Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Government Effectiveness
1.2. Urbanization in China: Providing a Context
1.3. Research Hypotheses
2. Data, Measures, and Analytical Strategy
2.1. The 2018 Urbanization and Quality of Life Survey
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Psychological Distress
2.2.2. Individual-Level Variables
2.2.3. Government Effectiveness
2.2.4. Township/County-Level Covariates
2.3. Analytical Strategy
3. Results
3.1. Local Government Effectiveness and Psychological Distress
3.2. Mediating Effects through Reducing Worries
3.3. Robustness Checks
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Peen, J.; Dekker, J.; Schoevers, R.A.; ten Have, M.; de Graaf, R.; Beekman, A.T. Is the prevalence of psychiatric disorders associated with urbanization? Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2007, 42, 984–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ventriglio, A.; Torales, J.; Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; De Berardis, D.; Bhugra, D. Urbanization and emerging mental health issues. CNS Spectr. 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Chen, S.; Landry, P.F.; Davis, D.S. How dynamics of urbanization affect physical and mental health in urban China. China Q. 2014, 220, 988–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, X.; Wei, H.; Lu, S.; Dai, Q.; Su, H. Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat Int. 2018, 71, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Some people may need it, but not me, not now: Seeking professional help for mental health problems in Urban China. Transcult. Psychiatry 2018, 55, 754–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Reavley, N. Recognition and beliefs about treatment for mental disorders in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2020, 55, 129–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fukuyama, F. Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it? Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 2016, 19, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helliwell, J.F.; Huang, H.; Grover, S.; Wang, S. Empirical linkages between good governance and national well-being. J. Comp. Econ. 2018, 46, 1332–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teorell, J.; Sundström, A.; Holmberg, S.; Rothstein, B.; Pachon, N.A.; Dalli, C.M. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan21; The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg: Gothenburg, Sweden, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Bank. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). Available online: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ (accessed on 30 April 2020).
- Sacks, A.; Levi, M.; Bozick, R.; Alexander, K.; Entwisle, D.; Dauber, S.; Kerr, K. Measuring government effectiveness and its consequences for social welfare in sub-Saharan African countries. Soc. Forces 2010, 88, 2325–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amahazion, F. Human trafficking: The need for human rights and government effectiveness in enforcing anti-trafficking. Glob. Crime 2015, 16, 167–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ortega, B.; Sanjuán, J.; Casquero, A. Determinants of efficiency in reducing child mortality in developing countries. The role of inequality and government effectiveness. Health Care Manag. Sci. 2016, 20, 500–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Helliwell, J.F.; Huang, H. How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. Br. J. Political Sci. 2008, 38, 595–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, H.; Gao, H.; Huang, Q. Better government, happier residents? Quality of government and life satisfaction in China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 147, 971–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peiró-Palomino, J.; Picazo-Tadeo, A.J.; Rios, V. Well-being in European regions: Does government quality matter? Pap. Reg. Sci. 2019, 99, 555–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erlingsson, G.Ó.; Lundåsen, S.W. When state-level institutions cannot tell the whole story: An inquiry into municipal variations in quality of government. Governance 2021, 34, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, C. Good governance and happiness: Does technical quality of governance lead to happiness universally in both rich and poor countries? J. Int. Area Stud. 2018, 25, 37–56. [Google Scholar]
- Diener, E.; Oishi, S.; Lucas, R.E. National accounts of subjective well-being. Am. Psychol. 2015, 70, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ritchie, H.; Roser, M. Urbanization. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization (accessed on 30 April 2020).
- United Nations. Goal 11: Make Cities Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/ (accessed on 15 September 2020).
- Cheru, F. Globalization and Uneven Urbanization in Africa: The limits to Effective Urban Governance in the Provision of Basic Services; UCLA Center for Near Eastern Studies: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Harpham, T.; Boateng, K.A. Urban governance in relation to the operation of urban services in developing countries. Habitat Int. 1997, 21, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, H.; Clench, B.; Harris, D. The Governance of Urban Service Delivery in Developing Countries: Literature Review; Overseas Development Institute (ODI): London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lintelo, D.T.; Gupte, J.; McGregor, J.; Lakshman, R.; Jahan, F. Wellbeing and urban governance: Who fails, survives or thrives in informal settlements in Bangladeshi cities? Cities 2018, 72, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cartier, C. Territorial urbanization and the party-state in China. Territ. Politics Gov. 2015, 3, 294–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsing, Y.-T. The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010; ISBN 9780191721632. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, L.J. Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China. Political Geogr. 2005, 24, 477–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. National Data on Administrative Divisions. Available online: http://data.stats.gov.cn (accessed on 6 November 2020).
- Solinger, D.J. Contesting Citizenship in Urban China: Peasant Migrants, the State, and the Logic of the Market; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999; ISBN 0520922611. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.-L. Organizing through Division and Exclusion: China’s Hukou System; Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2005; ISBN 9780804750394. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Davis, D.S.; Landry, P.F. Beyond Hukou Reform: Enhancing Human-Centered Urbanization in China; Paulson Policy Memoranda, Paulson Institute: Chicago, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.-R.; Hui, E.C.-M.; Choguill, C.; Jia, S.-H. The new urbanization policy in China: Which way forward? Habitat Int. 2015, 47, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China Daily. Urbanization to Fuel Rural Revitalization. Available online: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201902/27/WS5c75eca9a3106c65c34eba27.html (accessed on 27 February 2019).
- Li, B.; Chen, C.; Hu, B. Governing urbanization and the New Urbanization Plan in China. Environ. Urban. 2016, 28, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, L.H. State-led urbanization in China: Skyscrapers, land revenue and “concentrated villages”. China Q. 2014, 217, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China Daily. China’s Social Security Card Goes Digital. Available online: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201804/23/WS5addbf5da3105cdcf6519fae.html (accessed on 23 April 2018).
- Chen, A.J.; Pan, S.L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.W.; Zhu, S. Managing e-government implementation in China: A process perspective. Inf. Manag. 2009, 46, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xinhua.net. The Number of China’s Social Security Card Holders Has Reached 1.335 Billion. Available online: http://www.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2021-01/26/c_1127025921.htm (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China. Opinions of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security on Accelerating the Application of Social Security Cards. Available online: http://www.mohrss.gov.cn/SYrlzyhshbzb/zhuanti/jinbaogongcheng/jbgcshehuibaozhangka/jbgcshbzkwenjianbiaozhun/201408/t20140807_137962.html (accessed on 6 November 2020). (In Chinese)
- Chen, A.; Huang, W. China’s E-government. In Managing Organizational Complexities with Digital Enablement in China: A Casebook; Pan, S.L., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2015; pp. 97–106. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Shang, H. Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: Empirical evidence from China. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujarwoto, S.; Tampubolon, G. Decentralisation and citizen happiness: A multilevel analysis of self-rated happiness in Indonesia. J. Happiness Stud. 2015, 16, 455–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whiteley, P.; Clarke, H.D.; Sanders, D.; Stewart, M.C. Government performance and life satisfaction in contemporary Britain. J. Politics 2010, 72, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- National Development and Reform Commission of China. National New Urbanization Comprehensive Pilot Program; No. 1229, 2014. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-02/04/content_2814341.htm (accessed on 18 February 2021).
- Tian, X. Loneliness A psychological turning point in the reconstruction of the urban order in China. Soc. Sci. China 2010, 31, 147–164. [Google Scholar]
- Boehnke, K.; Fuß, D.; Rupf, M. Values and well-being: The mediating role of worries. In Life Goals and Well-Being: Towards a Positive Psychology of Human Striving; Schmuck, P., Sheldon, K.M., Eds.; Hogrefe & Huber Publishers: Seattle, WA, USA, 2001; pp. 85–101. [Google Scholar]
- Luciano, M.; De Rosa, C.; Del Vecchio, V.; Sampogna, G.; Sbordone, D.; Atti, A.; Bardicchia, F.; Bertossi, F.; Calò, S.; Cava, L.; et al. Perceived insecurity, mental health and urbanization: Results from a multicentric study. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 2015, 62, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iacus, S.M.; King, G.; Porro, G. Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 2012, 20, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landry, P.F.; Shen, M. Reaching migrants in survey research: The use of the global positioning system to reduce coverage bias in China. Political Anal. 2005, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J. Internal migration and health: Re-examining the healthy migrant phenomenon in China. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Zhu, S. Online information searches and help seeking for mental health problems in urban China. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 2015, 43, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, Y.-C.; Zhang, M.-Y.; Huang, Y.-Q.; He, Y.-L.; Liu, Z.-R.; Cheng, H.; Tsang, A.; Lee, S.; Kessler, R.C. Twelve-month prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in metropolitan China. Psychol. Med. 2005, 36, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacKinnon, D.P.; Lockwood, C.M.; Hoffman, J.M.; West, S.G.; Sheets, V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol. Methods 2002, 7, 83–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Preacher, K.J.; Leonardelli, G.J. Calculation for the Sobel Test—An Interactive Calculation Tool for Mediation Tests. Available online: http://quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htm (accessed on 6 November 2020).
Variables | Means or Percentages | Variable Descriptions |
---|---|---|
K10 psychological distress (mean) | 16.869 (0.163) | Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10): min = 10, max = 50 |
Social security cardholder (%) | 46.231 (1.219) | Dichotomous: 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Medical insurance (%) | 91.680 (0.621) | Dichotomous: 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Pension insurance (%) | 53.775 (1.231) | Dichotomous: 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Chronic health conditions (mean) | 0.595 (0.020) | Number of pain-related, cardiovascular, respiratory, and other chronic disorders: min = 0, max = 6 |
Age (mean) | 51.093 (0.440) | Years of age: min = 18, max = 75 |
Gender (%) | 49.213 (1.209) | Dichotomous: 1 = female, 0 = male |
Marital status (%) | 79.123 (1.209) | Dichotomous: 1 = married, 0 = other |
Education (mean) | 7.073 (0.092) | Years of schooling: min = 0, max = 20 |
Occupation (%) | 8.767 (0.741) | Dichotomous: 1 = professional/managerial, 0 = other |
CCP membership (%) | 6.726 (0.636) | Dichotomous: 1 = Chinese Communist Party (CCP) member, 0 = not a CCP member |
Household wealth (mean) | 2.364 (0.047) | An index based on ownership of a number of consumer items, such as an liquid-crystal-display television (LCD TV) and a car: min = 0, max = 7 |
Homeowner (%) | 85.676 (1.461) | Dichotomous: 1 = homeowner, 0 = not a homeowner |
Hukou (%) | Categorical: | |
Rural hukou | 84.122 (0.756) | 0 = rural hukou (reference) |
Urban hukou | 6.714 (0.522) | 1 = urban hukou |
Jumin hukou | 9.165 (0.569) | 2 = jumin hukou |
Migration status (%) | 16.708 (1.510) | Dichotomous: 1 = cross-town migrant, 0 = non-migrant |
Worry about medical expenses (%) | 69.692 (1.029) | Dichotomous: 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Worry about elder care (%) | 67.274 (1.018) | Dichotomous: 1 = yes, 0 = no |
Variables | Means or Percentages | Variable Descriptions |
---|---|---|
Percentage of social security cardholders in PSUs (mean) | 46.039 (29.425) | Percentage of social security cardholders in primary sampling units (PSUs); min = 1.250, max = 97.531 |
County GDP per capita in 2014 (CNY, mean) | 60,048 (36,946) | County gross domestic product (GDP) per capital in Chinese Yuan (CNY); min = 8998; max = 181,370 |
County GDP per capita in 2014 (ln, mean) | 10.809 (0.659) | Natural logarithm of county GDP per capital; min = 9.105, max = 12.108 |
County GDP growth 2014–2017 (mean) | 28.268 (9.324) | Percentage of county GDP growth from 2014 to 2017; min = 8.934, max = 46.274 |
Townships in newly urbanized areas (%) | 80.000 | Dichotomous; 1 = townships in newly urbanized areas, 0 = townships that are potential sites of urbanization |
Townships in the 2014 Pilot Program (%) | 50.000 | Dichotomous; 1 = townships in the 2014 Pilot Program, 0 = townships not in the Pilot Program |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Township/county-level variables | ||||||
Social security cardholders in PSUs | −1.119 *** | −0.885 *** | −0.727 ** | −0.719 ** | ||
(0.218) | (0.241) | (0.235) | (0.272) | |||
County GDP per capita in 2014 (ln) | −0.523 ** | |||||
(0.184) | ||||||
County GDP growth 2014–2017 | −0.016 | |||||
(0.151) | ||||||
Townships in newly urbanized areas | 0.834 | |||||
(0.506) | ||||||
Townships in the 2014 Pilot Program | 0.072 | |||||
(0.446) | ||||||
Individual-level variables | ||||||
Social security cardholder | −1.204 ** | −0.887 * | −0.708 | −0.711 | ||
(0.399) | (0.413) | (0.435) | (0.435) | |||
Medical insurance | −0.797 | −0.769 | ||||
(0.716) | (0.711) | |||||
Pension insurance | −1.045 * | −1.045 * | ||||
(0.472) | (0.470) | |||||
Chronic health conditions | 1.999 *** | 2.016 *** | 2.033 *** | 2.040 *** | 2.048 *** | 2.042 *** |
(0.173) | (0.167) | (0.172) | (0.168) | (0.169) | (0.171) | |
Age | 2.059 | 2.148 | 1.975 | 2.064 | 2.475* | 2.571* |
(1.149) | (1.170) | (1.157) | (1.174) | (1.172) | (1.173) | |
Age (squared) | −2.666 * | −2.725 * | −2.598 * | −2.656 * | −2.948 ** | −2.998 ** |
(1.061) | (1.072) | (1.069) | (1.077) | (1.078) | (1.078) | |
Female | 0.580* | 0.550* | 0.587* | 0.566* | 0.554* | 0.574* |
(0.272) | (0.273) | (0.269) | (0.270) | (0.269) | (0.271) | |
Married | −1.185 ** | −1.216 ** | −1.210 ** | −1.225 ** | −1.185 ** | −1.192 ** |
(0.413) | (0.411) | (0.413) | (0.411) | (0.415) | (0.422) | |
Years of schooling | −0.664 ** | −0.603 ** | −0.635 ** | −0.594 ** | −0.543 * | −0.502 * |
(0.210) | (0.217) | (0.210) | (0.216) | (0.215) | (0.209) | |
Professional/managerial occupation | 0.286 | 0.277 | 0.298 | 0.285 | 0.315 | 0.301 |
(0.576) | (0.578) | (0.570) | (0.572) | (0.570) | (0.574) | |
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) member | −0.597 | −0.492 | −0.542 | −0.476 | −0.424 | −0.440 |
(0.587) | (0.596) | (0.579) | (0.588) | (0.595) | (0.605) | |
Household wealth | −1.189 *** | −1.143 *** | −1.216 *** | −1.168 *** | −1.130 *** | −1.131 *** |
(0.179) | (0.179) | (0.172) | (0.171) | (0.171) | (0.171) | |
Homeowner | −2.193 ** | −2.099 ** | −2.209 ** | −2.134 ** | −2.105 ** | −2.142 ** |
(0.754) | (0.764) | (0.730) | (0.743) | (0.735) | (0.736) | |
Hukou (ref.: Rural hukou) | ||||||
Urban hukou | 0.114 | 0.349 | 0.138 | 0.290 | 0.460 | 0.442 |
(0.486) | (0.490) | (0.494) | (0.491) | (0.498) | (0.500) | |
Jumin hukou | −1.117 ** | −0.971 * | −0.942 * | −0.883 * | −0.810 * | −0.784 |
(0.421) | (0.420) | (0.395) | (0.406) | (0.390) | (0.405) | |
Cross-town migrants | −1.076 | −1.194 | −1.049 | −1.147 | −1.242 * | −1.157 |
(0.605) | (0.634) | (0.612) | (0.636) | (0.617) | (0.616) | |
Constants | 19.750 *** | 20.244 *** | 19.762 *** | 20.123 *** | 21.276 *** | 20.560 *** |
(0.799) | (0.807) | (0.728) | (0.748) | (0.932) | (1.044) | |
Random-effects parameters | ||||||
Variance (county/township) | 2.033*** | 1.457** | 0.743 | 0.789 | 0.596 | 0.242 |
(0.613) | (0.556) | (0.408) | (0.424) | (0.394) | (0.373) | |
Variance (neighborhood | county/township) | 2.884 ** | 2.997 ** | 2.869 ** | 2.950 ** | 2.910 ** | 2.914 ** |
(0.991) | (1.023) | (0.985) | (1.006) | (1.008) | (1.006) | |
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) | ||||||
County/township | 0.040 | 0.029 | 0.015 | 0.016 | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Neighborhood | county/township | 0.094 | 0.088 | 0.072 | 0.075 | 0.071 | 0.064 |
Observations | ||||||
Number of county/townships | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
Number of neighborhoods | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 |
Number of respondents | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 |
Log pseudo likelihood | −10,682.531 | −10,674.916 | −10,673.175 | −10,669.256 | −10,661.232 | −10,657.244 |
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psychological Distress | Worry about Medical Expenses | Worry about Elder Care | Psychological Distress | Psychological Distress | Psychological Distress | |
Township/county-level variables | ||||||
Social security cardholders in PSUs | −0.719 ** | −0.440 * | −0.674 ** | −0.563 * | −0.500 * | −0.475 * |
(0.272) | (0.204) | (0.230) | (0.243) | (0.243) | (0.238) | |
County GDP per capita in 2014 (ln) | −0.523 ** | −0.159 | −0.144 | −0.466 * | −0.465 * | −0.447 * |
(0.184) | (0.158) | (0.182) | (0.192) | (0.184) | (0.191) | |
County GDP growth 2014–2017 | −0.016 | 0.338* | 0.393 | −0.150 | −0.138 | −0.188 |
(0.151) | (0.171) | (0.223) | (0.154) | (0.141) | (0.152) | |
Townships in newly urbanized areas | 0.834 | −0.691 | −0.675 | 1.085 * | 1.022 * | 1.134 * |
(0.506) | (0.470) | (0.579) | (0.519) | (0.503) | (0.520) | |
Townships in the 2014 Pilot Program | 0.072 | 0.149 | 0.227 | 0.014 | −0.061 | −0.047 |
(0.446) | (0.381) | (0.443) | (0.445) | (0.435) | (0.445) | |
Individual-level variables | ||||||
Worry about medical expenses | 2.671 *** | 2.035 *** | ||||
(0.381) | (0.449) | |||||
Worry about elder care | 2.308 *** | 1.319 *** | ||||
(0.338) | (0.400) | |||||
Social security cardholder | −0.711 | −0.335 * | −0.413 ** | −0.597 | −0.561 | −0.541 |
(0.435) | (0.145) | (0.148) | (0.423) | (0.426) | (0.423) | |
Medical insurance | −0.769 | 0.131 | −0.126 | −0.824 | −0.725 | −0.782 |
(0.711) | (0.237) | (0.197) | (0.686) | (0.710) | (0.690) | |
Pension insurance | −1.045* | 0.120 | −0.010 | −1.086 * | −1.022 * | −1.063 * |
(0.470) | (0.154) | (0.143) | (0.450) | (0.455) | (0.446) | |
Chronic health conditions | 2.042 *** | 0.325 *** | 0.383 *** | 1.906 *** | 1.899 *** | 1.856 *** |
(0.171) | (0.050) | (0.053) | (0.175) | (0.170) | (0.174) | |
Age | 2.571 * | 1.885 *** | 2.002 *** | 1.760 | 1.814 | 1.525 |
(1.173) | (0.331) | (0.511) | (1.243) | (1.225) | (1.257) | |
Age (squared) | −2.998 ** | −2.154 *** | −2.271 *** | −2.066 | −2.145 | −1.804 |
(1.078) | (0.315) | (0.495) | (1.136) | (1.124) | (1.152) | |
Female | 0.574 * | 0.173 | −0.063 | 0.514 | 0.604 * | 0.545 * |
(0.271) | (0.107) | (0.092) | (0.269) | (0.268) | (0.268) | |
Married | −1.192 ** | 0.097 | −0.164 | −1.230 ** | −1.134 ** | −1.186 ** |
(0.422) | (0.157) | (0.160) | (0.406) | (0.414) | (0.404) | |
Years of schooling | −0.502 * | 0.055 | −0.011 | −0.526 * | −0.511 * | −0.525 * |
(0.209) | (0.063) | (0.071) | (0.215) | (0.208) | (0.213) | |
Professional/managerial occupation | 0.301 | −0.295 | −0.187 | 0.494 | 0.411 | 0.509 |
(0.574) | (0.170) | (0.225) | (0.552) | (0.555) | (0.545) | |
CCP member | −0.440 | −0.376 | −0.076 | −0.233 | −0.393 | −0.257 |
(0.605) | (0.235) | (0.250) | (0.568) | (0.587) | (0.565) | |
Household wealth | −1.131 *** | −0.370 *** | −0.338 *** | −0.958 *** | −0.996 *** | −0.919 *** |
(0.171) | (0.066) | (0.066) | (0.168) | (0.168) | (0.169) | |
Homeowner | −2.142 ** | −0.379 | −0.439 | −1.984 ** | −1.992 ** | −1.934 ** |
(0.736) | (0.319) | (0.339) | (0.678) | (0.737) | (0.693) | |
Hukou (ref.: Rural hukou) | ||||||
Urban hukou | 0.442 | 0.159 | −0.134 | 0.347 | 0.439 | 0.366 |
(0.500) | (0.271) | (0.180) | (0.434) | (0.505) | (0.449) | |
Jumin hukou | −0.784 | −0.431 * | −0.229 | −0.580 | −0.707 | −0.590 |
(0.405) | (0.213) | (0.255) | (0.402) | (0.374) | (0.393) | |
Cross-town migrants | −1.157 | −0.436 | 0.124 | −1.012 | −1.255 * | −1.104 |
(0.616) | (0.275) | (0.240) | (0.594) | (0.596) | (0.586) | |
Constants | 20,560 *** | 1.997 ** | 2.535 ** | 18,411 *** | 18,615 *** | 17,806 *** |
(1.044) | (0.681) | (0.779) | (0.981) | (1.031) | (0.996) | |
Random-effects parameters | ||||||
Variance (county/township) | 0.242 | 0.732* | 1.096** | 0.401 | 0.224 | 0.390 |
(0.373) | (0.301) | (0.383) | (0.427) | (0.433) | (0.458) | |
Variance (neighborhood | county/township) | 2.914 ** | 0.430 * | 0.231 * | 2.582 ** | 2.811 ** | 2.619 ** |
(1.006) | (0.167) | (0.096) | (0.900) | (1.003) | (0.920) | |
ICC | ||||||
County/township | 0.005 | 0.164 | 0.237 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.008 |
Neighborhood | county/township | 0.064 | 0.261 | 0.287 | 0.062 | 0.063 | 0.063 |
Observations | ||||||
Number of county/townships | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
Number of neighborhoods | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 | 159 |
Number of respondents | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 | 3199 |
Log pseudo likelihood | −10,657.244 | −1581.6751 | −1540.9434 | −10,616.83 | −10,627.357 | −10,609.250 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, J.; Gong, L.; Xie, S. Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042042
Chen J, Gong L, Xie S. Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042042
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Juan, Lin Gong, and Shenghua Xie. 2021. "Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 4: 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042042
APA StyleChen, J., Gong, L., & Xie, S. (2021). Psychological Distress in Urbanizing China: How Does Local Government Effectiveness Matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042042