Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Due to the drastic restrictions imposed by the authorities following the COVID-19 pandemic, the management of most multinational companies in Western Romania decided that the employees should work from home. After the relaxation of restrictions (8 March 2022), the corporate decision-makers agreed to return to classical status;
- During the telework period, distance communication use patterns (e.g., Microsoft Teams, Skype, etc.) were chosen by the company’s administration and appreciated by employees only in extreme cases (COVID-19 pandemic period). These are used to carry out the activity in the given situation and do not drastically change the classical, in-person approach;
- Regardless of the current status, company employees prefer face-to-face communication. The crisis did not influence this. This form of communication is primarily chosen because it provides an open area of interpersonal interaction. The participants observe non-verbal message transmissions (gestures, body communication, clothing etc.) or can perceive emotions and feelings. Their personality can be identified through unintentional contact to obtain constructive feedback through guidance and counseling. Moreover, it can be formed and develop productive, intentional connections. In this sense, stakeholders’ efficient and effective open dialogs will be encouraged;
- The telephone, as a form of data transmission and connection, is used in the working environment of multinationals more and more only for urgent clarifications, and e-mail only when necessary (opinions on this issue remained constant throughout the research period);
- Direct communicating with co-workers remains an important issue, which is why, regardless of the methods used, it continued to be convenient, good, and differently addressed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Independent of the telematic methods chosen, they turned out to be good. However, direct contact is the most appropriate in labor relations within multinationals;
- An open dialog highlights the organizational culture of each company. It visualizes the care of each one towards the image and the conversation with the stakeholders. The employees and external environment are also considered. Looking over the difficult times that companies experience, including the pandemic, the quality of communication between the management and the employees is much better. It was observed that after March 2022, the connections worsened (the approach was very difficult, including moments when the workers sustained that they didn’t understand their tasks. The effort made by the leadership to optimize the working media strengthens the bilateral engagement in the companies [52].
- Staff and employee connection from corporations was much more difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic. It involved the sustained transmission activity of management. However, the staff considered communicating well, using the most appropriate telematic means for each worker. The time involved in explaining the tasks was longer. The sustained effort was reflected in the positive appreciation of employees regarding the conversations.
- The research results can be a tool to understand/support employees/employers and in other similar situations with an impact on economic and social activities);
- The study can be used as informational support for the business environment and local authorities through the conclusions drawn;
- The COVID-19 pandemic is a life situation that can be learned from. The information collected, processed, and interpreted in the paper can represent a source for developing a good practice code in health situations of crisis level or otherwise. The data obtained could be considered a base for communication strategies’ improvement and/or development in different institutions during considered cases. In their study, Zhou et al. mentioned the discrepancies between academics and the public in limiting conditions [58]. It is important to find and/or project from ground bases instructive support for all actors involved in daily activities, especially if we consider exceptional situations [59].
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Maillot, A.-S.; Meyer, T.; Prunier-Poulmaire, S.; Vayre, E. A Qualitative and Longitudinal Study on the Impact of Telework in Times of COVID-19. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tengilimoğlu, D.; Zekioğlu, A.; Tosun, N.; Işık, O.; Tengilimoğlu, O. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic period on depression, anxiety and stress levels of the healthcare employees in Turkey. Leg. Med. 2021, 48, 101811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vélez, C.; Paz, M.; Skarbinski, K.; Minami, C.; Murray, H.B.; Bergmark, R.; Staller, K.; Kuo, B. Patient perspectives of pandemic-related disruptions in gastrointestinal care: Developing communication strategies. PEC Innov. 2022, 1, 100048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donovan, E.E.; Alducin, R.; Spaulding, K.; Kim, J.; Alkhafaji, H.; Gonzales, C.; Lazenby, B.; Naeem, A.; Sarwar, F. The labor of talking to stay healthy and socially connected: Communication work during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM—Qual. Res. Health 2022, 2, 100102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, M.M.; Huang, C.F. Transforming habitus and recalibrating capital: University students’ experiences in online learning and communication during the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguist. Educ. 2022, 69, 101057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabah, A.; Elhadi, M.; Ballard, E.; Cortegiani, A.; Cecconi, M.; Unoki, T.; Galarza, L.; Rosa, R.G.; Barbier, F.; Azoulay, E.; et al. Variation in communication and family visiting policies in intensive care within and between countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: The COVISIT international survey. J. Crit. Care 2022, 71, 154050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo-Sama, G.; Matulic, V.; Munté-Pascual, A.; de Vicente, I. Social Work during the COVID-19 Crisis: Responding to Urgent Social Needs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goktas, S.; Gezginci, E.; Kartal, H. The Effects of Motivational Messages Sent to Emergency Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Job Satisfaction, Compassion Fatigue, and Communication Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Emerg. Nurs. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics; No L 154/2003; Official Journal of the European Union: Brussel, Belgium, 2003.
- Brînzan, O. Dezvoltare Rurală; Editura Universităţii “Aurel Vlaicu”: Arad, Romania, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Institutul National de Statistica. Sustainable Development Indicators at Territorial Level for Romania (SDIT). Available online: https://insse.ro/cms/files/IDDT2012/index_IDDT_en.htm (accessed on 14 April 2022).
- Eurostat. Structural Business Statistics (Sbs). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/sbs_esms.htm (accessed on 19 May 2022).
- Paun, I.O.; Mateoc-Sirb, N.; Manescu, C.; Mateoc, T.; Vasile, G.; Banes, A. A Study of Romania’s Territorial Division and Regional Development. Rev. Cercet. Interv. Soc. 2013, 43, 80. [Google Scholar]
- Institutul National de Statistica. Statistics-FPC105B. Available online: http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/ (accessed on 17 April 2022).
- Institutul National de Statistica. Statistics-INT101O. Institutului Național de Statistică—Tempo Online, INT101O. Available online: http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).
- European Union Commission. Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 Concerning the Definition of Micro, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (Text with EEA Relevance); C(2003) 1422; European Union Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2003; Volume 46, pp. 36–41. [Google Scholar]
- Raicov, M.; Rujescu, C.; Feher, A.; Merce, I. The determination and ranking of factors bearing an influence over the ability to absorb rural development funds in Timis County, Romania. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, Maharashtra, India, 5–6 July 2018; p. 390006. [Google Scholar]
- Rožman, M.; Peša, A.; Rajko, M.; Štrukelj, T. Building Organisational Sustainability during the COVID-19 Pandemic with an Inspiring Work Environment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, Y.-J.; Lee, H.; Jang, S.J. Work stress and perceived organisational support on young Korean nurses’ care for COVID-19 patients. Collegian 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Hu, X. A dual perspective on work stress and its effect on unsafe behaviors: The mediating role of fatigue and the moderating role of safety climate. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Gordon, S.; Adler, H. Challenging or hindering? Understanding the daily effects of work stressors on hotel employees’ work engagement and job satisfaction. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 103, 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, D.; Li, Y.; Li, R.; He, J.; Ouyang, F.; Luo, D.; Xiao, S. Long working hours, work-related stressors and sleep disturbances among Chinese government employees: A large population-based follow-up study. Sleep Med. 2022, 96, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, Y.; Yu, Y. The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance. Sustainability 2014, 6, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Choi, Y.; Shin, J.; Morrison, A.M. Can communication messages affect promotion of international air travel in preparation for the post COVID-19 pandemic era? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 51, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beninger, P.; Caubel, P.; Sharma, L.; Pajovich, G.; Boyd, P. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pharmacovigilance Strategy, Systems and Processes of Large, Medium, and Small Companies: An Industry Survey. Clin. Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.Y.; Yang, Y.S.; Ghauri, P.N.; Park, B.I. The Impact of Social Media and Digital Platforms Experience on SME International Orientation: The Moderating Role of COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Int. Manag. 2022, 100950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munodawafa, D. Communication: Concepts, practice and challenges. Health Educ. Res. 2008, 23, 369–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lunenburg, F.C. Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. J. Sch. 2010, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Van Ruler, B. Communication Theory: An Underrated Pillar on Which Strategic Communication Rests. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 2018, 12, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verčič, A.T.; Verčič, D.; Sriramesh, K. Internal communication: Definition, parameters, and the future. Public Relat. Rev. 2012, 38, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigotti, E.; Rocci, A. Towards a definition of communication context. Stud. Commun. Sci. 2006, 6, 155–180. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, D.; Grimes, M.; Roch, S. Communication for Business Professionals; eCampusOntario: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tkalac Verčič, A.; Špoljarić, A. Managing internal communication: How the choice of channels affects internal communication satisfaction. Public Relat. Rev. 2020, 46, 101926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, H.M.; Witmaier, A.; Ko, E. Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 131, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Littlemore, J. The communicative effectiveness of different types of communication strategy. System 2003, 31, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bruggeman, B.; Garone, A.; Struyven, K.; Pynoo, B.; Tondeur, J. Exploring university teachers’ online education during COVID-19: Tensions between enthusiasm and stress. Comput. Educ. Open 2022, 3, 100095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimé, B.; Bouchat, P.; Paquot, L.; Giglio, L. Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2020, 31, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Pan, Y.; Hu, Y. The intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of interpersonal synchrony. Acta Psychol. 2022, 224, 103513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hamzah, M.I.; Othman, A.K.; Hassan, F.; Razak, N.A.; Yunus, N.A.M. Conceptualizing a Schematic Grid View of Customer Knowledge from the Johari Window’s Perspective. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 37, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ha, K.-M. Integrating the resources of Korean disaster management research via the Johari window. Eval. Program Plan. 2019, 77, 101724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shenk, D. The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You’ve Been Told about Genetics, Talent, and IQ Is Wrong; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, C. The functions of active listening responses. Behav. Process. 2018, 157, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Min, K.S.; Jung, J.M.; Ryu, K. Listen to their heart: Why does active listening enhance customer satisfaction after a service failure? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 96, 102956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrigo, J.L.; Samek, A.; Hurlburt, M. Minority and low-SES families’ experiences during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: A qualitative study. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2022, 140, 106594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stubbs, J.M.; Achat, H.M. Are healthcare workers particularly vulnerable to loneliness? The role of social relationships and mental well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res. Commun. 2022, 2, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, A.H.; Becene, I.A.; Nguyen, K.T.N.H.; Stuart, J.J.; West, M.G.; Berrill, J.E.S.; Hankins, J.; Borba, C.P.C.; Rich-Edwards, J.W. A qualitative analysis of psychosocial stressors and health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on frontline healthcare personnel in the United States. SSM—Qual. Res. Health 2022, 2, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dodd, W.; Brubacher, L.J.; Kipp, A.; Wyngaarden, S.; Haldane, V.; Ferrolino, H.; Wilson, K.; Servano, D.; Lau, L.L.; Wei, X. Navigating fear and care: The lived experiences of community-based health actors in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc. Sci. Med. 2022, 308, 115222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jämsen, R.; Sivunen, A.; Blomqvist, K. Employees’ perceptions of relational communication in full-time remote work in the public sector. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 132, 107240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genç, R. The Importance of Communication in Sustainability & Sustainable Strategies. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 8, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barendsen, W.; Muß, A.C.; Silvius, G. Exploring team members’ perceptions of internal sustainability communication in sustainable project management. Proj. Leadersh. Soc. 2021, 2, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities. How COVID-19 Is Changing the World: A Statistical Perspective; Angela Me, H.F., Ed.; Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume III, p. 88. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, Y. How dialogic internal communication fosters employees’ safety behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Relat. Rev. 2022, 48, 102156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukitsch, M.; Engert, S.; Baumgartner, R.J. The implementation of corporate sustainability in the European automotive industry: An analysis of sustainability reports. Sustainability 2015, 7, 11504–11531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, M. A Methodology for Mapping Meanings in Text-Based Sustainability Communication. Sustainability 2013, 5, 2457–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Micangeli, A.; Naso, V.; Michelangeli, E.; Matrisciano, A.; Farioli, F.; Belfiore, N.P. Attitudes toward Sustainability and Green Economy Issues Related to Some Students Learning Their Characteristics: A Preliminary Study. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3484–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rožman, M.; Tominc, P.; Milfelner, B. A Comparative Study Using Two SEM Techniques on Different Samples Sizes for Determining Factors of Older Employee’s Motivation and Satisfaction. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bjärntoft, S.; Hallman, D.M.; Zetterberg, C.; Larsson, J.; Edvinsson, J.; Jahncke, H. A Participatory Approach to Identify Key Areas for Sustainable Work Environment and Health in Employees with Flexible Work Arrangements. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Zhang, C. Breaking community boundary: Comparing academic and social communication preferences regarding global pandemics. J. Informetr. 2021, 15, 101162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mercader, V.; Galván-Vela, E.; Ravina-Ripoll, R.; Popescu, C.R.G. A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 14, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Features | Characteristics | Share (%) |
---|---|---|
Age | 18–30 | 20.1 |
31–40 | 43.7 | |
41–50 | 23.3 | |
51–60 | 12.9 | |
Gender | Male | 45.2 |
Female | 54.8 | |
Education level | High school education | 1.2 |
University degree | 59.5 | |
Master degree | 35.7 | |
PhD | 3.6 | |
Work experience in years | Under 1 | 13.1 |
1–3 | 25.0 | |
3–5 | 21.4 | |
5–7 | 16.7 | |
Over 7 | 23.8 | |
Percent of telework from the total time realized | Under 25 | 10.7 |
25–50 | 17.9 | |
50–75 | 9.5 | |
75–100 | 61.9 |
Features | Characteristics | Share (%) |
---|---|---|
Age | 18–30 | 23.8 |
31–40 | 45.2 | |
41–50 | 26.2 | |
51–60 | 4.8 | |
Gender | Male | 40.5 |
Female | 59.5 | |
Education level | Vocational school | - |
High school | 23.8 | |
Post-secondary | 4.8 | |
Higher education | 71.4 | |
Work experience in years | Under 1 | 11.9 |
1–3 | 11.9 | |
3–5 | 14.3 | |
5–7 | 26.2 | |
Over 7 | 35.7 | |
Percent of telework from the total time realized | Under 25 | 52.4% |
25–50 | - | |
50–75 | - | |
75–100 | 21.4% |
Features | Characteristics | Share (%) |
---|---|---|
Age | 20–30 | 42.6 |
31–40 | 27.7 | |
41–50 | 25.4 | |
51–60 | 4.3 | |
Gender | Male | 43.7 |
Female | 54.2 | |
Undefined | 2.1 | |
Education level | Vocational school | 10.4 |
High school | 39.6 | |
Post-secondary | - | |
Higher education | 50.0 | |
Work experience in years | Under 1 | 18.8 |
1–3 | 18.8 | |
3–5 | 27.1 | |
5–7 | 14.6 | |
Over 7 | 20.7 | |
Percent of telework from the total time realized | Under 25 | 58.3 |
25–50 | 16.7 | |
50–75 | 16.7 | |
75–100 | 8.3 |
Value | df | Asymptotic Significance (2-Sided) | |
---|---|---|---|
Pearson chi-square | 24.362 a | 4 | 0.000 |
Likelihood ratio | 25.501 | 4 | 0.000 |
Linear-by-linear association | 21.346 | 1 | 0.000 |
N of valid cases | 174 |
Value | df | Asymptotic Significance (2-Sided) | |
---|---|---|---|
Pearson chi-square | 1.124 a | 4 | 0.891 |
Likelihood ratio | 1.130 | 4 | 0.890 |
Linear-by-linear association | 0.290 | 1 | 0.590 |
N of valid cases | 174 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Țigan, E.; Blaga, R.L.; Isac, F.-L.; Lungu, M.; Milin, I.A.; Tripa, F.; Gavrilaș, S. Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169796
Țigan E, Blaga RL, Isac F-L, Lungu M, Milin IA, Tripa F, Gavrilaș S. Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(16):9796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169796
Chicago/Turabian StyleȚigan, Eugenia, Radu Lucian Blaga, Florin-Lucian Isac, Monica Lungu, Ioana Anda Milin, Florin Tripa, and Simona Gavrilaș. 2022. "Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 16: 9796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169796
APA StyleȚigan, E., Blaga, R. L., Isac, F. -L., Lungu, M., Milin, I. A., Tripa, F., & Gavrilaș, S. (2022). Analysis of Sustainable Communication Patterns during the Telework Period in Western Romanian Corporations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9796. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169796