Next Article in Journal
Doctors’ Extended Shifts as Risk to Practitioner and Patient: South Africa as a Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Antipsychotic Drugs in Prevention of Postoperative Delirium—What Is Known in 2020?
Previous Article in Journal
Implicit Motor Imagery and the Lateral Occipitotemporal Cortex: Hints for Tailoring Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyperosmolar Treatment for Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure: A Single-Center Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 16
10.3390/ijerph17165852
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature

by
Piotr F. Czempik
1,*,
Michał P. Pluta
2,3 and
Łukasz J. Krzych
1
1
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Medyków 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland
2
St. Barbara’s Memorial Hospital No. 5 Trauma Center, Plac Medyków 1, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
3
Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Medyków 14, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(16), 5852; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852
Submission received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 2 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 August 2020 / Published: 12 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuroprotection and Treatment in Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction (SABD) may be the most common type of encephalopathy in critically ill patients. SABD develops in up to 70% of septic patients and represents the most frequent organ insufficiency associated with sepsis. It presents with a plethora of acute neurological features and may have several serious long-term psychiatric consequences. SABD might cause various pathological changes in the brain through numerous mechanisms. Clinical neurological examination is the basic screening method for SABD, although it may be challenging in subjects receiving with opioids and sedative agents. As electrographic seizures and periodic discharges might be present in 20% of septic patients, screening with electroencephalography (EEG) might be useful. Several imaging techniques have been suggested for non-invasive assessment of structure and function of the brain in SABD patients; however, their usefulness is rather limited. Although several experimental therapies have been postulated, at the moment, no specific treatment exists. Clinicians should focus on preventive measures and optimal management of sepsis. This review discusses epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and prevention of SABD.

1. Introduction

Although significant progress has recently been made in increasing awareness among healthcare providers and in recognition and management [1], sepsis and septic shock remain a major healthcare problem worldwide. An integral component of sepsis is an acute organ dysfunction of multiple organs and organ systems. According to the most recent consensus, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [2]. As intensive care units (ICUs) are well placed for managing organ failures, sepsis is a frequent ICU admission diagnosis [3]. One of the organs affected in sepsis is the brain, and sepsis-associated brain dysfunction (SABD) is probably the most common type of encephalopathy in the ICU. SABD is defined as diffuse brain dysfunction caused by infection outside the central nervous system (CNS) and is a diagnosis of exclusion. There should be no other diagnoses explaining the neurological status of a patient (e.g., CNS infection). SABD might develop in up to 70% of septic patients [4], especially in patients with confirmed bacteremia [5], and represents the most frequent organ insufficiency associated with sepsis [6]. Disturbed consciousness in sepsis significantly increases mortality. The prevalence and dismal prognosis of patients presenting with SABD only highlights the imperative to better understand the condition, improve its diagnosis and treatment, and introduce preventive measures. In this review, based on the latest research, we discuss the following aspects of SABD: epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis/pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management.

2. Materials and Methods

Epidemiology

The prevalence of SABD is difficult to assess due to its various neurological manifestations and the fact that many other factors, apart from sepsis, may lead to brain dysfunction in septic patients. Additionally, sedation makes assessment of SABD difficult. Young et al. reported that among 69 patients with fever and positive microbial cultures, 32 had marked brain dysfunction, 17 showed mild encephalopathy, and 20 were neurologically asymptomatic [7]. A retrospective study evaluating ICU hospitalizations in a 3-year period reported sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) in 17.7% of patients; however, this study was based on an old definition of sepsis (2011), lacked precise diagnostic criteria for SABD, and patients receiving sedative agents were excluded [8]. Even more than 50% of septic patients may show signs of SABD [9], even before admission to hospital [4]. SABD may constitute the most common type of encephalopathy in a heterogeneous ICU population. Up to 70% of septic patients may develop SABD. Deteriorating neurological status (as per the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)) in SABD leads to increasing mortality; hence, regular screening for and monitoring of brain dysfunction is crucial [8]. The prevalence of SABD depends also on the site and etiology of infection. Biliary and intestine infections and pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, are associated with a higher risk of SABD [8]. Due to the lack of definite diagnostic criteria for SABD and variable clinical manifestation, prevalence and mortality of SABP is difficult to assess.

3. Results

Clinical Presentation

Due to use of opioids and sedative agents, accurate neurological assessment of patients hospitalized in the ICU might be impossible. There is a plethora of acute neurological features of SABD as well as long-term psychiatric consequences [7]. The long-term consequences of SABD might be present in up to 62% of patients [7]. Experimental research suggests that neuronal loss and reduced cholinergic signaling is responsible for the long-term consequences of SABD [8]. Table 1 lists various neurological features of SABD.

4. Discussion

4.1. Pathogenesis/ Pathophysiology

The pathologic changes detected in SABD include cerebral ischemia, hemorrhages [19], disseminated micro-abscesses [19,20,21,22], central pontine myelinolysis, multifocal necrotizing leukoencephalopathy [21], perivascular edema, swelling of astrocytic end-feet, and neuronal apoptosis [22]. These changes are present in the most severe cases.
The parts of the brain mostly involved in sepsis are the frontal cortex and the hippocampus, which leads to cognitive dysfunction [23]. There might be a brainstem dysfunction caused by the passage of inflammatory mediators through area postrema. Brainstem dysfunction may present as impaired alertness, impaired cardiovascular and immune control, and impaired brainstem reflexes [24]. Sepsis is associated with several neuroendocrine disorders: pituitary insufficiency, relative adrenal insufficiency, and impaired production of vasopressin [25]. Microglial activation affects the amygdala leading to psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)) [26].
Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to SABD are summarized in Figure 1.
Bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) are bonded by circulating LPS-binding protein (LBP), which later forms a complex with a membrane-bound cluster of differentiation (CD) 14 receptors on monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils, what induces synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor -α (TNF-α), interleukin - 1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) through Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 [27,28].
Systemically produced cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) activate microglia, causing the release of inflammatory mediators in the brain (e.g., transforming growth factor-beta1 and prostaglandin E2 cytokines), leading to disturbed neuronal function [27].
Pro-inflammatory cytokines in turn induce synthesis and secretion of nitric oxide (NO) and reactive oxygen radicals (ROS) [29]. Production of NO is initially increased; however, free radicals (such as superoxide anion) later react with NO forming peroxynitrite, which leads to a reduced NO bioavailability in the cerebrovascular bed. Experimental data using a fecal peritonitis Wistar rat model indicate that oxidative stress occurs early in sepsis and leads to decreased synthesis of adenotriphosphate (ATP) due to liver and skeletal muscle mitochondrial injury [30,31].
Oxidative stress leads to endothelial vasculopathy. Cytokine storm in SABD reduces concentrations of protein C and activated protein C and, along with endothelial vasculopathy, tips the balance of the hemostatic system toward coagulation and the formation of micro-thrombi, leading to tissue ischemia [32].
In normal conditions, cerebral vasodilation is mediated by nitric oxide, whereas cerebral vasoconstriction by endothelin [33]. In SABD, pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-1, IL-8) decrease NO, leading to increased cerebral arteriolar (40–200 μm) resistance with resultant decrease in cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume [34].
There may be an elevated level of NO leading to altered cerebral autoregulation. The coupling between blood flow and metabolism is lost. In patients with sepsis, there is a disturbed response of cerebral blood vessels to carbon dioxide [35].
Impairment of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) leads to a disturbed water transport, which is tightly regulated by aquaporin 4, resulting in perivascular edema, destruction of the astrocytic end-feet [19]. Through impaired BBB, leaked aromatic amino acids (AAAs) lead to an altered mental status [36]. Protein leaks through the impaired BBB and shows in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [37].
Concentrations of amino acids and neurotransmitters in the plasma and brain differ significantly between septic patients and healthy controls. AAAs are elevated in sepsis, whereas branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) are decreased [38]. BCAAs and AAAs compete for the same transporter in the BBB, so if BCAA levels are low, there will be an increase in the brain uptake of AAAs (SAE symptoms).
The concentration of glutamate, a major activating neurotransmitter in the brain, increases in sepsis. Glutamate works via activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors, which in turn decreases cellular ATP. Lack of ATP leads to Na/K-ATPase inhibition and cellular edema.
The cholinergic stimulation through nicotinic and muscarinic receptors modulates memory, learning abilities, arousal level, and major cognitive functions. It is significantly reduced in SABD and may lead to disruption of the aforementioned brain functions. Anticholinergic medications are considered risk factors for delirium; however, cholinesterase inhibitors did not show efficacy when used in prevention or treatment [39].
Excessive concentrations of norepinephrine and dopamine have been associated with hyperactive delirium, making dopamine antagonists useful for acute symptom control. However, dopamine antagonists do not shorten the duration or decrease severity of delirium in critically ill patients [40].

4.2. Diagnosis

SABD is a diagnosis of exclusion. In order to diagnose SABD, factors other than sepsis have to be excluded: drug effects, electrolyte disturbances, metabolic disturbances, primary CNS pathology (meningitis, encephalitis, cerebral abscess, septic emboli), and conditions with non-infective systemic inflammatory response (e.g., burns, severe acute pancreatitis, trauma). Neurological examination is the basic screening method for SABD in septic patients. In mechanically ventilated patients, deeper levels of sedation are occasionally necessary and preclude clinical neurological assessment. In patients who are not sedated or lightly sedated, objective assessment can be used. The most common objective method is the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), which has been translated into several languages. Nevertheless, when applied by ICU nurses, CAM-ICU showed lower sensitivity than unstructured delirium assessments made by qualified nurses [41]. When compared to assessments made by expert teams of psychiatrists, geriatricians, and neurologists, CAM-ICU showed a sensitivity of 47% and specificity of 98% [42]. These two studies were performed specifically to diagnose delirium associated with sepsis.
When clinical assessment is difficult or not feasible, instrumental methods can be used. The most sensitive method is electroencephalography (EEG). Normal alpha waves (7.5–12.5 Hz) slow down and theta waves (4–8 Hz) emerge in patients with no, mild, and moderate clinical symptoms (confusion, delirium). The appearance of delta waves (4 Hz), generalization of triphasic waves, and more burst-suppression pattern are associated with severe symptoms (stupor, coma). Mortality increases with the malignancy of EEG wave forms [43]. Nevertheless, these abnormal EEG findings are not specific to SABD and are present in other types of encephalopathy [44]. A recent study showed an association between delirium in non-sedated septic patients and electrographic seizures. Electrographic seizures and periodic discharges were present in 20% of septic patients. These wave forms were independently associated with ICU mortality, confirming the link between SABD and mortality [45].
In mild cases, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations are usually normal. In more severe cases, non-specific structural changes can be detected (mostly MRI): leukoencephalopathy, cerebral infarction, cerebral atrophy, generalized lowered density in the white matter, vasogenic edema, changes in the corpus callosum, subcortical, and deep cerebellar regions [46,47,48]. The degree of detected imaging abnormalities is correlated with severity of sepsis. In ICU survivors, an association between lower brain volumes (MRI) and longer duration of delirium/worse cognitive impairment (up to a year) was found [49].
Transcranial Doppler may detect cerebral blood flow changes, enabling easy and non-invasive assessment [50]. A pulsatility index higher than 1.3 in the first 24 h may be indicative of brain dysfunction in sepsis (delirium) [51].
As another non-invasive method, measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) can detect elevated intracranial pressure in septic patients. Intracranial hypertension in septic patients might be a sign of SABD. Nevertheless, using ONSD for SABD screening requires further research [52].
In patients with sepsis and septic shock, biomarkers of glia (S100β) or neurons (neuron-specific enolase) were detected; however, they are not specific for SABD [53].
Elevated concentration of protein in CSF, a consequence of increased permeability of blood proteins through the BBB, might be indicative of SABD.

4.3. Management

Although several experimental therapies have been postulated [54,55,56], at the moment, there is no specific treatment for SABD. The optimal treatment of the underlying sepsis is crucial. In patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure correlated with increased serum S100β levels [57]; therefore, attempts may be made to increase mean arterial pressure to mitigate brain injury.
A large multicenter randomized clinical trial carried out in American medical centers showed that a typical antipsychotic (haloperidol) or an atypical antipsychotic (ziprasidone) did not shorten the time patients were delirious or comatose, compared to a placebo. There were also no differences in mortality, ICU or hospital length stay [40].
An alpha-2 adrenergic agonist agent dexmedetomidine showed neuroprotective effects (inhibition of neuronal apoptosis, reduction in sepsis-associated inflammatory response, more delirium-free days) in septic patients compared to lorazepam [58]. The effect was probably due to inhibition of neuronal apoptosis and reduction of inflammatory response associated with sepsis. Sedation with dexmedetomidine, as compared to lorazepam, led to more encephalopathy-free days, shorted ventilation times, and lower mortality.

4.4. Prevention

As management of SABD is based on treatment of underlying sepsis, all patients at risk of sepsis should be screened. Through timely management of sepsis, it may be possible to prevent patients from developing SABD. Attention should be given to simple infections that may aggravate into sepsis.
The clinical symptoms of SABD may be detected prior to other symptoms of sepsis. According to Gofton et al., cognitive or mental changes associated with SABD can occur in susceptible patients up to 36–48 h before other systemic symptoms of sepsis. Such patients show unexplained reduction in level of consciousness but otherwise have normal neurological examination and neuroimaging [4]. Screening for delirium in order to identify patients prone to SABD is crucial here. In these patients, a search for infection should be started and appropriate therapy promptly introduced. The role of routine EEG in detection of SABD is not clear.
Elimination or reduction of the amount of sedation, especially benzodiazepines, showed a reduced incidence of sepsis-associated delirium; hence, introduction of minimal sedation policy should benefit ICU patients [59].
There are several modifiable factors associated with SABD (e.g., hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, hypercapnia, hypernatremia) that should be prevented [60].

5. Conclusions

Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction is a multifactorial disorder with high prevalence and mortality among critically ill septic patients. SABD should we viewed as acute organ insufficiency in early phase and as a cause of numerous long-term psychiatric problems. Several imaging techniques have been suggested for non-invasive assessment of structure and function of the brain in SABD patients; however, their usefulness is rather limited. Although some potential therapies have been tested at the experimental level, there are no specific treatment options available so far. Clinicians should focus on preventive measures and optimal management of sepsis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.F.C. and Ł.J.K.; methodology, P.F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, P.F.C.; writing—review and editing, Ł.J.K. and M.P.P.; visualization, M.P.P.; supervision, Ł.J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rhodes, A.; Evans, L.E.; Alhazzani, W.; Levy, M.M.; Antonelli, M.; Ferrer, R.; Kumar, A.; Sevransky, J.E.; Sprung, C.L.; Nunnally, M.E.; et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 43, 304–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Salluh, J.I.; Soares, M.; Teles, J.M.; Ceraso, D.; Raimondi, N.; Nava, V.S.; Blasquez, P.; Ugarte, S.; Ibanez-Guzman, C.; Centeno, J.V.; et al. Delirium epidemiology in critical care (DECCA): An international study. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gofton, T.E.; Young, G.B. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 8, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bolton, C.F.; Young, G.B.; Zochodne, D.W. The neurological complications of sepsis. Ann. Neurol. 1993, 33, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bolton, C.F.; Young, G.B. Managing the nervous system effects of sepsis. Chest 2007, 131, 1273–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Young, G.B.; Bolton, C.F.; Austin, T.W.; Archibald, Y.M.; Gonder, J.; Wells, G.A. The encephalopathy associated with septic illness. Clin. Investig. Med. 1990, 13, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, L.N.; Wang, X.T.; Ai, Y.H.; Guo, Q.L.; Huang, L.; Liu, Z.Y.; Yao, B. Epidemiological features and risk factors of sepsis-associated encephalopathy in intensive care unit patients: 2008–2011. Chin. Med. J. 2012, 125, 828–831. [Google Scholar]
  9. Eidelman, L.A.; Putterman, D.; Putterman, C.; Sprung, C.L. The spectrum of septic encephalopathy: Definitions, etiologies, and mortalities. JAMA 1996, 75, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mikkelsen, M.E.; Christie, J.D.; Lanken, P.N.; Biester, R.C.; Thompson, B.T.; Bellamy, S.L.; Localio, A.R.; Demissie, E.; Hopkins, R.O.; Angus, D.C. The adult respiratory distress syndrome cognitive outcomes study: Long-term neuropsychological function in survivors of acute lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 185, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Semmler, A.; Frisch, C.; Debeir, T.; Ramanathan, M.; Okulla, T.; Klockgether, T.; Heneka, M.T. Long-term cognitive impairment, neuronal loss and reduced cortical cholinergic innervation after recovery from sepsis in a rodent model. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 204, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Soriano, F.G. Quality of life: Late sequela in sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 33, 262–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lazosky, A.; Young, G.B.; Zirul, S.; Phillips, R. Quality of life after septic illness. J. Crit. Care 2010, 25, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Feng, Q.; Ai, Y.H.; Gong, H.; Wu, L.; Ai, M.L.; Deng, S.Y.; Huang, L.; Peng, Q.Y.; Zhang, L.N. Characterization of Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy. J. Intensive Care Med. 2019, 34, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wintermann, G.B.; Brunkhorst, F.M.; Petrowski, K.; Strauss, B.; Oehmichen, F.; Pohl, M.; Rosendahl, J. Stress disorders following prolonged critical illness in survivors of severe sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mostel, Z.; Perl, A.; Marck, M.; Mehdi, S.F.; Lowell, B.; Bathija, S.; Santosh, R.; Pavlov, V.A.; Chavan, S.S.; Roth, J. Post-sepsis syndrome—An evolving entity that afflicts survivors of sepsis. Mol. Med. 2019, 26, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lund-Sorensen, H.; Benros, M.E.; Madsen, T.; Sorensen, H.J.; Eaton, W.W.; Postolache, T.T.; Nordentoft, M.; Erlangsen, A. A Nationwide Cohort Study of the Association between Hospitalization with Infection and Risk of Death by Suicide. JAMA Psychiatry 2016, 73, 912–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Annane, D.; Sharshar, T. Cognitive decline after Sepsis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharshar, T.; Annane, D.; de la Grandmaison, G.L.; Brouland, J.P.; Hopkinson, N.S.; Françoise, G. The Neuropathology of Septic Shock. Brain Pathol. 2004, 14, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jackson, A.C.; Gilbert, J.J.; Young, G.B.; Bolton, C.F. The encephalopathy of sepsis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 1985, 12, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sharshar, T.; Polito, A.; Checinski, A.; Stevens, R.D. Septic-associated encephalopathy-everything starts at a microlevel. Crit. Care 2010, 14, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wilson, J.X.; Young, G.B. Progress in clinical neurosciences: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy: Evolving concepts. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003, 30, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sonneville, R.; Derese, I.; Marques, M.B.; Langouche, L.; Derde, S.; Chatre, L.; Chrétien, F.; Annane, D.; Sharshar, T.; Van den Berghe, G.; et al. Neuropathological Correlates of Hyperglycemia During Prolonged Polymicrobial Sepsis in Mice. Shock 2015, 44, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sharshar, T.; Porcher, R.; Siami, S.; Rohaut, B.; Bailly-Salin, J.; Hopkinson, N.S.; Clair, B.; Guidoux, C.; Iacobone, E.; Sonneville, R.; et al. Brainstem Responses Can Predict Death and Delirium in Sedated Patients in Intensive Care Unit. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 39, 1960–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stare, J.; Siami, S.; Trudel, E.; Prager-Khoutorsky, M.; Sharshar, T.; Bourque, C.W. Effects of peritoneal sepsis on rat central osmoregulatory neurons mediating thirst and vasopressin release. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 12188–12197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muscatell, K.A.; Dedovic, K.; Slavich, G.M.; Jarcho, M.R.; Breen, E.C.; Bower, J.E.; Irwin, M.R.; Eisenberger, N.I. Greater amygdala activity and dorsomedial prefrontal-amygdala coupling are associated with enhanced inflammatory responses to stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015, 43, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. van Gool, W.A.; van de Beek, D.; Eikelenboom, P. Systemic infection and delirium: When cytokines and acetylcholine collide. Lancet 2010, 375, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jacob, A.; Brorson, J.R.; Alexander, J.J. Septic encephalopathy: Inflammation in man and mouse. Neurochem. Int. 2011, 58, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Berg, R.M.; Moller, K.; Bailey, D.M. Neuro-oxidative-nitrosative stress in sepsis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31, 1532–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Azevedo, L.C. Mitochondrial dysfunction during sepsis. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2010, 10, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brealey, D.; Karyampudi, S.; Jacques, T.S.; Novelli, M.; Stidwill, R.; Taylor, V.; Smolenski, R.S.; Singer, M. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Long-Term Rodent Model of Sepsis and Organ Failure. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, 286, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cepinskas, G.; Wilson, J.X. Inflammatory response in microvascular endothelium in sepsis: Role of oxidants. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2008, 42, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Burkhart, C.S.; Siegemund, M.; Steiner, L.A. Cerebral perfusion in sepsis. Crit. Care 2010, 14, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Szatmari, S.; Vegh, T.; Csomos, A.; Hallay, J.; Takacs, I.; Molnar, C.; Fülesdi, B. Impaired Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy Studied by Acetazolamide Test. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Taccone, F.S.; Castanares-Zapatero, D.; Peres-Bota, D.; Vincent, J.-L.; Berre, J.; Melot, C. Cerebral Autoregulation Is Influenced by Carbon Dioxide Levels in Patients With Septic Shock. Neurocrit. Care 2010, 12, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Berg, R.M.; Taudorf, S.; Bailey, D.M.; Lundby, C.; Larsen, F.S.; Pedersen, B.K.; Møller, K. Cerebral net exchange of large neutral amino acids after lipopolysaccharide infusion in healthy humans. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Davies, D.C. Blood-brain Barrier Breakdown in Septic Encephalopathy and Brain Tumours. J. Anat. 2002, 200, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sprung, C.L.; Cerra, F.B.; Freund, H.R.; Schein, R.M.; Konstantinides, F.N.; Marcial, E.H.; Pena, M. Amino acid alterations and encephalopathy in the sepsis syndrome. Crit. Care Med 1991, 19, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. van Eijk, M.M.; Roes, K.C.; Honing, M.L.; Kuiper, M.A.; Karakus, A.; van der Jagt, M.; Spronk, P.E.; van Gool, W.A.; van der Mast, R.C.; Kesecioglu, J.; et al. Effect of rivastigmine as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on duration of delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 1829–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Girard, T.; Exline, M.C.; Carson, S.S.; Hough, C.L.; Rock, P. Haloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2506–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reade, M.C.; Eastwood, G.M.; Peck, L.; Bellomo, R.; Baldwin, I. Routine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) by bedside nurses may underdiagnose delirium. Crit. Care Resusc. 2011, 13, 217–224. [Google Scholar]
  42. van Eijk, M.M.; van den Boogaard, M.; van Marum, R.J.; Benner, P.; Eikelenboom, P.; Honing, M.L.; van der Hoven, B.; Horn, J.; Izaks, G.J.; Kalf, A.; et al. Routine use of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit: A multicenter study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Young, G.B.; Bolton, C.F.; Archibald, Y.M.; Austin, T.W.; Wells, G.A. The electroencephalogram in sepsis-associated encephalopathy. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 9, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kaplan, P.W. The EEG in metabolic encephalopathy and coma. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 21, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Azabou, E.; Magalhaes, E.; Braconnier, A.; Yahiaoui, L.; Moneger, G.; Heming, N.; Annane, D.; Mantz, J.; Chrétien, F.; Durand, M.-C.; et al. Early standard electroencephalogram abnormalities predict mortality in septic intensive care unit patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Luitse, M.J.; van Asch, C.J.; Klijn, C.J. Deep coma and diffuse white matter abnormalities caused by sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Lancet 2013, 381, 2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharshar, T.; Carlier, R.; Bernard, F.; Guidoux, C.; Brouland, J.-P.; Nardi, O.; de la Grandmaison, G.L.; Aboab, J.; Gray, F.; Menon, D.; et al. Brain lesions in septic shock: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Intensive Care Med. 2007, 33, 798–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ahmed, M.; Sureka, J.; Mathew, V.; Jakkani, R.K.; Abhilash, K.P. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in a fatal case of Salmonella typhi-associated encephalopathy: A case report and literature review. Neurol. India 2011, 59, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gunther, M.L.; Morandi, A.; Krauskopf, E.; Pandharipande, P.; Girard, T.D.; Jackson, J.C.; Thompson, J.; Shintani, A.K.; Geevarghese, S.; Miller, R.R.; et al. The association between brain volumes, delirium duration, and cognitive outcomes in intensive care unit survivors: The VISIONS cohort magnetic resonance imaging study. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 2022–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kulkarni, A.A.; Sharma, V.K. Role of transcranial Doppler in cerebrovascular disease. Neurol. India 2016, 64, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pierrakos, C.; Attou, R.; Decorte, L.; Kolyviras, A.; Malinverni, S.; Gottignies, P.; Devriendt, J.; De Bels, D. Transcranial Doppler to assess sepsis-associated encephalopathy in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014, 14, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Czempik, P.F.; Gąsiorek, J.; Bąk, A.; Krzych, L.J. Ultrasonic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients at Risk of Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Preliminary Report. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nguyen, D.N.; Spapen, H.; Su, F.; Schiettecatte, J.; Shi, L.; Hachimi-Idrissi, S.; Huyghens, L. Elevated serum levels of S-100beta protein and neuron-specific enolase are associated with brain injury in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 34, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Moss, R.F.; Parmar, N.K.; Tighe, D.; Davies, D.C. Adrenergic agents modify cerebral edema and microvessel ultrastructure in porcine sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2004, 32, 1916–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Toklu, H.Z.; Uysal, M.K.; Kabasakal, L.; Sirvanci, S.; Ercan, F.; Kaya, M. The Effects of Riluzole on Neurological, Brain Biochemical, and Histological Changes in Early and Late Term of Sepsis in Rats. J. Surg. Res. 2009, 152, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Andonegui, G.; Zelinski, E.L.; Schubert, C.L.; Knight, D.; Craig, L.A.; Winston, B.W.; Spanswick, S.C.; Petri, B.; Jenne, C.N.; Sutherland, J.C.; et al. Targeting inflammatory monocytes in sepsis-associated encephalopathy and long-term cognitive impairment. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e99364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pfister, D.; Schmidt, B.; Smielewski, P.; Siegemund, M.; Strebel, S.P.; Ruegg, S.; Marsch, S.C.U.; Pargger, H.; Steiner, L.A. Intracranial pressure in patients with sepsis. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2008, 102, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pandharipande, P.P.; Sanders, R.D.; Girard, T.D.; McGrane, S.; Thompson, J.L.; Shintani, A.K.; Herr, D.L.; Maze, M.; Ely, W.E. MENDS investigators Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: An a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit. Care 2010, 14, R38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Vincent, J.-L.; Shehabi, Y.; Walsh, T.S.; Pandharipande, P.P.; Ball, J.A.; Spronk, P.; Longrois, D.; Strøm, T.; Conti, G.; Funk, G.-C. Comfort and Patient-Centred Care without Excessive Sedation: The eCASH Concept. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 962–9671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sonneville, R.; de Montmollin, E.; Poujade, J.; Garrouste-Orgeas, M.; Souweine, B.; Darmon, M.; Mariotte, E.; Argaud, L.; Barbier, F.; Goldgran-Toledano, D.; et al. Potentially modifiable factors contributing to sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 1075–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 05852 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed pathophysiologic changes in sepsis-associated brain dysfunction.
Figure 1. Proposed pathophysiologic changes in sepsis-associated brain dysfunction.
Ijerph 17 05852 g001
Table
Table 1. Clinical features of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction.
Table 1. Clinical features of sepsis-associated brain dysfunction.
Acute ProblemsLong-Term Problems
Fluctuations of Vigilance Lower health-related quality of life [10,11,12,13,14]
LethargyAnxiety
DeliriumPost-traumatic stress disorder [15]/Post-sepsis syndrome [16]
ComaDepression
PolyneuropathySuicidal behavior [17]
Dementia [18]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czempik, P.F.; Pluta, M.P.; Krzych, Ł.J. Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852

AMA Style

Czempik PF, Pluta MP, Krzych ŁJ. Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(16):5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czempik, Piotr F., Michał P. Pluta, and Łukasz J. Krzych. 2020. "Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 16: 5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852

APA Style

Czempik, P. F., Pluta, M. P., & Krzych, Ł. J. (2020). Sepsis-Associated Brain Dysfunction: A Review of Current Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5852. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165852

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop