Next Article in Journal
The Association between Utilization of Media Information and Current Health Anxiety Among the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster Evacuees
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrated Family Planning and Immunization Service Delivery at Health Facility and Community Sites in Dowa and Ntchisi Districts of Malawi: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Emission-related Heavy Metal Associated with Oxidative Stress in Children: Effect of Antioxidant Intake
Previous Article in Special Issue
Utilization of Integrated Child Development Services in India: Programmatic Insights from National Family Health Survey, 2016
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Indicators of Pregnant Women in Tonkolili District, Rural Sierra Leone

by
Daphne Bussink-Voorend
1,*,
Anton P. Bussink
2,
Abdul M. Falama
3 and
Jelle Stekelenburg
4,5
1
Lion Heart Medical Centre, Yele, Gbonkolenken, Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone
2
Lion Heart Foundation INGO, Yele, Gbonkolenken, Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone
3
District Health Management Team Tonkolili, Primary Health Complex, Magburaka, Tonkolili District, Sierra Leone
4
Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 3918; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113918
Submission received: 4 May 2020 / Revised: 17 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 / Published: 1 June 2020

Abstract

:
Despite having reported one of the highest maternal mortality ratios and neonatal mortality rates in the world, surprisingly little is known about the general health status of pregnant women in rural parts of Sierra Leone. Malaria, anaemia and malnutrition are known contributors to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although their prevalence is known to be high, the burden of these conditions in the rural pregnant population remains unknown. Our study aimed to gain more insight into the health status of pregnant women. An observational retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the Lion Heart Medical Centre using antenatal care (ANC) registers. The study revealed high prevalence of malaria (35.2%), maternal undernutrition (10.4%) and anaemia (65.9%). The proportion of teenage pregnancies in the ANC population was 16.4%. Both malaria and anaemia were more prevalent in this group, with odds ratios of 2.1 and 1.7, respectively. The findings reveal alarming high rates of anaemia, acute undernutrition and malaria among pregnant women and high numbers of pregnancy among adolescents, with increased health risks. These results will be used to advocate for a malnutrition program, specifically for pregnant women. Our study further emphasises the importance of preventing malaria and anaemia in pregnant women.

1. Introduction

Sierra Leone has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios (MMR) in the world according to the latest estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), but surprisingly little is known about the health status of pregnant women in the Sierra Leonean setting [1]. The information that is available mainly comes from the demographic health survey (DHS) conducted in 2013 and the preliminary key findings from the DHS conducted in 2019. The main findings regarding pregnancy and childbirth include high numbers of teenage pregnancies, high rates of anaemia and malaria among pregnant women and a trend of increasing institutional deliveries [2,3]. For the entire Sub-Saharan African region, neonatal mortality has decreased substantially in the past decades, and the most recent estimate for 2017 is 27 deaths per 1000 live births [4]. Reports specifically for Sierra Leone indicate that neonatal mortality rate was 35 per 1000 live births in 2015, considerably higher than the regional average [5]. The recent DHS report indicates that neonatal mortality has dropped to 31 per 1000 live births [3].
Malaria infection during pregnancy is a well-known cause of impaired foetal growth due to disturbed development of the placenta, leading to low birth weight (LBW) [6,7,8]. An infection during the second trimester has the most negative effect on birth weight due to a disturbed development of the placenta [6]. In malaria endemic areas such as Sierra Leone, pregnant women are more susceptible to be infected than non-pregnant individuals. This susceptibility reduces in subsequent pregnancies, and therefore primigravid women bear the highest risk. At the same time, it may be challenging to diagnose malaria during pregnancy in areas with high transmission, since Plasmodium falciparum is often undetectable in blood smears due to sequestration of the parasite in the placenta. Additionally, in endemic areas, infections are often asymptomatic, leading to chronic infections in pregnant women, which contribute to the development of anaemia and LBW [9]. Estimates indicate that, in malaria endemic areas like Sierra Leone, 50% of LBW in infants can be attributed to malaria [10]. Strategies endorsed by the WHO to reduce malaria infections during pregnancy include the widespread dissemination of bed nets, intermittent preventive treatment with Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) and adequate case management of malaria infections in pregnancy.
Low birth weight is an important indirect cause of neonatal deaths, in particular for infants suffering from birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis. Together, these factors are responsible for 60% of all neonatal deaths [11]. In addition to malaria, other factors that put infants at risk for low birth weight include maternal undernutrition and maternal iron-deficiency anaemia [12,13].
Mild anaemia during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of stillbirths, neonatal deaths and LBW infants. These risks increase further when anaemia is moderate or severe [13]. Anaemia is mainly caused by dietary deficiencies, predominantly a lack of iron. Infections such as malaria, HIV and soil-transmitted helminths also contribute to or aggravate anaemia [14].
Maternal malnutrition is a serious underlying cause of adverse birth outcomes for both mother and child. Undernutrition during pregnancy increases the risk of an LBW infant and preterm delivery [12]. Scientific evidence on the relationship between undernutrition and maternal deaths is limited, but one study found an increased MMR in women with low mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurement [15]. Other reports state that undernutrition together with anaemia is responsible for 20% of all maternal deaths at delivery [11].
In light of the high maternal mortality ratio and high neonatal mortality rate, it can be suspected that the burden of malaria, anaemia and malnutrition is substantial. So far, data regarding these health indicators are only available from the DHS.
An analysis of existing ANC services in Sierra Leone showed that the lack of essential supplies and infrastructure at service delivery points combined with late first ANC visits is the main hurdle towards the provision of adequate ANC services [5,16]. Benefits that could result from ANC services are missed; these include prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV, anaemia treatment and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with IPTp-SP to combat malaria.
In Yele, Tonkolili district, the Lion Heart Medical Centre (LHMC) has implemented an ongoing program to complement and strengthen the provision of ANC services. This program, known as the Healthy Baby Voucher program (HBVP), involves a full screening of pregnant women once in their pregnancy to identify and follow up high-risk cases. In order to get an accurate insight into the presence of health indicators that contribute to adverse birth outcomes and the characteristics of women utilizing ANC services through this program, a retrospective survey was conducted. The overall aim of the survey was to document the health indicators of pregnant women in Tonkolili district, Sierra Leone.

2. Materials and Methods

The study took place at the LHMC, a 70-bed referral hospital located in Tonkolili district, Gbonkolenken chiefdom. Surrounded by 15 primary healthcare units, the direct catchment area of the hospital consists of approximately 100,000 inhabitants. Pregnant women receive routine ANC from their nearest health centre and are invited to visit the LHMC for additional screening in the 2nd trimester. This service is covered by HBVP, funded by the Dutch Lion Heart Foundation, which aims to increase coverage and quality of ANC services by identifying and following up high risk cases, whereas uncomplicated cases are referred back to the nearest primary healthcare unit (PHU). The screening consists of anthropometric measurements, history taking, physical examination, laboratory investigations and ultrasound imaging. The HBVP includes provision for transport from and back to the PHU, and all services are performed free of charge.
A retrospective analysis of the ANC records was conducted with the aim to map baseline characteristics and determine the prevalence of maternal malnutrition, adolescent pregnancies, malaria, HIV, syphilis and anaemia in pregnant woman. Approval for the study was obtained from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee. Additionally, the board of the LHMC gave institutional approval. Since the study involved a retrospective analysis of existing records, patient consent was not obtained.
The desired sample size was calculated using Cochran formula [17] (Equation (1)).
n = Z2p × (p − 1)/e2
When a confidence interval (Z) of 95% is used to estimate the precision (e), the sample sized is calculated using expected prevalence (p), indicated by findings from the DHS [2]. The analysis showed that a sample size of 380 or more would give statistically significant results for malaria, anaemia and malnutrition, with precision rates (e) of 5%, 5% and 1%, respectively. Subsequently, a desired sample size of 500 first ANC visits was chosen. A time frame of 5 months was selected, and all data between August and December 2018 were collected.
Data were extracted from existing ANC records by the corresponding author and transferred into a digital database (Microsoft Excel®, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The second author checked data entry. Each visit was encoded using a study number, personal data were not included to ensure privacy. The following information was recorded in the database: age, gravidity, parity, height, weight, MUAC, estimated gestational age (EGA) by ultrasound findings. Furthermore, laboratory results were matched with ANC visits and included in the database: haemoglobin (Hb) level, HIV, syphilis and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) result for infection with P. falciparum.
The Hb levels in the study population were routinely checked using the HemoCue® 301 (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden). All women were screened for malaria, irrespective of complaints, with an RDT (CareStart™ Malaria HRP2, Access Bio, Somerset, NJ, USA). During pregnancy, the use of RDTs is preferred over light microscopy due to the possibly diminished peripheral parasite density caused by sequestration of the parasites in the placenta [16]. The SD Bioline HIV/Syphilis duo test (Standard Diagnostics, Gheung-gu, Republic of Korea) was used routinely to detect antibodies against HIV-1/2 and Treponema pallidum.
MUAC was routinely measured for all women with an adult MUAC tape. The MUAC is rather insensitive with respect to the physical changes during pregnancy and therefore preferred [18,19]. According to international consensus, undernutrition (body mass index (BMI) < 18.5) in pregnancy correlates with MUAC < 23 cm in adults, obesity (BMI > 30) is reflected in a MUAC reading >30 cm [18]. The women in our study were grouped according to their nutritional status. Since these cut-off values are only validated for adults, adolescents and clients without a recorded age were excluded from further analysis. Only data from first antenatal visits were included in further analysis to prevent double counting and overrepresentation of complicated cases that would come for follow-up visits.

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, the data were imported into an SPSS database (IBM® SPSS® statistics 25, Chicago, IL, USA). Prevalence values were determined using the frequencies analysis function for the entire study population as well as relevant subgroups (adolescents versus adults; primipara versus multipara; under-nourished versus well nourished). To allow further comparison between subgroups, the odds ratio (OR) was calculated by comparing the probability of malaria and anaemia (outcome) between subgroups with different characteristics (exposure). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the precision of the odds ratio, and when the CI did not overlap with the null value (OR = 1), statistical significance was assumed [20,21,22].
In the occasion of any missing values, the case was excluded for that particular analysis.

3. Results

Between August and December 2018, a total of 865 women visited the ANC clinic, of which 611 (71%) were at their first visit. Women who presented at our ANC clinic were on average 26 years old, varying from 12 to 54 years. It should be noted that the records were based on self-reported age, and outliers were seen at the round numbers 20, 25, 30 and 35 years (Table 1).

3.1. Health Indicators

The records for the entire group of 611 first ANC visits were analysed and screened for the presence of health indicators, as described. An overview of the results is shown in Table 2.

3.2. Anaemia

Hb levels were available for 551 women (90.2%). Anaemia was defined according to the WHO guidelines and grouped into mild (Hb 10.0–10.9 g/dL), moderate (Hb 7.0–9.9 g/dL) and severe (Hb < 7.0 g/dL) for pregnant women [23]. A total of 65.9% of all pregnant women were anaemic, and 34.1% presented with a normal haemoglobin level of 11 g/dL or higher. As shown in Table 2, 30.1% of pregnant women were diagnosed with mild anaemia, and 35.6% with moderate anaemia. Severe anaemia was seen in only one case, representing 0.2% of the study population.

3.3. Infections during Pregnancy: HIV, Syphilis and Malaria

Regarding HIV, test results were available for 495 women (80.4%). As indicated in Table 2, the incidence of HIV in our study population was 0.8%. The incidence of syphilis in pregnancy was 0.2%. During the entire study period, a positivity rate for malaria of 35.2% was recorded. Due to seasonal variations, the highest positivity rate was found in August (48.1%), and the lowest one in December (21.5%), as shown in Table 3. Pregnant women were routinely tested for malaria, irrespective of complaints. Therefore, the group of women with a positive test includes asymptomatic, mild and severe cases. When comparing primipara to multipara, malaria was more prevalent in primipara, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.6 (CI 1.064–2.572).

3.4. Nutrition Status

MUAC values of adult pregnant women were analysed, as shown in Table 2. The results show that 10.4% of the participants were classified as undernourished, and 5.9% as obese. Further analysis was carried out to find if anaemia and malaria were more common in undernourished compared to well-nourished women. The ORs were, respectively, 1.7 (CI 0.8687–3.229) and 0.9 (0.4431–1.768) and were both non-significant.

3.5. Adolescents

Among pregnant women attending their first ANC visit, 16.4% were aged between 10 and 19 years and therefore classified as adolescent pregnancies according to the WHO definition. Among adolescents, 42 (50.6%) out of 83 were positive for malaria at their first ANC visit, which was higher compared to adults, for whom 143 (32.4%) positive cases out of 442 were recorded. The odds ratio for malaria in adolescents compared to adults was 2.1 (CI 1.335–3.441). For anaemia, 68 (75.6%) out of 90 pregnant adolescents were anaemic compared to 295 (64.0%) out of 461 adults. The OR for anaemia was 1.7 (CI 1.045–2.884).

4. Discussion

The present study is an attempt to document and characterize the health status of pregnant women in rural Sierra Leone, quantified by health indicators among the beneficiaries of our HBVP. The HBVP aims to improve the quality of ANC services. In our view, the most remarkable results are the high prevalence of malaria (35.2%), maternal undernutrition (10.4%) and anaemia (65.9%) among the pregnant population attending ANC for the first time in the LHMC.
In our study, 35.2% of all pregnant women had a positive RDT when screened, regardless of the presence of symptoms. Malaria was more frequent in primipara versus multipara, with an OR of 1.6. These findings are in line with previous research suggesting that the parity-dependent susceptibility for malaria in pregnancy is due to the development of immunity through infections in the previous pregnancy [9,18]. The positivity rates for malaria in our study population are alarmingly high and show that malaria is a major problem. Effective interventions to reduce malaria infections during pregnancy are the intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with IPTp-SP at every ANC visit from the second trimester onwards and the provision of bed nets. Results from the DHS show that the uptake IPTp-SP is inadequate, as only 44.4% of women in rural areas receive two or more doses during their ANC visits [2]. Ideally, pregnant women should receive three or more doses of SP, since reinfections with the two-dose regimen are common. Women who receive three or more doses of SP during their pregnancy gave birth to children with a higher mean birth weight and were less likely to have malaria at the time of delivery. Additionally, lower rates of anaemia were observed [24]. When taking into account the high rates of malaria found in our study and the low uptake of SP reported by the DHS, the existing interventions to reduce malaria—usage of bed nets and uptake of SP—should be evaluated and optimized.
In our study population, 10.4% of adult pregnant women were acutely undernourished, most likely as a consequence of food insecurity. These findings are in line with the DHS conducted in 2013, which found that, based on BMI, 10.2% of women (non-pregnant) in rural areas and Tonkolili district were acutely undernourished [2]. Since the rate of maternal malnutrition is high in our population and known to significantly contribute to adverse outcomes for both mothers and neonates, an intervention, such as a supplementary feeding program as introduced in other parts of Sierra Leone, would be justified.
Obesity has been on the rise in low- and middle-income countries for the past decades and, during pregnancy, obesity is a risk factor for developing gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and intrapartum complications such haemorrhage, caesarean delivery, infection and death [12]. The rate of obesity (5.9%) in our pregnant study population was roughly double the rate of obesity (2.9%) reported for women in rural areas by the DHS 2013 [2]. Reports have indicated that for the entire African region, levels of undernutrition have remained rather stable, while obesity is increasing [12]. Although the numbers in our study are small, a similar trend can be seen when comparing our data with the DHS 2013 findings. Unfortunately, the preliminary DHS report from 2019 does not report on the nutritional status. The increasing rate of obesity in developing countries is a result of a changing diet, with more sugar, fat, added meat and bigger portion sizes, less physical activity and higher social economic status [25].
A combined malnutrition (both under- and over-nutrition) prevalence of 16.3% suggests that the importance of nutritional programs providing information on and improved access to healthy nutrition cannot be overemphasised.
Anaemia was abundant, as 65.9% of all pregnant women in our study population suffered from low haemoglobin levels. This high prevalence is likely to be largely attributable to the high level of malaria infections, poor nutritional status and endemic soil-transmitted helminthiasis of our target population. Further research has also been done about the relationship between malaria and malnutrition, since a synergistic effect was suspected, but a large meta-analysis did not provide conclusive evidence [26].
Another important finding is the high proportion of adolescent pregnancies (16.4%) in the study population. This finding is in line with DHS data, indicating that the majority (44.9%) of 19-year-old women had already experienced childbearing [3]. Adolescents were more likely to present with malaria and anaemia at their first ANC visit, as reflected by the ORs of 2.1 and 1.7, respectively. This might be partially explained by the high number of primipara, who are more susceptible to malaria compared to multipara [9], in this group.
However, it should be noted that the percentage of pregnant adolescents corresponding to 16.4% was calculated on the basis of self-reported age. As many women are not sure of their exact age, there were large proportions of women reporting ages of 20, 25 and 30 years in our study population. This possibly caused an underestimation of the actual proportion of adolescents, as women (or girls) might simply round up their age to 20.
In the Sierra Leonean setting, pregnant adolescents suffer greatly from stigma and social abandonment. It is often thought that the lack of social support, rather than physical immaturity, is the main contributing factor for increased maternal deaths in this group [27]. This highlights the vulnerability of the adolescent group. The authors will explore the possibility to set up a framework for more social support for pregnant adolescents.

Limitations

One of the main limitations of this study is a selection bias; by only using data from pregnant women attending the ANC clinic of a referral hospital, obviously many cases are left out. A rough calculation using birth rates suggested that approximately 50% of all pregnant women in our catchment area attend our ANC clinic at least once. Given the many difficulties in providing access to healthcare in this setting, the authors consider it quite an achievement to cover half of all pregnant women attending the HBVP. Most likely, the missing half will be pregnant women from remote areas limited by resources, who might also have constraints visiting their nearest health facility for routine antenatal care or seeking medical care once in labour. The presented results might therefore underreport the levels of maternal anaemia, malaria and malnutrition.
Another factor might be that women with complaints or with previous complicated pregnancies or births are more inclined to seek medical care, and therefore complicated pregnancies are likely to be over-represented in our population.
In the present study, only first ANC visits were included to reduce further over-representation of complicated cases, since only complicated cases would come back for follow-up, and uncomplicated cases are routinely sent back to their nearest PHU for subsequent ANC visits and delivery.
Another limitation could be the chosen time frame of the study and the wrongful representation of malaria incidence due to seasonal variations. To avoid this, a time frame was chosen that covered parts of both rainy and dry seasons. Additionally, no interventions relating to Mother and Child Health were introduced during this period. Lastly, due to the retrospective design of the study and the use of existing records, the authors had to rely on others for adequate recordkeeping.

5. Conclusions

Our gap analysis reveals a high burden of malaria, anaemia and malnutrition among pregnant women attending routine antenatal care at secondary healthcare level in rural Sierra Leone. Although prevention and treatment of these conditions are incorporated in all antenatal care protocols as recommended by the WHO, the current provision of care is clearly not sufficient to meet minimal needs. At the facility level, we have intensified counselling during the ANC visits in order to optimize adherence to the advised intake of iron and folic acid supplements, methods to prevent malaria and intake of a balanced diet. Clearly, a reduction of MMR will require more interventions addressing the quality of comprehensive ANC services on a national scale.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B.-V. and A.P.B.; methodology, D.B.-V.; validation, A.P.B., A.M.F. and J.S.; formal analysis, D.B.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B.-V.; writing—review and editing, A.P.B., A.M.F., J.S.; supervision, J.S.; project administration, D.B.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for the contribution of the late Sister Patricia Serry-Kamal towards the establishment of this study. Additionally, we would like to thank the Lion Heart Foundation for their relentless efforts to fund and implement the HBVP, as well as their cooperation in allowing the collection of data used in this study. Furthermore, we are grateful to Jessica Nomen for providing a license for statistical software.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017 (accessed on 13 February 2020).
  2. Statistics Sierra Leone. Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-FR297-DHS-Final-Reports.cfm (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  3. Statistics Sierra Leone. Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey 2019-Key Indicators Report. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-pr122-preliminary-reports-key-indicators-reports.cfm (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  4. Hug, L.; Alexander, M.; You, D.; Alkema, L. UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation National, regional, and global levels and trends in neonatal mortality between 1990 and 2017, with scenario-based projections to 2030: A systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Heal. 2019, 7, e710–e720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ministry of Health and Sanitation. Sierra Leone National Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Strategy 2017–2021. Available online: https://www.afro.who.int/publications/sierra-leone-national-reproductive-maternal-newborn-child-and-adolescent-health (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  6. Umbers, A.J.; Aitken, E.H.; Rogerson, S.J. Malaria in pregnancy: Small babies, big problem. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guyatt, H.; Snow, R.W. Impact of Malaria during Pregnancy on Low Birth Weight in Sub-Saharan Africa. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Accrombessi, M.; Yovo, E.; Cottrell, G.; Agbota, G.; Gartner, A.; Martin-Prével, Y.; Fanou-Fogny, N.; Djossinou, D.; Zeitlin, J.; Tuikue-Ndam, N.; et al. Cohort profile: Effect of malaria in early pregnancy on fetal growth in Benin (RECIPAL preconceptional cohort). BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fried, M.; Muehlenbachs, A.; E Duffy, P. Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2012, 10, 1177–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dellicour, S.; Tatem, A.J.; Guerra, C.A.; Snow, R.W.; Ter Kuile, F.O. Quantifying the Number of Pregnancies at Risk of Malaria in 2007: A Demographic Study. PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Black, R.E.; Allen, L.H.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Caulfield, L.E.; De Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Mathers, C.; Rivera, J. Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008, 371, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Black, R.E.; Victora, C.G.; Walker, S.P.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Christian, P.; De Onis, M.; Ezzati, M.; Grantham-McGregor, S.; Katz, J.; Martorell, R.; et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013, 382, 427–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patel, A.; Prakash, A.A.; Das, P.K.; Gupta, S.; Pusdekar, Y.V.; Hibberd, P.L. Maternal anemia and underweight as determinants of pregnancy outcomes: Cohort study in eastern rural Maharashtra, India. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e021623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Balarajan, Y.; Ramakrishnan, U.; Özaltin, E.; Shankar, A.H.; Subramanian, S. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2011, 378, 2123–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Christian, P.; Katz, J.; Wu, L.; Kimbrough-Pradhan, E.; Khatry, S.K.; LeClerq, S.C.; West, K.P. Risk factors for pregnancy-related mortality: A prospective study in rural Nepal. Public Health 2008, 122, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Koroma, M.M.; Kamara, S.S.; Bangura, E.A.; Kamara, M.A.; Lokossou, V.; Keita, N. The quality of free antenatal and delivery services in Northern Sierra Leone. Heal. Res. Policy Syst. 2017, 15, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Pourhoseingholi, M.A.; Vahedi, M.; Rahimzadeh, M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench. 2013, 6, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Brabin, B.J. An analysis of malaria in pregnancy in Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 1983, 61, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Ververs, M.-T.; Antierens, A.; Sackl, A.; Staderini, N.; Captier, V. Which Anthropometric Indicators Identify a Pregnant Woman as Acutely Malnourished and Predict Adverse Birth Outcomes in the Humanitarian Context? PLoS Curr. 2013, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fakier, A.; Petro, G.A.; Fawcus, S. Mid-upper arm circumference: A surrogate for body mass index in pregnant women. S. Afr. Med J. 2017, 107, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Szumilas, M. Explaining Odds Ratios. J. Can. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2010, 19, 227–229. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bland, J.M.; Altman, U.G. Statistics Notes: The odds ratio. BMJ 2000, 320, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. WHO. Haemoglobin Concentrations for the Diagnosis of Anaemia and Assessment of Severity. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. Available online: http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin (accessed on 5 August 2018).
  24. Kayentao, K.; Garner, P.; Van Eijk, A.M.; Naidoo, I.; Roper, C.; Mulokozi, A.; MacArthur, J.R.; Luntamo, M.; Ashorn, P.; Doumbo, O.K.; et al. Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2013, 309, 594–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bhurosy, T.; Jeewon, R. Overweight and Obesity Epidemic in Developing Countries: A Problem with Diet, Physical Activity, or Socioeconomic Status? Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cates, J.; Unger, H.W.; Briand, V.; Fievet, N.; Valea, I.; Tinto, H.; D’Alessandro, U.; Landis, S.H.; Adu-Afarwuah, S.; Dewey, K.G.; et al. Malaria, malnutrition, and birthweight: A meta-analysis using individual participant data. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. November, L.; Sandall, J. ‘Just because she’s young, it doesn’t mean she has to die’: Exploring the contributing factors to high maternal mortality in adolescents in Eastern Freetown; a qualitative study. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Basic characteristics of pregnant women attending their first antenatal care visit. EGA, estimated gestational age.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of pregnant women attending their first antenatal care visit. EGA, estimated gestational age.
CharacteristicNo of Cases = NAverage (Mean)Lowest ValueHighest Value
Age61026 years1254
EGA53029 weeks840
Table 2. Basic characteristics of pregnant women attending their first ANC visit. RDT, rapid diagnostic test, MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.
Table 2. Basic characteristics of pregnant women attending their first ANC visit. RDT, rapid diagnostic test, MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.
Health IndicatorPercentage (%)
Adolescent pregnancy (<19 years)16.4
Primipara20.0
2nd–4th pregnancy55.1
Grande multipara (>5 pregnancies)24.9
Anaemia
Total (Hb < 11.0 g/dL)65.9
Mild (Hb 10.0–10.9 g/dL)30.1
Moderate (Hb 7.0–9.9 g/dL)35.6
Severe (Hb < 7.0 g/dL)0.2
Anaemic adolescents75.6
Anaemic adults63.9
Malaria positivity rate
(RDT for Plasmodium falciparum)
Total35.2
Primipara44.6
Multipara32.9
Adolescents50.6
Adults32.4
Other infections
HIV-positive0.8
Syphilis positive0.2
Malnutrition
Undernourished (MUAC < 23)10.4
Overnourished (MUAC > 30)5.9
Table 3. Positivity rates of RDTs (P. falciparum) in pregnant women, routinely tested during ANC.
Table 3. Positivity rates of RDTs (P. falciparum) in pregnant women, routinely tested during ANC.
MonthTotal RDTs Done at the ANC ClinicPositivePositivity Rate (%)
August1607748.1
September852934.1
October1314635.1
November701622.9
December791721.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bussink-Voorend, D.; Bussink, A.P.; Falama, A.M.; Stekelenburg, J. Health Indicators of Pregnant Women in Tonkolili District, Rural Sierra Leone. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113918

AMA Style

Bussink-Voorend D, Bussink AP, Falama AM, Stekelenburg J. Health Indicators of Pregnant Women in Tonkolili District, Rural Sierra Leone. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113918

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bussink-Voorend, Daphne, Anton P. Bussink, Abdul M. Falama, and Jelle Stekelenburg. 2020. "Health Indicators of Pregnant Women in Tonkolili District, Rural Sierra Leone" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 11: 3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113918

APA Style

Bussink-Voorend, D., Bussink, A. P., Falama, A. M., & Stekelenburg, J. (2020). Health Indicators of Pregnant Women in Tonkolili District, Rural Sierra Leone. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113918

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop