Next Article in Journal
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians’ Working Hours and Earnings in São Paulo and Maranhão States, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
How Does Adjacent Land Use Influence Sediment Metals Content and Potential Ecological Risk in the Hongze Lake Wetland?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking?

by
Albertas Skurvydas
1,2,
Ausra Lisinskiene
1,3,
Daiva Majauskiene
1,2,*,
Dovile Valanciene
1,
Ruta Dadeliene
2,
Natalja Istomina
4,
Asta Sarkauskiene
5 and
Gediminas Buciunas
6
1
Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Department of Rehabilitation, Physical and Sports Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 21/27 M.K. Čiurlionio St., 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
3
Institute of Education, Studies, Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
4
Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 21/27 M.K. Čiurlionio St., 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
5
Departments of Sports Recreation and Tourism, Klaipėda University, Herkaus Manto St. 84, 92294 Klaipėda, Lithuania
6
Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(16), 10076; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610076
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 15 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Exercise and Health)

Abstract

:
The aim of our study was to determine whether EI and LT vs. intuitive thinking (CRT score) are related to participation in professional sports, independent exercise, and exercise at a gym/health center compared with no exercise. We selected 20 of the most popular types of exercise in Lithuania among respondents who exercise independently or at a gym/health center, and we ranked these types of exercise according to the participants’ emotional intelligence and logical thinking. We studied 4545 women and 1824 men aged 18–74 years with a focus on whether emotional intelligence and logical thinking are related to type of exercise. Participation in any exercise was significantly related to emotional intelligence in men and women. Women in professional sports solved the lowest number of logic tasks. Women who exercise independently or at a gym/health center had better logical thinking than those who do not exercise. Among men, logical thinking was not associated with the type of exercise. We found the tendency for a negative correlation between EI and LT in the 20 most popular types of exercise. Emotional intelligence correlated positively with participation in MVPA. The highest emotional intelligence was in women who participate in dance or Pilates and in men who participate in martial arts, wrestling, boxing, or yoga. Logical thinking was the highest in men who participate in triathlon and in women who perform CrossFit. Men who practice martial arts or track and field and women who participate in cycling were in the top five for emotional intelligence and logical thinking.

1. Introduction

There is an increasing amount of evidence-based research showing that various forms and doses of physical activity (PA) or exercise are effective in combating many chronic diseases [1,2] and improving well-being and mental health [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The health benefits of PA are influenced by age, sex, health, and body mass index (BMI) [10,11,12,13]. Studies have also shown that the effects of PA or exercise on the body are specific; that is, they are affected by the intensity, duration, type of muscle contraction, motor control, and other factors [14,15]. Other findings suggest that PA or exercise may help in the maintenance of, or prevention of the decline in, cognitive function with illness or aging [16,17,18]. Insufficient PA is related to obesity and, through obesity, may contribute to systemic inflammation throughout the body, which is causally related to several chronic diseases [1,19].
Researchers have emphasized the distinction between two types of cognitive processes: those executed quickly (“fast” thinking), involving little conscious deliberation, and those that are slower and more reflective (“slow”, analytical thinking (LT)) [20]. Dual-process models propose that health actions are guided by both a conscious, reflective, analytical, rule-based system and a nonconscious, impulsive, associative system [20,21]. Explicit thinking (i.e., LT) requires more effort than implicit (i.e., “fast”) thinking, and implicit thinking is more often used to make rapid decisions [20,21].
Some studies investigated how different types of PA and exercise affect various indicators of human health. Berger and Owen established the positive effect of four exercise regimes (swimming, body conditioning, hatha yoga, fencing) on reducing stress and improving mood [22]. Matias et al. studied how depression depends on PA type (walking, running, cycling, team sports) and established reduced depressive symptoms [18]. Wennman and Borodulin investigated the association between PA type (e.g., walking, cleaning, jogging, swimming, skiing, gardening, stair climbing, and others) and meeting the PA guidelines [23]. Chekroud et al. studied the association between PA (aerobic or gym exercise, cycling, housework, popular sports, recreation, running or jogging, walking, and winter and water sports) and mental health in 1.2 million individuals and found that engaging in team sports and cycling was associated with the lowest mental health burden [24]. Schnohr et al. reported that the gains in life expectancy were larger in those who participate in specific sports compared with sedentary groups; the gains in life expectancy associated with specific activities were as follows: tennis, 9.7 years; badminton, 6.2 years; soccer, 4.7 years; cycling, 3.7 years; swimming, 3.4 years; jogging, 3.2 years; calisthenics, 3.1 years; and health club activities, 1.5 years [25]. It was, therefore, concluded that the type of activity may determine the magnitude of the improvement in life expectancy. However, the study by Schnohr et al. involved an observational study, and it remains uncertain whether this relationship is causal. Interestingly, the leisure-time sports that inherently involve more social interaction were associated with the best longevity, a finding that warrants further investigation [25].
Few researchers have examined whether EI and LT relate to the exercise or PA level that people perform to enhance health and during active leisure time. The aim of our study was to determine whether EI and LT vs. intuitive thinking (CRT score; [26]) are related to participation in professional sports, independent exercise, and exercise at a gym/health center compared with no exercise. We ranked the 20 most popular types of exercise among people who are not professional athletes in Lithuania to determine whether the type of independent PA or exercise is related to EI and LT in men and women of different ages.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

We surveyed 6369 people. The participants were aged 18–74 years (Table 1). The study was conducted from October 2019 to June 2020. The participants were selected from Lithuania to represent a Lithuanian sample. Participation was anonymous, and data collection and processing were confidential. We used an online survey to collect information using Google Forms (https://docs.google.com/forms/) (accessed on 1 March 2020). All participants completed the online questionnaires. The online survey was distributed by researchers through social media (Facebook) and personal messaging (WhatsApp). From the survey, we determined the BMI (kg/m2) and specificity of exercise of the participants, i.e., what percentage of the participants did not perform any physical exercise, were professional athletes, performed physical exercises independently, and exercised in sports and health centers (Table 1). The most popular sports among professional athletes were: martial arts (n = 34; both men and women), track and field (n = 30), dance (n = 25), volleyball (n = 24), basketball (n = 24), fitness (n = 19), running (n = 18), football (n = 17), roller sports (n = 14), powerlifting (n = 12), wrestling (n = 12), tennis (n = 10), handball (n = 9), boxing (n = 9), swimming (n = 9), rowing (n = 6), CrossFit (n = 6), aerobics (n = 6), bodybuilding (n = 5), triathlon (n = 5), and cycling (n = 3). As the number of participants in each of the sports was not large, we did not examine them separately but combined them into one group—professional athletes. From those who exercised independently and those who exercised at gyms/health centers, we selected 20 of the most popular exercise types among men and women in Lithuania in total, 2324 women and 1176 men were in the “20” group (individually exercise nonprofessionally or at gyms/health centers, performing one/some of the 20 most popular types of exercise in Lithuania).

2.2. Measurements

Danish Physical Activity Questionnaire (DPAQ): the DPAQ was adapted from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and differs from it by referring to PA in the past 24 h (for 7 consecutive days) instead of the past 7 days. The selected activities were listed on the PA scale at nine levels of physical exertion in metabolic equivalents (METs), ranging from sleep or inactivity (0.9 MET) to highly strenuous activities (>6 METs). Each level (A = 0.9 MET, B = 1.0 MET, C = 1.5 METs, D = 2.0 METs, E = 3.0 METs, F = 4.0 METs, G = 5.0 METs, H = 6.0 METs, and I > 6 METs) is described using examples of specific activities of that particular MET level and a small drawing. The PA scale is constructed so that the number of minutes (15, 30, or 45) and hours (1–10) spent at each MET activity level on an average 24 h weekday can be filled out. This allows for a calculation of the total MET time, representing 24 h of sleep, work, and leisure time on an average weekday [27]. We calculated how much energy (in METs) was consumed per day during sleep, moderate-intensity PA (MPA; 3–6 METs), and vigorous-intensity PA (VPA; >6 METs). We also combined MPA with VPA as moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA).
The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT): the test tasks were developed according to the CRT test discussed in the article by [26]. The test consists of three tasks, which, after reading, automatically select the wrong answer. The author noted that it is possible to check what kind of thinking system a person uses. The first system reflects intuitive decision-making, which is usually fast, automatic, implicit, emotional, and requires minimal effort. Meanwhile, the second system reflects reasoning that is slower, conscious, effort intensive, goal oriented, and logical. The test consists of three questions, for example: (1) A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total. The bat costs $1.00 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost? _____ cents; (2) If it takes 5 machines 5 min to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets? _____ minutes; (3) In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. Every day, the patch doubles in size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long would it take for the patch to cover half of the lake? _____ days. The measure is scored as the total number of correct answers. The Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) measures cognitive processing—specifically, the tendency to suppress an incorrect, intuitive answer and come to a more deliberate, correct answer via LT.
Emotional Intelligence (EI): EI was assessed using the Schutte self-report EI test (SSREIT) [28]. The SSREIT is a 33-item questionnaire divided into four subscales: perception of emotion assessed by 10 items, managing own emotions assessed by 9 items, managing others’ emotions assessed by 8 items, and utilization of emotions assessed by 5 items. The items are answered on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 33 to 165, with the higher scores indicating greater ability in EI.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Interval data are reported as the mean ± standard error. All interval data were confirmed as being normally distributed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Three-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to assess the effect of independent variables (specificity of exercise, age, gender) on the dependent (CRT score and EI) variables. Two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed to assess the effect of independent variables (specificity of exercise and age) on the dependent (CRT score and EI) variables in females and males. The partial eta-squared ( ŋ P 2 ) value was estimated as a measure of the effect size. If significant effects were found, Tukey’s post hoc adjustment was used for multiple comparisons within each repeated ANOVA. We also calculated the Pearson coefficient of correlation. Moreover, we computed the chi-square ( ŋ P 2 ) and its p-value. For all tests, statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 22; IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Values

The number, age, exercise experience, and number of sports for the men and women from all study groups are presented in Table 1. Study groups differed in age (p < 0.001; ŋ P 2 = 0.024) and sex distribution (p < 0.001; ŋ P 2 = 0.003), but the interaction between age and sex was not significant. Professional athletes were younger than the other groups (p < 0.001). Male and female professional athletes participated in exercise or PA for longer than those who exercise independently or at a gym/health center (p < 0.001). Those who exercise independently had greater exercise experience than those who exercise at a gym/health center (p < 0.001). The duration of exercise experience was longer in all groups of men (p < 0.001). BMI was lower in men and women in professional sports than in the other groups and lower in men and women who exercise independently or who exercise at a gym/health center than in those who do not exercise.
Table 1. Number, age, and exercise experience of the study participants.
Table 1. Number, age, and exercise experience of the study participants.
I Don’t ExerciseI’m in a Professional SportI Exercise by MyselfI Exercise in a Gym/Health CenterAssociated with of Exercise
Count %Women172638.00%1543.40%132729.20%133829.4%
Men39421.60%1397.60%87548%41622.8%
Age, yearsWomen39 b11.829.1 a10.539 b11.337.912.6<0.001
Men37.7 b11.128.7 a9.335.7 c1035.8 c11.4<0.001
Exercise experience Women0 9.5 a7.76.3 b8.65.27.1<0.001
Men0 12 a8.110.8 b11.17.88.8<0.001
Total types of exercises 0 44 66 74 <0.001
Letters that do not match indicate p < 0.05.
All indicators of EI (except for use of emotion for men) were worse for those who do not exercise than in the other groups (Table 2). Logical thinking (LT) in men was not significantly related to the type of exercise. By contrast, in women, the lowest LT score was in professional athletes (p < 0.05 compared with other groups), and the highest was for those who exercise independently or at a gym/health center. The MVPA was higher in male and female professional athletes than in those in the other groups (p < 0.001) and higher in men and women who exercise independently and those who exercise at a gym/health center than in untrained participants (who do not exercise). Sleep METs was higher in male and female professional athletes than in the other groups; men who do not exercise had the lowest sleep METs (p < 0.05).
The characteristics of the people who participate in the 20 most popular types of exercise in Lithuania are presented in Table 3. The type of exercise was significantly related to BMI in both women and men (women: p < 0.001, ŋ P 2 = 0.048; men: p < 0.001, ŋ P 2 = 0.06), MVPA (women: p < 0.001, ŋ P 2 = 0.152; men: p < 0.001, ŋ P 2 = 0.132), and sleep (women: p = 0.13, ŋ P 2 = 0.01; men: p < 0.001, ŋ P 2 = 0.041) (Table 3).
Table 2. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sleep, body mass index, emotional intelligence, and logical thinking in women and men.
Table 2. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sleep, body mass index, emotional intelligence, and logical thinking in women and men.
I Don’t ExerciseI’m in a Professional SportI Exercise by MyselfI Exercise in a Gym/Health CenterAssociated with of Exercise
Moderate-to-Women7.78 a7.423.4 b12.914.7 c10.614.8 c8.9<0.001
vigorous PA, METsMen9.3 a11.225 b11.217.6 c11.817.1 c10.6<0.001
Sleep, METsWomen6.5516.84 a0.866.60.96.570.780.92
Men6.33 a0.946.86 b0.916.53 c0.926.52 c0.79<0.001
Body mass index, kg/m2Women25.2 a5.222.3 b3.123.5 c3.823.4 c4<0.001
Man26.7 a4.124.8 b3.526 c3.325.6 c3.5<0.001
Emotional intelligenceWomen124.8 a16.8131.113.2128.915.4128.615.4<0.001
Men119.8 a16.5126.914.1123.715.1127.514.9<0.001
Perception of emotionWomen37.1 a6.139.25.138.35.338.25.7<0.001
Men35.4 a5.937.95.636.85.636.95.9<0.001
Managing own emotionWomen34.7 a5.436.94.136.15365<0.001
Man34.3 a5.336.34.635.44.935.34.7<0.001
Managing others emotionWomen29.8 a4.6314.130.74.430.74.3<0.001
Men28 a4.729.94.528.94.528.94.5<0.001
Utilization Women22.7 a3.923.93.623.93.723.83.7<0.001
emotionMen22.14.222.93.522.63.722.73.70.09
Logical Women1.02 a1.10.86 b11.09 c1.11.14 c0.90.003
thinkingMen1.241.11.311.11.251.11.231.10.9
Letters that do not match indicate p < 0.05.

3.2. Associated with of Exercise Specifics on the EI and LT of Men and Women of Different Ages

EI was lower in men and women of all ages who do not exercise than in the other groups (p < 0.001), but EI did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the other groups (Figure 1). EI was higher in women than in men (p < 0.001). In addition, EI differed between age groups (p < 0.007), and the interaction between the type of exercise and age was significant (p < 0.035). All logic tasks were solved by 16.5% of women who do not exercise, 13.6% of female professional athletes, 18.0% of women who exercise independently, and 19.4% of women who exercise at a gym/health center (chi-square: 19.7; p = 0.02). The respective values for men were 20.3%, 25.2%, 23.5%, and 20.0%, (chi-square: 8.7; p = 0.46). Female professional athletes aged 18–25 and 26–44 years had the lowest logic task scores compared with other groups of the same age (p < 0.01). A three-way ANOVA showed that solving logic tasks was significantly related to age (p = 0.045) and sex (p = 0.003) but not to the type of exercise (p = 0.297); the interaction between the three factors was not significant.

3.3. Ranking of 20 Types of Exercise According to EI

The associated with of the type of exercise (20 types) on EI was not significant in women and men: women: p = 0.291, ŋ P 2 = 0.013; men: p = 0.507, ŋ P 2 = 0.019 (two-way ANOVA) (Table 4). However, associated with of age on EI was significant in women (p = 0.002) and men (p = 0.001). The general EI was higher in women who participate in dance and Pilates than in those who perform CrossFit (p < 0.05, post hoc Tukey analysis); there were no significant differences between the other exercise types. The only significant difference among men was between those who participate in martial arts, wrestling, boxing, or yoga and those who perform powerlifting. In both men and women, the type of exercise was not significantly related to EI scores for perception (male: p = 0.523, ŋ P 2 = 0.019; female: p = 0.63, ŋ P 2 = 0.008), managing own emotions (male: p = 0.57, ŋ P 2 = 0.018; female: p = 0.206, ŋ P 2 = 0.008), managing others’ emotions (female: p = 0.115, ŋ P 2 = 0.013; male: p = 0.163, ŋ P 2 = 0.011), and use of emotions (male: p = 0.143, ŋ P 2 = 0.019; female: p = 0.817, ŋ P 2 = 0.005) (Table 5). All EI scores (except use of emotions) were significantly dependent on age (associated with of age: p < 0.01). In all cases, the interaction between the two factors was not significant.
Among women, scores for EI perception, managing own emotions, and managing others’ emotions were highest among those who participate in dance and Pilates. Scores for managing own and others’ emotions were also highest among women who play volleyball, and EI scores were significantly higher in those who participate in CrossFit.
Among men, those who participate in wrestling and boxing had the highest EI perception score, which was significantly higher than in those who perform powerlifting. Men who participate in track and field and martial arts had the highest scores for managing their own emotions, which were significantly higher than in those who exercise at a gym/health center. Men who participate in martial arts or boxing had the highest scores for managing others’ emotions, which were higher than in those who perform powerlifting. Men who participate in yoga had the highest use of emotion scores, which were significantly higher than in those who perform powerlifting.
Table 4. General emotional intelligence in men and women according to the type of exercise.
Table 4. General emotional intelligence in men and women according to the type of exercise.
MenWomen
SportEmotional Intelligence General RankSportEmotional Intelligence General Rank
MeanSDMeanSD
Martial arts127.8414.29Dance132.515.02
Wrestling127.7113.66Pilates132.212.68
Boxing127.0815.07Volleyball131.416.54
Yoga127.0610.7Cycling130.315.07
Track and field 125.7312.23Track and field 130.215.80
CrossFit125.4113.67Fitness130.014.70
Running125.1414.07Tennis129.713.90
Independent exercise124.7216.3Swimming129.718.29
Volleyball124.514.32Martial arts129.413.24
Football124.3112.77Basketball129.214.40
Basketball124.1914.76Stretching129.116.56
Bodybuilding124.1814.5Yoga129.115.92
Fitness124.1417.91Aerobics129.114.84
Swimming122.8315.52Gym129.119.51
Resistance exercise122.4815.68Resistance exercise128.814.93
Triathlon121.6516.05HIT128.713.20
Cycling121.0515.36Running128.214.81
Tennis120.3114.01Independent exercise127.915.56
Gym119.7817.98Callanetics126.815.14
Powerlifting119.2713.57CrossFit123.613.83
Untrained120.1616.84Untrained125.116.81
Professional athletes126.914.5Professional athletes131.113.20
Table 5. Relationship between different components of emotional intelligence and type of exercise in men and women.
Table 5. Relationship between different components of emotional intelligence and type of exercise in men and women.
Men
SportPerception of EmotionManaging Own EmotionManaging Others’ EmotionUtilization Emotion
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Basketball37.225.5335.554.7229.024.3822.43.56
Bodybuilding36.215.0435.345.4829.584.0523.054.08
Boxing38.325.8236.124.8229.644.36234.05
CrossFit37.715.135.714.1329.44.5222.63.9
Cycling35.666.2535.254.5628.214.8121.953.9
Fitness36.526.4535.055.529.65.2522.984.48
Football37.234.9335.254.5328.693.6323.153.3
Gym35.836.934.285.3827.673.94223.96
Independent exercise36.656.2935.195.2729.544.8823.343.74
Martial arts38.25.9536.434.3329.764.3523.463.61
Powerlifting35.66.1635.934.6826.734.53212.67
Resistance exercise36.836.0435.14.8828.074.5522.483.76
Running36.875.3735.954.7129.414.2522.913.83
Swimming37.764.8734.295.0528.224.8922.563.19
Tennis36.835.6334.634.8127.464.0521.43.99
Track and field 36.774.5336.814.5129.464.8322.693.11
Triathlon35.64.4835.054.9128.84.6322.24.07
Volleyball37.025.2735.854.529.235.0322.43.52
Wrestling39.256.37365.3629.214.2923.252.91
Yoga37.474.435.412.7929.414.1424.762.56
Untrained35.595.9834.435.3927.994.8522.164.28
Professional athletes37.95.536.34.629.834.522.883.5
Women
SportPerception of EmotionManaging Own EmotionManaging Others’ EmotionUtilization Emotion
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Aerobics38.5535.8730.9223.733.534.364.655.62
Basketball38.5336.2831.0323.343.784.214.595.61
Callanetics37.0635.7130.7423.233.914.045.015.66
CrossFit36.4734.9229.2622.923.564.634.445.54
Cycling39.1936.7331.0623.313.824.354.325.58
Dance39.3537.0231.8124.363.504.354.615.75
Fitness38.7936.3530.9023.943.824.354.895.73
Gym38.0236.2230.6424.194.224.885.747.28
HIT38.0036.4730.4023.872.723.894.376.43
Independent exercise38.0835.7630.4623.604.024.235.225.84
Martial arts38.6336.3830.2924.063.023.794.526.00
Pilates39.4636.9031.6924.183.623.734.604.91
Resistance exercise37.6736.3630.6424.133.494.514.765.90
Running38.2436.0730.4023.483.873.934.935.74
Stretching37.3736.6730.9024.203.284.965.686.48
Swimming39.1236.4530.7023.433.945.645.006.53
Tennis38.9435.8131.1123.853.504.434.995.35
Track and field 38.5536.5930.8824.203.894.625.164.98
Volleyball37.9737.3331.7124.433.974.275.286.28
Yoga38.6535.9830.4824.003.714.635.145.88
Untrained37.2334.7529.8523.233.944.705.566.03
Professional athletes39.2036.9031.0023.903.604.104.105.40

3.4. Ranking of the 20 Types of Exercise according to Logical Thinking

The associations between type of exercise and logical thinking (analyzed using one two-way ANOVA) were as follows: women: p = 0.108, ŋ P 2 = 0.013; men: p = 0.79; ŋ P 2 = 0.15. The associated with of age on LT was not significant both in women (p = 0.243) and men (p = 0.059) (interaction between factors was not significant). For men and women, LT did not differ significantly between the 20 types of exercise, except that the LT score was higher in men who participate in triathlon than in those who perform boxing and in women who perform CrossFit than in those who participate in HIT exercises (Table 6).
The structures for the solving of logic tasks are shown in Figure 2. The ability to solve the logic tasks was not significantly related to the type of exercise (women: chi-square 109.1, p = 0.23; men: chi-square 83.4, p = 0.87). The lowest problem-solving score was in the men who participate in boxing; only 8% solved all three tasks (Figure 2). By contrast, all three tasks were solved by 30% of the men who participate in track and field, which was the best performance among men. Among women, higher percentages of those who exercise at a gym/health center (25%) or perform CrossFit (23.7%) solved all three tasks, whereas lower percentages of those who play tennis (11.1%) or participate in HIT exercises (13.3%) solved all three tasks.
Figure 3 shows the ratings of the 20 most popular exercise types together with EI and LT scores. Groups within the top five EI and LT scores were women who participate in cycling and men who perform martial arts or track and field.

3.5. Relationships between Indicators

We found negative (but not significant) correlations between EI and LT for men and women: r = –0.37 (p = 0.107) and r = –0.39 (p = 0.09), respectively (the correlation coefficient among EI and LT when men and women together = –0.62 (p < 0.001)). LT did not correlate significantly with sleep in women (r = 0.48; p > 0.05) but did in men (r = 0.67; p < 0.05). MVPA and EI correlated significantly in women (r = 0.66) and men (r = 0.77), respectively (p < 0.05 for both).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this the first study to report that any exercise (professional sport, independent exercise, or exercise at a gym/health center) is significantly related to EI in men and women. We found that female professional athletes solved the lowest number of logic tasks compared with women in other groups, although the LT was better in women who exercise independently or at a gym/health center than in those who do not exercise. Among men, LT was not related to the type of exercise. The unique aspects of our study are the ranking of the 20 most popular types of exercise in Lithuania according to EI and logical thinking (LT) and the analysis of the relationships between exercise type and EI and LT in men and women separately. We found a negative (but not significant) correlation between EI and LT in both men and women, a positive correlation between MVPA and EI in both men and women, and no significant correlation between MVPA and LT (the correlation coefficient was calculated between the top “20”). Interestingly, in the “20” exercises, in women and men, neither EI nor LT depended on exercise specifics, but EI for both women and men depended on age.
This is consistent with data from other studies that also reported direct associations between EI and exercise [3,29,30,31,32,33]. It is not surprising that people who exercise have better EI because they strive to be the best and often want to lead, and EI is an important trait for leadership [34]. In our study, EI scores were not higher in professional athletes than in nonprofessionals who exercise independently or at a gym/health center. One recent systematic review showed that EI is a determining factor in the improvement in sports competencies [31]. Stanković et al. concluded that elite athletes are characterized by positive, high scores in self-efficacy and emotionality [32]. Ubago-Jiménez found that the relationship between PA and EI is stronger in male than in female students [33]. Our finding of significant positive correlations between MVPA and EI for both men and women is consistent with earlier work. Other studies suggested that EI is related to PA [3] and rapid decision making [35].
Few studies have examined whether EI is related to type of exercise. Stanković et al. showed that professional judo athletes are characterized by a low degree of emotionality, but the emotionality of members of team sports is higher [32]. In our study, EI was highest among participants in dual sports (martial arts, wrestling, boxing) and lowest among those who perform powerlifting. Mills et al. found that emotional competence is an important trait in the training of talented football players [29]. We found that EI of women was highest among those who dance and lowest among those who participate in CrossFit.
We found lower LT in professional athletes than in other groups that exercise, and higher LT in physically active women compared with those do not exercise. However, in men, LT was not related to the type of exercise. Several studies are currently looking at associations between PA and cognitive functions [4,5,8,12,16,36,37,38] or learning achievements [39,40,41,42]. To determine the effectiveness of intuitive thinking and LT, we selected the CRT [26]. CRT is used widely in the study of cognitive ability (intuitive thinking and LT) [43,44]. For example, women who participate in CrossFit had the highest LT and the lowest EI, and men who participate in triathlon had the highest logic score, and their EI was one of the lowest. In addition, the EI of men who participate in boxing was one of the highest, whereas their LT score was among the lowest.
There is a lack of research to explain which types of exercise or PA best stimulate LT (if at all). An increasing number of studies have investigated changes in the functional and structural organization of brain networks in response to exercise and increased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) [37]. Higher PA and CRF levels are associated with better cognitive and motor function, which may reflect enhanced structural network integrity. Dimech et al. reported sex differences in the associations between fitness and brain function in older adults [45]. Ferreira et al. found that, although various physical exercises (aerobic, neuromuscular, flexibility, or neuromotor) stimulate brain activity in older adults, balance and coordination exercises (neuromotor) are best performed [38]. Working memory in children and adolescents is trained better with high coordinative demands [46]. However, in our study, the LT of men was the highest among those who participate in triathlon, a sport that does not require much coordination, balance, or motor control.
We found no significant association between MVPA and LT in men or women, but LT was significantly associated with sleep duration in men. For example, women who cycle were in the top five for EI and LT, and men who participate in martial arts or track and field were equally good in both LT and EI. This is consistent with the findings of Giordano et al.: that children who practice martial arts have better executive functioning and higher school marks than those involved in team sports or not involved in any sports [47]. One study concluded that judo and ball games are beneficial to the quality of sleep and life of children and adolescents [48]. Another study reported that walking and bicycling rated much higher in measures of physical and mental health, confidence, positive affect, and overall hedonic well-being, which suggests significant benefits of physically active commuting [49]. By contrast, watching fast-paced movies impairs children’s executive function [50], and greater media multitasking is associated with poorer executive function ability, worse academic achievement, and a lower growth mind-set [51]. However, despite the data noted above, it is not yet possible to conclude which types of exercise are best for EI or LT or which may affect both LT and EI.

5. Limitations and Directions for Future Research

The main limitation of our research is that we could not test the development of EI and LT over several years experimentally in people participating in 20 of the most popular types of exercise. We also cannot rule out that, in addition to the type of exercise, it is possible that the participants with higher EI and LT choose the type of exercise most appropriate for them. In addition, the participants of our top “20” exercises differed by age. A person’s choice of PA is influenced by a number of interrelated determinants such as demographics, health, and health behavior and psychological, social, and environmental determinants related to the intervention [52]. We can only speculate that people make the decision to be physically active and select a particular form of exercise based more on implicit knowledge than on explicit (reflective) thinking because implicit thinking requires less effort and is more psychologically attractive [21]. To standardize the prescription of exercise for older adults, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2017) has classified physical exercise into four types: aerobic, neuromotor, neuromuscular, and flexibility; however, in our study, the 20 popular types of exercise did not fit neatly into these categories [53].

6. Conclusions

In summary, any exercise (professional sport, independent exercise, or exercise at a gym/health center) has a significant association with on EI in men and women. However, women in professional sports solved the lowest number of logic tasks (LT) compared with women in other groups, although the LT was better in nonprofessional women who exercise independently or at a gym/health center than in those who do not exercise. Among men, logical thinking was not related to the type of exercise. We found only the tendency for a negative correlation between EI and LT in the 20 most popular types of exercise. and We found a positive correlation between MVPA and EI. The unique aspects of our research are the ranking of 20 of the most popular types of exercise in Lithuania and the analysis of the relationships between exercise type and EI and LT for men and women separately. The long-term associated with of these popular exercise types on EI and LT needs to be confirmed and tested experimentally.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, and writing—review and editing: A.S. (Albertas Skurvydas); data curation: D.M. and D.V.; writing—original draft preparation: A.L., R.D., N.I., D.M., D.V., A.S. (Asta Sarkauskiene) and G.B.; visualization: D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval to conduct this research was provided by the Ethical Committee of Klaipeda University (protocol no. STIMC-BTMEK-08). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (revised 2013) and the National Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants (2017).

Informed Consent Statement

The purpose of the survey, introduction and about the length of the survey was added within the web-based open E-survey. A successful return of completed survey was considered as consent by the participant.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Thank you for all participants completed questionnaires.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pedersen, B.K.; Saltin, B. Exercise as medicine—Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2015, 25, 1–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.-P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Laborde, S.; Dosseville, F.; Allen, M.S. Emotional intelligence in sport and exercise: A systematic review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2016, 26, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zlibinaite, L.; Skurvydas, A.; Kilikeviciene, S.; Solianik, R. Two Months of Using Global Recommendations for Physical Activity Had No Impact on Cognitive or Motor Functions in Overweight and Obese Middle-Aged Women. J. Phys. Act. Health 2020, 1, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Žlibinaitė, L.; Solianik, R.; Vizbaraitė, D.; Mickevičienė, D.; Skurvydas, A. The effect of combined aerobic exercise and calorie restriction on mood, cognition, and motor behavior in overweight and obese women. J. Phys. Act. Health 2020, 17, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jacob, L.; Tully, M.A.; Barnett, Y.; Lopez-Sanchez, G.F.; Butler, L.; Schuch, F.; López-Bueno, R.; McDermott, D.; Firth, J.; Grabovac, I.; et al. The relationship between physical activity and mental health in a sample of the UK public: A cross-sectional study during the implementation of COVID-19 social distancing measures. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2020, 19, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thomas, J.; Bowes, N.; Meyers, R.; Thirlaway, K. Mental well-being and physical activity of young people experiencing homelessness before and during COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal study. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2021, 21, 100407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erickson, K.I.; Donofry, S.D.; Sewell, K.R.; Brown, B.M.; Stillman, C.M. Cognitive Aging and the Promise of Physical Activity. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2022, 18, 417–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gallardo-Gómez, D.; del Pozo-Cruz, J.; Noetel, M.; Álvarez-Barbosa, F.; Alfonso-Rosa, R.M.; del Pozo Cruz, B. Optimal Dose and Type of Exercise to Improve Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis of RCTs. Ageing Res. Rev. 2022, 76, 101591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bennie, J.A.; De Cocker, K.; Teychenne, M.J.; Brown, W.J.; Biddle, S.J. The epidemiology of aerobic physical activity and muscle-strengthening activity guideline adherence among 383,928 US adults. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ekelund, U.; Tarp, J.; Steene-Johannessen, J.; Hansen, B.H.; Jefferis, B.; Fagerland, M.W.; Whincup, P.; Diaz, K.M.; Hooker, S.P.; Chernofsky, A.; et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: Systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 2019, 366, l4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Skurvydas, A.; Lisinskiene, A.; Lochbaum, M.; Majauskiene, D.; Valanciene, D.; Dadeliene, R.; Sarkauskiene, A. Physical activity, stress, depression, emotional intelligence, logical thinking, and overall health in a large Lithuanian from October 2019 to June 2020: Age and gender differences adult sample. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Skurvydas, A.; Lisinskiene, A.; Lochbaum, M.; Majauskiene, D.; Valanciene, D.; Dadeliene, R.; Fatkulina, N.; Sarkauskiene, A. Did COVID-19 pandemic change people’s physical activity distribution, eating, and alcohol consumption habits as well as body mass index? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Skurvydas, A.; Zachovajevas, P. Is post-tetanic potentiation, low frequency fatigue (LFF) and pre-contractile depression (PCD) coexistent in intermittent isometric exercises of maximal intensity? Acta Physiol. Scand. 1998, 164, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Verbickas, V.; Baranauskiene, N.; Eimantas, N.; Kamandulis, S.; Rutkauskas, S.; Satkunskiene, D.; Sadauskas, S.; Brazaitis, M.; Skurvydas, A. Effect of sprint cycling and stretch-shortening cycle exercises on the neuromuscular, immune and stress indicators in young men. J. Physiol. Pharm. 2017, 68, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Erickson, K.I.; Hillman, C.; Stillman, C.M.; Ballard, R.M.; Bloodgood, B.; Conroy, D.E.; Macko, R.; Marquez, D.X.; Petruzzello, S.J.; Powell, K.E.; et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: A review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Čekanauskaitė, A.; Skurvydas, A.; Žlibinaitė, L.; Mickevičienė, D.; Kilikevičienė, S.; Solianik, R. A 10-week yoga practice has no effect on cognition, but improves balance and motor learning by attenuating brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in older adults. Exp. Gerontol. 2020, 138, 110998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Matias, T.S.; Lopes, M.V.V.; da Costa, B.G.G.; Silva, K.S.; Schuch, F.B. Relationship between types of physical activity and depression among 88,522 adults. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 297, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pedersen, B.K. The physiology of optimizing health with a focus on exercise as medicine. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019, 81, 607–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evans, J.S.B. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol 2008, 59, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maxwell, A.L.; Gardiner, E.; Loxton, N.J. Investigating the relationship between reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and food addiction: A systematic review. Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev. 2020, 28, 368–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Berger, B.G.; Owen, D.R. Stress reduction and mood enhancement in four exercise modes: Swimming, body conditioning, hatha yoga, and fencing. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1988, 59, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wennman, H.; Borodulin, K. Associations between physical activity types and reaching the physical activity guidelines: The FinHealth 2017 Study. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2021, 31, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chekroud, S.R.; Gueorguieva, R.; Zheutlin, A.B.; Paulus, M.; Krumholz, H.M.; Krystal, J.H.; Chekroud, A.M. Association between physical exercise and mental health in 1· 2 million individuals in the USA between 2011 and 2015: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Psychiatry 2018, 5, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schnohr, P.; O’Keefe, J.H.; Holtermann, A.; Lavie, C.J.; Lange, P.; Jensen, G.B.; Marott, J.L. Various Leisure-Time Physical Activities Associated With Widely Divergent Life Expectancies: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2018, 93, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frederick, S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 2005, 19, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aadahl, M.; Jørgensen, T. Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schutte, N.S.; Malouff, J.M.; Hall, L.E.; Haggerty, D.J.; Cooper, J.T.; Golden, C.J.; Dornheim, L. Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1998, 25, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mills, A.; Butt, J.; Maynard, I.; Harwood, C. Identifying factors perceived to influence the development of elite youth football academy players. J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 1593–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nicolas, M.; Martinent, G.; Millet, G.; Bagneux, V.; Gaudino, M. Time courses of emotions experienced after a mountain ultra-marathon: Does emotional intelligence matter? J. Sports Sci. 2019, 37, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ubago-Jiménez, J.L.; González-Valero, G.; Puertas-Molero, P.; García-Martínez, I. Development of emotional intelligence through physical activity and sport practice. a systematic review. Behav. Sci. 2019, 9, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stanković, N.; Todorović, D.; Milošević, N.; Mitrović, M.; Stojiljković, N. Aggressiveness in judokas and team athletes: Predictive value of personality traits, emotional intelligence and self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 824123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ubago-Jiménez, J.L.; Cepero-González, M.; Martínez-Martínez, A.; Chacón-Borrego, F. Linking Emotional Intelligence, Physical Activity and Aggression among Undergraduates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. George, J.M. Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Hum. Relat. 2000, 53, 1027–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mayer, J.D.; Roberts, R.D.; Barsade, S.G. Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008, 59, 507–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hatch, L.M.; Dring, K.J.; Williams, R.A.; Sunderland, C.; Nevill, M.E.; Cooper, S.B. Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Won, J.; Callow, D.D.; Pena, G.S.; Gogniat, M.A.; Kommula, Y.; Arnold-Nedimala, N.A.; Jordan, L.S.; Smith, J.C. Evidence for exercise-related plasticity in functional and structural neural network connectivity. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 131, 923–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ferreira, S.A.; Stein, A.M.; de Lima Stavinski, N.G.; de Castro Teixeira, D.; Queiroga, M.R.; Bonini, J.S. Different types of physical exercise in brain activity of older adults: A systematic review. Exp. Gerontol. 2021, 159, 111672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lambourne, K.; Hansen, D.M.; Szabo, A.N.; Lee, J.; Herrmann, S.D.; Donnelly, J.E. Indirect and direct relations between aerobic fitness, physical activity, and academic achievement in elementary school students. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2013, 6, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martin, A.; Saunders, D.H.; Shenkin, S.D.; Sproule, J. Lifestyle intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or obese children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 48, 1197–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Donnelly, J.E.; Hillman, C.H.; Castelli, D.; Etnier, J.L.; Lee, S.; Tomporowski, P.; Lambourne, K.; Szabo-Reed, A.N. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: A systematic review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 1197–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Syväoja, H.J.; Kankaanpää, A.; Hakonen, H.; Inkinen, V.; Kulmala, J.; Joensuu, L.; Räsänen, P.; Hillman, C.H.; Tammelin, T.H. How physical activity, fitness, and motor skills contribute to math performance: Working memory as a mediating factor. Scandinavian J. Med. Sci. Sports 2021, 31, 2310–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kahan, D.M. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2012, 8, 407–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pisl, V.; Volavka, J.; Chvojkova, E.; Cechova, K.; Kavalirova, G.; Vevera, J. Dissociation, Cognitive Reflection and Health Literacy Have a Modest Effect on Belief in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dimech, C.J.; Anderson, J.A.; Lockrow, A.W.; Spreng, R.N.; Turner, G.R. Sex differences in the relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and brain function in older adulthood. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 126, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ludyga, S.; Gerber, M.; Kamijo, K. Exercise types and working memory components during development. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2022, 26, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Giordano, G.; Gómez-López, M.; Alesi, M. Sports, Executive Functions and Academic Performance: A Comparison between Martial Arts, Team Sports, and Sedentary Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rosa, C.C.; Tebar, W.R.; Oliveira, C.B.S.; Farah, B.Q.; Casonatto, J.; Saraiva, B.T.C.; Christofaro, D.G.D. Effect of Different Sports Practice on Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: Randomized Clinical Trial. Sports Med. Open 2021, 7, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Singleton, P.A. Walking (and cycling) to well-being: Modal and other determinants of subjective well-being during the commute. Travel Behav. Soc. 2019, 16, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lillard, A.S.; Li, H.; Boguszewski, K. Television and children’s executive function. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 2015, 48, 219–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cain, M.S.; Leonard, J.A.; Gabrieli, J.D.; Finn, A.S. Media multitasking in adolescence. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2016, 23, 1932–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Aleksovska, K.; Puggina, A.; Giraldi, L.; Buck, C.; Burns, C.; Cardon, G.; Carlin, A.; Chantal, S.; Ciarapica, D.; Colotto, M.; et al. Biological determinants of physical activity across the life course: A “Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review. Sports Med. Open 2019, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Exercise testing and Prescription; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Emotional intelligence (A,C,E) and the effectiveness of solving different logic tasks (B,D,F) among men and women of different ages (years) who do not exercise, are professional athletes, exercise independently, or exercise at a gym/health center.
Figure 1. Emotional intelligence (A,C,E) and the effectiveness of solving different logic tasks (B,D,F) among men and women of different ages (years) who do not exercise, are professional athletes, exercise independently, or exercise at a gym/health center.
Ijerph 19 10076 g001
Figure 2. Ability to solve three logical thinking tasks among men (A) and women (B) according to the type of exercise. The numbers at the bottom (0–3) indicate the number of tasks solved.
Figure 2. Ability to solve three logical thinking tasks among men (A) and women (B) according to the type of exercise. The numbers at the bottom (0–3) indicate the number of tasks solved.
Ijerph 19 10076 g002
Figure 3. General ranking according to emotional intelligence and logical thinking men (A) and women (B).
Figure 3. General ranking according to emotional intelligence and logical thinking men (A) and women (B).
Ijerph 19 10076 g003
Table 3. Descriptive characteristics, body mass index, sleep, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in men and women who exercise, listed according to the type of exercise.
Table 3. Descriptive characteristics, body mass index, sleep, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in men and women who exercise, listed according to the type of exercise.
Age, YearsBody Mass Index, kg/m2Experience, YearsSleep, METsModerate-to-Vigorous PA, METs
MenNN Second
Sport
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Basketball1612032.619.4625.393.2617.839.986.520.819.312.3
Running1522637.2610.2125.083.059.238.726.49118.2210.72
Resistance exercise1262732.989.526.333.37.637.956.440.7815.6812.27
Independent exercise1131038.9313.3726.074.428.6711.196.440.9718.7214.12
Cycling732840.6210.3324.853.319.5910.386.420.819.4810.7
Martial arts70137.112.3825.473.612.7910.866.360.9221.2111.61
Football611332.3810.2325.183.18189.926.61.1423.113.62
CrossFit58534.697.626.42.613.795.666.690.7615.589.43
Volleyball481933.2710.0925.46310.4910.296.730.8420.039.47
Fitness421035.5510.6526.253.6210.3710.436.560.7819.3512.11
Swimming411739138425.793.4713.9818.866.80.6917.8913.38
Bodybuilding38 32.718.5327.534.027.545.816.420.9316.1513.7
Tennis351039.9412.9625.272.137.676.560.7519.7310.94
Track and field 26432.5411.8524.573.212.318.956.991.0319.6211.21
Boxing25631.727.9825.472.7210.397.46.440.6720.1310.55
Wrestling24233.139.6727.33.8514.8311.266.750.8118.959.53
Gym22932.946.8326.283.428.296.866.60.6914.4415.26
Yoga21744.2911.34262.744.974.556.720.7112.719.75
Triathlon20134.656.0424.351.923.722.056.840.5417.168.19
Powerlifting20327.6711.8928.6945.975.527.020.5817.2210.28
Age, YearsBody Mass Index, kg/m2Experience, YearsSleep, METsModerate-to-Vigorous PA, METs
WomenNN Second SportMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Independent exercise5644641.5512.9924.194.405.327.276.570.8513.7410.37
Yoga2425641.2611.8022.863.595.485.836.640.8413.989.29
Resistance exercise1815635.198.7023.023.383.964.556.650.8214.889.28
Running1765136.4710.3522.462.987.818.466.570.8017.809.81
Pilates1623243.139.7223.573.534.275.066.600.7912.717.85
Aerobics1422137.1810.3723.693.797.779.006.570.8215.609.95
Fitness1362135.6410.1622.663.065.566.346.530.8115.0510.54
Dance1273232.8510.9923.073.867.769.106.730.7516.7311.14
Callanetics773041.929.9024.453.533.614.756.490.7411.867.99
Swimming692539.6715.9724.684.7511.7613.526.670.9513.469.66
Gym64839.638.8323.693.855.356.956.490.7316.7010.18
Volleyball631033.3812.5122.982.8211.209.876.511.0820.5912.06
Track and field56430.0412.6022.053.6610.509.206.990.8122.3011.88
Tennis54435.3910.4023.163.419.528.236.471.0118.029.19
Cycling482441.1010.7325.085.688.479.416.580.8816.1311.52
Martial arts48136.6914.1822.812.566.996.916.280.7816.169.12
CrossFit38632.136.9623.042.872.291.656.780.7916.419.39
Basketball32232.2811.3324.235.2619.0310.666.540.9619.1812.30
Stretching30 43.6010.1224.624.485.796.506.650.7712.9611.47
Cardio151536.735.8422.952.336.176.836.270.9416.6513.40
Table 6. Relationship between logical thinking and type of exercise in men and women.
Table 6. Relationship between logical thinking and type of exercise in men and women.
MenWomen
SportLogicSportLogic
MeanSDMeanSD
Triathlon1.751.02CrossFit1.321.19
Track and field 1.541.21Gym1.201.25
Tennis1.491.27Cycling1.171.21
Powerlifting1.471.19Resistance exercise1.161.15
Martial arts1.391.18Independent exercise1.141.15
Volleyball1.351.23Stretching1.131.22
Swimming1.321.17Running1.131.20
Wrestling1.291.3Pilates1.121.11
CrossFit1.261.25Yoga1.121.11
Cycling1.251.21Swimming1.121.16
Resistance exercise1.251.13Track and field 1.111.15
Bodybuilding1.241.2Fitness1.081.11
Basketball1.21.21Callanetics1.031.17
Independent exercise1.191.16Martial arts1.021.16
Gym1.171.25Volleyball1.021.13
Running1.171.18Aerobic0.951.10
Football1.131.2Basketball0.941.08
Fitness1.121.17Dance0.921.14
Yoga1.061.2Tennis0.851.04
Boxing0.920.95HIT0.801.15
Untrained1.261.15Untrained1.011.12
Professional athletes1.311.2Professional athletes0.861.00
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skurvydas, A.; Lisinskiene, A.; Majauskiene, D.; Valanciene, D.; Dadeliene, R.; Istomina, N.; Sarkauskiene, A.; Buciunas, G. What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610076

AMA Style

Skurvydas A, Lisinskiene A, Majauskiene D, Valanciene D, Dadeliene R, Istomina N, Sarkauskiene A, Buciunas G. What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(16):10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skurvydas, Albertas, Ausra Lisinskiene, Daiva Majauskiene, Dovile Valanciene, Ruta Dadeliene, Natalja Istomina, Asta Sarkauskiene, and Gediminas Buciunas. 2022. "What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 16: 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610076

APA Style

Skurvydas, A., Lisinskiene, A., Majauskiene, D., Valanciene, D., Dadeliene, R., Istomina, N., Sarkauskiene, A., & Buciunas, G. (2022). What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop