Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Multifaceted Role of the miR-17-92 Cluster in Colorectal Cancer: From Mechanisms to Biomarker Potential
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Bioactive Compound Effects from Primary Legume Protein Sources in Human and Animal Health
Previous Article in Journal
A Potential Role of CD82/KAI1 during Uterine Decidualization in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protective Potential of a Botanical-Based Supplement Ingredient against the Impact of Environmental Pollution on Cutaneous and Cardiopulmonary Systems: Preclinical Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microbial-Based Bioactive Compounds to Alleviate Inflammation in Obesity

by
Oladayo Emmanuel Apalowo
1,
Grace Adeola Adegoye
2,* and
Tolulope Mobolaji Obuotor
3
1
Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA
2
Department of Nutrition and Health Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
3
Department of Microbiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta 110001, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(3), 1810-1831; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46030119
Submission received: 7 February 2024 / Revised: 20 February 2024 / Accepted: 23 February 2024 / Published: 28 February 2024

Abstract

:
The increased prevalence of obesity with several other metabolic disorders, including diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, has reached global pandemic proportions. Lifestyle changes may result in a persistent positive energy balance, hastening the onset of these age-related disorders and consequently leading to a diminished lifespan. Although suggestions have been raised on the possible link between obesity and the gut microbiota, progress has been hampered due to the extensive diversity and complexities of the gut microbiota. Being recognized as a potential biomarker owing to its pivotal role in metabolic activities, the dysregulation of the gut microbiota can give rise to a persistent low-grade inflammatory state associated with chronic diseases during aging. This chronic inflammatory state, also known as inflammaging, induced by the chronic activation of the innate immune system via the macrophage, is controlled by the gut microbiota, which links nutrition, metabolism, and the innate immune response. Here, we present the functional roles of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics as bioactive compounds by underscoring their putative contributions to (1) the reduction in gut hyperpermeability due to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) inactivation, (2) increased intestinal barrier function as a consequence of the upregulation of tight junction proteins, and (3) inhibition of proinflammatory pathways, overall leading to the alleviation of chronic inflammation in the management of obesity.

1. Introduction

The issue of obesity is multifaceted and extremely complex, as it increases the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular diseases, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and related diseases, and has now emerged as a serious worldwide health concern [1,2]. According to the World Obesity Atlas, in America, obesity prevalence among children and adolescents is likely to rise from 2020 to 2035, notably among boys, where the incidence is forecast to rise from 20% to 33%. Both men and women are likely to experience an increase in the prevalence of obesity over the same 15-year period, with almost half of all adults (47% to 49%) predicted to be affected by the disease by 2035 [3]. Globally, more than 4 billion people are projected to be affected by 2035 (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), reflecting over 50% of the world’s population compared to 2.6 billion in 2020, with the prevalence of obesity anticipated to rise from 14% to 24% in the population during the same period. Environmental variables, genetics, and energy imbalance—a state in which energy intake exceeds energy expenditure—can all have an impact on body weight [1]. The aging process is correlated with an augmentation in abdominal white adipose tissue (WAT) and the deposition of fat in skeletal muscle, significantly impacting insulin sensitivity [4,5]. Alterations in the lifestyle of the elderly, particularly as they transition into retirement, may induce a chronic positive energy balance, resulting in excess fat tissue accumulation. This condition accelerates the onset of age-related diseases [6]. It is increasingly evident that an obese state is associated with a diminished lifespan and health consequences akin to those observed in advanced aging [7]. Additionally, several studies have linked chronic inflammation to obesity and obesity-associated diseases [8,9,10].
The gut microbiota, consisting of approximately 100 trillion bacteria, colonizes the human intestine and plays a pivotal role in metabolic processes by producing many enzymes essential for extracting energy from the host’s diet and facilitating energy deposition in fat stores [11,12,13]. This functionality is contingent upon maintaining a delicate equilibrium between potentially pathogenic bacteria and many nonpathogenic microorganisms that contribute to overall health [14]. The commensal bacteria inhabiting the gut offer the advantages of functioning as an auxiliary organ, actively participating in cellulose digestion, and enhancing the development and maturation of both the intestinal and systemic immune systems [15]. The host’s immune system and metabolic pathways can be influenced by the gut microbiota in response to food preferences and energy requirements because of its flexibility and adaptability [16]. This dynamic relationship is essential to immunity and metabolism and has a major influence on optimal health. Age-related alterations may lead to systemic inflammaging, which might affect the makeup of the gut microbiota due to its continuous contact with organs and tissues, which, in turn, alters intestinal immune responses [17,18]. Research indicates variations in the composition of intestinal flora between lean and overweight rodents and humans [19,20,21], while various datasets from diverse sources have substantiated a causative association between gut microbiota and obesity [12,19,22,23].
Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and muramyl dipeptide, have been shown to have a significant impact on metabolic function [24]. Nonetheless, there is a significant study gap on the functional involvement of these components in the alleviation of chronic inflammation in the context of obesity management. Hence, this review explores the functional roles of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, with a focus on their overall effects on gut microbiota, functioning as bioactive compounds in the alleviation of chronic inflammation in obesity and related diseases.

2. Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Obesity

2.1. The Gut Microbiota

The human gut microbiota, a complex ecosystem consisting of up to 100 trillion microorganisms, engages in a largely symbiotic relationship with its host [25]. This diverse microbial community, collectively termed the microbiome, harbors at least 150 times more genes than the human genome itself [25]. Analyses based on 16S rRNA-targeted sequencing reveal that fecal samples from healthy individuals predominantly harbor two major bacterial phyla, namely the Gram-negative Bacteroidetes consisting of the genera Bacteroides, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Alistipes and the Gram-positive Firmicutes made up of the Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale, and Eubacterium hallii species in addition to numerous low-abundance species [26,27].
Notably, the gut microbiota exhibit remarkable microbial and genetic diversity, with specific bacterial species associated with distinct gastrointestinal regions. Bacterial density steadily increases from the proximal to the distal portions of the gastrointestinal tract [27]. The stomach harbors the lowest abundance, with approximately 101 microbial cells per gram of content. This number rises to 103 in the duodenum, 104 in the jejunum, and 107 in the ileum and culminates at 1012 cells per gram in the colon [28]. Consequently, the large intestine houses over 70% of the body’s microorganisms, which have a symbiotic relationship with the host and exert a substantial influence on the overall well-being of the host [29].
Healthy aging comprises limiting age-related health problems in older people by avoiding or delaying chronic diseases, even though the chance of various ailments grows with age due to the loss of tissue structure and physiological function [30,31]. This underscores the critical role that these variables play in age-related morbidity [30]. Aging and health status affect biological parameters, with the human microbiota being a dynamic indication that is modified by factors such as nutrition, lifestyle, and immunological response [32]. The varying composition of the gut microbiota in older adults reflects their current and previous health situations [30].
The gut microbiota is essential for development and adult homeostasis, and alterations have been associated with inflammatory and metabolic problems in adults, including inflammatory bowel disease and obesity [20,33,34,35]. While the gut microbiota remains stable and individual-specific in healthy adults, there is a significant fluctuation in older individuals compared to younger people [36,37]. Immunosenescence, which is characterized by persistent NF-kB-mediated inflammation and the loss of naïve CD41 T cells, is one facet of the aging process [38]. Intestinal homeostasis is significantly influenced by gut microbiota, and immunosenescence is linked to the persistent activation of the innate and adaptive immune systems [39,40].
Commensal bacteria control an innate immune response and accelerate the host’s response to enteric infections [41] by increasing baseline pro-inflammatory IL-1β production, which exerts a protective effect in assisting gut pathogen clearance and neutrophil recruitment by stimulating the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules [42]. Additionally, natural Killer (NK) T cells are regulated by commensal bacteria that can express both T cell receptors and NK cell receptors, which help to maintain homeostasis, and promote the release of inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-21, and inhibit excessive inflammatory response [43,44].
Correlations between certain microbiota elements and an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as serum TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and the C-reactive protein (CRP), have thus demonstrated this relationship in the elderly [35]. Additionally, mitogens and LPSs cause macrophages to secrete more IL-6 and IL-8, which alters macrophage activity [30]. Age-related dysregulation brought on by gut microbiota dysbiosis may weaken the intestinal barrier and cause the release of microbial products that raise pro-inflammatory factors like TNF-α, interferons, IL-6, and IL-1 [45]. This, in turn, may contribute to a chronic low-grade inflammatory state linked to chronic diseases [18,46,47,48].

2.2. Obesity and Related Diseases

Obesity, defined as an abnormal or excessive accumulation of fat, has reached global pandemic proportions [49]. The current clinical practice for identifying overweight and obese individuals relies primarily on body mass index (BMI) [50]. Accordingly, based on established BMI classifications, values between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2 classify individuals as overweight, while a value exceeding 30 kg/m2 indicates obesity [51]. Obesity primarily arises from an energy imbalance, where caloric intake exceeds expenditure, which leads to the storage of excess energy, such as fat and glycogen, in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and organs [52,53]. However, adipose tissue itself exhibits functional heterogeneity, comprising distinct depots with specialized roles [54].
Adipose tissue is classified into WAT and brown adipose tissue (BAT), distinguished by variations in morphology, anatomical position, developmental patterns, and metabolic functions [55]. WAT serves as a key endocrine organ, storing energy in the form of triglycerides and secretes adipokines, while BAT, characterized by multilocular adipocytes and UCP-1 expression, actively contributes to energy expenditure through non-shivering thermogenesis, playing a role in regulating body temperature and providing protection against obesity [56]. WAT is categorized into two primary depots, visceral WAT (VAT) and SAT, both of which are extensively examined for their correlation with the development of related diseases [57]. Despite accounting for just 1% to 2% of total fat, BAT is indispensable for maintaining homeostasis and has a beneficial impact on blood glucose levels [58]. Obese and diabetic individuals have smaller BATs and less activity than those with a normal BMI [59].
Adipose tissue in individuals exhibiting overweight or obesity is intricately associated with a chronic, low-grade inflammatory state, characterized by the heightened infiltration of macrophages of the M1 or ‘classically activated’ phenotype from the circulation into adipose tissue, leading to adipose tissue inflammation through the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8), while the balance of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IL-19) from adipocytes tends to decrease with weight gain, favoring the heightened production of pro-inflammatory adipokines [60,61,62]. Adipose tissue not only releases adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, visfatin, resistin) and constituents of the extracellular matrix to modulate interconnected pathways but also undergoes hyperplasia and hypertrophy due to excess fat accumulation, altering the secretome, releasing metabolites, and subsequently influencing the surrounding microenvironment [63,64].
An elevated level of proinflammatory adipokine leptin, in conjunction with an increase in the levels of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), resistin, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in adiponectin, contribute to the metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, heightened cardiovascular disease risk, and increased susceptibility to cancer [8,9,10]. Increased serum levels of free fatty acids (FFAs) in obese individuals promote vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and vimentin expression through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) upregulation, contributing to tumor growth, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis. At the same time, the concomitant overexpression of TNF-α and leptin inhibits insulin receptor activation, inducing resistance in the muscle, liver, islet α-cells, and adipose tissue, leading to T2DM [65,66].

2.3. Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation: Linking Gut Microbiota and Obesity

Obesity is characterized by changes in the abundant ratios of the dominating phyla. While some research implies that obese individuals have a higher Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio, the consistency of this observation and its reliability as a biomarker remains uncertain [67,68,69]. Furthermore, obesity-linked low-grade inflammatory states may be aggravated by microbiota-associated inflammatory processes [69]. Seven aging pillars that form an interconnected network that converge at inflammation have been identified [70], with dysfunction in one pillar leading to inflammation and subsequently impacting other pillars [18]; this event is now referred to as inflammaging, defined as a “chronic, sterile (occurring in the absence of infection and primarily driven by endogenous signals), low-grade inflammation that occurs during aging” [18]. This chronic inflammatory state, characterized by the innate immune system via macrophage activation and regulated by the gut microbiota, results in the production of inflammatory products [18,71].
Previous research demonstrated that a 4-week high-fat (HF) diet resulted in a two-to-threefold increase in plasma LPS levels, which is comparable to the effects observed during the subcutaneous infusion of LPSs in mice, leading to insulin resistance and obesity [72]. LPSs, a powerful activator of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), are found in Gram-negative bacteria [73]. Hence, changes in gut microbiota composition, known as intestinal dysbiosis, may contribute to a persistent low-grade inflammatory response in obesity. Since LPSs contain lipid A, they can translocate across the intestinal mucosa via tight junctions or with chylomicron facilitation. Given that lipoproteins play a crucial role in the absorption and transport of dietary triglycerides, this mechanism may serve as an initiating factor for inflammation, potentially contributing to the commonly observed insulin resistance in obesity [72,74].
As a member of the TLR family, TLR4 is found in many different types of cells, including macrophages. It recognizes pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and initiates a complicated cell signaling pathway that, when bound by LPSs, activates inflammatory response, and triggers the release of cytokines provided by the KEGG pathway in Figure 1 [13,75,76]. Additionally, TLR4 has been linked to the inflammatory response associated with increased intestinal permeability in circumstances such as diet-induced obesity (DIO), which leads to insulin resistance and metabolic imbalance [13]. Furthermore, elevated LPS levels are associated with increased intestinal permeability, driven by the reduced expression of vital tight junction proteins like zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), claudin, and occludin, leading to a compromised epithelial barrier that facilitates the entry of bacterial components from the intestinal lumen into the circulation, potentially initiating inflammation and insulin resistance in humans and animals [77,78].

2.4. Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)

The fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates in the cecum and colon by the gut microbiota produces SCFAs, such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, demonstrating metabolic cooperation among the bacterial community, where the collective role of the entire community is emphasized, and absorbed SCFAs in the intestine occur via passive diffusion via monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) [79]. SCFA, particularly butyrate, is a primary source of energy for colonic epithelial cells, promoting cell proliferation and differentiation [80,81], whereas acetate and propionate play separate roles in cholesterol/fatty acid precursor and gluconeogenesis, respectively [82]. While other bacterial by-products, such as conjugated linoleic acids and bile acids, and gases, including methane and hydrogen sulfide, have metabolic regulatory activities, they play limited roles in mammalian physiology in comparison to SCFA’s dominant effect [83,84].
Butyrate and acetate are essential for maintaining epithelial barrier function by influencing tight-junction protein expression (zonulin and occludin), increasing mucus production, and reducing intestinal permeability, with acetate having the most pronounced effects on epithelial protection and both SCFAs contributing to increased fatty acid oxidation and energy expenditure, potentially leading to weight loss, insulin sensitivity, and improved metabolic health [85,86]. SCFAs block NF-kB activation in host immune cells via binding to the G-protein-coupled receptors 43 and 41 (GPR43 and GPR41), with GPR43 playing an important role in regulating the anti-inflammatory responses elicited by acetate [87,88].

3. Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics in the Management of Obesity and Related Diseases

3.1. Probiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when ingested in appropriate amounts, confer a health benefit [89]. Their decline has been linked to an elevated risk of immune–metabolic conditions such as obesity, T2DM, and metabolic syndrome [89,90,91]. The two most frequent genera are Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [92]. Despite the absence of approval from medical regulatory authorities like the European Food Safety Authority and the US Food and Drug Administration for any probiotic formulation as a therapeutic agent [93,94,95], in compliance with the guidelines established by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) for healthful functional foods, South Korea uses 19 probiotic species as functional ingredients. Of these, 4 species are Bifidobacteria, and 12 are members of the Lactobacilli genus [96]. Certain microbial species like Akkermansia muciniphila, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Anaerobutyricum hallii and Anaerobutyricum soenhgenii, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides coprocola, Parabacteroides distasonis, Parabacteroides goldsteinii, Hafnia alvei, Odoribacter laneus, and Christensenella minuta have been identified as potential next-generation probiotics or live biotherapeutic products [90,97,98,99]. These strains hold promise, particularly in addressing obesity and related disorders, with some being prevalent in the microbiota of most individuals.
Despite increased dietary intake, the global rise in obesity and diabetes is associated with prevalent micronutrient deficiencies among obese individuals, specifically in vitamins and minerals important for glucose metabolism and insulin signaling pathways, potentially contributing to the development of diabetes and fatal outcomes (Figure 2) [100]. The small intestine, which consists of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, is the primary location for macro- and micronutrient digestion and absorption. A bidirectional relationship between the gut microbiome and micronutrients involves microbial reliance on micronutrients for growth and metabolism while also producing essential vitamins such as vitamins B and K, facilitating mineral absorption. Although microbial dysbiosis may influence nutrient bioavailability, probiotic supplements, including lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium, have been shown to promote beneficial microbial populations, enhance barrier integrity, and alleviate nutrient malabsorption and small intestinal disease [101,102,103,104,105,106].
Their impact on various physiological markers has been identified. For example, the Lactobacillus species administered to diet-induced obese mice resulted in beneficial outcomes, including reduced weight, visceral fat, glucose, insulin, triglyceride levels, insulin resistance, and proinflammatory cytokines, accompanied by increased IL-10 and improved fatty liver indices [109,110,111]. In overweight or grade 1 obese adults, a 12-week L. gasseri supplementation led to significant reductions in visceral fat and waist circumference [112], while a 24-week L. rhamnosus treatment resulted in significant weight reductions in female participants with obesity [113]. The oral administration of Bifidobacterium longum NK49, Lactobacillus plantarum NK3, and Bifidobacterium longum PI10 improved obesity in mice by improving intestinal barrier integrity via glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) and IL-10 induction, modulating immune cells, and lowering TNF-α expression [114,115].
Another recent randomized controlled trial on 50 obese women (mean age: 55.2 ± 6.9 years; BMI: 36.6 ± 6.0 kg/m2) showed that the administration of a probiotics supplement for 12 weeks consisting of Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Lactobacillus brevis W63, Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, and Lactococcus lactis W58 improved the lipid profile, and significantly reduced homocysteine, TNF-α, total cholesterol, LDL-c, and triglyceride with an increase in total antioxidant status. However, no significant change in BMI, waist circumference, SBP, or DBP was observed [116]. Similarly, an earlier study involving 81 obese women (mean age 55.16 ± 6.87 years; BMI: 36.57 ± 5.95 kg/m2) reported that a high dose of the probiotic supplement for 12 weeks resulted in a decrease in BMI, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), VEGF, IL-6, TNF-α, thrombomodulin, pulse wave analysis systolic pressure, pulse wave analysis pulse pressure, pulse wave analysis augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity [117].
A study on 58 obese postmenopausal women (mean age: 61.4 ± 6 years; BMI: 34.2 ± 3.1 kg/m2) with the administration of the probiotic supplement L. paracasei F19 for 6 weeks showed alterations in the fecal abundance of two metagenomic species (Eubacterium rectale and Ruminococcus torques). However, no significant effect was observed for insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism, inflammatory markers, or anthropometric measures [118]. Likewise, probiotics Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis Bb12 administered to 156 overweight men and women (mean age: 68.4 ± 8 years; BMI: 31 ± 4 kg/m2) for 6 weeks showed no significant change in anthropometric measures, insulin, or HbA1c, and no improvement in glycemic control [119].
To date, investigations derived from animal models (Table 1) and clinical trials (Table 2) have underscored a prevalent trend wherein the amelioration of inflammatory indicators emerges as a notable feature linked to the favorable actions of probiotics in rectifying metabolic dysregulations associated with obesity and related diseases.

3.2. Prebiotics

Prebiotics are described as non-digestible dietary components that selectively promote the growth and activity of specific beneficial bacteria in the colon that boost human health [160]. As defined by four criteria in 2004, prebiotics resist digestion by mammalian enzymes, solely undergo fermentation by the gut microbiota, elicit beneficial effects either systemically or within the luminal environment, and selectively promote the growth of gut microbiota linked to optimal health [160,161]. Various natural sources and suggested substances, such as galacto-oligosaccharides and inulin-type fructans, act as prebiotics, positively influencing gut microbiota composition and health outcomes, with evidence indicating that prebiotic-rich diets are associated with lower food intake, reduced body fat composition and weight gain, especially in overweight and obese individuals [86,162]. Prebiotics such as oligofructose stimulate the production of SCFAs and increase the number of enteroendocrine cells (EECs), resulting in the release of peptides vital to lipid elimination [163].
Furthermore, prebiotics impact the gut microbiota, resulting in a lower presence of LPSs and improving the structural integrity of the intestinal barrier. This fortification functions as a prophylactic strategy, preventing bacterial translocation into the circulation and causing systemic inflammation [164,165]. Prebiotics confer several health benefits impacting lipid and glucose metabolism, intestinal microbiota composition, obesity, and satiety hormones [163] in addition to immunological regulation, which is characterized by increased levels of immune-regulatory interleukins and intestinal-specific immunoglobulins, as well as a decrease in pro-inflammatory interleukins [166,167]. In addition, acorn and sago polysaccharides and unsaturated alginate oligosaccharides demonstrate an ability to reduce mucosal inflammatory biomarkers and alleviate gut hyperpermeability in obese and type 2 diabetic mice. They improve the intestinal barrier in obese mice by increasing ZO-1 and occludin expressions, respectively [168].

3.3. Synbiotics

In obesity therapy research, synbiotics, a combination of prebiotics and probiotics, have been investigated as a potential solution for gut microbiome dysfunction by employing complicated mixes of bacterial strains and varying prebiotic fiber concentrations [89]. Serving as a unique strategy for obesity prevention, combining omega-3 fatty acids with live probiotics has been shown to reduce hepatic steatosis and lipid buildup more significantly than probiotics alone [169,170]. Furthermore, diverse interventions, such as a combination of Bacillus licheniformis and xylo-oligosaccharides in obese rats and a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum PMO 08 with chia seeds in obese mice, show enhanced efficacy in improving body weight gain and lipid metabolism, as well as favorable changes in gut microbiota [171,172]. In addition, a combination of Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus paracasei DSM 4633, and oat β-glucan inhibited body weight gain and improved metabolic complications in obese mice [173]. This impact was achieved by restoring fecal levels of acetate, propionate, and butyrate while decreasing bile acid pools.
Formulations including Clostridium butyricum and corn bran reduce pathogen abundances, stimulate acetate-producing bacterial growth, and increase acetate and isovalerate synthesis [174]. Also, in an in vivo study, synbiotics containing Lactobacillus paracasei HII01 and xylo-oligosaccharides demonstrated the potential to prevent metabolic endotoxemia, decreasing the enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in obese rats [127]. This intervention addressed the effects of an unhealthy diet that may promote the growth of LPS-producing bacteria, leading to LPS translocation caused by intestinal barrier compromise and subsequent metabolic disorders, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, and immune responses [24].
However, while probiotic Bifidobacteria strains independently display anti-obesity effects, combining them with prebiotic galactooligosaccharides as a synbiotic does not result in synergistic benefits despite potential enhancements in the intestinal barrier function observed in obese adults [175]. This inconsistency could be attributed to the intensely competitive microenvironment, reminiscent of the gut microbiota, wherein substrates are concurrently accessible for both the indigenous microbiota and the introduced microbiota [89,150].

3.4. Postbiotics

Through complicated interactions with the immune system and food acquisition from the host, gut bacteria play a critical role in affecting host physiological processes by secreting low-molecular-weight metabolites that govern their development, growth, and propagation, as well as boosting the growth of beneficial species, allowing cell-to-cell contact, and protecting them from environmental challenges [56,176,177]. Some of these soluble mediators, known as postbiotics, can be produced by living bacteria or released following bacterial lysis and have the potential to benefit the host by altering cellular processes and metabolic functions [177]. Postbiotics come in a variety of forms. For example, the fermented infant formula (FIF) is made when infant formulas containing lactic acid-producing or other bacteria are fermented; it is typically devoid of viable bacteria, while paraprobiotics, also known as “ghost” probiotics, are non-viable or inactivated microbial cells that provide health benefits in sufficient quantities [177,178].
Other postbiotics include SCFA, peptides, enzymes, teichoic acids, and vitamins [177]. The gut microbiota produces SCFAs as metabolic byproducts when non-digestible carbohydrates—mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate—are fermented [179]. The acetate/propionate ratio is important for de novo lipogenesis because, in contrast to acetate, butyrate, and propionate have been demonstrated to increase gut hormones and reduce food intake, stimulate intestinal gluconeogenesis, and cause the expression of genes linked to gluconeogenesis, leading to a decrease in body weight and fat deposition, while propionate inhibits hepatic lipogenesis by downregulating fatty acid synthase [89,180].
Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum L-14 and long-chain polyphosphate from Lactobacillus brevis both have therapeutic benefits in mice [24]. By stimulating the TLR2-AMPK signaling system, the former suppresses adipocyte development and regulates body weight and lipid profiles, whilst the latter accelerates intestinal epithelial wound healing and barrier function by activating the extracellular-regulated protein kinase (ERK) signaling pathway [89,90]. Additionally, postbiotics like muramyl dipeptide, derived from bacterial cell walls, alleviate obesity-induced insulin resistance by targeting nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) and interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), while interactions between muropeptide and NOD2 may improve insulin sensitization and alleviate inflammation [181,182].

4. Conclusions

Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics all play a variety of roles that together have a wide range of effects on metabolic function. These constituents are essential for decreasing intestinal permeability by blocking LPSs and improving the function of the intestinal barrier by upregulating tight junction proteins and inhibiting proinflammatory pathways. As bioactive compounds, they modulate the gut microbiota and may aid in the complex reduction of chronic inflammation linked to obesity and related conditions. This multifaceted approach, which targets several aspects of gut health and immune functions, significantly reduces chronic inflammation through the regulation of the TLR family of proteins and inflammatory pathways contributing to obesity. Hence, by demonstrating the functional roles of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, future studies can seek to unravel the mechanism of action of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on TLRs in order to develop an effective therapeutic option for the management of obesity and related diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.E.A., G.A.A. and T.M.O.; Writing—original draft preparation, O.E.A. and G.A.A.; Writing—review and editing, O.E.A. and G.A.A.; Methodology, O.E.A. and T.M.O.; Validation, O.E.A., G.A.A. and T.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with a minor correction to resolve typographical errors. This change does not affect the scientific content of the article.

Abbreviations

DPP-IV: dipeptidyl peptidase-IV, CRP: C-reactive protein, GLP-1: glucagon-like peptide-1, GRO: growth-regulated oncogene, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, γGT: gamma-glutamyl transferase (γGT), AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine-aminotransferase, I-FABP: intestinal fatty acid-binding protein, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, GIP: gastric inhibitory polypeptide: PYY: peptide YY, IL10rα: interleukin 10 receptor alpha, FGF-19: fibroblast growth factor, TRANCE: tumor necrosis factor-related activation-induced cytokine, CD8A: T-cell surface glycoprotein CD8 alpha chain, PD-L1: programmed cell death 1 ligand 1, CXCL1: growth-regulated alpha protein C-X-C motif chemokine 1, uPA: urokinase plasminogen activator, BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor, GOS: galacto-oligosaccharides, LBP: lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, ANGPTL4: angiopoietin-like protein 4, TLR: toll-like receptor, and NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B.

References

  1. Jura, M.; Kozak, L.P. Obesity and Related Consequences to Ageing. Age 2016, 38, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Xie, K.; Hou, Y.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Man, C. Combating Obesity: Harnessing the Synergy of Postbiotics and Prebiotics for Enhanced Lipid Excretion and Microbiota Regulation. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lobstein, T.; Jackson-Leach, R.; Powis, J.; Brinsden, H.; Gray, M. World Obesity Atlas 2023; 2023. Available online: https://www.worldobesity.org/resources/resource-library/world-obesity-atlas-2023 (accessed on 13 December 2023).
  4. Slawik, M.; Vidal-Puig, A.J. Lipotoxicity, Overnutrition and Energy Metabolism in Aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2006, 5, 144–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barzilai, N.; Huffman, D.M.; Muzumdar, R.H.; Bartke, A. The Critical Role of Metabolic Pathways in Aging. Diabetes 2012, 61, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tchkonia, T.; Morbeck, D.E.; Von Zglinicki, T.; Van Deursen, J.; Lustgarten, J.; Scrable, H.; Khosla, S.; Jensen, M.D.; Kirkland, J.L. Fat Tissue, Aging, and Cellular Senescence. Aging Cell 2010, 9, 667–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahima, R.S. Connecting Obesity, Aging and Diabetes. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 996–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Obradovic, M.; Sudar-Milovanovic, E.; Soskic, S.; Essack, M.; Arya, S.; Stewart, A.J.; Gojobori, T.; Isenovic, E.R. Leptin and Obesity: Role and Clinical Implication. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 585887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Askarpour, M.; Alizadeh, S.; Hadi, A.; Symonds, M.E.; Miraghajani, M.; Sheikhi, A.; Ghaedi, E. Effect of Bariatric Surgery on the Circulating Level of Adiponectin, Chemerin, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, Leptin, Resistin, and Visfatin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jin, X.; Qiu, T.; Li, L.; Yu, R.; Chen, X.; Li, C.; Proud, C.G.; Jiang, T. Pathophysiology of Obesity and Its Associated Diseases. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 2403–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Hamady, M.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J.I. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature 2007, 449, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bäckhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, G.Y.; Nagy, A.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. The Gut Microbiota as an Environmental Factor That Regulates Fat Storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saad, M.J.A.; Santos, A.; Prada, P.O. Linking Gut Microbiota and Inflammation to Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Physiology 2016, 31, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hooper, L.V.; Gordon, J.I. Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut. Science 2001, 292, 1115–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, B.; Ma, Z.; Xin, G.; Yang, Y.; Xu, B. Fate of Dietary Phytochemicals in Human Gut and Interaction with Intestinal Flora. J. Food Bioact. 2022, 18, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Santoro, A.; Ostan, R.; Candela, M.; Biagi, E.; Brigidi, P.; Capri, M.; Franceschi, C. Gut Microbiota Changes in the Extreme Decades of Human Life: A Focus on Centenarians. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 129–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kundu, P.; Blacher, E.; Elinav, E.; Pettersson, S. Our Gut Microbiome: The Evolving Inner Self. Cell 2017, 171, 1481–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Parini, P.; Giuliani, C.; Santoro, A. Inflammaging: A New Immune–Metabolic Viewpoint for Age-Related Diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Mahowald, M.A.; Magrini, V.; Mardis, E.R.; Gordon, J.I. An Obesity-Associated Gut Microbiome with Increased Capacity for Energy Harvest. Nature 2006, 444, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ley, R.E.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Klein, S.; Gordon, J.I. Human Gut Microbes Associated with Obesity. Nature 2006, 444, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ley, R.E.; Bäckhed, F.; Turnbaugh, P.; Lozupone, C.A.; Knight, R.D.; Gordon, J.I. Obesity Alters Gut Microbial Ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11070–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Warwick, B.P.; Romsos, D.R. Energy Balance in Adrenalectomized Ob/Ob Mice: Effects of Dietary Starch and Glucose. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1988, 255, R141–R148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ferraris, R.; Vinnakota, R. Intestinal Nutrient Transport in Genetically Obese Mice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 62, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, H.Y.; Zhou, D.D.; Gan, R.Y.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhao, C.N.; Shang, A.; Xu, X.Y.; Li, H. Bin Effects and Mechanisms of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Postbiotics on Metabolic Diseases Targeting Gut Microbiota: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ursell, L.K.; Haiser, H.J.; Van Treuren, W.; Garg, N.; Reddivari, L.; Vanamala, J.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Knight, R. The Intestinal Metabolome: An Intersection Between Microbiota and Host. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Louis, P.; Young, P.; Holtrop, G.; Flint, H.J. Diversity of Human Colonic Butyrate-Producing Bacteria Revealed by Analysis of the Butyryl-CoA:Acetate CoA-Transferase Gene. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gomes, A.C.; Hoffmann, C.; Mota, J.F. The Human Gut Microbiota: Metabolism and Perspective in Obesity. Gut Microbes 2018, 9, 308–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sekirov, I.; Russell, S.L.; Antunes, L.C.M.; Finlay, B.B. Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 859–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jandhyala, S.M. Role of the Normal Gut Microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 8787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Y.L.; Xu, J.; Rong, X.Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, H.J.; Zhao, C. Gut Microbiota Alterations and Health Status in Aging Adults: From Correlation to Causation. Aging Med. 2021, 4, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ragonnaud, E.; Biragyn, A. Gut Microbiota as the Key Controllers of “Healthy” Aging of Elderly People. Immun. Ageing 2021, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jeffery, I.B.; Lynch, D.B.; O’Toole, P.W. Composition and Temporal Stability of the Gut Microbiota in Older Persons. ISME J. 2016, 10, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frank, D.N.; St. Amand, A.L.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-Phylogenetic Characterization of Microbial Community Imbalances in Human Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. O’Toole, P.W.; Claesson, M.J. Gut Microbiota: Changes throughout the Lifespan from Infancy to Elderly. Int. Dairy J. 2010, 20, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Claesson, M.J.; Jeffery, I.B.; Conde, S.; Power, S.E.; O’connor, E.M.; Cusack, S.; Harris, H.M.B.; Coakley, M.; Lakshminarayanan, B.; O’sullivan, O.; et al. Gut Microbiota Composition Correlates with Diet and Health in the Elderly. Nature 2012, 488, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rajilić-Stojanović, M.; Heilig, H.G.H.J.; Molenaar, D.; Kajander, K.; Surakka, A.; Smidt, H.; De Vos, W.M. Development and Application of the Human Intestinal Tract Chip, a Phylogenetic Microarray: Analysis of Universally Conserved Phylotypes in the Abundant Microbiota of Young and Elderly Adults. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 1736–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Claesson, M.J.; Cusack, S.; O’Sullivan, O.; Greene-Diniz, R.; de Weerd, H.; Flannery, E.; Marchesi, J.R.; Falush, D.; Dinan, T.; Fitzgerald, G.; et al. Composition, Variability, and Temporal Stability of the Intestinal Microbiota of the Elderly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4586–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Franceschi, C.; Bonafè, M.; Valensin, S.; Olivieri, F.; De Luca, M.; Ottaviani, E.; De Benedictis, G. Inflamm-aging: An Evolutionary Perspective on Immunosenescence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 908, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guigoz, Y.; Doré, J.; Schiffrin, E.J. The Inflammatory Status of Old Age Can Be Nurtured from the Intestinal Environment. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2008, 11, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Garrett, W.S.; Gordon, J.I.; Glimcher, L.H. Homeostasis and Inflammation in the Intestine. Cell 2010, 140, 859–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ivanov, I.I.; Atarashi, K.; Manel, N.; Brodie, E.L.; Shima, T.; Karaoz, U.; Wei, D.; Goldfarb, K.C.; Santee, C.A.; Lynch, S.V.; et al. Induction of Intestinal Th17 Cells by Segmented Filamentous Bacteria. Cell 2009, 139, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamada, N.; Seo, S.-U.; Chen, G.Y.; Núñez, G. Role of the Gut Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammatory Disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Olszak, T.; An, D.; Zeissig, S.; Vera, M.P.; Richter, J.; Franke, A.; Glickman, J.N.; Siebert, R.; Baron, R.M.; Kasper, D.L.; et al. Microbial Exposure During Early Life Has Persistent Effects on Natural Killer T Cell Function. Science 2012, 336, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van Kaer, L.; Parekh, V.V.; Wu, L. Invariant Natural Killer T Cells: Bridging Innate and Adaptive Immunity. Cell Tissue Res. 2011, 343, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cullender, T.C.; Chassaing, B.; Janzon, A.; Kumar, K.; Muller, C.E.; Werner, J.J.; Angenent, L.T.; Bell, M.E.; Hay, A.G.; Peterson, D.A.; et al. Innate and Adaptive Immunity Interact to Quench Microbiome Flagellar Motility in the Gut. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hopkin, S.; Lord, J.M.; Chimen, M. Dysregulation of Leukocyte Trafficking in Ageing: Causal Factors and Possible Corrective Therapies. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 163, 105323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moore, K.J. Targeting Inflammation in CVD: Advances and Challenges. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 74–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Effoe, V.S.; Correa, A.; Chen, H.; Lacy, M.E.; Bertoni, A.G. High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Is Associated with Incident Type 2 Diabetes Among African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 1694–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dragano, N.R.V.; Fernø, J.; Diéguez, C.; López, M.; Milbank, E. Recent Updates on Obesity Treatments: Available Drugs and Future Directions. Neuroscience 2020, 437, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nimptsch, K.; Konigorski, S.; Pischon, T. Diagnosis of Obesity and Use of Obesity Biomarkers in Science and Clinical Medicine. Metabolism 2019, 92, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lauby-Secretan, B.; Scoccianti, C.; Loomis, D.; Grosse, Y.; Bianchini, F.; Straif, K. Body Fatness and Cancer—Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 794–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gadde, K.M.; Martin, C.K.; Berthoud, H.-R.; Heymsfield, S.B. Obesity. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Haas, B.; Schlinkert, P.; Mayer, P.; Eckstein, N. Targeting Adipose Tissue. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2012, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ibrahim, M.M. Subcutaneous and Visceral Adipose Tissue: Structural and Functional Differences. Obes. Rev. 2010, 11, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Unser, A.M.; Tian, Y.; Xie, Y. Opportunities and Challenges in Three-Dimensional Brown Adipogenesis of Stem Cells. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 962–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Park, S.J.; Sharma, A.; Lee, H.J. Postbiotics against Obesity: Perception and Overview Based on Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Reyes-Farias, M.; Fos-Domenech, J.; Serra, D.; Herrero, L.; Sánchez-Infantes, D. White Adipose Tissue Dysfunction in Obesity and Aging. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 192, 114723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Becher, T.; Palanisamy, S.; Kramer, D.J.; Eljalby, M.; Marx, S.J.; Wibmer, A.G.; Butler, S.D.; Jiang, C.S.; Vaughan, R.; Schöder, H.; et al. Brown Adipose Tissue Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Health. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Betz, M.J.; Enerbäck, S. Targeting Thermogenesis in Brown Fat and Muscle to Treat Obesity and Metabolic Disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kawai, T.; Autieri, M.V.; Scalia, R. Adipose Tissue Inflammation and Metabolic Dysfunction in Obesity. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2021, 320, C375–C391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Reilly, S.M.; Saltiel, A.R. Adapting to Obesity with Adipose Tissue Inflammation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Coenen, K.R.; Gruen, M.L.; Chait, A.; Hasty, A.H. Diet-Induced Increases in Adiposity, but Not Plasma Lipids, Promote Macrophage Infiltration into White Adipose Tissue. Diabetes 2007, 56, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Habanjar, O.; Diab-Assaf, M.; Caldefie-Chezet, F.; Delort, L. The Impact of Obesity, Adipose Tissue, and Tumor Microenvironment on Macrophage Polarization and Metastasis. Biology 2022, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Galic, S.; Oakhill, J.S.; Steinberg, G.R. Adipose Tissue as an Endocrine Organ. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 316, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A. Hepatic Lipotoxicity and the Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: The Central Role of Nontriglyceride Fatty Acid Metabolites. Hepatology 2010, 52, 774–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Niswender, K. Diabetes and Obesity: Therapeutic Targeting and Risk Reduction—A Complex Interplay. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2010, 12, 267–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Murphy, E.F.; Cotter, P.D.; Healy, S.; Marques, T.M.; O’Sullivan, O.; Fouhy, F.; Clarke, S.F.; O’Toole, P.W.; Quigley, E.M.; Stanton, C.; et al. Composition and Energy Harvesting Capacity of the Gut Microbiota: Relationship to Diet, Obesity and Time in Mouse Models. Gut 2010, 59, 1635–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Hamady, M.; Yatsunenko, T.; Cantarel, B.L.; Duncan, A.; Ley, R.E.; Sogin, M.L.; Jones, W.J.; Roe, B.A.; Affourtit, J.P.; et al. A Core Gut Microbiome in Obese and Lean Twins. Nature 2009, 457, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Patterson, E.; Ryan, P.M.; Cryan, J.F.; Dinan, T.G.; Ross, P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Stanton, C. Gut Microbiota, Obesity and Diabetes. Postgrad. Med. J. 2016, 92, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kennedy, B.K.; Berger, S.L.; Brunet, A.; Campisi, J.; Cuervo, A.M.; Epel, E.S.; Franceschi, C.; Lithgow, G.J.; Morimoto, R.I.; Pessin, J.E.; et al. Geroscience: Linking Aging to Chronic Disease. Cell 2014, 159, 709–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wang, J.; Chen, W.-D.; Wang, Y.-D. The Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory Diseases: The Role of Macrophages. Front Microbiol 2020, 11, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic Endotoxemia Initiates Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Akira, S.; Takeda, K. Toll-like Receptor Signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Neal, M.D.; Leaphart, C.; Levy, R.; Prince, J.; Billiar, T.R.; Watkins, S.; Li, J.; Cetin, S.; Ford, H.; Schreiber, A.; et al. Enterocyte TLR4 Mediates Phagocytosis and Translocation of Bacteria Across the Intestinal Barrier. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 3070–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Medzhitov, R.; Horng, T. Transcriptional Control of the Inflammatory Response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for Taxonomy-Based Analysis of Pathways and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Burcelin, R.; Garidou, L.; Pomié, C. Immuno-Microbiota Cross and Talk: The New Paradigm of Metabolic Diseases. Semin. Immunol. 2012, 24, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Amar, J.; Chabo, C.; Waget, A.; Klopp, P.; Vachoux, C.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Smirnova, N.; Bergé, M.; Sulpice, T.; Lahtinen, S.; et al. Intestinal Mucosal Adherence and Translocation of Commensal Bacteria at the Early Onset of Type 2 Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms and Probiotic Treatment. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011, 3, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Cox, A.J.; West, N.P.; Cripps, A.W. Obesity, Inflammation, and the Gut Microbiota. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ardawi, M.S.M.; Newsholme, E.A. Fuel Utilization in Colonocytes of the Rat. Biochem. J. 1985, 231, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cummings, J.H.; Pomare, E.W.; Branch, W.J.; Naylor, C.P.; Macfarlane, G.T. Short Chain Fatty Acids in Human Large Intestine, Portal, Hepatic and Venous Blood. Gut 1987, 28, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Al-Lahham, S.H.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Roelofsen, H.; Vonk, R.J.; Venema, K. Biological Effects of Propionic Acid in Humans; Metabolism, Potential Applications and Underlying Mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2010, 1801, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Swann, J.R.; Want, E.J.; Geier, F.M.; Spagou, K.; Wilson, I.D.; Sidaway, J.E.; Nicholson, J.K.; Holmes, E. Systemic Gut Microbial Modulation of Bile Acid Metabolism in Host Tissue Compartments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4523–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sahakian, A.B.; Jee, S.-R.; Pimentel, M. Methane and the Gastrointestinal Tract. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2010, 55, 2135–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Peng, L.; He, Z.; Chen, W.; Holzman, I.R.; Lin, J. Effects of Butyrate on Intestinal Barrier Function in a Caco-2 Cell Monolayer Model of Intestinal Barrier. Pediatr. Res. 2007, 61, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ropelle, E.R.; Pauli, J.R.; Fernandes, M.F.A.; Rocco, S.A.; Marin, R.M.; Morari, J.; Souza, K.K.; Dias, M.M.; Gomes-Marcondes, M.C.; Gontijo, J.A.R.; et al. A Central Role for Neuronal AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (MTOR) in High-Protein Diet–Induced Weight Loss. Diabetes 2008, 57, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Maslowski, K.M.; Vieira, A.T.; Ng, A.; Kranich, J.; Sierro, F.; Yu, D.; Schilter, H.C.; Rolph, M.S.; Mackay, F.; Artis, D.; et al. Regulation of Inflammatory Responses by Gut Microbiota and Chemoattractant Receptor GPR43. Nature 2009, 461, 1282–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tedelind, S.; Westberg, F.; Kjerrulf, M.; Vidal, A. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of the Short-Chain Fatty Acids Acetate and Propionate: A Study with Relevance to Inflammatory Bowel Disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Vallianou, N.; Stratigou, T.; Christodoulatos, G.S.; Tsigalou, C.; Dalamaga, M. Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, Postbiotics, and Obesity: Current Evidence, Controversies, and Perspectives. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2020, 9, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Vallianou, N.G.; Kounatidis, D.; Tsilingiris, D.; Panagopoulos, F.; Christodoulatos, G.S.; Evangelopoulos, A.; Karampela, I.; Dalamaga, M. The Role of Next-Generation Probiotics in Obesity and Obesity-Associated Disorders: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, Z.-B.; Xin, S.-S.; Ding, L.-N.; Ding, W.-Y.; Hou, Y.-L.; Liu, C.-Q.; Zhang, X.-D. The Potential Role of Probiotics in Controlling Overweight/Obesity and Associated Metabolic Parameters in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 3862971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ban, O.H.; Bang, W.Y.; Jeon, H.J.; Jung, Y.H.; Yang, J.; Kim, D.H. Potential of Bifidobacterium Lactis IDCC 4301 Isolated from Breast Milk-Fed Infant Feces as a Probiotic and Functional Ingredient. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 1952–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Raises Concerns about Probiotic Products Sold for Use in Hospitalized Preterm Infants. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-raises-concerns-about-probiotic-products-sold-use-hospitalized-preterm-infants#:~:text=Importantly%2C%20the%20FDA%20has%20not,in%20infants%20of%20any%20age (accessed on 16 December 2023).
  94. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., on Advancing the Science and Regulation of Live Microbiome-Based Products Used to Prevent, Treat, or Cure Diseases in Humans. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-advancing-science-and-regulation-live-microbiome-based (accessed on 16 December 2023).
  95. European Parliament Use of the Term ‘Probiotic’ and Nutrition Claims. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2017-004201_EN.html#:~:text=In%20spite%20of%20many%20applications,approved%20health%20claims%20for%20probiotics (accessed on 16 December 2023).
  96. Kim, S.; Yoon, Y.; Oh, S. Suggestion of a Safety Evaluation Procedure to Improve Probiotic Safety. J. Dairy Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shetty, S.A.; Zuffa, S.; Bui, T.P.N.; Aalvink, S.; Smidt, H.; De Vos, W.M. Reclassification of Eubacterium Hallii as Anaerobutyricum Hallii Gen. Nov., Comb. Nov., and Description of Anaerobutyricum Soehngenii Sp. Nov., a Butyrate and Propionate-Producing Bacterium from Infant Faeces. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 3741–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cuffaro, B.; Assohoun, A.L.W.; Boutillier, D.; Peucelle, V.; Desramaut, J.; Boudebbouze, S.; Croyal, M.; Waligora-Dupriet, A.-J.; Rhimi, M.; Grangette, C.; et al. Identification of New Potential Biotherapeutics from Human Gut Microbiota-Derived Bacteria. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. O’Toole, P.W.; Marchesi, J.R.; Hill, C. Next-Generation Probiotics: The Spectrum from Probiotics to Live Biotherapeutics. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Via, M. The Malnutrition of Obesity: Micronutrient Deficiencies That Promote Diabetes. ISRN Endocrinol. 2012, 2012, 103472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Judkins, T.C.; Archer, D.L.; Kramer, D.C.; Solch, R.J. Probiotics, Nutrition, and the Small Intestine. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2020, 22, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bielik, V.; Kolisek, M. Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Minerals in Relation to a Healthy Gut Microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hadadi, N.; Berweiler, V.; Wang, H.; Trajkovski, M. Intestinal Microbiota as a Route for Micronutrient Bioavailability. Curr. Opin. Endocr. Metab. Res. 2021, 20, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chaplin, A.; Parra, P.; Laraichi, S.; Serra, F.; Palou, A. Calcium Supplementation Modulates Gut Microbiota in a Prebiotic Manner in Dietary Obese Mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2016, 60, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Balamurugan, R.; Mary, R.R.; Chittaranjan, S.; Jancy, H.; Shobana Devi, R.; Ramakrishna, B.S. Low Levels of Faecal Lactobacilli in Women with Iron-Deficiency Anaemia in South India. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Maynard, C.; Weinkove, D. Bacteria Increase Host Micronutrient Availability: Mechanisms Revealed by Studies in C. elegans. Genes Nutr. 2020, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. World Health Organization. Nutritional Deficiencies. Available online: https://platform.who.int/mortality/themes/theme-details/topics/topic-details/MDB/nutritional-deficiencies (accessed on 10 December 2023).
  108. Population Reference Bureau. Top 50 Countries with the Largest Number of Older Adults. Available online: https://www.prb.org/resources/countries-with-the-oldest-populations-in-the-world/ (accessed on 10 December 2023).
  109. Miyoshi, M.; Ogawa, A.; Higurashi, S.; Kadooka, Y. Anti-Obesity Effect of Lactobacillus Gasseri SBT2055 Accompanied by Inhibition of pro-Inflammatory Gene Expression in the Visceral Adipose Tissue in Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Eur. J. Nutr. 2014, 53, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Park, S.-Y.; Seong, K.-S.; Lim, S.-D. Anti-Obesity Effect of Yogurt Fermented by Lactobacillus Plantarum Q180 in Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2016, 36, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yoo, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, D.; Jung, U.; Jeon, S.; Ahn, Y.; Huh, C.; McGregor, R.; Choi, M.S. Probiotics L. plantarum and L. curvatus in Combination Alter Hepatic Lipid Metabolism and Suppress Diet-Induced Obesity. Obesity 2013, 21, 2571–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kim, J.; Yun, J.M.; Kim, M.K.; Kwon, O.; Cho, B. Lactobacillus Gasseri BNR17 Supplementation Reduces the Visceral Fat Accumulation and Waist Circumference in Obese Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J. Med. Food 2018, 21, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sanchez, M.; Darimont, C.; Drapeau, V.; Emady-Azar, S.; Lepage, M.; Rezzonico, E.; Ngom-Bru, C.; Berger, B.; Philippe, L.; Ammon-Zuffrey, C.; et al. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC1.3724 Supplementation on Weight Loss and Maintenance in Obese Men and Women. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1507–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kim, D.-E.; Kim, J.-K.; Han, S.-K.; Jang, S.-E.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.-H. Lactobacillus plantarum NK3 and Bifidobacterium longum NK49 Alleviate Bacterial Vaginosis and Osteoporosis in Mice by Suppressing NF-κ B-Linked TNF-α Expression. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 1022–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alard, J.; Cudennec, B.; Boutillier, D.; Peucelle, V.; Descat, A.; Decoin, R.; Kuylle, S.; Jablaoui, A.; Rhimi, M.; Wolowczuk, I.; et al. Multiple Selection Criteria for Probiotic Strains with High Potential for Obesity Management. Nutrients 2021, 13, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Majewska, K.; Kręgielska-Narożna, M.; Jakubowski, H.; Szulińska, M.; Bogdański, P. The Multispecies Probiotic Effectively Reduces Homocysteine Concentration in Obese Women: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Szulińska, M.; Łoniewski, I.; Skrypnik, K.; Sobieska, M.; Korybalska, K.; Suliburska, J.; Bogdański, P. Multispecies Probiotic Supplementation Favorably Affects Vascular Function and Reduces Arterial Stiffness in Obese Postmenopausal Women—A 12-Week Placebo-Controlled and Randomized Clinical Study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Brahe, L.K.; Le Chatelier, E.; Prifti, E.; Pons, N.; Kennedy, S.; Blædel, T.; Håkansson, J.; Dalsgaard, T.K.; Hansen, T.; Pedersen, O.; et al. Dietary Modulation of the Gut Microbiota—A Randomised Controlled Trial in Obese Postmenopausal Women. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ivey, K.L.; Hodgson, J.M.; Kerr, D.A.; Lewis, J.R.; Thompson, P.L.; Prince, R.L. The Effects of Probiotic Bacteria on Glycaemic Control in Overweight Men and Women: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Alard, J.; Lehrter, V.; Rhimi, M.; Mangin, I.; Peucelle, V.; Abraham, A.L.; Mariadassou, M.; Maguin, E.; Waligora-Dupriet, A.J.; Pot, B.; et al. Beneficial Metabolic Effects of Selected Probiotics on Diet-Induced Obesity and Insulin Resistance in Mice Are Associated with Improvement of Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1484–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Archer, A.C.; Muthukumar, S.P.; Halami, P.M. Lactobacillus Fermentum MCC2759 and MCC2760 Alleviate Inflammation and Intestinal Function in High-Fat Diet-Fed and Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 1068–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Robles-Vera, I.; Toral, M.; de la Visitación, N.; Sánchez, M.; Gómez-Guzmán, M.; Romero, M.; Yang, T.; Izquierdo-Garcia, J.L.; Jiménez, R.; Ruiz-Cabello, J.; et al. Probiotics Prevent Dysbiosis and the Rise in Blood Pressure in Genetic Hypertension: Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2020, 64, e1900616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. de Cossío, L.F.; Fourrier, C.; Sauvant, J.; Everard, A.; Capuron, L.; Cani, P.D.; Layé, S.; Castanon, N. Impact of Prebiotics on Metabolic and Behavioral Alterations in a Mouse Model of Metabolic Syndrome. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 64, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kundi, Z.M.; Lee, J.C.Y.; Pihlajamäki, J.; Chan, C.B.; Leung, K.S.; So, S.S.Y.; Nordlund, E.; Kolehmainen, M.; El-Nezami, H. Dietary Fiber from Oat and Rye Brans Ameliorate Western Diet–Induced Body Weight Gain and Hepatic Inflammation by the Modulation of Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Bile Acids, and Tryptophan Metabolism. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e1900580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ahmadi, S.; Nagpal, R.; Wang, S.; Gagliano, J.; Kitzman, D.W.; Soleimanian-Zad, S.; Sheikh-Zeinoddin, M.; Read, R.; Yadav, H. Prebiotics from Acorn and Sago Prevent High-Fat-Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance via Microbiome–Gut–Brain Axis Modulation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 67, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hann, M.; Zeng, Y.; Zong, L.; Sakurai, T.; Taniguchi, Y.; Takagaki, R.; Watanabe, H.; Mitsuzumi, H.; Mine, Y. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Isomaltodextrin in a C57BL/6NCrl Mouse Model with Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Thiennimitr, P.; Yasom, S.; Tunapong, W.; Chunchai, T.; Wanchai, K.; Pongchaidecha, A.; Lungkaphin, A.; Sirilun, S.; Chaiyasut, C.; Chattipakorn, N.; et al. Lactobacillus Paracasei HII01, Xylooligosaccharides, and Synbiotics Reduce Gut Disturbance in Obese Rats. Nutrition 2018, 54, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yao, F.; Jia, R.; Huang, H.; Yu, Y.; Mei, L.; Bai, L.; Ding, Y.; Zheng, P. Effect of Lactobacillus Paracasei N1115 and Fructooligosaccharides in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Arch. Med. Sci. 2019, 15, 1336–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, W.; Xu, A.-L.; Li, Z.-C.; Li, Y.; Xu, S.-F.; Sang, H.-C.; Zhi, F. Combination of Probiotics and Salvia miltiorrhiza Polysaccharide Alleviates Hepatic Steatosis via Gut Microbiota Modulation and Insulin Resistance Improvement in High Fat-Induced NAFLD Mice. Diabetes Metab. J. 2020, 44, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lee, J.; Park, S.; Oh, N.; Park, J.; Kwon, M.; Seo, J.; Roh, S. Oral Intake of Lactobacillus plantarum L-14 Extract Alleviates TLR2- and AMPK-mediated Obesity-associated Disorders in High-fat-diet-induced Obese C57BL/6J Mice. Cell Prolif. 2021, 54, e13039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Matheus, V.; Monteiro, L.; Oliveira, R.; Maschio, D.; Collares-Buzato, C. Butyrate Reduces High-Fat Diet-Induced Metabolic Alterations, Hepatic Steatosis and Pancreatic Beta Cell and Intestinal Barrier Dysfunctions in Prediabetic Mice. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 1214–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Megur, A.; Daliri, E.B.M.; Baltriukienė, D.; Burokas, A. Prebiotics as a Tool for the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes: Classification and Ability to Modulate the Gut Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Holscher, H.D. Dietary Fiber and Prebiotics and the Gastrointestinal Microbiota. Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Markowiak, P.; Śliżewska, K. The Role of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Animal Nutrition. Gut Pathog. 2018, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Choque Delgado, G.T.; Tamashiro, W.M. da S.C. Role of Prebiotics in Regulation of Microbiota and Prevention of Obesity. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Lecerf, J.-M.; Dépeint, F.; Clerc, E.; Dugenet, Y.; Niamba, C.N.; Rhazi, L.; Cayzeele, A.; Abdelnour, G.; Jaruga, A.; Younes, H.; et al. Xylo-Oligosaccharide (XOS) in Combination with Inulin Modulates Both the Intestinal Environment and Immune Status in Healthy Subjects, While XOS Alone Only Shows Prebiotic Properties. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 1847–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Cani, P.D.; Possemiers, S.; Van de Wiele, T.; Guiot, Y.; Everard, A.; Rottier, O.; Geurts, L.; Naslain, D.; Neyrinck, A.; Lambert, D.M.; et al. Changes in Gut Microbiota Control Inflammation in Obese Mice through a Mechanism Involving GLP-2-Driven Improvement of Gut Permeability. Gut 2009, 58, 1091–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Pluta, R.; Ułamek-Kozioł, M.; Januszewski, S.; Czuczwar, S.J. Gut Microbiota and pro/Prebiotics in Alzheimer’s Disease. Aging 2020, 12, 5539–5550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Shokryazdan, P.; Faseleh Jahromi, M.; Navidshad, B.; Liang, J.B. Effects of Prebiotics on Immune System and Cytokine Expression. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 206, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Li, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, B.; He, N. Unsaturated Alginate Oligosaccharides Attenuated Obesity-Related Metabolic Abnormalities by Modulating Gut Microbiota in High-Fat-Diet Mice. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 4773–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Kobyliak, N.; Falalyeyeva, T.; Bodnar, P.; Beregova, T. Probiotics Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids Are More Effective for Hepatic Steatosis Reduction in an Animal Model of Obesity. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2017, 9, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kobyliak, N.; Falalyeyeva, T.; Boyko, N.; Tsyryuk, O.; Beregova, T.; Ostapchenko, L. Probiotics and Nutraceuticals as a New Frontier in Obesity Prevention and Management. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 141, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Wei, X.; Su, X.; Li, M.; Yuan, J. Oral Supplements of Combined Bacillus licheniformis Zhengchangsheng® and Xylooligosaccharides Improve High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity and Modulate the Gut Microbiota in Rats. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 9067821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Oh, Y.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, T.S.; Yeo, I.H.; Ji, G.E. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum PMO 08 Alone and Combined with Chia Seeds on Metabolic Syndrome and Parameters Related to Gut Health in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice. J. Med. Food 2019, 22, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ke, X.; Walker, A.; Haange, S.-B.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Liu, Y.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; von Bergen, M.; Jehmlich, N.; He, X.; Clavel, T.; et al. Synbiotic-Driven Improvement of Metabolic Disturbances Is Associated with Changes in the Gut Microbiome in Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Mol. Metab. 2019, 22, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, J.; Sun, J.; Chen, X.; Nie, C.; Zhao, J.; Guan, W.; Lei, L.; He, T.; Chen, Y.; Johnston, L.J.; et al. Combination of Clostridium Butyricum and Corn Bran Optimized Intestinal Microbial Fermentation Using a Weaned Pig Model. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Walter, J.; Maldonado-Gómez, M.X.; Martínez, I. To Engraft or Not to Engraft: An Ecological Framework for Gut Microbiome Modulation with Live Microbes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Gensollen, T.; Iyer, S.S.; Kasper, D.L.; Blumberg, R.S. How Colonization by Microbiota in Early Life Shapes the Immune System. Science 2016, 352, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Aguilar-Toalá, J.E.; Garcia-Varela, R.; Garcia, H.S.; Mata-Haro, V.; González-Córdova, A.F.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Hernández-Mendoza, A. Postbiotics: An Evolving Term within the Functional Foods Field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wegh, C.A.M.; Geerlings, S.Y.; Knol, J.; Roeselers, G.; Belzer, C. Postbiotics and Their Potential Applications in Early Life Nutrition and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Schönfeld, P.; Wojtczak, L. Short- and Medium-Chain Fatty Acids in Energy Metabolism: The Cellular Perspective. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lin, H.V.; Frassetto, A.; Kowalik, E.J., Jr.; Nawrocki, A.R.; Lu, M.M.; Kosinski, J.R.; Hubert, J.A.; Szeto, D.; Yao, X.; Forrest, G.; et al. Butyrate and Propionate Protect against Diet-Induced Obesity and Regulate Gut Hormones via Free Fatty Acid Receptor 3-Independent Mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Cavallari, J.F.; Barra, N.G.; Foley, K.P.; Lee, A.; Duggan, B.M.; Henriksbo, B.D.; Anhê, F.F.; Ashkar, A.A.; Schertzer, J.D. Postbiotics for NOD2 Require Nonhematopoietic RIPK2 to Improve Blood Glucose and Metabolic Inflammation in Mice. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 318, E579–E585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Cavallari, J.F.; Fullerton, M.D.; Duggan, B.M.; Foley, K.P.; Denou, E.; Smith, B.K.; Desjardins, E.M.; Henriksbo, B.D.; Kim, K.J.; Tuinema, B.R.; et al. Muramyl Dipeptide-Based Postbiotics Mitigate Obesity-Induced Insulin Resistance via IRF4. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 1063–1074.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Depommier, C.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Plovier, H.; Van Hul, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Raes, J.; Maiter, D.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia Muciniphila in Overweight and Obese Human Volunteers: A Proof-of-Concept Exploratory Study. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Bernini, L.J.; Simão, A.N.C.; Alfieri, D.F.; Lozovoy, M.A.B.; Mari, N.L.; de Souza, C.H.B.; Dichi, I.; Costa, G.N. Beneficial Effects of Bifidobacterium Lactis on Lipid Profile and Cytokines in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Trial. Effects of Probiotics on Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrition 2016, 32, 716–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Kopp, L.; Schweinlin, A.; Tingö, L.; Hutchinson, A.N.; Feit, V.; Jähnichen, T.; Lehnert, K.; Vetter, W.; Rings, A.; Jensen, M.G.; et al. Potential Modulation of Inflammation and Physical Function by Combined Probiotics, Omega-3 Supplementation and Vitamin D Supplementation in Overweight/Obese Patients with Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Mo, S.-J.; Lee, K.; Hong, H.-J.; Hong, D.-K.; Jung, S.-H.; Park, S.-D.; Shim, J.-J.; Lee, J.-L. Effects of Lactobacillus Curvatus HY7601 and Lactobacillus Plantarum KY1032 on Overweight and the Gut Microbiota in Humans: Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sohn, M.; Jung, H.; Lee, W.S.; Kim, T.H.; Lim, S. Effect of Lactobacillus Plantarum LMT1-48 on Body Fat in Overweight Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Diabetes Metab. J. 2023, 47, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Cho, Y.G.; Yang, Y.J.; Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, E.S.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, Y.; Kang, C.H. Effect of MED-02 Containing Two Probiotic Strains, Limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4231 and MG4244, on Body Fat Reduction in Overweight or Obese Subjects: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Sohn, M.; Na, G.Y.; Chu, J.; Joung, H.; Kim, B.-K.; Lim, S. Efficacy and Safety of Lactobacillus Plantarum K50 on Lipids in Koreans with Obesity: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 12, 790046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Solito, A.; Bozzi Cionci, N.; Calgaro, M.; Caputo, M.; Vannini, L.; Hasballa, I.; Archero, F.; Giglione, E.; Ricotti, R.; Walker, G.E.; et al. Supplementation with Bifidobacterium Breve BR03 and B632 Strains Improved Insulin Sensitivity in Children and Adolescents with Obesity in a Cross-over, Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 4585–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Song, E.J.; Han, K.; Lim, T.J.; Lim, S.; Chung, M.J.; Nam, M.H.; Kim, H.; Nam, Y. Do Effect of Probiotics on Obesity-Related Markers per Enterotype: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial. EPMA J. 2020, 11, 31–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Machado, A.M.; da Silva, N.B.M.; Freitas, R.M.P.d.; Freitas, M.B.D.d.; Chaves, J.B.P.; Oliveira, L.L.; Martino, H.S.D.; Alfenas, R.d.C.G. Effects of Yacon Flour Associated with an Energy Restricted Diet on Intestinal Permeability, Fecal Short Chain Fatty Acids, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Markers Levels in Adults with Obesity or Overweight: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 64, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Adriano, L.S.; Dionísio, A.P.; Pinto de Abreu, F.A.; Wurlitzer, N.J.; Cordeiro de Melo, B.R.; Ferreira Carioca, A.A.; de Carvalho Sampaio, H.A. Acute Postprandial Effect of Yacon Syrup Ingestion on Appetite: A Double Blind Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hume, M.P.; Nicolucci, A.C.; Reimer, R.A. Prebiotic Supplementation Improves Appetite Control in Children with Overweight and Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 790–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Parnell, J.A.; Klancic, T.; Reimer, R.A. Oligofructose Decreases Serum Lipopolysaccharide and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in Adults with Overweight/Obesity. Obesity 2017, 25, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Zhang, X.; Irajizad, E.; Hoffman, K.L.; Fahrmann, J.F.; Li, F.; Seo, Y.D.; Browman, G.J.; Dennison, J.B.; Vykoukal, J.; Luna, P.N.; et al. Modulating a Prebiotic Food Source Influences Inflammation and Immune-Regulating Gut Microbes and Metabolites: Insights from the BE GONE Trial. EBioMedicine 2023, 98, 104873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Vaghef-Mehrabani, E.; Harouni, R.; Behrooz, M.; Ranjbar, F.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M.; Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M. Effects of Inulin Supplementation on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Clinical Symptoms of Women with Obesity and Depression on a Calorie-Restricted Diet: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial. Br. J. Nutr. 2023, 129, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Neyrinck, A.M.; Rodriguez, J.; Zhang, Z.; Seethaler, B.; Sánchez, C.R.; Roumain, M.; Hiel, S.; Bindels, L.B.; Cani, P.D.; Paquot, N.; et al. Prebiotic Dietary Fibre Intervention Improves Fecal Markers Related to Inflammation in Obese Patients: Results from the Food4Gut Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 3159–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. van der Beek, C.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Kip, A.M.; Gorissen, S.H.M.; Olde Damink, S.W.M.; van Eijk, H.M.; Holst, J.J.; Blaak, E.E.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Lenaerts, K. The Prebiotic Inulin Improves Substrate Metabolism and Promotes Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production in Overweight to Obese Men. Metabolism 2018, 87, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lauw, S.; Kei, N.; Chan, P.L.; Yau, T.K.; Ma, K.L.; Szeto, C.Y.Y.; Lin, J.S.-C.; Wong, S.H.; Cheung, P.C.K.; Kwan, H.S. Effects of Synbiotic Supplementation on Metabolic Syndrome Traits and Gut Microbial Profile among Overweight and Obese Hong Kong Chinese Individuals: A Randomized Trial. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Raji Lahiji, M.; Zarrati, M.; Najafi, S.; Yazdani, B.; Cheshmazar, E.; Razmpoosh, E.; Janani, L.; Raji Lahiji, M.; Shidfar, F. Effects of Synbiotic Supplementation on Serum Adiponectin and Inflammation Status of Overweight and Obese Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Support. Care Cancer 2021, 29, 4147–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kanazawa, A.; Aida, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Kaga, H.; Katahira, T.; Suzuki, L.; Tamaki, S.; Sato, J.; Goto, H.; Azuma, K.; et al. Effects of Synbiotic Supplementation on Chronic Inflammation and the Gut Microbiota in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Janczy, A.; Aleksandrowicz-Wrona, E.; Kochan, Z.; Małgorzewicz, S. Impact of Diet and Synbiotics on Selected Gut Bacteria and Intestinal Permeability in Individuals with Excess Body Weight—A Prospective, Randomized Study. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2020, 67, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Horvath, A.; Leber, B.; Feldbacher, N.; Tripolt, N.; Rainer, F.; Blesl, A.; Trieb, M.; Marsche, G.; Sourij, H.; Stadlbauer, V. Effects of a Multispecies Synbiotic on Glucose Metabolism, Lipid Marker, Gut Microbiome Composition, Gut Permeability, and Quality of Life in Diabesity: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 2969–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Angelino, D.; Martina, A.; Rosi, A.; Veronesi, L.; Antonini, M.; Mennella, I.; Vitaglione, P.; Grioni, S.; Brighenti, F.; Zavaroni, I.; et al. Glucose- and Lipid-Related Biomarkers Are Affected in Healthy Obese or Hyperglycemic Adults Consuming a Whole-Grain Pasta Enriched in Prebiotics and Probiotics: A 12-Week Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1714–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Krumbeck, J.A.; Rasmussen, H.E.; Hutkins, R.W.; Clarke, J.; Shawron, K.; Keshavarzian, A.; Walter, J. Probiotic Bifidobacterium Strains and Galactooligosaccharides Improve Intestinal Barrier Function in Obese Adults but Show No Synergism When Used Together as Synbiotics. Microbiome 2018, 6, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Chambers, E.S.; Viardot, A.; Psichas, A.; Morrison, D.J.; Murphy, K.G.; Zac-Varghese, S.E.K.; MacDougall, K.; Preston, T.; Tedford, C.; Finlayson, G.S.; et al. Effects of Targeted Delivery of Propionate to the Human Colon on Appetite Regulation, Body Weight Maintenance and Adiposity in Overweight Adults. Gut 2015, 64, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. van der Beek, C.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Lenaerts, K.; Troost, F.J.; Olde Damink, S.W.M.; Holst, J.J.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Blaak, E.E. Distal, Not Proximal, Colonic Acetate Infusions Promote Fat Oxidation and Improve Metabolic Markers in Overweight/Obese Men. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 2073–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Canfora, E.E.; van der Beek, C.M.; Jocken, J.W.E.; Goossens, G.H.; Holst, J.J.; Olde Damink, S.W.M.; Lenaerts, K.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Blaak, E.E. Colonic Infusions of Short-Chain Fatty Acid Mixtures Promote Energy Metabolism in Overweight/Obese Men: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Coppola, S.; Nocerino, R.; Paparo, L.; Bedogni, G.; Calignano, A.; Di Scala, C.; de Giovanni di Santa Severina, A.F.; De Filippis, F.; Ercolini, D.; Berni Canani, R. Therapeutic Effects of Butyrate on Pediatric Obesity. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2244912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. LPSs activate TLR4, signaling a chain reaction that releases inflammatory cytokines. TLRs, which are homologs of Toll in Drosophila, are present on the membranes of innate immune cells in humans (e.g., macrophages and dendritic cells) and are activated by membrane components from Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. When TLRs detect pathogens, they immediately activate innate immunity, causing the generation of proinflammatory cytokines and increasing the expression of costimulatory molecules. As shown above, TLR signaling networks include a MyD88-dependent pathway that rapidly activates NF-kB and MAPK, resulting in the generation of proinflammatory cytokines, while the MyD88-independent pathway is linked to delayed NF-kB and MAPK activation, resulting in the stimulation of IFN-beta, IFN-inducible genes, and dendritic cell maturation. Green box represents organism-specific pathways; +p = phosphorylation [76].
Figure 1. LPSs activate TLR4, signaling a chain reaction that releases inflammatory cytokines. TLRs, which are homologs of Toll in Drosophila, are present on the membranes of innate immune cells in humans (e.g., macrophages and dendritic cells) and are activated by membrane components from Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. When TLRs detect pathogens, they immediately activate innate immunity, causing the generation of proinflammatory cytokines and increasing the expression of costimulatory molecules. As shown above, TLR signaling networks include a MyD88-dependent pathway that rapidly activates NF-kB and MAPK, resulting in the generation of proinflammatory cytokines, while the MyD88-independent pathway is linked to delayed NF-kB and MAPK activation, resulting in the stimulation of IFN-beta, IFN-inducible genes, and dendritic cell maturation. Green box represents organism-specific pathways; +p = phosphorylation [76].
Cimb 46 00119 g001
Figure 2. Microbial dysbiosis may lower the intake of nutrients and increase total mortality due to nutritional deficiencies. This causes protein–energy malnutrition, iodine deficiency, vitamin A deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and other nutritional disorders. Inadequate consumption/availability of essential macronutrients or micronutrients can result in fatal outcomes. The latest data included by country: China, France—2017; Italy, Russia—2019; Brazil, Germany, Japan, UK, USA—2020 [107,108].
Figure 2. Microbial dysbiosis may lower the intake of nutrients and increase total mortality due to nutritional deficiencies. This causes protein–energy malnutrition, iodine deficiency, vitamin A deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, and other nutritional disorders. Inadequate consumption/availability of essential macronutrients or micronutrients can result in fatal outcomes. The latest data included by country: China, France—2017; Italy, Russia—2019; Brazil, Germany, Japan, UK, USA—2020 [107,108].
Cimb 46 00119 g002
Table 1. Effect of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on inflammatory markers and intestinal barrier proteins in experimental animal models.
Table 1. Effect of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on inflammatory markers and intestinal barrier proteins in experimental animal models.
Target DiseasesExperimental ModelBioactive
Compounds
DosesEffect on
Inflammatory Markers and
Intestinal
Barrier Proteins
References
Probiotics
Diet-induced obesity and
insulin
resistance
Male C57BL/6J mice; 5-week-oldBifidobacterium lactis
LMG P-28149, and
Lactobacillus rhamnosus
LMG S-28148
5 × 108 CFUDecrease in epididymal adipose tissue expression levels of inflammatory cytokines Tnfα, Il1a, Il6, and Il17. Additionally, liver Tnfα and Il6 were decreased while Il10 expression was restored.[120]
Diet-induced obesityC57BL/6JRj male mice; 5-week-oldBifidobacterium longum
PI10 alone or a mixture of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis LA804 and Lactobacillus gasseri LA806
5 × 108 CFUDecrease in inflammatory-related genes tnfα, mcp1, and cd68 in visceral adipose tissues; a significant decrease in jejunum mcp1 gene expression. [115]
Obesity and
osteoporosis
Female C57BL/6 mice; 6 weeks old for GV-induced bacterial vaginosis
and 11 weeks old for ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis
Lactobacillus plantarum NK3 and Bifidobacterium longum NK49 from kimchi1 × 109 CFUInhibition of NF-kB activation and TNF-α expression in the vagina, uterus, and colon; restoration of IL-10 expression in the vagina; and reduction in gut microbiota LPS production. [14]
Type 2 diabetesFemale Wistar rats (120–160 g)Lactobacillus fermentum MCC2759 and MCC2760109 CFUDownregulation of intestinal TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and reduced expression of the TLR4 receptor while inducing the
expression of IL-10, with a concomitant increase in the expression of tight junction proteins, ZO-1, GLP1, and
endocannabinoid receptor CB2 in the intestine.
[121]
HypertensionWistar Kyoto rats; 5-week-old Bifidobacterium breve
CECT7263 and
Lactobacillus fermentum
CECT5716
109 CFUDecreased plasma endotoxin (LPS) concentration; increased tissue repair of cytokine IL-18 expression.
Together with SCFAs, the probiotics restored TLR4 mRNA levels and the aortic accumulation of Treg (except for acetate)
[122]
Prebiotics
Metabolic
syndrome
Male db/db mice (C57BLKS/J-leprdb/leprdb); 5-week-oldoligofructose0.6 g/day/mouseIncreased plasma levels of IL-10 and hypothalamic IL-1β mRNA expression; IL-6 expression was normalized by OFS; and blood–brain barrier integrity was improved due to normalized expression of ZO-1 and
occludin.
[123]
Western-diet
-induced obesity
Male C57BL/6N mice; 3–4 weeks oldoat and rye fiber10% in diet; Attenuation of liver mRNA expression levels TNF-α and TLR4; increased colonic mucin (Mucin 3) and tight junction protein (Occludin and Claudin 7) mRNA expression, suggesting improved gut barrier function[124]
HF diet-induced obesity and
diabetes
C57BL/6J mice; 8–10 weeks oldacorn and sago polysaccharides 5% in dietReduced expression of intestinal IL-6, TNF-α, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (Ccl2, and MCP1 with a corresponding increase in ZO-1 and Occludin.[125]
Obesity and
insulin
resistance
Female C57BL/6NCrl mice; 15–16 weeks oldIsomaltodextrin1%, 2.5%, and 5% introduced through drinking waterDecreased expression of plasma TNF-α and MCP-1; increased adiponectin levels and increased expression of mucin 2, mucin 4, and claudin 4.[126]
Synbiotics
Obesity and
insulin
resistance
Male Wistar ratsLactobacillus paracasei
HII01 plus
xylo-oligosaccharide (XOS)
108 CFU; 10% XOSDecrease in serum LPS levels, and the intestinal proinflammatory cytokine gene expression of IL-6 and IL-1β in the ileum and proximal colon[127]
NAFLDC57BL/6 mice; 4 weeks oldLactobacillus paracasei N1115 (N1115) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS)2.2 × 109 CFU/mL (0.5 mL/day) and 4 g/kg/dayDecrease in serum and hepatic IL-1β and TNF-α, and serum LPS levels; decreased liver TLR4 and NF-κB mRNA expression; and increased intestinal protein expression of occludin-1 and claudin-1.[128]
NAFLDMale C57BL/6N mice Bifidobacterium
bifidum V,
Lactobacillus plantarum X
and Salvia miltiorrhiza
polysaccharide
2 × 108 CFU/mL; 1 × 108 CFU/mL; 50 mg/kg/day Reduced liver TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNA expression alongside cecal LPSs.[129]
Postbiotics
Obesity C57BL/6J male mice; 4-week-oldLactobacillus plantarum L-14 (KTCT13497BP) extract500 mg/kg Decreased expression of leptin, IL-6, TNF-α, and resistin with an increase in adiponectin and Arg1. Inhibition of adipogenesis via the activation of TLR2-AMPK pathway by exopolysaccharide[130]
Type 2 diabetes Male C57BL/6JUnib mice; 4–5 months oldButyrate 5% w/wIncrease in claudin-1 levels within intestinal epithelia (jejunum, ileum, and colon)[131]
Table 2. Select clinical trials on the impact of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on inflammatory markers and intestinal barrier proteins in overweight or obese subjects.
Table 2. Select clinical trials on the impact of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics on inflammatory markers and intestinal barrier proteins in overweight or obese subjects.
Participants/
Target
Diseases
Bioactive
Compounds
DosesEffect on
Inflammatory Markers and
Intestinal
Barrier
Proteins
Research NCTReferences
Probiotics
32 obese subjects aged 18–70 years with insulin resistanceLive or pasteurized Akkermansia muciniphila; 1010 CFU administered for 3 monthsDecrease in LPSs, DPP-IV activity, chemokine GRO, MCP-1, γGT, AST, and sCD40 ligand, but no significant change in plasma GLP-1, ALT, or CRP levels; similarly, there was no change in visceral adiposity and BMI, but a slight decrease was seen in body weightNCT02637115[132]
51 patients with metabolic syndromeBifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis ssp. nov. HN0193.4 × 108 CFU administered for 45 daysDecrease in TNF-α and IL-6 [133]
85 overweight or obese adults aged 25–65 years Lactobacillus paracasei (LCP-37),
Lactobacillus acidophilus (NCFM),
Bifidobacterium lactis (Bi-07), and
Bifidobacterium lactis (Bi-04)
1.25 × 109 CFU administered for 8 weeksIncrease in hs-CRP while the IL-6 and ω6/ω3 ratio decreased; no change in IL-4, IL-8, IL12, 1L-10, IFN-γ, or TNF-α. Gut barrier protein levels for I-FABP and zonulin did not changeNCT04126330[134]
69 obese or overweight adults aged 19–65 yearsLactobacillus
curvatus
HY7601
Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032
5 × 109 CFU administered for 12 weeksIncrease in
hs-CRP,
adiponectin, LDL-c and triglyceride levels
[135]
85 middle-aged overweight subjects Lactobacillus plantarum
strain (LMT1-48)
1 × 1010 CFU administered for 12 weeksIncrease in eGFR during 6th week but not during 12th week; decrease in the levels of ALT and AST during 6th and 12th weeks; decrease in total GIP during 12th week; no significant change in hs-CRP and GLP-1NCT03759743[136]
92 overweight or obese subjects aged 19 to 65 years; Limosilactobacillus fermentum MG4231 and MG42442.5 × 109 CFU administered for 12 weeksDecrease in adiponectin and triglyceride levels; no significant change in hs-CRP, LDL-c or total cholesterol [137]
81 obese subjects aged 20 to 65 years Lactobacillus plantarum K50 (LPK)2 × 109 CFU administered twice daily for 12 weeksDecrease in total cholesterol and triglyceride; no significant change in hs-CRP, LBP, resistin, and sCD14 [138]
101 obese youths aged 6–18 years with insulin resistanceBifidobacterium breve BR03 and B6322 × 109 CFU administered for 8 weeksDecrease in ALT and IL-6 levels; increases in TNF-α and HDL-c NCT03261466[139]
44 obese subjects aged 20–60 yearsBifidobacterium breve CBT BR3, and Lactobacillus
plantarum CBT LP3
1.5 × 1010 CFU administered for 12 weeksTC/HDL increases significantly and slight increases in ALT and AST; no significant change in CRP [140]
Prebiotics
26 overweight or obese adults aged 20–45 years FOS (8.67 g) from Yacon flour (25 g)Yacon flour consumed with a breakfast drink (350 mL) for 5 weeksSignificant increase in Nitric oxide level; No significant change in CRP, leukocyte, lymphocyte, platelet, or neutrophil levels [141]
40 obese women aged 19–20 years FOS (14 g) of Yacon syrup (14 g) Yacon syrup administered for 2 daysNo effect on GLP-1 levels [142]
38 overweight or obese children aged 7–12 yearsoligofructose8 g of oligofructose-enriched inulin administered daily for 16 weeksNo significant changes in GIP, GLP-1, and PYY levelsNCT02125955[143]
37 overweight or obese subjects aged 20–70 years oligofructose21 g of oligofructose administered for 12 weeksSignificant decrease in PAI-1 and LPSs; no changes in IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, adiponectin or resistin NCT00522353[144]
48 obese subjects ≥30 years Dietary fiber16 g of dietary (study beans) fiber administered for 6 weeksIncrease in FGF-19; decrease in IL10rα, TRANCE, CD8A, PD-L1, CXCL1, and uPANCT02843425[145]
45 obese and major depressive disorder subjects aged 20–50 years inulin10 g of Frutafit (inulin/oligofructose) daily for 8 weeks No significant effect on endotoxemia LPSs, gut barrier protein Zonulin, BDNF, or the inflammatory markers IL-10, TNF-α, MCP-1, TLR-4, and hs-CRP levels [146]
24 subjects aged 18–65 years with an obesity-related metabolic disorderInulin 16 g of native inulin (obtained from chicory root, Belgium) daily for 3 monthsDecrease in calprotectin but no change in fecal zonulinNCT03852069[147]
14 overweight or obese male adults aged 20–50 years Inulin 24 g of inulin administered over a 2-day investigationNo significant change in plasma GLP-1 and PYYNCT02009670[148]
Synbiotics
29 overweight or obese subjects aged 20–60 years Bifidobacterium lactis HN019; Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM; and polydextrose1 × 1010 CFU of probiotics and 1.7 g of polydextrose administered for eight weeksNo significant change in CRP or lipid profileNCT05459909[149]
76 overweight or obese subjects aged 50–70 yearsBifidobacterium breve,
Bifidobacterium longum,
Lactobacillus acidophilus,
Lactobacillus bulgaricus,
Lactobacillus casei,
Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and
Streptococcus thermophiles;
FOS
109 CFU of probiotics and 35 mg of FOS administered daily for 8 weeksIncreased adiponectin and decreased TNF-α, hs-CRP levels [150]
86 overweight or obese subjects aged 30–80 years Lacticaseibacillus paracasei YIT 9029;
Bifidobacterium breve YIT 12272; and GOS
3 × 108 CFU live probiotics and 7.5 g of GOS daily for 24 weeksNo significant effect on IL-6, LBP, or hs-CRP [151]
56 overweight or obese subjects with a mean age of 40.8 ± 14 yearsBifidobacterium lactis W51 (NIZO 3680),
Bifidobacterium lactis W52 (NIZO 3882),
Lactobacillus acidophilus W22 (NIZO 3674),
Lactobacillus paracasei W20 (NIZO 3672),
Lactobacillus plantarum W21 (NIZO 3673),
Lactobacillus salivarius W24 (NIZO 3675), and
Lactococcus lactis W19 (NIZO 3671);
FOS and Inulin
0.9–2.8 (×108) CFU probiotics plus 9.6 mg of FOS and 110.4 mg of inulin administered for 12 weeksDecrease in fecal zonulin level [152]
26 patients aged >18 years with diabesityB. bifidum W23, B. lactis W51, B. lactis W52, L. acidophilus W37, L. casei W56, L. brevis W63, L. salivarius W24, Lc. lactis W58 and Lc. lactis W19; FOS, GOS, and konjac glucomannan P13 (E425)1.5 × 1010 CFU probiotics and 8 g of active prebiotics administered for 6 monthsReduction in serum zonulin levels after 3 months but not 6 months; no significant changes to LPS, LBP, and sCD14 levelsNCT02469558[153]
41 adults aged 30–65 years with obesity or hyperglycemiaINN pasta containing Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 6086 and barley β-glucans; 7 log CFU/g (10 million CFU/g)1 serving of INN pasta taken for 12 weeksIncrease in plasma IL-6; decrease in plasma hs-CRPNCT02236533[154]
94 adults aged 18–65 years with obesityBifidobacterium
adolescentis IVS-1 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis
BB-12; GOS
1  ×  109 CFU for each probiotic and 6.9 g of GOS administered daily for 3 weeksNo noticeable change in endotoxemia markers of LPS and LBP; reduced ratio of post-aspirin sucralose to lactuloseNCT02355210[155]
Postbiotics
49 overweight adults aged 21–65 yearsPropionate 10 g of inulin-propionate ester administered daily for 24 weeksIncrease in postprandial plasma PYY and GLP-1NCT00750438[156]
6 overweight or obese adult menAcetate100 or 180 mmol/L colonic acetateIncreased fasting PYY; slight decrease in TNF-α [157]
12 overweight or obese adult men aged 20–40 years Acetate, butyrate, and propionate8–24 mmol (20–60%) of sodium acetate, sodium propionate, and sodium butyrate in 200 mL of sterile water administered for 4 daysIncrease in PYY, and postprandial GLP-1; no significant change in ANGPTL4, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8; [158]
48 children aged 5–17 years with pediatric obesityButyrate20 mg/kg of body weight of sodium butyrate administered daily for 6 monthsReduction in
microRNA-221, and IL-6
NCT04620057[159]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Apalowo, O.E.; Adegoye, G.A.; Obuotor, T.M. Microbial-Based Bioactive Compounds to Alleviate Inflammation in Obesity. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 1810-1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46030119

AMA Style

Apalowo OE, Adegoye GA, Obuotor TM. Microbial-Based Bioactive Compounds to Alleviate Inflammation in Obesity. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024; 46(3):1810-1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46030119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Apalowo, Oladayo Emmanuel, Grace Adeola Adegoye, and Tolulope Mobolaji Obuotor. 2024. "Microbial-Based Bioactive Compounds to Alleviate Inflammation in Obesity" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 3: 1810-1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46030119

APA Style

Apalowo, O. E., Adegoye, G. A., & Obuotor, T. M. (2024). Microbial-Based Bioactive Compounds to Alleviate Inflammation in Obesity. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(3), 1810-1831. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46030119

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop