Next Article in Journal
Do Migration and Acculturation Impact Somatization? A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Driving Forces of Land Use in the Context of Urbanization in China: Evidence from Nanchang City
Previous Article in Journal
Gender-Specific Significance of Peer Abuse during Childhood and Adolescence on Physical and Mental Health in Adulthood—Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in a Sample of Hospital Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Wetland in Dongting Lake Based on Multi-Source Satellite Observation Data during Last Two Decades
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

1
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
3
Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-Rural Integration Development, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
4
National Research Center for Geoanalysis, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16007; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316007
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 25 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Land Use Changes and the Corresponding Ecological Risks)

Abstract

:
Farmland abandonment is one of the most important land use changes in the world today and crucial to the sustainable development of the global environment. The authors carried out extensive research on farmland abandonment from many perspectives, but, due to the variety of the research contents, rich research perspectives, and complex research objects, the current research in this field lacks comprehensiveness, objectivity, and systematization. In this study, the bibliometric R software packages bibliometrix and biblioshiny (K-Synth Srl, Naples, Italy) were used to analyze the development history and current situation of 896 articles on farmland abandonment in the Web of Science core collection database from 1980 to 2021, revealing their research hotspots and predicting the future development trends. Over the past 40 years, the number of published papers on abandoned farmland has continuously increased. Research mainly focused on the ecological environment, with natural succession, biodiversity, and vegetation restoration being high-frequency keywords in this field. Research on the social aspects of farmland abandonment has developed rapidly in the past 6 years. Based on these findings, this paper put forward four future research directions: the data source for the extraction of abandoned farmland should transform to high spatial-temporal resolution and hyperspectral remote sensing images; the method should pay more attention to the time series change detection and the application of the model; future research should focus on the economic costs of the reclamation of abandoned farmland and the ecological consequences of such reclamation; and the global ecological impact of vegetation succession after the abandonment of farmland should be further discussed from a broader perspective.

1. Introduction

Land use change seriously affects the sustainable development of the global environment [1,2], especially in terms of ecosystem services and biodiversity [3]. Globally, farmland abandonment is one of the major land use changes today [4,5] and a result of the marginalization of farmland driven by social, economic, and environmental factors [6,7]. The main consequences of farmland abandonment are vegetation succession, environmental problems, as well as landscape and socio-economic impacts, with global impacts. Extensive farmland abandonment in one area may lead to large-scale grain imports, often resulting in deforestation [8] in other countries, with effects on ecology, goods, production, and services [9,10]. Recently, farmland abandonment has attracted wide attention from scholars, organizations, research institutions, and the public.
The term “farmland abandonment” has different definitions, depending on the method and content of the study [7]. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) defined farmland abandonment as changes in ecosystem services due to a significant reduction in farmland management. In some studies, farmland abandonment was defined as the cessation of agricultural activity on a given land surface and the subsequent natural restoration of vegetation to grassland [11], shrub vegetation [12], or forest [13], rather than its occupation by other activities (e.g., urbanization or afforestation) [14]. Some studies classified the conversion to forest into a special category of abandonment [15]. At a temporal scale, some studies defined abandoned farmland as farmland left idle for more than 1 year [7]. However, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), an idle period of 2 to 5 years must be guaranteed to define farmland as abandoned [16]. Fallows have been assessed as part of a crop rotation cycle to determine whether a plot of land was abandoned or awaiting future use [17]. Some studies distinguished abandoned farmland as a long-term fallow from temporary fallow (defined as farmland that was not cultivated within 1 year) [18].
Previous studies reviewed numerous aspects of research in the field of farmland abandonment. For example, the impact of farmland abandonment on the ecosystem and biodiversity [19] could be regarded as positive or negative [20]. Regarding the positive aspects, farmland abandonment is conducive to the regional biodiversity [21,22,23], increasing the soil organic carbon and vegetation water retention capacity [24,25], and promoting reforestation [26]. However, early succession vegetation after farmland abandonment provides fuel for wildfires [27] and increases the reproductive fitness of weeds, pests, and pathogens on the remaining farmland [28]. Farmland abandonment may also lead to the marginalization of the agricultural cultural landscape, causing the loss of cultural and aesthetic value [29,30]. These effects vary with the geographic area distribution and abandonment period. For example, in Spain, farmland abandonment led to the loss of bird habitat, reduced biodiversity [31], decreased the soil erosion potential within 50 years of farmland abandonment, and increased the incidence of soil erosion within 80–100 years of abandonment [32]. Against the background of food security and the local demand for agricultural products, in some areas, abandoned farmland is being reclaimed. Some examples are the reclamation of some areas after the disintegration of the former Soviet Union [24,33] and the cultivation of formerly abandoned farmland in mountainous areas of China [34,35]. To better understand the ecological consequences and reclamation potential of farmland abandonment, the spatial and temporal patterns and drivers of farmland abandonment distribution have been investigated [36,37,38]. Numerous factors can affect the distribution of abandoned farmland, including natural conditions (such as climate [39], terrain [40], soil [41]), market demand, traffic location conditions, urbanization, and policy [42,43,44].
Generally, literature reviews on farmland abandonment only cover a certain country or region [45,46], thereby lacking a global perspective. Moreover, they largely focus on one aspect of farmland abandonment, failing to outline the current situation or to predict the future development direction. Such an approach limits the ability of researchers to investigate farmland abandonment from different viewpoints and perspectives.
Bibliometrics is an alternative approach to analyze the distribution structure, research topics, and changing trends of a large number of academic publications via mathematical and statistical methods and visualizes the results through visual and intuitive charts [47,48]. Compared with classical review writing, researchers do not need to screen large amounts of literature one by one, which is more convenient, objective, and reliable. The commonly used bibliometric analysis tools include HistCite [49], SATI [50], and CiteSpace [51]. Bibliometrix is an open-source tool developed by Massimo Aria in the R language in 2017. Compared to other bibliometric software packages, such as CITAN [52] and ScientoText, bibliometrix can import and transform data from various database sources, such as the Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, and Lens.org, and has more literature information analysis and result visualization functions [53]. Based on the secondary development of bibliometrix, the entire bibliometric steps were assembled into an automated online workflow of biblioshiny. The difference between the two packages is that the bibliometrix’s mode of operation consisted of code commands, whereas biblioshiny uses the Shiny package to package the bibliometrix’s core code and create a web-based online data analysis framework, making it fully available for researchers without any programming skills. It can provide multiple types of statistical methods and a wide variety of visual charts [54].
Bibliometrix has been widely used to quantitatively analyze the literature in geography-related fields. For example, Soler et al. [55] retrieved 1150 publications on rural population reduction, published in the Web of Science and Scopus databases from 1979 to 2018, and used co-word analysis and the co-citation network to conclude that important themes of rural depopulation were relevant to specific geographic areas. Xie et al. [54] conducted data mining and quantitative analysis by retrieving publications in the field of land degradation from 1990 to 2019 from the core collection database of the Web of Science, revealing the research status of global land degradation and evaluating the direction of future research on land degradation. However, publications in the field of farmland abandonment have rarely been reviewed via bibliometrics.
Here, we used the bibliometrix and biblioshiny R language packages to comprehensively analyze the literature in the field of farmland abandonment, considering studies published in the Web of Science core database between 1980 and 2021. First, the development process, current situation, and trend of the research period in the field were identified through the statistical analysis of the annual output of related publications, citations, journal sources, and the main research countries and regions. In addition, collaborative network analysis and clustering of authors, keywords, and topics determined the research hotspots and future frontiers in this field. Based on the above analysis, the problems to be addressed are as follows: (1) What is the trend of article production and citation in the field of farmland abandonment? (2) What are the fluctuation trends regarding the authors, journals, and countries in the field of farmland abandonment? (3) What are the main research directions in the field of farmland abandonment? (4) What is the future research focus in the field of farmland abandonment?

2. Data Sources and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

To improve the representativeness and usability of the data, the data were collected from the Web of Science core collection database [56], which is the largest and one of the most comprehensive bibliometric analysis databases in the world, including data from natural sciences, computer sciences, biology, arts, humanities, and other fields from more than 12,000 high-impact academic journals. By referring to relevant articles in the field of farmland abandonment, we identified the most commonly used keyword “farmland abandonment” [35,57,58,59,60], and the search formula was as follows: T1 = (cropland abandonment) or T2 = (abandoned cropland) or T3 = (farmland abandonment) or T4 = (abandoned farmland) or T5 = (agricultural land abandonment) or T6 = (abandoned agricultural land) or T7 = (cultivated land abandonment) or T8 = (abandoned cultivated land) or T9 = (land abandonment) or T10 = (abandoned land). We limited the publication years to 1980–2021 as some articles will still be published in 2022, whereas the number of articles published before 1980 was extremely small. Overall, 977 publications were found. We focused on journal articles, conference transcript articles, and reviews, excluding comments, news, and letters. After filtering, 926 criteria-compliant publications were downloaded, exported as complete records, and referenced in the format “.txt”. To ensure the completeness and accuracy of the retrieved data, duplicates were manually removed. Finally, a total of 896 publications on farmland abandonment were obtained (Figure 1, Supplementary Table S1). We searched by title rather than by theme, author, abstract, and keywords. In many bibliometric studies, search by title is considered as the most accurate search method [61,62,63], whereas searching by theme/abstract/keywords will produce many false-positive results (the main concern is not the abandonment of farmland itself). Although searching by title can result in the loss of some documents (false-negatives), there will be more false-positive results when searching by theme. In this study, we searched by title and theme, respectively, resulting in 8603 documents being different between the two scenarios. Sorting according to the global citation rate of articles, manually reviewing the titles, abstracts, and keywords of the top 100 articles with the highest citation rates (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3), we found that only 12% of the articles appeared by a theme search focused on farmland abandonment, and most of them also appeared in the articles searched by title. Overall, 42% of the articles on farmland abandonment appeared as marginal research, and 46% of the articles did not investigate farmland abandonment. Among the articles found by the title search, 72% focused on farmland abandonment, 19% only marginally studied farmland abandonment, and 9% did not carry out research on farmland abandonment. Based on this, it was decided to search by title.

2.2. Methods

Using the bibliometrix and biblioshiny software packages, the research status and trends in the field of farmland abandonment were reviewed and analyzed. Data analysis included a quantitative analysis of annual scientific production, citations, and journal sources, a collaborative network analysis of authors, countries, and regions, a clustering analysis of document keywords, and the evolution analysis of thematic trends and monitoring methods in abandoned farmland areas during the research period (Figure 1). The present situation and law of research in abandoned farmland were expounded through multiple perspectives to provide a reference and suggestions for future research in this field. The workflow is as follows:
(1) Problems and spans of design research: This paper identified farmland abandonment as the research topic and searched the core database of the Web of Science for articles from 1980 to 2021 by determining search terms, search time, and document types. (2) Data collection: An article database was built [64] by exporting the retrieved documents into the appropriate format of bibliometric tools. (3) Data analysis and visualization: This included co-word analysis [65], collaborator analysis [66], citation analysis [67,68,69], coupling analysis [70,71], and co-citation analysis [72]. For example, two-dimensional maps, dendrograms, and collaborative network diagrams were generated. This step was implemented in the bibliometric software packages bibliometrix and biblioshiny. (4) Data interpretation: the results were analyzed and described, and future research directions in the field of farmland abandonment were proposed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Annual Scientific Results Output and Citation Number

To analyze the general situation and development trend of the research field, the number of published articles (Figure 2) and the mean number of citations (Figure 3) were summarized. From 1980 to 2000, fewer than 11 articles were published in any given year, representing only 10.9% of the total articles published. The mean number of citations can reflect the quality and influence of the article, with four peaks during this period, i.e., in 1987, 1994, 1997, and 2000. The research content was focused on the ecological impacts of farmland abandonment, such as species recovery [73], carbon fixation [74], water retention potential [75], and soil erosion [76]. Immediately after abandonment, because of the lack of vegetation, soil erosion and runoff were serious. In sites that had been abandoned for several years, with a dense vegetation cover, soil erosion and runoff were negligible. There were also studies evaluating the possibility of abandonment reclamation from the ecological perspective [77]. Although in this period studies were scarce, investigating a series of influences after the succession of abandoned farmland from an ecological perspective laid the foundation for subsequent research.
From 2001 to 2015, the number of published articles on farmland abandonment showed an upward trend, albeit with fluctuations, with an average of 25.13 articles per year, accounting for 42.1% of the total published volume. Mean citations peaked in 2003, 2008, and 2015. During this period, sustainability issues, such as climate change and food security, became major concerns. With increasing population size, urbanization, and farmland intensification, the migration of the rural population to cities has led to the large-scale abandonment of farmland. In this period, the contribution of the rational use of abandoned farmland to sustainable development was recognized, and the administration of abandoned farmland has become a hotspot [78,79]. For example, Calcerrada et al. predicted landscape dynamics after farmland abandonment by developing a landscape change transfer matrix model. The authors assumed that, in addition to the ecological value, abandoned farmland can also be used for a series of human activities, such as agriculture, animal husbandry, and tourism [80]. Vegetation succession on abandoned sites and the ecological impacts are some of the main research directions [81,82,83,84]. At the same time, with the emergence of machine learning and different resolution sensors, the use of remote sensing means combined with mathematical models to extract abandoned farmland also attracted wide attention [41,85].
From 2016 to 2021, the number of articles on farmland abandonment increased dramatically, especially in 2020 and 2021, with 80 and 93 articles, respectively. The papers published during this period accounted for 46.99% of the total articles published. In this period, in addition to a change from the traditional ecological perspective to a more modern approach, the research perspective was more diversified, involving the driving factors of farmland abandonment [86,87,88], social, economic, and environmental consequences [6,89], spatial patterns [90], and policy enlightenment [91]. For example, Xu et al. used survey data of rural households in 27 provinces of China to analyze the spatial patterns of abandoned farmland and studied the impact of farmers’ employment on farmland abandonment. Based on the results, labor migration and non-agricultural employment were the main factors driving the abandonment of rural farmland in China [92]. The methods and means of extracting abandoned farmland were also enriched, resulting in a higher accuracy. For example, Yin et al. developed a new method for the extraction of abandoned farmland using a 30-m resolution Landsat satellite time series, with an extraction accuracy of 97% [59]. Although the research content was richer and more diverse, the mean number of citations per project declined after 2018, and the influence of respective articles decreased in 2020 and 2021.

3.2. Journal Sources

To study the development of the research area in different journals, the sources of journals were ranked considering the number of publications, the H index, and TC (total citations) (Table 1). The H index was used to measure the importance and impact of the authors’ cumulative research contributions, and the TC represented the total citations for all articles from a journal source. The number of articles published in these journals ranged from 13 to 32. Articles published by Land Use Policy over the entire period accounted for 3.6% of the total published articles, followed by those published in Sustainability, with 2.9%. In terms of total citations, Land Use Policy was the most-cited source, followed by Catena with 1642 citations; the ninth-ranked journal, Remote Sensing, had the lowest number of citations (165). Taking into account the H index, Remote Sensing was again at the bottom of the list, whereas the seventh-ranked journal, Forest Ecology and Management, had an H index of 17, which was the same as the first-ranked journal Land Use Policy.
According to the journal source dynamics, the evolution curve of the cumulative number of published articles for the 10 most productive journals was plotted over time (Figure 4), obtaining the following information: (1) Land Use Policy had the largest production volume and the fastest growth rate during the research period. (2) Forest Ecology and Management had a significant production volume before 2014, with a decrease thereafter. (3) Catena published the first papers on farmland abandonment in 1999, with stagnation in the middle part of the research period and a significant increase after 2016; Land Degradation & Development showed a similar trend. In general, over time, farmland abandonment become the focus of several journals.

3.3. Author Analysis

We first ranked the most relevant authors in the field of farmland abandonment, along with several bibliometric metrics (Table 2), and subsequently generated the author collaboration network (Figure 5), which reflects the connection of different authors’ knowledge or social levels. This network can be used to identify previously unknown research groups and represents the similarity of research themes [93]. Finally, we plotted the authors’ changing results over time (Figure 6). Articles fractionalized (AF) indicated the contribution rate of the author to the article in the article jointly published by the author and other authors. Overall, 2747 authors contributed to publications in the field of farmland abandonment. Among them, the top three authors were Guobin Liu, Teodoro Lasanta, and Tobias Kuemmerle, with 19, 18, and 16 published papers, respectively (Table 2). Using the H index to measure the importance and influence of the cumulative research contribution, the author with the highest H index was the German scholar Tobias Kuemmerle, with a H index of 15 and a total citation number of 1813, indicating the high quality and influence of his published papers.
The results in the Author Collaborative Network (Figure 5) were divided into 13 clusters, with each color representing a group of collaborative authors. The larger the circle, the more productive the author. The most representative seven groups of authors were selected, and their studies were analyzed.
The first group examined farmland abandonment in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union after the disintegration of socialism. Different land policies, economic development, and reform strategies led to large differences in the abandonment rates among different countries [94,95]. During the transition period of 1990–2000, the agricultural sector in Russia, Latvia, and Lithuania declined sharply, while the socio-economic and agricultural infrastructure in Lithuania were more suitable for agriculture, leading to a low abandonment rate. In this period, the Russian government almost completely abolished agricultural subsidies, which led to a high abandonment rate [96]. In contrast, the Belarusian government provided more support for agriculture, leading to a low abandonment rate. Poland and Slovakia, located near the edge of the Carpathian Mountains, are largely affected by terrain and market access, which resulted in a high abandonment rate. However, due to the adoption of private agriculture in the socialist period in Poland’s plain area, the agricultural sector in this area quickly adapted to the post-socialist framework, which resulted in a low abandonment rate [94].
The second author group mainly studied the effects of farmland abandonment on soil and hydrological conditions in the Mediterranean region [97,98]. For example, in the southeast of Spain, soil degradation after farmland abandonment is serious. Droughts led to the generation of a surface crust, which reduces the permeability and increases surface runoff and soil erosion [76]. In the Pyrenees Mountains, farmland abandonment has greatly increased the contents of suspended sediment in the water, which has affected the water supply and agricultural activities in the downstream area. However, the local environment is humid, which is conducive to afforestation. Vegetation has increased the soil stability in this area, resulting in reduced soil erosion, surface runoff, and flood probability [5,97,98].
The third group of authors focused on the effects of farmland abandonment on the Loess Plateau of China, such as the effects on soil carbon sequestration [99] and the microbial community [100]. For example, Zhang et al. reported that the vegetation coverage rate decreased in the 10 years before abandonment and returned to normal levels after 15–20 years of abandonment [101]. Deng et al. studied the organic carbon reserves of soil after abandonment on the Loess Plateau, which decreased significantly in the first 20 years and recovered to pre-abandoned levels 30 years later [102]. Similar to the second group, this author group studied the impacts of farmland abandonment on the land. However, whilst the second group focused on soil properties and runoff, this group mainly investigated the succession of vegetation communities and organic carbon reserves over time.
The fourth group of authors mainly analyzed the factors driving and influencing the abandonment of rural farmland in China. In this country, more areas are abandoned in mountainous and hilly areas than in the plains [101]. Xu et al. revealed a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between farmers’ employment outside the agricultural sector and farmland abandonment; based on their results, non-agricultural labor does not necessarily lead to farmland abandonment. On the one hand, when rural laborers are employed in non-agricultural sectors, this leads to a shortage of the agricultural labor force, a lack of the land transfer market in rural areas, and insufficient labor resources for families to maintain the production of their existing land, often resulting in extensive farmland abandonment. On the other hand, most farmers are unable to integrate into urban areas and are unwilling to sacrifice their land; they may, therefore, choose outsourcing to avoid giving up their farmland [92,103]. Another study shows that the internet can help farmers significantly reduce farmland abandonment [104].
Similar to the second and third groups, the fifth group of authors also discussed the relationships between farmland abandonment and vegetation and species diversity but paying more attention to the afforestation on abandoned farmland in eastern and northern Europe. For example, hybrid aspen plantations planted on abandoned farmland in Estonia were monitored, and their impacts on understory vegetation and species numbers were discussed [105], as well as the effect of alder on soil nitrogen [106]. In another study, the aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, and nutrients of natural birch forests on abandoned farmland in Estonia were studied [107].
The sixth group of authors focused on abandoned farmland in the mountainous areas of Nepal, such as the Himalayan mountains [108,109] and the Dordi River basin [110]. For example, Chaudhary et al. evaluated the temporal and spatial degradation of abandoned farmland in the Dordi River basin and analyzed its causes and the resulting ecological environment risks. Of the total farmland surveyed, 92% had been completely destroyed, leading to landslides, debris flow, rock fall, gully formation, soil erosion, and limestone pits, thus increasing the negative impact on land resources and vegetation succession [109]. The authors also evaluated the temporal and spatial distribution and driving factors of farmland abandonment in the mountainous areas of Nepal and discussed the ecological and social impacts of abandonment. Based on their results, farmland abandonment is widespread in the hills and mountains of Nepal, with one fifth of the total farmland area being abandoned from 2001 to 2010. Population growth, migration, urbanization, inconvenient transportation, scattered living, poverty, and lack of land policies are the main factors driving farmland abandonment in Nepal. In turn, abandoned farmland restricts the supporting structure of terraced fields in this area, causing natural disasters, such as landslides and mud rock flows, and impeding natural succession. Overall, the results on the ecological environment and the rural society are negative [108,111].
The seventh group of authors studied the changes in species distributions after farmland abandonment, focusing on birds. The main study area was Hokkaido, Japan, where abandoned farmland and wetlands coexist. The authors assessed the landscape patterns of the abandoned farmland [112] and compared the bird biodiversity of the abandoned farmland with that of other local land use types [113,114], indicating that the bird abundance in abandoned areas is equivalent to that of wetlands. Different from the European region, the positive impact of farmland abandonment in this region is greater than the negative impact. Abandoned farmland may evolve into wetlands and forests, which can provide habitat and recovery opportunities for local species. In this context, the management of abandoned farmland in this area is crucial to the protection of bird species in the agricultural landscape.
At least five of these clusters were interested in ecological issues, whereas the remaining two clusters reported social concerns. Based on different natural conditions, policies, and systems, studies on farmland abandonment showed obvious regional differences.
Considering the authors’ production over time (Figure 6), Teodoro Lasanta and Artemi Cerda were the two authors with the longest-standing involvement in research on farmland abandonment. Daniel Muller published four articles with other authors in 2013, with the highest annual total citation number of 68.6. Abandoned farmland in Europe was extracted mainly by means of remote sensing methods. For example, the abandoned farmland [115] in 30 countries, including central and eastern Europe, was quantified by support vector machine classification in an article in cooperation with Alcantara et al., using MODIS NDVI time series satellite images. A spatial allocation model that obtained a time series of abandoned farmland [24] in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus from 1990 to 2009 was developed in cooperation with Schierhorn et al. Four articles published by Tobias Kuemmerle in collaboration with other authors received 58.2 annual total citations, also studying farmland abandonment in Europe [116,117]. Two authors, Daniel Muller and Tobias Kuemmerle, belong to the first cluster of the author collaboration network (Figure 5), with most of the total citations.

3.4. Analysis of the Distribution Characteristics of the Main Research Countries/Regions

To identify the key countries and regions in terms of publication number and impact, the cooperation network between countries and regions was analyzed (Figure 7). Between 1980 and 2021, a total of 62 countries or regions published papers. Among the top 20 countries regarding publication number (Table 3), there were three Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea), two American countries (the United States, Canada), 14 European countries (Spain, Italy, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, France, Estonia, Sweden, Switzerland, Russia, Greece, Slovakia, Portugal), and one Oceanian country (Australia). Among the top five countries with the largest numbers of publications, three were European countries. Based on our findings, European authors were more concerned about the issue of farmland abandonment. China was the only developing country among the top five countries regarding publication number, ranking first and having published 193 papers. However, the mean number of citations per article was low, with only 20.71, indicating that Chinese authors need to pay more attention to the quality of their articles. The countries with the highest mean citation numbers were the Netherlands, followed by Switzerland, with 96.88 and 95.07, respectively, but with fewer publications, ranking ninth and 15th, respectively.
Based on the national collaboration network (Figure 7), the most closely cooperating countries were Germany and the United States, Russia and Germany, and Spain and the Netherlands, with 17, 15, and 19 cooperation articles, respectively (the thicker the lines, the closer the connection between countries). The node size represents the number of articles published in cooperation with other countries. The countries with the most co-published articles were China, Spain, and Germany, with 42, 32, and 27 articles, respectively (Figure A1), accounting for 16%, 12%, and 10% of the total output of co-published articles, respectively. China and Spain published a larger number of articles independently, with Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands focusing on collaborative research with other countries.

3.5. Document Analysis

3.5.1. Analysis of Highly Cited Papers

The top 10 cited articles (Table 4) reflected the most influential content in the field of farmland abandonment from the perspective of citations, including seven research papers and three reviews. The article with the highest overall number of citations proposed that determining the ecological restoration goal of abandoned farmland is a challenge that people will face in the future. It was also proposed that the future research direction should be combined with land use policy [78]. Gellrich et al. [118] developed an economic model to analyze the driving factors of natural forest regeneration in the Swiss mountains, showing that natural forest regeneration is more likely to occur in areas where farmland has been abandoned. Similar findings were found in other mountainous areas, such as the Alps as well as in Sweden, Poland, Denmark, the Baltic Sea, and parts of Slovenia. Other studies focused on Europe; for example, the 10th article [119] used the revised CAPRI model to assess the consequences of farmland abandonment in the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). In the whole of the EU, the distribution of abandoned farmland in different countries, regions, and farm types is uneven. Abandoned farmland caused by agricultural and trade policy reforms may have a significant impact on rural livelihoods and the environment, such as a reduced biodiversity.
In addition, the paper ranked No. 2 [120] used the Dyna CLUE model to conduct a clear simulation and spatial evaluation on the natural succession track of abandoned farmland and vegetation in Europe from 2000 to 2030. The simulation results show that abandoned farmland in Europe mainly occurs in the mountainous regions. The natural succession after abandonment mainly depends on local conditions, such as climate, population density, and terrain [81,121,122,123]. The seventh-ranked article assessed the hydrological impacts of land abandonment in the Mediterranean region of Europe, focusing on water resource availability and soil erosion [45]. This study shows that vegetation succession after abandonment is related to many factors, including soil depth and fertility, slope aspect, and climate (annual average precipitation, evapotranspiration), among others [124]. In the Mediterranean region, abandoned farmland is mainly concentrated in mountain terraces and semi-arid areas, such as southern France, southeast Spain, south central Portugal, and Italy [81,125,126]. In terraced areas, such as the Iberian Mountains and the Pyrenees Mountains in Spain [84,127,128], farmland abandonment has resulted in landscape degradation and soil erosion, sediment deposition in river channels, and increased surface runoff. In semi-arid areas, higher temperatures, less precipitation, and long-term drought impede vegetation succession on abandoned farmland. The resulting surface crust reduces the infiltration rate, increases surface runoff, and leads to surface erosion [129]. On the contrary, in humid areas, the succession of vegetation dominated by herbaceous and shrub species is rapid [120].
After the collapse of the socialist system in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, under the dual impact of the system and the economy, farmland abandonment differed among different European countries. The article ranked No. 8 [42] studied the spatial distribution and driving factors of farmland abandonment in western Ukraine after the collapse of the socialist system, identifying differences with other parts of Europe. In western Europe, abandonment is mainly driven by industrialization, market orientation, and urbanization, such as in areas around the Alps and Romania [130]. The abandonment rate in the plains of western Ukraine is high, whereas that in the marginal areas is low. In the transitional period, the agriculture in this area was not yet industrialized and dominated by traditional self-supporting agriculture. The plain soil is relatively barren and not suitable for farming, and the reduction of the agricultural labor force due to large-scale migration and regular remittances from family members seeking non-agricultural employment in other regions can maintain the livelihood of the farmers. In addition, compared with other eastern European countries, such as Latvia, Poland, Russia, Lithuania, and Estonia [91,131,132], the abandonment mode in western Ukraine is different, most likely because of differences in socialist land ownership patterns, post-socialist land reform strategies, and rural population densities [94,115]. With this in mind, the factors driving farmland abandonment cannot be generalized among countries that are also impacted by the collapse of socialism.
Table 4. Highly cited articles on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: TC per Year = total citations per year; LCR = local citation rate).
Table 4. Highly cited articles on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: TC per Year = total citations per year; LCR = local citation rate).
PaperYearTotal CitationsTC per YearLCRSource
What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly [78]200853135.412.81Trends in Ecology and Evolution
Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model [120]200944932.078.02Landscape Ecology
Tree line shifts in the Swiss Alps: Climate change or land abandonment? [133]200743327.060Journal of Vegetation Science
The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands [79]200841827.879.09Environmental Science & Technology
The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands [74]200034715.092.88Restoration Ecology
Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: A spatially explicit economic analysis [118]200734221.3823.98Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Hydrological and erosive consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe, with special reference to the Mediterranean region—A review [45]20112882417.71Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine [42]201128723.9227.87Land Use Policy
Farmland abandonment: threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review [19]201426229.1121.76Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Policy reform and agricultural land abandonment in the EU [119]201325925.921.24Land Use Policy
The third-ranked article mainly studied the driving mechanism of grassland abandonment on forest expansion. Although the total citation number was high, the local citation rate (LCR) was 0, indicating that the article was not correlated to the field of farmland abandonment. The fourth-ranked article estimated the abandoned global farmland area via land use data from the global Environment 3.0 historical database and MODIS satellite images, demonstrating the bioenergy potential of the global abandoned farmland [79] using the CASA ecosystem model. Another article reviewed farmland abandonment and its impact on biodiversity from a global perspective by investigating studies from different countries, ranking No. 9 [19]. Reviewing 276 papers, this paper found that the impact of abandoned farmland on biodiversity differs regionally. Whilst most studies in Europe reported a negative impact of farmland abandonment on biodiversity, studies in central and southern America largely found positive impacts on biodiversity. In the latter region, agricultural expansion is the primary issue in biodiversity conservation. Most studies in North America discussed the processes and mechanisms that lead to or accompany farmland abandonment, largely neglecting its impact on biodiversity. Through further analysis, the authors found that the differences were mainly related to the environment, the methods used by researchers, and the concerns about the landscape before and after abandonment.

3.5.2. Keyword Analysis

By comparing the top 20 author keywords (DE) and keywords-plus (ID) most related to the field of farmland abandonment (Table A1), farmland abandonment/agricultural land abandonment, succession, soil erosion, biodiversity, restoration, and Europe were the six keywords shared by the two. Different author keywords clearly defined the content, approach, or method of the author’s research, and the common ones were farmland abandonment, land use change, land use, secondary succession, and afforestation. The keywords-plus in the Web of Science database could objectively describe the content of the article from a macro-perspective, such as farmland abandonment, vegetation, dynamics (mostly referred to soil dynamics), forest, and management. This indicates that, currently, studies focus on the natural succession of abandoned farmland and the impacts of human activities on the ecological environment.

3.5.3. High-Frequency Keyword Cluster Analysis and Multiple Correspondence Analysis

Using the functions of cluster analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, biblioshiny could reflect the hotspots, themes, and writing directions in the field of farmland abandonment. Cluster analysis was used to cluster complex keyword–network relationships into several relatively simple groups [134]. The keywords with the highest similarity were merged into one cluster, and the cluster with the highest similarity was merged into a large cluster, and so on, until all categories were finally merged into one class, forming a dendrogram representing the close or alienation relationship of the keywords in the field of farmland abandonment (Figure 8). Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) resulted in the formation of an intuitive two-dimensional graph by reducing multi-dimensional data to low dimensions, using a plane distance to reflect the similarity among keywords. A close proximity to the center indicates that this type of topic had received higher attention, whereas a greater distance of keywords from the center indicates less attention or a greater degree of deviation from the topic [135] (Figure A2).
The first cluster category focuses on the study of biodiversity, species richness, and plant communities after farmland abandonment. There are obvious regional differences in the ecological and environmental consequences of farmland abandonment. For example, most studies in European regions show that the encroachment of vegetation on bare land and original farmland after abandonment will have a negative impact on lizards, birds, and other animal species [136]. One study in the Mediterranean Sea shows that vegetation encroachment after farmland abandonment will cause the loss of bird habitats. Regular burning, grazing, and other means may help to protect bird diversity. However, a study on Hokkaido, Japan, obtained opposite results. Most wetlands in this area have been transformed into farmland, which is now abandoned. The authors assume that the abandoned farmland can be used as a habitat for wetland birds through management, helping to promote biodiversity [137,138]. In southeast Europe, such as in Bulgaria and Croatia, plant species diversity is greatly affected by elevation and temperature. In areas with low elevation and cold temperatures, species are more abundant [139]. However, the richness of bird species declines after farmland abandonment, highlighting the importance of the management and maintenance of traditional rural landscapes in this area.
The second cluster category mainly contains studies on vegetation and species restoration over time after farmland abandonment. Zhang et al. [140] studied the vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned farmland in the Qinling Mountains of China after a period of natural succession, indicating that natural succession is conducive to the ecological recovery of abandoned farmland, which is characterized by high biodiversity, high soil fertility, and high species richness. The species richness of the community increased in the first 15 years after abandonment [100,102,141]. However, Yannelli et al. [142] reported that, in arid regions, natural succession may not be the best method for ecological restoration, and soil erosion may occur during succession, preventing the establishment of a vegetation cover. Restoration should be adapted to local conditions, taking into account environmental factors such as climate and topography in different regions. Standish et al. [143] also considered the impact of alien species invasion on the restoration of abandoned farmland vegetation, indicating that, during natural succession, alien species are more competitive than native ones. The authors also highlighted that restoration should be more focused on maintaining ecosystem services at the site, rather than attempting to restore historic ecosystem states.
The third category contains publications on the impacts of natural succession on forests, soils, and microbial communities, mostly in the mountainous areas of Europe and on the Loess Plateau of China. Cojzer et al. [144], in Slovenia, compared the species structure, quantity, and tending time of young forests formed by secondary succession and artificial reforestation after farmland abandonment. The results showed that the young forests formed by secondary succession had great structural complexity and biodiversity, and the management of these stands was more conducive to local ecological restoration than reforestation. Treml et al. [145] evaluated the changes in tree coverage and number in the Sudeten Mountains of Central Europe through aerial images; based on their results, farmland abandonment is the main cause of forest intensification. Chinese authors studied the vegetation succession and soil carbon reserves after farmland abandonment on the Loess Plateau, reporting that vegetation coverage, species richness, and soil carbon reserves significantly increased over time, recovering to the original levels [146] within about 15 years, increasing significantly within 15 to 25 years; however, after 50 years, they were still lower than those of natural grassland [147,148]. In one study, the introduction of alien species reduced the time to restore vegetation to its original level to 11 years [149]. Another study showed that the reforestation of farmland after abandonment can significantly increase soil fertility [150].
The fourth category focused on methods to extract abandoned farmland, studying the mode, driving force, and spatial determinants of abandoned farmland. The commonly used method identified abandoned farmland by analyzing the inter-annual land use change in a given study area. Subsequently, the driving factors and spatial determinants of farmland abandonment [151,152] were determined by mathematical models. For example, Baumann et al. [42] plotted the abandoned farmland in the post-socialist period of western Ukraine, using the support vector machine classification method and Landsat images from 1986 to 2008, and determined the spatial determinants of abandonment using a combination of the optimal subset linear regression model and hierarchical division. Based on the results, 30% of the farmland was abandoned in the post-socialist period, mainly as the result of the combined impact of the system and the economy. A study in southern Chile [153] extracted the abandoned farmland by comparing land use in 1985 and 2007, using a spatial explicit statistical model. The authors showed that soil quality, distance to secondary roads, and agricultural subsidies were important drivers of local farmland abandonment. In eastern Poland, Zgłobicki et al. [154] showed that natural conditions (topography, soil), socioeconomic characteristics (farmland area, forest cover changes, farm size), and agricultural policies were the largest drivers of local farmland abandonment.
The fifth category was similar to the third and fourth categories. However, this category not only constructed the extraction method of farmland abandonment but also focused on the bioenergy potential abandoned farmland [155], estimating that the potential is 8% of the global demand for primary energy [79]. Schierhorn et al. developed a model for mapping abandoned farmland and calculating carbon sinks in such farmland, based on acreage statistics. The authors provided the means to map abandoned farmland in areas in which remote sensing is difficult to perform and stated that the rich carbon sinks of abandoned farmland can mitigate global climate change; reclamation of such areas is likely to lead to large amounts of carbon emission [24].
In Europe, with the highest number of publications on farmland abandonment, studies on the distribution, patterns, consequences, and impacts of farmland abandonment formed a separate cluster. The causes of farmland abandonment in Europe are various, depending on the region and period under consideration. Due to natural conditions, historical development, and economic, social, and demographic backgrounds, agricultural conditions vary from region to region. For example, Terres et al. established a unified indicator of the driving factors of abandonment through a comprehensive analysis of farmland abandonment in different regions of Europe, including the aging population, the low population density, the low farm income, the small scale, and the poor implementation of agricultural plans. This indicator covers the possible drivers of abandonment in all EU countries and can be flexibly applied according to the background of different regions [156,157,158]. Prishchepov et al. [132] discussed the impacts of institutional changes in different countries in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union on farmland abandonment after the collapse of socialism. The authors stated that the reform of systems and policies is an important factor indirectly driving farmland abandonment in this region. In places where the institutional change of agricultural land management is relatively small, and where the new institutions after the institutional change are relatively strong, the abandonment rate is the lowest. On the contrary, countries that delay the formulation of new agricultural production systems and regulations have a higher abandonment rate. In addition, the European region also focuses on the impact of farmland abandonment on ecology. For example, in the Alps, farmland abandonment leads to spontaneous reforestation, reducing grassland species and negatively impacting plant diversity [159]. Another study assessed the carbon storage dynamics of abandoned farmland in the former Soviet Union and showed that the abandoned farmland is transformed into an ecosystem dominated by grassland, resulting in an increase in carbon sequestration and a significant impact on the carbon sink in the region [160].

3.5.4. Analysis of the Research Theme Evolution

Theme evolution analysis can explore the changing laws, relationships, paths, and trends of the content, and intensity and structure of the research topic over time. Here, the study period was divided into three stages, with strategic coordinates being drawn (Figure A3). Overall, the research topics in the field of farmland abandonment experienced a process from increase to decrease to increase. In the initial stage of 1980–2000 (Figure A3), the core themes with high maturity were vegetation, landscape, dynamic degree, and management (the first quadrant in Figure A3). For example, a Swiss study provided advice on the local agricultural management policy [161] by interviewing people regarding their preferences for reforestation after farmland abandonment. However, Puerto Rico was the area of concern for this phase, mainly because it was funded by the US National Fund at the time [74] and because of the support of the University of Puerto Rico in this field [162]. The themes competition and basin disappeared in the following stage. In addition, the natural succession of abandoned farmland resulted in the formation of new forests after the abandonment, and forest communities, soil, and vegetation became research hotspots.
During the development stage from 2001 to 2015 (Figure A3), the theme type with high maturity was relatively single, and the dynamic degree (forests dynamic, land cover dynamics, vegetation dynamics) was still the core theme of this period. The new core themes, such as land cover and agricultural abandonment, were consistent with the study of land cover changes [81] following agricultural abandonment in the Mediterranean mountains and the role [80] of farmland abandonment in landscape dynamics in central Spain, using three Landsat land cover maps. Runoff and soil erosion were emerging themes in this period. However, the occurrence in the third quadrant showed that the research on this theme was not mature enough, and the topics such as vegetation, forest, and diversity are still hot topics for future research, getting closer to the first quadrant. Notably, the top 10 most-cited articles (Table 4) were all published in the second half of this period.
During the active phase of 2016–2021 (Figure A3), studies on forest, vegetation, dynamic degree, and biodiversity formed the core of the field of farmland abandonment research. Europe, as an important area in respective research, is distributed in the fourth quadrant as a keyword with a high number of occurrences. Along with the analysis of the driving factors and the determinants of abandonment, this field may become a research hotspot in the future. Whereas previous studies on farmland abandonment in Europe were mainly conducted in typical European countries and regions, with a small scale, with the increase in achievements and the improvement of technical means, large-scale studies covering the entire European continent appeared in this stage. For example, Walter et al. evaluated the causes and consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe by summarizing previous studies [6], whereas Ustaoglu et al. evaluated the drivers of farmland abandonment and their sustainability impact on society and the environment [86]. Lasanta studied the spatial and temporal processes and drivers of farmland abandonment in Europe [87]. Research on abandoned farmland in typical regions such as Ukraine [163], Russia, and Kazakhstan [37] has also been revitalized. Compared with previous stages, this stage of research pays more attention to the determinants of the reclamation of abandoned farmland, with the aim to avoid the ecological impacts of farmland expansion.

3.5.5. Analysis of the Monitoring Method Evolution

This study reviewed the abandoned farmland monitoring methods used in the database. The representative methods in this field changed over time (Table 5) and can be divided into three types: (1) Field survey; (2) remote sensing image classification methods, such as visual interpretation, supervised classification, object-oriented classification; and (3) change detection methods, including vegetation index change detection and multi-temporal remote sensing image time series change detection. At present, the monitoring of abandoned farmland mainly considers multi-source remote sensing images and the integration of multiple monitoring methods. Over time, the monitoring methods changed from field survey and the visual interpretation of aerial photos to remote sensing. Remote sensing data also changed from small-scale- and medium low-spatial-resolution data to large-scale- and high-spatial-resolution data [94,116,131,164,165].
(1) Field survey. The largest advantage of this method is that it can explain the mechanism behind farmland abandonment, although it is difficult to obtain a complete view of all abandoned farmland areas in a given region due to the lack of spatial details. Therefore, the extraction of abandoned farmland often uses field survey data coupled with other models. For example, Florian et al. distributed the survey data of European Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus to the remote sensing image data through the spatial allocation model, obtaining an accuracy of 65% [117]. Raymond et al. combined geographic data obtained from field surveys with aerial photos to extract abandoned farmland in southern France, which accounted for 5% of the study area [166].
(2) Classification of remote sensing images. Visual interpretation methods are mostly applied to Mediterranean mountains [41,42,81], and the data sources are mostly aerial photos. Visual interpretation has the advantages of simple operation and high accuracy, although it is greatly influenced by the interpreter, and the degree of automation is low. It requires considerable manpower and time to process data, and the data are difficult to obtain. The application of supervised classification originated in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union [96,121,132,167], generally applying Landsat TM/ETM+ data. Supervised classification can use prior knowledge to improve classification accuracy by learning sample features. This method can be applied to high-, medium-, and low-spatial-resolution remote sensing data at the same time, allowing its wide use in abandoned farmland monitoring. The disadvantage is that the sample selection is highly subjective, and it is difficult to distinguish land types with similar spectral characteristics.
(3) Change detection method. Some authors took more than 30 countries in central and eastern Europe as the research area and used MODIS NDVI time series products to extract abandoned farmland. This product has a high time resolution, and the characteristics of abandoned farmland can be compared with the growth cycle characteristics of vegetation types. However, the spatial resolution is low (250 m). This study also combines SVM classification, obtaining an accuracy of 50.7% [115]. Estel et al. used MODIS NDVI time series products combined with random forest classification to monitor abandoned farmland throughout Europe and mapped the reclamation range of farmland, with an accuracy of 90.1%. Farmland was mainly abandoned in eastern Europe, southern Scandinavia, and the European mountains. Reclamation is also common, mainly in eastern Europe (such as Russia in Europe, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, and Lithuania) and the Balkans [85]. Vegetation index change detection can identify the growth difference between crops and natural vegetation, with low data redundancy and high method fault tolerance, but, due to the influence of image spatial resolution, the recognition accuracy of abandoned farmland is low [79,115]. In recent years, the most commonly used method was Landsat remote sensing image time series change detection. Its key is the initial classification accuracy of the image, and the change detection accuracy is accumulated by different time phase classification accuracies. Yin et al. used Landsat images from 1985 to 2015 and the LandTrendr model to detect changes in the time series of multi-temporal remote sensing images, applying the object-oriented classification method. This method is not only based on the spectral information and texture information of abandoned farmland but also considers the geometric information. By formulating a variety of rules to constrain the target land class, it has significant advantages in improving the initial classification accuracy of remote sensing images. The overall accuracy of the study on the classification of abandoned farmland is 97%, which is better than that obtained using the pixel level change detection (82%) [59].

4. Conclusions and Prospects

We conducted a quantitative analysis and visualization of articles published in the field of farmland abandonment from 1980–2021 at the macro-scale by using the bibliometrix and biblioshiny software packages, based on the Web of Science core collection database. From this, we determined the current status and future development trends of scientific production in this field, overcoming the shortcomings of previous literature reviews that rarely comprehensively analyzed the research results from multiple perspectives and revealed the potential changes.
The annual scientific output results showed that the number of articles in the field of farmland abandonment fluctuated and increased rapidly, especially after 2016. According to the number of articles issued, the research period can be divided into three stages: budding stage, development stage, and active stage. Judging from the average number of citations of papers, the years with the strongest development in the field of farmland abandonment were 1987, 2003, 2008, and 2015. Over time, more attention was paid to abandoned farmland as such, with most papers being published from 2007 to 2017; however, the overall quality of the publications declined after 2018.
Journal source analysis showed that Land Use Policy was the most productive journal in the field of farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021, with the highest number of citations and the highest H index. In terms of research strength, China was the country that published the most articles, although countries in Europe were more influential. Cooperation between countries suggested that some countries in Europe, such as Germany, the UK, and the Netherlands, focused more on collaborative research. When considering both the number of papers published by independent authors and international cooperations, papers published by countries such as China and the United States through independent research were more common.
Studies on farmland abandonment were two-branched: one branch mainly analyzed the social factors, such as policies and trade, which may promote or inhibit the abandonment of farmland; the other focused on the ecological impacts of farmland abandonment, such as impacts on soil quality, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity. The same trend was found in the authors’ collaborative network, with five of the seven most productive research groups focusing on ecological aspects and the other two on social factors.
The most common keywords were farmland abandonment, land use, vegetation, dynamics, forest, and management. Analysis of the theme evolution of abandoned farmland showed that vegetation, landscape, dynamic degree, and management were the most commonly used keywords in the first stage. The influence of the most used keywords in the second stage was weakened; in this stage, the focus was on the improvement of the extraction technology. The last period was related to the driving forces and determinants of farmland abandonment, in addition to vegetation succession and biodiversity. The theme that remained constant throughout the study period was the succession of vegetation after farmland abandonment.
This study has two limitations. First, it relies more on dynamic databases that are constantly updated as the number of indexed journals increases or decreases. Therefore, the bibliometric analysis of farmland abandonment may change in the next few years. Another limitation is that this study largely relies on the results obtained from visual charts. However, the display of results lacks a richer global perspective. The global perspective can, however, be improved by incorporating other databases, such as Scopus.
Overall, the results obtained can help researchers determine the specific research areas and contents of farmland abandonment. The analysis of the cooperation between the author and the country may facilitate the investigation of the authors in the field of farmland abandonment or the formulation of policies at the national level. In addition, this study provides a database and analyzes the different topics and methods for future researchers, assisting in the selection of research areas and topics.
According to the results, farmland abandonment research needs to be further expanded in the following aspects:
(1) In terms of data sources, farmland abandonment experienced a process from the traditional family survey data to the remote sensing image data; the latter underwent a transformation from low to high spatial resolution. However, the high-resolution images used for farmland abandonment generally have a low temporal resolution. In the future, the use of multi-source remote sensing data to combine high temporal resolution and high spatial resolution for farmland abandonment extraction may become the mainstream of research. Nowadays, there are more and more applications of hyperspectral images, and improvements in spectrum number and spectral resolution can significantly enrich spectral information, revealing more details of ground objects. Such an approach would greatly improve the accuracy of remote sensing in the identification of ground objects. In the future, this direction can be explored with the use of hyperspectral images to extract abandoned farmland.
(2) To extract abandoned farmland, change detection methods are mostly used. The extraction accuracy largely depends on the classification accuracy, and the classification error of each temporary phase will be accumulated, affecting the final result. Moreover, the classification of heterogeneous images is independent and does not consider the correlation of time, making it easy to ignore vegetation changes in the growth cycle, resulting in unreasonable change detection results. Classification time series data can effectively avoid this problem, and models such as the Landsat-based detection of trends in disturbance and recovery (LandTrendr), breaks for additive season and trend (BFAST), and continuous change detection and classification (CCDC) can demonstrate this. Today, only the LandTrendr model is used for the extraction of abandoned farmland. With the rise of deep learning, the remote sensing time series change detection research based on deep learning has attracted the interest of many researchers. Deep learning is an automated learning based on the end-to-end mechanism. It does not rely on prior knowledge, but it is still difficult to automatically mine data and acquire the spatiotemporal features of images. In the future, how to use these models to effectively extract abandoned farmland may be an important development trend.
(3) Since the 21st century, the impact of global climate change on ecology and the social economy has been an important topic. In recent years, the global outbreak of COVID-19 and regional armed conflict have caused unprecedented crises in the world, seriously affecting agriculture, the economy, human health, and food security. It is, therefore, of great significance to meet the global food crisis by rationally reclaiming abandoned farmland to rapidly increase food production and the global grain supply. However, there is still controversy about the economic cost of abandoned farmland reclamation and the ecological consequences of such reclamation. Should the abandoned farmland be reclaimed, continue to expand, or be subjected to intensive farming? Research around this area may be a future focus.
(4) According to the results of this study, future studies will still focus on the ecological impacts of abandoned fields, such as vegetation succession, carbon sequestration, and impacts on biodiversity. However, most of the current studies focus on a certain country and region, with conflicting ecological impacts along with different geographical locations and environmental conditions. At present, the ecological impact of abandoned farmland is still controversial among scholars. In the future, further discussions on this impact are: Is this a threat or an opportunity? Is this negative or positive? The formulation of policies according to local conditions when facing farmland abandonment may be an important research topic in the near future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192316007/s1, Table S1: Database Article; Table S2: Most Global Cited Documents 100 (theme); Table S3: Most Global Cited Documents 100 (title).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.S.; methodology, B.L. and W.S.; formal analysis, B.L. and W.S.; investigation, Q.S.; resources, W.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L. and W.S.; writing—review and editing, W.S.; supervision, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42071233), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (Grant No. 2019QZKK0603), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA20040201).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data sets are mentioned in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Number of independent and cooperative publications in the 20 countries with the most published articles from 1980 to 2021.
Figure A1. Number of independent and cooperative publications in the 20 countries with the most published articles from 1980 to 2021.
Ijerph 19 16007 g0a1
Figure A2. Multiple correspondence analysis of keywords in the field of farmland abandonment.
Figure A2. Multiple correspondence analysis of keywords in the field of farmland abandonment.
Ijerph 19 16007 g0a2
Figure A3. Strategic coordinates of the farmland abandonment period 1980–2000 (A), 2001–2015 (B), and 2016–2021 (C).
Figure A3. Strategic coordinates of the farmland abandonment period 1980–2000 (A), 2001–2015 (B), and 2016–2021 (C).
Ijerph 19 16007 g0a3aIjerph 19 16007 g0a3b

Appendix B

Table A1. Most relevant keywords when searching for publications in farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Table A1. Most relevant keywords when searching for publications in farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
RankAuthor Keywords (DE)ArticlesKeywords-Plus (ID)Articles
1Abandonment/land abandonment/farmland Abandonment/abandoned farmland/cropland abandonment/abandoned land/abandoned cropland/agricultural abandonment/agricultural land abandonment/abandoned agricultural land284Farmland abandonment/agricultural land abandonment107
2Land use change81Vegetation90
3Land use42Dynamics86
4Secondary succession32Forest81
5Afforestation25Management79
6Soil erosion24Diversity74
7Remote sensing22Europe62
8Agriculture21Consequences61
9China21Conservation61
10Loess plateau21Biodiversity56
11Succession20Landscape54
12Mediterranean15Patterns54
13Soil organic carbon15Drivers46
14Biodiversity14Restoration46
15Reforestation14Impact44
16Restoration14Cover43
17Spain14Nitrogen43
18Europe11Carbon42
19GIS11Succession40
20Natural regeneration11Soil erosion39

References

  1. Pereira, H.M.; Leadley, P.W.; Proença, V.; Alkemade, R.; Scharlemann, J.P.; Fernandez-Manjarrés, J.F.; Araújo, M.B.; Balvanera, P.; Biggs, R.; Cheung, W.W. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 2010, 330, 1496–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lambin, E.F.; Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3465–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Foley, J.A.; DeFries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.; Gibbs, H.K. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Van der Sluis, T.; Kizos, T.; Pedroli, B. Landscape change in Mediterranean farmlands: Impacts of land abandonment on cultivation terraces in Portofino (Italy) and Lesvos (Greece). J. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 7, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Nadal-Romero, E.; Cammeraat, E.; Pérez-Cardiel, E.; Lasanta, T. Effects of secondary succession and afforestation practices on soil properties after cropland abandonment in humid Mediterranean mountain areas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2016, 228, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Leal Filho, W.; Mandel, M.; Al-Amin, A.Q.; Feher, A.; Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J. An assessment of the causes and consequences of agricultural land abandonment in Europe. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2017, 24, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Keenleyside, C.; Tucker, G.; McConville, A. Farmland Abandonment in the EU: An Assessment of Trends and Prospects; Institute for European Environmental Policy: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, X.; Brandt, M.; Tong, X.; Ciais, P.; Yue, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, K.; Fensholt, R. A large but transient carbon sink from urbanization and rural depopulation in China. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 5, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mottet, A.; Ladet, S.; Coqué, N.; Gibon, A. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 114, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Viviroli, D.; Dürr, H.H.; Messerli, B.; Meybeck, M.; Weingartner, R. Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: Typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43, W07447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Brinkert, A.; Hölzel, N.; Sidorova, T.V.; Kamp, J. Spontaneous steppe restoration on abandoned cropland in Kazakhstan: Grazing affects successional pathways. Biodivers. Conserv. 2016, 25, 2543–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rey-Benayas, J.M.; Galván, I.; Carrascal, L.M. Differential effects of vegetation restoration in Mediterranean abandoned cropland by secondary succession and pine plantations on bird assemblages. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Stanturf, J.A.; Madsen, P. Restoration concepts for temperate and boreal forests of North America and Western Europe. Plant Biosyst.-Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2002, 136, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, W.; Deng, X. Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Song, W. Mapping cropland abandonment in mountainous areas using an annual land-use trajectory approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pointereau, P.; Coulon, F.; Girard, P.; Lambotte, M.; Stuczynski, T.; Sánchez Ortega, V.; Del Rio, A. Analysis of the Driving Forces Behind Farmland Abandonment and the Extent and Location of Agricultural Areas that are Actually Abandoned or are in Risk to be Abandoned; EUR-OP: Luxembourg, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. Löw, F.; Fliemann, E.; Abdullaev, I.; Conrad, C.; Lamers, J.P. Mapping abandoned agricultural land in Kyzyl-Orda, Kazakhstan using satellite remote sensing. Appl. Geogr. 2015, 62, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Loboda, T.; Krankina, O.; Savin, I.; Kurbanov, E.; Hall, J. Land management and the impact of the 2010 extreme drought event on the agricultural and ecological systems of European Russia. In Land-Cover and Land-Use Changes in Eastern Europe after the Collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Queiroz, C.; Beilin, R.; Folke, C.; Lindborg, R. Farmland abandonment: Threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 12, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, S.; Li, X. Global understanding of farmland abandonment: A review and prospects. J. Geogr. Sci. 2017, 27, 1123–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woodhouse, S.; Good, J.; Lovett, A.; Fuller, R.; Dolman, P. Effects of land-use and agricultural management on birds of marginal farmland: A case study in the Llŷn peninsula, Wales. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 107, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lark, T.J.; Spawn, S.A.; Bougie, M.; Gibbs, H.K. Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dantas de Miranda, M.; Pereira, H.M.; Corley, M.F.; Merckx, T. Beta diversity patterns reveal positive effects of farmland abandonment on moth communities. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schierhorn, F.; Müller, D.; Beringer, T.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Kuemmerle, T.; Balmann, A. Post-Soviet cropland abandonment and carbon sequestration in European Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Romero-Díaz, A.; Ruiz-Sinoga, J.D.; Robledano-Aymerich, F.; Brevik, E.C.; Cerdà, A. Ecosystem responses to land abandonment in Western Mediterranean Mountains. Catena 2017, 149, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Benayas, J.R.; Martins, A.; Nicolau, J.M.; Schulz, J.J. Abandonment of agricultural land: An overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2007, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pereira, P.; Cerdà, A.; Úbeda, X.; Mataix-Solera, J.; Arcenegui, V.; Zavala, L. Modelling the impacts of wildfire on ash thickness in a short-term period. Land Degrad. Dev. 2015, 26, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smelansky, I.E. Biodiversity of Agricultural Lands in Russia: Current State and Trends. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283504120_Biodiversity_of_Agricultural_Lands_in_Russia_Current_State_and_Trends (accessed on 14 October 2022).
  29. Wei, S.; Ying, Z. Farmland abandonment research progress: Influencing factors and simulation model. J. Resour. Ecol. 2019, 10, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tieskens, K.F.; Schulp, C.J.; Levers, C.; Lieskovský, J.; Kuemmerle, T.; Plieninger, T.; Verburg, P.H. Characterizing European cultural landscapes: Accounting for structure, management intensity and value of agricultural and forest landscapes. Land Use Policy 2017, 62, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Plieninger, T. Habitat loss, Fragmentation, and Alteration–Quantifying the Impactof Land-use Changes on a Spanish Dehesa Landscape by Use of Aerial Photography and GIS. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruiz-Flan, P.; Garci, J.; Ortigosa, L. Geomorphological evolution of abandoned fields. A case study in the Central Pyrenees. Catena 1992, 19, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saraykin, V.; Yanbykh, R.; Uzun, V. Assessing the Potential for Russian Grain Exports: A Special Focus on the Prospective Cultivation of Abandoned Land. In The Eurasian Wheat Belt and Food Security; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, T.; Li, X.; Xin, L.; Xu, X. The spatial distribution of farmland abandonment and its influential factors at the township level: A case study in the mountainous area of China. Land Use Policy 2018, 70, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, S.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Cao, G.; Fischer, G.; Tramberend, S. An estimation of the extent of cropland abandonment in mountainous regions of China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 1327–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ioffe, G.; Nefedova, T.; Kirsten, D.B. Land abandonment in Russia. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 2012, 53, 527–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meyfroidt, P.; Schierhorn, F.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Müller, D.; Kuemmerle, T. Drivers, constraints and trade-offs associated with recultivating abandoned cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 37, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khamzina, A.; Lamers, J.; Vlek, P.L. Conversion of degraded cropland to tree plantations for ecosystem and livelihood benefits. In Cotton, Water, Salts and Soums; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hatna, E.; Bakker, M.M. Abandonment and expansion of arable land in Europe. Ecosystems 2011, 14, 720–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Müller, D.; Leitão, P.J.; Sikor, T. Comparing the determinants of cropland abandonment in Albania and Romania using boosted regression trees. Agric. Syst. 2013, 117, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gellrich, M.; Zimmermann, N.E. Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: A spatial statistical modelling approach. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baumann, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Elbakidze, M.; Ozdogan, M.; Radeloff, V.C.; Keuler, N.S.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Kruhlov, I.; Hostert, P. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lambin, E.F.; Meyfroidt, P. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 2010, 27, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stellmes, M.; Röder, A.; Udelhoven, T.; Hill, J. Mapping syndromes of land change in Spain with remote sensing time series, demographic and climatic data. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 685–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. García-Ruiz, J.M.; Lana-Renault, N. Hydrological and erosive consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe, with special reference to the Mediterranean region–A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 140, 317–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tarolli, P.; Preti, F.; Romano, N. Terraced landscapes: From an old best practice to a potential hazard for soil degradation due to land abandonment. Anthropocene 2014, 6, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rousseau, D.M. The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bosserman, P. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 79, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garfield, E. From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. J. Informetr. 2009, 3, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, Q.; Ye, Y. A Study on Mining Bibliographic Records by Designed Software SATI: Case Study on Library and Information Science. J. Inf. Resour. Manag. 2012, 2, 50–58. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, W.; Lu, C. Visualization analysis of big data research based on Citespace. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 8173–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gagolewski, M. Bibliometric impact assessment with R and the CITAN package. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lv, T. A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land 2020, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rodríguez-Soler, R.; Uribe-Toril, J.; Valenciano, J.D.P. Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation, a bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix R-tool. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fath, B.D. Research progress and hotspot analysis for reactive nitrogen flows in macroscopic systems based on a CiteSpace analysis. Ecol. Model. 2021, 443, 109456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Song, W. Determinants of cropland abandonment at the parcel, household and village levels in mountain areas of China: A multi-level analysis. Land Use Policy 2014, 41, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Song, W.; Pijanowski, B.C. The effects of China’s cultivated land balance program on potential land productivity at a national scale. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 46, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yin, H.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Kuemmerle, T.; Bleyhl, B.; Buchner, J.; Radeloff, V.C. Mapping agricultural land abandonment from spatial and temporal segmentation of Landsat time series. Remote Sens. Environ. Interdiscip. J. 2018, 210, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Quintas-Soriano, C.; Buerkert, A.; Plieninger, T. Effects of land abandonment on nature contributions to people and good quality of life components in the Mediterranean region: A review. Land Use Policy 2022, 116, 106053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ekundayo, T.C.; Okoh, A.I. A global bibliometric analysis of Plesiomonas-related research (1990–2017). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zyoud, S.H.; Waring, W.S.; Al-Jabi, S.W.; Sweileh, W.M. Global cocaine intoxication research trends during 1975-2015: A bibliometric analysis of Web of Science publications. Subst Abus. Treat Prev Policy 2017, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Okolie, C.C.; Ogundeji, A.A. Effect of COVID-19 on agricultural production and food security: A scientometric analysis. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2022, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Waltman, L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 365–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Callon, M.; Courtial, J.-P.; Turner, W.A.; Bauin, S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Soc. Sci. Inf. 1983, 22, 191–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Glänzel, W. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics 2001, 51, 69–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2008, 59, 2070–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. White, H.D.; Griffith, B.C. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1981, 32, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, E.; Ding, Y. Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2012, 63, 1313–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kessler, M.M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Am. Doc. 1963, 14, 10–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, S.; Han, R.; Wolfram, D.; Zhao, Y. Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): Introducing author keyword coupling analysis. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 132–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Small, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1973, 24, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gibson, C.; Watt, T.; Brown, V. The use of sheep grazing to recreate species-rich grassland from abandoned arable land. Biol. Conserv. 1987, 42, 165–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Silver, W.L.; Ostertag, R.; Lugo, A.E. The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 394–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lasanta, T.; Garcıa-Ruiz, J.; Pérez-Rontomé, C.; Sancho-Marcén, C. Runoff and sediment yield in a semi-arid environment: The effect of land management after farmland abandonment. Catena 2000, 38, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Cerdà, A. Soil erosion after land abandonment in a semiarid environment of southeastern Spain. Arid Land Res. Manag. 1997, 11, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Molinillo, M.; Lasanta, T.; García-Ruiz, J.M. Managing mountainous degraded landscapes after farmland abandonment in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Environ. Manag. 1997, 21, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cramer, V.A.; Hobbs, R.J.; Standish, R.J. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Campbell, J.E.; Lobell, D.B.; Genova, R.C.; Field, C.B. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5791–5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Romero-Calcerrada, R.; Perry, G.L. The role of land abandonment in landscape dynamics in the SPA ‘Encinares del río Alberche y Cofio, Central Spain, 1984–1999. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 66, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Poyatos, R.; Latron, J.; Llorens, P. Land use and land cover change after agricultural abandonment. Mt. Res. Dev. 2003, 23, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Bowen, M.E.; McAlpine, C.A.; House, A.P.; Smith, G.C. Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: A review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 140, 273–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lugo, A.E.; Helmer, E. Emerging forests on abandoned land: Puerto Rico’s new forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 190, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Koulouri, M.; Giourga, C. Land abandonment and slope gradient as key factors of soil erosion in Mediterranean terraced lands. Catena 2007, 69, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Estel, S.; Kuemmerle, T.; Alcántara, C.; Levers, C.; Prishchepov, A.; Hostert, P. Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 163, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ustaoglu, E.; Collier, M.J. Farmland abandonment in Europe: An overview of drivers, consequences, and assessment of the sustainability implications. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 396–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lasanta, T.; Arnáez, J.; Pascual, N.; Ruiz-Flaño, P.; Errea, M.; Lana-Renault, N. Space–time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. Catena 2017, 149, 810–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, X.; Xin, L.; Sun, L. Drivers of cropland abandonment in mountainous areas: A household decision model on farming scale in Southwest China. Land Use Policy 2016, 57, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kolecka, N.; Kozak, J.; Kaim, D.; Dobosz, M.; Ostafin, K.; Ostapowicz, K.; Wężyk, P.; Price, B. Understanding farmland abandonment in the Polish Carpathians. Appl. Geogr. 2017, 88, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Su, G.; Okahashi, H.; Chen, L. Spatial pattern of farmland abandonment in Japan: Identification and determinants. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Han, Z.; Song, W. Abandoned cropland: Patterns and determinants within the Guangxi karst mountainous area, China. Appl. Geogr. 2020, 122, 102245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xu, D.; Deng, X.; Guo, S.; Liu, S. Labor migration and farmland abandonment in rural China: Empirical results and policy implications. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Peters, H.; Van Raan, A. Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis: An expercise on a university faculty level. Scientometrics 1991, 20, 235–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kuemmerle, T.; Hostert, P.; Radeloff, V.C.; van der Linden, S.; Perzanowski, K.; Kruhlov, I. Cross-border Comparison of Post-socialist Farmland Abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 614–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Müller, D.; Munroe, D.K. Changing Rural Landscapes in Albania: Cropland Abandonment and Forest Clearing in the Postsocialist Transition. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2008, 98, 855–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Prishchepov, A.V.; Müller, D.; Dubinin, M.; Baumann, M.; Radeloff, V.C. Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 873–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Lana-Renault, N.; Regüés, D. Seasonal patterns of suspended sediment transport in an abandoned farmland catchment in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 2009, 34, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Khorchani, M.; Nadal-Romero, E.; Tague, C.; Lasanta, T.; Zabalza, J.; Lana-Renault, N.; Dominguez-Castro, F.; Choate, J. Effects of active and passive land use management after cropland abandonment on water and vegetation dynamics in the Central Spanish Pyrenees. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Deng, L.; Wang, G.-l.; Liu, G.-b.; Shangguan, Z.-p. Effects of age and land-use changes on soil carbon and nitrogen sequestrations following cropland abandonment on the Loess Plateau, China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, C.; Liu, G.; Xue, S.; Zhang, C. Rhizosphere soil microbial properties on abandoned croplands in the Loess Plateau, China during vegetation succession. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2012, 50, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, C.; Liu, G.; Xue, S.; Wang, G. Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 97, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Deng, L.; Shangguan, Z.P.; Sweeney, S. Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen following land abandonment of farmland on the Loess Plateau, China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Deng, X.; Xu, D.; Qi, Y.; Zeng, M. Labor Off-Farm Employment and Cropland Abandonment in Rural China: Spatial Distribution and Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Deng, X.; Xu, D.; Zeng, M.; Qi, Y. Does Internet use help reduce rural cropland abandonment? Evidence from China. Land Use Policy 2019, 89, 104243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tullus, T.; Tullus, A.; Roosaluste, E.; Lutter, R.; Tullus, H. Vascular plant and bryophyte flora in midterm hybrid aspen plantations on abandoned agricultural land. Can. J. For. Res. 2015, 45, 1183–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Uri, V.; Lõhmus, K.; Mander, Ü.; Ostonen, I.; Aosaar, J.; Maddison, M.; Helmisaari, H.-S.; Augustin, J. Long-term effects on the nitrogen budget of a short-rotation grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench) forest on abandoned agricultural land. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Uri, V.; Lõhmus, K.; Ostonen, I.; Tullus, H.; Lastik, R.; Vildo, M. Biomass production, foliar and root characteristics and nutrient accumulation in young silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) stand growing on abandoned agricultural land. Eur. J. For. Res. 2007, 126, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chaudhary, S.; Wang, Y.; Dixit, A.M.; Khanal, N.R.; Xu, P.; Yan, K.; Liu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Li, M. Eco-environmental risk evaluation for land use planning in areas of potential farmland abandonment in the high mountains of Nepal Himalayas. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Chaudhary, S.; Wang, Y.; Dixit, A.M.; Khanal, N.R.; Xu, P.; Fu, B.; Yan, K.; Liu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Li, M. Spatiotemporal degradation of abandoned farmland and associated eco-environmental risks in the high mountains of the Nepalese Himalayas. Land 2019, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Chaudhary, S.; Wang, Y.; Khanal, N.R.; Xu, P.; Fu, B.; Dixit, A.M.; Yan, K.; Liu, Q.; Lu, Y. Social impact of farmland abandonment and its eco-environmental vulnerability in the high mountain region of Nepal: A case study of Dordi River Basin. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Chaudhary, S.; Wang, Y.; Dixit, A.M.; Khanal, N.R.; Xu, P.; Fu, B.; Yan, K.; Liu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Li, M. A Synopsis of Farmland Abandonment and Its Driving Factors in Nepal. Land 2020, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Yamanaka, S.; Hanioka, M.; Nakamura, F. Changes in Ground Beetle and Bird Species After Farmland Abandonment. In Biodiversity Conservation Using Umbrella Species; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hanioka, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Senzaki, M.; Yamanaka, S.; Kawamura, K.; Nakamura, F. Assessing the landscape-dependent restoration potential of abandoned farmland using a hierarchical model of bird communities. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kitazawa, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Senzaki, M.; Kawamura, K.; Hanioka, M.; Nakamura, F. An evaluation of five agricultural habitat types for openland birds: Abandoned farmland can have comparative values to undisturbed wetland. Ornithol. Sci. 2019, 18, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alcantara, C.; Kuemmerle, T.; Baumann, M.; Bragina, E.V.; Griffiths, P.; Hostert, P.; Knorn, J.; Müller, D.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Schierhorn, F. Mapping the extent of abandoned farmland in Central and Eastern Europe using MODIS time series satellite data. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 035035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dara, A.; Baumann, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Pflugmacher, D.; Rabe, A.; Griffiths, P.; Hölzel, N.; Kamp, J.; Freitag, M.; Hostert, P. Mapping the timing of cropland abandonment and recultivation in northern Kazakhstan using annual Landsat time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 213, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Levers, C.; Schneider, M.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Estel, S.; Kuemmerle, T. Spatial variation in determinants of agricultural land abandonment in Europe. Sci Total Env. 2018, 644, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gellrich, M.; Baur, P.; Koch, B.; Zimmermann, N.E. Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: A spatially explicit economic analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 118, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Renwick, A.; Jansson, T.; Verburg, P.H.; Revoredo-Giha, C.; Britz, W.; Gocht, A.; McCracken, D. Policy reform and agricultural land abandonment in the EU. Land Use Policy 2013, 30, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Verburg, P.H.; Overmars, K.P. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: Exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24, 1167–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pueyo, Y.; Beguería, S. Modelling the rate of secondary succession after farmland abandonment in a Mediterranean mountain area. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 83, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Lesschen, J.; Cammeraat, L.; Kooijman, A.; van Wesemael, B. Development of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation and soil properties after land abandonment in a semi-arid ecosystem. J. Arid Environ. 2008, 72, 2082–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. MacDonald, D.; Crabtree, J.R.; Wiesinger, G.; Dax, T.; Stamou, N.; Fleury, P.; Lazpita, J.G.; Gibon, A. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. J. Environ. Manag. 2000, 59, 47–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. García-Ruiz, J.; Ruiz Flaño, P.; Lasanta, T. Soil erosion after farmland abandonment in submediterranean mountains: A general outlook. In Soil Degradation and Desertification in Mediterranean Environments; Geoforma Ediciones: Logroño, Spain, 1996; pp. 165–183. [Google Scholar]
  125. Nunes, A.; Coelho, C.d.O.A.; De Almeida, A.; Figueiredo, A. Soil erosion and hydrological response to land abandonment in a central inland area of Portugal. Land Degrad. Dev. 2010, 21, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Duarte, F.; Jones, N.; Fleskens, L. Traditional olive orchards on sloping land: Sustainability or abandonment? J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 89, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lesschen, J.; Cammeraat, L.; Nieman, T. Erosion and terrace failure due to agricultural land abandonment in a semi-arid environment. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. J. Br. Geomorphol. Res. Group 2008, 33, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Llorens, P.; Latron, J.; Gallart, F. Analysis of the role of agricultural abandoned terraces on the hydrology and sediment dynamics in a small mountainous basin (High Llobregat, Eastern Pyrenees). Pirineos 1992, 139, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Cammeraat, L.; Imeson, A. The evolution and significance of soil–vegetation patterns following land abandonment and fire in Spain. Catena 1999, 37, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Müller, D.; Kuemmerle, T.; Rusu, M.; Griffiths, P. Lost in transition: Determinants of post-socialist cropland abandonment in Romania. J. Land Use Sci. 2009, 4, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Alcantara, C.; Kuemmerle, T.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Radeloff, V.C. Mapping abandoned agriculture with multi-temporal MODIS satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124, 334–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Prishchepov, A.V.; Radeloff, V.C.; Baumann, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Müller, D. Effects of institutional changes on land use: Agricultural land abandonment during the transition from state-command to market-driven economies in post-Soviet Eastern Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 024021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gehrig-Fasel, J.; Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E. Tree line shifts in the Swiss Alps: Climate change or land abandonment? J. Veg. Sci. 2007, 18, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Ding, Y. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Abdi, H.; Valentin, D. Multiple correspondence analysis. Encycl. Meas. Stat. 2007, 2, 651–657. [Google Scholar]
  136. Zakkak, S.; Halley, J.M.; Akriotis, T.; Kati, V. Lizards along an agricultural land abandonment gradient in Pindos Mountains, Greece. Amphib. -Reptil. 2015, 36, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Katayama, N.; Mashiko, M.; Koshida, C.; Yamaura, Y. Effects of rice-field abandonment rates on bird communities in mixed farmland–woodland landscapes in Japan. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 319, 107539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hanioka, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Yamanaka, S.; Senzaki, M.; Kawamura, K.; Terui, A.; Nakamura, F. How much abandoned farmland is required to harbor comparable species richness and abundance of bird communities in wetland? Hierarchical community model suggests the importance of habitat structure and landscape context. Biodivers. Conserv. 2018, 27, 1831–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zakkak, S.; Radovic, A.; Panitsa, M.; Vassilev, K.; Shuka, L.; Kuttner, M.; Schindler, S.; Kati, V.; Woods, K. Vegetation patterns along agricultural land abandonment in the Balkans. J. Veg. Sci. 2018, 29, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, K.; Dang, H.; Tan, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Q. Vegetation community and soil characteristics of abandoned agricultural land and pine plantation in the Qinling Mountains, China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 2036–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, G.; Liu, G.; Xu, M. Above- and belowground dynamics of plant community succession following abandonment of farmland on the Loess Plateau, China. Plant Soil 2008, 316, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yannelli, F.A.; Tabeni, S.; Mastrantonio, L.E.; Vezzani, N. Assessing degradation of abandoned farmlands for conservation of the Monte Desert biome in Argentina. Environ. Manag. 2014, 53, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Standish, R.J.; Cramer, V.A.; Hobbs, R.J. Land-use legacy and the persistence of invasive Avena barbata on abandoned farmland. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Cojzer, M.; Diaci, J.; Brus, R. Tending of young forests in secondary succession on abandoned agricultural lands: An experimental study. Forests 2014, 5, 2658–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Treml, V.; Šenfeldr, M.; Chuman, T.; Ponocná, T.; Demková, K. Twentieth century treeline ecotone advance in the Sudetes Mountains (Central Europe) was induced by agricultural land abandonment rather than climate change. J. Veg. Sci. 2016, 27, 1209–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, C.; Liu, G.; Song, Z.; Qu, D.; Fang, L.; Deng, L. Natural succession on abandoned cropland effectively decreases the soil erodibility and improves the fungal diversity. Ecol. Appl. 2017, 27, 2142–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Chang, X.; Chai, Q.; Wu, G.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, G. Soil organic carbon accumulation in abandoned croplands on the Loess Plateau. Land Degrad. Dev. 2017, 28, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Jiang, J.-P.; Xiong, Y.-C.; Jiang, H.-M.; De-You, Y.; Ya-Jie, S.; Feng-Min, L. Soil microbial activity during secondary vegetation succession in semiarid abandoned lands of Loess Plateau. Pedosphere 2009, 19, 735–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yuan, Z.-Q.; Yu, K.-L.; Epstein, H.; Fang, C.; Li, J.-T.; Liu, Q.-Q.; Liu, X.-W.; Gao, W.-J.; Li, F.-M. Effects of legume species introduction on vegetation and soil nutrient development on abandoned croplands in a semi-arid environment on the Loess Plateau, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, Y.; Wei, L.; Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Shao, M. Long-term afforestation significantly improves the fertility of abandoned farmland along a soil clay gradient on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 3521–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Pazúr, R.; Lieskovský, J.; Feranec, J.; Oťaheľ, J. Spatial determinants of abandonment of large-scale arable lands and managed grasslands in Slovakia during the periods of post-socialist transition and European Union accession. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 54, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Janus, J.; Bozek, P. Aerial laser scanning reveals the dynamics of cropland abandonment in Poland. J. Land Use Sci. 2019, 14, 378–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Díaz, G.I.; Nahuelhual, L.; Echeverría, C.; Marín, S. Drivers of land abandonment in Southern Chile and implications for landscape planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 99, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zgłobicki, W.; Karczmarczuk, K.; Baran-Zgłobicka, B. Intensity and driving forces of land abandonment in Eastern Poland. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tremblay, S.; Ouimet, R. White spruce plantations on abandoned agricultural land: Are they more effective as C sinks than natural succession? Forests 2013, 4, 1141–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Terres, J.-M.; Scacchiafichi, L.N.; Wania, A.; Ambar, M.; Anguiano, E.; Buckwell, A.; Coppola, A.; Gocht, A.; Källström, H.N.; Pointereau, P. Farmland abandonment in Europe: Identification of drivers and indicators, and development of a composite indicator of risk. Land Use Policy 2015, 49, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Rajpar, H.; Zhang, A.; Razzaq, A.; Mehmood, K.; Pirzado, M.B.; Hu, W. Agricultural land abandonment and farmers’ perceptions of land use change in the indus plains of Pakistan: A case study of Sindh province. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Dax, T.; Schroll, K.; Machold, I.; Derszniak-Noirjean, M.; Schuh, B.; Gaupp-Berghausen, M. Land abandonment in mountain areas of the EU: An inevitable side effect of farming modernization and neglected threat to sustainable land use. Land 2021, 10, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Orlandi, S.; Probo, M.; Sitzia, T.; Trentanovi, G.; Garbarino, M.; Lombardi, G.; Lonati, M. Environmental and land use determinants of grassland patch diversity in the western and eastern Alps under agro-pastoral abandonment. Biodivers. Conserv. 2016, 25, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vuichard, N.; Ciais, P.; Belelli, L.; Smith, P.; Valentini, R. Carbon sequestration due to the abandonment of agriculture in the former USSR since 1990. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22, GB4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hunziker, M. The spontaneous reafforestation in abandoned agricultural lands: Perception and aesthetic assessment by locals and tourists. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1995, 31, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Rivera, L.; Zimmerman, J.; Aide, T. Forest recovery in abandoned agricultural lands in a karst region of the Dominican Republic. Plant Ecol. 2000, 148, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Smaliychuk, A.; Müller, D.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Levers, C.; Kruhlov, I.; Kuemmerle, T. Recultivation of abandoned agricultural lands in Ukraine: Patterns and drivers. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 38, 70–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yin, H.; Brandão Jr, A.; Buchner, J.; Helmers, D.; Iuliano, B.G.; Kimambo, N.E.; Lewińska, K.E.; Razenkova, E.; Rizayeva, A.; Rogova, N. Monitoring cropland abandonment with Landsat time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 246, 111873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Næss, J.S.; Cavalett, O.; Cherubini, F. The land–energy–water nexus of global bioenergy potentials from abandoned cropland. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Sluiter, R.; de Jong, S.M. Spatial patterns of Mediterranean land abandonment and related land cover transitions. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 22, 559–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Prishchepov, A.V.; Radeloff, V.C.; Dubinin, M.; Alcantara, C. The effect of Landsat ETM/ETM + image acquisition dates on the detection of agricultural land abandonment in Eastern Europe. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 126, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Technical flow of the applied bibliometrics approach.
Figure 1. Technical flow of the applied bibliometrics approach.
Ijerph 19 16007 g001
Figure 2. Number of articles on farmland abandonment published from 1980 to 2021 (Note: The different colors in the figure represent the three stages of the number of articles published).
Figure 2. Number of articles on farmland abandonment published from 1980 to 2021 (Note: The different colors in the figure represent the three stages of the number of articles published).
Ijerph 19 16007 g002
Figure 3. Mean total citations per year on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Figure 3. Mean total citations per year on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Ijerph 19 16007 g003
Figure 4. Growth curves of journal sources on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Figure 4. Growth curves of journal sources on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Ijerph 19 16007 g004
Figure 5. Collaborative network of authors publishing papers on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Figure 5. Collaborative network of authors publishing papers on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Ijerph 19 16007 g005
Figure 6. Works of different authors in the field of farmland abandonment over time (Note: N. Articles = number of articles; TC per Year = total citations per year).
Figure 6. Works of different authors in the field of farmland abandonment over time (Note: N. Articles = number of articles; TC per Year = total citations per year).
Ijerph 19 16007 g006
Figure 7. National collaborative network for research on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Figure 7. National collaborative network for research on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021.
Ijerph 19 16007 g007
Figure 8. Hierarchical clustering analysis of keywords in the field of farmland abandonment.
Figure 8. Hierarchical clustering analysis of keywords in the field of farmland abandonment.
Ijerph 19 16007 g008
Table 1. Journal sources with the most published articles on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: TC = total citations).
Table 1. Journal sources with the most published articles on farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: TC = total citations).
RankTotalArticlesH IndexTC
1Land Use Policy32171856
2Sustainability2612423
3Catena25141462
4Land Degradation & Development2414690
5Land249190
6Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment23141170
7Forest Ecology and Management2317970
8Science of the Total Environment2313527
9Remote Sensing147165
10Ecological Engineering1310357
Table 2. Top 10 most relevant authors in the field of farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: AF = articles fractionalized; TC = total citations).
Table 2. Top 10 most relevant authors in the field of farmland abandonment from 1980 to 2021 (Note: AF = articles fractionalized; TC = total citations).
RankAuthorsArticlesAFH IndexTC
1Guobin Liu194.1212789
2Teodoro Lasanta184.2812949
3Tobias Kuemmerle162.8151813
4Estela Nadal-Romero153.439359
5Alexander V Prishchepov152.6121505
6Daniel Muller122.92121197
7Sha Xue122.638527
8Artemi Cerda113.1610612
9Volker C Radeloff111.78111453
10Ju-Ying Jiao91.837229
Table 3. Numbers of publications and citations on farmland abandonment in different countries from 1980 to 2021.
Table 3. Numbers of publications and citations on farmland abandonment in different countries from 1980 to 2021.
CountryArticlesTotal CitationsAverage Citations
China193399720.71
USA105393637.49
Spain83285634.41
Italy42122329.12
Germany39232559.62
Japan3448414.24
Poland3042314.1
Canada2699038.08
Netherlands25242296.88
Australia20116458.2
United Kingdom18102156.72
France1772342.53
Estonia1641826.12
Sweden1583355.53
Switzerland14133195.07
Russia13614.69
Greece1237631.33
Slovakia1214612.17
Korea11817.36
Portugal1131028.18
Table 5. Evolution of methods for the extraction of abandoned farmland.
Table 5. Evolution of methods for the extraction of abandoned farmland.
Countries and RegionsData SourceResearch MethodsNotes
Cal Rodo catchment (southern margin of the Pyrenees)Two aerial photos from 1957 and 1996 (20 m)Visual interpretationPoyatos et al., 2003
Swiss mountainsLand use survey data during the 1980s and 1990sField surveyGellrich and Zimmermann, 2006
Peyne in FranceAerial photos (1 m) from 1946, 1954, 1970, 1971, 1983, and 1988, field geographic dataField survey, visual interpretationSluiter and Jong, 2006
Ijuez River Valley (Central Spanish Pyrenees)Aerial photos from 1957, 1977, and 2002 (1 m)Visual interpretationPueyo and Beguería, 2007
Poland, Slovakia, and UkraineLandsat TM/ETM+ images from 1986, 1988, and 2000 (30 m)Support Vector MachinesKuemmerle et al., 2008
Galicia (Spain)Aerial photographs from 1956 and 1957, and land use of the plot size specified in SIGPAC (2004)Visual interpretationCorbelle et al., 2011
Western Ukraine Landsat TM images from 1986, 1989, 2006, and 2008 (30 m)Support Vector MachinesBaumann et al., 2011
Smolensk, Kaluga, Tula, Rjazan, and Vladimir in European RussiaLandsat TM/ETM+ satellite images from 1990 and 2000 (30 m)Support Vector MachinesPrishchepov et al., 2012
Baltic countries, Belarus, and PolandMODIS NDVI time series from 2003 to 2008 (250 m)Vegetation index change detection, Support Vector MachinesAlcantara et al., 2012
Belarus, Lithuania, and PolandLandsat TM/ETM+ satellite images from 1989 and 1999 (30 m)Support Vector MachinesPrishchepov et al., 2012
Poland, Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, and European RussiaLandsat TM/ETM+ satellite images from 1990 and 2000 (30 m)Support Vector MachinesPrishchepov et al., 2012
Covering 6.4 Mkm2 across central and eastern Europe and the Balkan Peninsula, including 30 countries fully or partlyMODIS NDVI time series from 2004 to 2006 (250 m)Vegetation index change detection, Support Vector MachinesAlcantara et al., 2013
European Russia, Ukraine, and BelarusGLC2000, MODIS, national sown area statistics (1 km)A spatial allocation model was developed to allocate national area statistics to remote sensing image dataSchierhorn et al., 2013
Throughout EuropeMODIS NDVI time series from 2000 to 2012 (250 m)Vegetation index change detection, Random ForestEstel et al., 2015
Mountainous areas in ChinaHousehold survey data of 262 counties from 2011 to 2012Field surveyLi et al., 2017
Parts of Georgia and the North Caucasian Federal District of RussiaLandsat images from 1985 to 2015 (30 m)LandTrendr time series change detection, object-oriented classificationYin et al., 2018
Northern KazakhstanLandsat images from 1988 to 2013 (30 m)LandTrendr time series change detection, Random ForestDara et al., 2018
14 regions in the world (Iraq, Nebraska, Shaanxi, Orenburg, Uganda, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sardinia, Volgograd, Wisconsin, Chongqing, Goias, Mato Grosso, Nepal)Landsat images from 1987 to 2017 (30 m)Time series change detection, Random ForestYin et al., 2020
GlobalCCI-LC data from 1992 and 2015 (300 m)Change detection after classificationNæss et al., 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Song, W.; Sun, Q. Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316007

AMA Style

Liu B, Song W, Sun Q. Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):16007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bo, Wei Song, and Qian Sun. 2022. "Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 16007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316007

APA Style

Liu, B., Song, W., & Sun, Q. (2022). Status, Trend, and Prospect of Global Farmland Abandonment Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16007. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop