Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Alkali Activated Cementitious Material by Upgraded Fly Ash from MSW Incineration
Previous Article in Journal
Public Health Measures to Address the Impact of Climate Change on Population Health—Proceedings from a Stakeholder Workshop
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 20
10.3390/ijerph192013668
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ensiling Improved the Colonization and Degradation Ability of Irpex lacteus in Wheat Straw

by
Dongze Niu
1,2,*,
Peng Zhu
1,3,
Tingting Pan
2,4,
Changyong Yu
1,3,
Chunyu Li
1,
Jianjun Ren
1 and
Chuncheng Xu
2,*
1
Changzhou Key Laboratory of Biomass Green, Safe & High Value Utilization, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Institute of Urban and Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2
College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Petrochemical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
4
Shandong Institute of Standardization, Jinan 250014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(20), 13668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013668
Submission received: 31 August 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 2 October 2022 / Published: 21 October 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To develop a non-thermal method to replace steam autoclaving for white-rot fungi fermentation, Irpex lacteus spawn was inoculated in wheat straw (WSI) or ensiled WS (WSI) at varying ratios of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%, and incubated at 28 °C for 28 days to determine the effects of the ensiling and inoculation ratio on the colonization and degradation ability of Irpex lacteus in wheat straw (WS). The results demonstrate that ensiling effectively inhibited the growth of aerobic bacteria and molds, as well as other harmful microorganisms in WS, which created a favorable condition for the growth of I. lacteus. After the treatment of I. lacteus, the pH of EWSI decreased to below 5, while that of WSI, except for the feedstocks of WSI-50%, was around 7, indicating that I. lacteus colonized well in the ensiled WS because the substrates dominated by I. lacteus are generally acidic. Correspondingly, except for the molds in WSI-50% samples, the counts of other microorganisms in WSI, such as aerobic bacteria and molds, were significantly higher than those in EWSI (p < 0.05), indicating that contaminant microorganisms had a competitive advantage in non-ensiled substrates. Incubation with I. lacteus did not significantly affect the cellulose content of all samples. However, the NDS content of EWSI was significantly higher than that of WSI (p < 0.05), and the hemicellulose and lignin contents were significantly lower than the latter (p < 0.05), except for the NDS and hemicellulose contents of WSI-50% samples. Correlation analysis revealed a stronger negative correlation between NDS content and the contents of hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin in EWSI, which could be caused by the destruction of lignin and hemicellulose and the conversion from structural carbohydrates to fungal polysaccharides or other compounds in NDS form. Even for WSI-50% samples, the sugar yield of WS treated with I. lacteus improved with an increasing inoculation ratio, but the ratio was not higher than that of the raw material. However, the sugar yield of EWSI increased by 51–80%, primarily owing to the degradation of lignin and hemicellulose. Above all, ensiling improves the colonization ability of I. lacteus in WS, which promotes the degradation of lignin and hemicellulose and the enzymic hydrolysis of cellulose, so combining ensiling and I. lacteus fermentation has promising potential in the pretreatment of WS.

1. Introduction

Wheat straw (WS) is an important renewable resource that can produce valuable products or raw materials, including ruminant feed, biomass fuel, and platform chemicals [1,2]. However, degradable nutrients in the stalks, such as fat, starch, and protein, are transferred to the seeds during the ripening process of wheat plants; hence, mature WS is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin with low nutritional value [3,4]. Lignin forms a physical barrier through intramolecular processes and cross-linking with hemicellulose molecules, which limits the utilization of sugar in straw by microorganisms and their secreted enzymes [3,5]. To improve the utilization efficiency of lignocellulose, many researchers are constantly attempting to change the physical and chemical structure of cell walls through physical, chemical, biological, and combined methods to break the enzymatic hydrolysis resistance barrier of lignocellulose and improve the application value of straw in feed, energy, and other fields [3]. Compared to physical and chemical methods, a biological method represented by white-rot fungi (WRF) fermentation has attracted wide attention because of its mild fermentation conditions and no by-product production [6,7].
WRF is a type of filamentous fungi that causes the white rot of wood due to their better ability to degrade lignin than that of cellulose, so WRF has potential applications in the pretreatment of lignocellulose [6,7,8]. WRF, such as Irpex lacteus, Lentinus edodes, and Ceriporiopsis subvermispora, is effective in selectively degrading lignin [2,9]. However, most studies were conducted under sterilization conditions, resulting in high pretreatment costs because of the requirements for autoclaving and aseptic conditions [7,10,11]. To simplify the fermentation process and reduce the production cost, researchers have attempted to increase the inoculation amount [12] and sterilize substrates using a CaO solution and pasteurization [13,14] and have proven their effectiveness in improving the colonization ability of WRF. However, the methods still require washing with a large quantity of water [14], a higher than 30% inoculation amount [12], or a relatively high temperature [13]. Therefore, developing economical, environmentally friendly, and efficient pretreatment methods is crucial to inhibit the growth of harmful microorganisms and improve the colonization and degradation ability of WRF.
Ensiling is a technology that uses the anaerobic fermentation of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to preserve high-water-content feed crops [15,16]. This technology not only effectively avoids loss caused by poor weather conditions during drying but also reduces the risk of fire during storage [17]. Studies have demonstrated that ensiling can increase the hydrophilicity of lignin and the number of small holes in the cell wall, thus improving the enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass and Arundo donax [18,19]. Although the anaerobic process has little effect on lignin content and cannot remove lignin’s blocking effect on cellulase [20], the pH and the growth of harmful microorganisms in ensiled substrates decreases significantly after several weeks of anaerobic fermentation, allowing most silages to retain an adequate quality after several days or even weeks of opening [21,22]. Our previous studies have confirmed that I. lacteus has strong resistance to foreign bacteria and acidic conditions, so it colonizes well in ensiled WS (EWS), corn stalk, and oat straw [23,24,25]. However, the effects of ensiling on inoculation ratio, chemical composition, and enzymic efficiency are still unclear.
Generally, fungus-colonized substrate is a cheap and easily available inoculum, so I. lacteus colonized in WS was inoculated into untreated WS or EWS at various proportions and incubated at 28 °C for 28 days in this study. Culturable microbes, chemical composition, and enzymatic hydrolysis of WS were measured to determine the benefits of ensiling and the optimal inoculation ratio for WRF fermentation, which will provide theoretical guidance and methodological reference for the large-scale application of I. lacteus fermentation in WS treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strain and Preparation of I. lacteus Spawn

The fungal strain (I. lacteus CGMCC 5.809) used in this experiment was obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) in Beijing, China. Before the experiment, the strain was inoculated into a culture dish containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium and cultured at 28 °C for five days [2]. After the mycelium had colonized the culture dish, it was stored at 4 °C for further use.
The primary medium was comprised of 55% water, 39.5% wheat grains, 3% crushed WS, and 2.5% calcium sulfate. After sterilization at 121 °C for 20 min, ten 5 mm PDA plugs covered with I. lacteus mycelium were inoculated in 100 g primary medium and cultured at 28 °C for 5–7 days to make I. lacteus spawn [23]. The primary I. lacteus spawn (4%) was then inoculated in sterilized WS (121 °C, 20 min) with 70% water content and incubated at 28 °C for 28 days to obtain the secondary I. lacteus spawn, which were used as inoculants for subsequent fermentation.

2.2. Substrates and Ensiling Procedure

WS used in this experiment was obtained from the National Experiment Station for Precision Agriculture (40.22° N, 116.20° E, Beijing, China). The harvested WS was air-dried in the field before being collected, chopped to 1–2 cm with a hay cutter, and stored in a cool, dry place for subsequent ensiling or fermentation.
EWS was prepared from chopped WS according to a previous report [23]. Briefly, the moisture content of WS was adjusted to 55% and then the substrates were separated into polyethylene vacuum packaging bags, which were sealed with a vacuum packaging machine (Ouxin Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China). All samples were stored in the dark at room temperature. After ensiling for 28 days, the samples were opened and sampled for microbial and chemical analysis and the remaining samples were used for subsequent fermentation with I. lacteus.

2.3. Fermentation with I. lacteus

The water content of WS and EWS was adjusted to 70% using tap water, and then they were separated into polyethylene fresh-keeping bags (Miaojie, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China). After that, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% of secondary I. lacteus spawn (w/w) were inoculated into WS- and EWS-containing bags. After uniform mixing, they were incubated at 28 °C for 28 days. The 50% inoculated groups were sampled at 7, 14, and 28 days, whereas the samples in other groups were only sampled at 28 days. Each treatment had three replicates.

2.4. Microbial Analysis

The analysis of culturable microorganisms was conducted according to previous reports [16,23]. Briefly, 10 g of raw materials or fermentation samples were put into an extraction bag with 90 mL of sterilized distilled water. After thoroughly shaking, 1 mL of the extracted solution was diluted and spread in nutrient agar medium (Nissui, Japan), de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA), and Rose Bengal medium (Aobox, Beijing, China) for counting aerobic bacteria, LAB, and fungi (molds and yeasts), respectively [23]. A Mettler Toledo S20K pH meter (Greifensee, Switzerland) was used to determine the pH of fermentation samples. To determine organic acid content, the remaining extracted solutions were filtered and stored at −20 °C.

2.5. Chemical Analyses and Enzymatic Hydrolysis

About 150 g of raw materials or fermented WS were removed from each treatment. After accurate weighing, they were dried in a drying oven at 65 °C for 48 h to determine dry matter (DM) content. The dried samples were shattered using a high-speed grinder with a 1 mm screen. The water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content was determined using the anthrone method [21]. Neutral detergent solute (NDS), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were analyzed using an Ankom 2000 automated fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Fairport, NY, USA) [2]. Hemicellulose and cellulose contents were calculated using the difference between NDF, ADF, and ADL. The sugar yield of raw and treated WS was determined using the revised method of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) [23].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare different treatments and significance was declared when p < 0.05. The association between the parameters was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical and Microbial Compositions of Raw Materials before Inoculation

Table 1 displays the chemical and microbial compositions of WS and EWS before inoculating I. lacteus spawn. The WSC content of raw WS was 5.15% DM and significantly decreased (p < 0.05) after ensiling for 28 days, which is mainly attributed to the conversion of WSC to organic acids by LAB. During the fermentation process, LAB counts increased from 3.52 to 6.87 log10 CFU/g FM, but molds decreased to a non-detectable level. The changes in chemical and microbial composition after ensiling are consistent with previous reports [15,23]. The growth of harmful microorganisms on the surface of WS was inhibited by the organic acid produced by LAB [26], indicating that ensiling is an effective method to reduce the abundance of harmful microorganisms in WS.

3.2. pH and Microbial Composition during Incubation with I. lacteus

Figure 1 depicts the pH and culturable microorganisms in different treatments. The inoculation amount had no significant effect on the pH of EWSI after 28 days of incubation (p > 0.05), which ranged around 4.7 (Figure 1a). For the control treatment, the decreased pH was only observed in substrates with 50% inoculation (p < 0.05). Unlike other aerobic microorganisms, WRF can produce organic acids and some other active chemicals to inhibit most coexisting microorganisms, so the pH of substrates is an important index to evaluate WRF growth [23,27]. In this study, pH variations reflect that ensiling promotes the proliferation of I. lacteus in WS, consistent with previous reports [23,24].
In treatments with 50% inoculum, the pH of WSI-50% was significantly higher than that of EWSI-50% (p < 0.05), but the pH of both groups reached a similar value with an extending fermentation time, indicating that I. lacteus can secrete organic acids and reduce the pH of substrates [28]. To summarize, ensiling can enhance the colonization ability of I. lacteus in WS and thus reduce the requirement of the inoculation amount, which is an effective strategy for providing a competitive advantage for WRF growth.
Figure 2 displays the microorganism counts in various treatments. Similar to pH, ensiling significantly changed the microbial composition of WS treated with I. lacteus. After 28 days of fermentation, the counts of aerobic bacteria and molds in WSI were significantly higher than that in EWSI (p < 0.05), while the counts of LAB in WSI were significantly lower (p < 0.05). The aforementioned results are consistent with the change in microbial counts in WS before and after ensiling, reflecting that the change of microbial counts caused by ensiling in straw is irreversible.
In treatments with 50% inoculum, aerobic bacteria, LAB, and molds in WSI-50% and EWSI-50% significantly increased in the early fermentation stage (p < 0.05) but remained unchanged or significantly decreased in the middle and late stages. After 14 days of fermentation, mold count decreased below the detection limit. Throughout fermentation, the LAB count in EWSI-50% was significantly higher than that in WSI-50% (p < 0.05) and the counts of aerobic bacteria and mold were significantly lower than that in the latter (p < 0.05). WRF is known to coexist with some bacteria, thus promoting lignin degradation [29]. Although there is no evidence of symbiosis between WRF and LAB, straw fermented with WRF can be effectively ensiled [27,30]. Therefore, the metabolites of WRF do not inhibit LAB. On the contrary, some molds have an antagonistic relationship with WRF [31], so their lower counts in EWSI indicate that I. lacteus can continue the inhibitory effect on mold caused by ensiling.

3.3. Chemical Composition during Incubation with I. lacteus

Figure 3 depicts the chemical composition of WS in various treatments. In the samples with different inoculation, the NDS content in WSI increased with an increasing inoculation amount and the value of WSI-50% reached 32.4%, which is 14% higher than that of untreated WS and had no significant difference compared to that of EWS. NDS refers to components that can be washed with a neutral detergent solution, including starch, soluble sugar, pectin, protein, soluble phenols, lipids, and ash [2]. Because NDS components are mostly degradable, I. lacteus fermentation significantly improved the nutritional value of WS in WSI-50% and all EWSI samples. Contrary to NDS content, the hemicellulose content of WSI-50% and EWSI samples was significantly lower than that of other samples (p < 0.05) because WRF has a strong ability to degrade hemicellulose [32]. There was no significant difference in the cellulose and lignin contents of EWSI with different inoculation amounts. Notably, the cellulose content of WSI-50% was significantly lower than that of EWSI but the lignin content of WSI-50% was higher. The co-culture of some microorganisms with WRF is reported to increase the activities of cellulase, xylose, and chitinase [8]. Combined with the higher counts of other microorganisms, we inferred that their existence promoted the degradation of cellulose and other nutrients, increasing the relative content of lignin.
In the treatments with 50% inoculum, the contents of cellulose and hemicellulose revealed a downward trend but the contents of NDS had an upward trend. Compared to day 0, the NDS content of EWSI-50% at day 28 increased by 37%. However, the changes in lignin content in WSI-50% and EWSI-50% had an opposite trend. After 28 days of fermentation, the lignin content of WSI-50% increased by 23.0%, while that of EWSI-50% decreased by 25.4%. The findings indicate that, although a higher inoculation amount is an effective method to promote the growth and degradation of WRF [12], the presence of other microorganisms promotes the degradation of cellulose, hemicellulose, and other nutrients, resulting in higher dry matter loss and thus limiting the decrease of lignin content. Ensiling before fermentation with I. lacteus can effectively inhibit the consumption of nutrients by other microorganisms.
To clarify the relationships among different chemical compositions during fermentation with I. lacteus, their correlations in WSI and EWSI were analyzed (Table 2). In both groups, the NDS content was negatively correlated with hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin content, reflecting that a part of the degraded hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin was converted into NDS, which is easier to digest and utilize, rather than being completely consumed by the microorganisms. The correlation between hemicellulose and NDS in EWSI was stronger (R = 0.928, p < 0.01) than that of WS. Combined with the low hemicellulose contents in EWS, I. lacteus fermentation is demonstrated to efficiently convert hemicellulose to NDS in EWS. In addition, a strong positive correlation was observed between the contents of cellulose and lignin in WSI (R = 0.642, p < 0.05). In contrast, a strong positive correlation was observed between hemicellulose and lignin in EWSI (R = 0.920, p < 0.01). In lignocellulose, cellulose and lignin are the most difficult to degrade [5]. Given the low NDS content in WS, the high correlation between cellulose and lignin is thought to be mainly caused by an increase in their relative content. In contrast, the loss of NDS and other substances in EWSI was less, and hemicellulose and lignin formed a spatial network structure in straw [3,7]. Therefore, the degradation of hemicellulose or lignin by WRF destroyed the network structure, resulting in their simultaneous decrease, which is the primary reason for the strong correlation between hemicellulose and lignin in EWS.

3.4. Sugar Yield of Enzymatic Hydrolysis before and after Incubation with I. lacteus

Figure 4 depicts the sugar yields of various raw materials and treatments. The sugar yield of WS after 72 h of enzymatic hydrolysis was 28% and ensiling had no significant effect on the value (p > 0.05). After fermentation with I. lacteus for 28 days, the sugar yield of samples in WSI below 40% inoculation significantly decreased (p < 0.05) and that of WSI-50% had no significant difference with raw materials (p > 0.05). In contrast, the sugar yield of samples in EWSI increased by 40% to 47% (p < 0.05), which is equivalent to the sugar yield of WS delignified with 1.5% NaOH or 80% p-toluenesulfonic acid [33]. Further analysis reveals that sugar yield was positively correlated with NDS content (p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with hemicellulose and lignin contents (p < 0.01) but no significant correlation was observed between cellulose content and sugar yield. Considering the negative correlation between lignin and hemicellulose contents and the positive correlation between lignin and NDS contents, we inferred that the increased sugar yield of WS after fermentation with I. lacteus was mainly caused by the degradation of hemicellulose and lignin [2,10]. Above all, I. lacteus can effectively colonize in EWS and destroy the complex network of cellulose and hemicellulose, promoting the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose, so combining ensiling with I. lacteus fermentation is an effective method for high-value uses of WS.

4. Conclusions

Ensiling significantly altered the microbial community structure on the surface of WS, inhibited the growth of harmful microorganisms, and created favorable conditions for subsequent fermentation. Although I. lacteus can colonize in WS without ensiling when the inoculation amount is greater than 50%, the abundance of harmful microorganisms, such as aerobic bacteria, was high, making it impossible to improve the lignin degradation rate and sugar yield of WS. However, even at 10% inoculation, I. lacteus colonized well in EWS, and the lignin degradation rate and enzymatic hydrolysis sugar yield significantly improved. Therefore, inoculating 10% I. lacteus colonized in WS is an effective, economical, readily available inoculant for EWS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.N.; data curation, P.Z., T.P., and C.Y.; investigation, T.P.; methodology, P.Z. and C.Y.; project administration, C.X.; resources, C.X.; software, C.L.; Validation, J.R.; visualization, D.N.; writing—original draft, D.N.; Writing—review and editing, C.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 32002210] and the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province, China [grant number 20KJB230004].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationship that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Talebnia, F.; Karakashev, D.; Angelidaki, I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: An overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4744–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Niu, D.Z.; Zuo, S.S.; Jiang, D.; Tian, P.J.; Zheng, M.L.; Xu, C.C. Treatment using white rot fungi changed the chemical composition of wheat straw and enhanced digestion by rumen microbiota in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 237, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Houfani, A.A.; Anders, N.; Spiess, A.C.; Baldrian, P.; Benallaoua, S. Insights from enzymatic degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose to fermentable sugars—A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 134, 105481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Severe, J.; ZoBell, D. Technical aspects for the utilization of small grain straws as feed energy sources for ruminants: Emphasis on beef cattle. Utah State Univ. Ext. Publ. 2012, 4, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dos Santos, A.C.; Ximenes, E.; Kim, Y.; Ladisch, M.R. Lignin-enzyme interactions in the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 518–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kainthola, J.; Podder, A.; Fechner, M.; Goel, R. An overview of fungal pretreatment processes for anaerobic digestion: Applications, bottlenecks and future needs. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 321, 124397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gu, X.; Fu, X.; Chen, S. Hydrothermal liquefaction conversion of lignocelluloses with enhanced fungal pretreatment. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González, C.; Wu, Y.; Zuleta-Correa, A.; Jaramillo, G.; Vasco-Correa, J. Biomass to value-added products using microbial consortia with white-rot fungi. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 16, 100831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van Kuijk, S.J.A.; Sonnenberg, A.S.M.; Baars, J.J.P.; Hendriks, W.H.; Cone, J.W. Fungal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass: Importance of fungal species, colonization and time on chemical composition and in vitro rumen degradability. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2015, 209, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, M.; Zuo, S.; Niu, D.; Jiang, D.; Tao, Y.; Xu, C. Effect of four species of white rot fungi on the chemical composition and in vitro rumen degradability of naked oat straw. Waste Biomass Valori. 2020, 12, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, X.; Wang, F.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, D.; Wang, S.; Wu, D.; Wang, L.; Zhong, R. High-potency white-rot fungal strains and duration of fermentation to optimize corn straw as ruminant feed. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312, 123512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vasco-Correa, J.; Ge, X.; Li, Y. Fungal pretreatment of non-sterile miscanthus for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 203, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sasaki, C.; Yamanaka, S. Novel sterilization method combining food preservative use and low temperature steaming for treatment of lignocellulosic biomass with white rot fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, L.; Ma, F.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yu, H. The promoting effects of manganese on biological pretreatment with Irpex lacteus and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ni, K.; Wang, Y.; Pang, H.; Cai, Y. Effect of cellulase and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality and chemical composition of wheat straw silage. Am. J.Plant Sci. 2014, 05, 1877–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Niu, D.; Zheng, M.; Zuo, S.; Jiang, D.; Xu, C. Effects of maize meal and limestone on the fermentation profile and aerobic stability of smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss) silage. Grass Forage Sci. 2018, 73, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Digman, M.F.; Shinners, K.J.; Casler, M.D.; Dien, B.S.; Hatfield, R.D.; Jung, H.-J.G.; Muck, R.E.; Weimer, P.J. Optimizing on-farm pretreatment of perennial grasses for fuel ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5305–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Desta, S.T.; Yuan, X.; Li, J.; Shao, T. Ensiling characteristics, structural and nonstructural carbohydrate composition and enzymatic digestibility of Napier grass ensiled with additives. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 221, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, S.; Ge, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y. Effect of harvest date on Arundo donax L.(giant reed) composition, ensilage performance, and enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 205, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, Q.; Marshall, M.N.; Geib, S.M.; Tien, M.; Richard, T.L. Effects of laccase on lignin depolymerization and enzymatic hydrolysis of ensiled corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 117, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tian, P.; Vyas, D.; Niu, D.; Zuo, S.; Jiang, D.; Xu, C. Effects of calcium carbonate on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silage. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2020, 29, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, L.; Zhou, W.; Xing, Y.; Pian, R.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Improving the quality of rice straw silage with Moringa oleifera leaves and propionic acid: Fermentation, nutrition, aerobic stability and microbial communities. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 299, 122579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Niu, D.; Zuo, S.; Ren, J.; Huhetaoli; Zheng, M.; Jiang, D.; Xu, C. Novel strategy to improve the colonizing ability of Irpex lacteus in non-sterile wheat straw for enhanced rumen and enzymatic digestibility. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1347–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zuo, S.; Jiang, D.; Niu, D.; Zheng, M.; Tao, Y.; Xu, C. A lower cost method of preparing corn stover for Irpex lacteus treatment by ensiling with lactic acid bacteria. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zheng, M.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Cui, X.; Niu, D.; Yang, F.; Xu, C. Ensiling with rumen fluid promoted Irpex lacteus colonization on the non-sterile naked oat straw for enhanced lignocellulose degradation and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 183, 108462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Villa, R.; Ortega Rodriguez, L.; Fenech, C.; Anika, O.C. Ensiling for anaerobic digestion: A review of key considerations to maximise methane yields. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020, 134, 110401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Andrade, E.; Mendes-Ferreira, A.; Botelho, S.; Marques, G.; Cone, J.W.; Rodrigues, M.; Ferreira, L. Preservation of fungal-treated cowpea straw in association with discarded apple by ensilage process. Waste Biomass Valori. 2021, 12, 5533–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liaud, N.; Giniés, C.; Navarro, D.; Fabre, N.; Crapart, S.; Gimbert, I.H.; Levasseur, A.; Raouche, S.; Sigoillot, J.C. Exploring fungal biodiversity: Organic acid production by 66 strains of filamentous fungi. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2014, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Iimura, Y.; Abe, H.; Otsuka, Y.; Sato, Y.; Habe, H. Bacterial community coexisting with white-rot fungi in decayed wood in nature. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 3212–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mao, L.; Sonnenberg, A.S.; van Arkel, J.; Cone, J.W.; de Vos, R.C.; Marchal, J.L.M.; Hendriks, W.H. Storage temperature and time and its influence on feed quality of fungal treated wheat straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2021, 272, 114749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wiberth, C.C.; Casandra, A.Z.C.; Zhiliang, F.; Gabriela, H. Oxidative enzymes activity and hydrogen peroxide production in white-rot fungi and soil-borne micromycetes co-cultures. Ann. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Isroi, I.; Millati, R.; Niklasson, C.; Cayanto, C.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Lundquist, K. Biological treatment of Lignocelluloses with white-rot funghi and its applications. BioResources 2011, 6, 5224–5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Chio, C.; Yang, C.; Su, E.; Jin, Y.; Cao, F.; Qin, W. Delignification overmatches hemicellulose removal for improving hydrolysis of wheat straw using the enzyme cocktail from Aspergillus niger. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 13668 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of different treatment and fermentation days on the pH of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus. (a) treatment with different inoculating ratio; (b) treatment with 50% inoculating ratio at different days; mean ± SD (n = 3); values with different small letters differed (p < 0.05) among treatment.
Figure 1. Effects of different treatment and fermentation days on the pH of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus. (a) treatment with different inoculating ratio; (b) treatment with 50% inoculating ratio at different days; mean ± SD (n = 3); values with different small letters differed (p < 0.05) among treatment.
Ijerph 19 13668 g001
Ijerph 19 13668 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of different inoculating ratio (a,c,e) and fermentation days (b,d,f) on the culturable microbes of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus.
Figure 2. Effects of different inoculating ratio (a,c,e) and fermentation days (b,d,f) on the culturable microbes of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus.
Ijerph 19 13668 g002
Ijerph 19 13668 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of different treatment (a) and fermentation days (b) on the chemical composition of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus.
Figure 3. Effects of different treatment (a) and fermentation days (b) on the chemical composition of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus.
Ijerph 19 13668 g003
Ijerph 19 13668 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of inoculating ratio on the enzymatic digestibility of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus (a) and its correlation with main components (b,c,d).
Figure 4. Effects of inoculating ratio on the enzymatic digestibility of wheat straw treated with I. lacteus (a) and its correlation with main components (b,c,d).
Ijerph 19 13668 g004
Table
Table 1. Chemical and microbial compositions of the intact and ensiled wheat straw before inoculating I. lacteus spawn.
Table 1. Chemical and microbial compositions of the intact and ensiled wheat straw before inoculating I. lacteus spawn.
ItemWheat StrawEnsiled Wheat Straw
WSC (% DM)5.15 ± 0.2430.59 ± 0.038
NDS (% DM)28.4 ± 0.2325.2 ± 0.36
Hemicellulose (% DM)27.9 ± 0.2829.7 ± 0.31
Cellulose (% DM)37.9 ± 0.3341.3 ± 0.27
ADL (% DM)6.81 ± 0.176.99 ± 0.23
pH value6.88 ± 0.0765.55 ± 0.043
Lactic acid (% DM)ND2.48 ± 0.137
Acetic acid (% DM)ND3.40 ± 0.211
Butyric acid (% DM)ND2.67 ± 0.173
LAB (log10 CFU/g FM)3.52 ± 0.1276.87 ± 0.393
AB (log10 CFU/g FM)6.86 ± 0.2516.13 ± 0.174
Molds (log10 CFU/g FM)5.12 ± 0.181ND
DM, dry matter; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates; NDS, neutral detergent solute; ADL, acid detergent lignin; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; AB, aerobic bacteria; FM, fresh matter; ND, not detected; mean ± SD (n = 3); values with different small letters differed (p < 0.05) among treatment.
Table
Table 2. Correlation between the chemical composition of wheat straw with different treatments.
Table 2. Correlation between the chemical composition of wheat straw with different treatments.
TreatmentItemsNDSHemicelluloseCelluloseLignin
Wheat strawNDS1−0.527−0.828 **−0.666 *
Hemicellulose−0.52710.061−0.138
Cellulose−0.828 **0.06110.642 *
Lignin−0.666 *−0.1380.642 *1
Ensiled wheat strawNDS1−0.928 **−0.720 *−0.918 **
Hemicellulose−0.928 **10.4220.920 **
Cellulose−0.720 *0.42210.467
Lignin−0.918 **0.920 **0.4671
NDS, neutral detergent solute; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niu, D.; Zhu, P.; Pan, T.; Yu, C.; Li, C.; Ren, J.; Xu, C. Ensiling Improved the Colonization and Degradation Ability of Irpex lacteus in Wheat Straw. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013668

AMA Style

Niu D, Zhu P, Pan T, Yu C, Li C, Ren J, Xu C. Ensiling Improved the Colonization and Degradation Ability of Irpex lacteus in Wheat Straw. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(20):13668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niu, Dongze, Peng Zhu, Tingting Pan, Changyong Yu, Chunyu Li, Jianjun Ren, and Chuncheng Xu. 2022. "Ensiling Improved the Colonization and Degradation Ability of Irpex lacteus in Wheat Straw" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 20: 13668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013668

APA Style

Niu, D., Zhu, P., Pan, T., Yu, C., Li, C., Ren, J., & Xu, C. (2022). Ensiling Improved the Colonization and Degradation Ability of Irpex lacteus in Wheat Straw. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop