Next Article in Journal
Boosting Psychological Well-Being through a Social Mindfulness-Based Intervention in the General Population
Next Article in Special Issue
Burnout in Spanish Security Forces during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Characteristics Associated with Older Adults’ Social Participation: The Contribution of Sociodemography and Transportation in Metropolitan, Urban, and Rural Areas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emotion Regulation Strategies, Workload Conditions, and Burnout in Healthcare Residents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Psychological Capital and Burnout in Teachers: The Mediating Role of Flourishing

by
Carlos Freire
1,*,
María del Mar Ferradás
1,*,
Alba García-Bértoa
1,
José Carlos Núñez
2,
Susana Rodríguez
1 and
Isabel Piñeiro
1
1
Department of Psychology, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
2
Faculty of Psychology, University of Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8403; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228403
Submission received: 17 October 2020 / Revised: 4 November 2020 / Accepted: 11 November 2020 / Published: 13 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burnout as a Public Health Problem and Its Approach from Prevention)

Abstract

:
In keeping with the growth in the development of healthy environments in organizational contexts, in recent years, there has also been increasing interest in the identification of personal psychological resources that contribute to improved worker mental health. From this proactive approach, this study examines the mediating role of flourishing in the relationship between psychological capital (PsyCap) and burnout in teachers, a professional group that is particularly prone to suffering from this syndrome. A total of 1379 teachers from pre-school, primary, secondary, and vocational education systems participated in the study. The mediating effect of flourishing was determined via mediation analysis using the PROCESS macro. The results showed that flourishing partially mediates the negative effect of PsyCap on the three symptoms of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of professional accomplishment). These findings indicate that both PsyCap and flourishing may be effective personal resources in reducing teacher burnout. Therefore, in order to prevent burnout, it is advisable to design interventions that combine PsyCap and flourishing.

1. Introduction

The development of workplaces with healthy atmospheres and the preoccupation of workers’ well-being constitute one of the key strategies of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [1] with the aim of promoting social progress and the growth of individuals, families, and communities. This emerging approach therefore places workers’ well-being as a cornerstone in the achievement of healthy, effective, and productive occupational life [2,3], and makes it a key factor for public health [4].
The emphasis on aspects linked to optimal positive functioning in the organizational environment is anchored in positive psychology, a discipline that arose at the beginnings of this century with the aim of identifying and encouraging the conditions that contribute to individual, group, and institutional flourishing [5]. Flourishing would thus represent the true gold standard for studies carried out in organizational settings under the umbrella of positive psychology, as it would be the best way to ensure the prevention and reduction of pathological states and the achievement of high levels of adaptive functioning [6]. Although flourishing has been operationalized in research via various theoretical models [6,7,8], all of the models agree on the idea that this construct represents the combination of high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being [9], which are the achievement of a pleasant, comfortable life (hedonia), as well as a full life that is consistent with the development of personal potential and the values which embody our true self (eudaimonia) [10]. Therefore, flourishing epitomises mental health as it is conceptualized today [11], since mental health not only implies the absence of mental illness, but also the presence of “a state of well-being in which the individual realizes his or her own abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to his or her community” [12] (p. 10).
The prolific research activity around the identification of personal psychological resources that may best contribute to increased flourishing of workers in the organizational context has its highest expression in the construct of psychological capital (PsyCap) [13]. PsyCap is “an individual’s positive psychological state of development and is characterized by: (a) having confidence (efficacy) to take on and put in the necessary effort to succeed at challenging tasks; (b) making a positive attribution (optimism) about succeeding now and in the future; (c) persevering towards goals and, when necessary, redirecting paths to goals (hope) in order to succeed; and (d) when beset by problems and adversity, sustaining and bouncing back and even beyond (resiliency) to attain success” [14] (p. 2). PsyCap is therefore shaped by the interaction of the resources of efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience, which implies that these four attributes work synergistically as a higher resource, such that their predictive ability would be significantly greater when taken together than when taken separately [15]. In this regard, various studies in occupational and academic environments have shown that PsyCap predicts levels of flourishing significantly better when it is considered as a global construct [16,17,18,19,20].

1.1. Psychological Capital in Teachers: Its Relationship to Flourishing and to Burnout

Although most studies about PsyCap have focused on organizational environments, such as business and healthcare, there has been growing attention paid in recent years to the teaching profession. One of the main reasons behind this unanticipated interest in psychological resources that encourage adaptive organizational functioning in teachers is the high levels of burnout that this group of workers suffer from [21,22,23]. Burnout is typically characterized by the clinical manifestation of three symptoms produced by the experience of chronic occupational stress: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a lack of professional accomplishment [24,25]. Emotional exhaustion expresses itself through high levels of physical and mental tiredness, along with a lack of energy for facing the day to day demands of work, and a feeling of being overwhelmed by those demands. Depersonalization involves the development of attitudes of coldness, apathy, disinterest, and cynicism in workplace relationships (e.g., with students and other teachers). A lack of professional accomplishment is linked to a general feeling of stagnation, which is often accompanied by an intense desire to give up the profession.
Studies in the area of teacher burnout have been conclusive about the negative relationship between PsyCap and burnout [26,27,28,29,30], which suggests that PsyCap would be an effective personal resource for the reduction of these psychopathological states in teachers. This solid evidence is in contrast to the scant research about the contribution of PsyCap to teacher flourishing, which is consistent with the relatively young research tradition about aspects linked to well-being in this occupational group [31,32]. Within this fresh approach, attention has been mainly paid to hedonic aspects [33], finding that PsyCap encourages the experience of high levels of satisfaction and positive emotions in teaching [34,35]. In addition, some recent studies have documented PsyCap’s positive contribution to teachers’ eudaimonic well-being. In a longitudinal study with university teachers, Li [36] found that PsyCap was a long-term predictor (both directly and indirectly, via meaning in life) of psychological well-being, which is self-acceptance, positive relationships with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. Kurt and Demirbolat [37] concluded that PsyCap directly, and indirectly (via job satisfaction), improved eudaimonic well-being in secondary-school teachers.

1.2. The Current Study

In line with the growing interest in aspects related to flourishing in teaching, the aim of this study is to examine the mediating role of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and the three burnout dimensions, namely emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a lack of professional accomplishment (see Figure 1).
Although the studies we reviewed above indicate that PsyCap contributes to experiencing high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, as well as reduced teacher burnout, to the best of our knowledge, there is no research that has examined the relationship between these three variables together. However, there are various reasons leading us to hypothesize that the negative effect of PsyCap on the burnout dimensions will be partly mediated by flourishing. According to the widely-accepted job-demands resources model (JD-R) [38], PsyCap is a personal psychological resource that—in highly demanding occupational contexts, which are therefore potentially harmful to physical and psychological health—would not only directly reduce the likelihood of experiencing burnout, but would also stimulate worker well-being (i.e., flourishing). In turn, the JD-R model states that occupational well-being would reduce the tendency to experience burnout, although it also posits that high levels of burnout would negatively affect a worker’s well-being [39]. This dual approach demonstrates the heuristic nature of the JD-R model, in light of which both flourishing and burnout may be mediators or outcomes [40].
In line with this lack of consensus about the role played by flourishing and burnout in their relationship with PsyCap, Manzano-García and Ayala [19] have shown a moderating effect of burnout between PsyCap and eudaimonic well-being in direct support staff of specialist autism services. In contrast, Polizzi Filho and Claro [41] found that PsyCap and hedonic well-being were negative predictors of turnover intention (i.e., an indicator of the lack of professional accomplishment dimension of burnout) in teachers.
The results from Polizzi Filho and Claro are therefore consistent with our hypothesis that flourishing has a negative (mediating) effect on teacher burnout. Although to date the negative relationship between flourishing and burnout has not been clearly demonstrated in teachers, various arguments lead us to expect this effect. First, studies such as Redelinghuys, Rothman, and Botha [42] have found high levels of flourishing in teachers to be related to a lower likelihood of leaving the profession, a factor that is associated with one of the burnout dimensions, a lack of professional accomplishment. Second, studies with other professions [43] have found an inverse relationship between flourishing and burnout. Third, the idea of flourishing as a negative predictor of teacher burnout links conceptually with the positive psychology approach, which emphasizes the idea that flourishing represents the mirror opposite of the symptoms of common mental disorders [9], and as such is the best guarantee of preventing or reducing these pathologies (e.g., burnout).
In light of these arguments, one might assume that teachers with high PsyCap will be better able to experience states of flourishing in the performance of their job, and both aspects (PsyCap and flourishing) would reduce vulnerability to burnout. This would be consistent with the approach of the theory of Conservation of Resources (COR) [44], which suggests that people with personal resources exhibit strong motivation to acquire, maintain, and develop new resources (e.g., PsyCap) when facing occupational demands, and this spiral of positive gains would result in long-term adaptive personal results (e.g., high levels of flourishing, low levels of burnout). In short, within the relatively recent interest in the study of aspects linked to positive psychological functioning in teachers, the main contribution of this study lies in examining the role of teacher flourishing, not only as a possible desirable effect of PsyCap, but also as a major contributor to the reduction of burnout in this professional group.
We have chosen to statistically control the effect of gender, educational stage, and teacher experience in our study because, as previous research has shown, these sociodemographic variables seem to differentially influence teachers’ experience of burnout. In terms of gender, some studies have indicated that burnout is more pronounced in women [45], whereas others have reported the opposite [46]. It is possible that men and women display themselves differently in their vulnerability to the various burnout symptoms. Women would be more likely to suffer emotional exhaustion while men would be more affected by depersonalization and a lack of professional accomplishment [47,48,49,50,51]. The educational stage and professional experience may also be significant factors in the explanation of burnout, with greater vulnerability to the syndrome in the higher educational stages [52,53] and in teachers with little experience [54,55].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A total of 1379 teachers from pre-school, primary, and secondary education, as well as vocational systems (1016 women, 363 men) from Galicia (Spain) took part in the study. They were aged between 24 and 63 years old (M = 43.17; SD = 13.21). The distribution by educational stage was as follows: 107 (7.8%) worked in pre-school education (students aged 3–6); 297 (21.5%) worked in primary education (ages 6–12); 472 (34.2%) worked in compulsory secondary education (ages 12–16); 127 (9.2%) taught Bachillerato (Baccalaureate) (ages 16–18); 11 taught vocational training; and 365 (26.5%) taught in more than one educational stage. In terms of experience, 6 (0.4%) participants had less than 1 year of teaching experience, 204 (14.8%) had between 2 and 5, 137 (9.9%) had between 5 and 10, 386 (28%) had between 10 and 20, 409 (29.7%) had between 20 and 30, and 237 (17.2%) had more than 30 years’ experience.

2.2. Instruments

Psychological capital: We used the CapPsi Psychological Capital Scale [28,56]. It consists of 16 items which evaluate the four resources (efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience) which synergistically make up human psychological capital [14]. The responses are given on a six-point Likert-type scale (1 = completely disagree, to 6 = completely agree). Higher responses indicate a higher level of self-reported PsyCap. The internal consistency of the instrument in our study was α = 0.90, ω = 0.90 (95% CI [89,90]).
Flourishing: We assessed flourishing using the eight items making up the Flourishing Scale [57], Spanish version [58]. It uses a Likert-type response scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher levels of flourishing. The internal consistency of the instrument was α = 0.88, ω = 0.88 (95% CI [0.87, 0.89]).
Burnout: We measured burnout using the Spanish adaptation [59] of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey (MBI-ES) [60]. It consists of 22 items that evaluate the three manifestations of the syndrome (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of professional accomplishment). According to the original authors’ recommendations, each of these characteristics should be assessed individually. The emotional exhaustion scale has nine items (α = 0.90, ω = 0.91 (95% CI [0.89, 0.91]). The depersonalization scale has five items (α = 0.62, ω = 0.63 (95% CI [0.58, 0.64]). The professional accomplishment scale has eight items (α = 0.84, ω = 0.83 (95% CI [0.82, 0.85]). The responses to all of the items are given using a Likert-type scale with responses from 0 (never) to 6 (always). Higher scores indicate higher levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and lower scores indicate lower levels of professional accomplishment.

2.3. Procedure

We began the data collection process by sending emails to schools in the four provinces in Galicia. The email detailed the study objectives and the terms of participation (voluntary, anonymous, and confidential). It also included a link to an online platform which contained the measurement instruments items, the instructions for responding to them, and a declaration of informed consent, in accordance with the ethical principles of the University of A Coruña (UDC Ethical Code of Research 27 February 2019) and the Declaration of Helsinki. We asked the schools to distribute the information in the email to the teaching staff. Thus, the study included those teachers who, after accepting the above conditions, responded to the questions via the online platform, with no time limit.

2.4. Data Analysis

Our first step was to perform a preliminary analysis by calculating the descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, asymmetry, and kurtosis) and (Pearson) correlation matrix for the study variables. Following that, in order to test our hypothesis, we performed a mediation analysis using the PROCESS macro in the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) [61] statistics package. In line with the hypothesized mediation model (Figure 1), we specified PsyCap as the independent variable and the three burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of professional accomplishment) as dependent variables in the model. We added flourishing as a mediating variable of the effect of PsyCap on the three burnout dimensions. In addition, we specified gender, educational stage, and teacher experience as covariables in order to statistically control for their effect on the three burnout dimensions. The effect size was determined using Cohen’s d [62]: null: d < 0.09; small: d = 0.10—d = 0.49; medium: d = 0.50—d = 0.79; and large: d ≥ 0.80.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive and Correlation Analysis

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics and correlations for the variables. The data for asymmetry and kurtosis indicate that the variables exhibited a normal distribution. In addition, all of the variables demonstrated statistically significant correlations (p < 0.001). Both PsyCap and flourishing were negatively correlated with emotional exhaustion (r = −0.43, p < 0.001; and r = −0.38, p < 0.001, respectively) and depersonalization (r = −31, p < 0.001 with psychological capital and r = −0.33, p < 0.001 with flourishing). In contrast, the correlations with professional accomplishment were positive. We also found a positive correlation between PsyCap and flourishing (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). These indicators supported the suitability of subsequent multivariate analysis.

3.2. Mediation Analysis

The mediation effect of flourishing was assessed using the bootstrap estimation procedure. Following the recommendations of MacKinnon et al. [63], we used a bootstrap sample of 5000 cases and a confidence interval of 95%, given that, in general, estimations of indirect effects do not follow a normal distribution. Table 2 presents the direct, indirect, and total effects of the mediation analysis in the relationship between PsyCap and emotional exhaustion.
The data confirmed our initial hypotheses, as once the effects of covariables (gender, educational stage, and teacher experience) were statistically controlled for, flourishing partially mediated the effect of PsyCap on emotional exhaustion. More specifically, PsyCap exercised a significant direct effect on both flourishing and emotional exhaustion. For flourishing, this effect was positive (b = 0.727; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d = 3.55), whereas the effect on emotional exhaustion was negative (b = −0.767; p < 0.001), with a moderate effect size (d = 0.56). Flourishing in turn had a significant, direct, negative effect on emotional exhaustion (b = −0.372; p < 0.001), albeit with a small effect size (d = 0.29). We also found a significant indirect effect of PsyCap on emotional exhaustion via flourishing (b = –0.271; 95% CI [−0.309, −0.113]). The confidence intervals do not include zero, indicating that this indirect effect was statistically significant. The overall effect of the model was also statistically significant (b = –1.038; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d = 1.09). With regard to the effects of the covariables, we found that they had a significant effect on both flourishing (b = −0.063; p < 0.05) and emotional exhaustion (b = –0.164; p < 0.05), although with a small effect size (d = 0.12 in both cases). Being a woman predicted a greater level of flourishing and emotional exhaustion. The effects of the other two covariables (educational stage and experience) were not statistically significant.
We also confirmed the hypothesized effect of flourishing’s partial mediation in the relationship between PsyCap and depersonalization, once the effect of the three covariables was controlled for. As Table 3 shows, PsyCap had a significant negative effect on depersonalization, both directly (b = –0.274; p < 0.001; d = 0.27) and indirectly through flourishing (b = –0.244; 95% CI [–0.337, –0.153]). We also found a significant direct negative effect of flourishing on depersonalization (b = –0.335; p < 0.001), with a small effect size (d = 0.36). The total effect of the model was also statistically significant (b = –0.518; p < 0.001), with a moderate effect size (d = 0.69). With regard to the effects of the covariables, gender (b = 0.260; p < 0.001), educational stage (b = 0.027; p < 0.05), and teacher experience (b = –0.064; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of depersonalization, albeit with small effect sizes (d < 0.30, in each case). Being a man, teaching in a higher educational stage, and having less experience predicted greater levels of depersonalization.
Lastly, the data also supported our initial hypothesis about the partial mediating effect of flourishing in the relationship of PsyCap and the lack of professional accomplishment. As the results in Table 4 show, once the effect of the covariables was statistically controlled for, we found that PsyCap had a significant positive effect on professional accomplishment, both directly (b = 1.005; p < 0.001; large effect size, d = 1.61) and indirectly through flourishing (b = 0.140; 95% CI [0.079, 0.209]). Flourishing was also shown to be a significant positive predictor of professional accomplishment (b = 0.193; p < 0.001), although the effect size was small (d = 0.27). The total effect of the model was also statistically significant (b = 1.145; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d = 5.53). With regard to the covariables, only the educational stage demonstrated a statistically significant effect, which was negative, on professional accomplishment (b = –0.028; p < 0.05), with a small effect size (d = 0.15).

4. Discussion

Since flourishing has been considered a key objective for the development of healthy organizational environments, there has been growing interest in the identification of personal psychological resources that encourage workers’ successful adaptation to the complex, changing demands of the modern workplace [2]. In line with this proactive positioning, in this study, we examined the effect of PsyCap and flourishing on burnout in teachers, given its high prevalence in this professional group [21,22,23]. Specifically, we explored the possible mediating role of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and each of the symptomatic manifestations of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of professional accomplishment).
Our results confirmed our initial hypothesis. They showed that PsyCap has a direct effect on teacher flourishing and on the three burnout indicators. The effect of PsyCap on flourishing was positive, indicating that the availability of high levels of efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience in teaching is related to experiencing high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. This finding seems to align with recent research focused on teacher well-being [31,32], underlining the significant contribution of PsyCap as a personal resource that enhances the lives of teachers, not only in terms of satisfaction, pleasure, and enjoyment, but also as a means of attaining high levels of personal excellence, as other studies have concluded [34,35,36,37]. In addition, the positive effect of PsyCap on flourishing would confirm, along the lines laid out by the JD-R model [39], the significant contribution made by personal resources to well-being in occupational settings. More specifically, this positive impact on well-being was produced directly, which is consistent with other studies on teachers [36,64].
In contrast, our data show that the direct effect of PsyCap on the three characteristic burnout sypmtoms was negative. This suggests, in line with other studies [26,27,28,29,30], that PsyCap—considered as a paradigmatic example of positive organizational behavior—plays a significant role when it comes to reducing teachers’ vulnerability to feeling burned out in their day to day professional experience.
The negative effect of PsyCap on burnout is not only direct. Based on the results of our study the relationship is also partially mediated by flourishing. One notable implication resulting from this finding is the fact that flourishing, in addition to being an optimal outcome of the effective use of PsyCap in teaching, is also in itself an adaptive personal resource in the reduction of the three clinical manifestations of burnout. In this regard, studies such as Redelinghuys et al. [42] have already noted the negative effect of flourishing on one of the main indicators of a lack of professional accomplishment, the intention to quit the teaching profession. In addition to supporting this relationship, our data demonstrate that flourishing also contributes to reducing the tendency to experience the two “core” manifestations of burnout [65] (emotional exhaustion and depersonalization).
The consideration of flourishing as a personal resource promoted by PsyCap would also be consistent with the approach of COR theory [44], in that one may assume that teachers who have a high level of psychological resources (efficacy, optimism, hope, and resilience) would be involved in a rising spiral of acquisition, development, and preservation of new resources (i.e., indicators of flourishing such as life satisfaction, positive affect, purpose in life, autonomy, and relatedness). In contrast, the absence of PsyCap would bring with it the loss of new resources (flourishing) to face the demands of work, which would contribute to experiencing pathological states (burnout).
In effect, as the JD-R model postulates [38], suffering from work-related burnout usually occurrs in the context of high work-related demands and scarce resources to cope with them. For teachers, the need to respond to a growing number and variety of educational and bureaucratic demands, the lack of student motivation and issues of student discipline, and a lack of institutional support [66,67], together with a lack of psychological resources (e.g., low PsyCap, deficient skills for emotional regulation and stress management, personality with neurotic tendencies) [68,69,70,71], make up a breeding ground in which burnout may develop. Nevertheless, in accordance with the model, even in highly demanding situations, the availability of personal resources would significantly reduce vulnerability to stress and burnout [72].
The results of our study seem to confirm this thesis. It is not for nothing that those teachers who exhibit high levels of self-confidence in their capacity to successfully deal with professional challenges (efficacy), to perservere and manage any eventual obstacle in the achievement of a goal (hope), to resist and come through adversity stronger (resilience), and to maintain a positive outlook about their present and future work (optimism), are the teachers who have a range of personal resources that make them less prone to feeling physically and emotionally exhausted, cold and distant in their interpersonal relationships, or lacking accomplishment in their work. Instead, these resources provide teachers with sound personal capital that will lead them to experience high levels of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in their day to day work.

4.1. Implications for Intervention

We believe that the findings from our study may be an important contribution to the growing demand for effective interventions aimed at improving the psychological health of workers and organizations as a whole [2]. Our results show that both PsyCap and states of flourishing have a significant negative effect on the three symptomatic manifestations of burnout. This finding points to the possiblity that both factors (PsyCap and flourishing) may be effective psychological tools in the reduction of burnout symptoms in teachers. Given that, and the fact that both PsyCap and flourishing are considered to have a state-like, developable rather than dispositional, nature [15,73], the design of interventions aimed at stimulating teacher PsyCap and flourishing may be one mode of action to take in order to prevent the occurrence of health problems and encourage optimal positive functioning in this professional group.
There has been a proliferation of interventions in recent years aimed at the development of PsyCap and flourishing in a wide range of occupational settings [74,75], although only a few initiatives centered on PsyCap have focused on teachers [76,77]. For PsyCap these interventions have often consisted in micro-interventions (four- to eight weeks of sessions, each lasting between one and four hours) in which, among other things, teachers learn to set goals (specific, realistic, consistent with personal values and challenges), design alternative plans in case of obstacles, develop positive self-dialogs, visualize experiences of success, identify resources, and reduce risks, as well as implementing adaptive social skills when it comes to dealing with problems. Interventions aimed at stimulating flourishing have demonstrated a great variety of content, although initiatives aimed at encouraging gratitude, contribution to the community, work engagement, and social connectedness have been effective in workers in various professional environments [74].
To date, most interventions in the organizational context have not considered the combination of PsyCap and flourishing. However, the results of this study seem to indicate that this type of initiative would be more beneficial if both factors were worked on in combination, making use of the caravan action that, according to COR theory [78], is produced when new personal psychological resources are acquired and developed.

4.2. Study Limitations and Future Directions

The contributions of this study must be considered in light of the study’s limitations. Firstly, the transversal design of the study does not allow us to establish causal relationships between PsyCap, flourishing, and burnout. In this regard, experimental or longitudinal studies are needed which will allow us to determine whether an intervention focused on encouraging teacher PsyCap would produce improvements in their levels of flourishing and whether this would in turn result in them being less prone to experiencing emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, or a lack of professional accomplishment. Secondly, the use of self-report scales as the only data collection procedure may bring with it some biases (for example, social desirability). Future studies should therefore test the findings of our study by referring to other complementary sources for the collection of information (in-depth interviews, observations, etc.). In addition, the use of a convenience sample is a limitation in terms of obtaining a balanced sample of teachers with regard to variables such as gender, educational stage, or professional experience. To the extent that this sampling procedure does not guarantee representativeness of the teaching population, this may result in a bias in the results. New studies are needed which use more rigorous sampling procedures in order to make it possible to generalize the findings to the teaching population as a whole.
In this study, we considered three variables (gender, educational stage, and professional experience) as covariables in order to statistically control for their effect. Our data indicate that some of them may play a significant role (although small in terms of effect size) in the experience of teacher burnout. More specifically, women seem to be more prone to emotional exhaustion and men more prone to depersonalization. Both depersonalization and the lack of professional accomplishment seem to be more pronounced the higher the educational stage being taught. This is consistent with findings from other studies [47,48,49,50,51,52,53], and it would be advisable to take them into consideration when designing interventions aimed at preventing or reducing burnout in teachers.

5. Conclusions

Flourishing has been considered as a “promising new outcome variable for POB (positive organizational behavior) researchers” [79] (p. 50). In line with this new paradigm focused on the promotion of health in the organizational context, the main contribution of this study was the identification of flourishing as a mediating variable in the relationship between PsyCap and the symptoms of burnout in teachers, a group that faces high occupational demands. These findings indicate that flourishing is not only a desirable effect of the availability of a high level of PsyCap, but that it is also a valuable psychological resource supporting PsyCap, contributing to a reduced likelihood of suffering from burnout. Consequently, interventions designed to enhance teachers’ psychological health and that of schools overall should consider the possible synergistic action of PsyCap and flourishing to promote initiatives aimed at the development of both personal resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.d.M.F., C.F., and A.G.-B.; methodology, M.d.M.F., C.F., and J.C.N.; formal analysis, M.d.M.F., C.F., and J.C.N.; investigation, M.M.F., C.F., A.G.-B., and J.C.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.d.M.F., C.F., and S.R.; writing—review and editing, M.d.M.F., C.F., A.G.-B., S.R., and I.P.; supervision, M.d.M.F., C.F., S.R., and I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially funded by the European Regional Development Funds (European Union and Principality of Asturias) through the Science, Technology and Innovation Plan (FC-GRUPIN-IDI/2018/000199).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the teachers who participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed on 12 September 2020).
  2. Di Fabio, A. Positive healthy organizations: Promoting well-being, meaningfulness, and sustainability in organizations. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zwetsloot, G.; Pot, F. The business value of health management. J. Bus. Ethics 2004, 55, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. World Health Organization. Global Plan of Action on Workers’ Health 2008–2017. Available online: http://www.who.int/occupational_health/who_workers_health_web.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2020).
  5. Gable, S.L.; Haidt, J. What (and why) is Positive Psychology? Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2005, 9, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Seligman, M.E.P. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Policy 2011, 27, 60–61. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hone, L.C.; Jarden, A.; Schofield, G.M.; Duncan, S. Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. Int. J. Wellbeing 2014, 4, 62–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Keyes, C.L.M. The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2002, 43, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Huppert, F.A.; So, T.T.C. Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining wellbeing. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 110, 837–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Huta, V.; Waterman, A.S. Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. J. Happiness Stud. 2014, 15, 1425–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Keyes, C.L.M. Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing. A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am. Psychol. 2007, 62, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. World Health Organization. Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice (Summary report). Available online: https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/en/promoting_mhh.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2020).
  13. Luthans, F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 2002, 23, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Luthans, F.; Youssef-Morgan, C.M.; Avolio, B. Psychological Capital and Beyond; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Luthans, F.; Youssef-Morgan, C.M. Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2017, 4, 339–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Avey, J.B.; Luthans, F.; Smith, R.M.; Palmer, N.F. Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2010, 15, 7–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Finch, J.; Farrell, L.J.; Waters, A.M. Searching for the HERO in youth: Does psychological capital (PsyCap) predict mental health symptoms and subjective wellbeing in Australian school-aged children and adolescents? Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2020, 51, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hernández-Varas, E.; Labrador, F.J.; Méndez, M. Psychological capital, work satisfaction and health self-perception as predictors of psychological wellbeing in military personnel. Psicothema 2019, 31, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Manzano-García, G.; Ayala, J.C. Relationship between psychological capital and psychological well-being of direct support staff of specialist autism services. The mediator role of burnout. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Sabot, D.L.; Hicks, R.R. Does psychological capital mediate the impact of dysfunctional sleep beliefs on well-being? Heliyon 2020, 6, e04314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. García-Carmona, M.; Marín, M.D.; Aguayo, R. Burnout syndrome in secondary school teachers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2019, 22, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, S.; Li, Y.; Lv, H.; Jiang, R.; Zhao, P.; Zheng, X.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Mao, F. The prevalence and correlates of burnout among Chinese preschool teachers. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Molero, M.M.; Pérez-Fuentes, M.C.; Atria, L.; Oropesa, N.F.; Gázquez, J.J. Burnout, perceived efficacy, and job satisfaction: Perception of the educational context in high school teachers. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 1021408, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E. The measurement of experienced burnout. J. Occup. Behav. 1981, 2, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. World Health Organization. Burn-out an “Occupational Phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/ (accessed on 16 September 2020).
  26. Cheung, F.; Tang, C.S.-k.; Tang, S. Psychological capital as a moderator between emotional labor, burnout, and job satisfaction among school teachers in China. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2011, 18, 348–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Demir, S. The relationship between psychological capital and stress, anxiety, burnout, job satisfaction, and job involvement. Eurasian J. Educ. Res. 2018, 75, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ferradás, M.M.; Freire, C.; García-Bértoa, A.; Núñez, J.C.; Rodríguez, S. Teacher profiles of psychological capital and their relationship with burnout. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pu, J.; Hou, H.P.; Ma, R.Y.; Sang, J.Y. The effect of psychological capital between work-family conflict and job burnout in Chinese university teachers: Testing for mediation and moderation. J. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Hua, W. The impact of psychological capital and occupational stress on teacher burnout: Mediating role of coping styles. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2019, 28, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gruber, M.T.; Lämmerer, A.; Hofstadler, N.; Mercer, S. Flourishing or floundering: Factors Contributing to CLIL Primary Teachers’ Wellbeing in Austria. CLIL J. Innov. Res. Plurilingual Pluricult. Educ. 2020, 3, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mankin, A.; von der Embse, N.; Renshaw, T.L.; Ryan, S. Assessing teacher wellness: Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the Teacher Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 2018, 36, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Adil, A.; Kamal, A. Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Soykan, A.; Gardner, D.; Edwards, T. Subjective wellbeing in New Zealand teachers: An examination of the role of psychological capital. J. Psychol. Couns. Sch. 2019, 29, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tosten, R.; Toprak, M. Positive psychological capital and emotional labor: A study in educational organizations. Cogent Educ. 2017, 4, 1301012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y. Building well-being among university teachers: The roles of psychological capital and meaning in life. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2018, 27, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kurt, N.; Demirbolat, A.O. Investigation of the relationship between psychological capital perception, psychological well-being and job satisfaction of teachers. J. Educ. Learn. 2019, 8, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, A.B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004, 25, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Schaufeli, W.B.; Taris, T.W. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: Implications for improving work and health. In Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach; Bauer, G.F., Hämmig, O., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 43–68. [Google Scholar]
  40. Taris, T.W.; Schaufeli, W.B. The job demands-resources model. In Wiley Blackwell Handbooks in Organizational Psychology. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of The Psychology of Occupational Safety and Workplace Health; Clarke, S., Probst, T.M., Guldenmund, F., Pasmore, J., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 157–180. [Google Scholar]
  41. Polizzi Filho, A.; Claro, J.A.C.S. The impact of well-being at work and psychological capital over the turnover intention: A study of teachers. Rev. Adm. Mackenzie 2019, 20, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Redelinghuys, K.; Rothmann, S.; Botha, E. Flourishing-at-work: The role of positive organizational practices. Psychol. Rep. 2019, 122, 609–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vetter, M.H.; Vetter, M.K.; Fowler, J. Resilience, hope and flourishing are inversely associated with burnout among members of the Society for Gynecologic Oncology. Gynecol. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 25, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hobfoll, S.E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 1989, 44, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mousavy, S.; Nimehchisalem, V. Contribution of gender, marital status, and age to English language teachers’ burnout. Adv. Lang. Lit. Stud. 2014, 5, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sak, R. Gender differences in Turkish early childhood teachers’ job satisfaction, job burnout and organizational cynicism. Early Child. Educ. J. 2018, 46, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. García-Arroyo, J.A.; Osca, A.; Peiró, J.M. Meta-analytical review of teacher burnout across 36 societies: The role of national learning assessments and gender egalitarianism. Psychol. Health 2019, 34, 733–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. León-Rubio, J.M.; León-Pérez, J.M.; Cantero, F.J. Prevalencia y factores predictivos del burnout en docentes de la enseñanza pública: El papel del género [Prevalence and predictive factors of burnout in public teaching teachers: The role of gender]. Anxiety Stress 2013, 19, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  49. Purvanova, R.K.; Muros, J.P. Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 77, 168–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Teles, R.; Valle, A.; Rodríguez, S.; Piñeiro, I.; Regueiro, B. Perceived stress and indicators of burnout in teachers at Portuguese higher education institutions (HEI). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yorulmaz, Y.İ.; Altınkurt, Y. The examination of teacher burnout in Turkey: A meta-analysis. Turk. J. Educ. 2018, 7, 34–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Beer, J.; Beer, J. Burnout and stress, depression and self-esteem of teachers. Psychol. Rep. 1992, 71, 1331–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Esteras, J.; Chorot, P.; Sandín, B. Physical and mental symptomatology associated with burnout syndrome in teachers. Rev. Psicopat. Psicol. Clin. 2019, 24, 29–37. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jamaludin, I.I.; You, H.W. Burnout in relation to gender, teaching experience, and educational level among educators. Educ. Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 7349135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mónico, P.; Pérez-Sotomayor, S.M.; Areces, D.; Rodríguez, C.; García, T. Coping strategies in specific educational support needs and teacher burnout. J. Psychol. Educ. 2017, 12, 35–54. [Google Scholar]
  56. Omar, A.; Salessi, S.; Urteaga, F. Design and validation of the CapPsi Scale to measure psychological capital. Liberabit 2014, 20, 315–323. [Google Scholar]
  57. Diener, E.; Wirtz, D.; Tov, W.; Kim-Prieto, C.; Choi, D.; Oishi, S.; Biswas-Diener, R. New measures of well-being: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2010, 97, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Pozo, C.; Garzón, A.; Bretones, B.; Ligia, C. Propiedades psicométricas y dimensionalidad de “The Flourishing Scale” en población hispanohablante [Psychometric properties and dimensionality of “The Flourishing Scale” in Spanish-speaking population]. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 2016, 14, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Seisdedos, N. Manual MBI: Inventario Burnout de Maslach [MBI Handbook: Maslach Burnout Inventory]; TEA Ediciones: Madrid, Spain, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  60. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E.; Leiter, M.P. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual, 3rd ed.; Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression Based Approach; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Erlbaum: Hillsdale, MI, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  63. MacKinnon, D.P.; Lockwood, C.M.; Williams, J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2004, 39, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lorente, L.; Salanova, M.; Martinez, I.; Schaufeli, W.B. Extension of the job demands-resources model in the prediction of burnout and engagement among teachers over time. Psicothema 2008, 20, 354–360. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hakanen, J.J.; Bakker, A.B.; Schaufeli, W.B. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. J. Sch. Psychol. 2006, 43, 495–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rajendran, N.; Watt, H.M.; Richardson, P.W. Teacher burnout and turnover intent. Aust. Educ. Res. 2020, 47, 477–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Skaalvik, E.M.; Skaalvik, S. Dimensions of teacher burnout: Relations with potential stressors at school. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 2017, 20, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Castellano, E.; Muñoz-Navarro, R.; Toledo, M.S.; Spontón, C.; Medrano, L.A. Cognitive processes of emotional regulation, burnout and work engagement. Psicothema 2019, 31, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, L.E.; Jörg, V.; Klassen, R.M. A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher effectiveness and burnout. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2019, 31, 163–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pyältö, K.; Pietarinen, J.; Haverinen, K.; Tikkanen, L.; Soini, T. Teacher burnout profiles and proactive strategies. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Quayyum, A. Early childhood teachers’ stress and moderation and mediation effects of PsyCap: A comparative study. Eur. J. Educ. Stud. 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rothmann, S.; Joubert, J.H.M. Job demands, job resources, burn out and work engagement of managers at a platinum mine in the North West Province. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2007, 38, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Rothmann, S.; Van Zyl, L.E.; Rautenbach, C. Measuring flourishing @ work interventions: The development and validation of the Flourishing-at-Work Scale. In Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts; Van Zyl, L., Rothmann, S., Sr., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 241–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ghosh, A. Exploring flourishing in a multicultural work context: Proposed constructs for interventions. In Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts; Van Zyl, L., Rothmann, S., Sr., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 341–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Salanova, M.; Ortega-Maldonado, A. Psychological capital development in organizations: An integrative review of evidence-based intervention programs. In Positive Psychological Intervention Design and Protocols for Multi-Cultural Contexts; Van Zyl, L., Rothmann, S., Sr., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kalman, M.; Summak, M.S. Revitalizing the HERO within Teachers: An analysis of the effects of the PsyCap development training. Qual. Rep. 2017, 22, 655–682. [Google Scholar]
  77. Van Wingerden, J.; Derks, D.; Bakker, A.B. The impact of personal resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Hum. Res. Manag. 2017, 56, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hobfoll, S.E. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 6, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Simmons, B.L.; Nelson, D.L. Eustress at work: Extending the holistic stress model. In Positive Organizational Behavior; Nelson, D.L., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Hypothesized mediational model for the relationship between PsyCap, flourishing, and burnout. PsyCap = Psychological Capital; EE = Emotional Exhaustion; DP = Depersonalization; PA = Professional Accomplishment.
Figure 1. Hypothesized mediational model for the relationship between PsyCap, flourishing, and burnout. PsyCap = Psychological Capital; EE = Emotional Exhaustion; DP = Depersonalization; PA = Professional Accomplishment.
Ijerph 17 08403 g001
Table 1. Correlation matrix and descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, asymmetry, and kurtosis) for the study variables.
Table 1. Correlation matrix and descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, asymmetry, and kurtosis) for the study variables.
12345
  • Psychological Capital
2.
Flourishing
0.66 *
3.
Emotional exhaustion
−0.43 *−0.38 *
4.
Depersonalization
−0.31 *−0.33 *0.41 *
5.
Professional accomplishment
0.68 *0.53 *−0.42 *−0.41 *
M4.004.222.350.914.39
SD0.530.591.280.910.89
Asymmetry−0.77−1.000.511.31−0.48
Kurtosis1.481.77−0.391.900.23
Note: PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Burnout scales (0–6), with higher scores indicating greater levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, and lower scores indicating lower levels of professional accomplishment; * p < 0.001.
Table 2. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and emotional exhaustion.
Table 2. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and emotional exhaustion.
Description of the ModelCoef.SEtpdLCIUCI
Direct effect
PCA→FLO0.7270.02232.3650.0003.550.6830.771
GEN→FLO−0.0630.027–2.3030.0210.12–0.116–0.009
STA→FLO–0.0100.007–1.4360.151–0.0240.003
EXP→FLO–0.0040.009–0.5270.598–0.0230.013
Direct effect
PCA→EME–0.7670.076–9.9780.0000.56–0.917–0.616
FLO→EME–0.3720.069–5.3600.0000.29–0.509–0.236
GEN→EME–0.1640.070–2.3220.0200.12–0.302–0.025
STA→EME0.0330.0181.8460.065–0.0020.069
EXP→EME0.0360.0231.5400.123–0.0100.083
Indirect effect
PCA→FLO→EME–0.2710.064–0.309–0.113
Total effect–1.0380.058–17.7490.0001.09–1.152–0.923
Note: PCA = Psychological capital; FLO = Flourishing; EME = Emotional exhaustion; GEN = Gender; STA = Educational stage; EXP = Teacher experience. PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Emotional exhaustion scale (0–6), with higher scores indicating greater levels of emotional exhaustion; Gender: 1 = Woman, 2 = Man; LCI = Lower confidence interval (95%); UCI = Upper confidence interval (95%).
Table 3. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and depersonalization.
Table 3. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and depersonalization.
Description of the ModelCoef.SEtpdLCIUCI
Direct effect
PCA→DEP–0.2740.056–4.8770.0000.27–0.384–0.164
FLO→DEP–0.3350.059–6.5960.0000.36–0.435–0.236
GEN→DEP0.2600.0515.0400.0000.270.1590.362
STA→DEP0.0270.0132.0290.0420.110.0010.053
EXP→DEP–0.0640.017–3.6540.0000.20–0.098–0.029
Indirect effect
PCA→FLO→DEP–0.2440.046–0.337–0.153
Total effect–0.5180.043–12.0500.0000.69–0.603–0.434
Note: PCA = Psychological capital; FLO = Flourishing; DEP = Depersonalization; GEN = Gender; STA = Educational stage; EXP = Teacher experience. PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Depersonalization scale (0–6), with higher scores indicating greater levels of Depersonalization; Gender: 1 = Woman, 2 = Man; LCI = Lower confidence interval (95%); UCI = Upper confidence interval (95%).
Table 4. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and professional accomplishment.
Table 4. Results of the mediation analysis of flourishing in the relationship between PsyCap and professional accomplishment.
Description of the ModelCoef.SEtpdLCIUCI
Direct effect
PCA→PRO1.0050.04323.2720.0001.610.9201.089
FLO→PRO0.1930.0394.9560.0000.270.1170.270
GEN→PRO–0.0580.039–1.4850.137–0.1360.018
STA→PRO–0.0280.010–2.7900.0050.15–0.048–0.008
EXP → PRO0.0050.0130.4370.662–0.0200.032
Indirect effect
CAP → FLO → PRO0.1400.0330.0790.209
Total effect1.1450.03234.9240.0005.531.0811.210
Note: PCE = Psychological capital; FLO = Flourishing; PRO = Professional accomplishment; GEN = Gender; STA = Educational stage; EXP = Teacher experience. PsyCap scale (1–6), with higher scores indicating a higher level of PsyCap. Flourishing scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating a higher level of flourishing. Professional accomplishment scale (0–6), with lower scores indicating lower levels of professional accomplishment. Gender: 1 = Woman, 2 = Man; LCI = Lower confidence interval (95%); UCI = Upper confidence interval (95%).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Freire, C.; Ferradás, M.d.M.; García-Bértoa, A.; Núñez, J.C.; Rodríguez, S.; Piñeiro, I. Psychological Capital and Burnout in Teachers: The Mediating Role of Flourishing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228403

AMA Style

Freire C, Ferradás MdM, García-Bértoa A, Núñez JC, Rodríguez S, Piñeiro I. Psychological Capital and Burnout in Teachers: The Mediating Role of Flourishing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(22):8403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228403

Chicago/Turabian Style

Freire, Carlos, María del Mar Ferradás, Alba García-Bértoa, José Carlos Núñez, Susana Rodríguez, and Isabel Piñeiro. 2020. "Psychological Capital and Burnout in Teachers: The Mediating Role of Flourishing" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 22: 8403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228403

APA Style

Freire, C., Ferradás, M. d. M., García-Bértoa, A., Núñez, J. C., Rodríguez, S., & Piñeiro, I. (2020). Psychological Capital and Burnout in Teachers: The Mediating Role of Flourishing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8403. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228403

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop