Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Impact of Low-Level p53 Expression on Brain Astrocytomas Immunopositive for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Age-Associated Transcriptomic Changes Linked to Immunotherapy Response in Primary Melanoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Mutations in pncA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from Nepal in Association with Pyrazinamide Resistance

by
Dipti Shrestha
1,2,†,
Bhagwan Maharjan
3,4,†,
Jeewan Thapa
1,
Mwangala Lonah Akapelwa
1,
Precious Bwalya
1,
Joseph Yamweka Chizimu
1,
Chie Nakajima
1,5 and
Yasuhiko Suzuki
1,5,*
1
Division of Bioresources, Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control, Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
2
Department of Microbiology, Kathmandu College of Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
3
German Nepal Tuberculosis Project c/o Nepal Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Kalimati, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
4
National Tuberculosis Control Center, Thimi, Bhaktapur 44800, Nepal
5
International Collaboration Unit, Hokkaido University Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(9), 4132-4141; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090283
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 24 August 2022 / Published: 8 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Without the proper information on pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), PZA is inappropriately recommended for the treatment of both susceptible and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Nepal. This study aimed to collect information regarding PZA susceptibility in MTB isolates from Nepal by analyzing pncA and its upstream regulatory region (URR). A total of 211 MTB isolates were included in this study. Sequence analysis of pncA and its URR was performed to assess PZA resistance. First-line drug susceptibility testing, spoligotyping, and sequence analysis of rpoB, katG, the inhA regulatory region, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs were performed to assess their association with pncA mutation. Sequencing results reveal that 125 (59.2%) isolates harbored alterations in pncA and its URR. A total of 57 different mutation types (46 reported and 11 novel) were scattered throughout the whole length of the pncA gene. Eighty-seven isolates (41.2%) harbored mutations in pncA, causing PZA resistance in MTB. There was a more significant association of pncA alterations in MDR/pre-extensively drug-resistant (Pre-XDR) TB than in mono-resistant/pan-susceptible TB (p < 0.005). This first report on the increasing level of PZA resistance in DR-TB in Nepal highlights the importance of PZA susceptibility testing before DR-TB treatment.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), is one of the leading health problems and causes of death worldwide. In 2019, an estimated 10.0 million people suffered from TB, and 1.4 million people died of TB [1]. The increasing level of drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) each year challenges the effective management of TB. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated half a million new cases of rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB), with 78% of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). About 8.5% of MDR-TB cases were assumed to be extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) [1]. The estimated burden of annual DR-TB in Nepal is around 1500 cases, with around 350 to 450 MDR-TB cases [2].
Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line anti-TB drug with sterilizing activity against non-replicating persistent bacilli, which is used at the initial intensive phase of chemotherapy in combination with other first-line drugs: isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), and ethambutol (EMB). PZA shortens the treatment regimen for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB [1].
Despite the important role of PZA in TB treatment, PZA resistance in MTB has increased in both susceptible and MDR-TB cases. The estimated global burden of new PZA-resistant TB cases annually is 1.4 million cases, of which 270,000 cases occur in MDR-TB patients [3].
PZA is an indispensable drug included in all TB treatment regimens; therefore, the accurate understanding of PZA susceptibility and the monitoring of the spread of drug-resistant strains is important for the timely management of TB. However, phenotypic PZA susceptibility testing (PST) is difficult to perform, has a long turnaround time, and is not cost-effective for a developing country such as Nepal. Additionally, the requirement of an acidic medium has made phenotypic PST unreliable [4,5]. As a result, phenotypic PST is not routinely performed in most laboratories worldwide, including Nepal.
PZA is a pro-drug which enters the bacteria through passive diffusion and is converted into its active form, pyrazinoic acid (POA), by the non-essential enzyme pyrazinamidase (PZase), encoded by the pncA [6,7]. POA disrupts the bacterial membrane energetics and inhibits the membrane transport function in an acidic environment [8]. Mutation in pncA and its upstream regulatory region (URR), leading to a loss of PZase activity, is the major mechanism for PZA resistance in MTB and has been observed in 45 to 85% of PZA-resistant MTB isolates [9,10,11]. Thus, sequencing of pncA can rapidly and effectively judge PZA susceptibility, indicating its usefulness in the development of rapid molecular tools to detect PZA susceptibility in MTB.
Since both phenotypic and genotypic PST are currently unavailable, the prevalence of PZA resistance in MTB is unknown in Nepal. The lack of proper information on PZA susceptibility has resulted in the inappropriate recommendation of PZA for chemotherapy in both susceptible and MDR-TB. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate PZA susceptibility in MTB isolates from Nepal by analyzing pncA.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Study Sample

A total of 211 samples collected at the German Nepal Tuberculosis Project (GENETUP), Nepal, from August 2008 to February 2011 were included in this study. These samples were collected from 155 males and 56 females, with an age range from 12 to 82 years.
The sputum samples used in this investigation were decontaminated for 15 min in a 50 mL Falcon tube with 4 percent NALC-NaOH, neutralized for the same amount of time with phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and then centrifuged at 3000× g for 20 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and 1 mL of phosphate buffer was used to resuspend the sediment. Two slants of Löwenstein–Jensen (LJ) media were infected with resuspended samples (200 uL each) (BBLTM MycobactoselTM LJ Medium; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA).The samples that had been resuspended were utilized to make smears. The inoculated LJ slants were kept at 37 °C for 24 h while mycobacterial growth was observed. The TB Ag MPT64 Rapid test (SD Standard Diagnostics) was used to distinguish MTBC from non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in mycobacteria-positive cultures [11,12,13,14,15,16].

2.2. Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST)

DST for INH, RIF, EMB (FatolArzneimittel GmbH, Schiffweiler, Germany), and streptomycin (STR) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)was performed using the indirect proportion method on the LJ medium, with a critical concentration of 0.2, 40, 2, and 4 ug/mL, respectively [12]. Briefly, a 1.0 McFarland standard mycobacterial suspension was prepared from a freshly grown colony on LJ medium and serially diluted from 10−1 to 10−4, and then inoculated onto LJ slants with and without drugs and incubated at 37 °C for 28 to 42 days. Interpretation of results was performed according to the growth of bacilli on two slants. An isolate was determined to be resistant to a drug if it had ≥1% colony growth on a drug-containing medium when compared with a control isolate.

2.3. DNA Extraction

Hain DNA was processed for PCR using the Genotype MTBDRplusVer 2 (HainLifescience, Nehren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Colonies from successful cultures were kept suspended in 300 µL of DNA-free distilled water for 20 min at 95 °C. The heated sample was centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000× g after 15 min in an ultrasonic water bath. The DNAs of 211 isolates were utilized for PCR amplification [13,14,15].

2.4. Spoligotyping

The genotypes of the MTB isolates were identified using spoligotyping, as described earlier [13]. Briefly, a primer set was used to amplify the direct repeat region (Table 1) [14,15], and the resulting PCR products were hybridized to a set of 43 spacer-specific oligonucleotide probes on the membrane. Hybridization patterns were converted into binary and octal formats to determine the Spoligo-international types (SITs). The resulting SITs were compared with the patterns previously reported in the SpolDB4 database (http://www.pasteurguadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVIT_ONLINE/ (accessed on 10 March 2015)).

2.5. PCR Amplification and DNA Sequencing

Targeted gene fragments (rpoB, katG, inhA regulatory region, gyrA, rrs, and pncA with its URR) were amplified and sequenced using primers as previously described (Table 1) [14,15,16]. PCR was performed in a 20 μL reaction mixture consisting of 5X Green GoTaq® Reaction Buffer (Promega Corp, Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 M betaine, 0.25 mM MgCl2, dNTPs (0.25 mM each), primers (0.5 μM each), 1.25 U GoTaq® DNA Polymerase (Promega Corp), and 1 μL of template DNA (approximately 10 ng/μL). There was one cycle of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s annealing at 50 or 55 °C for 10 s, an extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Upon amplification, PCR products were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and sequenced using a 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using both forward and reverse primers. The obtained sequences were aligned with the corresponding sequences of the wild-type MTB H37Rv using Bio-Edit software (version 7.0.9).

2.6. SUSPECT-PZA

The SUSPECT-PZA (http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/suspect_pza/ (accessed on 5 October 2019)) is a web-server predictive tool to rapidly predict the PZA susceptibility using computational assessment of a single-nucleotide substitution. This web tool only uses the single-nucleotide substitution at the putative pncA region to predict the PZA susceptibility of MTB. The 3D structure of pncA as an output of the single-nucleotide substitution from this web tool could accurately predict mutations associated with PZA resistance [17].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the PZA resistance-associated mutations with the resistance-conferring mutations for other drugs, including STR, INH, RIF, and EMB. The odds ratio was calculated to detect the association between the frequency of pncA mutations and that of rpoB or katG or inhA mutations, gyrA or gyrB or rrs mutations, and pncA mutations among different drug-resistant profiles and MTB genotypes. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. MTB Genotypes and Drug Resistance Patterns

Using spoligotyping, 211 MTB isolates were identified as lineage 1 (n = 13), 2 (n = 113), 3 (n = 56), and 4 (n = 29), as shown in Table 2. The DST results show that a majority of isolates were MDR (108, 51.2%), followed by Pre-XDR isolates (57, 27%), pan-susceptible (41, 19.4%), and mono-resistant (5, 2.4%) as shown in Table 2. Eight different first-line drug susceptibility patterns among MTB isolates were observed (Supplementary Table S1). The drug susceptibility patterns for INH, RIF, EMB, and STR were available for 201 isolates, but only INH and RIF susceptibility results were available for 10 isolates (Supplementary Table S1).

3.2. pncA Mutation Profile

Sequencing results reveal that 125 (59.2%) isolates harbored alterations in pncA and/or its URR. A total of 57 different types of alterations (46 reported and 11 novel) scattered through the pncA were found. Three alterations in URR, single-nucleotide substitutions (A-11C and A-11G) in three isolates, and an insertion of C between -2 and -3 in one isolate were observed. Among 66 isolates with single-nucleotide substitutions, 38 types in 63 isolates were associated with phenotypic PZA resistance. Insertion and deletion of nucleotides in pncA causing frameshift associated with PZA resistance were observed in 11 isolates. No amplification of pncA was found in four isolates. The most frequent pncA mutation observed was associated with Leu182Ser in 12 isolates, followed by Leu4Ser in 6 isolates. Two types of silent mutations (Ser65Ser and Thr153Thr) were found in this study. Silent mutation Ser65Ser was significantly associated with the CAS genotype (48/56). Mutations associated with Thr100Pro and Val157Gly do not show any concomitant results between SUSPECT-PZA and the literature review (Supplementary Table S2).
Eighty-seven isolates (41.2%) had mutations in pncA and its URR (Table 3). The pncA mutations were found in 1 (2.1%) mono-resistant, 48 (44.4%) MDR, and 38 (66.6%) XDR-MTB isolates (Table 4). There was a more significant association of pncA mutations with MDR/Pre-XDR-TB than with pan-susceptible/mono-resistant MTB (p < 0.005). Among 87 isolates with pncA mutations, the majority were observed in lineage 2 (47, 54%), followed by lineage 4 (18, 20.6%), 3 (15, 17.2%), and 1 (7, 8%) (Table 5).
The distribution of pncA mutation frequency among different age-wise participants showed a wide range from 0 to 76.2%. The highest pncA mutation frequency (76.2%) was observed among the 16–20 age group of participants (Supplementary Table S3).

3.3. Association of pncA Mutations with rpoB, katG, inhA, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs Mutations

Among 108 MDR isolates, 45 (48.3%) had mutations in URR or the coding region of pncA, while 3 (20.0%) isolates without rpoB or katG or inhA mutation had mutations in pncA coding region. Mutations in coding region of pncA were 3.75 times more likely to occur in rpoB or katG or inhA mutants than in rpoB or katG or inhA non-mutants (p = 0.05) (Table 6). Similarly, a higher frequency of pncA mutations was found in 34 (77.3%) Pre-XDR isolates than in isolates without gyrA or gyrB or rrs mutants (Odds ratio = 7.65, p = 0.003) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt at molecular analysis of PZA susceptibility of MTB isolates in Nepal. Alterations in pncA and/or its URR were found in about 41.2% of MTB isolates. They scattered throughout the pncA with different mutations at codons, as previously described [18]. Other studies reported PZA resistance percentages among MTB isolates as 24.4% in Thailand [8], 32.3%, 43.1%, or 61.2% in China [19,20,21], 45% in Bangladesh [19], 52.3% in India [20], and 61.2% in Japan [21]. Our study shows values within the range of other countries, which suggests that PZA resistance could be predicted through pncA sequencing.
Three Pre-XDR isolates with single-nucleotide substitutions (A-C and A-G) at the URR-11 position and one isolate with an insertion of C between -2 and -3 were found in this study. Since the nucleotide position at URR-11 is a part of the Shine–Dalgarno sequence, [22] the substitution from A to C or G may cause low affinity of mRNA to the 3′ end of 16 ribosomal RNAs, and hence, it is associated with reduced expression of PncA. Therefore, the two single-nucleotide substitutions at URR A-11C and A-11G were associated with PZA resistance.
In this study, the most frequent mutation, T545C (Leu182Ser), was found in 12 (5.6%) isolates, followed by T11C (Leu4Ser) in 6 (2.8%) isolates. It was reported to cause PZA resistance [11,23] and showed identical similar mutations in rpoB, katG, gyrA, or rrs, suggesting the spread of those mutant strains in an outbreak. The 12-loci MIRU-VNTR patterns of three Beijing strains with T545C (Leu182Ser) were confirmed to be similar, which suggests the involvement of these mutants in an outbreak.
The mutation C169G (His57Asp) was found in two isolates. This mutation is a unique mutation specific to M. bovis strains, including BCG substrains (Pasteur, Copenhagen, Glaxo, Tokyo, Tice, and Phipps), which are naturally resistant to PZA [23]. However, the two isolates in this study were confirmed to be MTB using spoligotyping. PZA-resistant MTB isolates harboring the same mutation were reported earlier [6,24,25]. The MTB strain harboring a change in His57 to Asp57 might arise with a negative PZase activity and could eventually spread widely around the world.
Forty-one types of mutations (excluding silent mutation) that are associated with PZA resistance were found in this study. Mutations in pncA were dispersed throughout the gene, and some degree of clustering of mutations was found in three regions (amino acid 3–17, 61–85, and 127–154) of the PncA among PZA-resistant isolates, as has been widely reported [7,8,15,20,21,26,27,28]. The diverse and scattered nature of pncA mutations at different locations, as described by previous studies, poses a challenge for developing a rapid molecular assay for the detection of PZA susceptibility. Isolates harboring mutations at active site residues or metal ion binding site residues causes the loss of enzymatic activity or the chelation of ion atoms [23,24,29], leading to the emergence of PZA resistance. This information could be used to predict PZA resistance using molecular PST. Mutations Ser59Phe, Val139Ala, and Leu116Pro have been previously reported in PZA-susceptible and resistant strains. This discrepant result might be due to the inaccuracy of the phenotypic PZA susceptibility found using the MGIT 960 method [4,5] or due to the presence of hetero-resistance or a mixed bacterial population. These mutations were compared with the PZA susceptibility using SUSPECT-PZA and interpreted. Ser59Phe, Val139Ala, and Leu116Pro were interpreted as resistant, resistant, and susceptible, respectively.
No amplification of pncA was observed in one pan-susceptible and three Pre-XDR MTB isolates, as in previous reports [21,25]. The possible reason for no amplification of pncA might be changes at the primer binding site(s) or an entire pncA deletion. The deletion of an entire pncA causes negative PZase and leads to PZA resistance. These four pncA mutants show good PCR and sequencing results for rpoB, katG, inhA, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs genes. So, we could deny the possibility of technical failure of pncA PCR. However, to confirm the whole length of pncA deletion in MTB, PCR using primers targeting distinct sites should be performed.
In total, 87 (41.2%) isolates with pncA mutations were associated with PZA resistance. PncA is the non-essential enzyme, and the mutations in pncA or the deletion of an entire pncA have no fitness cost in bacteria [17,29]. Since PZA is included in the treatment of non-DR and DR-TB without the phenotypic DST in Nepal, this practice causes the selective pressure of PZA during MTB infection. Our study shows high variation in mutation frequency at the pncA nucleotide in MTB. This phenomenon has been reported by in vivo studies, which have shown that selective pressure occurs in the presence of PZA, causing maximal variation in the average mutation frequency at the pncA nucleotide [29].
We did not find pncA mutations in pan-susceptible and mono-resistant isolates in our study, except for one isolate with negative pncA PCR results. Most of the pncA mutations associated with PZA resistance were found among MDR-TB (44.4%) and Pre-XDR -TB (66.6%) isolates. The statistical analysis showed that pncA alterations were more likely to occur among MDR and Pre-XDR-TB isolates than pan-susceptible/mono-resistant TB isolates. Other studies have reported a high prevalence of PZA resistance among MDR and Pre-XDR/XDR-TB isolates [18,26]. An explanation for this could be that bacterial exposure to antibiotics (RIF, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides) can generate reactive oxygen species that induce the SOS system, which increases mutation frequency and facilitates the development of additional drug resistance [29]. The increasing rate of PZA resistance among DR-TB highlights the need for the prudent use of PZA for drug-resistant TB. In addition, pncA mutation was 3.75 and 7.65 times more likely to occur in rpoB or katG or inhA mutants and gyrA or gyrB or rrs mutants, respectively. Our results suggest that the detection of pncA mutations could be useful in the prediction of the prevalence of PZA resistance among MDR and Pre-XDR-TB isolates in Nepal. Furthermore, this information could indicate the proportions of PZA resistance among the different categories of MTB isolates from Nepal.
A wide range of pncA mutation frequencies were observed among different age groups. Even though there seems to be a wide range of pncA mutation frequency among different age groups, the distribution of participants according to age (5-year difference) was not uniform, resulting in inconsistent frequency distributions. The frequency of PZA resistance among lineage 2 MTB isolates was slightly higher than in other lineage isolates. Due to uneven sample size, PZA susceptibility did not correlate with the genotypic lineage of MTB, as previously reported [4]. The silent mutation Ser65Ser was linked to the PZA-susceptible MTB isolates of lineage, in agreement with the other literature [30].
A limitation of our study is the lack of phenotypic PZA susceptibility testing data for the isolates. Nonetheless, most of the alterations in pncA were correlated with in vitro/in vivo susceptibility studies and phenotypic susceptibility in the literature as well as in the SUSPECT-PZA web tool, which enabled us to estimate the potential prevalence of PZA resistance [17,29,31]. Even though SUSPECT-PZA can only be used for single-nucleotide polymorphisms at putative pncA, it has a positive predictive value of 95.4%; hence, it is a reliable and convenient alternative to MGIT 960, the existing gold-standard method [16]. Moreover, resistance to PZA has also been associated with mutations in other genes, including rpsA, panD, and others [32,33]. Therefore, it is important to also analyze these genes when considering developing a rapid diagnostic tool for the accurate prediction of PZA resistance in MTB.
In conclusion, the rate of pncA mutation was high in MDR-TB/Pre-XDR-TB in our study, and most of the pncA mutations resulted in PZA resistance in MTB. This increased number of PZA resistance cases among DR-TB in Nepal is alarming and necessitates routine testing for PZA susceptibility. The increasing rate of PZA resistance in drug-resistant TB has reduced the value of PZA for DR-TB treatment so much that PZA is now categorized in Group C according to the updated WHO consolidated treatment guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis [1]. Nevertheless, PZA is still used for both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB. This emphasizes the importance of PZA in TB treatment following PZA susceptibility testing. Considering the high cost and long turnaround time of phenotypic DST in developing countries, including Nepal, we recommend the more feasible method of molecular pncA sequencing for the detection of PZA susceptibility. Our work emphasizes the value of PZA susceptibility testing before its use in the treatment of DR-TB globally, Nepal included. Based on analysis of the results of our investigations using Nepali samples and SUSPECT-PZA, it was determined that MTB isolates had a greater level of PZA resistance, thus highlighting the importance of performing phenotypic and molecular PZA susceptibility testing prior to administering PZA for DR-TB treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb44090283/s1. Table S1: Distribution of first-line drug-susceptibility patterns in MTB lineages; Table S2: Mutations found in the pncA gene and its upstream regulatory region from M. tuberculosis isolates from Nepal [34]; and Table S3: Distribution of pncA mutation frequency among different age-wise participants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., C.N. and D.S.; methodology, D.S.; software, D.S.; validation, Y.S., C.N. and B.M.; formal analysis, D.S. and Y.S.; investigation, D.S.; resources, B.M.; data curation, Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S.; writing—review and editing, D.S., B.M., M.L.A. and J.T.; visualization, D.S., P.B. and J.Y.C.; supervision, Y.S., C.N. and B.M.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan, and the Joint Research Program of the Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University to Y.S., and in part by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under grant numbers JP21wm0125008, JP21jm0510001, and JP21jk0210005 to Y.S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study proposal with register no. 136/2013 was approved by the Ethical Review Board at Nepal Health Research Council on 29 November 2013.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Y.S., upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yukari Fukushima at Hokkaido University International Institute for Zoonosis Control for her technical support. We would also like to thank Bhabana Shrestha for administrative support and Bijendra Bhakta Raya, Meera Shrestha, Shova Maharjan, and Priya Khadka for technical support at GENETUP lab. Additionally, we would like to thank Kunjan Amatya for his support for statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/336069/9789240013131-eng.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  2. National Tuberculosis Center, Nepal. National Tuberculosis Program Nepal Annual Report 2074/75. 2018. Available online: https://nepalntp.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/NTP-Annual-Report-2074-75-Up.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2020).
  3. Whitfield, M.G.; Soeters, H.M.; Warren, R.M.; York, T.; Sampson, S.L.; Streicher, E.M.; van Helden, P.D.; van Rie, A. A global perspective on pyrazinamide resistance: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chedore, P.; Bertucci, L.; Wolfe, J.; Sharma, M.; Jamieson, F. Potential for erroneous results indicating resistance when using the Bactec MGIT 960 system for testing susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 300–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Simons, S.O.; van Ingen, J.; van der Laan, T.; Mulder, A.; Dekhuijzen, P.N.R.; Boeree, M.J.; van Soolingen, D. Validation of pncA gene sequencing in combination with the Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube method to test susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to pyrazinamide. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sreevatsan, S.; Pan, X.I.; Zhang, Y.; Kreiswirth, B.N.; Musser, J.M. Mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in pncA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rodrigues, V.D.F.S.; Telles, M.A.; Ribeiro, M.O.; Cafrune, P.I.; Rossetti, M.L.R.; Zaha, A. Characterization of pncA mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 444–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Mitchison, D. The curious characteristics of pyrazinamide: A review. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003, 7, 6–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jonmalung, J.; Prammananan, T.; Leechawengwongs, M.; Chaiprasert, A. Surveillance of pyrazinamide susceptibility among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramirez-Busby, S.M.; Valafar, F. Systematic review of mutations in pyrazinamidase associated with pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5267–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hameed, H.A.; Tan, Y.; Islam, M.; Lu, Z.; Chhotaray, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Fang, C.; Tan, S.; Yew, W.W.; et al. Detection of novel gene mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Southern China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. World Health Organization. Guidelines for surveillance of drug resistance in tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung. Dis. 1998, 2, 72–89. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamerbeek, J.; Schouls, L.; Kolk, A.; van Agterveld, M.; van Soolingen, D.; Kuijper, S.; Bunschoten, A.; Molhuizen, H.; Shaw, R.; Goyal, M.; et al. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Poudel, A.; Nakajima, C.; Fukushima, Y.; Suzuki, H.; Pandey, B.D.; Maharjan, B.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolated in Nepal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2831–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bwalya, P.; Yamaguchi, T.; Mulundu, G.; Nakajima, C.; Mbulo, G.; Solo, E.S.; Fukushima, Y.; Kasakwa, K.; Suzuki, Y. Genotypic characterization of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from Lusaka, Zambia. Tuberculosis 2018, 109, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shrestha, D.; Maharjan, B.; Oo, N.A.T.; Isoda, N.; Nakajima, C.; Suzuki, Y. Molecular analysis of streptomycin-resistance associating genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Nepal. Tuberculosis 2020, 125, 101985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karmakar, M.; Rodrigues, C.H.M.; Horan, K.; Denholm, J.T.; Ascher, D.B. Structure guided prediction of pyrazinamide resistance mutations in pncA. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lemaitre, N.; Sougakoff, W.; Truffot-Pernot, C.; Jarlier, V. Characterization of new mutations in pyrazinamide-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and identification of conserved regions important for the catalytic activity of the pyrazinamidase PncA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 1761–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rahman, A.; Ferdous, S.S.; Ahmed, S.; Rahman, S.M.M.; Uddin, M.K.M.; Pholwat, S.; Gratz, J.; Houpt, E.; Banu, S. Pyrazinamide susceptibility and pncA mutation profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Bangladesh. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00511-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shenai, S.; Rodrigues, C.; Sadani, M.; Sukhadia, N.; Mehta, A. Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing. Indian J. Tuberc. 2009, 56, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Aono, A.; Chikamatsu, K.; Yamada, H.; Kato, T.; Mitarai, S. Association between pncA gene mutations, pyrazinamidase activity, and pyrazinamide susceptibility testing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4928–4930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shine, J.; Dalgarno, L. Terminal-sequence analysis of bacterial ribosomal RNA. Correlation between the 3′-terminal-polypyrimidine sequence of 16-S RNA and translational specificity of the ribosome. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975, 57, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sheen, P.; Lozano, K.; Gilman, R.H.; Valencia, H.J.; Loli, S.; Fuentes, P.; Grandjean, L.; Zimic, M. pncA gene expression and prediction factors on pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2013, 93, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ando, H.; Mitarai, S.; Kondo, Y.; Suetake, T.; Sekiguchi, J.-I.; Kato, S.; Mori, T.; Kirikae, T. Pyrazinamide resistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Japan. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Suzuki, Y.; Suzuki, A.; Tamaru, A.; Katsukawa, C.; Oda, H. Rapid detection of pyrazinamide-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a PCR-based in vitro system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xia, Q.; Zhao, L.-L.; Li, F.; Fan, Y.-M.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Wu, B.-B.; Liu, Z.-W.; Pan, A.-Z.; Zhu, M. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of pyrazinamide resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Zhejiang, China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1690–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Zheng, H.; Shen, J.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y. Prevalence and molecular characterization of pyrazinamide resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Southern China. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yadon, A.N.; Maharaj, K.; Adamson, J.H.; Lai, Y.-P.; Sacchettini, J.C.; Ioerger, T.R.; Rubin, E.J.; Pym, A.S. A comprehensive characterization of PncA polymorphisms that confer resistance to pyrazinamide. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hirano, K.; Takahashi, M.; Kazumi, Y.; Fukasawa, Y.; Abe, C. Mutation in pncA is a major mechanism of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuber. Lung Dis. 1997, 78, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Denkin, S.; Volokhov, D.; Chizhikov, V.; Zhang, Y. Microarray-based pncA genotyping of pyrazinamide-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Microbiol. 2005, 54, 1127–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Allana, S.; Shashkina, E.; Mathema, B.; Bablishvili, N.; Tukvadze, N.; Shah, N.S.; Kempker, R.R.; Blumberg, H.M.; Moodley, P.; Mlisana, K.; et al. pncA gene mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance in drug-resistant tuberculosis, South Africa and georgia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miotto, P.; Cabibbe, A.M.; Feuerriegel, S.; Casali, N.; Drobniewski, F.; Rodionova, Y.; Bakonyte, D.; Stakenas, P.; Pimkina, E.; Augustynowicz-Kopeć, E.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis pyrazinamide resistance determinants: A multicenter study. mBio 2014, 5, e01819-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sheen, P.; Requena, D.; Gushiken, E.; Gilman, R.H.; Antiparra, R.; Lucero, B.; Lizárraga, P.; Cieza, B.; Roncal, E.; Grandjean, L.; et al. A multiple genome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals specific novel genes and mutations associated with pyrazinamide resistance. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, T.; Cai, X.; Kuang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, F.; Zhang, K.; Tan, S.; et al. Role of pncA and rpsA gene sequencing in detection of pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Southern China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing of targeted genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Table 1. Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing of targeted genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
LocusPrimersNucleotide Sequence (5′-3′)Product Size (bp)
rpoBON-513 (Forward)
ON-914 (Reverse)
CAGGACGTGGAGGCGATCAC
GAGCCGATCAGACCGATGTTGG
278 bp
katGON-114 (Forward)
ON-103R (Reverse)
ATGGCCATGAACGACGTCGAAAC
CGCAGCGAGAGGTCAGTGGCCAG
392 bp
inhAON-097 (Forward)
ON-098 (Reverse)
TCACACCGACAAACGTCACGAGC
AGCCAGCCGCTGTGCGATCGCCA
231 bp
gyrAON-747 (Forward)
ON-748 (Reverse)
AGCGCAGCTACATCGACTATGCG
CTTCGGTGTACCTCATCGCCGCC
321 bp
rrsON-1066 (Forward)
ON-1067 (Reverse)
CGGATCGGGGTCTGCAACTCGAC
CAAGAACCCCTCACGGCCTACG
299 bp
pncAON-1464 (Forward)
ON-1465 (Reverse)
GCACCAAGGCCGCGATGACAC
CGCGCGTCACCGGTGAACAACC
561 bp
direct repeat regionDRa (Forward)
DR-R (Reverse)
GGTTTTGGGTCTGACGAC
CCGAGAGGGGACGGAAAC
Varios
Table 2. Distribution of MTB isolates according to genotypes and drug resistance patterns.
Table 2. Distribution of MTB isolates according to genotypes and drug resistance patterns.
Types of MutationsNo. of Mutation TypesNo. of Isolates
Nucleotide substitution45109
URR23
Amino acid substitution3966
Termination22
Silent mutation238
Nucleotide deletion44
Nucleotide insertion66
URR11
Putative region55
Nucleotide substitution + deletion12
No amplification14
Total54125
Table 3. Distribution of polymorphisms of pncA among 211 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Nepal.
Table 3. Distribution of polymorphisms of pncA among 211 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Nepal.
LineagesPan-SusceptibleMono-ResistantMDRPre-XDRTotal
1308213
21236236113
3192231256
47015729
Total41510857211
Table 4. Mutation profile among different drug resistances of MTB isolates.
Table 4. Mutation profile among different drug resistances of MTB isolates.
GenotypePan-Susceptible/
Mono-Resistant
MDRPre-XDRTotal
Alteration in pncA and its URR1483887
WT456019124
Total4610857211
Table 5. Mutation profile among MTB lineages.
Table 5. Mutation profile among MTB lineages.
Mutation PatternsLineagesTotal
1234
Mutations in pncA and its URR747151887
WT6664111124
Total131135629211
Table 6. Comparison of pncA mutation frequencies with rpoB, katG, and inhA genes in 108 MDR-TB isolates and gyrA, gyrB, and rrs genes in 57 Pre-XDR-TB isolates.
Table 6. Comparison of pncA mutation frequencies with rpoB, katG, and inhA genes in 108 MDR-TB isolates and gyrA, gyrB, and rrs genes in 57 Pre-XDR-TB isolates.
Mutation PatternsNo. of IsolatesOdds Ratio, 95% CIp-Value
With pncA MutationsWithout pncA Mutations
rpoB or katG or inhA mutation45483.75 (0.9 to 14.1)0.05
None in above312
gyrA or gyrB or rrs mutation34107.65 (1.9 to 30.18)0.003
None in above49
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shrestha, D.; Maharjan, B.; Thapa, J.; Akapelwa, M.L.; Bwalya, P.; Chizimu, J.Y.; Nakajima, C.; Suzuki, Y. Detection of Mutations in pncA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from Nepal in Association with Pyrazinamide Resistance. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 4132-4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090283

AMA Style

Shrestha D, Maharjan B, Thapa J, Akapelwa ML, Bwalya P, Chizimu JY, Nakajima C, Suzuki Y. Detection of Mutations in pncA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from Nepal in Association with Pyrazinamide Resistance. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(9):4132-4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shrestha, Dipti, Bhagwan Maharjan, Jeewan Thapa, Mwangala Lonah Akapelwa, Precious Bwalya, Joseph Yamweka Chizimu, Chie Nakajima, and Yasuhiko Suzuki. 2022. "Detection of Mutations in pncA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from Nepal in Association with Pyrazinamide Resistance" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 9: 4132-4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090283

APA Style

Shrestha, D., Maharjan, B., Thapa, J., Akapelwa, M. L., Bwalya, P., Chizimu, J. Y., Nakajima, C., & Suzuki, Y. (2022). Detection of Mutations in pncA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates from Nepal in Association with Pyrazinamide Resistance. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 44(9), 4132-4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090283

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop