed in [21], where the antenna elements were placed orthogonally to increase isolation and achieve polarization diversity. An antenna working at multiple frequencies was presented in [22], where the resonating elements were arranged orthogonally to each other to reduce coupling between them. However, the antenna had a larger footprint. A Minkowski MIMO antenna was proposed in [23], where the Minkowski structure was obtained by cutting rectangular slots in the square patch, which helped increase isolation. In [24], a quad-port multiband MIMO antenna with pattern diversity and low inter-element coupling was reported. In [25], a quad-port antenna array was designed for 2G/3G/4G applications with isolation greater than 16.5 dB. In [26], a slotted microstrip antenna was proposed for WLAN applications, with a defected ground plane. In [27], an orthogonal orientation of elements was used to increase isolation in a quad-port triple-band antenna. In [28], a MIMO antenna was designed with meandering lines and SRR for improved isolation. However, the above-mentioned antennas are relatively large, have few resonating elements, and require more installation space.
This paper proposes a UWB MIMO antenna for automotive applications. The proposed antenna element has a straightforward geometry that covers a wide range of frequencies. Resonances at 1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz are also achieved by incorporating stubs in the patch of the antenna element. The antenna elements are arranged orthogonally to develop the proposed MIMO antenna. The proposed quad-port MIMO antenna offers polarization and spatial diversity. The MIMO antenna is compact in size, covers multiple frequency bands, and offers good reliability in the automotive environment. It can be easily integrated into a vehicle using the shark fin mounting available in the market. The diversity parameters are also evaluated to understand the performance of the MIMO antenna, and the results are satisfactory.

2. Antenna Design

2.1. Antenna Element

Figure 1 shows the layout of the proposed antenna element. The antenna is developed on the FR-4 substrate with relative permittivity of 4.4 and a thickness of 1.6 mm. A simple hexagonal monopole radiator is combined with a 50 Ω feeding line and a modified ground plane to form the antenna element. The EM solver CST Microwave Studio® is used to perform simulations of the proposed antenna. The size of the antenna element is 19 mm × 25 mm.
The lower band-edge frequency (fl) of the UWB monopole antenna is calculated as [29]
f l = 7.2 l + r + p × k
where l and r are the height and width of the antenna, respectively, and p is the distance between the ground plane and the radiator. The value of the empirical constant (k) is evaluated as
k = ε e f f 4
For the proposed antenna, Equation (1) is modified as
f l = 7.2 0.295 π a + b + p × k
where 0.295 π a + b corresponds to the term (1+r), and a and b represent the semi-length and semi-width of the radiator, respectively.
Furthermore, resonant frequencies of 2.45 GHz and 1.5 GHz are obtained by adding G-shaped and E-shaped strips of length λ0/2, respectively. The wavelengths of G-shaped and E-shaped strips are calculated using the dimensions shown in Figure 1c,d. The dimensions of the G-shaped and E-shaped stubs are given in Table 1.
The development stages of the proposed antenna element are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2a depicts a simple rectangular monopole antenna fed by a microstrip line of 50 Ω. The reflection coefficient characteristics of the evolution stages are shown in Figure 3. The rectangular monopole antenna exhibits poor impedance matching. In step 2, the edges of the radiator are truncated, and a defect in the ground plane is introduced for impedance matching. Step 3 involves etching the center metal of the radiator in order to reduce the physical size of the antenna. In step 4, an E-shaped strip is added to obtain resonance at 1.5 GHz, and a G-shaped strip is added (in step 5) to achieve additional resonance in the Bluetooth/Wi-Fi/RFID band (2.45 GHz). The addition of resonating stubs causes minor changes in impedance matching, which can be compensated by loading a patch in the ground plane, shown in step 6. Figure 4 shows the simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna element.
The antenna element offers an impedance bandwidth of 3.1 to 10.6 GHz and can be used for UWB automotive applications. The additional resonances (1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz) can be employed for GPS and RFID/Bluetooth/Wi-Fi applications, respectively.

2.2. Equivalent Circuit

The antenna mechanism is studied physically by means of an equivalent circuit [30]. The equivalent circuit is derived from the impedance characteristics of the antenna. These resonances can be represented by the R, L, and C components. Two peak impedance points (5.124 GHz and 8.625 GHz) are chosen from Figure 4 (measured) and a corresponding circuit is derived.
The impedance characteristics determine the type of resonant circuit. When the impedance moves from low (negative) to high (positive), a series resonance circuit is drawn, and when the impedance moves from high (positive) to low (negative), a parallel resonance circuit is drawn [31]. The real and imaginary curves (shown in Figure 5) can be used to draw the RLC equivalent of the antenna. The equivalent circuit of the antenna element and the corresponding result is shown in Figure 6, and the corresponding RLC parameters are given in Table 2. The 1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz frequencies are contributed by two parallel resonant circuits, and the UWB is supported by two series resonant circuits.

2.3. MIMO Antenna

Multiple antennas are required in automobile applications to receive signals from all directions. The antenna elements in the proposed MIMO antenna are arranged orthogonally to one another to improve isolation, without the use of any decoupling structures. The orthogonal placement also provides polarization diversity.
The inter-element spacing between the radiators is kept as 0.06λ0, and the MIMO antenna dimensions are 56 mm × 56 mm. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the proposed MIMO/diversity antenna and its S-parameters without a connected ground plane, respectively. The MIMO antenna with a common ground plane [32] is shown in Figure 9. The reflection coefficients and mutual coupling of the MIMO antenna with a connected ground plane are presented in Figure 10a–c, respectively. There are no significant differences in the performance of the antenna with or without connected ground. The photograph of the proposed MIMO antenna prototype is shown in Figure 11.

3. Radiation and Diversity Characteristics

The radiation patterns of the antenna in the E-plane and H-plane are displayed in Figure 12. Figure 13 depicts the gain and efficiency of the proposed antenna. The maximum gain is found to be 2.14 dBi, and the maximum efficiency is 87%.
The diversity characteristics of the MIMO antenna are examined for its use in automobile applications. Envelope correlation coefficient (ECC) can be calculated with the S-parameter (Equation (1)) and the far-field (Equation (2)) [33], and the calculated ECC is less than 0.4, as shown in Figure 14.
E C C ρ e = S i i * S i j + S j i * S j j 2 1 S i i 2 S i j 2 1 S j i 2 S i i 2
E C C ρ e = F 1 θ , φ . F 2 θ , φ d 2 F 1   θ , φ 2 d F 2 θ , φ 2 d
Diversity gain (DG) is defined as an increase in signal-to-interference ratio without compromising quality [34]. It also demonstrates how much transmission power can be saved by employing a diversity scheme. It is measured in decibel or power ratio. DG can be calculated with the S-parameter and the far-field, and the DG of the antenna is shown in Figure 15.
DG = 10 1 ECC 2
The total active reflection coefficient (TARC) is the square root of the summation of outgoing powers divided by the summation of incident powers at any port of an N-port antenna [35]. TARC is estimated using the Equation (7), where ai is the incident signal and bi is the received signal. TARC of the proposed antenna is less than −10 dB, shown in Figure 16.
T A R C = i = 1 N b i 2 i = 1 N a i 2
In high data rate transmission, the transmission loss is calculated using channel capacity loss (CCL) [36]. The CCL of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure 17, and it is less than the practical limit of 0.4 bits/s/Hz.

4. Housing Effect

The reliability of the antenna in the automotive environment is investigated, taking into account the housing effects [37]. The roof of the car is represented by a metal plate. The antenna is placed in the xz-plane and yz-plane, and the reflection coefficient characteristics in the presence of a conductor are investigated. The dimensions of the metal plate are kept as 40 cm × 40 cm and 1 m × 1 m (shown in Figure 18), and the gap between the antenna and the metal plate is marked as 10 mm. The results demonstrated (shown in Figure 19) that the performance of the antenna is not much affected by the metal conductor.

5. On-Car Scenario

The various locations in a vehicle where the proposed antenna can be installed are depicted in Figure 20. The antenna can be mounted on the bumper, roof, rear window, or side mirrors. The distance between the antenna and the ground should be larger to avoid ground losses. Therefore, the roof of the vehicle is the best place for antenna mounting. The antenna can be mounted on the roof using a shark-fin mounting system or in the chassis cavity.
Furthermore, the antenna is imported into an open-source CAD model to evaluate its directivity for on-vehicle conditions. Additionally, the far-field performance of the proposed antenna is investigated for an on-car scenario. The results showed that the antenna has omnidirectional characteristics over the desired frequencies. The proposed antenna has directivity greater than 7 dBi, as shown in Figure 21.
A comparison of the proposed antenna to previously reported antennas is shown in Table 3. The salient features of the proposed antenna are as follows:
  • The proposed antenna covers multiple bands, including UWB, whereas other antennas reported in the literature [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53] operate on a single wideband frequency.
  • The proposed antenna requires less space than the antenna configurations reported in [39,40,41,42,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].
  • The multiband operation is achieved in the proposed prototype without any need for reconfigurability.
  • The orthogonal configuration of the antenna provides additional polarization and covers signals from all directions.
  • The MIMO antenna diversity performance is investigated using parameters such as ECC, DG, TARC, and CCL, and the calculated values are found in the acceptable limits.
  • The proposed antenna is tested in an automotive environment, and the results show that the performance of the proposed antenna is stable.
The proposed antenna has the potential for automotive applications such as V2V, vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), V2X, intelligent transport system, automatic vehicle identifier, and RFID-based electronic toll collection.

6. Conclusions

A MIMO/diversity antenna for automotive communications is designed and developed in this paper. Stubs are integrated into the UWB monopole antenna element to achieve resonance at 1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz. The automotive antenna must receive signals from all directions; therefore, the antenna elements are arranged orthogonally to each other. The orthogonal arrangement of the antenna elements also improves inter-element isolation. The antenna is fabricated and tested for diversity performance, and the obtained results show that the ECC is less than 0.4, DG is greater than 9 dB, TARC is greater than −10 dB, and CCL is less than 0.4 bits/s/Hz. The proposed MIMO antenna could be helpful for GPS, RFID/Bluetooth/Wi-Fi, and V2V communications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.K., S.K.P., M.K. and S.K.; methodology, L.K. and S.K.P.; software, L.K.; validation, L.K., S.K.P., M.G.N.A. and T.R.R.; formal analysis, L.K., M.G.N.A. and T.R.R.; investigation, L.K. and L.W.; resources, S.K.P., S.K. and L.W.; data curation, L.K. and M.K.; writing and original draft preparation, L.K.; writing review and editing, S.K., S.K.P. and L.W.; supervision, S.K.P. and S.K.; project administration, S.K.P., S.K. and T.R.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of the Shenzhen Science and Technology Commission (GJHZ20200731095804014).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alsath, M.G.N.; Kanagasabai, M. Planar pentaband antenna for vehicular communication application. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Madhav, B.T.P.; Anilkumar, T.; Kotamraju, S.K. Transparent and conformal wheel-shaped fractal antenna for vehicular communication applications. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2018, 91, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Malathy, E.M.; Praveen Joe, I.R.; Ajitha, P. Miniaturized dual-band metamaterial-loaded antenna for heterogeneous vehicular communication networks. IETE J. Res. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kola, K.S.; Chatterjee, A. Design of a right-handed circularly polarized printed antenna for vehicular communication. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Madhav, B.T.P.; Anilkumar, T. Design and study of multiband planar wheel-like fractal antenna for vehicular communication applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 60, 1985–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Raheja, D.K.; Kumar, S.; Kanaujia, B.K. Compact quasi-elliptical-self-complementary four-port super-wideband MIMO antenna with dual band elimination characteristics. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 114, 153001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, S.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, K.W. Dual circularly polarized planar four-port MIMO antenna with wide axial-ratio bandwidth. Sensors 2020, 20, 5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Srivastava, K.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Dwari, S.; Kumar, S.; Khan, T. 3D cuboidal design MIMO/diversity antenna with band notched characteristics. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 108, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Raheja, D.K.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Kumar, S. Low profile four-port super-wideband multiple-input-multiple-output antenna with triple band rejection characteristics. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 29, 21831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khan, A.; Bashir, S.; Ghafoor, S.; Qureshi, K.K. Mutual coupling reduction using ground stub and EBG in a compact wideband MIMO-antenna. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 40972–40979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H. Self-decoupled MIMO antenna pair with shared radiator for 5G smartphones. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 3423–3432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iqbal, A.; Altaf, A.; Abdullah, M.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Limiti, E.; Kim, S. Modified u-shaped resonator as decoupling structure in MIMO antenna. Electronics 2020, 9, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Faraz, F.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Khan, T.A.; Zhang, X. Mutual coupling reduction of dual polarized low profile MIMO antenna using decoupling resonators. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 2020, 35, 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sakli, H.; Abdelhamid, C.; Essid, C.; Sakli, N. Metamaterial-based antenna performance enhancement for MIMO system applications. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 38546–38556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaur, N.; Sivia, J.S.; Kumar, M. SRR and rectangular stubs loaded novel fractal antenna realization for multiband wireless applications. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 120, 515–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajeshkumar, V.; Rajkumar, R. SRR loaded compact tri-band MIMO antenna for wlan/wimax applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2020, 95, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paul, P.M.; Kandasamy, K.; Sharawi, M.S. A multi-band u-strip and SRR loaded slot antenna with circular polarization characteristics. Adv. Electromagn. 2020, 9, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Srivastava, K.; Kumar, S.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Dwari, S. Design and packaging of ultra-wideband multiple-input-multiple-output/diversity antenna for wireless applications. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, M.S.; Iftikhar, A.; Shubair, R.M.; Capobianco, A.-D.; Braaten, B.D.; Anagnostou, D.E. Eight-Element Compact UWB-MIMO/Diversity Antenna with WLAN Band Rejection for 3G/4G/5G Communications. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2020, 1, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maddio, S.; Pelosi, G.; Righini, M.; Selleri, S. A slotted patch antenna with enhanced gain pattern for automotive applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2021, 95, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maurya, N.K.; Bhattacharya, R. Design of compact dual-polarized multiband MIMO antenna using near-field for IoT. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 117, 153091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dileepan, D.; Natarajan, S.; Rajkumar, R. A high isolation multiband mimo antenna without decoupling structure for wlan/wimax/5g applications. Prog. Electron. Res. C 2021, 112, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Babu, K.V.; Anuradha, B. Design of multi-band minkowski MIMO antenna to reduce the mutual coupling. J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci. 2020, 32, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jha, K.R.; Jibran, Z.A.P.; Singh, C.; Sharma, S.K. 4-Port MIMO Antenna Using Common Radiator on a Flexible Substrate for Sub-1GHz, Sub-6GHz 5G NR, and Wi-Fi 6 Applications. IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. 2021, 2, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, J.; Dong, G.; Cai, J.; Li, H.; Liu, G. A quad-port dual-band mimo antenna array for 5 g smartphone applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ayinala, K.D.; Sahu, P.K. A Compact Slit-loaded Modified Slot Antenna Based Quad-port MIMO Antenna for WLAN Applications. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON 2020), Prayagraj, India, 27–29 November 2020; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  27. Naidu, P.V.; Saiharanadh, A.; Maheshbabu, D.; Kumar, A.; Vummadisetty, N. Design and performance analysis of g-shaped compact acs fed 4-port mimo antenna for triple frequency band applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2021, 112, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nagendra, R.; Swarnalatha, S. Design and performance of four port MIMO antenna for IOT applications. ICT Express 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ray, K.P. Design Aspects of Printed Monopole Antennas for Ultra-Wide Band Applications. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2008, 2008, 713858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanyal, R.; Sarkar, P.P.; Sarkar, S. Octagonal nut shaped monopole UWB antenna with sextuple band notched characteristics. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 110, 152833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sharma, M.; Awasthi, Y.K.; Singh, H. CPW-fed triple high rejection notched UWB and X-band antenna on silicon for imaging and wireless applications. Int. J. Electron. 2019, 106, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharawi, M.S. Current Misuses and Future Prospects for Printed Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output Antenna Systems [Wireless Corner]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2017, 59, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elshirkasi, A.M.; Al-Hadi, A.A.; Mansor, M.F.; Khan, R.; Soh, P.J. Envelope correlation coefficient of a two-port mimo terminal antenna under uniform and gaussian angular power spectrum with user’s hand effect. Prog. Electron. Res. C 2019, 92, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dkiouak, A.; Zakriti, A.; El Ouahabi, M.; Elftouh, H.; McHbal, A. Design of CPW-fed MIMO antenna for ultra-wideband communications. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 46, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fritz-Andrade, E.; Jardon-Aguilar, H.; Tirado-Mendez, J.A. The correct application of total active reflection coefficient to evaluate MIMO antenna systems and its generalization to N ports. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 4, e22113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sultan, K.S.; Abdullah, H.H. Planar UWB MIMO-Diversity Antenna with Dual Notch Characteristics. Prog. Electron. Res. C 2019, 93, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ramanujam, P.; Venkatesan, P.G.R.; Arumugam, C.; Ponnusamy, M. Design of a compact printed lowpass filtering antenna with wideband harmonic suppression for automotive communication. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ojaroudi Parchin, N.; Jahanbakhsh Basherlou, H.; I A Al-Yasir, Y.; M Abdulkhaleq, A.; A Abd-Alhameed, R. Ultra-Wideband Diversity MIMO Antenna System for Future Mobile Handsets. Sensors 2020, 20, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agarwal, M.; Dhanoa, J.K.; Khandelwal, M.K. Ultrawide band two-port MIMO diversity antenna with triple notch bands, stable gain and suppressed mutual coupling. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2020, 120, 153225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khalid, M.; Iffat Naqvi, S.; Hussain, N.; Rahman, M.; Mirjavadi, S.S.; Khan, M.J.; Amin, Y. 4-port MIMO antenna with defected ground structure for 5G millimeter wave applications. Electronics 2020, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kumar, S.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, D.H.; Mohyuddin, W.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, K.W. A compact four-port UWB MIMO antenna with connected ground and wide axial ratio bandwidth. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2020, 12, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mathur, R.; Dwari, S. Compact 4-port MIMO/Diversity antenna with low correlation for UWB application. Frequenz 2018, 72, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Premalatha, J.; Sheela, D. Compact four-port vertically polarized UWB monopole antenna for MIMO communications. Circuit World 2020, 47, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  44. Naktong, W.; Ruengwaree, A. Four-port rectangular monopole antenna for UWB-MIMO. Prog. Electron. Res. B 2020, 87, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mathur, R.; Dwari, S. Compact 4-Port UWB-MIMO slot antenna with dual polarization and low correlation for spatial diversity application. Frequenz 2018, 72, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Luo, S.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.; Li, E.; Jiang, C. A compact dual-port UWB-MIMO antenna with quadruple band-notched characteristics. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 136, 153770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nikam, B.V.; Jadhav, M.R. A compact quad-port band-notched MIMO antenna for Wi-MAX application with low mutual coupling. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2020, 104, 53–67. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sudarsan, H.; Gayathri, R.; Mahendran, K. A novel square fractal dual port MIMO antenna with tri band rejection capabilities. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kumar, P.; Urooj, S.; Alrowais, F. Design and implementation of quad-port MIMO antenna with dual-band elimination characteristics for ultra-wideband applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Arumugam, S.; Manoharan, S.; Palaniswamy, S.K.; Kumar, S. Design and performance analysis of a compact quad-element uwb mimo antenna for automotive communications. Electronics 2021, 10, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kumar, P.; Urooj, S.; Malibari, A. Design of quad-port ultra-wideband multiple-input-multiple-output antenna with wide axial-ratio bandwidth. Sensors 2020, 20, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Khan, A.A.; Naqvi, S.A.; Khan, M.S.; Ijaz, B. Quad port miniaturized MIMO antenna for UWB 11 GHz and 13 GHz frequency bands. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 131, 153618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Agarwal, M.; Dhanoa, J.K.; Khandelwal, M.K. Two-port hexagon shaped MIMO microstrip antenna for UWB applications integrated with double stop bands for WiMax and WLAN. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 138, 153885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yalavarthi, U.D. Reconfigurable orthogonal quad-port MIMO antenna for DSRC, WLAN, RADAR and Ku-band applications. AEU-Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 136, 153766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abd El-Hameed, A.S.; Wahab, M.G.; Elshafey, N.A.; Elpeltagy, M.S. Quad-Port UWB MIMO antenna based on LPF with vast rejection band. AEU-Int. J. Elect. Commun. 2021, 134, 153712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Layout of the antenna element: (a) front view, (b) back view, (c) G-shaped stub, 2.4 GHz, (d) E-shaped stub, 1.5 GHz.
Figure 1. Layout of the antenna element: (a) front view, (b) back view, (c) G-shaped stub, 2.4 GHz, (d) E-shaped stub, 1.5 GHz.
Sensors 21 08238 g001
Figure 2. Evolution stages of the antenna element: (a) step 1, (b) step 2, (c) step 3, (d) step 4, (e) step 5, (f) step 6.
Figure 2. Evolution stages of the antenna element: (a) step 1, (b) step 2, (c) step 3, (d) step 4, (e) step 5, (f) step 6.
Sensors 21 08238 g002
Figure 3. Reflection coefficients of the evolution steps.
Figure 3. Reflection coefficients of the evolution steps.
Sensors 21 08238 g003
Figure 4. Reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna element.
Figure 4. Reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna element.
Sensors 21 08238 g004
Figure 5. Impedance characteristics of the antenna element.
Figure 5. Impedance characteristics of the antenna element.
Sensors 21 08238 g005
Figure 6. Equivalent circuit of the antenna (a) model, (b) S-parameters.
Figure 6. Equivalent circuit of the antenna (a) model, (b) S-parameters.
Sensors 21 08238 g006
Figure 7. Layout of the MIMO antenna with unconnected ground planes: (a) front view, (b) rear view.
Figure 7. Layout of the MIMO antenna with unconnected ground planes: (a) front view, (b) rear view.
Sensors 21 08238 g007
Figure 8. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna with unconnected ground planes: (a) reflection coefficients, (b) mutual coupling with respect to port 1 and port 2, (c) mutual coupling with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Figure 8. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna with unconnected ground planes: (a) reflection coefficients, (b) mutual coupling with respect to port 1 and port 2, (c) mutual coupling with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Sensors 21 08238 g008aSensors 21 08238 g008b
Figure 9. Layout of the proposed MIMO antenna with a common ground plane: (a) front view, (b) rear view.
Figure 9. Layout of the proposed MIMO antenna with a common ground plane: (a) front view, (b) rear view.
Sensors 21 08238 g009
Figure 10. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna with the connected ground plane: (a) reflection coefficients, (b) mutual coupling with respect to port 1 and port 2, (c) mutual coupling with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Figure 10. S-parameters of the MIMO antenna with the connected ground plane: (a) reflection coefficients, (b) mutual coupling with respect to port 1 and port 2, (c) mutual coupling with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Sensors 21 08238 g010
Figure 11. Proposed MIMO antenna prototype.
Figure 11. Proposed MIMO antenna prototype.
Sensors 21 08238 g011
Figure 12. Measured radiation patterns of the antenna: (a) when port 1 is excited, (b) when port 2 is excited.
Figure 12. Measured radiation patterns of the antenna: (a) when port 1 is excited, (b) when port 2 is excited.
Sensors 21 08238 g012
Figure 13. Measured gain and efficiency of the designed antenna.
Figure 13. Measured gain and efficiency of the designed antenna.
Sensors 21 08238 g013
Figure 14. ECC of the MIMO antenna.
Figure 14. ECC of the MIMO antenna.
Sensors 21 08238 g014
Figure 15. DG of the proposed antenna (a) using far-field, (b) using S-parameters.
Figure 15. DG of the proposed antenna (a) using far-field, (b) using S-parameters.
Sensors 21 08238 g015
Figure 16. TARC of the proposed antenna (a) with respect to port 1 and port 2, (b) with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Figure 16. TARC of the proposed antenna (a) with respect to port 1 and port 2, (b) with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Sensors 21 08238 g016aSensors 21 08238 g016b
Figure 17. CCL of the proposed antenna (a) with respect to port 1 and port 2, (b) with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Figure 17. CCL of the proposed antenna (a) with respect to port 1 and port 2, (b) with respect to port 3 and port 4.
Sensors 21 08238 g017
Figure 18. Housing effect of the antenna: (a) 40 cm × 40 cm, case-1, (b) 40 cm × 40 cm, case-2, (c) 1 m × 1 m, case-1, (d) 1 m × 1 m, case-2.
Figure 18. Housing effect of the antenna: (a) 40 cm × 40 cm, case-1, (b) 40 cm × 40 cm, case-2, (c) 1 m × 1 m, case-1, (d) 1 m × 1 m, case-2.
Sensors 21 08238 g018aSensors 21 08238 g018b
Figure 19. S-parameters of the antenna considering the housing effect.
Figure 19. S-parameters of the antenna considering the housing effect.
Sensors 21 08238 g019
Figure 20. Different antenna mounting locations in a car.
Figure 20. Different antenna mounting locations in a car.
Sensors 21 08238 g020
Figure 21. On-car performance of the proposed antenna: (a) 1.5 GHz, (b) 2.45 GHz, (c) 5 GHz.
Figure 21. On-car performance of the proposed antenna: (a) 1.5 GHz, (b) 2.45 GHz, (c) 5 GHz.
Sensors 21 08238 g021
Table 1. Dimensions of the G-shaped and E-shaped stubs.
Table 1. Dimensions of the G-shaped and E-shaped stubs.
DimensionValue (mm)DimensionValue (mm)
L11.7S46.9
L22.75S51.7
L310.6S65.5
L48.05S71.7
L522.3S85.5
L61.9S91.85
L76.7S104.8
L86.5S112.35
L94.3S124.8
S112.3S132.1
S28.15S145.4
S324.5S1514.75
Table 2. RLC parameters of the equivalent circuit.
Table 2. RLC parameters of the equivalent circuit.
Frequency (GHz)R (Ω)C (pF)L (nH)
1.5338.9323.550.459
2.4355.1113.380.321
4.50450.60.442.837
8.65650.390.07394.571
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed antenna to previously reported antenna configurations.
Table 3. Comparison of the proposed antenna to previously reported antenna configurations.
Ref.Bandwidth (GHz)Dimensions (λ0 × λ0)SubstratePeak Gain (dBi)Efficiency (%)DG (dB)ECCPolarization
[38]2–110.22 × 0.22FR-437510<0.5Dual
[39]3.1–10.60.39 × 0.39FR-45---10<0.02Dual
[40]25.5–29.62.5 × 2.97Rogers RO4350B8.382>9.96<0.01Dual
[41]3.1–110.46 × 0.46FR-45.5--->9.9<0.015Vertical
[42]3.2–110.38 × 0.38FR-44>70>9 (ADG)<0.5Dual
[43]2.2–12.30.19 × 0.19FR-45.8287>8 (ADG), >7.5 (EDG)<0.3Vertical
[44]3.1–10.60.82 × 0.82FR-43.38>85.7---<0.001Dual
[45]3.1–11.90.37 × 0.37FR-46>78>9.96<0.03Dual
[46]3–110.39 × 0.3Rogers 58805.8->9.8<0.02Vertical
[47]5.1–5.80.85 × 0.85FR-42.9>70>9.9<0.0006Dual
[48]2.35–9.040.51 × 0.27FR-43-8<0.5Vertical
[49]3–160.58 × 0.58FR-47--<0.07Dual
[50]3.14–12.240.524 × 0.524Rogers 30035.1>81>9.6<0.004Dual
[51]3.8–6.50.57 × 0.57FR-46.8>60-<0.04Circular
[52]3–13.50.4 × 0.4TMM4 laminate3.5>89>9.95<0.4Dual
[53]2.1–11.40.24 × 0.32FR-41.2>75>9.9<0.04Dual
[54]5.5–9.2, 13.2–17.9, 11.5–14.60.733 × 0.733FR-47.57 dB>70>9.9<0.05Dual
[55]2.15–200.308 × 0.308FR-46.7>60>9.96<0.01Dual
This work1.41–1.62, 2.4–2.462, 3.1–12.80.2 × 0.2FR-42.1487>9<0.4Dual
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kannappan, L.; Palaniswamy, S.K.; Wang, L.; Kanagasabai, M.; Kumar, S.; Alsath, M.G.N.; Rao, T.R. Quad-Port Multiservice Diversity Antenna for Automotive Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248238

AMA Style

Kannappan L, Palaniswamy SK, Wang L, Kanagasabai M, Kumar S, Alsath MGN, Rao TR. Quad-Port Multiservice Diversity Antenna for Automotive Applications. Sensors. 2021; 21(24):8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kannappan, Lekha, Sandeep Kumar Palaniswamy, Lulu Wang, Malathi Kanagasabai, Sachin Kumar, Mohammed Gulam Nabi Alsath, and Thipparaju Rama Rao. 2021. "Quad-Port Multiservice Diversity Antenna for Automotive Applications" Sensors 21, no. 24: 8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248238

APA Style

Kannappan, L., Palaniswamy, S. K., Wang, L., Kanagasabai, M., Kumar, S., Alsath, M. G. N., & Rao, T. R. (2021). Quad-Port Multiservice Diversity Antenna for Automotive Applications. Sensors, 21(24), 8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21248238

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop