Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of 6-Gingerol in Prevention of Colon Cancer Induced by Azoxymethane through the Modulation of Antioxidant Potential and Inflammation
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Mechanism of Gibberellins in Mesocotyl Elongation Response to Deep-Sowing Stress in Sweet Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Baicalein Relieves Ferroptosis-Mediated Phagocytosis Inhibition of Macrophages in Ovarian Endometriosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cold Tolerance of ScCBL6 Is Associated with Tonoplast Transporters and Photosynthesis in Arabidopsis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 44
Issue 12
10.3390/cimb44120423
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

DELAY OF GERMINATION 1, the Master Regulator of Seed Dormancy, Integrates the Regulatory Network of Phytohormones at the Transcriptional Level to Control Seed Dormancy

by
Qiujia Li
1,†,
Xi Chen
1,†,
Shengnan Zhang
2,
Siyao Shan
1 and
Yong Xiang
1,*
1
Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen 518120, China
2
Center for Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(12), 6205-6217; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120423
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 8 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stress and Signal Transduction in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seed dormancy, an important adaptive trait that governs germination timing, is endogenously controlled by phytohormones and genetic factors. DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 (DOG1) is the vital genetic regulator of dormancy, significantly affecting the expression of numerous ABA and GA metabolic genes. However, whether DOG1 could influence the expression of other phytohormone-related genes is still unknown. Here, we comprehensively investigated all well-documented hormone-related genes which might be affected in dog1–2 dry or imbibed seeds by using whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq). We found that DOG1 could systematically control the expression of phytohormone-related genes. An evident decrease was observed in the endogenous signal intensity of abscisic acid (ABA) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), while a dramatic increase appeared in that of gibberellins (GA), brassinosteroids (BR), and cytokinin (CK) in the dog1–2 background, which may contribute considerably to its dormancy-deficient phenotype. Collectively, our data highlight the role of DOG1 in balancing the expression of phytohormone-related genes and provide inspirational evidence that DOG1 may integrate the phytohormones network to control seed dormancy.
Keywords:
dormancy; DOG1; phytohormone; ABA; GA; IAA

1. Introduction

Seed dormancy, defined as the incapacity of a viable seed to germinate under favorable conditions [1], is a critical adaptive trait that determines the seed germination timing and facilitates seedling survival. Seed dormancy is also an invaluable agronomic trait that controls fast and uniform germination, especially preventing pre-harvest sprouting which causes tremendous economic losses [2,3,4].
Seed dormancy is tightly controlled by phytohormones and genetic factors. Nine major phytohormones have been discovered and well studied to date, which are abscisic acid (ABA), auxin (the major natural auxin in plants is indole-3-acetic acid, IAA), brassinosteroids (BR), cytokinins (CK), ethylene (ET), gibberellins (GA), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and strigolactones (SL) [5,6,7]. ABA and GA are undoubtedly the two principal hormones that regulate seed dormancy, and the balance between GA and ABA is critical for regulating seed dormancy and germination [8,9]. ABA positively regulates dormancy [1,6]. During seed maturation, ABA levels gradually increase to establish seed dormancy; while during seed germination, ABA is gradually inactivated to release dormancy [10]. Generally, mutants with increased ABA contents or enhanced ABA signaling exhibit elevated dormancy levels, while those with decreased ABA contents or attenuated ABA signaling display reduced dormancy levels [1,2,3,4,5,6]. GA, which acts antagonistically to ABA, breaks dormancy and promotes germination. Like ABA, mutants with altered GA contents or GA signaling display varied dormancy levels [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Some phytohormones regulate seed dormancy via the interaction with ABA and GA. ET, another key phytohormone besides ABA and GA, negatively regulates seed dormancy by counteracting ABA effects through the regulation of ABA metabolism and signaling pathway [11,12,13]. IAA, a newly recognized positive regulator of seed dormancy after ABA, can maintain seed dormancy through the stimulation of ABI3-mediated ABA signaling [14]. BR and CK can stimulate seed germination via the interaction with GA [15,16]. Despite few reports showing the role of JA, SL, and SA in regulating seed dormancy, they can regulate seed germination. JA inhibits seed germination synergistically with ABA [17], and SL can stimulate seed germination circumventing the GA requirement [18], SA inhibits seed germination under normal conditions while improving it under salt stress conditions [19].
DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 (DOG1) is the major genetic regulator of seed dormancy. DOG1 is closely associated with the degree of dormancy in freshly harvested seeds [20,21,22]. So many genes modulate seed dormancy dependent on their regulation of DOG1 expression from various aspects, ranging from the cis-element within the DOG1 promoter to the chromatin remodeling at the DOG1 locus, such as Basic LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 67 (bZIP67), ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 12 (ERF12), the transcript elongation factor TFIIS, and two histone demethylases, LYSINESPECIFIC DEMETHYLASE LIKE 1 and 2 (LDL1 and LDL2) [23,24,25,26]. Despite numerous reports on upstream regulators of DOG1, there are few reports on downstream targets of DOG1. DOG1 regulates seed germination and flowering time through an influence on levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) miR156 and miR172 [27]. Furthermore, DOG1 physically interacts with two key negative regulators of ABA signaling ABA HYPERSENSITIVE GERMINATION1 (AHG1) and AHG3 to functionally block their essential downstream roles [28,29], implying a somewhat convergence of the DOG1 pathway with ABA signaling pathway. In dog1–1, a loss-of-function of DOG1 mutant, the expression of some ABA synthesis genes (NCED2/3/5/9) [30,31,32] was significantly reduced, while the expression of ABA catabolism genes (CYP707A1/A3) [33,34] and GA synthesis (GA20ox1/2/3 and GA3OX1/2) [35,36] was significantly increased; ABA and GA contents also changed in dog1–1 mutants corresponding to the gene expression [20]. These clues suggest an important role of DOG1 in modulating the expression of ABA and GA metabolism-related genes, which may contribute considerably to the regulation of seed dormancy by DOG1. Apart from ABA and gibberellins, more and more evidence indicates that other phytohormones also function in seed dormancy individually or by hormones crosstalk. As a seed dormancy core regulator, DOG1 may also affect these phytohormones’ metabolism and signaling. However, due to the technical limitations at that time, the relationship between the function of DOG1 and the expression regulation of phytohormone-related genes could not be investigated in a high-throughput way. In this study, we used RNA-seq to systematically analyze the impact of DOG1 on the expression of all known important hormone-related genes and found that the influence is tremendous but distinct for a particular phytohormone. Moreover, DOG1 negatively regulates the dormancy hormone represented by GA and positively regulates the dormancy hormone represented by ABA and IAA, and their balance is important for establishing and maintaining seed dormancy. As a whole, our work reconfirms the role of DOG1 in regulating hormone-related gene expression, and provides an inspirational clue that DOG1 may function as a master regulator of nine dormancy-related phytohormones.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Condition

Arabidopsis seeds used in this study were Col-0 (wild type) and the dog1–2 mutant, which is in the Col-0 background [20]. Seeds were sown in the soil mixture (potting soil: vermiculite = 3:1) and grown in the growth chamber with 16-h-light under 80–90 μmol m−2 s−1 white light intensity/8-h-dark cycle at 24 °C/22 °C.

2.2. Germination Assay

Seed germination assays were performed as previously described [20]. Freshly harvested seeds of each genotype were sown on filter paper, placed into transparent moisturized containers, and incubated in a germination cabinet in long-day conditions. Photos that check the germination status of Col and dog1–2 after imbibition for 6 h were taken under a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan); photos that check the surface structure of Col and dog1–2 seeds after imbibition for 6 h were taken using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The germination percentages were analyzed after 7 days of incubation. For each germination test, we performed ten biological replicates.

2.3. Transcriptome Analysis

Freshly harvested seeds were immediately sampled (dry seeds) or imbibed in saturated filter paper for 6 h prior to sample (imbibed seeds). RNA was extracted from dry and imbibed seeds using FastPure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Polysaccharides and Polyphenolics-rich) (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-Seq library preparation and sequencing were performed at Novogene Biotech (Beijing, China) using an Illumina Novaseq500-PE150. Low-quality sequences were removed using fastp (version 0.20.0, -z 4 -q 20 -u 30 -n 10). We then mapped the clean reads to the Arabidopsis reference genome using the software Hisat2 (version 2.1.0). FeatureCounts (version 2.0.1) was used to count the reads using these common parameters (-p -t exon -g gene_id). Raw counts were normalized with DEseq2 (version 1.34.0) to compare gene expression in different samples. Gene expression values (normalized counts) were calculated by DEseq2. DEGs were also identified with DEseq2 with adjust p < 0.05 and fold-changes > 2.

2.4. RT-qPCR Assay

Total RNA was extracted using FastPure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Polysaccharides and Polyphenolics-rich) (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After treatment with DNase I to remove residual genomic DNA, 1 μg total RNA was used as template for reverse transcription reaction using HiScript® III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Relative gene expression was analyzed based on the 2−ΔΔCt method with ACTIN8 (AT1G49240) as an internal control. Gene-specific primers are list in Table S3.

3. Results

3.1. Dog1–2 Is Suitable to Analyze DOG1 Regulatory Role

We adopted Col and dog1–2 seeds with clearer genetic backgrounds as materials to investigate the transcriptome changes in this study. dog1–2 has been verified as a loss of function mutant in the Col-0 background and showed no dormancy [20,37]. We also confirmed the reduced dormancy phenotype before the following treatment (Figure 1A). Imbibition is the early stage of seed germination in which the transcriptome changed dramatically. In order to capture the DOG1-regulated transcription changes, the time point of sampling imbibed seeds should rule out the disruption of the change in seed germination status or seed surface structure. Therefore, we assessed the seeds structure of Col and dog1–2 with the help of the stereomicroscope and the scanning electron microscope at the imbibition stage. No obvious difference could be observed between Col and dog1–2 when the seeds were imbibed for 6 h (Figure 1B,C), which implied that 6-h imbibition was suitable for transcription analysis. Therefore, seeds were sampled at 0 (hereafter referred to as dry seeds) and 6 h (hereafter referred to as imbibed seeds) after the start of imbibition. Finally, we performed an RNA-seq experiment with three biological replicates and comparatively analyzed the gene expression differences between wild-type Col and the dog1–2 mutant. Two-dimensional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that transcriptomes of dog1–2 were different from Col in both dry and imbibed seeds (Figure 1D). In addition, the three biological repeats were always clustered together, which indicated the high reproducibility of this dataset. Taken together, the RNA-seq data obtained from the dry and imbibed seeds of Col and dog1–2 mutant is reliable to investigate the influence of DOG1 on the whole transcriptome level.

3.2. DOG1 Dramatically Influences the Whole Transcriptome Level of Freshly Harvested Seeds

Our RNA-seq method detected a total of 25280 expressed genes in freshly-harvested dry and imbibed seeds. The genes with absolute fold-change > 2 and p-value < 0.05 were defined as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs were 1679 and 758 in dry seeds, respectively (Figure 2A and Table S1). The up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs were 2364 and 1583 in imbibed seeds, respectively (Figure 2B and Table S1). The Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis summarized the top categories in which the DOG1-regulated DEGs were involved. As expected, we noticed a considerable number of categories were associated with phytohormones in dry and imbibed seeds. Notably, ABA-related categories (GO: 0009737/0009738) were enriched highest among all phytohormones, which was 3.03- and 3.31-fold enrichment in dry and imbibed seeds, respectively. The category of “response to auxin” (GO: 0009733) was enriched 2.11- and 2.19-fold significantly in the up-regulated DEGs both in dry and imbibed seeds, respectively, suggesting a link between DOG1 and gene expression of IAA. Unexpectedly, some phytohormones, such as salicylic acid and jasmonic acid, which are generally thought to play weak roles in regulating seed dormancy, were also included in the top categories (Figure 2), implying that DOG1 is more closely related to phytohormones than previously thought.

3.3. DOG1 Plays an Important Role in Regulating Phytohormone-Related Gene Expression

The complicated gene regulatory networks of phytohormone have been studied intensively over the past decades. We carefully selected 636 genes proven to be involved in the homeostasis or signal transduction of phytohormones (Table S2) from the classic publications for gene expression detection in dog1–2 background. Among them, the expression value of 585 genes was detected by our RNA-seq. The total DEGs were approaching and even exceeding one-tenth of the total detectable genes in dry seeds (2437 DEGs, 9.6%) and imbibed seeds (3947 DEGs, 15.61%) in the dog1–2 mutant, respectively (Figure 3A). When considering the phytohormone-related DEGs only, these proportions climbed up to one-fifth (104 DEGs, 17.81%) and one-third (172 DEGs, 29.45%) in dry and imbibed seeds, respectively. The enrichment degree of hormone-related DEGs in dry and imbibed seeds was almost twice that of the whole DEGs (17.81% vs. 9.6%; 29.45% vs. 15.61%) (Figure 3A), indicating that the functional DOG1 is especially important for the normal expression of phytohormones related genes.
We further analyzed the specific effect of DOG1 on a single hormone. We divided plant hormones into two groups according to their roles in seed dormancy or seed germination. One group, denoted by “+”, includes the hormones that can induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; the other group, denoted by “−”, includes those that can release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. In dry seeds, the order of the percentage of DEGs in each hormone from high to low is ABA, IAA, SA, and JA for group “+” and GA, BR, ET, SL, and CK for group “−”; in imbibed seeds, the order is ABA, SA, JA, and IAA for group “+” and SL, GA, ET, BR, and CK for group “−” (Figure 3B). ABA and GA are ranked among the top both in dry seeds and imbibed seeds, indicating that DOG1 had the greatest influence on ABA- and GA-related gene expression. The number and the percentage of DEGs of most hormones increased significantly after seed imbibition (with the only exception of IAA), suggesting that the function of DOG1, the master regulator of seed dormancy, in regulating gene expression in the early stage of seed germination should be considered.

3.4. DOG1 Differentially Affects the Homeostasis or Signaling DEGs of Different Hormones

Both homeostasis and signaling are necessary for hormone proper function. Therefore, we compared the effects of DOG1 on the expression of different phytohormone homeostasis or signaling genes. The percentage of homeostasis-related DEGs is usually higher than that of signaling-related DEGs both in dry seeds and in imbibed seeds for most hormones (Figure 4A), indicating that DOG1 had a more notable impact on phytohormone homeostasis. However, there is an obvious exception for ABA, in which the percentage of homeostasis-related DEGs is lower than that of signaling in dry seeds and is about the same amount in imbibed seeds, suggesting that the regulation of DOG1 on ABA is somehow different from other hormones.
Of a particular hormone within a plant cell, the homeostasis is regulated both by the rate of its anabolism and catabolism and by the capacity of its transport; its signaling is regulated both by the receptors (responsible for signal perception) and by the transducers (responsible for signal transduction). Therefore, we compared the impacts of DOG1 on the expression of genes related to the above five aspects of each hormone. DOG1 showed completely distinct regulatory patterns for different hormones. For hormones such as ABA, IAA, and GA, which play a predominant role in the regulation of seed dormancy, DOG1 had a relatively balanced regulation of the expression of the genes involved in the above five aspects (Figure 4B). However, for hormones such as JA, SA, and SL, which play weak roles in dormancy regulation, the regulation pattern of gene expression by DOG1 is quite irregular (Figure 4B).

3.5. DOG1 Has a Specific Impact on the Expression of a Particular Gene in Various Phytohormones

The completely distinct regulatory pattern of DOG1 on the genes in different hormones prompted us to dissect the specific influence of DOG1 on the expression of a particular gene in each hormone (Figure 5 and Figure S1). For GA, we observed a consistent phenomenon, that is all the GA anabolism-related DEGs (CPS, GA20ox1/2/3, and GA3ox1/2/4) were up-regulated while all the GA catabolism-related DEGs (GA2ox3/6 and ELA2) were down-regulated in dog1–2 seeds (Figure 5). For ABA, we also observed a similar phenomenon, but with two exceptions (ABA4 and CYP707A1); that is, most ABA anabolism-related DEGs (ABA1 and NCED2/3/4/5/9) were down-regulated while one ABA catabolism-related DEG (CYP707A3) was up-regulated in dog1–2 seeds. These results emphasized the importance of DOG1 in regulating ABA and GA homeostasis. The impact of DOG1 on ABA signaling is vast, too. DOG1 could significantly affect the expression of genes encoding almost all the core components in ABA signaling, including the majority of indispensable ABA receptors (PYR1/PYL1/2/3/4/6/7/8/11/12/13), the majority of pivotal negative regulators PP2Cs (ABI2, AHG1, HAB1, and HAI1/2/3), several critical down-stream kinases (SnRK2.6 and CPK3), numerous crucial transcription factors (ABI4, ABI5, and ABFs), and multiple vital regulatory factors for these core-components such as CARK, CARs, and CEPR2 (for ABA receptors), as well as PUB11 (for PP2Cs) and AFP1–4 (for ABI5). This phenomenon highlights the importance of DOG1 in ABA signaling, consistent with the recent discovery that DOG1 can directly interact with phosphatases AHG1 in ABA signaling, and block their downstream roles [28,29].
DOG1 also had an immense impact on the gene expression of GA-signaling. The expression levels of three GA receptors decreased in dog1–2 to varying degrees, especially the GID1a (Figure 5); nearly all the expression of genes encoding GA signal transducer increased in dog1–2, including four of five pivotal DELLAs (RGA1, RGL1, RGL2, and RGL3) (Figure 5), suggesting a role of DOG1 in GA signaling. DOG1 also affected the expression of other hormone-related genes to varying degrees. For example, most anabolism-related genes of IAA, JA, BR, and CK were up-regulated in dog1–2 seeds; however, most catabolism-related genes in IAA and BR were also up-regulated. Most transport-related genes of IAA and JA were up-regulated in dog1–2 seeds, while those of CK were down-regulated (Figure 5). Generally, the impact of DOG1 on gene expression for a particular hormone includes positive and negative; however, it is worth noting that the majority of IAA- and BR-related DEGs were only up-regulated in dog1–2 seeds, implying that DOG1 has a special impact on these two hormones. In a nutshell, for ABA and GA, the two hormones that play dominant roles in regulating seed dormancy, the expression profile affected by DOG1 is obvious and regular; however, for other hormones which may play minor roles in regulating seed dormancy, there was no obvious regular pattern by DOG1.

3.6. DOG1 Ultimately Affects the Endogenous Signal Intensity of Various Hormones

Considering that DOG1 could regulate the expression of various hormone-related genes, we compared the expression alteration of marker genes of each hormone between WT and dog1–2 mutants to evaluate the final impact of DOG1 on the signal intensity of a particular hormone. The expression alterations of marker genes of a given hormone are widely adopted to reflect the changes in signal intensity due to the variation of contents or sensitivity of that hormone. We selected two to four widely accepted reporter genes from the literature for each hormone: RAB18, RD26, RD29A, and RD29B for ABA [38,39,40]; SAUR7, SAUR36, and SAUR46 for IAA [41,42]; JAZ10, JR2, and VSP2 for JA [43,44]; PR1, PR2, and PR5 for SA [45]; GASA4, GASA6 and EXPA2 for GA [46,47,48]; EBP, ERF1, EBF2 and ETR2 for ET [49,50,51]; DWF4, EXP8, and SAUR-AC1 for BR [52,53]; and ARR4 and ARR5 for CK [46]. The evaluation of SL is missed because there is currently no widely recognized and used marker gene for SL. Some marker genes may not be suitable as indicators of hormonal levels within seeds because their expression levels are hardly detected in this tissue (Figure S2), although they may work well in other tissues such as roots or rosettes. After excluding the interference of these marker genes, we obtained perspicuous results (Figure 6). The expression of all marker genes of ABA decreased significantly in dog1–2, while that of GA increased sharply, reconfirming that DOG1 can disrupt the balance between endogenous ABA and GA. The signal intensity of IAA, another essential hormone that induces seed dormancy besides ABA, also decreased in imbibed seeds reflected by its marker gene SAUR36. The signal intensity of JA and SA, two hormones that may play weak roles in seed dormancy but mainly function in repressing seed germination, increased both in dry seeds and imbibed seeds. Like GA, the signal intensity of CK, and BR, two hormones that negatively regulate seed dormancy, both increased to some extent. The only hormone that was difficult to determine the alteration of signal intensity was ET. Among the four marker genes of ET, one did not change (EBP), two changes were contradictory in dry and imbibed seeds (ERF1 and ERS2), and one decreased, but the degree was very slight.
In addition, the expression pattern of marker genes was further analyzed by RT-qPCR (Figure S3). The expression of most marker genes was significantly altered in dog1–2. ABA-related marker genes decreased significantly in dog1–2, while all marker genes of CK and GA increased. As the two marker genes of IAA, SAUR7 and SAUR36 showed slight decrease in dry and imbibition seeds, respectively. The RT-qPCR results were highly consistent with our RNA-seq data.

4. Discussion

As the core regulator of seed dormancy, DOG1 was frequently reported as a downstream factor that can be regulated directly and indirectly [23,24,25,26], while few reports about the downstream targets of DOG1 [27,28,29]. Previous study has reported the severely affected transcriptome in dog1–1 with microarray analysis [54]. However, the dog1–1 mutant is in a complicated NIL-DOG1 background, a near-isogenic line containing the DOG1 allele from Cvi in a Ler background. In this study, we performed a transcriptome analysis using dry and imbibed seeds of dog1–2 in Col-0 background with RNA-seq analysis. The time point of samples collection was precisely selected to detect whole transcriptome at the beginning of seed germination according to the seeds` morphological status (Figure 1). The PCA analysis revealed the high reproducibility of our dataset. Generally, our study could present a more reliable investigation into the influence of DOG1 on the whole transcriptome.
In our data, DOG1 influences gene expression significantly because one-tenth of genes, especially hormone-related genes, were differentially expressed in dog1–2 dry and imbibed seeds (Figure 2 and Figure 3A). Hormone-related genes, with their roles quickly in response to endogenies and exogenous cues, effected more remarkable in our study, as the proportion of DEGs reached nearly one-fifth and almost one-third in dry and imbibed seeds, respectively (Figure 3A). The effects of DOG1 on the expression of genes in a particular phytohormone are quite distinct (Figure 4 and Figure 5), and might lead to various degrees of changes in the signal intensity of each hormone (Figure 6). Those indicate analysis downstream is also quite important to uncover the DOG1 function.
Further investigation revealed an evident decrease in the endogenous signal intensity of ABA and IAA while a dramatic increase in that of GA, BR, and CK (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Our data obtained from Col and dog1–2 are highly consistent with the previous results [20], and indicate that DOG1 may be at the center of hormonal regulation, especially reconfirming that DOG1 plays a central role in regulating the balance between GA and ABA. Unlike GA and ABA, the relationship between DOG1 and IAA has been overlooked for a long time until a recent work combined transcriptome and translatome analyses highlighted the role of auxin biosynthesis in the control of DOG1-dependent seed dormancy [55]. Bai et al. found that the expression of IAA metabolism genes was discriminative during the imbibition of after-ripened and dormant seeds of NIL-DOG1 [55]. This implied the role of IAA in dormancy and the possible link between IAA and DOG1. In this work, we also identified a large number of DEGs involved in the IAA pathway, including YUC3 and YUC6, encoding two essential auxin synthesis enzymes [56,57], as well as other genes involved in the auxin pathway (Figure 5). Therefore, the relationship between DOG1 and IAA deserves in-depth studies in the future. Besides ABA, GA, and IAA, DOG1 can also influence the endogenous signal intensity of JA, SA, CK, and BR (Figure 5). There are few reports about those hormones involved in DOG1-related seed dormancy, which might be due to their minor effect or not clearly characterized roles in dormancy regulation.
DOG1 has such a substantial effect on gene expression, which might potentially be explained by its protein sequence. One of the three protein domains of DOG1 is present in group D bZIP transcription factors, and the protein with the highest sequence similarity to DOG1 is the wheat transcription factor HBP-1b [58]. DOG1 may regulate dormancy-related phytohormone genes potentially through acting as a DNA-binding protein. Another possibility is that DOG1 may interact with some transcription factors and coordinately regulate downstream gene expression. Nee and Nishimura identified many DOG1 interacting proteins by pull-down combined with mass spectrometry, including a large number of genes that may function as transcription factors [28,29]. The third possibility is the feedback from the DOG1-involved pathway. For example, DOG1 interacts with AHG1 and regulates the activation state of SnRK2s through the inhibition of the PP2C activity of AHG1 [28,29]. That might induce an ABA feedback response during the biological process.
To uncover these possibilities, further validation of DOG1 co-effectors, especially DOG1 binding to those DNA sites by employing other methods such as Chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) is required.

5. Conclusions

Our study uncovered a dramatic transcriptome alteration in dry and imbibed seeds of dog1–2, a non-dormant mutant in Col-0 background. Further investigation revealed that phytohormone-related DEGs referred to both homeostasis and signaling pathway. The signal intensity of ABA and IAA decreased significantly, while that of GA, CK, and BR increased notably. Our data indicated the center-balancing role of DOG1 in phytohormones related dormancy control.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44120423/s1, Figure S1: Comprehensive analysis of the influence of DOG1 on the expression of a particular gene in each phytohormone. Figure S2: The expression value of marker genes that are not suitable as indicators of hormonal levels within seeds. Figure S3: Validation of the expression of marker genes by RT-qPCR assays. Table S1. All DEGs list in dry seeds and imbibition seeds. Table S2. The Hormone-related genes list. Table S3. Primers used for RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

Q.L., X.C. and Y.X. designed the experiments and wrote the paper. Q.L., S.Z. and S.S. performed the experiments. X.C, Q.L and Y.X analyzed the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32000250 and 32170364), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2021B0707010006), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2020M682997), The Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality (Grant No. KCXFZ20201221173203009 and KCXFZ20211020164207012) and Dapeng New District Science and Technology Program (Grant No. KJYF202101-09 and RCTD20180102).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data in this study can be found in public databases and Supplementary Materials, as described in the Section 2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Finch-Savage, W.E.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006, 171, 501–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gubler, F.; Millar, A.A.; Jacobsen, J.V. Dormancy release, ABA and pre-harvest sprouting. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L.; Soppe, W.J. Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Graeber, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Miatton, E.; Leubner-Metzger, G.; Soppe, W.J. Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 1769–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vanstraelen, M.; Benkova, E. Hormonal interactions in the regulation of plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kucera, B.; Cohn, M.A.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2005, 15, 281–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, K.; Guo, H.; Zhai, J. Interplay of phytohormones and epigenetic regulation: A recipe for plant development and plasticity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Finkelstein, R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Penfield, S. Seed dormancy and germination. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R874–R878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kanno, Y.; Jikumaru, Y.; Hanada, A.; Nambara, E.; Abrams, S.R.; Kamiya, Y.; Seo, M. Comprehensive hormone profiling in developing Arabidopsis seeds: Examination of the site of ABA biosynthesis, ABA transport and hormone interactions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1988–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beaudoin, N.; Serizet, C.; Gosti, F.; Giraudat, J. Interactions between abscisic acid and ethylene signaling cascades. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Linkies, A.; Muller, K.; Morris, K.; Tureckova, V.; Wenk, M.; Cadman, C.S.C.; Corbineau, F.; Strnad, M.; Lynn, J.R.; Finch-Savage, W.E.; et al. Ethylene Interacts with Abscisic Acid to Regulate Endosperm Rupture during Germination: A Comparative Approach Using Lepidium sativum and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3803–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Corbineau, F.; Xia, Q.; Bailly, C.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H. Ethylene, a key factor in the regulation of seed dormancy. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, Z.; Li, Q.; Yang, H.Q.; Luan, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.H. Auxin controls seed dormancy through stimulation of abscisic acid signaling by inducing ARF-mediated ABI3 activation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 15485–15490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Zhong, C.; Patra, B.; Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Yuan, L.; Wang, X. A transcriptional hub integrating gibberellin-brassinosteroid signals to promote seed germination in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4708–4720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eastwood, D.; Tavener, R.J.; Laidman, D.L. Sequential action of cytokinin and gibberellic acid in wheat aleurone tissue. Nature 1969, 221, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, Y.; Hou, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Tang, L.; Tong, X.; Zhang, J. Abscisic acid promotes jasmonic acid biosynthesis via a ‘SAPK10-bZIP72-AOC’ pathway to synergistically inhibit seed germination in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1336–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bunsick, M.; Toh, S.; Wong, C.; Xu, Z.; Ly, G.; McErlean, C.S.P.; Pescetto, G.; Nemrish, K.E.; Sung, P.; Li, J.D.; et al. SMAX1-dependent seed germination bypasses GA signalling in Arabidopsis and Striga. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rajjou, L.; Belghazi, M.; Huguet, R.; Robin, C.; Moreau, A.; Job, C.; Job, D. Proteomic investigation of the effect of salicylic acid on Arabidopsis seed germination and establishment of early defense mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 910–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. N-3akabayashi, K.; Bartsch, M.; Xiang, Y.; Miatton, E.; Pellengahr, S.; Yano, R.; Seo, M.; Soppe, W.J. The time required for dormancy release in Arabidopsis is determined by DELAY OF GERMINATION1 protein levels in freshly harvested seeds. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 28268. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cyrek, M.; Fedak, H.; Ciesielski, A.; Guo, Y.; Sliwa, A.; Brzezniak, L.; Krzyczmonik, K.; Pietras, Z.; Kaczanowski, S.; Liu, F.; et al. Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis Is Controlled by Alternative Polyadenylation of DOG1. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fedak, H.; Palusinska, M.; Krzyczmonik, K.; Brzezniak, L.; Yatusevich, R.; Pietras, Z.; Kaczanowski, S.; Swiezewski, S. Control of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis by a cis-acting noncoding antisense transcript. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7846–E7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Bryant, F.M.; Hughes, D.; Hassani-Pak, K.; Eastmond, P.J. Basic leucine zipper transcription Factor67 Transactivates DELAY OF GERMINATION1 to Establish Primary Seed Dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 1276–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Li, X.; Chen, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Chen, F.; Li, Y.; Soppe, W.J.J.; Li, W.; Liu, Y. ETR1/RDO3 Regulates Seed Dormancy by Relieving the Inhibitory Effect of the ERF12-TPL Complex on DELAY OF GERMINATION1 Expression. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mortensen, S.A.; Grasser, K.D. The seed dormancy defect of Arabidopsis mutants lacking the transcript elongation factor TFIIS is caused by reduced expression of the DOG1 gene. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, K. Arabidopsis histone demethylases LDL1 and LDL2 control primary seed dormancy by regulating delay of germination 1 and ABA signaling-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Huo, H.; Wei, S.; Bradford, K.J. DELAY OF GERMINATION1 (DOG1) regulates both seed dormancy and flowering time through microRNA pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E2199–E2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nee, G.; Kramer, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Yuan, B.; Xiang, Y.; Miatton, E.; Finkemeier, I.; Soppe, W.J.J. DELAY OF GERMINATION1 requires PP2C phosphatases of the ABA signalling pathway to control seed dormancy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nishimura, N.; Tsuchiya, W.; Moresco, J.J.; Hayashi, Y.; Satoh, K.; Kaiwa, N.; Irisa, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Schroeder, J.I.; Yates, J.R.; et al. Control of seed dormancy and germination by DOG1-AHG1 PP2C phosphatase complex via binding to heme. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Iuchi, S.; Kobayashi, M.; Taji, T.; Naramoto, M.; Seki, M.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Kakubari, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 27, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tan, B.C.; Joseph, L.M.; Deng, W.T.; Liu, L.; Li, Q.B.; Cline, K.; McCarty, D.R. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis 9-cis epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene family. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 35, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lefebvre, V.; North, H.; Frey, A.; Sotta, B.; Seo, M.; Okamoto, M.; Nambara, E.; Marion-Poll, A. Functional analysis of Arabidopsis NCED6 and NCED9 genes indicates that ABA synthesized in the endosperm is involved in the induction of seed dormancy. Plant J. 2006, 45, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saito, S.; Hirai, N.; Matsumoto, C.; Ohigashi, H.; Ohta, D.; Sakata, K.; Mizutani, M. Arabidopsis CYP707As encode (+)-abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the oxidative catabolism of abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1439–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Okamoto, M.; Kuwahara, A.; Seo, M.; Kushiro, T.; Asami, T.; Hirai, N.; Kamiya, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Nambara, E. CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Xu, Y.L.; Li, L.; Wu, K.; Peeters, A.J.; Gage, D.A.; Zeevaart, J.A. The GA5 locus of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a multifunctional gibberellin 20-oxidase: Molecular cloning and functional expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 6640–6644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Chiang, H.H.; Hwang, I.; Goodman, H.M. Isolation of the Arabidopsis GA4 locus. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 195–201. [Google Scholar]
  37. Footitt, S.; Olcer-Footitt, H.; Hambidge, A.J.; Finch-Savage, W.E. A laboratory simulation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy cycling provides new insight into its regulation by clock genes and the dormancy-related genes DOG1, MFT, CIPK23 and PHYA. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1474–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Fujii, H.; Chinnusamy, V.; Rodrigues, A.; Rubio, S.; Antoni, R.; Park, S.Y.; Cutler, S.R.; Sheen, J.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Zhu, J.K. In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signalling pathway. Nature 2009, 462, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nishiyama, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Fujita, Y.; Le, D.T.; Kojima, M.; Werner, T.; Vankova, R.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Kakimoto, T.; et al. Analysis of Cytokinin Mutants and Regulation of Cytokinin Metabolic Genes Reveals Important Regulatory Roles of Cytokinins in Drought, Salt and Abscisic Acid Responses, and Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mao, X.G.; Zhang, H.Y.; Qian, X.Y.; Li, A.; Zhao, G.Y.; Jing, R.L. TaNAC2, a NAC-type wheat transcription factor conferring enhanced multiple abiotic stress tolerances in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2933–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Franco, A.R.; Gee, M.A.; Guilfoyle, T.J. Induction and superinduction of auxin-responsive mRNAs with auxin and protein synthesis inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15845–15849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Goda, H.; Sawa, S.; Asami, T.; Fujioka, S.; Shimada, Y.; Yoshida, S. Comprehensive comparison brassinosteroid-regulated of auxin-regulated and brassinosteroid-regulated genes in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1555–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fernandez-Calvo, P.; Chini, A.; Fernandez-Barbero, G.; Chico, J.M.; Gimenez-Ibanez, S.; Geerinck, J.; Eeckhout, D.; Schweizer, F.; Godoy, M.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH Transcription Factors MYC3 and MYC4 Are Targets of JAZ Repressors and Act Additively with MYC2 in the Activation of Jasmonate Responses. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 701–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Berriri, S.; Gangappa, S.N.; Kumar, S.V. SWR1 Chromatin-Remodeling Complex Subunits and H2A.Z Have Non-overlapping Functions in Immunity and Gene Regulation in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1051–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Antignani, V.; Klocko, A.L.; Bak, G.; Chandrasekaran, S.D.; Dunivin, T.; Nielsen, E. Recruitment of PLANT U-BOX13 and the PI4Kbeta1/beta2 phosphatidylinositol-4 kinases by the small GTPase RabA4B plays important roles during salicylic acid-mediated plant defense signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 243–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Putarjunan, A.; Rodermel, S. gigantea suppresses immutans variegation by interactions with cytokinin and gibberellin signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 2115–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhong, C.; Xu, H.; Ye, S.; Wang, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X. Gibberellic Acid-Stimulated Arabidopsis6 Serves as an Integrator of Gibberellin, Abscisic Acid, and Glucose Signaling during Seed Germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2288–2303. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sanchez-Montesino, R.; Bouza-Morcillo, L.; Marquez, J.; Ghita, M.; Duran-Nebreda, S.; Gomez, L.; Holdsworth, M.J.; Bassel, G.; Onate-Sanchez, L. A Regulatory Module Controlling GA-Mediated Endosperm Cell Expansion Is Critical for Seed Germination in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lin, Y.T.; Chen, L.J.; Herrfurth, C.; Feussner, I.; Li, H.M. Reduced Biosynthesis of Digalactosyldiacylglycerol, a Major Chloroplast Membrane Lipid, Leads to Oxylipin Overproduction and Phloem Cap Lignification in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tateda, C.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Shrestha, J.; Jelenska, J.; Chinchilla, D.; Greenberg, J.T. Salicylic Acid Regulates Arabidopsis Microbial Pattern Receptor Kinase Levels and Signaling. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4171–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jeong, J.; Kim, K.; Kim, M.E.; Kim, H.G.; Heo, G.S.; Park, O.K.; Park, Y.I.; Choi, G.; Oh, E. Phytochrome and Ethylene Signaling Integration in Arabidopsis Occurs via the Transcriptional Regulation of Genes Co-targeted by PIFs and EIN3. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Wang, W.X.; Lu, X.D.; Li, L.; Lian, H.L.; Mao, Z.L.; Xu, P.B.; Guo, T.T.; Xu, F.; Du, S.S.; Cao, X.L.; et al. Photoexcited CRYPTOCHROME1 Interacts with Dephosphorylated BES1 to Regulate Brassinosteroid Signaling and Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1989–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Malinovsky, F.G.; Batoux, M.; Schwessinger, B.; Youn, J.H.; Stransfeld, L.; Win, J.; Kim, S.K.; Zipfel, C. Antagonistic regulation of growth and immunity by the Arabidopsis basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor homolog of brassinosteroid enhanced expression2 interacting with increased leaf inclination1 binding bHLH1. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dekkers, B.J.; He, H.; Hanson, J.; Willems, L.A.; Jamar, D.C.; Cueff, G.; Rajjou, L.; Hilhorst, H.W.; Bentsink, L. The Arabidopsis DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 gene affects ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) expression and genetically interacts with ABI3 during Arabidopsis seed development. Plant J. 2016, 85, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bai, B.; Novak, O.; Ljung, K.; Hanson, J.; Bentsink, L. Combined transcriptome and translatome analyses reveal a role for tryptophan-dependent auxin biosynthesis in the control of DOG1-dependent seed dormancy. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhao, Y.; Christensen, S.K.; Fankhauser, C.; Cashman, J.R.; Cohen, J.D.; Weigel, D.; Chory, J. A role for flavin monooxygenase-like enzymes in auxin biosynthesis. Science 2001, 291, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cheng, Y.F.; Dai, X.H.; Zhao, Y.D. Auxin synthesized by the YUCCA flavin Monooxygenases is essential for embryogenesis and leaf formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2430–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bentsink, L.; Jowett, J.; Hanhart, C.J.; Koornneef, M. Cloning of DOG1, a quantitative trait locus controlling seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 17042–17047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cimb 44 00423 g001 550
Figure 1. Quality evaluation of the experimental materials, conditions, and data. (A) The germination rate showed that the dog1–2 seeds completely lost dormancy. (B) The stereomicroscope photos showed that the germination status of the dog1–2 seeds was not changed compared with that of Col after imbibition for 6 h. (C) The scanning electron microscopy images showed that the surface structure of dog1–2 seeds was not changed compared with that of Col after imbibition for 6 h. (D) Two-dimensional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the whole transcriptome level of the dog1–2 seeds was significantly altered compared with that of the wild-type. Scale bars, 1 mm in B and 120 μm in C.
Figure 1. Quality evaluation of the experimental materials, conditions, and data. (A) The germination rate showed that the dog1–2 seeds completely lost dormancy. (B) The stereomicroscope photos showed that the germination status of the dog1–2 seeds was not changed compared with that of Col after imbibition for 6 h. (C) The scanning electron microscopy images showed that the surface structure of dog1–2 seeds was not changed compared with that of Col after imbibition for 6 h. (D) Two-dimensional Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the whole transcriptome level of the dog1–2 seeds was significantly altered compared with that of the wild-type. Scale bars, 1 mm in B and 120 μm in C.
Cimb 44 00423 g001
Cimb 44 00423 g002 550
Figure 2. The overview of the alteration of transcriptome level in dog1–2 seeds. The volcano plots (middle panel) and the tables (left and right panels) showed the number and extent of up-and down-regulated DEGs and the Top categories of GO analysis in dry (A) and imbibed seeds (B).
Figure 2. The overview of the alteration of transcriptome level in dog1–2 seeds. The volcano plots (middle panel) and the tables (left and right panels) showed the number and extent of up-and down-regulated DEGs and the Top categories of GO analysis in dry (A) and imbibed seeds (B).
Cimb 44 00423 g002
Cimb 44 00423 g003 550
Figure 3. Phytohormone-related DEGs were highly enriched in dog1–2. (A) The percentage of the total DEGs and the phytohormone-related DEGs in dry and imbibed seeds. DEGs, differentially expressed genes. nDEG, not DEGs. (B) The number and percentage of DEGs in the indicated phytohormone pathways in dry and imbibed seeds. “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds.
Figure 3. Phytohormone-related DEGs were highly enriched in dog1–2. (A) The percentage of the total DEGs and the phytohormone-related DEGs in dry and imbibed seeds. DEGs, differentially expressed genes. nDEG, not DEGs. (B) The number and percentage of DEGs in the indicated phytohormone pathways in dry and imbibed seeds. “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds.
Cimb 44 00423 g003
Cimb 44 00423 g004 550
Figure 4. The homeostasis or signaling DEGs of different phytohormones were variously affected in dog1–2. (A) The proportion of the homeostasis and signaling DEGs of phytohormones. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. (B) The proportion of up- or down-regulated DEGs involved in the anabolism, catabolism, and transport, as well as the signal reception and transduction of the indicated phytohormone. The dashed line divides the five categories into two classes: S, Signaling; H, Homeostasis.
Figure 4. The homeostasis or signaling DEGs of different phytohormones were variously affected in dog1–2. (A) The proportion of the homeostasis and signaling DEGs of phytohormones. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. (B) The proportion of up- or down-regulated DEGs involved in the anabolism, catabolism, and transport, as well as the signal reception and transduction of the indicated phytohormone. The dashed line divides the five categories into two classes: S, Signaling; H, Homeostasis.
Cimb 44 00423 g004
Cimb 44 00423 g005 550
Figure 5. Comprehensive analysis of the influence of DOG1 on the expression of a particular gene in each phytohormone. The histogram shows expression alteration of the up- or down-regulated DEGs in dog1–2 in the indicated phytohormone pathway. Gene name in yellow or blue denotes that the gene plays a positive or negative role in homeostasis or signal transduction, respectively. *, p < 0.05. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. A, Anabolism; C, Catabolism; P, transPort; R, Receptor; D, transDucer.
Figure 5. Comprehensive analysis of the influence of DOG1 on the expression of a particular gene in each phytohormone. The histogram shows expression alteration of the up- or down-regulated DEGs in dog1–2 in the indicated phytohormone pathway. Gene name in yellow or blue denotes that the gene plays a positive or negative role in homeostasis or signal transduction, respectively. *, p < 0.05. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. A, Anabolism; C, Catabolism; P, transPort; R, Receptor; D, transDucer.
Cimb 44 00423 g005
Cimb 44 00423 g006 550
Figure 6. DOG1 differentially regulates the endogenous signal intensity of different phytohormones. FKPM value shows the relative expression level of representative marker genes of the indicated phytohormone pathway in Col and dog1–2 seeds. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 6. DOG1 differentially regulates the endogenous signal intensity of different phytohormones. FKPM value shows the relative expression level of representative marker genes of the indicated phytohormone pathway in Col and dog1–2 seeds. DS, dry seeds; IS, imbibed seeds. The dashed line divides the phytohormones into two classes: “+” denotes the phytohormones that induce seed dormancy or inhibit seed germination; “−” denotes the phytohormones that release seed dormancy or promote seed germination. *, p < 0.05.
Cimb 44 00423 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Shan, S.; Xiang, Y. DELAY OF GERMINATION 1, the Master Regulator of Seed Dormancy, Integrates the Regulatory Network of Phytohormones at the Transcriptional Level to Control Seed Dormancy. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 6205-6217. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120423

AMA Style

Li Q, Chen X, Zhang S, Shan S, Xiang Y. DELAY OF GERMINATION 1, the Master Regulator of Seed Dormancy, Integrates the Regulatory Network of Phytohormones at the Transcriptional Level to Control Seed Dormancy. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(12):6205-6217. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qiujia, Xi Chen, Shengnan Zhang, Siyao Shan, and Yong Xiang. 2022. "DELAY OF GERMINATION 1, the Master Regulator of Seed Dormancy, Integrates the Regulatory Network of Phytohormones at the Transcriptional Level to Control Seed Dormancy" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 12: 6205-6217. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120423

APA Style

Li, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, S., Shan, S., & Xiang, Y. (2022). DELAY OF GERMINATION 1, the Master Regulator of Seed Dormancy, Integrates the Regulatory Network of Phytohormones at the Transcriptional Level to Control Seed Dormancy. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 44(12), 6205-6217. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120423

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop