Next Article in Journal
Development of Multichannel Artificial Lipid-Polymer Membrane Sensor for Phytomedicine Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Electrochemical and Optical Sensors in Flow-Based Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Sub-Nanoliter Spectroscopic Gas Sensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Development in Optical Chemical Sensors Coupling with Flow Injection Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Solvent Extraction in Flow Analysis with the Chromatomembrane Cell

by
Leonid N. Moskvin
1 and
Juergen Simon
2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, 198904 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Free University of Berlin, Fabeckstrasse 34/36, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2006, 6(10), 1321-1332; https://doi.org/10.3390/s6101321
Submission received: 15 July 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published: 17 October 2006
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors in Flow Analysis)

Abstract

:
Since twelve years the Chromatomembrane Cell has been proposed as a new and versatile device for extraxtion procedures in the flow based analysis. In the meantime a remarkable number of papers was submitted dealing with applications of the novel method to all the conceivable varieties of flow injection and sequential injection analysis. The device supports important analytical procedures such as sampling, sample preparation, and preconcentration each being combined with a phase transfer of the analyte. The Chromatomembrane Cell can be coupled to most of the modern detectors which work computer aided in the laboratories of today. Centrepiece of the cell is a block made from biporous hydrophobic PTFE, inside which polar (in the macropores) and nonpolar (in the micropores) solvents come into a close contact with each other and might flow independently with different flow rates. Microporous PTFE membranes prevent polar phases from their flowthrough into directions which are reserved for nonpolar fluids only. Thus, a strict control over the fluxes can be established at the analysts request. Especially, that PTFE block offers outstanding possibilities as a sampling unit for air monitoring.

1. Introduction

During the past decades the Flow-Injection methods became a versatile instrumental tool that contributed substancially to the development of automation in chemical analysis. A wide ranging field of its application is within bounds of possibility, and on top of that the main steps such as sampling, sample preparation and analyte detection can be integrated into only one set-up of instrumentation. But one problem arises in numerous cases, i.e., whenever the analyte has to be separated from a complex matrix, the classical techniques of solvent extraction are difficult to be realized with common devices of Flow Analysis. In principle three various steps have to be performed following each other: First, two immiscible phases must be dispersed together with constant volume ratio each, then the two phases have to remain in close contact attaining effective mass transfer, and finally, a physical separation of both of the phases has to be established [1, 2]. Later on such problems were solved by a segmental flow moving in narrow tubes followed by a separation step [3]. All these devices suffer for their restricted possibilities in analyte preconcentration. The application of membranes proved to be reliable in particular, and yet the supplement of further devices is mostly required. Moreover, for liquid/liquid extraction procedures it has been turned out, that one of the liquids is a non-polar solvent, which is a hazard to the environment and therefore should be avoided. Alternative techniques were introduced to the Flow Analysis such as the solid phase micro extraction (SPME) [4] using suitable filters or surface treated beads [5].
The traditional and well tried extraction will get appropriate prospects for its use in modern analysis only when the quantity of the organic solvent can be held extremely small, and when the process comes together with remarkable preconcentration of the analyte. Our group presented a new concept for the implementation of extraction procedures inside a novel material, namely the biporous PTFE, which contains two types of pores, micropores and macropores. Polar liquids fill the macropores whereas the micropores remain available for non polar liquids or gases only. The penetration of polar liquids into the micropores prevents their capillary pressure therein [6,7]. Due to the fact, that gases are able to substitute the non polar liquid within the micropores, the new method especially provides a lot of applications in the field of automated gas analysis. The biporous PTFE can be used for both, the collecting of air samples and a more than hundredfold preconcentration of the analyte in an adequately prepared aqueous solution. The new technique combines partition chromatography with the use of microporous PTFE membranes as barriers against the flowthrough of aqueous solutions. Accordingly, this technique was named “chromatomembrane method”, and its most important device is the “chromatomembrane cell” (CMC) with separated inlets and outlets for the both phases. Within the block of biporous PTFE the analyte transfer is made possible across the extended interface between the contacting phases.

2. The Chromatomembrane Method

Biporous PTFE consists of solid material (PTFE), macropores (250 – 500 μm in diameter), and micropores (0.1 – 0.5 μm), each of them contains roughly a third of the entire volume. The aqueous phase in the macropores and the organic one in the micropores safely coexist as long as Porg < Paq < Porg + Pcap (Paq, Porg pressures of aqueous and organic phase, Pcap capillary pressure). The size of the surface boundary, where the two phases are in mutual contact, was determined to be in the range of 60 cm2/cm3 biporous PTFE [8]. This mostly guarantees to avoid kinetic hindrance for the analyte transfer between the two phases.
The chromatomembrane cell, which was introduced to the instrumentation of flow analysis by L.N. Moskvin [7], contains a rectangular block of the biporous PTFE as its main part. The special construction of the cell (Fig. 1) allows independent flows of two immiscible phases. Inlet and outlet of the aqueous phase result from direct supply to the macropores and effluence from the opposite side of the PTFE block respectively. Rectangular to this direction flows the organic phase, which is made possible by covering opposite sides of the block with microporous PTFE membranes.
In order to reduce the flow resistance of the organic phase these membranes are completely embedded now between biporous PTFE. (CMC models of the first hour contained a PTFE block with microporous membranes connected to the surface by sintering. Due to its high flow resistance the cell often suffered from leakages.) The enclosure of the CM body is constructed from non-corroding metals like steel or Titanium. Varying the flow rates of the two phases continuously working extraction processes can be established. Using a “stopped flow” mode the preconcentration of the analyte in the extracting phase is possible. The partition of a dissolved substance between the two solvents, which flow inside the CMC independently and rectangular to each other, may be considered as a two dimensional chromatography and, if required, multiple extraction procedures could be managed by adopted flux rates. The adequate parameter adjustment and the benefits from the application of the chromatomembrane cell for sample preparation and extraction procedures were explained in paper [9]. A physico-chemical model of the CM process and its application in chemical analysis were discussed in details by Moskvin [10].
Let us consider the continuous flux of the two phases to be rectangular to each other as shown in Fig. 1: The partition of the analyte is given by the distribution coefficient
k = c n / c p
which produces the retarding of its shift related to the flow-rates of the two fluxes (cn and cp are the equilibrium concentrations in the non-polar and the polar phase).The same retarding goes for an injected component-zone in flowing systems. Such zone-shift uip of the analyte with the polar flux results in
u i p = u p 1 + k ( V n / V p )
and the zone-shift uin with the non-polar flux according to
u i n = u n 1 + ( 1 / k ) ( V p / V n )
(up and un are the flow-rates and Vp and Vn the contacting volumes of the two phases). These volumes correspond with the volumes of the macropores and the micropores inside the biporous PTFE block. A system of a two dimensional chromatography is described in such a way. The times tzp and tzn of the respective breakthroughs result in:
t zp = u p / u ip and t zn = u n / u in .
As long as tzp > tzn, the analyte has no time to reach the outlet for the polar phase, in other words, the separation from that phase occurred completely. But, whenever tzp < tzn, the analyte remains partially in the polar phase, whereas the outflow of the non-polar phase will be saturated from the substance extracted. Under that condition a procedure of “ultimate equilibrium saturation” can be realized. Further calculations reveal that complete analyte separation takes place in case of up/un < k, and the ultimate equilibrium saturation in the extracting phase is realized by setting the ratio of flow rates to be up/un > k respectively.
There are two independent variables which characterize the state of a partition equilibrium, i.e. the partition constant and the ratio of the volumes of the two immiscible solvents being in contact with each other. That ratio can not differ remarkably from 1 : 1 using the customary extraction techniques. But in flow systems with continuously streaming fluids coming into contact with another inside a cell with a given volume, the ratio of the flow rates substitutes that of the volumes. Because of the fact, that immiscible solvents flow independently within the biporous PTFE (even in different directions) preconcentration can be provided in accordance with the highest possible ratio of flow rates which may increase up to 1 : 150 inside a CMC. Assuming a partition constant of k = 103 and a ratio of flow rates set to be 1 : 100, a hundretfold preconcentration will occur linked with an analyte transfer of 91 % [11], i.e., the calculated recovery of the analyte being concentrated hundredfold in the extracting phase. This is a further and efficient mode of preconcentration being possible in case the CM-method will be employed.
Moreover, the CM-method provides alternative variants of its application. Fig.2 shows an extraction cell filled with biporous PTFE. The two immiscible fluids can flow inside the tool with optional rates together or against each other. Nothing else but a T-shaped tubing is required for the mixing and a suitable phase-separator for moving the solvents apart from each other.
Gaseous fluids were normally supplied to the CMC via the microporous membrane. But analyzing ambient air into its trace constituents it might happen, that such traces are adsorbed at aerosol particles which cannot pass a microporous membrane of hydrophobic material. This would mean, that the analyte extraction into an aqueous phase is strongly hindered. Because of that the “three-hole” CMC is constructed which uses a port of the polar phase as the gas inlet at first and after it as the outlet for the extracting aqueous phase [12, 13]. This requires to operate in a stopped flow mode preconcentrating the constituents of the air in an absorbing aqueous solution. It's obvious that after the supply of the gas sample the outflow of the extracting solvent must be diverted to the analyzer circuit by means of a suitable valve. In the cases dicussed at first, the block of biporous PTFE inside the cell has been used for the extraction procedure only, for the analysis of gases, however, the entire gas sample gets collected within that block. In other words the CMC also takes part in the sampling process. This fact allows the set-up of fully automated FIA-systems for monitoring the ambient air as Motomizu's group [14] realized for the detection of several pollutive constituents. These papers especially show the robustness of CMCs working integrated in analyzer-modules as units for sampling and separation. The cells do not need any maintenance over extended periods, so that their application is possible in fully equipped and automated systems, which do their job anywhere in the field. It should be emphasized that both, liquid/liquid and gas/liquid extraction procedures can be established without problems.
In conclusion the CMC works as an effective tool in all extraction procedures with preconcentration of the analyte in the extracting phase. The method requires small sample sizes and therefore reduces the consumption of organic solvents. The quality of its results bears comparison with the established methods in every respect. The versatility of the proposed method may be understood from the possibility to realize the analyte transfer between any desirable combination of two immiscible solvents even in the both conceivable directions.

3. Application in Analytical Chemistry

As mentioned above stable working conditions inside the CMC will exist if the pressure of the polar phase exceeds somewhat that of the non-polar one. A simple possibility of its realization is to make sure that the outflow of the polar phase is higher than the level of the CMC, so that a hydrostatic pressure will be produced in addition.The flow rates of polar liquids through a block of biporous PTFE with a volume of about 2 cm3 can be set up to several ml/min, non-polar liquids should flow with rates of 1 ml/min at the most, whereas flowrates of more than 100 ml/min are possible for gaseous phases. In principle, the flow diagrams for the CMC preconcentration from an aqueous phase or a gas phase were shown in Fig. 3. The scheme can be adjusted to every special analytical requirement for FIA and SIA applications.

3.1 Liquid/liquid solvent extraction

Let us consider the micropores of the biporous PTFE to be filled with an organic extractant and its flux to be stopped completely. If the aqueous phase containing the analyte flows through the macropores, a partition between the two phases will take place like in common chromatography and a retention results in accordance with the partition law. The zone shift inside the PTFE block in the direction of the flux of the polar phase determines the time up till the break-through of the analyte. In case the entire volume of the organic solvent is removed within that period, the extraction of the analyte will completely occur. The optimum efficiency of the process will be given if the flux rate of the organic phase is exactly calculated for the condition discussed before. On this basis a continuous extraction procedure can be established.
Several examples related to continuous solvent extraction:
-
Chromatomembrane method coupled to photometric detection for the determination of phenol in water (phenol-index, the limit of detection is in the range of 5 μg per liter aqueous phase [8]. (R2 = 0,99 for calibration graph).
-
Luminescence determination of oil products and phenols in natural water [15] and [16].
-
Determination of nitrite traces with chromatomembrane extraction [17]
-
Monitoring of PAH and EOX in waste water. Flow based procedures with chromatomembrane cells coupled to gaschromatography and ion-chromatography respectively [18]. (LOD's for PAH: 1 - 2 μg l-1, R2 =0,999, LOD's for EOX: ∼ 0,5 mg l-1, R2 = 0,999, even the simultaneous detection of the three halogens is possible).
Whenever higher analyte preconcentration is required, the “stopped-flow-mode” may be the method of choice. In this case the flux of the extracting solvent has been stopped as long as the capacity for the analyte uptake from the flowing sample (its rate is uw) is still not exceeded. Then the sample flux becomes stopped (after the preconcentration time tp) and the extracting solvent starts to flow for the transportation of the taken analyte to the detecting device. The calibrated detector records the mass m of the analyte, and its concentration cw in the original sample can be calculated from the equation: m = cw * uw * tp .
Further details of the application of the “stopped-flow-mode” are disussed in some published papers:
-
Photometric determination of anionic surfactants by separation from the aqueous phase with the chromatomembrane cell ((MBAS-Index) [19]) (LOD = 20 μg l-1 for dodecylsulfate, R2 = 0,998).
-
The chromatomembrane method used for sample preparations in the spectrophotometric determination of zinc and copper in pharmaceuticals (extraction of the Me(PAN)2 complexes) [20]) (LOD's = 40 μg l-1, R2 = 0,996).
At least, the natural progression of the well established membrane methods towards the CMC filled the lack of new procedures for the continuous and selective extraction of substances from a complex matrix. Solvent extraction by the CMC is a promising technique in the flow based analysis, by which the three steps necessary for a complete extraction procedure are combined in one small and robust device only. A sophisticated automation is provided to FIA and SIA applications [21].

3.2 Gas/liquid extraction

The use of chromatomembrane methods in the analysis of gases such as ambient air is pretty unsurpassable. The extracting solvent is a suitable aqueous solution which is able to absorb selectively the constituent desired, and therefore hazardous organic solvents can be completely avoided. A measured volume of the gas becomes supplied to the micropores of the biporous PTFE, whereas its macropores are filled with absorbing solution, so that the gas sample will be collected in the CMC. In other words the sampling procedure fully occurs in the biporous PTFE, and the CMC proves itself to be the sampling unit.
At first investigations started with the absorption of ammonia from loaded air into an aqueous phase and the electrochemical detection of the pH-shift [22]. For a better adaption to the requirements of gas analysis the “three-hole”-cell was constructed as discussed above. It allows the preconcentration of nitrogen oxides in a solution of 0.2 % triethanolamine (TEA) in water and the following detection of the formed nitrite ions with a coupled ion-chromatograph [23]. Using the same technique the ozone content of air was measured after its preconcentration in a 0.1 % potassium iodide solution (pH 4.2). The oxidation of the I- to I2 produces a change in the conductivity of the solution, which was determined conductometrically in a flowthrough cell (LOD = 7 μg O3 per m3 air) [24]. A flow injection analyzer coupled to a photometric detector was used for the CMC absorption of formaldehyde from air [25]. All these procedures require the calibration with standard gases. Only in case of high quality instrumentation the conductometric method allows the direct mass detection by mathematical evaluation. The versatility of the biporous PTFE gives analysts the idea of developing special cell designs for solving analytical problems. So it happens that arsine can be formed from arsenic species inside a CMC and be removed with a nitrogen flux for its adsorption in a column filled with a solution of special reagents for the photometric detection which follows.
In case of using 5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-phenyl-3H-1,2,3,4-tetraazol-2-ium chloride for absorption a limit of detection in the range of 1 μg l-1 is possible [26].
Providing a micro-FIA system Motomizu's group succeeded in going a remarkable step forward in the automation of flow based gas analysis. A three-hole CMC was used for collecting NO2 [14,27,28] or SO2 [29] from air and for their simultaneous absorption in aqueous solutions. The absorbing solutions were supplied to a detection circuit where a dye will be formed for the photometric determination. It was shown that the absorption of the air pollutant occurs completely in the biporous PTFE by forming nitrite (in 0.2 % TEA) or sulfite respectively. On request the system calibrates itself by analyzing NO2- or SO32- standard solutions. Thus, this “intelligent” device allows the fully automated air monitoring. (By using 20 ml air the LOD for NO2 is 0,9 ppb and 0,5 ppb for SO2).

3.3 Liquid/gas extraction

The objectives and features of the gas extraction from a stationary liquid phase were discussed by Rodinkov et al. [30] in details. In this context alternativ applications of the CMC to the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOC) should be mentioned [12,31,32]. In this way compounds such as methane, ethane, acetylene, propane, isobutene or butane can be extracted from aqueous phases in the CMC for their detection in a gas chromatograph [33]. (LOD's for the different VOC's range from 0,01 to 10 μg/l-1). In electrochemical investigations the problem arises, that dissolved oxigen disturbes measurements with electrodes. It became a habit to remove it by rinsing with nitrogen, but in case of very sensitive measurements the use of purified nitrogen or argon is necessary. In order to reduce the quantities of such expensive gases an alternative technique is required. Thus, a CMC should help in the removal of oxygen [34,35]. The efficiency of the proposed oygen removal is comparable to that of the degassing system of Colombo and van den Berg [36]. Working with high sensitive mercury film electrodes this method allows to deposite online the Hg-films on glassy carbon electrodes inside a closed flowthrough cell, and a high-performance SIA enables inverse voltammetric studies in the lower range of nano A currents [35]. The LOD's for Cd2+ and Pb2+ in aqueous solutions are about 0.5 μg l-1.

4. Conclusion

Since more than one decade the chromatomembrane method has succeeded in a wide spread field of different analytical applications. One of its many advantages is the flexibilty of trace separation from complex matrices for all types of flow analysis. This is especially based on the
-
small volumes of the contacting phases (100 – 200 μl)
-
fast adjustment of distribution equilibria because of the short distances to the phase boundary
-
uncomplicated phase separation
-
continuous extraction and preconcentration by varying the ratio of flux rates between 1 : 1 and 1 : 100.
-
preconcentration by using a “stopped flow mode”
-
fully automated sample pretreatment on request, i.e.: process analysis can be realized.
S. Motomizu [37] and K. Higuchi [38] contributed very much to the common knowledge of the new method within Japan and described the CMC as an “intelligent device”.
Later on S. Kawakubo and T. Yamane [39] reviewed the features of online extraction devices and in this context they discussed the feasibility of the CMC in details. New constructions of especially designed cells keep options open for analysts being creative in solving separation problems. The possibilties have been discussed above, which CMCs offer for integrating separation and detection in only one modul for doing its job outside of the laboratory.
The CMC can be handled quite easily and is a low cost offer to flow based techniques. It is a supplement which improves the quality not only of routine but also of process analysis. It decreases the waste production (hazardous organic solvents) and enhances the repeatabilty in combination with online processing because of the flexibility of the CM-method and its suitability for coupling to the most of common sensor-systems. The on-line sampling of ambient air with automated FIA-systems is a key feature of the Chromatomembrane Cell.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Shoji Motomizu (Okayama University, Japan) for his efficient cooperation and for his deep friendship which has lasted for many years.

References

  1. Karlberg, B.; Thelander, S. Extraction based on the flow-injection principle: Part I. Description of the extraction system. Anal. Chim. Acta 1978, 98, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergamin, H.; Medeiros, J.X.; Reis, B.F.; Zagatto, E.A.G. Solvent extraction in continuous flow injection analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1978, 101, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Karlberg, B. Flow injection in theory and practice. Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 1988, 329, 660–662. [Google Scholar]
  4. Majors, R.E. Current trends and developments in sample preparation. LC GC International 1998, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ruzicka, J.; Scampavia, L. From flow injection to bead injection. Analytical Chemistry News&Features 1999, 257A. [Google Scholar]
  6. Moskvin, L.N.; Simon, J. Flow injection analysis with the chromatomembrane – a new device for gaseous/liquid and liquid/liquid extraction. Talanta 1994, 41, 1765–1769. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moskvin, L.N. Chromatomembrane method for the continuous separation of substances. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 669, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  8. Erxleben, H.; Simon, J.; Moskvin, L.N.; Nikitina, T.G. Photometric determination of phenol with a flow-injection analyzer that includes a chromatomembrane-cell for sample preconcentration. J. Flow Injection Anal. 2001, 18, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Simon, J.; Moskvin, N.L. Does the chromatomembrane cell improve the quality of environmental analysis? Talanta 1999, 49, 985–988. [Google Scholar]
  10. Moskvin, N.L.; Moskvin, A.L. Chromatomembrane methods: novel automatization possibilities of substances' separation processes. LRA 1998, 10, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Simon, J.; Moskvin, N.L. From three stage procedures to chromatomembrane cells, advanced extraction procedures in flow analysis. Analytical Sciences 2001, 17 (Supplement), i425–i428. [Google Scholar]
  12. Simon, J.; Bloch, C.; Erxleben, H.; Kirchhoff, A. Die Chromatomembrane-Methode. GIT Spezial – Separation 1999, 1, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  13. Erxleben, H.; Simon, J.; Moskvin, L.N.; Vladimirovna, L.O.; Nikitina, T.G. Automized procedures for the determination of ozone and ammonia contents in air by using the chromatomembrane method for gas-liquid extraction. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 332–335. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wei, Y.; Oshima, M.; Simon, J.; Motomizu, S. The application of the chromatomembrane cell for the adsorptive sampling of nitrogen dioxide followed by continuous determination of nitrite using a micro-flow system. Talanta 2002, 57, 355–364. [Google Scholar]
  15. Moskvin, A.L.; Moskvin, L.N.; Moszhuchin, A.V.; Fomin, V.V. Extraction-chromatographic preconcentration with chromatomembrane separation of extract from aqueous phase for luminescence determination of oil products and phenols in natural water by flow analysis. Talanta 1999, 50, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moskvin, A.L.; Moskvin, L.N.; Moszhuchin, A.V.; Fomin, V.V. Luminescence determination of oil products and phenols in natural water. J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 54, 324 – ibd. 2000, 55, 354. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nikonorov, V.V.; Moskvin, N.L. Flow injection determination of nitrite with chromatomembrane extraction preconcentration. J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 53, 948. [Google Scholar]
  18. Simon, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Gültzow, O. Advanced sample pretreatment for the monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and extractable organic halogens in waste water. Flow based procedures with chromatomembrane cells. Talanta 2002, 58, 1335–1341. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moskvin, L.N.; Simon, J.; Loeffler, P.; Michailova, N.V.; Nicolaevna, D.N. Photometric determination of anionic surfactants with a flow-injection analyzer that includes a chromatomembrane cell for sample preconcentration. Talanta 1996, 43, 819–824. [Google Scholar]
  20. Supriyanto, G.; Simon, J. The chromatomembrane method used for sample preparations in the spectrophotometric determination of zinc and copper in pharmaceuticals. Talanta 2005, 68, 318–322. [Google Scholar]
  21. Moskvin, L.N.; Nikitina, T.G. Membrane methods of substance separation in analytical chemistry. J. Anal. Chem. 2004, 59, 2–16. [Google Scholar]
  22. Loeffler, P.; Simon, J.; Katruzov, A.; Moskvin, N.L. Separation and determination of traces of ammonia in air by means of chromatomembrane cells. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1995, 352, 613–614. [Google Scholar]
  23. Erxleben, H.; Moskvin, L.N.; Nikitina, T.G.; Simon, J. Determination of small quantities of nitrogen oxides in air by ion chromatography using a chromatomembrane cell for preconcentration. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 361, 324–325. [Google Scholar]
  24. Erxleben, H.; Simon, J.; Moskvin, L.N.; Vladimirovna, L.O.; Nikitina, T.G. Automized procedures for the determination of ozone and ammonia contents in air by using the chromatomembrane method for gas-liquid extraction. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2000, 366, 332–335. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rodinkov, O.V.; Moskvin, L.N.; Vaskova, E.A. Photometric flow injection determination of formaldehyde in atmospheric air using chromatomembrane absorption. J. Flow Injection Anal. 2005, 22, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moskvin, L.N.; Bulatov, A.V.; Grigorjev, G.L.; Koldobskij, G.I. Flow-injection photometric determination of arsenic microconcentrations in water media with chromatomembrane cell preconcentration by extraction. J. Flow Injection Anal. 2003, 20, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, Y.L.; Oshima, M.; Simon, J.; Motomizu, S. Application of chromatomembrane cell to flow injection analysis of trace pollutant in ambient air. Analytical Sciences 2001, 17 (Suppl.), a325–a328. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wei, L.; Oshima, M.; Simon, J.; Moskvin, L.N.; Motomizu, S. Absorption, concentration and determination of trace amounts of air pollutants by flow injection method coupled with a chromatomembrane cell system: application to nitrogen dioxide determination. Talanta 2002, 58, 1343–1355. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sritharathikhun, P.; Oshima, M.; Wei, Y.; Simon, J.; Motomizu, S. On-line collection/ concentration and detection of sulfur dioxide in air by flow injection spectrophotometry coupled with a chromatomembrane cell. Analytical Sciences 2004, 20, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rodinkov, O.V.; Moskvin, L.N.; Rathour, J.K. Features of dynamic chromatomembrane gas extraction from a stationary liquid phase. J. Anal. Chem. 2004, 59, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar]
  31. Moskvin, L.N.; Rodinkov, O.V. Continuous chromatomembrane headspace analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 725, 351–359. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bloch, C.; Simon, J.; Moskvin, N.L.; Rodinkov, O.V. The properties of chromatomembrane cells in flow systems coupled to gas chromatography – analysis of volatile organic compounds. Talanta 2000, 52, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rondinkov, O.V.; Moskvin, N.L.; Zykin, I.A. Gas-chromatographic determination of gaseous hydrocarbons (C1 – C4) in aqueous solution using the continuous chromatomembrane gas extraction from a flow of the test solution. J. Anal. Chem. 2003, 58, 71. [Google Scholar]
  34. Moskvin, N.L.; Rodinkov, O.V.; Katruzov, A.N.; Grigorjev, G.L.; Khromov-Borisov, S.N. Dissolved oxygen removal from aqueous media by the chromatomembrane method. Talanta 1995, 42, 1707–1710. [Google Scholar]
  35. Reinke, R.; Simon, J. The online removal of dissolved oxygen from aqueous solutions used in voltammetric techniques by the chromatomembrane method. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 1256–1260. [Google Scholar]
  36. Colombo, C.; van den Berg, C. In-line deoxygenation for flow analysis with voltammetric detection. Anal. Chimica Acta 1998, 337, 229–240. [Google Scholar]
  37. Higuchi, K.; Motomizu, S. Intelligent devices for advanced chemical analysis using flow injection method. J. Flow Injection Anal. 1999, 16, 183–197. [Google Scholar]
  38. Higuchi, K. Approach to an improvement on the quality of environmental analysis using chromatomembrane cell. J. Flow Injection Anal. 1999, 16, 267–268. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kawakubo, S.; Yamane, T. Online separation and concentration in FIA. J. Flow Injection Anal. 2004, 21, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The Chromatomembrane Cell (from [11]).
Figure 1. The Chromatomembrane Cell (from [11]).
Sensors 06 01321f1
Figure 2. Extraction Cell without phase separation (from [11]).
Figure 2. Extraction Cell without phase separation (from [11]).
Sensors 06 01321f2
Figure 3. Scheme for chromatomembrane preconcentration from (a) an aqueous and (b) a gaseous phase. 1 valve, 2 CMC, 3 detector, 4 aqueous sample (a) or aqueous absorber solution (b), 5 polar extractant (a) or gas sample (b), 6 waste.
Figure 3. Scheme for chromatomembrane preconcentration from (a) an aqueous and (b) a gaseous phase. 1 valve, 2 CMC, 3 detector, 4 aqueous sample (a) or aqueous absorber solution (b), 5 polar extractant (a) or gas sample (b), 6 waste.
Sensors 06 01321f3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moskvin, L.N.; Simon, J. Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Solvent Extraction in Flow Analysis with the Chromatomembrane Cell. Sensors 2006, 6, 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6101321

AMA Style

Moskvin LN, Simon J. Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Solvent Extraction in Flow Analysis with the Chromatomembrane Cell. Sensors. 2006; 6(10):1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6101321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moskvin, Leonid N., and Juergen Simon. 2006. "Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Solvent Extraction in Flow Analysis with the Chromatomembrane Cell" Sensors 6, no. 10: 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6101321

APA Style

Moskvin, L. N., & Simon, J. (2006). Gas/Liquid and Liquid/Liquid Solvent Extraction in Flow Analysis with the Chromatomembrane Cell. Sensors, 6(10), 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6101321

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop