Next Article in Journal
Differences in Gender and Overall Survival for Temperature-Sensitive TP53 Mutations in Gastroesophageal Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Paternal Contributions to Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Children—Exploring Its Role in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Alloimmune Causes of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Cellular Mechanisms and Overview of Therapeutic Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity After Ultrasound-Guided Intragestational Injection in a Patient with Caesarean Scar Pregnancy—A Case Report

by
Sofoklis Stavros
1,
Anastasios Potiris
1,*,
Angeliki Gerede
2,
Athanasios Zikopoulos
1,
Maria Giourga
3,
Christina Karasmani
3,
Athanasios Karpouzos
3,
Theodoros Karampitsakos
1,
Spyridon Topis
1,
Ismini Anagnostaki
1,
Konstantinos Louis
1,
Ioannis Tsakiridis
4,
Themistoklis Dagklis
4,
Peter Drakakis
1 and
Ekaterini Domali
3
1
Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 124 62 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, 691 00 Campus, Greece
3
First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece
4
Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital Ippokratio, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(11), 1900; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111900
Submission received: 15 October 2024 / Revised: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 19 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy in which the early pregnancy implants at the site of the uterine scar. Methotrexate (MTX) in lower doses can be used to treat CSPs. However, MTX administration is associated with a spectrum of side effects that include hematological toxicities. This case report presents a CSP treated with an intragestational injection of MTX and subsequently developed pancytopenia. Materials and Methods: A 23-year-old woman at six weeks and six days of pregnancy was referred as a potential case of CSP. After establishing the diagnosis, she was treated with a transvaginal ultrasound-guided intragestational administration of 80 mg MTX (adjusted to 50 mg/m2 body surface area) under sedation. Results: On day four after the MTX injection, she developed oral ulcers, fever, and pruritic phlyctenular maculopapular rash. Subsequently, the patient developed febrile neutropenia and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. On day six, a subsequent exacerbation of the rash was observed with the formation of blisters and purplish spots with concurrent odynophagia and sialorrhea. Ultimately, the patient developed pancytopenia due to bone marrow suppression. Fifteen days after MTX administration, the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital hemodynamically stable, afebrile, with dropping β-hcg levels, and in good clinical condition. Conclusions: Although methotrexate administration is the preferred option for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies, clinicians should be aware of the fact that its use entails potential risks, even when it is used locally. To our knowledge, this case is the first description of pancytopenia due to bone marrow suppression following a single low dose of intragestational methotrexate injection.

1. Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy occurs when a fertilized ovum implants outside the uterine cavity. Its incidence is estimated to be around 1–2% of all pregnancies, and the most common implantation spot is the fallopian tubes [1]. Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy in which the early pregnancy implants at the site of the uterine scar of a previous cesarean section [2]. The incidence of CSP is estimated to be about 1 in 1800 to 2500 pregnancies [3]. CSP is a challenging gynecologic high-risk condition due to its rarity, its difficulty to diagnose with a high misdiagnosis rate, and, ultimately, its severe complications (excessive bleeding, uterine rupture, and fecundity impairment) if it is not diagnosed and treated early and promptly [2,4].
Treatment options for CSP include medical management primarily with methotrexate and excisional treatments [5]. Methotrexate (MTX) is a pharmaceutical agent that inhibits dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), a pivotal enzyme within the folic acid metabolism pathway [6]. Its application encompasses high doses for specific hematologic malignancies and lower doses for the management of autoimmune disorders, as well as the treatment of ectopic pregnancies, such as cesarean scar pregnancies [7]. Despite its proven efficacy, MTX is associated with a spectrum of potential side effects that include hematological, hepatic, renal, dermatologic, and gastrointestinal toxicities. Although these adverse effects are conventionally present at higher dosages, their occurrence remains possible even with lower-dose MTX administration [8].
In cases where methotrexate is insufficient or contraindicated, more invasive techniques are employed. These include either the evacuation of the pregnancy using suction or hysteroscopic resection, or the excision of the pregnancy with a laparotomic or laparoscopic approach [4,9,10]. Suction is the most frequently utilized invasive technique with or without additional hemostatic measures such as cervical cerclage, uterine artery embolization, and intra-uterine catheter insertion [11,12,13,14]. On the other hand, excisional techniques are more invasive and difficult to perform, but they bear the advantage of repairing the scar itself [5,15]. However, it is still unknown whether the repair of the scar is associated with a reduced risk for recurrence in future pregnancies.
This case report presents the unique case of a 23-year-old woman who was treated with an ultrasound-guided intragestational injection of MTX for a cesarean scar pregnancy and subsequently developed pancytopenia. To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature of pancytopenia after the intragestational administration of MTX. Clinicians should be aware and alarmed that severe side effects can occur even with this route of administration with catastrophic consequences if they are not identified and treated early.

2. Detailed Case Description

A 23-year-old G6P3 woman at six weeks and six days of pregnancy was referred to our Early Pregnancy Unit as a potential case of a cesarean scar pregnancy. The patient’s obstetrical history included three cesarean sections and two first trimester abortions treated with expectant management. The patient reported no other comorbidities, allergies, or previous operations. The patient’s height was 165 cm, their body weight was 56 kg, and their measured body surface area was 1.6 m2. In our department, the diagnosis was confirmed according to the diagnostic criteria [16]. Transvaginal ultrasound findings showed an empty uterine cavity with a gestational sac of 25 mm in diameter with a fetal pole (crown rump length of 0.62 cm) and positive fetal cardiac activity located anteriorly at the level of the internal os embedded at the site of the previous lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Moreover, an empty endocervical canal and a thin layer under 2 mm of myometrium between the gestational sac and the bladder were also illustrated in the same scan (Figure 1 and Videos S1 and S2).
The patient’s beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hcg) levels were at 30.420 mIU/mL. Pre-treatment diagnostic analyses (white blood cells: 8.2 × 109/L; hematocrit: 36%; hemoglobin: 13.5 g/dL; platelet count: 180 × 109/L) were in a normal range. Subsequently, a transvaginal ultrasound-guided intragestational injection of 80 mg MTX (adjusted to 50 mg/m2 body surface area) was administered to the patient under sedation (Videos S3 and S4).
However, on day four after the MTX injection and while the patient was still hospitalized, she developed oral ulcers, fever (38.4 °C), and pruritic phlyctenular maculopapular rash. On day five, the clinical status of the patient remained unchanged, but the hematological assessment revealed febrile neutropenia (WBC: 0.8 × 109/L; neutrophils: 35%; Hb: 11.9 g/dL; PLTs: 248 × 109/L). Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, intravenous hydration, and folate supplementation were initiated. Given the previously normal blood counts, methotrexate-induced neutropenia was suspected. The patient was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit to ensure optimal care. On day six, a subsequent exacerbation of the rash was observed, causing blisters and purplish spots to form. The patient complained of odynophagia and sialorrhea. An examination of the oral cavity revealed the erosion of the mucosal lining in both the oral and pharyngeal regions. Further drops in neutrophils (WBC: 0.4 × 109/L; neutrophils 25%), anemia (HB: 7 g/dL; HCT: 22%), and thrombocytopenia (PLTs: 110 × 109/L) were reported. As a rescue therapy, leucovorin (120 mg/day) was initiated, and the patient received a transfusion of platelets and packed RBCs (red blood cells) because of pancytopenia. A personalized genetic test detected Methylene Tetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism, thus indicating the decreased activity of the MTHFR [17]. On day seven, she developed further pancytopenia (WBC: 0.3 × 109/L; HB: 6.8 g/dL; HCT: 21%; PLTs: 30 × 109/L) and severe alopecia. Blood and urine cultures were negative. A bone marrow biopsy was performed, which revealed bone marrow suppression. She received a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor agent (filgrastim). The transvaginal ultrasound revealed a persistent gestational sac and no fetal heart rate (Video S5). On the seventh day from MTX administration, a dilation and aspiration of the sac, guided by ultrasound, was performed under anesthesia to eliminate the risk of infection.
Ultimately, 15 days after MTX administration, the patient’s hematologic parameters were normalized and the patient was discharged from the hospital hemodynamically stable, afebrile, with dropping β-hcg levels and in good clinical condition. Table 1 presents the complete timeline of the patient’s symptoms and β-hcg levels during the course of the hospitalization.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying videos. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editorial Office of this journal.

3. Discussion

The prevalence of cesarean scar pregnancy is escalating due to the increased use of early gestational ultrasound and the increased rate of cesarean section deliveries [18]. As a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, CSP is a potential cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the first trimester of pregnancy. As most women affected by CSP are in their reproductive years and express a desire to preserve fertility, the focus of treatment should be on treating CSP while maintaining the woman’s reproductive potential. In this context, preference is given to medical or minimally invasive interventions over surgical approaches. Consequently, various treatment modalities have been suggested and studied [19].
Methotrexate (MTX) acts as a folic acid antagonist, and its adverse effects stem from inhibiting the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, which is critical in purine synthesis and cell division. Consequently, tissues undergoing rapid proliferation, such as skin, bone marrow, and oral and gastrointestinal mucosa, are particularly susceptible, leading to earlier and more frequent manifestations of adverse effects. Adverse effects, such as stomatitis, leukopenia, nausea, abdominal distress, malaise, fatigue, chills, alopecia, fever, and dizziness, are reported more frequently. Additionally, the rarely occurring yet life-threatening complications of MTX treatment include myelosuppression, renal failure, severe infections, and neurotoxicity [20].
Local and systemic methotrexate therapies represent CSP’s two most extensively used treatment choices [2,3,4,7]. However, the use of systemic MTX treatment for CSP has been associated with various concerns. A recent comprehensive review revealed that nearly one-fifth of women (19%) subjected to this approach experienced significant complications, requiring additional surgery with dilation and curettage (D&C) in 99% of cases [19]. The administration of intragestational MTX injection is a widely favored therapeutic approach for CSP due to its fast response and relatively low rate of side effects [21]. However, it should be noted that the optimal dose of MTX for intragestational administration has not yet been established. Most cases adhere to the optimal dose of 50 mg per m2. Recent research has also suggested the addition of mifepristone to reduce the necessary dose of MTX [22].
A literature search was conducted and revealed only five cases of pancytopenia after a single dose of MTX in patients with ectopic pregnancy (Table 2). However, the administration in all five cases was systemic (either intravenous or intramuscular), and none of them involved the intragestational administration of MTX, as in our case. In three of these cases [23,24,25], MTX was administered intramuscularly, and in the other two [26,27], it was administered intravenously. Two of the patients died due to complications [25,27], and the other three recovered within 14 to 16 days after the administration of MTX [23,24,26]. In our case, after a single dose of intragestational administration of MTX, the patient developed stomatitis, oral ulcers, alopecia, skin rash, and eventually pancytopenia. All the above complications are mainly reported in cases of high-dose MTX used in oncology and rheumatology, but also in some cases of systemic administration in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy in gynecology. It is extremely rare to face this kind of side effect when using MTX locally. Genetic testing also revealed that our patient had a genetic mutation in the MTHFR. One of the most frequently occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene is C677T, indicating a reduced enzyme activity. It is known that the MTHFR polymorphism could act as a predictor of MTX toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients [28].

4. Conclusions

Although methotrexate is a very useful drug regimen in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies, clinicians should be aware that its use entails potential risks, even when it is used locally. To our knowledge, this case represents the first description of pancytopenia due to bone marrow suppression following a single dose of intragestational methotrexate injection for the treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy. Further study is essential in the management of these complex cases to achieve the best possible outcome with minimally invasive and fertility-sparing treatments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina60111900/s1, Video S1: The endometrial cavity is empty, but the gestational sac is clearly visible. Video S2: The sac contains a yolk sac and pole with a positive fetal heart rate. The cervical canal is also closed. Video S3: The needle is delicately guided into the endometrial cavity, revealed by transvaginal ultrasonography, and then followed by gentle fluid drainage. Video S4: The MTX is administered directly into the endometrial cavity. Video S5: The yolk sac and the fetal pole are no longer visible in the gestational sac the following day.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S. and E.D.; methodology, A.P.; validation, A.G., A.Z. and T.K.; investigation, M.G., C.K., A.K., I.A., I.T. and T.D.; data curation, S.T. and K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, A.G., A.Z., M.G., C.K., A.K., T.K., S.T., I.A., K.L., I.T., T.D., P.D. and E.D.; visualization, A.P.; supervision, P.D.; project administration, E.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). In accordance with the policy of Alexandra University Hospital and ATTIKON University General Hospital, IRB approval was not required for case reports, as patient consent was already obtained. Every procedure or medical intervention was not experimental but the standard of care.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and accompanying videos. A copy of the written consent is available for review from the Editorial Office of this journal.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shaw, J.L.; Dey, S.K.; Critchley, H.O.; Horne, A.W. Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update 2010, 16, 432–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Society for Maternal-Fetal, M.; Miller, R.; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C.; Publications Committee. Electronic address, p.s.o. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #63: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 227, B9–B20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Timor-Tritsch, I.E.; Monteagudo, A.; Santos, R.; Tsymbal, T.; Pineda, G.; Arslan, A.A. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 207, 44.e1–44.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Machairiotis, N.; Stavros, S.; Antonakopoulos, N.; Vrachnis, D.; Potiris, A.; Fotiou, A.; Loukas, N.; Drakakis, P.; Vrachnis, N. Ectopic pregnancy with full implantation of the gestational sac in the caesarean section scar managed successfully with laparotomy. Clin. Case Rep. 2024, 12, e9087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alameddine, S.; Lucidi, A.; Jurkovic, D.; Timor Tritsch, I.; Coutinho, C.M.; Ranucci, L.; Buca, D.; Khalil, A.; Jauniaux, E.; Mappa, I.; et al. Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024, 37, 2327569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Friedman, B.; Cronstein, B. Methotrexate mechanism in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Jt. Bone Spine 2019, 86, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rotas, M.A.; Haberman, S.; Levgur, M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 107, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Howard, S.C.; McCormick, J.; Pui, C.H.; Buddington, R.K.; Harvey, R.D. Preventing and Managing Toxicities of High-Dose Methotrexate. Oncologist 2016, 21, 1471–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Q.; Piao, S.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C. Hysteroscopic surgery of ectopic pregnancy in the cesarean section scar. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2009, 16, 432–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, H.Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.N.; Wei, W.; Zhang, D.W.; Lu, Y.Q.; Zhang, H.F. Laparoscopic management or laparoscopy combined with transvaginal management of type II cesarean scar pregnancy. J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2013, 17, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jurkovic, D.; Ben-Nagi, J.; Ofilli-Yebovi, D.; Sawyer, E.; Helmy, S.; Yazbek, J. Efficacy of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jurkovic, D.; Knez, J.; Appiah, A.; Farahani, L.; Mavrelos, D.; Ross, J.A. Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 47, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, X.B.; Zhong, Y.C.; Chi, J.C.; Shen, J.L.; Qiu, X.X.; Xu, J.R.; Zhao, A.M.; Di, W. Caesarean scar pregnancy: Treatment with bilateral uterine artery chemoembolization combined with dilation and curettage. J. Int. Med. Res. 2012, 40, 1919–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhuang, Y.; Huang, L. Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 201, 152.e1–152.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Elson, C.J.; Salim, R.; Potdar, N.; Chetty, M.; Ross, J.A.; Kirk, E.J. Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21. BJOG 2016, 123, e15–e55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Timor-Tritsch, I.E.; Khatib, N.; Monteagudo, A.; Ramos, J.; Berg, R.; Kovacs, S. Cesarean scar pregnancies: Experience of 60 cases. J. Ultrasound Med. 2015, 34, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spyridopoulou, K.P.; Dimou, N.L.; Hamodrakas, S.J.; Bagos, P.G. Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and their association with methotrexate toxicity: A meta-analysis. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2012, 22, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Timor-Tritsch, I.E.; Monteagudo, A.; Cali, G.; Palacios-Jaraquemada, J.M.; Maymon, R.; Arslan, A.A.; Patil, N.; Popiolek, D.; Mittal, K.R. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 43, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Birch Petersen, K.; Hoffmann, E.; Rifbjerg Larsen, C.; Svarre Nielsen, H. Cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zachariae, H. Methotrexate side-effects. Br. J. Dermatol. 1990, 122 (Suppl. S36), 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seow, K.M.; Wang, P.H.; Huang, L.W.; Hwang, J.L. Transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2013, 288, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stabile, G.; Vona, L.; Carlucci, S.; Zullo, F.; Lagana, A.S.; Etrusco, A.; Restaino, S.; Nappi, L. Conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with the combination of methotrexate and mifepristone: A systematic review. Womens Health 2024, 20, 17455057241290424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Isaacs, J.D., Jr.; McGehee, R.P.; Cowan, B.D. Life-threatening neutropenia following methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: A report of two cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 88, 694–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shao, S.C.; Yang, Y.K.; Chien, P.S.; Lai, E.C. Methotrexate-induced pancytopenia in a patient with ectopic pregnancy. Arch. Med. Sci. 2018, 14, 475–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gaies, E.; Ben Sassi, M.; Charfi, R.; Lakhal, M.; Klouz, A.; Trabelsi, S.; Salouage, I. Fatal methotrexate toxicity in a patient treated for an ectopic pregnancy. Therapie 2016, 71, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Willner, N.; Storch, S.; Tadmor, T.; Schiff, E. Almost a tragedy: Severe methotrexate toxicity in a hemodialysis patient treated for ectopic pregnancy. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014, 70, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kelly, H.; Harvey, D.; Moll, S. A cautionary tale: Fatal outcome of methotrexate therapy given for management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 107, 439–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shao, W.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Y. Association Between MTHFR C677T Polymorphism and Methotrexate Treatment Outcome in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2017, 21, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transvaginal ultrasound findings. (a) The empty uterine cavity marked with a white arrow; (b) the empty cervical canal marked with a white arrow; (c) the gestational sac embedded at the site of the previous lower uterine segment and the thin layer of myometrium between the gestational sac and the bladder marked with a white arrow; (d) the presence of the fetal pole.
Figure 1. Transvaginal ultrasound findings. (a) The empty uterine cavity marked with a white arrow; (b) the empty cervical canal marked with a white arrow; (c) the gestational sac embedded at the site of the previous lower uterine segment and the thin layer of myometrium between the gestational sac and the bladder marked with a white arrow; (d) the presence of the fetal pole.
Medicina 60 01900 g001
Table 1. Follow-up with beta HCG and the patient’s symptoms after the administration of intragestational methotrexate.
Table 1. Follow-up with beta HCG and the patient’s symptoms after the administration of intragestational methotrexate.
Day (After MTX Administration)β-HCG Levels (I.U.)Symptoms
0 (day of administration)56.529No symptoms
165.595Mild vaginal bleeding
253.860Mild vaginal bleeding
443.845Fever, pruritic skin rash, sore throat
623.573Fever and pruritic skin rash, sore throat, mucositis, odynophagia, sialorrhea, neutropenia
817,673Pruritic skin rash, sore throat, mucositis, odynophagia, alopecia, pancytopenia
113755Pruritic skin rash, sore throat, mucositis, odynophagia, alopecia, pancytopenia
13655Pruritic skin rash, sore throat, mucositis, odynophagia, alopecia
14300Skin lesions and mucositis on recovery, normal blood tests
16140Skin lesions and mucositis on recovery, normal blood tests
1771.8Skin lesions and mucositis on recovery, normal blood tests
198Normal blood tests, skin lesions and mucositis healed.
Table 2. Cases in the literature with pancytopenia after a single low dose of methotrexate.
Table 2. Cases in the literature with pancytopenia after a single low dose of methotrexate.
StudyAge (in Years)HistoryMethotrexate DosageInitial SymptomsOutcome
Isaac Jr et al. [23]23Previous ectopic pregnancy with left salpingectomy50 mg/m2 i.m.Vomiting, mucositis, fever, and pruritic rashRecovery from day 14
Shao S. et al. [24]27No comorbidities50 mg i.m.Vomiting, mucositis, fever, and skin rashRecovery from day 16
Gaies E. et al. [25]32Penicillin allergy44 mg/m2 i.m.Mucositis, odynophagia, dysphagia, fever, and skin lesionsDeceased (pancytopenia, septic shock, and hepatic cytolysis)
Willner et al. [26]21No comorbidities100 mg i.v.Sore throat, skin rash, and feverRecovery from day 15
Kelly et al. [27]N/AHemodialysis-dependent (renal failure)50 mg/m2 i.v.Abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, and severe mouth painDeceased (pancytopenia, acute respiratory distress, and bowel ischemia)
Present Case23No comorbidities80 mg
intragestational injection
Mucositis, odynophagia, fever, and skin rashRecovery from day 15
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stavros, S.; Potiris, A.; Gerede, A.; Zikopoulos, A.; Giourga, M.; Karasmani, C.; Karpouzos, A.; Karampitsakos, T.; Topis, S.; Anagnostaki, I.; et al. Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity After Ultrasound-Guided Intragestational Injection in a Patient with Caesarean Scar Pregnancy—A Case Report. Medicina 2024, 60, 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111900

AMA Style

Stavros S, Potiris A, Gerede A, Zikopoulos A, Giourga M, Karasmani C, Karpouzos A, Karampitsakos T, Topis S, Anagnostaki I, et al. Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity After Ultrasound-Guided Intragestational Injection in a Patient with Caesarean Scar Pregnancy—A Case Report. Medicina. 2024; 60(11):1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stavros, Sofoklis, Anastasios Potiris, Angeliki Gerede, Athanasios Zikopoulos, Maria Giourga, Christina Karasmani, Athanasios Karpouzos, Theodoros Karampitsakos, Spyridon Topis, Ismini Anagnostaki, and et al. 2024. "Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity After Ultrasound-Guided Intragestational Injection in a Patient with Caesarean Scar Pregnancy—A Case Report" Medicina 60, no. 11: 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111900

APA Style

Stavros, S., Potiris, A., Gerede, A., Zikopoulos, A., Giourga, M., Karasmani, C., Karpouzos, A., Karampitsakos, T., Topis, S., Anagnostaki, I., Louis, K., Tsakiridis, I., Dagklis, T., Drakakis, P., & Domali, E. (2024). Methotrexate-Induced Toxicity After Ultrasound-Guided Intragestational Injection in a Patient with Caesarean Scar Pregnancy—A Case Report. Medicina, 60(11), 1900. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111900

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop