Next Article in Journal
Semisynthesis and Cytotoxic Evaluation of an Ether Analogue Library Based on a Polyhalogenated Diphenyl Ether Scaffold Isolated from a Lamellodysidea Sponge
Previous Article in Journal
Alexandrium spp.: From Toxicity to Potential Biotechnological Benefits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 22
Issue 1
10.3390/md22010032
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deciphering the Glycosylation Steps in the Biosynthesis of P-1894B and Grincamycin Isolated from Marine-Derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32

by
Hongbo Huang
1,2,†,
Yun Zhang
2,†,
Yongxiang Song
2,
Chunyao Ling
2,
Siyan Peng
1,
Bo Ding
1,
Yiwen Tao
1,* and
Jianhua Ju
2,3,*
1
Guangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Target and Clinical Pharmacology, The NMPA and State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China
2
CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Marine Materia Medica, RNAM Center for Marine Microbiology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
3
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2024, 22(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/md22010032
Submission received: 12 December 2023 / Revised: 30 December 2023 / Accepted: 31 December 2023 / Published: 2 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Biotechnology Related to Drug Discovery or Production)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Recently, we re-isolated the glycosylated angucycline antibiotics P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) from the marine-derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32 as potent antitumor agents and identified their biosynthesis gene cluster gcn. Both P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) possess a trisaccharide and a disaccharide moiety comprised of five deoxysugars. In this work, three genes encoding glycosyltransferases (GcnG1, GcnG2, and GcnG3) responsible for the assembly of deoxysugars into angucycline aglycone were identified from the biosynthesis gene cluster gcn. Gene inactivations of gcnG1, gcnG2, gcnG3, and gcnG1G2 by lambda-RED-mediated gene replacements led to the construction of four mutants, in which the glycosyltransferase genes were disrupted, respectively. The metabolites from the mutants were purified and identified, including two new analogues designated as grincamycin U (3a) and V (3′). The sequential glycosylation steps in the biosynthesis of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) catalyzed by GcnG3, GcnG1, and GcnG2 were elucidated.

1. Introduction

Natural angucycline compounds were a group of secondary metabolites derived from Actinomycetes, mainly from the genus of Streptomyces [1]. Biosynthetically, the initial framework of angucyclines, benz[a]anthracene, was synthesized by type II polyketide synthases (PKS) as angular decaketide intermediate. The benz[a]anthracene backbone was modified by various post-PKS tailoring enzymes to form a multiplicity of sugarless angucycline species, including classical tetracyclic angucycline aglycones with or without angular oxygen atom(s), non-classical tricyclic or rearranged “linear” angucycline aglycones [2]. Most of the angucycline compounds were glycosylated by deoxysaccharide(s), such as D-olivose, L-rhodinose, L-aculose, L-cinerulose A/B, and so on. The glycodiversity leads to dramatic structural diversity of angucyclines. In addition, glycosylated modifications of angucycline aglycones played important roles in enhancing the biological activities of these compounds through improving water solubility and increasing cell membrane-penetrating ability [2]. A typical example was landomycins A and Y bearing a hexasaccharidal chain showed better cytotoxicities against breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-231 than other landomycins with shorter sugar chains [3]. The representative angucyclines with significant anti-tumor bioactivities, including BE-7585A, benzanthrin A, grincamycin, vineomycin B2, and kerriamycins A–C, were all glycosylated with deoxysaccharides. The glycosylation of natural angucyclines was catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (GTs) via transferring NDP-activated sugars to the angucycline acceptors [4]. Up to now, dozens of GTs that participated in the assembly of deoxysaccharide chains for landomycin A [5], urdamycin A [6,7], squayamycin [8,9], mithraycin [10], Sch47554, and Sch47555 [11] had been reported. These GTs involved in biosynthesis of angucyclines were divided into the C-GT group and the O-GT group, governing the construction of C-glycoside and O-glycoside via the formation of the C-C bond and C-O bond, respectively. In some cases, one GT could assemble two sugar units through iterative action, such as SaqGT1, SaqGT3, LanGT1, and LanGT4. In the previous reports, the functions of these GTs were elucidated by gene inactivation and heterologous expression experiments. During these courses, some new “unnatural” natural angucycline compounds, such as novel glycosylated urdamycin and landomycin, were produced by genetically constructed mutants, which provided an alternative route to obtain new chemical structures of angucycline by avoiding complicated synthesis reactions of multichiral center deoxysugars.
The potent antitumor antibiotics P-1894B (1, also named vinoemycin A1, Figure 1) [12,13,14] and grincamycin (1′) [15,16] were classic angucycline glycosides first identified from the genus of Streptomyces in the 1980s. P-1894B (1) showed powerful growth inhibition activity toward Jurkat T cells with an IC50 value of 11 nmol/L [17]. P-1894B (1) also demonstrated in vivo activity against Sarcoma 180 solid tumors in mice. Grincamycin (1′) was reported to inhibit the proliferation of murine leukemia P388 cells with an IC50 value of 13 ng/mL [15]. The structures of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) were very similar; both of them had an identical angucycline aglycone designated SS-228Y-type [1]. P-1894B (1) carried a trisaccharide chain comprised of a D-olivose, an L-rhodinose, and an L-aculose at the C-9 position and a disaccharide chain including an L-rhodinose and an L-aculose at the C-3 position. However, the two terminal L-aculose units were replaced by L-cinerulose A units in grincamycin (1′). Although the biosynthesis pathway of angucycline aglycone had been investigated [18], the glycosylation pathway of the trisaccharide and disaccharide chains in P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) was not clear.
In our previous work, we re-isolated P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) as predominant products from a deep-sea-derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32 when fermented in modified AM2 and RA media, respectively [16,17]. The gene cluster gcn (NCBI accession number KC962511) responsible for biosynthesis of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) was also identified [19]. The gcn cluster encoded type II polyketide synthases and cyclases (GcnHIJKL), accounting for angucycline core construction, oxidoreductases (GcnACFMQTU) required for postmodifications, as well as eight deoxysugar biosynthesis enzymes (GcnS1–S8) and three putative glycosyltransferases (GTs, GcnG1–G3). We also uncovered the role of the sugar-tailoring enzyme GcnQ. A glycosidic intermediate (1a, Figure 1) with two terminal L-rhodinoses in the di- and trisaccharide chains was obtained from the mutant Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnQ. The two terminal L-rhodinose units in the intermediate (1a) were converted into L-aculose units to form P-1894B, or converted into L-cinerulose A to produce grincamycin under the catalyzation of GcnQ, respectively [19]. However, the assembly steps of the D-olivose and four L-rhodinose units in the intermediate (1a) were still unknown. In this paper, the role of the three GTs encoded by gcnG1~G3 were investigated by the gene inactivation approach, and the biosynthetic pathway for glycosylation of P-1894B and grincamycin was elucidated. Furthermore, two new angucycline glycosides were obtained from the GT mutant strains, demonstrating that inactivation of GT genes is a promising route to generate a variety of “unnatural” natural compounds.

2. Results

The biosynthetic gene cluster gcn contains three putative glycosyltransferase genes, including gcnG1, gcnG2, and gcnG3. The BLAST analysis of the primary amino acid sequence of these genes revealed that gcnG1 and gcnG2 were homologies to O-GTs, whereas gcnG3 was homology to C-GTs (Table S1, Supplementary Materials). A comparison of multiple amino acid sequences revealed that GcnG1 showed homology to SaqGT2 with 54% identity [8] and to LanGT4 with 45% identity [20]. The GcnG2 was homologous to SaqGT4 and UrdGT1c with 58% identity [6,7,8]. The GcnG3 showed similarity to UrdGT2 with 79% identity and to SaqGT5 with 65% identity [6,7,8]. Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences inferred that the GcnG1 and GcnG2 may play a role in governing the transfer of the L-rhodinose unit, whereas the GcnG3 could be responsible for the attachment of D-olivose moiety in the biosynthesis of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′). To confirm the functions of GcnG1, GcnG2, and GcnG3, four mutant strains named Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnG1, ΔgcnG2, ΔgcnG3, and ΔgcnG1G2 were constructed by replacing the abovementioned genes using the lambda-RED-mediated gene recombineering strategy [19]. The mutants were fermented in modified AM2 medium. Subsequently, the culture extracts were analyzed by LC–MS; the resultant compounds were isolated by silica gel column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC. The structures were identified by HR-MS and NMR methods.

2.1. Construction and Metabolite Analysis of Mutant ΔgcnG3

The gcnG3 gene was inactivated using homologous recombination by replacing a 687 bp fragment in gcnG3 with apramycin resistance gene cassettes aac(3)IV-oriT in a size of 1369 bp, which contained the apramycin-resistant gene and the origin of transfer site, to generate a mutant ΔgcnG3 (Figure S1(A1)). PCR analysis using genome-specific primers (G3tF and G3tR, Table S3) showed a product of 1.7 kb amplified from Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnG3 genome, whereas the wild-type genome demonstrated a fragment of 1.0 kb (Figure S1(B1)). These results confirmed the occurrence of the expected double crossover events and verified the inactivation of the gcnG3 gene.
The mutant ΔgcnG3 was fermented in modified AM2 medium on a rotation at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 5.5 days in an 8 L scale. After fermentation, the whole culture was centrifuged, and the mycelium was extracted by acetone. LC–UV/MS analysis of the extract showed a predominant peak (2) at 8.9 min (Figure 2A, trace III). ESI-MS spectrum revealed a molecular weight of 322 for 2, suggesting that 2 was an aglycone of angucycline without glycosylation. Subsequently, compound 2 was purified using silica gel column chromatography and semi-preparative HPLC equipped with an ODS column. Comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data of 2 with those reported in the literature confirmed that compound 2 was tetrangomycin (Figure 2B) [21].

2.2. Construction and Metabolite Analysis of Mutants ΔgcnG2 and ΔgcnG1

The gene gcnG2 encodes a putative O-glycosyltransferase. The mutant ΔgcnG2 was constructed using homologous recombination by substituting a 717 bp fragment in gcnG2 with apramycin-resistant gene cassettes aac(3)IV-oriT, as abovementioned (Figure S1(A2)). PCR product amplified from Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnG1 genome using genome-specific primers (G2tF and G2tR, Table S3) showed a band with the size of 1.7 kb when analyzed by gel electrophoresis, whereas the wild-type genome displayed a fragment of 1.0 kb (Figure S1(B2)), confirming the generation of the double crossover events.
The mutant ΔgcnG2 was fermented and the extract was analyzed in the same fashions as mentioned for ΔgcnG3. Two major product peaks with retention times of 12.3 min (3) and 16.5 min (3a) were revealed in the HPLC–UV/MS chromatography (Figure 2A, trace IV). Compound 3 was identified to be saquayamycin G by comparing its 1H and 13C NMR data with those reported in previous literature [22]. HR-ESI-MS spectrum of 3a showed an [M−H]− ion signal at m/z 675.2448, suggestive of a molecular formula of C37H40O12. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data of 3a were similar to those of saquayamycin G (Table 1). Detailed comparison revealed that two oxygen-bearing quaternary carbons at δC 81.1 (C-4a) and δC 83.4 (C-12b) in saquanyamycin G were replaced by two aromatic carbons at δC 149.7 (C-4a) and δC 136.7 (C-12b) in 3a, respectively. The HMBC correlations from H-5 (δH 7.56) to C-4, C-6a, and C-12b, and from H-6 (δH 8.06) to C-4a, C-7, and C-12a, confirmed the presence of a benzene ring. Therefore, compound 3a was determined to be a new analog of saquanyamycin G, and only the aglycone was replaced by tetrangomycin. Analysis of 2D NMR (COSY, HMQC, HMBC, and NOESY) spectroscopic data of 3a (Figure 3) verified the elucidated structure. Compound 3a was named grincamycin U.
The gcnG1 is homologous to O-GTs. The ΔgcnG1 mutant strain was constructed and fermented by the same approach. HPLC–UV/MS analysis of culture extract of the mutant ΔgcnG1 revealed a major product with a retention time of 13.8 min (4) (Figure 2A, trace V). Compound 4 was purified for structure identification. A comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data of 4 with those previously reported in the literature indicated that 4 was saquayamycin B1 [22,23].

2.3. Construction and Metabolite Analysis of Mutant ΔgcnG1G2

The two genes gcnG1 and gcnG2 were next to each other closely in the alignment of the gcn gene cluster. Therefore, a mutant with double deletion of gcnG1 and gcnG2 was constructed successfully using the forward primer of gcnG1 and the reverse primer of gcnG2 by replacing a fragment in gcnG1 and gcnG2 with aac(3)IV-oriT cassettes (Figure S1(A4)). After verification by gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR products amplified from Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnG1G2 genome (Figure S1(B4)), the mutant ΔgcnG1G2 was fermented and extracted using the same fashions as mentioned above. HPLC–UV/MS analysis revealed two product peaks with retention times of 10.7 min (5) and 12.9 min (5a) (Figure 2A, trace VI), demonstrating molecular weights of 486 and 470, respectively. Compounds 5 and 5a were purified in a quantity sufficient for measurement of 1H and 13C NMR. These two compounds were determined to be aquayamycin (5) [24,25] and 3′-deoxyaquayamycin (5a) [11] by comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data with those previously reported, respectively.

2.4. Products of Mutant ΔgcnG3~ΔgcnG1 and ΔgcnG1G2 in Modified RA Medium

It is interesting to note that when the SCSIO LR32 wild-type strain fermented in modified RA medium, several nonclassic angucycline C-glycosides with rearranged tricyclic aglycone (fridamycin E, 2′) were obtained, including grincamycins B, C, D, and K [16,26]. In order to confirm if the mutants fermented in modified RA medium could produce compounds with the same tricyclic aglycone, all four mutants were fermented again using modified RA medium. Not surprisingly, the isolation and identification of the culture products revealed the presence of the tricyclic fridamycin E (2′) [27] from ΔgcnG3. Additionally, four C-glycosides carried the fridamycin E (2′) as aglycone were obtained, including a new compound named grincamycin V (3′) from ΔgcnG2, fridamycin D (4′) [28] from ΔgcnG1, and fridamycin A (5′) [29] from ΔgcnG1G2 (Figure 4).
The new structure of grincamycin V (3′) was determined by the interpretation of MS and NMR data. The HR-ESI-MS signal of 3′ at m/z 713.2796 ([M−H]−, calc. for 713.2815, C37H45O14−) indicated the molecular formula of C37H46O14. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data of 3′ revealed a C-glycosidic moiety the same as fridamycin A (5′). Additional signals attributed to two anomeric methines at δH 5.23 (brs), δC 91.3 (CH-1″) and δH 4.77 (brs), δC 98.6 (CH-1‴) suggested the presence of two more sugar units. The 1H−1H spin systems revealed in the COSY spectrum and the HMBC correlations established two rhodinose sugars (Figure 3). The O-glycosidic linkages of C-1‴−O−C-4″ and C-1″−O−C-12 were confirmed by the HMBC correlations of H-1‴/C-4″ and H-4″/C-1‴, and H-1″/C-12, respectively.

3. Discussion

3.1. Functional Characterizations of GcnG1~GcnG3

The mutant ΔgcnG3 produced the aglycone tetrangomycin (2) without any sugar. The mutant ΔgcnG1G2 yielded the C-glycosidic compound aquayamyicn (5), and 3′-deoxyaquayamycin (5a) only carried a D-olivose and a 3′-deoxy-olivose unit, respectively. These results unambiguously confirmed that the gcnG3 gene encoded C-glycosyltransferase responsible for the attachment of the D-olivose to form the initial C-glycosidic aquayamyicn (5) in the glycosylation pathway. The mutant ΔgcnG2 generated saquayamycin G (3) and grincamycin U (3a). In addition to the D-olivose transferred by GcnG3 attached at the C-9 position, compounds 3 and 3a also carried a disaccharidic chain of L-aculose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose linked at the C-3 position of the aglycone, which was the same as the disaccharide chain in P-1894B (1). As we know that the terminal L-aculose in P-1894B (1) was converted from an L-rhodinose under the catalyzation of GcnQ [19], compounds 3 and 3a isolated from ΔgcnG2 mutant thus suggested that the GcnG1 transferred an L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose moiety into the C-3 position of the aglycone. On the other hand, compounds 3 and 3a lost the L-aculose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose chain connected with D-olivose relative to P-1894B (1), conversely indicating the gcnG2 gene encoding an O-glycosyltransferase responsible for assembly of the L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose moiety attached in the D-olivose of the intermediate (1a) in the wild-type SCSIO LR32 strain. The mutant ΔgcnG1 produced saquayamycin B1 (4) bearing an L-cinerulose B-(1→4, 2→3)-D-olivose unit, which only had one more L-cinerulose B unit instead of the expected rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose. It was speculated that the inherent substrate of GcnG2 in the wild-type SCSIO LR32 strain could be the intermediate (3b, Figure 5), which did not exist in the mutant ΔgcnG1. Alternatively, GcnG2, a protein with wide substrate specificity, catalyzed a monoglycosylation step using the non-inherent substrate aquayamycin (5) to produce a shunt metabolite saquayamycin B1 (4) in the ΔgcnG1. This result suggested that the assembly of the right L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose moiety at C-3 of the aglycone transferred by GcnG1 was prior to the left one linked with D-olivose assembled by GcnG2. Additionally, the absence of the right L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose unit at C-3 in saquayamycin B1 (4) produced from ΔgcnG1 conversely confirmed that the diglycosylation step of the L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose was catalyzed by GcnG1.

3.2. The Glycosylation Pathway of P-1894B and Grincamycin

The glycosylation step in the biosynthetic pathway of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) in the wild-type SCSIO LR32 strain are shown in Figure 5. The aglycone was sequentially glycosylated. Firstly, the C-GT GcnG3 transferred a D-olivose into the C-9 position to form a C-glycosidic aquayamyicn (5). Secondly, an L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose chain was attached at C-3 by the O-GT GcnG1, generating the intermediate (3b). Then, another L-rhodinose-(1→4)-L-rhodinose chain was assembled onto D-olivose by the O-GT GcnG2 to yield the final intermediate (1a). Finally, the two terminal L-rhodinosyl units in 1a were converted into L-aculoses to produce P-1894B (1) or were changed into L-cinerulose A units to form grincamycin (1′) under the catalyzation of the oxidoreductase GcnQ in modified AM2 or RA media, respectively.

3.3. The Glycosylation Pathway of Compounds with Tricyclic Aglycone

The tricyclic fridamycin E (2′) and three anguacycline glycosides (3′, 4′, and 5′) with fridamycin E (2′) as aglycone were isolated from the mutants cultured in modified RA medium. Previous reports showed that the classic tetracyclic aglycone could be rearranged into the tricyclic aglycone under acidic conditions [1,19,30]. However, the fermentation, extract, and purification procedures for these tricyclic compounds were not treated with any acids. The O-glycosidic bonds in the structures of grincamycin V (3′) and fridamycin D (4′) also proved the acid-free isolation process. Thus, the generation of the tricyclic aglycone angucycline glycosides in the mutant and wild-type strains of SCSIO LR32 could be catalyzed by biosynthetic enzymes. One possible biosynthetic pathway could be that the tetracyclic glycosides (4, 5, 3b, and 1a) were transferred into the compounds with tricyclic aglycone directly (Figure 6A), while another possibility involves the formation of tricyclic aglycone compounds that may be the common intermediate UWM6 of angucycline converted into fridamycin E (2′) firstly, then a serial of glycosylated reactions would occur sequentially under the catalyzation of GcnG3, GcnG1, and GcnG2 to produce the intermediate (6′). Compound 6′ was finally transformed into grincamycin B (6′a) and vineomycin B2 (6′b) as minor products catalyzed by GcnQ in the wild-type strain (Figure 6B).
Our previous works showed that the tricyclic angucycline grincamycin B (1″) showed significant inhibitory effects on human acute promyelocytic leukemia NB4 cells and glioblastoma multiforme cells [31,32]. Most recently, several tricyclic aglycone-containing compounds, grincamycins P-T, were identified from a marine-sediment-derived Streptomyces stain, which exhibited low micromolar inhibitory activities against pseudomyxoma peritonei cells [33]. However, the detailed biosynthetic pathway for the tricyclic anguacycline products remains to be investigated.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and General Experimental Procedures

The wild-type strain Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32 was isolated from deep-sea-derived sediment collected in the South China Sea in 2010 by our group [16]. Genomic library construction and screening, and DNA sequencing and annotation, had been reported in our previous work [19]. Strains and plasmids used and generated in this study are listed in Table S2 (Supplementary Materials). All DNA manipulations were performed according to standard procedures or the manufacturer’s instructions. Reagents for polymerase chain reactions (PCR), restriction enzymes, and DNA ligase were purchased from Takara Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China) and Trans gene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Primers used for gene disruption and PCR confirmation were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). DNA sequencing was performed at the Invitrogen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China), the Major Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and Chinese National Genome Center (Shanghai, China). Plasmid and gel extraction kits were purchased from Omega Bioteck Inc. (Guangzhou, China). Other chemical and biochemical reagents were purchased from standard commercial sources.
Optical rotations were measured on an MCP 500 polarimeter (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria). The 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded with an AV-500 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). The chemical shifts were given in ppm relative to the signals from residual undeuterated solvent or TMS. LC–MS analyses with low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry were conducted on a 1260 HPLC instrument (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with an Amazon SL ion trap mass spectrometer and a Maxis quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) using Luna C18 columns (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), respectively. The elution system consisted of solvent A (15% acetonitrile in H2O added with 0.1% HOAc) and solvent B (85% acetonitrile in H2O added with 0.1% HOAc). A linear gradient elution started from 20% solvent B to 100% solvent B in 0–20 min was employed, then kept 100% solvent B for 12 min. The flow rate was set at 1 mL/min. Column chromatography (CC) was performed using silica gel (100–200 mesh; Jiangyou Silica gel development, Inc., Yantai, China). Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a ProStar apparatus (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using an Ultimate XB-C18 column (250 × 10 mm, 5 µm, Welch, Shanghai, China).

4.2. Gene Inactivation Experiments

The gene inactivation experiments in S. lusitanus SCSIO LR32 were performed using the lambda-RED-mediated gene replacements as previously reported [19]. In brief, the apramycin resistance gene cassette was amplified using the primers listed in Table S3 and followed by gel purification. The resulting oriT-aac(3)IV cassette was introduced into E. coli BW25113/pIJ790 containing cosmid 228A by electroporation. Those positive clones in which the targeted gene was replaced by oriT-aac(3)IV were selected through apramycin resistance. The correctly mutated cosmids were then introduced into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 for conjugation with S. lusitanus SCSIO LR32. The donor E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 was incubated to an OD600 value of 0.6~0.8, and then the cells were resuspended in LB medium. Spores of S. lusitanus SCSIO LR32 were germinated in TSB medium for 10~12 h and then resuspended in LB medium. Next, 200 μL of donor strains and 200 μL of recipient strains were mixed and spread onto M-ISP4 (soluble starch 1%, K2HPO4 0.1%, MgSO4·7H2O 0.1%, NaCl 0.1%, (NH4)2SO4 0.2%, CaCO3 0.2%, peptone 0.1%, yeast extract powder 0.05%, trace salt 0.1 mL, sea salt 3%, pH 7.0~7.4) medium plates and grown for 20 h at 30 °C. The plates were covered with 25 μL apramycin (50 mg/mL) and 25 μL trimethoprim (50 mg/mL) and then incubated at 30 °C after drying. The exconjugants with apramycin-resistant characteristics were selected 4~6 d later. The double-crossover mutants from homologous recombination were verified through diagnostic PCR using primers listed in Supplementary Table S4. The PCR confirmation of the mutants is shown in Figure S1(B1~B4). Three independent clones from each double-crossover mutant were randomly chosen for small-scale fermentation and subjected to metabolite analyses by HPLC. In each case, three independent clones showed the same profile of metabolites, providing reliable evidence for the inactivation of the target genes. In total, four genetic mutants S. lusitanus SCSIO LR32/ΔgcnG1, ΔgcnG2, ΔgcnG3, and ΔgcnG1G2 were successfully constructed.

4.3. Fermentation of Mutant Strains

The fermentation method adopted for the S. lusitanus SCSIO LR32 wild-type strain and mutant strains has been reported previously [19]. The spore of wild-type or mutant strains was seeded into 50 mL of modified AM2 medium in a 250 mL flask and incubated on a rotary shaker under 200 rpm at 28 °C for 1.5 days. Then, 10% (v/v) seed culture was transferred into 200 mL modified AM2 medium or modified RA medium in a 1 L flask and then incubated on a rotary shaker under 200 rpm at 28 °C for 5 days.
Modified AM2 medium: bean powder 0.5%, yeast extract 0.2%, peptone 0.2%, soluble starch 0.5%, glucose 2%, CaCO3 0.2%, NaCl 0.4%, KH2PO4 0.05%, MgSO4 0.05%, sea salt 3%, pH 7.2~7.4 before sterilization.
Modified RA medium: glucose 1%, malt extract 1%, corn starch 0.5%, soluble starch 2%, maltose 1%, trace elements (100 mL/L), sea salt 3%, pH 7.2~7.4 before sterilization.

4.4. Isolation of Grincamycin Analogues from Mutant Strains

When the fermentation was finished, the whole culture broth (8 L for each strain) was centrifuged to yield mycelium and supernatant. The mycelium was extracted with an equal volume of acetone to afford an oily residue. The residue was subjected to silica gel CC using gradient elution with mixtures of CHCl3/MeOH (100:0, 99:1, 97:3, 95:5, 93:7, 90:10, v/v) to give six fractions (Fr.1–Fr.6). Then, the fractions containing targeted compounds were further separated by silica gel CC eluted with petroleum ether (60~90 °C)/EtOAc or by preparative HPLC eluted with CH3CN-H2O. For example, Fr.2 from the mutant ΔgcnG3 was isolated by silica gel CC eluted with mixtures of petroleum ether (60~90 °C)/EtOAc (80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 30:70, 20:80, 10:90, v/v) to afford eight fractions (Fr.2-1~Fr.2-8). Fr.2-6 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC equipped with an Ultimate C18 column (250 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm), eluting with 30% HCN to 70% HCN over 30 min at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min to yield 3′-deoxyaquayamycin (5a, tR 18.2 min). Fr. 3 was isolated by silica gel CC under the same elution method to give eight fractions (Fr.3-1~Fr.3-8). Fr.3-6 and Fr.3-7 were combined and purified by semi-preparative HPLC, eluting with 30% HCN to 90% HCN over 35 min at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min to yield aquayamycin (5, tR 15.3 min). Detailed isolation processes were introduced in Figures S2–S5 (Supplementary Materials).
Grincamycin U (3a): dark-red powder; [α]20D + 165 (c 0.20, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 230 (4.39), 258 (4.15), 294 (3.68), 442 (3.79); 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; (−)HR-ESI-MS m/z 675.2448 ([M−H]−, calcd for C37H39O12−, 675.2447).
Grincamycin V (3′): dark-red powder; [α]20D + 231 (c 0.20, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 232 (4.42), 259 (4.17), 293 (3.67), 446 (3.74); 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; (−)HR-ESI-MS m/z 713.2796 ([M−H]−, calcd for C37H45O14−, 713.2815).

5. Conclusions

In sum, four mutants with disruption of glycosyltransferase genes (gcnG1, gcnG2, gcnG3, and gcnG1G2) were constructed by the lambda-RED-mediated gene replacement approach on the basis of identification of the biosynthetic gene cluster for P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′). The angucycline analogs from the mutants were purified and identified, including two new glycosidic compounds designated grincamycins U (3a) and V (3′). The functions of the three glycosyltransferases GcnG1, GcnG2, and GcnG3 were characterized, and the glycosylation steps in the biosynthetic pathway of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′) catalyzed by these glycosyltransferases were elucidated based on the analyses of chemical structures obtained from the mutants. In our future endeavors, we aim to diversify angucycline glycoside compounds by integrating these glycosyltransferase genes into other related biosynthetic gene clusters.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md22010032/s1, Figure S1: Gene inactivation of gcnG3~gcnG1, and gcnG1G2; Figures S2–S5: Procedures for isolation of compounds from the mutants; Figures S6–S23: The UV, (−)HR-ESI-MS, and NMR spectra of grincamycin U (3a) and grincamycin V (3′); Table S1: Deduced functions of ORFs containing gcnG1~gcnG3 and gcnQ genes in the grincamycin biosynthetic gene cluster; Tables S2–S4: Bacteria, plasmid, and primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

J.J. designed the project; H.H., Y.T., Y.S., C.L. and S.P. performed the chemical experiments; Y.Z. conducted the gene inactivation experiments; H.H. and B.D. analyzed the NMR and MS data; H.H. and Y.Z. wrote the original draft manuscript; J.J. and Y.T. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21977103, U2106207), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFC2804100), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2023A1515010968), Guangzhou Education Bureau Yangcheng Scholars Project (202032774), Key Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (ZDKJ202018), Local Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project of Guangdong (2019BT02Y262), and Guangdong Undergraduates’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (S202310570071).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to Aijun Sun, Zhihui Xiao, and Xiaohong Zheng from SCSIO for conducting NMR and MS measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rohr, J.; Thiericke, R. Angucycline group antibiotics. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1992, 9, 103–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kharel, M.K.; Pahari, P.; Shepherd, M.D.; Tibrewal, N.; Nybo, S.E.; Shaaban, K.A.; Rohr, J. Angucyclines: Biosynthesis, mode-of-action, new natural products, and synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 264–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, X.; Woodward, J.; Hourani, A.; Zhu, D.; Ayoub, S.; Zhu, J. Synthesis of the 2-deoxy trisaccharide glycal of antitumor antibiotics landomycins A and E. Carbohydr. Res. 2016, 430, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luzhetskyy, A.; Vente, A.; Bechthold, A. Glycosyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of biologically active natural products that contain oligosaccharides. Mol. Biosyst. 2005, 1, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Luzhetskyy, A.; Fedoryshyn, M.; Dürr, C.; Taguchi, T.; Novikov, V.; Bechthold, A. Iteratively acting glycosyltransferases involved in the hexasaccharide biosynthesis of landomycin A. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Trefzer, A.; Hoffmeister, D.; Künzel, E.; Stockert, S.; Weitnauer, G.; Westrich, L.; Rix, U.; Fuchser, J.; Bindseil, K.U.; Rohr, J.; et al. Function of glycosyltransferase genes involved in urdamycin A biosynthesis. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hoffmeister, D.; Ichinose, K.; Domann, S.; Faust, B.; Trefzer, A.; Dräger, G.; Kirschning, A.; Fischer, C.; Künzel, E.; Bearden, D.; et al. The NDP-sugar co-substrate concentration and the enzyme expression level influence the substrate specificity of glycosyltransferases: Cloning and characterization of deoxysugar biosynthetic genes of the urdamycin biosynthetic gene cluster. Chem. Biol. 2000, 7, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Erb, A.; Luzhetskyy, A.; Hardter, U.; Bechthold, A. Cloning and sequencing of the biosynthetic gene cluster for saquayamycin Z and galtamycin B and the elucidation of the assembly of their saccharide chains. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 1392–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salem, S.M.; Weidenbach, S.; Rohr, J. Two cooperative glycosyltransferases are responsible for the sugar diversity of saquayamycins isolated from Streptomyces sp. KY 40-1. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 2529–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, G.; Kharel, M.K.; Pahari, P.; Rohr, J. Investigating mithramycin deoxysugar biosynthesis: Enzymatic total synthesis of TDP-D-olivose. ChemBioChem 2011, 12, 2568–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fidan, O.; Yan, R.; Gladstone, G.; Zhou, T.; Zhu, D.; Zhan, J. New insights into the glycosylation steps in the biosynthesis of Sch47554 and Sch47555. ChemBioChem 2018, 19, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ohta, K.; Kamiya, K. X-ray crystal structure of P-1894B, a collagen proline hydroxylase inhibitor produced by Streptomyces albogriseolus subsp. No. 1894. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1981, 4, 154–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Okazaki, H.; Ohta, K.; Kanamaru, T.; Ishimaru, T.; Kishi, T. A potent prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, P-1894B, produced by a strain of Streptomyces. J. Antibiot. 1981, 34, 1355–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Imamura, N.; Kakinuma, K.; Ikekawa, N.; Tanaka, H.; Satoshi, Ō. Identification of the aglycon part of vineomycin A1 with aquayamycin. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981, 29, 1788–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hayakawa, Y.; Iwakiri, T.; Imamura, K.; Seto, H.; Otake, N. Studies on the isotetracenone antibiotics. III. A new isotetracenone antibiotic, grincamycin. J. Antibiot. 1987, 40, 1785–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, H.; Yang, T.; Ren, X.; Liu, J.; Song, Y.; Sun, A.; Ma, J.; Wang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, C.; et al. Cytotoxic angucycline class glycosides from the deep sea actinomycete Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, X.; Duan, Y.; Cui, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ju, J.; Huang, H. Cytotoxic rearranged angucycline glycosides from deep sea-derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 819–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ishimaru, T.; Kanamaru, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ohta, K.; Okazaki, H. Inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase activity and collagen biosynthesis by the anthraquinone glycoside, P-1894B, an inhibitor produced by Streptomyces albogriseolus. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1982, 31, 915–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, Q.; Luo, M.; Sun, A.; Song, Y.; Ma, J.; Ju, J. Identification of the grincamycin gene cluster unveils divergent roles for GcnQ in different hosts, tailoring the L-rhodinose moiety. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3254–3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Westrich, L.; Domann, S.; Faust, B.; Bedford, D.; Hopwood, D.A.; Bechthold, A. Cloning and characterization of a gene cluster from Streptomyces cyanogenus S136 probably involved in landomycin biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaliappan, K.P.; Ravikumar, V. Angucyclinone antibiotics: Total syntheses of YM-181741, (+)-ochromycinone, (+)-rubiginone B2, (−)-tetrangomycin, and MM-47755. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6116–6126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shaaban, K.A.; Ahmed, T.A.; Leggas, M.; Rohr, J. Saquayamycins G-K, cytotoxic angucyclines from Streptomyces sp. Including two analogues bearing the aminosugar rednose. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Uchida, T.; Imoto, M.; Watanabe, Y.; Miura, K.; Dobashi, T.; Matsuda, N.; Sawa, T.; Naganawa, H.; Hamada, M.; Takeuchi, T. Saquayamycins, new aquayamycin-group antibiotics. J. Antibiot. 1985, 38, 1171–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sezaki, M.; Kondo, S.; Maeda, K.; Umezawa, H.; Ono, M. The structure of aquayamycin. Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 5171–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kusumi, S.; Nakayama, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Kuriki, H.; Matsumoto, Y.; Takahashi, D.; Toshima, K. Total synthesis of aquayamycin. Chemistry 2016, 22, 18733–18736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lai, Z.; Yu, J.; Ling, H.; Song, Y.; Yuan, J.; Ju, J.; Tao, Y.; Huang, H. Grincamycins I-K, cytotoxic angucycline glycosides derived from marine-derived actinomycete Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. Planta Med. 2018, 84, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ueberbacher, B.J.; Osprian, I.; Mayer, S.F.; Faber, K. A chemoenzymatic, enantioconvergent, asymmetric total synthesis of (R)-fridamycin E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 7, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maskey, R.P.; Helmke, E.; Laatsch, H. Himalomycin A and B: Isolation and structure elucidation of new fridamycin type antibiotics from a marine Streptomyces isolate. J. Antibiot. 2003, 56, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yoon, S.Y.; Lee, S.R.; Hwang, J.Y.; Benndorf, R.; Beemelmanns, C.; Chung, S.J.; Kim, K.H. Fridamycin A, a microbial natural product, stimulates glucose uptake without Inducing adipogenesis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Imamura, N.; Kakinuma, K.; Ikekawa, N.; Tanaka, H.; Omura, S. The structure of vineomycin B2. J. Antibiot. 1981, 34, 1517–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; Li, Z.X.; Zhao, W.C.; Huang, H.B.; Wang, J.Q.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.Y.; Wang, R.N.; Li, W.; Cheng, Z.; et al. Identification and characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) as a functional target of marine natural product grincamycin B. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2021, 42, 801–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yao, Y.; Sun, S.; Cao, M.; Mao, M.; He, J.; Gai, Q.; Qin, Y.; Yao, X.; Lu, H.; Chen, F.; et al. Grincamycin B functions as a potent inhibitor for glioblastoma stem cell via targeting RHOA and PI3K/AKT. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 2256–2265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shang, Z.; Ferris, Z.E.; Sweeney, D.; Chase, A.B.; Yuan, C.; Hui, Y.; Hou, L.; Older, E.A.; Xue, D.; Tang, X.; et al. Grincamycins P-T: Rearranged angucyclines from the marine sediment-derived Streptomyces sp. CNZ-748 inhibit cell lines of the rare cancer pseudomyxoma peritonei. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 1638–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g001
Figure 1. The structures of P-1894B (1), grincamycin (1′), and the intermediate (1a).
Figure 1. The structures of P-1894B (1), grincamycin (1′), and the intermediate (1a).
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g001
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g002
Figure 2. (A) HPLC analysis results of the culture products (λ = 254 nm): (I) SCSIO LR32 WT strain fermented in modified AM2 medium; (II) SCSIO LR32 WT strain fermented in modified RA medium; (III)~(VI) ΔgcnG3, ΔgcnG2, ΔgcnG1, and ΔgcnG1G2 in modified AM2 medium, respectively. (B) Compounds isolated from the four mutants fermented in modified AM2 medium.
Figure 2. (A) HPLC analysis results of the culture products (λ = 254 nm): (I) SCSIO LR32 WT strain fermented in modified AM2 medium; (II) SCSIO LR32 WT strain fermented in modified RA medium; (III)~(VI) ΔgcnG3, ΔgcnG2, ΔgcnG1, and ΔgcnG1G2 in modified AM2 medium, respectively. (B) Compounds isolated from the four mutants fermented in modified AM2 medium.
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g002
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g003
Figure 3. (A) The COSY and HMBC correlations of grincamycins U (3a) and V (3′). (B) The key NOESY correlations of the deoxysugar units in grincamycins U (3a) and V (3′).
Figure 3. (A) The COSY and HMBC correlations of grincamycins U (3a) and V (3′). (B) The key NOESY correlations of the deoxysugar units in grincamycins U (3a) and V (3′).
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g003
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g004
Figure 4. (A) HPLC profile (λ = 254 nm) of the four mutants cultured in modified RA medium. (B) Chemical structures of compounds isolated from the mutants cultured in modified RA medium.
Figure 4. (A) HPLC profile (λ = 254 nm) of the four mutants cultured in modified RA medium. (B) Chemical structures of compounds isolated from the mutants cultured in modified RA medium.
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g004
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g005
Figure 5. The glycosylation steps catalyzed by GcnG1~GcnG3 (arrows in color) in the biosynthetic pathway of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′). Compounds in the dotted line frame were isolated from the mutants cultured in modified AM2 medium.
Figure 5. The glycosylation steps catalyzed by GcnG1~GcnG3 (arrows in color) in the biosynthetic pathway of P-1894B (1) and grincamycin (1′). Compounds in the dotted line frame were isolated from the mutants cultured in modified AM2 medium.
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g005
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g006
Figure 6. The possible biosynthetic pathways of tricyclic aglycone glycosides. Pathway (A) the tetracyclic glycosides were converted into the tricyclic glycosides by biosynthetic enzymes. Pathway (B) the tricyclic aglycone fridamycin E (2′) was generated first, followed by sequential glycosylation under catalyzation of GcnG3, GcnG1, and GcnG2. Compounds in the dotted line frame were isolated from the mutants fermented in modified RA medium.
Figure 6. The possible biosynthetic pathways of tricyclic aglycone glycosides. Pathway (A) the tetracyclic glycosides were converted into the tricyclic glycosides by biosynthetic enzymes. Pathway (B) the tricyclic aglycone fridamycin E (2′) was generated first, followed by sequential glycosylation under catalyzation of GcnG3, GcnG1, and GcnG2. Compounds in the dotted line frame were isolated from the mutants fermented in modified RA medium.
Marinedrugs 22 00032 g006
Table 1. 1H (700 MHz) and 13C (175 MHz) NMR data for gincamycins U (3a) and V (3′) in CD3OD.
Table 1. 1H (700 MHz) and 13C (175 MHz) NMR data for gincamycins U (3a) and V (3′) in CD3OD.
Gincamycin U (3a) Gincamycin V (3′)
δC, TypeδH, multi. (J in Hz) δC, TypeδH, multi. (J in Hz)
1198.6, C 1160.9, C
252.8, CH23.18, d (15.5);2134.9, C
2.87, d (15.5)
377.8, C 3139.5, CH7.60, d (7.7)
442.6, CH23.29, d (16.5); 4118.7, CH7.42, d (7.7)
3.10, d (16.5)
4a149.7, C 4a131.2, C
5134.4, CH7.56, d (7.3)5158.1, C
6130.3, CH8.06, d (7.3)6138.2, C
6a134.5, C 7132.7, CH7.70, d (7.7)
7188.7, C 8117.9, CH7.45, d (7.7)
7a115.8, C 8a131.1, C
8158.9, C 9187.3, C
9138.2, C 9a114.9, C
10134.8, CH7.75, d (7.7)10187.3, C
11119.9, CH7.42, d (7.7)10a114.7, C
11a135.0, C 1138.0, CH23.21, d (13.0); 3.06, d (13.0)
12183.8, C 1277.2, C
12a136.7, C 1344.1, CH22.76, d (15.0); 2.61, d (15.0)
12b136.7, C 14173.3, C
1326.3,CH31.49, s1522.3, CH31.44, s
olivose olivose
1′72.4, CH4.77, d (11.2)1′71.1, CH4.74, d (11.9)
2′40.9, CH22.46, dd (11.2, 4.0);2′39.5, CH22.49, dd (11.9, 3.5);
1.37, t (11.3) 1.40, m
3′73.6, CH3.72, ddd (11.4, 9.0, 4.9)3′72.3, CH3.74, m
4′78.8, CH3.06, t (9.0)4′77.4, CH3.10, t (8.9)
5′77.7, CH3.46, m5′76.3, CH3.44, m
6′18.8, CH31.39, d (6.0)6′17.4, CH31.42, overlapped
rhodinose rhodinose 1
1″92.9, CH5.10, brs1″91.3, CH5.23, brs
2″26.0, CH21.80, m; 1.50, m2″25.4, CH22.08, m; 1.42, m
3″25.2, CH21.70, m3″24.3, CH22.10, m; 1.85, m
4″77.6, CH3.49, s4″75.1, CH3.48, m
5″67.8, CH3.97, q (6.5)5″66.7, CH4.11, m
6″17.5, CH31.12, d (6.5)6″16.2, CH31.10, d (6.4)
aculose rhodinose 2
1‴96.4, CH 5.19, d (3.2)1‴98.6, CH4.77, brs
2‴145.5, CH6.95, dd (10.2, 3.2)2‴29.5, CH21.93, m; 1.69, m
3‴127.5, CH6.00, d (10.2)3‴27.1, CH21.80, m
4‴198.4, C 4‴71.4, CH23.18, m
5‴71.4, CH4.47, q (6.7)5‴70.0, CH3.69, m
6‴15.5, CH31.17, d (6.7)6‴17.0, CH31.44, overlapped
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Song, Y.; Ling, C.; Peng, S.; Ding, B.; Tao, Y.; Ju, J. Deciphering the Glycosylation Steps in the Biosynthesis of P-1894B and Grincamycin Isolated from Marine-Derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22010032

AMA Style

Huang H, Zhang Y, Song Y, Ling C, Peng S, Ding B, Tao Y, Ju J. Deciphering the Glycosylation Steps in the Biosynthesis of P-1894B and Grincamycin Isolated from Marine-Derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. Marine Drugs. 2024; 22(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22010032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Hongbo, Yun Zhang, Yongxiang Song, Chunyao Ling, Siyan Peng, Bo Ding, Yiwen Tao, and Jianhua Ju. 2024. "Deciphering the Glycosylation Steps in the Biosynthesis of P-1894B and Grincamycin Isolated from Marine-Derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32" Marine Drugs 22, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22010032

APA Style

Huang, H., Zhang, Y., Song, Y., Ling, C., Peng, S., Ding, B., Tao, Y., & Ju, J. (2024). Deciphering the Glycosylation Steps in the Biosynthesis of P-1894B and Grincamycin Isolated from Marine-Derived Streptomyces lusitanus SCSIO LR32. Marine Drugs, 22(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22010032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop