Next Article in Journal
The Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on Glycaemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Mental Health and Wellbeing in Young People in the UK during Lockdown (COVID-19)
Previous Article in Journal
Public Health Regulations and Policies Dealing with Preparedness and Emergency Management: The Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationships between Occupational Stress, Change in Work Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms among Non-Healthcare Workers in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 3
10.3390/ijerph19031092
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Predictors of the Development of Mental Disorders in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients without Previous Psychiatric History: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in South Korea

by
Jangrae Kim
1,
Yae Eun Seo
1,
Ho Kyung Sung
2,3,*,
Hye Yoon Park
4,5,
Myung Hwa Han
1 and
So Hee Lee
1,*
1
Department of Psychiatry, National Medical Center, Eulji-ro 245, Jung-gu, Seoul 04564, Korea
2
Institute for Public Healthcare, National Medical Center, Eulji-ro 245, Jung-gu, Seoul 04564, Korea
3
National Emergency Medical Center, National Medical Center, Eulji-ro 245, Jung-gu, Seoul 04564, Korea
4
Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Daehak-ro 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
5
Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehak-ro 103, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1092; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031092
Submission received: 8 December 2021 / Revised: 14 January 2022 / Accepted: 17 January 2022 / Published: 19 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health in the Time of COVID-19)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to investigate the predictors for new-onset mental disorders among patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 illness during hospitalization. A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to a nationally designated hospital between 1 February and 30 June 2020. Demographic, clinical, psychological assessments, and psychiatric outcomes were obtained from electronic medical record review. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of new-onset mental disorders. Among 185 patients, 130 had no history of mental disorders or cognitive impairment at the time of admission. Of 130 patients, 29 (22.3%) were newly diagnosed with mental disorders during hospitalization. The following factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of a psychiatric diagnosis: Charlson comorbidity index core ≥1 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.115, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.737–15.058), length of stay (aOR per 1-day increase = 1.067, 95% CI: 1.035–1.100), and self-reported depressive symptoms at the time of admission (aOR = 5.357, 95% CI: 1.745–16.444). The predictive accuracy of combining these risk factors was relatively high (area under curve = 0.851, 95% CI: 0.778–0.923). These potential risk factors could help to predict the new-onset mental disorder among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

1. Introduction

By the end of 2021, 278,714,484 cases of COVID-19 had been reported worldwide [1]. As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, mental health among patients with COVID-19 is an emerging and important public health issue [2,3,4].
There is a growing body of evidence that has identified a high incidence of developing psychological sequelae in patients with COVID-19. In a cohort study from China, 23% survivors of the diseases reported anxiety or depression during the 6 months follow-up period [5]. A study using Korean health insurance claim data showed that COVID-19 survivors had a greater risk of developing mental illness than the rest of the population [6]. Psychological morbidities, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression, were reported to be common in COVID-19 patients, along with immune function changes associated with self-reported depression during short-term follow-up after discharge from hospital [7]. Analysis of data from patients with severe COVID-19 symptoms revealed neurological problems, such as delirium, dysexecutive syndrome, hypoxic encephalopathy, and encephalitis [8]. According to the results of telephone-based interventions for psychological problems in hospital isolated patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, clinically meaningful psychological symptoms such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, and suicidal ideation were found [9]. Among mild or moderate COVID-19 patients, suicidal attempts or violent behaviors during isolated hospitalization have been reported and might be challenging problems [10,11]. Previous psychiatric history is one of the important risk factors for depression and anxiety among survivors of COVID-19. Perceived stigma and history of psychiatric treatment affected PTSD symptom severity as psychological consequences of survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia 1 month after discharge [12]. For depression and anxiety, previous psychiatric history and stigma of COVID-19 infection were significant risk factors among the patients with mild illness [13].
However, the new-onset mental disorders among COVID-19 patients without previous psychiatric history undergoing treatment have yet to be sufficiently investigated. Additionally, effectiveness about psychological tests on admission to predict developing mental disorders during acute phase of COVID-19 would be important, because recognizing the risk group who needed psychiatric attention among isolated patients with COVID-19 as early as possible would help to advance the quality of emotional care and to prevent self-endangering or violent behavioral problems due to mental health problems. Therefore, we aimed to determine the proportion of patients newly diagnosed with mental disorders among the patients with COVID-19 during the acute phase of COVID-19, and to identify the risk factors.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Subjects

This was a single-centered, retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria of this study were laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the isolation wards of the National Medical Center (NMC), Seoul, South Korea between 1 February and 30 June 2020 and COVID-19 patients who could complete the psychological questionnaires when admitted in the hospital. Patients with a history of mental illness and those who were unable to the complete the psychological instruments due to diminished consciousness or substantial deterioration of the medical condition were excluded. Figure 1 shows the flow of study patients.
According to the guidelines of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (up to June 2020), confirmed cases were those with a positive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assay result for SARS-CoV-210. For discharge from hospital and cessation of isolation, negative rRT-PCR results were needed at 24 h intervals.
The NMC is a 480-bed public hospital in Seoul, Korea. The Korean government designated The NMC as a hospital for infectious diseases in 2015. After the pandemic reached Korea, the hospital’s resources have been concentrated on the management of COVID-19 patients; all wards that include negative pressure rooms have been dedicated to these patients. Based on experience of the MERS outbreak in 2015, all patients with COVID-19 admitted to the NMC were assigned to psychiatrists so that their mental health status could be monitored [14]. We offered three routes to access mental health services during hospitalization: psychological tests (self-report questionnaires) within a few days of admission; daily telephone calls to determine whether any mental issues were interfering with daily life; and face-to-face interviews on patient request or the emergence of acute psychiatric symptoms.

2.2. Outcome Variable

The outcome of interest was newly developed mental disorders among the patients during hospitalization. Mental disorders were diagnosed by two psychiatrists based on telephone or face-to-face interviews, along with thorough investigation of medical records and checking for signs. Patients’ family members or assigned nurses were contacted as needed for more information. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5), was used for final diagnosis by the psychiatrists. Psychotropic medications were prescribed in accordance with the diagnosis, with consideration of the patients’ condition and progression.

2.3. Psychological Instruments

The psychological instruments used herein included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and P4 Screener. We used the short versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and Korean version of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (K-PC-PTSD-5) for patients aged 65 years or older.
We used the PHQ-9 to assess the severity of depression [15]. This questionnaire includes nine items based on the criteria for depression of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, for an overall severity score of 0–27. We considered depression to be present when the total score was ≥10. The Korean version of the PHQ-9 has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool for screening and assessment of depressed patients [16]. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.85.
The PHQ-2 is a shorter instrument used to identify depression more rapidly [17]. The PHQ-2 has a validated Korean translation and has shown good validity (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94); the optimal cut-off score for depression is 3.
The GAD-7 is a screening tool used to measure the severity of anxiety over the past 2 weeks. It consists of seven items rated on a four-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 points (Nearly every day). A total score ≥ 10 is considered to be clinically significant. The Korean version of the GAD-7 showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88) [18].
The K-PC-PTSD-5 is a brief instrument used to screen for PTSD symptoms according to the DSM-5 criteria. The K-PC-PTSD-5 has shown good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) [19]. We considered a score of 3 as the threshold for clinically significant PTSD symptoms.
The PCL-5 is a self-rating questionnaire to screen for PTSD symptoms based on the DSM-5 criteria. It includes 20 items, each scored from 0 to 4. A total score of 33 is the cut-off for PTSD diagnosis [20]. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94.
The P4 Screener was used to screen for suicidality based on past suicide attempts, suicidal ideation, probability of completing suicide, and preventive factors. Suicide risk is classified as minimal, low, or high. The P4 Screener is useful for assessing suicide risk in clinically depressed patients, including in the context of clinical research [21]. The low- and high-risk categories were taken to indicate suicidal status in this study.

2.4. Data Collection

Two experienced psychiatrists extracted data from electronic medical records using a standardized data collection form. Information concerning demographic characteristics, previous history of psychiatric symptoms, presence of pneumonia on admission, comorbidities, self-reported psychological assessments, oxygen therapy, psychiatric diagnoses, and psychotropic drugs prescribed during hospitalization (if any) was collected.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We divided the patients into two groups according to whether or not they were newly diagnosed with any mental disorders during hospitalization. The demographic and COVID-19-related clinical characteristics and psychiatric information of both groups are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables, and as frequency and percentage for categorical variables. Characteristics were compared between patient groups using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, as appropriate.
Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential predictors of new-onset (during hospitalization) mental disorders. The potential predictors identified as significant in the univariate analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression models, with the exclusion of highly correlated clinical factors using stepwise selection methods with entry and exit criteria of 0.05. The predictive performance of the multivariate logistic regression models was evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Given the potential for heterogeneity, we also performed a sensitivity analysis that excluded mental disorders associated with deterioration of the medical condition (i.e., delirium) from the analysis of the outcome variable.
A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance for all test statistics. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.; Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 185 patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the isolation wards of the NMC between 1 February and 30 June 2020. Fifty-five patients were excluded due to a previous diagnosis of a mental disorder (n = 32) or the inability to complete the psychological instruments due to diminished consciousness or substantial deterioration of the medical condition (n = 23). Of the 130 eligible patients, 29 (22.3%) were newly diagnosed with mental disorders during their hospital stay.
Table 1 compares the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with and without newly developed mental disorders during hospitalization. The median age was 58 (IQR: 35–68) years for patients with newly developed mental disorders and 40 (IQR: 27–58) years for patients without any newly developed mental disorders. Patients with newly developed mental disorders had a higher had a higher prevalence of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) core ≥ 1 (44.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.003) including diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, mild liver disease, and acquired immune-deficiency syndrome [22]. Significant differences were also observed between the two groups in the incidence rates of pneumonia on admission (79.3% vs. 58.4, p = 0.040), oxygen therapy (31.0% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.003), and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (17.2% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.029). Patients with newly developed mental disorders had longer median hospital stays (44 (IQR: 33–54) days vs. 26 (IQR: 16–39) days, p < 0.001) than those without newly developed mental disorders.

3.2. Psychological Assessment

Among the entire cohort, 23 (17.7%) patients reported depressive symptoms (score of ≥10 on the PHQ-9 or ≥3 on the PHQ-2), 7 (5.4%) reported significant PTSD symptoms (score of ≥3 on the PC-PTSD or ≥33 on the PCL-5), and 4 (3.1%) reported significant suicidal ideation; all of these patients completed the self-report questionnaires within a few days of admission (Table 2). Comparison between the two groups revealed that patients with new-onset mental disorders had a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (37.9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.001) than those without new-onset mental disorders. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in PTSD symptoms and suicide ideation.

3.3. Newly Developed Mental Disorders and Prescribed Psychotropic Medications

Table 3 lists the newly developed mental disorders, which were clinically confirmed by two psychiatrists, and the prescribed psychotropic medications. Of the 29 patients with new-onset mental disorders, 14 (48.3%) had adjustment disorder, 10 (34.5%) had insomnia, 3 (10.3%) had panic disorder, and 2 (6.9%) had delirium. A total of 17 patients were prescribed psychotropic drugs; antianxiety medications (53.8%) were the most frequently prescribed, followed by antidepressants (23.1%) and antipsychotics (20.5%).

3.4. Predictors of New-Onset Mental Disorders

In univariate analysis, age (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) per 1-year increase: 1.027, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.004–1.051, p = 0.020), CCI score ≥ 1 (unadjusted OR: 3.747, 95% CI: 1.536–9.140, p = 0.004), duration of hospital stay (unadjusted OR per 1-day increase: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.030–1.089, p < 0.001), oxygen therapy (unadjusted OR: 5.231, 95% CI: 1.798–15.219, p = 0.002), ICU admission (unadjusted OR: 4.000, 95% CI: 1.071–1.941, p = 0.039), and self-reported depressive symptoms (unadjusted OR: 4.532, 95% CI: 1.732–11.864, p = 0.002) had p-values < 0.05. Among these variables, CCI score core ≥ 1, hospital length of stay, and self-reported depressive symptoms were included in the multivariate analysis using the stepwise selection method. In the multivariate analysis, CCI score core ≥ 1 (adjusted OR: 5.115, 95% CI: 1.737–15.058, p = 0.003), hospital length of stay (adjusted OR per 1-day increase: 1.067, 95% CI: 1.035–1.100, p < 0.001), and self-reported depressive symptoms (adjusted OR: 5.357, 95% CI: 1.745–16.444, p = 0.003) associated with a significantly increased risk of new-onset mental disorders (Table 4). Figure 2 presents the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicating the accuracy of the multivariate model for predicting new-onset mental disorders during hospitalization. The AUC was 0.851 (95% CI: 0.778–0.923).
In sensitivity analysis, we excluded two patients that developed delirium during hospitalization. The association was consistent in hospital length of stay (adjusted OR per 1-day increase: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.029–1.090, p < 0.001), and depression symptoms (adjusted OR: 5.830, 95% CI: 1.965–13.829, p = 0.001), except for CCI score core ≥ 1, which was associated with deterioration of medical condition and delirium (Table S1). The AUC of sensitivity analysis was 0.827 (95% CI: 0.740–0.915). The ROC assessing the predictive accuracy of sensitivity analysis is presented in Figure S1 (see Supplementary).

4. Discussion

In this study, 22.3% of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 illness had newly diagnosed mental disorders during hospitalization. The most common newly diagnosed mental disorders were adjustment disorder and insomnia. This incidence and individual diagnosis are similar to the results of large cohort studies conducted in China and the US [5,23].
We also found 16.3% of the subjects had self-reported depressive symptom (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or PHQ-2 score 3) and 6.3% had self-reported PTSD symptom (PCL-5 score ≥ 33 or PC-PTSD score ≥ 3) on admission. A substantial portion of psychological problems on admission would be due to COVID-19 health anxiety [24]. The patients with COVID-19 might have excessive worry about their health condition or aggravation of the disease. In addition, COVID-19 patients might be distressed due to various troublesome events related with being quarantined, which included worries about taking care of children, leaving home, family members who may have also contracted COVID-19, or economic burdens suffered during hospitalization [25].
Our result suggested that several factors including comorbidity, hospital length of stay, and self-reported depressive symptom were associated with an increased risk of new-onset mental disorders. In particular, because early detection and rapid management are important, it is noteworthy that the usefulness of self-reported psychological tests was found. Our findings further suggest that psychiatric symptoms emerging during the initial phase of hospitalization predict the development of mental illness, highlighting the importance of involving mental health professionals in the earliest stages of hospitalization. Even though this result came from the context of a hospital in South Korea during the early pandemic period, early detection using self-reported psychological tests was demonstrated to be useful through Italian and US studies [26,27].
The hospital length of stay was strongly associated with the development of mental disorders and the risk was increased by approximately 7% per day. This is consistent with earlier studies on loneliness and depression in COVID-19 patients due to isolation during the initial phase of lockdown [28], where hospitalization duration was a major factor contributing to psychological distress [28,29]. As isolation to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 could promote mental illness or exacerbate existing conditions [30,31,32], multidisciplinary programs with exercise and psychological supports are highly recommended for this population [9,33]. In addition, minimizing hospitalization for only isolation purposes could reduce the mental illness of patients with COVID-19.
Comorbidities showed a significant association with new-onset mental disorders. This is consistent with the result from a nationwide retrospective cohort study using Korean health insurance claims data [6]. This suggests that COVID-19 patients with underlying diseases need special psychiatric attention. It may be useful to detect high-risk groups by applying the brief screening instruments described above to patients with underlying diseases identified at the time of hospitalization and to perform psychiatric interventions at an early stage.
In the pandemic situation, it will be very important to consider the patient’s mental health needs [34]. The World Psychiatric Association position paper in 2020 insisted that the human rights of people with mental disorders must be protected, and appropriate and safe services provided for their treatment [35]. Investments in online mental health providing services, which build up the possibilities to reach all the mentally distressed people, were suggested to facilitate recovery from COVID-19 pandemic. Those strategies should be especially emphasized for the isolated people due to infection [36]. The strength of our study is that it showed the possibility of early detection of vulnerable people who can develop mental disorders.

5. Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, we included only patients admitted to a nationally designated COVID-19 hospital. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized to all patients with COVID-19. A larger and multi-centered study is needed to verify the results of this study. Second, the pandemic affected patients with chronic mental disorders, which is a very important public health issue, and we only included patients with no previous history of mental disorder. Third, self-reported psychiatric symptoms may be under- or over-reported. In particular, tests related to cognitive impairment were not performed. However, all of the psychological instruments used in this study were validated and all patients were assessed by a psychiatrist. Fourth, our study included a relatively small number of COVID-19 patients who progressed to severe illness. Therefore, the effect of severe illness, such as hypoxemia or medications, on the development of mental illness may not have been sufficiently evaluated. Finally, it is possible that the incidence of mental illness was underestimated because only the hospitalized period was evaluated.

6. Conclusions

This study provided evidence that a substantial proportion of COVID-19 patients without a history of psychiatric disorders may develop psychological symptoms and be diagnosed with a new-onset mental disorder. As well as comorbid physical conditions, depressive symptom should be checked for on admission using brief screening instruments. Furthermore, minimizing the length of hospital stay may reduce psychological suffering in COVID-19 patients. These potential risk factors could help to predict the new-onset mental disorder among patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph19031092/s1, Table S1: Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis of predictors for newly developed mental disorder except delirium during hospitalization (sensitivity analysis), Figure S1: ROC curve and AUC of sensitivity analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K.S. and S.H.L.; data curation, J.K., Y.E.S., H.K.S. and M.H.H.; formal analysis, J.K., Y.E.S., H.K.S., M.H.H. and S.H.L.; funding acquisition, H.Y.P. and S.H.L.; investigation, H.Y.P. and S.H.L.; methodology, J.K., Y.E.S., H.K.S., M.H.H. and S.H.L.; project administration, H.Y.P. and S.H.L.; supervision, H.Y.P. and S.H.L.; writing—original draft, J.K.; writing—review and editing, H.K.S. and S.H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Mental Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HL19C0007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects at the NMC (NMC-2006-005).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to data use restrictions contained in study participants’ information material.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all healthcare workers at the National Medical Center for their support in data acquisition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Weekly Epidemiological Update on COVID-19—28 December 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---28-december-2021 (accessed on 7 December 2021).
  2. Xie, Q.; Liu, X.B.; Xu, Y.M.; Zhong, B.L. Understanding the psychiatric symptoms of COVID-19: A meta-analysis of studies assessing psychiatric symptoms in Chinese patients with and survivors of COVID-19 and SARS by using the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaseda, E.T.; Levine, A.J. Post-traumatic stress disorder: A differential diagnostic consideration for COVID-19 survivors. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2020, 34, 1498–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Holmes, E.A.; O’Connor, R.C.; Perry, V.H.; Tracey, I.; Wessely, S.; Arseneault, L.; Ballard, C.; Christensen, H.; Cohen Silver, R.; Everall, I.; et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, C.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Gu, X.; Kang, L.; Guo, L.; Liu, M.; Zhou, X.; et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: A cohort study. Lancet 2021, 397, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Park, H.Y.; Song, I.A.; Lee, S.H.; Sim, M.Y.; Oh, H.S.; Song, K.H.; Yu, E.S.; Park, H.Y.; Oh, T.K. Prevalence of mental illness among COVID-19 survivors in South Korea: Nationwide cohort. BJPsych Open 2021, 7, e183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yuan, B.; Li, W.; Liu, H.; Cai, X.; Song, S.; Zhao, J.; Hu, X.; Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.; et al. Correlation between immune response and self-reported depression during convalescence from COVID-19. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 88, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rogers, J.P.; Chesney, E.; Oliver, D.; Pollak, T.A.; McGuire, P.; Fusar-Poli, P.; Zandi, M.S.; Lewis, G.; David, A.S. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 611–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, J.W.; Stewart, R.; Kang, S.J.; Jung, S.I.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, J.M. Telephone based Interventions for Psychological Problems in Hospital Isolated Patients with COVID-19. Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci. Off. Sci. J. Korean Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020, 18, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bellizzi, S.; Pichierri, G.; Farina, G.; Cegolon, L.; Abdelbaki, W. Violence Against Healthcare: A Public Health Issue beyond Conflict Settings. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 106, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Epstein, D.; Andrawis, W.; Lipsky, A.M.; Ziad, H.A.; Matan, M. Anxiety and Suicidality in a Hospitalized Patient with COVID-19 Infection. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2020, 7, 001651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Park, H.Y.; Jung, J.; Park, H.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, H.B.; Song, K.H. Psychological Consequences of Survivors of COVID-19 Pneumonia 1 Month after Discharge. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020, 35, e409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kang, E.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Jung, H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, K.N.; Park, H.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Cho, B.; Sohn, J.H. The Psychological Burden of COVID-19 Stigma: Evaluation of the Mental Health of Isolated Mild Condition COVID-19 Patients. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2021, 36, e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, H.C.; Yoo, S.Y.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, S.H.; Shin, H.S. Psychiatric Findings in Suspected and Confirmed Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Patients Quarantined in Hospital: A Retrospective Chart Analysis. Psychiatry Investig. 2018, 15, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, S.; Huh, Y.; Kim, J. Finding optimal cut off points of the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening depressive disorders. Mood Emot. 2014, 12, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shin, J.-H.; Kim, H.-C.; Jung, C.-H.; Kim, J.-B.; Jung, S.-W.; Cho, H.-J.; Jung, S.-h. The Standardization of the Korean Version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. J. Korean Neuropsychiatr. Assoc. 2013, 52, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lee, S.H.; Shin, C.; Kim, H.; Jeon, S.W.; Yoon, H.K.; Ko, Y.H.; Pae, C.U.; Han, C. Validation of the Korean version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 self-rating Scale. Asia-Pac. Psychiatry Off. J. Pac. Rim Coll. Psychiatr. 2020, e12421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jung, Y.E.; Kim, D.; Kim, W.H.; Roh, D.; Chae, J.H.; Park, J.E. A Brief Screening Tool for PTSD: Validation of the Korean Version of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (K-PC-PTSD-5). J. Korean Med. Sci. 2018, 33, e338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Blevins, C.A.; Weathers, F.W.; Davis, M.T.; Witte, T.K.; Domino, J.L. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J. Trauma. Stress 2015, 28, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dube, P.; Kurt, K.; Bair, M.J.; Theobald, D.; Williams, L.S. The p4 screener: Evaluation of a brief measure for assessing potential suicide risk in 2 randomized effectiveness trials of primary care and oncology patients. Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry 2010, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Charlson, M.E.; Charlson, R.E.; Peterson, J.C.; Marinopoulos, S.S.; Briggs, W.M.; Hollenberg, J.P. The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008, 61, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Taquet, M.; Luciano, S.; Geddes, J.R.; Harrison, P.J. Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: Retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry 2021, 8, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tyrer, P. COVID-19 health anxiety. World Psychiatry Off. J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. 2020, 19, 307–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sahoo, S.; Mehra, A.; Suri, V.; Malhotra, P.; Yaddanapudi, L.N.; Dutt Puri, G.; Grover, S. Lived experiences of the corona survivors (patients admitted in COVID wards): A narrative real-life documented summaries of internalized guilt, shame, stigma, anger. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 53, 102187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bastiani, L.; Fortunato, L.; Pieroni, S.; Bianchi, F.; Adorni, F.; Prinelli, F.; Giacomelli, A.; Pagani, G.; Maggi, S.; Trevisan, C.; et al. Rapid COVID-19 Screening Based on Self-Reported Symptoms: Psychometric Assessment and Validation of the EPICOVID19 Short Diagnostic Scale. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e23897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mansbach, W.E.; Mace, R.A.; Tanner, M.A. A New Tool for Detecting COVID-19 Psychological Burden Among Postacute and Long-term Care Residents (Mood-5 Scale): Observational Study. JMIR Aging 2021, 4, e26340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Niedzwiedz, C.L.; Green, M.J.; Benzeval, M.; Campbell, D.; Craig, P.; Demou, E.; Leyland, A.; Pearce, A.; Thomson, R.; Whitley, E.; et al. Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: Longitudinal analyses of the UK Household Longitudinal Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2021, 75, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ann-Yi, S.; Bruera, E.; Wu, J.; Liu, D.D.; Agosta, M.; Williams, J.L.; Balankari, V.R.; Carmack, C.L. Characteristics and Outcomes of Psychology Referrals in a Palliative Care Department. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2018, 56, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, F.; Tam, W.; Hu, X.; Tan, W.; Jiang, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, X.; Zou, Y.; Hu, Y.; et al. A quantitative and qualitative study on the neuropsychiatric sequelae of acutely ill COVID-19 inpatients in isolation facilities. Transl. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, Y.; You, C.; Tan, J.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, L. Factors related to mental health of inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 89, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Song, R.; Yang, D.; Duan, X. Prevalence of psychiatric diagnosis and related psychopathological symptoms among patients with COVID-19 during the second wave of the pandemic. Glob. Health 2021, 17, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sepulveda-Loyola, W.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, I.; Perez-Rodriguez, P.; Ganz, F.; Torralba, R.; Oliveira, D.V.; Rodriguez-Manas, L. Impact of Social Isolation Due to COVID-19 on Health in Older People: Mental and Physical Effects and Recommendations. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2020, 24, 938–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Adhanom Ghebreyesus, T. Addressing mental health needs: An integral part of COVID-19 response. World Psychiatry Off. J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. 2020, 19, 129–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stewart, D.E.; Appelbaum, P.S. COVID-19 and psychiatrists’ responsibilities: A WPA position paper. World Psychiatry Off. J. World Psychiatr. Assoc. 2020, 19, 406–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. McDaid, D. Viewpoint: Investing in strategies to support mental health recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. Psychiatry J. Assoc. Eur. Psychiatr. 2021, 64, e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 19 01092 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the National Medical Center between 1 February and 30 June 2020.
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the National Medical Center between 1 February and 30 June 2020.
Ijerph 19 01092 g001
Ijerph 19 01092 g002 550
Figure 2. ROC curve and AUC assessing the predictive accuracy of multivariate model for new-onset mental disorder during hospitalization. ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = area under curve.
Figure 2. ROC curve and AUC assessing the predictive accuracy of multivariate model for new-onset mental disorder during hospitalization. ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = area under curve.
Ijerph 19 01092 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients according to new-onset (during hospitalization) mental disorder status.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the patients according to new-onset (during hospitalization) mental disorder status.
Overall
(n = 130)		Newly Developed Mental Disordersp Value
Yes
(n = 29)		No
(n = 101)
Age, year40 (28–61)58 (35–68)40 (27–58)0.031
Sex
Male87 (66.9)18 (62.1)69 (68.3)0.528
Female43 (33.1)11 (37.9)32 (31.7)
Marital status
Single56 (43.1)8 (27.6)48 (47.5)0.056
Married74 (56.9)21 (72.4))53 (52.5)
Education level
High school and under65 (50.0)19 (65.5)46 (45.5)0.058
University and higher65 (50.0)10 (34.5)55 (54.5)
Occupation
Unemployed58 (44.6)13 (44.8)45 (44.6)0.979
Employed72 (55.4)16 (55.2)56 (55.4)
CCI score
099 (76.2)16 (55.2)83 (82.2)0.006 *
1–227 (20.8)12 (41.4)15 (14.9)
3–40 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
≥54 (3.1)1 (3.5)3 (3.0)
Presence of pneumonia on admission
No48 (36.9)6 (20.7)42 (41.6)0.040
Yes82 (63.1)23 (79.3)59 (58.4)
Oxygen therapy
No113 (86.9)20 (69.0)93 (92.1)0.003 *
Yes17 (13.1)9 (31.0)8 (7.9)
Nasal cannula or simple facial mask14 (10.8)7 (24.1)7 (6.9)
HFNC or ventilator3 (2.3)2 (6.9)1 (1.0)
ICU admission
No120 (92.3)24 (82.8)96 (95.0)0.029
Yes10 (7.7)5 (17.2)5 (5.0)
Hospital length of stay, days31 (18–43)44 (33–54)26 (16–39)<0.001
<2859 (45.4)5 (17.2)54 (53.5)0.001
≥2871 (54.6)24 (82.8)47 (46.5)
Values are expressed as n (%) or median (interquartile ranges), as appropriate. HFNC = high flow nasal cannula, ICU = intensive care unit, CCI = Charlson comorbidity index. * Fisher’s exact test.
Table
Table 2. Baseline psychological assessment results of the patients.
Table 2. Baseline psychological assessment results of the patients.
Overall
n = 130		Newly Developed Mental Disorderp Value
Yes
n = 29		No
n = 101
Depressive symptom
PHQ-2 (n = 17)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)1 (0–2)0.733
PHQ-9 (n = 113)3 (0–7)8 (3–14)3 (0–5)0.002
Yes *23 (17.7)11 (37.9)12 (11.9)
No107 (82.3)18 (62.1)89 (88.1)0.001
PTSD symptom
PC-PTSD (n = 17)1 (0–2)1 (0–1)1 (1–3)0.180
PCL-5 (n = 113)3 (0–10)7 (1–20)2 (0–7)0.047
Yes †7 (5.4)0 (0.0)7 (6.9)
No123 (94.6)29 (100.0)94 (93.1)0.145
Suicide idea
Yes4 (3.1)2 (6.9)2 (2.0)
No126 (96.9)27 (93.1)99 (98.0)0.177
Values are expressed as n (%) or median (interquartile ranges), as appropriate. * PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or PHQ-2 score 3. † PCL-5 score ≥ 33 or PC-PTSD score ≥ 3.
Table
Table 3. New-onset mental disorders and psychotropic medications prescribed during hospitalization.
Table 3. New-onset mental disorders and psychotropic medications prescribed during hospitalization.
Number (%)
New-onset mental disorders
Delirium2 (6.9)
Panic disorder3 (10.3)
Adjustment disorder14 (48.3)
Insomnia10 (34.5)
Psychotropic medications *
Antipsychotics7 (20.5)
Antidepressants9 (23.1)
Antianxieties20 (53.8)
* The number of prescriptions.
Table
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis identifying predictors of new-onset (during hospitalization) mental disorders.
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis identifying predictors of new-onset (during hospitalization) mental disorders.
Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
Age, years *1.027 (1.004–1.051)0.020
Female sex (vs. male)1.318 (0.558–-3.112)0.529
Low education level (vs. high)2.272 (0.961–5.369)0.062
Unemployed (vs. employed)1.011 (0.441–2.320)0.9792
CCI score ≥ 1 (vs. 0)3.747 (1.536–9.140)0.0045.115 (1.737–15.058)0.003
Pneumonia (vs. no)2.729 (1.022–7.283)0.045
Hospital length of stay, days †1.059 (1.030–1.089)<0.0011.067 (1.035–1.100)<0.001
Oxygen therapy (vs. no)5.231 (1.798–15.219)0.002
ICU admission (vs. no)4.000 (1.071–14.941)0.039
Depressive symptom ‡ (vs. no)4.532 (1.732–11.864)0.0025.357 (1.745–16.444)0.003
PTSD symptom ‡ (vs. no)<0.001>999.999
Suicide idea ‡ (vs. no)3.667 (0.493–27.246)0.204
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; CCI = Charlson comorbidity index; ICU = intensive care unit; PTSD = post-traumatic stress disorder; * per 1 year increase; † per 1 day increase; ‡ reported on self-assessed psychological test on admission.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Seo, Y.E.; Sung, H.K.; Park, H.Y.; Han, M.H.; Lee, S.H. Predictors of the Development of Mental Disorders in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients without Previous Psychiatric History: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031092

AMA Style

Kim J, Seo YE, Sung HK, Park HY, Han MH, Lee SH. Predictors of the Development of Mental Disorders in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients without Previous Psychiatric History: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jangrae, Yae Eun Seo, Ho Kyung Sung, Hye Yoon Park, Myung Hwa Han, and So Hee Lee. 2022. "Predictors of the Development of Mental Disorders in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients without Previous Psychiatric History: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in South Korea" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031092

APA Style

Kim, J., Seo, Y. E., Sung, H. K., Park, H. Y., Han, M. H., & Lee, S. H. (2022). Predictors of the Development of Mental Disorders in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients without Previous Psychiatric History: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031092

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop