Next Article in Journal
Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions Regarding Carcinogenic Pesticides in Fez Meknes Region (Morocco)
Next Article in Special Issue
Socioeconomic Differences in Lifetime and Past 30-Day E-Cigarette, Cigarette, and Dual Use: A State-Level Analysis of Utah Youth
Previous Article in Journal
Menthol Smoking and Nicotine Dependence among Black/African American Women Smokers Living in Low-Resource, Rural Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Recruiting Latinos in Decídetexto—A Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial from an Emergency Department Patient Registry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 20
10.3390/ijerph182010878
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Examining Menthol Preference as a Correlate of Change in Cigarette Smoking Behavior over a One-Year Period

by
Danielle R. Davis
1,2,*,
Maria A. Parker
3,
Cristine D. Delnevo
4,5 and
Andrea C. Villanti
1
1
Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Departments of Psychology & Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
2
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
3
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Indiana, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
4
Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA
5
Department of Health Behavior, Society & Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 10878; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010878
Submission received: 13 August 2021 / Revised: 1 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 October 2021 / Published: 16 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inequalities and Tobacco Use)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Menthol cigarette use has been shown to be a contributing factor in the changes in smoking over time among youth. The current study aim was to use prospective survey data to identify if menthol cigarette use was associated with changes in smoking among adults. A representative cohort from the 2010 U.S. Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey was interviewed at two time points one year apart. Respondents were past-30-day cigarette smokers at Wave 1 or Wave 2 categorized by menthol vs. non-menthol flavor preference (n = 3668). Trajectories were categorized as maintained, increased, or decreased smoking behavior between Waves. Multinomial logistic regressions examined if menthol cigarette use was associated with an increase/decrease in smoking behavior, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Menthol cigarette use was not associated with change over time in cigarette smoking in adult smokers. Age, race/ethnicity and sex were associated with changes in cigarette smoking. Young (vs. older) adults were more likely to increase smoking. Black and Hispanic smokers (vs. white smokers) were more likely to report any change in smoking. Males were less likely than females to change smoking behavior. Menthol status was not associated with changes in smoking among adults; however, young age, race/ethnicity, and sex were, suggesting populations to target for intervention.

1. Introduction

Menthol cigarettes represent a growing proportion of the cigarette market, even as overall smoking prevalence declines [1,2]. Menthol cigarette use is higher among female, non-white, and youth and young adult populations [1,3,4,5]. Evidence suggests menthol cigarettes contribute to youth cigarette smoking initiation and reduced adult cessation [6,7,8,9]. Not only may menthol contribute to smoking initiation and reduced cessation, it may also facilitate movement from lighter and infrequent smoking to heavier and more frequent smoking. Given the known health effects of continued smoking, [10] understanding what contributes to transitions in heaviness and frequency of smoking are important. This has primarily been examined in youth and young adults with studies showing associations between menthol cigarette use and transitions from infrequent, non-daily use and/or initiation to more frequent use [11,12,13,14,15]. Among youth, longitudinal studies have shown initiating menthol cigarettes (vs. non-menthol) was associated with transitions to established cigarette use and greater nicotine dependence [12,13]. Among young adults, studies demonstrated initiating with menthol cigarettes in 18–24 year olds [15] and preference for menthol cigarettes in 18–34 year olds [11] increased likelihood of subsequent cigarette use. First use of a menthol cigarette was associated with subsequent daily cigarette use in youth, young adults, and adults [14]. Among adults, research has been restricted to examining associations of initiating smoking and has not examined transitions in smoking behavior [14,15].
Given federal interest in a menthol cigarette ban [10] and calls for menthol restrictions at federal and local levels [16], it is important to understand how using menthol cigarettes is associated with patterns of cigarette use over time and if use of menthol cigarette contributes to heavier and/or more frequent smoking behavior. The existing literature is limited to smoking patterns in younger populations and there has yet to be a full study of the adult smoking population. It is unclear whether a similar relationship between menthol cigarette use and smoking progression exists in older, more established populations. The aim of this exploratory investigation was to expand upon earlier studies [11,12,13,14] by using a longitudinal adult sample to examine changes in smoking behaviors across a one-year time period.

2. Materials and Methods

This study used the most recent National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored longitudinal Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) cohort data, a nationally representative survey of the United States. Wave 1 was administered in May 2010 and followed up one year later in May 2011 (Wave 2). Briefly, TUS-CPS interviews all household members 18 and older. Most were interviewed via telephone (~64%) [17] and self-response (~80%) [17]. A total of 28,153 respondents completed the May 2010–2011 longitudinal supplement, representing 67.9% of the May 2010 sample.
Respondents were included in analyses if they were current smokers at either Wave 1 or 2, defined as established cigarette smokers (≥100 lifetime cigarettes) who reported past-30-day smoking. Of 4060 current smokers at either timepoint, 3668 had complete data on both menthol status and cigarette smoking behavior across both waves.
Cigarette smoking behavior was estimated at each wave via self-reported: (1) average cigarettes smoked per day (CPD, range: 1–40), and (2) days smoked in the past 30-days (range: 1–30). At both waves, variables were combined to create an overall smoking value. Change in cigarette smoking behavior between waves was calculated by taking the difference in smoking behavior between waves to determine whether there was (1) maintained (i.e., no change), (2) increased, or (3) decreased current smoking behavior. For example, if someone reported 10 CPD and 10 smoking days, their overall smoking value would be ‘100′. Individuals (n = 251) who did not report current smoking at Wave 1, but did at Wave 2 were characterized as increasing smoking behavior; those who were current smokers at Wave 1, but not 2 (n = 408) were categorized as decreasing smoking behavior.
Respondents were asked about menthol status at both waves. For analyses, menthol status from Wave 1 was used ((“Do you usually smoke menthol or non-menthol cigarettes?”) and respondents denoted their menthol preference: Menthol, Non-menthol, Blank/No Preference [No Usual Type, Do not Know, Blank, No Response, Refused]).
Given menthol preference stability over time (i.e., only 2.4% and 2.8% of Wave 1 switched to menthol or non-menthol, respectively), Wave 1 menthol status was imputed using Wave 2 data when needed using next observation carried backward. When Wave 1 menthol status was not available (n = 850), including those who initiated smoking at Wave 2, left menthol status blank, or had no preference at Wave 1, Wave 2 menthol status imputed to Wave 1 using baseline observation carried forward (n = 487). Remaining participants with “Blank/No preference” menthol status were treated as missing.
Demographics and smoking characteristics were examined by menthol status including age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, CPD, smoking frequency (i.e., every-day or some-day smoking), and time to first cigarette (TTFC) [18,19]. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to calculate relative risk ratios (RRR) for increasing and decreasing smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior by menthol status. Unadjusted models were run, followed by adjusted models, which included sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, other race [other race combined due to sample size]), and age (18–24, 25+). Sensitivity analyses restricted the sample to 18–34 year olds to compare findings to prior young adult studies [11]. We also used to sensitivity analyses to determine if differences based on inclusion or exclusion of the “Blank/No preference” menthol status category. TUS-CPS replicate weights were applied according to recommended procedures [20]. Analyses were performed using Stata 14 software (StataCorp. College Station, TX) for complex weighted survey data.

3. Results

A total of 3668 participants were included in the analyses, 29.4% were menthol cigarette smokers (weighted; n = 977) and 70.6% (weighted; n = 2691) were non-menthol cigarette smokers. Menthol preference was greater in females, those reporting Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity, some-day smokers, and 18–24 year olds (Table 1). Menthol smokers had a significantly lower CPD, but no difference in TTFC (Table 1). 37.6% of the sample was categorized as maintaining smoking behavior, 36.8% as decreasing smoking behavior, and 25.6% was categorized as increasing smoking behavior.
No differences in statistical significance were observed between adjusted and unadjusted models. In the adjusted model, there was no difference by menthol preference in the likelihood of increasing (RRR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.71, 1.17) or decreasing (RRR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.79, 1.22) smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior. Males were less likely than females to increase (RRR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65, 0.96) or decrease (RRR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.65, 0.91) smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior. Black smokers had twofold likelihood of either change in smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior compared to white smokers (RRR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.38, 3.28 increase; RRR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.26, 2.61 decrease). Hispanic cigarette smokers (RRR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.09, 2.40); as well as those of other ethnicities (RRR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.11, 2.46) had greater likelihood of decreasing smoking relative to maintaining smoking compared to white smokers. Relative to older adults, 18–24 year olds were more likely to increase smoking behavior (RRR = 1.50 95% CI = 1.02, 2.19) (Table 2).
In line with findings in the full sample, sensitivity analyses restricted to 18–34 year olds did not demonstrate differences with respect to menthol status or age and had similar findings to full analyses with regard to race and sex. Including those with menthol status as “blank/no preference” did not change our menthol status findings.

4. Discussion

While prior studies have addressed the influence of menthol cigarettes on smoking behavior patterns in youth/young adults, our study extended examinations into adult cigarette smokers prospectively over a one-year time period. In established smokers, we observed that males were more likely to maintain smoking behavior across time than females. We also found that, compared to white smokers, non-white smokers were more likely to change behavior over time: Black smokers were more likely to increase or decrease smoking behavior, while Hispanic and other race smokers were more likely to decrease smoking behavior. Additionally, young adults were more likely to increase smoking behavior relative to older adults.
Unexpectedly, menthol cigarette preference was not a predictor of behavior change. Our measures captured change over time among established smokers (>100 lifetime cigarettes); while this is a standard threshold for established cigarette smoking in adults, it differs from the prior work on this topic in youth and young adults, which used less restrictive measures of smoking, including past 30-day use [13], ever smoking with some past month cigarette use [12], or a 100-cigarette lifetime threshold at Wave 2 and queried Wave 1 retrospectively [11]. Taken together with prior work, our findings suggest that menthol may be a direct facilitator of change among experimental, less established populations as opposed to adult cigarette smokers with an established repertoire of smoking.
Although we did not observe differences by menthol preference, we did observe differences in rates of menthol preference by age, sex, and race/ethnicity consistent, with other national studies [1,3]. Findings regarding smoking behavior by age, race/ethnicity, and sex over time suggest opportunity within these subgroups for intervention. Young (vs. older) adults were more likely to increase smoking behavior, consistent with work demonstrating transitions in smoking occur during young adulthood [21,22,23]. Our data demonstrate that even among those considered established smokers, young adults may still be developing a pattern of smoking behavior and are more likely to have shifts in frequency and/or heaviness of smoking [24]. Focused intervention specifically among young adults may be especially important to reduce likelihood of transitioning to heavier smoking.
Consistent with prior work [11], Black smokers and females were more likely to change smoking behavior than white smokers and males. If Black smokers and females have greater likelihood of changing smoking behavior (i.e., increasing or decreasing cigarette smoking) over a relatively short time period (one year), we may be able to use this information to target smoking cessation/reduction interventions within these groups, especially given evidence that both of these subgroups have lowered success with smoking cessation [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Given the high prevalence of menthol use among both populations [1,3], and that they may be susceptible to changing smoking behavior, policies restricting availability of menthol cigarettes, such as the current federal proposal of a menthol ban in cigarettes [10], may harness underlying changes in smoking behavior and have greater impact on reducing smoking in these populations than previously estimated [32]. This is in line with research demonstrating restricting availability to menthol cigarettes reduced smoking rates with this effect shown to strongest among Black smokers [33]. Another consideration is to understand what contributes to behavior changes in either direction; research is needed to establish why some populations are more likely to change smoking behavior than others and how antecedents to changes in either direction may be used in interventions directed at cessation or preventing increases in smoking. Hypothetical tasks have demonstrated that availability impacts cigarette use [34,35]; these tasks may be one way to examine if the subpopulations identified by the current study have more elastic demand (i.e., use is more sensitive to change) relative to other populations. Finally, we also found that Hispanic and other race/ethnicity smokers were more likely to decrease their smoking behavior relative to white smokers, which is consistent with national cross-sectional data showing Hispanic smokers have lower smoking rates overall than white smokers [36]. These data suggest cessation efforts geared toward Hispanic smokers may be especially relevant, as this population may be susceptible to decreases in smoking.
There are some limitations to this study. The TUS-CPS captures detailed data on smoking for those with ≥100 lifetime cigarettes; it does not include inexperienced and/or experimental smokers. Second, data were collected between 2010–2011; thus, there were no questions investigating tobacco products after that time period. While these data do not include more recent products, it is important to note that the patterns observed would still be likely to occur in an environment with newer tobacco products. Future research should examine whether this pattern persists among current tobacco users and if product switching occurs in groups that demonstrate changes, specifically decreases, in smoking behavior. Additionally, respondents without reported menthol status at either timepoint were excluded from analyses. While inclusion of the “Blank/No preference” category in models did not impact findings, this may reduce model estimates’ precision.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, menthol cigarette preference was not a correlate of change in smoking behavior over a one-year time period among established adult cigarette smokers. Female, young, and non-white populations were more likely to change than maintain smoking behavior over one year. These findings suggest specific interventions to aid smoking cessation may be relevant for these groups with more transient smoking behavior. Broader population-level approaches to make cigarettes less appealing, affordable, and available hold promise and may be a way to facilitate smoking reduction and reduce tobacco-related health disparities in U.S. communities [37].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.D., A.C.V. and M.A.P.; methodology, D.R.D., A.C.V. and M.A.P.; formal analysis, M.A.P.; investigation, D.R.D. and M.A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.R.D. writing—review and editing, A.C.V., M.A.P., C.D.D. and D.R.D.; supervision, A.C.V.; project administration, D.R.D., M.A.P., A.C.V. and C.D.D.; funding acquisition, A.C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Food & Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products (U54DA036114, U54DA036151, U54CA229973), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences’ (NIGMS) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence award (P20GM103644), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA046333).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/tus-cps/questionnaires-data (last accessed on 15 July 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Villanti, A.C.; Mowery, P.D.; Delnevo, C.D.; Niaura, R.S.; Abrams, D.B.; Giovino, G.A. Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004–2014. Tob. Control 2016, 25 (Suppl. 2), ii14–ii20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2017; Federal Trade Commission: Wahington, DC, USA, 2019.
  3. Giovino, G.A.; Villanti, A.C.; Mowery, P.D.; Sevilimedu, V.; Niaura, R.S.; Vallone, D.M.; Abrams, D.B. Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: Is menthol slowing progress? Tob. Control 2015, 24, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Villanti, A.C.; Johnson, A.L.; Ambrose, B.K.; Cummings, K.M.; Stanton, C.A.; Rose, S.W.; Feirman, S.P.; Tworek, C.; Glasser, A.M.; Pearson, J.L.; et al. Flavored Tobacco Product Use in Youth and Adults: Findings from the First Wave of the PATH Study (2013–2014). Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 53, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lawrence, D.; Rose, A.; Fagan, P.; Moolchan, E.T.; Gibson, J.T.; Backinger, C.L. National patterns and correlates of mentholated cigarette use in the United States. Addiction 2010, 105 (Suppl. 1), 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee. Menthol Cigarettes and Public Health: Review of Scientific Evidence and Recommendations. In Products; U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Reference Addendum: Preliminary Scientific Evaluation of the Possible Public Health Effects of Menthol versus Nonmenthol Cigarettes. In Products; U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Villanti, A.C.; Collins, L.K.; Niaura, R.S.; Gagosian, S.Y.; Abrams, D.B. Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary Scientific Evaluation of the Possible Public Health Effects of Menthol versus Nonmenthol Cigarettes; U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD, USA, 2013.
  10. FDA Commits to Evidence-Based Actions Aimed at Saving Lives and Preventing Future Generations of Smokers. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-commits-evidence-based-actions-aimed-saving-lives-and-preventing-future-generations-smokers (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  11. Delnevo, C.D.; Villanti, A.C.; Wackowski, O.A.; Gundersen, D.A.; Giovenco, D.P. The influence of menthol, e-cigarettes and other tobacco products on young adults’ self-reported changes in past year smoking. Tob. Control 2016, 25, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nonnemaker, J.; Feirman, S.P.; MacMonegle, A.; Ambrose, B.K.; Jackson, K.J.; Schroeder, M.J.; Smith, A.A.; Ridgeway, W.; Rass, O. Examining the role of menthol cigarettes in progression to established smoking among youth. Addict. Behav. 2019, 98, 106045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nonnemaker, J.; Hersey, J.; Homsi, G.; Busey, A.; Allen, J.; Vallone, D. Initiation with menthol cigarettes and youth smoking uptake. Addiction 2013, 108, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Villanti, A.C.; Johnson, A.L.; Glasser, A.M.; Rose, S.W.; Ambrose, B.K.; Conway, K.P.; Cummings, K.M.; Stanton, C.A.; Edwards, K.C.; Delnevo, C.D.; et al. Association of Flavored Tobacco Use with Tobacco Initiation and Subsequent Use among US Youth and Adults, 2013–2015. JAMA Netw Open 2019, 2, e1913804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Villanti, A.C.; Johnson, A.L.; Halenar, M.; Sharma, E.; Cummings, K.M.; Stanton, C.A.; Delnevo, C.D.; Wackowski, O.A.; Bansal-Travers, M.; Pearson, J.L.; et al. Menthol and mint cigarettes and cigars: Initiation and progression in youth, young adults and adults in Waves 1–4 of the PATH Study, 2013–2017. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2021, 23, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Delnevo, C.D.; Ganz, O.; Goodwin, R.D. Banning Menthol Cigarettes: A Social Justice Issue Long Overdue. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2020, 22, 1673–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Available online: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-source/tobacco-use-supplement-current-population-survey#:~:text=The%20TUS%20response%20rate%20is,were%20eligible%20to%20complete%20it.&text=For%20the%20May%202010%20basic,nonresponse%20rate%20was%207.6%20percent (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  18. Fagerstrom, K. Time to first cigarette; the best single indicator of tobacco dependence? Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2003, 59, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center Tobacco Dependence; Baker, T.B.; Piper, M.E.; McCarthy, D.E.; Bolt, D.M.; Smith, S.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Colby, S.; Conti, D.; Giovino, G.A.; et al. Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: Implications for nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2007, 9 (Suppl. 4), S555–S570. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Davis, W.W.; Hartman, A.N.; Gibson, J.T. Weighting the overlap sample obtained from two Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey. Available online: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/tus-cps/TUS-CPS_overlap.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  21. Hammond, D. Smoking behaviour among young adults: Beyond youth prevention. Tob. Control 2005, 14, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Foldes, S.S.; An, L.C.; Rode, P.; Schillo, B.A.; Davern, M.; Alesci, N.L.; Kinney, A.M.; Saul, J.; Zupan, B.A.; Manley, M.W. The prevalence of unrecognized tobacco use among young adults. Am. J. Health Behav. 2010, 34, 309–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hair, E.; Bennett, M.; Williams, V.; Johnson, A.; Rath, J.; Cantrell, J.; Villanti, A.; Enders, C.; Vallone, D. Progression to established patterns of cigarette smoking among young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017, 177, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Farrelly, M.C.; Loomis, B.R.; Kuiper, N.; Han, B.; Gfroerer, J.; Caraballo, R.S.; Pechacek, T.F.; Couzens, G.L. Are tobacco control policies effective in reducing young adult smoking? J. Adolesc Health 2014, 54, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Delnevo, C.D.; Gundersen, D.A.; Hrywna, M.; Echeverria, S.E.; Steinberg, M.B. Smoking-cessation prevalence among U.S. smokers of menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hymowitz, N.; Sexton, M.; Ockene, J.; Grandits, G. Baseline factors associated with smoking cessation and relapse. MRFIT Research Group. Prev. Med. 1991, 20, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kulak, J.A.; Cornelius, M.E.; Fong, G.T.; Giovino, G.A. Differences in Quit Attempts and Cigarette Smoking Abstinence Between Whites and African Americans in the United States: Literature Review and Results From the International Tobacco Control US Survey. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016, 18 (Suppl. 1), S79–S87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gundersen, D.A.; Delnevo, C.D.; Wackowski, O. Exploring the relationship between race/ethnicity, menthol smoking, and cessation, in a nationally representative sample of adults. Prev. Med. 2009, 49, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Holford, T.R.; Levy, D.T.; Meza, R. Comparison of Smoking History Patterns Among African American and White Cohorts in the United States Born 1890 to 1990. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016, 18 (Suppl. 1), S16–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bacio, G.A.; Guzman, I.Y.; Shapiro, J.R.; Ray, L.A. Differences in quit attempts between non-Hispanic Black and White daily smokers: The role of smoking motives. Addict. Behav. 2014, 39, 1769–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Perkins, K.A.; Gerlach, D.; Vender, J.; Grobe, J.; Meeker, J.; Hutchison, S. Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of visual and olfactory cigarette smoke stimuli. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2001, 3, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Levy, D.T.; Pearson, J.L.; Villanti, A.C.; Blackman, K.; Vallone, D.M.; Niaura, R.S.; Abrams, D.B. Modeling the future effects of a menthol ban on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 2011, 101, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bold, K.W.; Jatlow, P.; Fucito, L.M.; Eid, T.; Krishnan-Sarin, S.; O’Malley, S. Evaluating the effect of switching to non-menthol cigarettes among current menthol smokers: An empirical study of a potential ban of characterising menthol flavour in cigarettes. Tob. Control 2020, 29, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. MacKillop, J.; Murphy, J.G.; Ray, L.A.; Eisenberg, D.T.; Lisman, S.A.; Lum, J.K.; Wilson, D.S. Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zvorsky, I.; Nighbor, T.D.; Kurti, A.N.; DeSarno, M.; Naude, G.; Reed, D.D.; Higgins, S.T. Sensitivity of hypothetical purchase task indices when studying substance use: A systematic literature review. Prev. Med. 2019, 128, 105789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jamal, A.; Phillips, E.; Gentzke, A.S.; Homa, D.M.; Babb, S.D.; King, B.A.; Neff, L.J. Current Cigarette Smoking among Adults—United States, 2016. MMWR 2018, 67, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. U.S. National Cancer Institute. A Socioecological Approach to Addressing Tobacco Related Health Disparities. In National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph 22; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic of smoking characteristics by menthol preference at Wave 1.
Table 1. Sociodemographic of smoking characteristics by menthol preference at Wave 1.
Menthol PreferenceNon-Menthol Preferencep Value
(n = 977)(n = 2691)
Percent95% CIPercent95% CI
Sex <0.001
 Male23.6(21.3, 26.0)76.4(74.0, 78.7)
 Female36.0(33.5, 38.5)64.0(61.5, 66.5)
Age Group <0.001
 18–24 years41.9(34.6, 49.5)58.1(50.5, 65.4)
 25+ years28.0(26.2, 29.8)72.0(70.2, 73.8)
Race/ethnicity <0.001
 White, NH22.3(20.5, 24.1)77.7(75.9, 79.5)
 Black, NH74.9(69.7, 79.3)25.1(20.6, 30.3)
 Hispanic/Latino32.6(26.9, 38.9)67.4(61.1, 73.1)
 Other, NH26.8(19.3, 36.0)73.2(64.0, 80.7)
Education 0.25
 Less than High School31.0(26.6, 35.8)69.0(64.2, 73.4)
 High School Degree/Equivalent30.0(27.4, 32.6)70.0(67.4, 72.6)
 Some college29.8(26.7, 33.1)70.2(66.9, 73.3)
 College Graduate24.4(19.5, 30.2)75.6(69.8, 80.5)
Smoking Days 0.02
 Every-day27.9(25.9, 29.9)72.1(70.1, 74.1)
 Some-day33.6(29.4, 38.2)66.4(61.8, 70.6)
Time to first cigarette 0.26
 Less than 30 min27.3(25.1, 29.8)72.7(70.3, 74.9)
 30 min or more29.6(26.3, 33.2)70.4(66.8, 73.7)
Mean95% CIMean95% CI
Cigarettes Per Day14.2(13.5, 14.9)16.5(16.1, 16.9)
<0.001
Past 30-day Smoking Days26.8(26.2, 27.4)27.3(27.0, 27.6)
0.13
Data are presented as row percentages. Chi-square tests were conducted for categorical variables and independent sample t-tests for continuous variables.
Table
Table 2. Relative risk ratio for increasing or decreasing smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior over a 12-month period.
Table 2. Relative risk ratio for increasing or decreasing smoking behavior relative to maintaining smoking behavior over a 12-month period.
Increased Smoking Behavior from May 2010 to May 2011 aDecreased Smoking Behavior from May 2010 to May 2011 a
RRR95% CI RRR95% CI
Cigarette Preference Cigarette Preference
 Menthol Preferring0.91(0.71, 1.17) Menthol Preferring0.98(0.79, 1.22)
 Non-Menthol Preferring1.00ref Non-Menthol Preferring1.00ref
Sex Sex
 Male0.79(0.65, 0.96) Male0.77(0.65, 0.91)
 Female1.00ref Female1.00ref
Age group, years Age group, years
 18–241.50(1.02, 2.19) 18–241.13(0.77, 1.67)
 25+1.00ref 25+1.00ref
Race/ethnicity Race/ethnicity
 Black, NH2.13(1.38, 3.28) Black, NH1.81(1.26, 2.61)
 Hispanic/Latino1.62(1.09, 2.40) Hispanic/Latino1.53(1.05, 2.23)
 Other, NH1.08(0.64, 1.84) Other, NH1.65(1.11, 2.46)
 White, NH1.00ref White, NH1.00ref
Bolded values represent a statistically significant finding (p < 0.05). a Relative to maintaining smoking. NH = Non-Hispanic. 25+ = In the dataset, age is entered as a continuous variable until age 79 and a categorical variable from those 80–84 and 85+.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Davis, D.R.; Parker, M.A.; Delnevo, C.D.; Villanti, A.C. Examining Menthol Preference as a Correlate of Change in Cigarette Smoking Behavior over a One-Year Period. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010878

AMA Style

Davis DR, Parker MA, Delnevo CD, Villanti AC. Examining Menthol Preference as a Correlate of Change in Cigarette Smoking Behavior over a One-Year Period. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(20):10878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Davis, Danielle R., Maria A. Parker, Cristine D. Delnevo, and Andrea C. Villanti. 2021. "Examining Menthol Preference as a Correlate of Change in Cigarette Smoking Behavior over a One-Year Period" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 10878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010878

APA Style

Davis, D. R., Parker, M. A., Delnevo, C. D., & Villanti, A. C. (2021). Examining Menthol Preference as a Correlate of Change in Cigarette Smoking Behavior over a One-Year Period. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop