Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Social Influence Model (SIM)
2.2. Para-Social Interaction
2.3. Social Interaction Tie
2.4. Trust
3. Research Method
3.1. Theoretical Model and Hypotheses Development
3.2. Measurement Items and Sampling
4. Empirical Data Results
4.1. Measurement Model Analysis
- Convergent validity: The degree of correlation between different measures of variables from related variables should be high, i.e., the scores and results of measuring the same thing should be the same.
- Discriminant validity: The degree of correlation between two concepts that are not identical when measured, regardless of whether the measurers use the same method or different methods, is lower when the results are correlated.
- Individual item reliability: This index evaluates the factor loading of the latent variable by the measured variable and whether each loading is statistically significant. Table 2 shows that the factor loadings for all individual items were above 0.6 (factor loading coefficients ranged from 0.694 to 0.859), which is in accordance with the values suggested by Hair et al. [82].
- Reliability of latent variables: In order to ensure the reliability and validity of the study findings, the measurement model was tested in this study. We used three indicators, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and Rho A, to measure the reliability. The confidence of a latent variable is a component of the confidence of all its measured variables and indicates the internal consistency of the constructs. The higher the value of the confidence of a latent variable, the better the measurement indicator is able to detect the latent variable. Past studies suggested that Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability should be above the value of 0.6 or higher and Rho A should be above 0.7 or higher (Fornell and Larcker [83]; Henseler et al. [84]). Table 3 shows that the values of the reliability indicators for each variable of the model are above the criterion of 0.7, which represents a good internal consistency of the study model.
- Average variance extracted (AVE): A higher AVE indicates higher confidence and convergent validity of the latent variable. Previous studies have suggested that the AVE value should be greater than 0.5 (Fornell and Larcker [83]; Hair et al. [82]). The information in Table 4 shows that the AVEs of the study model were higher than the proposed values for all the components (AVE values ranged from 0.589 to 0.692). From the above, it is clear that this study has convergent validity.
- This research model utilizes two ways to identify the results of discriminant validity. First, the discriminant validity is judged by whether the square root of each variable AVE is greater than the correlation coefficient between the variables. The diagonal values in Table 4 show that the minimum value of the square root of AVE is 0.767 and the maximum value of the correlation coefficient is 0.736 for each component. The comparison shows that the variables have good differential validity (Fornell and Larcker [83]). Second, as shown in Table 5, the values in the heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the reflective measurement model in this study ranged from 0.321 to 0.735, with each value in the matrix being less than 0.85, suggesting that the reflective measurement model in this study has discriminant validity at the conceptual level (Henseler et al. [85]).
4.2. Structural Model Analysis
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Contribution
5.2. Practical Implication
5.3. Limitations and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Gender | 1 □Male 2 □ Female |
Age | 1□<18 2□18–25 3□26–30 4□31–40 5□41–50 6□51–60 7□>60 |
Education | 1□≤junior high school 2□ junior high school (including technical secondary school) 3□ junior college 4□ undergraduate 5□ Graduate above |
Which online healthcare community website do you use usually? | 1□ PingAn Good Doctor 2□ChunYu Doctor 3□ Good Doctor Online 4□ One Medical website 5□ Microhospital 6□DingXiang Doctor 7□ Micropulse 8□ Ask Doctor 9□ XiaoWei healthcare 10□ others |
How often do you use your favorite healthcare community website? | 1□ daily 2□ 1–2 day 3□ 3–5 day 4□ 1 week 5□ 1–4 week 6□ 1–3 month 7□ 3 month above |
Approximately how long do you visit your favorite healthcare community each time? | 1□ Under 30 min 2□ 30 min–1 h 3□ 1–3 h 4□ 3–6 h 5□ 6 h above |
Occupation | 1□ Student 2□ Manufacturing 3□Sales 4□ Marketing/PR/Advertising 5□ Customer Service 6□ Administration/Logistics 7□ Human Resource 8□ Finance/Audit 9□ Civilian/Office 10□ Technician /Researchers 11□ Administrative 12□ Teachers 13□ Consultant 14□ Professionals (e.g., accountants, lawyers, architects, healthcare professionals, journalists, etc.) 15□ others |
How long have you been using the Internet? | 1□ daily 2□ 1–2 day 3□ 3–5 day 4□ 1 week 5□ 1–4 week 6□ 1–3 month 7□ 3 month above |
Perceived critical mass (scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
PCM1 | I have bought food safety service or green food on OHC according to my friend’s advice. How do I feel about this? |
PCM2 | I like to buy food safety service or green food on OHC website with my family and friends. |
PCM3 | I go to OHC because I see family and friends using them to buy food safety services and green foods. |
PCM4 | On the OHC website, I always look for the doctor who answers the most questions or sends the most gifts to register and consult about food safety issues online |
PCM5 | On OHC website, I will only seek for food safety consultation or purchase services from doctors with many comments and high praise. |
PCM6 | On the OHC website, the doctors with more questions and answers, or the doctors with more gifts, the more I pay attention to them. |
Image (scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
IM1 | It’s an outdated phenomenon if I can’t use the OHC to seek food safety advice among my relatives and friends. |
IM2 | People in my relatives and friends who use the OHC have more prestige than those who do not. |
IM3 | People among my relatives and friends who use the OHC have a high profile. |
Para-social interaction(scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
PSI1 | Medical social networking sites are human when they are involved in the interaction with doctors and participants who care his/her health and food safety. |
PSI2 | In the process of consultation and communication on medical social networking sites, my feeling is close and there is no distance. |
PSI3 | If doctors and participants who care his/her health and food safety have been consulted and communicated with on medical social networks appear on other media, I will watch this program or report on it. |
PSI4 | Participating in the consultation sessions on medical social networking sites made me feel comfortable, as if I were with friends. |
PSI5 | In the process of consulting and communicating on medical social networking sites, I felt warm. |
Social interaction tie (scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
SIT1 | I have a high degree of interaction with members of the medical social network. |
SIT2 | I have spent a lot of time interacting with doctors and participants who care his/her health and food safety on medical social networking sites. |
SIT3 | I often communicate with doctors and participants who care his/her health and food safety on medical social networking sites. |
Trust (scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
TR1 | Doctors and participants who care his/her health and food safety will be willing and brave to solve the problems of other patients. |
TR2 | Medical social networking sites can provide reliable food safety information |
TR3 | In general, medical social networking sites are very trustworthy. |
Continuance intention (scaling from ‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’ on a seven-point scale) | |
CI1 | I will continue to use medical social networking sites for food safety advice or green food shopping. |
CI2 | In the future, I will continue to use medical social networking sites for food safety consultation or to buy green food. |
CI3 | I would advise my friends to use medical social networking sites for food safety advice. |
References
- On 16 February the National Board of Health Issued the COVID-19 Alert. Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1691811749835477929&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on 16 February 2021).
- Ping an Good Doctor Annual Performance Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.jk.cn/aboutUs/news/132 (accessed on 16 February 2021).
- Agarwal, R.; Gao, G.; Desroches, C.; Jha, A.K. Research Commentary—The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead. Inf. Syst. Res. 2010, 21, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kane, G.C.; Fichman, R.G.; Gallaugher, J.; Glaser, J. Community relations 2.0. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2009, 87, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Pacho, F.; Liu, J.; Kajungiro, R. Factors influencing organic food purchase intention in developing countries and the moderating role of knowledge. Sustainability 2019, 11, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seo, S.; Almanza, B.; Miao, L.; Behnke, C. The effect of social media comments on consumers’ responses to food safety information. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2015, 18, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loss, J.; Lindacher, V.; Curbach, J. Online social networking sites—A novel setting for health promotion? Health Place 2014, 26, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.Y.; Lu, H.P. Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2011, 14, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, S.C. To use or not to use: Understanding the factors affecting continuance intention of mobile banking. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2012, 10, 490–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, P.; Marwell, G.; Teixeira, R. A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. Am. J. Sociol. 1985, 91, 522–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Metcalfe, B. Metcalfe’s law: A network becomes more valuable as it reaches more users. Infoworld 1995, 17, 53–54. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, F.-F.; Wu, C.-S.; Chen, Y.-C. Creating customer loyalty in online brand communities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 107, 105752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynne Markus, M.; Connolly, T. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 7–10 October 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Boulding, K.E. General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Manag. Sci. 1956, 2, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moore, G.C.; Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2, 192–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, H.; Chen, H. Understanding the relationship between online self-image expression and purchase intention in SNS games: A moderated mediation investigation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 112, 106477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.; Lee, S.-G.; Kang, M. I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users’ identification with virtual communities and avatars. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horton, D.; Wohl, R.R. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 1956, 19, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blanchard, A.; Horan, T. Virtual Communities and Social Capital, in Social Dimensions of Information Technology: Issues for the New Millennium; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2000; pp. 6–22. [Google Scholar]
- Hagel, J. Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. J. Interact. Mark. 1999, 13, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komito, L. The net as a foraging society: Flexible communities. Inf. Soc. 1998, 14, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.-H.; Yoo, D.; Doh, S.-J. Self-construal on brand fan pages: The mediating effect of para-social interaction and consumer engagement on brand loyalty. J. Brand Manag. 2021, 28, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.Y.; Gan, C.L. Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: The Malaysian perspective. J. Mark. Anal. 2020, 8, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-C.; Chiang, M.-J. Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 2009, 47, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiell, A.; Hawe, P.; Kavanagh, S. Evidence suggests a need to rethink social capital and social capital interventions. Soc. Sci. Med. 2020, 257, 111930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, F. Social capital: Is it good for your health? Issues for a public health agenda. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1999, 53, 195–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Drevdahl, D.; Kneipp, S.M.; Canales, M.K.; Dorcy, K.S. Reinvesting in social justice: A capital idea for public health nursing? Adv. Nurs. Sci. 2001, 24, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kemperman, A.; van den Berg, P.; Weijs-Perrée, M.; Uijtdewillegen, K. Loneliness of Older Adults: Social Network and the Living Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ali, F.; El-Sappagh, S.; Islam, S.R.; Ali, A.; Attique, M.; Imran, M.; Kwak, K.-S. An intelligent healthcare monitoring framework using wearable sensors and social networking data. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2021, 114, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, P.; Hoffman, M.; Raabe, I.J.; Dowd, J.B.; Rahal, C.; Kashyap, R.; Mills, M.C. Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020, 4, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 1988, 94, S95–S120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkhäuer, J.; Gaab, J.; Kossowsky, J.; Hasler, S.; Krummenacher, P.; Werner, C.; Gerger, H. Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsai, W.; Ghoshal, S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Manag. J. 1998, 41, 464–476. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, H.; Lederman, R. Online health communities: How do community members build the trust required to adopt information and form close relationships? Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2018, 27, 62–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.C.; Yen, D.C.; Hwang, M.I. Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y.; Wang, H.; Xia, Q.; Zheng, L.; Shi, Y. Factors that determine a Patient’s willingness to physician selection in online healthcare communities: A trust theory perspective. Technol. Soc. 2021, 64, 101510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machackova, H.; Smahel, D. The perceived importance of credibility cues for the assessment of the trustworthiness of online information by visitors of health-related websites: The role of individual factors. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.L.; Lu, H.P. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf. Manag. 2004, 41, 853–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, I.V.; Kim, J.S. Technology acceptance and critical mass: Development of a consolidated model to explain the actual use of mobile health care communication tools. J. Biomed. Inform. 2021, 117, 103749. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, X.L.; Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O. Perceived critical mass and collective intention in social media-supported small group communication. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2013, 33, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelman, H.C. Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. J. Confl. Resolut. 1958, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Martineau, P. The Personality of the Retail Store; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.-B.; Li, Y.-N.; Wu, B.; Li, D.-J. How WeChat can retain users: Roles of network externalities, social interaction ties, and perceived values in building continuance intention. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 69, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Choi, J.Y. The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 39, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoerner, J. Scaling the web: A parasocial interaction scale for world wide web sites. Advert. World Wide Web 1999, 99, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
- Colliander, J.; Dahlén, M. Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media: Weighing publicity effectiveness of blogs versus online magazines. J. Advert. Res. 2011, 51, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, R.L.; Cothrel, J. Four smart ways to run online communities. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2000, 41, 81–91. [Google Scholar]
- Houlberg, R. Local television news audience and the para-social interaction. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 1984, 28, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballantine, P.W.; Martin, B.A. Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. ACR N. Am. Adv. 2005, 32, 197–201. [Google Scholar]
- Sokolova, K.; Kefi, H. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 53, 101742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, K.; Zhang, Q. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 87, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raggatt, M.; Wright, C.J.; Carrotte, E.; Jenkinson, R.; Mulgrew, K.; Prichard, I.; Lim, M.S. “I aspire to look and feel healthy like the posts convey”: Engagement with fitness inspiration on social media and perceptions of its influence on health and wellbeing. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klassen, K.M.; Borleis, E.S.; Brennan, L.; Reid, M.; McCaffrey, T.A.; Lim, M.S. What people “like”: Analysis of social media strategies used by food industry brands, lifestyle brands, and health promotion organizations on Facebook and Instagram. J. Med. Internet Res. 2018, 20, e10227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ji, P. When SNS Platform Hosts Complex Source Structures: How Wechat Frames the Credibility Assessment of Food-Safety Information in China. China Media Res. 2018, 14, 57–72. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C. Groundswell. Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Strat. Dir. 2010, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Chen, X. Social capital, motivations, and knowledge sharing intention in health Q&A communities. Manag. Decis. 2017, 55, 1536–1557. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Featherman, M.S.; Pavlou, P.A. Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2003, 59, 451–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoo, S.; Li, H.; Xu, Z. Can I talk to an online doctor? Understanding the mediating effect of trust on patients’ online health consultation. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 2020, 31, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Browne, G.J.; Chau, P.Y. An empirical investigation of web site use using a commitment-based model. Decis. Sci. 2006, 37, 427–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.S.; Wang, Y.M.; Lin, H.H.; Tang, T.I. Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: An empirical study. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2003, 14, 501–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seifert, C.; Kwon, W.-S. SNS eWOM sentiment: Impacts on brand value co-creation and trust. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2019, 38, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markus, M. Lynne. Critical Mass Contingencies for Telecommunications Consumers. In Modelling the Innovation; Elsevier Science Publishers: North-Holland, The Netherlands, 1990; Volume 3, pp. 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Hsiao, K.L.; Lin, J.C.C.; Wang, X.Y.; Lu, H.P.; Yu, H. Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations: An empirical study in social shopping. Online Inf. Rev. 2010, 34, 935–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, H.; Luo, W.; Strong, D. Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2000, 9, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sledgianowski, D.; Kulviwat, S. Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2009, 49, 74–83. [Google Scholar]
- Rubin, R.B.; McHugh, M.P. Development of parasocial interaction relationships. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 1987, 31, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Mark. 1996, 60, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giles, D.C. Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychol. 2002, 4, 279–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, L.; James, E.L. Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 1998, 42, 457–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.C.; Lin, T.C.; Lin, K.J. Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2009, 8, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z.C.; Guo, T.C. The formation of social identity and self-identity based on knowledge contribution in virtual communities: An inductive route model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 43, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiu, C.M.; Hsu, M.H.; Wang, E.T. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis. Support Syst. 2006, 42, 1872–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, S.; Andreu, L.; Campo, S. Knowledge sharing among tourists via social media: A comparison between Facebook and TripAdvisor. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 19, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.C.; Liu, S.C.; Li, S.H.; Yen, D.C. Understanding the mediating effects of relationship quality on technology acceptance: An empirical study of e-appointment system. J. Med. Syst. 2013, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.C.; Li, S.H.; Liu, S.C.; Yen, D.C.; Ruangkanjanases, A. Assessing Determinants of Continuance Intention towards Personal Cloud Services: Extending UTAUT2 with Technology Readiness. Symmetry 2021, 13, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorsuch, R.L. Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. J. Personal. Assess. 1997, 68, 532–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis; Cengage: Boston, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Hubona, G.; Ray, P.A. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sobel, M.E. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In Sociological Methodology; Leinhart, S., Ed.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1982; pp. 290–312. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, A.F.; Preacher, K.J. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 2014, 67, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lowry, P.B.; Gaskin, J. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 2014, 57, 123–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newman, M.E.; Barabási, A.-L.E.; Watts, D.J. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ellison, N.B.; Steinfield, C.; Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 12, 1143–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pfeil, U.; Arjan, R.; Zaphiris, P. Age differences in online social networking—A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Constructs | Operational Definition | Related Documents |
---|---|---|
Perceived Critical Mass (PCM) | When the number of participants and users reaches a certain threshold, people will have a certain social tendency, i.e., a collective action that will influence this social activity. | Oliver et al. [13]; Markus et al. [67]; Hsiao et al. [68]; Lou et al. [69]; Sledgianowski et al. [70]; |
Image (IM) | When the OHC platform responds to food safety crisis, users’ subjective attitudes, emotions, and impressions of the OHC platform based on the functional qualities and psychological feelings of the OHC platform’s authoritative doctors who answer food safety questions scientifically and the famous hospitals who guide food safety issues positively are one of the images. | Venkatesh et al. [11]; Moore &Benbasat [18] |
Para-social Interaction (PSI) | The extent to which a person-to-person conversation and interpersonal involvement is facilitated by media features and conversations in a sensory or non-sensory manner as the health visitor navigates the information in the OHC environment. | Rubin [71]; Houlberg [52]; Hoffman [72]; Giles [73]; Blanchard [22]; Ha & Jammes [74]; Ballantine and Martin [53] |
Social Interaction Tie (SIT) | OHC as an online health services social platform that allows people to build interpersonal networks where doctors quickly share food safety articles, hospitals guide the public in responding to food safety crises, and participants who care his/her health and food safetysearch for safety information. Such a platform allows members of the OHC to engage in social activities among themselves, interact and communicate with other communities of interest, and build and maintain social capital. | Huang et al. [75]; Cheng and Guo [76]; Chiu et al. [77]; Okazaki et al. [78] |
Trust (TR) | Trust refers to the interpersonal relationships that develop over time as people interact with each other over time. The special relationships such as friendship, respect and trust that arise from the interaction between members of online communities influence people’s behavior and the accumulation of social capital. This study concluded that hospital doctors interacting and communicating with participants who care his/her health and food safety in the food safety area on the OHC platform, and responding to food safety crises with scientific and professional health knowledge, would increase the trust in the OHC platform for users. | Chen et al. [79] |
Continuance Intention (CI) | Continuance Intention refers to a situation in which an individual identifies a continuing use for an action or purpose that he or she has taken. This study defines the habit of members of the OHC platform to join and participate in this relational community, which is assessed by two attributes such as the frequency and number of times members participate in the OHC platform. | Chen et al. [79]; Chen et al. [80] |
Indicator | Mean | S.D. | Skewness | Kurtosis | Factor Loading | T-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IM1 | 5.009 | 1.728 | −0.843 | −0.133 | 0.765 | 60.664 |
IM2 | 4.977 | 1.795 | −0.759 | −0.324 | 0.760 | 42.136 |
IM3 | 5.048 | 1.694 | −0.805 | −0.229 | 0.783 | 46.586 |
PCM1 | 4.807 | 1.816 | −0.663 | −0.630 | 0.777 | 33.784 |
PCM2 | 4.670 | 1.748 | −0.573 | −0.711 | 0.773 | 58.668 |
PCM3 | 4.790 | 1.834 | −0.661 | −0.672 | 0.786 | 42.416 |
PCM4 | 4.861 | 1.836 | −0.668 | −0.606 | 0.816 | 59.835 |
PCM5 | 4.540 | 1.987 | −0.527 | −0.861 | 0.794 | 44.414 |
PCM6 | 4.665 | 1.718 | −0.518 | −0.784 | 0.760 | 41.312 |
PI1 | 4.656 | 1.498 | −0.505 | −0.268 | 0.789 | 61.945 |
PI2 | 4.645 | 1.681 | −0.550 | −0.392 | 0.727 | 37.809 |
PI3 | 4.724 | 1.740 | −0.724 | −0.408 | 0.807 | 59.333 |
PI4 | 4.884 | 1.687 | −0.764 | −0.163 | 0.780 | 50.330 |
PI5 | 4.795 | 1.653 | −0.623 | −0.341 | 0.819 | 49.525 |
SIT1 | 5.543 | 1.488 | −1.190 | 1.156 | 0.859 | 70.031 |
SIT2 | 5.182 | 1.282 | −1.173 | 1.714 | 0.774 | 53.008 |
SIT3 | 5.443 | 1.482 | −1.138 | 1.026 | 0.780 | 44.736 |
TR1 | 4.804 | 1.753 | −0.690 | −0.449 | 0.694 | 38.390 |
TR2 | 4.591 | 1.700 | −0.582 | −0.656 | 0.779 | 69.046 |
TR3 | 4.884 | 1.820 | −0.803 | −0.355 | 0.823 | 54.616 |
CI1 | 4.901 | 1.515 | −0.648 | 0.256 | 0.857 | 80.583 |
CI2 | 5.082 | 1.640 | −0.723 | −0.269 | 0.817 | 74.336 |
CI3 | 4.901 | 1.552 | −0.837 | 0.311 | 0.821 | 71.813 |
Cronbach’s Alpha | rho_A | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IM | 0.813 | 0.813 | 0.813 | 0.592 |
PCM | 0.906 | 0.906 | 0.906 | 0.616 |
PSI | 0.889 | 0.890 | 0.889 | 0.616 |
SIT | 0.846 | 0.849 | 0.847 | 0.649 |
TR | 0.810 | 0.815 | 0.810 | 0.589 |
CI | 0.871 | 0.871 | 0.871 | 0.692 |
Construct | IM | PCM | PSI | SIT | TR | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IM | 0.769 | |||||
PCM | 0.545 | 0.785 | ||||
PSI | 0.565 | 0.570 | 0.785 | |||
SIT | 0.706 | 0.736 | 0.725 | 0.805 | ||
TR | 0.390 | 0.406 | 0.532 | 0.619 | 0.767 | |
CI | 0.321 | 0.374 | 0.394 | 0.571 | 0.634 | 0.832 |
Construct | IM | PCM | PSI | SIT | TR | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IM | ||||||
PCM | 0.545 | |||||
PSI | 0.566 | 0.571 | ||||
SIT | 0.708 | 0.735 | 0.725 | |||
TR | 0.391 | 0.405 | 0.533 | 0.619 | ||
CI | 0.321 | 0.373 | 0.394 | 0.568 | 0.634 |
Path | Standardized Path Coefficient | Standard Deviation | T Statistics | p Values |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1: PCM -> SIT | 0.357 *** | 0.034 | 10.411 | 0.000 |
H2: PCM -> CI | 0.024 | 0.051 | 0.464 | 0.643 |
H3: IM -> SIT | 0.266 *** | 0.042 | 6.396 | 0.000 |
H4: IM -> CI | −0.037 | 0.049 | 0.747 | 0.455 |
H5: PSI -> SIT | 0.319 *** | 0.050 | 6.349 | 0.000 |
H6: PSI -> CI | −0.017 | 0.055 | 0.308 | 0.758 |
H7: SIT -> TR | 0.515 *** | 0.047 | 10.954 | 0.000 |
H8: SIT -> CI | 0.309 *** | 0.079 | 3.892 | 0.000 |
H9: TR -> CI | 0.387 *** | 0.050 | 7.778 | 0.000 |
Mediation Path | Z-Value of Sobel Test | Indirect Effect (IE) | Direct Effect (DE) | Mediation Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
SIT -> TR -> CI | 6.564 *** | 0.197 *** | 0.493 *** | Partial mediation |
PCM -> SIT -> TR | 6.796 *** | 0.321 *** | 0.029 | Full mediation |
PCM -> SIT -> CI | 6.242 *** | 0.308 *** | 0.025 | Full mediation |
IM -> SIT -> TR | 7.459 *** | 0.294 *** | 0.025 | Full mediation |
IM -> SIT -> CI | 6.601 *** | 0.298 *** | −0.027 | Full mediation |
PSI -> SIT -> TR | 5.574 *** | 0.239 *** | 0.215 ** | Partial mediation |
PSI -> SIT -> CI | 5.999 *** | 0.287 *** | 0.061 | Full mediation |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, J.; Jong, D. Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126514
Yang J, Jong D. Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(12):6514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126514
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Jinxin, and Din Jong. 2021. "Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 12: 6514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126514
APA StyleYang, J., & Jong, D. (2021). Understanding Continuance Intention Determinants to Adopt Online Health Care Community: An Empirical Study of Food Safety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126514