Next Article in Journal
Discovering the Biological Target of 5-epi-Sinuleptolide Using a Combination of Proteomic Approaches
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Guanidinium Toxins and Their Interactions with Voltage-Gated Sodium Ion Channels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 15
Issue 10
10.3390/md15100313
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Conotoxins as Tools to Understand the Physiological Function of Voltage-Gated Calcium (CaV) Channels

by
David Ramírez
1,2,
Wendy Gonzalez
1,3,
Rafael A. Fissore
4 and
Ingrid Carvacho
5,*
1
Centro de Bioinformática y Simulación Molecular, Universidad de Talca, 3460000 Talca, Chile
2
Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, 3460000 Talca, Chile
3
Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channels-Associated Diseases (MiNICAD), Universidad de Talca, 3460000 Talca, Chile
4
Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
5
Department of Biology and Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, 3480112 Talca, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2017, 15(10), 313; https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100313
Submission received: 8 August 2017 / Revised: 6 September 2017 / Accepted: 4 October 2017 / Published: 13 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Drugs and Ion Currents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Voltage-gated calcium (CaV) channels are widely expressed and are essential for the completion of multiple physiological processes. Close regulation of their activity by specific inhibitors and agonists become fundamental to understand their role in cellular homeostasis as well as in human tissues and organs. CaV channels are divided into two groups depending on the membrane potential required to activate them: High-voltage activated (HVA, CaV1.1–1.4; CaV2.1–2.3) and Low-voltage activated (LVA, CaV3.1–3.3). HVA channels are highly expressed in brain (neurons), heart, and adrenal medulla (chromaffin cells), among others, and are also classified into subtypes which can be distinguished using pharmacological approaches. Cone snails are marine gastropods that capture their prey by injecting venom, “conopeptides”, which cause paralysis in a few seconds. A subset of conopeptides called conotoxins are relatively small polypeptides, rich in disulfide bonds, that target ion channels, transporters and receptors localized at the neuromuscular system of the animal target. In this review, we describe the structure and properties of conotoxins that selectively block HVA calcium channels. We compare their potency on several HVA channel subtypes, emphasizing neuronal calcium channels. Lastly, we analyze recent advances in the therapeutic use of conotoxins for medical treatments.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Venomous cone snails (Conus) produce several toxic peptides, conopeptides, which target the neuromuscular system of their prey, worms, mollusks, snails and fishes [1,2]. Conotoxins are peptides of 20–30 residues whose main structural characteristic is a rigid backbone formed by disulfide bonds between six cysteines. Conotoxins can be classified according to several criteria, including: a. the gene superfamily they belong to; b. the pattern of cysteine distribution, cysteine framework; and c. their molecular targets. Table 1 summarizes the known groups of conotoxins and their protein targets.
The toxins produced by the genus Conus are numerous and diverse, and approximately 6200 different toxins have been isolated and identified from more than 100 different species thus far [14,15]. The target of most of these toxins are ion channels, including voltage- and ligand-gated channels, as well as G-protein coupled receptors [16,17]. In this review, we will focus on ω-conotoxins, which modulate CaV2.X channels. ω-conotoxins prevent entry of calcium (Ca2+) through these voltage-activated CaV, channels at the presynaptic nerve terminal, thereby, interfering with the release of vesicles containing acetylcholine and neurotransmission [13]. In general, ω-conotoxins impede Ca2+ flux by physically occluding the channel pore [18]. The kinetics of the binding is variable and can show slow dissociation rates, generating poorly reversible blockage and long term inhibition [18].

1.1. Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels

Voltage-gated Ca2+ (CaV) channels are transmembrane proteins that belong to the same transmembrane gene superfamily as the NaV and the KV channels. CaV channels can be organized into two groups according to the voltage changes required for activation: Ca2+ channels that require “larger” depolarizations to be opened (when compared with the current-voltage relation for INa) are known as high-voltage activated (HVA) channels, whereas Ca2+ channels that open at more negative potentials are known as low-voltage activated (LVA) [19]. CaVs are composed of a pore forming subunit, α1, encoded by the CACNA1x genes (see Table 2). L-Type CaVs, CaV1.1–1.4, are known as α1S, α1C, α1D, and α1F. The P/Q-, N- and R-type, CaV2.1–CaV2.3, are termed as α1A, α1B, and α1E. Finally, the T-Type, CaV3, are composed of α1G, α1H, and α1I (Table 2 [20,21]). Depolarizations provoked by the opening of CaV channels shape the action potential in the heart, regulate muscle contraction, and modulate neurotransmitter secretion at nerve terminals. In general, “excitable cells translate their electricity into action by Ca2+ fluxes modulated by voltage-sensitive, Ca2+-permeable channels” [19]. Once Ca2+ ions gain access to the cytosol, they act as second messengers, capable of binding thousands of proteins affecting their localization and function. Variations of intracellular Ca2+ concentrations influence many cell functions such as transcription, motility, apoptosis and initiation of development [22].
The expression and properties of the pore forming α subunit are modified by two main auxiliary or accessory subunits: α2δ and β, which regulate the channel’s biophysical properties, its trafficking, and membrane expression. CaV1 and CaV2 channels can form heteromeric complexes co-assembling with different α2δ subunits, which are encoded by CACNA2D1-4 genes, and β subunits, which are encoded by CACNB1-4 genes. The stoichiometry of this assembly is of one β subunit and one α2δ accessory subunit. An additional accessory subunit, γ, has been reported only in skeletal muscle [20].

1.2. CaV2.X Channels

The channels of the CaV2 family is formed by a pore-forming CaVα1 subunit plus the auxiliary subunits CaVβ and CaVα2δ, with the CaVα1 subunit defining the channel subtype, as shown previously (see Table 2). The CaV2.1 channels conduct currents classified as P-type and Q-type that are well described in neurons, whereas the CaV2.2 and CaV2.3 channels underpin the N-type and R-type currents, respectively, also characterized in neurons [23].
Cav2 channels are responsible for the Ca2+ influx required for the fast release of neurotransmitters as well as for the release of hormones from secretory-type cells such as chromaffin cells [24]. CaV2 channels also regulate neuronal excitability via activation of the Ca2+ activated K+ channels that in turn control repolarization and hyperpolarization [25]. Consistent with these functions, CaV2.1 null mice exhibit ataxia and die around 4 weeks after birth [26]. Mice deficient in CaV2.2 channels, N-type, showed suppressed response to pain, which is consistent with the use of conotoxins as analgesics [27], and with the expression of CaV2.2 channels in nerve terminals in association with pain receptors. CaV2.2 channels are involved in neurotransmitter release of nociceptive pathways from afferent terminals in the ventral and dorsal horn of the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion neurons [20,28]. CaV2.3 null mice also show reduced pain sensitivity [23].

1.3. General Properties of ω-Conotoxins

ω-conotoxins are small peptides ranging in size from 13 to 30 amino acids. They have net charges between +5 and +7 [17], are mostly polar and are highly water soluble. They show three disulfide bridges that are formed between conserved cysteine residues that are arranged in the following organization, C-C-CC-C-C [29]; they form a common structural motif consisting of a cysteine knot, which is also present in toxic and inhibitory polypeptides [30]. The ω-conotoxins family exhibit a characteristic pattern signature described in the PROSITE database [31,32] (see Figure 1).
Most ω-conotoxins characterized to date are selective for N-type CaV channels. As indicated, the main mechanism of action of ω-conotoxins’ is by blocking the channel pore [33], which is accomplished by tight binding of the toxin to the channel pore [18]. The most studied and defined ω-conotoxin is GVIA isolated from Conus geographus [34]. Its specific activity against N-type Ca2+ channels—CaV2.2 channels- [35] was established in neuronal cell types [36]. Other ω-conotoxins from the venom of different Conus species include CVID from the venom of Conus catus, CNVIIA from Conus consors and MVIIA, MVIIIV, and MVIID from Conus magus have been identified [37]. Additional ω-conotoxins have been isolated from other Conus such as striatus [38], and magus [39].

2. Classification of ω-Conotoxins That Target CaV Channels

2.1. C. geographus—GVIA

GVIA. It consists of 27 amino acids with a backbone constrained by the formation of three disulfide bonds (Cys1–Cys16, Cys9–Cys20, and Cys15–Cys26). The possible toxic effect of GVIA and of the other members of the family such as GVIB, GVIC, GVIIA, and GVIIB was determined by performing intracerebral injections in mice, which provoked involuntary movements (“shaking”) in the animals [34] (Table 3). In vitro studies were first performed on nerve-muscle preparations of frogs where GVIA irreversible blocked the voltage-activated Ca2+ channels of the presynaptic terminal preventing acetylcholine exocytosis [13]. Together, these studies showed that GVIA selectively inhibits CaV2.2 channels in an irreversible manner. The site of action of GVIA on CaV2.2 was found to be on the large extracellular domain III between the S5–S6 trans-membrane regions [18]; mutagenesis studies further showed that the reversibility of the block induced by GVIA and MVIIA was dramatically enhanced by swapping a glycine residue at position 1326 for a proline. GVIA also binds the α1 subunit of the Torpedo nAChR [13]. The 3D structures of GVIA resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) are: 2CCO [40], 1TTL [41], and 1OMC [42].

2.2. C. magus—MVIIA and MVIIC

MVIIA. Also known as ziconotide is a 25 amino acid peptide that also blocks the pore of CaV2.2 channels (Table 3) and induced potent analgesia in rodents [43] and human patients with persistent cancer pain [44]. In December 2004, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Prialt® (commercial name for MVIIA) for the treatment of severe chronic pain using an intrathecal pump system to deliver the drug into the cerebrospinal fluid. Consistent with this action, injection of MVIIA into mammals caused important neuromuscular effects such as decrease of spontaneous and coordinated locomotor activity and tremors [45]. It was shown that these effects and the pain relief caused by delivery of MVIIA into the cerebrospinal fluid are mediated by inhibition of the release of pro-nociceptive neurochemicals such as glutamate, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and substance P into the brain and spinal cord [46,47]. Site-mutagenesis studies revealed that the Met12 residue in loop 2 (Figure 2) is the responsible for the toxicity of MVIIA. Met12 interacts with the hydrophobic pocket residues Ile300, Phe302, and Leu305, located between repeats II and III of CaV2.2 channels; this interaction disrupts the normal function of the channel [45]. Systematic mutations of the residues in the loop 2 of MVIIA as well as of other ω-conotoxins may be used for future drug design to develop modulators of CaV2.2 with lower side effects and higher effectiveness [45]. The 3D structures of MVIIA resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDB are: 1OMG [48], 1MVI [49], 1TTK [50], 1DW4 [51], and 1DW5 [51].
MVIIC. This toxin blocks CaV2.1 and CaV2.2 channels (Table 3). It possesses similar characteristics to those described for MVIIA and its intracerebral injection in mice caused progressive decrease in respiration rates with marked signs of gasping for breath. The peptide was lethal at low doses (0.1–0.4 μg [52]). The 3D structures of MVIIC resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDB are: 1OMN [53] and 1CNN [54].

2.3. C. striatus—SVIA and SVIB SO-3

SVIA and SVIB. The SVIA toxin contains 24 amino acids. Its administration into lower vertebrates such as fish and frogs provokes paralysis [38], although it has relatively poor activity against mammalian Ca2+ channels. While SVIA blocks only CaV2.2, SVIB blocks P/Q type and N-type channels (Table 3). SVIB induces respiratory distress in mice when injected intracranially at concentrations of 70 pmol/g mouse and it is lethal around 300 pmol/g mouse; SVIA administration does not kill mice even at extremely high doses [38].
SO-3. This ω-conotoxin shows analgesic activity similar to that of MVIIA when tested in models of acute and chronic pain in rodents, however, it has fewer adverse effects than MVIIA [45,55]. The 3D structure of SO-3 resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDBe is: 1FYG [56].

2.4. C. catus—CVID

CVID. The sequence of its loop 4 is less conserved than other of ω-conotoxins. It displays the highest selectivity for N-type over P/Q- type Ca2+ channels (radioligand binding assays) [57] and because of this it has been tested in clinical trials as analgesic [58]. The 3D of CVID structure resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDB is: 1TT3 [50].

2.5. C. fulmen—FVIA

FVIA. It is reported to only be effective against CaV2.2 channels [59]. The 3D structure of FVIA resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDB is 2KM9 (to be published).

2.6. C. textile—TxVII and CNVIIA

TxVII. This conopeptide is very hydrophobic and has net negative charge of −3. The sequence of TxVII is 58% identical to that of δ-conotoxin-TxVIA, which targets Na+ channels. This toxin blocks the slowly inactivating, dihydropyridine- (DHP-) sensitive current [60]. The 3D of TxVII structure resolved by NMR spectroscopy deposited in the PDB is: 1F3K [61].
CNVIIA. This toxin is closely related to the CnVIIH toxin (Table 3), which possesses an unprocessed final glycine and therefore lacks amidation of its C-terminal end [62,63]. CNVIIA blocks CaV2.2 channels but surprisingly it does not block the neuromuscular junction of amphibians. Intracerebroventricular injection of CNVIIA in mice causes shaking movements and mild tremors, depending on dosage, whereas when injected intramuscularly into fish it causes paralysis and death at higher doses [62].

3. Structural Characteristics of ω-Conotoxins and Blockade Site on the CaV Channels

ω-conotoxins share several structural characteristics that allow them to block multiple CaVs on diverse cell types. Here we explore in detail four well known ω-conotoxins, CVID, SVIB, GVIA, and MVIIA, whose 3D structures have been resolved by NMR except for CVID (PDB IDs 1MVJ [49], 2CCO [40], and 1MVI [49], respectively); their multiple sequence alignments as well as their 3D structures are shown in Figure 2. As previously noted, they share four loops and three disulfide bonds (Figure 2A,C), giving them the same structural pattern (Figure 2B). These similarities are evident between CVID and SVIB (RMSDbackbone = 0.109 Å), although they are more subtle between CVID and GVIA (RMSDbackbone = 1.635 Å) (Figure 2D). The main structural differences between loops 2 and 3 (structural difference 1) and 4 (structural difference 2), where ω-conotoxins residues are not highly conserved, are highlighted with gray boxes (Figure 2B). Despite the structural similarities, there are differences in the selectivity of targets between these toxins. To understand the selectivity of these toxins at the structural basis, using NMR spectroscopy, researchers have determined the secondary and tertiary structures [50]. Adams et al. found a correlation between the solvent accessible surface area and the selectivity of ω-conotoxins, where the most exposed residue, R10 in MVIIA, play a crucial role in binding to CaVs [50]. The residue(s) on CaV channels that interacts with ω-conotoxins is not yet elucidated, although the extracellular linker region between the P-region and S5 in domain III, the pore of CaV2.2, is reported to be the area where the toxins bind channels [17,33]. In this region, G1326 appears to be the essential residue, as its mutation modifies the access of GVIA and MVIIA to the active site [69].
The structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies conducted in conotoxins identified key residues involved in the interaction with protein targets as well as identification of specific amino acids involved in their structural arrangement. These studies have been used to design small bioactive mimetics to selectively block CaV2.2 over CaV2.1 channels [70,71]. Bioactive mimetics have become promising candidates in the search for novel drugs for the treatment of chronic pain [21]. For example, based on the 3D structure of MVIIA [48] and identification of key residues such as K2, R10, L11, Y13, and R21 involved in the binding of MVIIA [72]. The data collected gave fundamental information for the design of the first bioactive mimetic of MVIIA in 1998, including the draft of small structures to mimic the residues R10, L11, and Y13 [73]. Although this bioactive mimetic showed poor inhibition against CaV2.2 (19% at 10 μM), a second generation of mimetics was produced and two of these compounds showed promising activities against CaV2.2 (IC50 = 3.3 and 2.7 μM) [74]. Since then, others ω-conotoxins mimetics have been reported using SAR information [70,75,76].

4. Therapeutic Uses of Conotoxins

The therapeutic and pharmacological potential of the conotoxins is well-known [1,47,77]. Nevertheless, their intrinsic physic-chemical and therapeutic characteristics such as molecular weight and low bioavailability due to their susceptibility to peptidase degradation has prevented the widespread use of conotoxins in the clinic. Importantly, and despite these limitations, their ability to selectively bind closely related molecular targets is an important strength of these marine conopeptides. Another advantage of Conotoxins is the diversity of targets, as they can act upon ion channels such as KV, NaV, and CaV channels, as well as on several G-protein coupled receptors including neurotensin, α-adrenergic, and vasopressin receptors and also on ligand-gated receptors such as AChRs, 5HT3Rs, and NMDARs [77]. These properties make them excellent candidates to develop new bio-compounds and derivatives against pathologies such as pain, stroke, and convulsive disorders. Especially interesting is their specific affinity for N-type, CaV2.2, CaV channels, which is a useful pharmacological characteristic for the validation of molecular targets, for example, in neuropathic pain. CaVs channel-mediated cellular events can be modulated for therapeutic purposes by direct block of CaV2.2, i.e., small peptides as conotoxins; by activation of GPCRs, or by direct interference with the channel trafficking [23].
In nature the proteins targeted by the cone snails on the preys are closely related to the proteins targeted in humans; however small structural and physiological differences can modify the efficacy, selectivity, and potency of conotoxins. Moreover, the target protein in cone snail’s preys may serve functions that are distinct to those in humans. Further, in humans and mammals the target proteins may be found in protected physiological spaces such as the Central Nervous System [77].
The recent significant progress in the identification of novel pharmacological targets for analgesic drugs designed using natural products has promoted the therapeutic use of conotoxins in pain relief. The main analgesic conopeptide is the ω-conotoxin MVIIA (Prialt®), which was approved for the management of severe chronic pain [43,47]. Prialt® is being manufactured and labeled by Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Eisai Limited in the US and the European Union, respectively. Prialt® blocks selectively N-type CaV channels through the inhibition of the presynaptic neurotransmitter release [13,78]. Prialt® attenuates nociception in several animal models such as models of persistent pain [79], chronic inflammatory pain [80], neuropathic pain [81], and postoperative pain [43]. Prialt® showed high effectiveness in morphine tolerant murine models [82], and prolonged Prialt® intrathecal infusion does not produce tolerance to its analgesic effects [79,82]. Another ω-conotoxin with analgesic activity is CVID (AM336), a conopeptide selective for N-type Ca channels [83], although it might have greater side effects than MVIIA [83]. Other conotoxins used in analgesia are Contulakin-G (CGX-1160), MrIA (Xen-2174), Conantokin-G (CGX-1007), Vc1.1 (ACV-1), and MrVIB (CGX-1002) [77].
The pharmacological and therapeutically pre-clinical efficacy of MVIIA and CVID, along with the FDA approval of Prialt®, have established ω-conotoxins (and conotoxins in general) as viable platforms for the design of new and specific drugs to alleviate pain by aiming N-type CaV channels.

5. Conclusions

Neuronal CaV channels have potential as targets for treatments of pain and the selectivity of conotoxins for these channels render conopeptides valuable therapeutic tools. ω-conotoxins display an inhibitory cysteine knot which is also present in other toxic peptides. This motif, along with other common structural characteristics, is the basis of their potent and selective blocking activity on the pore of CaV channels. A ω-conotoxin, MVIIA, has been approved by the FDA for therapeutic use under the commercial name of Prialt®. Going forward, however, more widespread applications of conotoxins will require improvements to enhance their transport across the blood-brain barrier as well as modification to increase their chemical stability.
The association between the structure of ω-conotoxins and their activity against CaV channels remains undetermined and such knowledge will be fundamental to improve their use as therapeutic agents. Techniques such as circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy have been helpful in the development of SAR studies, which have aided in the design of MVIIA [84], and GVIA [85] analogues. Additionally, the combination of electrophysiology, computational biophysics approaches, and SAR studies has provided new insights into the molecular binding mechanism of ω-conotoxins to their targets. This knowledge now places the drug design processes targeting chronic pain in a robust position to develop novel therapeutic agents. The design of small mimetics requires the identification of the correct scaffolds as well as of key residues to mimic. Towards this end, non-peptide mimetics containing the scaffolds of dendritic, 8-hydroxy-2-(1H)-quinolinone and the 5-hydroxymethyl resorcinol and the residues Leu, Arg, and Tyr, which matched the pharmacophore found in the conotoxin, were developed as MVIIA mimetics and show promissory biological activities against CaV2.2. Conotoxins remain an attractive option for the development of new therapeutic strategies using bioactive mimetics against chronic pain. Nevertheless, additional work involving both experimental and theoretical approaches are needed to unravel at the structural level the mechanisms modulating the protein targets of these peptides.

Acknowledgments

Wendy Gonzalez and David Ramirez want to thank Fondecyt 1140624. The laboratory of Rafael A. Fissore was supported in part by funds from a Hatch-NIFA project # NE-1227 and NIH RO1 #51872. Ingrid Carvacho thanks Matthias Piesche and Nolan Piesche for helpful discussion.

Author Contributions

David Ramirez prepared the figures. David Ramirez and Ingrid Carvacho wrote the manuscript. David Ramirez, Wendy Gonzalez, Rafael A. Fissore, and Ingrid Carvacho prepared the manuscript for submission. All authors revised and approved the last version of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Becker, S.; Terlau, H. Toxins from cone snails: Properties, applications and biotechnological production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 79, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Terlau, H.; Olivera, B.M. Conus venoms: A rich source of novel ion channel-targeted peptides. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 41–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gray, W.R.; Luque, A.; Olivera, B.M.; Barrett, J.; Cruz, L.J. Peptide toxins from Conus geographus venom. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 4734–4740. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Fainzilber, M.; Nakamura, T.; Lodder, J.C.; Zlotkin, E.; Kits, K.S.; Burlingame, A.L. γ-Conotoxin-PnVIIA, a γ-carboxyglutamate-containing peptide agonist of neuronal pacemaker cation currents. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1470–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fainzilber, M.; Gordon, D.; Hasson, A.; Spira, M.E.; Zlotkin, E. Mollusc-specific toxins from the venom of Conus textile neovicarius. FEBS J. 1991, 202, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rigby, A.C.; Lucas-Meunier, E.; Kalume, D.E.; Czerwiec, E.; Hambe, B.; Dahlqvist, I.; Fossier, P.; Baux, G.; Roepstorff, P.; Baleja, J.D.; et al. A conotoxin from Conus textile with unusual posttranslational modifications reduces presynaptic Ca2+ influx. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5758–5763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Buczek, O.; Wei, D.; Babon, J.J.; Yang, X.; Fiedler, B.; Chen, P.; Yoshikami, D.; Olivera, B.M.; Bulaj, G.; Norton, R.S. Structure and sodium channel activity of an excitatory I1-superfamily conotoxin. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 9929–9940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Terlau, H.; Shon, K.-J.; Grilley, M.; Stocker, M.; Stühmer, W.; Olivera, B.M. Strategy for rapid immobilization of prey by a fish-hunting marine snail. Nature 1996, 381, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cruz, L.J.; Gray, W.R.; Olivera, B.M.; Zeikus, R.D.; Kerr, L.; Yoshikami, D.; Moczydlowski, E. Conus geographus toxins that discriminate between neuronal and muscle sodium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 9280–9288. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Sharpe, I.A.; Gehrmann, J.; Loughnan, M.L.; Thomas, L.; Adams, D.A.; Atkins, A.; Palant, E.; Craik, D.J.; Adams, D.J.; Alewood, P.F.; et al. Two new classes of conopeptides inhibit the α1-adrenoceptor and noradrenaline transporter. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 902–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. England, L.J.; Imperial, J.; Jacobsen, R.; Craig, A.G.; Gulyas, J.; Akhtar, M.; Rivier, J.; Julius, D.; Olivera, B.M. Inactivation of a serotonin-gated ion channel by a polypeptide toxin from marine snails. Science 1998, 281, 575–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petrel, C.; Hocking, H.G.; Reynaud, M.; Upert, G.; Favreau, P.; Biass, D.; Paolini-Bertrand, M.; Peigneur, S.; Tytgat, J.; Gilles, N.; et al. Identification, structural and pharmacological characterization of τ-CnVA, a conopeptide that selectively interacts with somatostatin sst 3 receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 1663–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kerr, L.M.; Yoshikami, D. A venom peptide with a novel presynaptic blocking action. Nature 1984, 308, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaas, Q.; Westermann, J.-C.; Halai, R.; Wang, C.K.L.; Craik, D.J. ConoServer, a database for conopeptide sequences and structures. Bioinformatics 2007, 24, 445–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kaas, Q.; Yu, R.; Jin, A.-H.; Dutertre, S.; Craik, D.J. ConoServer: Updated content, knowledge, and discovery tools in the conopeptide database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, gkr886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Olivera, B.M.; Rivier, J.; Scott, J.K.; Hillyard, D.R.; Cruz, L.J. Conotoxins. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 22067–22070. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Adams, D.J.; Berecki, G. Mechanisms of conotoxin inhibition of N-type (Cav2.2) calcium channels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2013, 1828, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bourinet, E.; Zamponi, G.W. Block of voltage-gated calcium channels by peptide toxins. Neuropharmacology 2016, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hille, B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes; Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2001; Volume 507. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dolphin, A.C. Voltage-gated calcium channels and their auxiliary subunits: Physiology and pathophysiology and pharmacology. J. Physiol. 2016, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schroeder, C.I.; Lewis, R.J. ω-conotoxins GVIA, MVIIA and CVID: SAR and clinical potential. Mar. Drugs 2006, 4, 193–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Clapham, D.E. Calcium signaling. Cell 1995, 80, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zamponi, G.W.; Striessnig, J.; Koschak, A.; Dolphin, A.C. The physiology, pathology, and pharmacology of voltage-gated calcium channels and their future therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Rev. 2015, 67, 821–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Albillos, A.; Neher, E.; Moser, T. R-Type Ca2+ channels are coupled to the rapid component of secretion in mouse adrenal slice chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 8323–8330. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Loane, D.J.; Lima, P.A.; Marrion, N. V Co-assembly of N-type Ca2+ and BK channels underlies functional coupling in rat brain. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jun, K.; Piedras-Renteria, E.S.; Smith, S.M.; Wheeler, D.B.; Lee, S.B.; Lee, T.G.; Chin, H.; Adams, M.E.; Scheller, R.H.; Tsien, R.W.; et al. Ablation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channel currents, altered synaptic transmission, and progressive ataxia in mice lacking the α1A-subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 15245–15250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saegusa, H.; Kurihara, T.; Zong, S.; Kazuno, A.; Matsuda, Y.; Nonaka, T.; Han, W.; Toriyama, H.; Tanabe, T. Suppression of inflammatory and neuropathic pain symptoms in mice lacking the N-type Ca2+ channel. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bourinet, E.; Altier, C.; Hildebrand, M.E.; Trang, T.; Salter, M.W.; Zamponi, G.W. Calcium-permeable ion channels in pain signaling. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 81–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schroeder, C.I.; Rash, L.D.; Vila-Farrés, X.; Rosengren, K.J.; Mobli, M.; King, G.F.; Alewood, P.F.; Craik, D.J.; Durek, T. Chemical Synthesis, 3D Structure, and ASIC Binding Site of the Toxin Mambalgin-2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1017–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pallaghy, P.K.; Norton, R.S.; Nielsen, K.J.; Craik, D.J. A common structural motif incorporating a cystine knot and a triple-stranded β-sheet in toxic and inhibitory polypeptides. Protein Sci. 1994, 3, 1833–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sigrist, C.J.A.; Cerutti, L.; Hulo, N.; Gattiker, A.; Falquet, L.; Pagni, M.; Bairoch, A.; Bucher, P. PROSITE: A documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief. Bioinform. 2002, 3, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sigrist, C.J.A.; De Castro, E.; Cerutti, L.; Cuche, B.A.; Hulo, N.; Bridge, A.; Bougueleret, L.; Xenarios, I. New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 41, D344–D347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ellinor, P.T.; Zhang, J.F.; Horne, W.A.; Tsien, R.W. Structural determinants of the blockade of N-type calcium channels by a peptide neurotoxin. Nature 1994, 372, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Olivera, B.M.; Gray, W.R.; Zeikus, R.; McIntosh, J.M.; Varga, J.; Rivier, J.; De Santos, V.; Cruz, L.J. Peptide neurotoxins from fish-hunting cone snails. Science 1985, 230, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. McCleskey, E.W.; Fox, A.P.; Feldman, D.H.; Cruz, L.J.; Olivera, B.M.; Tsien, R.W.; Yoshikami, D. Omega-conotoxin: Direct and persistent blockade of specific types of calcium channels in neurons but not muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 4327–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Regan, L.J.; Sah, D.W.Y.; Bean, B.P. Ca2+ channels in rat central and peripheral neurons: High-threshold current resistant to dihydropyridine blockers and ω-conotoxin. Neuron 1991, 6, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Olivera, B.M.; Cruz, L.J.; De Santos, V.; LeCheminant, G.; Griffin, D.; Zeikus, R.; McIntosh, J.M.; Galyean, R.; Varga, J. Neuronal calcium channel antagonists. Discrimination between calcium channel subtypes using omega.-conotoxin from Conus magus venom. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 2086–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ramilo, C.A.; Zafaralla, G.C.; Nadasdi, L.; Hammerland, L.G.; Yoshikami, D.; Gray, W.R.; Kristipati, R.; Ramachandran, J.; Miljanich, G.; Olivera, B.M. Novel alpha- and omega-conotoxins from Conus striatus venom. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 9919–9926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miljanich, G.P.; Bitner, R.S.; Bowersox, S.S.; Fox, J.A.; Valentino, K.L.; Yamashiro, D.H. Method of Treating Ischemia-Related Neuronal Damage. U.S. Patent 5,051,403 A, 24 September 1991. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pallaghy, P.K.; Norton, R.S. Refined solution structure of ω-conotoxin GVIA: Implications for calcium channel binding. J. Pept. Res. 1999, 53, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mould, J.; Yasuda, T.; Schroeder, C.I.; Beedle, A.M.; Doering, C.J.; Zamponi, G.W.; Adams, D.J.; Lewis, R.J. The α2δ auxiliary subunit reduces affinity of ω-conotoxins for recombinant N-type (Cav2.2) calcium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 34705–34714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Davis, J.H.; Bradley, E.K.; Miljanich, G.P.; Nadasdi, L.; Ramachandran, J.; Basus, V.J. Solution structure of. omega.-conotoxin GVIA using 2-D NMR spectroscopy and relaxation matrix analysis. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 7396–7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, Y.-X.; Pettus, M.; Gao, D.; Phillips, C.; Bowersox, S.S. Effects of intrathecal administration of ziconotide, a selective neuronal N-type calcium channel blocker, on mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia in a rat model of postoperative pain. Pain 2000, 84, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Miljanich, G.P. Ziconotide: Neuronal calcium channel blocker for treating severe chronic pain. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 3029–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, F.; Yan, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Wu, Q.; Yu, S.; Ding, J.; Dai, Q. Molecular basis of toxicity of N-type calcium channel inhibitor MVIIA. Neuropharmacology 2016, 101, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Skov, M.J.; Beck, J.C.; de Kater, A.W.; Shopp, G.M. Nonclinical safety of ziconotide: An intrathecal analgesic of a new pharmaceutical class. Int. J. Toxicol. 2007, 26, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. McGivern, J.G. Ziconotide: A review of its pharmacology and use in the treatment of pain. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2007, 3, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kohno, T.; Kim, J.I.; Kobayashi, K.; Kodera, Y.; Maeda, T.; Sato, K. Three-Dimensional Structure in Solution of the Calcium Channel Blocker omega.-Conotoxin MVIIA. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 10256–10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nielsen, K.J.; Thomas, L.; Lewis, R.J.; Alewood, P.F.; Craik, D.J. A consensus structure for ω-conotoxins with different selectivities for voltage-sensitive calcium channel subtypes: Comparison of MVIIA, SVIB and SNX-202. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 263, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Adams, D.J.; Smith, A.B.; Schroeder, C.I.; Yasuda, T.; Lewis, R.J. ω-conotoxin CVID inhibits a pharmacologically distinct voltage-sensitive calcium channel associated with transmitter release from preganglionic nerve terminals. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 4057–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Atkinson, R.A.; Kieffer, B.; Dejaegere, A.; Sirockin, F.; Lefèvre, J.-F. Structural and dynamic characterization of ω-conotoxin MVIIA: The binding loop exhibits slow conformational exchange. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 3908–3919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Monje, V.D.; Haack, J.A.; Naisbitt, S.R.; Miljanich, G.; Ramachandran, J.; Nasdasdi, L.; Olivera, B.M.; Hillyard, D.R.; Gray, W.R. A new Conus peptide ligand for Ca channel subtypes. Neuropharmacology 1993, 32, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Farr-Jones, S.; Miljanich, G.P.; Nadasdi, L.; Ramachandran, J.; Basus, V.J. Solution structure of ω-conotoxin MVIIC, a high affinity ligand of P-type calcium channels, using1H NMR spectroscopy and complete relaxation matrix analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 248, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nielsen, K.J.; Adams, D.; Thomas, L.; Bond, T.; Alewood, P.F.; Craik, D.J.; Lewis, R.J. Structure-activity relationships of ω-conotoxins MVIIA, MVIIC and 14 loop splice hybrids at N and P/Q-type calcium channels. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 289, 1405–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wen, L.; Yang, S.; Qiao, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, P. SO-3, a new O-superfamily conopeptide derived from Conus striatus, selectively inhibits N-type calcium currents in cultured hippocampal neurons. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 145, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yan, Y.; Tu, G.; Luo, X.; Dai, Q.; Huang, P.; Zhang, R. Three-dimensional solution structure of ω-conotoxin SO3 determined by1H NMR. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2003, 48, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lewis, R.J.; Nielsen, K.J.; Craik, D.J.; Loughnan, M.L.; Adams, D.A.; Sharpe, I.A.; Luchian, T.; Adams, D.J.; Bond, T.; Thomas, L.; et al. Novel ω-conotoxins from Conus catus discriminate among neuronal calcium channel subtypes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35335–35344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Schroeder, C.I.; Doering, C.J.; Zamponi, G.W.; Lewis, R.J. N-type calcium channel blockers: Novel therapeutics for the treatment of pain. Med. Chem. 2006, 2, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lee, S.; Kim, Y.; Back, S.K.; Choi, H.-W.; Lee, J.Y.; Jung, H.H.; Ryu, J.H.; Suh, H.-W.; Na, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Analgesic effect of highly reversible ω-conotoxin FVIA on N type Ca2+ channels. Mol. Pain 2010, 6, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fainzilber, M.; Lodder, J.C.; van der Schors, R.C.; Li, K.W.; Yu, Z.; Burlingame, A.L.; Geraerts, W.P.M.; Kits, K.S. A novel hydrophobic omega-conotoxin blocks molluscan dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 8748–8752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kobayashi, K.; Sasaki, T.; Sato, K.; Kohno, T. Three-dimensional solution structure of ω-conotoxin TxVII, an L-type calcium channel blocker. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 14761–14767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Favreau, P.; Gilles, N.; Lamthanh, H.; Bournaud, R.; Shimahara, T.; Bouet, F.; Laboute, P.; Letourneux, Y.; Ménez, A.; Molgó, J.; et al. A new ω-conotoxin that targets N-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels with unusual specificity. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 14567–14575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Violette, A.; Biass, D.; Dutertre, S.; Koua, D.; Piquemal, D.; Pierrat, F.; Stöcklin, R.; Favreau, P. Large-scale discovery of conopeptides and conoproteins in the injectable venom of a fish-hunting cone snail using a combined proteomic and transcriptomic approach. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 5215–5225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Miljanich, G.P.; Bitner, R.S.; Bowersox, S.S.; Fox, J.A.; Valentino, K.L.; Yamashiro, D.H.; Tsubokawa, M. Screening Method for Neuroprotective Compounds. U.S. Patent 5,424,218 A, 4 November 1993. [Google Scholar]
  65. Miljanich, G.P.; Bowersox, S.S.; Fox, J.A.; Valentino, K.L.; Bitner, R.S.; Yamashiro, D.H. Compositions for Delayed Treatment of Ischemia-Related Neuronal Damage. WO Patent 1993010145 A1, 27 May 1993. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bai-Song, L.; Fang, Y.; Dong, Z.; Pei-Tang, H.; Cui-Fen, H. Conopeptides from Conus striatus and Conus textile by cDNA cloning. Peptides 1999, 20, 1139–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Berecki, G.; Motin, L.; Haythornthwaite, A.; Vink, S.; Bansal, P.; Drinkwater, R.; Wang, C.I.; Moretta, M.; Lewis, R.J.; Alewood, P.F.; et al. Analgesic ω-conotoxins CVIE and CVIF selectively and voltage-dependently block recombinant and native N-type calcium channels. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 77, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kits, K.S.; Lodder, J.C.; Van Der Schors, R.C.; Li, K.W.; Geraerts, W.P.M.; Fainzilber, M. Novel ω-Conotoxins Block Dihydropyridine-Insensitive High Voltage-Activated Calcium Channels in Molluscan Neurons. J. Neurochem. 1996, 67, 2155–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Feng, Z.-P.; Hamid, J.; Doering, C.; Bosey, G.M.; Snutch, T.P.; Zamponi, G.W. Residue Gly1326 of the N-type calcium channel α1B subunit controls reversibility of ω-conotoxin GVIA and MVIIA block. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 15728–15735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Schroeder, C.I.; Smythe, M.L.; Lewis, R.J. Development of small molecules that mimic the binding of ω-conotoxins at the N-type voltage-gated calcium channel. Mol. Divers. 2004, 8, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Baell, J.B.; Duggan, P.J.; Forsyth, S.A.; Lewis, R.J.; Lok, Y.P.; Schroeder, C.I. Synthesis and biological evaluation of nonpeptide mimetics of ω-conotoxin GVIA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 4025–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nadasdi, L.; Yamashiro, D.; Chung, D.; Tarczy-Hornoch, K.; Adriaenssens, P.; Ramachandran, J. Structure-Activity Analysis of a Conus Peptide Blocker of N-Type Neuronal Calcium Channels. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 8076–8081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Menzler, S.; Bikker, J.A.; Horwell, D.C. Synthesis of a non-peptide analogue of omega-conotoxin MVIIA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7619–7622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Menzler, S.; Bikker, J.A.; Suman-Chauhan, N.; Horwell, D.C. Design and biological evaluation of non-peptide analogues of omega-conotoxin MVIIA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 345–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guo, Z.-X.; Cammidge, A.N.; Horwell, D.C. Dendroid peptide structural mimetics of ω-conotoxin MVIIA based on a 2 (1H)-quinolinone core. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5169–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Duggan, P.J.; Tuck, K.L. Bioactive mimetics of conotoxins and other venom peptides. Toxins 2015, 7, 4175–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Layer, R.T.; Mcintosh, J.M. Conotoxins: Therapeutic Potential and Application. Mar. Drugs 2006, 4, 119–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yeager, R.E.; Yoshikami, D.; Rivier, J.; Cruz, L.J.; Miljanich, G.P. Transmitter release from presynaptic terminals of electric organ: Inhibition by the calcium channel antagonist omega Conus toxin. J. Neurosci. 1987, 7, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Malmberg, A.B.; Yaksh, T.L. Effect of continuous intrathecal infusion of ω-conopeptides, N-type calcium-channel blockers, on behavior and antinociception in the formalin and hot-plate tests in rats. Pain 1995, 60, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sluka, K.A. Blockade of N-and P/Q-type calcium channels reduces the secondary heat hyperalgesia induced by acute inflammation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1998, 287, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Xiao, W.H.; Bennett, G.J. Synthetic omega-conopeptides applied to the site of nerve injury suppress neuropathic pains in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1995, 274, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, Y.-X.; Gao, D.; Pettus, M.; Phillips, C.; Bowersox, S.S. Interactions of intrathecally administered ziconotide, a selective blocker of neuronal N-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels, with morphine on nociception in rats. Pain 2000, 84, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hannon, H.E.; Atchison, W.D. Omega-conotoxins as experimental tools and therapeutics in pain management. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 680–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kim, J.I.; Takahashi, M.; Ogura, A.; Kohno, T.; Kudo, Y.; Sato, K. Hydroxyl group of Tyr13 is essential for the activity of omega-conotoxin GVIA, a peptide toxin for N-type calcium channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 23876–23878. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Lew, M.J.; Flinn, J.P.; Pallaghy, P.K.; Murphy, R.; Whorlow, S.L.; Wright, C.E.; Norton, R.S.; Angus, J.A. Structure-function relationships of ω-conotoxin GVIA Synthesis, structure, calcium channel binding, and functional assay of alanine-substituted analogues. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 12014–12023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Marinedrugs 15 00313 g001 550
Figure 1. ω-Conotoxins family pattern (PROSITE ID: PS60004). The pattern is described using the following conventions: ‘x’ is used for a position where any amino acid is accepted; ambiguities are indicated by listing the acceptable amino acids for a given position, between square parentheses ‘[ ]’, i.e., [ALT] stands for Ala or Leu or Thr. Each element in the pattern is separated from its neighbor by a ‘-‘. Repetition of a pattern element can be indicated by following that element with a numerical value or a numerical range in brackets. Examples: x(2) corresponds to x-x, x(1,5) corresponds to x or x-x or x-x-x or x-x-x-x or x-x-x-x-x.
Figure 1. ω-Conotoxins family pattern (PROSITE ID: PS60004). The pattern is described using the following conventions: ‘x’ is used for a position where any amino acid is accepted; ambiguities are indicated by listing the acceptable amino acids for a given position, between square parentheses ‘[ ]’, i.e., [ALT] stands for Ala or Leu or Thr. Each element in the pattern is separated from its neighbor by a ‘-‘. Repetition of a pattern element can be indicated by following that element with a numerical value or a numerical range in brackets. Examples: x(2) corresponds to x-x, x(1,5) corresponds to x or x-x or x-x-x or x-x-x-x or x-x-x-x-x.
Marinedrugs 15 00313 g001
Marinedrugs 15 00313 g002 550
Figure 2. Structural differences between ω-conotoxins. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of ω-conotoxins colored by conservation in a ramp, from white (not conserved) to dark blue (highly conserved); cysteines involved in disulfide bonds (gray lines) are highlighted in orange, and loops are indicated at the bottom; (B) Structural alignment of CVID (model from Swiss Model Repository ID: P58920); SVIB (PDB ID: 1MVJ); GVIA (PDB ID: 2CCO) and MVIIA (PDB ID: 1MVI); the ω-conotoxins backbone is represented as a ribbon diagram. Major structural differences in ω-conotoxins are labeled as 1 and 2. (C) ω-conotoxins in ribbon representation with disulfide bonds in stick representation. (D) RMSD (Å) matrix from ω-conotoxins backbone atoms structural alignment.
Figure 2. Structural differences between ω-conotoxins. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of ω-conotoxins colored by conservation in a ramp, from white (not conserved) to dark blue (highly conserved); cysteines involved in disulfide bonds (gray lines) are highlighted in orange, and loops are indicated at the bottom; (B) Structural alignment of CVID (model from Swiss Model Repository ID: P58920); SVIB (PDB ID: 1MVJ); GVIA (PDB ID: 2CCO) and MVIIA (PDB ID: 1MVI); the ω-conotoxins backbone is represented as a ribbon diagram. Major structural differences in ω-conotoxins are labeled as 1 and 2. (C) ω-conotoxins in ribbon representation with disulfide bonds in stick representation. (D) RMSD (Å) matrix from ω-conotoxins backbone atoms structural alignment.
Marinedrugs 15 00313 g002
Table
Table 1. Classification of conotoxins and their molecular targets 1.
Table 1. Classification of conotoxins and their molecular targets 1.
Conotoxin FamilyMolecular TargetReference
α (alpha)Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR)[3]
γ (gamma)Neuronal pacemaker cation currents (inward cation current)[4]
δ (delta)Voltage-gated sodium (Na+) channels[5]
ε (epsilon)Presynaptic calcium (Ca2+) channels or G protein-coupled presynaptic receptors[6]
ι (iota)Voltage-gated sodium (Na+) channels[7]
κ (kappa)Voltage-gated potassium (K+) channels[8]
μ (mu)Voltage-gated sodium (Na+)channels[9]
ρ (rho)Alpha1-adrenoceptors (GPCR)[10]
σ (sigma)Serotonin-gated ion channels 5-HT3[11]
τ (tau)Somatostatin receptor[12]
χ (chi)Neuronal noradrenaline transporter[10]
ω (omega)Voltage-gated calcium (CaV) channels[13]
1 Taken and adapted from www.conoserver.org [14,15].
Table
Table 2. Types of calcium channels in vertebrates [19,21].
Table 2. Types of calcium channels in vertebrates [19,21].
Ca ChannelHuman Gene NameVoltage Activationα1 SubunitCa Current
CaV1.1–1.4CACNA1S; CACNA1C; CACNA1D; CACNA1FHVAα1S, C, D, FL
CaV2.1CACNA1AHVAα1AP/Q
CaV2.2CACNA1BHVAα1BN
CaV2.3CACNA1EHVAα1ER
CaV3.1–3.3CACNA1G; CACNA1H; CACNA1ILVAα1G, H, I.T
HVA: High Voltage activated; LVA: Low Voltage activated.
Table
Table 3. ω-Conotoxins from Conus species and their targets.
Table 3. ω-Conotoxins from Conus species and their targets.
Specie Conusω-ConotoxinAlternative NamesTargetOrganismIC50Reference
C. geographusGVIAG6a, SNX-124,CaV2.1R. norvegicus1.05 μM 1[57]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus2.02 pM 1[62]
GVIB ? [34]
GVIC ? [34]
GVIIASNX-178CaV2.2R. norvegicus22.9 nM 1[64]
GVIIB ? [34]
C. magusMVIIAM7a, SNX-111, Ziconotide, Prialt®CaV2.1R. norvegicus156 nM 1[62]
CaV2.2H. sapiens7.96 nM 2[59]
MVIIBSNX-159CaV2.2R. norvegicus101 pM 1[65]
MVIICM7c, SNX-230CaV2.1R. norvegicus600 pM 1[57]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus7.0 nM 1[57]
MVIIDSNX-238? [52]
C. striatusSVIAS6a, SNX-157CaV2.2R. norvegicus1.46 μM 1[65]
SVIBS6b, SNX-183CaV2.1 [38]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus1.09 nM 1[65]
SO-3 CaV2.2 160 nM 2[45]
SO-4 ? [66]
SO-5 ? [66]
C. catusCVIAC6a, catus-C1bCaV2.1R. norvegicus850 nM 1[57]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus560 pM 1[57]
CVIBC6bCaV2.1
CaV2.2		R. norvegicus
R. norvegicus
11 nM 1
7.7 nM 1
12 nM 2		[57]
[57]
[67]
CVICC6cCaV2.1R. norvegicus31 nM 1[57]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus7.6 nM 1[57]
CVIDAM-336, AM336, leconotideCaV2.1R. norvegicus55 μM 1[57]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus70 pM 1[57]
CVIE CaV2.2R. norvegicus2.6 nM 2
0.12 nM 2		[67]
CVIFC6fCaV1.2R. norvegicus>3 μM 2[67]
CaV1.3R. norvegicus>3 μM 2[67]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus19.9 nM/[67]
0.1 nM 2[67]
CaV2.3R. norvegicus>3 μM 2[67]
C. fulmenFVIA CaV2.2H. sapiens11.5 nM 2[59]
C. radiatusRVIAR6aCaV2.2R. norvegicus229 nM 1[39]
C. textileTxVII L-type [60]
C. consorsCnVIIACn7a, CnVIIHCaV2.1R. norvegicus179 nM 1[62]
CaV2.2R. norvegicus2.3–3.7 pM 1[62]
CnVIIBCnVIIG? [63]
CnVIICCnVIIE? [63]
C. pennaceusPnVIAPn6a?Lymnaea stagnalis~5 μM2 [68]
PnVIBPn6b?Lymnaea stagnalis~5 μM2[68]
C. tulipaTVIASNX-185CaV2.2R. norvegicus228 pM 1[65]
1 Binding/competition assay; 2 Electrophysiological measurements.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramírez, D.; Gonzalez, W.; Fissore, R.A.; Carvacho, I. Conotoxins as Tools to Understand the Physiological Function of Voltage-Gated Calcium (CaV) Channels. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100313

AMA Style

Ramírez D, Gonzalez W, Fissore RA, Carvacho I. Conotoxins as Tools to Understand the Physiological Function of Voltage-Gated Calcium (CaV) Channels. Marine Drugs. 2017; 15(10):313. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramírez, David, Wendy Gonzalez, Rafael A. Fissore, and Ingrid Carvacho. 2017. "Conotoxins as Tools to Understand the Physiological Function of Voltage-Gated Calcium (CaV) Channels" Marine Drugs 15, no. 10: 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100313

APA Style

Ramírez, D., Gonzalez, W., Fissore, R. A., & Carvacho, I. (2017). Conotoxins as Tools to Understand the Physiological Function of Voltage-Gated Calcium (CaV) Channels. Marine Drugs, 15(10), 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop