Next Article in Journal
Sedentariness and Physical Activity during School Recess Are Associated with VO2Peak
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowledge and Practices Related to Salt Intake among Saudi Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Exercise Training during Christmas on Body Weight and Cardiometabolic Health in Overweight Individuals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Gender and Age on Dietary Intake and Body Mass Index in Hypertensive Patients: Analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 13
10.3390/ijerph17134731
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review

by
Alessandra Buja
1,*,
Marco Pierbon
2,
Laura Lago
2,
Giulia Grotto
1 and
Vincenzo Baldo
1
1
Department of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Via Loredan 18, 35127 Padova, Italy
2
Masters Course in Sciences for the Public Health and Prevention Professions, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35127 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(13), 4731; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134731
Submission received: 2 June 2020 / Revised: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 25 June 2020 / Published: 1 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Health Behaviors, Risk Factors, NCDs and Health Promotion)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Introduction: Many studies have been published, but none have pooled the useful evidence available in the literature to produce guidelines and health policies promoting healthy eating styles to prevent breast cancer (BC). The present study aimed to summarize the evidence produced to date, taking a judicious, critical approach to the quality of the studies analyzed. Methods: An umbrella review method was adopted, which is a systematic review of second-level studies, meta-analyses and literature reviews. Results: In all, 48 studies were considered: 32 meta-analyses, 4 pooled analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 7 qualitative reviews. A higher intake of total meat, or red or processed meats, or foods with a high glycemic index, or eggs would seem to be associated with a higher risk of BC. Some foods, such as vegetables, would seem instead to have an inverse association with BC risk. One meta-analysis revealed an inverse association between citrus fruit and mushroom consumption and BC. Some nutrients, such as calcium, folate, vitamin D, lignans and carotenoids, also seem to be inversely associated with BC risk. The evidence is still conflicting as concerns exposure to other dietary elements (e.g., polyunsaturated fatty acids, dairy foods). Conclusion: Nutrition is one of the most modifiable aspects of people’s lifestyles and dietary choices can affect health and the risk of cancer. Overall, adhering to a healthy eating style may be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of BC.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed female cancer, accounting for 29% of cancers in women [1]. It is important for primary prevention to include reducing modifiable risk factors, such as obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, and a poor diet. Each of these factors can have various effects, depending on breast tissue type and age (premenopausal and menopausal).
As concerns diet, the role of alcohol as a risk factor has been well established: the results of the 2011 EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) survey found that 5% of BCs could be attributable to alcohol consumption [2]. Numerous studies have addressed the role of several other foods too, sometimes reporting divergent results. For example, according to the EPIC survey, a diet rich in saturated fat is associated with a higher risk of estrogen- and progesterone-positive cancer, with a significantly higher hazard ratio [3]. Similar results emerged from a Swedish cohort survey, in which a high dietary fat consumption seemed to lead to a significant increase in the risk of developing BC [4]. On the other hand, a case-control survey conducted in China in 2008 found no significant association between the various types of dietary fat and the odds of cancer [5]. Red meat and animal proteins seem to be associated with an increase in the risk of neoplastic disease: Jansen suggested that consuming them in large amounts anticipates menarche, and this is recognized as a risk factor and predictor of BC [6].
Several epidemiological studies have shown that consuming soy products is associated with a lower incidence of hormone-related tumors, including BC, due to the properties of isoflavones and phytoestrogens [7,8,9].
Despite the many studies conducted on the topic, the evidence in the literature has yet to be pooled and used for the purpose of drawing up guidelines and health policies to promote healthy eating styles. The aim of the present work was thus to obtain a synthesis of the scientific evidence produced over the last 15 years regarding the association between nutrition and BC. The umbrella review approach was adopted, which entails conducting a systematic review of second-level studies, meta-analyses, and literature reviews, and summarizing the evidence available to date in the light of a judicious critical assessment of the quality of the studies involved.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

An umbrella review was conducted, which involved critically examining the literature, starting from a synthesis of the previously-published second-level research, and performing a critical review of all available evidence [10,11].

2.2. Sources

A comprehensive search (see Figure 1) was conducted in the PubMed (Medline) and Scopus databases using combined MeSH terms: (“breast neoplasm” (MeshTerm) OR “breast cancer” OR “breast tumor”) AND (“diet” (MeshTerm) OR “alimentation” OR “nutrition”) AND (“prevention” (MeshTerm) OR “risk” (MeshTerm) OR “association” (MeshTerm)) from 2000 to February 2016. The search concerned meta-analyses, pooled analyses, systematic reviews, and qualitative reviews on the risk of BC in the female population. We checked the references for the systematic reviews and meta-analyses retrieved, and the proceedings of relevant conferences for articles missed by the electronic search. In particular, we included studies that examined the presence and intake of foods in the diet (exogenous exposure), instead of just measuring endogenous nutrients. Studies with the subsequent characteristics were excluded:
  • General and descriptive reports, comments and updates without any reported association measures;
  • Studies on populations or groups at increased risk;
  • Analyses of dietary supplements or studies examining the combined effect of physical activity and diet;
  • Studies involving BC recurrence;
  • Studies written in languages other than Italian or English.

2.3. Data Extraction

We first extracted the general characteristics of each eligible systematic review or meta-analysis, the first author’s name, the year of publication, the type of epidemiological design, the total size of the samples in all the studies included in a review. Then, we extracted the main findings of each study, including how exposure was measured and the overall results, and we summarized the meta-analytic estimates. Finally, we input details of the limitations of the study, and the authors’ recommendations. Two investigators (M.P., L.L.) independently searched the literature, assessed the eligibility of the papers they retrieved, and extracted the data. Disagreements were solved by discussion with a third investigator (A.B.).

2.4. Study Quality Assessment

The PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) checklist, developed in 2009 [12,13], was used for a critical assessment of the internal validity of the reviews and meta-analyses considered. A checklist was compiled for each study included in the umbrella review (see Table S3).

3. Results

Our literature search identified 8564 results in Scopus and 2121 in PubMed (Figure 1). Then 2359 of the former studies and 618 of the latter were removed after applying publication and language filters. Another 6178 and 1503 studies were excluded after screening the abstracts and titles. In the end, 74 studies were included in the pre-selection phase, and 40 of them were deleted after reading the full text, leaving 34 studies. At this point, 14 further articles were drawn from the lists of references of the reviews considered. A total of 48 studies were tabulated for the purposes of our umbrella review: 32 meta-analyses, 4 pooled analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 7 other reviews. The quality of these studies varied considerably: the meta-analyses scored a mean 20.1 points on the PRISMA checklist, the pooled analyses 15.5, the systematic reviews 15.2, and the other reviews 9 points.
Table 1 contains data concerning the general characteristics of the studies identified, Table 2 shows the exposure measures and main findings of the studies, Table 3 shows the conclusions and recommendations, and Tables S1 and S2 show summaries of the results of the studies.

3.1. Dietary Patterns

The umbrella review ultimately included five studies (two meta-analyses [14,15], one three-cohort analysis [16], two systematic reviews [17,18]) on the association between dietary patterns and BC risk. A diet was judged to be “healthy” if it included plenty of fiber and limited amounts of saturated fat, animal proteins, and refined sugars. The Mediterranean diet (MD) also contemplates a moderate consumption of red wine, and the use of extra-virgin olive oil for seasoning. These two (healthy and MD) eating patterns have been associated with a protective role against the development of BC [14,17,18] (Brennan, all studies combined: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.82–0.99). A systematic review [18], which included five cohort studies and three case-control studies, found that the case-control studies had identified an inverse association between MD and BC risk, in both pre- and post-menopausal women, but the cohort studies reported controversial results. One study that examined three cohorts using a standardized method found no association between a vegetable-based diet (characterized by high intakes of vegetables, legumes, fruit, pasta, fish, and oil) and BC risk in any of the cohorts [16]. This goes to show that the literature still does not offer a clear evidence of the association between a healthy diet and the risk of BC.
The Western diet includes large amounts of refined sugars, proteins, saturated fats, and alcohol, and—judging from case-control studies alone—it appears to be associated with a higher risk of BC (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05–1.63 [14]). On the other hand, when Brennan combined all types of study, there was no evidence of any difference in the risk of BC for women in the highest category of intake of Western/unhealthy dietary patterns compared with the lowest category (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.22).

3.2. Foods

Five studies (two meta-analyses [19,20], one systematic review [21], one pooled analysis [22] and one qualitative review [23]) examined the association between BC risk and red and processed meat consumption. Guo’s meta-analysis [19] found a positive association between the risk of BC and both red meat (summary RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.19) and processed meat (summary RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.15), and Taylor [20] reported an association between red meat consumption and a higher BC risk in premenopausal women (summary RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08–1.42) [24]. On the other hand, the pooled study [22] found no significant associations between the intake of total meat, red meat or white meat, and BC risk.
It emerged from one meta-analysis [25] that a high weekly rate of egg consumption was associated with an increased risk of developing BC, that was only significant in women of postmenopausal age (RR estimates: 1.06; 95% CI 1.02–1.10).
Of the four studies that considered dairy food consumption (two meta-analyses [26,27], one pooled analysis [22], and one systematic review [28]), two reported an inverse association between the consumption of dairy products and the risk of BC [26,27].
Eleven of the studies analyzed the association between BC and the intake of soy foods, phytoestrogens, isoflavones, and lignans (six meta-analyses [9,29,30,31,32,33], three systematic reviews [22,28,34], and three qualitative reviews [35,36,37]). Three of these studies [29,32,34] demonstrated a significant inverse association between BC and a high lignans consumption in postmenopausal women, while two others [31,36] detected stronger evidence of this association in premenopausal women. The protective role of soy and phytoestrogens was recognized as significant in another seven studies [9,21,28,30,33,35,37].
Seven studies (three meta-analyses [24,33,38], two systematic reviews [21,28], one qualitative review [23], and one pooled analysis [39]) investigated dietary fiber: the three meta-analyses confirmed its protective effect against BC, the pooled analysis [39] found an inverse borderline association, while one of the systematic reviews [21] and the qualitative review [23] found no association between fruit fiber intake and the incidence of BC. The other systematic review only found a protective role for vegetable consumption, but no significant association with fruits or fruit fiber [28]. In another meta-analysis [40], Song reported a statistically significant association between citrus fruit consumption and the risk of developing BC (summary RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85–0.96). A further meta-analysis [41] showed a significant inverse association between mushroom consumption and the risk of BC, in both premenopausal women (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91–1.00), and postmenopausal women (summary RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.91–0.97). The scientific evidence of any role for green tea in preventing BC is rather weak: one meta-analysis [42] and one systematic review [28] included in our umbrella review found no significant association, while a subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant inverse association in case-control studies (summary RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38–0.83).

3.3. Nutrients

Eight of the studies (including four meta-analyses [33,43,44,45], two systematic reviews [21,28], one pooled analysis [46] and one qualitative review [23]) analyzed fat intake and the risk of BC. One meta-analysis [43] found no statistically significant association (summary RR estimate 1.11, 95% CI 0.91–1.36); one of the systematic reviews [29] and the qualitative review [23] obtained similar results. Another four studies found an increased risk of BC in women with a high intake of total fat [21,33,44] (Boyd et al. [44]) (summary RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.25) and saturated fat [46] (summary RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.00–1.19); one study found a positive association between a high intake of total fat and BC risk in postmenopausal women only [45] (summary RR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07).
Only one of the two meta-analyses included in our review [47,48] showed a modest increase in the risk of BC for women with dietary patterns associated with a high glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) [48]. Another two studies investigating the association between foods with a high GI or GL and the risk of BC also produced controversial results [21,28].
The consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) was examined in seven studies (five meta-analyses [44,45,49,50,51], one systematic review [21], and one pooled analysis [46]). Two meta-analyses [49,50] found a significant protective association, three studies [44,46,51] reported a statistically insignificant inverse association, and another two studies [21,45] identified a higher risk of BC in women with a high PUFA consumption (summary RR: 1.07; 95% CI 1.01–1.14).
As for vitamin D and calcium, three studies (two meta-analyses [52,53] and one qualitative review [54]) considered these factors, and their protective effect was confirmed.
Three studies (two meta-analyses [55,56], and one qualitative review [57]) tested the association between folate consumption and the risk of BC, finding no significant inverse association overall. The only study that considered flavonoids and flavones (one meta-analysis [58]) concluded that the risk of BC was significantly reduced in women with a high overall consumption of flavonoids (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80–0.96), and flavones (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.76–0.91). One meta-analysis [59] and one systematic review [28] investigated the relationship between carotenoid consumption and BC: the meta-analysis found that α-carotene and β-carotene consumption had a significant protective effect against BC, while the systematic review showed no such association. One systematic review [28] studied the association between BC and vitamins A, B, C and E, finding no such association in ten cohort studies; a positive association between vitamin E and BC emerged in one cohort study.
The overall results of the studies are summarized in Tables S1 and S2.

4. Discussion

Judging from this review, a higher intake of total meat, or red or processed meats, or of foods with a high GI, or eggs would seem to be associated with a higher risk of BC. Other foods, such as vegetables, soy and carotenoids, would seem to be inversely associated with BC risk. One meta-analysis demonstrated an inverse association between BC and the consumption of citrus fruits and mushrooms. Some nutrients also seem to be inversely associated with BC risk, including calcium, folate, vitamin D, lignans, and carotenoids. As concerns exposure to other dietary elements (polyunsaturated fatty acids, dairy foods), the evidence is still conflicting.

4.1. Dietary Patterns

Our findings indicate that most of the literature analyzed here attributed a protective role to the MD [19,51]. Research has shown that this type of diet is rich in antioxidants, which probably inhibit the synthesis and activity of growth factors promoting the development of cancer cells. A more recent meta-analysis of studies on postmenopausal BC [61] found an inverse association between MD and BC risk, when alcohol was excluded (summary Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% CI 0.87, 0.98), while this association disappeared when alcohol was included. This might indicate that the MD could even be used as a primary BC prevention measure, especially in postmenopausal women. Some authors have said that calorie balance, adiposity control, and exercise are important to BC prevention too, as well as the composition and quality of the diet [62,63,64,65]. The MD also seems to have a beneficial influence against the risk of BC regardless of body weight and BMI [66,67,68,69]. The literature on the traditional MD has demonstrated that dietary fiber has multiple protective effects, which include inhibiting intestinal estrogen reabsorption, and modulating cholesterol levels and glucose release, thereby reducing BC risk [70]. The protective effect of fruit and vegetables seems to be linked to their high content of beneficial substances (vitamins, minerals, salicylates, phytosterols, glucosinolates, polyphenols, phytoestrogens, sulfides, lectins, etc.), which have an antioxidant action, preventing the activation of many carcinogens, suppressing spontaneous mutations, and protecting cellular structures and DNA against the oxidative damage generated by metabolic processes [70,71,72]. Leafy vegetables are rich in lutein, zeaxanthin, folates, vitamin A and carotenoids, which are antioxidant and also able to regulate estrogen metabolism and inhibit tumor growth [73,74]. Fruits seem to have an anti-carcinogenic potential due to their antioxidant properties; this is especially true of red fruits, which contain ellagic acid, quercitin and anthocyanins. These substances stimulate the mechanisms behind the elimination of toxic substances, inhibit angiogenesis, reduce inflammation, and promote cellular apoptosis mechanisms [71,75]. Some mushroom-derived substances, like polysaccharides, are known for their anti-tumor and immunomodulatory properties, for enhancing immune system activity and protecting against tumor recurrences [76]. A pooled analysis of eight large cohort studies did not strongly associate the intake of fruit and vegetables with the risk of BC, however [46]. Another comparative study of three cohorts also indicated that a diet rich in vegetables and fruits, but also characterized by other foods such as oil and fish, was not significantly related to a lower risk of BC [46].
The studies included in the present review indicated that the Western diet, which involves a high intake of refined sugars, saturated fats and alcohol, is strongly associated with an increased risk of BC [14,17]. This type of diet influences inflammatory processes, and induces an increase in adiposity and the production of growth factors and hormones (estrogen and testosterone).
Overall, however, the studies reviewed did not produce consistent results concerning specific dietary patterns and the risk of BC. Further studies could probably be conducted using machine learning techniques: this type of analysis could test clusters of foods not defined a priori—instead of prototypic dietary patterns—in terms of their association with BC risk, or BC prevention. In fact, a diet can include numerous foods that might have opposite effects, in which case analyzing preset eating patterns would be unable to produce evidence of any clear association.

4.2. Foods

The significant association demonstrated by the EPIC study [77] between red or processed meat consumption and a higher risk of BC, and BC-related mortality, was also confirmed in our umbrella review [19,20]. Apart from the related fat intake, various other factors appear to be involved in the carcinogenic potential of red and processed meat: the presence of carcinogens or their precursors (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic aromatic amines, nitrosamines) produced by food treatments like cooking, salting or smoking; a high intake of animal proteins, with a potential increase in insulin-like growth factor (IGF) levels; hormone residues contained in meat from intensive farming; and the fact that intestinal fermentation of animal proteins raises the concentration of some polyamines, which are fundamental to cell proliferation.
A significant association also emerged between egg consumption and a higher risk of BC [24], but this relationship needs to be confirmed. The most plausible mechanism behind the carcinogenic potential of eggs might relate to their high cholesterol content (425 mg per 100 g) [24], given the recommended daily dose of 300 mg. Cholesterol is a precursor of steroid hormones, so it can influence estrogen activity and contribute to cellular inflammation, a crucial component in BC progression [78]. However, some evidence points to the association between eggs and BC being not necessarily due to cholesterol [79]: when fried at high temperatures, eggs also become a source of heterocyclic amines and several carcinogenic components, so their mutagenic activity can increase in some conditions (cooking at high temperatures and with inappropriate oil) [80].
Our umbrella review showed that studies consistently provided evidence of a protective effect of soy in the diet against the risk of BC [9,29,30,32,34,35,36], especially among postmenopausal women [28,31,33]. Phytoestrogens are structurally and functionally natural substances similar to estradiol, with a similar estrogenic activity. The evidence indicates a lower BC risk in consumers of soybean and phytoestrogen-containing plants, particularly in Asian populations (who are exposed to such foods from childhood), and in postmenopausal women. The protective effect of these foods is due to the agonist or antagonist actions against estrogens in breast tissue, reducing blood levels of estradiol [81,82] and consequently also the risk of estrogen receptor positive (ER+)/progesterone receptor positive (PR+) BC.
Finally, our umbrella review found that consuming lean dairy products was associated with a lower risk of BC [25,26], probably due to the protective effect of vitamin D and calcium [52,53,54]. Breast tissue has receptors to the biologically active form of vitamin D, calcitriol 1,25(OH)2D, which appears to be able to directly and indirectly control more than 200 genes, including those responsible for cell proliferation, malignant cell differentiation, apoptosis and angiogenesis [83]. In contrast, there are also reports of dairy product consumption leading to an increased estrogen hormone intake, which can enhance the penetrance of BC associated with Breast Related Cancer Antigens (BRCA) mutations [84]. In addition, milk has the potential to raise blood levels of growth factors, and a diet rich in animal protein is associated with high serum IGF-1 levels, which are strongly associated with a greater risk of BC [85,86].
The consumption of citrus fruits, rich in vitamin C, β-carotene, quercitin and folate, seems to have a very positive impact on health due to the antioxidant, immune-stimulant, and detoxifying properties, and a capacity to modulate insulin sensitivity and cholesterol levels [87]. In fact, our review found a 10% lower BC risk in women who consumed large amounts of citrus fruit.

4.3. Nutrients

A significant inverse association has been demonstrated between BC risk and consumption of carotenoids [88], which have antioxidant properties. These compounds, especially β-carotenes, are capable of binding and eliminating free radicals, and repairing DNA damage, inhibiting cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and suppressing angiogenesis [89]. Flavonoids have been acknowledged to have a role in protecting against and preventing non-communicable diseases [90,91,92,93], and neoplasms in particular, due to their potent antioxidant and DNA repairing activity. In this review, the dietary impact of various subclasses of flavonoids was analyzed, and it proved significant for flavonols, flavones, and flavan-3-ol swell classes, particularly after menopause. Folic acid, a soluble member of the vitamin B group, is needed for all DNA synthesis, repair and methylation reactions, so folate deficiency in the diet can negatively affect cell division and DNA repair mechanisms. The studies assessed in our umbrella review generally reported inconsistent results on the association between folic acid and BC, however.
Foods with a high GI, such as simple sugars, refined carbohydrates and starches, induce a rapid increase in blood glucose, and consequently stimulate insulin production. High levels of insulin cause the production of IGF-1 and testosterone, which are recognized as risk factors for BC. In addition, chronic hyperinsulinemia with associated insulin resistance has a key role in the etiology of BC as it induces the production of IGF-1, which is capable of causing mutagenic changes [94]. The studies included in our review [47,48] demonstrated no strong association between high GI food consumption and any increased risk of BC, however; this is probably due to reliability issues with the measurement indices adopted.
On the whole, our review identified a moderate risk of BC in women with a high total fat and/or saturated fat intake [32,44,46]. There was also evidence to support this higher BC risk applying especially to postmenopausal women [95,96,97], and the consumption of saturated fat is also associated with a higher likelihood of obesity [98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Obesity and overweight, together with lack of exercise, are established risk factors for BC [105,106]. A diet rich in saturated fat also increases estrogen synthesis, leading to an increased cell proliferation and a consequently higher BC risk [107,108].
On the other hand, our review found that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) can have a role in reducing BC risk [49,50], although some studies found controversial results [21,45]. A possible explanation of the discrepancy of results concerns the fact that the two studies that found a protective effect of the PUFAs against the BC specifically examined the intake of n-3/n-6 PUFAs [49] and marine n-3 PUFA [50]. On the contrary, in the two studies [21,45] which gave an opposite result, the association between BC and the PUFA subtypes was not examined. The n-3 PUFA family compete for the same metabolic pathway with the n-6 PUFA family, which is associated with cell proliferation in breast tissue. The n-3 PUFA family reduces inflammation, controls triglyceride levels, and thus reduces the risk of BC via several mechanisms, i.e., by altering the composition of the phospholipid cell membranes, inhibiting arachidonic acid (ARA) metabolism and pro-inflammatory molecule production, and modulating the expression and function of various receptors, transcription factors, and signaling molecules [109]. Marine-derived n-3 PUFA would seem to have a protective effect against the development of BC [110], particularly in postmenopausal women, whereas n-6 PUFA contribute to carcinogenic mechanisms with the production of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids, such as prostaglandin E2, which is implicated in angiogenic processes and in the suppression of cancer cell apoptosis [109,111].
Overall, our study confirms the content of the third report from the World Cancer Research Fund [112], which found moderate evidence of the following: consuming non-starchy vegetables might reduce the risk of estrogen-receptor-negative (ER-) BC; consuming foods containing carotenoids, or adopting diets high in calcium might reduce the risk of BC in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women; and consuming dairy products might reduce the risk of BC, but only in premenopausal women. Our study also indicated that other foods and nutrients, including soy, folate, vitamin D, and lignans, seem to be inversely associated with BC.
This umbrella review of studies investigating the associations between diet, or specific foods or nutrients and BC reveals the weaknesses of the observational studies and reviews published on this topic (as shown in Table 3). The main shortcoming concerns measurement errors in dietary intake assessments, which bias the estimates of any such associations. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews of case-control studies may also be affected by recall and interview bias, often revealing associations that are not confirmed in cohort studies. Some studies also adjusted inconsistently for potential confounders (e.g., physical activity, often associated with both outcome and exposure), and this could result in residual confounding elements that would bias the estimates emerging from a meta-analysis.

5. Conclusions

Nutrition is one of the most modifiable aspects of lifestyle, and nutritional choices can affect people’s health and the risk of cancer. Active strategies are warranted, including educational/behavioral interventions in high-risk groups, to promote healthy eating habits.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4731/s1, Table S1: Summary of measures of BC risk associated with dietary exposures—For META-ANALYSES only; Table S2: Summary of measures of BC risk associated with dietary exposures; Table S3: Quality of studies included in the umbrella review.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: A.B.; acquisition of data, review literature: M.P., L.L., G.G.; interpretation of data: G.G., A.B., V.B.; drafting of manuscript: G.G., L.L.; critical revision: A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tumore al Seno—Tumori AIRC. Available online: http://www.airc.it/tumori/tumore-al-seasp (accessed on 31 August 2017).
  2. Schütze, M.; Boeing, H.; Pischon, T.; Rehm, J.; Kehoe, T.; Gmel, G.; Olsen, A.; Tjønneland, A.M.; Dahm, C.C.; Overvad, K.; et al. Alcohol attributable burden of incidence of cancer in eight European countries based on results from prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011, 342, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sieri, S.; Chiodini, P.; Agnoli, C.; Pala, V.; Berrino, F.; Trichopoulou, A.; Benetou, V.; Vasilopoulou, E.; Sánchez, M.J.; Chirlaque, M.; et al. Dietary fat intake and development of specific breast cancer subtypes. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mattisson, E.; Wirfält, P.; Wallström, B.; Gullberg, H.O.L.; Berglund, G. High fat and alcohol intakes are risk factors of postmenopausal breast cancer: A prospective study from the Malmö diet and cancer cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 110, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, C.-X.; Ho, S.C.; Lin, F.-Y.; Chen, Y.-M.; Cheng, S.-Z.; Fu, J.-H. Dietary fat intake and risk of breast cancer: A case-control study in China. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2011, 20, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jansen, E.C.; Marin, C.; Mora-Plazas, M.; Villamor, E. Higher childhood red meat intake frequency is associated with earlier age at menarche. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 792–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Varinska, L.; Gal, P.; Mojzisova, G.; Mirossay, L.; Mojzis, J. Soy and breast cancer: Focus on angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 11728–11749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Messina, M.; McCaskill-Stevens, W.; Lampe, J.W. Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: Review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 1275–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wu, H.; Yu, M.C.; Tseng, C.C.; Pike, M.C. Epidemiology of soy exposures and breast cancer risk. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Aromataris, E.; Fernandez, R.; Godfrey, C.M.; Holly, C.; Khalil, H.; Tungpunkom, P. Summarizing systematic reviews. Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc. 2015, 13, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Aromataris, E.; Fernandez, R.; Godfrey, C.; Holly, C.; Khalil, H.; Tungpunkom, P. Methodology for JBI Umbrella Reviews. Joanna Briggs Inst. Rev. Man. 2014, 1–34. Available online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4367&context=smhpapers (accessed on 29 June 2020).
  12. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D. PRISMA CHECKLIST. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, 7. [Google Scholar]
  13. Moher, D.; Altman, D.G.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J. PRISMA Statement. Epidemiology 2011, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Brennan, S.F.; Cantwell, M.M.; Cardwell, C.R.; Velentzis, L.S.; Woodside, J.V. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Schwingshackl, L.; Hoffmann, G. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 1884–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Männistö, S.; Dixon, L.B.; Balder, H.F.; Virtanen, M.J.; Krogh, V.; Khani, B.R.; Berrino, F.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Hartman, A.M.; Pietinen, P.; et al. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: Results from three cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project. Cancer Causes Control 2005, 16, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Albuquerque, R.C.R.; Baltar, V.T.; Marchioni, D.M.L. Breast cancer and dietary patterns: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farsinejad-Marj, M.; Talebi, S.; Ghiyasvand, R.; Miraghajani, M. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Arch. Iran. Med. 2015, 18, 786–792. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, J.; Wei, W.; Zhan, L. Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 151, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Taylor, V.H.; Misra, M.; Mukherjee, S.D. Is red meat intake a risk factor for breast cancer among premenopausal women? Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 117, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mourouti, N.; Kontogianni, M.D.; Papavagelis, C.; Panagiotakos, D.B. Diet and breast cancer: A systematic review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Missmer, S.A.; Smith-Warner, S.A.; Spiegelman, D.; Yaun, S.S.; Adami, H.O.; Beeson, W.L.; Van Den Brandt, P.A.; Fraser, G.E.; Freudenheim, J.L.; Goldbohm, R.A.; et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 31, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hanf, V.; Gonder, U. Nutrition and primary prevention of breast cancer: Foods, nutrients and breast cancer risk. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005, 123, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gandini, S.; Merzenich, H.; Robertson, C.; Boyle, P. Meta-analysis of studies on breast cancer risk and diet: The role of fruit and vegetable consumption and the intake of associated micronutrients. Eur. J. Cancer 2000, 36, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Si, R.; Qu, K.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, X.; Gao, P. Egg consumption and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer 2014, 21, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dong, J.-Y.; Zhang, L.; He, K.; Qin, L.-Q. Dairy consumption and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 127, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zang, J.; Shen, M.; Du, S.; Chen, T.; Zou, S. The association between dairy intake and breast cancer in western and Asian populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Breast Cancer 2015, 18, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. .Michels, K.B.; Mohllajee, P.A.; Roset-Bahmanyar, E.; Beehler, G.P.; Moysich, K.B. Diet and breast cancer: A review of the prospective observational studies. Cancer 2007, 109, 2712–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buck, K.; Zaineddin, A.K.; Vrieling, A.; Linseisen, J.; Chang-Claude, J. Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, J.-Y.; Qin, L.-Q. Soy isoflavones consumption and risk of breast cancer incidence or recurrence: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 125, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trock, B.J.; Leena, H.C.; Clarke, R. Meta-analysis of soy intake and breast cancer risk. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Velentzis, L.S.; Cantwell, M.M.; Cardwell, C.; Keshtgar, M.R.; Leathem, A.J.; Woodside, J.V. Lignans and breast cancer risk in pre- and post-menopausal women: Meta-analyses of observational studies. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wu, Y.-C.; Zheng, D.; Sun, J.-J.; Zou, Z.-K.; Ma, Z.-L. Meta-analysis of studies on breast cancer risk and diet in Chinese women. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Mourouti, N.; Panagiotakos, D.B. Soy food consumption and breast cancer. Maturitas 2013, 76, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Duffy, C.; Perez, K.; Partridge, A. Implications of phytoestrogen intake for breast cancer. Cancer J. Clin. 2007, 57, 60–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lof, M.; Weiderpass, E. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with reduced risk of breast, endometrial, and prostate cancers. Nutr. Res. 2006, 26, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peeters, P.H.M.; Keinan-Boker, L.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; Grobbee, D.E. Phytoestrogens and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2003, 77, 71–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Aune, D.; Chan, D.S.; Greenwood, D.C.; Vieira, A.R.; Rosenblatt, D.A.; Vieira, R.; Norat, T. Dietary fiber and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith-Warner, S.A.; Spiegelman, D.; Yaun, S.S.; Adami, H.O.; Beeson, W.L.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Folsom, A.R.; Fraser, G.E.; Freudenheim, J.L.; Goldbohm, R.A.; et al. Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of breast cancer a pooled analysis of cohort studies. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2001, 285, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, J.K.; Bae, J.M. Citrus fruit intake and breast cancer risk: A quantitative systematic review. J. Breast Cancer 2013, 16, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Li, J.; Zou, L.; Chen, W.; Zhu, B.; Shen, N.; Ke, J.; Lou, J.; Song, R.; Zhong, R.; Miao, X. Dietary mushroom intake may reduce the risk of breast cancer: Evidence from a meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Seely, D.; Mills, E.J.; Wu, P.; Verma, S.; Guyatt, G.H. The effects of green tea consumption on incidence of breast cancer and recurrence of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Alexander, D.D.; Morimoto, L.M.; Mink, P.J.; Lowe, K.A. Summary and meta-analysis of prospective studies of animal fat intake and breast cancer. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Boyd, N.F.; Stone, J.; Vogt, K.N.; Connelly, B.S.; Martin, L.J.; Minkin, S. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk revisited: A meta-analysis of the published literature. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 1672–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Turner, L.B. A meta-analysis of fat intake, reproduction, and breast cancer risk: An evolutionary perspective. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2011, 23, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Smith-Warner, S.A.; Spiegelman, D.; Adami, H.O.; Beeson, W.L.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Folsom, A.R.; Fraser, G.E.; Freudenheim, J.L.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Graham, S.; et al. Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 92, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mulholland, H.G.; Murray, L.J.; Cardwell, C.R.; Cantwell, M.M. Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 99, 1170–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Mullie, P.; Koechlin, A.; Boniol, M.; Autier, P.; Boyle, P. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition relation between breast cancer and high glycemic index or glycemic load: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies relation between breast cancer and high glycemic index or glycemic load. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yang, B.; Ren, X.-L.; Fu, Y.-Q.; Gao, J.-L.; Li, D. Ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFAs and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 274135 adult females from 11 independent prospective studies. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zheng, J.-S.; Hu, X.-J.; Zhao, Y.-M.; Yang, J.; Li, D. Intake of fish and marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of breast cancer: Meta-analysis of data from 21 independent prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2013, 346, F3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhou, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhai, S.; Li, W.; Meng, Q. Linoleic acid and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 19, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Chen, P.; Hu, P.; Xie, D.; Qin, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, H. Meta-analysis of vitamin D, calcium and the prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 121, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gissel, T.; Rejnmark, L.; Mosekilde, L.; Vestergaard, P. Intake of vitamin D and risk of breast cancer—A. meta-analysis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 111, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cui, Y.; Rohan, T.E. Vitamin D, calcium, and breast cancer risk: A review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2006, 15, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, P.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Chu, R.; Wang, H. Higher dietary folate intake reduces the breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 2327–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Larsson, S.C.; Giovannucci, E.; Wolk, A. Folate and risk of breast cancer: A. meta-analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007, 99, 64–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Eichholzer, M.; Lüthy, J.; Moser, U.; Fowler, B. Folate and the risk of colorectal, breast and cervix cancer: The epidemiological evidence. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2001, 131, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Hui, C.; Qi, X.; Qianyong, Z.; Xiaoli, P.; Jundong, Z.; Mantian, M. Flavonoids, flavonoid subclasses and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, F.; Wang Yi, B.; Zhang, W.; Liang, J.; Lin, C.; Li, D.; Wang, F.; Pang, D.; Zhao, Y. Carotenoids and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 131, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rossi, R.E.; Pericleous, M.; Mandair, D.; Whyand, T.; Caplin, M.E. The role of dietary factors in prevention and progression of breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014, 34, 6861–6875. [Google Scholar]
  61. van den Brandt, P.A.; Schulpen, M. Mediterranean diet adherence and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: Results of a cohort study and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 2220–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Campbell, K.L.; Foster-Schubert, K.E.; Alfano, C.M.; Wang, C.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Duggan, C.R.; Mason, C.; Imayama, I.; Kong, A.; Xiao, L. Reduced-calorie dietary weight loss, exercise, and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: Randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 2314–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pasanisi, P.; Berrino, F.; de Petris, M.; Venturelli, E.; Mastroianni, A.; Panico, S. Metabolic syndrome as a prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrences. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 119, 236–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Frank, L.L.; Sorensen, B.E.; Yasui, Y.; Tworoger, S.S.; Schwartz, R.S.; Ulrich, C.M.; Irwin, M.L.; Rudolph, R.E.; Rajan, K.B.; Stanczyk, F.; et al. Effects of exercise on metabolic risk variables in overweight postmenopausal women: A randomized clinical trial. Obes. Res. 2005, 13, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. McTiernan, A.; Tworoger, S.S.; Ulrich, C.M.; Yasui, Y.; Irwin, M.L.; Rajan, K.B.; Sorensen, B.; Rudolph, R.E.; Bowen, D.; Stanczyk, F.Z. Effect of exercise on serum estrogens in postmenopausal women: A 12-month randomized clinical trial. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 2923–2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Trichopoulou, C.; Bamia, P.L.; Trichopoulos, D. Conformity to traditional Mediterranean diet and breast cancer risk in the Greek EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Sieri, S.; Krogh, V.; Pala, V.; Muti, P.; Micheli, A.; Evangelista, A.; Tagliabue, G.; Berrino, F. Dietary patterns and risk of breast cancer in the ORDET cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2004, 13, 567–572. [Google Scholar]
  68. Murtaugh, M.A.; Sweeney, C.; Giuliano, A.R.; Herrick, J.S.; Hines, L.; Byers, T.; Baumgartner, K.B.; Slattery, M.L. Diet patterns and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women: The Four-Corners Breast Cancer Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 978–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wu, H.; Yu, M.C.; Tseng, C.-C.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Pike, M.C. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian American women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rose, D.P.; Goldman, M.; Connolly, J.M.; Strong, L.E. High-fiber diet reduces serum estrogen concentrations in premenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 54, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Surh, Y.-J. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Berrino, F. Il Cibo dell’Uomo. La Via della Salute tra Conoscenza Scientifica e Antiche Saggezze; Franco Angeli: Milan, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  73. Masala, G.; Assedi, M.; Bendinelli, B.; Ermini, I.; Sieri, S.; Grioni, S.; Sacerdote, C.; Ricceri, F.; Panico, S.; Mattiello, A.; et al. Fruit and vegetables consumption and breast cancer risk: The EPIC Italy study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 132, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ribaya-Mercado, J.D.; Blumberg, J.B. Lutein and zeaxanthin and their potential roles in disease prevention. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 567S–587S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Allegro, G.; Villarini, A. Prevenire i Tumori Mangiando con Gusto; Sperling & Kupfer: Milan, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wasser, S. Medicinal mushrooms as a source of antitumor and immunomodulating polysaccharides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 60, 258–274. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rohrmann, S.; Overvad, K.; Bueno-de-Mesquita, H.B.; Jakobsen, M.U.; Egeberg, R.; Tjønneland, A.; Nailler, L.; Boutron-Ruault, M.C.; Clavel-Chapelon, F.; Krogh, V.; et al. Meat consumption and mortality—Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Med. 2013, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ferretti, G.; Bacchetti, T.; Nègre-Salvayre, A.; Salvayre, R.; Dousset, N.; Curatola, G. Structural modifications of HDL and functional consequences. Atherosclerosis 2006, 184, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Aune, D.; De Stefani, E.; Ronco, A.L.; Boffetta, P.; Deneo-Pellegrini, H.; Acosta, G.; Mendilaharsu, M. Egg consumption and the risk of cancer: A multisite case-control study in Uruguay. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2009, 10, 869–876. [Google Scholar]
  80. Li, F.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, R.T.; Hou, L.N.; Du, Y.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Olkkonen, V.M.; Tan, W.L. Egg consumption and risk of bladder cancer: A meta-analysis. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 538–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lu, L.J.; Anderson, K.E.; Grady, J.J.; Nagamani, M. Effects of soya consumption for one month on steroid hormones in premenopausal women: Implications for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 1996, 5, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lu, L.-J.W.; Anderson, K.E.; Grady, J.J.; Kohen, F.; Nagamani, M. Decreased ovarian hormones during a soya diet: Implications for breast cancer prevention. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 4112–4121. [Google Scholar]
  83. Bartolozzi, G. Fisiopatologia della vitamina D (seconda parte). Medico. E. Bambino. Pagine. Elettron. 2007, 10, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  84. Pasanisi, P.; Bruno, E.; Venturelli, E.; Manoukian, S.; Barile, M.; Peissel, B.; De Giacomi, C.; Bonanni, B.; Berrino, J.; Berrino, F. Serum levels of IGF-I and BRCA penetrance: A case control study in breast cancer families. Fam. Cancer 2011, 10, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Norat, T.; Dossus, L.; Rinaldi, S.; Overvad, K.; Grønbaek, H.; Tjønneland, A.; Olsen, A.; Clavel-Chapelon, F.; Boutron-Ruault, M.C.; Boeing, H. Diet, serum insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF-binding protein-3 in European women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Qin, L.-Q.; He, K.; Xu, J.-Y. Milk consumption and circulating insulin-like growth factor-I level: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Silalahi, J. Anticancer and health protective properties of citrus fruit components. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 11, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Boeke, C.E.; Tamimi, R.M.; Berkey, C.S.; Colditz, G.A.; Eliassen, A.H.; Malspeis, S.; Willett, W.C.; Frazier, A.L. Adolescent carotenoid intake and benign breast disease. Pediatrics 2014, 133, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cui, Y.; Lu, Z.; Bai, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, W.e.; Zhao, B. β-Carotene induces apoptosis and up-regulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ expression and reactive oxygen species production in MCF-7 cancer cells. Eur. J. Cancer 2007, 43, 2590–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hui, C.; Yujie, F.; Lijia, Y.; Long, Y.; Hongxia, X.; Yong, Z.; Jundong, Z.; Qianyong, Z.; Mantian, M. MicroRNA-34a and microRNA-21 play roles in the chemopreventive effects of 3,6-dihydroxyflavone on 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea-induced breast carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14, R80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Coburn, R.A.; Morris, M.E. Structure activity relationships and quantitative for the flavonoid-mediated inhibition of breast cancer resistance protein. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 70, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Neuhouser, M.L. Review. Dietary flavonoids and cancer risk: Evidence from human population studies. Nutr. Cancer 2004, 50, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ross, J.A.; Kasum, C.M. Dietary flavonoids: Bioavailability, metabolic effects, and safety. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2002, 22, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Papa, V.; Belfiore, A. Insulin receptors in breast cancer: Biological and clinical role. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1994, 19, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Laamiri, F.Z.; Otmani, A.; Ahid, S.; Barkat, A. Lipid profile among Moroccan overweight women and breast cancer: A case-control study. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2013, 6, 439–445. [Google Scholar]
  96. Sieri, S.; Krogh, V.; Ferrari, P.; Berrino, F.; Pala, V.; Thiébaut, A.C.; Tjønneland, A.; Olsen, A.; Overvad, K.; Jakobsen, M.U.; et al. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 1304–1312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Armstrong, B.; Doll, R. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 15, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/obesity/en/ (accessed on 29 June 2020).
  99. Golay, A.; Bobbioni, E. The role of dietary fat in obesity. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1997, 21, S2–S11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Astrup, A.; Buemann, B.; Western, P.; Toubro, S.; Raben, A.; Christensen, N.J. Obesity as an adaptation to a high-fat diet: Evidence from a cross-sectional study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 59, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jequier, E. Pathways to obesity. Int. J. Obes. 2002, 26, S18–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Hill, J.O.; Melanson, E.L.; Wyatt, H.T. Dietary fat intake and regulation of energy balance: Implications for obesity. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 284S–288S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Bray, G.A.; Popkin, B.M. Dietary fat intake does affect obesity! Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1157–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Schrauwen, P.; Westerterp, K.R. The role of high-fat diets and physical activity in the regulation of body weight. Br. J. Nutr. 2000, 84, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Larsson, S.C.; Wolk, A. Excess body fatness: An important cause of most cancers. Lancet 2008, 371, 536–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dossus, L.; Kaaks, R. Nutrition, metabolic factors and cancer risk. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 22, 551–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Key, T.J.; Allen, N.E.; Spencer, E.A.; Travis, R.C. Nutrition and breast cancer. The Breast 2003, 12, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lahmann, P.H.; Lissner, L.; Berglund, G. Breast cancer risk in overweight postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2004, 13, 8. [Google Scholar]
  109. Murff, H.J.; Shu, X.O.; Li, H.; Yang, G.; Wu, X.; Cai, H.; Wen, W.; Gao, Y.T.; Zheng, W. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: A prospective cohort study. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Liu, J.; Ma, D.W.L. The role of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Nutrients 2014, 6, 5184–5223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Corso, G.; Maisonneuve, P.; Massari, G.; Invento, A.; Pravettoni, G.; De Scalzi, A.; Intra, M.; Galimberti, V.; Morigi, C.; Lauretta, M.; et al. Validation of a Novel Nomogram for Prediction of Local Relapse after Surgery for Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 27, 1864–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Breast Cancer. Continuous Update Project Expert Report. 2018. Available online: https://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Summary-of-Third-Expert-Report-2018.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2020).
Ijerph 17 04731 g001 550
Figure 1. The research strategy used to identify the articles for the umbrella review.
Figure 1. The research strategy used to identify the articles for the umbrella review.
Ijerph 17 04731 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the umbrella review.
Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the umbrella review.
Author_ YearContinent or Region, n. of StudiesSearch Range AppliedTotal n. of Studies Included in the ReviewTotal Sample Size of all Studies Included in the ReviewType of StudyStudy DesignAssociation/s Examined
Characteristics of meta-analyses included in the umbrella review (32)
Alexander 2010 [43]//up to 200811 studies referring to 6 cohort studies//meta-analysis and review of epidemiological cohort studies6 cohort studiesanimal fat intake and breast cancer (BC)
Aune 2012 [38]9 studies in America, 6 in Europe and 1 in Asiafrom January 2006 to 31 August 201116 prospective studies (17 publications)26,523 cases among 999,271 participantssystematic review and meta-analysis16 cohort studies high vs. low dietary fiber intake and BC risk
Boyd 2003 [44]22 studies in Europe (including Russia), 15 in North America, 5 in Asia, 2 in Australia and 1 in South America (Uruguay)from January 1966 to July 200345 studies16,280 BC cases and 18,966 controls in case-control studies; 8735 BC cases out of 568,549 participants (total 25,015 BC cases and 580,000 controls)meta-analysis of the published literature31 case-control studies and 14 prospective studies (cohort and nested case-control studies)dietary fat and BC risk
Brennan 2010 [14]7 studies in North America, 5 in Europe, 2 in South America (Uruguay), 2 in Asiaup to November 200916 articles 13,885 BC cases out of 465,891 participants in cohort studies; 10,746 BC cases and 34,311 controls in case-control studiessystematic review and meta-analysis8 case-control and 8 cohort studiesdietary patterns and BC risk
Buck 2010 [29]16 studies in Europe, 6 in North America 1 in Asia and 1 in Australiafrom 1997 to August 200924 articles, including 21 studies (all on lignan exposures—9 studies on calculated dietary plant lignans)21,159 BC cases among 188,302 participants overall meta-analysis11 cohort studies and 10 case-control studieslignans and BC risk
Chen 2010 [52]//up to July 200911 studies on vitamin D intake and 15 on calcium intake (26 studies in all)//meta-analysis5 case-control and 6 cohort studies on vitamin D intake; 9 case-control and 6 cohort studies on calcium intakevitamin D and calcium intake on BC risk
Chen 2014 [55]20 studies in North America,10 in Europe, 9 in Asia, 1 in Australia, 1 in China 1 in Brazilup to January 201450 eligible studies, 42 of which reported on folate intake and breast cancer 26,205 BC cases out of 744,068 participants in prospective studies; 16,826 BC cases and 21,820 controls in case-control studiessystematic review and meta-analysis16 prospective studies (14 cohort and 2 nested case-control) on folate intake; 26 case-control studies on folate intake (8 studies on blood folate levels) folate intake and overall BC risk
Dong 2011 (a) [29]8 studies in Europe, 4 studies in Asia, 2 studies in USAup to September 201014 studies on BC incidence369,934 participants and 5828 cases of BCmeta-analysis of prospective studies (nested case-control and cohort studies)6 nested case control studies and 8 cohort studiessoy isoflavone consumption and BC risk
Dong 2011 (b) [25]9 studies in USA, 8 in Europe, 1 in Japanup to January 201118 studies 24,187 BC cases and 1,063,471 participantsmeta-analysis of prospective studies (nested case-control and cohort studies)18 cohort studies; 12 studies on total dairy food intake and 13 on milk intakedairy product consumption and BC risk
Gandini 2000 [38]14 studies in Europe, 8 in North America, 3 in Asia, 1 in Australia1982–199926 studies focusing on vegetables (17), fruits (13), beta-carotene (11) and vitamin C (9)23,038 cases in allmeta-analysis5 cohort studies and 21 case-control studiesconsumption of fruit and vegetables, and associated micronutrients, and risk of BC
Gissel 2008 [53]//up to June 20076 studies 78,712 womenmeta-analysis epidemiological studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs)vitamin D intake and BC
Guo 2015 [19]6 studies in the USA, 6 in Europe, 1 in North America and Western Europe, and 1 in Asiaup to October 201414 prospective studies 1,588,890 participants and 31,552 BC cases meta-analysis 14 cohort/nested case-control studies red meat and processed meat consumption and BC risk
Hu 2012 [59]//January 1982–May 201133 studies //meta-analysis and meta-regression24 case-control studies, 1 nested case-control study, 2 case-cohort studies and 6 cohort studiescarotenoids and BC risk
Hui 2013 [58]5 studies in Europe, 5 in North America (4 in the USA) and 2 in Asia (China)up to July 201212 studies included9513 cases and 181,906 controls meta-analysis of epidemiological studies6 cohort studies, 6 case-control studiesflavonoids, flavonoid subclasses and BC risk
Larsson 2007 [56]12 studies in North America (10 in the USA), 7 in Europe, 2 in Asia, 1 in South America (Uruguay) and 1 in Australiafrom January 1966 to November 200623 studies (21 assessing dietary folate intake)8367 BC cases out of 302,959 participants in cohort studies; 8558 BC cases and 10,812 control subjects in case-control studies meta-analysis9 cohort studies and 14 case-control studiesdietary folate intake and BC risk
Li 2014 [41]8 case-control studies in Asia, 2 cohort studies in Europeup to 20137 articles including 10 studies 2313 BC cases and 2387 controls in case-control studies; 4577 cases among 1,748,623 follow-up person/yearsmeta-analysis2 cohort and 8 case-control studiesdietary mushroom intake and BC risk
Mulholland 2008 [47]8 studies in North-Central America, 5 in Europe and 1 Australiaup to May 200814 studies 17,673 BC cases out of 492,011 participantssystematic review and meta-analysis10 cohort, 4 case-control studiesdietary glycemic index, glycemic load and BC risk
Mullie 2016 [48]6 studies in North America, 4 in Europe, 1 in Australia and 1 in Chinaup to December 201112 studies20,973 BC cases out of 773,971 subjectsmeta-analysis of prospective cohort studies12 cohort studieshigh glycemic index, glycemic load and BC risk
Schwingshackl 2014 [15]7 studies in Europe, 4 in North Americaup to January 201411 studies on BC risk489,109 participants in cohort studies; 4990 BC cases and 5446 controls in case-control studies systematic review and meta-analysis5 case-control and 6 cohort studiesMediterranean diet and BC risk
Seely 2005 [42]4 studies in Asian populations (Japanese, Chinese or Filipino) in Asia, 1 in Asian populations of the USAfrom 1966 to November 20047 studies (5 prevention studies examining risk of primary BC and green tea consumption)857 primary BC cases and 1519 controls in case-control studies; 115,601 participants in cohort studiessystematic review and meta-analysis3 cohort studies and 2 case-control studies green tea consumption and BC risk
Si 2014 [25]5 studies in Asia, 4 in Europe, 2 in the USA, 1 in South America and 1 in both Europe and Americaup to February 201313 studies 19,280 BC cases among 811,555 participants in cohort studies; 13,949 cases and 37,883 controls in case-control studiesmeta-analysis5 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies egg consumption and BC risk
Song 2013 [40]3 studies in China, 2 in the USA, 1 in Australiaup to January 20126 studies8393 participants: 3789 cases and 4705 controlsquantitative systematic review and meta-analysis6 case-control studiesassociation between citrus fruit intake and BC risk
Taylor 2009 [20]5 studies in North America, 2 in Europe, 2 in Asia and 1 in South Americafrom 1966 to 200910 studies 1842 BC cases and 2124 controls in case-control studies; 2024 BC cases among 192,627 participants in cohort studiesmeta-analysis 6 case-control studies, 1 nested case-control and 3 cohort studiesred meat intake and BC risk
Trock 2006 [31]8 studies in Asian populations and 10 in Western populationsfrom 1978 to 200418 studies9182 BC casesmeta-analysis 12 case-control and 6 cohort or nested case-control studiessoy intake and BC risk
Turner 2011 [45]25 studies in North America (USA), 18 in Europe, 2 in South America (Uruguay), 6 in Asia, and 1 in Australia up to May 201052 studies 44,070 BC cases among 1,659,913 participants/controls meta-analysis 25 cohort studies and 27 case-control studiesfat intake and BC risk
Velentzis 2009 [32]6 studies conducted in North America, 6 in Europeup to September 200823 studies, 12 of them on plant lignan intake12,430 BC cases among 258,984 participants meta-analyses 5 cohort and 7 case-control studieslignans and BC risk
Wu 2008 [9]8 studies in Asia and Asian Americans, 11 in Western populations//19 studies//meta-analysis 14 case-control studies and 5 cohort/nested case-control studiessoy exposure and BC risk
Wu 2015 [33]All studies on Chinese populationsup to June 201322 studies23,201 subjects: 10,566 in the experimental group (cases) and 12,635 controlssystematic review and meta-analysis21 case-control studies and 1 cohort studydietary factors and BC risk
Yang 2014 [49]4 studies in the USA, 5 in Europe and 2 in Asiaup to April 201311 prospective studies8331 BC events among 274,135 adult womenmeta-analysis 6 nested case-control studies and 5 cohort studiesn-3/n-6 PUFAs and risk of BC
Zang 2015 [27]11 cohort studies in the USA, 10 in Europe, 1 in Japan; 5 case-control studies in Asia up to January 201427 studies 37,925 BC cases among 1,566,940 participants in cohort studies and 7418 incident BC cases among 33,372 participants in case-control studiessystematic review and meta-analysis22 cohort studies and 5 case-control studiesdairy intake and BC
Zheng 2013 [50]11 studies in USA, 11 in Europe and 4 in Asiaup to December 201226 publications on 21 prospective studies: (14 on fish intake and 19 on marine n-3 PUFA)20,905 BC cases and 883,585 participantsmeta-analysis 26 cohort studies (8 nested case-control and 2 case-cohort studies) intake of fish and marine omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA)and risk of BC
Zhou 2015 [51]6 studies in Europe, 5 in the USA and 1 in Asia (China)up to November 201412 studies, 2 of which reported two separate outcomes (pre- and post-menopausal), for a total of 14 outcomes included in the meta-analysis10,410 BC events among 358,955 adult femalesmeta-analysis8 cohort studies and 4 nested case-control studieslinoleic acid and BC risk
Characteristics of pooled analyses included in the umbrella review (4)
Mannisto 2005 [16] //3 cohort studies77,037 participants and 3271 BC casespooled analysis3 cohort studies in the DIETSCAN project: Netherlands Cohort Study on diet and cancer (NCLS), the Italian “Ormoni e Dieta nella Eziologia dei Tumori”(ORDET) and the Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC)dietary pattern and BC risk
Missmer 2002 [22]North America and Western Europe//8 studies7379 BC cases out of 351,041 womenpooled analysis8 cohort studiesmeat and dairy food consumption and risk of BC
Smith-Warner 2001 (a) [46]7 studies in North America, 2 in Europeup to 20018 studies (9 in all, because the Nurse’s Health Study was divided in two)7329 BC cases out of 351,821 participantspooled analysis of cohort studiespooling project: 9 prospective studies (8 analyzed as nested case-control studies, 1 used a case-cohort design)types of dietary fat and BC risk
Smith-Warner 2001 (b) [39]7 studies in North America, 2 in Europeup to 20018 studies (9 in all, because the Nurse’s Health Study was divided in two)7377 incident BC cases among 351,825 participantspooled analysis of cohort studiespooling project: 9 prospective studies (8 analyzed as nested case-control studies, 1 used a case-cohort design)intake of fruits and vegetables and BC risk
Characteristics of systematic reviews included in the umbrella review (5)
Albuquerque 2013 [17]8 studies in Europe, 9 in North America, 5 in Asia, 4 in South America, 1 in Africa, and 1 in Oceaniaup December 201226 articles584,437 women and 28,962 incident cases of BCsystematic review11 cohort studies and 15 case-control studiesdietary patterns and BC risk
Farsinejad-Marj 2015 [18]7 studies in Europe, 1 in Americaup to April 20158 studies502,253 participantssystematic review5 cohort studies; 3 case-control studiesMediterranean diet and BC risk
Michels 2007 [28]not clearly definedJanuary 1950–May 200521 studies on fat intake, 8 on fruit and vegetables, 11 on carbohydrates, 11 on antioxidants, 12 on dairy products, 2 on vitamin D, 5 on soy, 6 on green tea, 1 on heterocyclic amines, 2 on adolescent dietnot clearly definedsystematic review73 cohort studies, 3 meta-analyses, 3 pooled analysesdiet and BC
Mourouti 2013 [34]//from January 2000 to April 201329 studies, 12 on populations with a high consumption of soy //systematic review10 cohort, 3 nested case-control and 16 case-control studiessoy food consumption and BC risk
Mourouti 2015 [21]//from January 2002 to August 201295 studies on: fruit and vegetable (11), meat (14), soy (24), dietary fiber (9), dietary carbohydrates (16), dietary lipids (21)fruit and veg: 16,110 cases among 122,933 participants meat: 31,918 cases among 813.021 participants soy: 9064 cases among 324,345 participants dietary fiber: 15,880 cases among 641,322 participants fat: 24,788 cases among 951,479 participants diet carbohydrates (studies showing a positive association): 4332 cases among 146,692 participants systematic review42 case-control studies, 51 cohort studies and 2 dietary intervention RCTsdiet and BC
Characteristics of not systematic reviews included in the umbrella review (7)
Cui 2006 [54]vitamin D: 7 studies in North America (6 in USA), 1 in Europe (Switzerland)
Calcium: 9 studies in Europe, 2 in North America, and 1 in Asia (China)		not defined20 studies (8 on dietary vitamin D and 12 on calcium intake)vitamin D: 7947 BC cases out of 218,776 subjects; calcium: 11,378 BC cases out of 16,764 subjectsnot-systematic reviewvitamin D: 5 prospective studies (4 cohort and 1 nested case-control) and 3 case control studies;
calcium: 3 cohort and 9 case-control studies 		association between vitamin D and calcium and BC risk
Duffy 2007 [35]5 studies in Europe, 8 in Asia, 6 North America//21 studies12,472 BC cases and 35,513 controls in case-control studies; 1799 BC cases among 206,030 participants in cohort studiesnot-systematic review6 cohort studies and 15 case-control studiesphytoestrogen intake and BC risk
Eichholzer 2001 [57]6 studies in North America, 1 in South America, and 1 in Europe//8 studies 9420 BC cases not-systematic review5 case control studies and 3 nested case-control studiesfolate intake and BC risk
Hanf 2005 [23]////13 prospective studies on fat intake; 10 prospective studies on meat consumption//not-systematic reviewcohort studies and interventional trialsfoods, nutrients and BC risk
Lof 2006 [36]5 studies in North America, 3 in Europe (1 of them on an Asian population)from 1966 to September 20067 studies 4741 BC cases among 134,100 participantsnot-systematic review5 case-control studies and 2 cohort studiesdietary phytoestrogens intake and BC risk
Peeters 2003 [37]2 studies in North America and 11 on Asian populationsup to November 201113 studies on dietary phytoestrogens5954 BC cases out of 27,162 participants not-systematic review9 case-control studies and 4 cohort studiesphytoestrogens and BC risk
Rossi 2014 [60]//1975–2013175 pertinent articles: 18 for proteins, 18 for carbohydrates, 18 for dietary fat, 33 for polyphenols and phytoestrogen, 18 for fruit and vegetables, 11 for lycopene, 44 for vitamins and oligo elements, 8 for alcohol//not-systematic review//impact of dietary factors in BC risk
Table
Table 2. Results of studies included in the umbrella review.
Table 2. Results of studies included in the umbrella review.
Author_ YearMenopausal StatusExposure MeasureOverall Results of ReviewStatistical MethodSummary Estimates and Related 95% CIp-value
Results of meta-analysis included in the umbrella review (32)
Alexander 2010 [43]pre- and post-menopauseanimal fat intake (highest vs. lowest categories)no statistically significant association was found between animal fat intake (comparing highest vs. lowest category) and BC risk. random effect model summary relative risk (RR) estimates: 1.11 (0.91–1.36)//
Aune 2012 [38]pre- and post-menopause dietary fiber, fruit fiber, vegetable fiber, cereal fiber, soluble and insoluble fiberan inverse association was found between dietary fiber intake and BC risk; the association appeared to be most pronounced in studies with high levels (>25 vs. <25 g/day) or large ranges (>13 vs. <13 g/day) of fiber intake. random effects model was used to calculate summary RRs and 95% CIssummary RR (high vs. low intake): //
- dietary fiber 0.93 (0.89–0.98)
- fruit fiber 0.95 (0.86–1.06)
- vegetable fiber 0.99 (0.92–1.07)
- cereal fiber 0.96 (0.90–1.02)
- soluble and insoluble fiber 0.91 (0.84–0.99)
Boyd 2003 [44]//dietary fat: total fat, saturated fat and monounsaturated fat; foods containing animal fat: meat, milk and cheesea higher fat intake is associated with a higher risk of BC, with a significant positive association confirmed for total fat and saturated fat; meat and cheese consumption was also associated with a statistically significant increase in BC risk. random effects model summary RR (highest vs. lowest categories of intake) for all studies combined//
- total fat 1.13 (1.03–1.25)
- saturated fat 1.19 (1.06–1.35)
- monounsaturated fat 1.11 (0.96–1.28)
-polyunsaturated fat 0.94 (0.80–1.10)
- meat consumption 1.17 (1.06–1.29)
- milk consumption 1.12 (0.88–1.43)
- cheese consumption 1.26 (0.96–1.66)
Brennan 2010 [14]//dietary patterns (DP): “prudent/healthy” vs.
“Western/unhealthy”		no overall association was found for Western/unhealthy DP and BC risk; results of combined case-control studies showed that Western DP was positively associated with BC risk (highest vs. lowest category of intake); there was evidence of a lower risk of BC (highest vs. lowest category of intake) associated with a prudent/healthy DP in all studies and in pooled cohort studies.random effects model summary RR estimates (highest vs. lowest categories of intake):
Western/unhealthy diet overall 1.09 (0.98–1.22);0.11
- case-control combined 1.31 (1.04–1.63);0.02
- cohort combined 0.99 (0.90–1.08)0.82
Prudent/healthy diet overall 0.89 (0.82–0.99);0.02
- case-control combined 0.84 (0.67–1.04);0.12
- cohort combined 0.93 (0.88–0.98)0.01
Buck 2010 [29]pre- and post-menopause lignan exposure, plant lignan intakelignan exposure was not associated with a significantly lower risk of BC; but a high lignan intake in postmenopausal women was associated with a significant reduction in risk of BC.random effects model and fixed effects model pooled estimate (highest vs. lowest quantile)//
overall 0.92 (0.81–1.02)
- premenopause 0.87 (0.66–1.08)
- postmenopause 0.86 (0.78–0.94)
dietary plant lignans 0.94 (0.82–1.05)
- premenopause 1.01 (0.87–1.15)
- postmenopause 0.86 (0.77–0.94)
Chen 2010 [52]pre- and post-menopausedietary calcium and vitamin D intakea statistically significant overall inverse association was found between dietary vitamin D intake and BC risk; high vitamin D intake was associated with a 17% decrease in BC risk in premenopausal women; a statistically significant overall inverse association was found between dietary calcium intake and BC risk. a random effects model if there was significant heterogeneity among studies; if not, a fixed effects model was acceptablesummary RRs (highest vs. lowest category)://
- vitamin D intake overall 0.91 (0.83–1.00)
premenopause 0.83 (0.73–0.95)
postmenopause 0.94 (0.83–1.07)
- calcium intake overall 0.81 (0.72–0.90)
premenopause 0.72 (0.55–0.95)
postmenopause 0.95 (0.79–1.14)
Chen 2014 [55]pre- and post-menopause total folate intake, dietary folate intake and folate supplement intakeno significant association between dietary folate intake and BC risk in meta-analysis of prospective studies, but a significantly negative correlation emerged from the case control studies, particularly for postmenopausal women; more dietary folate may reduce the BC risk in populations of Europe, Australia or Asia (not in the USA).inverse variance weighting method; random effects modelsummary RRs (highest vs. lowest category) in prospective studies://
total folate 0.97 (0.87–1.08);
dietary folate (DF) 0.95 (0.87–1.03)
- DF premenopause 1.02 (0.62–1.67)
- DF postmenopause 0.94 (0.81–1.08)
OR (highest vs. lowest category) in case-control studies:
total folate 0.87 (0.61–1.23)
dietary folate (DF) 0.79 (0.67–0.92)
DF premenopause 0.78 (0.53–1.14)
DF postmenopause 0.73 (0.59–0.92)
Dong 2011 (a) [30]pre- and post-menopausedietary soy isoflavone intakesoy isoflavone intake was associated with a significantly reduced risk of BC in Asian populations, but not in Western populations; a significant inverse association between soy isoflavone intake and risk of BC emerged in postmenopausal but not in premenopausal women. random or fixed effects modelsummary RR://
all women 0.89 (0.79–0.99)
Asian countries 0.76 (0.65–0.86)
Western countries 0.97 (0.87–1.06)
premenopause 0.90 (0.64–1.15)
postmenopause 0.78 (0.63–0.93)
Dong 2011 (b) [26]pre- and post-menopausetotal dairy food defined as skimmed/low-fat milk, whole/high-fat milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, butter, and other dairy productsfor total dairy food consumption, a significantly inverse association with BC risk was confirmed, and was stronger for low-fat dairy food and for premenopausal women; for milk consumption only low-fat milk was significantly associated with a lower BC risk; no association in postmenopausal women.random effects modelsummary RR (highest vs. lowest intake)//
total dairy food 0.85 (0.76–0.95)
milk 0.90 (0.80–1.02)
total dairy food
- premenopause 0.79 (0.63)
- postmenopause 0.92 (0.83–1.01)
total milk
- premenopause 0.79 (0.60–1.02)
- postmenopause 1.01 (0.94–1.09)
Gandini 2000 [38]//vegetable and fruit consumption, and 2 related micronutrients: vitamin C and beta-carotenehigh vegetable consumption, and high vitamin C and beta-carotene intake had a significant protective effect against BC; pooled estimates for fruit intake indicated that this food group may have a protective effect, but without statistical significance.random effects model
fixed effects model		summary RR (high vs. low consumption)//
- vegetables 0.75 (0.66–0.85)
- fruits 0.94 (0.79–1.11)
- vitamin C 0.80 (0.68–0.95)
- beta-carotene 0.82 (0.76–0.91)
Gissel 2008 [53]pre- and post-menopausevitamin D consumptionno association between vitamin D levels and BC risk.random effects modelsummary RR: 0.98 (0.93–1.03) analysis restricted to intake <400 International Units (IU)/day vs. lower intake://
RR 0.92 (0.87–0.97)
Guo 2015 [19]pre- and post-menopausered and processed meat consumptionhigher red and processed meat intake was associated with higher risk of BC. random effects model summary RR of BC (highest vs. lowest consumer categories) were: 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–1.19) for red meat, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.01–1.15) for processed meat intake; estimated summary RR were 1.11 (1.05–1.16) for an increase of 120 g/day of red meat, and 1.09 (1.03–1.16) for an increase of 50 g/day of processed meat//
Hu 2012 [59]pre- and post-menopausedietary α-carotene; dietary β-carotene; β-cryptoxanthin; lutein+ zeaxanthin; lycopenea significant inverse association between α-carotene consumption and BC risk, in both cohort and case-control studies; a trend towards a protective effect of β-carotene; no significant association between β-cryptoxanthin, lutein+zeaxanthin and BC risk; lycopene may have a protective effect against BC (significant inverse association in case-control studies).random effects modelsummary RR among cohort studies:
α-carotene 0.91 (0.85–0.98)0.01
β-carotene 0.94 (0.88–1.00)0.05
β-cryptoxanthin 1.03 (0.96–1.11)0.39
lutein+zeaxanthin 0.94 (0.87–1.02)0.13
lycopene 0.99 (0.93–1.06)0.77
summary OR among case-control studies:
α-carotene 0.82 (0.70–0.97)0.02
β-carotene 0.75 (0.67–0.85)<0.01
β-cryptoxanthin 0.95 (0.80–1.13)0.54
lutein+zeaxanthin 0.79 (0.66–0.94)0.01
lycopene 0.71 (0.56–0.92)0.01
Hui 2013 [58]pre- and post-menopauseflavonoid subclasses: flavonols (onions, broccoli, tea, fruit); flavones (herbs, parsley, chamomile); flavonones (citrus fruits, oranges, grapefruit);
flavan-3-ols (dark chocolate, apples, grapes, red wine, green tea); anthocyanidins (berries, cranberries, black currants, blueberries); isoflavones (soy and soy products)		BC risk significantly lower in women with high intake of flavonols and flavones; no significant association with flavan-3-ols, flavonones, anthocyanins or total flavonoids. Summary RRs of studies stratified by menopausal status suggest that flavonols, flavones and flavan-3-ols are associated with a significantly lower risk of BC in postmenopausal, but not in premenopausal women.random and fixed effects modelsummary RR (highest vs. lowest consumption)://
flavonols 0.88 (0.80–0.96)
- postmenopause 0.92 (0.85–0.99)
flavones 0.83 (0.76–0.91)
- postmenopause 0.86 (0.77–0.94)
flavan-3-ols 0.93 (0.84–1.02)
- postmenopause 0.90 (0.83–0.98)
flavonones 0.95 (0.88–1.03)
anthocyanidins 0.97 (0.87–1.08)
Larsson 2007 [56]pre- and post-menopausedietary folate intakeno significant association between dietary folate intake and BC risk in prospective studies; in case-control studies, high vs. low dietary folate intake was associated with a significantly different risk of BC (lower in the former).random effects modelsummary estimates (highest vs. lowest dietary folate intake categories)://
cohort studies: RR 0.96 (0.87–1.05)
case-control studies: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.73 (0.64–0.83)
Li 2014 [41]pre- and post-menopausedietary mushroom intakea significant inverse association between mushroom consumption and BC risk random and fixed effects modelsummary RR (highest vs. lowest dietary mushroom intake categories)://
premenopause 0.96 (0.91–1.00)
postmenopause 0.94 (0.91–0.97)
overall: 0.97 (0.96–0.99)
Mulholland 2008 [47]pre- and post-menopauseglycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL)no strong associations between high vs. low GI and BC risk; a positive association emerged once analysis was restricted to more robust measures of dietary intake, for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.//summary RR in cohort studies (high vs. low GI)//
premenopause RR 1.20 (1.01–1.43)
postmenopause RR 1.10 (1.02–1.19)
Mullie 2016 [48]pre- and post-menopausedietary pattern with high GI or GLwomen with high GI or GL had a small, 5–6% increase in BC risk.random effects modelsummary RR (high vs. low) for GI 1.05 (1.00–1.11)//
- premenopause 1.04 (0.86–1.27)
- postmenopause 1.05 (0.98–1.13)
for GL 1.06 (1.00–1.13)
- premenopause 1.23 (0.75–2.00)
- postmenopause 1.05 (0.97–1.13)
Schwingshackl 2014 [15]//Mediterranean diet (MD; fruits, vegetables, legumes, olive oil, nuts, plant protein and whole grains, fish; moderate red wine consumption and low amounts of red meat, poultry and dairy products)case-control studies showed a significant association between greater adherence to MD and lower BC risk; cohort studies showed no significant association between BC risk and MD. Overall, MD was not associated with a significant reduction in BC risk. random effects modelpooled RR (highest vs. lowest adherence to MD category):
total 0.95 (0.84–1.06)0.35
cohort 1.01 (0.88–1.16)0.89
case-control 0.82 (0.69–0.97)0.02
Seely 2005 [42]//green tea (dried leaves of Camellia sinensis with minimal oxidation of herbs, polyphenols and catechins)random effects model revealed no significant association between green tea consumption and BC risk; fixed effects model in case-control studies showed a significant inverse association. random effects model
fixed effects model		pooled RR (highest vs. lowest consumption)
cohort studies 0.89 (0.71–1.10)0.28
case-control studies 0.44 (0.14–1.31)0.14
case-control studies 0.57 (0.38–0.86)0.007
Si 2014 [25]pre- and post-menopauseegg consumption quartiles:
1 a week (reference)
≥1, <2 a week
≥2, ≤5 a week
> 5 a week		higher egg consumption was associated with higher BC risk; subgroup analyses showed this association in cohort studies, among Europeans, Asian populations, postmenopausal women, and consumers of ≥2 and ≤5 eggs/week.random effects modelpooled adjusted RR
overall 1.04 (1.01–1.08)0.02
case control 1.06 (0.97–1.15)0.21
cohort 1.04 (1.00–1.08)0.05
postmenopause 1.06 (1.02–1.10)0.01
premenopause 1.04 (0.98–1.11)0.2
≥2 and ≤5/week (ref. <1/week)
RR 1.10 (1.02–1.17)0.01
Song 2013 [40]not statedcitrus fruit intake, yellow and orange fruit, oranges or tangerinesa higher intake of citrus fruit may reduce BC risk. fixed effects modelsummary OR (highest vs. lowest intake group): 0.90 (0.85–0.96)//
Taylor 2009 [20]premenopause red meat consumptiona significant positive association was found overall between high of red meat intake and BC risk among premenopausal women; case-control studies confirmed a strong association between red meat and BC risk, while cohort studies found no statistically significant association between them. //summary RR (highest vs. lowest red meat intake)://
overall 1.24 (1.08–1.42)
cohort studies 1.11 (0.94–1.31)
case-control studies 1.57 (1.23–1.99)
Trock 2006 [31]pre- and post-menopausesoy protein (grams of soy protein consumed daily)among all women, high soy intake was modestly associated with a lower BC risk; the association was not significant for Asian women; among 10 studies stratified by menopausal status, the inverse association between soy exposure and BC risk was stronger premenopause than postmenopause.random effects model and fixed effects model (in premenopausal women)pooled OR (high vs. low soy intake)//
all women 0.86 (0.75–0.99)
premenopause 0.70 (0.58–0.85)
postmenopause 0.77 (0.60–0.98)
Turner 2011 [45]premenopause (7), postmenopause (20), and both (25)total fat, saturated fat (SAT), monounsaturated fat (MUFA), polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) cohort studies found significant summary RR between PUFA and BC; case-control studies found no association between fat and BC; postmenopausal women had a significant association between total fat, PUFA intake and BC; an inverse association between total intake of all fats and BC was seen in premenopausal women, but was not significant. random effects model pooled RR (highest vs. lowest quartile of consumption)
total fat 1.01 (0.99–1.03)non-significant (NS)
SAT 1.00 (0.95–1.05)NS
MUFA 0.99 (0.95–1.05)NS
PUFA 1.06 (1.01–1.14)0.03
premenopause 0.97 (0.94–1.01)NS
postmenopause 1.04 (1.01–1.07)0.004
Velentzis 2009 [32]pre- and post-menopauseplant lignan intakeno significant association between plant lignan intake and BC risk, despite a slight protective effect; when menopausal status was considered, a statistically significant risk reduction was seen for the highest plant lignan intake in postmenopausal women. random effects model combined OR (highest vs. lowest plant lignan intake)
overall 0.93 (0.83–1.03)0.15
postmenopause 0.85 (0.78–0.93)< 0.001
Wu 2008 [9]pre- and post-menopausesoy intake - isoflavone
Asian (highest >20 mg/day - lowest <5 mg/day)
Western (highest >0.8 mg/day - lowest <0.15 mg/day)		a statistically significant 29% reduction in BC risk associated with high soy intake in Asian populations (high consumers); both premenopausal and postmenopausal Asian women consuming large amounts of soy had a lower BC risk; no significant association was found in Western countries. random effects model pooled OR (highest vs. lowest soy intake)//
Asian 0.71 (0.60–0.85)
- premenopause 0.65 (0.50–0.85)
- postmenopause 0.63 (0.46–0.85)
Western 1.04 (0.97–1.11)
Wu 2015 [33]//dietary factors: vegetables, fruits, soy food, or dietary fathigh consumption of fruits, vegetables and soy foods was significantly inversely associated with a lower BC risk in Chinese women; higher fatty food consumption appeared to be related to higher risk of BC in Chinese women. random effects model combined OR (high vs. low intake)
vegetables 0.77 (0.62–0.96)0.02
fruit 0.68 (0.49–0.93)0.02
soy food 0.68 (0.50–0.93)0.02
fat 1.15 (1.01–1.30)0.03
Yang 2014 [49]pre- and post-menopausedietary polyunsaturated fatty acid intake (n-3/n-6 PUFA)intake ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFA was inversely associated with BC risk for the highest vs. lowest quantiles of the study population. random effects model pooled RR (highest quantile vs. lowest)//
overall diet 0.90 (0.82–0.99)
premenopause 0.80 (0.43–1.48)
postmenopause 0.85 (0.75–0.97)
Zang 2015 [27]pre- and post-menopausedairy food consumption:
high (>600 g/day)
modest (400–600 g/day)
low (<400 g/day)
dairy food items (milk, cheese, butter) converted into grams of protein per day		higher dairy food consumption was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of BC, in both cohort and case-control studies; there was a marginally lower BC risk in premenopausal women. random effects model combined estimates (highest dairy consumption vs. lowest)//
cohort RR 0.90 (0.83–0.98)
- premenopause 0.88 (0.77–1.00)
- postmenopause 0.94 (0.86–1.02)
case-control OR 0.74 (0.62–0.88)
Zheng 2013 [50]pre- and post-menopausedietary intake of marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA)greater marine n-3 PUFA intake was associated with a 14% reduction in BC risk; no significant association for fish intake or exposure to alpha-linoleic acid. random effects model fish intake (highest vs. lowest category)//
overall 1.03 (0.93–1.14)
- premenopause 1.04 (0.91–1.20)
- postmenopause 1.08 (0.92–1.27)
marine n-3 PUFA (highest vs. lowest)
overall 0.86 (0.78–0.94)
- premenopause 0.96 (0.78–1.18)
- postmenopause 0.88 (0.76–1.00)
Zhou 2015 [51]pre- and post-menopauselinoleic acidboth dietary linoleic acid and overall linoleic acid level were associated with a lower risk of BC, but none of the associations were statistically significant.random and fixed effects modelexposure assessment (highest vs. lowest category of linoleic acid)//
overall 0.98 (0.93–1.04)
dietary linoleic acid 0.96 (0.92–1.01)
premenopause 0.64 (0.20–2.09)
postmenopause 1.01 (0.94–1.08)
Results of pooled analyses included in the umbrella review (4)
Mannisto 2005 [16]//2 dietary patterns with a high intake of: VEG = vegetables, legumes, fruit, pasta fish and oil; PPP = pork, processed meat, potatoes, beef, rice, poultry, liver, butter/low-fat margarine, pasta and coffeeno significant association between VEG pattern and BC risk in any of the cohorts included in the analysis; in the multivariate model PPP was not significantly associated with BC risk in two cohorts (ORDET, SMC), while in the NLCS (Netherlands) cohort there was a significantly inverse association between PPP intake and BC risk (RR 0.90_0.81–0.99).//////
Missmer 2002 [22]pre- and post-menopausetotal meat, red and white meat, dairy fluids and solidsno significant association between total meat, red meat, white meat, total dairy fluids or solids and BC risk.random effects modelpooled RR (highest vs. lowest quartile)
total meat 1.08 (0.98–1.19)0.13
red meat 0.94 (0.87–1.02)0.13
white meat 1.02 (0.91–1.13)0.21
dairy fluids 0.93 (0.84–1.03)0.09
dairy solids 1.01 (0.93–1.09)0.94
Smith-Warner 2001 (a) [46]pre- and post-menopausesaturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, animal, vegetable and total fat intakeno statistically significant association between intake of fat subtypes and BC risk; no associations for animal or vegetable fat intake; these associations were unaffected by menopausal status. random effects modelpooled adjusted RR (5% energy increases from specific fat subtypes):
saturated fat 1.09 (1.00–1.19)
- premenopause 1.10 (0.91–1.35)0.61
- postmenopause 1.07 (0.93–1.24)0.61
monounsaturated fat 0.93 (0.84–1.03)
- premenopause 0.87 (0.63–1.19)0.46
- postmenopause 0.81 (0.65–1.03)0.46
polyunsaturated fat 1.05 (0.96–1.16)
- premenopause 1.12 (0.88–1.41)0.72
- postmenopause 1.28 (0.96–1.69)0.72
animal fat 1.01 (0.96–1.06)
- premenopause 1.01 (0.91–1.12)0.93
- postmenopause 0.99 (0.95–1.03)0.93
vegetable fat 1.01 (0.98–1.04)
- premenopause 1.03 (0.93–1.13)0.54
- postmenopause 0.99 (0.94–1.04)0.54
Smith-Warner 2001 (b) [39]pre- and post-menopausetotal fruits, fruit juice, total vegetables, total fruit and vegetablesweak, insignificant associations for total fruits, total vegetables, and total fruit and vegetables; no associations for green leafy vegetables, 8 botanical groups, and 17 specific fruits and vegetables; these associations were not influenced by menopausal status.random effects modelpooled adjusted RR (highest vs. lowest quartile of intake):
total fruits 0.93 (0.86–1.00)0.08
total vegetables 0.96 (0.89–1.04)0.54
total fruits and vegetables 0.93 (0.86–1.00)0.12
Author_yearMenopausal statusExposure measureOverall results of review
Results of systematic reviews included in the umbrella review (5)
Albuquerque 2013 [17]//dietary patterns (DP):
- “Healthy/prudent”(fruits, vegetables, whole grains and cereals, fish and soy)
-”Mediterranean”(fruit, raw and cooked vegetables, fish and crustaceans, olive and sunflower oil)
- “Western” (red and processed meats, refined grains, potatoes and starches, snacks, sweets, fried food and soft drinks)		23 studies on the association of Healthy DP and BC risk (highest vs. lowest level of consumption):
- 12 studies found a significant inverse association with BC;
- 9 studies reported no statistically significant association;
- 2 case-control studies found a positive association.
3 studies assessed the Mediterranean DP (highest vs. lowest level of consumption):
- 2 studies found a significant inverse association with BC;
- 1 study report no statistically significant association.
24 studies examined the association of Western DP and BC risk (highest vs. lowest level of consumption):
- 9 studies found a positive association with BC;
- 14 studies reported no statistically significant association;
- 1 studies found a significant inverse association with BC.
Farsinejad-Marj 2015 [18]pre- and post-menopause for six studies; postmenopause for two studiesMediterranean diet4 studies considered the association between MD and BC risk in both pre- and post-menopausal women:
  • two reported an inverse association;
  • one found no association;
  • two found an inverse association only in postmenopausal women;
  • one found an inverse association only in premenopausal women.
2 studies considered the association between MD and BC risk only in postmenopausal women:
5.
1 found an inverse association;
6.
1 found no association.
Michels 2007 [28]pre- and post-menopausedietary exposures: fat intake, fruit and vegetables consumption, antioxidants, vitamins (A, C, E, β-carotene), carbohydrates, glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL), dairy food consumption (including vitamin D), soy and isoflavones, green tea, heterocyclic amines, adolescent dietoverall fat intake was unrelated to the incidence of BC; 2 cohorts showed a significant positive association between high fat intake and BC risk (ORDET cohort: RR 3.47_1.43–8.44);
fruit and vegetable consumption may prevent BC: only one significant association (Nurses’ Health Study) reported an inverse association for 5 or more vegetables/day;
vitamins A,C,E, beta-carotene: no consistent association (except for vitamin E intake in postmenopausal women);
carbohydrates, GI and GL: no significant association;
results for vitamin D, dairy and soy products were inconsistent.
Mourouti 2013 [34]//soy consumption (isoflavones and lignans)13 out of 16 case-control studies, 3 out of 3 nested case-control studies, and 3 out of 10 cohort studies demonstrated an inverse association between soy food, soy product or isoflavone intake and BC risk; some studies, 3 out of 16 case-control studies and 6 out of 10 cohort studies found no association between soy or isoflavone intake and BC risk; only 1 of 29 studies revealed a possible association between phytoestrogen dietary intake and BC risk.
Mourouti 2014 [21]pre- and post-menopauseintake of fruit and vegetables, meat, soy products and isoflavones, dietary fiber, dietary carbohydrates, dietary lipidsfor fruit and vegetable consumption, most studies found a significant inverse association with BC risk;
for meat intake, 7 studies found a significantly higher risk and 7 found no association; most case-control studies on soy consumption found an inverse association;
most studies on dietary fiber found no association;
3 cohort and 2 case-control studies on dietary carbohydrates found a higher BC risk for higher GI and GL, while the other 11 studies found no association;
6 out of 10 case-control studies found a positive association with high fat intake, but most cohort studies found no significant association.
Results of qualitative reviews included in the umbrella review (7)
Cui 2006 [54]pre- and post-menopausedietary and supplemental vitamin D intake; dietary and supplemental calcium intake7 studies (5 on pre- and post-menopausal women, 1 on postmenopausal women, 1 on premenopausal women) of the 12 studies considered found a statistically significant inverse association (highest vs. lowest category of intake) between calcium intake and BC risk; this study showed no association between dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake and BC; only one cohort study found a protective effect among premenopausal women.
Duffy 2007 [35]pre- and post-menopausephytoestrogen intake 10 case-control studies showed a significant inverse association between phytoestrogen/isoflavone/lignin intake and BC risk, while 5 revealed no such association; only 1 of 6 cohort studies found a protective effect of high isoflavone intake.
Eichholzer 2001 [57]pre- and post-menopausedietary folate intakeepidemiological studies suggested an inverse association between folate intake and BC among female regular alcohol consumers; no significant association between folate intake and BC risk in the overall population.
Hanf 2005 [23]//fat intake; meat and fish consumption; fruit and vegetable consumption, fiber consumption12 studies tested total fat intake as a risk factor for BC, and only one showed a statistically significant reduced RR with a higher total fat intake; animal fat was not found associated with BC; no significant association emerged for saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids: 4/10 prospective studies found a positive correlation between high levels of meat consumption and BC risk; no association between fish intake and BC; no significant correlation between BC and high consumption of fruit and vegetables; no overall association between fiber intake and BC risk: only 1 of 5 studies suggested an effect of fiber.
Lof 2006 [36]pre- and post-menopausedietary lignan intake4 of 5 case-control studies showed a protective effect of dietary lignans against BC, especially in premenopausal women; 2 prospective studies did not confirm any protective effect of dietary lignans.
Peeters 2003 [37]pre- and post-menopausephytoestrogens (soybeans, soy products, miso, tofu, soy protein, isoflavones)overall, results showed no protective effect of dietary intake of soy products against BC, except for women who consumed phytoestrogens in adolescence or in very high doses.
Rossi 2014 [60]//proteins, carbohydrates and glycemic index (GI), dietary fat, polyphenols and phytoestrogens, fruits and vegetables, lycopene, vitamins and oligo elements, alcoholconsumption of well- or over-cooked red meat was associated with a higher risk of BC; n-3 PUFA may protect against BC; a lower GI seems associated with a lower risk of BC; high-fat diet, and high total cholesterol and triglyceride levels are associated with a higher risk of BC; evidence supports a protective role of lycopene, polyphenols, fruit and vegetables against BC; there was evidence of vitamin D reducing the BC risk; and of zinc and, to a lesser extent, vitamins E and B reducing the BC risk thanks to their antioxidant properties.
Table
Table 3. Conclusions and limitations of studies included in the umbrella review.
Table 3. Conclusions and limitations of studies included in the umbrella review.
Author_ YearLimitations Recommendations/ConclusionsQuality Assessment ToolQuality Assessment
Conclusion and quality assessment of meta-analysis included in the umbrella review (32)
Alexander 2010 [43]Meta-analysis limited to analysis of results reported across publications. Many studies on fat intake and BC probably did not examine fat from animal sources alone. Differential reporting of dietary factors may influence summary associations across the literature. The association between dietary fat and BC subgroups is also incomplete.The available epidemiological evidence from prospective studies does not support an independent association between animal fat intake and BC risk. Better dietary assessments and methods in cohort studies, also examining dietary fat and BC in randomized clinical trials, may help to clarify any possible relationships. ////
Aune 2012 [38]Potential unmeasured or residual confounders; a higher fiber intake is often associated with other lifestyle factors (higher levels of physical activity, lower prevalence of obesity, lower intake of alcohol and dietary fat); measurement errors in dietary intake assessments are known to bias effect estimates.Diet with a high intake of plant-based foods rich in fiber could have an impact in the prevention of BC; this review suggests that diets rich in fiber are associated with a lower BC risk. ////
Boyd 2003 [44]Measurement error in the food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) used in most studies may lead to overestimation of the range of intakes, and may also lead to attenuation of risk.Combined risk estimates of for total and saturated fat intake, and for meat intake, all indicated an association between higher intakes and an increased risk of BC. Case-control and cohort studies gave similar results. Quality of studies scored using preset methodological standardsTwenty-six studies defined as “higher-quality”
Brennan 2010 [14]Possible recall bias in case-control combined analysis; possible weakness in design of the studies (different response rates and inconsistent adjustment for potential confounders). Possible misclassification within the two dietary patterns.This review provided evidence of a small inverse association between a healthy diet and a positive trend between Western diet and BC risk. The results of this meta-analysis highlight the need for more carefully designed observational and intervention studies to clarify the influence of diet on BC risk.////
Buck 2010 [29]Potential measurement errors due to recall bias or shortcomings in food composition database. High lignan exposure may be associated with a reduced risk of BC in postmenopausal women. Additional work is warranted to confirm this association. ////
Chen 2010 [52]Not reported.From the meta-analysis, there was a significant inverse association between vitamin D and calcium intake and BC risk; these findings support the use of vitamin D and calcium as chemopreventive agents against BC. Better designed clinical trials are needed to ascertain the protective effect and optimize the doses of these nutrients.////
Chen 2014 [55]The BC prevention effect of folate may be conferred by other nutrients in foods (leafy vegetables, legumes, egg yolk, baker’s yeast); dose–effect relationships for dietary folate intake level and BC risk differed between prospective and case-control studies; changing dietary habits during the follow-up in prospective studies was not assessed; differences in sample size, study region, study design and assessment methods may cause heterogeneity and prompt differences in the stratification analysis.The findings revealed a potential non-linear dose effect for dietary folate levels against BC risk, and modest folate intake may reduce BC risk. Given the complexity of folate metabolism and uses, the dose and timing of folate intake should be considered. More prospective studies are necessary.Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS)Thirty studies classified as “higher-quality” (≥5 points (pt)), twelve as “lower-quality” (<5 pt)
Dong 2011 (a) [30]Strong degree of heterogeneity made results difficult to interpret. Changes in soy consumption during the long follow-up may have weakened the associations observed.A statistically significant inverse association was confirmed between soy isoflavone intake and BC risk. The protective effect of soy against BC may be due to other, associated healthy lifestyle factors (high vegetable and fruit intake, more physical activity). ////
Dong 2011 (b) [26]Consumption of dairy food, especially low-fat products, is probably associated with a healthy lifestyle; the likelihood of inadequate control for confounding factors may bias the findings; dietary assessments suffer from measurement error; possible misclassification bias; substantial heterogeneity across studies.Findings indicate that a higher consumption of total dairy products may be associated with a reduced BC risk: menopausal status may influence this effect.////
Gandini 2000 [24]Possibility of publication bias (due to studies not being published if findings are not significant); heterogeneous intake categories.This analysis confirmed the association between vegetable and, to a lesser extent, fruit intake and BC risk. Increasing vegetable consumption, and the intake of associated micronutrients (vitamin C and b-carotene) might reduce the risk of BC.////
Gissel 2008 [53]Few studies and low vitamin D intake reported in most trials; possible bias from diet reporting. Increasing the intake of vitamin D above 400 IU/day may help to prevent BC; but more research is needed.////
Guo 2015 [19]The residual confounders in the studies are a problem in the meta-analysis of observational studies; these findings are probably affected by the misclassification of meat; the intake and consumption levels in the highest and lowest categories varied across studies; possibility of publication bias.A high intake of red and/or processed meat was associated with an increased risk of BC. Additional cohort or interventional studies will be needed to confirm the association.////
Hu 2012 [59]Socio-economic position may influence the intake of carotenoids; the lack of original data in the studies limited the assessment of potential interactions; no cohort study in Asia focused on the associations between carotenoids and BC. This analysis did not assess the quality of all the studies included.Total α-carotene intake could reduce the BC risk. The relationship between β-carotene intake and BC needs to be confirmed. No significant associations emerged between dietary β-cryptoxanthin, lutein+zeaxanthin, lycopene and BC. ////
Hui 2013 [58]//The study suggested that the intake of flavonols and flavones, but not of other flavonoid subclasses, is associated with a decreased risk of BC, especially after menopause. ////
Larsson 2007 [56]Potential bias due to confounders inherent in the original studies; potential recall, interviewer or selection bias in case-control studies; heterogeneity due to methodological differences among the studies.No clear support for an overall relationship between folate intake and BC risk. Adequate folate intake may have a protective effect against BC.////
Li 2014 [41]Relatively small number of eligible studies included in the analysis, and only two prospective studies; limited information extracted from the original studies; different types of mushroom.The findings suggested that a higher edible mushroom consumption may be associated with a lower risk of BC; large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm as much.Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemFour studies classified as “higher-quality” (≥7 pt)
three as “lower-quality” (<7 pt)
Mulholland 2008 [47]Study results inconsistently adjusted for potential confounders might result in residual confounding elements; a relatively small number of studies included in the analysis, making it difficult to estimate publication bias and heterogeneity.High dietary GI and GL do not appear to be of etiological importance in BC development.Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS) —9 pt scoring systemFourteen “higher-quality” studies
Mullie 2016 [48]Not all studies reported women’s menopausal status. Lack of RR unadjusted and adjusted for adiposity.The evidence supports a modest association between a dietary pattern with high GI/GL and the risk of BC.////
Schwingshackl 2014 [15]Relationship between diet and cancer is complex (multiple confounding variables); Mediterranean diet (MD) was not homogenous (heterogeneity on score items); possible measurement errors and recall/selection bias in the studies included.No significant changes in risk reduction for BC by adherence to MD. Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemEight “higher-quality” (≥7 pt) and three “lower-quality” studies (<7 pt)
Seely 2005 [42]Small number of observational studies and no RCTs; marked variability among questionnaire response rates in cohort studies; unadjusted analysis for potential confounding factors; possible selection bias that could distort the findings; case-control studies produced weaker evidence than cohort studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant effect of green tea on BC prevention. Green tea consumption may be associated with a reduced risk of BC recurrences. ////
Si 2014 [25]Only articles written in English were included in the meta-analysis; possible selection bias; categorical standards for egg consumption were confused, making it difficult to them among the studies; cooking methods were not ascertained. Pooled results of cohort studies and combined results showed that higher egg consumption was associated with a higher BC risk, especially for European and postmenopausal populations. More studies should be conducted using a well-recognize categorical standard for egg consumption. Egg consumption should be reduced to reduce BC risk.////
Song 2013 [40]Diversity of study design; the apparent association of these pooled results is restricted to the case-control study (overestimating the exposure effect due to recall and selection bias); measurement error in the FFQs; cut-off points for citrus fruit intake vary across studies, so there is uncertainty about the optimal citrus fruit intake for the prevention of BC.Pooled results from observational studies showed an inverse association between citrus fruit intake and the risk of BC. This study underscores the need for well-designed prospective observational and intervention studies to clarify the influence of citrus fruit on BC. ////
Taylor 2009 [20]Bias involving the use of FFQs in all studies (self-report measures to assess consumption can lead to misclassification of intake); recall bias in case-control studies may affect observed associations between dietary intake and cancer risk (tendency to over-report among cases and under-report among controls).Red meat may be a source of heterocyclic amines and heme-iron, a highly bioavailable form of iron which has been shown to enhance estrogen-induced tumor formation. This quantitative summary of published literature indicates that red meat may contribute to BC risk in premenopausal women. ////
Trock 2006 [31]Possible measurement errors among the studies; potential selection bias; different levels of soy consumption among the studies; potentially uncontrolled confounders among the studies.Soy intake may be associated with a small reduction in BC risk. This result should be interpreted with caution, however, due to potential exposure misclassification, confounders, or lack of a dose-response effect. ////
Turner 2011 [45]Small sample size in premenopausal studies; association between BC risk and PUFA subtypes not examined separately. High-fat diet may increase estrogen levels and therefore increase BC risk. Higher risk of BC in postmenopausal women consuming large amounts of total fat and PUFA. Conversely, dietary fat may have some BC prevention effects in premenopausal women. ////
Velentzis 2009 [32]Over- or under-estimation of food content; some food composition databases are incomplete; the amount of lignans in food can differ depending on crop variety, location, year of harvest and processing; possible dietary measurement errors associated with FFQs; possibility of residual confounding factors. Plant lignans may be associated with a small (15%) reduction in postmenopausal BC risk, but further studies are needed to confirm these results.////
Wu 2008 [9]Not reported Overall, data based on Asian women showed a dose-dependent statistically significant association between soy food intake and BC risk reduction; soy intake was unrelated to BC risk in studies conducted on Western populations.////
Wu 2015 [33]Different units used to assess food intakes among the studies; dose-response analysis was not conducted; possible measurement errors and analysis unadjusted for potential confounding factors.High fruit and vegetable consumption, as a protective measure, can reduce the incidence of BC in Chinese women. High fruit consumption protects against BC (higher soy food consumption induces a 69% reduction in BC risk). High-fat food consumption may increase BC risk.Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemEleven studies were “higher-quality” (≥7 pt) and eleven were “lower-quality” (<7 pt)
Yang 2014 [49]Potential publication bias (small studies with null results tend not to be published); any measurement error and resulting misclassification would most likely lead to an attenuation of the true association; dietary questionnaires are liable to measurement errors (reporting bias or inaccurate databases); potential residual confounding factors not excluded. Findings provide conclusive evidence to support increasing n-3/n-6 PUFA intake for BC prevention. For every 1/10 increment in n-3/n-6 PUFA there was a 6% reduction in BC risk; importance of promoting nutritional education (increasing the consumption of marine foods).Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemSix studies were classified as “high-quality” (≥8 pt), five as “moderate-quality” (<8 pt)
Zang 2015 [27]Potential confounding factors inherent in the original study design; misclassification of dairy food consumption (self-reporting system) may cause incorrect estimates; potential methodological differences between studies; use of case-control studies may provide a lower level of evidence.Dairy food consumption was inversely associated with BC risk; possible association between high dairy food consumption and beneficial environmental factors (economic status, physical activity, healthier lifestyle). Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemTwelve studies scored 8 pts, nine scored 7 pts, and six scored 6 pts
Zheng 2013 [50]Different assessment methods; limited data available on individual n-3 PUFA; potential residual confounders not analyzed; possible language bias.This meta-analysis provided strong and solid evidence of marine n-3 PUFA intake being inversely associated with risk of BC. Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemStudies were of “moderate-quality“ (5–7 pt) and “higher-quality” (>7 pt)
Zhou 2015 [51]Selection bias might be unavoidable; relatively limited amount of data included in the meta-analysis; potential measurement errors and misclassification; unmeasured or residual confounders might affect the association between linoleic acid and BC riskThis meta-analysis suggested that linoleic acid is associated with a lower risk of BC, but none of the associations were statistically significant. Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS)—9 pt scoring systemFour studies scored 6/9 pts, ten studies scored 7/9 pts
Conclusion and quality assessment of pooled analysis included in the umbrella review (4)
Mannisto 2005 [16]//The results supported the suggestion deriving from relatively recent epidemiological research that diet may not have an important role in the etiology of BC. The possible protective effect of “Pork, Processed Meat, Potatoes” dietary pattern in the NLCS cohort could be explained by a difference in that pattern for NLCS (type of food included in the FFQs).////
Missmer 2002 [22]Inability to assess the effect of how food was cooked and for how long (data not collected); possible measurement errors not collected.This large study does not provide evidence of a diet rich in meat and dairy products increasing the risk of BC. ////
Smith-Warner 2001 (a) [46]Possible errors in estimates of consumption (over- or under-estimation); possible methodological errors in study design.The pooled analysis suggested only a weak positive association for replacing saturated fat consumption with carbohydrate consumption; none of the other types of fat examined were associated with BC risk; these results, though not significant, are compatible with a lower BC risk observed for higher intakes of olive oil (rich source of monounsaturated fat) in studies conducted in Mediterranean countries. ////
Smith-Warner 2001 (b) [39]Differences in study design; numerous fruit and vegetable categories reported in the studies; possible publication bias. The results suggest that fruit and vegetable consumption in adulthood is not significantly associated with BC risk (BC risk only 3% to 9% lower in women in the highest decile of fruit or vegetable consumption). No specific fruits or vegetables had strong and significant association with BC risk.////
Conclusion and quality assessment of systematic reviews included in the umbrella review (5)
Albuquerque 2013 [17]No summary estimate measure was produced; instruments used to collect dietary information differed among the studies; FFQs, used in most cases, are liable to measurement error and might not detect a significant association; great variability among the studies; possibility of recall or selection bias.The results suggest that a dietary pattern characterized by vegetables, fruit, fish and soy (healthy), or the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of BC. A positive association was observed for the Western dietary pattern, but most of these results were not statistically significant. Efforts are expected to aid future research. Strobe Checklist//
Farsinejad-Marj 2015 [18]Scarcity of studies, no assessment of factors hypothesized to relate to BC (breastfeeding, adiposity, physical activity, genetic background, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation). Few studies separately investigated risk of BC in pre- and post-menopausal women. Different components of the MD can act synergistically in reducing BC risk so it is important to consider all components of the MD in studies.Case-cohort studies found an inverse association between the MD and BC risk in pre- and post-menopausal women, but cohort studies reported controversial results. It seems that there are insufficient data to reach a conclusion about the effect of MD on BC risk before and after menopause, but there is some evidence to suggest a protective association. More cohort studies need to be conducted in different parts of the world to confirm these results.////
Michels 2007 [28]Possible measurement error (FFQs); great heterogeneity in dietary patterns among different countries; timing in diet; possible inadequate follow-up in studies.There was no consistent strong and statistically significant association between diet and BC risk. ////
Mourouti 2013 [34]Possible recall bias; variation in exposure measures used in the studies; variation in the amount and type of soy consumed and in the sample size may have over- or under- estimated the true effect sizes measured. Potential dietary measurement error may mask the true relationship. The majority of the studies (66%) revealed a statistically significant inverse association between soy and isoflavones consumption and BC risk. Limitations in the study design may mask the real associations.////
Mourouti 2014 [21]Differences in experimental design and habits among study populations; lack of sufficient follow-up in the studies; methodological problems with the assessment tools used in each study.No consistent and statistically strong association emerged between BC incidence and dietary factors; soy food and isoflavone intake seemed to protect against BC, mainly in Asian populations; no association reported for the consumption of dietary carbohydrates, GI or GL, dietary fiber intake and the risk of BC. The consumption of dietary fat probably raises the risk of BC. The studies that examined the role of fruit, vegetable and meat intake provide inconsistent results.////
Conclusion and quality assessment of qualitative reviews included in the umbrella review (7)
Cui 2006 [54]Possible selection bias due to case-control study design; shortcomings in methodology and summary estimate measures.Despite inconsistent results from the epidemiological studies, some evidence indicates that vitamin D and calcium might have a protective role against BC. Experimental evidence suggests that the association between vitamin D intake and BC may be stronger for premenopausal than for postmenopausal women. Further analyses are required to assess this interaction.////
Duffy 2007 [35]Not reportedEarly exposure in childhood or adolescence may have a protective effect against BC.////
Eichholzer 2001 [57]Not reportedHigh folate intake may be associated with a lower risk of BC in women at high risk (alcohol users).////
Hanf 2005 [23]Not reportedRegional differences in BC incidence are probably partially attributable to lifelong dietary habits. ////
Lof 2006 [36]Potential misclassification of phytoestrogen intake due to measurement associated with dietary assessment; potential recall bias in retrospective studies.Epidemiological data seem to support a small protective effect of isoflavones against BC; as for lignans and BC, the results are somewhat inconsistent, but the protective effect might be limited to premenopausal women.////
Peeters 2003 [37]None of the studies considered age at time of consumption, which seems to be important in BC development; methodological differences between the studies are too large to estimate any summary effect; limited number of epidemiological studies on phytoestrogens and BC.None of the studies found evidence for an increased risk of BC with an increased phytoestrogen intake.////
Rossi 2014 [60]Limitations due to study design (methodological shortcomings and lack of association measures).Nutritional factors might have a role in the development of BC; red meat intake and dietary sugar should be reduced, whereas increased fish intake appears to be protective; fruit and vegetables, including polyphenols, have shown promising results. Prospective randomized trials are needed to develop population-based prevention strategies for BC.////

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buja, A.; Pierbon, M.; Lago, L.; Grotto, G.; Baldo, V. Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134731

AMA Style

Buja A, Pierbon M, Lago L, Grotto G, Baldo V. Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(13):4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buja, Alessandra, Marco Pierbon, Laura Lago, Giulia Grotto, and Vincenzo Baldo. 2020. "Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 13: 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134731

APA Style

Buja, A., Pierbon, M., Lago, L., Grotto, G., & Baldo, V. (2020). Breast Cancer Primary Prevention and Diet: An Umbrella Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop